09.01.2013 Views

Biowarfare, Bioterrorism, and Animal Diseases as Bioweapons

Biowarfare, Bioterrorism, and Animal Diseases as Bioweapons

Biowarfare, Bioterrorism, and Animal Diseases as Bioweapons

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A single c<strong>as</strong>e of a high profile dise<strong>as</strong>e (e.g., BSE) or<br />

a small number of c<strong>as</strong>es of more common dise<strong>as</strong>es (e.g.,<br />

Newc<strong>as</strong>tle dise<strong>as</strong>e or bovine tuberculosis) may result in<br />

international sanctions that cause major economic losses for<br />

agriculture <strong>and</strong> related industries. The connectivity between<br />

many dise<strong>as</strong>es of animals <strong>and</strong> humans suggests the need<br />

for integrated preparedness for addressing the potential for<br />

bioterrorism attacks against animals. The 2001 outbreak of<br />

foot-<strong>and</strong>-mouth dise<strong>as</strong>e (FMD) in Europe is somber testimony<br />

to the costs that can be incurred by agriculture from<br />

the introduction of a highly contagious dise<strong>as</strong>e. More than 6<br />

million animals were slaughtered to combat this dise<strong>as</strong>e. 209<br />

Predicted costs from an FMD outbreak in California alone<br />

are at le<strong>as</strong>t $13.5 billion. 210<br />

Pacific<br />

Ocean<br />

EXPLANATION<br />

USA<br />

Era, country <strong>and</strong> dise<strong>as</strong>e species<br />

WW1<br />

USA* (horses, mules)<br />

Romania (horses, sheep, livestock)<br />

Spain (horses, cattle)<br />

Norway (reindeer, cattle)<br />

France (horses)<br />

Atlantic<br />

Ocean<br />

France<br />

Spain<br />

Norway<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Romania<br />

Kenya<br />

1952<br />

Kenya (cattle)<br />

1978–80<br />

Rhodesia (cattle) (now Zimbabwe)<br />

1982–84<br />

Afghanistan (horses)<br />

248 Dise<strong>as</strong>e Emergence <strong>and</strong> Resurgence: The Wildlife–Human Connection<br />

“Double Agents”<br />

Pathogens that can cause dise<strong>as</strong>e in humans <strong>and</strong> animals<br />

can be viewed <strong>as</strong> “double agents” relative to the populations<br />

they can impact. Although the historic use of biological<br />

agents in wartime appears to have been specifically focused<br />

on either human or animal targets, most of the early uses of<br />

microbes <strong>as</strong> bioweapons involved agents capable of causing<br />

serious dise<strong>as</strong>e in both (Table 6.1). The interfaces between<br />

humans <strong>and</strong> animals can promote persistence <strong>and</strong> spread of<br />

infectious agents. Thus, careful selection of target situations<br />

can enhance the probabilities for dise<strong>as</strong>e in both humans<br />

<strong>and</strong> animals, <strong>and</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>e the potential for environmental<br />

persistence of the dise<strong>as</strong>e agent <strong>and</strong> dise<strong>as</strong>e spread through<br />

animal movements.<br />

Afghanistan<br />

Indian<br />

Ocean<br />

Gl<strong>and</strong>ers<br />

Anthrax<br />

Plant toxin<br />

* Maryl<strong>and</strong>, Virginia, <strong>and</strong><br />

New York area<br />

Figure 6.4 Documented war time uses of biological weapons to target livestock (developed from Wilson et al. 110 ).<br />

Pacific<br />

Ocean

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!