09.01.2013 Views

DNV's Container (slot) Cost Calculator

DNV's Container (slot) Cost Calculator

DNV's Container (slot) Cost Calculator

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Minimale Brennstoffkosten bei<br />

<strong>Container</strong>schiffen<br />

Ein entscheidender Wettbewerbsvorteil<br />

Jost Bergmann<br />

Segment director container ships<br />

THB-Stammtisch, 21. November 2011


Übersicht<br />

� Mega-Trends in der <strong>Container</strong>schiffahrt<br />

� Gegenüberstellung Konstruktionsanforderungen<br />

� Hauptmerkmale moderner <strong>Container</strong>schiffe<br />

� Ökonomische Betrachtungen für Neubauten<br />

� Herausforderungen für bestehende Schiffe<br />

2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

2


Mega trends<br />

� Changed market<br />

2011<br />

- Unstable world economy<br />

- Structural oversupply, tough competition<br />

- <strong>Cost</strong> pressure<br />

- High fuel oil costs<br />

� Increasing environmental attention<br />

- Public awareness<br />

- Shipper’s requirements<br />

- New environmental rules and legislations<br />

- MARPOL Annex VI. Tier II & III<br />

- Extended ECA areas<br />

- EEDI, EEOI, ESI<br />

- Cold ironing<br />

- Market Based Measures/ Carbon tax?<br />

� Changing infra structure<br />

- Panama Canal<br />

- New terminal technology e.g. gantries, IT systems<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

3


Changed design requirements<br />

� Existing designs<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

4


Changed design requirements<br />

� Existing design<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

- Lean<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- Old Panama Canal<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

5


Changed design requirements<br />

� Existing design<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

- Lean<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- Old Panama Canal<br />

- Tend to have too little stability<br />

- Lot of ballast water<br />

- High powered engines<br />

- One fuel (HFO)<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

6


Key features of modern designs<br />

� Existing design<br />

2011<br />

- High design speed, design draft<br />

- “off design” conditions neglected<br />

- Lean<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- Old Panama Canal<br />

- Tend to have too little stability<br />

- Lot of ballast water<br />

- High powered engines<br />

- One fuel (HFO)<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

7<br />

� Future design<br />

- Reduced top speed, variable draft<br />

- Optimized for operational profile<br />

- Shorter/ wider & bigger<br />

- Hydrodynamics<br />

- New Panama Canal dimensions<br />

- Economy of scale<br />

- Tend to have too much stability<br />

- BW mainly for trim control<br />

- Flexible & efficient engines<br />

- Multiple fuel, new fuels (LNG) or<br />

exhaust gas treatment


Slot cost as function of size/ speed/ utilization/ HFO cost...<br />

DNV’s <strong>Container</strong> (<strong>slot</strong>) <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Calculator</strong><br />

2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

HFO 600 USD/ t, 21 kn/ 100% utilization<br />

Size class 10.000 14.000 18.000<br />

Slot cost, $ 371 327 312<br />

Slot cost savings, % - 12 16<br />

HFO 600 USD/ t, 21 kn/ Abt. 1.000.000 TEU p.a.<br />

Size class 10.000 14.000 18.000<br />

Utilization 100% 75% 50%<br />

Slot costs, $ 371 445 592<br />

Slot cost savings, % - -20 -60<br />

HFO price increase from 600 USD/t to 800 USD/t<br />

21 kn/ 100 % utilization<br />

Size class 10.000 14.000 18.000<br />

Slot cost, $ @ 600 $/t 371 327 312<br />

Slot cost, $ @ 800 $/t 434 382 362<br />

Slot cost increase, % 16,98 16,82 16,03<br />

8


Example: Fuel efficiency of different designs<br />

2011<br />

Fuel <strong>Cost</strong>s [US$/TEU/d]<br />

CASE: 18 kn, 650 Fuel <strong>Cost</strong>s USD/ US$/TEU/day t HFO-<br />

20kn Vessel Speed, 9t/TEU, 650US$/tHFO<br />

•13,5 Difference between worst and best design = 1,75 USD/ TEU/ d<br />

• Assuming 10 ships string, 12.000 TEU WB, 10.000 TEU EB<br />

MITSUBISHI Yard 1 w/o MALS<br />

13,0<br />

DSME Yard 2<br />

• 1,75 USD/ TEU/ d * 11.000 TEU = 19.250 USD / ship/ d at sea<br />

12,5<br />

Imabari Yard 3<br />

• Assuming 50 days at sea on 70 day R/V = 19.250 * 50 = $962.500 per R/V<br />

12,0<br />

SHI Yard 4<br />

• Assuming weekly service = 52 R/V p.a. = 962.500 * 52 HYUNDAI = Yard $50.000.000 5<br />

p.a.<br />

11,5<br />

HHIC Yard 6<br />

11,0<br />

STX Yard 7<br />

10,5<br />

10,0<br />

9,5<br />

9,0<br />

8,5<br />

8,0<br />

7,5<br />

7,0<br />

6,5<br />

6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 10500 11000 11500 12000 12500 13000 13500<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

Number of 9t TEU


Example: 10.000 TEU, Seaspan, YZJ<br />

2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

10


2011<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

The Advanced Bangkok Max-Size<br />

<strong>Container</strong> Feeder – MARLIN 2000 (Blue)<br />

MAIN DIMENSIONS<br />

Length OA 172.2 m<br />

Length PP abt. 162.1 m<br />

Breadth moulded 27.5 m<br />

Depth to main deck 13.7 m<br />

Draught, design 9.0 m<br />

Draught, scantling 9.5 m<br />

Deadweight (T= 9.5 m) 21,760 t<br />

Gross tonnage 17,500<br />

11<br />

SPEED & ENDURANCE<br />

Design Speed (NCR, T= 9.0 m) 18 kts<br />

Max. Speed (MCR, T= 9.5 m) abt.20 kts<br />

HFO capacity, approx. abt. 2,300 m³<br />

Endurance (HFO) abt. 17,000 nm<br />

CLASS NOTATION<br />

DNV +1A1 <strong>Container</strong> Carrier,<br />

NAUTICUS (Newbuilding) E0, DG-P,<br />

BIS, TMON, NAUT-AW, BWM(T),<br />

CLEAN, COMF-V(2)


Competitiveness of existing ships<br />

� Existing cellular fleet (all sizes / all positions) (Alphaliner 11/2011)<br />

2011<br />

- 4,935 ships<br />

- 15.297.118 TEU<br />

� New designs may be quite a lot more efficient compared with existing designs<br />

� Charterers will focus more on fuel efficiency when chartering in ships in the future<br />

� DNV and HSVA are working on a “Fuel Efficiency Guideline”,<br />

to be published by end NOV 2011<br />

� Categories of fuel saving measures<br />

- Reducing the hull resistance<br />

- Improving the propulsion efficiency<br />

- Improving the power plant efficiency<br />

- Improving the operational efficiency<br />

� Some aspects are discussed by Dr. Hollenbach<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

12


2011<br />

Safeguarding life, property<br />

and the environment<br />

www.dnv.com<br />

© Det Norske Veritas AS. All rights reserved.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!