09.01.2013 Views

Internal Wave Generation in Uniformly Stratified Fluids. 1 ... - LEGI

Internal Wave Generation in Uniformly Stratified Fluids. 1 ... - LEGI

Internal Wave Generation in Uniformly Stratified Fluids. 1 ... - LEGI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ωg = ∂Φg<br />

∂t<br />

= N cos θ , (7.9)<br />

kg = – ∇Φg = Nt<br />

r r r × r r × ez sgn z . (7.10)<br />

The pressure and velocity oscillate <strong>in</strong> phase and verify, consistently with (4.5),<br />

vg ~ t r Pg<br />

ρ0<br />

r r<br />

. (7.11)<br />

Note, however, that the velocity grows with time as √t and ultimately diverges (Zavol’skii &<br />

Zaitsev 1984), the pressure simultaneously decreas<strong>in</strong>g as 1/√t so as to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the radiated<br />

energy flux f<strong>in</strong>ite. Meanwhile, the wavelength λ g given by (4.8) decays as 1/t and may<br />

eventually become smaller than <strong>in</strong>termolecular distances (Sobolev 1965 p. 203), vitiat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous medium model. Clearly, a cutoff elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the ultimate dom<strong>in</strong>ance of the smaller<br />

wavelengths is needed (Lighthill 1978 p. 359). As above, the consideration of the f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

dimensions of real sources will provide it.<br />

The phase Φ b = Nt – π/4 of buoyancy oscillations confirms that they do not propagate,<br />

whereas their amplitude shows them to be present everywhere and to <strong>in</strong>duce a radial motion<br />

of fluid particles, <strong>in</strong> contrast to the predictions of the Bouss<strong>in</strong>esq group velocity theory. This<br />

testifies to their non-Bouss<strong>in</strong>esq orig<strong>in</strong>. The pressure and velocity are π/2 out of phase,<br />

imply<strong>in</strong>g a zero energy flux. Compared with gravity waves buoyancy oscillations decrease<br />

with time as t –3/2 and rema<strong>in</strong> negligible. This is contradictory to the ultimate dom<strong>in</strong>ance of<br />

oscillations of the fluid at the buoyancy frequency, experimentally found by McLaren et al.<br />

(1973) for transient <strong>in</strong>ternal waves. The explanation for this phenomenon lies, aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ite size of real sources.<br />

Exact <strong>in</strong>tegral expressions of the pressure and velocity fields follow from the same<br />

method that has been used to derive the spectral decompositions (5.12) and (5.16) of the<br />

Green’s function. Amendments are nevertheless required, s<strong>in</strong>ce (7.4) is not <strong>in</strong>tegrable at the<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gularities ± N⏐cos θ⏐. A method to circumvent this difficulty, which turns out to be equivalent<br />

to that proposed by Zavol’skii & Zaitsev (1984), may be found <strong>in</strong> Vois<strong>in</strong> (1991). It yields for<br />

the pressure<br />

<strong>Internal</strong> wave generation. 1. Green’s function 30<br />

PB(r, t) = ρ0 m0<br />

2π 2 r π 2<br />

N<br />

δ'(t) + H(t) ω<br />

N cos θ<br />

N2 – ω2 ω2 – N2 cos ωt dω<br />

cos2θ , (7.12)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!