11.01.2013 Views

Annual Review 2009 - Watson, Farley & Williams

Annual Review 2009 - Watson, Farley & Williams

Annual Review 2009 - Watson, Farley & Williams

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 DISPUTE RESOLUTION<br />

Dispute resolution<br />

A landmark<br />

judgment<br />

on ‘inherent<br />

vice’ and ‘perils<br />

of the sea’<br />

MORE CASES...<br />

> Acted for Norwegian ship owners<br />

Parbulk AS against Kristen Marine<br />

SA in a US$200 million ship sale<br />

and purchase dispute.<br />

> Advised a large ship owner in<br />

relation to multiple commercial<br />

arbitrations in respect of the<br />

cancellation of a US$1 billion<br />

newbuilding order book.<br />

> Won a case for the Government<br />

of Pakistan in the Court of Appeal.<br />

The case has now been appealed<br />

to the Supreme Court.<br />

> Advised a Kazakh hotel<br />

development group in respect<br />

of US$100 million LCIA<br />

arbitration claim against a<br />

US property developer.<br />

> Defended an international trading<br />

group in respect of an alleged<br />

US$100 million fraud.<br />

LANDMARK DRILLING RIG CASE<br />

In a high-profile case involving the loss of<br />

part of a drilling rig close to the South African<br />

Cape coast, WFW Singapore succeeded in<br />

overturning an earlier Commercial Court<br />

decision.<br />

We acted for Global Process Systems (GPS),<br />

providers of technical and equipment<br />

services to the oil and gas industry, against<br />

their Malaysian marine insurers for the cost<br />

of replacing three legs of a jack-up drilling rig.<br />

The legs were lost at sea while the rig was being<br />

dry-towed on the back of a semi-submersible<br />

barge around the Cape of Good Hope.<br />

The original case went against GPS on the<br />

grounds that the loss of the legs was due<br />

to ‘inherent vice’, an excluded peril under the<br />

policy. But the Court of Appeal clarified the<br />

relationship between the concept of ‘inherent<br />

vice’ and that of ‘perils of the sea’ and in finding<br />

that the latter was the proximate cause of the<br />

loss, produced a landmark judgment in favour<br />

of our long-standing client. The case was<br />

valued at more than US$11 million, plus costs,<br />

a proportion of which were payable on an<br />

indemnity basis.<br />

The document-intensive case required<br />

wide-ranging knowledge of technical issues<br />

including naval architecture, structural<br />

engineering and marine insurance. WFW<br />

London was also involved, providing logistical<br />

support for the appeal.<br />

MARITIME BANKCRUPTCy SETTLEMENT<br />

In a complex case, WFW’s New york and<br />

London teams acted for Bank of Scotland<br />

following the bankruptcy of a group of<br />

borrowing companies. The companies were<br />

related to Eastwind Maritime, an operator<br />

of refrigerated ships, which had filed for<br />

Chapter 7 bankruptcy.<br />

The bank’s loan to the companies was<br />

secured by ship mortgages for existing<br />

vessels, assignments for newbuilding<br />

contracts and pledges of shares in the<br />

borrowing companies. When the latter<br />

defaulted on their payments, the bank had<br />

acted to exercise the share pledges and sold<br />

the shares on. Shortly afterwards, Eastwind<br />

had taken all the companies into bankruptcy,<br />

effectively trying to deny the bank the shares<br />

that were due to it.<br />

WFW prepared motions to dismiss the<br />

borrowing companies from the bankruptcy,<br />

so that the bank could realise its security.<br />

Following intense negotiations, we reached<br />

a settlement with the debtors’ trustee in the<br />

bank’s favour. Our timely action prevented<br />

our client from being involved in major<br />

litigation. The New york team provided<br />

maritime law, bankruptcy law and litigation<br />

services, while the London office advised<br />

on ship finance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!