Annual Review 2009 - Watson, Farley & Williams
Annual Review 2009 - Watson, Farley & Williams
Annual Review 2009 - Watson, Farley & Williams
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
14 DISPUTE RESOLUTION<br />
Dispute resolution<br />
A landmark<br />
judgment<br />
on ‘inherent<br />
vice’ and ‘perils<br />
of the sea’<br />
MORE CASES...<br />
> Acted for Norwegian ship owners<br />
Parbulk AS against Kristen Marine<br />
SA in a US$200 million ship sale<br />
and purchase dispute.<br />
> Advised a large ship owner in<br />
relation to multiple commercial<br />
arbitrations in respect of the<br />
cancellation of a US$1 billion<br />
newbuilding order book.<br />
> Won a case for the Government<br />
of Pakistan in the Court of Appeal.<br />
The case has now been appealed<br />
to the Supreme Court.<br />
> Advised a Kazakh hotel<br />
development group in respect<br />
of US$100 million LCIA<br />
arbitration claim against a<br />
US property developer.<br />
> Defended an international trading<br />
group in respect of an alleged<br />
US$100 million fraud.<br />
LANDMARK DRILLING RIG CASE<br />
In a high-profile case involving the loss of<br />
part of a drilling rig close to the South African<br />
Cape coast, WFW Singapore succeeded in<br />
overturning an earlier Commercial Court<br />
decision.<br />
We acted for Global Process Systems (GPS),<br />
providers of technical and equipment<br />
services to the oil and gas industry, against<br />
their Malaysian marine insurers for the cost<br />
of replacing three legs of a jack-up drilling rig.<br />
The legs were lost at sea while the rig was being<br />
dry-towed on the back of a semi-submersible<br />
barge around the Cape of Good Hope.<br />
The original case went against GPS on the<br />
grounds that the loss of the legs was due<br />
to ‘inherent vice’, an excluded peril under the<br />
policy. But the Court of Appeal clarified the<br />
relationship between the concept of ‘inherent<br />
vice’ and that of ‘perils of the sea’ and in finding<br />
that the latter was the proximate cause of the<br />
loss, produced a landmark judgment in favour<br />
of our long-standing client. The case was<br />
valued at more than US$11 million, plus costs,<br />
a proportion of which were payable on an<br />
indemnity basis.<br />
The document-intensive case required<br />
wide-ranging knowledge of technical issues<br />
including naval architecture, structural<br />
engineering and marine insurance. WFW<br />
London was also involved, providing logistical<br />
support for the appeal.<br />
MARITIME BANKCRUPTCy SETTLEMENT<br />
In a complex case, WFW’s New york and<br />
London teams acted for Bank of Scotland<br />
following the bankruptcy of a group of<br />
borrowing companies. The companies were<br />
related to Eastwind Maritime, an operator<br />
of refrigerated ships, which had filed for<br />
Chapter 7 bankruptcy.<br />
The bank’s loan to the companies was<br />
secured by ship mortgages for existing<br />
vessels, assignments for newbuilding<br />
contracts and pledges of shares in the<br />
borrowing companies. When the latter<br />
defaulted on their payments, the bank had<br />
acted to exercise the share pledges and sold<br />
the shares on. Shortly afterwards, Eastwind<br />
had taken all the companies into bankruptcy,<br />
effectively trying to deny the bank the shares<br />
that were due to it.<br />
WFW prepared motions to dismiss the<br />
borrowing companies from the bankruptcy,<br />
so that the bank could realise its security.<br />
Following intense negotiations, we reached<br />
a settlement with the debtors’ trustee in the<br />
bank’s favour. Our timely action prevented<br />
our client from being involved in major<br />
litigation. The New york team provided<br />
maritime law, bankruptcy law and litigation<br />
services, while the London office advised<br />
on ship finance.