Whole Foods/Wild Oats Merger: - The Arthur Page Society
Whole Foods/Wild Oats Merger: - The Arthur Page Society
Whole Foods/Wild Oats Merger: - The Arthur Page Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
including our plan to invest capital in and improve many of the stores currently owned<br />
by <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong>." 64<br />
In the months following, <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> released several statements informing its publics of<br />
the newest developments in the case against the FTC [See Appendices E and F]. Key topics<br />
discussed in releases include:<br />
• <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> Market Adds New Section on Web Site for Posting Information<br />
Regarding FTC's Attempt to Block Proposed <strong>Merger</strong> with <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong> Markets<br />
• Statement of <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> Market, Inc. Concerning FTC Motion to Stay and Appeal<br />
• Court Denies FTC's Request for Stay Pending Appeal; <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> Market and <strong>Wild</strong><br />
<strong>Oats</strong> Markets Legally Cleared to Proceed with <strong>Merger</strong><br />
During the months of June and July, <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> issued seven news releases regarding the<br />
merger with <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong> and/or the resistance of the FTC.<br />
5.5. <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> Market, <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong> & <strong>The</strong> FTC<br />
In his blog, Mackey consistently stated that his intentions were to obtain complete<br />
transparency regarding the merger with its publics. He wanted to leverage the blog as a<br />
platform to share his personal perspective about why the <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong>’ acquisition of <strong>Wild</strong><br />
<strong>Oats</strong> is a good thing and about why the FTC is wrong in filing a complaint against it. 65<br />
Under the section “Why does <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> Market want to buy <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong>?” Mackey<br />
included a formerly confidential e‐mail proposal sent to the Board of Directors about the<br />
merger. He informed his readers that the e‐mail very accurately states all of the reasons<br />
why <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> wants to buy <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong> and then goes on to explain each reason in more<br />
detail.<br />
<strong>The</strong> blog also included a copy of the news release that the FTC created about<br />
blocking the merger between <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> and <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong>. Following the release, Mackey<br />
reviewed the content, paragraph by paragraph, to provide specific responses against the<br />
FTC’s claims. For example, in response to the FTC’s statement that “the transaction would<br />
violate federal antitrust laws by eliminating the substantial competition between these two<br />
uniquely close competitors in numerous markets nationwide in the operation of premium<br />
natural and organic supermarkets,” Mackey offered this perspective:<br />
“Do <strong>Whole</strong> <strong>Foods</strong> and <strong>Wild</strong> <strong>Oats</strong> compete against each other as the FTC claims? <strong>The</strong><br />
answer is obvious: Of course we do. We compete in numerous markets and it is a<br />
simple truism to say that if we merge together that we will no longer compete against<br />
each other … If the FTC is opposed to eliminating competition between companies then<br />
it should never approve any mergers.” 66<br />
At the end of Mackey’s post, consumers and other publics had the opportunity to post<br />
direct responses and feedback. Several readers posted comments in support of <strong>Whole</strong><br />
17