Clinical Evaluation Systematic Literature Review - Apec-ahc.org
Clinical Evaluation Systematic Literature Review - Apec-ahc.org
Clinical Evaluation Systematic Literature Review - Apec-ahc.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Data from Each Study Evaluated<br />
• Partial sample data exaction evaluation<br />
• Data extracted from each study<br />
Ref Study<br />
Design<br />
1<br />
5<br />
Case Series<br />
(Level IV)<br />
Prognostic<br />
Study<br />
(Level II-<br />
1)<br />
Patients<br />
Initial<br />
Numbers Age Sex Weight Height Indications Diagnosis<br />
Implants<br />
Initial<br />
Mean Range Men Women Mean Range Mean Range<br />
45/33 55/40 57 30-73 23 22 77 49-<br />
126<br />
52/42<br />
53/43<br />
70 34-<br />
86<br />
Portion of Sample Narrative<br />
170 145-<br />
187<br />
NR<br />
Osteoarthritis<br />
40<br />
Congenital hip<br />
dysplasia 5<br />
24 18 NR NR NR NR NR Osteoarthritis<br />
50<br />
Avascular<br />
necrosis 2<br />
• XX, YY and ZZ (Ref 1, published XXX) in a retrospective Level-IV<br />
case series, reported on the use of 50 stems in 43 patients (mean<br />
age 58 years) during primary and revision procedures. The mean<br />
follow-up was 12.5 years. The outcomes were encouraging with a<br />
mean Harris hip score of 87 points reported during the most<br />
recent follow-up and 25 patients (75%) showing mild or no pain.<br />
There was 1 revision post-op. They concluded that the femoral<br />
component provided excellent long-term results at 10 to 14 years.<br />
42