12.01.2013 Views

Clinical Evaluation Systematic Literature Review - Apec-ahc.org

Clinical Evaluation Systematic Literature Review - Apec-ahc.org

Clinical Evaluation Systematic Literature Review - Apec-ahc.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Data from Each Study Evaluated<br />

• Partial sample data exaction evaluation<br />

• Data extracted from each study<br />

Ref Study<br />

Design<br />

1<br />

5<br />

Case Series<br />

(Level IV)<br />

Prognostic<br />

Study<br />

(Level II-<br />

1)<br />

Patients<br />

Initial<br />

Numbers Age Sex Weight Height Indications Diagnosis<br />

Implants<br />

Initial<br />

Mean Range Men Women Mean Range Mean Range<br />

45/33 55/40 57 30-73 23 22 77 49-<br />

126<br />

52/42<br />

53/43<br />

70 34-<br />

86<br />

Portion of Sample Narrative<br />

170 145-<br />

187<br />

NR<br />

Osteoarthritis<br />

40<br />

Congenital hip<br />

dysplasia 5<br />

24 18 NR NR NR NR NR Osteoarthritis<br />

50<br />

Avascular<br />

necrosis 2<br />

• XX, YY and ZZ (Ref 1, published XXX) in a retrospective Level-IV<br />

case series, reported on the use of 50 stems in 43 patients (mean<br />

age 58 years) during primary and revision procedures. The mean<br />

follow-up was 12.5 years. The outcomes were encouraging with a<br />

mean Harris hip score of 87 points reported during the most<br />

recent follow-up and 25 patients (75%) showing mild or no pain.<br />

There was 1 revision post-op. They concluded that the femoral<br />

component provided excellent long-term results at 10 to 14 years.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!