12.01.2013 Views

In Gear - Today's Trucking

In Gear - Today's Trucking

In Gear - Today's Trucking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The following headline<br />

is factual: “<strong>Trucking</strong><br />

company agrees to pay<br />

damages in wrongful death<br />

lawsuit totaling $3,000,000.”<br />

Imagine if the company had<br />

not settled out of court. The<br />

payout could have easily been<br />

triple the settled-on amount.<br />

Of course some questions<br />

arise.<br />

“Why would this company<br />

agree to settle the lawsuit?<br />

“What would have<br />

motivated them to admit to<br />

negligent hiring and<br />

negligent entrustment?<br />

And, “what the heck are<br />

negligent hiring and negligent<br />

entrustment, exactly?”<br />

Simply put, negligent hiring<br />

means the trucking company<br />

either failed to conduct<br />

a thorough background check<br />

on the driver or—if it had and<br />

discovered that he had a<br />

previous crash resulting in a<br />

suspended license and<br />

multiple moving violation<br />

convictions—the company<br />

hired him anyway without<br />

doing anything about it.<br />

I happen to know that in<br />

the $3-million case, it was the<br />

latter, because the company<br />

also admitted to negligent<br />

entrustment.<br />

That means they allowed<br />

this driver to operate a<br />

commercial vehicle while<br />

knowing that he had previous<br />

collisions and moving violations<br />

and should probably not<br />

have been behind the wheel.<br />

Does that mean they never<br />

should have hired this driver?<br />

<strong>In</strong> this case yes, but maybe<br />

not in all cases.<br />

It’s one thing to not check<br />

a driver’s history. You already<br />

know to do that, so no<br />

attorney can ever surprise<br />

you in court by bringing up<br />

information from a driver’s<br />

past that you didn’t know<br />

about. Never hire without<br />

asking yourself, “if we were<br />

being sued because of a<br />

collision that this driver was<br />

involved in, are we sure that<br />

there is going to be no new<br />

information dug up that we<br />

were unaware of?”<br />

I assure you, in thousands<br />

of lawsuits across North<br />

America every year, employers<br />

are being surprised by<br />

information about their own<br />

employees’ pasts.<br />

So what happens when you<br />

find past indiscretions on a<br />

new hire? Should you just stop<br />

the hiring process right there?<br />

Not necessarily. But what<br />

you must do is investigate<br />

what came of those indiscretions.<br />

Did the driver receive<br />

remedial training after a<br />

crash or moving violation?<br />

How long has it been since<br />

that incident? Was there a<br />

pattern of incidents? Has the<br />

driver learned from his past<br />

and has he received upgrading<br />

or training to improve his<br />

skills? Is there a paper trail to<br />

prove that said training<br />

occurred?<br />

What generally happens in a<br />

lawsuit like this is the plaintiff<br />

attorney will try to show a<br />

history of non-compliance<br />

with rules and regulations<br />

and show that the carrier did<br />

nothing about them and<br />

allowed them to continue.<br />

Once the lawyer does that, it<br />

is very easy to prove negligent<br />

hiring and or negligent<br />

entrustment.<br />

You have to be 100-percent<br />

sure of not only the drivers<br />

you hire and their histories<br />

but also your current drivers<br />

and the steps you take after<br />

collisions, citations or incidents.<br />

Make sure they receive<br />

remedial training and or<br />

discipline, road test them and<br />

ensure they continue to meet<br />

standards and can operate<br />

safely and within the law. And<br />

document everything you do.<br />

Make sure that when you<br />

write it down, it will stand up<br />

to scrutiny by that plaintiff<br />

Street Smarts<br />

Surprised Parties<br />

safety Don’t let sneaky money-hungry litigators sideswipe you in court.<br />

By Brian Botham<br />

A trucking company<br />

involved in a crash<br />

presents a huge<br />

target to hungry<br />

litigators. And they<br />

will come after you,<br />

armed with facts.<br />

WHEN THE BOOKS COOK YOU:<br />

You should never be surprised in court.<br />

lawyer and a jury.<br />

This is why your insurance<br />

company shows up on a regular<br />

basis to go through your<br />

files and hiring practices, etc.<br />

They want to ensure that if a<br />

situation occurs you have<br />

everything in place to<br />

protect yourself and their<br />

exposure. That catch phrase<br />

you always hear—Risk<br />

Management—really means<br />

managing (and therefore<br />

minimizing) your risks.<br />

Believe me. A trucking<br />

company involved in a crash<br />

presents a huge target to<br />

hungry litigators. And they<br />

will come after you, armed<br />

with facts.<br />

The public (and many<br />

attorneys) seem to believe we<br />

are all loaded, with more<br />

millions to throw around<br />

than Tiger Woods.<br />

Maybe you are. I’m not. ▲<br />

Brian Botham, CDS, is a certified<br />

director of safety through NATMI.<br />

He can be reached at 519-533-<br />

3656 or bbotham@cmvsafety.ca.<br />

JANUARY 2010 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!