Global Retirement Plan Innovation - Dimensional Fund Advisors
Global Retirement Plan Innovation - Dimensional Fund Advisors
Global Retirement Plan Innovation - Dimensional Fund Advisors
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LegAL UPDAte<br />
MAnAGInG FIDUCIArY<br />
reSPOnSIBILItY<br />
How plan fiduciaries can enlist the help of an investment advisor<br />
By IAn KOPeLMAn, Partner at DLA Piper LLP (US) and PSCA’s Legal Counsel<br />
Pitfalls await 401(k)<br />
plan fiduciaries who<br />
assume that, under<br />
the employee<br />
retirement Income<br />
Security Act of 1974<br />
(erISA), they can<br />
eliminate their potential liability<br />
with respect to the plan’s<br />
investment options by retaining an<br />
outside investment advisor. the<br />
facts: erISA plan fiduciaries (e.g.,<br />
the sponsor, a committee, or<br />
another in-house fiduciary) are<br />
never fully relieved of fiduciary<br />
responsibility, even when an advisor<br />
assumes that responsibility for the<br />
investment of plan assets. However,<br />
retaining an outside advisor can<br />
help plan fiduciaries fulfill their<br />
responsibilities under erISA.<br />
A plan fiduciary has the duty to act:<br />
(1) solely in the interest of<br />
participants and beneficiaries and<br />
(2) for the exclusive purpose of<br />
benefiting participants and<br />
beneficiaries, and defraying<br />
reasonable expenses of<br />
administering the plan. Further,<br />
under erISA’s prudent man<br />
standards, fiduciaries must<br />
discharge their duties with “the<br />
care, skill, prudence, and diligence<br />
under the circumstances then<br />
prevailing that a prudent man<br />
acting in a like capacity and familiar<br />
with such matters would use in the<br />
conduct of an enterprise of a like<br />
character and with like aims.”<br />
translation: All fiduciary actions are<br />
measured against what someone<br />
who knows the area would do<br />
under the same circumstances. If a<br />
plan fiduciary does not know the<br />
area, prudence requires the<br />
fiduciary to get help from someone<br />
who does. Decisions concerning<br />
the investment options offered to<br />
plan participants are one area in<br />
which prudence may require the<br />
fiduciary to get expert help.<br />
Many plan fiduciaries are officers or<br />
other employees of the plan sponsor<br />
whose primary responsibilities do not<br />
require investment expertise. In other<br />
words, unlike an investment advisor,<br />
the average plan fiduciary is not a<br />
specialist in portfolio theory, financial<br />
analysis, or investment management<br />
and probably does not have the time<br />
to become one. An informed<br />
decision about the investment<br />
options offered to plan participants<br />
requires an analysis of information<br />
such as past performance and<br />
returns, fund volatility, fund<br />
managers, turnover, and fees. this<br />
process requires both time and<br />
expertise, which can be in short<br />
supply for the plan’s fiduciaries. An<br />
“ It may be advisable to get expert<br />
help—and it may be required.”<br />
— Ian Kopelman,<br />
PSCA’s Legal Counsel<br />
advisor has greater and faster access<br />
to relevant information regarding the<br />
plan’s investment options. As a result,<br />
an advisor’s analysis is likely to be<br />
more exact, and the investment<br />
options that are eventually selected<br />
may be more in line with the<br />
investment goals of the plan and<br />
participants. thus, it may be<br />
advisable to get expert help, and<br />
according to Department of Labor<br />
regulations, it is actually required:<br />
“Unless they possess the necessary<br />
expertise . . . fiduciaries would need<br />
6 DC DIMenSIOnS