Jer Rutton Kavasmneck alias Jer Jawahar Thandi - Bombay High ...

hvn
24/195
may be reasonably required to examine as to whether the case
does infact bona fide fall under any of the foregoing
circumstances.”
COAPPL41.12
31. The Chairman of the meeting signed minutes of EOGM dated 22 nd May
2012. According to the said Minutes, the Chairman gave ruling after giving
due consideration to the objection and observations made by both the
scrutinizers as referred in the minutes of meeting and announced the result of
the poll. According to the said minutes of meeting of EOGM dated 22 nd May
2012, the total votes polled were 62883. Votes in favour of the resolution were
47623 (75.73%) and the votes against the resolution were 15260 (24.26%).
32. On 9 th June 2012, the appellants filed CA (91/12) for further amendment
to CP(87/10) before the CLB challenging the meeting dated 22 nd May 2012 and
seeking injunction on implementation of the resolution dated 22 nd May 2012.
On 12 th June, 2012, the first respondent company filed CA (85/12) before CLB
for vacating and/or modifying interim injunction order dated 21 st May 2012
passed by CLB in CA (73/12).
33. On 10 th August, 2012 arguments on C.A. (73/12) and C.A.(85/12) were
closed and orders were reserved. C.A.(91/12) was adjourned to 6 th September
2012. On 13 th August 2012, the CLB passed a detailed order and judgment
allowing C.A.(73/12) seeking amendment to C.P.(87/10) filed by the