Jer Rutton Kavasmneck alias Jer Jawahar Thandi - Bombay High ...

hvn
4/195
COAPPL41.12
21, 2012 on the same grounds on the basis of which the Order
dated May 2012 was passed ?
D. Whether the CLB is required to “pronounce” its orders and
whether an order merely posted by speed post without its being
“pronounced” is not a judicial order in the eyes of law?
E. Whether the CLB could not have permitted the 1 st
Respondent from implementing a resolution purportedly passed at
its Extraordinary General Meeting when :
(i) the CLB itself permitted amendment of the Company Petition
impugning the convening of the said EOGM, and
(ii) the CLB had adjourned another Company Application for
further amendment of the Company Petition questioning the
conduct at the impugned EOGM?
F. Whether the CLB could not have permitted the 1 st Respondent
to implement the resolution purportedly passed at the impugned
EOGM when the conduct of the impugned EOGM was under
serious dispute and challenge and without even considering the
prima facie case made out by the Appellants ?
G. Whether the abrogation of the vested right of preemption
from the Articles of Association itself amounts to oppression?
H. Whether the majority rights cannot be abused for amending
the Articles of Association of a Company in a manner that is
oppressive to the minority shareholders ?