15.01.2013 Views

STRAIGHTEN UP - Natural Awakenings

STRAIGHTEN UP - Natural Awakenings

STRAIGHTEN UP - Natural Awakenings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

globalbriefs<br />

News and resources to inspire concerned citizens to work together<br />

in building a healthier, stronger society that benefits all.<br />

Preventing Extinction<br />

Buying Time for Threatened Species<br />

How long does it take a species to disappear forever?<br />

It turns out that habitat destruction drives species<br />

to extinction more slowly than previously thought,<br />

according to a new model described in the journal<br />

Nature. The pace at which plants and animals are<br />

vanishing from the planet as their habitats shrink may<br />

be overstated by as much as 160 percent or more.<br />

An approach widely used to estimate extinctions<br />

from habitat loss is conceptually flawed, says a study<br />

in the publication. Researchers say that their new method more accurately reflects<br />

the interplay of shrinking habitats and the populations that rely on them. The new<br />

study is one of at least two that highlight scientists’ efforts to sharpen the tools<br />

needed to track the scope of the species-extinction problem and to design better<br />

approaches for dealing with it.<br />

The development of a new tool for estimating extinctions, “... is welcome<br />

news, in the sense that we have bought a little time for saving species,” says<br />

Stephen Hubbell, an ecologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, and<br />

one of two scientists who performed the analysis. “But it’s [also] unwelcome<br />

news,” he adds, “because we have to redo a whole bunch of research performed<br />

using the previous method.”<br />

Source: The Christian Science Monitor<br />

GPS Biking<br />

Mapnificent Will Show the Way<br />

Want to know how far it’s possible<br />

to travel by biking or using public<br />

transit in under 15 minutes? There’s<br />

a map for that. Mapnificent shows<br />

the areas one can reach from any<br />

point in a city at any given time.<br />

Stefan Wehrmeyer, a Berlinbased<br />

software architect, has developed<br />

a tool that uses public transit<br />

data to help users decide on where<br />

to live, work or meet up. Using<br />

data from the GTFS Data Exchange<br />

and overlaying the extracted information on a Google map, Mapnificent visualizes<br />

the reach of public transport in the selected city. This becomes especially useful for<br />

decision-making purposes, rather than trip planning.<br />

“Let’s say you found a job in San Francisco and want to move there,” Wehrmeyer<br />

explains. “Where can you live so that you need less than 30 minutes to go<br />

to your work place? Mapnificent is able to answer that question.”<br />

Mapnificent is available in public beta and can be used for major cities in the<br />

United States.<br />

Source: TheCityFix.com<br />

16 Chicago North & North Shore www.NAChicagoNorth.com<br />

Appliance Awareness<br />

Home Electronics Getting<br />

Greener<br />

Greenpeace has compiled their third<br />

annual survey of the “greenest” home<br />

electronics products from 18 companies<br />

in seven categories—desktops,<br />

laptops, netbooks, mobile phones, televisions,<br />

monitors and smart phones—<br />

based on their environmental impact<br />

(tinyurl.com/23pxpsc). Considerations<br />

included hazardous substances, power<br />

consumption, product lifecycle (recycling<br />

potential) and innovation in<br />

marketing (carbon footprint).<br />

The survey found a significant<br />

overall reduction in the use of hazardous<br />

chemicals since last year, with more<br />

products made without toxic polyvinyl<br />

chloride (PVC) and brominated fire<br />

retardant (BFR). The use of phthalates,<br />

beryllium and antimony (heavy metals)<br />

and their associated compounds also<br />

went down in every category.<br />

Almost all products submitted for<br />

the survey met or exceeded the current<br />

Energy Star standards established by the<br />

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.<br />

However, one conclusion of the report<br />

is that companies seemed to put more<br />

effort into improving the overall energy<br />

efficiency of operating their products<br />

rather than reducing the embedded<br />

energy, or carbon footprint, involved in<br />

manufacturing them.<br />

Lifecycle management continues<br />

to be the weakest eco-link when it<br />

comes to electronics production. The<br />

researchers found little use of recycled<br />

plastic, take-back practices, and marketing<br />

efforts aimed to prevent rapid<br />

obsolescence.<br />

Source: Greenpeace

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!