15.01.2013 Views

Native Vegetation Management - A Framework for Action - Summary

Native Vegetation Management - A Framework for Action - Summary

Native Vegetation Management - A Framework for Action - Summary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

➤<br />

WHAT IS THE<br />

GOVERNMENT DOING<br />

ABOUT NATIVE<br />

VEGETATION?<br />

While the <strong>Framework</strong> sets a<br />

new standard <strong>for</strong> future<br />

management, significant work<br />

has occurred over the last 10<br />

years. Our farmers and land<br />

➤<br />

THERE ARE SO<br />

MANY POLICIES,<br />

WHERE DOES THE<br />

FRAMEWORK FIT?<br />

The <strong>Framework</strong> reflects a<br />

range of Victoria’s<br />

commitments to national<br />

policies, principally:<br />

managers have been at the<br />

<strong>for</strong>efront of Victoria’s native<br />

vegetation management<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts. Through the Landcare,<br />

Land <strong>for</strong> Wildlife, Bushcare<br />

and salinity programs as well<br />

as individual ef<strong>for</strong>ts, the rural<br />

community has strongly<br />

supported the<br />

native vegetation<br />

management ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />

• The National <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

the <strong>Management</strong> and<br />

Monitoring of Australia’s<br />

<strong>Native</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> (ANZECC<br />

1999). The National<br />

<strong>Framework</strong> provides a<br />

vehicle <strong>for</strong> the<br />

implementation of the<br />

National Heritage Trust<br />

Partnership Agreement<br />

between the Commonwealth<br />

and the State and Territory<br />

Governments. Its primary<br />

objective is to reverse the<br />

long term decline in the<br />

quality and extent of<br />

Australia’s native vegetation<br />

cover by June 2001.<br />

• The National Strategy <strong>for</strong><br />

Ecologically Sustainable<br />

Development, with a goal<br />

that is endorsed by all<br />

Australian governments, of<br />

“development that improves<br />

the total quality of life,<br />

both now and in the future,<br />

in a way that maintains the<br />

ecological processes on<br />

which life depends”<br />

(ESD 1992).<br />

The core objectives of<br />

Ecologically Sustainable<br />

Development (ESD) are:<br />

•To enhance individual and<br />

community well-being and<br />

welfare by following a path<br />

of economic development<br />

that safeguards the welfare<br />

of future generations;<br />

•To provide <strong>for</strong> equity<br />

within and between<br />

generations; and<br />

More than 86,000 hectares of<br />

native vegetation has been<br />

re-established by landholders<br />

with Government assistance.<br />

Of this 66,000 hectares were<br />

planted to address salinity<br />

problems, and a further<br />

20,000 hectares were planted<br />

through Bushcare, Growing<br />

Victoria’s Greenhouse Sinks<br />

and other programs<br />

•To protect biological<br />

diversity and to maintain<br />

essential ecological<br />

processes and life<br />

support systems.<br />

Victoria has adopted a range<br />

of measures to help protect<br />

native vegetation. These<br />

measures sit within the<br />

legislative framework provided<br />

by the Planning and<br />

Environment Act 1987, Flora<br />

and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988<br />

and the Catchment and Land<br />

Protection Act 1994. The<br />

<strong>Framework</strong> is one of the State<br />

Policies guiding decisions<br />

through the municipal<br />

planning schemes. Local<br />

Government works closely<br />

with the community in<br />

administering their planning<br />

scheme and delivering results<br />

in a range of conservation and<br />

land protection areas to<br />

ensure ecologically<br />

sustainable development.<br />

Like other State policy<br />

documents such as: Victoria’s<br />

Biodiversity Strategy, Victoria’s<br />

Salinity <strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Framework</strong> and Victorian Pest<br />

<strong>Management</strong> - A <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Action</strong>, Victoria’s <strong>Native</strong><br />

<strong>Vegetation</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – A<br />

<strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Action</strong>, is<br />

reflected in the Catchment<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Authorities’<br />

Regional Catchment Strategies.<br />

It guides the associated<br />

regional action plans,<br />

particularly the <strong>Native</strong><br />

<strong>Vegetation</strong> Plans which<br />

are a regional expression<br />

of the <strong>Framework</strong>.<br />

What is Net Gain?<br />

Net Gain is the primary<br />

goal identified <strong>for</strong> native<br />

vegetation management:<br />

‘A reversal, across the<br />

entire landscape, of the<br />

long-term decline in the<br />

extent and quality of<br />

native vegetation, leading<br />

to a Net Gain’.<br />

Net Gain is the outcome<br />

<strong>for</strong> native vegetation and<br />

habitat where overall gains<br />

are greater than overall<br />

losses and where individual<br />

losses are avoided where<br />

possible. The losses and<br />

gains are determined by a<br />

combined quality-quantity<br />

measure and over a<br />

specified area and period<br />

of time. Gains may be<br />

either required offsets <strong>for</strong><br />

permitted clearing actions<br />

or as a result of landholder<br />

and Government assisted<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts that are not<br />

associated with clearing.<br />

Achievement of the Net<br />

Gain goal will have<br />

benefits <strong>for</strong> biodiversity,<br />

land and water quality, and<br />

climate change<br />

amelioration.<br />

The Net Gain approach:<br />

• Has, as a priority, the<br />

avoidance of further<br />

permanent losses in<br />

existing native vegetation<br />

through clearing;<br />

• Recognises that <strong>for</strong><br />

native vegetation,<br />

although “natural is<br />

best”, it is possible to<br />

partially recover both<br />

extent and quality by<br />

active intervention and<br />

thus to effect the net<br />

result;<br />

• Identifies a quantitative<br />

approach to the “reverse<br />

the decline” pathway,<br />

allowing us to set<br />

targets and measure<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance,<br />

• At the on-ground level,<br />

expresses the principle<br />

that where losses are<br />

directly permitted<br />

and/or incurred, ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

should be made, at a<br />

minimum, to balance<br />

such losses with<br />

commensurate gains in<br />

some way,<br />

• At the regional level,<br />

facilitates establishment<br />

of a complete picture of<br />

the native vegetation<br />

asset, against which<br />

incremental losses and<br />

emerging issues can be<br />

evaluated, and<br />

• Plays an important part<br />

in assessing ecologically<br />

sustainable<br />

development.<br />

What is a Habitat<br />

Hectare?<br />

The habitat hectare is<br />

a site-based measure of<br />

quality and quantity of<br />

native vegetation.<br />

<strong>Native</strong> vegetation at a<br />

site is assessed by<br />

comparing it to a<br />

benchmark, which<br />

represents the average<br />

characteristics of a<br />

mature and apparently<br />

long-undisturbed stand<br />

of the same type of<br />

vegetation. This<br />

measure can be<br />

consistently applied<br />

across the State.<br />

For example, one<br />

hectare of unaltered<br />

natural habitat which<br />

is at 100% of its<br />

natural quality will<br />

equal one habitat<br />

hectare. That is, the<br />

quality multiplied by<br />

the quantity. Ten<br />

hectares of this high<br />

quality habitat would<br />

be equivalent to ten<br />

habitat hectares,<br />

and so on.<br />

If an area of natural<br />

habitat had lost 50%<br />

of its quality because<br />

of weed invasion, loss<br />

of understorey or other<br />

means then one<br />

hectare of this land<br />

would be equivalent to<br />

0.5 habitat hectares,<br />

ten hectares would<br />

equivalent to five<br />

habitat hectares,<br />

and so on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!