Native Vegetation Management - A Framework for Action - Summary
Native Vegetation Management - A Framework for Action - Summary
Native Vegetation Management - A Framework for Action - Summary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
➤<br />
WHAT IS THE<br />
GOVERNMENT DOING<br />
ABOUT NATIVE<br />
VEGETATION?<br />
While the <strong>Framework</strong> sets a<br />
new standard <strong>for</strong> future<br />
management, significant work<br />
has occurred over the last 10<br />
years. Our farmers and land<br />
➤<br />
THERE ARE SO<br />
MANY POLICIES,<br />
WHERE DOES THE<br />
FRAMEWORK FIT?<br />
The <strong>Framework</strong> reflects a<br />
range of Victoria’s<br />
commitments to national<br />
policies, principally:<br />
managers have been at the<br />
<strong>for</strong>efront of Victoria’s native<br />
vegetation management<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts. Through the Landcare,<br />
Land <strong>for</strong> Wildlife, Bushcare<br />
and salinity programs as well<br />
as individual ef<strong>for</strong>ts, the rural<br />
community has strongly<br />
supported the<br />
native vegetation<br />
management ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />
• The National <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />
the <strong>Management</strong> and<br />
Monitoring of Australia’s<br />
<strong>Native</strong> <strong>Vegetation</strong> (ANZECC<br />
1999). The National<br />
<strong>Framework</strong> provides a<br />
vehicle <strong>for</strong> the<br />
implementation of the<br />
National Heritage Trust<br />
Partnership Agreement<br />
between the Commonwealth<br />
and the State and Territory<br />
Governments. Its primary<br />
objective is to reverse the<br />
long term decline in the<br />
quality and extent of<br />
Australia’s native vegetation<br />
cover by June 2001.<br />
• The National Strategy <strong>for</strong><br />
Ecologically Sustainable<br />
Development, with a goal<br />
that is endorsed by all<br />
Australian governments, of<br />
“development that improves<br />
the total quality of life,<br />
both now and in the future,<br />
in a way that maintains the<br />
ecological processes on<br />
which life depends”<br />
(ESD 1992).<br />
The core objectives of<br />
Ecologically Sustainable<br />
Development (ESD) are:<br />
•To enhance individual and<br />
community well-being and<br />
welfare by following a path<br />
of economic development<br />
that safeguards the welfare<br />
of future generations;<br />
•To provide <strong>for</strong> equity<br />
within and between<br />
generations; and<br />
More than 86,000 hectares of<br />
native vegetation has been<br />
re-established by landholders<br />
with Government assistance.<br />
Of this 66,000 hectares were<br />
planted to address salinity<br />
problems, and a further<br />
20,000 hectares were planted<br />
through Bushcare, Growing<br />
Victoria’s Greenhouse Sinks<br />
and other programs<br />
•To protect biological<br />
diversity and to maintain<br />
essential ecological<br />
processes and life<br />
support systems.<br />
Victoria has adopted a range<br />
of measures to help protect<br />
native vegetation. These<br />
measures sit within the<br />
legislative framework provided<br />
by the Planning and<br />
Environment Act 1987, Flora<br />
and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988<br />
and the Catchment and Land<br />
Protection Act 1994. The<br />
<strong>Framework</strong> is one of the State<br />
Policies guiding decisions<br />
through the municipal<br />
planning schemes. Local<br />
Government works closely<br />
with the community in<br />
administering their planning<br />
scheme and delivering results<br />
in a range of conservation and<br />
land protection areas to<br />
ensure ecologically<br />
sustainable development.<br />
Like other State policy<br />
documents such as: Victoria’s<br />
Biodiversity Strategy, Victoria’s<br />
Salinity <strong>Management</strong><br />
<strong>Framework</strong> and Victorian Pest<br />
<strong>Management</strong> - A <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>Action</strong>, Victoria’s <strong>Native</strong><br />
<strong>Vegetation</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – A<br />
<strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Action</strong>, is<br />
reflected in the Catchment<br />
<strong>Management</strong> Authorities’<br />
Regional Catchment Strategies.<br />
It guides the associated<br />
regional action plans,<br />
particularly the <strong>Native</strong><br />
<strong>Vegetation</strong> Plans which<br />
are a regional expression<br />
of the <strong>Framework</strong>.<br />
What is Net Gain?<br />
Net Gain is the primary<br />
goal identified <strong>for</strong> native<br />
vegetation management:<br />
‘A reversal, across the<br />
entire landscape, of the<br />
long-term decline in the<br />
extent and quality of<br />
native vegetation, leading<br />
to a Net Gain’.<br />
Net Gain is the outcome<br />
<strong>for</strong> native vegetation and<br />
habitat where overall gains<br />
are greater than overall<br />
losses and where individual<br />
losses are avoided where<br />
possible. The losses and<br />
gains are determined by a<br />
combined quality-quantity<br />
measure and over a<br />
specified area and period<br />
of time. Gains may be<br />
either required offsets <strong>for</strong><br />
permitted clearing actions<br />
or as a result of landholder<br />
and Government assisted<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts that are not<br />
associated with clearing.<br />
Achievement of the Net<br />
Gain goal will have<br />
benefits <strong>for</strong> biodiversity,<br />
land and water quality, and<br />
climate change<br />
amelioration.<br />
The Net Gain approach:<br />
• Has, as a priority, the<br />
avoidance of further<br />
permanent losses in<br />
existing native vegetation<br />
through clearing;<br />
• Recognises that <strong>for</strong><br />
native vegetation,<br />
although “natural is<br />
best”, it is possible to<br />
partially recover both<br />
extent and quality by<br />
active intervention and<br />
thus to effect the net<br />
result;<br />
• Identifies a quantitative<br />
approach to the “reverse<br />
the decline” pathway,<br />
allowing us to set<br />
targets and measure<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance,<br />
• At the on-ground level,<br />
expresses the principle<br />
that where losses are<br />
directly permitted<br />
and/or incurred, ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
should be made, at a<br />
minimum, to balance<br />
such losses with<br />
commensurate gains in<br />
some way,<br />
• At the regional level,<br />
facilitates establishment<br />
of a complete picture of<br />
the native vegetation<br />
asset, against which<br />
incremental losses and<br />
emerging issues can be<br />
evaluated, and<br />
• Plays an important part<br />
in assessing ecologically<br />
sustainable<br />
development.<br />
What is a Habitat<br />
Hectare?<br />
The habitat hectare is<br />
a site-based measure of<br />
quality and quantity of<br />
native vegetation.<br />
<strong>Native</strong> vegetation at a<br />
site is assessed by<br />
comparing it to a<br />
benchmark, which<br />
represents the average<br />
characteristics of a<br />
mature and apparently<br />
long-undisturbed stand<br />
of the same type of<br />
vegetation. This<br />
measure can be<br />
consistently applied<br />
across the State.<br />
For example, one<br />
hectare of unaltered<br />
natural habitat which<br />
is at 100% of its<br />
natural quality will<br />
equal one habitat<br />
hectare. That is, the<br />
quality multiplied by<br />
the quantity. Ten<br />
hectares of this high<br />
quality habitat would<br />
be equivalent to ten<br />
habitat hectares,<br />
and so on.<br />
If an area of natural<br />
habitat had lost 50%<br />
of its quality because<br />
of weed invasion, loss<br />
of understorey or other<br />
means then one<br />
hectare of this land<br />
would be equivalent to<br />
0.5 habitat hectares,<br />
ten hectares would<br />
equivalent to five<br />
habitat hectares,<br />
and so on.