Marana Regional Landfill - Pima County

Marana Regional Landfill 

Traffic Impact Study 

Prepared for submittal to: 

Town of Marana Public Works Department 

and 

Pima County Department of Transportation 

5460 W. Four Barrel Court 

Tucson, AZ 85743 

February 22, 2010

Marana Regional 


Prepared for submittal to: 

Town of Marana Public Works Department 

and 

Pima County Department of Transportation 

Prepared by: 

Curtis Lueck & Associates 

5460 W. Four Barrel Ct. 

Tucson, AZ 85743 

(520) 743-8748 

Project No 2009.22 

Curtis Lueck, P.E., Principal 

Marcos Esparza, P.E. 

Kenneth Shackman, P.E., PTOE 

Cheryl Rader, Senior Planner/Analyst 

February 22, 2010 

NOTICE 

This study has been prepared using available traffic data and forecasts, as well as limited field data collected specifically for this 

study. It is intended for use in making a determination regarding the transportation infrastructure needs of the study area. It is not 

intended for use as a design document, nor does it represent a standard or specification. The document is copyrighted by Curtis 

Lueck & Associates, 5460 W. Four Barrel Court, Tucson, AZ 85743, telephone 520-743-8748. All rights are reserved pursuant to 

United States copyright law. The document may not be reproduced digitally or mechanically, in whole or in part, without the prior 

written approval of CLA, except as noted in the following. (1) Limited quotations may be made, for technical purposes only, as long 

as proper citation to the authors is provided. (2) Governmental agencies to which this report is submitted for review may make 

limited copies for internal use and to fulfill public requests under the Freedom of Information Act.

Table of Contents 

1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS ......................................................................................... 1 

Project Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1 

Purpose of Report .......................................................................................................................... 1 

Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 1 

Summary of Key Findings .............................................................................................................. 2 

2. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................ 3 

Site Location ................................................................................................................................... 3 

Proposed Development and Access .............................................................................................. 3 

Land Use and Intensity ................................................................................................................... 3 

Development Phasing and Timing ................................................................................................. 3 

3. STUDY AREA CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................. 5 

Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 5 

Site Accessibility ............................................................................................................................. 5 

Future Roadway Improvements ..................................................................................................... 5 

Alternate Modes ............................................................................................................................. 5 

Safety Issues .................................................................................................................................. 6 

4. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 9 

Physical Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 9 

Traffic Volumes and Level of Service ...........................................................................................13 

5. PROJECTED TRAFFIC .......................................................................................................................................... 15 

Site Traffic Forecasting .................................................................................................................15 

Total Traffic ...................................................................................................................................19 

6. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 20 

Roadway Performance (Planning Level Analysis) .......................................................................20 

Intersection Performance .............................................................................................................20 

Traffic Control Needs ....................................................................................................................24 

Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Considerations ..........................................................................25 

Speed Considerations ..................................................................................................................25 

Sight Distances .............................................................................................................................25 

I-10/Avra Valley Road TI ..............................................................................................................25 

Bridges ..........................................................................................................................................25 

Pavement Condition on Avra Valley Road ...................................................................................26 

7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 27

List of Exhibits 

Exhibit 1 Project Location ................................................................................................................................ 1 

Exhibit 2 Proposed Development ................................................................................................................... 4 

Exhibit 3A Crash Type Summary ...................................................................................................................... 7 

Exhibit 3B Crash Severity Summary ................................................................................................................. 8 

Exhibit 4 Roadway Inventory .......................................................................................................................... 9 

Exhibit 5 Existing Avra Valley Road / Trico Road Intersection ................................................................... 10 

Exhibit 6 Existing Avra Valley Road / Sanders Road Intersection ............................................................. 10 

Exhibit 7 Existing Avra Valley / Sandario Road Intersection ...................................................................... 11 

Exhibit 8 Existing Avra Valley Road / Airline Road Intersection ................................................................. 11 

Exhibit 9 Ground Photographs .................................................................................................................... 12 

Exhibit 10 Current Segment Volumes / Performance (Based on Daily Volumes) ...................................... 13 

Exhibit 11 Current Intersection Volumes ....................................................................................................... 14 

Exhibit 12 Current Intersection Performance ................................................................................................ 14 

Exhibit 13 Trip Generation Estimates ............................................................................................................ 15 

Exhibit 14A Site Trip Distribution and Assignment .......................................................................................... 16 

Exhibit 14B Site Trip Distribution (Diagram) .................................................................................................... 17 

Exhibit 15 Site Traffic Assignment ................................................................................................................. 17 

Exhibit 16A Peak Hour Background Traffic at Opening Year (2013) ............................................................. 18 

Exhibit 16B Peak Hour Background Traffic at 20-Year Horizon (2030) ......................................................... 18 

Exhibit 17A Total Volumes at Opening Year (2013) ....................................................................................... 19 

Exhibit 17B Total Volumes at 20-Year Horizon (2030) ................................................................................... 19 

Exhibit 18A Future Roadway Performance at Opening Year 2013 ............................................................... 21 

Exhibit 18B Future Roadway Performance at 20-Year Horizon - 2030 ......................................................... 21 

Exhibit 19 Roadway Segment Analysis – Two-lane Highway HCM (Existing and 2013 With Project) ..... 22 

Exhibit 20 Traffic Signal Screening Analysis – Opening Year with the Project ........................................... 22 

Exhibit 21 Turn Lane Warrants Analysis – Opening Year ............................................................................ 23 

Exhibit 22 Summary of Intersection Performance – Opening Year With the Project ................................. 24

1. Introduction and Summary of Key Findings 

Project Overview 

This study address a proposed regional landfill located north of Avra Valley Road between Trico Road and 

Sanders Road in unincorporated Pima County. The site is expected to be annexed by the Town of Marana, and would 

be within Town limits after annexation. 

This landfill will provide solid waste disposal and recycling services to the northwest area of the Tucson 

metropolitan area. This regional landfill will be important since the existing Tangerine Landfill, which is operated by 

Pima County, is projected to reach its capacity within the next few years and will then be closed. The new landfill will 

allow commercial dumping, which the Tangerine Landfill does not now allow. Exhibit 1 shows the project location and 

the location of the Tangerine Landfill. 

The existing Tangerine Landfill, located one mile west of I-10 with access from Tangerine Farms Road provides 

residential waste disposal services to Pima County residents. Besides the Tangerine Landfill, there is no other nearby 

landfill. Residents near the project would need to drive about 50 miles round-trip to the nearest full service landfill, 

which is the City of Tucson’s Los Reales Landfill, after the closing of the Tangerine Landfill. 

Exhibit 1 Project Location 

Purpose of Report 

This report assesses the traffic impacts of the proposed landfill on the surrounding roadways. This traffic study 

is being prepared for review by both the Town of Marana and Pima County because the traffic impacts associated with 

this project will be realized in both jurisdictions, and because an annexation is underway but not yet complete. 

Methodology 

This report has been prepared following the guidelines contained in the Town of Marana’s Procedures for 

Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. A traffic report checklist was prepared for and review by Town staff, as required 

by Marana’s TIS procedures. The checklist is reproduced in the appendix. 

© 2010 Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 1 

Tucson, Arizona



Based on trip generation estimates, this study would be classified as a category A study (less than 500 peak 

hour trips). However, because of the heavy truck traffic associated with this type of development (in terms of vehicle 

weight, not necessarily traffic volume), the Town of Marana requires more extensive analysis. This includes analysis of 

Avra Valley Road from Trico Road to the east side of Airline Road for current conditions and operational performance, 

opening year (2013), and the 20-year horizon (2030). Roadway and intersection counts are used to perform current 

year and opening year analyses. Opening year analysis will be based on five percent increase in traffic volumes 

between 2010 and 2013. Analysis of the 20-year horizon includes background traffic derived from the Pima 

Association of Governments (PAG) travel demand model. 

Summary of Key Findings 

1. Access will be provided by an improved 80-foot wide private access easement. This easement will run 

north/south from Avra Valley Road to the southeast corner of the site. Final design of this roadway will be 

prepared at the time of development plan, be subject to Town Engineer approval, and accommodate both 

private vehicles and commercial vehicles. 

2. Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates are typically used to help forecast future trips. 

However, a regional landfill category is not included in Trip Generation, so we based the analysis on traffic 

data from two local landfills: Tangerine and Los Reales. 

3. This project will generate a moderate amount of traffic on existing roadways. The estimated site traffic 

volumes are 620 trips per weekday (total inbound and outbound) with 49 vph and 19 vph respectively 

during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. Site traffic will be higher on Saturday with 900 

site generated vehicles per day and 137 site generated vehicles in the peak hour. 

4. Commercial vehicle trips will comprise approximate 32% of the site trips during the weekday and 5% 

during Saturday. 

5. Traffic volumes on the project access routes currently are less than the LOS D maximum service volume 

capacities. 

6. Existing study area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). 

7. Year 2013 projected volumes on the project roadways will not exceed the capacities of the roadways. 

8. Year 2013 study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or 

better) with the current roadway configurations and traffic control. 

9. Year 2030 projected volumes on the project roadways will not exceed the LOS D maximum service volume 

capacities of the roadways with the planned 2030 RTP roadway improvements in place, with one 

exception. Sanders Road, north of Avra Valley Road is projected to exceed its LOS E maximum service 

volume capacity by 2030. 

10. Traffic signal warrants may be met at Avra Valley Road/Trico Road and at Avra Valley Road/Sandario Road 

by 2013. These may be met even without the influence of the landfill project. 

11. The pavement condition on Avra Valley Road between Trico Road and I-10 is currently rated as “poor” for 

the Town of Marana section between Sanders Road and Airline Drive, and “failing” by Pima County for the 

remaining sections between Trico Road and I-10. 

12. A right turn lane should be provided on Avra Valley Road and the project entrance easement for 

westbound-to-northbound turning movements. The storage length should be 200 feet long, which 

exceeds Pima County minimum standard of 150 feet, in consideration of the proportion of commercial 

vehicles. 

13. Pavement marking and signing should be provided in advance of the landfill access intersection on all legs 

in accordance with the 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 

guidelines. Advisory speed limit signs (45 mph) should be posted in advance of the access roadway 

intersection on Avra Valley Road. 


Tucson, Arizona Project No. 2009.22

2. Proposed Development 



Site Location 

The 590-acre subject property, Assessor Parcel ID number 208-24-0010, is located south of Silverbell Road, 

north of Avra Valley Road and just east of Trico Road. The property lies within Township 12S, Range 10E, Section 1 and 

is situated in Marana’s Planning Area per the adopted Town of Marana General Plan. The project site is surrounded by 

vacant/undeveloped or agricultural properties. To the east of the project site is the Marana Northwest Regional 

Airport. Further south of the site is Tucson Adobe, an adobe manufacturing facility with sand and gravel operations. 

North of Silverbell Road is an existing residential development. 

Proposed Development and Access 

The project is a regional landfill with services for residential and commercial solid waste disposal. The 

proposed development site plan is shown in Exhibit 2. 

Of the roadways in the vicinity of the landfill, Avra Valley Road will carry the highest volume of site 

traffic associated with the landfill, with a majority of the Avra Valley Road traffic coming from I-10. 

Access will be provided by an improved 80-foot private access easement. This easement will run 

north/south from Avra Valley Road to the southeast corner of the site. Final design of this roadway will be done 

at the time of development plan subject to the Town Engineer approval to accommodate both private vehicles 

and larger commercial vehicles. 

Upon arrival to the Marana Regional Landfill, customers will weigh in at the scale house in the southeast 

corner of the site. The Recycling Area is located near the facility entrance to allow for and to promote recycling. 

Convenient drop-off bins will be provided for the deposit of recyclable items by local residents. This area is also 

designated for resource recovery retail, as items including but not limited to yard waste composting and 

processing of construction debris such as concrete, wood, drywall, and metals will be sold for resale. It is 

anticipated that future demands may also warrant the development of a material recovery processing facility. 

Land Use and Intensity 

The 590 acre project will provide landfill services for residential and commercial users. It will generate traffic 

associated with landfill activities. It is estimated that residential traffic intensities and patterns will be similar to what is 

currently experienced at the Tangerine Landfill, which only accepts residential waste. The project developer has 

indicated that there may be approximately 100 commercial vehicles per weekday that access the landfill, with 

approximately 20% of the weekday commercial use expected on Saturdays. 

Development Phasing and Timing 

It is estimated that it will take one to two years for development permitting and other preliminary activities to 

be conducted before the landfill is constructed. Therefore, for the purposes of this traffic study, we have estimated the 

opening year to be 2013. The landfill is projected to have a 50 year service life; however, we have analyzed conditions 

for 2030, which is a typical 20-year horizon for transportation projects. It is not feasible at this time to estimate the 

impacts of the landfill beyond this period. 



Exhibit 2 Proposed Development 

Source: The Planning Center 





3. Study Area Conditions 



Study Area 

The study area is generally defined as the area bounded by Trico-Marana Road on the north, Avra Valley Road 

on the south, Trico Road on the west and I-10 on the east. This is a rural area and contains large lot residential 

subdivisions, ranch and farmland, a few community commercial facilities and some industrial uses as well as the 

Marana Regional Airport along the north side of Avra Valley road near Sandario Road. 

Area of Significant Traffic Impact 

The significant impact area will be on Avra Valley Road between Trico Road on the west and I-10 on the east. 

Influence Area 

The landfill will serve the area currently served by the existing Tangerine Landfill, generally the northwest 

region of the Tucson metropolitan area. 

Site Accessibility 

Access to the site will be through a new private easement intersecting Avra Valley Road. Avra Valley Road 

provides access to I-10 about nine miles east of the site and throughout the northwest regional area through 

connections to the major roadways in the study area. Avra Valley Road will carry the most site traffic of the roadway 

network impacted by the landfill. 

All-Weather Access 

The Brawley Wash and the Santa Cruz River are two major waterways that exist in the area. With the 

exception of one dip section on Avra Valley Road, the major roadways have bridges or box culverts crossing over these 

two washes providing all-weather access to I-10 through three routes. There are existing bridges on Trico Road, 

Silverbell Road that have weight restrictions that may limit their use for large commercial vehicles, such as waste 

disposal vehicles. For purposes of this traffic study, we believe that all-weather access is reasonably available to the 

site. The final determination of compliance with the County’s Flood Plain Management Ordinance rests with the Flood 

Control District. 

Future Roadway Improvements 

Two projects are listed in the adopted 2030 Pima Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan 

(PAG RTP) within the study area. These projects are: 

� Avra Valley Road #1, Anway to Marana Town Limits, Widen Roadway, Medium Period (2010-2020), 

Pima County, $23,850,000 

� Avra Valley Road #2, West Town Limits to I-10, Realign & Widen to 4 lanes, Medium Period (2010- 

2020), Marana, $31,600,000 

There is one project in the 2030 PAG RTP that is a “reserve” project, indicating that funding and an estimated 

time frame have not been identified for it. It is: 

� Silverbell Road #5, Sanders Road to West Town Limits, Widen to 4 lanes, $12,650,000 

Alternate Modes 

There are no sidewalks existing along these roadways at this time due to their rural nature. Pedestrians use 

the pathways along the side of the minor roadways and the paved shoulders along the two major routes. 





Avra Valley Road is shown as a designated bike route on the regional bike map. It is defined as both a “bike 

route with striped shoulder” and “key connecting street”. Avra Valley Road is used primarily by experienced cyclists. 

Safety Issues 

Crash data were obtained from ADOT risk management for the three-year period of January 1, 2006 through 

December 31, 2008 and are provided in Exhibit 3A and 3B. Exhibit 3A shows that there have been about 84 

intersection crashes and 27 segment crashes in the study area. Three of the segment crashes involved fatalities. 



Exhibit 3A Crash Type Summary 

(Crashes between 1/01/2006 and 12/31/2008) 


Tucson, Arizona 


Traffic Impact Analysis 

Angle 

Opposite Right S/S Same S/S Single Rear Rear to 

Direction Angle Direction Opposite Vehicle End Side Other TOTAL 

INTERSECTION CRASHES 

Avra Valley Rd/ Clayton Rd 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 5 

Avra Valley Rd/ Maybrook Ave 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/ Sandario Rd 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 

Avra Valley Rd/ Sanders Rd 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/ Seattle Ave 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/ Trico Rd 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 

Avra Valley Rd/ Wright Way 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/010 1 5 22 2 0 1 0 0 0 30 

Avra Valley Rd/010 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 

Avra Valley Rd/010242G 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 

010 1/ Avra Valley Rd 4 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 

010 2/ Avra Valley Rd 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 

TOTAL 12 54 4 0 5 5 0 0 79 

SEGMENT CRASHES 

Avra Valley Rd: I-10 to Airline Rd 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 9 

Avra Valley Rd: Airline Rd to Sandario Rd 0 0 1 1 10 0 0 2 14 

Avra Valley Rd: Sandario Rd to Sanders Rd 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 

Avra Valley Rd: Sanders Rd to Trico Rd 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 

TOTAL 0 0 2 2 20 0 1 2 27

Exhibit 3B Crash Severity Summary 

(Crashes between 1/01/2006 and 12/31/2008) 

Fatal 

Non 

incapacitating 

injury 

Incapacitating 

Injury 

Non Injury 

Accident 


Tucson, Arizona Project No. 2009.22 



Possible 

Injury Total 

INTERSECTION CRASHES 

Avra Valley Rd/ Clayton Rd 0 0 0 3 2 5 

Avra Valley Rd/ Maybrook Ave 0 1 0 0 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/ Sandario Rd 0 1 0 1 1 3 

Avra Valley Rd/ Sanders Rd 0 0 0 1 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/ Seattle Ave 0 0 0 0 1 1 

Avra Valley Rd/ Trico Rd 0 0 0 6 0 6 

Avra Valley Rd/ Wright Way 0 0 0 1 0 1 

Avra Valley Rd/010 1 0 5 0 23 2 30 

Avra Valley Rd/010 2 0 0 0 6 0 6 

Avra Valley Rd/010242G 0 0 1 0 0 1 

010 1/ Avra Valley Rd 0 0 4 13 2 19 

010 2/ Avra Valley Rd 0 0 0 4 1 5 

TOTAL 0 7 5 58 9 79 

SEGMENT CRASHES 

Avra Valley Road: I-10 to Airline Road 1 1 1 5 1 9 

Avra Valley Road: Airline Road to Sandario Road 2 0 3 8 1 14 

Avra Valley Road: Sandario Road to Sanders Road 0 0 0 2 1 3 

Avra Valley Road: Sanders Road to Trico Road 0 1 0 0 0 1 

TOTAL 3 2 4 15 3 27

4. Analysis of Existing Conditions 

Physical Characteristics 



Existing Roads 

Avra Valley Road is a rural major collector that extends from I-10 on the east to the Silverbell Mountains on 

the west. It is the primary access route for residents of the area that travel to the Tucson metropolitan area. It is an 

undivided, 2-lane roadway with 6-foot paved shoulders which meets current standards for a rural road. Avra Valley 

Road is mostly level with a few horizontal curves along its mostly straight alignment. It has paved shoulders acceptable 

for bicycle use. Avra Valley Road will be the major route, primarily from I-10, for site traffic associated with the 

proposed landfill. 

Trico Road extends from Avra Valley on the south to Pinal Airpark Road on the north. Access to I-10 is 

provided by way of Avra Valley Road Interchange for access to the Tucson Metropolitan area and by way of Trico 

Marana Road and Pinal Airpark Road for travel to the north. Trico-Marana Road would be used to access future 

development in the Northwest Marana area. The roadway has 14-foot travel lanes with 6-foot paved shoulders and 

meets or exceeds the County’s current cross section standards for a rural road. 

Sanders Road extends from Avra Valley Road on the south to I-10 on the North. It is an undivided, 2- lane 

roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. 

Sandario Road extends from Avra Valley Road on the north to State Route 86 (Ajo Highway) on the south. It 

is an undivided, two-lane roadway with posted speed limits between 35mph and 55 mph, although it is posted for 45 

mph near Avra Valley Road. It continues through the Town of Marana, Pima County, and Saguaro National Park (west). 

It is a designated bike route on the Tucson Bike Map. 

Airline Road is a two-lane roadway that extends south from Avra Valley Road ½ mile and continues to the east 

as Lambert Lane through a rural residential area, and then south as Silverbell Road. It is posted for 35 mph near Avra 

Valley Road. 

Exhibit 4 provides a physical inventory of these roadways. Ground photographs of the existing roadways are 

provided at the end of this section. In the table, “TWLTL” represents a center two-way left-turn lane. 

Exhibit 4 Roadway Inventory 

Roadway Segment Jurisdiction No. Divided Bike Bus Side- Speed 

Lanes 

Route Route walk Limit 

Avra Valley Rd - West of Trico Rd Pima County 2 No No No No 55 

Avra Valley Rd - Trico Rd to Sanders Rd Pima County 2 No No No No 55 

Trico Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd Pima County 3 TWLTL No No No 50 

Trico Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd Pima County 2 No No No No 50 

Avra Valley Rd - Sanders Rd to Sandario Rd Marana 2 No No No No 55 

Sanders Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd Marana 2 No No No No 45 

Avra Valley Rd - Sandario Rd to Airline Rd Marana 2 No Yes No No 55 

Sandario Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd Marana 2 No Yes No No 45 

Avra Valley Rd - East of Airline Rd Marana 3 TWLTL Yes No No 55 

Airline Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd Marana 2 No Yes No No 35 

Existing Intersections 

This study includes analysis of the major intersections along Avra Valley Road from Trico Road to I-10. These 

are (from west to east) Avra Valley / Trico Road, Avra Valley / Sanders Road, Avra Valley / Sandario Road, and Avra 

Valley / Airline Road. 





Avra Valley / Trico Road serves the unincorporated area west of Marana. This area includes residential 

subdivisions and minimum neighborhood commercial services. It also provides access into Pinal Air Park at the north 

end of Marana. The intersection is currently a four-legged intersection on a curve section of Avra Valley Road. One 

shared-use lane exists in all directions. Exhibit 5 illustrates the existing intersection configuration. 

Exhibit 5 Existing Avra Valley Road / Trico Road Intersection 

Avra Valley / Sanders Road provides access north into northwest Marana from Avra Valley Road. This is a 

three-legged intersection with shared-use lanes at all approaches. Stop control is on Sanders Road. The existing 

intersection is shown in Exhibit 6. 

Exhibit 6 Existing Avra Valley Road / Sanders Road Intersection 

Avra Valley / Sandario Road provides access north to the Picture Rocks community and to Twin Peaks Road, 

which provides access into Continental Ranch. This is a three-legged intersection with stop control on Sandario Road 





and shared-use lanes on the eastbound and northbound approaches. An exclusive left-turn lane exists on the 

westbound approach. The existing configuration is shown in Exhibit 7. 

Exhibit 7 Existing Avra Valley / Sandario Road Intersection 

Avra Valley / Airline Road provides access to an existing residential subdivision along the south side of Avra 

Valley Road, access to the master-planned Saguaro Springs development, and provides alternate access to Continental 

Ranch. Stop control is on Airline Road and the northbound and eastbound approaches consist of one shared-use lane. 

The westbound approach provides an exclusive left-turn lane from the TWLTL that extends east from Airline Road on 

Avra Valley Road. The existing configuration is shown in Exhibit 8. 

Exhibit 8 Existing Avra Valley Road / Airline Road Intersection 



Exhibit 9 Ground Photographs 

Avra Valley Road, looking west. Project site is to the right. 

Trico Road, looking north 





Looking south on Trico Road approaching Avra Valley Road 



Traffic Volumes and Level of Service 

Level of service is a qualitative description of how well a roadway operates under prevailing traffic conditions 

based on average daily traffic volumes and capacity of the roadway. A grading system of A through F, similar to 

academic grades, is utilized. LOS A is free-flowing traffic, whereas LOS F is forced flow and extreme congestion. LOS D 

is generally accepted as the standard in urbanized areas and LOS C in rural areas. Segment performance is based on 

the maximum daily service volumes contained in the TOM TIS Manual. 

Roadway Performance (Based on Daily Volumes) 

Traffic volumes were recorded by CLA on Avra Valley Road and at the study area intersections on Tuesday, 

February 2, 2010. Average daily traffic volumes for the intersection roadways are estimated based on the turn 

movement counts using Avra Valley Road k factors. Exhibit 10 provides the current traffic volumes on study area 

roadway segments. Exhibit 11 is a diagram showing the AM and PM peak hour turn volumes in the study area. 

Exhibit 10 Current Segment Volumes / Performance (Based on Daily Volumes) 

Recorded or 

Estimated 

LOS E V/C 

Roadway Segment 

ADT Source Year Capacity Ratio LOS 

Avra Valley Rd - West of Trico Rd 4,350 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.28 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Trico Rd to Sanders Rd 5,950 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.38 C 

Trico Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 2,300 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.15 C 

Trico Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 50 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.00 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Sanders Rd to Sandario Rd 4,600 CLA 2010 15,600 0.29 C 

Sanders Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 3,650 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.23 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Sandario Rd to Airline Rd 7,200 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.46 C 

Sandario Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 5,550 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.36 C 

Avra Valley Rd - East of Airline Rd 8,060 CLA 2010 15,600 0.52 C 

Airline Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 500 CLA(1) 2010 15,600 0.03 C 



Exhibit 11 Current Intersection Volumes 



Intersection Performance 

The current unsignalized intersections intersection performance was analyzed using the Synchro-6 Software. 

Exhibit 12 Current Intersection Performance 

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 

Queue (FT) 

LOS Delay LOS Delay 95th % 

Trico / Avra Valley Road 

EB Left/thru/right A 0.6 A 1.3 1 

WB Left/thru/right A 0.6 A 0.1 0 

NB Left/thru/right A 9.6 A 8.7 0 

SB Left/thru/right B 12.6 B 11.8 20 

INTERSECTION A 0.0 A 1.7 

Sanders Road / Avra Valley Road 

EB Left/thru A 0.9 A 1.2 2 

WB Thru/right A 0.0 A 0.0 0 

SB Left/right B 13.9 B 13.4 29 


Sandario Road / Avra Valley Road 

EB Thru/right A 0.0 A 0.0 0 

WB Left A 8.3 A 7.8 4 

WB Thru A 0.0 A 0.0 

NB Left/Right C 16.9 B 14.0 58 

INTERSECTION 

Airline Road / Avra Valley Road 

A 5.5 A 3.5 


WB Left A 8.4 A 7.8 0 


NB Left/Right B 14.1 B 12.4 4 




5. Projected Traffic 



Site Traffic Forecasting 

ITE trip generation rates are typically used to help forecast future trips. However, a regional landfill category is 

not included in Trip Generation, so we based the analysis on traffic data from two local landfills: Tangerine and Los 

Reales. The Tangerine landfill does not accommodate commercial dumping anymore, but the daily private vehicle 

traffic to this site is expected to represent the daily private vehicle trips to the proposed site. The landfill developer has 

estimated that there will be approximately 100 commercial vehicles entering and exiting the site on a typical weekday. 

This represents about 30 percent of the current daily commercial traffic at Los Reales landfill. About 20 percent of the 

weekly commercial trips are estimated during a typical Saturday. 

Trip Generation 

Exhibit 13 shows the trip generation estimates for this project based on the existing landfill traffic. 

Included are average weekday, weekday AM and PM peak hour, typical Saturday and Saturday Peak hour trips. 

Trip Generation - Non commercial 

Trip Generation - Commercial 

TOTAL TRIP GENERATION 

Exhibit 13 Trip Generation Estimates 

Internal Capture 

No deductions have been taken for internal capture. 

Average Saturday 

AM Peak PM Peak Weekday Peak Saturday 

Total Total Total Total Total 

In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out 

21 10 420 131 860 

7 14 5 5 210 210 62 69 430 430 

28 9 200 6 40 

15 13 4 5 100 100 3 3 20 20 

49 19 620 137 900 

22 27 9 10 310 310 65 72 450 450 

Pass-By Trips 

No trip deductions have been taken for pass-by traffic to this site. 

New Site Trips 

All trips generated by this project are considered new trips to this site. 

Trip Distribution 

Trips generated by this project have been assigned to the surrounding roadway network as shown in Exhibit 

14A and illustrated in Exhibit 14B. 



DIST 

Exhibit 14A Site Trip Distribution and Assignment 



AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday Sat Peak Hour Saturday 

In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 

Roadway Segment 

22 27 49 9 10 19 310 310 620 65 72 137 450 450 900 

Avra Valley Rd - West of Trico Rd 15% 3 4 7 2 1 3 46 46 92 10 10 20 67 67 134 

Trico Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 5% 1 1 2 0 1 1 16 16 32 3 4 7 23 23 46 

Trico Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Avra Valley Rd - Trico to Access Rd 20% 4 5 9 2 2 4 62 62 124 13 14 27 90 90 180 

Avra Valley Rd - Access Rd to Sanders Rd 80% 18 22 40 7 8 15 248 248 496 52 58 110 360 360 720 

Avra Valley Rd - Sanders Rd to Sandario Rd 75% 17 21 38 7 7 14 232 232 464 49 54 103 337 337 674 

Sanders Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 5% 1 1 2 0 1 1 16 16 32 3 4 7 23 23 46 

Avra Valley Rd - Sandario Rd to Airline Rd 65% 15 18 33 6 6 12 201 201 402 42 47 89 292 292 584 

Sandario Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 10% 2 3 5 1 1 2 31 31 62 7 7 14 45 45 90 

Avra Valley Rd - East of Airline Rd 63% 15 17 32 6 6 12 195 195 390 41 46 87 283 283 566 

Airline Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 2% 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 6 12 1 1 2 9 9 18 



Exhibit 14B Site Trip Distribution (Diagram) 



Site Traffic Assignment 

Using the above distribution, the site trips are assigned to the roadways and the intersections. The resulting 

peak hour assignment is shown in Exhibit 15. The assignment diagram includes weekday AM, PM and Saturday peak 

hour trips. The site trip assignment remains the same for both study horizons. 

Exhibit 15 Site Traffic Assignment 





Non-Site Traffic Forecasting 

The background traffic for the opening year (2013) was estimated using a growth rate of 5 percent between 

2010 and 2013. This projected background traffic is provided in Exhibit 16A and 16B. The background traffic for 2030 

was estimated using the ADT projections from the PAG travel demand model. The growth factor between the current 

recorded ADTs and the projected ADTs was applied to the approach volumes at the existing intersections. Turn 

volumes for the future south leg of Sanders Road were estimated using distribution and growth factors. 

Exhibit 16A Peak Hour Background Traffic at Opening Year (2013) 

Exhibit 16B Peak Hour Background Traffic at 20-Year Horizon (2030) 





Total Traffic 

The estimated site trips were added to the above background volumes to project total trips on the roadways 

and at the intersections when the project is complete. These volumes are provided in Exhibit 17A and 17B. 

Exhibit 17A Total Volumes at Opening Year (2013) 

Exhibit 17B Total Volumes at 20-Year Horizon (2030) 



6. Traffic and Circulation Analysis 



Roadway Performance (Planning Level Analysis) 

Future segment volumes with and without the site traffic from this project at the opening year and 5-year 

horizon are provided in Exhibits 18A and 18B, and the level of service assessment is based on the Town of Marana 

planning level capacities. This analysis is provided to show the impact from the proposed project. 

The tables summarize capacity, volume estimates and site traffic with and without the project at both horizon 

years and show that in the opening year, all roadways will continue to operate at LOS C or better during the average 

weekday with existing configuration. The roadway capacities in the 2030 table reflect the improved Avra Valley 

roadway with a four-lane section as currently planned in the PAG RTP and a four-lane section on the new south leg of 

Sanders Road. All other roadways are assumed to be two-lane cross sections. Exhibit 18B shows that the north leg of 

Sanders Road will operate at LOS F without the project if no improvements are constructed before 2030. All other 

roadways will operate at LOS D or better with the project, and with the planned roadway widening projects listed in 

the 2030 PAG RTP. 

Roadway Performance (Based on Peak Hour Volumes) 

In addition to the planning level analysis of the roadway segments, we also evaluated the roadway segments 

by applying the methodology for assessing LOS on two-lane highways from the Highway Capacity Manual. For twolane 

highways, level of service is based on average travel speed along a roadway segment and the percentage of time 

following another vehicle. This analysis accounts for the percentage of no-passing lanes along the segment, the 

number of access points, traffic volumes during the peak hour, and roadway geometric features. Free-flow speed is 

also a factor in this analysis. 

Exhibit 19 provides the level of service analysis results for the Avra Valley roadway segments between Trico 

Road and Airline Road for the existing and 2013 opening year with project conditions. (Year 2030 conditions are 

considered too speculative for a discrete analysis as this, therefore the planning level analysis should be considered 

adequate for the horizon year of 2030.). Analysis of the existing conditions is provided here to show that the decrease 

in travel speed and increase in percentage of following time is minimal with the year 2013 project traffic even when 

compared to existing conditions. 

Intersection Performance 

Traffic signal screening warrants and turn-lane warrants analyses were performed for the study area 

intersections. The traffic signal screening warrants uses the methods developed by the Oregon Department of 

Transportation, which provides a planning level analysis of the MUTCD Warrant 1 using projected daily traffic volumes. 

The analyses are provided for the opening year, based on ADT, with the project at 2013. (Note that the results are the 

same using ADT without the project). The results, which are provided in Exhibit 20 shows that a traffic signal may be 

warranted at two locations in 2013. These intersections are Avra Valley Road / Trico Road and Avra Valley Road / 

Sandario Road. At the request of the Town of Marana, a full MUTCD traffic signal warrants analysis was conducted and 

is attached to this report as an addendum. Three warrants are currently met at that intersection. 

The turn lane warrant analysis is based on the methods contained in the Pima County Subdivision and 

Development Street Standards, April 2004 and is provided for the opening year with and without the project. It is 

assumed that the improvements along Avra Valley Road will include warranted turn lanes before the 2030 horizon. The 

analysis worksheet is provided in Exhibit 21. The tables show that right- and left-turn lanes are probably currently 

warranted at several locations and the addition of site traffic does not add additional locations. 

Future intersection performance was analyzed using the Synchro 6 Trafficware software for unsignalized 

intersections although, discussed above, two of these intersections may warrant traffic signals. The unsignalized 

analyses are summarized in Exhibit 22 for the opening year 2013 with the project. It is assumed that improvements on 

Avra Valley Road will include intersection improvements to accommodate the future traffic in 2030 and a pavement 

structure that accommodates forecast loadings. 



Exhibit 18A Future Roadway Performance at Opening Year 2013 

WITHOUT THE PROJECT WITH THE PROJECT 

Maximum Current Regional Base V/C 

Site Projected V/C 

Road Segment 

Capacity ADT Growth ADT Ratio LOS Traffic ADT Ratio LOS 

Avra Valley Rd - West of Trico Rd 15,600 4,350 220 4,570 0.29 C 90 4,660 0.30 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Trico Rd to Sanders Rd 15,600 5,950 300 6,250 0.40 C 495 6,745 0.43 C 

Trico Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 2,300 115 2,415 0.15 C 30 2,445 0.16 C 

Trico Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 50 5 55 0.00 C 0 55 0.01 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Sanders Rd to Sandario Rd 15,600 4,600 230 4,830 0.31 C 465 5,295 0.34 C 

Sanders Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 3,650 185 3,835 0.25 C 30 3,865 0.25 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Sandario Rd to Airline Rd 15,600 7,200 360 7,560 0.48 C 400 7,960 0.51 C 

Sandario Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 5,550 280 5,830 0.37 C 60 5,890 0.38 C 

Avra Valley Rd - East of Airline Rd 15,600 8,060 405 8,465 0.54 C 390 8,855 0.57 C 

Airline Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 500 25 525 0.03 C 10 535 0.03 C 

Exhibit 18B Future Roadway Performance at 20-Year Horizon - 2030 


Maximum Projected V/C 

Site Projected V/C 

Road Segment 

Capacity 2030 ADT Ratio LOS Traffic ADT Ratio LOS 

Avra Valley Rd - West of Trico Rd 32,900 9,700 0.29 C 90 9,790 0.30 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Trico Rd to Sanders Rd 32,900 8,500 0.26 C 495 8,995 0.27 C 

Trico Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 8,700 0.56 C 30 8,730 0.56 C 

Trico Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 50 0.00 C 0 50 0.00 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Sanders Rd to Sandario Rd 32,900 17,450 0.53 C 465 17,915 0.54 C 

Sanders Rd - north of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 17,250 1.11 F 30 17,280 1.11 F 

Sanders Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 32,900 8,150 0.25 C 0 8,150 0.25 C 

Avra Valley Rd - Sandario Rd to Airline Rd 32,900 24,800 0.75 D 400 25,200 0.77 D 

Sandario Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 12,350 0.79 D 60 12,410 0.80 D 

Avra Valley Rd - East of Airline Rd 32,900 27,300 0.83 D 390 27,690 0.84 D 

Airline Rd - south of Avra Valley Rd 15,600 11,000 0.71 D 10 11,010 0.71 D 




Traffic Impact Analysis



Exhibit 19 Roadway Segment Analysis – Two-lane Highway HCM (Existing and 2013 With Project) 

Average 

Travel 

Speed 

Existing (2010) Opening Year With Project (2013) 

Percent 

Time 

Following LOS 

Average 

Travel 

Speed 

Percent 

Time 

Following LOS 

Trico to Sanders 50.9 mph 55.2% C 50.6 mph 56.5% C 

Sanders to 

Sandario 46.5 mph 62.8% C 46.1 mph 64.1% C 

Sandario to Airline 51.8 mph 57.4% C 51.2 mph 59.3% C 

Exhibit 20 Traffic Signal Screening Analysis – Opening Year with the Project 

Preliminary Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis 

(Oregon Department of Transportation) 

Marana Road 85th percentile 

speed is 40 or above; all 

others assumed to be below 

40 

MUTCD Warrant 1 

Screening Volumes 

(80%) 

Approach Lanes: 1 Major/1Minor 

Opening Year Without the 

Project 

MAJOR STREET 

MINOR STREET 

Projected 

Volume 

2-way 

Approach 

No of 

Approach 

Lanes 

Percent of 

Standard 

Case A 

7,080 

2,120 

Case B 

10,640 

1,080 

Avra Valley Road 

Trico Road 

16,585 

1,860 

1 

1 

80% 

80% 

NO YES 


Project Access 

5,065 

500 

1 

1 

100% 

100% 

NO NO 


Sanders Road 

5,065 

2,940 

1 

1 

80% 

80% 

NO NO 


Sandario Road 

7,600 

4,490 

1 

1 

80% 

80% 

YES NO 


Airline Road 

8,450 

410 

1 

1 

100% 

100% 

NO NO 



Exhibit 21 Turn Lane Warrants Analysis – Opening Year 






ADT at 

MAX 

RIGHT TURN ANALYSIS 2013 ADT RANGE 

RT NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB 

Avra Valley Road 6,445 5,000-10,000 70 0 120 0 120 

Trico Road 2,330

Exhibit 22 Summary of Intersection Performance – Opening Year With the Project 

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Queue (FT) 

LOS Delay LOS Delay 95th % 

Trico / Avra Valley Road 

EB Left/thru/right A 0.7 A 0.5 1 

WB Left/thru/right A 0.4 A 0.2 0 

NB Left/thru/right A 9.8 A 8.7 1 

SB Left/thru/right B 13.2 B 11.8 24 


Sanders Road / Avra Valley Road 



SB Left/right C 15.1 B 14.4 34 


Sandario Road / Avra Valley Road 


WB Left A 8.5 A 7.8 4 


NB Left/Right C 20.6 B 12.7 78 

INTERSECTION 

Airline Road / Avra Valley Road 

A 6.1 A 0.6 


WB Left A 8.5 A 8.5 0 


NB Left/Right B 14.9 B 14.9 6 

INTERSECTION 

Access Road / Avra Valley Road 

A 0.6 A 0.6 



SB Left/right B 12.0 B 12.5 4 



Traffic Control Needs 

For the project intersection of Avra Valley Road/Project Roadway, we recommend that the Project Roadway 

approach be stop sign controlled. A right turn lane on Avra Valley Road for westbound to northbound turning vehicles 

should be provided. Based on Pima County standards for turn lane length and the number of large turning vehicles, 

the minimum length should be 200 feet. This exceeds Pima County’s minimum length of 150 feet, but accounts for the 

number of large commercial vehicles turning. Traffic control devices, including signs and markings, should be installed 

in accordance with the MUTCD. 

The signal warrant analysis contained herein has indicated that the intersections of Avra Valley Road/Trico 

Road and Avra Valley Road/Sandario Road may meet signal warrants by 2013. These warrants may be met even 

without the development of the project. 

Although the access road to the landfill will be a private easement, the 2009 MUTCD requires that facilities 

that provide public access are subject to the same requirements for traffic control devices as public facilities. 





Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Considerations 

Both Avra Valley Road and Trico Road have striped paved shoulders. None of the project area roads that are 

within one mile of the project site are designated on the Tucson Bike Map as bike routes. There are no sidewalks or 

other pedestrian facilities within the project area. Transit service is not provided in the vicinity. It is unlikely that site 

traffic will include pedestrian, bicycle or transit traffic. 

Pedestrian paths should be strategically provided within the landfill for workers who would walk between the 

different activities. It is unlikely that pedestrian or bicycle facilities will be needed to connect the external roadway 

system to the landfill as most if not all site traffic will arrive via motorized vehicle. 

Speed Considerations 

Because the access on Avra Valley Road is located on a curved section and because of the mix of vehicle 

classes along this section of Avra Valley Road, it is recommended that advisory speed signs be placed on Avra Valley 

Road in advance of the project entrance intersection. These signs should be placed based on MUTCD guidelines. 

Sight Distances 

Sight visibility triangles will be included in the project development plan, as required by Marana’s 

development code. 

I-10/Avra Valley Road TI 

Because we have estimated that over 60% of the site traffic will be east of Airline Road, we have requested 

information from ADOT on planned projects at the I-10/Avra Valley Road TI. ADOT is about to begin a design 

concept report and environmental assessment for I-10 from Tangerine Rd to Ina Rd. The study will take 

approximately 18-24 months. There is also a proposed private development on the southwest quadrant of Avra 

Valley Rd/ I-10. It is our understanding that negotiations regarding off-site impacts between the developer of 

this project and ADOT are currently underway. 

It should be noted that this TI experiences a high percentage of truck traffic. There is a sand and quarry 

pit on the west side of I-10 off of Avra Valley Road. Pioneer Landscaping is located on the east side of I-10, but 

large landscaping vehicles, including material “hopper” trucks were observed on the west side of I-10. 

Bridges 

There are several bridges near the project. The Avra Valley Road Bridge over the Santa Cruz River was rebuilt 

in the 1990’s and has an “unrestricted” weight limit allowance, implying a maximum limit of 80,000 pound Gross 

Vehicle Weight, (or GVW). Other bridges over the Santa Cruz River on Trico Road, Trico-Marana Road and Silverbell 

Road have weight limit restrictions of 30,000 GVW or less. Typical commercial landfill trucks can have loads of 50,000 

GVW or more, thus limiting access on these roadways to vehicles that weigh less than commercial landfill vehicles. 

PC DOT staff reported that that bridge over the east branch of the Brawly Wash, located approximately 

one-half mile east of the project access road on Avra Valley Road, currently has an "unrestricted weight limit", 

which allows up to 40 tons GVW. However, there is noticeable spalling on the surface of the bridge which 

indicates underlying problems with the bridge structure. PC DOT will conduct formal evaluation of this bridge 

and other bridges in the vicinity in April or May. Following this evaluation, recommendations will be provided to 

the Pima County Department of Transportation Director. One potential recommendation would be to reduce 

the weight limit on the bridge due to the current lack of Bridge Maintenance funds available to rebuild the 

bridge. 

Pima County staff provided cost estimates to rebuild a bridge to unrestricted weight limit condition. The 

general cost per square foot of surface area for a new bridge is $150 to $200/square foot, not including the 

planning, design, approach pavement, watercourse work and other non-bridge structure costs. Using aerial 

photos to estimate bridge surface area (about 3500 square feet), a new bridge structure would cost between 

$500k to $700k, plus undetermined related costs mentioned above. 





Pavement Condition on Avra Valley Road 

The Traffic Division Manager for Town of Marana requested an evaluation of the pavement structural 

condition on Avra Valley Road and an assessment of the potential truck axle loading on the road. We evaluated 

the existing pavement condition of Avra Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10 and estimated the impact of the 

projected vehicle mix associated with the landfill and the background traffic. A stand alone document is 

included as an appendix to this report. 

The following conclusions were developed based on the information collected and analyzed for this 

document. 

1. The pavement condition of Avra Valley Rd. within the Town of Marana (Sanders Rd. to Airline Rd.) is 

considered by the Town staff to currently have a “failed” condition rating. 

2. The pavement condition of Avra Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10, excluding the segment within the Town 

of Marana, is considered by the County staff to currently have a “Poor” condition rating. 

3. The impact of the commercial vehicles generated by the proposed Marana Landfill on the pavement condition 

on Avra Valley Rd. will be significantly smaller than the impact of the cement plant and quarry facilities west of 

I-10. 

4. The magnitude of ESALs on Avra Valley Rd. west of Sanders Rd. due to the operation of the Marana Landfill on 

a typical weekday will increase between 35 and 49 percent depending on direction of travel. Although these 

percentages appear high, it must be recognized that the proposed landfill is only generating approximately 

100 truck trips in each direction per typical weekday. The hourly rate for these additional trips is only 13 

directional trucks trips per hour. 



7. Conclusions and Recommendations 



1. Access will be provided by an improved 80-foot private access easement. This easement will run 

north/south from Avra Valley Road to the southeast corner of the site. Final design of this roadway will be 

done at the time of development plan subject to the Town Engineer approval to accommodate both 

private vehicles and larger commercial vehicles. 

2. Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates are typically used to help forecast future trips. 

However, a regional landfill category is not included in Trip Generation, so we based the analysis on traffic 

data from two local landfills: Tangerine and Los Reales. 

3. This project will generate a moderate amount of traffic on existing roadways. The estimated site traffic 

volumes are 620 trips per weekday with 49 vph and 19 vph during the respective weekday morning and 

afternoon peak hours. Site traffic will be higher on Saturday with 900 site generated vehicles per day and 

137 site generated vehicles in the peak hour. 

4. Commercial vehicle trips will comprise approximate 32% of the site trips during the weekday and 5% 

during Saturday. 

5. Traffic volumes on the project roadways currently do not exceed their LOS D maximum service volume 

capacities. 

6. Existing study area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). 

7. Year 2013 projected volumes on the project roadways will not exceed the capacities of the roadways. 

8. Year 2013 study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or 

better) with the current roadway configurations and traffic control. 

9. Year 2030 projected volumes on the project roadways will not exceed the LOS D maximum service volume 

capacities of the roadways with the planned 2030 RTP roadway improvements in place, with one 

exception. Sanders Road, north of Avra Valley Road is projected to exceed its LOS E maximum service 

volume capacity by 2030. 

10. Traffic signal warrants may be met at Avra Valley Road/Trico Road and at Avra Valley Road/Sandario Road 

by 2013. These may be met even without the influence of the landfill project. 

11. The pavement condition on Avra Valley Road between Trico Road and I-10 is currently rated as “poor” 

(Town of Marana section between Sanders Road and Airline Drive) or “failing” by Pima County (remaining 

sections between Trico Road and I-10). 

12. A right turn lane should be provided on Avra Valley Road for westbound to northbound turning 

movements. The storage length should be 200 feet long which exceeds Pima County minimum standards, 

but considers the number of large turning trucks. 

13. Pavement marking and signing should be provided in advance of the landfill access intersection on all legs 

in accordance with current (2009) MUTCD guidelines. Advisory speed limit signs (45 mph) should be 

posted in advance of the access roadway intersection on Avra Valley Road. 



APPENDIX 

� TIS Checklist 

� Pavement Analysis Report 

� Signal Warrant Analysis for Avra Valley Road/Sandario Road 

� Synchro - Intersection Analysis Sheets 

� HCS – Two-Lane Highway Analysis Sheets 

� Traffic Data

CURTIS LUECK & ASSOCIATES 

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY 

CHECKLIST AND SUBMITTAL FORM 

Please complete this form PRIOR TO PREPARING A TRAFFIC REPORT. 

Submit the completed and approved form with the your study. Studies will not be submitted without this checklist 

attached. (Approval of this form does not constitute approval of the study.) 

Project Name: Marana Regional Landfill (PCZ-09057 Marana Regional Landfill- Specific Plan ; CLA 2009.22A) 

Project Location: North of Avra Valley Road, east of Trico Road and approximately 9 miles west of I-10. 

Applicant/Developer: The Planning Center/DKL Holdings 

Consultant: Curtis Lueck & Associates 

Address: 5460 W. Four Barrel Court Phone: 743-8748 

City/Town: Tucson, Arizona 

State: Arizona E-mail: cla-tucson@comcast.net 

Arizona Civil Engineering Registrant? Yes 

Was the consultant actively involved in the site circulation, roadway layout, and selection of access locations? We assisted in the 

development of the traffic section of the site analysis that was incorporated into the 10-29 Draft Specific Plan submittal 

Brief description of project: New private regional landfill on a 584 acre parcel. Access is to be provided via a new private road from the site to 

Avra Valley Road. A site plan is provided attached as Exhibit 1. 

Current and proposed zoning: The current zoning is RH (Pima County). Adjacent property to the east is Zone C (Large Zone Lot, Town of 

Marana). A specific plan has been prepared for this project. Annexation into Marana is proposed. 

Pre-submittal Meeting Held__________A review meeting to discuss Town of Marana’s comments on the Specific Plan was held on 

1/28/10.____________________________________ 

Summary of Meeting: 

Discussion of Town of Marana’s comments on draft Specific Plan, including those from the town’s Traffic Division Manager. Following 

this meeting, Marcos Esparza of CLA met with Mr. Prol to discuss the requirements for the TIS. These requirements are provided in this 

Checklist. 

Nature of Transportation Study 

Rezoning study? □ Yes □ No 

Development Plan? □ Yes □ No 

Block Plat? □ Yes □ No 

Specific Plan? X Yes □ No 

Proposed access locations: 

One access point on Avra Valley Road 

New Median Openings requested? 

Access via Non-Agency Roadways? 

Coordination with Multiple Agency(s)? 

□ Yes 

X - Yes (Pima 

County) 

X Yes (Pima 

County) 

□ No 

□ No 

□ No

Transportation Study Parameters 

Trip Generation Trip generation from the proposed project will be based on data currently being collected from the City of 

Tucson’s Los Reales landfill which is a similar use, except larger. It permits commercial waste management 

vehicles. Distribution is proposed as shown on Exhibit 2, attached. 

Horizon Year(s) Existing conditions (2010), Opening Year (2013), and 20-year horizon (2030) 

Passer-by Traffic & 

Internal Capture 

We will assume 0% passer-by and internal traffic. 

Alternate Modes There is no fixed route transit service in the vicinity of the site. We do not believe that there will be quantifiable 

Considerations 

site traffic via pedestrian or bicycle modes. 

Traffic Data and Land Use and Employee Data is being collected from the Los Reales landfill which currently includes 

Preliminary Trip commercial trucks. Current traffic counts are being collected along Avra Valley Road and at key intersections. 

Generation 

Los Reales landfill count data will be used to estimate trip generation from the proposed project. 

Analysis Elements and Methods 

Roadways The TIS will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Town of Marana TIS manual. In 

additiona, the Town requires that the TIS include analysis of Avra Valley Road from Trico Road to I-10 for 

current conditions, opening year, and the 20-year horizon. Roadway and intersection counts will be used to 

perform peak hour roadway analyses using the HCM 2-Lane Highway methodology. Opening year analysis will 

be based on and estimated five percent increase in traffic volumes between 2010 and 2013. Analysis of the 

20-year horizon will consider traffic forecasts from the PAG regional model and the CLA QRSII model. 

Intersections Our intersection analysis will be based on the methodologies in the current Highway Capacity Manual and will 

be for the three horizons stated above. Intersections include Avra Valley/Trico, Avra Valley/Sanders, Avra 

Valley/Sandario, and Avra Valley/Airline. Turn lane warrants and storage length analysis will be performed for 

these intersections and a traffic signal warrants study will be included for the Avra Valley/Sandario Road 

intersection. Additional planning level analysis will be conducted for the I-10/Avra Valley TI ramps and 

intersections. 

Special 

Assessment of pavement structure and bridge weight restrictions along Avra Valley Road will also be included. 

Considerations 

We will also gather information on current developments along Avra Valley, including the SW quadrant of the I- 

10/Avra Valley TI. 

We concur that the information above is correct and that the study will include the parameters 

and elements described above. 

Consultant Concurrence in Study Requirements 

Printed name: Marcos Esparza, P.E. 

Consultant signature: 

Title: Senior Associate Date: 2-2-10 

*Checklist Approved Agency authorized signature: 

Printed name: 

Title: Date: 

CLA USE ONLY: 

* As there may be instances when one or more study requirements are inadvertently not discussed during the pre-submittal 

meeting, additional study parameters or elements (other than those discussed in this Checklist) may be required following the 

first submittal of the study if the agency deems that they are critical to the study findings.

Exhibit 1-Site Plan (Land Use Concept – Source: The Planning Center)

Exhibit 2-Site Traffic Distribution 

Roadway Segment Distribution 

Avra Valley Road - West of Trico Road 15% 

Trico Road - north of Avra Valley Road 5% 

Trico Road - south of Avra Valley Road 0% 

Avra Valley Road - Trico Road to Landfill 

Access 

20% 

Avra Valley Road – Landfill Access to 

Sanders Road 

80% 

Sanders Road - north of Avra Valley Road 5% 

Avra Valley Road - Sanders Road to 

Sandario Road 

75% 

Sandario Road - south of Avra Valley Road 10% 

Avra Valley Road - Sandario Road to 

65% 

Airline Road 

Airline Road – south of Avra Valley Road 2% 

Avra Valley Road – East of Airline Road 63%

MARANA, ARIZONA 

PROPOSED MARANA LANDFILL 

AVRA VALLEY ROAD FROM TRICO ROAD TO I-10 

PAVEMENT CONDITION AND TRUCK LOADING INFORMATION 

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 

February 22, 2010 

Prepared by 

Curtis Lueck & Associates 

5460 West Four Barrel Court 

Tucson, Arizona 85743 

(520) 743-8748 

CLA Project No. 2009.22A 

Curtis Lueck, P.E., Ph.D., Principal 

Marcos Esparza, P.E. 

Kenneth Shackman, P.E., PTOE 

This document has been prepared using information provided by the Town of Marana and Pima County or information collected and 

analyzed by the consultant. This information has been supplemented with other readily available information. It is intended for use 

in guiding the project to a successful conclusion. It is not intended for use as a design document, nor does it represent a standard or 

specification. The document is copyrighted by the Town of Marana, Arizona and Curtis Lueck & Associates (CLA), 5460 West Four 

Barrel Court, Tucson, AZ 85743, (Telephone: 520-743-8748). All rights are reserved pursuant to United States copyright law. The 

document may not be reproduced digitally or mechanically, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of CLA, except as 

noted in the following: (1) Limited quotations may be made, for technical purposes only, as long as proper citation to the authors is 

provided; and (2) Governmental agencies to which this report is submitted for review may make limited copies for internal use and 

to fulfill public requests under the Freedom of Information Act.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 

EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION .......................................................................... 1 

POTENTIAL TRUCK AXLE LOADING.......................................................................... 3 

CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 5 

EXHIBIT 1: LOCATION MAP 

LIST OF EXHIBITS 

EXHIBIT 2: PAVEMENT TREATMENTS RELATED TO OVERALL CONDITION INDEX 

EXHIBIT 3: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION METHOD 

FOR CALCULATING EQUIVALENT SINGLE AXLE LOADS 

EXHIBIT 4: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION VEHICLE CLASSIFICATIONS 

EXHIBIT 5: CALCULATED EQUIVALENT SINGLE AXLE LOADS

Introduction 

The Town of Marana is considering annexing the site of a proposed privately-owned landfill that 

will functionally replace a nearby County landfill. The site being considered for the landfill is 

located approximately two miles north of W. Avra Valley Rd. and approximately one mile east of 

N. Trico Rd. The proposed landfill will increase both traffic volumes and pavement loading on 

Avra Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10, a distance of approximately 10 miles. Refer to 

Exhibit 1. 

The Curtis Lueck & Associates (CLA) staff is evaluating the traffic impact of the proposed landfill. 

The Town of Marana staff has requested that the traffic analysis include an evaluation of the 

additional truck traffic to the site. The purpose of this document is to twofold: 

1. To discuss the existing pavement condition of Avra Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I- 

10; and 

2. To provide information about potential truck axle loading (which will impact the life of 

the roadway pavement structure). 

Existing Pavement Condition 

Avra Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10 is maintained by two units of government, the Town 

of Marana and Pima County. The portion of the roadway maintained by Marana is between 

Sanders Rd. and Airline Rd., a distance of approximately four miles. The pavement condition of 

Avra Valley Rd. is regularly monitored by both the Town and the County. 

This roadway segment has a Rural Major Collector roadway functional classification. This is a 

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) designation. 

Town of Marana Roadway Segments 

The Town of Marana staff uses a 10 percent sampling procedure developed by the U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers to monitor the pavement condition of its roadways. Each roadway, e.g., Avra 

Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10, is divided into logical homogeneous segments based on 

the overall condition. Several representative 100 ft. lengths of roadway within each logical 

homogeneous segment are inspected and evaluated for cracking (longitudinal and transverse), 

edge raveling, weathering, potholes, and other signs of deterioration. These 100 ft. lengths 

create the 10 percent sample. The inspection/evaluation of the pavement is for the entire 

pavement width. The 100 ft. length is not inspected or evaluated by direction of travel. Based on 

the information collected and the evaluations performed for the 100 ft. lengths, an Index value 

is calculated for each length. The Index values for the 100 ft. lengths within each segment are 

averaged and then adjusted based on a visual inspection of the entire segment to determine the 

Overall Condition Index (OCI) value. The Index values for the 100 ft. lengths and the OCI value 

for each logical homogeneous segment vary between 0 and 100. The pavement condition 

ratings for various OCI values are as follows. 


Tucson, Arizona

OCI Value Range Pavement Condition Rating 

0 - 50 Failed 

51 – 85 Satisfactory 

Greater than 85 Excellent 

In October 2009, four sample segments were inspected and evaluated on Avra Valley Rd. 

between Sanders Rd, and Airline Rd. Three of the roadway segment pavements were 

constructed using asphalt concrete (AC) and one segment pavement was constructed using 

Portland cement concrete (PCC). The results of the October 2009 inspection/evaluation are as 

follows. Based on the three segments where the pavement type is asphalt concrete, the 

pavement of Avra Valley Rd. is currently in need of some type of improvement. 

Segment ID 100 ft. Length Pavement Type OCI Value Condition Rating 

Number ID Number 

424-009 AC 39.79 Failed 

424-017 AC 47.37 Failed 

424-025 AC 45.37 Failed 

424 AC 43.80 Failed 

425-010 AC 56.37 Satisfactory 



425-037 AC 47.84 Failed 

425-046 AC 43.37 Failed 

425-055 AC 36.50 Failed 

425-064 AC 35.79 Failed 

425-073 AC 37.19 Failed 

425-082 AC 42.84 Failed 


426-001 PCC 88.00 Excellent 

426 PCC 86.36 Excellent 

427-010 AC 33.97 Failed 

427-019 AC 48.81 Failed 

427-028 AC 49.71 Failed 

427-037 AC 44.17 Failed 

427-046 AC 45.84 Failed 

427-055 AC 47.37 Failed 

427-064 AC 45.36 Failed 


427-082 AC 42.43 Failed 

427-091 AC 22.21 Failed 

427-100 AC 36.79 Failed 




Tucson, Arizona

Exhibit 2 is a slide from a December 20, 2005 Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) 

PowerPoint presentation to the Mayor and Council (in Study Session) on street maintenance 

sustainability. The Pima County Department of Transportation (PCDOT) used a similar 

illustration in a December 31, 2007 memorandum to the County Administrator. The exhibit 

indicates that the vast majority of the four mile segment within the Town of Marana is in need 

of an overlay or another pavement treatment and that some portions of the roadway need to 

be reconstructed. 

Unincorporated Pima County Roadway Segments 

The Pima County Department of Transportation (PCDOT) staff does not use the same procedure 

as the Town of Marana staff for determining an Overall Condition Index (OCI). The PCDOT OCI 

values are based entirely on a visual inspection of the each homogeneous roadway segment. 

The pavement condition ratings for various OCI values are as follows. 

OCI Value Range Pavement Condition Rating 

0 - 40 Failed 

41 - 55 Poor 

56 – 70 Fair 

71 - 85 Good 

Greater than 85 Excellent 

In the summer of 2007, various roadway segments on Avra Valley Rd. were inspected. The 

results of the 2007 inspections are as follows. 

Segment Begins Segment Ends Pavement Type OCI Value Condition Rating 

Anway Rd. Sanders Rd. AC 50 Poor 

Airline Rd. Quarry Rd. AC 70 Fair 

Quarry Rd. Casa Grande Hwy. AC 50 Poor 

Based on these three segments, the pavement of Avra Valley Rd. in unincorporated Pima County 

between Trico Rd. and I-10 is also in need of some type of improvement. Exhibit 2 indicates that 

the vast majority of the roadway maintained by PCDOT between Trico Rd. and I-10 is in need of 

an overlay or another pavement treatment. 

Potential Truck Axle Loading 

Highway designers have long known that the life of a roadway pavement is dependent on the 

environment and the traffic conditions that it is subjected to. One of the more critical factors is 

the vehicle axle loading. Automobiles and pick-up trucks have minimal impact on the pavement. 

However, larger vehicles, e.g., buses and large trucks, impose sufficient stress to damage the 

pavement, even though they represent only a minor portion of the traffic stream. This is 

because damage is cumulative over the life of the pavement. Depending on the roadway 

pavement structural section, i.e., the layers of concrete or asphalt concrete above the aggregate 

base course and the subgrade, different pavement structures will have different service lives. 


Tucson, Arizona

In order to determine the service life of a pavement structure, technical procedures have been 

developed. One of the most broadly used procedures involves calculating “equivalent single axle 

loads” (ESALs). This procedure converts wheel loads of various magnitudes and repetitions to a 

known “standard” or “equivalent” load. In the United States, this “standard” load is an 18,000 

pound single axle load, sometimes referred to as 18-kip ESALs. 

The CLA staff used a procedure developed by the Washington State Department of 

Transportation (WSDOT) for calculating the ESALs for Avra Valley Rd. for 2010. Refer to Exhibits 

3 and 4. This procedure or similar ones are very widely accepted and are being used by many of 

the state and local transportation departments throughout the United States. 

For this study, vehicle classification traffic counts were performed at two locations on Avra 

Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10. One location was west of Sanders Rd. and the other 

location was east of Cement Plant Rd./Quarry Rd. The counts were performed for 24 hours on 

Tuesday, February 2, 2010. Each direction of travel was counted separately. Using the WSDOT 

methodology, annual ESALs were calculated. Refer to Exhibit 5 for the calculated annual ESALs 

at the two locations on Avra Valley Rd. It should be noted that the number of large trucks 

observed in the vicinity of Cement Plant Rd./Quarry Rd. is significantly greater than the number 

of large trucks in the vicinity of Sanders Rd. This is due to the commercial cement and quarry 

activities at the eastern counting location. 

In early February 2008, vehicle classifications counts similar to those taken on Avra Valley Rd. 

were taken on a Thursday, Friday, and Saturday at the primary access point to the Los Reales 

Landfill. Annual ESALs were calculated for the three days of vehicle classification information. 

The ESALs and other traffic information related to the Los Reales Landfill primary access point 

are included in Exhibit 5. The Los Reales Landfill information is provided to show the truck 

volumes and the associated annual ESALs. It should be noted that the Los Reales Landfill is a 

major landfill operated by the City of Tucson. The City, which has an approximate population of 

550,000, has its own department responsible for trash collection. It is assumed that the 

proposed landfill in Marana will generate far fewer truck trips and the associated ESALs as the 

Los Reales facility because Marana has a less populous service area. 

Based on projections made by the landfill owner, it is estimated that approximately 100 

commercial vehicles will be entering and exiting the proposed Marana Landfill on a typical 

weekday (Monday through Friday). These commercial vehicles will be composed of trucks with 

gross vehicle weights of 50,000 and 80,000 pounds per vehicle. This is similar to the conditions 

that existed at the Los Reales Landfill on a Saturday in February 2008. Refer to Exhibit 5. It is 

estimated that the number of commercial vehicles accessing the Marana Landfill on a typical 

Saturday may be approximately 20 percent of the typical weekday volume of commercial 

vehicles. 

Using the information contained in Exhibit 5, an estimate was made of the forecasted number of 

ESALs on Avra Valley Rd. west of Sanders Rd. on a typical weekday after the Marana Landfill 

becomes operational. The Saturday Los Reales Landfill information from 2008 was added to the 

Avra Valley Rd. information from 2010. The forecasted weekday ESALs are as follows. 


Tucson, Arizona

Location of Vehicle Direction of Truck Daily Volume Estimated 

Classification Count Travel (Classes 4 thru 13) Annual ESALs 

West of Sanders Rd. Westbound 347 71,905 

Eastbound 249 54,312 

The estimated annual ESALs for the Avra Valley Rd. segment west of Sanders Rd. are significantly 

lower than those calculated for Avra Valley Rd. east of Cement Plant Rd./Quarry Rd. 

Conclusions 

The following conclusions were developed based on the information collected and analyzed for 

this document. 

1. The pavement condition of Avra Valley Rd. within the Town of Marana (Sanders Rd. to 

Airline Rd.) is considered by the Town staff to currently have a “failed” condition rating. 

2. The pavement condition of Avra Valley Rd. between Trico Rd. and I-10, excluding the 

segment within the Town of Marana, is considered by the County staff to currently have 

a “Poor” condition rating. 

3. The impact of the commercial vehicles generated by the proposed Marana Landfill on 

the pavement condition on Avra Valley Rd. will be significantly smaller than the impact 

of the cement plant and quarry facilities west of I-10. 

4. The magnitude of ESALs on Avra Valley Rd. west of Sanders Rd. due to the operation of 

the Marana Landfill on a typical weekday will increase between 35 and 49 percent 

depending on direction of travel. Although these percentages appear high, it must be 

recognized that the proposed landfill is only generating approximately 100 truck trips in 

each direction per typical weekday. The hourly rate for these additional trips is only 13 

directional trucks trips per hour. 


Tucson, Arizona

EXHIBITS

W AVRA VALLEY RD 

N TRICO RD 

N TRICO RD 

N TRICO RD 

N TRICO RD 

W SILVERBELL RD 


W SILVERBELL RD 


Exhibit 1 

Location Map 

(From Pima County MapGuide) 

N SANDERS RD 

N SANDERS RD 

N TANGERINE FARMS RD 


N SANDARIO RD 

N SANDARIO RD 

N LON ADAMS RD 

W TWIN PEAKS RD 

N SANDARIO RD 

W I10 FRONTAGE RD 

N TANGERINE FARMS RD 


W I10 FRONTAGE RD 

W TANGERINE RD 


W TWIN PEAKS RD 

N CASA GRANDE HY 

N SILVERBELL RD 

W TANGERINE RD 

N CASA GRANDE HY 

N SILVERBELL RD

Exhibit 2 

Pavement Treatments Related to 

Overall Condition Index (OCI) 

Street Maintenance Sustainability 

Source: December 20, 2005 Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) PowerPoint 

presentation to the Mayor and Council (in Study Session) on street maintenance 

sustainability.

Exhibit 3 

Washington State Department of Transportation 

Method for Calculating Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) 

WSDOT Vehicle Counting and ESAL Assumptions 

The WSDOT Pavement Management System (PMS) uses a simplified version of the 

FHWA vehicle classification system. Like many other states WSDOT uses three 

categories and assumes the following ESAL values: 

WSDOT Category 

FHWA Functional 

Classifications 

WSDOT 

Assumed ESALs 

per Truck 

Single Units 4, 5, 6, 7 0.40 

Double Units 8, 9, 10 1.00 

Trains 11, 12, 13 1.75 

The WSDOT PMS equation for annual ESALs on any given roadway is: 

Annual ESALs = 365[0.40(single units) + 1.00(double units) + 1.75(trains)] 

This equation implies that passenger automobile contributions to total ESAL counts 

are negligible. 

Source: Washington State Department of Transportation 

http://training.ce.washington.edu/wsdot/Modules/04_design_parameters/04-3_body.htm#esal

Exhibit 4 

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 

Vehicle Classifications (from 2001) 1 

Class Type Description 

1 Motorcycles 

2 Passenger Cars 

3 

Other Two-Axle, 

Four-Tire Single 

Unit Vehicles 

4 Buses 

5 

6 

7 

8 

Two-Axle, Six- 

Tire, Single Unit 

Trucks 

Three-Axle 

Single Unit 

Trucks 

Four or More 

Axle Single Unit 

Trucks 

Four or Less 

Axle Single 

Trailer Trucks 

All two- or three-wheeled motorized vehicles. Typical 

vehicles in this category have saddle type seats and are 

steered by handle bars rather than wheels. This category 

includes motorcycles, motor scooters, mopeds, motorpowered 

bicycles, and three-wheel motorcycles. This 

vehicle type may be reported at the option of the State. 

All sedans, coupes, and station wagons manufactured 

primarily for the purpose of carrying passengers and 

including those passenger cars pulling recreational or 

other light trailers. 

All two-axle, four tire, vehicles, other than passenger 

cars. Included in this classification are pickups, panels, 

vans, and other vehicles such as campers, motor homes, 

ambulances, hearses, and carryalls. Other two-axle, 

four-tire single unit vehicles pulling recreational or other 

light trailers are included in this classification. 

All vehicles manufactured as traditional passengercarrying 

buses with two axles and six tires or three or 

more axles. This category includes only traditional buses 

(including school buses) functioning as passengercarrying 

vehicles. All two-axle, four-tire single unit 

vehicles. Modified buses should be considered to be a 

truck and be appropriately classified. 

All vehicles on a single frame including trucks, camping 

and recreational vehicles, motor homes, etc., having two 

axles and dual rear wheels. 

All vehicles on a single frame including trucks, camping 

and recreational vehicles, motor homes, etc., having 

three axles. 

Typical 

ESALs per 

Vehicle 2 

Negligible 

Negligible 

Negligible 

0.57 

0.26 

0.42 

All trucks on a single frame with four or more axles. 0.42 

All vehicles with four or less axles consisting of two 

units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck power 

unit. 

0.30

Exhibit 4 (continued) 

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 

Vehicle Classifications (from 2001) 1 

Class Type Description 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

Five-Axle 

Single Trailer 

Trucks 

Six or More 

Axle Single 


Five or Less 

Axle Multi- 


Six-Axle Multi- 


Seven or More 

Axle Multi- 


All five-axle vehicles consisting of two units, one of 

which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 

All vehicles with six or more axles consisting of two 

units, one of which is a tractor or straight truck 

power unit. 

All vehicles with five or less axles consisting of three 

or more units, one of which is a tractor or straight 

truck power unit. 

All six-axle vehicles consisting of three or more units, 

one of which is a tractor or straight truck power unit. 

All vehicles with seven or more axles consisting of 

three or more units, one of which is a tractor or 

straight truck power unit. 

Note 1: In reporting information on trucks the following criteria should used: 

Typical 

ESALs per 

Vehicle 2 

1.20 

0.93 

0.82 

1.06 

1.39 

1. Truck tractor units without a trailer will be considered single unit trucks. 

2. A truck tractor unit pulling other such units in a "saddle mount" 

configuration will be considered as one single unit truck and will be 

defined only by the axles on the pulling unit. 

3. Vehicles shall be defined by the number of axles in contact with the 

roadway. Therefore, "floating" axles are counted only when in the down 

position. 

4. The term "trailer" includes both semi- and full trailers. 

Note 2: Based on the overall ESAL per vehicle class for 10 weigh-in-motion (WIM) 

sites averaged over a one-year period. The averaging method treats all pavements 

the same (i.e., no separate LEFs for flexible and rigid pavements) and all axles as 

singles. This approach produces LEFs similar to the 1993 AASHTO Guide's LEFs for 

single axles assuming SN = 5 and pt = 2.5. 

Source: Washington State Department of Transportation 

http://training.ce.washington.edu/wsdot/Modules/04_design_parameters/04-3_body.htm#esal

Exhibit 5 

Calculated Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) 

Avra Valley Road Information 

Avra Valley Road from Trico Road to I-10 (Tuesday/02-02-10) 

Location of Vehicle Direction of Total Daily Truck Daily Volume Calculated 

Classification Count Travel Volume (Classes 4 thru 13) Annual ESALs 

West of Sanders Rd. Westbound 2,150 233 53,071 

Eastbound 2,453 138 36,573 

East of Cement 

Plant Rd./Quarry Rd. 

Westbound 3,656 712 210,331 

Eastbound 4,401 810 229,950 

Los Reales Landfill Information 

Los Reales Landfill (Thursday/02-07-08) 



Access to landfill Westbound 610 307 49,257 

Eastbound 606 307 49,257 

Los Reales Landfill (Friday/02-08-08) 




Eastbound 716 373 58,455 

Los Reales Landfill (Saturday/02-09-08) 




Eastbound 678 111 17,739

MUTCD SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS – AVRA VALLEY/SANDARIO 

The desirability of traffic signals at any given intersection is based on three perceptions: (1) traffic signal 

warrants defined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), (2) professional judgment on the part 

of the agency responsible for the intersection, and (3) public and political interest in the installation of a signal. This 

portion of the study deals solely with the first of these three perspectives. 

The MUTCD sets forth basic principles governing the selection, design, and usage of traffic control devices, 

including traffic signs, pavement markings, and traffic signals. Traffic control devices should meet five basic 

requirements to be effective. 

They should: 

1. Fulfill a need, 

2. Command attention, 

3. Convey a clear simple meaning, 

4. Command respect of road users, and 

5. Give adequate time for proper motorist response. 

Traffic control devices need to be used in a uniform manner without regard for jurisdiction or roadway 

type. The concept of uniformity is crucial because motorists have learned expectancies about the relationship 

between roadway surroundings, traffic conditions, and traffic control devices. For instance, motorists expect that 

posted speed limits allow adequate sight distances to accommodate emergency stops, and that appropriate 

devices will regulate the flow of traffic from side streets on to a major street. When these expectations are 

violated, unsafe conditions and driving practices may result. 

The MUTCD defines eight warrants for traffic signal installation, any one of which could identify the need 

for a signal. The mere satisfaction of a warrant or warrants is not in itself justification for a signal. The signal should 

only be installed if it will improve the overall safety and operation of the intersection. When a signal is warranted, 

it is presumed that the signal and all related traffic control devices will be installed according to the standards set 

forth in the MUTCD. The MUTCD provides the following guidance regarding the installation of traffic signals: 

1. A traffic control signal should not be installed unless one or more of the factors 

described in this section are met. 

2. A traffic control signal should not be installed unless an engineering study indicates 

that installing a traffic control signal will improve the overall safety and/or operation 

of the intersection. 

3. A traffic control signal should not be installed if it will seriously disrupt progressive 

traffic flow. 

Traffic volumes along Avra Valley road were recorded on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 between Sanders 

Road and the Santa Cruz River. Turn movement volumes were recorded at Sandario Road on the same date. 

Hourly volumes on the northbound approach of Sandario Road were estimated based on the distribution and k 

factors on Avra Valley Road and the recorded peak hour turn volumes on Sandario Road. The following table 

provides the hourly volumes used in this warrants analysis. 


Tucson, Arizona

Hourly Volumes 

Avra Valley Road / Sandario Road 

MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis 

7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 

Major (both ways) 594 746 629 546 480 546 633 563 

Highest Minor approach 232 228 119 181 149 157 142 197 

Lowest Minor approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Total Entering Vehicles 826 974 748 727 629 703 775 760 

Pedestrian Volume unk unk unk unk unk unk unk unk 

SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS 

The following table summarizes the results of the analysis and shows that three of the warrants are 

currently met. Stopped-delay based warrants were not evaluated due to the extensive data collection 

requirement and high likelihood that the warrant would not be met. 

MUTCD WARRANTS 

Summary of Warrants Analysis 

Description Meets Requirements 

Warrant 1 Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume YES 

Warrant 2 Four-Hour Vehicular Volume YES 

Warrant 3 Peak Hour YES 

Warrant 4 Pedestrian Volume Not Analyzed 

Warrant 5 School Crossing Does not apply 

Warrant 6 Coordinated Signal System Does not apply 

Warrant 7 Crash Experience NO 

Warrant 8 Roadway Network Does not apply 

Following is the analysis of the eight warrants based on the new MUTCD. 

Warrant 1—Eight Hour Vehicular Volume - The Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A, is intended for 

application where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control 

signal. The Interruption of Continuous traffic, Condition B, is intended for application where the traffic volume on a 

major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or 

crossing the major street. Either condition must be met to satisfy this warrant. 

ANALYSIS: 

The required street volumes are contained in Table 4C-1 of Section 4C.02 (MUTCD 2000). The 70% columns of 

Table 4C-1 has been used in place of the 100% columns because the 85 th percentile speed on the major street 

(Avra Valley Road) exceeds 40 mph. 

Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume 

7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 3:00 4:00 6:00 

AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM 

Req’d Major Street Volume 350 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 

Req’d Minor Street Volume 105 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 

OR 


Tucson, Arizona

Condition B - Interruption of Continuous traffic 



7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 3:00 4:00 6:00 

AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM 

Required Major Street Volume 525 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 

Required Minor Street Volume 53 YES YES YES YES NO YES YES YES 

This Warrant is met for the current condition. 

Warrant 2 - Four-Hour Vehicular Volume - The Four-Hour Vehicular Volume signal warrant conditions are 

intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic 

control signal. 

The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that for each of any 4 

hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both 

approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher volume minor-street approach (one direction 

only) all fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 for the existing combination of approach lanes. On the minor 

street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 4 hours. 

ANALYSIS: 

START TIME 7:00 8:00 4:00 6:00 

AM AM PM PM 

Major Street Volume 594 746 633 563 

Minor Approach 232 228 142 197 

Must fall above the top curve in figure 4C-2 YES YES YES YES 

MINOR STREET - 

HIGH VOLUME APPROACH 

Figure 4C-2 Warrant 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) 

Community Less than 10,000 Population or above 40 mph on Major Street 

400 

300 

200 

100 

200 

2 or ore la 

2 or m ne & 

m ne & 2 or more l anes 

ore l la 

1 la ne & 1 lane 

a 1 ne 

300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 

MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH 

The volumes meet or exceed the requirements of the chart 

4 

1 

3 

Warrant 3 - Peak Hour - The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic 

conditions are such that for a minimum of 1 hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay 

when entering or crossing the major street. 

2 



80 

60



This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases. Such cases include, but are not limited to, office 

complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or 

discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time. 

This warrant requires that either of the following conditions be met: 

ANALYSIS: 

Condition A: If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four 

consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day: 

1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor-street 

approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 

vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach; or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach, 

and 

2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or 

exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per 

hour for two moving lanes, and 

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles 

per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for 

intersections with four or more approaches. 

Condition B: The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of 

both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor street 

approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average 

day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes. 

Condition A – This condition was not analyzed because delay was not recorded. 

OR 

Condition B: 

START TIME 7:00 8:00 4:00 6:00 

AM AM PM PM 

Major Street Volume 594 746 633 563 

Minor Approach 232 228 142 197 

Must fall above the top curve in figure 4C-4 YES YES YES YES 


Tucson, Arizona

MINOR STREET - 

HIGH VOLUME APPROACH 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

Figure 4C-4 Warrant 3- Peak Hour (70% Factor) 

Community Less than 10,000 Population or above 40 mph on Major Street 

300 

2 or more lane & 1 lane 

1 lane & 1 l ane 

2 or ore la 

m ne or m o 

& 2 re lanes 

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 

MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH 

The volumes meet or exceed the requirements of the chart 

4 

1 

3 

2 



Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume - The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant is intended for application where 

the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major 

street. 

The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or mid-block crossing shall be considered if an 

engineering study finds that both of the following criteria ire met: 

Condition A: The pedestrian volume crossing the major street at an intersection or mid-block 

location during an average day is 100 or more for each of any 4 hours or 190 or more during any 1 

hour, and 

Condition B: There are fewer than 60 gaps per hour in the traffic stream of adequate length to 

allow pedestrians to cross during the same period when the pedestrian volume criterion is 

satisfied. Where there is a divided street having a median of sufficient width for pedestrians to 

wait, the requirement applies separately to each direction of vehicular traffic. 

The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest 

traffic control signal along the major street is less than 90 m (300 ft), unless the proposed traffic control signal will 

not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. In this case, the distance to the nearest traffic control signal is 

greater than 300 feet. 

If a traffic control signal is justified by both this signal warrant and a traffic engineering study, the traffic 

control signal shall be equipped with pedestrian signal heads conforming to requirements set forth in Chapter 4E 

of the MUTCD. 

This Warrant was not analyzed; Pedestrian is insignificant in this area. 

Warrant 5 - School Crossing - The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where school 

children crossing the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. 

This Warrant was not analyzed; there are no school crossings existing or planned at this location 



100 

75



Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System - Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes 

necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not otherwise be needed in order to 

maintain proper platooning of vehicles. 

This Warrant was not analyzed; this warrant does not apply to this location 

Warrant 7 -Crash Experience - The Crash Experience signal warrant conditions are intended for application 

where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal. 

The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the 

following criteria are met: 

Condition A: Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has 

failed to reduce the crash frequency, and 

Condition B: Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a control signal, 

have occurred within a 12-month period, each resulting in personal injury or property damage 

apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash, and 

Condition C: For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph in both of the 

80% columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 (see Warrant 1), or the vph in both of the 80% columns 

of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major street and on the higher-volume minor-street 

approach respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is than 80 percent 

of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minorstreet 

volumes shall be for the 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be 

required on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. 

ANALYSIS: The following tables summarize the intersection crashes recorded at this location between 

1/01/2006 and 12/31/2008 which were provided by ADOT Risk Management. There are four crashes during this 

period, but there may have been more recorded during 2009 which would meet the requirement of this warrant. 

This Warrant is not met based on available information 

Warrant 8- Roadway Network - Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to 

encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network. The need for a traffic control 

signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two or more major routes 

meets one or both of the following criteria: 

Condition A: The intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of 

at least 1,000 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has 5-year 

projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 

2, and 3 during an average weekday, or 

Condition B: The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at 

least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each of any 5 hours of a non-normal business day (Saturday or 

Sunday). 

A major route as used in this signal warrant shall have one or more of the following characteristics: 

� It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for 

through traffic flow, or 

� It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city, or 


Tucson, Arizona



� It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an urban 

area traffic and transportation study. 

This warrant does not apply to this intersection at this time. 


Tucson, Arizona

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 

1: Avra Valley Road & Trico Road 

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR 

Lane Configurations 

Sign Control Free Free Stop 

Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 80 0 5 265 0 10 

Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 

Hourly flow rate (vph) 87 0 5 288 0 11 

Pedestrians 

Lane Width (ft) 

Walking Speed (ft/s) 

Percent Blockage 

Right turn flare (veh) 

Median type None 

Median storage veh) 

Upstream signal (ft) 

pX, platoon unblocked 

vC, conflicting volume 87 386 87 

vC1, stage 1 conf vol 


vCu, unblocked vol 87 386 87 

tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 

tC, 2 stage (s) 

tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 100 99 

cM capacity (veh/h) 1509 615 972 

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 

Volume Total 87 293 11 

Volume Left 0 5 0 

Volume Right 0 0 11 

cSH 1700 1509 972 

Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.01 

Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 

Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 8.7 

Lane LOS A A 

Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 8.7 

Approach LOS A 

Intersection Summary 

Average Delay 0.4 

Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.0% ICU Level of Service A 

Analysis Period (min) 15 

2/21/2010 

2013 PM Peak 2/19/2010 Baseline Synchro 6 Report 

Curtis Lueck & Associates Page 1



Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR 



Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 5 80 265 120 45 25 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 91 96 


Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1 




cSH 1141 1700 603 




Lane LOS A B 


Approach LOS B 





2/21/2010 




3: Avra Valley Road & Access 




Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 0 130 385 5 10 0 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 98 100 






cSH 1135 1700 488 




Lane LOS B 







2/21/2010 




4: Avra Valley Road & Sanders Road 




Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 25 110 230 140 125 0 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 98 74 100 






cSH 1156 1700 518 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 




5: Avra Valley Road & Sandario Road 




Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 240 15 5 305 20 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 95 99 


Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 

Volume Total 277 5 332 27 

Volume Left 0 5 0 22 

Volume Right 16 0 0 5 

cSH 1700 1286 1700 495 

Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.00 0.20 0.05 

Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 4 

Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.8 0.0 12.7 

Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 




6: Avra Valley Road & Airline Road 




Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 485 15 5 210 20 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 99 94 99 






cSH 1700 1025 1700 391 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 78 0 3 253 0 3 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 100 100 






cSH 1700 1512 974 




Lane LOS A A 







2/21/2010 

current pM Peak 2/19/2010 Baseline Synchro 6 Report 







Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 13 78 253 112 45 22 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1162 1700 601 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 0 125 368 0 0 0 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 100 100 






cSH 1159 1700 1700 




Lane LOS A 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 16 98 213 133 121 26 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1182 1700 587 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 123 97 59 262 83 55 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 




Volume Total 239 64 285 150 



cSH 1700 1328 1700 547 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 222 13 7 287 20 4 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1700 1310 1700 510 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 250 0 5 90 0 10 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 100 99 






cSH 1700 1292 767 




Lane LOS A A 







2/21/2010 

2013 AM Peak 2/19/2010 Baseline Synchro 6 Report 







Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 20 250 90 35 125 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1448 1700 581 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 5 370 120 20 20 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 96 99 






cSH 1429 1700 541 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 25 285 90 155 130 25 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1298 1700 525 




Lane LOS A C 


Approach LOS C 





2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 352 100 50 135 110 130 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 




Volume Total 491 54 147 261 



cSH 1700 1072 1700 487 




Lane LOS A C 


Approach LOS C 





2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 485 15 5 210 20 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1700 1025 1700 391 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 80 0 5 265 0 10 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 100 99 






cSH 1700 1509 972 




Lane LOS A A 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 5 80 265 120 45 25 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 91 96 






cSH 1141 1700 603 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 0 130 385 5 10 0 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 98 100 






cSH 1135 1700 488 




Lane LOS B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 25 110 230 140 125 25 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1156 1700 543 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 240 15 5 305 20 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 

p0 queue free % 100 95 99 






cSH 1700 1286 1700 495 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 








Grade 0% 0% 0% 

Volume (veh/h) 485 15 5 210 20 5 



Pedestrians 













tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 


tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 







cSH 1700 1025 1700 391 




Lane LOS A B 







2/21/2010 



Two-Way 

TWO-WAY TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET 

General Information Site Information 

Analyst MUE 

Agency or Company CLA 

Date Performed 2/20/2010 

Analysis Time Period Highest Peak Hour 

Project Description: Marana Regional Landfill 

Input Data 

Average Travel Speed 

Highway Avra Valley Road 

From/To Trico to Sanders Road 

Jurisdiction Marana/Pima County 

Analysis Year 2010 

gfedcb gfedc 

Grade adjustment factor, f G (Exhibit 20-7) 1.00 

Passenger-car equivalents for trucks, E T (Exhibit 20-9) 1.2 

Passenger-car equivalents for RVs, E R (Exhibit 20-9) 1.0 

Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, f HV =1/ (1+ P T (E T -1)+P R (E R -1) ) 0.984 

Two-way flow rate 1 , v p (pc/h)=V/ (PHF * f G * f HV ) 589 

v p * highest directional split proportion 2 (pc/h) 442 

Class I highway Class II highway 

Terrain gfedcb Level gfedc Rolling 

Two-way hourly volume 493 veh/h 

Directional split 75 / 25 

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 

No-passing zone 30 

% Trucks and Buses , PT 8 % 

% Recreational vehicles, PR 0% 

Access points/ mi 10 

Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free-Flow Speed 

Field Measured speed, SFM mi/h 

Observed volume, Vf veh/h 

Free-flow speed, FFS FFS=SFM +0.00776(Vf / fHV ) mi/h 

Base free-flow speed, BFFS FM 

Adj. for lane width and shoulder width3 , fLS (Exhibit 

20-5) 

60.0 mi/h 

0.0 mi/h 

Adj. for access points, fA (Exhibit 20-6) 2.5 mi/h 

Free-flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLS-fA ) 57.5 mi/h 

Adj. for no-passing zones, f np ( mi/h) (Exhibit 20-11) 2.0 

Average travel speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATS=FFS-0.00776v p -f np 

Percent Time-Spent-Following 

Grade Adjustment factor, f G (Exhibit 20-8) 1.00 






Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF(%)=100(1-e -0.000879v p) 40.2 

Adj. for directional distribution and no-passing zone, f d/hp (%)(Exh. 20-12) 15.0 

Percent time-spent-following, PTSF(%)=BPTSF+f d/np 

Level of Service and Other Performance Measures 

Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 20-3 for Class I or 20-4 for Class II) C 

Volume to capacity ratio, v/c=V p / 3,200 0.18 

Peak 15-min veh-miles of travel, VMT 15 (veh- mi)= 0.25L t (V/PHF) 580 

file://C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\Local Settings\Temp\s2k256.tmp 

50.9 

55.2 

Page 1 of 2 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 

Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT 60 (veh- mi)=V*L t 1972 

Peak 15-min total travel time, TT 15 (veh-h)= VMT 15 /ATS 11.4 

Notes 

Page 2 of 2 

1. If Vp >= 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 

2. If highest directional split Vp>= 1,700 pc/h, terminated anlysis-the LOS is F. 

Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ TM Version 5.21 Generated: 2/22/2010 7:04 AM 


2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Analyst MUE 





Input Data 



From/To Sandario to Sanders Road 



gfedcb gfedc 






















20-5) 

60.0 mi/h 

0.0 mi/h 



















file://C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\Local Settings\Temp\s2k25B.tmp 

46.5 

62.8 

Page 1 of 2 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Notes 

Page 2 of 2 





2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Analyst MUE 





Input Data 



From/To Sandario to Airline Road 



gfedcb gfedc 






















20-5) 

60.0 mi/h 

0.0 mi/h 



















file://C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\Local Settings\Temp\s2k25F.tmp 

51.8 

57.4 

Page 1 of 2 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Notes 

Page 2 of 2 




file://C:\Documents and Settings\Dad\Local Settings\Temp\s2k25F.tmp 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Analyst MUE 





Input Data 



From/To Trico to Sanders Road 



gfedcb gfedc 






















20-5) 

60.0 mi/h 

0.0 mi/h 




















50.6 

56.5 

Page 1 of 2 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Notes 

Page 2 of 2 





2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Analyst MUE 





Input Data 



From/To Sandario to Sanders Road 



gfedcb gfedc 






















20-5) 

60.0 mi/h 

0.0 mi/h 




















46.1 

64.1 

Page 1 of 2 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Notes 

Page 2 of 2 





2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Analyst MUE 





Input Data 



From/To Sandario to Airline Road 



gfedcb gfedc 






















20-5) 

60.0 mi/h 

0.0 mi/h 




















51.2 

59.3 

Page 1 of 2 

2/22/2010

Two-Way 



Notes 

Page 2 of 2 





2/22/2010

Count #2 Avra Valley Road West Location WB 

End Classification 

Total 

Count Date Time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Volume 

Tuesday, February 02, 2010 15 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 





































































Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1730 0 29 22 0 6 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 60

Count #2 Avra Valley Road West Location WB 


Total 




























14 1128 775 15 115 16 0 38 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 2150 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Count #2 Avra Valley Road West Location EB 


Total 








































































Count #2 Avra Valley Road West Location EB 


Total 





























24 1617 674 3 33 26 1 8 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 2453 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Count #2 Avra Valley Road East Location WB 


Total 






































































Count #2 Avra Valley Road East Location WB 


Total 






























10 1670 1264 12 77 112 34 27 442 1 3 4 0 0 0 3656 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Count #2 Avra Valley Road East Location EB 


Total 






































































Count #2 Avra Valley Road East Location EB 


Total 






























6 1790 1795 14 121 140 35 32 459 1 4 4 0 0 0 4401 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Project: Arva Valley Rd at Trico Road 

Date: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 

Count period: 0:15 

Count Starts at 

7:00 AM NB Trico Rd SB Trico Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 

END Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right TOTALS END 

Time Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU Turn NB SB EB WB Total Time 

7:15 AM 0 0 0 44 0 0 4 74 0 0 21 4 0 44 78 25 147 7:15 AM 

7:30 AM 0 1 1 35 0 2 4 66 0 0 17 5 2 37 70 22 131 7:30 AM 

7:45 AM 0 0 1 15 0 1 7 47 0 1 20 14 1 16 54 35 106 7:45 AM 

8:00 AM 0 0 0 23 0 3 3 47 0 0 22 10 0 26 50 32 108 8:00 AM 

8:15 AM 0 0 0 16 0 1 3 52 0 0 13 7 0 17 55 20 92 8:15 AM 

8:30 AM 0 0 3 25 0 1 0 39 0 0 16 11 3 26 39 27 95 8:30 AM 

8:45 AM 0 0 0 23 0 1 4 27 0 1 15 8 0 24 31 24 79 8:45 AM 

9:00 AM 0 0 0 25 0 3 3 36 0 0 16 8 0 28 39 24 91 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 8:00 AM 0 1 2 117 0 6 18 234 0 1 80 33 3 123 252 114 492 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 

7:15 AM 8:15 AM 0 1 2 89 0 7 17 212 0 1 72 36 3 96 229 109 437 7:15 AM 8:15 AM 

7:30 AM 8:30 AM 0 0 4 79 0 6 13 185 0 1 71 42 4 85 198 114 401 7:30 AM 8:30 AM 

7:45 AM 8:45 AM 0 0 3 87 0 6 10 165 0 1 66 36 3 93 175 103 374 7:45 AM 8:45 AM 

8:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 0 3 89 0 6 10 154 0 1 60 34 3 95 164 95 357 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 9:00 AM 0 1 5 206 0 12 28 388 0 2 140 67 6 218 416 209 849 7:00 AM 9:00 AM 


4:00 PM NB Trico Rd SB Trico Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 

END Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right TOTALS END 

Time Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU Turn NB SB EB WB Total Time 

4:15 PM 0 0 1 8 1 7 3 24 0 0 63 22 1 16 27 85 129 4:15 PM 

4:30 PM 0 0 1 12 1 4 3 31 0 0 43 21 1 17 34 64 116 4:30 PM 

4:45 PM 0 0 0 12 0 10 2 20 0 0 44 33 0 22 22 77 121 4:45 PM 

5:00 PM 0 0 0 12 0 5 3 21 0 0 60 28 0 17 24 88 129 5:00 PM 

5:15 PM 0 0 1 11 0 8 2 26 0 0 63 23 1 19 28 86 134 5:15 PM 

5:30 PM 0 1 1 9 0 3 4 16 0 1 57 25 2 12 20 83 117 5:30 PM 

5:45 PM 0 0 0 13 1 5 4 15 0 2 73 36 0 19 19 111 149 5:45 PM 

6:00 PM 0 2 0 17 0 2 1 10 0 1 48 34 2 19 11 83 115 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 5:00 PM 0 0 2 44 2 26 11 96 0 0 210 104 2 72 107 314 495 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 

4:15 PM 5:15 PM 0 0 2 47 1 27 10 98 0 0 210 105 2 75 108 315 500 4:15 PM 5:15 PM 

4:30 PM 5:30 PM 0 1 2 44 0 26 11 83 0 1 224 109 3 70 94 334 501 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 

4:45 PM 5:45 PM 0 1 2 45 1 21 13 78 0 3 253 112 3 67 91 368 529 4:45 PM 5:45 PM 

5:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 3 2 50 1 18 11 67 0 4 241 118 5 69 78 363 515 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 3 4 94 3 44 22 163 0 4 451 222 7 141 185 677 1010 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

Project: Sanders Rd at Avra Valley Rd 

Tuesday, February 02, 2010 

Date: Count period: 0:15 


7:00 AM SB Sanders Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 

END Left Right Left Right TOTALS END 

Time Turn Turn Turn THRU THRU Turn SB EB WB Total Time 

7:15 AM 48 7 8 64 9 32 55 72 41 168 7:15 AM 

7:30 AM 39 9 5 76 17 48 48 81 65 194 7:30 AM 

7:45 AM 22 4 6 62 23 40 26 68 63 157 7:45 AM 

8:00 AM 15 3 7 50 21 27 18 57 48 123 8:00 AM 

8:15 AM 18 5 8 51 22 26 23 59 48 130 8:15 AM 

8:30 AM 24 5 3 54 15 35 29 57 50 136 8:30 AM 

8:45 AM 18 2 3 43 20 14 20 46 34 100 8:45 AM 

9:00 AM 17 4 1 51 20 18 21 52 38 111 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 8:00 AM 124 23 26 252 70 147 147 278 217 642 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 

7:15 AM 8:15 AM 94 21 26 239 83 141 115 265 224 604 7:15 AM 8:15 AM 

7:30 AM 8:30 AM 79 17 24 217 81 128 96 241 209 546 7:30 AM 8:30 AM 

7:45 AM 8:45 AM 75 15 21 198 78 102 90 219 180 489 7:45 AM 8:45 AM 

8:00 AM 9:00 AM 77 16 15 199 77 93 93 214 170 477 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 9:00 AM 201 39 41 451 147 240 240 492 387 1119 7:00 AM 9:00 AM 


4:00 PM SB Sanders Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 

END Left Right Left Right TOTALS END 

Time Turn Turn Turn THRU THRU Turn SB EB WB Total Time 

4:15 PM 30 5 5 25 41 55 35 30 96 161 4:15 PM 

4:30 PM 23 10 5 33 43 37 33 38 80 151 4:30 PM 

4:45 PM 38 5 3 23 57 25 43 26 82 151 4:45 PM 

5:00 PM 24 9 2 25 54 26 33 27 80 140 5:00 PM 

5:15 PM 35 5 8 24 49 38 40 32 87 159 5:15 PM 

5:30 PM 24 7 3 26 53 44 31 29 97 157 5:30 PM 

5:45 PM 18 4 5 24 61 22 22 29 83 134 5:45 PM 

6:00 PM 18 3 6 20 72 19 21 26 91 138 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 5:00 PM 115 29 15 106 195 143 144 121 338 603 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 

4:15 PM 5:15 PM 120 29 18 105 203 126 149 123 329 601 4:15 PM 5:15 PM 

4:30 PM 5:30 PM 121 26 16 98 213 133 147 114 346 607 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 

4:45 PM 5:45 PM 101 25 18 99 217 130 126 117 347 590 4:45 PM 5:45 PM 

5:00 PM 6:00 PM 95 19 22 94 235 123 114 116 358 588 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 6:00 PM 210 48 37 200 430 266 258 237 696 1191 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

Project: Sandario Rd at Avra Valley Rd 




7:00 AM NB Sandario Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 

END Left Right Right Left TOTALS END 

Time Turn Turn THRU Turn Turn THRU NB EB WB Total Time 

7:15 AM 23 28 74 41 20 18 51 115 38 204 7:15 AM 

7:30 AM 33 47 85 23 12 32 80 108 44 232 7:30 AM 

7:45 AM 32 14 76 15 8 31 46 91 39 176 7:45 AM 

8:00 AM 17 34 55 13 9 31 51 68 40 159 8:00 AM 

8:15 AM 19 10 54 15 6 29 29 69 35 133 8:15 AM 

8:30 AM 25 14 67 11 9 25 39 78 34 151 8:30 AM 

8:45 AM 15 9 46 13 11 19 24 59 30 113 8:45 AM 

9:00 AM 19 8 56 12 13 19 27 68 32 127 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 8:00 AM 105 123 290 92 49 112 228 382 161 771 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 

7:15 AM 8:15 AM 101 105 270 66 35 123 206 336 158 700 7:15 AM 8:15 AM 

7:30 AM 8:30 AM 93 72 252 54 32 116 165 306 148 619 7:30 AM 8:30 AM 

7:45 AM 8:45 AM 76 67 222 52 35 104 143 274 139 556 7:45 AM 8:45 AM 

8:00 AM 9:00 AM 78 41 223 51 39 92 119 274 131 524 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 9:00 AM 183 164 513 143 88 204 347 656 292 1295 7:00 AM 9:00 AM 


4:00 PM NB Sandario Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 



4:15 PM 30 10 35 20 17 67 40 55 84 179 4:15 PM 

4:30 PM 23 13 39 21 17 57 36 60 74 170 4:30 PM 

4:45 PM 18 13 35 26 13 63 31 61 76 168 4:45 PM 

5:00 PM 23 12 28 22 17 56 35 50 73 158 5:00 PM 

5:15 PM 21 22 26 30 13 66 43 56 79 178 5:15 PM 

5:30 PM 21 8 34 19 16 77 29 53 93 175 5:30 PM 

5:45 PM 8 7 27 15 12 75 15 42 87 144 5:45 PM 

6:00 PM 12 4 28 14 22 79 16 42 101 159 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 5:00 PM 94 48 137 89 64 243 142 226 307 675 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 

4:15 PM 5:15 PM 85 60 128 99 60 242 145 227 302 674 4:15 PM 5:15 PM 

4:30 PM 5:30 PM 83 55 123 97 59 262 138 220 321 679 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 

4:45 PM 5:45 PM 73 49 115 86 58 274 122 201 332 655 4:45 PM 5:45 PM 

5:00 PM 6:00 PM 62 41 115 78 63 297 103 193 360 656 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 6:00 PM 156 89 252 167 127 540 245 419 667 1331 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

Project: Airline Rd at Avra Valley Rd 




7:00 AM NB Airline Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 



7:15 AM 1 2 91 4 0 47 3 95 47 145 7:15 AM 

7:30 AM 4 1 139 4 0 48 5 143 48 196 7:30 AM 

7:45 AM 6 0 125 4 0 49 6 129 49 184 7:45 AM 

8:00 AM 4 1 93 1 2 46 5 94 48 147 8:00 AM 

8:15 AM 4 1 92 4 3 43 5 96 46 147 8:15 AM 

8:30 AM 0 5 90 2 1 53 5 92 54 151 8:30 AM 

8:45 AM 2 2 77 1 1 41 4 78 42 124 8:45 AM 

9:00 AM 1 3 74 2 0 44 4 76 44 124 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 8:00 AM 15 4 448 13 2 190 19 461 192 672 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 

7:15 AM 8:15 AM 18 3 449 13 5 186 21 462 191 674 7:15 AM 8:15 AM 

7:30 AM 8:30 AM 14 7 400 11 6 191 21 411 197 629 7:30 AM 8:30 AM 

7:45 AM 8:45 AM 10 9 352 8 7 183 19 360 190 569 7:45 AM 8:45 AM 

8:00 AM 9:00 AM 7 11 333 9 5 181 18 342 186 546 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 

7:00 AM 9:00 AM 22 15 781 22 7 371 37 803 378 1218 7:00 AM 9:00 AM 


4:00 PM NB Airline Rd EB Avra Valley WB Avra Valley 



4:15 PM 6 1 75 4 2 74 7 79 76 162 4:15 PM 

4:30 PM 5 1 51 2 2 67 6 53 69 128 4:30 PM 

4:45 PM 5 2 55 6 2 75 7 61 77 145 4:45 PM 

5:00 PM 4 0 41 1 1 71 4 42 72 118 5:00 PM 

5:15 PM 9 0 46 2 3 68 9 48 71 128 5:15 PM 

5:30 PM 1 2 33 5 1 100 3 38 101 142 5:30 PM 

5:45 PM 4 2 44 2 1 71 6 46 72 124 5:45 PM 

6:00 PM 11 1 36 4 3 87 12 40 90 142 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 5:00 PM 20 4 222 13 7 287 24 235 294 553 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 

4:15 PM 5:15 PM 23 3 193 11 8 281 26 204 289 519 4:15 PM 5:15 PM 

4:30 PM 5:30 PM 19 4 175 14 7 314 23 189 321 533 4:30 PM 5:30 PM 

4:45 PM 5:45 PM 18 4 164 10 6 310 22 174 316 512 4:45 PM 5:45 PM 

5:00 PM 6:00 PM 25 5 159 13 8 326 30 172 334 536 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 

4:00 PM 6:00 PM 45 9 381 26 15 613 54 407 628 1089 4:00 PM 6:00 PM

IncidentMicr 

Inciden 

ofilm IncidentDateTime IncidentOnroad IncidentCrossingFeature tOffset IncidentInjurySeverityDesc IncidentFirstHarmfulDesc IncidentCollisionMannerDesc IncidentLightConditionDesc Desc 

15390451 1/31/2006 20:05 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 





16392354 10/6/2006 10:17 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

16392354 10/6/2006 10:17 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

17462782 3/8/2007 11:07 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 


17582226 4/4/2007 10:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 


17731967 7/18/2007 11:24 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 




17884491 11/4/2007 13:30 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAWN CLOUDY DRY 

17893775 11/29/2007 7:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAWN CLOUDY DRY 





18592699 4/25/2008 9:01 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

18592699 4/25/2008 9:01 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 



18612981 8/26/2008 10:22 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAWN CLEAR DRY 

18612981 8/26/2008 10:22 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAWN CLEAR DRY 



15570374 3/7/2006 11:42 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 2 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT RAIN WET 

15731117 4/7/2006 8:46 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 2 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT RAIN WET 





18620201 11/5/2008 11:55 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010242A 0.0229 NO_INJURY OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT RAIN WET 

18620201 11/5/2008 11:55 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010242G 0 NO_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR OTHER 

15082431 3/2/2006 14:02 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

15082431 3/2/2006 14:02 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

15332420 1/7/2006 16:29 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

15332420 1/7/2006 16:29 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

16522654 11/16/2006 10:00 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 


16743028 6/4/2007 6:45 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

16743028 6/4/2007 6:45 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

16743028 6/4/2007 6:45 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 


17510986 3/28/2007 21:33 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

17510999 3/29/2007 15:59 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 



18592493 3/25/2008 18:25 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 










18613093 9/23/2008 14:21 I 010 2 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

18613093 

IncidentDate 

Between 

9/23/2008 14:21 I 010 2 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

Incident 

Weather 

Inciden 

tSurfac 

eCondit

IncidentMicr 

UnitTravelDirection 

U 

ni PersonT 

ofilm IncidentJunctionRelationDesc UnitBodyStyleDesc 

Desc UnitActionDesc 

t ypeDesc PersonSafetyDeviceDesc PersonViolationDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc0 

15390451 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP NE - NORTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15390451 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15452149 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NE - NORTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15452149 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

15520250 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SE - SOUTHEAST STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY 3 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

16392354 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SE - SOUTHEAST OTHER 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17462782 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17510986 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17582226 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17731967 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17731967 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17774266 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17774266 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 




17893775 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592454 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


18592609 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592699 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592699 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 



18612981 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER_UNSAFE_PASSING 

18612981 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK W - WEST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

15520250 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN E - EAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15570374 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


15731117 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NE - NORTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17002852 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NW - NORTHWEST OTHER 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17361701 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 



18620201 RAILWAY_GRADE_CROSSING TRUCK_TK_TRUCK NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 

18620201 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE E - EAST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 

15082431 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15082431 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15332420 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SE - SOUTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15332420 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NW - NORTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16522654 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16522654 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16743028 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16743028 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER NONE_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16743028 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17002852 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17510986 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17510999 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

17582226 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

18592493 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 

18592493 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 


18612849 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16022526 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NW - NORTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

16022526 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

16182027 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17361701 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

17462782 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

18613093 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP NW - NORTHWEST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 

18613093 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE 

IncidentDate 

Between 

PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN NW - NORTHWEST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE

IncidentMicr 

ofilm 

15390451 

15390451 

15452149 

15452149 

15520250 

16392354 

16392354 

17462782 

17510986 

17582226 

17731967 

17731967 

17774266 

17774266 

17884491 

17884491 

17893775 

17893775 

18592454 

18592609 

18592609 

18592699 

18592699 

18601208 

18601208 

18612981 

18612981 

15520250 

15570374 

15570374 

15731117 

17002852 

17361701 

18611819 

18611819 

18620201 

18620201 

15082431 

15082431 

15332420 

15332420 

16522654 

16522654 

16743028 

16743028 

16743028 

17002852 

17510986 

17510999 

17510999 

17582226 

18592493 

18592493 

18612849 

18612849 

16022526 

16022526 

16182027 

16182027 

17361701 

17462782 

18613093 

18613093 

IncidentDate 

Between 

PersonPhysicalDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc2 PersonPhysicalDesc3 PersonPhysicalDesc4 PersonPhysicalDesc5 PersonPhysicalDesc6 

PersonPhysi 

calDesc97 

PersonPhysicalD 

esc99 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

97 - OTHER

g 

crofilm IncidentDateTime IncidentOnroad e Offset IncidentInjurySeverityDesc IncidentFirstHarmfulDesc IncidentCollisionMannerDesc IncidentLightConditionDesc 

15321319 1/9/2006 7:24 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -1.1 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

15321319 1/9/2006 7:24 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -1.1 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

15601282 6/20/2006 6:35 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -0.1701 INCAPACITATING_INJURY FENCE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

16170564 7/16/2006 21:30 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -0.5 NO_INJURY ANIMAL_LIVESTOCK SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16150459 7/16/2006 22:45 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -0.0227 NO_INJURY ANIMAL_LIVESTOCK SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16460511 11/18/2006 20:00 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -2.5 FATAL PEDALCYCLE SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16460511 11/18/2006 20:00 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -2.5 FATAL PEDALCYCLE SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17600924 4/19/2007 18:59 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD 0.75 NO_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAWN 

18592571 4/5/2008 12:17 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AIRLINE RD -1 NO_INJURY FENCE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

17812458 9/22/2007 2:25 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 AVRA RD -0.0379 NO_INJURY OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16351606 9/25/2006 11:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CEMENT PLANT RD -0.25 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

16351606 9/25/2006 11:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CEMENT PLANT RD -0.25 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

16222041 8/11/2006 6:17 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CEMENT PLANT RD 0.5 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

15372685 1/16/2006 10:05 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

15372685 1/16/2006 10:05 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

17010932 12/6/2006 15:37 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -0.0019 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

17010932 12/6/2006 15:37 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -0.0019 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18023060 2/20/2008 17:40 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0.0947 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18023060 2/20/2008 17:40 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0.0947 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

17600471 4/18/2007 6:51 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17600471 4/18/2007 6:51 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17772508 8/27/2007 11:37 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0.0066 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17772508 8/27/2007 11:37 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0.0066 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

18303833 8/1/2008 11:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0.0053 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

18303833 8/1/2008 11:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0.0053 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17041754 12/12/2006 0:10 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17041754 12/12/2006 0:10 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17725003 7/10/2007 17:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -0.0028 NO_INJURY UTILITY_POLE_LIGHT_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

17923496 12/25/2007 18:30 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -1 NO_INJURY ANIMAL_LIVESTOCK SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18023009 2/25/2008 21:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -0.0002 NO_INJURY OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18236128 6/11/2008 15:24 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -1 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

18375451 9/26/2008 23:40 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 CLAYTON RD -0.0095 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17735834 7/30/2007 9:02 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD -0.1 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

17735834 7/30/2007 9:02 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD -0.1 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

17666022 5/29/2007 14:00 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD 0.0189 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

17666022 5/29/2007 14:00 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD 0.0189 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

17843911 10/11/2007 15:07 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD -0.0379 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

17843911 10/11/2007 15:07 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD -0.0379 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

16222181 8/27/2006 2:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD 0.5 INCAPACITATING_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17140108 12/21/2006 17:34 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD 0.1894 NO_INJURY TREE_BUSH_STUMP_STANDING SINGLE_VEHICLE DAWN 

18135366 4/19/2008 22:43 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD 0.5 NO_INJURY ANIMAL_LIVESTOCK SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18235825 6/4/2008 9:18 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD -0.0379 POSSIBLE_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

18480092 12/1/2008 12:49 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 EL PASO GAS RD -0.1201 NO_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

15391531 1/27/2006 6:27 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 GARVEY RD -0.3 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15391531 1/27/2006 6:27 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 GARVEY RD -0.3 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16150154 7/17/2006 21:30 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 GARVEY RD 0.0568 NO_INJURY TREE_BUSH_STUMP_STANDING SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18282213 7/24/2008 17:04 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 GARVEY RD 0.0568 NO_INJURY TREE_BUSH_STUMP_STANDING SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

18340294 10/12/2008 9:32 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 MAYBROOK AVE 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18340294 10/12/2008 9:32 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 MAYBROOK AVE 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

17661634 5/18/2007 11:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.0085 POSSIBLE_INJURY OTHER_NON_FIXED_OBJECT OTHER DAYLIGHT 

17661634 5/18/2007 11:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.0085 POSSIBLE_INJURY OTHER_NON_FIXED_OBJECT OTHER DAYLIGHT 

18230315 7/16/2008 9:59 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.3701 INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

18230315 7/16/2008 9:59 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.3701 INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

15470349 2/17/2006 11:12 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.25 NO_INJURY FENCE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

16122290 7/6/2006 17:59 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.5 INCAPACITATING_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

16460254 9/4/2006 20:16 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.8 FATAL CULVERT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17920671 12/21/2007 22:30 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 QUARRY RD 0.5 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17726514 7/5/2007 8:26 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD -0.0095 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17726514 7/5/2007 8:26 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD -0.0095 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18611561 5/12/2008 17:28 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18611561 5/12/2008 17:28 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18612950 8/19/2008 6:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18612950 8/19/2008 6:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

15271796 3/26/2006 19:09 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 1.3 FATAL MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT HEAD_ON DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 



18610981 5/27/2008 7:26 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 1 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

18610981 5/27/2008 7:26 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 1 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

15501632 2/26/2006 22:36 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0.8 NO_INJURY OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17102230 1/1/2007 22:01 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 1 NO_INJURY ANIMAL_WILD_GAME SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17293042 1/12/2007 7:00 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0.5 NO_INJURY FENCE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAWN 

17361715 2/15/2007 17:22 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 1.5 NO_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

17886362 11/24/2007 11:01 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD -0.25 POSSIBLE_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

17963218 1/5/2008 17:36 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD -0.0568 NO_INJURY FENCE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAWN 

18066147 3/26/2008 0:28 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDARIO RD 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16422754 10/23/2006 5:56 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDERS RD -0.0947 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAWN 

16422754 10/23/2006 5:56 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDERS RD -0.0947 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAWN 

16742719 5/24/2007 7:41 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDERS RD -0.0057 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

16742719 5/24/2007 7:41 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDERS RD -0.0057 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT

g 


18235809 6/1/2008 22:59 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDERS RD 0.0947 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_TO_SIDE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18235809 6/1/2008 22:59 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SANDERS RD 0.0947 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_TO_SIDE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17814840 9/29/2007 22:51 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SEATTLE AVE 0.0189 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17814840 9/29/2007 22:51 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 SEATTLE AVE 0.0189 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15840305 4/17/2006 19:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15840305 4/17/2006 19:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15970250 5/29/2006 16:52 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 




17290490 1/6/2007 15:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 1 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17290490 1/6/2007 15:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 1 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

15401864 1/29/2006 2:45 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0.75 NO_INJURY OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16322314 9/14/2006 16:46 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0.5 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY UTILITY_POLE_LIGHT_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

18592620 4/11/2008 20:47 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 WRIGHT WAY 0.0729 INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT HEAD_ON DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 



17884504 11/7/2007 13:47 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 WRIGHT WAY -0.0038 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17884504 11/7/2007 13:47 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 WRIGHT WAY -0.0038 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT 

17893764 11/27/2007 8:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 WRIGHT WAY 0.083 INCAPACITATING_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

16522654 11/16/2006 10:00 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 




16743028 6/4/2007 6:45 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT

g 


15390451 1/31/2006 20:05 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15390451 1/31/2006 20:05 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17361701 2/13/2007 9:38 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 


17582226 4/4/2007 10:33 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 






17893775 11/29/2007 7:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAWN 

17893775 11/29/2007 7:15 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAWN 







18601208 12/5/2008 19:13 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18601208 12/5/2008 19:13 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17472413 3/15/2007 6:42 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 -0.25 NO_INJURY GUARDRAIL_FACE OTHER DAYLIGHT 

17472413 3/15/2007 6:42 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 -0.25 NO_INJURY GUARDRAIL_FACE OTHER DAYLIGHT 

17462782 3/8/2007 11:07 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAWN 

17462782 3/8/2007 11:07 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAWN 

18611603 5/19/2008 12:12 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 -0.0568 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

18611603 5/19/2008 12:12 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 -0.0568 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

17202657 1/5/2007 22:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 -0.0057 NO_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

18016613 2/10/2008 14:30 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010 1 -0.25 POSSIBLE_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

18592454 3/17/2008 9:09 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010242A 0.0229 NO_INJURY OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

15731117 4/7/2006 8:46 10 AVRA VALLEY RD I 010242G 0 NO_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 

17731383 7/10/2007 20:43 10 TRICO RD 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17731383 7/10/2007 20:43 10 TRICO RD 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15452149 2/8/2006 21:42 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

15452149 2/8/2006 21:42 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

16182027 8/8/2006 9:14 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

16182027 8/8/2006 9:14 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT 

15520250 3/6/2006 10:11 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 




16022526 6/20/2006 12:53 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 


17510986 3/28/2007 21:33 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 

17510986 3/28/2007 21:33 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 



18592609 4/11/2008 13:07 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 

18592609 4/11/2008 13:07 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 POSSIBLE_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT 


18620201 11/5/2008 11:55 I 010 1 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT

crofilm IncidentWeatherDesc rfaceCondi IncidentJunctionRelationDesc UnitBodyStyleDesc 

15321319 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 


15601282 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED TRUCK_TK_TRUCK 


16150459 CLOUDY WET NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

16460511 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

16460511 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED No Data 



17812458 CLOUDY DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 



16222041 CLOUDY DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

15372685 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 


17010932 CLEAR DRY UNKNOWN PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 
















18375451 CLEAR UNKNOWN NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 

17735834 CLOUDY DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 





17843911 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED NOT_REPORTED 






15391531 CLEAR DRY DRIVEWAY PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 

15391531 CLEAR DRY DRIVEWAY PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 




18340294 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK 

17661634 CLEAR DRY UNKNOWN PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

17661634 CLEAR DRY UNKNOWN MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 

18230315 CLOUDY DRY DRIVEWAY MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 

18230315 CLOUDY DRY DRIVEWAY TRUCK_TK_TRUCK 


16122290 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 

16460254 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 


17726514 CLEAR DRY DRIVEWAY NOT_REPORTED 


18611561 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 


18612950 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 






18610981 CLEAR UNKNOWN NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED TRUCK_TK_TRUCK 


17102230 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED NOT_REPORTED 

17293042 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED TRUCK_TK_TRUCK 








16742719 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_SCBS_SCHOOL_BUS


15321319 









16241286 SLEET_HAIL_FREEZING_RAIN_OR_DRIZZLE UNKNOWN INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

16241286 SLEET_HAIL_FREEZING_RAIN_OR_DRIZZLE UNKNOWN INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 















16743028 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN


15321319 







17731967 CLOUDY DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

17731967 CLOUDY DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 













17472413 CLEAR DRY RAILWAY_GRADE_CROSSING PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 

17472413 CLEAR DRY RAILWAY_GRADE_CROSSING PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP 





17202657 CLOUDY WET INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN 

18016613 CLEAR DRY NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 

18592454 RAIN WET RAILWAY_GRADE_CROSSING TRUCK_TK_TRUCK 

15731117 CLEAR OTHER INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE 




















18620201 CLEAR DRY INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_TK_TRUCK

yp 

y 

crofilm Desc UnitActionDesc n c PersonSafetyDeviceDesc PersonViolationDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc0 

alDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc2 

15321319 E - EAST OVERTAKING_PASSING 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15321319 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15601282 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 

16170564 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 

16150459 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


16460511 W - WEST OTHER 2 PEDALCYCLIST UNKNOWN OTHER 

17600924 W - WEST AVOIDING_VEHICLE_OBJECT_PEDESTRIAN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 

18592571 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17812458 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 

16351606 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16351606 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16222041 NW - NORTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15372685 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

15372685 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

17010932 W - WEST MAKING_U_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


18023060 E - EAST MAKING_U_TURN 1 DRIVER NONE_USED FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17600471 W - WEST STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17600471 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FOLLOWED_TOO_CLOSELY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17772508 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17772508 W - WEST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18303833 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FOLLOWED_TOO_CLOSELY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18303833 W - WEST SLOWING_IN_TRAFFICWAY 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17041754 W - WEST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17725003 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


18023009 E - EAST OTHER 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 

18236128 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18375451 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN EXCEEDED_LAWFUL_SPEED 

17735834 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17735834 E - EAST MAKING_U_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17666022 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT KNOWINGLY_OPERATED_WITH_FAULTY_MISSING_EQUIPMENT 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17843911 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 

17843911 E - EAST OVERTAKING_PASSING 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN OTHER_UNSAFE_PASSING 

16222181 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 

17140108 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


18235825 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 

18480092 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15391531 E - EAST OVERTAKING_PASSING 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER_UNSAFE_PASSING 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15391531 E - EAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 



18340294 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17661634 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17661634 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER HELMET_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18230315 NE - NORTHEAST OVERTAKING_PASSING 1 DRIVER NONE_USED DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 

18230315 NE - NORTHEAST SLOWING_IN_TRAFFICWAY 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


16122290 NW - NORTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER HELMET_USED OTHER 

16460254 W - WEST UNKNOWN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 1 - ILLNESS 

17920671 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 

17726514 N - NORTH UNKNOWN 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 

17726514 W - WEST STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

18611561 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


18612950 E - EAST OVERTAKING_PASSING 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN OTHER_UNSAFE_PASSING 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18612950 N - NORTH MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15271796 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 




18610981 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER NONE_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15501632 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT SPEED_TO_FAST_FOR_CONDITIONS 


17293042 E - EAST BACKING 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN OTHER 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17361715 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 


17963218 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 2 - PHYSICAL_IMPAIRMENT 

18066147 N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 


16422754 N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


16742719 W - WEST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE

yp 


15321319 

18235809 W - WEST OTHER 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18235809 W - WEST BACKING 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17814840 W - WEST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17814840 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN PASSED_IN_NO_PASSING_ZONE 

15840305 SE - SOUTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

15840305 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

15970250 E - EAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 



16241286 S - SOUTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17290490 E - EAST CHANGING_LANES 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17290490 E - EAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


16322314 W - WEST AVOIDING_VEHICLE_OBJECT_PEDESTRIAN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592620 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 

18592620 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER NONE_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 



17884504 E - EAST STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17893764 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED SPEED_TO_FAST_FOR_CONDITIONS 

16522654 NE - NORTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


16743028 NE - NORTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16743028 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

16743028 SE - SOUTHEAST STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY 3 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

y 

alDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc2

yp 

y 


alDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc2 

15321319 

15390451 SE - SOUTHEAST OTHER 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17361701 S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17582226 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17582226 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17731967 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17731967 NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17884491 S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 




18592493 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592493 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592699 S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 




18601208 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18601208 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

17472413 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT DROVE_RODE_IN_OPPOSING_TRAFFIC_LANE 2 - PHYSICAL_IMPAIRMENT 

17472413 NW - NORTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17462782 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER_UNSAFE_PASSING 

17462782 W - WEST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

18611603 NE - NORTHEAST OTHER 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17202657 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 

18016613 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18592454 NE - NORTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT OTHER 

15731117 E - EAST MAKING_RIGHT_TURN 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 



15452149 S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15452149 N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16182027 SE - SOUTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16182027 NW - NORTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15520250 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


15570374 N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15570374 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER NONE_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16022526 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17510986 N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17510999 SE - SOUTHEAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

17510999 SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

18592609 S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 

18592609 E - EAST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 


18620201 W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

crofilm 

15321319 

15321319 

PersonPhysicalDesc3 

lDesc4 sicalDesc5 sicalDesc6 calDesc97 esc99 

15601282 

99 - UNKNOWN 

16170564 

16150459 

16460511 

99 - UNKNOWN 

16460511 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17600924 

18592571 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17812458 3 - FELL_ASLEEP_FATIGUED 

16351606 

16351606 

16222041 

15372685 

99 - UNKNOWN 

15372685 

17010932 

17010932 

18023060 

18023060 

17600471 

17600471 

17772508 

17772508 

18303833 

18303833 

17041754 


17725003 

17923496 

99 - UNKNOWN 

18023009 

18236128 

4 - ALCOHOL 

18375451 

17735834 

17735834 

17666022 

17666022 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17843911 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17843911 

99 - UNKNOWN 

16222181 

17140108 

18135366 


18480092 

15391531 

15391531 

16150154 

4 - ALCOHOL 


18340294 

18340294 

17661634 

17661634 

4 - ALCOHOL 

18230315 

18230315 

15470349 

97 - OTHER 

16122290 

16460254 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17920671 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17726514 

99 - UNKNOWN 

17726514 

18611561 

18611561 

18612950 

18612950 

99 - UNKNOWN 

15271796 

15271796 

15271796 

18610981 

18610981 


17102230 

17293042 


17886362 

17963218 

99 - UNKNOWN 

18066147 

16422754 

16422754 


16742719 

4 - ALCOHOL

y 

y 

y 

y 

crofilm 

15321319 

18235809 

18235809 

17814840 

PersonPhysicalDesc3 

lDesc4 sicalDesc5 sicalDesc6 calDesc97 

17814840 

15840305 

15840305 

15970250 

15970250 

16241286 

16241286 

17290490 

17290490 

4 - ALCOHOL 


16322314 

18592620 

18592620 

18592620 

17884504 

17884504 


16522654 

16522654 

16743028 

16743028 

16743028 

esc99 

y 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN

crofilm PersonPhysicalDesc3 

15321319 

15390451 

15390451 

17361701 

17361701 

17582226 

17582226 

17731967 

17731967 

17884491 

17884491 

17893775 

17893775 

18592493 

18592493 

18592699 

18592699 

18612981 

18612981 

18601208 

18601208 

17472413 

17472413 

17462782 

17462782 

18611603 

18611603 

17202657 

18016613 

18592454 

15731117 

17731383 

17731383 

15452149 

15452149 

16182027 

16182027 

15520250 

15520250 

15570374 

15570374 

16022526 

16022526 

17510986 

17510986 

17510999 

17510999 

18592609 

18592609 

18620201 

18620201 

lDesc4 

y 

y 

y 

y 

sicalDesc5 sicalDesc6 calDesc97 

esc99 

y 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN 

99 - UNKNOWN

crofilm IncidentDateTime IncidentOnroad IncidentCrossingFeature Offset IncidentInjurySeverityDesc IncidentFirstHarmfulDesc IncidentCollisionMannerDesc IncidentLightConditionDesc IncidentWeatherDesc rfaceCondi 

15840305 4/17/2006 19:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

15840305 4/17/2006 19:50 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

15970250 5/29/2006 16:52 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

15970250 5/29/2006 16:52 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 10 TRICO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR 

SLEET_HAIL_FREEZING_RAIN_OR_DRI 

DRY 


ZZLE 

SLEET_HAIL_FREEZING_RAIN_OR_DRI 

UNKNOWN 


ZZLE UNKNOWN 

17731383 7/10/2007 20:43 10 TRICO RD 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

17731383 7/10/2007 20:43 10 TRICO RD 10 AVRA VALLEY RD 0 NO_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

17701967 6/25/2007 13:05 10 TRICO RD 10 EL CAMINO DE TRES AR -0.5 NO_INJURY OTHER_NON_COLLISION SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

18134976 4/19/2008 7:05 10 TRICO RD 10 EL CAMINO DE TRES AR -0.5 INCAPACITATING_INJURY TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

16222186 8/23/2006 17:11 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

16222186 8/23/2006 17:11 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLOUDY DRY 

17656848 5/14/2007 14:10 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

17656848 5/14/2007 14:10 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_RIGHT_ANGLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

17362093 2/16/2007 13:50 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

17362093 2/16/2007 13:50 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT REAR_END DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

17602881 4/26/2007 11:09 10 TRICO RD 10 EL TIRO RD 0.0142 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY TREE_BUSH_STUMP_STANDING SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

17971248 1/16/2008 8:36 10 TRICO RD 10 GOLD BELL RD 0 INCAPACITATING_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT SIDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 







16150424 7/21/2006 11:23 10 TRICO RD 10 GOLD BELL RD -0.0947 NON_INCAPACITATING_INJURY GUARDRAIL_FACE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

18375435 9/27/2008 6:25 10 TRICO RD 10 GOLD BELL RD -0.0852 NO_INJURY FENCE SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR UNKNOWN 

17884880 11/14/2007 16:18 10 TRICO RD 10 SANDY ST -0.5 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

17884880 11/14/2007 16:18 10 TRICO RD 10 SANDY ST -0.5 NO_INJURY MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT ANGLE_OPPOSITE_DIRECTION DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

15360519 1/10/2006 16:24 10 TRICO RD 10 SANDY ST -0.4 INCAPACITATING_INJURY GUARDRAIL_FACE SINGLE_VEHICLE DAYLIGHT CLEAR DRY 

15601043 6/28/2006 2:07 10 TRICO RD 10 SPUR BELL LN 0.6 FATAL OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLOUDY DRY 

17370502 2/26/2007 20:50 10 TRICO RD 10 SPUR BELL LN 0.0152 NO_INJURY TREE_BUSH_STUMP_STANDING SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY 

18134975 4/19/2008 3:29 10 TRICO RD 10 SPUR BELL LN 0.5 POSSIBLE_INJURY OVERTURN_ROLLOVER SINGLE_VEHICLE DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING CLEAR DRY

yp 

crofilm IncidentJunctionRelationDesc UnitBodyStyleDesc Desc UnitActionDesc n esc PersonSafetyDeviceDesc PersonViolationDesc1 PersonPhysicalDesc0 PersonPhysicalDesc1 

15840305 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN SE - SOUTHEAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 

15840305 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP SW - SOUTHWEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 

15970250 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP E - EAST MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


16241286 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP W - WEST GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

16241286 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP S - SOUTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17731383 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17731383 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_OBEY_STOP_SIGN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17701967 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18134976 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 


16222186 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE MOTORCYCLE_MC_MOTORCYCLE N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 2 DRIVER HELMET_USED NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 


17656848 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17362093 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17362093 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FOLLOWED_TOO_CLOSELY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17602881 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 

17971248 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT SPEED_TO_FAST_FOR_CONDITIONS 

17971248 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE TRUCK_BS_BUS S - SOUTH STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY 2 DRIVER UNKNOWN NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17971248 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE No Data E - EAST GETTING_ON_OR_OFF_VEHICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN UNKNOWN OTHER 

17971248 INTERSECTION_RELATED_NON_INTERCHANGE No Data E - EAST GETTING_ON_OR_OFF_VEHICLE 4 PEDESTRIAN UNKNOWN OTHER 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 




16150424 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT UNKNOWN 

18375435 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH OTHER 1 DRIVER UNKNOWN OTHER 

17884880 DRIVEWAY PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH MAKING_LEFT_TURN 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT FAILED_TO_YIELD_RIGHT_OF_WAY 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

17884880 DRIVEWAY PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 2 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

15360519 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED NOT_REPORTED S - SOUTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT INATTENTION_DISTRACTION 

15601043 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_PU_PICKUP N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER NONE_USED UNKNOWN 

17370502 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION 0 - NO_APPARENT_INFLUENCE 

18134975 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED PASSENGER_SD_SEDAN N - NORTH GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD 1 DRIVER SHOULDER_AND_LAP_BELT NO_IMPROPER_ACTION

y 

y 

y 

crofilm PersonPhysicalDesc2 PersonPhysicalDesc3 

lDesc4 PersonPhysicalDesc5 PersonPhysicalDesc6 calDesc97 esc99 

15840305 

99 - UNKNOWN 

15840305 

15970250 

15970250 

16241286 

16241286 

17731383 

17731383 

17701967 

99 - UNKNOWN 

18134976 

16222186 

16222186 

17656848 

17656848 

17362093 

17362093 

3 - FELL_ASLEEP_FATIGUED 

17602881 

4 - ALCOHOL 

17971248 

17971248 

3 - FELL_ASLEEP_FATIGUED 

17971248 

17971248 

17971248 

17971248 

17971248 

99 - UNKNOWN 

16150424 

99 - UNKNOWN 

18375435 

17884880 

17884880 

99 - UNKNOWN 

15360519 

97 - OTHER 

15601043 

17370502 

99 - UNKNOWN 

18134975 

3 - FELL_ASLEEP_FATIGUED

Marana Regional Landfill - Pima County

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?