Imaging 12 - Fujifilm Graphic Systems
Imaging 12 - Fujifilm Graphic Systems
Imaging 12 - Fujifilm Graphic Systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SCANNING case study – Triangle Print, Northcliffe Newspapers Group<br />
Quattro wins scanning Derby<br />
Northcliffe midlands newspapers are using a<br />
<strong>Fujifilm</strong> Lanovia Quattro scanner for speed<br />
and quality.<br />
“The <strong>Fujifilm</strong> flatbeds<br />
are as good as our<br />
old drum scanner.”<br />
Paul Kilminster, deputy systems<br />
imaging manager, Triangle Print<br />
28<br />
roducing the Derby Evening Telegraph and the<br />
Nottingham Evening Post city newspapers plus the<br />
P monthly colour magazine Derbyshire Now, with colour<br />
in all three, meant a requirement for both repro quality<br />
and throughput in the editorial production department at<br />
Northcliffe’s Derby Evening Telegraph site.<br />
A <strong>Fujifilm</strong> Lanovia C-550 scanner installed at the Derbybased<br />
Triangle Print subsidiary in early 1999 for normal<br />
scanning and copydot work had proved itself to be ‘more than<br />
acceptable’ in terms of quality and productivity according to<br />
regional systems imaging manager Nick Preston, so when a<br />
new scanner was needed to replace an older drum unit, it was<br />
logical to look at the new <strong>Fujifilm</strong> models.<br />
After a demonstration of ColourKit at Ipex 2002 Preston<br />
and his deputy Paul Kilminster confirmed their order for a<br />
<strong>Fujifilm</strong> Lanovia Quattro scanner. The unit was delivered the<br />
following month and after a swift and trouble-free installation<br />
was up and running.<br />
“We were impressed with the original Lanovia we bought,”<br />
commented Paul Kilminster, “and the Quattro has even better<br />
software in ColourKit and is easier to use. The <strong>Fujifilm</strong> flatbeds<br />
are as good as our old drum scanner.”<br />
Scanner operators have noticed that in addition to<br />
producing sharper images, the scanning time is significantly<br />
reduced on the Quattro. Although most images are scanned<br />
from colour print – virtually everything is now shot on colour<br />
negative by staff photographers – typically hundreds of<br />
images have to be scanned each day, so the extra productivity<br />
is essential.<br />
<strong>Imaging</strong> <strong>12</strong> autumn 2002<br />
may have a ‘set paper to white’ option<br />
that will automatically lose the paper<br />
colour but the result might be less visually<br />
pleasing than allowing some tone into the<br />
blank areas.<br />
The dynamic duo –<br />
UCR and GCR<br />
Two acronyms that can strike fear into the<br />
hearts of inexperienced scanner operators<br />
are UCR (under colour removal) and GCR<br />
(grey component replacement). The<br />
former removes cyan, magenta and yellow<br />
from black or heavy shadow areas in order<br />
to limit ink coverage. This is typically used<br />
in newspapers or any other high volume/<br />
high speed printing on thin stock where<br />
drying time is critical.<br />
GCR applies the same principle –<br />
replacing equal proportions of cyan,<br />
magenta and yellow with an equivalent<br />
percentage of black – across the entire<br />
image, again to limit ink usage which<br />
saves both money (black ink is still<br />
cheaper) and drying time.<br />
The good news is that in an ICC-based<br />
colour workflow both these parameters<br />
can be built into the output profile, so for<br />
regular repeating newspaper or catalogue<br />
work it should only be necessary to obtain<br />
the correct profile (see also article on<br />
colour management in this issue, page 22)<br />
and then designers can safely work on the<br />
image within the constraints of the output<br />
process. If you have to produce the<br />
occasional one-off scan for newspaper use<br />
and an ICC profile isn’t available or appropriate,<br />
the target publications should be<br />
able to supply you with UCR/GCR specifications<br />
that can be entered via your<br />
scanning software or in Photoshop and<br />
used to create a suitable CMYK image.<br />
Feeling negative?<br />
Scanning from colour negatives was<br />
always the bugbear of professional repro<br />
houses. Usually drum scanner operators<br />
would prefer to scan from a print, as it<br />
gave them an ‘original’ to match. While<br />
this benefit still applies (and <strong>Fujifilm</strong>’s<br />
Peter Virgo opines that colour transparency<br />
is still the better medium),<br />
‘intelligent’ scanning of negatives has<br />
come a long way recently towards overcoming<br />
the inherent variability in colour<br />
negative stocks and the effects of<br />
different processing.<br />
Good scanning software should be able<br />
to analyse a negative and produce an<br />
acceptable scan with minimal intervention.<br />
<strong>Fujifilm</strong>’s ColourKit embodies the negative<br />
scanning expertise from the company’s<br />
professional photographic roots and can<br />
analyse negatives for under- or overexposure,<br />
detect the presence of flesh<br />
tones and adjust colour balance and<br />
density settings accordingly. While it’s<br />
always preferable to have a good reference<br />
to scan to, capabilities like these take<br />
most of the guesswork out of scanning<br />
orphaned negs, leaving only minor tweaks<br />
to be made by eye.<br />
From print to print<br />
Sometimes you’re faced with an original<br />
that’s a screened and printed image, or<br />
perhaps you’re presented with a set of film<br />
separations and told to get on with it.<br />
Don’t panic, once again current software<br />
should cover this. De-screening of printed<br />
originals and copydot scanning of separations<br />
aren’t new ideas by any means, but<br />
what used to be fairly esoteric and special-<br />
SEE YOU SOOM<br />
It’s always best to scan for the specific<br />
output instance, but in today’s multiple<br />
media repurposable environment that’s not<br />
always desirable or even possible. Hence<br />
the evolution of Scan Once Output Many<br />
(SOOM), a scanning workflow that aims to<br />
separate as many output-specific parameters<br />
(image size, colour space, screen/<br />
resolution, etc) from the raw image data as<br />
possible so that the same initial scan can be<br />
used to generate a host of daughter<br />
variants to suit the widest range of output<br />
circumstances, from glossy magazines to<br />
newspapers, brochures to Web sites.<br />
Ideally a SOOM setup will apply all<br />
output-specific calculations, such as<br />
resampling, sharpening, ICC profile-based<br />
colour transformations (including UCR/GCR<br />
and any other reproduction-related colour<br />
correction) when the specific daughter file<br />
is generated, leaving the original data<br />
untouched. Products from different vendors<br />
achieve this to a greater or lesser degree.<br />
<strong>Fujifilm</strong>’s ColourKit uses a nondestructive<br />
editing technique that stores all<br />
image alterations in a profile, including<br />
scaling, sharpening and even the modulation<br />
transfer function of the scanning<br />
device, which is used in conjunction with<br />
sharpening and scaling routines to produce<br />
optimised results from photomultiplier<br />
(drum) scanners or CCD (flatbed) devices.<br />
However many output-specific images are<br />
generated, the original raw scan data is<br />
preserved to maximise quality.