17.01.2013 Views

Imaging 12 - Fujifilm Graphic Systems

Imaging 12 - Fujifilm Graphic Systems

Imaging 12 - Fujifilm Graphic Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SCANNING case study – Triangle Print, Northcliffe Newspapers Group<br />

Quattro wins scanning Derby<br />

Northcliffe midlands newspapers are using a<br />

<strong>Fujifilm</strong> Lanovia Quattro scanner for speed<br />

and quality.<br />

“The <strong>Fujifilm</strong> flatbeds<br />

are as good as our<br />

old drum scanner.”<br />

Paul Kilminster, deputy systems<br />

imaging manager, Triangle Print<br />

28<br />

roducing the Derby Evening Telegraph and the<br />

Nottingham Evening Post city newspapers plus the<br />

P monthly colour magazine Derbyshire Now, with colour<br />

in all three, meant a requirement for both repro quality<br />

and throughput in the editorial production department at<br />

Northcliffe’s Derby Evening Telegraph site.<br />

A <strong>Fujifilm</strong> Lanovia C-550 scanner installed at the Derbybased<br />

Triangle Print subsidiary in early 1999 for normal<br />

scanning and copydot work had proved itself to be ‘more than<br />

acceptable’ in terms of quality and productivity according to<br />

regional systems imaging manager Nick Preston, so when a<br />

new scanner was needed to replace an older drum unit, it was<br />

logical to look at the new <strong>Fujifilm</strong> models.<br />

After a demonstration of ColourKit at Ipex 2002 Preston<br />

and his deputy Paul Kilminster confirmed their order for a<br />

<strong>Fujifilm</strong> Lanovia Quattro scanner. The unit was delivered the<br />

following month and after a swift and trouble-free installation<br />

was up and running.<br />

“We were impressed with the original Lanovia we bought,”<br />

commented Paul Kilminster, “and the Quattro has even better<br />

software in ColourKit and is easier to use. The <strong>Fujifilm</strong> flatbeds<br />

are as good as our old drum scanner.”<br />

Scanner operators have noticed that in addition to<br />

producing sharper images, the scanning time is significantly<br />

reduced on the Quattro. Although most images are scanned<br />

from colour print – virtually everything is now shot on colour<br />

negative by staff photographers – typically hundreds of<br />

images have to be scanned each day, so the extra productivity<br />

is essential.<br />

<strong>Imaging</strong> <strong>12</strong> autumn 2002<br />

may have a ‘set paper to white’ option<br />

that will automatically lose the paper<br />

colour but the result might be less visually<br />

pleasing than allowing some tone into the<br />

blank areas.<br />

The dynamic duo –<br />

UCR and GCR<br />

Two acronyms that can strike fear into the<br />

hearts of inexperienced scanner operators<br />

are UCR (under colour removal) and GCR<br />

(grey component replacement). The<br />

former removes cyan, magenta and yellow<br />

from black or heavy shadow areas in order<br />

to limit ink coverage. This is typically used<br />

in newspapers or any other high volume/<br />

high speed printing on thin stock where<br />

drying time is critical.<br />

GCR applies the same principle –<br />

replacing equal proportions of cyan,<br />

magenta and yellow with an equivalent<br />

percentage of black – across the entire<br />

image, again to limit ink usage which<br />

saves both money (black ink is still<br />

cheaper) and drying time.<br />

The good news is that in an ICC-based<br />

colour workflow both these parameters<br />

can be built into the output profile, so for<br />

regular repeating newspaper or catalogue<br />

work it should only be necessary to obtain<br />

the correct profile (see also article on<br />

colour management in this issue, page 22)<br />

and then designers can safely work on the<br />

image within the constraints of the output<br />

process. If you have to produce the<br />

occasional one-off scan for newspaper use<br />

and an ICC profile isn’t available or appropriate,<br />

the target publications should be<br />

able to supply you with UCR/GCR specifications<br />

that can be entered via your<br />

scanning software or in Photoshop and<br />

used to create a suitable CMYK image.<br />

Feeling negative?<br />

Scanning from colour negatives was<br />

always the bugbear of professional repro<br />

houses. Usually drum scanner operators<br />

would prefer to scan from a print, as it<br />

gave them an ‘original’ to match. While<br />

this benefit still applies (and <strong>Fujifilm</strong>’s<br />

Peter Virgo opines that colour transparency<br />

is still the better medium),<br />

‘intelligent’ scanning of negatives has<br />

come a long way recently towards overcoming<br />

the inherent variability in colour<br />

negative stocks and the effects of<br />

different processing.<br />

Good scanning software should be able<br />

to analyse a negative and produce an<br />

acceptable scan with minimal intervention.<br />

<strong>Fujifilm</strong>’s ColourKit embodies the negative<br />

scanning expertise from the company’s<br />

professional photographic roots and can<br />

analyse negatives for under- or overexposure,<br />

detect the presence of flesh<br />

tones and adjust colour balance and<br />

density settings accordingly. While it’s<br />

always preferable to have a good reference<br />

to scan to, capabilities like these take<br />

most of the guesswork out of scanning<br />

orphaned negs, leaving only minor tweaks<br />

to be made by eye.<br />

From print to print<br />

Sometimes you’re faced with an original<br />

that’s a screened and printed image, or<br />

perhaps you’re presented with a set of film<br />

separations and told to get on with it.<br />

Don’t panic, once again current software<br />

should cover this. De-screening of printed<br />

originals and copydot scanning of separations<br />

aren’t new ideas by any means, but<br />

what used to be fairly esoteric and special-<br />

SEE YOU SOOM<br />

It’s always best to scan for the specific<br />

output instance, but in today’s multiple<br />

media repurposable environment that’s not<br />

always desirable or even possible. Hence<br />

the evolution of Scan Once Output Many<br />

(SOOM), a scanning workflow that aims to<br />

separate as many output-specific parameters<br />

(image size, colour space, screen/<br />

resolution, etc) from the raw image data as<br />

possible so that the same initial scan can be<br />

used to generate a host of daughter<br />

variants to suit the widest range of output<br />

circumstances, from glossy magazines to<br />

newspapers, brochures to Web sites.<br />

Ideally a SOOM setup will apply all<br />

output-specific calculations, such as<br />

resampling, sharpening, ICC profile-based<br />

colour transformations (including UCR/GCR<br />

and any other reproduction-related colour<br />

correction) when the specific daughter file<br />

is generated, leaving the original data<br />

untouched. Products from different vendors<br />

achieve this to a greater or lesser degree.<br />

<strong>Fujifilm</strong>’s ColourKit uses a nondestructive<br />

editing technique that stores all<br />

image alterations in a profile, including<br />

scaling, sharpening and even the modulation<br />

transfer function of the scanning<br />

device, which is used in conjunction with<br />

sharpening and scaling routines to produce<br />

optimised results from photomultiplier<br />

(drum) scanners or CCD (flatbed) devices.<br />

However many output-specific images are<br />

generated, the original raw scan data is<br />

preserved to maximise quality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!