17.01.2013 Views

Air Pollution Engineering Manual Part5 1973

Air Pollution Engineering Manual Part5 1973

Air Pollution Engineering Manual Part5 1973

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TYPES OF RESINS<br />

RESIN KETTLES<br />

A resin is defined by the American Society for<br />

Testing Materials (ASTM) as a solid or semisolid,<br />

water-insoluble, organic substance, with<br />

little or no tendency to crystallize. Resins are<br />

the basic components of plastics and are important<br />

components of surface-coating formulations.<br />

For both uses, growth in recent years has been<br />

phenomenal; more than 5, 000 companies in the<br />

United States now produce plastics.<br />

There are two types of resins--natural and synthetic.<br />

The natural resins are obtained directly<br />

from sources such as fossil remains and tree sap.<br />

These include Congo, Batu, and East India resins<br />

I from fossils; lac from insects; and damar and<br />

I rosin from tree sap.<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

Synthetic resins can be classified by physical<br />

properties as thermoplastic or thermosetting.<br />

CHAPTER 11<br />

CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

resisting qualities to cross-linked molecular<br />

structures.<br />

Phenolic Resins<br />

Phenolic resins can be made from almost any<br />

phenolic compound and an aldehyde. Phenol and<br />

formaldehyde are by far the most common ingredients<br />

used, but others include phenol-fukfural,<br />

resorcinol-formaldehyde, and many similar<br />

combinations. Since a large proportion of<br />

phenolic-resin production goes into the manufacture<br />

of molding materials, the most desirable<br />

process for this manufacture will be described.<br />

Phenol and formaldehyde, along - with an acid<br />

catalyst (usually sulfuric, hydrochloric, or<br />

phosphoric acid), are charged to a steamjacketed<br />

or otherwise indirectly heated resin<br />

kettle that is provided with a reflux condenser<br />

and is capable of being operated under vacuum.<br />

The following formula shows the basic reaction:<br />

j<br />

1<br />

1<br />

I,<br />

. . , . .<br />

... ,<br />

-<br />

Thermoplastic resins undergo no permanent<br />

change upon heating. They can be softened,<br />

melted, and molded without change in their physi<br />

cal properties. Thermosetting resins, on the<br />

other hand, can he softened, melted, and molded,<br />

but with continued heating, they harden or set to<br />

a permanent, rigid state and cannot be remolded<br />

PHENOL FORMALDEHYDE<br />

0-<br />

",, t, ,, ",, C,<br />

un n n un n<br />

--c i -n- ! -0- i -Q + H ~ O<br />

HO OH<br />

In this section, several synthetic resins are dis-<br />

cussed briefly. For each, an example of ingre-<br />

dients is given and a typical manufacturing opera-<br />

tion is discussed. Each basic resin type requires<br />

many modifications both in ingredients and tech-<br />

niques of synthesis in order to satisfy proposed<br />

uses and provide desired properties (Kirk and<br />

Othmer, 1947; Plastics Catalog Corporation,<br />

1959; Shreve, 1956). Not all of these variations<br />

will be discussed, however, since not all present<br />

individual air pollution problems.<br />

Thermosetting resins are obtained from fusible<br />

ingredients that undergo condensation and poly-<br />

merization reactions under the influence of heat,<br />

pressure, and a catalyst and form rigid shapes<br />

that resist the actions of heat and solvents.<br />

These resins, including phenolic, amino, poly-<br />

ester, and polyurethane resins, owe their heat-<br />

TYPICAL ( INTERMEDIATE) CONDENSATION PRODUCT<br />

Heat is applied to start the reaction, and then<br />

the exothermic reaction sustains itself for a<br />

while without additional heat. Water formed<br />

during the reaction is totally refluxed to the<br />

kettle. After the reaction is complete, the upper<br />

layer of water in the kettle is removed by draw-<br />

ing a vacuum on the kettle. The warm, dehy-<br />

drated resin is poured onto a cooling floor or<br />

into shallow trays and then ground to powder<br />

after it hardens. This powder is mixed with<br />

other ingredients to make the final plastic mate-<br />

rial. Characteristics of the molding powder,<br />

as well as the time and rate of reaction, depend<br />

upon the concentration of catalyst used, the<br />

phenol-formaldehyde ratio used, and the reac-<br />

tidn temperature maintained.


702 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Amino Resins<br />

The most important amino resins are the urea-<br />

formaldehyde and melamine-formaldehyde resins.<br />

The urea-Cormaldehyde reaction is simple: 1<br />

mole of urea is mixed with 2 moles of formalde-<br />

hyde as 38 percent solution. The mixture is<br />

kept alkaline with ammonia pH 7.6 to 8. The<br />

reaction is carried out at 77°F for 2 days at<br />

atmospheric pressure without any reflux.<br />

The - melamine resins are made in much the same<br />

manner except that the reactants must be heated<br />

to about 176°F initially, in order to dissolve the<br />

melamine. The solution is then cooled to 77°F<br />

for 2 days to complete the reaction.<br />

The equipment needed for the synthesis of the<br />

amino resins consists of kettles for the conden-<br />

sation reaction (usually nickel or nickel-clad<br />

steel), evaporators for concentrating the resin,<br />

and some type of dryer.<br />

The amino resins are used as molding compounds,<br />

adhesives, and protective coatings, and ior treat-<br />

ing textiles and paper.<br />

Polyester ond Alkyd Resins<br />

There is much confusion concerning the mean-<br />

ing of the two terms polyester and alkyd. Ap-<br />

parently, by chemical definition, the product<br />

obtained by the condensation reaction between<br />

a polyhydric alcohol and a polybasic acid, whether<br />

or not it is modified by other materials, is prop-<br />

erly called a polyester. All polyesters can then<br />

be divided into three basic classes: Unsaturated<br />

polyesters, saturated polyesters, and alkyds.<br />

Unsaturated polyesters are iormed when<br />

either of the reactants (alcohol and acid)<br />

contains, or both contain, a double-bonded<br />

pair of carbon atoms. The materials usu-<br />

ally used are glycols of ethylene, propylene,<br />

and butylene and unsaturated dibasic acids<br />

such as maleic anhydride and furnaric acid.<br />

A typical reaction is as follows:<br />

MALEIC ANHYDRIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL<br />

REPRESENTATIVE SEGMENT OF CHAIN-FORMED<br />

The resulting polyester is capable of cross-<br />

linking and is usually blended wlth a poly-<br />

merizable material such as styrene. Under<br />

heat or a peroxide catalyst, or both, this<br />

blend copolymerizes into a thermosetting<br />

resin. It has recently found extensive use<br />

in the reinforced-plastics field where it is<br />

laminated with fibrous glass. It is also<br />

molded into many forms for a variety of uses.<br />

2. Saturated polyesters are made from saturated<br />

acids and alcohols, as indicated by the follow-<br />

ing reaction:<br />

H 1 ,L - - - - - - H H<br />

H - O C - 0 - C - I ' O - I !<br />

H H<br />

TEREPHTHALIC ACID ETHYLENE GLYCOL<br />

$__-__--i + H I - 0 - C - C - O - H - 4<br />

POLYESTER (REPERTING UNIT)<br />

The polyesters formed are long-chain, saturated<br />

materials not capable of cross-linking.<br />

Several of these are used as plasticizers. A<br />

special type made from ethylene glycol and<br />

terephthalic acid has been made into fiber<br />

(Dacron) and film ( ~ylara. Still others of<br />

this type with lower molecular weights are<br />

being used with di-isocyanate8 to form polyurethane<br />

resins.<br />

Alkyd resins differ from other polyesters<br />

as a result of modification by additions of<br />

fatty, monobasic acids. This is known as oil<br />

modification since the fatty acids are usu-<br />

ally in the form of naturally occurring oils<br />

such as linseed, tung, soya, cottonseed, and,<br />

at times, fish oil. The alkyds, thinned with,<br />

organic solvents, are used predominantly in<br />

the protective coating industry in varnishes,<br />

paints, and enamels.<br />

The most widely used base ingredients are<br />

phthalic anhydride and glycerol. Smaller<br />

quantities of other acids such as maleic,<br />

fumaric, and others and alcohols such as<br />

pentaerythritol, sorbitol, mannitol, ethylene<br />

glycol, and others are used. These are re-<br />

acted with the oils already mentioned to<br />

form the resin.<br />

The oils, as they exist naturally, are pre-<br />

dominantly in the form of triglycerides and<br />

do not react with the polybasic acid. They<br />

are changed to the reactive monoglyceride<br />

by reaction with a portion of the glycerol or<br />

other alcohol to be used. Heat and a cata-<br />

lyst are needed to promote this reaction,


which is known as alcoholysis. The resin<br />

is then formed by reacting this monoglyceride<br />

with the acid by agitation and sparging with<br />

inert gas until the condensation reaction prod-<br />

uct has reached the proper viscosity. The<br />

reaction takes place in an enclosed resin ket-<br />

tle equipped with a condenser and usually a<br />

scrubber, at temperatures slightly below<br />

500°F. The alcoholysis can be accomplished<br />

first and then the acid and more alcohol can<br />

be added to the kettle, or all the ingredients<br />

can be added simultaneously.<br />

An example of an alcoholysis reaction followed<br />

by reaction of the monoglyceride formed with<br />

phthalic anhydride is shown in the following:<br />

-<br />

C3 H5 (CI7 H33 COO)3 + C3 Hg (OH13<br />

Resin Kettles 703<br />

The flexible foams have found wide use in auto-<br />

mobile and furniture upholstery and in many<br />

other specialty items.<br />

By varying the ingre ents and adding other blowing<br />

agents such as Fre % ? 11, rigid foams with<br />

fine, close-cell structure can be formed. These<br />

can be formed in place by spraying techniques<br />

and are used extensively as insulating materials.<br />

Thermoplastic Resins<br />

GLYCEROL TRIESTER OF OLElC ACID GLYCERIN Polyvinyl Resins<br />

As already stated, thermoplastic resins are<br />

capable oi being reworked alter they have been<br />

formed into rigid shapes. The subdivisions in<br />

this group that are discussed here are the vinyls,<br />

styrenes, and the coal tar and petroleum base<br />

resins.<br />

H<br />

The polyvinyl resins are those having a vinyl<br />

HF - OH A !<br />

(CH=CH2) group. The most important of these<br />

-HC - 0 - C - C17 H33 +<br />

I are made from the uolvmerization oi vinvl ace-<br />

HC - OH<br />

H d<br />

MONOGLYCERIDE OF OLElC ACID PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE<br />

H H H 9<br />

.... 0 . C. C C. 0 . C R<br />

Polyurethane<br />

H A H<br />

I<br />

CI7 H33 - C = 0<br />

REPEATING UNIT FOR OIL-MOOIFIEO ALKYO<br />

A ,<br />

tate and vinyl chloride. Other associated resins<br />

are also discussed briefly.<br />

Vinyl acetate monomer is a clear liquid made<br />

from the reaction between acetylene and acetic<br />

acid. The monomer can be polymerized in bulk,<br />

in solution, or in beads or emulsion. In the bulk<br />

reaction, only small batches can be safely bandled<br />

because oi the almost explosive violence of<br />

the reaction once it has been catalyzed by a small<br />

amount of peroxide. Probably the most common<br />

method of preparation is in solution. In this<br />

process, a mixture of 60 volumes vinyl acetate<br />

and 40 volumes benzene is fed to a jacketed,<br />

stirred resin kettle equipped with a reflux condenser.<br />

A small amount oi peroxide catalyst<br />

. .<br />

The manufacture of the finished polyurethane<br />

. .<br />

. ,<br />

.<br />

...<br />

.<br />

resin differs from the others described in that<br />

no heated reaction in a kettle is involved. One<br />

of the reactants. however. ~-. is -~ a saturated ~.. mnlu- r --,<br />

ester resin. as alreadv mentioned. . or. , more - -<br />

recently, a polvether - . resin. To iorm a flexible<br />

foam product, the resin, typically a polyether<br />

such as polyoxypropylenetriol, is reacted with<br />

tolylene diisocyanate and water in an approximate<br />

100: 42: 3 ratio by weight, along with small quantities<br />

of an emulsifying agent, a polymerization<br />

is added and the mixture is heated until gentle<br />

refluxing is obtained. Aiter about 3 hours, approximately<br />

70 percent is polymerized, and the<br />

run is transferred to another kettle where the<br />

solvent and unreacted monomer are removed by<br />

steam distillation. The wet polymer is then<br />

dried. Polyvinyl acetate is used extensively in<br />

water-based paints, and lor adhesives, textile<br />

finishes, and production of polyvinyl butyral.<br />

catalyst, and a silicone lubricant. The ingredients<br />

are metered to a mixing head that deposits<br />

the mixture onto a moving conveyor. The resin<br />

and tolylene diisocyanate (TDI) polymerize and<br />

cross-link to form the urethane resin. The TDI<br />

also reacts with the water, yielding urea and<br />

carbon dioxide. The evolved gas forms a loamlike<br />

structure. The product forms as a continuous<br />

loaf. After room temperature curing lor<br />

about a day, the loaf can be cut into desired<br />

sizes and shapes, depending upon required use.<br />

Vinyl chloride monomer under normal conditions<br />

is a gas that boils at -14°C. It is usually stored<br />

and reacted as a liquid under pressure. It is<br />

made by the catalytic combination of acetylene<br />

and hydrogen chloride gas or by the chlorination<br />

of ethylene followed by the catalytic removal of hydrogen<br />

chloride. It is polymerized in a jacketed,<br />

stirred autoclave. Since the reaction is highly exothermic<br />

and can result in local overheating and poor<br />

quality, it is usually carried out as a water emulsion<br />

to facilitate more precise control. To ensure


704 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

quality and a properly controlled reaction, several with ethylene in presence of a Fridel-Crafts cataadditives<br />

are used. These include an emulsifying lyst such as aluminum chloride. During storage<br />

agent such as soap, a protective colloid such as glue, or shipment the styrene must contain a polymerizaa<br />

pH control such as acetic acid or other moderate- tion inhibitor such as hydroquinone and must be<br />

ly weak acid (2.5 is common), oxidation and re- kept under a protective atmosphere of nitrogen<br />

duction agents such as ammonium persulfate and or natural gas.<br />

sodium hisulfite, respectively, to control the oxidation-reduction<br />

atmosphere, a catalyst or initiator<br />

like henzoyl peroxide, and a chain length-con-<br />

Styrene can he polymerized in bulk, emulsion,<br />

or suspension using techniques similar to<br />

i<br />

1<br />

trolling agent such as carbon tetrachloride. The<br />

reaction is carried out in a completely enclosed<br />

vessel with the pressure controlled to maintain<br />

the unreacted vinyl chloride in the liquid state.<br />

As the reaction progresses, a suspension of latex<br />

or polymer is formed. This raw latex is removed<br />

from the kettle, and the unreacted monomer is<br />

removed by evaporation and recovered by compression<br />

and condensation.<br />

A modification oi the emulsion reaction is known<br />

as suspension polymerization. In this process,<br />

droplets of monomer are kept dispersed by rapid<br />

agitation in a water solution of sodium sulfate or<br />

in a colloidal suspension such as gelatin in water.<br />

During the the of monomer are<br />

converted to heads of oolvrner that are easily rethose<br />

mreviouslv described. The reaction is - ~<br />

exothermic and has a runawav tendencv unless I<br />

the temperature is carefully controlled. Oxygen<br />

must he excluded from the reaction since it causes 1<br />

a yellowing of the product and affects the rate of<br />

nnlvmPrira+ion. --, ---.. .-.--.<br />

i<br />

!<br />

Polystyrene is used in tremendous quantities for<br />

many .. purposes. . Because of its ease of handline, 4 u~ ,,<br />

dimensional stability, and unlimited color possi- 1<br />

bilities, it is used widely for toys, novelties, i<br />

toilet articles. houseware marts. radio and tele- ~ ~ !<br />

vision ~arts, wall tile. and other oroducts. Dis- I<br />

advantages include limited heat resistance, brit- .!<br />

tleness, and vulnerability to attack by organic<br />

solvents such as kerosine and carbon tetrachloride, i<br />

3<br />

covered and cleaned. This process is more<br />

troublesome and exacting than the emulsion reac- Petroleum and Coal Tar Resins<br />

tion hut eliminates the contaminating effects of<br />

the emulsifying agent and other additives.<br />

Petroleum and coal tar resins are the least expensive<br />

of the synthetic resins. They are made<br />

!<br />

from-the polymerization of unsaturated hydrocarbons<br />

found in crude distillate from coal tar in coke ovens ;<br />

or from cracking of petroleum. The exact chemical;<br />

nature of these hydrocarbons has not been determined,<br />

hut the unsaturates of coal tar origin are<br />

i<br />

known to be primarily cyclic while petroleum deriva<br />

tives are hoth straight- and close-chain types.<br />

Other vinyl-type resins are polyvinylidene chloride<br />

(saran@, polytetrafluoroethylene (fluoroethene),<br />

polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl hutyral, and others.<br />

The first two of these are made hy controlled poly-<br />

merization of the monomers in a manner similar to<br />

that previously described {or polyvinyl chloride.<br />

Polyvinyl alcohol has no existing monomer and<br />

is prepared from polyvinyl acetate by hydrolysis.<br />

Polyvinyl alcohol is unique among resins in that<br />

it is completely soluble in hoth hot and cold water.<br />

Polyvinyl butyral is made by the condensation<br />

reaction of butyraldehyde and polyvinyl alcohol.<br />

All have specific properties that make them super-<br />

ior for certain applications.<br />

Polystyrene<br />

Polystyrene, discovered in 1831, is one of the<br />

oldest resins known. Because of its transparent,<br />

glasslike properties, its practical application<br />

was recognized even then. Two major obstacles<br />

prevented its commercial development--prepara-<br />

tion of styrene monomer itself, and some means<br />

of preventing premature polymerization. These<br />

obstacles were not overcome until nearly 100<br />

years later.<br />

Styrene is a colorless liquid that boils at 145°C.<br />

It is prepared commercially from ethylbenzene,<br />

which; ,in turn, is made by reaction of benzene<br />

Most typical of the coal tar resins are those<br />

called Coumarone-Indene resin because these<br />

two compounds constitute a large portion of the<br />

distillate used for the reaction. The polymeriza-<br />

tion is initiated by a catalyst (usually sulfuric<br />

acid). After the reaction has proceeded as far as<br />

is desired, the unreacted monomer is removed<br />

by distillation. By controlling time, temperature,<br />

and proportions, many modifications of color and<br />

physical characteristics can be produced. The<br />

petroleum base distillate is polymerized in the<br />

same manner, yielding resins of slightly lower<br />

specific gravity than that of the coal tar resins.<br />

These resins are used in coating adhesives, in<br />

oleoresinous varnishes, and in floor coverings<br />

(the so-called asphalt tile).<br />

RESIN-MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT<br />

Most resins are polymerized or otherwise reacted 1<br />

in a stainless steel, jacketed, indirectly heated ;<br />

vessel, which is completely enclosed, equipped j


with a stirring mcchanism, and generally contains<br />

an integral relluu condenser (Figure 549). Since<br />

most of the reactions prcviously iiescrihcd are<br />

exothermic, cooling coils are usually required.<br />

Some resins, such as thc phenolics, require<br />

that the kettle he under vacuum during part of<br />

the cyclc. This can be suppliecl either by a vac-'<br />

uum pump 01. by a steam or water jet ejector.<br />

Moreover, for somu reactions, that oi polyvinyl<br />

chlorirle [or example, the vessel must be capable<br />

of being operatcd uildcr pressure. This is nec-<br />

essary to kecp the norrnally gaseous monomer in<br />

a liquid state. The size of resin-processing ket-<br />

tles varies from a few hundred to several thou-<br />

sand gallons' capacity.<br />

Because oi Lhr rnany types of raw materials,<br />

ranging from gases to solids, storagc facilities<br />

vary accordingly--ethylene, a gas, is handled<br />

as such; vinyl chloride, a gas at standard condi-<br />

tions, is liquefieci easily under pressure. It is<br />

stored, therefore, as a liquid in a pressurized<br />

vessel. Most of the other liquid monomers do<br />

Res~n Kettles 705<br />

not present any particular storage problems.<br />

Some, such as styrene, must he stored under an<br />

inert atmosphere to prevent premature poly-<br />

merization. Some of the more volatile mate-<br />

rials are stored in cooled tanks to prevent ex-<br />

cessive vapor loss. Some of the materials have<br />

strong odors, and care must be taken to prevent<br />

emission of odors to the atmosphere. Solids,<br />

such as phthalic anhydride, are usually packaged<br />

and stored in bags or fiber drums.<br />

Treatment of the resin after polymerization varies<br />

with the proposed use. Resins for moldings are<br />

dried and crushed or ground into molding powder.<br />

Resins, such as the alkyd resins, to be used for<br />

protective coatings are normally transferred to<br />

an agitated thinning tank, as shown in Figure 550,<br />

where they are thinned with some type of solvent<br />

and then stored in large steel tanks equipped<br />

with water-cooled condensers to prevent loss of<br />

solvent to the atmosphere (Figure 551). Still<br />

other resins are stored in latex form as they<br />

come from the kettle.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

The major sources of possible air contamination<br />

in resin manufacturing are the emissions of raw<br />

materials or monomer to the atmosphere, ernis-<br />

sions of solvent or other volatile liquids during<br />

the reaction, emissions of sublimed solids such<br />

as phthalic anhydride in alkyd production, emis-<br />

sions oi solvents during thinning of some resins,<br />

and emissions of solvents during storage and<br />

handling of thinned resins. Table 190 lists the<br />

most probable types and sources of air contami-<br />

nants from various resin-manufacturing opera- ,.<br />

tions.<br />

In the formulation of polyurethane foam, a slight<br />

excess of tolylene diisocyanate is usually added.<br />

Some of this is vaporized and emitted along<br />

with carbon dioxide during the reaction. The<br />

TDI fumes are extremely irritating to the eyes<br />

and respiratory system and are a source oi local<br />

air pollution. Since the vapor pressure of TDI<br />

is small, the fumes are minute in quantity and,<br />

if exhausted from the immediate work area and<br />

discharged to the outside atmosphere, are soon<br />

diluted to a nondetectible concentration. No<br />

specific controls have been needed to prevent<br />

emission of TDI fumes to the atmosphere.<br />

The finished solid resin represents a very small<br />

problem--chiefly some dust from crushing and<br />

grinding operations for molding powders. Generally<br />

the material is pne~rmatically conveyed<br />

from the grinder or pulverizer through a cyclone<br />

separator to a storage hopper. The fines escap-<br />

. .<br />

Figure 549. Typical resin-manufacturing unit<br />

showing process kettle and l iquid feed tanks<br />

ing the cyclone outlet are collected by a baghousetype<br />

dust collector. The collector should be de-<br />

\<br />

1<br />

(Si lmar Chemical Company, Hawthorne, Cal if.). signed for a filter velocity of about 4 fpm or less. I<br />

. ,


706 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EOUIPMENT<br />

Figure 550. Resin-thinning tanks with water-cooled condensers (Allied Chemical Carp., Plastics Div.<br />

Lynnwood. Calif.).<br />

Most of the contaminants are readily condensable.<br />

In addition to these, however, small quantities<br />

of noncondensable, odorous gases similar to those<br />

irom varnish cooking may be emitted. These are<br />

morc prevalent in the manufacture of oil-modi-<br />

fied alkyds where a drying oil such as tung, lin-<br />

seed, or soya is reacted with glycerin and phtha-<br />

lic anhydride. When a drying oil is heated,<br />

acrolein and other odorous materials are emitted<br />

at temperatures exceeding about 350°F (see<br />

Iurther discussion under Varnish Cookers). The<br />

intensity of these emissions is directly propor-<br />

tional to maximum reaction temperatures. Thus,<br />

the intensity of noncondensable gases from resin<br />

formulation should he considerably less than<br />

that of gases from varnish cooking since the re-<br />

action temperature is approximately 100°F lower.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMEN1<br />

Figure 551. Resin storage tanks with condensers<br />

Control of monomer and volatile solvent emis-<br />

CAI I ied chemical c ~ plastics ~ ~ 0ivision, , ~ L ~ ~ ~ .<br />

wood, Calif.),<br />

sions during storage before the reaction and of


Resin Kettles 707<br />

Table 190. PRINCIPAL AIR CONTAMINANTS AND SOURCES OF EMISSION FROM<br />

RESIN-MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS<br />

Resin<br />

I<br />

<strong>Air</strong> contaminant<br />

I<br />

Possible sources<br />

of emission<br />

Phenol~c Aldehyde odor Storage, leaks, condenser outlet,<br />

vacuum pump discharge<br />

Amino / Aldehyde odor I Storage, leaks<br />

Polyester and alkyds<br />

Polyvinyl acetate<br />

Oil-cooking odors<br />

Phthalic anhydride fumes<br />

Solvent<br />

Vinyl acetate odor<br />

Solvent<br />

Polyvinyl chloride Vinyl chloride odor 1<br />

Polystyrene<br />

Styrene odor<br />

Petroleum and coal<br />

tar resins<br />

Polyurethane resins<br />

Monomer odors<br />

Tolylene diisocyanate<br />

solvent emissions during thinning and storage<br />

after the polymerization of the resin is relatively<br />

simple. It involves care in maintaining gastight<br />

containers for gases or liquefied gases stored<br />

under pressure, and condensers or cooling coils<br />

on other vessels handling liquids that might vapor-<br />

ize. Since most resins are thinned at elevated<br />

temperatures near the boiling point of the thinner,<br />

resin-thinning tanks, especially, require ade-<br />

quate condensers. Aside from the necessity for<br />

control of air pollution, these steps are needed<br />

to prevent the loss of valuable products.<br />

Heated tanks used for storage of liquid phthalic<br />

and maleic anhydrides should be equipped with<br />

condensation devices to prevent losses of sub-<br />

limed material. An excellent device is a water-<br />

jacketed, vertical condenser with provisions for<br />

admitting steam to the jacket and provisions for<br />

a pressure relief valve at the condenser outlet<br />

set at perhaps 4 ounces' pressure. During stor-<br />

age the tank is kept under a slight pressure of<br />

about 2 ounces, an inert gas making the tank<br />

completely closed. During filling, the displaced<br />

gas, with any sublimed phthalic anhydride, is forced<br />

through thc cooled condenser where the phthalic is<br />

deposited on the condenser walls. After filling is<br />

completed, the condensed phthalic is remelted by<br />

passing steam through the condenser jacket.<br />

Addition of solids such as phthalic anhydride to<br />

other ingredients that are above the sublimation<br />

temperature of the phthalic anhydride causes<br />

Uncontrolled resin kettle discharge<br />

Kettle or condenser discharge<br />

Storage, condenser outlet during<br />

reaction, condenser outlet during<br />

steam distillation to recover sol-<br />

vent and unreacted monomer<br />

Leaks in pressurized system<br />

Leaks in storage and reaction<br />

equipment<br />

Leaks in storage and reaction<br />

equipment<br />

Emission from finished foam result-<br />

ing from excess TDI in formulation<br />

temporary emissions that violate most air pollution<br />

standards regarding opacity of smoke or<br />

fumes. These emissions subside somewhat as<br />

soon as the solid is completely dissolved but remain<br />

in evidence at a reduced opacity until the<br />

reaction has been completed. The emissions<br />

can he controlled fairly easily with simple scrubbing<br />

devices. Various types of scrubbers can<br />

be used. A common system that has been proved<br />

effective consists of a settling chamber, commonly<br />

called a resin slop tank, followed by an<br />

exhaust stack equipped with water sprays. The<br />

spray system should provide for at Least 2 gallons<br />

per 1, 000 scf at a velocity of 5 ips. The settling<br />

chamber can consist of an enclosed vessel partially<br />

filled with water capable of being circulated<br />

with gas connections from the reaction vessel and<br />

to the exhaust stack. Some solids and water of<br />

reaction are collected in the settling tank, the<br />

remainder being knocked down by the water sprays<br />

in the stack. Another example is shown in Figure<br />

552. Here the vapors from a polyester resin<br />

process kettle are first passed through a spray<br />

chamber-type precleaner followed by a venturi<br />

scrubber. This system effectively reduces visible<br />

emissions. Scrubber water may be recirculated<br />

or used on a once-through basis, depending<br />

~ rimaril~ upon the available waste-water disposal<br />

system. The scrubber water can be odorous<br />

and should be discharged to a sanitary sewer.<br />

Many resin polymerization reactions, for example,<br />

polyvinyl acetate by the solution method, require


708 CHEMICAL PROCES SING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 552. Venturi scrubber venting resin-man-<br />

ufacturinn equipment (Silmar Chemical Corporation,<br />

Hawthorne; Calif. ).<br />

refluxing of ingredients during the reaction. Thus,<br />

all reactors ior this or other reactions involving<br />

the vaporization of portions of the reactor con-<br />

tents must be equipped with suitable reflux- or<br />

horizontal-type condensers or a combination oi<br />

both. The only problems involved here are prop-<br />

er sizing of the condensers and maintaining the<br />

cooling medium at the temperature necessary to<br />

effect complete condensation.<br />

When noncondensable, odor-bearing gases are<br />

emitted during the reaction, especially with alkyd<br />

resin production as already mentioned, and these<br />

gases are in sufficient concentration to create<br />

a public nuisance, more extensive air pollution<br />

control equipment is necessary. Such equipment<br />

is discussed thoroughly under other sections con-<br />

cerning odors (Varnish Cookers and Reduction of<br />

Inedible Animal Matter) and includes equipment<br />

for absorption and chemical oxidation, adsorption,<br />

and combustion, both catalytic and direct-ilame<br />

type.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

VARNISH COOKERS<br />

Varnish cooking processes discussed in this sec-<br />

tion include both the heated processes used to<br />

modify natural or synthetic oils or resins which<br />

will be the film-forming vehicles in inks or<br />

coatings (i.e., varnish, paint, enamel, lacquer)<br />

and those processes completely synthesizing<br />

iilm-forming vehicles. The effect of the various<br />

processes is to shorten the drying time and im-<br />

prove the qualities of chemicals which would,<br />

without modification, dry and form a film. Some<br />

varnish cooking processes will involve the manu-<br />

facture of a resin simultaneously with the rnodi-<br />

iication of the drying oils and in the same equip-<br />

ment.<br />

Varnish cooking, until the 19301s, involved only<br />

two basic processes: heat processing of natural<br />

oils to purify them or improve their drying time<br />

ior use in coatings and manufacture of oleoresin-<br />

nus varnish by heat processing the natural oils<br />

with natural resins. Since that time synthetic<br />

resins and synthetic film-forming compounds<br />

have greatly expanded the number of heating<br />

processes employed. Many new coatings do not<br />

use the film-forming products oi varnish cooklng.<br />

As a result, the products of varnish cooking con-<br />

stitute a much lower percentage of all coating<br />

materials than they did a decade ago. Neverthe-<br />

less, varnish cooking products still are exten-<br />

sively produced for use in the manufacture of<br />

surface coatings.<br />

DEFINITIONS - PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES<br />

Table 191 lists the various oils that are processed<br />

in varnish cooking equipment and the resins, both<br />

natural and synthetic, most frequently used in the<br />

manufacture of the iilm-forming materials. Var-<br />

nish cooking operations are varied, All opera-<br />

tions of this type, however, involve the applica-<br />

tion oi heat to these materials and their resultant<br />

polymerization, depolyrnerization, melting,<br />

esterification, isomerization, etc. Some of the<br />

most common processes are defined below.<br />

Boiled Oil. Linseed oil, soybean oil or other<br />

natural oils heated with small percentages oi<br />

oxides, acetates, or other salts of lead, manga-<br />

nese, or cobalt are known as boiled oils. During<br />

the process, the oil thickens, its density in-<br />

creases, and its color darkens, principally due<br />

to polymerization hut also to some oxidation.<br />

When catalysts, certain metal oxides, activated<br />

nickel, or sulfur dioxide are added, isomeriza-<br />

tion, or conjugation, occurs. This process is<br />

periormed to accelerate the normal drying time<br />

oi the oil. While oil so treated is known as


Table 191. VARNISH COOKING INGREDIENTS<br />

(Shreve, 1967)<br />

Oils<br />

Linseed oil<br />

Tung oil<br />

Dehydrated castor oil<br />

Castor oil<br />

Fish oils<br />

Tall oils<br />

Soya oil<br />

Cottonseed oil<br />

Coconut oil<br />

Natural resins<br />

Shellac, insect secretion<br />

Rosin<br />

East India<br />

Manila<br />

Kauri, old fossil resin<br />

Copal, fossil resin<br />

Dammar, recent fossil resin<br />

Synthetic resins<br />

Phenol-aldehvde (oil-soluble)<br />

Alkyd resins<br />

Mannitol esters<br />

Pentaerythritol esters and interesters<br />

Limed rosin<br />

Ester gum<br />

Cumarone-indene<br />

Melamine and urea-formaldehvde<br />

Chlorinated rubber and diphenyl<br />

Acrylates<br />

Vinyl resins<br />

Silicones<br />

Depolymerized copals<br />

Epoxies<br />

Polyurethanes<br />

boiled oil, the oil actually is heated only to tem-<br />

peratures of 360' to 580DF, which are below the<br />

boiling point.<br />

Heat-Bodied Oil. Linseed and other natural oils,<br />

including nut, vegetable, and marine oils, heated<br />

to temperatures from 485" to 620°F are known as<br />

heat-bodied oils. The viscosity of the oil, or its<br />

"body," is increased; the amount of increase de-<br />

pends upon the kind of oil and the time and tem-<br />

perature levels to which the oils are heated.<br />

Bodying is done principally for oils to be used in<br />

enamels and printing inks and results mainly from<br />

polymerization, although some oxidation also<br />

takes place.<br />

Blown Oil. Linseed oil and other natural oils may<br />

also be bodied by bubbling air through them and,<br />

in this case, are known as blown oils. The reac-<br />

tion is mainly oxidation; however, some polymeri-<br />

zation of the oxidized molecules also occurs.<br />

During the blowing process, the oil is heated to<br />

temperatures of 212 " to 390 "F.<br />

Varnish Cookers 709<br />

Esterification. The reaction of an organic acid<br />

(or acid anhydride) with an alcohol is known as<br />

esterification. In varnish cooking, copolymer<br />

oils, such as soyhean oil-maleic anhydride, are<br />

esterified with glycerol or other polyhydric alco-<br />

hols, or the vegetable oil may first be alcoholized<br />

and then treated with the anhydride. These opera-<br />

tions produce good drying oils from less desirable<br />

ones by increasing the double bond structures of<br />

the molecules. Polymeric esters, good synlhetic<br />

film-forming materials, are prepared by csteri-<br />

lication of glycerol, fatty acids, and phrhalic<br />

anhydride. These processes are performed in<br />

closed vessels at moderate temperatures.<br />

Spirit Varnish. Most spirit varnishes do not<br />

involve varnish cooking, but are mostly solutions<br />

of resins and volatile solvents mixed at room<br />

temperature. However, one spirit varnish, gloss<br />

oil, does involve varnish cooking. Resins are<br />

cooked at moderate to high temperatures with<br />

slaked lime, and the hot calcium resinate product<br />

is thinned with petroleum spirits.<br />

Oleoresinous Varnish. These varnishes are manu<br />

factured hy heating various combinations of natural<br />

oils with various svnthetic or natural resins<br />

to hlgh - temperatures, 520 " to 650 OF. The final<br />

product is thinned with solvent, and drying agents<br />

are added after thinning.<br />

Oil Breaking. Linseed oil, or other natural oils,<br />

contain some unsaponifiable matter, usually 1 to<br />

L percent. Those oils to be used in coatings<br />

without any other treatment will he cleared of<br />

most of this unsaponifiable material by the "break-<br />

ing" process. If the oils were allowed to age,<br />

this material would eventually separate and, along<br />

with other foreign matter, would settle as foots.<br />

Heating the oil to about 450 "F accelerates this<br />

separation and the oil is said to "break."<br />

Gum Running. Some natural resins, such as<br />

kauri gum, are insoluble in oil. In order to use<br />

them, they first are heated to temperatures of<br />

570 " to 700 "F. Then they are mixed with heated<br />

oils to produce the desired varnish product. This<br />

high temperature process, called gum running,<br />

serves to depolymerize the resin.<br />

MAJOR TYPES OF VARNISH COOKING EQUIPMENT<br />

Varnish cooking processes are conducted in two<br />

types of vessels--the open-topped portable kettle<br />

and the newer, totally enclosed, stationary kettle.<br />

The open kettles are cylindrical vessels with<br />

dished or flat bottoms. They usually are trans-<br />

ported on a three- or four-wheel truck, and are<br />

heated over an open flame. This type of kettle<br />

usually varies in capacity from 185 to 375 gallons


710 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

and is made of steel, copper, monel, aluminum,<br />

nickel, or stainless steel. Under most operating<br />

conditions, the kettle is charged in a loading<br />

room and then moved to the fire pit. It is heated<br />

over the fire pit and then, when the reaction is<br />

complete, transferred to another location for<br />

cooling. When the contents have cooled to the<br />

proper temperature, the kettle may be transferred<br />

to a third location for the addition of thinners<br />

and dryers or for transfer of its contents to<br />

a thinning tank. In the past, it was common to<br />

manually agitate the contents during cooking.<br />

Materials in open kettles now are seldom agitated<br />

manually. Agitation is provided by air-driven or<br />

electrically driven mixers and by sparging the<br />

contents with an inert gas, such as carbon dioxide<br />

or nitrogen. Figure 553 shows a kettle of this<br />

type. The open kettle still is employed extensively<br />

in paint manufacturing establishments.<br />

The enclosed stationary kettles are indirectly<br />

heated or cooled by jacketing or by coils. The<br />

kettles are vertical cylinders with dished tops<br />

and dished bottoms. They are constructed of an<br />

appropriate grade of stainless steel to resist cor-<br />

rosion. Some kettles are glass lined. An electri-<br />

cally driven agitator is mounted on the kettle.<br />

Batch weighing or metering equipment, pumps,<br />

and piping for the charging of liquid raw materi-<br />

als are installed with the kettle. The kettles are<br />

equipped with sealable openings through which<br />

solid or liquid materials can be charged manually.<br />

Inert gas is sparged into the bottom so as lo per-<br />

meate the entire contents of the kettle. For some<br />

types of production, condensers for reflux or<br />

vapor recovery are installed on the kettle.<br />

Figure 553. Uncontrolled open kettle far varnish<br />

cooking.<br />

Thinning for viscosity adjustment, or the addi-<br />

tion of dryers or unreacted monomers, usually<br />

is not done in the reaction kettle. Instead, the<br />

contents are pumped to other vessels designed<br />

for these purposes. These second vessels, or<br />

thinning vessels, also are closed and equipped<br />

with agitators. Jackets or coils for indirect<br />

heating or cooling, and nozzles for sparging<br />

with inert gas are installed. The thinning ves-<br />

sels are equipped with water-cooled vent con-<br />

densers mounted so that condensed solvent will<br />

drain back into the vessel. The closed station-<br />

ary kettles are almost exclusively found at chemi-<br />

cal companies engaged in manufacturing a wide<br />

variety of paint bases.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

Varnish cooking processes in both open and closed<br />

kettles are carried out at temperatures ranging<br />

from 200 " to 650 "F or higher. At times, rapid<br />

cooling of the cook is necessary to control the<br />

reaction or to control the composition of a parti-<br />

cular product. At approximately 350 "F, almost<br />

all of the solid or liquid materials begin to voli-<br />

tilize and emit vapors or gases from the vessel.<br />

As long as the ingredients are held at or above<br />

this temperature, the emissions continue. Some<br />

varnish cooking operations require 3 to 10 hours<br />

or longer. The quantity, composition, and rate<br />

of emissions depend upon ingredients in the cook,<br />

maximum temperature levels, method of intro-<br />

ducing additives, degree of stirring, cooking time,<br />

and extent of air or inert gas blowing (Stenburg,<br />

1958). Total emissions for oleoresinous varnish<br />

cooking can be as high as 6 to 12 percent by<br />

weight of the materials in the kettle, and those<br />

from oil cooking and blowing, 4 to 6 percent by<br />

weight.<br />

Cooker emissions vary in composition, depending<br />

upon the ingredients in the cook. Mattiello (1943)<br />

states that compounds emitted from cooking of<br />

oleoresinous varnish include water vapor, fatty<br />

acids, glycerine, acrolein, phenols, aldehydes,<br />

ketones, terpene oils, terpenes, and carbon diox-<br />

ide. Heat-bodying of oils causes the emission of<br />

these same compounds less the phenols, terpene<br />

oils, and terpenes. Gum running yields water<br />

vapor, fatty acids, terpenes, terpene oils, and<br />

tar. Besides the air contaminants listed by Mat-<br />

tiello, some highly offensive sulfur compounds<br />

such as hydrogen sulfide, allylsulfide, butyl mer-<br />

captan, and thiophene are formed when tall oil is<br />

esterified with glycerine and ~entaerythritol.<br />

These compounds are emitted as a result of small<br />

amounts of sulfur in the tall oil. Attempts to<br />

alleviate this problem involve further refining of<br />

the tall oil to remove as much sulfur as possible.


Of all the compounds emitted, acrolein is the one<br />

most generally associated with oil cooking because<br />

of its pungent, disagreeable odor and irritating<br />

characteristics. Some of the more odorous com-<br />

pounds have very low odor thresholds; acrolein,<br />

for example, has a threshold at 1.8 ppm and some<br />

of the sulfur compounds have a threshold at about<br />

0.001 ppm.<br />

A good portion of the emissions from these opera-<br />

tions are in the form of noncondensibles, insoluble<br />

gases or vapors, or condensible vapors which<br />

tend to form submicron size droplets. Emissions<br />

in the form of particulate matter have been found,<br />

upon examination under the microscope, to be in<br />

a size range between 2 and 20 microns in diame-<br />

ter. The median size of several samples varied<br />

from 8 to 10 microns.<br />

An important source of emissions is the thinning<br />

of varnish with solvent. In most of the newer<br />

stationary enclosed kettle installations, the<br />

cooked varnish is pumped from the reaction kettIe<br />

to a thinning tank that is equipped with an integral-<br />

ly mounted condenser. In the older portable open-<br />

kettle operations, however, the thinning operation<br />

is carried out near the boiling point of the solvent,<br />

and emissions of vapor can be considerable. Con-<br />

sequently, the thinning tank can be hooded and the<br />

vapors can be ducted to the same control system<br />

that removes the fumes from the cooker. While<br />

emission of solvents from the thinning tanks con-<br />

stitutes a greater potential for formation of photo-<br />

chemical smog than emissions from the varnish<br />

cooker, emissions from varnish cookers cause<br />

greater local nuisance problems because of nox-<br />

ious odors. Both operations result in the emis-<br />

sion of visible dense white plumes.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

For air pollution control to succeed, all fumes<br />

emitted from the kettles and thinning vessels<br />

must be captured and conveyed to a control device<br />

under all operating conditions without hindering<br />

producti~n.<br />

Stationary closed kettle emission volumes are<br />

entirely dependent upon the type of operation per-<br />

formed, whether the kettle is sealed shut, oper-<br />

ated under partial vacuum, or merely vented with-<br />

out sealing so that air may be drawn into it and<br />

over its contents. <strong>Air</strong> volumes necessary to ex-<br />

haust open portable kettles are considerably<br />

reduced with properly designed close-fitting hoods.<br />

Sufficient air must continuously be swept through<br />

the open kettles so as to prevent the build up of<br />

explosive concentrations of the volatiles above<br />

the surface of the liquids within the kettle and in<br />

the exhaust ductwork.<br />

Figure 554 shows two open kettles in place over<br />

Varnish Cookers 711<br />

two open furnaces. The kettles are equipped with<br />

well designed removable hoods. The hoods are<br />

provided with openings for the manual addition of<br />

materials, for thermometers, and for agitators.<br />

The openings have hinged covers so that they can<br />

be kept closed except when being used.<br />

Indraft velocities of at least 100 to 150 fpm should<br />

be provided through the face of all the openings<br />

when the largest covered area is open to prevent<br />

the escape of contaminants from the kettle during<br />

charging or observation. Good hood design pro-<br />

vides the necessary indraft velocities when gas<br />

volumes of 100 to 300 cfm are exhausted from the<br />

kettle. Because the volatiles coming from a kettle<br />

condense on the hood, the hoods for open kettles<br />

should be provided with an outer trough to collect<br />

the condensed liquids whlch will appear on the<br />

hood surfaces. This trough should have provi-<br />

sions for drainage, usually to a small container.<br />

In the past, exhaust ductwork was sized for velo-<br />

cities of 1500 to 2000 fpm. Currently, ductwork<br />

frequently is designed for higher velocities, usual-<br />

ly 3000 to 3500 fpm. Higher velocities help reduce<br />

the rate of deposition of cond'ensed vapors on the<br />

duct walls. An exhaust gas blower in the exhaust<br />

system is necessary when venting open kettles.<br />

A blower also is required for closed kettles oper-<br />

ated at atmospheric conditions rather than under<br />

pressure or vacuum. When the air pollution con-<br />

trol system includes an afterburner, reliance upon<br />

the natural draft generated by its stack can be<br />

hazardous. Positive ventilation should be pro-<br />

vided to keep the vapor composition above the<br />

kettle below explosive limits and to maintain sd-<br />

ficient velocity in the exhaust system and at the<br />

entrance to the afterburner to prevent flashback.<br />

When the exhaust system includes an afterburner,<br />

the best placement of the exhaust blower is down-<br />

stream from the afterburner. If it is installed in<br />

front of the afterburner, serious maintenance and<br />

operating problems occur because deposits quickly<br />

build on the fan blades, resulting in unbalanced<br />

operation. With the blower on the discharge side<br />

of the afterburner, blower blades remain clean<br />

and in balance. Exhaust gases are cooled by dilu-<br />

tion with ambient air before entering the blower<br />

to a temperature of about 500 'F. Blowers of<br />

standard construction are available for operation<br />

at this temperature.<br />

The exhaust ductwork is subject to severe corro-<br />

sion and to heavy fouling. Use of appropriate<br />

corrosion-resistant material such as stainless<br />

steel will overcome most corrosion problems.<br />

Fouling problems require that the ductwork con-<br />

tain a number of sealed clean-out openings for<br />

access to the interior and that a regular cleaning<br />

schedule be maintained.


712 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 554. Open varnish-cooking kettles with exhaust hoods (Standard Brand Paints<br />

Company, Torrance, Calif.).<br />

Fouling has been reduced greatly or completely<br />

eliminated in some recent installations where the<br />

air pollution control device is an afterburner. In<br />

these installations, concentric type ductwork,<br />

with the outer duct insulated, has been used. A<br />

portion of the hot exhaust gas from the afterburn-<br />

er, after dilution to temperatures in the range of<br />

500" to 600 "F, is blown into the annular space<br />

between the inner and outer duct. The hot gas in<br />

the annular space heats the internal duct carry-<br />

ing the contaminated effluent from the kettles.<br />

The heated gases pass countercurrent to flow in<br />

the interior duct. The temperature of the wall of<br />

the duct carrying the contaminated effluent is<br />

raised, and condensation on the ductwork is<br />

limited. Condensation usually is restricted to<br />

low-viscosity liquids which may be carried along<br />

in the exhaust gas stream. The concentric duct-<br />

work is usually used only for the main section.<br />

Where dibasic acids, especially phthalic anhy-<br />

dride, are employed in the cooking operation,<br />

the concentric ductwork is extended to the ex-<br />

haust port on each kettle. Figure 555 illustrates<br />

one such exhaust system. Experience for 3 years<br />

with this system has demonstrated that cleaning<br />

of the duct has not been necessary. However,<br />

some provision for draining fluids from the duct<br />

should be included. Ln the installation illustrated,<br />

the downcomer duct to the afterburner is equipped<br />

with a well for fluid accumulation. The well has<br />

a removable cover, and it is cleaned after each<br />

week of operation.<br />

The cost of installing the concentric ductwork and<br />

its insulation adds approximately 150 percent to<br />

the cost of single ductwork. However, the reduc-<br />

tion of maintenance, the reduction of fire hazards,<br />

and the elimination of deposits inside the duct<br />

make the additional capital expenditure worthwhile.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMEN1<br />

All operations in which varnish or paint base is<br />

cooked or in which drying oils are bodied or other-<br />

wise prepared by the application of heat should be<br />

vented to air pollution control devices. From 1<br />

to 5 percent or more of the total material charged<br />

to a kettle for these processes otherwise is emit-<br />

ted to the atmosphere during operation. The<br />

material emitted includes the odorous irritating<br />

compounds previously mentioned. In addition to<br />

odors, the emissions contain considerable parti-<br />

culate matter and frequently form a highly visible<br />

plume. The control devices applicable to varnish<br />

cooking are the same as those used for controlling<br />

other sources of organic vapors, particulates,<br />

odors, and visible emissions, with some modifi-<br />

cations to meet those situations unique to the var-<br />

nish cooking operations.


CONTAMINATED<br />

EXHAUST DUCT<br />

EXHAU TO AFTERBURNER<br />

BLOWE<br />

Varnish Cookers 713<br />

EXHAUST DUCT<br />

Figure 555. Varnish-cooking control system using heated concentric ductwork and an afterburner (Old Quaker<br />

Paint Co., Torrance. California).<br />

PHERE


714 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Scrubbers<br />

Scrubbers, in the past, were the only devices<br />

installed to control emissions from varnish cook-<br />

ing. The inherent hazard of fire or explosion pre-<br />

vented serious consideration of afterburners. As<br />

the control of air pollution became more critical,<br />

direct-fired afterburners were chosen to comply<br />

with the more stringent regulations. For some<br />

processes, however, scrubbers still are adequate<br />

for controlling emissions of condensibles and are<br />

less costly to install and operate than afterburners.<br />

Sampling results (test 20, Table 192) for a spray<br />

scrubber venting a closed vessel producing alkyd<br />

modified varnish, illustrated in Figure 556, indi-<br />

cated that emissions from certain processes can<br />

be controlled sufficiently to meet stringent ernis-<br />

sion limitations.<br />

Many existing scrubbers have been left in place<br />

when afterburners were installed to serve as con-<br />

densers and to provide flashback protection before<br />

the contaminated emissions enter the afterburner.<br />

The various types of scrubbers which have been<br />

used include simple spray towers, sieve plate<br />

towers, chambers or columns with series of baf-<br />

fles and water curtains, agitated tanks, and water<br />

venturi jets. Scrubbers employing spray nozzles<br />

have suffered from a major disadvantage. The<br />

excessive maintenance required to keep the noz-<br />

zles free from clogging or to replace the nozzles<br />

because of erosion by recirculated scrubbing<br />

Table 192. SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF STACK DISCHARGE TESTS, VARNISH COOKING<br />

CONTROLLED BY AFTERBURNERSANDSCRUBBERS<br />

Itsm<br />

TOW proceaa time, hr<br />

Rots.. time of teat.<br />

hr<br />

Temperature of<br />

material. OF<br />

Teat No. 3<br />

Test No. 5<br />

1. Alkyd resin u=rnish Alkyd reeh vnrniah Heat body-<br />

2. Oleorealn varniah Two kettles ing oil<br />

Two - closed<br />

GO2 L~IOB.<br />

stage of procesa Heating to<br />

maldmum temperawre<br />

ExLaust volume. scfm<br />

Temperature of<br />

exhaust. OF<br />

Particulate loading. a<br />

grlecf<br />

Rate of particuloles. iblhr<br />

Organic acids, grlsci<br />

Aldehydes-ketone., p p<br />

Hydrocarbona, ppm<br />

Ait pollution control<br />

equipment<br />

Afterburner temperature,<br />

OF<br />

Total. 950<br />

Glycerine - fatty acid8<br />

Pentaerythrifol<br />

Phthalic anhydride<br />

Closed, gas fired<br />

N2 atmoa.<br />

106 147<br />

5.20<br />

0.174<br />

67<br />

I<br />

103<br />

3 spray towers<br />

vertical afterburner<br />

1200 to I240<br />

I<br />

Linseed<br />

oil<br />

ope.<br />

I<br />

Test No. 16<br />

Phenolic rcein varnish<br />

Linseed oil<br />

Phenolic resin<br />

Two. open<br />

rf<br />

Final f cook, f cooling<br />

i L 7<br />

Heating to mardmum<br />

temperature and<br />

cooling<br />

Sinale sorav in duct I Horizontal afterburner<br />

Teat No. 20<br />

Alkyd resin varninh<br />

Soy. chinasmod oils<br />

Glycerine<br />

Phthalic anhydride<br />

Closed<br />

N2 Ltmo.. .<br />

light vacvvm<br />

Major<br />

phthalic<br />

add.<br />

2bOf<br />

90<br />

I spray<br />

in stack<br />

Minor<br />

phthalic<br />

add.<br />

Organic acids, grlscf 1 0.066 1 None / . 1 . 1 0.15 / 0.082<br />

Efrlclcnolb<br />

*art>~"lates, %<br />

Chgmlc sclds. %<br />

Aldehydes-kctone., %<br />

Hydrocarbon#, %<br />

94<br />

48<br />

73<br />

99t<br />

.See Rule 2. in appendix.<br />

b<br />

&si. - reduction of total weight.<br />

'4ccur.q ~tmited to 10 ppm.<br />

d<br />

Wution air included.<br />

'hrulySi. of combustible gam. by CCLR method. Total ppm.<br />

'with ono md tao .toam let8 in stack.<br />

97.3<br />

99.9+<br />

73<br />

85<br />

93<br />

94<br />

90d<br />

170


U<br />

GAS BURNER<br />

STEAM<br />

-<br />

F~gure 556. D~agram of a spray scrubber venting oleoresln<br />

rnanufacturlng equ~pment. Afterburners<br />

fluids has resulted in every scrubber of this type<br />

being taken out of service. Packed scrubbers<br />

have not been used in these operations because<br />

the condensed fumes rapidly plug the packing.<br />

1<br />

I<br />

Varnish Cookers 715<br />

WATER<br />

SEWER<br />

The scrubbers employed in these systems usually<br />

are designed with the flow of the contaminated gas<br />

stream countercurrent to that of the scrubbing<br />

medium. Generally, water is the scrubbing<br />

medium, and is not recirculated. Attempts have<br />

been made to use acids, bases, various oils, and<br />

solvents as scrubbing materials, but these scrub-<br />

bing solutions have not resulted in an increase in<br />

efficiency that would warrant their higher costs.<br />

Wetting agents have been added to scrubbing water,<br />

and in some special circumstances have resulted<br />

in increased collection efficiency.<br />

Condensers<br />

WATER<br />

Condensers have been used both to conserve sol-<br />

vent and to control visible emissions during the<br />

thinning operation. Varnish is thinned by the slow<br />

addition of the hot varnish to cold solvent or vice<br />

versa. Maximum solvent vaporization occurs<br />

during the initial contact between the solvent and<br />

hot varnish. Condensers must be designed to<br />

control the higher rate of emissions during the<br />

initial contact. When thinning vessels are vented<br />

directly to the atmosphere, loss of solvent, in the<br />

form of a dense white plume, is considerable. A<br />

condenser, usually a water-cooled shell-and-tube<br />

type, is mounted on the top of the thinning vessel<br />

vertically or at an angle so that the condensed sol-<br />

vent can drain back into the vessel.<br />

At one installation, a water -cooled shell-and-tube<br />

condenser having 52 square feet of transfer area<br />

and using copper tubes was mounted on a 350-gal-<br />

Ion hatch thinning tank. The condenser prevented<br />

visible emissions when 125 gallons of solvent was<br />

added to 195 gallons of varnish at 340 'F. The<br />

initial solvent flow rate was 7$ gallons per minute<br />

for 3f minutes: and the final flow rate was 12 gal-<br />

Ions per minute over an additional 14-minute<br />

period.<br />

Gas flow velocity from the condenser should be<br />

kept below 1000 fpm to minimize entrainment of<br />

condensate droplets. An entrainment separator<br />

should be installed on the discharge side of the<br />

condenser. The separator retains liquid particulates<br />

released during the initial high-volume surge<br />

of solvent vapors, which occurs when cold solvent<br />

and hot varnish first contact each other. Details<br />

on designing vapor condensers are given - in Chaater<br />

5 of this manual.<br />

Incineration of the effluent from varnish cooking<br />

processes has proved to be the most effective con-<br />

trol method and one relatively free of major main-<br />

tenance problems. Incineration has been effective<br />

for both open portable kettles and closed station-<br />

ary kettles. A direct-fired afterburner designed<br />

with appropriate parameters can reduce inlet odor<br />

concentration by 99 percent or more, and can<br />

oxidize 90 percent or more of the carbon in con-<br />

taminated effluent to carbon dioxide. Figures 555<br />

and 557 show two types of afterburners used to<br />

vent open kettle installations. Table 192 summar-<br />

izes results of stack tests conducted on direct-<br />

fired afterburners.<br />

In Los Angeles County, afterburners controlling<br />

emissions from varnish cookers have been pre-<br />

dominantly of the direct-fired type. Catalytic<br />

afterburners, however, are known to have been<br />

installed to control emissions from varnish cook-<br />

ers in other areas of the United States. Although<br />

a few catalytic units have been installed in the past<br />

in Los Angeles County, they have since been re-<br />

placed with direct-fired afterburners.<br />

One of the two most important design requirements<br />

for direct-fired afterburners is the capacity to<br />

operate at outlet temperatures of 1200" to 1400 "F<br />

under all conditions. When afterburner tempera-<br />

tures fall below 1200 "F. odor reduction is inade-<br />

quate and combustion efficiency for particulate<br />

matter and organic gases and vapors falls below<br />

90 percent an a carbon basis. The second impor-<br />

tant design requirement is the provision for direct<br />

flame contact with all vapors and gases emitted<br />

from the varnish cookers. Tests of afterburners,<br />

where direct flame contact of all the emissions<br />

did not occur, even with outlet temperatures of<br />

1400 'F and retention times greater than 0.3<br />

second, have revealed that combustion efficiencies<br />

for carbon have fallen well below 90 percent.


716 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 557. Direct-fired vertical afterburner (Great<br />

Western Paint Co., a division of Western Wood<br />

Preserving Co., Los Angeles, Calif.).<br />

A serious concern in venting varnish cookers and<br />

similar process equipment to an afterburner is<br />

the danger of flashback and fire. Where scrubbing<br />

equipment is used in the exhaust system prior to<br />

entry to the afterburner, this danger is usually<br />

overcome. Newer installations of afterburners<br />

on this type of equipment have not used a scrubber<br />

upstream from the afterburner. A short section<br />

of ductwork just prior to the entrance of the after-<br />

burner is designed so that the gases and vapors<br />

passing into this section are at a velocity consi-<br />

derably greater than the ilame propagation rate<br />

of the effluent gases in the reverse direction.<br />

Generally, flame propagation rates are 18 to 20<br />

fps, but the ductwork is designed for gas veloci-<br />

ties of about 50 fps.<br />

If there are considerable deposits inside the duct<br />

at the entrance to the afterburner, these deposits<br />

will start to burn after a lengthy afterburner oper-<br />

ation. Fire control dampers, when employed in<br />

the exhaust system ductwork, require constant<br />

maintenance and inspection if they are to be effec-<br />

tive. Several fires and explosions have been<br />

traced to failure of, or slow operation of, these<br />

devices.<br />

Heat-recovery equipment should be seriously con-<br />

sidered when an afterburner is used to control<br />

emissions. Heat exchangers can be installed so<br />

that the hot exhaust gases from the afterburner<br />

are cooled to below 600 "F by transferring waste<br />

heat to either Dowtherm, water (steam), or other<br />

heat-transfer media. The recovered heat then<br />

can be used in jacketed or coil-equipped kettles<br />

or in other plant process equipment. At a recent<br />

installation, a waste heat boiler utilizing the heat<br />

of the afterburner exhaust reduced fuel costs by<br />

supplying process steam in the plant. The payout<br />

time for the waste heat boiler is expected to be<br />

2 to 4 years.<br />

SULFURIC ACID MANUFACTURING<br />

Sulfuric acid is used as a basic raw material<br />

in an extremely wide range of industrial pro-<br />

cesses and manufacturing operations. Because<br />

of its widespread usage, sulfuric acid plants are<br />

scattered throughout the nation near every indus-<br />

trial complex.<br />

Basically, the production of sulfuric acid involves<br />

the generation of sulfur dioxide (SO2), its oxidation<br />

to sulfur trioxide (SO3), and the hydration of<br />

the SO3 to form sulfuric acid. The two main processes<br />

are the chamber process and the contact<br />

process. The chamber process uses the reduction<br />

of nitrogen dioxide to nitric oxide as the oxidizing<br />

mechanism to convert the SO2 to SO3 The<br />

contact process, using a catalyst to oxidize the<br />

SO2 to SO is the more modern and the more<br />

3 '<br />

commonly encountered. For these reasons further<br />

discussion will be restricted to the contact<br />

process of sulfuric acid manufacture.<br />

CONTACT PROCESS<br />

A flow diagram of a "Type S" (sulfur-burning,<br />

hot-gas purification type) contact sulfuric acid<br />

plant is shown in Figure 558. Combustion air is<br />

drawn through a silencer, or a filter when the air<br />

is dust laden, by either a single-stage centrif-<br />

ugal blower or a positive-pressure-type blower.<br />

Since the blower is located on the upstream side,<br />

the entire plant is under a slight pressure, vary-<br />

ing from 1. 5 to 3. 0 psig. The combustion air<br />

is passed through a drying tower before it enters<br />

the sulfur burner. In the drying tower, moisture<br />

is removed from the air by countercurrent scrub-<br />

bing with 98 to 99 percent sulfuric acid at tem-<br />

peratures from 90" to 120°F. The drying tower<br />

has a topside internal-spray eliminator located<br />

just below the air outlet to minimize acid mist<br />

carryover to the sulfur burner.


WEAK hClO<br />

DRIlNG<br />

lDWER<br />

FILTERED AIR<br />

Molten sulfur is pumped to the burner where it<br />

is burned with the dried combustion air to form<br />

SO2. Normally a gas containing approximately<br />

9 percent SO2 is produced in a Type S plant. The<br />

combustion gases together with excess air leave<br />

the burner at about 1,600°F and are cooled to<br />

apprdximately 800°F in a water tube-type waste-<br />

heat boiler. The combustion gases then pass<br />

through a hot-gas filter into the first stage or<br />

"pass" of the catalytic converter at between<br />

750" and 800°F to begin the oxidation of the SO2<br />

to SO3. If the molten sulfur feed has been fil-<br />

tered at the start of the process, the hot-gas<br />

filter may be omitted. Because the conversion<br />

reaction is exothermic, the gas mixture from.<br />

the first stage of the converter is cooled in a<br />

smaller waste-heat boiler. Gas cooling after<br />

the second and third converter stages is achieved<br />

by steam superheaters. Gas leaving the fourth<br />

stage of the converter is partially cooled to ap-<br />

proximately 450 "F in an economizer. Further<br />

cooling takes place in the gas duct before the<br />

gas enters the absorber. The extent of cooling<br />

required depends largely upon whether or not<br />

oleum is to be produced. The total equivalent<br />

conversion from SO2 to SO3 in the four con-<br />

version stages is about 98 percent. Table 193<br />

shows typical temperatures and conversions<br />

at each stage of the four-stage converter. These<br />

figures vary somewhat with variations in gas<br />

composition, operating ra:e, and catalyst con-<br />

dition.<br />

The cooled SO3 combustion gas mixture enters<br />

the lower section of the absorbing tower, which<br />

is similar to the drying tower. The SO3 is ab-<br />

sorbed in a circulating stream of 99 percent<br />

sulfuric acid. The nonabsorbed tail gases pass<br />

overhead through mist removal equipment to<br />

the exit gas stack (Duecker and West, 1959).<br />

Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing 717<br />

MOLTEN<br />

SULFUR Ya"W>>w#:2:>>2.:<br />

A contact process plant intended mainly for use<br />

with various concentrations of hydrogen sulfide<br />

(H2S) as a feed material is known as a wet-gas<br />

Figure 558. ~ i o w diagram of a typical " Type S"<br />

sulfur-burning contact sulfuric acid pl.anf.<br />

~~~ ..........<br />

~~ ....<br />

WEAK IMPURE AClO<br />

Table 193. TEMPERATURES AND CONVERSIONS<br />

IN EACH STAGE OF A FOUR-STAGE CONVERTER<br />

FOR A "TYPE S" SULFUR-BURNING CONTACT<br />

SULFURIC ACLD PLANT<br />

Location of gas<br />

enter in^ 1st pass<br />

.<br />

1<br />

410 1 770<br />

Leaving 1st pass 601.8 1,115<br />

74.0<br />

Entering 2d pass<br />

Leaving 2d pass<br />

Entering 3d pass<br />

Leaving 3d pass<br />

Entering 4th pass<br />

Leaving 4th pass<br />

Total rise<br />

Temperatures,<br />

"C I "F<br />

t<br />

Equivalent<br />

conversion, 70<br />

plant, as shown in Figure 559. The wet-gas<br />

plant's combustion furnace is also used for burn-<br />

ing sulfur or dissociating spent sulfuric acid. A<br />

common procedure for wet-gas plants located near<br />

petroleum refineries is to burn simultaneously<br />

H2S, molten sulfur, and spent sulfuric acid from<br />

the alkylation processes at the refineries. In<br />

some instances a plant of this type may produce<br />

sulfuric acid by using only H2S or spent acid.<br />

In a wet-gas plant, the H2S gas, saturated with<br />

water vapor, is charged to the combustion fur-<br />

nace along with atmospheric air. The SO2<br />

formed, together with the other combustion<br />

products, is then cooled and treated for mist<br />

removal. Gas may be cooled by a waste-heat<br />

boiler or by a quench tower followed by Karhate<br />

and updraft coolers. Mist formed is removed


718 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

HYOROGEN SULFIDE<br />

HEAT EXCHANGERS<br />

STAGE<br />

CATALYTIC ABSORBER<br />

...............<br />

...............<br />

...........<br />

%AX ACID STRONG AClO<br />

CDMBUSTION<br />

CHAMBER<br />

820<br />

WASTE<br />

WEAK IMPURE<br />

C<br />

NEAT HUMIOIFYING MIST DRYING ACIO TO STORAGE<br />

BOILER TOWER PRECI PITAIOR TOWER<br />

Figure 559. Flow diagram of a contact-type wet-gas sulfuric acid plant.<br />

by an electrical precipitator. Moisture is re- Table 194. SULFUR TRIOXIDE AND SULFUR<br />

moved from the SO2 and airstream with con- DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM TWO ABSORBERS IN<br />

centrated sulfuric acid in a drying tower. A CONTACT SULFURIC ACID PLANTS<br />

centrifugal blower takes suction on the drying<br />

tower and discharges the dried SO2 and air to<br />

the converters. The balance of the wet-gas pro-<br />

cess is essentially the same as that of the pre-<br />

viously discussed sulfur-burning process.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

The only significant source of air contaminant<br />

discharge from a contact sulfuric acid plant<br />

is the tail gas discharge from the SO3 absorber.<br />

While these tail gases consist primarily of in-<br />

nocuous nitrogen, oxygen, and some carbon di-<br />

oxide, they also contain small concentrations<br />

of SO2 and smaller amounts of SO3 and sulfuric<br />

acid mist. Table 194 shows the SO2 and SO3<br />

discharged from two wet-gas sulfuric plant ab-<br />

sorbers.<br />

A well-designed contact process sulfuric acid<br />

plant operates at 90 to 95 percent conversion of<br />

the sulfur feed into product sulfuric acid. Thus<br />

a 250-ton-per-day plant can discharge 1.25 to 2.5<br />

tons of SO2 and SO3 per day. When present in<br />

sufficient concentration, SO2 is irritating to<br />

throat and nasal passages and injurious to vege-<br />

Gas flow rate,<br />

scfm<br />

Sulfur trioxide,<br />

grlscf<br />

70 by vol as SO2<br />

lblhr<br />

Sulfur dioxide,<br />

grlscf<br />

70 by vol<br />

Ib/hr<br />

Outlet of<br />

absorber No. 1<br />

9,600<br />

0.033<br />

0.002<br />

2.73<br />

2.63<br />

0.22<br />

216<br />

STACK<br />

Outlet of<br />

absorber No. 2<br />

7,200<br />

0.39<br />

2.4<br />

2.45<br />

151.2<br />

tation. SO2 concentrations greater than 0.25 ppm<br />

cause injury to plants on long exposure. The<br />

permissible limit for humans for prolonged ex-<br />

posure is 10 ppm.<br />

Tail gases that contain SO3, owing to incomplete<br />

absorption in the absorber stack, hydrate and<br />

form a finely divided mist upon contact with at-<br />

mospheric moisture. According to Fairlie<br />

(1936) the process temperature of gas going to<br />

the absorber should be on the lower side of a<br />

temperature range between 150" and 230°C.


The optimum acid concentration in the absorb-<br />

ing tower is 98.5 percent. This concentration<br />

has the lowest SO3 vapor pressure. The partial<br />

pressure of SO3 increases if the absorbing acid<br />

is too strong, and SO3 passes out with the tail<br />

gases. If a concentration of absorbing acid<br />

less than 98.5 percent is used, the beta phase<br />

of SO3, which is less easlly absorbed, is pro-<br />

duced. A mist may also form when the pro-<br />

cess gases are cooled before final absorption,<br />

as in the manufacture of oleum.<br />

Water-based mists can form as a result of the<br />

presence of water vapor in the process gases fed<br />

to the converter. This condition is often caused<br />

by poor performance of the drying tower. Effi-<br />

cient performance should result in a moisture<br />

loading of 5 milligrams or less per cubic foot.<br />

In sulfur-burning plants, mists may be formed<br />

from water resulting from the combustion of<br />

hydrocarbon impurities in the sul


720 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

SO2 concentrations resulting from acid plant<br />

startups and upsets could be handled adequately<br />

by a system such as this.<br />

Table 195. SULFUR TRIOXIDE AND SULFUR<br />

DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM A TWO-STAGE<br />

ELECTRICAL PRECIPITATOR SERVLNG<br />

Acid Mist Removal<br />

A CONTACT SULFURIC ACID PLANT<br />

Electrical precipitators<br />

Inlet of<br />

precipitator<br />

Outlet of<br />

prec~pitator<br />

Electrical precipitators are widely used for re- Gas flow rate, scfm 13,400 13,100<br />

moval of sulfuric acid mist from the cold SO2<br />

Gas temperature, "F<br />

160 80<br />

gas stream of wet-purification systems. The<br />

wet-lead-tube type is used extensively in this<br />

service.<br />

Average gas velocity, fps<br />

Collection efficiency, a 70<br />

Moisture in gas, %<br />

GOZ, 70 (stack conditions)<br />

36. 5<br />

0.8<br />

5.9<br />

20. 6<br />

93<br />

4.1<br />

6<br />

Tube-type precipitators have also been used for<br />

treating tail gases from SO3 absorber towers.<br />

More recently, however, two-stage, plate-type<br />

02, %(stack conditions)<br />

CO, 70 (stack conditions)<br />

N2. % (stack conditions)<br />

Sulfur trioxide,<br />

9.6<br />

0<br />

83.4<br />

8.4<br />

0<br />

81.2<br />

precipitators have been used successfully. One grlscf<br />

0.062 0.0048<br />

such unit, lead lined throughout to prevent corro- lhlhr<br />

7. 1 0.54<br />

sion, is designed to handle approximately 20, 000 %by volume<br />

0.0042 0.00032<br />

cfm tail gas from a 300-ton-per-day contact<br />

sulfuric acid plant. This wet-gas plant processes<br />

H7S, - sulfur, and spent alkylation acid. Dry<br />

gas containing SO2, carbon dioxide, oxygen,<br />

nitrogen, and 5 to 10 milligrams of acid mist<br />

per cubic foot enters two inlet ducts to the precipitator.<br />

The gas flows upward through distribution<br />

tiles to the humidifying section. This<br />

section contains 5 feet of 3-inch single-spiral<br />

Sulfur dioxide,<br />

grlscf<br />

4. 1 4.1<br />

lblhr<br />

470 460<br />

70 by volume<br />

0.345 0.345"<br />

aA mechanical rectifier was supplying only 36, 000<br />

volts to the precipitator. During normal operation,<br />

silicon rectifiers suIjply 75,000 volts to the electrode<br />

wires. This should increase the acid mist collection<br />

efficiencv appreciablv.<br />

. --<br />

h~ule 53. 1 for "scavenger plants'' is applicable to<br />

tile irrigated by 800 gpm weak sulfuric acid. this plant rather than Rule 53a, which limits ernis-<br />

The conditioned gas then flows to the ionizing<br />

sions of SO2 to 0. 2 percent by volume. This plant<br />

section, which consists of about 75 grounded<br />

recovers SO2 that would otherwise be emitted to the<br />

curtain electrodes and 100 electrode wire ex-<br />

atmosphere.<br />

tensions.<br />

mechanical rectifier was, however, supplying<br />

only 36, 000 volts to the precipitator during this<br />

test. During normal operation, silicon rectifiers<br />

supply 75, 000 volts to the electrode wires.<br />

Ionized gas then flows to the precipitator section<br />

where charged acid particles migrate to the col-<br />

lector plate electrodes. There are twelve 14-<br />

by 14-foot lead plates and 375 electrode wires.<br />

The negative wire voltage is 75, 000. Acid mi-<br />

grating to the plates flows down through the pre-<br />

cipitator and is collected in the humidifying sec-<br />

tion. The gas from the precipitator section flows<br />

to a 5-foot-diameter, lead-lined stack that dis-<br />

charges to the atmosphere 150 feet above grade.<br />

The high-voltage electrode wires are suspended<br />

vertically by three sets of insulators. Horizontal<br />

motion is eliminated by four diagonally placed in-<br />

sulators, which are isolated from the gas stream<br />

by oil seals. All structural material in contact<br />

with the acid mist is lead clad. Electrical wires<br />

are stainless steel cores with lead cladding. Volt-<br />

age ia supplied from a generator with a maximum<br />

capacity of 30 kilovolt-amperes. A battery of<br />

silicon rectifiers supplies 75, 000 volts of direct<br />

current to the electrode wires.<br />

Table 195 shows the sulfur trioxide and sulfur<br />

dioxide emissions from the previously described<br />

two-stage electrical precipitator. The acid mist<br />

collection efficiency was only 93 percent. A<br />

Packed-bed separators<br />

Packed-bed separators employ sand, coke, or<br />

glass or metal fibers to intercept acid mist par-<br />

ticles. The packing also causes the particles to<br />

coalesce by reason of high turbulence in the small<br />

spaces between packing. Moderate-sized particles<br />

of mist have been effectively removed in a 12-inch-<br />

deep bed of l-inch Berl saddles with gas veloc-<br />

ities of approximately 10 fps.<br />

Glass fiber filters have not been very effective<br />

in mist removal because of a tendency on the<br />

part of the fiber to sag and mat. Nevertheless,<br />

experimental reports by Fairs (1958) on acid<br />

mist removal by silicone-treated glass wool are<br />

encouraging. A special fine-glass wool with a<br />

fiber diameter between 5 and 30 microns was<br />

used. The coarser fibers allowed adequate pene<br />

tration of the bed by the mist particles to ensure<br />

a reasonable long life and ~rovided sufficient<br />

support for the finer fibers in their trapping of<br />

the small acid mist particles.


The glass wool was treated by compressing it<br />

into a filter 2 inches thick to a density of 10<br />

pounds per cubic foot. It was then placed in<br />

a sheet metal container and heated at 500°C<br />

for 1 hour. By this treatment, the stresses<br />

in the compressed fibers were relieved, and<br />

the fiber mass could be removed from the mold<br />

without losing shape or compression. The<br />

fibers were then treated with a solution of meth-<br />

yl cblorosilane.<br />

The threshold concentration for mist visibility<br />

after scrubbing has been found experimentally<br />

by Fairs (1958) to be about 3.6 x gram<br />

SO3 per cubic foot. The discharge gases from<br />

the silicone-treated filter had an SO3 concen-<br />

tration of 1. 8 to 2. 5 x 10-4 gram per cubic<br />

foot and no appreciable acid mist plume. A<br />

faint plume became perceptible at approximate-<br />

ly weekly intervals but was eliminated by flush-<br />

ing the filter bed with water. The average tail<br />

gas-filtering rate for the treated filter was<br />

15. 6 cfm per square foot of filtering area for<br />

a pressure drop of 9-112 to 10 inches water<br />

column. According to Fairs, the effective<br />

life of the silicone fiber should be at least<br />

5,000 hours. Garnetted terylene was also<br />

used but was not as efficient as silicone-treated<br />

glass wool. It should, however, prove ade-<br />

quate for less stringent duties. Its life should<br />

be long since it does not require silicone pre-<br />

treatment. The use of untreated glass wool<br />

fiber proved unsatisfactory in reducing the<br />

opacity of the acid mist plume.<br />

Table 196 shows the SO2 and acid mist emis-<br />

sions from the outlet of a typical silicone-<br />

treated, glass fiber mist eliminator. This<br />

control unit processes absorber discharge gas<br />

from a contact sulfuric acid plant. The acid<br />

mist collection efficiency for the fiber glass<br />

mist eliminator was 98. 9 percent. A success-<br />

ful application of a mist eliminator using treat-<br />

Table 196. EMISSIONS OF SULFUR DIOXIDE<br />

AND ACID MIST FROM THE OUTLET OF<br />

A SILICONE-TREATED, GLASS FIBER MIST<br />

ELIMINATOR SERVING A CONTACT<br />

SULFURIC ACID PLANT<br />

Mist<br />

I inlet I<br />

Concentration, . - erlscf 0.035<br />

Concentration, ppm<br />

ZOO<br />

25<br />

Weight, lhlhr<br />

45<br />

0.5<br />

Collection efficiency, 70 I 98.9<br />

Gas<br />

1<br />

flow rate, scfm<br />

Avg gas velocity, fps<br />

Gas temoerature. ~F<br />

Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing 721<br />

1,300<br />

160<br />

ed fiber (Figure 560) bas been made by the<br />

Monsanto Chemical Company (Brink, 1959).<br />

exact treatment given to the fiber is not available<br />

since it is the property of the inventor, J. A.<br />

Brink, Jr.<br />

FIBER PRCKING<br />

Figure 560. Brink fiber mist eliminator (Brink,<br />

1959).<br />

Wire mesh mist eliminators<br />

Wire mesh mist eliminators are usually con-<br />

structed in two stages. The lower stage of<br />

wire mesh may have a bulk density of about<br />

14 pounds per cubic foot, while the upper stage<br />

is less dense. The two stages are separated<br />

by several feet in a vertical duct. The high-<br />

density lower stage acts as a coalescer. The<br />

reentrained coalesced particles are removed<br />

in the upper stage. Typical gas velocities for<br />

these units range from 11 to 18 fps. The kinet-<br />

ic energy of the mist particle is apparently too<br />

low to promote coalescence at velocities less<br />

than 11 fps, and reentrainment becomes a<br />

problem at velocities greater than 18 fps. The<br />

tail gas pressure drop through a wire mesh<br />

mist installation is approximately 3 inches<br />

water column.


722 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Exit sulfuric acid mist loadings of less than 5<br />

milligrams per cubic foot of gas are normally<br />

obtained from wire mesh units serving plants<br />

making 98 percent acid. No type of mechan-<br />

ical coalescer, however, has satisfactorily<br />

controlled acid mists from oleum-producing<br />

plants. Corrosion possibilities from concen-<br />

trated sulfuric acid must be considered in se-<br />

lecting wire mesh material. The initial cost of<br />

wire mesh equipment is modest. The value of<br />

recovered sulfuric acid is usually sufficient to<br />

pay the first investment in 1 or 2 years (Duecker<br />

and West, 1959).<br />

Ceramic filters<br />

Porous ceramic filter tubes have proved success-<br />

ful in removing acid mist. The filter tubes are<br />

usually several feet in length and several inches<br />

in diameter with a wall thickness of about 318 inch.<br />

The tubes are mounted in a horizontal tube sheet,<br />

with the tops open and the bottoms closed. The<br />

tail gases flow downward into the tubes and pass<br />

out through porous walls. Appreciably more fil-<br />

tering area is required for the ceramic filter<br />

than for the wire mesh type. The porous ceramic<br />

filter is composed of small particles of alumina<br />

or similar refractory material fused with a binder.<br />

The maintenance costs for ceramic tubes is con-<br />

siderably higher than those for wire mesh filters<br />

because of tube breakage. Initial installation<br />

costs are also considerably higher than those for<br />

wire mesh. A pressure drop of 8 to 10 inches<br />

water column is required to effect mist removal<br />

equivalent to that of a wire mesh filter. Thus,<br />

operating costs would also be appreciable (Duecker<br />

and West, 1959).<br />

Sonic agglomeration<br />

The principle of sonic agglomeration is also<br />

used to remove acid particles from waste-gas<br />

streams. Sound waves cause smaller particles<br />

in an aerosol to vibrate and thereby coalesce<br />

into larger particles. Conventional cyclone sep-<br />

arators can then be used for removal of these<br />

larger particles. One installation treating exit<br />

stack gases from a contact acid plant has been<br />

reported to remove 90 percent by weight of acid<br />

in the gas stream. The tail gases leaving the<br />

sonic collector contained 2 to 3 milligrams of<br />

100 percent sulfuric acid mist per cubic foot. A<br />

nuisance factor must be taken into consideration,<br />

however, since some of the sound frequencies<br />

are in the audible range (Duecker and West, 1959).<br />

5 microns in size. A considerable amount of<br />

the larger size acid mist particles may he re-<br />

moved; however, the visibility of the stack<br />

plume is not greatly affected, since the smallest<br />

particle size contributes most to visibility. Vane-<br />

type separators operate at relatively high gas<br />

velocities and thus make better use of the parti-<br />

cles' kinetic energy. They have been found to be<br />

moderately effective for contact plants having<br />

wet-purification systems in reducing stack plume<br />

opacities (Duecker and West, 1959).<br />

SULFUR SCAVENGER PLANTS<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

A sulfur scavenger plant scavenges elemental<br />

sulfur from the waste gases and fuel gases pro-<br />

duced in an oil refinery. Elemental sulfur has a<br />

wide variety of industrial uses and the amount of<br />

sulfur produced by scavenger plants is becoming<br />

increasingly important. As the demand for sul-<br />

fur increases and as natural sulfur deposits are<br />

depleted or their recovery becomes uneconomical,<br />

the price of sulfur will rise. Accordingly, the<br />

'recovery of sulfur from refinery gases containing<br />

high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S)<br />

becomes increasingly economical. From an air<br />

pollution standpoint, the vital function of the sul-<br />

fur scavenger plant is to prevent or reduce the<br />

emission of sulfur compounds to the atmosphere.<br />

SULFUR IN CRUDE OIL<br />

A11 crude oils contain sulfur and sulfur compounds<br />

in widely varying amounts. Some crudes contain<br />

as little as 0.1 percent while others contain 5.0<br />

percent or more, with most crudes having between<br />

1 and 2 percent by weight of sulfur and sulfur com-<br />

pounds. It is beneficial to refinery operations to<br />

remove the sulfur compounds because of their<br />

deleterious effects. The major effects are illus-<br />

trated in Table 197.<br />

In a variety of crude oil refining processes, most<br />

of the sulfur and sulfur compounds in the original<br />

crude oil are converted to H2S. This H2S gas is<br />

contained in the overhead off-gas streams from<br />

these processes and, after separation of ~roduct<br />

gas fractions, remains in the final waste gases<br />

which usually are used as fuel in refinery heaters.<br />

The burning of these gases results in large quanti-<br />

ties of sulfur dioxide (SO2) being formed and emit- 1<br />

Miscellaneous devices ted from the heater stacks. To reduce emissions<br />

Simple baffles and cyclone separators are not<br />

of SO2 from this source, it is necessary to remove<br />

as much H2S as possible from these gases<br />

effective in collecting particles smaller than before they are used as heater fuel.


Sulfur Scavenger Plants 721<br />

Table 197. EFFECT OF SULFUR COMPOUNDS DURING REFINING<br />

Purpose Primary Effect of contaminant<br />

contaminants<br />

Reduce Mercaptans Offensive product odors 0. 002% max. tolerable con-<br />

odor centration<br />

Reduce<br />

corrosion<br />

Reduce oper-<br />

ational pro-<br />

blems<br />

Improve<br />

gasoline octane<br />

Avoid catalyst<br />

poisoning<br />

Elemental S Attacks iron, copper, etc., forming sulfides<br />

Hzs Attacks zinc, copper, iron<br />

Mercaptans Mildly corrosive<br />

1 Corrosion compounds<br />

I<br />

H2S<br />

Iron sulfide<br />

Sulfur compounds<br />

Improve color, Disulfides<br />

reduce gum<br />

I<br />

Thiophenol<br />

(mercaptan)<br />

Plug exchangers, collect on fractionator trays;<br />

spontaneous combustion during cleanout<br />

Highly toxic (dangerous during cleanout)<br />

Foaming in amine systems (reduced efficiency)<br />

Foaming in caustic wash systems<br />

Oxidation (in simlight) to form acids and haze in gas-<br />

oline~<br />

Catalyst in gum formation reactions<br />

Disulfides In the listed order of severity, sulfur compounds<br />

Sulfides reduce the effectiveness of TEL in raising octane<br />

Thiophene ratings<br />

Elemental S In reforming operations, sulfur compounds are con-<br />

Sulfur compounds verted to H2S which may react with catalyst to form<br />

sulfides<br />

Extend lube Sulfur in gasoline Sulfur compounds formed during combustion drastic-<br />

oil life ally reduce lube oil life<br />

REMOVAL OF H2S FROM REFINERY WASTE GASES RNHZ H2S G RNH3HS<br />

There are numerous methods by which H2S can be<br />

separated from hydrocarbon gas streams, and<br />

other methods are in the development stage. The<br />

three methods which are in common use in the<br />

petroleum industry are illustrated in Table 198.<br />

As noted in the table, the iron-sponge process is<br />

not practical for large gas streams or gas streams<br />

with a high H2S content. This process is used<br />

most commonly in desulfurizing natural gas<br />

streams, and the carbonate or amine absorption<br />

processes are used most commonly in petroleum<br />

refinery operations. Of the latter two processes,<br />

the amine is the most popular since refinery waste<br />

gases generally have H2S concentrations well<br />

suited to this process, and a greater removal effi-<br />

ciency is obtained than by the carbonate process.<br />

Both DEA (diethanolomine) and MEA (monoethano-<br />

lamine) are used, with DEA being preferred since<br />

chemical degradation and make-up rates are lower.<br />

Amine solutions will absorb both HzS and CO2<br />

according to the following reactions:<br />

Absorption of H2S occurs at 100 O F or below, and<br />

rejection of sulfide is active at 240 "F. The amine<br />

desulfurization process, therefore, involves con-<br />

tacting the sour (sulfur bearing) gas stream with<br />

a cool amine solution to absorb the H2S and then<br />

regenerating the amine and stripping the H2S from<br />

the amine solution by heating. A typical amine<br />

H2S removal system is shown in Figure 561.<br />

The treated gas leaving the amine desulfuriaation<br />

process will be used as refinery fuel or be burned<br />

in a flare. It is necessary, therefore, to ensure<br />

proper capacity and funcdoning of the amine sys-<br />

tem. The efficiency of an operating amine system<br />

can readily be determined by laboratory analysis<br />

of the sour inlet gas, treated outlet gas, and acid<br />

outlet gas streams. It may also be necessary to<br />

verify the adequacy of a proposed new amine sys-<br />

tem, and the following parameters may be used<br />

for this purpose:


724 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Progress<br />

Iron sponge<br />

Hot potassium<br />

carbonate<br />

Arnine<br />

(MEA or DEA)<br />

Table 198. REMOVAL OF H2S FROM REFINERY GAS<br />

I Gas to be<br />

treated<br />

I process<br />

stages<br />

Advantages<br />

of method<br />

1. Low gas volume<br />

2. Low H2S content<br />

1. High volume<br />

2. Very sour gas<br />

(5 to 50% H2S)<br />

1. High volume<br />

2. Low or intermediate<br />

H2S content<br />

COOL WATER<br />

I I<br />

1. Reaction to<br />

2. Revivification<br />

or<br />

3. Repacking<br />

1. Absorption<br />

2. Regeneration<br />

by decrease in<br />

pressure<br />

1. Absorption<br />

2. Regeneration<br />

by heat striping<br />

I<br />

1. Low initial cost<br />

2. High efficiency<br />

for gas streams<br />

with low H2S content<br />

1. Will reduce H2S<br />

to less than 0.1% in<br />

very sour gas streams<br />

2. Extensive heat exchange<br />

equipment not<br />

required<br />

3. Absorbent (K2CO3)<br />

does not decrade<br />

readily.<br />

1. Will reduce H2S<br />

to less than 1 grain<br />

I100 ft3 in sour gas<br />

stream<br />

2. DEA preferred over<br />

MEA due to degradation<br />

of MEA by carbonyl<br />

sulfide and carbon<br />

disulfide in gas stream<br />

1. Actual H2S/DEA ratio versus H2SIDEA<br />

equilibrium ratio<br />

2. corrosion limitation<br />

3. absorber column sizing.<br />

Figure 561. Amine desulfurization process. standard parameters.<br />

The following example illustrates the calculations<br />

used in verifying the adequacy of a proposed<br />

amine (DEA) desulfurization system:<br />

Given:<br />

Total sour gas feed, scf/day<br />

= 20x106<br />

Specific gravity of sour gas = 0.8<br />

H2S in sour gas feed, weight % = 2.5<br />

DEA solution circulation rate, gal. /min 1.160<br />

DEA concentration, % = 20<br />

Absorber temperature, O F =lo0<br />

Absorber pressure, psig =I20<br />

Absorber diameter, feet = 5.0<br />

Absorber tray spacing, feet = 2.0<br />

Problem:<br />

Verify performance of proposed system against


Sulfur Scavenger Plants 725<br />

Solution: H2S IDEA (actual) =<br />

1. Actual H2S/DEA ratio: 1907 lb Hzs<br />

2. 5% 20 x lo6 scf/day<br />

Total H2S in feed = --<br />

100 24 hrlday 2. Corrosion limitation:<br />

1<br />

x - 1870 lblhr Total H2S =<br />

1 14 f b<br />

= 0. 109<br />

17,500 lb DEA - (OK)<br />

1907 lbIhr = 56. 0 mol/hr<br />

34 lb/mol<br />

Total H2S in DEA (based on 98% regeneration)<br />

Total DEA = 17' 500 lbIhr - 166.5 mol/hr<br />

= (1870)(0. 02) = 21 1b/hr 105.1 lblmol<br />

Total H2S to absorber = 1907 lb/hr<br />

Total DEA flow (20% solution) = (160 gallmin)<br />

x (60 minlhr) = 9600 gallhr<br />

H2S/DEA ratio (maximum recommended) =<br />

mol<br />

0. 4 - mol<br />

20% DEA = 1920 gallhr<br />

H2S DEA ratio (actual) = -- 56 0.336 (OK)<br />

166.5 - --<br />

80% Hz0 = 7680 gallhr<br />

3. Absorber column sizing:<br />

Total DEA flow = (1920 gal/hr)(9.09 lblgal) +<br />

. Experience has shown that a satisfactory<br />

absorber tower cross-sectional area may be<br />

(7680 gal/hr)(8. 34 lblgal) derived from the following equation (Connors,<br />

1958):<br />

HzSIDEA ratio = - x 100 = 2. 34% (by<br />

81,500<br />

weight)<br />

Partial pressure H2S = (120 psi + 14. 7 psi*)<br />

x (760 mm Hgl14.7 psi) x (2. 34%/100) =<br />

163 mm Hg<br />

lb H2S<br />

HzSIDEA equilibrium = 0. 23 -<br />

lb DEA<br />

(from Figure 562)<br />

HzS PRESSURE, mm.Hg (GAS PHASE)<br />

Figure 562. Equilibrium plats of H2S in 20% DEA<br />

aqueous solution.<br />

*Atmospheric pressure.<br />

where<br />

A = absorber cross-sectional area, ft2<br />

B =Brown tray spacing factor<br />

(24 in. ) = 0. 82<br />

C = Barton plate correction<br />

factor (120 psig) = 1. 56<br />

D = specific gravity of sour gas = 0. 80<br />

K : specific gravity of liquid<br />

PEA) = 1. 09<br />

P = gas pressure, psia = 134.7<br />

Q = acid gas volume, lo6 scflday = 20. 0<br />

T = temperature, 'R = 560<br />

Required absorber diameter, Dr = (23.35)*<br />

-<br />

= 4. 83 ft<br />

-<br />

Actual absorber diameter, Da = 5.0 ft (OK)


726 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

The acid gas stream from typical refinery amine<br />

(or potassium carbonate) units will contain we11<br />

over 95 percent acid gas (HZS and carbon dioxide).<br />

I£ desired, there are processes for selective re-<br />

moval of the C02 from the acid gas, but this is<br />

not essential for processing the gas. The remain-<br />

der of the stream will be largely hydrocarbons,<br />

with small amounts of carried-over amine. With-<br />

out air pollution control equipment, this highly<br />

toxic and undesirable gas stream would have to be<br />

burned to convert the H2S to SO2, which is less<br />

toxic but also highly undesirable. <strong>Air</strong> pollution<br />

control equipment is required, therefore, for<br />

reduction of H2S emission to the atmosphere with-<br />

out a corresponding substitution of SO2 emission.<br />

This may be done by conversion of H2S to elemen-<br />

tal sulfur.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

There are numerous processes by which H2S<br />

can be removed from hydrocarbon gas streams<br />

by conversion to free sulfur, but these are pri-<br />

marily natural gas purification processes. The<br />

sulfur scavenger plant, however, serves solely<br />

to produce free sulfur from EZS streams which<br />

have been removed from hydrocarbon streams by<br />

other (amine, etc.) methods. The standard sulfur<br />

scavenger plant is based on the Claus process<br />

which involves oxidation of one-third of the H2S<br />

to SO2 and then catalytically reacting the remain-<br />

ing H2S with the SO2 to form water and free sul-<br />

fur:<br />

and<br />

The second (catalyzed) reaction usually is accom-<br />

plished in two stages, but more recently, three<br />

stages are being used for more complete conver-<br />

sion. Final off-gas is incinerated to prevent un-<br />

reacted HZS from being emitted into the atmos-<br />

phere. This results in some SO2 emission, al-<br />

though only a fraction of that which would have<br />

been emitted upon combustion of all the HZS.<br />

A variation of the basic Claus (split-stream) pro-<br />

cess is the partial-combustion process wherein<br />

the acid gas stream is partially oxidized by con-<br />

trolling the supply of air. The reaction gas is<br />

cooled to condense sulfur vapors and comingled<br />

with air and a slip-stream of acid gas, which are<br />

burned "in-line" so as to reheat the mixture be-<br />

fore it is passed to the first converter. This<br />

reaction gas is again cooled to condense sulfur<br />

vapors before being reheated by "in-line" com-<br />

bustion of additional slip-stream acid gas and<br />

being passed to the second catalytic converter.<br />

Again, the reaction gas is cooled for condensation<br />

of sulfur and then passed to a coalescer for<br />

removal of the remaining sulfur mist before being<br />

incinerated. All condensed sulfur drains to mol-<br />

ten sulfur storage, from which it may be pumped<br />

out and shipped in the molten state or may be<br />

solidified, by cooling in vats or blocks, for han-<br />

dling in the solid state. The basic split-stream<br />

process is illustrated in Figure 563, and the<br />

more commonly used partial-oxidation process<br />

is illustrated in Figure 564.<br />

However high the efficiency of a scavenger<br />

,$ant, the plant will be a source of SO2 air pol-<br />

lutlon slnce remaining sulfur compounds in the<br />

final vent gas will be incinerated to SO2 and then<br />

discharged through a stack to the atmosphere.<br />

Operation of the scavenger plant, however, re-<br />

duces the amount of SO2 emission in proportion<br />

to the amount of sulfur which is recovered, and<br />

this reduces overall emission of pollutants. In<br />

Los Angeles County. APCD Rule 53. 1 specifies<br />

that the scavenger plant must "substantially"<br />

reduce the amount of pollutants which would<br />

otherwise be emitted. In practice, a well-<br />

designed and properly operated scavenger plant<br />

can be expected to recover more than 90 percent<br />

of the sulfur contained in the acid gas feed. The<br />

criterion for evaluating scavenger plants has,<br />

therefore, been the achievement of a recovery<br />

efficiency of 90 percent or greater. Even at<br />

satisfactory plant efficiency, however, the SO2<br />

concentration in incinerated flue gas may exceed<br />

allowable limits and it may, therefore, be neces-<br />

sary to add dilution air to the incinerated gas<br />

(see Figures 563 and 564) before discharge to the<br />

atmosphere.<br />

The efficiency of an operating scavenger plant<br />

may be determined by methods similar to that<br />

illustrated by the following example:<br />

Given:<br />

Test period, hours<br />

- 24<br />

Total feed gas volume, scf = 600,000<br />

Feed gas composition:<br />

H2S, mol 70 - 65. 0<br />

Hydrocarbons, mol 70 - 2.0<br />

Sulfur produced, short tons = 15. 0<br />

Problem:<br />

Calculate efficiency of sulfur recovery.


ACID GAS<br />

I I<br />

Sulfur Scavenger Plants 727<br />

2/3 STREAM FLUE GAS<br />

1/3 STREAM<br />

OXIDATION<br />

AIR BLOWER<br />

STEAM<br />

OXIDATION UNIT AND<br />

WASTE HEAT BOILER<br />

NO 1<br />

F~gure 563. Sulfur scavenger plant using the spllt-stream process (Giusti, 1965).<br />

Solution: 4. reheater 2: in-line combustion (or other<br />

1. Available sulfur in feed - gas<br />

means) to reheat gases to 450 "F<br />

5. converters 1 and 2: each to have sufficient<br />

600, 000 ft3<br />

379 ft3/mol<br />

0. 65 32 lblrnol<br />

2000 lb/ton<br />

= 16.45 tons<br />

bauxite catalyst that the<br />

ratio of H7S flow (cfs) to<br />

catalyst volume (f't3) does<br />

2. Sulfur recoyery efficiency not exceed 2:l.<br />

15. 0 tons x 100 = 91. 2%<br />

16. 45 tons<br />

In addition to supplying the correct amount of<br />

oxygen (air) to permit conversion reactions to<br />

take place, optimum operating conditions also<br />

must be maintained. The waste beat boiler, cool-<br />

ers, reheaters, and converters must be sized and<br />

operated to achieve conditions approximating<br />

those shown below:<br />

1. Waste heat boiler: boiler feed water to cool<br />

reaction gases Lo 450 "F<br />

2. coolers 1, 2, and 3: each to have capacity to<br />

cool gases to 300 "F<br />

3. reheater 1: in-line combustion (or other<br />

means) to reheat gases to 475 "F<br />

The above conditions can be achieved by various<br />

combinations of vessel sizing and/or flow rates<br />

and need not be further illustrated.<br />

Incineration Requirements<br />

Even in an efficient scavenger plant, a portion of<br />

the H2S in the acid gas is unreacted and passes<br />

through the plant. The final vent gas is composed<br />

of the products of reaction (other than recovered<br />

sulfur) and the inert nitrogen contained in the air<br />

used for supply of reaction oxygen, plus the com-<br />

ponents of the feed stream which do not take part<br />

in the conversion reactions and the unreacted H2S.<br />

Because of the remaining HZS, this vent gas must<br />

be incinerated to convert the H2S to SO2 before<br />

the vent gas is discharged to the atmosphere.<br />

Although the oxidation of H2S is exothermic, it<br />

may be necessary to supply additional heat at the


728 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

SLIP STREW"<br />

STEAM<br />

If If<br />

"3<br />

4<br />

LI)<br />

- m<br />

0<br />

4<br />

WASTE HEAT<br />

BOILER - AIR<br />

4<br />

AIR<br />

L<br />

I<br />

2 %<br />

C<br />

"7<br />

- Z<br />

4<br />

I<br />

OXIDATION<br />

-<br />

UNIT<br />

CONDENSER<br />

OXIDATION MOLTEN !<br />

AIR BLOWER AIR FUEL GAS SULFUR -. I<br />

DILUTION<br />

AIR<br />

STORAGE<br />

PIT<br />

F~gure 564 Sulfur scavenger plant uslng the partlal ox~dat~on process (Giustl, 1965)<br />

incinerator in order to maintain incineration tem-<br />

perature for the total vent gas stream. Determina-<br />

tion of incineration requirements is illustrated by<br />

the following example for a scavenger plant simi-<br />

lar to that shown in Figure 563 and for the same<br />

feed stream used in the preceding example. All<br />

data are for a 24-hour period.<br />

Given:<br />

Feed composition:<br />

Total feed, scf = 600,000<br />

H2S, mol %<br />

- 65<br />

CO2, mol %<br />

- 3 3<br />

CH4, mol 70<br />

- 1.5<br />

CzH6, mol %<br />

- -<br />

Sulfur recovery efficiency, 70 = 91. 2<br />

Free sulfur carry-over (0. l%), lb = 30. 0<br />

Final vent gas temperature. "F = 320<br />

Problem A:<br />

Determine quantities of unreacted products pass-<br />

ing through the unit to the incinerator.<br />

Solution:<br />

1. Weight of unreacted H2S<br />

H 2 S - 100 - 91.2 = 8.8%<br />

- 0.5 = 3.77 mol/hr<br />

-<br />

\


Sulfur Scavenger Plants 729<br />

2. Weight of unreacted GO2 6. Reaction quantities for hydrocarbon oxidation :<br />

Problem B:<br />

Using basic reaction formulas, determine quantities<br />

of reaction products from oxidation of both<br />

H2S and hydrocarbons.<br />

Solution:<br />

0.79N2<br />

N2 = 3.14 mollhr x = 11. 8 mollhr<br />

0.2102 -<br />

GO2 = l(0. 99) f 2(0. 33) = 1. 65 mol/hr<br />

HzO= 2(0. 99) t 3(0. 33) = 2.molIhr<br />

7. Total reaction products (other than sulfur):<br />

--<br />

1. Basic reaction formulas for conversion of H2S: from 3 from 6<br />

HzS<br />

3<br />

- 02 -SO2<br />

2<br />

i Hz0<br />

H20 = 60.1 t 2.97 = 63. mollhr<br />

3<br />

3HZS + - 02-<br />

2<br />

2. Weight of reacted H2S :<br />

3S t 3H20 Problem C:<br />

Determine quantity of free sulfur carry-over.<br />

Solution:<br />

1. Weight of sulfur carrv-over<br />

= 60.1 mollhr<br />

15.0 tons (0.001)~2000<br />

S2 = lblton<br />

3. Weight of H2S reaction products (other than<br />

-<br />

sulfur) :<br />

24 hr x 64 lb/mol<br />

= 0.02 mollhr<br />

Oxidation of H2S to SO2 is rapid and essentially<br />

3 mol<br />

HO-- x 60.1 mollhr = 60.1 mol/hr<br />

2 - 3 mol<br />

complete at temperatures over 1050 "F, provided<br />

there is adequate air supply and mixing. For<br />

given operating conditions, additional fuel gas and<br />

air requirements may be determined and effectiveness<br />

of incineration may be verified.<br />

4. Reaction formulas for oxidation of<br />

hydrocarbons :<br />

CH4 t 202-C02 + 2H20<br />

7<br />

I CZH6 + 02- 2C02 i 3H20<br />

I<br />

5. Weight of hydrocarbons in feed stream:<br />

i = 0. 99 mollhr<br />

i<br />

= 0. mollhr<br />

Given:<br />

Vent gas temperature, "R = 320 t 460 = 780<br />

Incineration pressure, psia = 14.7<br />

Proposed incineration temperature. "R = 1700<br />

Excess air to be supplied, % = 25<br />

Dimensions of incinerator chamber = 4 ft diam<br />

x 8 it long<br />

Heat value (refinery gas), ~tu/ft~ = 800<br />

Temperature refinery gas and air, "F = 100<br />

Problem D:<br />

Determine air required for incineration of vent<br />

gas stream.


730 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Solution: COz=21.70 + 1.65 = 23.35 mollhr<br />

Composition,<br />

mol/hr Oxidation reaction<br />

3<br />

H2S = 3.77 HZS + - 02 -SOZ + H20<br />

2<br />

GO2= 23.35 C02 C02<br />

N2 = 113. 0 (from reaction) = 113.00 mol/hr<br />

N2 = 21.45 (from<br />

incineration) = 21.45mollhr<br />

<strong>Air</strong> = 6.78 (excess, from<br />

incineration) = 6.78 mollhr<br />

H20= 63.07 H20 Hzo 2. Total heat required<br />

Hi (at initial<br />

N2 =<br />

124. 80<br />

215. Oi2 N2<br />

SO2<br />

H2(1700 'F) - temperature) = Btulmol<br />

25,350 16,200 (780 "R) 9,150<br />

1. Theoretical O2 required<br />

3<br />

02 = 2(0. 02) + $3.77) = 5.70 mollhr<br />

2. Amount N2 for required 02<br />

79%<br />

N = 5.70 x - = 21.45 mollhr<br />

2 21%<br />

3. Excess air for 25% excess<br />

<strong>Air</strong> = 0. 25<br />

Problem E:<br />

(5' 70<br />

(0.21)<br />

= 6. 78 mol/hr<br />

Determine heat evolved from incineration of vent<br />

gases.<br />

Solution: Heat<br />

value,<br />

mollhr x lb/mol x Btullb = Btulhr<br />

----<br />

S2 0.02 64 3.984 5.100<br />

HZ 3.77 2 51,593 389,000<br />

S 3.77 3 2 3,984 480,500<br />

Total evolved heat 874,600<br />

Problem F:<br />

Calculate heat required to raise other (reacted)<br />

vent gases from 320 "F to 1240 "F.<br />

Solution:<br />

1. Total vent gases, after oxidation of comhustibles<br />

(from quantities in Problems A, C, and<br />

D, and reaction equations in Problem D)<br />

SO, = Z(0.02) + lf3.77) = 3.81 mollhr<br />

H20 34,450 21,650 (780 "R) 12,800<br />

C02 14,270 3,510 (780 a) lo, 760<br />

N2 9,600 2, 850 (780 "R) 6.750<br />

N i 9,600 1, 310 (560 OR) 8,290<br />

<strong>Air</strong> 9,680 1, 310 (560 "R) 8, 370<br />

3. Total heat required for incineration<br />

mollhr x Btulmol = Btu/hr<br />

s02 3. 81 9,150 34,800<br />

Hzo 66.84 12,800 856,000<br />

C02 23. 35 10,760 255,000<br />

N2<br />

113.00 6.750 763, 000<br />

N 2 21.45 8.290 177, 800<br />

<strong>Air</strong> 6.78 8, 370 56,700<br />

Total<br />

4. Additional heat required<br />

= 2,143, 300<br />

H = Heat required to raise products to 1240<br />

"F, minus incineration-evolved heat.<br />

H : 2,143, 300 - 874,600 = 1,268,700 Btulhr<br />

5. Refinery gas required for additional heat<br />

H = 800 Btu/ft3 x 379 ft3/mol = 313,000<br />

Btulmol<br />

1,268,700 Btu/hr = 4. O5<br />

Weight required =<br />

313,000 Btulmol mollhr<br />

Hz0 = (3.77) + 63. 07 = 66.84 mollhr Use 5. 0 mol/hr (for safety factor)


Sulfur Scavenger Plants 731<br />

When burning refinery gas to obtain the required<br />

additional heat necessary to achieve the proposed<br />

Total = 2, 390,600 Btulhr<br />

incineration temperature, additional air for corn- 3. Anticipated incinerator temperature<br />

bustion of this gas must be supplied. The required<br />

air can be determined by calculations similar T - T -<br />

2 1- -<br />

to those above. A final incineration heat balance<br />

M C ~<br />

can then be made, and the actual incineration<br />

temperature can be predicted. It is also neces- Where<br />

sary that the incinerator mixing velocity be such<br />

that the retention time exceeds 0. 3 second to T2 = final temperature, "F<br />

ensure adequate time for conversion of H2S to<br />

SO2. TI = initial temperature, "F<br />

Given: AQ = heat added, Btulhr<br />

Refinery gas essentially 75% CH4 and 25% C2H6. W = weight of gas, lb<br />

Excess air for combustion = 25%<br />

Problem G:<br />

Determine air requirement for fuel gas combus-<br />

tion and make final heat balance of combined vent<br />

gases, fuel gas, and air for fuel gas. Determine<br />

predicted incineration temperature and check<br />

against desired 1240 "F. Verify incinerator<br />

mixing velocity and retention time.<br />

Solution:<br />

1. <strong>Air</strong> requirement for 5. 0 mollhr fuel gas<br />

7 5<br />

02 = 2(-x 5. 0 mollhr) = 7. 5 mollhr<br />

100<br />

7 25<br />

02 = - (-x 5. 0 mollhr) = 4. 375 mol/hr<br />

2 100<br />

Required O2 = 7.5 + 4. 375 = 11. 875 mollhr<br />

Required N2 = - O' 79 x 11. 875 = 44.7 mollhr<br />

0. 21<br />

25 11. 875<br />

Excess air = - x --- mollhr = 14. 14<br />

100 0.21<br />

mollhr<br />

Additional C02 and H20 from fuel gas<br />

H20 = 2(3. 75) t 3(1. 25) = 11. 25 mol/hr<br />

C = specific heat of gas.<br />

P<br />

Assumed:<br />

(149)<br />

TI = 300 "F (vent gas at 320 "F; fuel and air<br />

at 100 O F )<br />

Cp = 0.27 (based on weighted average of C<br />

P<br />

for major vent gas components)<br />

Incinerator heat loss = 15%<br />

W, weight of gases (Problem F and 1 above)<br />

mol/hr x lblmol = lb/hr<br />

C02 = l(3. 75) t 2(1. 25) = 6. 25 mol/hr (checks with assumed temperature of 1240 "F,<br />

allowing for heat-loss);. - ,<br />

2. Total heat added<br />

! 4. Incinerator mixing velocity:<br />

I<br />

1<br />

.~.. ,<br />

Incineration heat (Problem E) = 874.600 Btulhr<br />

Volume of gases<br />

mol<br />

Btu<br />

Fuel gas heat = 5. 0 - x 379 Gl ft3 x 800 - to incinerator<br />

hr<br />

= 311.57 mollhr x 379 ft3/hr<br />

ft3


7 32 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Area of<br />

incinerator<br />

- 3. 14(4)2 = 12. 56 ft2<br />

- 4<br />

119,700 ft3/hr 1<br />

Mixing velocity = 3600 sec/hr 12.56 ft<br />

5. Retention time:<br />

= 2. 65 fps<br />

Length of incinerator = 8. 0 ft<br />

Retention time = O ft = 3 seconds (OK)<br />

2. 65 ft/sec<br />

Stack Dilution <strong>Air</strong><br />

As shown in the preceding problems, unconverted<br />

HzS and carried-over sulfur are burned in the<br />

incinerator to SO2. However, even when the<br />

scavenger plant is operating efficiently, the vol-<br />

ume concentration of SO2 in the flue gas from the<br />

incinerator may be high. To meet acceptable con-<br />

centration levels at the stack, dilution air may<br />

be added at the base of the stack. The required<br />

amount of dilution air may be determined as<br />

illustrated in the following problem.<br />

Maximum allowable SO2 = 0. 2 vol %<br />

Solution:<br />

1. Undiluted SO2 concentration<br />

3. 81<br />

volume 70 = - x 100 = 1.207%<br />

311.57<br />

2. Required dilution air<br />

Total volume required - 3. 8lmollhr x 379 ftlmol'<br />

for 0. 2% SO2<br />

60 minlhr x 0.002<br />

Total incinerator gas =<br />

= 12,040 cfm<br />

311. 57 mollhr x 379 ft3/mol = 1970 cfm<br />

60 minlhr<br />

Required air = total volume - incinerated gas<br />

: 12, 040 - 1970 = 10,070 cfm<br />

Use 11,-cfm blower<br />

In some localities, there may be no established<br />

criterion for maximum allowable SO2 concentra- ;<br />

tion in the flue gas. Nevertheless, SO2 is itself<br />

toxic and it is necessary to ensure that safe<br />

ground level concentrations are not exceeded.<br />

Additionally, some of the SO2 may be oxidized<br />

to SO3 which, in turn, could combine with atmo- I<br />

spheric moisture to form acid mist and lead to I<br />

extensive ground level damage. The additionof<br />

1<br />

dilution air, in addition to reducing SO2 concen-<br />

1<br />

tration, has the added advantage of "quenching"<br />

the incinerated gases and greatly reducing SO3<br />

formation.<br />

Incinerator Stack Height<br />

Where there is no set limit for stack SO2 concentration,<br />

an attempt may be made to keep<br />

ground level concentration to an acceptable level<br />

by providing a high stack. The required stack<br />

height may be determined by methods illustrated<br />

in the following example:<br />

i<br />

!<br />

Example<br />

Problem:<br />

Determine the SO2 concentration in the flue gas<br />

and the amount of dilution air required to lower<br />

the concentration to an acceptable level.<br />

Given:<br />

Total SO2 (from Problem G)= 3. 81 mollhr<br />

Given:<br />

Total flue gas volume, cfm<br />

SO2 concentration, vol %<br />

Allowable SO2 at 500 ft from base<br />

of stack, ppm<br />

Wind velocity, mph<br />

Solution:<br />

= 2000<br />

=0.5<br />

= 3<br />

= 10<br />

1<br />

I 1<br />

I<br />

!<br />

i<br />

!<br />

I<br />

Total gas = 311.57 mollhr The general concentration equation is<br />

I<br />

1<br />

where<br />

C = ground concentration, it3 50~/10~ ft3 air i<br />

M = SO2 emission rate, tonslday<br />

V = wind velocity, mph<br />

X = distance from stack base, ft !<br />

K = e (-20 HIX)<br />

(Values of K are plotted in Figure 565. )<br />

2000 cfm x 0.005 1440 min/day<br />

M =<br />

5. 93 ft31lb 2000 lblton<br />

= 121 tonslday<br />

1<br />

1 i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

!<br />

i


VALUE OF COEFFICIENT K<br />

stack for any stack height and wind veincity (Steinbock,<br />

1952).<br />

Stack height (from Figure 565). H = 130 ft<br />

Maximum ground level concentration will occur<br />

roughly at a distance of ten times the stack height<br />

from the stack. Since this distance derives from<br />

the stack height not yet determined, the required<br />

stack height to limit the ground concentration at<br />

any point must be determined. The height may be<br />

determined from Figure 566 by the following steps:<br />

1. Draw a vertical line at 121 tons per day until<br />

it intersects the 10-mph curve.<br />

2. From this intersection, draw a horizontal line.<br />

3. Draw a vertical line from 3 ppm mtil it inter-<br />

sects the horizontal line.<br />

RATE OF EMISSION OF POLLUTANTS, tons/day<br />

MAXIMUM SOZGROUND CONCENTRATION, ppm<br />

Figure 566. Maximum ground concentration of sulfur<br />

dioxide discharged from stacks of various heights<br />

(Steinbock. 1952).<br />

Sulfur Scavenger Plants 733<br />

4. The pocnt of intersection is the required stack<br />

height.<br />

By interpolation of height curves, H = 230 ft.<br />

Plant Operational Procedures<br />

Even in properly designed plants, operational<br />

problems which result in decreased sulfur re-<br />

covery efficiency and consequent increase in H2S<br />

vented to the incinerator are often encountered.<br />

Most of these problems stem from either varia-<br />

tion in the feed gas stream or from inadequate<br />

reaction air and/or cooling water controls.<br />

Problems in these areas, in turn, affect the cata-<br />

lyst and may drastically reduce conversion<br />

efficiency.<br />

Based upon a fixed feed stream composition, the<br />

correct amount of oxidation air can readily be<br />

controlled by flow controllers. However, feed<br />

gas composition monitoring equipment is expen-<br />

sive and difficult to maintain and is therefore<br />

not generally used. The H2S content can be<br />

readily checked, and this is generally done on a<br />

periodic basis, with air supply adjustment as<br />

necessary.<br />

A more difficult problem is an increase in the<br />

hydrocarbon content, which may not be detected<br />

until the imbalance in feed is reflected in ahnor-<br />

ma1 temperature differentials in the waste heat<br />

boiler, coolers, and/or reactors. It is necessary,<br />

therefore, that operating temperatures he con-<br />

stantly monitored to detect hydrocarbon fluctua-<br />

tions. If not, the excess hydrocarbons will dis-<br />

rupt the oxygen supply and not permit full H2S<br />

conversion to SO2 in the first-stage reaction.<br />

Secondly, if not controlled, temperatures may<br />

rise to the point of equipment damage and pos-<br />

sible breakdown. Thirdly, the excess hydrocar-<br />

bons may not be fully oxidized in the controlled<br />

air supply and, particularly when the hydrocar-<br />

bons are heavier than C3 fractions, carbon may<br />

be deposited on the catalyst and thus reduce con-<br />

version efficiency.<br />

As discussed earlier, a two-stage conversion<br />

plant should attain a sulfur recovery efficiency of<br />

at least 90 percent. Many modern plants will<br />

yield 94 to 96 percent, and the efficiencies may<br />

he raised to as high as 98 percent where a third<br />

stage is used. Although the addition of a third<br />

stage to an existing two-stage plant may not be<br />

economical solely on a sulfur recovery basis,<br />

the provision of a third stage in new plants is<br />

relatively inexpensive. In either case, this third<br />

stage is highly desirable from an air pollution<br />

standpoint since large amounts of pollutant are<br />

represented by each percentage point of recovery<br />

efficiency. Also, the third stage can act as a<br />

stand-by for the other stages during upset con-


7 34 CHEMICAL PROCE :SSING EQUIPMENT<br />

ditions. As activity of catalyst in the first stage<br />

is reduced (by surface deposits of sulfur or car-<br />

bon), abnormal quantities of HzS will pass<br />

through. However, this can then be reaCtkd in<br />

the subsequent stages and high efficiencies can<br />

still be maintained until the first stage catalyst<br />

is reactivated. With the additional flexibility of<br />

three stages, any one of the stages can be by-<br />

passed for replacement of inactive catalyst.<br />

Generally, however, catalyst is reactivated rather<br />

than replaced, and this is done during periodic<br />

plant maintenance shutdown. Sour gas feed is<br />

shut off and fuel gas is burned with theoretical<br />

air in the combustion chamber until all sour gas<br />

is purged from the reaction system, Thereafter,<br />

air supply is raised to 25 percent excess for a<br />

period and then to 50 percent excess. In doing so,<br />

the hot excess air burns surface carbon and<br />

sulfur from the reactor catalyst, and this is<br />

reflected by a temperature rise across the re-<br />

actor. When the temperature becomes equal at<br />

inlet and outlet, surface material has been fully<br />

oxidized and the catalyst is reactivated.<br />

In all areas where either oil refining or sour<br />

natural gas processing operations take place,<br />

the sulfur scavenger plant may be one of the most,<br />

if not the most, important single air pollution<br />

control method. The provision of such plants,<br />

properly designed and efficiently operated, will<br />

prevent the emission to the atmosphere of intoler-<br />

ably high amounts of material which is toxic to<br />

both man and his environment.<br />

Inasmuch as the gas treating plants, as well as<br />

the sulfur recovery facilities, are processing a<br />

highly odorous and toxic gas, it is of utmost<br />

importance that the area be designed for easy<br />

cleaning oi spills, and that an efficient plant<br />

housekeeping program be followed.<br />

Tail Gas Treofmenf<br />

As previously discussed, the main portion of the<br />

sulfur from the crude oil can be removed and recovered.<br />

Recent attention to further reduced<br />

ambient air quality standards for sulfur oxides<br />

reauires added treatment to the tail u gases from<br />

the scavenger plants. Conversion efficiencies<br />

must be raised from the 90 to 95 percent range<br />

to a level greater than 99 percent.<br />

Two approaches are available to achieve the addi-<br />

tional clean-up. One requires the tail gas efflu-<br />

ent from the sulfur plant to be totally in an oxi-<br />

dize? *tate. The gas is then conditioned and<br />

treated by chemical scrubbing. The treated gas,<br />

containing less than 100 ppm sulfur compounds,<br />

discharges to the atmosphere, the chemical solu-<br />

tion is regenerated, and the resulting sulfur<br />

oxides are recycled back to the sulfur recovery<br />

units. This process was developed by Wellman-<br />

Power Gas, Inc.. of Lakeland, Florida.<br />

The other approach to this problem is to provide<br />

the tail gas in a reduced state of H2S before chemi-<br />

cally scrubbing. It is necessary to minimize car-<br />

bon disulfide and carbonyl sulfides to prevent high<br />

degradation of the scrubbing solution. Two pro-<br />

cesses of this type are known as the Beavon Stret-<br />

ford (R. M. Parsons Go. of Los Angeles, Califor-<br />

nia) and the Cleanair (The Pritchard Companies of<br />

Kansas City, Missouri). Both processes are<br />

capable of reducing the sulfur compounds to less<br />

than 100 ppm.<br />

Various other approaches to tail gas treatment<br />

are in development stages. Many involve chemi<br />

cal scrubbing of the gaseous streams although<br />

adsorption and molecular separation processes<br />

are being evaluated.<br />

PHOSPHORIC AClD MANUFACTURING<br />

During the past 20 years, the use of phosphorus-<br />

containing chemical iertilizers, phosphoric acid,<br />

and phosphate salts and derivatives has increased<br />

greatly. In addition to their very large use in<br />

fertilizers, phosphorus derivatives are widely<br />

used in food and medicine, and for treating water,<br />

plasticizing in the plastic and lacquer industries,<br />

flameproofing cloth and paper, refining petroleum,<br />

rustprooiing metal, and lor a large number of<br />

miscellaneous purposes. Most of the phosphate<br />

salts are produced for detergents in washing<br />

compounds.<br />

With the exception of the iertilizer products,<br />

most phosphorus compounds are derived from<br />

orthophosphoric acid, produced by the oxidation<br />

of elemental phosphorus. At present, elemental<br />

phosphorus is manufactured on a large enough<br />

scale to be classed as a heavy chemical and is<br />

shipped in tank cars from the point of initial<br />

manufacture, where the raw materials are inex-<br />

pensive, to distant plants for its conversion to<br />

phosphoric acid, phosphates, and other compounds.<br />

PHOSPHORIC AClD PROCESS<br />

Generally, phosphoric acid is made by burning<br />

phosphorus to form the pentoxide and reacting<br />

the pentoxide with water to form the acid. Spe- ~<br />

cifically, liquid phosphorus (melting point 112'F) !<br />

is pumped into a refractory-lined tower where it<br />

is burned to form phosphoric oxide, P4Ol0, which<br />

is equivalent algebraicly to two molecules of the<br />

theoretical pentoxide, PZ05, and is, therefore,<br />

commonly termed phosphorus pentoxide:


An excess of air is provided to ensure complete<br />

oxidation so that no phosphorus trioxide (P203)<br />

or yellow phosphorus is coproduced. The reac-<br />

tion is exothermic, and considerable heat must<br />

be removed to reduce corrosion. Generally,<br />

water is sprayed into the hot gases to reduce<br />

their temperature before they enter the hydrating<br />

section.<br />

Additional water is sprayed countercurrently to<br />

the gas stream, hydrating the phosphorus pent-<br />

oxide to orthophosphoric acid and diluting the<br />

acid to about 75 to 85 percent:<br />

The hot phosphoric acid discharges continuously<br />

into a tank, from which it is periodically rc-<br />

moved for storage or purification. The tail gas<br />

from the hydrator is discharged to a final col-<br />

lector where most of the residual acid mist is<br />

removed before the tail gas is vented to the air.<br />

A general flow diagram for a phosphoric acid<br />

plant is shown in Figure 567.<br />

Figure 567. General flow diagram for phosphoric<br />

acid production.<br />

The raw acid contains arsenic and other heavy<br />

metals. These impurities are precipitated as<br />

sulfides. A slight excess of hydrogen sulfide,<br />

sodium hydrosulfide, or sodium sulfide is add-<br />

ed and the treated acid is filtered. The excess<br />

hydrogen sulfide is removed from the acid by<br />

air blowing.<br />

The entire process is very corrosive, and<br />

special materials oi construction are required.<br />

Stainless steel, carbon, and graphite are com-<br />

monly used for this severe service.<br />

Special facilities are required for handling<br />

elemental yellow phosphorus since it ignites<br />

Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing 735<br />

spontaneously on contact with air at atmospher-<br />

ic temperatures and is highly toxic. Phosphorus<br />

is always shipped and stored under water to pre-<br />

vent combustion. The tank car of phosphorus is<br />

heated by steam coils to melt the water-covered<br />

phosphorus. Heated water at about 135°F is<br />

then pumped into the tank car and displaces the<br />

phosphorus, which flows into a storage tank.<br />

A similar system using hot displacement water<br />

is irequently used to feed phosphorus to the<br />

burning tower.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

A number oi air contaminants, such as phosphinc,<br />

phosphorus penlosiiie, hydrogen suliide, and phos-<br />

phoric acid niist, may be released by the phosphor-<br />

ic acid process.<br />

Phosphine (pH3), a very toxic gas, may be formed<br />

by the hyrlralysis of metallic phosphides that exist<br />

as impurities in the phosphorus. When the tank<br />

car is opened, the phosphine usually ignites spon-<br />

taneously hut only momentarily.<br />

Phosphorus pcntoxide (P4010), created when<br />

ptiosphorus is burned with excess air, forms<br />

an extremely dense fume. Our military forces<br />

takc advantage oi this property by using this con-<br />

pound to form srnolie screens. The fumes are<br />

submicron in size and are 100 percent opaque.<br />

Except for this military use, phosphorus pent-<br />

oxide is never released to the atmosphere unless<br />

phosphorus is accidentally spilled and exposed<br />

to air. Since handling elemental phosphorus is<br />

extremely hazardous, stringent safety precau-<br />

tions are mandatory, and phosphorus spills are<br />

very infrequent.<br />

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is released from the acid<br />

during treatment with NaHS to precipitate sulfides<br />

of antimony and arsenic and other heavy metals.<br />

Removal of these heavy metals is necessary for<br />

manufacture of good grade acid. H2S is highly<br />

toxic and flammable. Health authorities recom-<br />

mend a maximum allowable concentration of this<br />

gas of 20 ppm for an 8-hour exposure. The odor<br />

threshold is 0. 19 ppm (Gillespie and Johnstone,<br />

1955). In practice, however, H2S is blown from<br />

the treating tank and piped to the phosphorous-<br />

burning tower where it is burned to SO2. Source<br />

test information indicates that the concentration<br />

of SOZ in the gaseous effluent from the acid tower<br />

scrubberwillnot exceed 0.03 volume percent. Evo-<br />

lution of H2S is also minimized by restricting the<br />

amount of NaHS in excess of thatneeded to precipitate<br />

arsenic and antimony and other heavy metals.<br />

The manufacture of phosphoric acid cannot he<br />

accomplished in a practical way by burning<br />

phosphorus and bubbling the resultant products<br />

through either water or dilute phosphoric acid


736 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT I<br />

(Slaik and Turk, 1953). When water vapor comes<br />

into contact with a gas stream that contains a<br />

volatile anhydride, such as phosphorus pentoxide,<br />

an acid mist consisting of liquid particles of var-<br />

ious sizes is formed almost instantly. An investi-<br />

gation (Brink, 1959) indicates that the particle<br />

size of the phosphoric acid aerosol is small,<br />

about 2 microns or less, and that it has a median<br />

diameter of 1.6 microns, with a range of 0. 4 to<br />

2.6 microns.<br />

The tail gas discharged from the phosphoric acid<br />

plant is saturated with water vapor and produces<br />

a 100 percent opaque plume. The concentration<br />

of phosphoric acid in this plume may be kept<br />

small with a well-designed plant. This loss<br />

amounts to 0.2 percent or less of the phosphorus<br />

charged to the combustion chamber as phosphorus<br />

pentoxide.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

All the reactions involved take place in closed<br />

vessels. The phosphorus-burning chamber and<br />

the hydrator vessel are kept under a slight neg-<br />

ative pressure by the fan that handles the effluent<br />

gases, as shown in Figure 520. This is neces-<br />

sary to prevent loss of product as well as to pre-<br />

vent air pollution.<br />

The hydrogen sulfide generated during the acid<br />

purification treatment must be captured and collected,<br />

and sufficient ventilation must be provided<br />

to prevent an explosive concentration, for<br />

hydrogen sulfide has a lower explosive limit of<br />

4. 3 percent. The sulfiding agent must be carefully<br />

metered lnto the acld to prevent excessively<br />

rap~d evolution of hydrogen sulfide.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

The hydrogen sulfide can he removed by chem-<br />

ical absorption or by combustion. Weak solu-<br />

tions of caustic soda or soda ash sprayed<br />

countercurrently to the gas stream react with<br />

the hydrogen sulfide and neutralize it:<br />

NaZC03 t H2S - NaHC03 t NaHS<br />

The hydrogen sulfide may also he oxidized in<br />

a suitable afterburner:<br />

The phosphoric acid mist in the tail gas is<br />

commonly removed by an electrical precip-<br />

itator, a venturi scrubber, or a Brink fiber<br />

mist eliminator (Brink, 1959). All are very<br />

effective in this service.<br />

The Tennessee Valley Authority has used elec-<br />

trical precipitators for many years to reduce<br />

the emission of phosphoric acid mist (Striplin,<br />

1948). Severe corrosion has always been a<br />

problem with these precipitators. Published<br />

data (Slaik and Turk, 1953) indicate that the<br />

problem has been partially solved by reducing<br />

the tail gas temperature to 135' to 185°F.<br />

The acid discharged amounts to about 0. 15 per-<br />

cent of the phosphorus pentoxide charged to the<br />

combustion chamber as phosphorus. The rela-<br />

tively low gas temperatures and consequently<br />

infrequent failure of the wires are given as the<br />

reason for the high mist recovery from the gas<br />

Stream.<br />

The TVA replaced one of the electrical precip-<br />

itators wlth a venturi scrubber in 1954. The<br />

venturi scrubber is constructed of stainless<br />

steel and is 14 feet 6 inches high, with a 30-<br />

inch-diameter inlet and outlet and a 11-112-<br />

inch-diameter throat (Barber, 1958). The<br />

scrubber is followed by a centrifugal entrain-<br />

ment separator. Stack analyses of emissions<br />

from this production unit are summarized in<br />

Table 199.<br />

Table 199. STACK ANALYSES OF EMISSIONS<br />

FROM A PHOSPHORIC ACID PLANT<br />

WITH A VENTURI SCRUBBER<br />

Phosphorus burning rate, lhlhr 2,650<br />

Temperature, *F<br />

Vaporizer outlet 1,650<br />

Burner outlet 880<br />

Venturi scrubber outlet 195<br />

Stack gas 175<br />

Pressure drop, in. WC<br />

Across venturi scrubber 25.2<br />

Across entrainment separator 1.9<br />

Emissions as % of phosphorous burned 0.2<br />

In 1962, the TVA constructed a stainless steel<br />

phosphoric acid unit that has an adjustable ven-<br />

turi scrubber, followed by a packed scrubber,<br />

and a wire mesh mist eliminator. When the<br />

venturi scrubber is adjusted to give a pressure<br />

drop of 37 inches of water column or higher,<br />

losses of P205 from the unit amount to only<br />

about 5 pounds per hour at phosphorus-burn-<br />

ing rates up to 6,000 pounds per hour.<br />

Considerable research and development work<br />

by the TVA demonstrated that good recovery of<br />

phosphoric acid mist could be achieved by intro-<br />

ducing water vapor into the hot gases from the<br />

combustion of phosphorus, passing the mixture<br />

through a packed tower, and condensing it<br />

(Slaik and Turk, 1953).


. .<br />

Soap, Fatty Acid, and Glycerine Manufacturing Equipment 737<br />

A large-scale plant using a Raschig ring-packed The Brink (1959) [iber mist eliminator is a relatower<br />

Sollowed by three gas coolers was built. tively new type of collector that has been used<br />

1<br />

1<br />

Overall p21aspRorus pcntoxide recovery exceeded<br />

99. 9 percent, hut the process was eventually<br />

alianiloneil bccausr of the ercessivc rate of corrosuccessfully<br />

on sulfuric acid mist, oleurn, phosphoric<br />

acid, ammonium chloride fume, and various<br />

organics. Collectors of this type have been dission<br />

of the gas coolers. cussed in the preceding section of this chapter.<br />

This same process, with a second packed scrubber<br />

or glass fiber-packed iiltcr unit for acid mist re-<br />

moval replacing the gas cooler, is used by a number<br />

of phosphoric acid producers throughout the country.<br />

Thcsr plants routinely operatc with phosphorus<br />

pentoxiclr recovery efiiciencies in exccss of 99. 8<br />

perccnt. H visible pliosphoric acid plume still<br />

rzmains, though the phosphorus content has been<br />

rccluced to lcss than 0. 1 grain pcr scS. A plant<br />

such as this is in opcration in Los Angeles County<br />

and is shoxm in Figure 568. Thc plume contains<br />

a large pcrcentagc of watcr vapor and does not<br />

violatc local air pollution prohibitions. Stack<br />

analyscs ol emissions irom this plant are shown<br />

in Table 200.<br />

The packed scruhber must be tl~oroughly and uniformly<br />

wctted with either water or weak acid and<br />

must have uniform gas distribution to achieve high<br />

collection cificiency. Gooci gas distribution is also<br />

niandatory iar glass fiber filter units, and a superficial<br />

gas velocity of less than 100 fpm is recommended.<br />

At one plant owned by Monsanto Chemical Company,<br />

the stack plume was very persistent and visible.<br />

Thirty milligrams of fine sulfuric acid mists per<br />

standard cubic foot and 80 to 200 milligrams of<br />

phosphoric acid particles per standard cubic foot<br />

were emitted from the stack. To correct the<br />

situat~on, a gas absorption apparatus followed<br />

by a flber mist collector was installed. Collection<br />

efficiencies of 99 percent on particles less<br />

than 3 microns in diameter and of 100 percent<br />

on larger particles were achieved. The stack<br />

plume, which consists of 15 percent water vapor,<br />

disappears within 40 to 50 feet of the stack on<br />

dry days and within 150 feet on wet days. No<br />

maintenance problems or changes in pressure drop<br />

through the apparatus have been encountered.<br />

SOAP, FATTY ACID, AND GLYCERINE<br />

MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Soap for washing and emulsifying purposes bas<br />

been manufactured and used for over two thou-<br />

sand years. Traditionally, soap has been manu-<br />

factured in batches by saponifying natural oils<br />

and fats with a solution of caustic soda, salting<br />

out the soluble soap formed, and drawing off the<br />

dilute glycerol produced. Shortly before World<br />

War 11, major changes started to occur in the<br />

industry. Pretreatment of the fats and oils was<br />

introduced and changes were made in plant pro-<br />

cedures and in finishing of the soap. Since World<br />

Was 11, with the advent of synthetic detergents,<br />

soap use has declined precipitously until its pro-<br />

duction today constitutes less than 20 percent of<br />

the combined production of soaps and detergents<br />

(Silvas, 1969). Figure 569 illustrates the vast<br />

change in relative production of soap and deter-<br />

gent since 1944. The manufacture of detergents<br />

is discussed in another section of this manual.<br />

When the direct neutralization of fatty acids by<br />

soda ash and/or caustic soda was introduced as<br />

a soap-making process, fat splitting, or hydrolysis,<br />

became a basic operation of the soap industry.<br />

Prior to 1955. the soap industry generated<br />

its own supply of fatty acids for use in soap making<br />

by splitting of natural fats and oils and provided<br />

fatty acids to other chemical process industries.<br />

Since 1955, however, fattv acids have<br />

also been synthesized from petroleum products,<br />

F~gure 568. Phosphor~c acld plant wlth a Raschlg so that today fatty acids are produced synthetlcalrine-packed<br />

scrubber. ly in greater quantities than by spllttlng natural


7 38<br />

CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 200. STACK ANALYSES OF EMISSIONS FROM A PHOSPHORIC ACID<br />

PLANT WITH TWO RASCHIG RING-PACKED SCRUBBERS<br />

Phosphorus burning rate, lh/hr<br />

Gas rate, stack outlet, scfm<br />

Gas temperature, stack outlet, "F<br />

Diameter of first packed scrubber,ft<br />

Height of first scrubber's Raschig ring packing, ft<br />

Diameter of final packed scrubber, ft<br />

Height of final scrubber's Raschig ring packing, ft<br />

Final scrubber's superficial velocity, fpm<br />

P205 emitted, gr/scf<br />

P205 emitted, lblhr<br />

Emissions as 70 of phosphorus burned<br />

RAW MATERIALS<br />

Report series No.<br />

C-167 A C-167 B<br />

The soap industry applies the term "oi1"to those<br />

natural fats which are liquid at ambient conditions,<br />

excluding hydrocarbon oils obtained from petro-<br />

leum. "Fats, " in the soap industry, refers to<br />

all natural oils and fats, liquid or solid. Soap<br />

is produced almost exclusively from these natu-<br />

ral fats and oils.<br />

Ordinary soluble soaps are classifiable in a num-<br />

ber of ways. They may be generally classed as<br />

toilet soaps, household soaps or industrial soaps.<br />

Traditionally, sodium soaps have been called hard<br />

soaps, and potassium soaps called soft soaps.<br />

Today such classification is no longer meaningful,<br />

as the hard or soft quality of soap is much more !<br />

0 drpident on the type and quality of fats and oils j<br />

1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1364<br />

used to make the soap.<br />

YEAR i<br />

Figure 569. Production of soap and detergents in the<br />

United States, 1944 to 1968 (Chemical Week, 1969).<br />

fats and oils. The soap industry, however, still<br />

uses fatty acids produced almost exclusively by<br />

splitting natural oils and fats, and still supplies<br />

a significant amount of fatty acids to other chemi-<br />

cal process industries. The soap industry had<br />

been the principal supplier of glycerine to chemi-<br />

cal process industries. However, glycerine is<br />

now produced synthetically, and presently the<br />

soap industry supplies only about one-half of the<br />

total glycerine consumed in this country.<br />

Metallic soaps have uses entirely different from<br />

those for ordinary soaps, so that theyare not in<br />

direct competition. These soaps are alkaline<br />

earth, metal, or heavy-metal salts of fatty acids.<br />

They are made either by heating fatty acids with<br />

metallic oxides, carbonates, etc.. or by the re-<br />

action of soluble ordinary soap with solutions of<br />

heavy-metal salts. Their manufacture will not<br />

be discussed in this section.<br />

1,875<br />

12,200<br />

175<br />

8.5<br />

12<br />

2 0<br />

3<br />

47<br />

0.095<br />

9.9<br />

0.23<br />

895<br />

3,420<br />

162<br />

8. 5<br />

12<br />

2 0<br />

3<br />

13<br />

0.108<br />

3.2<br />

0. 16<br />

The properties of soaps are directly related to the !.<br />

type of fatty acids used. The most desirable fatty i.<br />

acids are lauric, myristic, paluitic, stearic, and !<br />

1 .<br />

olsic, which are acids having 12 to 18 carbon<br />

I'<br />

atoms. These acids constitute the bulk of the<br />

fatty acids found in tallow and coconut oil. As a<br />

1'<br />

result, many soaps are combinations of these two i<br />

oils, usually in ratios of 3 or 4 parts of tallow to 1<br />

1 part coconut oil. Because of its favorable acid !<br />

content, availability, and low price, tallow is the 1<br />

most predominant fat used for soap making. It<br />

constitutes 80 percent or more of the total fats<br />

used by the soap industry. Greases, the rendered j<br />

fats from hogs and other small domestic animals,<br />

are the next most often consumed fatty material<br />

(Shreve, 1967). Other natural oils, including<br />

marine oils, may also he used in the soap making<br />

processes. Many of the marine oils are used in i<br />

special applications. They represent only an !<br />

insignificant portion of the total fats used.<br />

Sodlum hydroxide is the saponifying alkali used<br />

for most soap manufacture. Potassium hydroxide


Soa~. Fattv Acid. and Glvce? .ine Manufacturing Equipment 739<br />

still is used to some degree, and because potas-<br />

sium soaps are more soluble than the sodium<br />

soaps, they are used, or blended with sodium<br />

soaps, for making liquid soap solutions. Miner-<br />

als, including soda ash, caustic potash, sodium<br />

silicate, sodium bicarbonate, and trisodium<br />

phosphate, are used extensively as builders or<br />

fillers. Used in smaller quantities, but of ex-<br />

ceeding importance as synergetic soap builders,<br />

are tetrasodium pyrophosphate and sodium tri-<br />

polyphosphate. Carboxylmethylcellulose (CMC)<br />

also is an additive for most heavy-duty soaps.<br />

Finished soaps also may contain small quantities<br />

of chemicals used as preservatives, pigments,<br />

dyes, and perfumes, as well as antioxidants or<br />

chelating compounds. Bar toilet soaps and pow-<br />

der or granular laundry soaps may be manufac-<br />

tured as a combination of synthetic detergents<br />

and the neutralized fatty acid soluble soaps.<br />

Detergents used are either anionic or nonionic,<br />

but not cationic.<br />

FATTY AClD PRODUCTION<br />

Fatty acid production from natural fats may be<br />

performed by any one of several processes. The<br />

processes all result in "splitting" or hydrolysis<br />

of the fat. This may be represented as:<br />

I<br />

H-C -OH<br />

I I<br />

-<br />

H - COOR + 3H70-3RC00 + H - C -OH<br />

I<br />

H - COOR<br />

FAT<br />

I<br />

H-C-OH<br />

FATTY GLYCEROL<br />

AClD<br />

Three current processes for splitting or hydro-<br />

lyzing fats to produce fatty acids and glycerol<br />

utilizing either batch or continuous processes<br />

are detailed and compared in Table 201. Several<br />

older process methods, such as panning and<br />

pressing procedures, fractional distillation, and<br />

solvent crystalization, no longer are used. Of<br />

the three current processes, the continuous high-<br />

pressure hydrolysis process is the one most often<br />

used by the soap industry. A flow diagram of the<br />

process is shown in Figure 570.<br />

In the continuous high-pressure hydrolysis pro-<br />

cess, fat and water, both in liquid phase, are<br />

heated in contact with each other to temperatures<br />

in excess of about 400 "F, and some of the water<br />

becomes dissolved in the fatty matter. The pro-<br />

portion of water that becomes dissolved in the<br />

fatty layer increases rapidly with rise in tempera<br />

ture, causing a reduction in the aqueous layer.<br />

At temperatures approaching 550 "F, depending<br />

upon the type of oil used, the aqueous phase<br />

merges into the fatty phase, leaving but a single<br />

liquid phase (Ittner, 1942). In practice, the<br />

equipment is operated at temperatures and pres-<br />

sures where the two components show consider-<br />

able mutual solubility but below the temperatures<br />

where only one phase exists. The glycerine<br />

formed is continuously removed in the water<br />

stream, and at the same time the product fatty<br />

acids are removed as a separate stream.<br />

The equipment used for this process is a vertical<br />

column (Figure 570). The fats, in liquid form,<br />

are first vacuum deaerated, which prevents dar-<br />

kening, and then pmnped into the bottom of the<br />

column through a sparge ring. Deaerated, de-<br />

mineralized water is pumped at high temperature<br />

and high pressure into the top of the tower. High-<br />

pressure steam, at pressures of 700 to 750 psi,<br />

is introduced into the tower either along with the<br />

oil or directly into the reaction zone at the center<br />

of the tower, or, in some cases, at both the top<br />

and bottom of the tower. Tower operating pres-<br />

sures are usually 650 to 800 psi, and temperature<br />

of the fats is usually around 485 ' to 500 "F. The<br />

oil droplets travel up the column, while the water-<br />

glycerine solution flows down the column. The<br />

fatty acids then pass overhead to a flash tank for<br />

the removal of entrained water, or they may be<br />

decanted from the water after cooling and then<br />

passed to a settling tank where further separation<br />

occurs.<br />

As shown in Figure 570, the glycerine and water<br />

solution, called sweetwater, is drawn from the<br />

bottom of the hydrolyzer tower and is passed<br />

through a series of evaporators, or to a flash<br />

tank to remove some of the water, and then to<br />

storage as crude glycerine.<br />

The fatty acids produced are characteristic of<br />

the particular type oils being processed. Distil-<br />

lation is employed frequently on- stream with con-<br />

tinuous hydrolization to further refine fatty acids.<br />

When chemical and industrial products are manu-<br />

factured from these fatty acids, fractional distil-<br />

lation is used. When soap stock is produced.<br />

simple distillation in a continnous vacuum-type<br />

still is used as shown in Figure 570.<br />

In the vacuum still, the boiling fatty acids pass<br />

overhead through a series of condensers. They<br />

are then either drawn off and pumped to storage<br />

as fatty acids or passed through a line mixer<br />

where caustic soda or soda ash is added to pro-<br />

duce the salt of the fatty acids, which is a soluble<br />

soap. The soap stock thus produced is then held<br />

in storage for use in the various soap manufac-<br />

turing and finishing operations.


740 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 201. COMPARISON OF THREE CURR<br />

Temperature, "F<br />

Pressure, psig<br />

Catalyst<br />

Time, hr<br />

Operation<br />

Equipment<br />

Hydrolyzed<br />

Advantages<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Twitchell<br />

212 to220<br />

0<br />

AIkyl-aryI sulfonic acids<br />

or cycloaliphatic sulfonic<br />

acids, both used with sul-<br />

furic acid, 0. 75 to 1. 25%<br />

of the charge<br />

12 to 48<br />

Batch<br />

Lead-lined, copper-lined,<br />

monel-lined, or<br />

wooden tanks<br />

85 to 98 % hydrolyzed:<br />

5 to 15 % glycerol solution<br />

obtained, depending on<br />

number of stages and<br />

type of fat<br />

Lorn temp-rature and<br />

pressure; adaptable to<br />

small scales; low first<br />

cost because of relatively<br />

simple and inexpensive<br />

equipment<br />

Catalyst handling; long<br />

reaction time; fat stocks<br />

of poor quality must<br />

often be acid-refined to<br />

avoid catalyst poison-<br />

ing; high steam consump-<br />

tion; tendency to form<br />

dark-colored acids;<br />

need for more than one<br />

stage for good yield and<br />

high glycerin concentra-<br />

tion; not adaptable to<br />

automatic control;<br />

:NT FAT-SPLITTING PROCE:<br />

Batch autoclave<br />

300 to350 (450 without cataly<br />

75 to 150 (425 to 450 without<br />

catalyst)<br />

Zinc<br />

calcium.<br />

or magne-<br />

sium<br />

oxides.<br />

1 to 2%<br />

5 to 10<br />

Batch<br />

Copper or stainless-steel<br />

autoclave<br />

85 to 98 %hydrolyzed;<br />

10 to 15 % glycerol,<br />

depending on<br />

number of stages and<br />

type of fat<br />

Adaptable to small<br />

scale; lower first cost<br />

for small scale than<br />

continuous process;<br />

faster than Twitchell<br />

High first cost; catalyst<br />

handling; longer<br />

reaction time than<br />

continuous process;<br />

not so adaptable to<br />

automatic control as<br />

continuous; high<br />

labor cost; need for<br />

more than one<br />

stage for good yield<br />

and high glycerin<br />

concentration<br />

5 (Shreve. 1967)<br />

Continuous<br />

counter current<br />

485 approx<br />

600 to700<br />

Optional<br />

2 to 3<br />

Continuous<br />

Type 316 stainless<br />

tower<br />

97 to 99 %, hydolyzid;<br />

10 to 25 % glycerol,<br />

depending on type<br />

of fat<br />

Small floor space;<br />

uniform product<br />

quality; high<br />

glycerin concen-<br />

tration; low<br />

labor cost; more<br />

accurate and<br />

automatic control;<br />

constant utility<br />

load<br />

High first cost;<br />

high temperature<br />

and pressure;<br />

greater operating<br />

skill<br />

The fatty acids, which may contain considerable soap stock. The hydrogenation operation is us=unsaturated<br />

organic acids, can be further pro- ally on-stream with the hydrolysis operation.<br />

cessed by hydrogenation. Hydrogenation, with<br />

the use of a catalvst, saturates the double bonds<br />

GLYCERINE PRODUCTION<br />

of the unsaturated fatty acids. The process helps The saponification of natural oils can be repre<br />

to eliminate objectionable odors and hardens the sented by the following reaction:


Soap, Fatty Acid, and Glycerine Manufacturing Equipment<br />

Figure 570. Flow diagram of a continuous process for hydrolysis of natural fats.<br />

H H<br />

I I<br />

H - COOCR H-C -OH<br />

I I<br />

H - COOCR + 3NaOH -+3NaCOOR + H - C - OH<br />

I I<br />

H - COOCR H-C-OH<br />

I I<br />

FAT SOAP GLYCEROL<br />

Whether soap is manufactured by the older method<br />

of saponification of natural oils illustrated by the<br />

preceding reaction or by the newer method of<br />

direct saponification of fatty acids, glycerine is<br />

always an accompanying product.<br />

Figure 571 illustrates a typical soap plant glyc<br />

erine purification operation. The crude weak<br />

glycerine solution derived from the hydrolysis<br />

process is refined to produce both commercial<br />

and pharmaceutical grades of glycerine. The<br />

processing of the glycerine obtained from the<br />

continuous hydrolysis process is a much easier<br />

operation than the processing of the spent soap<br />

741<br />

lye glycerine from the kettle or batch processes<br />

of soap making. The sweetwater drawn from<br />

the bottom of the hydrolizer column has a concentration<br />

of about 12 percent glycerol. This<br />

sweetwater usually is so hot that, upon passing<br />

through three evaporators in sequence, the glycerol<br />

concentration increases to about 75 to SO<br />

percent by weight: This crude glycerine then is<br />

held in a settling tank for at least 48 hours at<br />

elevated temperatures to reduce whatever fatty<br />

impurities are still present. It then is distilled<br />

under vacuum (60 mm Hg absolute) at temperatures<br />

of approximately 400 'F. Small amounts I<br />

of caustic are added to the still feed to saponify the !<br />

!<br />

I


742 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT -<br />

v<br />

STILL FEED TANK<br />

Y<br />

STEAM<br />

CAUSTIC<br />

FOOTS<br />

HOT WATER<br />

F~gure 571. Flow diagram for glycerine manufacture from hydrolys~s sweetwaters<br />

small amounts of fatty acid impurities which are<br />

present so that they will not boil off. The overhead<br />

product glycerine from the vacuum still then is<br />

condensed in a three-stage condensing system<br />

with progressively lower temperatures at each<br />

stage. The staged condensation yields different<br />

grades of glycerine. The highest temperature<br />

first-stage condensate usually contains 99 percent<br />

glycerol. Lower quality grades are collected<br />

from the lower temperature condensers. The<br />

glycerine is purified by bleeching and filtration<br />

or ion exchange.<br />

In the making of soap by alkaline saponification<br />

of fats, glycerine always is formed and common-<br />

ly is recovered in solution in the soap lye. The<br />

spent lye removed from the saponification process<br />

averages around 4 to 5 percent glycerine when<br />

removed directly, and may exceed 10 percent<br />

when other washing processes are used. The<br />

spent lye, in addition to the glycerine, contains<br />

roughly 10 percent by weight of salt and some<br />

small amount of soaps that are still soluble in<br />

the lye.<br />

Figure 572 illustrates a typical spent soap lye<br />

processing plant. The first step is the purifica-<br />

-L<br />

TO EJECTORS<br />

tion of the lye solution removed from the saponifi-<br />

cation operation. The lye is neutralized by trrat-<br />

ing with mlneral acids to form a salt. The neu-<br />

tralized solution is heated and agitated to precip-<br />

itate any remaining soap. After filtration, the<br />

solution then is evaporated. Vacuum evaporation,<br />

either in a series of batch vessels or continuously<br />

in cone bottom vessels, causes the salt crystal-<br />

lization point to be reached.<br />

As the salt concentration increases, salt crystal-<br />

lizes out and separates. In the continuous vessel,<br />

a portion of the separated salt is intermittently<br />

removed from the bottom. In the batch separation,<br />

the salt is removed from the slurry by pumping it<br />

through filters or centrifuges. Recovered salt is<br />

reused in the soap making process. The concen-<br />

trated glycerine is boiled down to remove even<br />

more salt until a concentrated crude soap lye<br />

glycerine is obtained. At this stage the crude<br />

glycerine constitutes 80 to 82 percent by weight<br />

of the solution with approximately 2 percent by<br />

weight of nonvolatile organic matter, the remain-<br />

der being a mild salt solution in water. Further<br />

treaixnent of this crude glycerine follows the same<br />

procedures used with the crude glycerine obtained<br />

from fat splitting operations.


FATTY ACID OR<br />

HIGH F.A. STOCK<br />

BOILING TANK<br />

SOAP MANUFACTURING<br />

Soap, Fatty Acid, and Glycerine Manufacturing Equipment<br />

SPENT SOAP LYE<br />

FROM SOAP MAKING<br />

SURGE TANK<br />

Figure 572. Spent soap lye plant for recovery of crude glycerine.<br />

The soap-making processes, either those utiliz-<br />

ing the alkaline saponification of fats and oils or<br />

those employing the saponification of fatty acids.<br />

are variously batch or continuous. The kettle or<br />

full-boiled process is a batch process which fol-<br />

lows the historical and traditional soap-making<br />

methods since the beginning of the industry. This<br />

process involves several steps or operations in a<br />

single kettle or, in large operations, a series of<br />

kettles. The kettles or pans used in these pro-<br />

cesses vary considerably in size depending upon<br />

production requirements. Small operations or<br />

producers of specialty soaps may employ a kettle<br />

which will only produce a few hundred pounds of<br />

soap. Large commercial producers of soaps may<br />

use kettles which will produce 150,000 pounds of<br />

soap per batch.<br />

4<br />

><br />

Y<br />

743<br />

The steps or operations performed include sapon-<br />

ification of the fats and oils by boiling in a caustic<br />

solution using live steam, followed by "graining"<br />

or precipitating the soft curds of soap out of the<br />

aqueous lye solution by adding sodium chloride<br />

salt. The soap solution then is washed to remove<br />

glycerine and color body impurities to leave the<br />

settled or "neat" soap to form on standing. Neat<br />

soap is the almost pure soap produced in the full-<br />

boiled process and remains as the upper layer of<br />

soap from which "nigre" soap and lye solutions<br />

have settled. The steps described above in the<br />

full-boiled process, including that of the final<br />

settling, can require a period of several days.<br />

The smaller kettles using this process may re-<br />

quire up to 24 hours per batch, while the larger<br />

kettles may require up to a full week to complete<br />

a batch.


744 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Other batch processes of saponification of fats<br />

and oils, still used for small production runs of<br />

specialty soaps, include the semiboiled process,<br />

the cold process, the autoclave process, the<br />

methyl ester process and the jet saponification<br />

process.<br />

Two proprietary processes for continuous sapon-<br />

ification of natural oils are used by some soap<br />

manufacturers. These are the Sharples Process<br />

and the Mon Savon Process. Both processes,<br />

while dissimilar, eliminate the large kettles and<br />

lengthy process time required by the old tradi-<br />

tional batch operations. All processes, however,<br />

accomplish the same steps of soap manufacture.<br />

The manufacture of soap by direct saponification<br />

of fatty acids is easily accomplished in continuous<br />

processes. However, many plants employ con-<br />

ventional soap kettle processes. Batch saponifi-<br />

cation also is performed in mixing kettles, com-<br />

monly called crutchers. Fatty acids obtained by<br />

continuous hydrolysis are usually neutralized with<br />

50 percent caustic soda continuously in a high-<br />

speed mixer-neutralizer to form soap. The neat<br />

soap produced is discharged at 200°F into an<br />

agitated blending tank to even out any inequalities<br />

of neutralization. The neat soap contains approx-<br />

imately 30 percent water at this stage. This soap<br />

stock then is held at an elevated temperature for<br />

use in the various soap finishing operations.<br />

SOAP FINISHING<br />

-<br />

Soap is finished for consumer use in various<br />

forms such as liquid, powder, granule, chip,<br />

flake, or bar. Part of the finishing operation<br />

for soap is the addition of various ingredients to<br />

accomplish the purposes for which the final product<br />

is designed. Toilet bars of the purest type<br />

of soap will have the minimum of additional ingredients.<br />

Heavy-duty laundry soaps will have a<br />

with whatever markings are desired, and wrapped<br />

for shipment.<br />

Most bar soap today is manufactured by a second<br />

process, the "milling" process. Milled soaps,<br />

as they are called by the industry, usually are<br />

manufactured in one of two processes. In the<br />

older and still more commonly used process<br />

shown in Figure 573, the soap stock is batched<br />

in a mixer, called a "crutcher", with other ingredients.<br />

The batch is then flowed onto chill<br />

rolls, and then flaked off and passed through a<br />

steam-heated hot:& dryer. The flakes can be<br />

packaged as flake soap or ground and packaged as<br />

powder. When soap bars are made, the flakes<br />

from the dryer are 'Lplodded'l (mixed in a screw<br />

or sugar tubular mixer) or mixed with final ingredients<br />

such as perfume. The plodded material<br />

then is fed to a roll mill. The flaky soap produced<br />

by the roll mill then is plodded again to throughly<br />

mix ingredients and improve texture and is extruded<br />

in a continuous bar shape for cutting,<br />

stamping, and wrapping.<br />

li<br />

MIXER<br />

STEAM<br />

maximum of other ingredients added. All soap, - -<br />

after finishing, contains some water, usually between<br />

10 and 30 percent, because anhydrous soap<br />

PLODDER<br />

ROLL<br />

would be too insoluble to use easily. The finished<br />

soap product contains perfume which, while fre-<br />

t - - quently not apparent, has been mixed in with the<br />

soap to disguise somewhat unappealing odors.<br />

CUTTER<br />

MIXER<br />

MILL<br />

v -<br />

STAMPER<br />

PACKAGING<br />

FLAKE<br />

PACKAGING<br />

BAR<br />

PACKAGING<br />

Bar soap is produced in three general processes.<br />

The oldest process, the framing -. process, seldom<br />

is used today except for some special types of<br />

soap. In this process, liquid soap, after mixing<br />

or crutching with other necessary ingredients, is<br />

Figure 573. Flow diagram of milling soap finishing<br />

n. - r- n- - - r . ~ ~ ~<br />

poured as a semiliquid paste into large vertical In the second and more recent milled soap promolds.<br />

The soap hardens upon cooling in these cess, the basic blended soap stock is pumped<br />

molds. The sides of the molds or frames are through atomizing nozzles against the inside wall<br />

removed and the soap is cut by mechanical saw- of a vacuum chamber and dropped from the chaming<br />

processes into rough shapes and sizes of the ber into a plodder. Figure 574 is a diagram of<br />

hars. They are then stamped into the final shape, this process. The plodded soap is immediately


t<br />

LIQUID MIXER<br />

SOAP<br />

STOCK<br />

I<br />

-<br />

PLODDER CUTTER<br />

Soap, Fatty Acid, and Glycerine Manufacturing Equipment 745<br />

MINOR INGREDIENTS TO VACUUM<br />

- VACUUM<br />

n FLASH<br />

CHAMBER<br />

t<br />

STEAM<br />

MIXER<br />

PERFUME, ETC.<br />

Figure 574. Flow diagram of vacuum flash drying<br />

process for bar soap production.<br />

mixed with the necessary additional ingredients<br />

and then passed through a series of roll mills<br />

and plodders until it is extruded in a continuous<br />

bar for cutting, stamping, and wrapping.<br />

A third process, illustrated in Figure 575, pro-<br />

duces aerated soap bars. Neat soap is heated<br />

under pressure and then water is flashed off.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> is mixed with the soap, perfume is added, and<br />

the paste chilled and then extruded continuously.<br />

After cutting to rough shape, the bars are "aged"<br />

or cooled, and then stamped and wrapped.<br />

Soap also is finished for marketing in flake or<br />

chip form. In manufacturing this type of product,<br />

the same procedures are followed as were de-<br />

scribed for the framing process. The only ex-<br />

ception is that after hot air-drying, the soap is<br />

not milled or plodded.<br />

Soap powder formerly was produced by grinding<br />

the chips coming from the hot air-dryer discussed<br />

above and shown in Figure 573. This method of<br />

soap powder manufacture has been highly unsat-<br />

isfactory since it produced a product containing<br />

excessive fines. However, this process is still<br />

used occasionaly in some soap plants. Soap<br />

powders now are manufactured almost exclusive-<br />

ly by first crutching the soap stock with the fillers<br />

and other additives to produce the final composi-<br />

tion and then spray drying the slurry mix. The<br />

spray drying of soap and the spray drying of syn-<br />

L<br />

TI<br />

LIQUID SOAP (<br />

I STOCK I ( I<br />

A<br />

1-i VAPOR<br />

FLASH TANK 1<br />

"<br />

I<br />

I I<br />

CONTIYUOUS<br />

I CRUTCHER -<br />

FREEZER-<br />

I I<br />

CUTTER<br />

04<br />

AGING ROOM<br />

H-H~I<br />

CUTTER STAMPER PACKAGING<br />

Figure 575. Flow diagram of aerated soap har<br />

production.<br />

thetic detergent compounds are very similar pro-<br />

cesses. Spray drying is discussed in much great-<br />

er detail in the section of this manual dealing<br />

with detergents.<br />

Liquid soaps very rarely are manufactured today<br />

except for some very specialized products such<br />

as "pure soap hair shampoo. " Top quality liquid<br />

soap is blended in tanks with the other ingredients<br />

desired and then packaged in standard bottle<br />

filling equipment.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

All chemical processes and some of the other<br />

operations involved in the making of soap, pro-<br />

duction of fatty acids, and the purification of<br />

glycerine have odors as a common air pollution<br />

problem. Blending, mixing, drying, packaging,<br />

and other physical operations are subject to the<br />

air pollution problems of dust emissions.<br />

Odors may be emitted from equipment used for<br />

the following operations:


746 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

1. Receiving and storage of animal and vege-<br />

table oils<br />

2. saponification of fats and oils or of fatty<br />

acids<br />

3. hydrolieation of natural fats and oils to<br />

produce fatty acids<br />

4. distillation of fatty acids<br />

5. hydrogenation of fatty acids<br />

6. concentration and distillation of glycerine.<br />

During their receiving and storage, natural fats<br />

and oils are heated to temperatures not over 150°~<br />

to reduce viscosity for pumping. The fats and oils<br />

used by most soap manufacturers are of high qual-<br />

ity, and odors usually do not cause a local nuisance<br />

unless the equipment is located adjacent to homes<br />

or businesses.<br />

Fats and oils are heated during the direct saponi-<br />

fication, resulting in the emission of odors.<br />

These odors may cause a local nuisance, depend-<br />

ing upon the location of the equipment in the com-<br />

munity, and may require control equipment.<br />

Odors also are emitted during the deaeration and<br />

hydrolization of fats and oils to produce fatty acids.<br />

Distillation and hydrogenation of the fatty acids<br />

emit odors. Fortunately, the flash deaeration of<br />

fats and oils is performed under a vacuum, pro-<br />

duced usually by water or steam jets. Steam jets<br />

are followed by contact barometric condensers<br />

which in effect serve as scrubbers. This arrange-<br />

ment of equipment provides satisfactory odor con-<br />

lrol so that the installation of additional control<br />

equipment usually is not necessary. All stages of<br />

these operations are vented similarly. Figure 576<br />

illustrates several vacuum ejector and condenser<br />

systems.<br />

The flash dehydration of glycerine has been found<br />

to emit only mild odors. Equipment for glycerine<br />

distillation under vacuum is vented through steam<br />

jets and barometric condensers. Emissions again<br />

are very light and odors do not cause any nuisance<br />

problems.<br />

In soap-finishing operations, dust can be emitted<br />

from equipment performing the following opera-<br />

tions: Addition of powdered and fine crystalline<br />

materials to crutchers, mechanical sawing and<br />

cntting of cold frame soap, milling and plodding<br />

soap, air drying of soap in steam-heated dryers,<br />

milling, forming, and packaging. Although dust<br />

emissions from these equipment sources rarely<br />

violate existing air pollution regulations, the dust<br />

emissions cause an internal plant hygiene problem.<br />

Various pieces of process equipment must there-<br />

fore be vented to control equipment for worker<br />

comfort and safety.<br />

There are, however, other equipment sources of<br />

dust emissions which usually exceed air pollution<br />

regulations. The sources are: Grinding of soap<br />

chips, pneumatic conveying of powders, and spray<br />

drying of soap. Installation of control equipment<br />

is necessary for compliance with air pollution<br />

regulations as well as worker comfort and safety.<br />

The production of soap powder by spray drying<br />

creates the largest single source of dust in the<br />

manufacture of soap. Spray drying is designed to<br />

produce relatively coarse granules followed by<br />

highly efficient separation of soap granules from<br />

the drying air before the air is vented to the at-<br />

mosphere. Most towers for the spray drying of<br />

soap are the concurrent type where both the heat-<br />

ed air and soap slurry spray are introduced at<br />

the top of the tower. Heated air and soap granu-<br />

les are separated at the bottom of the tower in a<br />

baffled area which causes the granule-laden air to<br />

make sharp 180" turns. Most of the soap is de-<br />

posited in the baffled section and drops into the<br />

cone bottom of the spray dryer. However, a few<br />

soap particles still remain in the heated air after<br />

passage through the baffled area. The particles<br />

range in size from 2 to 200 microns, with a medi-<br />

ian particle size of over 20 microns. <strong>Air</strong> pollution<br />

control equipment is required before venting the<br />

contaminated air to the atmosphere.<br />

The hot soap granules removed from the bottom<br />

of the spray dryer must be cooled to prevent cak-<br />

ing and then screened and stored or sent to pack-<br />

aging equipment. The most common way to cool<br />

soap granules is by pneumatic conveying of the<br />

soap granules to elevated locations for gravity<br />

flow through screens into storage or packaging<br />

equipment. Cyclone separators or gravity settling<br />

chambers are used to remove the soap granules<br />

from the conveying air. Soap particles venting<br />

- -<br />

from the separator or settling chamber are finer<br />

in size than the soap particles in the exhaust air<br />

from the spray drying tower and are in such concentrations<br />

that they must be collected by control<br />

equipment in order to comply with air pollution<br />

regulations.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

The elimination of odors from the manufacture of<br />

raw soap, fatty acids, and glycerine can be accom-<br />

plished by scrubbers such as water ejectors or<br />

barometric condensers. Figure 576a shows a<br />

contact type scrubber which successfully vents<br />

odorous emissions from a vessel used for dehy-<br />

drating blends of tallow and foots oils by heating<br />

them above 200'F. This water jet contact scrubber


-<br />

60°F WATER<br />

8 PSlG<br />

6-in. dla. DUCT<br />

50 - 100 ft.<br />

1%-tn. INLET<br />

I I TO HOTWELL<br />

50,000 to 100,000 odor units per 113<br />

Soap, Fatty Acid, and Glycerine Manufacturing Equipment<br />

?-in OUTLET<br />

a. Barometric condenser and fan venting odorous oil b. Vacuum still which also provides odor reduction.<br />

blending operations.<br />

C. Flash tank which provides both jet exhaust<br />

and odor reduction.<br />

DRUM DRIER<br />

MAKEUP WATER PUMP<br />

d. Drum dryer which provides both vapor removal<br />

and odor reduction.<br />

Figure 576. Steam and water ejector and barometric condenser combinations which also effect odor reduction<br />

(condenser) reduces odor levels by over 90 per- Dust emissions from equipment used in the soap-<br />

cent. Tbe odor-containing gases vented from this finishing operations other than spray drying can<br />

scrubber are in very low volumes. The residual be controlled by dry filters and baghouses. Mois-<br />

odors are diluted in the atmosphere well below ture content of the dust-laden air is well below<br />

their threshold levels in traveling through the saturation and close to ambient so that condensa-<br />

atmosphere for only a short distance from the tion in the baghouse is not a problem. Dust col-<br />

scrubber exhaust. lected in filters or baghouses can be recycled<br />

747


748 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

to the process. Methods for hooding and ventila- equipment of higher collection efficiency than the<br />

tion of equipment emitting dust and the design of cyclones must be used in place of the cyclones or<br />

baghouses or filters are discussed in Chapter 4 be installed in series on the exhaust from the last<br />

of this manual. cyclone when this occurs. A baghouse presents<br />

problems because the exhaust air is usually saturated<br />

at tempzratures of 100" to 150 "F and, at<br />

<strong>Air</strong> pollution control equipment for soap spray this saturated condition, caking and blinding of the<br />

drying towers is designed specifically for the op- bag fabric can occur unless a special heated bagerating<br />

parameters of the particular tower. These house design is employed. Figure 577 is a flow<br />

parameters include: Materials sprayed, tower diagram illustrating the control of a soap spray<br />

operating temperature, tower dimensions, gas drying operation. Multistage centrifugal scrubbers<br />

velocities, and others. Because of the relatively or venhri scrubbers have proven to be satisfac~<br />

large size of the particulates in soap drying, high- tory when additional control is required. Recirefficiency<br />

cyclones installed in series may be sat- culation of scrubbing liquid has not been employed<br />

isfactory in controlling emissions. Cyclones per- because soap slurry can cause severe foaming<br />

mit the recovery of materials for reuse in the<br />

'<br />

problems. Details on the design of scrubbers are<br />

process. However, small particulates may escape given in Chapter 4 of this manual. Further discollection<br />

by the second cyclone and may be in cussion which is applicable to spray drying towers<br />

such concentrations and quantities as to cause for soap also can be found in the following section<br />

emissions which violate regulations. Control on synthetic detergents.<br />

F~gure 577. Flow d~agram of soap spray drylng process wlth cyclones and baghouse for air pollution control.


Synthetic Detergent Surfactant Manufacturing Equipment<br />

SYNTHETIC DETERGENT SURFACTANT<br />

MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Surfactants are organic compounds that encom-<br />

pass in the same molecule two dissimilar struc-<br />

tural groups, e. g. , a water-soluble (hydrophilic)<br />

and a water-insoluble (hydrophobic) group. The<br />

composition, solubility properties, location, and<br />

relative sizes of these dissimilar groups in rela-<br />

tion to the overall molecular configuration deter-<br />

mine the surface activity of the compound (Kirk<br />

and Othmer, 1969). Every surfactant possesses<br />

detergent, dispersing, emulsifying, foaming,<br />

solubilizing, and wetting properties in varying<br />

degrees. The predominant property of any parti-<br />

cular surfactant dictates its use. Those surfact-<br />

ants with strong detergent properties when in<br />

aqueous solutions are used as the active agents<br />

in formulating various synthetic detergent pro-<br />

ducts. Detergent surfactant production for use<br />

in comp2unding of laundry and other cleaning com-<br />

pounds represents over 80 percent of all synthetic<br />

surfactant production. The remaining synthetic<br />

surfactants produced, of all types, are used in<br />

various industrial and chemical processes.<br />

Soap, as discussed earlier in this chapter, is a<br />

detergent type surfactant derived from saponification<br />

of natural oils and fats. It is generally<br />

not included in the present meaning of the term<br />

"detergent. I' Detergent is now almost exclusive<br />

'ly considered to apply to the synthetic organic<br />

surfactants. Synthetic detergents were first<br />

commerciallv emoloved in the textile industrv<br />

A ,<br />

during the 1930's. Just prior to World War 11,<br />

some commercial production of laundry products<br />

containing detergents was started. Since the<br />

close of World War 11, products incorporating<br />

detergents greatly increased in use with a concomitant<br />

decline in the use of soap. By 1968,<br />

synthetic detergent products accounted for 83<br />

percent of the total combined production of soap<br />

and detergent cleaning compounds in the United<br />

States (Silvas, 1969). Figure 569 graphically<br />

illustrates this change in relationship.<br />

Surfactants are classified into four categories<br />

on the basis of their hydrophilic grouping: (1)<br />

Anionic surfactants have hydrophilic groups that<br />

are carboxylates, sulfonates, sulfates, or phos-<br />

phates, e. g., -OSO3- or S03-; (2) cationic sur-<br />

factants have hydrophilic groups that are primary,<br />

secondary, and tertiary amines and quaternary<br />

ammonium groups, e. g., -N(CH3)3f or C5~5~f-;<br />

(3) nonionic surfactants have hydrophilic groups<br />

that are hydroxyl groups and polyoxyethylene<br />

chains, e. g.. -(OCHZCHZ), OH; (4) amphoteric<br />

or zwitterionic surfactants include more than<br />

one solubiliaing group of differing types.<br />

749<br />

Table 202 shows the total 1966 U. S. production of<br />

surfactants divided among several major catego-<br />

ries. All soaps, both those for cleaning and<br />

washing products and those for metallic soaps<br />

for industrial and chemical processes, are in-<br />

cluded under carboxylates in the table. The over-<br />

whelming bulk of surfactant is produced by the i<br />

soap and detergent manufacturing companies, and<br />

consists almost exclusively of the anionic types.<br />

Limited amounts of anionic surfactants used in<br />

detergent cleaning and washing compounds are<br />

produced by petrochemical or chemical manufac-<br />

turing companies. The other two major catego-<br />

ries of synthetic surfactants, cationic and non-<br />

ionic, are almost entirely produced by chemical<br />

manufacturing companies. Their total produc-<br />

tion is relatively minor compared to anionic pro-<br />

duction. Therefore, cationic and nonionic sur-<br />

factants will not be discussed in this section.<br />

Row Materials<br />

The hydrophobic portion of most anionic surfac-<br />

tants is a hydrocarbon containing 8 to 18 carbon<br />

atoms in a straight or slightly branched chain.<br />

In certain cases, a benzene ring may replace<br />

some of the carbon atoms in the chain, e.g.,<br />

C12H25-, C9H19. C6H4-. The hulk of anionic<br />

surfactants are made with dodecylbenzene, or<br />

commonly termed "detergent alkylate, 'I as the<br />

hydrophobic group. Prior to 1965, the alkylates<br />

were produced by reacting benzene or its homo-<br />

logs with branched-chain olefins such as propy-<br />

lene trimer or tetramer. Since 1965, the alky-<br />

lates used for detergents are "soft", or biode-<br />

gradable, and are made from long straight-chain<br />

normal paraffins, which are combined with ben-<br />

zene by the FriedelLCrafts reaction. Most deter-<br />

gent alkylates are produced at petroleum refiner-<br />

ies or petrochemical plants. Their production<br />

will not he discussed in this section. Some<br />

anionic detergents are made with normal fatty<br />

alcohols. Most of these alcohols are produced<br />

by large soap and detergent plants by hydro-<br />

genation of the fatty acxds obtained by the hydro-<br />

lization of natural oils and fats. Synthetic alco-<br />

hols are also used. The production of natural<br />

or synthetic alcohol will not be discussed in this<br />

section.<br />

The hydrophilic grouping in the anionic synthetic<br />

detergent surfactants is either a sulfonate or a<br />

sulfate. Sulfur trioxide or one of its hydrates,<br />

sulfuric acid or oleum, is reacted with alkylate<br />

or fatty alcohols to organic acids which are later<br />

neutralized to form salts. Neutralization is ac-<br />

complished hy empLoying sodium hydroxide, so-<br />

dium bicarbonate, or other sodium bases to form<br />

the sodium salts of the sulfonate or sulfate. Other<br />

neutralization procedures employ ammonia, po-<br />

tassium, diethanolamine, or triethanolamine to<br />

form their respective salts.


750 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMEI'JT<br />

Processes<br />

Table 202. TOTAL U. S. PRODUCT-ION OF SURFACTANTS, DIVIDED<br />

I.V'IO hlA.IOK CAILtiOlllES. ALL FIGUIlL'S ARE FOR 100 I'LKCES I'<br />

SURI'ACL-I\C I'IVL' 11A ILKIALS<br />

(Kirk-Othmer, 1969)<br />

Nonionic-total all types<br />

Cationic-total all types<br />

Type<br />

Anionic synthetics<br />

Sulfonic acids and salts<br />

Sulfuric acids esters and salts (sulfates)<br />

Others<br />

Total anionic synthetic<br />

Amphoteric-total all types<br />

Carboxylic acids and salts-soaps and others<br />

Total-all surfactants<br />

There are several separate and distinctive pro-<br />

cesses for sulfonation or sulfation of various or-<br />

ganic bases to produce the detergents most com-<br />

monly manufactured. These processes variously<br />

employ oleum, sulfur trioxide in liquid or in va-<br />

port phase, sulfuric acid in high concentration,<br />

or chlorosulfuric acid.<br />

The attachment of the sulfonic acid group, 502<br />

OH, to a carbon atom of a hydrocarbon group<br />

(RH) is termed sulfonation. As<br />

with sulfur trioxide RH + S03-RSO2OH<br />

with sulfuric acid RHt H2SOqzRS020H<br />

with oleum t Hz0<br />

with chlorosulfuric RH t ClSO3H-RSOzOH<br />

acid (sulfone) t H CI~<br />

Sulfation in detergent manufacturing denotes the<br />

attachment of an SO2OH group to an oxygen atom<br />

of an alcohol group. As<br />

with sulfur trioxide ROH t SO3-ROS020H<br />

with sulfuric acid<br />

with oleum ROH + HSOtROS020H<br />

with chlorosulfuric ROHt C1S03H-ROSOzOH<br />

acid (sulfone) 1 t HC11<br />

Production,<br />

pounds<br />

963,812,000<br />

111,925,000<br />

12,956,000<br />

1P88,693,000<br />

2,903,503,000<br />

Oleum is the most frequently used reactant for<br />

sulfonation. Oleum of 20 or 25 percent strength<br />

(20 or 25 parts by weight of sulfur trioxide liquid<br />

dissolved in 75 or 80 parts by weight or concen-<br />

trated sulfuric acid) is most frequently employed.<br />

During the early period of commercial production<br />

of synthetic detergents, all sulfonation processes<br />

employed 20 percent oleum in batch operations.<br />

Today almost all sulfonation of alkylate with oleum<br />

is performed in continuous operations. There are<br />

two typical processes: (1) Oleum sulfonation and<br />

(2) oleum sulfonation and sulfation.<br />

OLEUM SULFONATION I<br />

~<br />

The most frequently encountered oleum sulfonation<br />

is the patented packaged plant illustrated in<br />

Figure 578. Although the feed equipment and discharge<br />

equipment may differ, the essential suli<br />

I<br />

i<br />

fonation and neutralization processes are the same<br />

for all of these plants. Oleum and alkylate are<br />

precisely metered and introduced to a centrifugal<br />

!<br />

mixing pump. The reacting mixture is then cooled<br />

in heat exchangers. Some reacting product !<br />

recirculates to the mixing pump. The discharged<br />

I<br />

reacting product enters a digester tube section to<br />

allow the reaction to go to completion. The pro-<br />

duct is then diluted with water which hydrolizes<br />

sulfuric acid anhyrides and makes possible sub-<br />

sequent layer separation of spent sulfuric acid<br />

from the sulfonic acid. The layer separation<br />

step, which would normally require several hours,<br />

is effected in only a few minutes by adding sul-<br />

fonic acid product to the large mass of recycling<br />

spent acid. A centrifugal mixing pump is used


Synthetic Detergent Surfactant Manufacturing Equipment<br />

WATER ALKALI 1<br />

SULFONIC<br />

SULFONATION DILUTION CONCENTRATION NEUTRALIZATION<br />

Figure 578. Sulfonation of detergent alkylate with oleum in package plant with vacuum deodorizing<br />

(Chemithon Corp., Seattle, Wash.).<br />

to add dilution water, and the pump recirculates<br />

part of the dilute sulfonic acid along with part of<br />

the spent acid from the separation vessel. The<br />

spent acld is pumped from the bottom of the<br />

separation vessel, and sulfonic acid is pumped<br />

from the top. At this point in the process, differ-<br />

ences from one installation to another are found.<br />

Various arrangements of equipment provide for:<br />

Neutralization of the sulfonic acid followed by<br />

storage: deodorization by vacuum treating follow-<br />

ed either by storage or neutralization and storage;<br />

storage of the sulfonic acid without any further<br />

treating.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Emissions of highly visible white opacity occur<br />

when oleum, formerly termed fuming sulfuric<br />

acid, is charged to a vessel and the displaced<br />

vapors are allowed to escape to the atmosphere.<br />

The visible emissions result from the reaction of<br />

sulfur trioxide vapor with water vapor in the air<br />

to form sulfuric acid particles in mist form. The<br />

particle size of this mist is directly comparable to<br />

the sulfuric acid mist in tail gases from sulfuric<br />

acid manufacturing. The particles of this mist<br />

are all less than 2 microns and 10 percent by<br />

weight are less than 1 micron. The threshold of<br />

visibility for this mist has been found experimen-<br />

tally to be of the order of 3.6 x grains/ft3<br />

(0.0203 mg/ft3), the precise value depending upon<br />

the temperature and humidity of the atmosphere<br />

(Fairs, 1958). Dense white emissions up to 100<br />

percent opacity occur from vents of storage tanks<br />

and process vessels during filling operations<br />

with oleum.<br />

Continuous sulfonation occurs in this equipment<br />

in a closed system without venting (except for<br />

751<br />

emergency relief). The sulfonic acid separation<br />

vessel is not vented, and the discharge of sul-<br />

fonic acid product and the waste sulfuric acid,<br />

after separation, to storage tanks does not cause<br />

emissions of more than trace opacities from vents<br />

of these tanks. When the sulfonic acid is neutra-<br />

lized, no visible emissions occur from the pro-<br />

cess equipment or from the final storage vessel.<br />

Depending upon the reagents used, the presence<br />

of long alkyl chains in the alkylate can lead to<br />

some dealkylation. Dealkylation results in the<br />

formation of small amounts of long-chain olefins<br />

which can cause product odor problems. To over-<br />

come odors, some plants deodorize the sulfonic<br />

acid product in a vacuum tank. The thresholds<br />

of the odorous materials removed depend upon<br />

the organic base feed stock. The ejectors and<br />

barometric condensers used for producing the<br />

vacuum scrub out odorous compounds from the<br />

gaseous stream. The odorous materials are<br />

skimmed from the water in the hot well. After<br />

skimming, the water may safely be cooled with-<br />

out creating odor emissions from the cooling<br />

tower.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

The transfer of liquid sulfur trioxide into vessels<br />

creates the same dense visible emissions as de-<br />

scribed for the transfer of oleum. When oleum<br />

and liquid SO3 were first introduced in industrial<br />

operations, control of emissions was attempted<br />

with simple water or caustic solution traps or<br />

scrubbers, but without success. Scrubbers and<br />

packed towers employing concentrated sulfuric<br />

acid as the scrubbing or absorbing medium were<br />

next employed. Many of these control installa-<br />

tions succeeded in reducing the opacity of the<br />

visible mist emissions, but did not reduce them


~.<br />

. .. .<br />

752 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

to a point that their corrosive effects on adjoin-<br />

ing equipment were eliminated.<br />

tured by Monsanto Company. Efficient operation<br />

of the filter is dependent upon adequately contact-<br />

ing the off-gases with water before entering the<br />

filter to convert all sulfur trioxide vapor to sul-<br />

furic acid mist for filtration. This is accomplish-<br />

ed by water sprayed concurrent with the gas flow.<br />

A 20 percent oleum was charged to the vented<br />

vessel at a rate of approximately 1000 pounds per<br />

minute, and the filter reduced the dense white<br />

emissions to a barely visible plume.<br />

Sulfur trioxide liquid is usually stored, shipped,<br />

and handled at a temperature between 90' and<br />

100 "F. Commercial stabilized SO3 has a melting<br />

point of about 62.2"F and a boiling point of<br />

about 112 "F. It is best handled and stored at<br />

92.2"F. Pure SO3 has a vapor pressure of 1 atmosphere<br />

at its boiling point, but the pressure<br />

will vary, at some lower value, from one supplier<br />

to another depending on the stabilizers employed.<br />

The vapor pressure of SO3 over 20 percent<br />

oleum, however, is only 0.8 mm Hg at<br />

OLEUM SULFONATION AND SULFATION<br />

35 "C (0.24 ounces~in.~ at 95°F). The vapor<br />

readily reacts either with water or water vapor<br />

to form sulfuric acid. Because it is a vapor<br />

phase reaction, and the sulfuric acid formed<br />

immediatley condenses to a liquid, the acid droplets<br />

are very small. Effective collection of these<br />

mists from tanks and vessels receiving SO3 or<br />

oleum will require exceedingly high-energy<br />

scrubbers or very high-efficiency filters. An<br />

Another continuous sulfonation process empLoys<br />

both sulfonation of an alkylate and sulfation of an<br />

alcohol in a two-stage series reaction with oleum<br />

in both stages. Figure 580 is a schematic flow<br />

diagram of this process. This process is proprietary<br />

and is operated by The Procter and Gamble<br />

Manufacturing Company.<br />

effective high-efficiency filter was constructed<br />

by Fairs (1958). The filter was made by com-<br />

Process<br />

pressing silicone treated ultrafine glass fibers<br />

to a bulk density of 10 pounds per cubic foot. Provision<br />

was made to throughly humidify the acid<br />

bearing exhaust gases before passing them to this<br />

filter.<br />

In this process, 20 percent oleum is continuously<br />

introduced to a mixing pump along with alkylate.<br />

The process proceeds according to what is termed<br />

the "dominant bath" principle to control the heat<br />

of sulfonation conversion and maintain the temp-<br />

A high-efficiency filter installation is illustrated<br />

in Figure 579. This oleum tank vent control consists<br />

of a Brink Mist Eliminator filter, manufacerature<br />

at a steady 130'F. A high recirculation<br />

ratio (volume of recirculating material divided<br />

by the volume of throughput) of at least 20: 1 is<br />

maintained ~~ to ~rodnce a favorable system. The<br />

discharged sulfonic mixture is passed through<br />

TO ATMOSPHERE coils to provide sufficient time for sulfonation to<br />

reach the desired high conversion. In the second<br />

stage of the process, fatty tallow alcohol, more<br />

oleum, and the first-stage sulfonic product are<br />

mixed in a centrifugal pump. This stage also<br />

OLEUM TANK<br />

HIGH-EFFICIENCY<br />

employs the dominant bath principle with a high<br />

recirculation ratio. The discharged sulfonicsulphate<br />

product then passes to a continuous line<br />

mixer where a sodium hydroxide solution is introduced<br />

for neutralization. Again, the dominant<br />

bath principle with a high recirculation ratio is<br />

used in the neutralization step. The surfactant<br />

slurry then is pumped to storage. This process<br />

makes no attempt to separate and remove any<br />

unreacted sulfuric acid as waste acid. All residual<br />

sulfuric acid is neutralized to sodium sulfate.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

SEWER<br />

The Procter and Gamble process requires an entirelv<br />

closed system. Venting - to the atmosphere<br />

Figure 579. High-efficiency mineral fiber filter installed<br />

ta vent acid mists from oleum storage tank;<br />

back flow not shown (Brink Filter. Monsanto Co.. St.<br />

iou!~. MO.).<br />

occurs only when the surfactant slurry is discharged<br />

into a storage vessel. Gaseous emissions<br />

from the storage vessel are minimal, and no air<br />

pollution control equipment is required.


CAUSTIC<br />

Synthetic Detergent Surfactant Manufacturing Equipment 753<br />

Figure 580. Continuous series sulfonation-sulfation with oleum, ending with neutralization, employing circulating<br />

heat-exchanging dominant bath to control heat (The Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Co., Long Beach, Calif.).<br />

SULFUR TRlOXlDE VAPOR SULFONATION<br />

When liquid detergent compounds were introduced<br />

as household products, it became necessary to<br />

reduce the sodium sulfate content of the surfac-<br />

tant. Sulfonation with oleum resulted in excess-<br />

ively high sodium sulfate content when the sur-<br />

factant was neutralized and used in liquid deter-<br />

gent products. The high sulfate content (11 to 12<br />

percent) caused cloudiness in the liquid deter-<br />

gent products and the sulfate settled out in the<br />

bottom of the containers. Sulfonation with pure<br />

sulfur trioxide vapor provided neutralized sur-<br />

factants with much lower sodium sulfate content<br />

(1 to 3 percent) and thus became an important<br />

process. The first ma'or installations of SO3<br />

vapor sulfonation equipLent included sulfur burn-<br />

ers for production of SO3. However, with the<br />

commercial development and availability of<br />

stabilized SO3 at low costs, many installations<br />

eliminated the SO3 production equipment (SO3<br />

production is discussed earlier in this chapter).<br />

Earliest processes for SO3 vapor sulfonation were<br />

batch operations. Several proprietary continuous<br />

operations are now used for this process. The<br />

continuous processes employ several types of<br />

reactors. One reactor is a mechanically agitated<br />

unit, and two others are film type reactors. The<br />

processes are similar and cause similar air<br />

pollution problems. SO3 is vaporized and diluted<br />

in a dry air stream (dew point 40 'F) to 29 to 8<br />

percent by volume before entering the reactor.<br />

Either alkylates or alcohols may be used in the<br />

processes. Figure 581 is a schematic flow dia-<br />

gram of one installation utilizing a film reactor.<br />

In this process, air is compressed, cooled, and<br />

dehydrated, then accurately metered to the reac-<br />

tion column. Simultaneously, stabilized liquid<br />

SO3 is weighed, then metered to a steam heat<br />

exchanger to be vaporized. Metered air is mix-<br />

ed with the SO3 vapor just before entering the<br />

reaction column, Al+late, alcohol, or other<br />

organic materials are metered and pumped to the<br />

reaction column. The reactor is a vertical cclumn<br />

designed for concurrent flow from top to bottom of<br />

the dilute SO3 vapor in air and the organic liquid.<br />

Cooling water flows on the outside of the reactor<br />

from the bottom to top in an opposite direction to<br />

the descending reactants. The sulfonic acid dis-<br />

charges from the bottom of the column to a cen-<br />

trifugal separator where liquid sulfonic acid is<br />

drawn from the bottom, and gas is vented from<br />

the top of the separator to the atmosphere (other<br />

installations may recycle the discharged gas and<br />

only vent some bleed-off). The liquid sulfonic<br />

acid then passes through a degassing column,<br />

maintained under vacuum, to remove unreacted<br />

SO3 vapors in the liquid phase. Depending upon<br />

the product manufactured, the product is pumped<br />

either to storage or neutralization tanks or to an<br />

"ageing tank" maintained under slight vacuum<br />

where it is agitated and cooled by water coils to<br />

ensure completion of the sulfonation reaction.<br />

It is then pumped either to storage or to neutra-<br />

lization equipment. Trace amounts of sulfuric


754 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

I<br />

COMPRESSED AIR AIR AIR TO<br />

DRYER<br />

t<br />

POLLUTION CONTROL<br />

COOL WATER<br />

.-... - VAPORIZER I I I I<br />

LlUUlU<br />

SULFUR TRlOXlDE I I I<br />

STEAM 'V<br />

- -<br />

ALKYLATEORALCOHOL I I l l<br />

V<br />

INTERNAL SEPARATOR<br />

- I<br />

SULFONIC ACID<br />

VACUUM LINE PRODUCT<br />

COOL WATER<br />

- --. I&<br />

VACUUM<br />

OR<br />

DEGASSER<br />

NEUTRALIZER<br />

r TO STORAGE<br />

OR PROCESS<br />

NEUTRALIZER WATER<br />

~<br />

Figure 581. Sulfonation with sulfur trioxide vapor using a f i lrn reactor (Texti lana Corp., Hawthorne, Cal if.).<br />

acid anhydrides may be present in the sulfonic<br />

product, and form sodium sulfate when neutra-<br />

lized. Fatty alcohols must be neutralized immed-<br />

iately after the reaction with SO3 because sulfuric<br />

acid esters hydrolize rapidly. Some sulfonic<br />

acid is diluted with water to eliminate anhydrides<br />

before being stored. Neutralization of the sulfonic<br />

acid or sulfate is accomplished batchwise in an<br />

agitated water-cooled tank or in a dominant bath<br />

continuous neutralizer. The sulfonic acid or sul-<br />

fate products may be neutralized by sodium or<br />

potassium alkalies or by ammonia.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

COOLING TANK<br />

(AGING)<br />

In the SO3 vapor sulfonation process described,<br />

there are three point sources from which air<br />

contaminants can be emitted. The principal<br />

source of emission is the venting of gas separated<br />

from the sulfonic product upon discharge from the<br />

reactor. When the film reactor equipment was<br />

first installed, the emissions were believed to be<br />

_<br />

:<br />

.<br />

.,<br />

'=<br />

SURGE<br />

COOL<br />

WATER<br />

I<br />

STEAM<br />

TO HOTWELL<br />

__,.<br />

r<br />

QD I TO STORAGE<br />

mostly air with a small amount of SO3 vapor as<br />

acid mist. Control of this emission was attempt- i.<br />

ed by employing a mist eliminator followed by a<br />

packed scrubber using 99 percent sulfuric acid<br />

as the scrubbing medium. This method of control<br />

did not eliminate the visible emission ranging<br />

from 50 to 100 percent opacity. Upon investiga-<br />

I<br />

i<br />

tion, the emission was found to be almost com-<br />

pletely water soluble and to cause suds in water.<br />

The sulfuric acid in the scrubber did not in-<br />

crease in strength as would be the case if SO3<br />

were absorbed in the scrubber. Infrared spectro-<br />

meter analysis of the gaseous emissions indicated :<br />

the principle constituent of the visible emission to ~<br />

be sulfonic acid. Fine mists are produced in the i<br />

reactor and may be formed in several ways. Some 1<br />

alkylate may vaporize in excess of normal equili-<br />

brium conditions due to localized hot zones in the<br />

reactor to later condense in the gas phase with<br />

the SO3 gas to produce sulfonic acid. Since the<br />

sulfonic acid is produced under conditions below<br />

its dewpoint, it immediately condenses from the<br />

!.<br />

1<br />

, ,


Synthetic Detergent Surfactant Manufacturing Equipment 755<br />

gas phase as a very fine mist. Some water is<br />

produced by side reactions. The water vaporizes<br />

and reacts with the SO3 gas in the vapor phase<br />

to form sulfuric acid below its dewpoint result-<br />

ing in a fine mist (Brink, et al. 1966).<br />

The other two paints of emissions have not been<br />

found to cause emissions of excessive opacities.<br />

One of these points is the exhaust from the single-<br />

stage steam ejector employed to provide vacuum.<br />

The ejector exhaust was found to contain little if<br />

any air contaminants and is not controlled. The<br />

third point of emission is the by-pass discharge<br />

from the reactor. The by-pass discharges liquids<br />

from the reactor during start-up procedures to a<br />

sump lor disposal to the sewer system. When<br />

carefully operated to avoid wasting materials or<br />

product, the start-up by-pass discharge is used<br />

for only a very short period, usually less than<br />

1 minute. Visible air contaminants from this<br />

source have been observed only during these<br />

short periods.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

The visible mist emitted from the vent of the re-<br />

actor is not readily controlled by scrubbing. In-<br />

cineration of the off-gasses eliminates visible<br />

emissions but results in emission of sulfur oxides.<br />

The high-efficiency filter discussed previously for<br />

SO3 acid mist control may be expected to control<br />

emissions from the reactor. The volume of ex-<br />

haust gas is determined by the operating para-<br />

meters of the sulfonation equipment. Pressure<br />

drop through the high-efficiency filter arranged<br />

for horizontal gas flow with velocities of 15 to 30<br />

fpm ranges between 5 and 8 inches of water col-<br />

umn. Provisions should he made for back-wash-<br />

ing of the filter elements.<br />

SULFUR TRlOXlDE LIQUID SULFONATION<br />

Since liquid sulfur trioxide with even a trace of<br />

moistur 2 present forms solid polymers at room<br />

temperatures, it was not a commerically feasible<br />

reactant until it was stabilized by addition of small<br />

quantities of suitable compounds. First processes<br />

employing liquid SO3 resulted in surfactants of<br />

poor color or with unpleasant odors. Liquid SO3<br />

added to undiluted alkylate causes heavy dealkyla-<br />

tion with the formation of odorous long-chain ole-<br />

fins. Pilot Chemical Company developed a com-<br />

mercial process employing the liquid, shown<br />

schematically in Figure 582. The process is op-<br />

erated in batches and employs liquid sulfur diox-<br />

ide as a diluent and as a refrigerant to maintain<br />

low batch temperatures (30°F) during the highly<br />

exothermic sulfonation reaction.<br />

Alkylate to be sulfonated is metered into the re-<br />

actor, and then the liquid SO2 and SO3 are meter-<br />

ed to the reactor. The heat generated by the sul-<br />

fonation reaction causes evaporation of the SOz,<br />

which holds the reaction mass at low temperature.<br />

The reactor is maintained under negative condition<br />

by pumping the SO2 vapor from it. The reaction<br />

is completed after several hours, and the sulfonic<br />

product is then heated to 85°F to drive off reemin-<br />

ing SO2 liquid as a vapor. The SOZ vapor removed<br />

from the reactor is compressed, scrubbed with<br />

concentrated sulfuric acid to remove any SO3,<br />

condensed, and returned to storage. The sulfonic<br />

product discharged from the reactor passes to a<br />

vacuum stripper to remove traces of SO2 and then<br />

to either storage or a neutralization tank. The<br />

vacuum pump for the vacuum stripper discharges<br />

to the compressors and returns any removed SO2<br />

to storage.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

The Pilot Chemical process emp?oys an entirely<br />

closed system u?til the sulfonic product is dis-<br />

charged to storage. The product in storage does<br />

not cause any air contaminant emissions other<br />

than very dilute and mild odors. The only air<br />

pollution problem found from the operation is<br />

from the necessary purge venting of the liquid<br />

SO2 storage tank. The tank must be continuously<br />

purged whenever the compressor is discharging<br />

SO2 back to it from the sulfonation reaction. This<br />

prevents any build-up of air which enters the<br />

system by leakage into the compressor and other<br />

equipment. SO2 vapors are present in the gas<br />

flow from the purge vent line.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

SO2 vapor emitted from the storage tank receiv-<br />

ing recovered SO2 from this process is readily<br />

controlled by absorption in a caustic solution.<br />

Moderate energy scrubbers such as packed<br />

columns and spargers using 10 percent sodium<br />

hydroxide solution as the scrubbing medium are<br />

effective. An air pollution control scrubber is<br />

schematically shown in Figure 583. At this<br />

installation, gas flow rate from the tank is limi-<br />

ted to approximately 1 to 2 cfm by a needle valve<br />

for the purge operation. SO2 vapor is sparged<br />

beneath the caustic solution contained in two<br />

scrubber vessels connected in series. The caus-<br />

tic solution is sampled regularly and maintained<br />

above 5 percent concentration. The same system<br />

can serve to vent the storage tank when it is fill-<br />

ed with liquid SO2 from a tank truck. The SO2<br />

vapor displaced during filling is returned to the<br />

truck tank so that the purge line vents only a low<br />

gas flow to the scrubber. The knock-out pot in<br />

the purge line between the tank and the scrubber<br />

principally serves to prevent back-flow of caustic<br />

solution to the SO2 storage tank.


756 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

SULFONIC AClD<br />

TO<br />

NEUTRALIZATION<br />

OR<br />

STORAGE<br />

Figure 582. Sulfonation with liquid sulfur trioxide diluted with liquid sulfur dioxide (Pilot<br />

Chemical Co., Santa Fe Springs, Calif.).<br />

CHLOROSULFURIC AClD SULFATION<br />

Chlorosulfuric acid as an acid reactant requires<br />

considerably different process equipment than<br />

any of the other processes discussed previously.<br />

The reaction is carried out with fatty alcohols.<br />

It is employed to produce surfactants used in for-<br />

mulating detergent products of high quality. Fig-<br />

ure 584 is a schematic flow diagram illustrating<br />

this process. Fatty alcohols are transferred<br />

from storage by a vacuum applied to the reactor.<br />

In the reactor, the alcohols are first cooled to the<br />

point of solidification by circulation of refrigera-<br />

ted water in the reactor jacket. The reactor is<br />

purged with inert gas (nitrogen) and chlorosulfuric<br />

acid is then slowly metered into the reactor. This<br />

reaction is characterized by the highly unbalanced<br />

pattern of heat and gas evolution. When the acid<br />

is first added to the alcohol, the exothermic for-<br />

mation of slkoxonium chloride occurs, and the<br />

hydrogen chloride generated by the sulfonation re-<br />

action is retained in the reactant mass. As acid<br />

addition continues, the HC1 is endothermically<br />

evolved as a gas and released from the reacting<br />

mass with considerable foaming. The heat evo-<br />

lution is highest at the start of the reaction, with<br />

approximately 60 percent of the total heat<br />

generated when only 20 percent of the total acid<br />

reagent has been added. Inert gas must be con-<br />

tinuously bled from the reactor along with the<br />

generated HC1. Off-gases containing HC1 pass to<br />

a falling film reactor for recovery of the HCI by<br />

absorption in water to form hydrochloric acid as<br />

a valuable byproduct. When the reaction has<br />

reached completion, the sulfated alcohol is trans-<br />

ferred to another vessel for neutralization. So-<br />

dium hydroxide, triethanolamine, or ammonia is<br />

used for neutralization. The sulfated alcohol must<br />

be neutralized immediately after completion of<br />

the reaction to avoid hydrolization.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

The receiving, storage, and handling of chloro-<br />

sulfuric acid results in more severe air pollution<br />

problems than those encountered with liquid So3<br />

and oleum. Chlorosulfuric acid is a fuming liquid<br />

which is extremely corrosive and reacts violently<br />

with water to produce hydrochloric and sulfuric<br />

acid. It is not normally exposed to air, and inert


Synthetic Detergent Surfactant Manufacturing Equipment 757<br />

NEEDLEVALVE<br />

SULFUR DIOXIDE RETURN SULFUR<br />

F-A AIR AND SULFUR<br />

( LIQUID SULFUR DIOXIDE<br />

TANK<br />

CAUSTIC<br />

OVER<br />

:&--- -x--<br />

pH GUAGE . .<br />

TO SEWER<br />

LIQUID<br />

Figure 583. <strong>Air</strong> pollution control system venting<br />

liquid sulfur dioxide tank receiving recycled sulfur<br />

dioxide from sulfonation process (Pi lot Chemical Co.,<br />

Sante Fe Springs, Calif.).<br />

gas under positive pressure is used in place of<br />

atmosphere when charging or discharging any<br />

containers or vessels. Venting of the displaced<br />

gas from vessels when filling with chlorosulfuric<br />

acid produces visible emissions of the acid mist.<br />

The chlorosulfation process evolves HC1 gas which<br />

is vented along with inert gas to a falling film ab-<br />

sorber. Most of the HC1 is absorbed in water,<br />

but a small amount of unabsorbed HCl is carried<br />

out with the inert gas to the atmosphere, causing<br />

visible emissions of acid mist. Hydrochloric<br />

acid produced by absorption of the HCl in water<br />

(usually 25 to 28 percent solution) is transferred<br />

to storage. Displaced vapors vented during fill-<br />

ing of the storage tank also consist of visible<br />

acid mist. The balance between the reactor op-<br />

eration and the absorber operation is critical if<br />

absorption of the HCl gas is to be reasonably com-<br />

plete. If absorption is inefficient, larger quanti-<br />

ties of acid mists are emitted from the storage<br />

tank vent. If inert gas flow volume to the reac-<br />

tor is excessively high, the absorption efficiency<br />

for HCl decreases. The flow of HCl from the re-<br />

actor is not constant. Therefore the feed water<br />

rate and other absorption variables must be con-<br />

trolled to keep the byproduct acid concentration<br />

from the absorber constant in spite of varying<br />

HCl gas loads.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

HCI acid mist displaced during filling of the stor-<br />

age tank is readily controlled with a caustic solu-<br />

tion scrubber or packed column. Two simple<br />

submersion type scrubbers illustrated in Figure<br />

585 serve to control emissions with high efficiency.<br />

The volume of HCl solution discharged from the<br />

chlorosulfation unit absorber is quite low, and<br />

this scrubber contains an excess of caustic for<br />

neutralizing all the HC1 vented during the batch<br />

operation. The caustic solution is tested after<br />

each batch operation to maintain the pH of the<br />

solution at 8 or greater.<br />

Sulfoalkylation is a condensation-type reaction<br />

producing a more complex sulfonate from a sim-<br />

ple one. One sulfoalkylation process, the manu-<br />

facture of N-acyl-N-alkyltaurate, is performed<br />

in the same equipment schematically illustrated<br />

in Figure 584 for a chlorosulfation process.<br />

Fatty acids are moved to the reactor, and phos-<br />

phorous trichloride is added as a reactant to pro-<br />

duce a fatty acyl chloride. Inert gas sparging is<br />

used, and hydrogen chloride is released by the<br />

reaction to be vented from the reactor with the<br />

inert gas. In this reaction, phosphoric acid is<br />

also formed in the reactor and settles out at its<br />

bottom. When the reaction is complete, remain-<br />

ing HCl is purged with the inert gas, and the<br />

phosphoric acid is drawn off. The fatty acyl<br />

chloride product of the first reaction is then re-<br />

acted with N-methyltaurine (taurine is 2-amino-<br />

ethane sulfonic acid) to form the final detergent<br />

surfactant (one of the "Igepon TI1 series of Gen-<br />

eral Aniline and Film Corporation). The HCl and<br />

inert gas vented from the reactor during the first<br />

reaction flows to the falling film absorber for<br />

HCl recovery. The surfactant is pumped from<br />

the reactor to a neutralization tank for final<br />

treatment with a caustic solution.<br />

Another sulfoalkylation process is a reaction be-<br />

tween fatty acids and isethionate, the sodium<br />

salt of isethionic acid (Z-hydroxyethane sulfonic<br />

acid), as the sulfating agent, and fatty acids in the<br />

presence of a catalyst to produce 8-sulfoesters.<br />

These detergents are sensitive to hydrolysis and<br />

are used only in specialty products. Hydrolysis<br />

does not deter their use in personal products.<br />

The sodium salt of 2-sulfoethyl ester of lauric<br />

acid or of coconut acid is used in manufacturing<br />

synthetic detergent bars.<br />

In this process, isethionic acid and coconut fatty<br />

acid are metered to a closed reactor, and a catalyst<br />

in ~owder form is added. The mix is agitated<br />

and circulated through a heat exchanger to<br />

add heat to the reactant mass. Inert gas is sparged<br />

into the reactor to prevent discoloration of pro-


758 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Flgure 584. Chlorosulfonatian af fatty alcohols and recovery af hydrogen chloride (Textilana Carp.,<br />

Hawthorne, Calif.).<br />

a. Low-volume hydrogen chlorlde ac~d mlst<br />

vented from chlorosulfonat~on process.<br />

VACUUM RELIEF VALVE<br />

b. Low-volume hydrogen chloride ac~d mlst vented<br />

from hydrogen chlorlde storage tank.<br />

Flgure 585. Submersion type scrubbers uslng caustlc solution (Textllana Corp., Hawthorne, Cal~f.).


Synthetic Detergent Product Manufacturing Equipment 759<br />

duct. Fatty acid vapor, water vapor, and inert<br />

SYNTHETIC DETERGENT PRODUCT<br />

gas are vented from the reactor through a condenser<br />

to a seaarator tank. Fattv acids seoara- MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT<br />

ted are recycled to the reactor, the water is sent<br />

to the sewer, and the inert gas . is returned to a<br />

gas holder. The reaction is completed after several<br />

hours, and the product is then pumped to a<br />

jacketed vacuum stripper tank. The temperature<br />

is maintained, tallow fatty acid and more catalyst<br />

are added, and inert gas is sparged into the tank.<br />

The vessel is held under slight vacuum for a short<br />

period while the contents are agitated. The vacuum<br />

is then increased to strip any remaining unreacted<br />

fatty acid. Water vapor, inert gas, and<br />

fatty acid vapors are vented through a condenser.<br />

The condensate from the condenser consists primarily<br />

of coconut fatty acid and is returned to<br />

storage. The fresh surfactant is discharged<br />

through a line mixer where a small amount of water<br />

is added for cooling purposes. It is then transferred<br />

to a holding vessel for use in formulation<br />

of toilet bars. The water content flashes off in<br />

the holding vessel.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

The first of the two reactions involved in the production<br />

of alkyltaurates, the fatty acyl chloride<br />

reaction, also creates HCI acid mist emissions<br />

similar to those from the chlorosulfonation reaction.<br />

The second reaction, with the N-methyltaurine.<br />

is accomplished in the vessel without<br />

venting until the reaction is complete.<br />

The vacuum system employed in the second process<br />

to oroduce the sulfoester consists of compound<br />

steam ejectors with barometric condensers.<br />

The condensers discharge to a hot well. Visible<br />

and odiferous emissions, principally fatty acid<br />

vapors, occur from the hot well. Uncondensable<br />

gases in the reactor recirculation system also are<br />

vented and cause odors and visible emissions.<br />

The flashed off water vapor from the product hold<br />

tank can also contain contaminants of an odorous<br />

nature. No other air pollutant emissions occur<br />

from this process.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

The same control equipment shown in Figure 584<br />

for HC1 acid mist serves to control the emissions<br />

from the first sulfoalkylation process producing<br />

the alkyltaurate.<br />

The hot well receiving condenser water and uncon-<br />

densed gas and vapor from the vacuum jet systems<br />

in the second process for sulfoesters must be<br />

closed and vented to control equipment to eliminate<br />

odors and visible acid mist emissions. Scrubbers<br />

with gas pressure drops ranging from 7 to 12 in-<br />

ches water column usually control these emissions.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

"Synthetic detergent products" applies broadly to<br />

cleaning and laundering compounds containing surfactants<br />

along with other ingredients formulated<br />

for use in aqueous solutions. These products are<br />

marketed as heavy- or light-duty granules or liquids,<br />

cleansers. - - and laundrv or toilet bars. The heavvduty<br />

granules representthemajor portionof allproducts<br />

manufactured, with the light- andheavy-duty<br />

liquid or light-duty granules in far lesser production.<br />

The manufacture of all detergentproducts incorporates<br />

equipment andprocesses similar to those for<br />

manufacturing soapproducts. Themanufacture of<br />

the granular products is ofparamountinterest, with<br />

more severe air pollutionproblems than those encountered<br />

with soap granule production. The manufacture<br />

of liquid detergent andhar products is oflesser<br />

importance, withlittle or no difference from similar<br />

soap products in either process equipment or air<br />

pollution potential, and will not be discussed.<br />

Raw Materials<br />

The surfactants used in formulating synthetic detergent<br />

products are either anionic or nonionic.<br />

The products also contain other chemical compounds<br />

which supplement the detergent of the surfactant.<br />

Each particular formulation depends upon<br />

the ultimate design for consumer use. Table 203<br />

illustrates the formulations commonly used in<br />

large-volume granule and liquid detergent manufacture.<br />

Sodium tripolyphosphate (STP) or tetrasodium<br />

pyrophosphate (TSPP) are incorporated in most<br />

granular formulations as "builders" or seques-<br />

tering agents. They serve to eliminate inter-<br />

ference with the detergent action by the calcium<br />

and magnesium ions (hardness) in the water used<br />

in the wash solution. STP and TSPP may be used<br />

in powder, prill, or granule form, and are re-<br />

ceived in carlots. These ingredients are most<br />

often blended into the slurry before spray drying.<br />

Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) and its sodium salts<br />

have recently been incorporated in some heavy-<br />

duty granule products to replace part of the STP.<br />

It is more expensive than STP, but is a better<br />

sequestrant. The growing public concern with the<br />

role phosphates in detergents may play in deteri-<br />

oration of water quality has generated manufac-<br />

turers' interest in this substitute. Indications<br />

are that it will be employed in the near future in<br />

more formulations and in larger quantities. The<br />

acid is a crystalline powder and the salts (disodi-<br />

um or trisodium) are powders. They are receiv-<br />

ed in carlots. NTA is added to the slurry mix be-<br />

fore drying.


760 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Surfactants<br />

Table 203. FORMULATIONS(1N PERCENT) FOR LARGE-VOLUME DETERGENT<br />

MANUFACTURE IN THE UNITED STATES<br />

Constituent<br />

Alcohol sulfate<br />

Alkyl sulfonate<br />

Ethoxulated<br />

fatty alcohol<br />

Alkyl amine oxide<br />

Soap<br />

Builders<br />

Fatty alcohol<br />

or amines<br />

STPINTA<br />

TS P<br />

Additives<br />

CMC<br />

Sodium silicate<br />

Sodium sulfate<br />

Enzyme<br />

Other<br />

Heavy duty Light duty<br />

p-<br />

High suds<br />

granules<br />

Low suds<br />

granules<br />

Brand A Brand B Brand C Brand D Liquid Granules Liquid<br />

Fillers, usually sodium sulfate or sodium car--<br />

bonate, are incorporated in granule products.<br />

They are either powders or crystalline powders<br />

and are added in bulk form to the slurry before<br />

drying.<br />

8<br />

8<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1. 5-2<br />

60<br />

-<br />

0. 5-0. 9<br />

5-7<br />

10-20<br />

Amides of various types are used as supplemen-<br />

tary surfactants in many formulations. They im-<br />

prove detergency of the sulfonic and sulfate sur-<br />

factants and act as foam boosters or stabilizers.<br />

Amides used include the higher fatty amides<br />

(e. g. cocomonethanolamide), ethanolamides,<br />

dialkyl and alkylol (hydroxyalkyl) amides, mor-<br />

pholides, and nitriles, as well as the lower acyl<br />

derivatives of higher fatty amines. These ma-<br />

terials are handled as liquids and received in<br />

tank cars or barrels. In granule manufacture,<br />

they are either incorporated in the slurry before<br />

drying or blended with the detergent granules<br />

after drying.<br />

18<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0~0. 5<br />

50-60<br />

0. 5-0. 9<br />

5-7<br />

10-20<br />

0-35<br />

0-35<br />

0-35<br />

0-15<br />

-<br />

0-12<br />

-<br />

0-20<br />

0. 5-0. 9<br />

5-7<br />

-<br />

0.2-0.730.2-0.750.2-0.740.2-0.750.2-0.75<br />

0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5<br />

-<br />

6<br />

6<br />

-<br />

2<br />

50-60<br />

.<br />

0. 5-0. 9<br />

7-9<br />

10-30<br />

17<br />

-<br />

-<br />

.<br />

50-60<br />

-<br />

0. 5-0. 9<br />

7-9<br />

10-30<br />

25-32<br />

25-32<br />

-<br />

-<br />

.<br />

-<br />

.<br />

-<br />

0-5<br />

0-4<br />

60-70<br />

-<br />

0-5<br />

Function<br />

Cleaning<br />

agent<br />

for oily<br />

and organic<br />

s 011<br />

Foam booster<br />

or stabilizer<br />

Overcome<br />

water hardness<br />

and clean<br />

inorganic stains<br />

Antiredepositlon<br />

Corrosion<br />

inhibitor<br />

Flller<br />

Clean protein<br />

stain<br />

Perfume, dye,<br />

bleach, etc.<br />

Trisodium phosphate (TSP) is used in detergent<br />

granule formulations such as dishwasher com-<br />

pounds and wall cleaners which are designed to<br />

clean hard surfaces. TSP is considered func-<br />

tionally as an alkali rather than a sequestering<br />

agent. It is usually handled as a crystalline<br />

powder and is received in carlots, drums, or<br />

bags.<br />

Carboxy methylcellulose (CMC; sodium cellulose<br />

glycolate) usually is added to heavy-duty granules<br />

and serves to prevent redeposition onto the fabric<br />

of the dirt removed by the detergent. This chemical<br />

is received in bags or drums as a powder or<br />

granule. It is added to the slurry mixture before<br />

drying.<br />

Sodium silicate is added in most synthetic deter-<br />

gent formulations to inhibit the surfactant's ten-<br />

dency to corrode metal. It also is used to over-<br />

-<br />

20-25<br />

or<br />

20-25<br />

-<br />

10-12<br />

5-12<br />

2-15<br />

0-20<br />

-<br />

0-4<br />

0-5


come production and packaging problems encoun-<br />

tered with detergent granules. It is functionally<br />

used as a primary detergent alkali in compounds<br />

designed for hard surface washing, e. g. , machine<br />

dishwashing comp~unds. It can serve to retain<br />

uniform viscosity in the mixing and pumping of<br />

the slurry before it is dried, and it reduces the<br />

"tackiness" of the dried granules, facilitating<br />

their handling and reducing caking of the product<br />

after packaging. The sodium silicates are re-<br />

ceived in tank cars as water solutions.<br />

Optical brightners are added to many formulations.<br />

These are usually fluorescent dyes which absorb<br />

ultraviolet rays and reflect them as visible light.<br />

The dyes are received as powders in bags or as<br />

liquids in drums, and they are usually blended in<br />

the slurry before drying.<br />

Perfumes are added to almost all detergent pro-<br />

ducts to overcome unpleasant odors and impart a<br />

pleasing scent to laundered fabrics. The per-<br />

fumes are added by spraying onto the dried gran-<br />

ules or mixing with the liquid detergents. They<br />

are handled as liquids in small-size containers<br />

or drums.<br />

Bleaches of various kinds are frequently incor-<br />

porated in heavy-duty detergents. Sodium per-<br />

borate, along with magnesium silicate as a sta-<br />

bilizer, is commonly employed. They are re-<br />

ceived as powders or crystals in boxes or bags<br />

and are added to the granules after drying.<br />

Synthetic Detergent Product Manufacturing Equipment<br />

Enzymes have recently been introduced as part<br />

of the formulation of heavy-duty detergent pro-<br />

ducts to assist in the removal of protein-based<br />

stains from fabrics. The enzymes are received<br />

as powders in bags or drums. The enzymes are<br />

heat sensitive and are destroyed if heated to212"F.<br />

Most manufacturers blend the enzymes into the<br />

detergent granules after drying.<br />

Many other compounds may be incorporated in<br />

various products. Preservatives, antioxidants,<br />

foam- suppressors and other types of additives<br />

are used. The scouring cleansers are composed<br />

principally of finely pulverized silica, active<br />

detergent, small amounts of phosphates, and fre-<br />

quently a bleach.<br />

Detergent surfactants include alkyl sulfonic,<br />

alkyl sulfate, and alcohol sulfates, discussed<br />

above, and almost the entire range of anionic<br />

and nonionic detergents, including soap. Plants<br />

manufacturing their own sulfonic and sulfate sur-<br />

factants also use other surfactants in some or all<br />

of their products. The detergents are received<br />

and handled mostly as liquid solutions of varying<br />

strength, but some surfactants are received as<br />

flake or powder. Surfactants are principally mix-<br />

ed with the slurry before drying.<br />

Processes<br />

The only manufacturing process to be discussed<br />

here will be the production of detergent granule<br />

formulations incorporating spray-drying pro-<br />

cesses. All other products are produced in pro.<br />

cesses, such as drum drying, similar to soap<br />

production, discussed in the previous section.<br />

Manufacture of detergent granules incorporates<br />

three separate steps: Slurry preparation, spray<br />

drying, and granule handling (including cooling,<br />

additive blending, and packaging). Figure 586<br />

illustrates the various operations.<br />

SLURRY PREPARATION<br />

The formulation of slurry for detergent granules<br />

requires the intimate mixing of various liquid,<br />

powdered, and granulated materials. The soap<br />

crutcher is almost universally used for this mix-<br />

ing operation. Premixing of various minor ingre-<br />

dients is performed in a variety of equipment prior<br />

to charging to the crutcher or final mixer. The<br />

slurry, mixed in batch operations, is then held<br />

in surge vessels for continuous pumping to the<br />

spray drier.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

The receiving, storage, and hatching of the vari-<br />

ous dry ingredients creates dust emissions.<br />

Pneumatic conveying of fine materials causes<br />

dust emissions when conveying air is separated<br />

from the bulk solids. Many detergent products re-<br />

quire raw materials with high percentages of<br />

fines, viz.. typical specifications for some raw<br />

materials include the followiug percentage of<br />

fine materials passing a 200 mesh screen: Sodium<br />

sulfate - 12 percent; sodium tetrapyrophosphate -<br />

74 percent; sodium tripolyphosphate - 53 percent.<br />

The storage and handling of the liquid ingredients,<br />

including the sulfonic acids, sulfonic salts, and<br />

sulfates, do not cause emission problems other<br />

than mild odors.<br />

In the hatching and mixing of fine dry ingredients<br />

to form slurry, dust emissions are generated at<br />

scale hoppers, mixers, and the crutcher. Liquid<br />

ingredient addition to the slurry creates no vis-<br />

ible emissions but may cause odors.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

Control of dusts generated from pneumatic or<br />

mechanical conveying or from discharge of fine<br />

materials into bins or vessels is described in<br />

Chapters 3 and 4. There are no unique problems<br />

in hoodihg or exhaust systems for controlling dust<br />

emissions from conveying and slurry preparation.


762 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Baghouses are employed not only to reduce and<br />

eliminate the dust emissions but for salvage of<br />

raw materials. None of the dusts causes any<br />

serious corrosion problems. Filter fabrics should<br />

be selected which have good resistance to alkalis.<br />

Filter ratios for baghouses with intermittent<br />

shaking cleaning mechanisms should be under 3<br />

cfm per square foot.<br />

SPRAY DRYING<br />

All spray drying equipment designed for detergent<br />

granule production incorporates the following com-<br />

ponents: Spray-drying tower, air heating and<br />

supply system, slurry atomizing equipment,<br />

slurry pumping equipment, product cooling equip-<br />

ment, and conveying equipment. The towers are<br />

cylindrical with cone bottoms and range in size<br />

from 12 to 24 feet in diameter and 40 to 125 feet<br />

in height. Single towers may be of varying dia-<br />

meter, being larger at the top and smaller at the<br />

bottom. <strong>Air</strong> is supplied to the towers from di-<br />

rect-heated furnaces fired with either natural gas<br />

or fuel oil. The products of combustion are tem-<br />

pered with outside air to lower temperatures and<br />

then are blown to the dryer under forced draft.<br />

The towers are usually maintained under slightly<br />

negativepressure, between 0.05 and 1.5 inches of<br />

water column, withexhaust blowers adjusted topro-<br />

vide this balance. Most towers designed for de-<br />

tergent production are of the countercurrent type,<br />

with the slurry introduced at the top and the heat-<br />

ed air introduced at the bottom. A few towers of<br />

the concurrent type are used for detergent spray<br />

drying, with both hot air and slurry introduced at<br />

the top. Some towers are equipped for either<br />

mode of operation as illustrated in Figure 586.<br />

In most towers today, the slurry is atomized by<br />

spraying through a number of nozzles, rather<br />

than by centrifugal action. The slurry is sprayed<br />

at pressures of 600 to 1000 psi in single-fluid<br />

nozzles, and at pressures of 50 to 100 psi in two-<br />

fluid nozzles. Steam or air is used as the atomiz-<br />

ing fluid in the two-fluid nozzles.<br />

Tower operations vary widely between manufac-<br />

turers and between products. Heated air supplied<br />

to the tower varies from 350' to 750°F. Temp-<br />

eratures of air supplied to countercurrent towers<br />

are generally lower, and most often range from<br />

500" to 650DF. Concurrent tower temperatures<br />

are somewhat higher. Solids content of slurrys<br />

for detergent spray drying varies from 50 to 65<br />

percent by weight, with some operations to as<br />

high as 70 percent. Moisture content of the dried<br />

product varies from 10 to 17 percent. Towers are<br />

designed for specific air-flow rates, and these<br />

rates are maintained throughout all phases of op-<br />

eration. Slurry temperatures may vary, but in<br />

most formulations they do not exceed 160°F.<br />

Frequently, they are as low as 8O0F. Exit gas<br />

temperatures range from 150" to 250°F with wet-<br />

bulb temperatures of 120" to 150°F. <strong>Air</strong> velocities<br />

in concurrent towers are usually higher than ve-<br />

locities in countercurrent towers. The concurrent<br />

towers produce granules which are mostly hollow<br />

beads of light specific gravity (0.05 to 0.20).<br />

Countercurrent towers produce granules which<br />

are multicellular and irreaularlv shaved and which<br />

have higher specific gravities ranging from 0.25<br />

to 0.45.<br />

In countercurrent towers, with lower air velocities<br />

and droplets descending against a rising column<br />

of air, most of the dried granules fall into the<br />

cone at the bottom of the tower. They are dis-<br />

charged through a star valve, or regulated open-<br />

ing, while still hot. Cooling of the granules is<br />

discussed below with other granule processing<br />

procedures. Unlike other product spray drying<br />

operations, e. g., powdered milk, the desired de-<br />

tergent granule product is comparatively large in<br />

size. The specifications for some well known<br />

granular products require 50 percent by weight<br />

or more to be retained on a 28-mesh screen. A<br />

certain amount of the product is dried to compar-<br />

atively small size. This amount is dependent on<br />

tower feed rates, the liquid droplet size in slurry<br />

atomization, the paste viscosity, the particular<br />

product, and other variables. Usually the exhaust<br />

air entrains 7 to 10 percent of that portion of the<br />

granular product which is too fine to settle out at<br />

the base of the tower.<br />

Concurrent towers, operate with higher air velocities<br />

than countercurrent towers. The air is vented<br />

just above the bottom of these towers through a<br />

baffle which causes violent changes of direction to<br />

the exhaust air to dynamically separate the dried<br />

granules, which then fall to the cone bottom for<br />

discharge. Concurrent towers producing very<br />

low-gravity granules vent air still conveying the<br />

~roduct to auxiliary equipment for separation.<br />

The loss of detergent fines entrained in the exhaust<br />

air stream will be somewhat higher from<br />

concurrent towers than from countercurrent<br />

towers.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

The exhaust air from detergent spray drying tow-<br />

ers contains two types of air contaminants. One<br />

is the fine detergent particles entrained in the<br />

exhaust air discussed above; the second consists<br />

of organic materials vaporized in the higher temp-<br />

erature zones of the tower.<br />

The detergent particles entrained in the exhaust<br />

air are relatively large in size. Over 50 percent<br />

by weight of these particles are over 40 microns.<br />

These particles constitute over 95 percent of the<br />

total weight of air contaminants in the exhaust air<br />

(Phelps, 1967). They consist principally of deter-<br />

-


Synthetic Detergent Product Manufacturing Equipment 763<br />

Figure 586. Detergent spray-drying with tower equ~pped for elther concurrent or countercurrent operation<br />

(dampers in countercurrent mode of operatlon).<br />

gent compounds, although some of the particles<br />

are uncombined phosphates, sulfates, and other<br />

mineral compounds.<br />

The second type of the air contaminant in the ex-<br />

haust air can create serious air pollution control<br />

problems. Various organic components in the<br />

slurry vaporize in the tower. The amount vapor-<br />

ized is dependent upon many variables, such as<br />

tower zone temperatures and volatility of the<br />

organics in the slurry mixture. The vaporized<br />

organic materials condense upon cooling in the<br />

tower exhaust air stream into micron- and sub-<br />

micron-size droplets or particles. Spray drying<br />

of one particular product resulted in the measured<br />

discharge of condensed organic particulates in the<br />

tower exhaust air ranging in size from 0.2 to 0.5<br />

micron.<br />

The variety of possible detergent compounds is<br />

almost infinite, and manufacturers are continually<br />

introducing new formulations or reformulating<br />

older ones. It is not always possible to predict<br />

how certain organic compounds in a slurry mix-<br />

ture will affect stack emission. If amides are<br />

present in the slurry in amounts greater than 0.5<br />

percent by weight, emission problems will occur.<br />

Source tests of exhaust air from an air pollution<br />

control scrubber with amides present in the slurry<br />

being dried in the spray tower revealed 0.08 grain<br />

of organic particulates per scf of exhaust gas. The<br />

presence of this relatively low concentration of<br />

submicron-size aerosols causes water vapor plumes<br />

to persist for long distances. Following the break<br />

or end of the water vapor plume, a highly visible<br />

contaminant plume persists for even greater dis-<br />

tances. The amide emission rate increases ex-<br />

ponentially with increases in tower operating tem-<br />

peratures. Many tower operating variables affect<br />

air contaminant emissions, but the temperature<br />

of the exhaust air probably is the most important.<br />

At one spray drier installation, opacities of organ-<br />

ic aerosol emissions were reduced by approximate-<br />

ly 30 percent when tower operation was altered to<br />

effect a reduction of exhaust gas temperature from<br />

2004 to 180°F.<br />

t<br />

i


764 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Slurry formulations containing ethoqlated alcohol<br />

surfactants cause similar aerosol emissions.<br />

When this nonionic detergent is used in the slurry,<br />

source tests of the aerosol leaving the scrubber<br />

indicate a particle size range of 0. 2 to 1 micron.<br />

Plumes persist for long distances following the<br />

disappearance of the water vapor plume.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

The collection of air contaminants not only pro-<br />

vides for the economic return of detergent fines<br />

to the process, but also provides for control of<br />

submicron particles to ensure compliance with<br />

air pollution prohibitory rules.<br />

Manufacturers producing detergent granu!es have<br />

developed two separate approaches for capturing<br />

the detergent fines in the spray drier effluent for<br />

return to process. One method utilizes centrifugal<br />

separators to capture most of the product<br />

dust. The exhaust gases then are vented from<br />

the separators to scrubbers for removal of micron-size<br />

particles. The cyclone separators remove<br />

approximately 90 percent by weight of the<br />

detergent product fines in the tower exhaust air.<br />

The detergent dust remaining in the effluent<br />

vented from the cyclones consists of particles<br />

almost all of which are over 2 microns in size.<br />

Size distribution of these particles by weight will<br />

peak in the range of 7 to 10 microns. Particulate<br />

concentrations vary from 0.1 to 1.0 grain per scf.<br />

The cyclones are designed for relatively high<br />

efficiencies and operate at pressure drops from<br />

8 to 10 inches of water column (Phelps, 1967).<br />

A venturi type scrubber is used downstream of the<br />

cyclone, using water at 8 to 10 psig distributed<br />

through nozzles in the throat. Throat velocities<br />

of the exhaust gases average 8,500 fpm. With<br />

water supplied . to the throat at a ratio of 4.5 to<br />

5.0 gallons per 1,000 cubic feet of effluent, scrubber<br />

exhaust gases have loadings of about 0.085 grain<br />

per scf when slurries with amides are spray dried.<br />

A highly visible plume persists after the condensed<br />

water vapor plume has dissipated.<br />

In the second method of recovery of detergent<br />

fines, the centrifugal collector is eliminated, and<br />

only a scrubber is used. However, the scrubber<br />

uses detergent slurry as a scrubbing medium<br />

rather than water. The scrubbing slurry is main-<br />

tained at a high enough concentration to prevent<br />

foam, but at a low enough concentration to permit<br />

pumping and spraying. No further control device<br />

is used to cleanse the exhaust gases from the<br />

scrubber. When slurries with volatile organic<br />

materials are spray dried, highly visible plumes<br />

persist after the condensed water vapor plume<br />

has dissipated. A plume was even observed from<br />

a pilot venturi scrubber operating at a high pres-<br />

sure drop of 50 inches of water column. A 40 per-<br />

cent solids slurry was used as the scrubbing fluid<br />

delivered at gas scrubbing ratios of 60 to 100 gal-<br />

lons per 1000 cubic feet of gas.<br />

An alternative method for controlling emissions<br />

from the drier caused by volatile organics in the<br />

slurry is to reformulate the slurry to eliminate<br />

these offending organic compounds. When amide<br />

compounds were identified as causing the emission<br />

problems, some manuiacturers developed other<br />

formulations or methods for adding the amides<br />

to the spray dried granules to achieve a compar-<br />

able product.<br />

When reformulation is not possible, the tower<br />

production rate may be reduced, permitting oper-<br />

ation at lower air inlet temperatures and lower<br />

exhaust gas temperatures. When tower tempera-<br />

tures are reduced, lesser amounts of organic<br />

compounds are vaporized in the spray drier, and<br />

the scrubber is able to collect these emissions.<br />

GRANULE HANDLING<br />

Many manufacturers discharge hot granules from<br />

the spray tower into mixers where dry or liquid<br />

ingredients are added. The granules are usually<br />

mechanically conveyed away from the tower or<br />

mixer discharge and then are air-conveyed to<br />

storage and packaging. <strong>Air</strong> conveying serves to<br />

cool the granules and to elevate them for gravity<br />

flow through further processing equipment to<br />

storage and packaging. <strong>Air</strong> conveying of lowdensity<br />

granules usually is designed for 50 to 75<br />

scfm air per ~ound of granules conveyed. At the<br />

end of the conveyor, centrifugal separators remove<br />

granule product from the conveying air.<br />

Some manufacturers mechanically lift the granules<br />

from the spray tower to aeration bins where the<br />

granules are cooled or aged by injecting air at<br />

the bottom of the bin. This air percolates upward<br />

through the scrubber.<br />

The cooled granules are screened to deagglomerate<br />

the large granules and to remove undersize or<br />

oversize particles. Further mixing or blending<br />

may be performed to add heat-sensitive compounds<br />

to the detergent ~roducts. Many manufacturers<br />

do not store the finished granules, but convey<br />

them directly to packaging equipment. Some de-<br />

tergent products are held in storage, either in<br />

large fixed bins or small-wheeled buggy bins, and<br />

then are charged to packaging equipment. Pack-<br />

aging is done with either scale or volumetric fill-<br />

ing machines.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Conveying, mixing, packaging, and other equip-<br />

ment used for granules can cause dust emissions.<br />

The granule particles, which are hollow beads, are<br />

crushed during mixing and conveying, and generate<br />

fine dusts. Dusts emitted from screens, mixers,<br />

bins, mechanical-conveying equipment, and air-<br />

conveying equipment are quite irritating to eyes<br />

and nostrils with continuous exposure. Some of


the additive materials, such as enzymes also<br />

cause serious health problems. Equipment in-<br />

volving enzymes requires very efficient ventila-<br />

tion in addition to proper dust collection. Dust<br />

emissions in most cases represent a significant<br />

product loss, and their collection and return to<br />

process (usually as an ingredient of the slurry to<br />

be spray dried) is necessary for economic plant<br />

operation as well as for air pollution control.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

Dust generated by granule processing, convey-<br />

ing, and storage equipment does not create unique<br />

air pollution control problems. Usually, bag-<br />

houses provide the best control. Collection effi-<br />

ciencies for baghouses are high; in many cases,<br />

efficiencies exceed 99 percent. No extreme con-<br />

ditions of temperature or humidity have to be met,<br />

but filter fabrics selected must show good resis-<br />

tance to alkaline materials. Baghouses utilizing<br />

intermittent shaking mechanisms should not have<br />

filtering velocities exceeding 3 fpm. Baghouses<br />

with continuous cleaning mechanisms may have<br />

filtering velocities as high as 6 fpm.<br />

GLASS MANUFACTURE<br />

Glass has been made for over 3,500 years, but<br />

only in the last 75 years have engineering and<br />

science been able to exploit its basic properties<br />

of hardness, smoothness, and transparency so<br />

that it can now be made into thousands of diverse<br />

products.<br />

The economics and techniques connected with<br />

mass production of glass articles have led to<br />

the construction of glass-manufacturing plants<br />

near or within highly populated areas. Un-<br />

fortunately, airborne contaminants generated<br />

by these glass plants can contrihute substantial-<br />

ly to the air pollution problem of the surround-<br />

ing community. Control of dust and fumes has,<br />

therefore, been, and must continue to be, in-<br />

herent to the progress of this expanding industry.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> pollution control is necessary, not only to<br />

eliminate nuisances, but also to bring substan-<br />

tial savings by extending the service life of<br />

the equipment and by reducing operating ex-<br />

penses and down time for repair. Reduction<br />

in plant source emissions can be accomplished<br />

by several methods, including control of raw<br />

materials, batch formulation, efficient com-<br />

bustion of fuel, proper design of glass-melt-<br />

ing furnaces, and the installation of control<br />

equipment.<br />

ufacture 765<br />

TYPES OF GLASS<br />

Nearly all glass produced commercially is one<br />

of five basic and broad types: Soda-lime, lead,<br />

fused silica, borosilicate, and 96 percent silica.<br />

Of these, modern soda-lime glass is well suited<br />

for melting and shaping into window glass, plate<br />

glass, containers, inexpensive tableware, elec-<br />

tric light bulbs, and many other inexpensive,<br />

mass-produced articles. It presently consti-<br />

tutes 90 percent of the total production of com-<br />

mercial glass (Kirk and Othmer, 1947).<br />

Typical compositions of soda-lime glass and<br />

the four other major types of commercial glass<br />

are shown on Table 204. Major ingredients of<br />

soda-lime glass are sand, limestone, soda ash,<br />

and cullet. Minor ingredients include salt cake,<br />

aluminum oxide, barium oxide, and boron oxide.<br />

Minor ingredients may be included as impuri-<br />

ties in one or more of the major raw ingredients.<br />

Soda-lime glasses are colored by adding a<br />

small percentage of oxides of nickel, iron,<br />

manganese, copper, and cobalt, and elemen-<br />

tal carbon as solutions or colloidal particles<br />

(Tooley, 1953).<br />

Although glass production results in tens of<br />

thousands of different articles, it can be divid-<br />

ed into the following general types (Kirk and<br />

Othmer, 1947):<br />

70<br />

-<br />

Flat glass 2 5<br />

Containers 5 0<br />

Tableware 8<br />

Miscellaneous instruments, scientific<br />

equipment, and others 17<br />

GLASS-MANUFACTURING PROCESS<br />

Soda-lime glass is produced on a massive scale<br />

in large, direct-fired, continuous melting fur-<br />

naces. Other types of glass are melted in small<br />

batch furnaces having capacities ranging from<br />

only a few pounds to several tons per day. <strong>Air</strong><br />

pollution from the batch furnaces is minor, but<br />

the production of soda-lime glass creates major<br />

problems of air pollution control.<br />

A complete process flow diagram for the con-<br />

tinuous production of soda-lime glass is shown<br />

in Figure 587. Silica sand, dry powders,<br />

granular oxides, carbonates, cullet (broken<br />

glass), and other raw materials are transferred<br />

from railroad hopper cars and trucks to storage<br />

bins. These materials are withdraw from the<br />

storage bins, batch weighed, and blended in a<br />

mixer. The mixed batch is then conveyed to<br />

the feeders attached to the side of the furnace.<br />

Although dust emissions are created during


766 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 204. COMPOSITIONS OF COMMERCIAL GLASSES (Kirk and Othmer, 1947)<br />

Component<br />

Si02<br />

Na20<br />

K2O<br />

CaO<br />

PbO<br />

B2°3<br />

AlZ03<br />

MgO<br />

. Soda-lime<br />

70 to 75 (72)<br />

12 to 18 (15)<br />

0 to 1<br />

5 to 14 (9)<br />

-<br />

-<br />

0.5 to 2.5 (1)<br />

0 to 4 (3)<br />

Figure 587. Flow diagram for soda-lime glass manufacture (Kirk<br />

and Othmer, 1947).<br />

these operations, control can be accomplished<br />

by totally enclosing the equipment and install-<br />

ing filter vents, exhaust systems, and bag-<br />

houses.<br />

Screw- or reciprocating-type feeders contin-<br />

uously supply hatch-blended materials to the<br />

direct-fired, regenerative furnace. These dry<br />

materials float upon the molten glass within<br />

Composition, qoa<br />

a~he figures in parentheses give the approximate composition of a typical member.<br />

SILICA SAND SODI ASH LIMESTONE<br />

or burn, ,me<br />

~andlonrr (in ~s.,<br />

wva. I,,. MO., "D<br />

(rushed. wd$hzd.<br />

@pro*. 20.120 me*<br />

Oc8,a"Ylar<br />

M ~ atlo O relulfr<br />

,,raw mateldl<br />

ionIans MgCO,<br />

screenad to APProx. 2[il20 rn8.h<br />

8PP'o.. 20-100 mash<br />

CO"ti""0UI tan* turnsre ioo*mg Mdtlng<br />

doxnt"r.ugh top (crown,. about 2. 70o0i CYilPlcrYIhlng<br />

suhmera~ tnroat in aridaera,,<br />

Lead<br />

53 to 68 (68)<br />

5 to 10 (10)<br />

1 to 10 (6)<br />

0 to 6 (1)<br />

15 to 40 (15)<br />

-<br />

0 to 2<br />

-<br />

2<br />

Relining:<br />

fining and<br />

~orosilicate 96% silica<br />

73 to 82 (80)<br />

3 to 10 (4)<br />

0.4 to 1<br />

0 to 1<br />

0 to 10<br />

5 to 20 (14)<br />

2 to 3 (2)<br />

-<br />

96<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

3<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Silica glass<br />

99. 8<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

the furnace until they melt. Carbonates de-<br />

compose releasing carbon dioxide in the form<br />

of bubbles. Volatilized particulates, com-<br />

posedmostly of alkali oxides and sulfates,<br />

are captured by the flame and hot gases pass-<br />

ing across the molten surface. The particu-<br />

lates are either deposited & the checkers and<br />

refractory-lined passages or expelled to the<br />

atmosphere.


Glass Ma1<br />

The mixture of materials is held around 2, 700°F<br />

in a molten state until it acquires the homogeneous<br />

character of glass. Then it is gradually cooled<br />

to about 2,200aF to make it viscous enough to<br />

form. In a matter of seconds, while at a yellow-<br />

orange hot temperature, the glass is dram<br />

from the furnace and worked on forming machines<br />

by a variety of methods including pressing, blow-<br />

ing in molds, drawing, rolling, and casting.<br />

One source of air pollution is hydrocarbon greases<br />

and oils used to lubricate the hot delivery systems<br />

and molds of glass-forming machines. The smoke<br />

from these greases and oils creates a significant<br />

amount of air pollution separate from furnace<br />

emissions.<br />

Immediately after being shaped in the machines,<br />

the glass articles are conveyed to continuous<br />

annealing ovens, where they are heat treated<br />

to remove strains that have developed during<br />

the molding or shaping operations and then<br />

subjected to slow, controlled cooling. Gas-<br />

fired or electrically heated annealing ovens<br />

are not emitters of air contaminants in any<br />

significant quantity. After leaving the anneal-<br />

ing ovens, the glass articles are inspected and<br />

packed or subjected to further finishing opera-<br />

tions.<br />

Glass-forming machines for mass production<br />

of other articles such as rod, tube, and sheet<br />

usually do not emit contaminants in significant<br />

amounts .<br />

HANDLING, MIXING, AND STORAGE SYSTEMS<br />

FOR RAW MATERIALS<br />

Material-handling systems for batch mixing<br />

and conveying materials for making soda-<br />

lime glass normally use commercial equip-<br />

ment of standard design. This equipment is<br />

usually housed in a structure separate from<br />

the glass-melting furnace and is commonly<br />

referred to as a "batch plant. " A flow dia-<br />

gram of a typical batch plant is shown in Figure<br />

588. In most batch plants, the storage bins are<br />

located on top, and the weigh hoppers and mixers<br />

are below them to make use of the gravity flow.<br />

Major raw materials and cullet (broken scrap<br />

glass) are conveyed from railroad hopper cars<br />

or hopper trucks by a combination of screw<br />

conveyors, belt conveyors, and bucket eleva-<br />

tors, or by pneumatic conveyors (not shown in<br />

Figure 588) to the elevated storage bins. Minor<br />

ingredients are usually delivered to the plant<br />

in paper bags or cardboard drums and trans-<br />

ferred hy hand to small bins.<br />

Ingredients comprising a batch of glass are<br />

dropped by gravity from the storage bins into<br />

weigh hoppers and then released to fall into<br />

the mixer. Cullet is ground and then mixed<br />

with the dry ingredients in the mixer. Ground<br />

cullet may also bypass the mixer and be mixed<br />

instead with the other blended materials in the<br />

bottom of a bucket elevator. A typical batch<br />

charge for making soda-lime flint glass in a<br />

mixer with a capacity of 55 cubic feet consists<br />

of:<br />

Silica sand<br />

Cullet<br />

Soda ash<br />

Limestone<br />

Niter<br />

Salt cake<br />

Arsenic<br />

Raw materials are blended in the mixer for peri-<br />

ods of 3 to 5 minutes and then conveyed to a<br />

charge bin located alongside the melting furnace.<br />

At the bottom of the charge bin, rotary valves<br />

feed the blended materials into reciprocating- or<br />

screw-type furnace feeders.<br />

In a slightly different arrangement of equipment<br />

to permit closer control of batch composition,<br />

blended materials are discharged from the mixer<br />

into batch cans that have a capacity of one mixer<br />

load each. Loaded cans are then conveyed by<br />

monorail to the furnace feeders. Trends in<br />

batch plant design are toward single reinforced-<br />

concrete structures in which outer walls and<br />

partitions constitute the storage bins. Complete<br />

automation is provided so that the batch plant is<br />

under direct and instant control of the furnace<br />

foreman.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

The major raw materials for making soda-lime<br />

glass--sand, soda-ash, and limestone--usually con-<br />

tain particles averaging about 300 microns in size,<br />

Particles less than 50 microns constitute only a<br />

small portion of the materials, but are presentin<br />

sufficient quantities to cause dust emissions during<br />

conveying, mixing, and storage operations. More-<br />

over, minor raw materials such as salt cake and<br />

sulfur can create dust emissions during handling.<br />

Dust is the only air contaminant from batch plants.<br />

and the control of dust emissions poses problems<br />

similar to those in industrial plants handling simi-<br />

lar dusty powder or granular materials.<br />

Hooding and Ventilation Requirements<br />

Dust control equipment can be installed on con-<br />

veying systems that use open conveyor belts.<br />

A considerable reduction in the size of the dust


768 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

CULLET<br />

- > - 2 - * - =<br />

MAGNETIC E<br />

SEPARATOR +<br />

<<br />

-<br />

CRUSHER = rn<br />

RAW MATERIALS<br />

RECEIVING<br />

HOPPER<br />

V<br />

SCREW<br />

CONVEYOR<br />

C<br />

-<br />

-1<br />

BELT CONVEYOR<br />

Figure 588. Process flow diagram of a hatch plant.<br />

control equipment can be realized by totally en- cfm per foot of belt width, with 200 fpm minimum<br />

closing all conveying equipment and sealing all<br />

covers and access ooenines with easkets of<br />

velocity through the hood openings.<br />

polyurethane foam. In fact, by totally enclos-<br />

-<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

ing all conveying ~. equipment, . - exhaust systems<br />

become unnecessary, and relatively small filter<br />

Because dust emissions contain particles only i<br />

vents or dust cabinets can be attached directly<br />

!<br />

a few microns in diameter, cyclones, and cento<br />

the conveying equipment and storage bins.<br />

I<br />

On the other hand, exhaust systems are re-<br />

quired for ventilating the weigh hoppers and<br />

mixers. For example, a 60-cubic-foot-capacity<br />

mixer and a 4,500-pound-capacity mixer each<br />

require about 600 cfm ventilation air. Seals of<br />

polyvinylchloride should be installed between<br />

the rotating body of the mixer and its frame td<br />

reduce ventilation to a minimum.<br />

Railroad hopper cars and hopper bottom trucks<br />

must be connected to sealed receiving hoppers<br />

by fabric sleeves so that dust generated in the<br />

hoppers during the loading operation is either<br />

filtered through the sleeves or exhausted tbrough<br />

a baghouse.<br />

Local exhaust systems for dust pickup are de-<br />

signed by using the recommended practice of the<br />

Committee on Industrial Ventilation (1960). For<br />

example, the ventilation rate at the transfer<br />

point between two open belt conveyors is 350<br />

- -<br />

trifueal scrubbers are not as effective as haehouses<br />

or filters are in collecting these small<br />

I<br />

;<br />

particles; consequently, simple cloth filters and I<br />

I<br />

baghouses are used almost exclusively in con- 1.<br />

trolling dust emissions from batch plants.<br />

Filter socks or simple baghouses with intermittent<br />

shaking mechanisms are usually de-<br />

I<br />

signed for a filter velocity of 3 fpm, but bag-<br />

i<br />

I<br />

houses with continuous cleaning devices such as i<br />

pulse jets or reverse air systems can be de-<br />

!<br />

signed for filter velocities as high as 10 fpm. i'<br />

Filtration cloths are usually cotton, though ny- i<br />

lon, orlon, and dacron are sometimes used.<br />

Dusts collected are generally noncorrosive.<br />

Filters or baghouses for storage bins are designed<br />

to accommodate not only displaced air<br />

from the filling operation but also air induced<br />

by falling materials. Filtration of air exhaust<br />

from pneumatic conveyors used in filling the<br />

bins must also be provided. Filters with at least<br />

a 1-square-foot area should be mounted on the<br />

hand-filled minor-ingredient bins.<br />

4<br />

I<br />

!<br />

i<br />

!<br />

~


Glass Man1<br />

Transfer chutes of special design are used for<br />

hand filling the minor ingredient bins. They are<br />

first attached securely with gaskets to the top of<br />

the bins. The bags are dropped into a chute<br />

containing knives across the bottom. The knives<br />

split the bag, and as the materials fall into the<br />

bin, the broken bag seals off the escape of dust<br />

from the top of the chute.<br />

CONTlNUOUS SODA-LIME GLASS-MELTING FURNACES<br />

While limited quantities of special glasses such<br />

as lead or horosilicate are melted in electrically<br />

heated pots or in small-batch, regenerative fur-<br />

naces with capacities up to 10 tons per day, the<br />

hulk of production, soda-lime glass, is melted<br />

in direct-fired, continuous, regenerative furnaces.<br />

Many of these furnaces have added electric induc-<br />

tion systems called "boosters" to increase capac-<br />

ity. Continuous, regenerative furnaces usually<br />

range in capacity from 50 to 300 tons of glass<br />

per day; 100 tons is the most common capac-<br />

ity found in the United States.<br />

Continuous, regenerative, tank furnaces differ<br />

in design according to the type of glass products<br />

manufactured. All have two compartments. In<br />

the first compartment, called the melter, the dry<br />

ingredients are mixed in correct prcportions and<br />

are continuously fed onto a molten mass of glass<br />

having a temperature near 2,700-F. The dry mate-<br />

rials melt after floating a third to one-half of the<br />

way across the compartment and disappearing into<br />

the surface of a clear, viscous-liquid glass. Glass<br />

flows from the melter into the second compartment,<br />

commonly referred to as the refiner, where it is<br />

mixed for homogeneity and heat conditioned to<br />

eliminate bubbles and stones. The temperature<br />

is gradually lowered to about 2,200-F. The<br />

amount of glass circulating within the melter<br />

and refiner is about 10 times the amount with-<br />

drawn for production (Sharp, 1954).<br />

Regenerative furnaces for container and tableware<br />

manufacture have a submerged opening or throat<br />

separating the refiner from the melter. The throat<br />

prevents undissolved materials and scum on the<br />

surface from entering the refiner. Glass flows<br />

from the semicircular refining compartment into<br />

long, refractory-lined chambers called forehearths.<br />

Oil or gas burners and ventilating dampers ac-<br />

curately control the temperature and viscosity of<br />

the glass that is fed from the end of the forehearth<br />

to glass -forming machines.<br />

Continuous furnaces for manufacturing rod, tube,<br />

and sheet glass differ from furnaces for container<br />

and tableware manufacture in that they have no<br />

throat between the melter and refiner. The com-<br />

partments are separated from each other by float-<br />

ing refractory beams riding in a drop arch across<br />

the entire width of the furnace. Glass flows from<br />

the rectangular-shaped refiner directly into the<br />

forming machines.<br />

Regenerative firing systems for continuous glass<br />

furnaces were first devised by Siemens in 1852,<br />

and since then, nearly all continuous glass fur-<br />

naces in the United States have used them. In<br />

Europe, continuous glass furnaces employ both<br />

recuperative and regenerative systems.<br />

Regenerative firing systems consist of dual<br />

chambers filled with brick checkerwork. While<br />

the products of combustion from the melter pass<br />

through and heat one chamber, combustion air<br />

is preheated in the opposite chamber. The func-<br />

tions of each chamber are interchanged during<br />

the reverse flow of air and combustion products.<br />

Reversals occur every 15 to 20 minutes as re-<br />

quired for maximum conservation of heat.<br />

Two basic configur~tions are used in designing<br />

continuous, regenerative furnaces - end port.<br />

Figure 589, and side port, Figure 590. Ir, the<br />

side port furnace, combustion products and<br />

flames pass in one direction across the melter<br />

during one-half of the cycle. The flow is reversed<br />

during the other half cycle. The side<br />

port design is commonly used in large furnaces<br />

with melter areas in excess of 300 square feet<br />

(Tooley, 1953).<br />

In the end port configuration, combustion products<br />

and flames travel in a horizontal U-shaped path<br />

across the surface of the glass within the melter.<br />

Fuel and air mix and ignite at one port and dis-<br />

charge through a second port adjacent to the first<br />

on the same end wall of the furnace. While the<br />

end port design has been used extensively in small-<br />

er furnaces with melter areas from 50 to 300<br />

square feet, it has also been used in furnaces with<br />

melter areas up to 800 square feet.<br />

Continuous furnaces are usually operated slightly<br />

above atmospheric pressure within the melter to<br />

prevent air induction at the feeders and an over-<br />

all loss in combustion efficiency. Furnace draft<br />

can be produced by several methods: Induced-<br />

draft fans, natural-draft stacks, and ejectors.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Particulates expelled from the melter are the re-<br />

sult of complex physical and chemical reactions<br />

that occur during the melting process.<br />

Glass has properties akin to those of crystalline<br />

solids, including rigidity, cold flow, and hard-<br />

ness. At the same time, it behaves like a super-


. .<br />

. .<br />

. .~<br />

. . . ~.<br />

770 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 589. Regeneratlve end port glass-melting furnace.<br />

cooled liquid. It has nondirectional properties,<br />

fracture characteristics of an amorphous solid,<br />

and no freezing or melting point. To account for<br />

the wide range of properties, glass is considered<br />

to be a configuration of atoms rather than an aggregate<br />

of molecules. Zachariasen (1932) proposed<br />

the theory that glass consists of an extended,<br />

continuous, three-dimensional network of ions with<br />

a cet.tain amount of short-distance-ordered arrangement<br />

similar to that of a polyhedral crystal.<br />

These dissimilar properties explaln in part why<br />

predictions of particulate losses from the melter<br />

based solely upon known temperatures and vapor<br />

pressures of purp compounds have been inaccurate.<br />

Other phenomena affect the generation of par-<br />

ticulates. During the melting process, carbon<br />

dioxide bubbles and propels particulates from the<br />

melting batch. Particulates are entrained by the<br />

fast-moving stream of flames and combustion<br />

gases. As consumption of fuel and refractory tem-<br />

peratures of the furnace increase with glass ton-<br />

nage, particulates also increase in quantity. Par-<br />

ticulates, swept from the melter, are either col-<br />

lected in the checkerwork and gas passages or<br />

exhausted to the atmosphere.<br />

Source test data<br />

In a recent study, many source tests of glass<br />

furnaces in Los Angeles County were used for<br />

determining the major variables influencing stack<br />

emissions. As summarized in Table 205, data<br />

include: Particulate emissions, opacities, pro-<br />

cess variables, and furnace design factors.<br />

Particle size distributions of two typical stack<br />

samples are shown in Table 206. These particu-<br />

late samples were obtalned from the catch of a<br />

pilot baghouse venting part of the effluent from<br />

a large soda-lime container furnace.


Chemical composition of the particulates was<br />

determined by microquantitative methods or by<br />

spectrographic analysis. Five separate samples,<br />

four from a pilot baghouse, and one from the<br />

stack of a soda-lime regenerative furnace, are<br />

given in Table 207. They were found to be com-<br />

posed mostly of alkali sulfates although alkalies<br />

are reported as oxides. The chemical composi-<br />

tion of sample 5 was also checked by X-ray<br />

crystallography. In this analysis, the only<br />

crystalline material present in identifiable<br />

amounts was two polymorphic forms of sodium<br />

sulfate.<br />

Opacity of stack emissions<br />

From the source test data available, particu-<br />

late emissions did not correlate with the opacity<br />

of the stack emissions. Some generalizations on<br />

opacity can, however, be made. Opacities usu-<br />

Glass Manufacture 771<br />

Figure 590. Regenerative side port glass-melting furnace.<br />

ally increase as particulate emissions increase.<br />

More often than not, furnaces burning U. S. Grade<br />

5 fuel oil have plumes exceeding 40 percent white<br />

opacity while operating at a maxim- pull rate,<br />

which is the glass industry's common term for<br />

production rate. Plumes from these same fur-<br />

naces were only 15 to 30 percent white opacity<br />

while burning natural gas or U. S. Grade 3<br />

(P.S. 200) fuel oil. Somewhat lower opacities<br />

may be expected from furnaces with ejector<br />

draft systems as compared with furnaces with<br />

natural-draft stacks or induced-draft fans.<br />

Hooding and Ventilation Requirements<br />

In order to determine the correct size of air<br />

pollution control equipment, the volume of dirty<br />

exhaust gas from a furnace must be known. Some<br />

of the more important factors affecting exhaust<br />

volumes include: Furnace size, pull rate, com-


772 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Test No.<br />

C-339b<br />

C-339<br />

C-382-1<br />

C-382-2<br />

C-536<br />

C-383<br />

Pri Lab<br />

Pri Lab<br />

Pri Lab<br />

Pri Lab<br />

Pri Lab<br />

Pri Lab<br />

Pri Lab<br />

C-101<br />

C-120<br />

C-577<br />

C-278-1<br />

C-278-2<br />

C-653<br />

C-244-1<br />

C-244-2<br />

C-420-1<br />

C-420-2<br />

C-743<br />

C-471<br />

Table 205. SOURCE TEST DATA FOR GLASS-MELTING FURNACES<br />

x1<br />

Type Type (particulate<br />

of of<br />

furnacea fuel<br />

x33<br />

wt fraction<br />

of cullet in<br />

chargeC<br />

0.300<br />

0.300<br />

0. 300<br />

0.300<br />

0.199<br />

0.300<br />

0. 094<br />

0. 094<br />

0. 157<br />

0. 094<br />

0. 365<br />

0.269<br />

0. 175<br />

0.300<br />

0. 320<br />

0. 134<br />

0.361<br />

0. 360<br />

0. 131<br />

0. 182<br />

0.100<br />

0. I00<br />

0.100<br />

0.047<br />

0.276<br />

x4<br />

(checker volumd,<br />

ft3/ft2 of melter<br />

a~~ = end port, regenerative furnace; SP = side port, regenerative furnace.<br />

bG = natural gas; 0-200 = U.S. Grade 3 fuel oil; 0-300 = U.S. Grade 5 fuel oil.<br />

CConstants: Sulfate content of charge 0. 18 to 0. 34 wt 70.<br />

Fines (-325 mesh) content of charge 0.2 to 0.3 wt %.<br />

bustion efficiency, checker volume, and furnace<br />

condition.<br />

Exhaust volumes can be determined from fuel<br />

requirements for container furnaces given by<br />

the formula of Cressey and Lyle (1956).<br />

where<br />

F = total beat, 10<br />

6<br />

Btulday<br />

A = melter area, ft2<br />

T = pull rate, tonsfday.<br />

This straight-line formula includes minimum<br />

heat to sustain an idle condition plus additional<br />

heat for a specified pull rate. Fuel require-<br />

ments for bridgewall-type, regenerative fur-<br />

naces are also given by Sharp (1955) and are<br />

Maximum<br />

opacity<br />

of stack<br />

emissions,<br />

5 0<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

10<br />

2 0<br />

2 5<br />

2 5<br />

25<br />

2 5<br />

--<br />

45<br />

20<br />

2 0<br />

2 0<br />

3 5<br />

2 0<br />

2 0<br />

40<br />

2 5<br />

25<br />

10<br />

5<br />

2 5<br />

30<br />

shown in Figure 591. The melter rating para-<br />

meter of 4 square feet of melter surface area<br />

per daily ton of glass should be used to estimate<br />

the fuel requirements of container furnaces at<br />

maximum pull rates, but 8 square feet per ton<br />

can be used for estimating fuel requirements<br />

for non-bridgewall furnaces supplying glass<br />

for tableware and for sheet, rod, and tube<br />

manufacture. Fuel requirements given are<br />

averages for furnaces constructed before 1955;<br />

consequently, these furnaces generally require<br />

more fuel per ton of glass than do furnaces con-<br />

structed since 1955. After the fuel require-<br />

ments are determined, exhaust volumes are com-<br />

puted on the basis of combustion with 40 percent<br />

excess combustion air. Forty percent excess<br />

combustion air is chosen as representing av-<br />

erage combustion conditions near the end of the<br />

campaign/ (a total period of operation without shut-<br />

ting down for repairs to the furnace).<br />

Exhaust volumes determined from fuel require-<br />

ments are for furnaces with induced-draft sys-


Glass Manufacture 773<br />

Table 206. SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF in temperature from 600" to 850°F, but exhaust<br />

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS gas temperatures from furnaces containing ejec-<br />

(MICROMEROGRAPH ANALYSES) tors are lower and vary from 400" to 600°F:<br />

- In Table 208 are found chemical analyses of gas-<br />

Furnace 1<br />

D~ameler (D),<br />

W<br />

36.60<br />

22.00<br />

18. 30<br />

16.50<br />

14.60<br />

12.80<br />

12.20<br />

11.60<br />

11.00<br />

10.40<br />

9. 80<br />

9.20<br />

8.5G<br />

7. 30<br />

6. 10<br />

4. 88<br />

3. 66<br />

3. 05<br />

2.44<br />

1. 83<br />

1. 52<br />

1.22<br />

Fhnt glass<br />

70 (by wt)<br />

Less than D<br />

100<br />

99. 5<br />

98. 6<br />

97.7<br />

94.0<br />

84. 6<br />

80.7<br />

76.6<br />

72. 7<br />

67. 7<br />

62.4<br />

58. 3<br />

51.8<br />

43.1<br />

34.4<br />

28. 0<br />

21.3<br />

18. 6<br />

14. 9<br />

11.0<br />

8. 3<br />

4. 1<br />

Furnace 2 Amber @ass<br />

Dlamcter (D), 70 (by wt)<br />

&.<br />

less than D<br />

17.40 100<br />

15.70<br />

99.8<br />

14. 00<br />

99.4<br />

12.20<br />

96. 8<br />

11.60<br />

92. 5<br />

11.00<br />

84. 5<br />

10.50<br />

87. 2<br />

9.90<br />

83.4<br />

9.30<br />

78. 7<br />

8.80<br />

75.0<br />

8. 10<br />

73.4<br />

7.00<br />

60. 3<br />

5.80<br />

47.6<br />

4. 65<br />

35. 6<br />

3.49<br />

25. 4<br />

2.91<br />

20. 5<br />

2.33<br />

16. 4<br />

1.74<br />

10.9<br />

1.45<br />

8.9<br />

1. 16<br />

5.3<br />

eous components of exhaust gases from large,<br />

regenerating, gas-fired furnaces melting three<br />

kinds of soda-lime glass.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Methods<br />

As the furnace chmpaign progresses, dust carry-<br />

over speeds destruction of the checkers. Upper<br />

courses of the firebrick checker glaze when sub-<br />

jected to high temperatures. Dust and condensate<br />

collect on the brick surface and form slag that<br />

drips downward into the lower courses where it<br />

solidifies at the lower temperature and plugs the<br />

checkers. Slag may also act somewhat like fly-<br />

paper, tenaciously clinging to the upper courses<br />

and eventually sealing off upper gas passages.<br />

Hot spots develop around clogged checkers and<br />

intensify the destructive forces, which are re-<br />

flected by a drop in regenerator efficiency and a<br />

rise in fuel consumption and horsepower required<br />

to overcome additional gas flow resistance through<br />

the checkers. Checker damage can finally reach<br />

tems or natural-draft stacks. Exhaust volumes a point where operation is no longer economical or<br />

for ejector systems can he estimated by increas- is physically impossible because of collapse. Thus,<br />

ing the exhaust volume by 30 to 40 percent to successful operation of modern regenerative fur-<br />

account for ejector air mixed with the furnace naces requires keeping dust carryover from the<br />

effluent. melter to an absolute minimum, which also coin-<br />

cides with air pollution control ohjectives by prevent-<br />

Exhaust gases from furnaces with natural-draft ing air contaminants from entering the atmosphere.<br />

stacks or induced-draft fan systems usually range Aside from reducing air contaminants, benefits de-<br />

Table 207. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS<br />

(QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES), METALLIC IONS REPORTED AS OXIDES<br />

Sample source<br />

Test<br />

type of glass<br />

components<br />

Baghouse<br />

catch<br />

No. 1<br />

amber,<br />

wt %<br />

Silica (Si02) (SiO,)<br />

0. 03<br />

Calcium oxide (CaO)<br />

1. 70<br />

Sulfuric anhydride (SO3) )<br />

Boric anhydride (B203)<br />

Arsenic oxide (As,O?) - -<br />

Chloride (Cl)<br />

46.92<br />

3. 67<br />

7. 71<br />

Lead oxide (PbO) 0. 39<br />

Fe203<br />

MgO<br />

ZnO<br />

Unknown metallic oxide (R203)<br />

Loss on ignition<br />

10.10<br />

Baghouse<br />

catch<br />

No. 2<br />

flint,<br />

wt Yo<br />

0.3<br />

2.3<br />

25. 1<br />

1.3<br />

30.8<br />

Baghouse<br />

catch<br />

No. 3<br />

amber,<br />

wt Yo<br />

0.1<br />

0.8<br />

46. 7<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

25. 7<br />

Baghouse<br />

catch<br />

No. 4<br />

flint,<br />

wt %<br />

4.1<br />

19.2<br />

30.5<br />

0.6<br />

1.4<br />

7.5<br />

Millipore<br />

filter<br />

No. 5<br />

flint,<br />

wt %<br />

3.3<br />

39.4<br />

6. 5<br />

11. 6


774 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

By the method of Brandon (1959), particulate emis-<br />

sions, the dependent variable were found to corre-<br />

late with the following independent variables and<br />

nonquantitative factors:<br />

1. Process weight, lb/hr-ft2;<br />

2. cullet, wt % of charge;<br />

3 2<br />

3. checker volume, ft /ft melter;<br />

4. type of furnace, side port or end port;<br />

5. type of fuel, U.S. Grade 5 (PS300) oil or<br />

natural gas;<br />

2<br />

6. melter area, ft .<br />

Several simplifying assumptions are made so that<br />

furnaces of different sizes can be compared. Pro-<br />

cess weight per square foot of melter describes a<br />

unit process occurring in each furnace regardless<br />

of size. Cubic feet of checkers per square foot<br />

of melter not only defines the unit's dust-collect-<br />

ing capability but is also a measure of fuel economy.<br />

Source tests C-382 and C-536 in Table 205 (and<br />

other source tests) show no appreciable difference<br />

in particulate emissions from burning natural gas<br />

or U. S. Grade 3 fuel oil.<br />

MELTER AREA. f t 2<br />

Correlation of particulate emissions with weight<br />

percent sulfate (SO3) and minus 325-mesh fines<br />

in the charee - was not nossible because of insuffi-<br />

Figure 591' gas for<br />

regenerative furnaces (Sharp, 1955).<br />

I-type<br />

cient test data. Limited data available indicate<br />

that particulate emissions may double when total<br />

sulfate (SO2) content of the batch charge is in-<br />

A<br />

creased from 0. 3 to 1. 0 weight percent. Total<br />

rived from reducing dust carryover are many and sulfates (SO3) include equivalent amounts of eleinclude<br />

longer furnace campaigns, lower mainte- mental sulfur and all compounds containing sulfur.<br />

nance costs, and savings on fuel.<br />

Sulfates usually comprise over 50 percent of the<br />

particulate emissions. They act as fluxing agents<br />

In order to determine which design and operating preventing the melting dry-hatch charge from<br />

variables have the greatest effect upon dust carry- forming a crust that interferes with heat transover<br />

and particulate emissions, statistical analysis fer and melting (Tooky, 1953). Compounds of<br />

was performed on the source test data given in arsenic, boron, fluorine, and metallic selenium<br />

Table 205.<br />

are also expected to be found alone with sodium<br />

sulfate in the particulate emissions because of<br />

their high vapor pressures.<br />

Data roughly indicate that particulate emissions<br />

increase severalfold when the quantity of minus<br />

325-mesh fines increases from 0. 3 weight per-<br />

cent to 1 or 2 weight percent.<br />

Statistical analysis using the method of curvilinear<br />

multiple correlation by Ezekiel (1941) results in the<br />

following equation, which describes particulate<br />

emissions, the dependent variable, as a function<br />

Table 208. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GASEOUS EMISSIONS<br />

FROM GAS-FIRED, REGENERATIVE FURNACES<br />

Gaseous components<br />

Nitrogen, vol 7%<br />

Oxygen, vol 70<br />

Water vapor, vol 70<br />

Carbon dioxide, vol %<br />

Carbon monoxide, vol %<br />

Sulfur dioxide (SO2), ppm<br />

Sulfur trioxide (SO3), ppm<br />

Nitrogen oxides (NO,NOZ), ppm<br />

Organic acids, ppm<br />

Aldehydes, ppm<br />

aNA = not available.<br />

Flint glass<br />

71. 9<br />

9. 3<br />

12.4<br />

6. 4<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

724<br />

NA"<br />

N A<br />

Amber glass<br />

81. 8<br />

10.2<br />

7.7<br />

8. 0<br />

0. 007<br />

61<br />

12<br />

137<br />

5 0<br />

7<br />

Georgia green<br />

72.5<br />

8.0<br />

12.1<br />

7.4<br />

0<br />

14<br />

15<br />

N A<br />

N A<br />

N A


of four independent variables and two nonquanti-<br />

tative independent factors. This equation is<br />

valid only when two other independent variables--<br />

sulfate content and content of minus 325-mesh fines<br />

of the batch--lie between 0. 1 to 0. 3 weight percent<br />

and, also, when fluorine, boron, and lead com-<br />

pounds are either absent from the batch charge or<br />

present only in trace amounts.<br />

where<br />

XI = particulate emissions, lb/hr<br />

2<br />

X2 = process wt, lb/hr-ft melter<br />

X3 =<br />

wt fraction of cullet in charge<br />

X4 =<br />

3 2<br />

checker volume, ft /ft melter<br />

X5 =<br />

2<br />

melter area, ft 1100<br />

Glass Ma nufacture 77c<br />

(152)<br />

a = constant involving two nonquantitative<br />

independent factors relating the type<br />

of furnace (side port or end port) and<br />

the type of fuel (U. S. Grade 5 fuel or<br />

natural gas).<br />

a = -0.493 end port - U.S. Grade 5<br />

fuel oil<br />

a = -0. 623 side port - U.S. Grade 5<br />

fuel oil<br />

a = -1.286 end port - natural gas<br />

a = -1.416 side port - natural gas.<br />

Particulate emissions computed by this equation<br />

for 25 source tests show a standard deviation<br />

from measured particulate emissions of + 1.4<br />

pounds per hour. Further statistical refine-<br />

ment failed to yield a lower standard deviation.<br />

Emissions to the atmosphere can be predicted<br />

by using equation 152 or Figures 592 to 595, which<br />

are based upon this equation. The curves should<br />

be used only within the limits indicated for the<br />

variables. The curves should not be extrapolated<br />

in either direction with the expectation of any de-<br />

gree of accuracy, even though they appear as<br />

straight lines. Particulate emissions are first<br />

determined from Figure 592, then positive or<br />

negative corrections obtained from Figures 593<br />

to 595 are added to the emissions obtained from<br />

Figure 592.<br />

Design and operation of soda-lime, continuous,<br />

regenerative furnaces to alleviate dust carry-<br />

over and minimize particulate emissions are<br />

discussed in succeeding paragraphs. Advantages<br />

of all-electric, continuous furnaces for melting<br />

glass are also cited.<br />

Control of raw materials<br />

Although glassmakers have traditionally sought<br />

fine-particle materials for easier melting, these<br />

materials have intensified dust carryover in regenerative<br />

furnaces. A compromise must be<br />

reached. Major raw materials should be in the<br />

form of small particles, many of them passing<br />

U. S. 30-mesh screen, but not more than 0. 3<br />

weight percent passing U. S. 325-mesh screen.<br />

Because crystals of soda ash, limestone, and<br />

other materials may be friable and crush in the<br />

mixer, producing excessive amounts of fines,<br />

screen analyses of individual raw materials<br />

should not be combined for estimating the screen<br />

analyses of the batch charge. Crystalline shape<br />

and density of raw materials should be thoroughly<br />

investigated before raw material suppliers are<br />

selected.<br />

Since particulate emissions from soda-lime re -<br />

generative furnaces increase with an increase in<br />

equivalent sulfate (SO3) present in the batch<br />

charge, sulfate content should be reduced to an<br />

absolute minimum consistent with good glassmaking.<br />

Preferably, it should be below 0. 3<br />

weight percent. Equivalent sulfate (SO3) content<br />

of the batch includes all sulfur compounds and<br />

elemental sulfur. Compounds of fluorine, boron,<br />

lead, and arsenic are also known to promote dust<br />

carryover (Tooley, 1953), but the magnitude of<br />

their effect upon emissions is still unknown. In<br />

soda-lime glass manufacture, these materials<br />

should be eliminated or should be present in only<br />

trace amounts.<br />

From the standpoint of suppressing stack emis-<br />

sions, cullet content of the batch charge should<br />

be kept as high as possible. Plant economics may,<br />

nevertheless, dictate reduction in cullet where fuel<br />

or cullet is high in cost or where cullet is in short<br />

supply. Some manufacturing plants are able to<br />

supply all their cullet requirements from scrap and<br />

reject glassware.<br />

Batch preparation<br />

There are a number of ways to condition a batch<br />

charge and reduce dust carryover. Some sodalime<br />

glass manufacturers add moisture to the<br />

dry batch, but the relative merits of this process<br />

are debatable. Moisture is sprayed into the drybatch<br />

charge at the mixer as a solution containing<br />

1 gallon of surface-active wetting agent to 750<br />

gallons of water. Surface tension of the water is<br />

reduced by the wetting agent so that the water<br />

wets the finest particles and is evenly distributed


776 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 592. Particulate emlsslons versus checker<br />

volume per ft2 of melter.<br />

- x<br />

z<br />

w,<br />

-<br />

B<br />

B<br />

7<br />

6<br />

E 3<br />

+<br />

c, u 2<br />

=<br />

-<br />

cz<br />

U I<br />

0<br />

I<br />

3<br />

0 B 12 16 20 24 28 31<br />

X2 PROCESS WEIGHT, Ib/hr Per 11' neller<br />

Figure 593. Correction to particulate emissions<br />

for process weight per ft2 melter.<br />

U.YI U,IU U. 13 U.IU 0.25 0.30 0.35<br />

X1. KEIGHT FRACTIOH OF CULLET IH CHIAGE<br />

Figure 594. Correction to particulate emissions for cullet content<br />

of the batch charge.<br />

Figure 595. Correction to particulate emissions<br />

for melter area.<br />

, Other<br />

throughout the batch (Wilson, 1960). Fluxing<br />

materials such as salt cake appear more effec-<br />

tive, since the unrnelted batch does not usually<br />

travel so far in the melter tank before it melts.<br />

Moisture content of the batch is normally in-<br />

creased to about 2 percent by weight. If the<br />

moisture content exceeds 3 percent, batch in-<br />

gredients adhere to materials-handling equip-<br />

ment and may cake in storage bins or batch cans.<br />

batch preparation methods have been em-<br />

ployed on a limited-production or experimental<br />

basis to reduce dust carryover from soda-ash<br />

glass manufacture. One method involves prer<br />

sintering the batch to form cullet and then charg-<br />

ing only this cullet to the furnace. Advantages


Glass Manx<br />

claimed are faster melting, better batch con-<br />

trol, less seed formation, reduced clogging in<br />

the checkers, and lower stack losses (Arrandale,<br />

1962). A Dutch oven doghouse cover also reduces<br />

dust carryover by sintering the top of the floating<br />

dry batch before it enters the melter. This meth-<br />

od is probably not as efficient as is complete pre-<br />

sintering in reducing dust carryover.<br />

Other methods include: (1) Charging briquets,<br />

which are made from regular batch ingredients<br />

by adding up to 10 percent by weight of water;<br />

(2) charging wet hatches containing 6 percent<br />

moisture, which are made by first dissolving<br />

soda-ash to form a saturated solution and mix-<br />

ing this solution with sand and the other dry<br />

materials: (3) charging the dry batch (Submerged)<br />

in the melter; (4) enclosing batch feeders (Fabri-<br />

anio, 1961); and (5) installing batch feeders on<br />

opposite sides of end port, regenerative furnaces<br />

and charging alternately on the side under fire.<br />

Checkers<br />

The design concept of modern regenerative fur-<br />

naces, with its emphasis on maximum use of<br />

fuel, is also indirectly committed to reducing<br />

dust carryover. All things being equal, less<br />

fuel burned per ton of glass means less dust<br />

entrainment by hot combustion gases and flames<br />

flowing across the surface of the melting glass.<br />

Although container furnaces constructed over<br />

15 years ago required over 7,000 cubic feet of<br />

natural gas per ton of glass at maximum pull<br />

rates, container furnaces built today can melt<br />

a ton of glass with less than 5,000 cubic feet<br />

of natural gas.<br />

While several design changes are responsible<br />

for this improvement, one of the most important<br />

is the increase in checker volume. The ratio of<br />

checker volume (cubic feet) to meter area (square<br />

feet) has been rising during the years from about<br />

5 in earlier furnaces to about 9 today. Enlarged<br />

checkers not only reduce fuel consumption and<br />

particulate formation but also present a more<br />

effective trap for dust particles that are expelled<br />

from the melter. Source tests conducted by a<br />

large glass-manufacturing company indicated<br />

that over 50 percent of the dust carryover from<br />

the melter is collected by the checkers and gas<br />

passages instead of entering the atmosphere.<br />

Of course, the economics connected with regen-<br />

erative furnace operation dictates the checker<br />

volume. The law of diminishing returns oper-<br />

ates where capital outlay for an added volume<br />

of checkers will no longer be paid within a spe-<br />

cified period by an incremental reduction in fuel<br />

costs. Checkers have been designed in douhle-<br />

pass arrangements to recover as much as 55 per-<br />

cent of the heat from the waste gases (Sharp, 1954).<br />

Although dust collects within checkers by mechan-<br />

isms of impingement and settling, the relationship<br />

among various factors influencing dust collection<br />

is unknown. These factors include: Gas velocity,<br />

brick size, flue spacing, brick setting, and brick<br />

composition. Checkers designed for maximum<br />

fuel economy may not necessarily have the high-<br />

est collection efficiency. Further testing will<br />

he necessary in order to evaluate checker de-<br />

signs. Checkers designed for maximum heat<br />

exchange contain maximum heat transfer surface<br />

per unit volwne, a condition met only by smaller<br />

refractories with tighter spacing. Heat transfer<br />

surfaces can be computed by the method given in<br />

Trinks (1955). Since gas velocities are also<br />

highest for maximum heat transfer, less dust<br />

collects by simple settling than by impingement.<br />

Dust collection is further complicated in that<br />

smaller brick increases the potential for clogging.<br />

To prevent clogging in the checkers and ensure<br />

a reasonable level of heat transfer, checkers<br />

should be cleaned once per month or more often;<br />

an adequate number of access doors should be<br />

provided for this purpose (Spain, 195613). Com-<br />

pressed air, water, or steam may be used to<br />

flush fine particles from the checkers. Virtual-<br />

ly nothing can be done to remove slag after it<br />

has formed. Checkers can be arranged in a<br />

double vertical pass to reduce overall furnace<br />

height and make cleaning easier. Access doors<br />

should also be provided for remqving dust de-<br />

posits from the flues.<br />

Preheaters<br />

Further reductions in fuel consumption to re-<br />

duce dust emissions may be realized by install-<br />

ing rotsry, regenerative air preheaters in series<br />

with the checkers. Additional benefits include<br />

less checker plugging, reduced maintenance, and<br />

increased checker life. Rotating elements of<br />

the preheater are constructed of mild steel, low-<br />

alloy steel, or ceramic materials. Preheaters<br />

raise the temperature of the air to over 1, 000°F.<br />

and the increased velocity of this preheated air<br />

aids in purging dust deposits that block gas pas-<br />

sages of the checkers. Exhaust gases passing<br />

through the opposite side of the preheater are<br />

cooled below 800°F before being exhausted to<br />

the atmosphere. A heat balance study of a plate<br />

glass, regenerative furnace shows a 9 percent<br />

increase in heat use by the installation of a<br />

rotary, regenerative air preheater (Waitkus,<br />

1962). To maintain heat transfer and prevent<br />

re-entrainment, dust deposits on the preheater<br />

elements must he removed by periodic cleaning.<br />

Ductwork and valves should he installed for by-<br />

passing rotary air preheaters during the cleaning<br />

stage.


778 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Refractories and insulation<br />

Slagging of the upper courses of checkerwork<br />

can be alleviated in most cases by installing<br />

basic (high alumina content) brick in place of<br />

superduty firebrick (Robertson et al., 1957).<br />

Basic brickcourses extend from the topdown-<br />

ward to positions where checker temperatures<br />

arebelow l,50O0F. Atthis temperature, fire-<br />

bricknolonger "wets" and forms slagwithdust<br />

particles. Dust usually collects in the lower<br />

courses of firebrick in the form of fine particles<br />

that are easily removed by cleaning. Although<br />

basic brick costs 3 or 4 times as much as super-<br />

duty firebrick, some glass manufacturers are<br />

constructing entire checkerworks of basic brick<br />

where slagging and clogging are most severe.<br />

In some instances, basic refractories are re-<br />

placing fireclay rider tiles and rider arches<br />

in checker supports (Van Dreser, 1962). A<br />

word of caution, basic brick is no panacea for<br />

all ills of checkers. Chemical composition of<br />

the dust should be known, to determine com-<br />

patibility with the checkers (Fabrianio, 1961).<br />

Regenerative furnaces can be designed to con-<br />

sume less fuel and emit less dust by proper<br />

selection and application of insulating refrac-<br />

tories. A heat balance study of a side port, re-<br />

generative furnace shows that, in the melting<br />

process, glass receives 10 percent of heat<br />

transfer from convection and 90 percent from<br />

radiation. Of the radiation portion of heat<br />

transferred, the crown accounts for 33 percent<br />

(Merritt, 1958). Since heat lossesthrough the un-<br />

insulated crown can run as high as 10 percent of<br />

the total heat input, there is need for insulation<br />

at this spot.<br />

Most crowns are constructed of silica brick<br />

with a maximum furnace capacity restricted to an<br />

operating temperature of 2,850"F (Sharp, 1955).<br />

Insulation usually cons is ts of insulating silica<br />

brick backed with high-duty plastic refractory.<br />

Furnaces are first operated without insulation,<br />

so that cracks can be observed. Then the cracks<br />

are sealed with silica cement, and the ~nsulation<br />

is applied.<br />

Insulation is needed on the melter sidewall and<br />

at the port necks to prevent glassy buildup caused<br />

by condensation of vapors. Condensate buildup<br />

flows across port sills into the melter and can<br />

become a major source of stones.<br />

While insulation of sidewalls shows negligible<br />

fuel reduction for flint glass manufacture, it<br />

does show substantial fuel reduction for colored<br />

glasses. The problem in manufacturing colored<br />

glass is to maintain a high enough temperature<br />

below the surface to speed the solution of stones<br />

and prevent stagnation. Insulation on sidewalls<br />

raises the mean temperature to a point where<br />

stones dissolve and glass circulates freely.<br />

Six inches or more of electrofusion cast block<br />

laid over a clay bottom in a bed of mortar (Baque,<br />

1954) not only saves fuel but is also less subject<br />

to erosion than is fireclay block.<br />

Insulation is seldom needed on the refining end<br />

of the furnace since refiners have become cool-<br />

ing chambers at today's high pull rates. Nose<br />

crowns, however, are insulated to minimize con-<br />

densation and drip (Bailey, 1957). Checkers are<br />

sometimes encased in steel to prevent air infiltra-<br />

tion through cracks and holes that develop in the<br />

refractory regenerator walls during the campaign.<br />

Combustion of fuel<br />

Furnace size also has an effect upon use of fuel,<br />

with a corresponding effect on the emissions of<br />

dust. Large furnaces are more economical than<br />

are small furnaces because the radiating surface<br />

or heat loss per unit volume of glass is greater<br />

for small furnaces.<br />

Slightly greater fuel economy may be expected<br />

from end port furnaces as compared with side<br />

port furnaces of equal capacity. Here again, the<br />

end port furnace has a heat loss advantage over<br />

the side port furnace because it has less exposed<br />

exterior surface area for radiating heat. Side<br />

port furnaces can, however, be operated at great-<br />

er percentages in excess of capacity since mixing<br />

of fuel with air is more efficient through several<br />

smaller inlet ports than it is through only one<br />

large inlet port. In fact, end port furnaces are<br />

limited in design to the amount of fuel that can<br />

be efficiently mixed with air and burned through<br />

this one inlet port (Spain, 1955). As far as dust<br />

losses are concerned, there are only negligible<br />

differences between end port and side port furnaces<br />

of equal size. Reduced fuel consumption to re-<br />

duce dust carryover can also be realized by in-<br />

creasing the depth of the melter to the maximum<br />

consistent with good-quality glass. Maximum<br />

depths for container furnaces are 42 inches for<br />

flint glass (Tooley, 1953) and about 36 inches for<br />

amber glass and emerald green glass.<br />

Dust emissions as well as fuel consumption can<br />

also be reduced by firing practice. Rapid changes<br />

in pull rates are wasteful of fuel and increase<br />

stack emissions. Hence, charge rates and glass<br />

pull rates for continuous furnaces should remain<br />

as constant as possible by balancing loads be-<br />

tween the glass -forming machines. If possible,<br />

furnaces should be fired on natural gas or U. S.<br />

Grade 3 or lighter fuel oil. Particulate emis -<br />

sions increase an average of about 1 pound per<br />

hour when U. S. Grade 5 fuel oil is used instead


of natural gas or U. S. Grade 3 fuel oil, and<br />

opacities may exceed 40 percent white.<br />

Combustion air should be thoroughly mixed with<br />

fuel with only enough excess air present to en-<br />

sure complete combustion without smoke. Ex-<br />

cess air robs the furnace of process heat by<br />

dilution, and this heat loss must be overcome<br />

by burning additional fuel. Volume of the melter<br />

should be designed for a maximum fuel heat re-<br />

lease of about 13.000 Btu per hour per cubic foot.<br />

Furnace reversals should be performed by an<br />

automatic control system to ensure optimum<br />

combustion. Only automatic systems can pro-<br />

vide the exact timing required for opening and<br />

closing the dampers and valves and for co-<br />

ordinating fuel and combustion airflow (Bulcraig<br />

and Haigh, 1961). For instance, fuel flow and<br />

ignition must be delayed until combustion air<br />

travels through the checkers after reversal to<br />

mix with fuel at the inlet port to the melter. Fur<br />

nace reversals are usually performed in fixed<br />

periods of 15 to 20 minutes, but an improvement<br />

in regenerator efficiency can be realized by pro-<br />

gramming reversal periods to checker tempera-<br />

tures measured optically. Reversals can then<br />

occur when checker temperatures reach preset<br />

values consistent with maximum heat transfer<br />

(Robertson et al., 1957).<br />

An excellent system for controlling air-to-fuel<br />

ratios incorporates continuous flue gas analyzers<br />

for oxygen and combustible hydrocarbons. With<br />

this system, the most efficient combustion and<br />

best flame shape and coverage occur at optimum<br />

oxygen with a trace of combustible hydrocarbons<br />

present in the flue gas. Sample gas is cleaned<br />

for the analyzers through water-cooled probes<br />

containing sprays. The system automatically<br />

adjusts to compensate for changes in ambient<br />

air density. Fuel savings of 6 to 8 percent<br />

can be accomplished on furnaces with analyzers<br />

over furnaces not so equipped (Gunsaulus, 1958).<br />

Combustion of natural gas in new furnaces occurs<br />

efficiently when the.oxygen content of the flue<br />

gases in the exhaust ports is less than 2 percent<br />

by volume. As the campaign progresses, air<br />

infiltration through cracks and pores in the<br />

brickwork, air leakage through valves and damp-<br />

ers, increased pressure drop through the regen-<br />

erators, and other effects combine to make<br />

combustion less efficient. To maintain maxi-<br />

mum combustion throughout the campaign, pres-<br />

sure checks with draft gages should be run peri-<br />

odically at specified locations (Spain, 1956a).<br />

Fuel savings can also be expedited by placing<br />

furnace operators on an incentive plan to keep<br />

combustion air to a minim-.<br />

Glass Manufacture 774<br />

Electric melting<br />

Although melting glass by electricity is a more<br />

costly process than melting glass by natural<br />

gas or fuel oil, melting electrically is a more<br />

thermally efficient process since heat can be<br />

applied directly to the body of the glass.<br />

Electric induction systems installed on regen-<br />

erative furnaces are designed to increase max-<br />

imum pull rates by as much as 50 percent. These<br />

systems are called boosters and consist of sev-<br />

eral water-cooled graphite or molybdenum elec-<br />

trodes equally spaced along the sides of the melt-<br />

er 18 to 32 inches below the surface of the glass.<br />

Source test results indicate that pull rates can<br />

be increased without any appreciable increase in<br />

dust carryover or particulate emissions. Fur-<br />

nace temperatures may also be reduced by<br />

boosters, preventing refractory damage at peak<br />

operations.<br />

Furnace capacity increase is nearly proportional<br />

to the amount of electrical energy expended. A<br />

56-ton-per-day regenerative furnace requires<br />

480 kilowatt-hours in the booster to melt an addi-<br />

tional ton of glass, which is close to the theoret-<br />

ical amount of heat needed to melt a ton of glass<br />

(Tooley, 1953).<br />

Electric induction can also be used exclusively<br />

for melting glass on a large scale. Design of<br />

this type of furnace is simplified since regen-<br />

erative checkerworks and large ductwork are no<br />

longer required (Tooley, 1953). One recently<br />

collstructed 10-ton-per-day, all-electric furnace<br />

consists of a simple tank with molybdenum elec-<br />

trodes. A small vent leads directly to the at-<br />

mosphere, and dust emissions through this vent<br />

are very small. The furnace operates with a<br />

crown temperature below 600°F and with a<br />

thermal efficiency of over 60 percent. Glass<br />

quality is excellent, with homogeneity nearly<br />

that of optical glass. After the first 11 months<br />

of operation, there was no apparent wear on the<br />

refractories (Peckham, 1962). First costs and<br />

maintenance expenses are substantially lower<br />

than for a comparable-size regenerative furnace.<br />

An electric furnace may prove competitive with<br />

regenerative furnaces in areas with low-cost<br />

electrical power.<br />

Baghouses and centrifugal scrubbers<br />

<strong>Air</strong> pollution control equipment can be installed<br />

on regenerative furnaces where particulate<br />

emissions or opacities cannot be reduced to<br />

required amounts through changes in furnace de-<br />

sign, control of raw materials, and operating<br />

procedures. Regenerative furnaces may be<br />

vented by two types of common industrial con-<br />

trol devices--wet centrifugal scrubbers and<br />

baghouses.


780 CHEMICAL PROCESSJI \iG EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 596 shows a low-pressure, wet, centrifugal<br />

scrubber containing two separate contacting<br />

sections within a singk casing. Separate<br />

50-horsepower, circulating fans force<br />

dirty gas through each section containing two<br />

to three impingement elements similar to fixed<br />

blades of a turbine. Although the collection<br />

efficiency of this device is considered about the<br />

highest for its type, source tests show an over-<br />

.~ .<br />

. . all efficiency of only 52 percent. This low efficiency<br />

demonstrates the inherent inability of<br />

the low-pressure, wet, centrifugal scrubbers<br />

to collect particulates of submicron size.<br />

Figure 596.~et, centrifugal-type scrubber con-<br />

trolling emissions from a glass-melting furnace<br />

(Thatcher Glass Co., Saugus, Calif. ).<br />

On the other hand, baghouses show collection<br />

efficiencies of over 99 percent. Although<br />

baghouses have not as yet been installed on<br />

large continuous, regenerative furnaces, they<br />

have been installed on small regenerative fur-<br />

naces. One baghouse alternately vents a l, 800-<br />

pound- and a 5,000-pound-batch regenerative<br />

furnace used for melting optical and special<br />

glasses used in scientific instruments. Bags<br />

are made of silicone-treated glass fiber. Off-<br />

gases are tempered by ambient air to reduce the<br />

temperature to 40OSF, a safe operating temper-<br />

ature for this fabric.<br />

Another baghouse, although no longer m operation,<br />

venteda 10-ton-per-day regenerative furnace for<br />

melt~ng soda-lime fllnt glass. Stack gases were<br />

cooled to 250°F by rad~ation and convect~on from<br />

an uninsulated steel duct before entering the baghouse<br />

contaming orlon bags.<br />

To determine the feasibility of using a cloth fil-<br />

tering device on large continuous, regenerative<br />

furnaces, a pilot baghouse was used with bags<br />

made of various commercial fabrics. An air-<br />

to-gas heat exchanger containing 38 tubes, each<br />

1-112 inches in outer diameter by 120 inches in<br />

length, cooled furnace exhaust gases before the<br />

gases entered the pilot baghouse. The baghouse<br />

contained 36 bags, each 6 inches in diameter by<br />

111 inches in length, with a 432-net-square-foot<br />

filter area. A 3-horsepower exhaust fan was<br />

mounted on the discharge duct of the baghouse.<br />

When subjected to exhaust gases from amber<br />

glass manufacture, hags made of cotton, orlon,<br />

dynel, and dacron showed rapid deterioration<br />

and stiffening. Only orlon and dacron bags ap-<br />

peared in satisfactory condition when controlling<br />

dirty gas from flint glass manufacture and when the<br />

dirty gas was held well above its dew point. This<br />

difference in corrosion between amber and flint<br />

glass was found to be caused by the difference in<br />

concentrations of sulfur trioxide (SO3) present in<br />

the flue gas.<br />

To reduce the concentration of SO3 from amber<br />

glass manufacture, iron pyrites were substituted<br />

for elemental sulfur in the hatch, but this change<br />

met with no marked success. Stoichiometric<br />

amounts of ammonia gas were also injected to<br />

remove SO3 as ammonium sulfate. Ammonia in-<br />

jection not only failed to lessen bag deterioration<br />

but also caused the heat exchanger tubes to foul<br />

more rapidly.<br />

In all cases, the baghouse temperature had to be<br />

kept above the dew point of the furnace effluent<br />

to prevent condensation from blinding the bags<br />

and promoting rapid chemical attack. At times,<br />

the baghouse had to be operated with an inlet<br />

temperature as high as 280°F to stay above the<br />

elevated dew point caused by the presence of SO3.<br />

Additional pilot baghouse studies are needed to<br />

evaluate orlon and dacron properly for flint glass<br />

manufacture. Experiments are also required for<br />

evaluating silicone-treated glass fiber bags in con-<br />

trolling exhaust gases from regenerative furnaces<br />

melting all types of glass.<br />

Information now available indicates that glass<br />

fiber bags can perform at temperatures as<br />

high as 500 "F, well above the elevated dew<br />

points. They are virtually unaffected by rela-<br />

tively large concentrations of SOZ and SO3, and<br />

there is less danger from condensation. One<br />

advantage of glass fiber is that less precooling<br />

of exhaust gases is required because of the high-<br />

er allowable operating temperatures. Reverse<br />

air collapse is generally conceded to be the best<br />

method of cleaning glass fiber bags, since this


Glass Manu<br />

material is fragile and easily breaks when regu-<br />

lar shakers are installed.<br />

Furnace effluent can be cooled by several meth-<br />

ods: <strong>Air</strong> dilution, radiation coollng columns,<br />

air-gas heat exchangers, and water spray<br />

chambers. Regardless of the cooling method se-<br />

lected, automatic controls should be installed to<br />

ensure proper temperatures during the complete<br />

firing cycle. Each cooling method has its ad-<br />

vantages and disadvantages. Dilution of offgases<br />

with air is the simplest and most troublefree<br />

way to reduce temperature but requires the larg-<br />

est baghouse. <strong>Air</strong>-to-gas heat exchangers and<br />

radiation and convection ductwork are subject to<br />

rapid fouling from dust in the effluent. Automatic<br />

surface-cleaning devices should be provided, or<br />

access openings installed for frequent manual<br />

cleaning to maintain clean surfaces for adequate<br />

heat transfer. If spray chambers are used, se-<br />

vere problems in condensation and temperature<br />

control are anticipated.<br />

GLASS-FORMING MACHINES<br />

From ancient times, bottles and tableware were<br />

made by handblowing until mechanical production<br />

~. began in the decade preceding the turn of the cen-<br />

!<br />

tury with the discovery of the "press and blow"<br />

I<br />

and the "blow and blow" processes. At first,<br />

- machines were semiautomatic in operation.<br />

Machine feeding was done by hand. Fully automatic<br />

machines made their appearance during<br />

World War I and completely replaced the semiautomatic<br />

machines by 1925. Two types of automatic<br />

feeders were developed and are in use today.<br />

The first type consists of a device for dipping and<br />

evacuating the blank mold in a revolving pot of<br />

glass. The second type, called a gob feeder,<br />

consists of an orifice in the forehearth combined<br />

with shears and gathering chutes (Tooley, 1953).<br />

Glass container-forming machines are of two<br />

general types. The first type is a rotating ma-<br />

chine in which glass is processed through a<br />

sequence of stations involving pressing, blowing,<br />

or both. An example of this type of machine is<br />

a Lynch machine. A second type is used in con-<br />

junction with a gob feeder and consists of inde-<br />

pendent sections in which each section is a com-<br />

plete manufacturing unit. There is no rotation,<br />

and the molds have only to open and close. An<br />

example of this type is the Hartford-Empire<br />

Individual Section (I.S.) six-section machine<br />

shown in Figure 597. Mechanical details and<br />

operations of various glass-forming machines<br />

for manufacturing containers, flat glass, and<br />

tableware are found in the Handbook of Glass<br />

Manufacture (Tooley, 1953).<br />

Figure 597. Hartford-Empire I.S. six-section glass-<br />

forming machine. (Thatcher Glass Co., Sangus, Calif.).<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Dense smoke is generated by flash vaporization<br />

of hydrocarbon greases and oils from contact<br />

lubrication of hot gob shears and gob delivery<br />

systems. This smoke emission can exceed 40<br />

percent white opacity.<br />

Molds are lubricated with mixtures of greases<br />

and oils and graphite applied to the hot internal<br />

surfaces once during 10- to 20-minute periods.<br />

This smoke is usually 100 percent white in<br />

opacity and exists for 1 or 2 seconds. It rapid-<br />

ly loses its opacity and is completely dissipated<br />

within several seconds.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Methods<br />

During the past decade, grease and oil lubri-<br />

cants for gob shears and gob delivery systems<br />

have been replaced by silicone emulsions and<br />

water-soluble oils at ratios of 90 to 150 parts<br />

of water to 1 part oil or silicone. The effect<br />

has been the virtual elimination of smoke. The<br />

emulsions and solutions are applied by intermittent<br />

sprays to the delivery system and shears only when<br />

the shears are in an opened position.


782 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Lubricating properties of silicone-based emul- when mounted at the point of transfer of gobs<br />

sions appear in some respects superior to those from the blank mold to the blow mold.<br />

of soluble oil solutions. Gob droo soeeds are<br />

a<br />

increased by 20 to 25 percent. Apparently, the<br />

gob rides down the deliverv chute on a cushion<br />

-<br />

of steam. Heat from the gob breaks the silicone<br />

emulsion, forming an extremely stable resin, a<br />

condensation product of siloxane, which acts as<br />

a smooth base for the cushioning effect of steam.<br />

This resin is degraded in a matter of seconds<br />

and must be reformed continuously hy reapply-<br />

ing the silidone emulsion.<br />

While graphite gives no apparent advantages to<br />

emulsions, a combination of water soluble oil and<br />

silicone emulsion appears to be most effective<br />

(Singer, 1956). Oil aids the wetting of metal<br />

surfaces with silicone and coats metal surfaces,<br />

retarding rust formation. Sodium nitrite is also<br />

helpful in inhibiting rust when added to silicone<br />

emulsion. Water for mixtures must be pure, and<br />

in most cases, requires treatment in ion ex-<br />

changers or demineralizers.<br />

Water treatment is most critical for soluble oil to<br />

prevent growth of algae and bacteria. Oil solutions<br />

form gelatinous, icicle-like deposits upon drying<br />

on the surfaces of pipes and arms of the I.S. ma-<br />

chine. These particles should not be allowed to<br />

fall into the mold. Optimum results are obtained<br />

by flood lubrication'of the delivery system to the<br />

maximum amount that can be handled by a runoff<br />

wire or blown off by air. Dry lubrication of<br />

delivery systems has been tried on an experi-<br />

mental basis by coating the metal contact sur-<br />

faces with molybdenum disulfide or graphite.<br />

Although future developments in the application<br />

of emulsions to molds look promising, present<br />

practice still relies upon mixtures of hydro-<br />

carbon greases, oils, and graphite. Silicone<br />

emulsions and soluble oils eliminate smoke,<br />

but several difficulties must be overcome be-<br />

fore they can be widely used for mold lubrica-<br />

tion. Water emulsions with their high specific<br />

heat cause excessive cooling if they are not ap-<br />

plied evenly to the mold surfaces by proper<br />

atomization. Fine sprays meet with wind re-<br />

sistance, and these sprays cannot be effectively<br />

directed to cover the shoulder sectipns of some<br />

molds. Because of the low viscosity of water<br />

emulsions, the emulsions are very difficult to<br />

meter through existing sight oil feeders. One<br />

company has equipped its machine with individual<br />

positive-displacement pumps for each nozzle.<br />

Invert-post cross-spraying is found to be most<br />

effective in giving a uniform coating to the molds<br />

of I. S. machines (Bailey, 1957).<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

FRlT SMELTERS<br />

Ceramic coatings are generally divided into two<br />

classes, depending upon whether they are applied<br />

to metal or to glass and pottery. In the case of<br />

metal, the coating is widely referred to in this<br />

country as;porcelain enamel. The use of the<br />

term vitreous enamel seems to be preferred in<br />

Europe. Glass enamel is sometimes used inter-<br />

changeably with both terms. On the other hand,<br />

the coating applied to glass or pottery is known<br />

as ceramic glaze.<br />

Ceramic coatings are essentially water suspen-<br />

sions of ground frit and clay. Frit is prepared<br />

by fusing various minerals in a smelter. The<br />

molten material is then quenched with air or<br />

water. This quenching operation causes the<br />

melt to solidify rapidly and shatter into numerous<br />

small glass particles, called frit. After a drying<br />

process, the frit is finely ground in a ball mill,<br />

where other materials are added. When suspend-<br />

ed in a solution of water and clay, the resulting<br />

mixture is known as a ceramic slip. Enamel<br />

slip is applied to metals and fired at high tem-<br />

peratures in a furnace. Glaze slip is applied to<br />

pottery or glass and fired in a kiln.<br />

Raw Materials<br />

The raw materials that go into the manufacture<br />

of various frits are similar to each other whether , j<br />

the frit is for enameling on steel or aluminum or<br />

1.<br />

for glazing. The basic difference is in the chem- i.<br />

I<br />

ical composition.<br />

The raw materials used in enamels and glazes<br />

may he divided into the following six groups:<br />

i<br />

Refractories, fluxes, opacifiers, colors, floatl<br />

ing agents, and electrolytes (Andrews, 1961). ~<br />

The refractories include materials such as I !<br />

quartz, feldspar, and clay, which contribute to<br />

the acidic part of the melt and give body to the<br />

glass. The fluxes include minerals such as<br />

borax, soda ash, cryolite, fluorspar, and litharge,<br />

which are basic in character and react with the<br />

acidic refractories to form the glass and, more-<br />

over, tend to lower the fusion temperatures of<br />

the glasses. These refractory and flux materials<br />

chiefly comprise the ingredients that go into the<br />

raw batch that is charged to the smelter.<br />

Rotating machines are much easier to lubricate Materials falling into the other four groups are<br />

than are individual section machines. Emulsion introduced later as mill additions and rarely exsprays<br />

are most effective on rotating machines ceed 15 percent of the total frit composition.<br />

I<br />

i<br />

j


They include opacifiers, which are compounds<br />

added to the glass to give it an opaque appear-<br />

ance such as the characteristic white of porce-<br />

lain enamels. Examples are tin oxide, anti-<br />

mony oxide, sodium antimonate, and zirconium<br />

oxide. The color materials include compounds<br />

such as the oxides of cobalt, copper, iron, and<br />

nickel. The floating agents consist of clay and<br />

gums and are used to suspend the enamel or<br />

glaze in water. Electrolytes such as borax,<br />

soda ash, magnesium sulfate, and magnesium<br />

carbonate are added to flocculate the clay and<br />

further aid the clay in keeping the enamel or<br />

glaze in suspension (Parmelee, 1951).<br />

Types of Smelters<br />

Frit Smt<br />

Smelters used in frit making, whether for<br />

enamel or glaze, may be grouped into three<br />

classes: Rotary, hearth, and crucible. The<br />

rotary smelter is cylindrical and can be rotated<br />

in either direction to facilitate fusing, as shown<br />

in Figure 598. It can also be tilted vertically<br />

for the pouring operation, as demonstrated in<br />

Figure 599. The smelter is open at one end for<br />

the introduction of fuel and combustion air. It<br />

is similarly open at the opposite end for the dis-<br />

charge of flue gases and for charging raw mate-<br />

rials. Operated solely as a batch-type smelter,<br />

it is normally charged by means of a screw con-<br />

veyor, which is inserted through the opening.<br />

Rotary smelters are normally sized to take<br />

batches varying from approximately 100 to 3,000<br />

pounds. Fired with either gas or oil, the smelter<br />

is lined with high-alumina, refractory firebrick<br />

with an average life of from 400 to 600 melts.<br />

Firing cycles vary from 1 to 4 hours.<br />

The hearth smelter consists of a brick floor, on<br />

which the raw materials are melted, surrounded<br />

by a boxlike enclosure. This type of smelter<br />

can be either continuous, as illustrated in Figure<br />

600, or batch type, as shown in Figure 601. In<br />

either case, the hearth (or bottom) is sloped<br />

from one side to a point on the opposite side<br />

where the molten material is tapped. The con-<br />

tinuous type is usually screw fed. A flue stack<br />

is located on the opposite end. Oil or gas is<br />

normally used as fuel for the one or more burn-<br />

ers. The walls and floor are lined with a first-<br />

quality, refractory firebrick. The batch type is<br />

sized to take batches ranging from 100 to several<br />

thousand pounds. About 30 pounds of batch can<br />

be smelted for each square foot of hearth area.<br />

The typical continuous-hearth smelter can pro-<br />

cess 1, 000 to 1, 500 pounds of raw materials<br />

per hour.<br />

The crucible smelter consists of a high-refrac-<br />

tory, fireclay, removable crucible mounted<br />

within a circular, insulated, steel shell lined<br />

with high-grade firebrick, as shown in Figure<br />

602. Heating is usually accomplished with oil<br />

or gas burners, though electricity can be used.<br />

The combustion chamber surrounds the crucible,<br />

occupying the space between the crucible and the<br />

shell lining. Because the heat must be trans-<br />

mitted through the crucible to the batch, re-<br />

fractory and fuel costs are high. Crucibles can<br />

be sized to smelt a 5-pound batch for laboratory<br />

purposes, but the commercial crucibles are<br />

sized to take batches from 100 pounds to 3, 000<br />

pounds. Smelting cycles vary from 2 to 3 hours<br />

at temperatures around 2,200mF, depending<br />

upm the size of the batch and its composition.<br />

The steel shell is supported by trunnions so<br />

that the crucible can be tilted for the pouring<br />

operation.<br />

Frit Manufacturing<br />

Since the raw materials that comprise the<br />

smelter batch consist of refractories and<br />

fluxes, thorough and uniform mixing of these<br />

ingredients before the charging operation is<br />

essential for efficient smelting. Smelting<br />

involves the heating of raw materials until a<br />

fairly homogeneous glass is formed. The<br />

fundamental changes that occur are inter-<br />

action of acids and bases, decomposition,<br />

fusion, and solution. A considerable quanti-<br />

ty of steam is evolved as the borax begins to<br />

melt. The order of melting for some of the<br />

materials is: Sodium nitrate at 586"F, borax<br />

at 1, 366"F, soda ash at 1,564"F, litharge at<br />

1, 630°F, feldspar at 2,138"F, and quartz at<br />

3,llO"F.<br />

If white or light-colored frits are being smelted,<br />

smelter refractory linings must be high in alumi-<br />

na and low in iron to prevent discoloration and<br />

dark specks in the frit. The batch is protected.<br />

from contact with fuel gases during the-early<br />

stages of smelting by the evolution of gases<br />

within the smelter. To illustrate, a batch<br />

containing 35 percent borax and 10 percent<br />

soda ash loses about 165 pounds of water and<br />

42 pounds of carbon dioxide for a 1,000-pound<br />

batch of frit. This is equivalent to 483 cfm<br />

water vapor and 60 cfm C02 at a smelter tem-<br />

perature of 1,700°F and for a smelting period<br />

of 30 minutes.<br />

The rate and period of heat application is criti-<br />

cal in smelting enamels and glazes. A temper-<br />

ature too low may be sufficient only to vaporize<br />

the more fusible materials instead of volatilizing<br />

them, and thereby result in a very slow reaction<br />

with the more refractory ingredients. A higher<br />

operating temperature eliminates this low pro-<br />

duction rate. If the batch is heated too rapidly,<br />

however, the more fusible elements are melted


784 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 598. Rotary-type frit smelter (Ferro Corp.,<br />

Los Angeles, Calif.).<br />

Figure 599. Rotary-type frit smelter in pouringposition (Ferro Corp.,<br />

Los Angeles, Calif.).


Frit Smelters 785<br />

Figure 600. Continuous-hearth-type frit smelter '(~erro Corporation,<br />

Las Angeles, Calif.).<br />

Flgure 601. Batch-hearth-type frlt smelter (Ferro Corporatlon.<br />

Los Angeles, Cal~f.).


786 CHEMICAL PROCESS11 VG EQUIPMENT<br />

Flgure 602. Crucible-type f r ~ smelter t<br />

(Californla<br />

Metal Enamel lng Company, Los Angeles, Cal lf.).<br />

and volatilized hefore they have a chance to react<br />

with the more refractory materials. Driving off<br />

the fluxes in this manner results in a harder (less<br />

fusible) final batch. Excessive smelting, after the<br />

melt is ready to pour, results in a similar condi-<br />

tion and, if permitted to continue, necessitates a<br />

further increase in temperature to facilitate<br />

pouring. Oversmelting also causes loss of opac-<br />

ity, poor gloss, and discoloration in the frit.<br />

Insufficient smelting, on the other hand, causes<br />

blistering, loss of acid resistance, and poor<br />

texture in the finished coating. Batch composi-<br />

tion is the determining factor in selecting op-<br />

timum smelter temperatures and cycles.<br />

After the smelting operation, the molten material<br />

is quenched. Rapid cooling can be accomplished<br />

with either air, water, or a combination of the<br />

two. <strong>Air</strong> quenching produces a better product<br />

but is not normally practiced, owing to the quench-<br />

ing Znd storage space required. Water quench-<br />

ing is commonly practiced in the industry by<br />

pouring the molten material from the tilted<br />

smelter into a large pan of water. Water quench-<br />

ing is also frequently done by pouring molten mate-<br />

rial into a metal trough in which a continuous<br />

stream of water is flowing. The trough empties<br />

into a large wire basket suspended in a well,<br />

which holds the shattered frit but permits the<br />

water to flow out through an overflow. Rapid<br />

cooling is somewhat impeded by this method<br />

owing to a layer of steam that forms over the<br />

glass. <strong>Air</strong>-water quenching appears to be the<br />

most economical and effective method since a<br />

more thorough shattering of the glass results.<br />

In this method the molten material is poured<br />

from the smelter and passed through a blast of<br />

air and water. Quenching causes the molten ma-<br />

terial to solidify and shatter into numerous small<br />

glass particles (called frit) ranging from 114 inch<br />

in diameter down to submicron sizes. Its main<br />

purpose is to facilitate grinding.<br />

After draining, the frit contains 5 to 15 percent<br />

water and may be milled in this condition or<br />

may first he dried. Three types of dryers are<br />

employed: The drying table, the stationary<br />

dryer, and the rotary dryer. The drying table<br />

is a flat hearth on which the frit is placed. Heat<br />

is applied beneath the hearth, and the frit is<br />

raked manually. The stationary dryer consists<br />

of a sheet iron chamber in which a basket of<br />

frit is placed. Heated air from an exchanger on<br />

the smelter flue is passed through the basket of<br />

frit. The rotary dryer consists of a porcelain-<br />

lined rotating cylinder that is inclined slightly,<br />

causing the frit to move through continuously.<br />

The typical size is approximately 2 feet in di-<br />

ameter and 20 feet long, though larger cylinders<br />

are used. The rotary dryer, which is economical<br />

and efficient, can he heated by waste heat or by<br />

oil or gas. The frit can he further refined by<br />

using magnetic separation to remove small iron<br />

particles, which would otherwise cause black<br />

specks in the enamel.<br />

The final step in frit making is size reduction,<br />

which is normally done with a ball mill. Frits<br />

used in porcelain enamel are required to pass<br />

a No. 100 seive (150 microns), though a certain<br />

percent of fines must remain as residue on a<br />

finer sieve. In the case of ceramic glaze frits, a<br />

finer grind is necessary. About one-half of a<br />

batch must he less than 2. 5 microns with the<br />

remainder no greater than 10 microns. Effi-<br />

cient milling is best obtained when the speed of<br />

rotation is such that the balls ride three-fourths<br />

of the way up one side of the cylinder, and the inner-<br />

most balls slide back down over the outermost<br />

balls. This is achieved, for example, at a speed<br />

of 25 rpm for a 4-foot-diameter cylinder. Porce-<br />

lain balls or flint pebbles are used in the mill. The<br />

diameter of the balls ranges from 1 to 3 inches,<br />

and the charge should be maintained at about 55<br />

percent of the mill volume. Ball wear amounts to<br />

5 to 10 pounds in milling 1,000 pounds of frit.<br />

Colors, opacifiers, floating agents, and electro-<br />

lytes are mixed with the frit before it is charged<br />

to the ball mill. After the milling operation be-<br />

gins, water is added at a constant rate to keep<br />

the specific gravity of the slurry (referred to as<br />

slip) at the correct value at all times. After the<br />

milling operation, the ceramic slip is screened<br />

to remove large particles. A 1- to 2-day aging<br />

process then takes place at a temperature close


to that at which the enamel or glaze is to be ah-<br />

plied. Aging is necessary to set up an equilibrium<br />

among the clay, frit, and solution. The enamel<br />

or glazs slip is now ready for application.<br />

Application, Firing, and Uses of Enamels<br />

Enamels and glazes may be applied to ware<br />

blanks by immersion or spraying (Hansen,<br />

1932). The pouring and brushing methods are<br />

seldom employed today. In the dipping opera-<br />

tion, the blank is immersed in the slip and then<br />

withdrawn and allowed to drain. If the slip is<br />

thick, the excess enamel must he shaken from<br />

the ware, a process called slushing. Spraying<br />

is the application of enamel or glaze slip to<br />

ware by atomizing it through an air gun.<br />

After the enamel or glaze has been applied, it<br />

must then be burned or fired on the ware to<br />

fuse the coating to a smooth, continuous, glassy<br />

layer. The firing temperatures and cycles for<br />

porcelain enamel on steel and aluminum are<br />

approximately 1, 500°F (Shreve, 1945) for 5<br />

minutes and 1,000"F for 5 minutes, respective-<br />

ly. Ceramic glaze, however, is fired on pottery<br />

at about 2, 300°F for several hours or even days.<br />

The firing is accomplished in what is called a<br />

furnace in the porcelain enamel industry, and a<br />

kiln in the ceramic glaze industry.<br />

Porcelain enamel is used as a protective coating<br />

for metals--primarily steel, cast iron, and<br />

aluminum. Familiar items are bathtubs, water<br />

heater tanks, refrigerators, washing machines,<br />

and cooking ranges. Coated aluminum is being .<br />

used more and more in recent times for signs<br />

such as those installed on highways. Ceramic<br />

elazes are used as a decorative or orotective<br />

"<br />

coating on a wide variety of pottery and glass<br />

articles. Examples are lavatory basins, water<br />

closets, closet bowls, chinaware, and figurines.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

Significant dust and fume emissions are created<br />

by the frit-smelting operation. These emissions<br />

consist primarily of condensed metallic oxide<br />

fumes that have volatilized from the molten charge.<br />

They also contain mineral dust carryover and<br />

sometimes contain noxious gases such as hydro-<br />

gen fluoride. In addition, products of combus-<br />

tion and glass fibers are released. The quanti-<br />

ty of these air contaminants can be reduced by<br />

following good smelter-operating procedures.<br />

This can be accomplished by not rotating the<br />

smelter too rapidly, to prevent excessive dust<br />

carryover, and by not heating the batch too rapid-<br />

ly or too long, to prevent volatilizing the more<br />

fusible elements before they react with the more<br />

refractory materials. A typical rotary smelter,<br />

Frit Smelters 7 87<br />

for example, discharges 10 to 15 pounds of dust<br />

and fumes to the atmosphere per hour per ton of<br />

material charged. In some cases, where ingredi-<br />

ents require,high melting temperatures (1, 500°F<br />

or higher), emissions as great as 50 pounds per<br />

hour per ton of material have been observed,<br />

Depending upon the composition of the batch, a<br />

significant visible plume may or may not be<br />

present. Tables 209 to 212 indicate the extent of<br />

emissions from uncontrolled, rotary frit smelters<br />

for various-sized batches and compositions.<br />

Table 209. DUST AND FUME DISCHARGE FROM<br />

A 1,000-POUND, ROTARY FRIT SMELTER<br />

process wt, lh/hr<br />

Stack vol, scfm 1,390 1,540 1,630<br />

Stack gas temp, .F<br />

Concentration, grlacf 0.118 0.387 0.381<br />

Stack emissions. Ihlhr 1.41 5.11 5. 32<br />

CO, vol % (stack condition) 0.002 0.001 0.002<br />

NZ. "01 % (stack condition) 76.9<br />

Process wf, lblhr<br />

Stack vol, scfm 1,310 1,400 1,480<br />

Stack gas temp, OF<br />

Concentration. . erlscf 0.111 0. 141 0. I24<br />

Stack emissions, iblhr 1. 25 1.79 1.57<br />

to. "01 % (stack condition) 0<br />

N. 1 % k d o 1 7 1 0 1 73. 30<br />

I I I<br />

aThese three tests represent approximately the 1st. 2d, and 3d<br />

hour. of a 248-minute smelting cycle. The total charge amounted<br />

to 717 pounds of material con$isting of borax. feldspar, sodium<br />

fluoride, soda ash, and zinc oxide.<br />

b~hese three fesis represent approximately the 1st. Zd, and 3d<br />

hours of a 195-minute smelting cycle. The total charge amounted<br />

to 949 pounds of material consi3ting of litharge, silica, boric<br />

acid, feldspar, fluorspar. borax, and aircon.<br />

Table 210. DUST AND FUME DISCHARGE FROM<br />

A 3,000-POUND, ROTARY FRIT SMELTER<br />

c<br />

Test data<br />

Process wt. Iblhr<br />

47Za<br />

Stack vol, scfm<br />

Stack - nas , temo. .. 'F<br />

. -<br />

2.240<br />

630<br />

Stack emissions, iblhr<br />

CO. "01 70 (stack condition)<br />

N ~ "01 , 70 (stack condition)<br />

2.70<br />

0.02<br />

75. 30<br />

7 1 8 I 9<br />

I I I<br />

472'<br />

2,270<br />

800<br />

Concentration. erlscf 1 0. 143 1 0. 114 1 0.172<br />

2.20<br />

0.02<br />

75.60<br />

=These three tests repreoent approximately the 1st. 2d, and 3d<br />

hours of a 248-minute smelting cycle. The total charge<br />

amounted to 1,951 pounds of material consisting of litharge,<br />

silicb, boric acid, feldspar, whiting. borax, and zircon.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

472'<br />

2,260<br />

Rotary smelters require a detached canopy-type<br />

hood suspended from the lower end of a vertical<br />

stack as shown in Figures 598 and 599. It is<br />

suspended far enough above the floor to trap the<br />

discharge gases from the smelter when in the<br />

horizontal position. Refractory-lined, it is of<br />

sufficient size to prevent gases from escaping<br />

840<br />

3.30<br />

0.02<br />

76.30


788 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 211. FLUORIDE DISCHARGE FROM owing to the occasional presence of fluorides in<br />

A ROTARY FRIT SMELTER the effluent. The discharge gases must be cooled<br />

by heat exchangers, quench chambers, cooling<br />

Test data<br />

Process wt. lblhr<br />

stark "01, scrm<br />

Stack gas temp, .B<br />

Concentration, grlscl<br />

Stack emiasionr. . lbihr .<br />

174=<br />

1.400<br />

130<br />

0. 061<br />

0. 73<br />

~ert NO.<br />

'There two tests were of 90 minutesm dvration each and represented<br />

approximately the iirrt half and the second haU of a 248-minute<br />

smelting cycle. The total charge amounted fa 717 pounds of mntcrial<br />

~"nrirfing oi borax, feldspar, SOdivm fluoride, soda ash, and zinc<br />

oxide.<br />

b~hela two 60-minute t~ais reprerented approximately the 1st and the<br />

4th hours of s 450-mhufe am~iting cycle. Thm total charge amounted<br />

to i.211 pounds of malcrial consistin8 ol sodium carbonatm, calcium<br />

carbonate, pyrobar, and silica. The test was specifically conducted<br />

lorn batch containing maximum carbonaten (19%) and no liiharge.<br />

Table 212. DUST AND FUME DISCHARGE FROM<br />

A 2,000-POUND ROTARY FRIT SMELTER<br />

Test data<br />

14'<br />

174=<br />

1,600<br />

840<br />

0. 035<br />

0. 48<br />

162~<br />

1.000<br />

480<br />

0. 196<br />

1.68<br />

Process wt, lblhr<br />

857' 890~ 890b<br />

Stack vol. scim<br />

3<br />

2,430 4,347<br />

4,347<br />

Stack gas temp, 'P 600 600 340<br />

340<br />

Canrcnlration. crizcf 0.130 0.112 0.111 0. 103<br />

Stack emissions, lblhr 2.710 2.340 4. 110 3. 320<br />

"T~EJF two b0-minute testa rrprcaent the 1st and LC! hours of a 140minvtr<br />

rmclfing cycle. The total char~e amountad to 2.000 poimr,.<br />

oi rnatrria, containini: lilica, lifharge. an


Food Processing Equipment 789<br />

Figure 603. Venturi water scrubber venting<br />

three frit'smelters (Ferro Corporation, Los<br />

Angeles, Calif.).<br />

Table 213. EFFICIENCY OF VENTURI WATER SCRUBBER ON PARTICULATE<br />

MATTER AND FLUORIDES WHEN VENTING THREE FRIT SMELTERS<br />

Test data<br />

Process wt, lb/hr<br />

Stack "01, scim<br />

Stack gas temp, "F<br />

Dust concentration, gr/scf<br />

' Inlet<br />

Outlet<br />

Dust emissions, lb/hr<br />

Inlet<br />

Outlet<br />

Control efficiency, 7'0<br />

18<br />

1,360<br />

4,280<br />

570<br />

0.228<br />

0. 074<br />

8. 37<br />

2.72<br />

67.50<br />

19<br />

Dust and fumes<br />

Test No. a<br />

Fluorides<br />

1, 360 1, 360 1,360 1,360<br />

4.280 1 4.280 4.280 4.280<br />

552 564 570 552<br />

0.234<br />

0.077<br />

8.60<br />

2.85<br />

67.20<br />

a~ests No. 18 and 21 represent the first 54 minutes of the 107-minute smelting cycle, tests No. 19<br />

and 22 represent the last 54 minutes, and tests No. 20 and 23 represent the 23-minute tapping<br />

period. Total process weight was 3, 000 pounds of material consisting of borax, potassium carbonate,<br />

potassium nitrate, zinc oxide, titanium oxide, ammonium phosphate, lithium carbonate,<br />

sodium silico-fluoride, fluorspar, silica, and talc. Pressure drop across throat was 21 in. WC.<br />

Water flow rate to throat was 50 gpm.<br />

2 0<br />

0.127<br />

0.088<br />

1. 78<br />

1. 35<br />

30.70<br />

21<br />

0.092<br />

0.006<br />

3. 38<br />

0.22<br />

93.20<br />

2 2<br />

0.137<br />

0.008<br />

5. 03<br />

0.29<br />

94<br />

2 3<br />

1,360<br />

4.280 ,<br />

564<br />

0.034<br />

0.017<br />

0. 48<br />

0. 26<br />

5 0


. .<br />

790 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

various preserving processes. More recently<br />

we find food purveyors increasingly concerned<br />

with processes that render foods more flavorful<br />

and easier to prepare. The trend toward greater<br />

presale food preparation has possibly caused<br />

a shift of at least some alr pollutants from many<br />

domest~c kitchens to a significantly smaller number<br />

of food-processing plants.<br />

Food processing includes operations such as<br />

. . .. . slaughtering, smoking, drying, cooking, baking,<br />

frying, boiling, dehydrating, hydrogenating,<br />

fermenting, distilling, curing, ripening, roasting,<br />

broiling, barbecuing, canning, freezing,<br />

enriching, and packaging. Some produce large<br />

volumes of air contaminants; others, only insignificant<br />

amounts. Equipment used to process<br />

food is legion. Some of the unit operations in-<br />

. .<br />

. . volved are the following (Kirk and Othrner, 1947):<br />

Material handling. Conveying, elevating, pump-<br />

ing, packing, and shipping.<br />

Figure 604. Baghouse with radiant cooling<br />

columns venting four rotary frit smelters<br />

(Glostex Chemicals, Inc., Vernon: Calif.).<br />

Separating. Centrifuging, draining, evacuating,<br />

filtering, percolating, fitting, pressing, skimming,<br />

sorting, and trimming. (Drying, screening, sifting,<br />

and washing fall into this category. )<br />

Heat exchanzing. Chilling, freezing, and refrig-<br />

erating; heating, cooking, broiling, roasting, bak-<br />

ing, and so forth.<br />

Mixing. Agitating, beating, blending, diffusing,<br />

dispersing, emulsifying, homogenizing, kneading,<br />

stirring, whipping, working, and so forth.<br />

Disintegrating. Breaking, chipping, chopping,<br />

crushing, cutting, grinding, milling, maturating,<br />

pulverizing, refining (as by punching, rolling,<br />

and so forth), shredding, slicing, and spraying.<br />

Forming. Casting, extruding, flaking, molding,<br />

pelletizing, rolling, shaping, stamping, and die<br />

casting.<br />

Coating. Dipping, enrobing, glazing, icing, pan-<br />

ning, and so forth.<br />

Decorating. Embossing, imprinting, sugaring,<br />

topping, and so forth.<br />

Controlling. Controlling air humidity, temperature,<br />

pressure, and velocity; inspecting, measuring, tem-<br />

pering, weighing, and so forth.<br />

Packaging. Capping, closing, filling, labeling,<br />

packing, wrapping, and so forth.<br />

Storing.<br />

forth.<br />

Piling, stacking, warehousing, and so<br />

A description and discussion of each type of equip-<br />

ment used for food processing is not within the


scope of this manual. The following discussion<br />

will be limited to food processes in which air pollu-<br />

tion problems are inherent and in which typical<br />

food-processing air contaminants are encountered.<br />

This section is not concerned with the production<br />

of pet foods or livestock feeds, though in some<br />

instances, these materials are byproducts of food<br />

processes.<br />

COFFEE PROCESSING<br />

Most coffee is grown in Central and South America.<br />

After harvesting and drying at or near the coffee<br />

plantation, most "green" coffee beans are exported<br />

and further processed before sale to the consumer.<br />

Coffee processing in the United States consists es-<br />

sentially of cleaning, roasting, grinding, and packag<br />

ing.<br />

Roasting is the key operation and produces most<br />

of the air contaminants associated with the indus-<br />

try. Roasting reduces the sugar and moisture<br />

contents of green coffee and also renders the bulk<br />

density of the beans about 50 percent lighter. An<br />

apparently desired result is the production of<br />

water-soluble degradation products that impart<br />

most of the flavor to the brewed coffee. Roasting<br />

also causes the beans to expand and split into<br />

halves, releasing small quantities of chaff.<br />

Botch Roosting<br />

The oldest and simplest coffee roasters are directfired<br />

(usually by natural gas), rotary, cylindrical<br />

chambers. These units are designed to handle<br />

from 200 to 500 pounds of green beans per 15- to<br />

20-minute cycle and are normally operated at<br />

about 400DF. A calculated quantity of water is<br />

added at the completion of the roast to quench the<br />

beans before discharge from the roaster. After<br />

they are dumped, the beans are further cooled<br />

with air and run through a "stoner" air classifier<br />

to remove metal and other heavy objects before<br />

the grinding and packaging. The roaster and<br />

cooler and all air-cleaning devices are normally<br />

equipped with cyclone separators to remove dust<br />

and chaff from exhaust gases. Most present-day<br />

Food Processing Equipment 791<br />

Flgure 605. A recirculating-batch coffee<br />

roaster (Jabez Burns - Gump Division,Blaw<br />

Knox Company, New York, N.Y.).<br />

An Integrated Coffee Plant<br />

A process flow diagram of a typical large integra-<br />

ted coffee plant is shown in Figure 606. Green<br />

beans are first run through mechanical cleaning<br />

equipment to remove any remaining hulls and<br />

foreign matter before the roasting. This system<br />

includes a dump tank, scalper, weigh hopper,<br />

mixer, and several bins, elevators, and convey-<br />

ors. Cleaning systems such as this commonly<br />

include one or more centrifugal separators from<br />

which process air is exhausted.<br />

The direct, gas-fired roasters depicted in Figures<br />

606 and 607 are of continuous rather than<br />

batch design. Temperatures of 4000F to 5000F<br />

are maintained in the roaster, and the residence<br />

time ~- --- is -~ adinrted bv controlline ~ - the drum soeed.<br />

~~ ~ ~~2 --- ~ - ~~ 3<br />

~-<br />

Roaster exhaust products are drawn off through<br />

a cyclone separator and afterburner, with some<br />

recirculation from the cyclone to the roaster.<br />

coffee roasters are of batch design, though the<br />

Chaff and other particulates from the cyclone<br />

newer and larger installations tend to favor con- are fed to a chaff collection system. Hot beans<br />

tinuous roasters. are continuously conveyed through the air cooler<br />

and stoner sections. Both the cooler and the<br />

In the batch roaster shown in Figure 605, some stoner are equipped with cyclones to collect parof<br />

the gases are recirculated. A portion of the ticulates.<br />

gases is bled off at a point between the burner<br />

and the roaster. Thus, the burner incinerates The equipment following the stoner is used only<br />

combustible contaminants and becomes both an to blend, grind, and package roasted coffee.<br />

air pollution control device and a heat source for Normally, there are no points in these systems<br />

the roaster.<br />

where process air is emitted to the atmosphere.<br />

1


792 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Fiaure 607. A continuous coffee roaster and cooler:(left) continuous<br />

roister. showine course of the heated eases as thev are drawn throueh<br />

the coffee beans in the perforated, heiical-flanged cylinder and then<br />

into the recirculation svstem; (right) left-side elevation of contin-<br />

uous roaster, showing relationship-of reci rculating and cooler fans<br />

and the respective collectors on the roof (Jabez Burns - Gump Division,<br />

Blaw-Knox Company, New York, N.Y.).


At the plant shown on the flow diagram, chaff is<br />

collected from several points and run to a hold-<br />

ing bin from which it is fed at a uniform rate to<br />

an incinerator. Conveyors in the chaff system<br />

may be of almost any type, though pneumatic con-<br />

veyors are most common. The design of the in-<br />

cinerator depicted is similar to that of the saw-<br />

dust burners described in Chapter 8 but the<br />

incinerator is much smaller.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Dust, chaff, coffke bean oils (as mists), smoke,<br />

and odors are the principal air contaminants<br />

emitted from coffee processing. Ln addition,<br />

combustion contaminants are discharged if chaff<br />

is incinerated. Dust is exhausted from several<br />

points in the process, while smoke and odors are<br />

confined to the roaster, chaff incinerator, and, in<br />

some cases, to the cooler.<br />

Coffee chaff is the main source of particulates,<br />

but green beans, as received, also contain ap-<br />

preciable quantities of sand and miscellaneous<br />

dirt. The major portion of this dirt is removed<br />

by air washing in the green coffee-cleaning sys-<br />

tem. Some chaff (about 1 percent of the green<br />

weight) is released from the bean on roasting and<br />

is removed with roaster exhaust gases. A small<br />

amount of chaff carries through to the cooler and<br />

stoner. After the roasting, coffee chaff is light<br />

and flaky, partlcle sizes usually exceeding 100<br />

microns. As shown in Table 214, particulate-<br />

matter emissions from coffee processing are well<br />

below the limits permitted by typical dust and<br />

fume prohibitions.<br />

Table 214. ANALYSIS OF COFFEE<br />

ROASTER EXHAUST GASES<br />

I contaminant concentration<br />

Collt~nnous roaster Batch roaster<br />

-- 1 I75<br />

Particulate matter, grlscf 0. 1891 0.006 I 0.160<br />

/ 1<br />

Aldehydes<br />

(as formaldehyde), ppm 139 .- 42<br />

Organic acids<br />

(as acetic acid), ppm . . 213<br />

Oxides of nitrogen<br />

(as NOZ). P P ~<br />

26. 8 -- 21.4<br />

Coffee roaster odors are attributed to alcohols,<br />

aldehydes, organic acids, and nitrogen and sulfur<br />

compounds, which are all probably breakdown<br />

products of sugars and oils. Roasted coffee odors<br />

are considered pleasant by many people, and in-<br />

deed, they may often be pleasant under certain<br />

conditions. Nevertheless, continual exposure to<br />

uncontrolled roaster exhaust gases usually elicits<br />

widespread complaints from adjacent residents.<br />

The pleasant aroma of a short sniff apparently<br />

develops into an annoyance upon long exposure.<br />

Food Proces~ ;ing Equipment 793<br />

Visible bluish-white smoke emissions from coffee<br />

roasters are caused by distilled oils and organic<br />

breakdown products. The moisture content of<br />

green coffee is only 6 to 14 percent, and thus<br />

there is not sufficient water vapor in the 400"<br />

to 500°F exhaust gases to form a visible steam<br />

plume. From uncontrolled, continuous roasters,<br />

the opacity of exhaust gases exceeds 40 percent<br />

almost continuously. From batch roasters, ex-<br />

haust opacities normally exceed 40 percent only<br />

during the last 10 to 15 minutes of a 20-minute<br />

roast. Smoke opacity appears to be a function<br />

of the oil content, the more oily coffee producing<br />

the heavier smoke. The water quenching of<br />

batch-roasted coffee causes visible steam emis-<br />

sions that seldom persist longer than 30 seconds<br />

per batch.<br />

Hooding ond Ventilotion Requirements<br />

Exhaust volumes from coffee-processing sys -<br />

tems do not vary greatly from one plant to<br />

another insofar as roasting, cooling, and stoning<br />

are concerned. Roasters equipped with gas re-<br />

circulation systems exhaust about 24 scf per<br />

pound of finished coffee. Volumes from nonre-<br />

circulation roasters average ahout 40 scf per<br />

pound. A 10,000-pound-per-hour, continuous<br />

roaster with a recirculation system exhausts<br />

about 4, 000 scfm. A 500-pound-per-batch, non-<br />

recirculation roaster exhausts about 1, 000 scfm.<br />

Each hatch cycle lasts about 20 minutes.<br />

Coolers of the continuous type exhaust about<br />

120 scf per pound of coffee. Batch-type cool-<br />

ers are operated at ratios of about 10 scfm per<br />

pound. The time required for batch cooling<br />

varies somewhat with the operator. Batch-cool-<br />

ing requirements are inversely related to the<br />

degree of water quenching employed.<br />

Continuous-type stoners use about 40 scf air per<br />

pound of coffee. Batch-stoning processes require<br />

from 4 to 10 scfm per pound, depending upon duct-<br />

work size and batch time.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

<strong>Air</strong> contaminants from coffee-processing plants<br />

have been successfully controlled with afterburn-<br />

ers and cyclone separators, and combinations<br />

thereof. Incineration is necessary only with roaster<br />

exhaust gases. There is little smoke in other coffee<br />

plant exit gas streams where only dust collectors<br />

are required to comply with air pollution control<br />

regulations.<br />

Separate afterburners are preferable to the com-<br />

bination heater-incinerator of the batch roaster<br />

shown in Figure 605. When the afterburner serves<br />

as the roaster's heat source, its maximum operat-


794 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

ing temperature is limited to about 1,00O0F. A<br />

temperature of 1,200°F or greater is necessary<br />

to provide good particulate incineration and odor<br />

removal.<br />

A roaster afterburner should always be preceded<br />

by an efficient cyclone separator in which most<br />

of the particulates are removed. A residence<br />

time of 0. 3 second is sufficient to incinerate<br />

most vapors and small-diameter particles at<br />

1,200°F. Higher temperatures and longer resi-<br />

dences are, however, required to burn large-<br />

diameter, solid particles. Afterburner design<br />

is discussed in Chapter 5.<br />

Properly designed centrifugal separators are<br />

required on essentially all process airstreams<br />

up to and including the stoner and chaff collec-<br />

tion system. With the plant shown, cyclones<br />

are required at the roaster, cooler, stoner,<br />

chaff storage bin, and chaff incinerator. In<br />

addition, the scalper is a centrifugal classiiier<br />

venting process air. Some plants also vent the<br />

green coffee dump tank and several conveyors and<br />

elevators to centrifugal dust collectors.<br />

For best results. the chaff incinerator should be<br />

of the design discussed in Chapter 8 in which<br />

combustible material is fed at a uniform rate.<br />

It is, however, considerably smaller and has<br />

burning rates usually below 100 pounds per hour.<br />

The inorganic ash content of the chaff, at approxi-<br />

mately 5 percent by weight, is considerably great-<br />

er than that of most combustible refuse fed to<br />

incinerators. Provisions should be made in the<br />

incinerator design so that this material does<br />

not become entrained in the exhaust gases. If<br />

most of the noncombustible material is dis-<br />

charged with products of combustion from the<br />

incinerator, the combustion contaminants then<br />

exceed 0.3 grain per cubic foot calculated to<br />

12 percent carion dioxide.<br />

SMOKEHOUSES<br />

Smoking has been used for centuries to preserve<br />

meat and fish products. Modern smoking opera-<br />

tions do not differ greatly from those used by our<br />

forefathers, though the prime purposes of smoking<br />

today appear to be the imparting of flavor, color,<br />

and "customer appeal" to the food product. Cur-<br />

ing and storage processes have been improved<br />

to the point where ,preservation is no longer the<br />

principal objective.<br />

The vast majority of smoked products are meats<br />

of porcine and bovine origin. Some fish and<br />

poultry and, in rare instances, vegetable prod-<br />

ucts are also smoked as gourmet items.<br />

The Smoking Process<br />

Smoking is a diffusion process in which food<br />

products are exposed to an atmosphere of hard-<br />

wood smoke. Table 215 is an analysis of smoke<br />

produced through the destructive distillation of<br />

a hardwood. As smoke is circulated over the<br />

food, aldehydes, organic acids, and other<br />

organics are adsorbed onto its outer surface.<br />

Smoking usually darkens the food's natural color,<br />

and in some cases, glazes the outer surface.<br />

Table 215. ANALYSIS OF WOOD SMOKE<br />

USED IN MEAT SMOKEHOUSES<br />

(Jensen, 1945)<br />

Contaminant Concentration, ppm<br />

Formaldehyde 20 to 40<br />

Higher aldehydes 140 to 180<br />

Formic acid 90 to 125<br />

Acetic and higher acids 460 to 500<br />

Phenols 20 to 30<br />

Ketones 190 to 200<br />

Resins 1,000<br />

Regardless of smokehouse design, some spent<br />

gases are always exhausted to the atmosphere.<br />

These contain odorous, eye-irritating gases and<br />

finely divided, organic particulates, often in<br />

sufficient concentration to exceed local opacity<br />

restrictions.<br />

Smokehouses are also used to cook and dry food<br />

products either before or after smoking. <strong>Air</strong><br />

contaminants emitted during cooking and drying<br />

are normally well below allowable control limits.<br />

Atmospheric Smokehouses<br />

The oldest smokehouses are of atmospheric or<br />

natural-draft design. These boxlike structures<br />

are usually heated directly with natural gas or<br />

wood. Smoke is often generated by heating<br />

sawdust on a steel plate. These smoke gener-<br />

ators are normally heated with natural gas pipe<br />

burners located in the bottom of the house. Hot,<br />

smoky gases are allowed to rise by natural con-<br />

vection through racks of meat. Large atmospheric<br />

houses are often built with two or three levels of<br />

meat racks. One or more stacks are provided<br />

to exhaust spent gases at the top of the house. In<br />

some instances the vents are equipped with ex-<br />

haust fans. During the smoking and drying cy-<br />

cles, exhaust gas temperatures range from<br />

120" to 150°F. Slightly higher temperatures<br />

are sometimes encountered during the cooking<br />

cycle.


Food Processing Equipment 795<br />

Recirculating Smokehouses Smoking by Immersion<br />

Most large, modern, production meat smokehouses<br />

are of the recirculating type (Figure 608)<br />

wherein smoke is circulated at reasonably high<br />

velocities over the surface of the product. The<br />

purpose is to provide faster and more nearly<br />

uniform diffusion of organics onto the product,<br />

and nlore uniform temperatures throughout the<br />

house. These units are usually of stainless<br />

steel construction and are heated by steam or<br />

gas. Smoke is piped to the house from external<br />

smoke generators. Each unit is equipped with<br />

a large circulating fan and, in some instances, a<br />

smaller exhaust fan. During smoking and cooking,<br />

exhaust volumes of 1 to 4 cfm per square foot of<br />

floor area are maintained. The exhaust rate is<br />

increased to 5 to 10 cfm per square foot during .<br />

the drying cycle. Recirculating smokehouses<br />

are usually equipped with temperature and humidity<br />

controls, and the opacity and makeup of<br />

exhaust gas are usually more constant than those<br />

from atmospheric units.<br />

/-ALTERNATING<br />

AUTOMATIC<br />

Figure 608. A modern recirculating smokehouse<br />

(Atmos Corp., Chicago, II I.).<br />

Corlventional smoking operations can.be seen<br />

as an extremely devious method of coating food<br />

products with a myriad of hardwood distillation<br />

products. One might wonder why this coating<br />

is not applied by simple immersion. Unfortu-<br />

nately, many of the compounds present in smoke<br />

are highly toxic. If these were deposited heavily<br />

on the food product, results could be fatal. Smok-<br />

ing, therefore, provides a reasonably foolproof,<br />

if quaint, means of assuring that these toxic com-<br />

pounds do not accumulate in lethal concentrations.<br />

Many states have laws prohibiting the smoking of<br />

meats by liquid immersion.<br />

Smoking by Electrical Precipitation<br />

Some attempts have been made to precipitate<br />

smoke particles electrically onto food products<br />

in the smokehouse, and a few smokehouses so<br />

designed are in operation today. From the opera-<br />

tors' point of view, this arrangement offers the<br />

advantages of faster smoking and greater use<br />

of generated smoke. From the standpoint of air<br />

pollution control, it is desirable inasmuch as<br />

considerably lesser quantities of air contami-<br />

nants are vented to the atmosphere than are<br />

vented from a conventional, uncontrolled smoke-<br />

house.<br />

These units normally consist of a conveyorized<br />

enclosure equipped with an ionizer section similar<br />

to those used with two-stage precipitators.<br />

The foo'd product is usually passed 2 to 3 inches<br />

below tlie ionizing wires, which are charged with<br />

about 15, 000 volts. No electrical charge is aplied<br />

to the food products or the conveyor. These<br />

smokers are operated at ambient temperatures<br />

and do not lend themselves to use for either cooking<br />

or drying food products. As would be expected,<br />

spacing is a critical factor.<br />

There are very few precipitation smokehouses<br />

in the Unites States today, and for this reason,<br />

little reliable data about the operating characteristics<br />

or the air pollutants emitted are available.<br />

Smokehouses of this design have been<br />

reported to operate with visible emissions of<br />

only 5 to 10 percent opacity. Concentrations of<br />

air contaminants in gases from precipitationtype<br />

smokehouses would, under optimum conditions,<br />

be expected to be approximately equivalent<br />

to those from conventional smokehouses<br />

equipped with two-stage electrical precipitators.<br />

These units offer the potential of markedly reduced<br />

smoking times. Indeed, the few operating<br />

units have residence times of less than 5 minutes.<br />

If equipment such as this were perfected for a<br />

wider range of operation, residence times would<br />

not be expected to exceed 10 minutes.


796 CHEMICAL PROCESS1 LNG EQUIPMENT<br />

The application of precipitation smokehouses<br />

is today limited by a number of inherent problems,<br />

the foremost of which is the irregular shape of<br />

many smoked products, that is, hams, ham hooks,<br />

and salami. The degree of smoke deposition in<br />

a unit such as this is governed by the distance :<br />

between the ionizer and the food product. Irregu-<br />

lar spacing results, therefore, in irregular smok-<br />

ing of round and odd-shaped products that cannot<br />

be positioned so that all surfaces are equidistant<br />

from ionizer wires. The few existing installa-<br />

tions are used to impart a light smoke to regular-<br />

shaped, flat items such as fish fillets and sliced<br />

meat products.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Smokehouse exhaust products include organic<br />

gases, liquids, and solids, all of which must<br />

be considered air contaminants. Many of the<br />

gaseous compounds are irritating to the eyes<br />

and relatively odorous. A large portion of the<br />

particulates is in the submicron size range where<br />

light scattering is maximum. These air con-<br />

taminants are attributable to smoke, that is, to<br />

smoke generated from hardwood, rather than<br />

from the cooked product itself.<br />

Exhaust gases from both atmospheric and re-<br />

circulating smokehouses can be periodically<br />

expected to exceed 40 percent opacity, the<br />

maximum allowable under many local air pollu-<br />

tion control regulations. With the possible ex-<br />

ception of public nuisance, smokehouse exhaust<br />

gases are not likely to exceed other local air<br />

quality standards. As shown in Table 215, con-<br />

centrations of particulate matter average only<br />

0. 14 grain per scf.<br />

Hooding and Ventilation Requirements<br />

Atmospheric smokehouses are designed with ex-<br />

haust volumes of about 3 cubic feet per square<br />

foot of floor area. Somewhat higher volumes are<br />

used with atmospheric houses of two or more<br />

stories. Inasmuch as there are no air recircula-<br />

tion and normally little provision for forced draft,<br />

the exhaust rate for an atmospheric house is es-<br />

sentially constant over the drying, cooking, and<br />

smoking cycles. Moreover, there is often some<br />

smoke in the house even during the cooking and<br />

drying cycles. This is particularly true where<br />

smoke is generated in the house rather than in<br />

an external smoke generator. If gases are to be<br />

ducted to air pollution control equipment, an ex-<br />

haust fan should be employed to offset the added<br />

pressure drop. When an afterburner is used, it<br />

can often be positioned to provide additional nat-<br />

ural draft.<br />

Recirculation smokehouses have a considerably<br />

wider range of exhaust rates. During smoking<br />

and cooking cycles, volumes of 1 to 4 cubic<br />

feet per square foot of floor area are exhausted.<br />

The rate increases to 5 to 10 cubic feet per square<br />

foot during the drying cycle. Recirculation houses<br />

are almost always equipped with external smoke<br />

generators, and a control of smoke flow is much<br />

more positive. There is essentially no smoke in<br />

the houses during the cooking and drying cycles.<br />

Most smokehouses do not require hooding. Ex-<br />

haust gases are normally ducted directly to the<br />

atmosphere or to control equipment. Some at-<br />

mospheric houses are, however, equipped with<br />

hoods over the loading doors to gather smoke that<br />

might escape during the shifting of meat racks. The<br />

latter situation is due to the inherently poor dis-<br />

tribution of smoke and heat in an atmospheric house.<br />

To maintain product uniformity, the meat racks<br />

must often be shifted while there is smoke in the<br />

house. Most atmospheric houses do not have ex-<br />

haust systems adequate to prevent appreciable<br />

smoke emissions from the door during these in-<br />

stances. Hoods and exhaust systems are some-<br />

times installed principally for worker comfort. The<br />

hoods or fans, or both, may be located in corridor<br />

ceilings immediately above the doors. These ven-<br />

tilators are often operated automatically whenever<br />

the doors are opened. Volumes can be appreciable,<br />

in some instances exceeding the smokehouse's ex-<br />

haust rate.<br />

There are normally no appreciable smoke emis-<br />

sions from doors of recirculation-type smoke-<br />

houses. Temperature and smoke distribution<br />

are sufficient so that there is no need to shift<br />

meat in the houses. Moreover, the doors are<br />

designed to provide tighter closures. Recircula-<br />

tion houses are operated under positive pressure,<br />

and any small opening causes large emissions of<br />

smoke.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

Afterburners<br />

Smoke, odors, eye irritants, and organic partic-<br />

ulate matter can be controlled with afterburners,<br />

provided temperature and design are adequate.<br />

Most of these contaminants can be eliminated at<br />

temperatures of 1, 000°F to 1,200"F in well-de-<br />

signed units. Larger diameter particulate matter<br />

is somewhat more difficult to burn at these tem-<br />

peratures; however, since concentrations of par-<br />

ticulate matter from smokehouses are reasonably<br />

small, this limitation is not critical.


Electrical precipitators<br />

Low-voltage, two-stage electrical precipitators<br />

were installed in the Los Angeles area as early<br />

as 1957 to control visible smokehouse air con-<br />

tamirlants. They have since been used at many<br />

other locations in the United States. Before<br />

1957, their use had been confined principally to<br />

. . . . air-conditioning applications.<br />

Electrical precipitators are, of course, effective<br />

only in the collection of particulate matter. They<br />

cannot he used to control gases or vapors. At<br />

smokehouse installations, their purpose is to<br />

collect the suhmicron smoke particles responsible<br />

for visible opacity. Two-stage precipitators<br />

.. ~ . . have been shown capable of reducing smoke opaci-<br />

~ ~<br />

. . . . ~ .. ties to less than 10 percent under ideal conditions.<br />

A typical two-stage precipitator control system<br />

... .<br />

. . with a wet, centrifugal collector is shown in Figure<br />

609. The wet collector is used to control<br />

temperature and humidity and also remove a<br />

small amount of particulates. This is followed<br />

by a heater in which gas temperatures are regulated<br />

before the gases enter the ionizer. Voltages<br />

of 6, 000 to 15, 000 volts are applied to the ionizer<br />

I 1 and plate sections. Particulate matter collects<br />

on the plates and drains, as a gummy liquid, to<br />

1 the collection pan below.<br />

For sat~sfactory control of visihle emissions, it<br />

has been found that superficial gas velocities<br />

through the plate collector section should not exceed<br />

100 fpm. Some difficulty has been experience<br />

Food Processing Equipment 797 1<br />

owing to channeling in the collector. For best oper-<br />

ation, vanes or other means of ensuring uniform<br />

flow should bk used ahead of the plate section.<br />

Even under optimum conditions, a slight trace of<br />

smoke can he expected from the precipitator's<br />

outlet. At the discharge of the unit, eye irrita-<br />

tion is usually severe, and odors are strong<br />

though not overpowering. These odors and eye<br />

irritants can constitute a public nuisance, de-<br />

pending upon plant location.<br />

Electrical precipitation versus incineration<br />

Both electrical precipitation and incineration<br />

offer the classical choice of high initial cost<br />

versus high operating cost, but in addition, they<br />

differ markedly from the standpoint of air pollu-<br />

tion control.<br />

Electrical precipitators are capable of collect-<br />

ing particulate matter and thereby reducing<br />

visihle emissions to tolerable amounts. They<br />

have no effect on nitrogen oxides and little<br />

effect, if any, on gaseous eye irritants and<br />

odors. If arcing occurs, some small and proh-<br />

ably insignificant quantity of ozone is also pro-<br />

duced. The initial cost of precipitators is high,<br />

and their operating cost low in comparison with<br />

that of afterburners. Smokehouse precipita-<br />

tors do, however, require a relatively high<br />

degree of maintenance. If they are not proper-<br />

ly maintained, poor control efficiency and fire<br />

damage are probable. Fire damage can result<br />

d in extended outage periods during which uncon-<br />

Figure 609. A two-stage precipitator and wet centrifugal<br />

collector venting smokehouses (The Rath Pa-king Co., Vernon, Calif.).


798 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

trolled exhaust gases may vent directly to the<br />

atmosphere.<br />

Incineration is much more effective than elec-<br />

trical precipitation is in controlling gaseous<br />

organics and finely divided particulates. Large<br />

particles are, however, relatively difficult to<br />

burn at the normal operating temperatures and<br />

residence times of smokehouse afterburners.<br />

Under average conditionsl collection efficiency<br />

for particulate matter (about 65 percent) is<br />

roughly the same as that of a two-stage elec-<br />

trical precipitator. Fuel costs make the oper-<br />

ation of an incineration device more expensive<br />

than that of a precipitator. Nevertheless,<br />

maintenance is much less a problem. There<br />

is no buildup of tars and resins in the afterburner<br />

or stack to impede its operation. As with any<br />

smokehouse control device, tars accumulate in<br />

the ductwork between the house and afterburner,<br />

necessitating periodic cleaning. As shown in<br />

Table 216, incineration creates additional nitro-<br />

gen oxides, increasing concentrations from about<br />

4 ppm to approximately 12 ppm on the average.<br />

Comparative test data on smokehouse afterburners<br />

and electrical precipitators, as shown in Tables<br />

216 and 217, indicate that collection efficiencies<br />

for particulate matter, aldehydes, and organic<br />

acids are of the same magnitude for both types<br />

of control dequipment. These data fail to re-<br />

flect larger concentrations of odors and eye<br />

irritants from electrical precipitators that are<br />

readily apparent upon personal inspection of the<br />

devices.<br />

Bypassing control devices during nonsmoking<br />

periods<br />

Many operators of recirculation smokehouses<br />

find it desirable to bypass air pollution control<br />

devices during nonsmoking periods. From the "<br />

standpoint of air pollution control, this practice<br />

is not unreasonable. The major smokehouse air<br />

contaminant is smoke. Concentrations of air con-<br />

taminants during cooking and drying are relative-<br />

ly small, comparable to those of ordinary meat-<br />

cooking ovens. Drying-cycle exhaust gases are<br />

2 to 4 times more voluminous than those vented<br />

Table 216. ANALYSES OF MEAT SMOKEHOUSE EXHAUST GASES BEFORE AND<br />

AFTER INCINERATION IN NATURAL GAS-FIRED AFTERBURNERS<br />

Particulate matter,<br />

grlscf<br />

Aldehydes (as form<br />

aldehyde), pprn . Organic acids (as<br />

acetic acid)<br />

Oxides of nitrogen<br />

(as NO2), ppm<br />

Contaminant concentration<br />

Smokehouse<br />

Afterburner<br />

Range Average Range Average<br />

0.016 to 0.234<br />

8 to 74<br />

30 to 156<br />

1.2 to 7.2<br />

40<br />

0.141<br />

87<br />

3.9<br />

0.011 to 0.070<br />

5 to 61<br />

0 to 76<br />

3.7 to 33.8<br />

0.048<br />

Control<br />

efficiency,<br />

%<br />

Table 217. ANALYSES OF MEAT SMOKEHOUSE EXHAUST GASES BEFORE AND AFTER<br />

CONTROL IN TWO-STAGE ELECTRICAL PRECIPITATION SYSTEMS<br />

Contaminant concentration<br />

. Control<br />

Smokehouse<br />

Control systema efficiency, %<br />

Range Average Range Average<br />

Particulate matter,<br />

grlscf<br />

0.33 to 0.181 0.090 ' 0. 016 to 0. 051 0. 032 6 5<br />

Aldehydes (as formaldehyde),<br />

ppm<br />

--- 7 4 --- 47<br />

3 7<br />

Organic acids (as acetic<br />

acid), ppm<br />

--- 91<br />

>.- 48<br />

47<br />

aEach control system is equipped with a wet centrifugal collector upstream from the<br />

precipitator.<br />

2 5<br />

33.5<br />

11.7<br />

6 6<br />

3 8<br />

62<br />

Negative


during the smoking cycle. The size of control<br />

equipment is materially increased if drying<br />

gases are ducted to it. The initial cost and oper-<br />

ating cost of a smokehouse's air pollution control<br />

system can, therefore, be considerably reduced<br />

if exhaust gases are bypassed during drying and<br />

cooking cycles when no smoke is introduced into<br />

the house.<br />

If control devices are to be bypassed duringnonsmok-<br />

ing periods, the ductwork and valving should be de-<br />

signed to provide automatic or nearly automatic<br />

operation. Water seal dampers (Figure 610) are<br />

preferable. Mechanical dampers demand optimum<br />

maintenance for satisfactory closure. They are<br />

considerably more likely to malfunction owing to<br />

corrosion and contamination with greases and tars.<br />

Moreover, mechanical dampers are more suscepti-<br />

ble to physical damage than water dampers are.<br />

Ideally, damper operation should be keyed to other<br />

smokehouse auxiliaries such as fans and smoke<br />

generators. Where controls are manually oper-<br />

ated, there is a strong possibility that dampers<br />

will not be opened or closed at proper times,<br />

causing either overloading of the control device<br />

or the discharge of untreated air contaminants<br />

directly to the atmosphere.<br />

CASES FROM<br />

SMObEHOUSE<br />

10 CONTROL<br />

C-<br />

OtYlCt AIMOSPHERE<br />

F~gure 610. Diagram of a water-operated damper<br />

used to bypass the a1 r pol lut~on control dev~ce<br />

dur~ng nonsmoking per~ods.<br />

DEEP FAT FRYING<br />

Deep fat or "French" frying involves the cooking<br />

of foods in hot oils or greases. Deep-fried prod-<br />

ucts include doughnuts, fritters, croquettes, vari-<br />

ous potato shapes, and breaded and batter-dipped<br />

fish and meat. Most of these foods contain some<br />

moisture, a large portion of which is volatilized<br />

out as steam during frying. Some cooking oils,<br />

as well as animal or vegetable oils from tb". prod-<br />

uct, are usually steam distilled during the pro-<br />

cess.<br />

Food Processing Equipment 799<br />

Deep fat frying is in common usage in homes,<br />

restaurants, and frozen food plants. In the home<br />

and in smaller commercial establishments, batch-<br />

type operation is more common. The principal<br />

equipment is an externally heated cooking oil vat.<br />

Oil temperatures are usually controlled to be-<br />

tween 325" and 400°F. Almost any type-of<br />

heating is possible. Where combustion fuels<br />

are used, burner gases are vented separately.<br />

The product to be fried is either manually or<br />

mechanically inserted into the hot grease and<br />

removed after a definite time interval.<br />

In large commercial establishments, highly<br />

mechanized, conveyorized fryers, such as that<br />

shown in Figure 611, are used. The raw food<br />

product is loaded onto an endless conveyor belt<br />

and passed through hot grease at a rate adjusted<br />

to provide the proper cook time. Almost all<br />

fryers are of one-pass design. Frequently, cook-<br />

ing units are followed by product coolers and pack-<br />

aging and freezing equipment.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

In a typical large industrial operation of this<br />

type, the cooking vat constitutes the principal<br />

source of air contaminants. Uncooked materials<br />

are usually wet or pasty, and the feed system<br />

produces little or no air pollution. Most cooked-<br />

product-handling systems are also innocuous,<br />

except in rare instances where fine, dusty mate-<br />

rials are encountered.<br />

TO - -+ Odors, visible smoke, and entrained fat particles<br />

are emitted from the cooking vats. Depending<br />

upon operating conditions and the surrounding<br />

area, these contaminants may or may not be m<br />

sufficient concentration to exceed the limits of<br />

local opacity or nuisance regulations.<br />

From the standpoint of air pollution control, the<br />

most objectionable operations involve foods con-<br />

taining appreciable fats and oils. Light ends of<br />

these oils are distilled during cooking. In gen-<br />

eral, the deep frying of vegetable products is<br />

less troublesome than that of fish and meat prod-<br />

ucts, which contain higher percentages of fats<br />

and oils.<br />

Most food products cooked in this manner con-<br />

tain between 30 and 75 percent moisture before<br />

the cooking. Almost all moisture is driven off<br />

in the cooking vat and appears as steam in ex-<br />

haust gases. Moisture concentrations in stack<br />

gases are usually between 5 and 20 percent, de-<br />

pending upon the volume of air drawn into the<br />

cooker hood and exhaust system. In highl!-<br />

mechanized installations, very little air enters<br />

under the cooker hood. As a result, the warm<br />

air-stream from a fryer such as this is often


800 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 611. A continuous deep fat fryer: (left) Interior view,<br />

(right) end view (J.C. Pitman & Sons, Inc., Concord, N.H.).<br />

saturated, and downstream cooling causes visi-<br />

ble condensation at or near the stack exit.<br />

Moisture has two effects: (1) It causes fats and<br />

oils to be steam distilled from the cooking vat,<br />

and (2) it masks visible stack emissions. Smoke<br />

observations of equipment such as this must be<br />

made at the point in the stack plume where water<br />

vapor has disappeared. This is best accomplished<br />

when the weather is warm and dry. On a cold,<br />

moist day, the vapor plume may extend as far<br />

as the smoke.<br />

Excessive smoking is most often due either to<br />

overheating or to the characteristics of the<br />

material being cooked. When, for instance,<br />

potato chip or corn chip fryers are operated<br />

in normal temperature ranges, there is usually<br />

no more than a trace of smoke in exhaust gases.<br />

On the other hand, several meat product fryers<br />

have been found to exhaust gases of high opacity,<br />

and control equipment was needed to bring them<br />

into compliance with local regulations. These<br />

visible emissions appear to be finely divided<br />

fat and oil particles distilled either from the<br />

product or the cooking oil. Cooking oils are<br />

usually compounded within reasonably narrow<br />

boiling ranges, and when fresh, very little of<br />

the oils is steam distilled. Most objectionable<br />

air contaminants probably originate, therefore,<br />

in the product or in spent cooking oil.<br />

The carryover of oil droplets can also cause a<br />

nuisance by spotting fabrics, painted surfaces,<br />

and other property in the surrounding area.<br />

1<br />

j<br />

This problem is most likely to occur when the<br />

I<br />

raw food contains relatively large concentrations j<br />

of moisture, a situation in which steam distillation<br />

is proportionally higher. 1 i<br />

I<br />

Hooding and Ventilation Requirements<br />

Deep fat fryers should always be hooded and<br />

vented through a fan. Axial-flow fans are pre-<br />

ferred. Exhaust volumes are governed by the<br />

open area under the hood. Where there is open<br />

area around the full hood periphery, the indraft<br />

velocity should be at least 100 fpm. In many<br />

modern units, the dryer sides are completely<br />

enclosed, and the only open areas are at the con-<br />

veyor's inlet and outlet. At these installations,<br />

exhaust volumes are considerably less, even<br />

though indraft velocities are well above 100 fpm.<br />

If control equipment is to be employed, exhaust<br />

volumes become an important factor. In these<br />

instances, redesigning the existing hoods to low-<br />

er the exhaust rates is often desirable.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

Incineration, low-voltage electrical precipita-<br />

tion, and entrainment separation have been used<br />

to control air contaminants from deep fat fryers.<br />

Since practically all air contaminants from fry-<br />

ers are combustible, a well-designed afterburn-<br />

er provides adequate control if the cperating tem-<br />

perature is sufficiently high. Temperatures from


1, 000' to 1, 200°F are often sufficient to eliminate<br />

smoke-causing particulates and to incinerate odors<br />

and eye irritants. The combustion of larger par-<br />

ticles usually requires higher temperatures, some-<br />

times as high as 1,600-F. The concentration of<br />

particulates in fryer exit gases is, however, nor-<br />

mally less than 0. 1 grain per scf, which is well<br />

below common limits for particulate emissions.<br />

Two-stage, low-voltage electrical precipitators<br />

(6, 000 to 15, 000 volts) can be used to collect a<br />

substantial portion of the particulates responsible<br />

for visible air contamination. These devices,<br />

unfortunately, do not remove the gaseous con-<br />

taminants that are usually responsible for odors<br />

and eye irritation. As would be expected, the<br />

effectiveness of a precipitator depends upon the<br />

particular fryer it is serving. If particulates<br />

are the only significant contaminants in the ex-<br />

haust gases, a precipitator can provide an ade-<br />

quate means of control. If, on the other hand, the<br />

problem is due to odors of overheated oil or prod-<br />

uct, a device such as this is of little benefit. For<br />

optimum performance, the temperature, humidity,<br />

and volume of gases vented to a two-stage pre-<br />

cipitator must be controlled within reasonably<br />

narrow limits. The oils collected are usually<br />

free flowing and readily drain from collector<br />

plates. A collection trough should be provided<br />

to prevent plate fouling and damage to the roof<br />

or other supporting structure on which the pre-<br />

cipitator is located.<br />

Entrainment separators have been employed<br />

with varying success to remove entrained oils<br />

in fryer exhaust stacks. These are most use-<br />

ful where the concentration of oils is relatively<br />

large. The material collected can represent a<br />

savings in oil and can prevent damage to ad-<br />

jacent roofing. Because of the inherently low<br />

collection efficiency of these devices, their<br />

use is not recommended where smoke or<br />

odors constitute the major air pollution prob-<br />

lem. Some cooking oils usually collect on the<br />

inner surfaces of uninsulated exhaust stacks<br />

and drain back towards the cooker. Most com-<br />

mercial fryers are .equipped with pans to col-<br />

lect this drainage at the bottom of the stack.<br />

LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTERING<br />

Slaughtering operations have traditionally<br />

been associated with odorous air contaminants,<br />

though much of these odors is due to byproduct<br />

operations rather than to slaughtering and meat<br />

dressing itself. Slaughtering is considered to<br />

include only the killing of the animal and the<br />

separation of the carcass into humanly edible<br />

meat and inedible byproducts. The smoking<br />

of edible meat products, and reduction of edi-<br />

ble materials are discussed in this subsection,<br />

Food Processii ng Equipment 801<br />

while the reduction of inedible materials is<br />

covered in another part of this chapter.<br />

Cattle-, sheep-, and hog-killing operations are<br />

necessarily more extensive than those concerned<br />

with poultry, though poultry houses usually han-<br />

dle appreciably larger numbers of animals.<br />

A flow diagram of a typical cattle-slaughtering ,<br />

operation is shown in Figure 612. The animal<br />

is stunned, bled, skinned, eviscerated, and<br />

trimmed as shown. Blood is drained and col-<br />

lected in a holding tank. After removal, en-<br />

trails are sliced in a "gut hasher, " then washed<br />

to separate the partially digested food termed<br />

"paunch manure. " Many slaughterers have<br />

heated reduction facilities in which blood, in-<br />

testines, bones, and other inedible materials<br />

are processed to recover tallow, fertilizer,<br />

and animal feeds. The firms that do not oper-<br />

ate this equipment usually sell their offal to<br />

scavenger plants that deal exclusively in by-<br />

products. Hides are almost always shipped to<br />

leather-processing firms. Dressed beef, nor-<br />

mally about 56 percent of the live weight, is<br />

refrigerated before it is shipped.<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Odors represent the only air contaminants<br />

emitted from slaughtering operations. The<br />

odors could be differentiated as (1) those<br />

released from the animal upon the killing and<br />

cutting, and upon the exposure of blood and<br />

flesh to air; and (2) those resulting from the<br />

decay of animal matter spilled on exposed sur-<br />

faces or otherwise exposed to the atmosphere,<br />

Odors from the first source are not appreciable<br />

when healthy livestock is used. Where nuisance-<br />

causing odors are encountered from slaughter-<br />

ing, they are almost always attributable to in-<br />

adequate sanitary measures. These odors are<br />

probably breakdown products of proteins. Amines<br />

and sulfur compounds are considered to be the<br />

most disagreeably odorous breakdown products.<br />

In addition to these sources, there are odors<br />

at slaughterhouse stockyards and from the stor-<br />

age of blood, intestines, hides, and paunch<br />

manure before their shipping or further process-<br />

ing.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

As has been explained, odorous air contami-<br />

nants are emitted from several points in a<br />

slaughtering operation. Installing control equip-<br />

ment at each source would be difficult if not im-<br />

possible. Methods of odor control available in-<br />

clude: (1) Rigid sanitation measures to prevent


802 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

STORAGE<br />

RENDERING<br />

STORAGE<br />

Figure 612. Typical livestock-slaughtering and processing area<br />

(The Globe Company, Chicago, Ill.).<br />

RENDERING<br />

the decomposition of animal matter, and (2) com- EDIBLE-LARD AND TALLOW RENDERING<br />

plete enclosure of the operation to capture the<br />

effluent and exhaust it through a control device. Methods used to produce edible lard and tallow<br />

Where slaughtering is government inspected,<br />

the operators are required to wash their kill<br />

rooms constantly, clean manure from stock<br />

pens, and dispose of all byproducts as rapidly<br />

as possible. These measures normally hold<br />

plant odors to a tolerable minimum.<br />

When a slaughterer is located in a residential<br />

area, the odor reduction afforded by strict<br />

sanitation may not be sufficient. In these in-<br />

stances, full-plant air conditioning might be<br />

necessary. Filtration with activated carbon<br />

would appear to be the only practical means<br />

of controlling the large volume of exhaust<br />

gases from a plant of this type. The latter<br />

method has not yet been employed at slaughter<br />

houses in the United States. Nevertheless,<br />

activated-carbon filtration of the entire plant<br />

has been employed to control similar odors<br />

at animal matter byproduct plants. With in-<br />

creasing urbanization, this method of control<br />

may, conceivably, be used in the near future.<br />

are similar to those described later in this<br />

chapter for rendering of inedibles. As with<br />

processes for inedibles, feedstocks are heated<br />

either directly or indirectly with steam to effect<br />

a phase separation yielding fats, water,<br />

and solids. Moisture is removed either by<br />

vaporization or by mechanical means. Tallow<br />

and solids are mechanically separated from<br />

one another in presses, centrifuges, and filters.<br />

The only major process differences between<br />

rendering edibles and rendering inedibles are<br />

due to the composition and freshness of the<br />

materials handled. Edible feedstocks contain<br />

80 to 90 percent lard or tallow, 10 to 20 per-<br />

cent moisture, and less than 5 percent muscle<br />

tissue. Inedible feedstocks contain appreciably<br />

higher precentages of both moisture and solids.<br />

Edible feedstocks, in addition to being more<br />

select portions of the animal, are generally<br />

much fresher than inedible cooker materials<br />

are.


Food Processing Equipment 803<br />

Whenever its products are intended for human material in direct contact with live steam.<br />

consumption, the process is much more stringent- -<br />

ly supervised and regulated by Federal and local<br />

The principal advantage of this type of renderagencies.<br />

There are numerous government regulations<br />

concerning the freshness of edi,,le-rendering<br />

is that large quantities of lar* Or tallow<br />

ing feedstocks, the cleanliness of processing<br />

can be produced without finely grinding the feed<br />

equipment, and the handling of rendered fats. material. Low-cost equipment and labor can<br />

For instance, paragraph 15. 1 of the United States<br />

be used.<br />

- -<br />

Department of Agriculture's Meat Inspection<br />

Regulations specifies that inspected feed mate-<br />

Wet rendering, however, necessarily requires<br />

higher temperatures (280" to 300°F) and inrial<br />

must be heated to a temperature not lower<br />

than 170°F for a period of not less than 30<br />

ternal pressures of 38 to 40 psig, The quality<br />

minutes when edible lard or tallow is being proof<br />

the lard or tallow produced is relatively low,<br />

duced.<br />

owing to the high temperatures to which it is<br />

subjected.<br />

Dry Rendering<br />

The <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Problem<br />

Batchwise renderine - The only noteworthy air contaminants generated<br />

Most of the high-quality edible lard and tallow<br />

from edible-rendering processes are odors. In<br />

are produced in indirectly steam-heated cookers.<br />

comparison with odors generated from inedible-<br />

These processes are frequently carried out at<br />

rendering processes, however, those from<br />

temperatures of less than 212°F. The lower<br />

edible-rendering processes are relatively minor.<br />

operating temperatures are afforded either by<br />

vacuum cooking or by finely grinding the feed-<br />

In Los Angeles County, rendering of edibles acstocks.<br />

The vacuum process is usually percounts<br />

for only about 10 percent of the total aniformed<br />

batchwise in a horizontal, steam-jacmal<br />

matter rendered. Rendering of inedibles<br />

keted cooker very similar to those used for<br />

at packing houses constitutes approximately 32<br />

rendering of inedibles. The vacuum is usually<br />

percent and that at scavenger plants accounts<br />

created through the use of steam- or waterfor<br />

the remaining 58 percent of the tonnage.<br />

operated ejectors. Variations in dry, ediblerendering<br />

processes are usually concerned<br />

In addition, rates of odor emissions from renwith<br />

temperatures and the degree of comminu- dering of edibles are low compared with those<br />

tion of fats. Where raw materials are ground from inedible-rendering processes. Inasmuch<br />

into fine particles, operation at lower tem-<br />

as edible feedstocks contain relatively low perperatures<br />

is usually possible, even without<br />

centages of water, the resultant steam generated<br />

a vacuum-producing device.<br />

from cookers, 6,300 scf per ton, is not appre-<br />

Continuous low-temperature rendering<br />

ciable. Feedstocks contain approximately 15 percent<br />

moisture, as compared with 50 percent<br />

from inedible cooker materials. Odor concentrations<br />

in cxhaust gases from the rendering<br />

of edibles are significant at 3, 000 odor units<br />

per scf but not excessive. Equipment at plants<br />

rendering edibles is kept scrupulously clean,<br />

which substantially reduces odors from inplant<br />

handling operations.<br />

Dry rendering processes have been developed<br />

to produce edible lard and tallow on a continu-<br />

ous basis from high-fat feedstocks. A typical<br />

process is shown in Figure 613. Feedstocks<br />

are first introduced to a grinder, where they<br />

are finely shredded at 120°F. and then heated<br />

to approximately 185°F before being passed<br />

through a desludging centrifuge in which solids<br />

are removed from the water and tallow. Lia-<br />

uids are then reheated to about 200°F in a<br />

steam jet heater. The remaining moisture is<br />

removed from the hot tallow in a second cen-<br />

trifuge from which edible lard or tallow is<br />

run to storage. The separated water is piped<br />

to a skimming pond where it is cooled before<br />

being sewered. Vapors from the several<br />

vessels are vented to a fume scrubber (con-<br />

tact condenser).<br />

Hooding and Ventilation Requirements<br />

Almost always, cooker gases from rendering of<br />

edibles can be piped directly to air pollution con-<br />

trol devices. Where condenser odor control de-<br />

vices are used, there is usually enough vacuum,<br />

that is, pressure differential, in the ductwork<br />

to cause vapors to flow from the cooker at a<br />

sufficiently high rate. Steam or water ejectors<br />

are sometimes employed to lower operating<br />

temperatures or to remove water vapor more<br />

Wet Rendering<br />

rapidly. Uncondensible gases do not exceed<br />

5 percent of cooker gases unless there is ap-<br />

The wet rendering process involves rendering preciable leakage into the system, as through<br />

of fats in a vertical, klosed tank with the feed seals on shafts, doors, and so forth.


804 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

HEADER SLOPE TO SCRUBBER. NO POCKETS OR TRAPS<br />

r'&..p AZZ-F-7<br />

PUMP PURIFIER TO STICKWATER PLANT<br />

OR CATCH BASIN<br />

1<br />

\scE!kEy<br />

1<br />

I<br />

i<br />

J<br />

---<br />

VAPOR VENT LINES<br />

COLD WATER<br />

1 i,L<br />

CATCH BASIN.<br />

B C<br />

TO SEWER<br />

80' TO 190°F 1185" TO 215OF<br />

Figure 613. DeLaval continuous centriflow process for edible protein recovery<br />

and edible fat rendering (The DeLaval Separator Co., Millbrae, Calif.).<br />

Where cooking is performed at pressures<br />

greater than 1 atmosphere, piping must usually<br />

be arranged in a manner that prevents surging<br />

when high-pressure gases are released. If<br />

the main valve is released quickly, the high-<br />

pressure vapors usually cause slugs of grease<br />

and solids to be carried over into the control<br />

system. Severe surging can cause siphoning<br />

of all the material from cooker to the control<br />

system. To prevent this, the piping is often<br />

arranged with a small pipe, 1 to 2 inches in<br />

diameter, that bypasses the main cooker's<br />

exhaust line. High pressures are reduced by<br />

venting first through the small pipe to the con-<br />

trol device. Once the high pressure is relieved,<br />

the large valve can be opened to provide great-<br />

er flow.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control Equipment<br />

lower volume of steam exhausted from the cook-<br />

er. Exit water temperatures should be held<br />

below 140°F to prevent the release of volatile,<br />

odorous materials from downstream piping<br />

and sewers.<br />

Surface condensers are also satisfactory con-<br />

trol devices for edible-rendering processes.<br />

At the same condensate volume and tempera-<br />

ture, however, surface condensers by them-<br />

selves are not as effective as contact con-<br />

densers. This is due to the inherently lower<br />

condensate volume and larger concentration<br />

of odorous materials in the condensate of sur-<br />

face condensers.<br />

That an edible-rendering process would require<br />

more extensive odor control than would be afforded<br />

by an adequate condenser is unlikely.<br />

Nevertheless, uncondensed offgases from condensers<br />

could be further controlled by incineration<br />

or carbon adsorption, as outlined for<br />

processing of inedibles later in this chapter.<br />

Water spray contact condensers are the simplest<br />

devices used for controlling odorous air contaminants<br />

from rendering . of edibles. These condense<br />

a major portion of the steam-laden effluent<br />

vapors and dissolve much of the odorous materi-<br />

FlSH CANNERIES AND FlSH<br />

als. Water requirements of the contact condenser<br />

for edible-rendering operations are considerably<br />

REDUCTION PLANTS<br />

lower than those for the contact condenser used Canning is the principal method of preserving<br />

to control cooker gases from rendering of in- highly perishable fish foodstuffs. Canneries<br />

edibles. This is due primarily to the lower fcr this purpose are usually located near harmoisture<br />

content of feedstocks and the resultant bors where fish can be unloaded directly from


oats. Byproduct reduction plants are operated<br />

at or near fish canneries to process scrap ma-<br />

terials, and much of the odorous air contami-<br />

nants generally attributed to canneries emanate<br />

from byproduct processes. Only choice por-<br />

tions of sound fish are canned for human con-<br />

sumption. The remainder is converted into by-<br />

products, notably fish oil and high-protein<br />

animal feed supplements.<br />

Basically there are two types of fish-canning<br />

operations in use today. In the older, so-called<br />

"wet-fish" method, trimmed fish are cooked<br />

directly in the can. The more popular "pre-<br />

cooked" process is used primarily to can tuna.<br />

The latter method is characterized by the cook-<br />

ing of whole, eviscerated fish, and the hand<br />

sorting of choice parts before canning.<br />

WET-FISH CANNING<br />

Wet-fish canning is used to preserve salmon,<br />

anchovies, mackerel, sardines, and similar<br />

species that can be obtained locally and brought<br />

to the cannery quickly. The distinctive feature<br />

of the wet-fish process is the complete removal<br />

of heads, tails, and entrails before the cooking.<br />

Fish Canneries and Fish Reduction Plants 805<br />

Trimmed and eviscerated raw fish is packed<br />

into open cans that are conveyed through a 100-<br />

to 200-foot-long hot-exhaust box. Here live<br />

steam is employed to cook the fish. Hot-ex-<br />

haust boxes are vented through several stacks<br />

located along their lengths (Figure 614). At<br />

the discharge end, cans may he mechanically<br />

upended so that "stick water" is decanted from<br />

the cans while the cooked fish remains. Stick<br />

water consists of condensed steam, juices, and<br />

oils that have cooked out of the fish. This liq-<br />

uid is collected and retained for byproduct<br />

processing as described later in this section.<br />

The cans of drained fish are filled with tomato<br />

sauce, olive oil, or other suitable liquid before<br />

being sealed. Sealed cans are pressure cooked<br />

before their labeling, packing, and shipping.<br />

TUNA CANNING<br />

The precooked canning method was developed<br />

to improve the physical appearance of canned<br />

fish. It is confined to the commercial canning<br />

of larger fishes, principally tuna. Whole,<br />

cviscerated fish are placed in wire baskets and<br />

charged to live-steam-heated cookers such as<br />

those of Figure 615. The cookers are operated<br />

Figure 614. Unsealed cans of cooked mackerel beina conveved from


806 CHEMICAL PROCE :SSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Flgure 615. A bank of 11ve-steam-heated cookers<br />

used to process raw, whole tuna (Star-Klst Foods,<br />

Inc., Termlnal Island, Calif.).<br />

at about 5 psig pressure, condensate being dis-<br />

charged through steam traps. <strong>Air</strong>, steam, and<br />

any uncondensed, odorous gases are bled from<br />

the cookers through one or more small vents in<br />

'the ceiling.<br />

As the fish are cooked, juices, condensed steam,<br />

and oils are collected, centrifuged, and pumped<br />

to stick water and oil storage tanks. Cooking<br />

reduces the weight of a fish by about one-third.<br />

After the cooking, the flesh is cooled so that it<br />

becomes firm before it is handled. It is then<br />

placed on a conveyorized picking line. Operators<br />

stationed along the conveyor select the portions<br />

to be canned for human consumption. After being<br />

packed and sealed in cans, the fisb is pressure<br />

cooked for sterilization before its labeling, pack-<br />

ing, and shipping. Much of the dark meat is<br />

canned for pet food. Only about one-third of the<br />

raw tuna weight is canned as food for humans and<br />

pets. The remaining skin, bone, and other scrap,<br />

roughly amounting to one-third of the raw weight,<br />

is fed to the fish meal reduction system.<br />

CANNERY BYPRODUCTS<br />

A large fraction of the fish received in a cannery<br />

is processed into byproducts. In the precook<br />

process, about two-thirds of the raw fish weight<br />

is directed to byproduct reduction systems as<br />

stick water or solid scrap. The wet-fish process<br />

usually produces somewhat less offal, depending<br />

principally upon the size of fish. Typical head-<br />

and-tail mackerel scrap is pictured in Figure 616.<br />

In addition, whole fish may be rejected at the can-<br />

ning line because of spoilage, freezer burns, bad<br />

color, and so forth. Any fish or portions of fish<br />

Figure 616. Typical raw head-and-tail mackerel j<br />

scrap awaiting processing in a fish meal reduction 1<br />

system (Star-Kist Foods, Inc., Terminal Island,<br />

Calif.). i<br />

not suitable for human consumption or for pet<br />

food are handled in the reduction plant. In order<br />

of volume and relative importance, the byproducts<br />

are: Fish meal, used almost exclusively as an<br />

animal feed supplement; fish oil, used in the<br />

paint industry and in vitamin manufacture; and<br />

"liquid fish" and "fish solubles, " high-protein<br />

concentrates. The latter are manufactured<br />

somewhat differently, but both are used as ani-<br />

mal feed supplements and as fertilizers.<br />

.FISH MEAL PRODUCTION<br />

Fish scrap from the canning lines, including<br />

any rejected whole fisb, is charged to continuous<br />

live-steam cookers in the meal plant.<br />

Flow through a typical fish meal plant is diagrammed<br />

in Figure 617. Cookers of the type<br />

shown in Figure 618 are operated at between 10<br />

and 25 psig steam pressure. Material charged<br />

to the cookers normally contains 20 to 30 percent<br />

solids. Cooked scrap has a slightly smaller<br />

solids content owing to the condensed steam<br />

picked up in cooking. After the material<br />

leaves the cooker, it is pressed to remove<br />

oil and water, and this pressing lowers the<br />

moisture content of the press cake to approximately<br />

50 percent. The press cake is broken Up,<br />

usually in a hammer mill, and dried in a directfired<br />

rotary drier or in a steam-tube rotary<br />

drier. Typical fish meal driers ~ield 2 to 10<br />

tons of meal per hour with a moisture content<br />

of 4 to 10 percent. Both types of driers em-


Fish Canneries and Fish Reduction Plants an7<br />

1<br />

FISH SCRAP VAPORS TO CONDENSER<br />

t t<br />

1 WATER<br />

LIVE STEAM COOKER CENTRIFUGE<br />

AN0 SOLUBLES<br />

STEAM 5 PSlg DRIER GASES TO<br />

GRINDER<br />

SOLIDS<br />

SEPARATOR<br />

SOLlOS LlQUlOS rv<br />

ROTARY FISH MEAL DRIER<br />

t<br />

, TO STORAGE MEAL +<br />

I I FINES I<br />

GRINDER<br />

Flgure 617. Flow d~agram of a fish meal reduct~on system includ~ng<br />

011-separat~ng and 011-clar~fy~ng equ~pment.<br />

Figure 618. A live-steam reduction cooker and a<br />

continuous press (Standard Steel Corp., Los Angeles,<br />

Calif.).<br />

ploy air as the drying medium. Moisture is<br />

removed with exhaust gases, which are volu-<br />

minous.<br />

Direct-fired driers include stationary fireboxes<br />

ahead of the rotating section, as shown in Fig-<br />

ure 619. They are normally fired with natural<br />

gas or fuel oil. Combustion is completed in<br />

the firebox. Hot products of combustion are<br />

mixed with air to provide a temperature of 400"<br />

to 1,000"F at the point where wet meal is initial-<br />

ly contacted. Hot, moist exhaust gases from<br />

the drier contain appreciable fine meal, which<br />

is commonly collected in a cyclone separator.<br />

The essential feature of steamtube driers is<br />

a bank of longitudinal, rotating steamtubes<br />

arranged in a cylindrical pattern, as shown in<br />

Figure 620. Steam pressures range from 50<br />

to 100 psig in the tubes. Heat is transferred<br />

both to the meal and air. As with direct-fired<br />

units, gases pass parallel to meal along the<br />

axis of the drier and are vented through a cy-<br />

clone separator. Meal produced in steamtube<br />

driers is less likely to be over-heated and is<br />

generally of higher quality than that from direct-<br />

fired units.<br />

FISH SOLUBLES AND FlSH OIL PRODUCTION<br />

Fish solubles is the term used to designate the<br />

molasses-like concentrate containing soluble<br />

proteins and vitamins that have been extracted<br />

from fish flesh by cooking processes. The<br />

flow diagram of Figure 617 includes the sep-<br />

aration of press water and fish oil. The sources<br />

of solubles and oils are the juices and conden-<br />

sate collected as press water and stick water.


808 CHEMICAL PROCESSLNG EQUIPMENT<br />

AUTOMATIC OIL<br />

OR GAS BURNER<br />

VAPOR LADEN GASES -<br />

VAPOR AND PRODUCT EXHAUST<br />

TEMPERATURE LIMIT<br />

SAFETY CONTROL \<br />

THERMOSTATIC<br />

TEMPERATURE<br />

CONTROL<br />

\ / I<br />

CONTINUOUS BED FRAME ROLLER BEARING MOTORIZED VAPOR AND<br />

PRODUCT<br />

OPTIONAL TRUNNIONS REDUCER<br />

PRODUCTFAN DISCHARGE<br />

Figure 619. A parallel-flow, direct-fired, rotary, fish meal drier<br />

(Standard Steel Corp., Los Angeles. Gal if.).<br />

Figure 620. A stearntube, rotary, fish meal drier (Standard Steel Corp.,<br />

Los Angeles, Calif.).<br />

!<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i


Thesetwo liquids may be processed separately<br />

or blended before their processing. The liq-<br />

uids are first acidified to prevent bacterial de-<br />

composition. Some protein is flocculatdd up-<br />

on the addition of acid. The floc and other<br />

suspended solids are removed in a centrifuge<br />

and recycled to the fish meal reduction process.<br />

Liquids pass through a second centrifuge, where<br />

the fish oils are removed. The water layer is<br />

pumped to multiple-effect evaporators where<br />

the solids content is increased from approxi-<br />

mately 6 to 50 percent by weight. Uncondensed<br />

gases are removed from the process at one of<br />

the evaporator effects, which is operated under<br />

high vacuum. The vacuum is held by a water<br />

or steam ejector. Where steam ejectors are<br />

used they are equipped with barometric-leg<br />

aftercondensers.<br />

DIGESTION PROCESSES<br />

Fish viscera are usually digested by enzymatic<br />

and bacterial action rather than by thermal reduction.<br />

The product is a liquid that is concentrated<br />

by evaporation and marketed as a highproteln<br />

livestock feed supplement very similar<br />

to fish solubles.<br />

Most cannery-operated digestion processes are<br />

of the enzymatic type and are used only to pro-<br />

cess viscera. Stomach enzymes, under con-<br />

trolled pH and temperature, reduce the viscera<br />

to a liquid. The process is u'sually carried out<br />

, in a simple tank at atmospheric pressure, near-<br />

ambient temperature, and an acid pH. Essen-<br />

tially no moisture is evaporated during digestion.<br />

Before concentration, the digested liquid is fil-<br />

tered and centrifuged to remove small quantities<br />

of scales, bones, and oil. The evaporation pro-<br />

cess is identical to that used for fish solubles,<br />

yielding a liquid of 50 percent solids.<br />

Bacterial digestion is used to reduce all types<br />

of fish flesh. It is carried out at an alkaline<br />

pH in equipment similar to that used for en-<br />

zymatic processes. Again, there is no appre-<br />

ciable moisture evaporation, but odors evolved<br />

are considerably stronger and more likely to<br />

elicit nuisance complaints.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

<strong>Air</strong> contaminants emanate from a number of<br />

sources in fish canneries and fish reduction<br />

plants, including both edible-rendering and<br />

byproduct processes. Odors are the most ob-<br />

jectionable of these contaminants, though dust<br />

and smoke can be a major problem. In a fish<br />

cannery, some odor is unavoidable owing to<br />

the nature of the species. Heavy odor emis-<br />

Fish Canneries and Fish Reduction Plants<br />

sions that cause nuisance complaints can usu-<br />

ally, however, be traced to poor sanitation or<br />

inadequate control of air contaminants. Tri-<br />

methyl amine, (CH3)3N, is the principal com-<br />

pound identified with fish odors.<br />

Reduction processes produce more odors than<br />

camlery operations do. Materials fed to re-<br />

duction processes are generally in a greater<br />

state of decay than the fish are that are pro-<br />

cessed for human consumption. Edible por-<br />

tions of the fish are always handled first, and<br />

great care is maintained to guarantee the qual-<br />

ity of edible products. The portions that are<br />

unsuitable for human consumption have much<br />

less value, and it is not uncommon for opera-<br />

tors to allow reduction plant feedstocks to<br />

decompose markedly before the processing.<br />

The largest sources of reduction plant odors<br />

are fish meal driers. Lesser quantities of<br />

odors are emitted from cookers preceding<br />

meal driers, from digestion processes, oilwater<br />

separators, and evaporators. Dust<br />

emissions are lxmited to driers and the pneu-<br />

matic conveyors and grinders following them.<br />

Smoke can be created by overheating or burn-<br />

ing meal m the drier.<br />

Odors From Meal Driers<br />

809<br />

Fish meal driers exhaust large vollunes of gases<br />

at significantly large odor concentrations. Dur-<br />

ing the processing of fresh fish scrap, odor con-<br />

centrations in exhaust gases range from 1,000 to<br />

5,000 odor units per scf (see Appendix B for defi-<br />

nition of odor units and method of measuring odor<br />

concentrations). If the feedstocks are hlghly de-<br />

cayed, much greater odor concentrations can<br />

be expected. The result is an extremely heavy<br />

rate of odor emission, even when fresh fish<br />

scrap is processed. For example, a direct-fired<br />

drier operating under "low-temperature " condi-<br />

tions and producing 4 or 5 tons of dried fish meal<br />

per hour exhausts about 30 to 40 million odor<br />

units per minute if the concentration is about<br />

2,000 odor units per scf and the exhaust rate is<br />

15,000 to 20.000 scfm. Drier exit temperatures<br />

average about 200" F, and the moisture content<br />

normally ranges between 15 and 25 percent by<br />

volume.<br />

A more startling example is that of the direct-<br />

fired rotary drier operating under "high-tempera-<br />

ture" conditions. It produces 10 tons of dried<br />

fish meal per hour and exhausts 600 to 800 million<br />

odor units per minute. The odor concentration is<br />

about 40,000 odor units per scf with an exhaust<br />

rate of 15,000 to 20,000 scfm. Drier exit tem-<br />

peratures average above 300" F during high-<br />

temperature operation.


810 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Emissions from steamtube driers are less<br />

water aggravates the problem by lowering the<br />

voluminous and can he less odorous than those temperature, which increases condensation and,<br />

from direct-fired units. With steamtube driers,<br />

there is less likelihood of burning or overheatthereby,<br />

the opacity.<br />

ing the meal and, therefore, excessively heavy<br />

odor concentrations are encountered less often.<br />

Dust From Driers and Conveyors<br />

Moisture contents are comparatively greater<br />

in gases from steamtube driers. Typical gases<br />

from emitted steamtube driers during tuna scrap<br />

processing contain about 25 percent moisture as<br />

compared with approximately 15 percent from<br />

a direct-fired unit processing the same material.<br />

As a result, volumes from steamtuhe driers are<br />

30 to 45 oercent lower than those from com-oar-<br />

The only major points of dust emission in canneries<br />

and reduction plants are the driers themselves<br />

and the grinders and conveyors used to<br />

handle dried fish meal. Driers and pneumatic<br />

conveyors are equipped with cyclone separators,<br />

and emissions are functions of collection efficiencies.<br />

able direct-fired units. Odor concentrations<br />

from steamtuhe driers are generally in the same<br />

range as those from direct-fired units when<br />

fresh fish scrap is being processed under proper<br />

operating conditions, that is, when meal is<br />

not overheated.<br />

Fish meal does not usually contain a large fraction<br />

of fines. A particle size analysis of a typical<br />

meal is provided in Table 218. This meal<br />

sample was collected in a pneumatic conveyor<br />

handling ground fish meal. It can he seen that<br />

the sample contains only 0.6 percent by weight<br />

less than 5 microns in diameter, and 1. 4 per-<br />

Smoke From Driers<br />

Excessive visible air contaminants can be created<br />

in fish meal driers by the overheating of<br />

meal and volatilization of low-boiling oils and<br />

cent less than 10 microns in diameter. Ninetysix<br />

percent is larger than 20 microns.<br />

other organic compounds. Smoke is more likely Table 218. PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF<br />

to be emitted from direct-fired driers than from<br />

A TYPICAL GROUND,<br />

steam-tube units, particularly if the drier is<br />

operated under high-temperature conditions.<br />

DRIED FISH MEALa<br />

Range of particle diameter, I<br />

IL<br />

,t qo<br />

b<br />

All driers have limits for gas discharge tempera-<br />

tures above which excessive visible contaminants<br />

appear in the elrit gas steam. The smoking lim-<br />

it is a function of drier design as well as of feed-<br />

stocks and varies somewhat from unit to unit.<br />

For direct-fired units, this limit is about 300" F.<br />

Direct-fired driers operated under low-tempera-<br />

ture conditions process fish meal at about one-<br />

half the rate for high-temperature conditions,<br />

and the limit for gas discharge temperature is<br />

about 200" F. Only low-temperature operation<br />

is suitable for control by chlorinator-scrubbers.<br />

Chlorination of a drier exit gas steam which is<br />

in excess of 200' F will predictably produce an<br />

opacity coupled with a corresponding rise in odor<br />

level.<br />

The addition of certain low-boiling materials to<br />

drier feedstocks can also create visible emis-<br />

sions when there is essentially no overheating<br />

of meal in the drier. One such material is di-<br />

gested fish concentrate. Some operators add<br />

this high-protein liquid to drier feedstocks to<br />

upgrade the protein content of meal. Digested<br />

fish concentrate can contain low-boiling com-<br />

pounds that are vaporized into exhaust gases and<br />

condense upon discharge to the atmosphere.<br />

These finely divided, organic, liquid particulates<br />

can impart greater than 40 percent opacities to<br />

drier gases. Scrubbing the drier gases with<br />

0 to 5<br />

5 to 10<br />

10 to 20<br />

20 to 44<br />

44 to 74<br />

74 to 149<br />

149 to 246<br />

246 to 590<br />

590 to 1,651<br />

1, 651 to 2,450<br />

more than 2,450<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

2.6<br />

7.5<br />

11. 5<br />

29. 9<br />

16.4<br />

22.8<br />

7.4<br />

0.4<br />

0.1<br />

asample drawn from a pneumatic conveyor<br />

following a direct-fired drier and hammer<br />

mill.<br />

b~ize determination by micromerograph.<br />

Concentrations of fines in exit gases are usually<br />

less than 0.4 grain per scf. The pneumatic con-<br />

veyor cyclone handling the meal of Table 218 was<br />

found to be better than 99.9 percent efficient,<br />

with an exit dust concentration of less than 0. 01<br />

grain per scf. This efficiency is much greater<br />

than would be predicted on the basis of cyclone<br />

design and particle size. It indicates that ap-<br />

preciable agglomeration probably takes place<br />

in the cyclone.


. .<br />

. .<br />

Odors From Reduction Cookers<br />

Fish Canneries and Fish Reduction Plants 811<br />

condensers, are used to produce the vacuum,<br />

odor emissions to the atmosphere are much<br />

The cookers preceding fish meal driers exhaust greater. Contact condensers (water ejectors)<br />

gases of heavy odor concentration. Nevertheless, provide a dilution of condensate 10 to 20 times<br />

: the volumes of these offgases are appreciablyless greater than that produced by surface-type con-<br />

than those from driers. Cooker gases are simi-. densers used with steam ejectors or vacuum<br />

lar to those from indirectly heated rendering Pumps.<br />

cookers. They consist almost entirely of water<br />

vapor but contain significant quantities of extremely<br />

odorous organic gases and vapors. Odor<br />

Odors From Edibles Cookers<br />

concentrations from live-steam-heated cookers<br />

range from 53 000 to over loo, 000 odor units Per<br />

scf, depending to a large degree upon the state<br />

of feedstocks. Any malodorous gases contained<br />

While most odorous air contaminants are considered<br />

to emanate from fish reduction processes,<br />

the handling and cooking of edible fish also produce<br />

measurable odors. The largest single sources<br />

in the cellular flesh structure are usually liberated<br />

when the material is first heated in the cooker.<br />

are the cookers described earlier in this section.<br />

...<br />

. .~ . .~<br />

~ . . . . .<br />

. . ... . .<br />

Essentially no solids are in the effluent from the<br />

cookers, though some entrained oil particulates<br />

are usually present. The volumes of exhaust<br />

vapors depend upon the degree of sealing provided<br />

in the cooker. All the steam can be contained in<br />

the cooker with no leakage. Most cookers, however.<br />

are desiened - to bleed off 100 to 1. 000 cfm<br />

through one or more stacks. The latter arrangement<br />

is recommended, since it provides a positive<br />

exhaust point at which air contaminants can<br />

be controlled. Otherwise the malodorous gases<br />

would be liberated at the press and grinder where<br />

they are difficult to contain.<br />

The precooked process is less productive of odors<br />

than the wet-fish orocess L - ~ is -~. ~ When - . --....-..-..<br />

~ tvna ~ iq cnnkod<br />

in the live-steam cookers of Figure 615, much of<br />

the odorous gases and vapors is condensed in the<br />

cooker and the steam trap. Only the volatile,<br />

albeit highly odorous, compounds are vented<br />

through the steamtrap.<br />

The hot-exhaust boxes of wet-fish production<br />

systems are commonly vented directly to the<br />

atmosphere. These offgases consist mostly of<br />

steam with some noncondensihle air and malodorous<br />

gases entrained. Hot-exhaust boxes<br />

are the points of initial cooking of wet fish, and<br />

are, therefore, origins of large quantities of<br />

Odors From Digesters<br />

gases and vapors.<br />

The digestion of fish scrap produces only small<br />

volumes of exhaust gases, though these gases<br />

can have a large odor concentration. The en-<br />

zymatic, acid-pH decomposition of viscera<br />

does not normally produce odor concentrations<br />

greater than 20,000 odor units per scf, depend-<br />

ing again upon the quality of feedstocks. Alka-<br />

line digestion of fish scrap, on the other hand,<br />

is productive of strong odors that are likely to<br />

create a public nuisance.<br />

Odors From Evoporotors<br />

The evaporation of the water-soluble extracts--<br />

stick water and press water--does not generally<br />

result in heavy odor emissions. This is pri-<br />

marily due to the use of water ejector-condensers.<br />

Odors could be considerably heavier if different<br />

types of vacuum-producing equipment were em-<br />

ployed. Most fish canneries are located near<br />

large bodies of water,and it is common to use<br />

water jet ejectors to maintain a vacuum on the<br />

evaporator system. All uncondensed gases and<br />

vapors from the evaporators are vented to the<br />

ejectors, which act as contact condensers. Most<br />

of the odorous compounds are condensed or dis-<br />

solved in the effluent water. If steam ejectors<br />

and surface condensers, rather than contact<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

When air pollution control is employed, most<br />

fish cannerv and reduction orocesses are vented<br />

directly to the control device. Cookers, presses,<br />

grinders, and the hot press-water auxiliary<br />

equipment require hooding. Hot material from<br />

the cooker evolves appreciable steam and odors<br />

when the oil and water are pressed from it<br />

and when the resultant press cake is broken<br />

up before the drying. The vapors liberated at<br />

these points consist principally of steam. When<br />

the gases are vented to a condenser, hooding<br />

should be as tight as possible to prevent dilu-<br />

tion with air. Indraft velocities of 100 fpm<br />

across the open area under the hood are nor-<br />

mally satisfactory. Where possible, the source<br />

itself should be totally enclosed and ducted to<br />

control equipment. Unfortunately, the designs<br />

of many presses and grinders are not conducive<br />

to complete enclosure, and hoods must be em-<br />

ployed.<br />

The largest contaminated gas streams are ex-<br />

hausted from fish meal driers. As shown in<br />

Table 219, volume rates are lower from steam-<br />

tube driers than from direct-fired units. For<br />

the hypothetical comparison made in this table,


812 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 219. CHARACTERISTICS OF EXHAUST tion is preferable if it can be adapted to the pro-<br />

GASES FROM TYPICAL DIRECT-FIRED AND cess. Incineration provides the most positive<br />

STEAMTUBE FISH MEAL DRIERSa control of nuisance-causing - odorous comoounds.<br />

Steamtube<br />

drier .....<br />

~ o ~ evapora~ed s t ~ from ~ meal. ~ scfmb 320 320<br />

Natural gas fuel, sctmC<br />

Moisture in product. of combustion. scfm<br />

Total moisture in exhaust gases, scfm<br />

I6<br />

3 1<br />

ory exhaust gases, scfm<br />

Total exhaust gases, ostm<br />

Moisture content, %by volume<br />

Direct-fir,?d<br />

drier<br />

Temperature of exhaust gases, 'F 180 I 205<br />

a~asis: 1 ton of feed per hour to drier. ~oist~re content of press<br />

cake to drier. 50% by weight.<br />

b~oisture content of dried meal, 8% by weight.<br />

C~atural gas o* I. LOO Bt" per scf gross heating value<br />

the fired drier exhausts 70 percent more gases<br />

than the steamtube drier does and the moisture<br />

content is comparatively less, 15 percent com-<br />

pared with 24 percent. A 10-ton-per-hour fired<br />

drier would exhaust 22,830 scfm at about 200aF,<br />

while a steamtube unit of the same size would<br />

exhaust only 13, 500 scfm at about 180°F.<br />

Exhaust volumes from live-steam-heated cook-<br />

ers range from 100 to 1,000 cfm and depend<br />

to a large degree upon cooker design. Inlet<br />

and exit seals should be tight to prevent leakage.<br />

Most cookers are vented through a single stack.<br />

Digestion tanks with a capacity of 2,000 gallons<br />

or less seldom exhaust more than 50 scfm. Ex-<br />

haust volumes from digesters vary appreciably<br />

during the processing of a batch, exit rates being<br />

negligible much of the time.<br />

Where water ejector contact condensers are em-<br />

ployed on evaporators, exhaust rates are well<br />

below 50 scfm. If surface condensers or vacuum<br />

pumps are employed instead of contact condensers,<br />

exhaust volumes can exceed 100 cfm.<br />

Fish meal pneumatic conveyors are designed to<br />

provide from 45 to 70 cubic feet of air per pound<br />

of meal conveyed. A pneumatic conveyor handling<br />

5 tons of dried meal per hour exhausts about<br />

10,000 cfm.<br />

Exhaust'gases from cookers used in the precooked<br />

tuna process are relatively small in volume and<br />

include only those gases that are not condensed or<br />

dissolved at the steamtrap or the cooker itself.<br />

Gases evolved from the hot-exhaust boxes of the<br />

wet-fish lines are considerably more voluminous.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

Fish cannery and fish reduction equipment are<br />

controlled principally with condensers, scrubbers.<br />

afterburners. and centrifueal - dust collectors.<br />

Where odors are concerned, incinera-<br />

Condensers are effective where exhaust gases<br />

contain appreciable moisture, while centrifugal .<br />

collectors are usually satisfactory to prevent<br />

excessive dust emissions. Scrubber-chlorina- - --<br />

tors find particular use in the control of odors<br />

from fish meal driers.<br />

Controlling Fish Meal Driers<br />

Because of the exceedingly large volume of mal-<br />

odorous exhaust products from driers, they<br />

cohstitute the most costly air pollution control<br />

problem in a reduction plant. Drier gases nor-<br />

mally contain only 15 to 25 percent moisture.<br />

Thus, even after condensation, the volume is<br />

great. Moreover, there are enough entrained<br />

solids in drier exit gases to make incineration<br />

difficult.<br />

Incinerating Drier Gases<br />

Incineration of odorous air contaminants from<br />

fish meal driers is possible, though costly. It<br />

is, however, the only feasible method presently<br />

available to control driers operated under high-<br />

temperature conditions. This occurs when the<br />

operator processes fish meal at such a rate that<br />

the drier gases emerge at a temperature above<br />

300" F, and the feed scrap is subjected to hot<br />

gases between 1,200" and 1,700" F.<br />

A properly designed afterburner control system<br />

requires a dust collector ahead of the afterburner<br />

to remove solids that cannot readily be burned.<br />

The incineration of solid particulates at 1, 2OO'F<br />

or lower can result in partial oxidation of partic-<br />

ulates, which tends to increase rather than de-<br />

crease odor concentrations. A contact condenser-<br />

scrubber removes much of the difficult-to-burn<br />

particulates and materially reduces the volume<br />

rate by condensing the moisture. If the partic-<br />

ulate matter concentration in gases to the after-<br />

burner is sufficiently small, incineration at<br />

1,200°F reduces odor concentrations to about<br />

50 odor units per scf. Owing to the high cost<br />

of fuel in such an arrangement, few large in-<br />

stallations of afterburners serve fish meal<br />

driers. To make incineration economically at-<br />

tractive, heat from the afterburner should be<br />

reclaimed in some manner. The most likely<br />

arrangement is the preheating of air to the drier.<br />

An afterburner operating at 1,200°F provides<br />

all the heat necessarv to oaerate the drier, which<br />

thus eliminates the need for a firebox.<br />

Chlorinoting and Scrubbing Drier Gores<br />

A unique scrubber-chlorinator design has been<br />

developed to control the odors from fish meal


driers. Units of this design have proved to be<br />

satisfactory, provided the driers are operated<br />

under low-temperature conditions. During lowtemperature<br />

operation, the drier exit gas temperature<br />

is not allowed to exceed 200" F. The<br />

driving force for drying air and products of combustion<br />

is maintained below 6 Btu per scf, and<br />

the temperature at the zone where the fish scrap<br />

enters is maintained below 600" F. Such stringent<br />

conditions placed upon the operation of the<br />

drier cause the production rate to be reduced to<br />

approximately one-half of design if the moisture<br />

content of the dried meal is to be maintained at<br />

an acceptable level. This unit is demonstrated<br />

in the flow diagram - of Figure - 621 and pictured in<br />

Figure 622.<br />

The process depends largely upon the reaction of<br />

chlorine gas with odorous compounds at drier exit<br />

temperatures. As shown in Figure 621, gases<br />

from the drier are first directed through a cyclone<br />

separator to remove fine particulates. Chlorine is<br />

then added at a rate calculated to provide a concentration<br />

of 20 ppm by volume in the gas stream.<br />

The reactionis allowed to ~roceedat about 200" F-the<br />

drier exit temperature--in the ductwork for<br />

approximately 0.6 second before the stream is<br />

chilled and scrubbed with sea water in a packed<br />

tower. Gases pass up through the packing countercurrently<br />

to the sea water.<br />

In Figure 623, odor concentrations from the<br />

scrubber exit are plotted against the chlorine<br />

addition rate at constant gas and sea water<br />

throughput. As can be seen from the curve,<br />

odors reach a minimum at about 20 ppm chlo-<br />

rine. When more than 20 ppm is added, chlo-<br />

Fish Canneries and Fish Reduction Plants 813<br />

rine odors become readily detectable in treated<br />

gases, and odor concentrations tend to increase.<br />

All the odor measurements used to draw this<br />

curve were made on drier gas.samples taken !<br />

between 170" and 205"F, when there was es-<br />

sentially no overheating of meal in the drier.<br />

This method provides an overall odor reduction<br />

of 95 to 99 percent when fresh fish scrap is being<br />

processed in the drier. Chlorination itself pro-<br />

vides a 50 to 80 percent reduction in odor con-<br />

centration. Scrubbing reduces the remaining I<br />

odor concentration by another 50 to 80 percent.<br />

Condensation provides a 12 to 22 percent re-<br />

duction in volume, depending upon the original<br />

moisture content of the gases. i<br />

The exact mechanism of the chlorination reac-<br />

tion is uncertain, but it is assumed that chlorine<br />

reacts with odorous compounds, probably amines,<br />

to form additional products that are less odorous<br />

than the original compounds. Chlorine is not<br />

considered to be a sufficiently strong oxidizing<br />

agent to oxidize fully the odorous organic mate-<br />

rials present in drier gases.<br />

Controlling Reduction Cookers and Auxiliary<br />

Equipment<br />

There is a tendency for the operator to use more<br />

live steam to cook fish scrap before it is fed into<br />

the rotary drier if low-temperature operation of<br />

the drier itself is employed. The entire prepara-<br />

tion of the drier feed is carried out at tempera-<br />

tures above 170nF, and large volumes of contam-<br />

inated steam are released to the atmosphere.<br />

These occur at the cooker, press, grinder, and<br />

press-water screen and sump. They can be con-<br />

-<br />

CHLORINE GbS<br />

Figure 621. A chlorinator-scrubber odor control system venting a fish<br />

meal dr~er.<br />

. ,


814 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 622. A chlorinator-scrubber odor control<br />

system venting a fish meal drier (Star-Kist<br />

Foods, Inc., Terminal Island, Calif.).<br />

trolled by hooding the component parts and ex-<br />

hausting to a condenser followed by an after-<br />

burner. The firebox of the rotary drier may<br />

provide a satisfactory substitute for the after-<br />

burner if adequate control is maintained on the<br />

drier exit gases.<br />

Controlling Digesters<br />

Digester gases are most easily controlled with<br />

afterburners. These gases are small in volume<br />

and require only minimal fuel for incineration.<br />

Digester offgases contain no appreciable moisture<br />

or particulates. Odor concentrations can normal-<br />

ly be reduced by 99 percent or more at 1,200-F<br />

in a properly designed afterburner.<br />

Controlling Evoporotors<br />

Evaporators for stick water, press water, and<br />

digested liquor can be controlled with condensers<br />

and afterburners and combinations thereof. Most<br />

Figure 623. Exit odor concentrations from a chlo-<br />

rinator-scrubber as a function of the chlorine eas<br />

addition rate. Temperatures of gas discharged from<br />

drier are less than 205O~.<br />

evaporators are equipped with water ejector con-<br />

tact condensers to provide the necessary vacuum<br />

in the one effect of the multiple evaporator effects.<br />

Condensate temperatures from these ejectors are<br />

usually less than 80°F. As a result, they con-<br />

dense and dissolve most of the odorous compounds<br />

that would otherwise be discharged to the atmo-<br />

sphere. Condensate cannot be circulated through<br />

cooling towers without causing the emission of<br />

strong odors. Ideally, sea water or harbor<br />

water is used for this purpose, with no recircu-<br />

lation. The entrained air contaminants do not<br />

add enough material to tail waters to create a<br />

water pollution problem.<br />

If water ejectors are not used, odorous air con-<br />

taminants are emitted in much heavier concen-<br />

tration. The most likely alternative is a steam<br />

ejector and surface-type aftercondenser, possi-<br />

bly with multiple ejector stages. Noxious odors<br />

from an operation such as this are stronger and<br />

more voluminous than those emitted from contact<br />

condensers. Hooding of the condenser hot-well<br />

and exhausting to an afterburner operating at<br />

1.200" F or greater is usually the most feasible<br />

means of controlling these processes. Activated<br />

carbon can be used in lieu of an afterburner.


Collecting Dust<br />

As previously noted, fish meal does not contain<br />

a large amount of extremely fine particles, that<br />

is, those less than 10 microns. For this reason,<br />

cyclone separators are normally sufficient to<br />

prevent excessive emissions from the drier and<br />

subsequent pneumatic conveyors. If the meal<br />

from a particular plant were to contain appre-<br />

ciably more fine material than the sample shown<br />

in Table 218, more efficient dust collectors,<br />

such as small-diameter, multiple cyclones or<br />

baghouses, would have to be used.<br />

Controlling Edible-Fish Cookers<br />

Exhaust gases from both precooked and wet-fish<br />

process cookers consist essentially of water<br />

vapor. At tuna cookers, most of this vapor is<br />

condensed in the steamtraps on the cookers. If<br />

further control is desired, an afterburner,<br />

carbon adsorber, or low-temperature contact<br />

condenser is recommended.<br />

Reduction of Inedible Anlrnal Matter 815<br />

which are operated solely for the byproducts.<br />

In Figure 624, "deadstock" is shown awaiting<br />

dismemberment at a scavenger plant. Com-<br />

mon rendering cooker feedstocks are pictnred<br />

in Figure 625. In general, the materials pro-<br />

cessed in captive packing house systems are<br />

fresher than those handled at scavenger plants<br />

where feedstocks can be highly decayed. Typ-<br />

ical slaughterhouse yields of inedible offal,<br />

bone, and blood are listed in Table 220.<br />

The hot-exhaust boxes of wet-fish processes<br />

represent large odor sources that can be controlled<br />

with contact condensers, often at little<br />

expense to the operator. Most canneries are<br />

located near large bodies of water. Sea water<br />

or harbor water can be directed to contact condensers<br />

at little cost in these instances. Since<br />

exhaust box - eases are orincioallv water, there<br />

& ,<br />

is a marked reduction in volume across a condenser<br />

such as this, in addition to a decrease Figure 624. Dead stock awaiting skinning and dismemberment<br />

at a scavenger renderine plant (Califorin<br />

odor concentration.<br />

nia Rendering Co.,Ltd.. Los Angeles, Calif.).<br />

REDUCTION OF INEDIBLE<br />

ANIMAL MATTER<br />

Animal matter not suitable as food for humans<br />

or pets is converted into salable byproducts<br />

through various reduction processes. Animal<br />

matter reduction is the principal waste disposal<br />

outlet for slaughterhouses, butcher shops,<br />

poultry dressers, and other processors of<br />

flesh foods. In addition, it is used to dispose<br />

of whole animals such as cows, horses, sheep,<br />

poultry, dogs, and cats that have died through<br />

natural or accidental causes. If it were not<br />

for reduction facilities, these remains would<br />

have to be buried to prevent a serious health<br />

hazard. The principal products of reduction<br />

processes are proteinaceous meals, which find<br />

primary use as poultry and livestock feeds, and<br />

tallow.<br />

Much reduction equipment is operated in meat-<br />

packing plants to handle only the "captive" blood,<br />

meat, and bone scrap offal produced on the<br />

premises. Other reduction cookers and driers<br />

are located in scavenger rendering plants,<br />

Figure 625. Inedible animal matter in the receiving<br />

pit of a rendering system (California Rendering Co.,<br />

Ltd., Los Angeles, Calif.).


816 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 220. INEDIBLE, REDUCTION PROCESS<br />

RAW MATERIALS ORIGINATING<br />

FROM SLAUGHTERHOUSES<br />

(The Globe Co., Chicago, Ill. )<br />

Source, lb live wt<br />

Steers, I, 000<br />

Cows<br />

Calves, 200<br />

Sheeo . . 80<br />

Hogs, 200<br />

Inedible offal and bone,<br />

lblhead<br />

90 to 100<br />

110 to 125<br />

15 to 20<br />

(I to 10<br />

10 to 15<br />

Blood,<br />

Iblhead<br />

55<br />

55<br />

5<br />

4<br />

7<br />

The animal mstter reduction industry has been<br />

traditionally considered one of the "offensive<br />

trades. " The reputation is not undeserved.<br />

Raw materials and process exhaust gases are<br />

highly malodorous and capable of eliciting nuisance<br />

complaints in surrounding areas. In<br />

recognition of these facts, specific air pollution<br />

control regulations have been enacted requiring<br />

the control of odorous process vapors.<br />

BATCHWISE DRY RENDERING<br />

The most widely used reduction process is dry<br />

rendering, wherein materials containing tallow<br />

are heated indirectly, usually in a steam-jac-<br />

keted vessel. Heat breaks down the flesh and<br />

bone structure, allowing tallow to separate<br />

from solids and water. Ln the process, most<br />

of the moisture is evaporated. Emissions con-<br />

sist essentially of steam with small quantities<br />

of entrained tallow, solids, and gases.<br />

Dry rendering mav be performed batchwise or<br />

continuously and may be accomplished at pressures<br />

greater or less than atmospheric. A<br />

typical batch-type, steam-jacketed, dry rendering<br />

cooker is shown in Figure 626. These vessels<br />

are normally charged with 3,000 to 10,000<br />

pounds of animal matter per batch. The cookers<br />

are equipped with longitudinal agitators that are<br />

driven at 25 to 65 rpm. Each batch is cooked<br />

for 314 to 4 hours.<br />

Rendering is a specific heated reduction<br />

process wherein fat-containing materials are<br />

reduced to tallow and proteinaceous meal.<br />

Blood drying, feather cooking, and grease reclaiming<br />

are other reduction operations usually<br />

performed as companion processes in rendering<br />

plants.<br />

Pressures of 50 psig and greater are used to<br />

digest bones, hooves, hides, and hair. At the<br />

resulting temperature (about 300°F), these<br />

materials are reduced to a pulpy mass. In typical<br />

dry-pressure-rendering cycles, the cooker<br />

vent is initially closed to cause pressure and<br />

temperature to increase. Some materials are<br />

cooked as long - as 2 hours at elevated pressure<br />

Reduction processes are influenced largely by<br />

the makeup of feedstocks. As can be seen from<br />

Table 221, some materials, such as blood and<br />

feathers, are essentially grease free, while<br />

to obtain the necessary digestion. After pressures<br />

are reduced, the batch is cooked or dried<br />

to remove additional moisture and to complete<br />

tallow-solids separation.<br />

others contain more than 30 percent tallow. Some dry rendering operations are carried out<br />

Where no tallow is present, the reduction pro- under vacuum to remove moisture rapidly at<br />

cess becomes primarily evaporation with, possi- temperatures sufficiently low to inhibit degradahly,<br />

some thermal digestion, tion of products. Vacuum rendering processes<br />

Table 221. COMPOSITION OF TYPICAL INEDIBLE RAW MATERIALS<br />

CHARGED TO REDUCTION PROCESSES<br />

(The Globe Co., Chicago, Ill. )<br />

Source<br />

Packlng house offal and bone<br />

Steers<br />

Cows<br />

Calves<br />

Sheep<br />

Hogs<br />

Dead stock (whole anlmals)<br />

Cattle<br />

Cows<br />

Sheep<br />

Hogs<br />

Blood<br />

Feathers (from poultry houses)<br />

Butcher shop scrap<br />

Tallow or grease,<br />

wt %<br />

15 to 20<br />

10 to 20<br />

8 to 12<br />

25 to 35<br />

15 to 20<br />

12<br />

8 to 10<br />

22<br />

3 0<br />

.<br />

3 7<br />

Solids,<br />

wt %<br />

30 to 35<br />

20 to 30<br />

20 to 25<br />

20 to 25<br />

18 to 25<br />

25<br />

23<br />

2 5<br />

25 to 30<br />

12 to 13<br />

20 to 30<br />

25<br />

Moisture,<br />

wt %<br />

45 to 55<br />

50 to 70<br />

60 to 70<br />

45 to 55<br />

55 to 67<br />

6 3<br />

67 to 69<br />

5 3<br />

40 to 45<br />

87 to 88<br />

70 to 80<br />

3 8


are essentially all of the batch type. Thevacu-<br />

um is usually produced with a precondenser,<br />

steam ejector, and aftercondenser. Cooker<br />

pressures are close to atmospheric at the start,<br />

then diminish markedly as the moisture content<br />

of the charge decreases. Vacuum rendering<br />

produces high-quality tallow but has a disadvan-<br />

tage in that ternperatures are low and incomplete<br />

cooking of bones, hair, and so forth, may occur.<br />

CONTINUOUS DRY RENDERING<br />

Because of the increased demand for processing<br />

meat, bone, and offal, highly mechanized con-<br />

tinuous dry rendering processes are used today.<br />

The advantages readily become apparent when it<br />

is shown that one operator can process 1 - 114<br />

million pounds of material in 16 hours. It would<br />

Reduction of Inedible Animal Matter 817<br />

Figure 626. A horizontal, batch-type, dry-rendering<br />

cooker equipped with a charging elevator (Standard<br />

Steel Corp., Los Angeles, Calif.).<br />

otherwise take 40 batch cookers and an undeter-<br />

mined crew of men to produce the same volume<br />

of throughput. Some processes consist essen-<br />

tially of a series of grinders, steam-jacketed<br />

conveyor-cookers, and presses. The continuous<br />

system of Figure 627 uses recycle tallow and a<br />

vertical-tube vacuum cooker. Selected meat and<br />

bone scrap is ground and slurried withhottallow<br />

before being charged to the cooker. Slurry is<br />

circulated through the tubes, and vapors are<br />

vented to a contact condenser. Steam is con-<br />

densed ahead of the ejector, and a barometric<br />

leg is employed. Tallow and solids are continu-<br />

ously withdrawn from the bottom of the cooker.<br />

In another continuous system, material is con-<br />

veyedto ahasher or hogger before it is fed to the<br />

first cooker. Here the temperature is brought<br />

up to approximately 180" F. Then the material is<br />

fed to a high-speed hammer mill or blender be-<br />

fore it is conveyed to the next cooker. The mate-<br />

rial is brought up to a temperature of about 21 0" F<br />

in the second cooker and then continuously con-<br />

veyed to a stacked set of finishing cookers. The<br />

finishing cookers consist of long jacketed continu-<br />

ous-tube screw conveyors where the material is<br />

brought up to 275" F before it is discharged onto<br />

a screen or into a prepresser. The prepresser,<br />

a press with extra spacing, gently squeezes the<br />

crax before it is fed to a press, or many presses<br />

in parallel. The press-cake is ground in a high-<br />

speed hammer mill and emerges as a meat meal<br />

product. Pressed and free-running tallow is<br />

settled, centrifuged, bleached, dried, and fil-<br />

tered to a premium grade tallow.<br />

Another continuous process consists of a hasher<br />

and one large continuous-tube cooker without


818 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

FLUlDlllNG TANK<br />

TRAMP METAL OISCHhRGF<br />

WATER SUPPLY<br />

STEAM SUPPLY<br />

BAROMETRIC CONDENSER STEhM SUPPLY<br />

FIUIOIIINO PUMP<br />

KlTER OISCHIIROE<br />

-AIR IN0 NUN CONOENSIBLE EJECTOR<br />

EAM CONOENSAI<br />

,. Y'8 . .<br />

FIT OISCIARGE 1<br />

STORAGE IANK<br />

Figure 62i. A continuous, vacuum rendering system employing tallow recycl ing (Carver-Greenf ield<br />

Process, The V.D. Anderson Co., Cleveland, Ohio).<br />

finishing cookers. The material is brought to<br />

250" to 300" F before being discharged to the<br />

prepresser. The feed rate to a unit without<br />

finishing cookers must necessarily be adjusted<br />

to allow more residence time in the single cooker.<br />

Another variation in the finishing cycle involves<br />

the use of a multiple-effect evaporator. The<br />

feed rate through the continuous-tube cooker may<br />

be approximately doubled and the material<br />

emerges half-cooked at approximately 210" to<br />

220" F. The steam driven off from the half-<br />

cooked material goes to an evaporator, where<br />

the remainder of the moisture is cooked off at a<br />

temperature of approximately 190" F and a<br />

vacuum of approximately 27 inches of water<br />

column.<br />

WET RENDERING<br />

One of the oldest reduction methods is the wet<br />

process, wherein animal matter is cooked in a<br />

closed vessel with live steam. There is little<br />

evolution of steam. Most of the contained mois-<br />

ture is removed as a liquid. Live steam is fed<br />

to a charge in a closed, vertical kettle until the<br />

internal pressure reaches approximately 60 psig<br />

(about 307°F). Heat causes a phase separation<br />

of water, tallow, and solids. After initial cook-<br />

ing, the pressure is released, and some steam<br />

is flashed from the system. The charge is then<br />

cooked at atmospheric pressure until tallow<br />

separation is complete. Water, tallow, and<br />

solids are separated by settling, pressing, and<br />

centrifuging.<br />

The water layer from a wet rendering process<br />

contains 6 to 7 percent solids. Soluble proteins<br />

can be recovered by evaporation, as in the<br />

processing of stick water at fish reduction<br />

plants.<br />

Wet rendering finds some use today in the han-<br />

dling of dead stock, namely whole animals that<br />

have died through accidents or natural causes.<br />

It has given way to dry rendering at most pack-<br />

ing houses and scavenger plants. Wet rendering<br />

is used to a limited degree in the production of<br />

edible fats and oils, as noted previously in this<br />

chapter.


REFINING RENDERED PRODUCTS<br />

At the completion of the cook cycle, tallow and<br />

sblids are run through a series of separation<br />

equipment as in the integrated plant of Figure<br />

628. Some systems are more complex than<br />

others, but the essential purpose is to produce<br />

dry, proteinaceous cracklings and clear, mois-<br />

ture-free tallow. In almost all cases, the cook-<br />

ers are discharged into perforated percolator<br />

pans that allow free-running tallow to drain from<br />

hot solids. The remaining solids are pressed to<br />

remove residual tallow. Dry cracklings are usu-<br />

ally ground to a meal before being marketed. In<br />

Figure 629, grease-laden cracklings are being<br />

dumped from a percolator pan after free tallow<br />

has been drained.<br />

Tallow from the percolators and presses is<br />

further treated to remove minor quantities of<br />

solids and water. Solids may he removed in<br />

desludging centrifuges, filters, or settling tanks.<br />

Traces of moisture are often removed from it<br />

by boiling or blowing air through heated tallow.<br />

Some operators remove moisture by settling in<br />

cone-bottom tanks, often with the aid of soda<br />

ash or sulfuric acid to provide better phase<br />

separation.<br />

Reduction of Inedible Animal Matter 819<br />

Belgian De Smet process, in which hexane is<br />

employed, has been adopted by some renderers<br />

in the United States and Canada. The entire<br />

process is enclosed in a vaportight building to<br />

minimize the explosion hazard. After extrac-<br />

tion, hexane is stripped from tallow and solids.<br />

The only measurable air contaminants, solvent<br />

vapors, are vented at one or more condensers.<br />

DRYING BLOOD<br />

Animal blood is evaporated and thermally di-<br />

gested to produce a dry meal used as a fertiliz-<br />

er, as a livestock feed supplement, and, to a<br />

limited degree, as a glue. Blood contains only<br />

10 to 15 percent solids and essentially no fat.<br />

At most packing houses, it is dried in horizontal,<br />

dry rendering cookers. In typical slaughtering<br />

operations, blood is continually drained from<br />

the kill floor to one or more cookers, throughout<br />

the day. Initially, while there is appreciable<br />

moisture in the blood, heat transfer through the<br />

jacket is reasonably rapid. As the moisture<br />

content decreases, however, heat transfer be-<br />

comes slower. During the final portion of the<br />

cycle, drying is extremely slow, and dusty meal<br />

can be entrained in exit gases.<br />

In some instances, solvents are used to extract In some instances, a tubular evaporator is used<br />

tallow from rendered solids. Solvent extraction to remove the initial portion of the water. When<br />

allows extremely fine control of products. he the moisture content decreases to about 65 per-<br />

Figure 628. An integrated dry rendering plant equipped with batch<br />

cookers, percolators, a crack1 ings press, and a tal low-settl ing tank.


820 CHEMICAL PROCESSJNG EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 629. Tallow-laden crack1 ings being dum~ed<br />

from a percolator after free tallow has been allowed<br />

to drain (California Render~ng Co.,<br />

California).<br />

Ltd., Los Angeles,<br />

cent, the material is transferred to a dry ren-<br />

dering cooker for final evaporation.<br />

Continuous dry rendering is also used to process<br />

blood into blood meal. The raw or green blood<br />

is screened and air blown, then fed to a continu-<br />

ous coagulator where the blood is "set" with live<br />

steam. It then goes to a separator, where serum<br />

is removed from the coagulated blood. The co-<br />

agulated blood is then fed into a recycling hot-air<br />

drying system called a Ring drier. The Ring<br />

drier system consists of a feed port and hammer<br />

mill where the coagulated blood is fed into the<br />

system. It is pulverized in an atmosphere of<br />

180" to 200" F and blown to the manifold where<br />

it meets the air from the furnace. The furnace<br />

gases of 600" to 800" F provide the make-up air<br />

to the system and enter at the control manifold.<br />

Control dampers are located in the manifold and<br />

regulate the recirculation rate of the material as<br />

well as the product take-off ratio. A cyclone col-<br />

lecting system also is ducted to the control mani-<br />

fold and driven by an exhaust fan at the outlet.<br />

Product is withdrawn through star valves located<br />

in the solids discharge leg of the cyclones.<br />

Some animal blood is spray dried to produce<br />

a plywood glue that commands a price con-<br />

siderably higher than that of fertilizer or live-<br />

stock feed. This is an air-drying process, and<br />

exhaust gases are markedly more voluminous<br />

than those of rendering equipment. Feedstocks<br />

are usually concentrated in an evaporator be-<br />

fore the spray drying.<br />

PROCESSING FEATHERS<br />

Poultry feathers are pressure cooked and sub-,<br />

sequently dried to produce a high-protein meal<br />

used principally as a poultry feed supplement.<br />

Feathers, like blood, contain practically no fat,<br />

and meal is the only product of the system.<br />

Feathers are pressure cooked at about 50 psig<br />

to hydrolyze the protein keratin, their principal<br />

constituent. Initial cooking is usually carried<br />

out in a dry rendering cooker. Final moisture<br />

removal may be accomplished in the cooker at<br />

ambient pressure or in separate air-drying<br />

equipment. Rotary steamtube air driers, such<br />

as that shown in Figure 630, are frequently<br />

used for this purpose. If separate driers are !<br />

employed, the material is transferred from<br />

cooker to drier at a moisture content of about<br />

50 percent.<br />

The Ring drier described under "Drying Blood''<br />

can also be used to dry feather meal. However,<br />

continuous dry rendering of poultry feathers still<br />

appears to be in the pilot stage. The pressure<br />

required to break down the feathers requires<br />

choking in the continuous-tube cookers. Another<br />

problem is the lack of free-running tallow for<br />

heat transfer. Economically, although a large<br />

continuous supply of feed feathers is available,<br />

continuous rendering does not show the tremendous<br />

advantage for feathers that it does for meat<br />

and bone for tallow and meat meal because of the<br />

relatively lower price for feather meal.<br />

ROTARY AIR DRIERS I<br />

Dlrect-fired rotary driers are seldom used in<br />

the reduction of inedible packing house waste<br />

or dead stock. As noted previously in this<br />

chapter, they find wide use in the reduction of<br />

fish scrap. Fired driers have been used to a<br />

limited degree to dry wet rendering tankage<br />

and some materials of low tallow content.<br />

Where air driers are required, steamtube<br />

units are generally more satisfactory from the<br />

standpoint of both ~roduct quality and odor emission.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

Malodors are the principal air contaminants<br />

emitted irom inedible-rendering equipment and<br />

from other heated animal matter reduction pro-<br />

cesses, Reduction plant odors emanate from<br />

the handling and storage of raw materials and<br />

products as well as from heated reduction pro-<br />

cesses. Some feed materials are highly decayed,<br />

even before delivery to scavenger rendering<br />

plants, and the grinding, conveying, and storage<br />

of these materials cannot help but generate some<br />

malodors. Cooking and drying processes are,<br />

I


SIDE ELEVATION SHOW1 NG<br />

ARRANGEMENT OF TUBES<br />

Reduction of Inedible Animal Matter<br />

FRONT ELEVATION SHOWING STEAM FLOW<br />

CUTAWAY OF PIPES<br />

Figure 630. A rotary steamtube air drier of the type commonly<br />

used for the continuous drying of cooked feathers (The V.D.<br />

Anderson Co.. Cleveland, Ohio)<br />

nevertheless, considered the largest odor sources,<br />

and most odor control programs have been di-<br />

rected at them. Handling and storage odors can<br />

usually be kept to a tolerable minimum by fre-<br />

quently washing working surfaces and by pro-<br />

cessing uncooked feedstocks as rapidly as possible.<br />

McCord and Witheridge (19491, who discuss<br />

the "offensive trades" at length, attribute<br />

rendering plant malodors to a variety of com-<br />

pounds. Ronald (1935) identifies rendering<br />

odors as principally ammonia, ethylamines,<br />

and hydrogen sulfide, all decomposition products<br />

of proteins. Skatole, other amines, sulfides,<br />

and mercaptans are also usually present. Tallow<br />

and fats do not generate as great quantities of<br />

odorous materials. Aldehydes, organic acids,<br />

and other partial oxidation products are the<br />

principal odorous breakdown products of fats.<br />

Putrescine, NH2 (CH2)4 NH2, and cadaverine,<br />

NH2(CH2)5NH2, are two extremely malodorous<br />

diamines associated with decaying flesh and<br />

rendering plants. Several specific compounds<br />

have extremely low odor thresholds and are de-<br />

tectable in concentrations as small as 10 parts<br />

per billion (ppb). Odor threshold concentra-<br />

tions of compounds are listed in Table D2,<br />

Appendix D. Many suspected compounds have<br />

not been positively identified nor have their<br />

odor thresholds been determined.<br />

821


822 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Cookers As Prominent Odor Sources Odors From <strong>Air</strong> Driers<br />

When animal matter is subjected to heat, the<br />

cell structure breaks down liberating volatile<br />

gases and vapors. Further heating causes some<br />

chemical decomposition, and the resultant prod-<br />

ucts are often highly odorous. All these mal-<br />

odorous gases and vapors are entrained in ex-<br />

haust gases.<br />

Exhaust products from cooking processes con-<br />

sist essentially of steam. Entrained gases and<br />

vapors are, nevertheless, highly odorous and<br />

apt to elicit nuisance complaints in areas sur-<br />

rounding animal matter reduction plants. Odor<br />

concentrations measured in exhaust gases of<br />

typical reduction processes are listed in Table<br />

222. Evidently there is a wide variation in<br />

odor concentrations from similar equipment.<br />

For instance, dry-batch rendering processes<br />

range from 5,000 to 500,000 odor units per scf,<br />

depending principally upon the type and "ripe-<br />

ness" of feedstocks. Blood drying can be even<br />

more odorous, with concentrations as great as<br />

1 million odor units per scf if the blood is allowed<br />

to age for only 24 hours before processing. High-<br />

ly odorous steam emissions also are generated<br />

whenever fresh feed material is dropped into a<br />

hot cooker. Approximately 4 hours rest time<br />

would be required between loads to prevent fresh<br />

material from being distilled during the loading<br />

operation.<br />

Source<br />

-<br />

Renderine cooker.<br />

dry-batch typeb ' 1<br />

Blood cooker,<br />

dry-batch type b<br />

Feather drier,<br />

s teamtuheC<br />

Blood spray<br />

drierc'<br />

Grease-drying tank,<br />

air blowing<br />

156°F<br />

170°F<br />

2Z5'F<br />

As can be seen from Table 222, feather drier<br />

odor concentrations, though generally smaller,<br />

are more variable than those from rendering<br />

cookers. Their largest odor concentrations--<br />

25,000 odor units per scf--are associated with<br />

operations where feedstocks are putrefied or<br />

not completely cooked beforehand or where the<br />

meal is overheated in the drier. Under optimum<br />

conditions, odor concentrations from these driers<br />

should not exceed 2,000 odor units per scf. With<br />

blood spray driers, where extreme care is main-<br />

tained to ensure freshness of feedstocks, con-<br />

centrations can be less than 1,000 odor units per<br />

scf. In general, air drier odor concentrations<br />

are less than those of cookers for the following<br />

reasons: (1) In most instances feedskocks are<br />

cooked or partially evaporated before the air<br />

drying; (2) odorous gases are more dilute in<br />

drier exit gases; (3) feedstocks are often fresher.<br />

Odors and Dust From Rendered-Product Systems<br />

Some odors and dust are emitted from cooked<br />

animal matter as it is separated and refined.<br />

The heaviest points of odor emission are the<br />

percolators into which hot cooker contents are<br />

dumped. Steam and odors evolve from the hot<br />

material, particularly during times of cooker<br />

unloading. Cookers are normally dumped at or<br />

near 212°F.<br />

Table 222. ODOR CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES FROM<br />

INEDIBLE REDUCTION PROCESSES<br />

Odor concentration,<br />

odor unit/scf<br />

Range ITypical average<br />

Typical moisture<br />

content of<br />

feeding stocks, 70<br />

5. 000 to I 50,000<br />

50<br />

500,000 1 I I<br />

10,000 to<br />

1 million<br />

600 to<br />

25, 000<br />

600 to<br />

1,000<br />

100,000<br />

2,000<br />

aAssumi~~g 5 percent moisture in solid products of system.<br />

b~oncondensable gases are neglected in determining emission rates.<br />

CExhaust gases are assumed to contain 25 percent moisture.<br />

d~lood handled in spray drier before any appreciable decomposition. occurs.<br />

800<br />

4, 500<br />

15,000<br />

60,000<br />

90<br />

5 0<br />

6 0<br />

< 5<br />

Exhaust products,<br />

scf/ton of feeda<br />

20.000<br />

38, 000<br />

77,000<br />

100,000<br />

100 scfm<br />

per tank<br />

Odor emission<br />

rate, odor unit/<br />

ton of feed


Table 223 shows odor threshold concentrations of<br />

emissions from cookers during the dumping oper-<br />

ation. The type of material being rendered has a<br />

great effect on the odor concentration. As indi-<br />

cated, meat and bone trimmings from restaurants,<br />

which contain large quantities of rancid grease.<br />

produce high odor concentrations which would<br />

require hooding and incineration in an afterburner.<br />

Entrails from turkeys and chickens would be bor-<br />

derline, as shown in the table. The type of mate-<br />

rial, quantity of tallow or grease in the batch,<br />

freshness of the material, and unloading tempera-<br />

tures all are factors which influence the odor con-<br />

centration. Each rendering operation should be<br />

sampled for odors before deciding whether or not<br />

air pollution control equipment is required for<br />

the dump operation.<br />

Odorous steam emissions and smoke generated<br />

by the presses usually require control. Centri-<br />

fuges and settling tanks where meal and tallow<br />

are heated to accomplish the desired separation<br />

also emit odorous steam.<br />

I The grinding of pressed solids, and subsequent<br />

meal conveying are the only points of dust emis-<br />

! sion from rendering systems. These particulates<br />

1 are reasonably coarse, and dust is usually not<br />

1 excessive.<br />

i Grease-Processing Odors<br />

I<br />

!<br />

I<br />

!<br />

, .<br />

Some odors are generated at processing tanks<br />

when moisture is removed from grease or tallow<br />

by boiling or by air blowing or both. If air is<br />

used for this purpose, exhaust volumes seldom<br />

Reduction of Inedible Animal Matter 823<br />

exceed 100 scfm, but odor concentrations are<br />

measurable. Odor concentration is a function<br />

of operating temperature. As shown in Table<br />

222, measured concentrations have been found<br />

to range from 4,500 odor units per scf at 150" F,<br />

to 60,000 odor units per scf at 225" F. Odor<br />

concentrations vary greatly with the type of<br />

grease processed and the air rate, as well as<br />

with temperature.<br />

Row-Materials Odors<br />

Some malodors emanate from the cutting and<br />

handling of raw materials. In most instances<br />

these emissions are not great. Odors usuaiiy<br />

originate at the point where raw material is<br />

first sliced, ground, or otherwise broken into<br />

smaller parts. Most feedstocks are ground in<br />

a hammer mill before the cooking. Large,<br />

whole animals (dead stock) must be skinned,<br />

eviscerated, and at least partially dismembered<br />

before being fed to rendering equipment. If the<br />

animal is badly decomposed, this skinning and<br />

cutting operation can evolve strong odors.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

All heated animal matter reduction processes<br />

should be vented directly to control equipment.<br />

Hooding is used in some instances to collect<br />

malodors generated in the processing of raw<br />

materials and cooked products.<br />

The loading of material into a hot batch cooker<br />

generates highly odorous steam emissions. It is<br />

impractical to require a cooker to be cooled be-<br />

Table 223. ODOR CONCENTRATIONS OF EMISSIONS FROM INEDIBLE RENDERING COOKERS<br />

DURING THE DUMPING OPERATION<br />

Poultry feathers<br />

Type of material cooked<br />

Entrails from turkeys and chickens<br />

Meat and bone trimmings with large quantities<br />

of rancid restaurant grease<br />

Emissions during<br />

dump from cooker.<br />

odor unitslcf<br />

200<br />

2,000<br />

25,000<br />

40,000<br />

Fresh meat and bone trimmings from a beef 100<br />

slaughterhouse<br />

Mixture of dead cats and dogs, fish scrap,<br />

poultry offal, etc.<br />

Slaughterhouse viscera and bones<br />

a<br />

x = 7 minutes.<br />

b<br />

x = 18 minutes.<br />

1,000<br />

150<br />

200<br />

Emissions 5<br />

minutes after<br />

dumping,<br />

odor units/cf<br />

2 0<br />

500<br />

3,000<br />

200<br />

7 0<br />

1,500<br />

150<br />

Emissions x<br />

minutes after<br />

dumping,<br />

odor unitslcf<br />

-<br />

.<br />

-<br />

800a<br />

150b


824 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

fore receiving the next charge. One method to<br />

prevent escape of air contaminants during the<br />

loading of a cooker is to provide a choked feed<br />

arrangement. A hopper may be constructed above<br />

the cooker that holds one full load. The material<br />

is dumped quickly and there is enough mass of<br />

material to prevent steaming. Another method<br />

is to blow the material into the cooker through a<br />

closed feed system.<br />

The methods described above, unfortunately, are<br />

not feasible for loading poultry feathers because<br />

of their density and texture. Grinding the feathers<br />

beforehand has not proven to be satisfactory. A<br />

successful method to control the loading of feathers,<br />

however, has been developed. The feather cooker<br />

is provided with a separate dome and vent at the<br />

drive end. Both exhaust systems may be valved<br />

at the dome. An indraft of 100 fpm through the<br />

charge door is usually adequate. The exhaust<br />

system used for cooking must be closed during<br />

the loading cycle and vice ver,sa.<br />

If highly decayed dead stock is being processed,<br />

the entire dead stock room should be ventilated<br />

at a rate of 40 or more air changes per hour for<br />

worker comfort. Areas should also be ventilated<br />

where raw materials are stored unrefrigerated<br />

for any appreciable time before processing.<br />

Hooding may be employed on raw-material<br />

grinders preceding cookers and percolator<br />

pans and expeller presses used to handle<br />

cooked products. Although the volume of<br />

steam and odors evolved at any of these points<br />

does not exceed 100 cfm, greater volumes are<br />

normally required to offset crossdrafts. In-<br />

draft velocities of 100 fpm under hoods are usu-<br />

ally satisfactory.<br />

Emission Rates From Cookers<br />

The ventilation rates of cookers can be esti-<br />

mated directly from the quantity of moisture<br />

removed and the time of removal. Maximum<br />

emission rates from dry cookers are approxi-<br />

mately twice the average moisture evaporation<br />

rates. In the determination of exhaust volumes,<br />

noncondensablegases can normally be neglected.<br />

Consider a batch cooker that removes 3, 000<br />

pounds of moisture from 6,000 pounds of animal<br />

matter in 3 hours, a relatively long cook cycle.<br />

The average rate of emission is 16.7 pounds<br />

per minute or 450 cfm steam at about 212°F.<br />

The instantaneous evaporation rate and cumula-<br />

tive moisture removal are plotted in Figure<br />

631. The maximum evolution rate apparently<br />

occurs near the initial portion of the cook at<br />

29 pounds per minute or 790 cfm at ZlZ'F. As<br />

moisture is removed from a batch cooker, the<br />

heat transfer rate decreases, the temperatures<br />

Figure 631. Steam emission pattern f ram a<br />

batch-type, dry render~ng cooker operated<br />

at ambient pressure.<br />

rise, and the evaporation rate falls off. The<br />

general shapes of the curves in Figure 631 are<br />

typical of batch-cooking cycles. Where cook<br />

times are appreciably shorter, evaporation<br />

rates are greater; nevertheless, the ratio of<br />

maximum to average evaporation rate is main-<br />

tained at approximately 2 to 1.<br />

The length of a cooking cycle, and the evapo-<br />

ration rate are dependent upon the temperature<br />

in the steam jacket, and the rotational speed<br />

of the agitator. The highest permissible agita-<br />

tor speeds (about 65 rpm) can result in cooking<br />

times of 45 minutes to 1 hour. Many operators,<br />

particularly at packing houses, use slower<br />

agitator speeds, and cycles are as long as 4<br />

hours.<br />

If vacuum cooking is employed, volume rates<br />

and temperatures decrease as the batch pro-<br />

gresses. With these systems, the vacuum-<br />

producing devices largely govern cooking times.<br />

The evaporation rate in a vacuum system is lim-<br />

ited by the rate at which steam can be removed,<br />

usually by condensation. If vapor cannot be<br />

condensed as fast as it is evaporated, the cycle<br />

is merely lengthened.<br />

Pressure cookers have a slightly dsferent emis-<br />

sion pattern, but maximum emission rates are<br />

again twice the average. During the initial<br />

portion of the cycle, there are no emissions<br />

while pressures are increasing to the desired<br />

maximum. The cooker is vented at elevated


pressure, usually about 50 psig. High-pres-<br />

sure vapors are relieved through small bypass<br />

lines so that the surge of steam is not more than<br />

the control system can handle. Most of the con-<br />

tained moisture is evaporated after pressures<br />

are reduced to ambient levels.<br />

Vapor emission rates from wet rendering cook-<br />

ers are considerably lower than those from dry<br />

cookers, comparable to initial volumes during<br />

pressure cooking. Only enough steam is flash<br />

evaporated to reduce the pressure to 1 atmos-<br />

phere. The large percentage of moisture in<br />

a wet rendering process is removed as water<br />

by physical separation rather than by evapora-<br />

tion.<br />

Emission rates from continuous, dry rendering<br />

processes are steady and can be calculated<br />

directly from the moisture content of feedstocks<br />

and products. To lower the moisture content<br />

from 36 to 6 percent in typical meat, bone, and<br />

offal scrap, 2,750 scfm or 110 pounds of steam<br />

per minute would be evaporated if the charge<br />

rate to the cooker were 20,000 pounds per hour.<br />

Since it is difficult to operate continuous systems<br />

gas-tight, it is necessary to produce an indraft<br />

at the feed and outlet ends of the system in order<br />

to ensure that cooker effluent does not escape<br />

into the atmosphere. Thus, another 490 scfm,<br />

or 15 percent by volume, must be accounted for<br />

in the emission rate from continuous tube systems.<br />

Emission rates from blood cookers are general- -<br />

ly lower than those from dry rendering cookers<br />

owing to the longer cook cycles employed. Blood<br />

is continually added to an operating cooker during<br />

a typical packinghouse workday. The emission<br />

rate fluctuates as a function of the moisture content<br />

in the cooker. A cook cycle may extend<br />

over 8 or 10 hours, and charging patterns can<br />

vary tremendously. Emission rates do not<br />

normally exceed 500 cfm, and at times, are considerably<br />

lower.<br />

Emission rates irom feather cookers follow the<br />

same pattern as those from other dry pressure<br />

cookers though rates are lower and cooking<br />

times usually longer. Inasmuch as feathers<br />

contain no appreciable tallow, heat transfer is<br />

relatively slow. At some plants, batches of<br />

feathers are cooked as long as 8 hours. Where<br />

separate driers are used, feathers are still<br />

cooked 2 to 4 hours, which reduces the moisture<br />

content to 50 percent before the charging to a<br />

drier.<br />

Emission Rates From Driers<br />

Most air-drying processes are operated on a<br />

continuous basis with no measurable fluctua-<br />

Reduction of Inedible Animal Matter 825<br />

tions in exhaust rates. Enough air and, in some<br />

instances, products of combustion are added to<br />

yield a moisture content of 10 to 30 percent by<br />

volume in the exit gas stream. To dry 2,000<br />

pounds of cooked feathers per hour from 50 to<br />

5 percent moisture requires a drier (steamtube)<br />

exhaust volume of 1,660 scfm at 20 percent<br />

moisture in the gases. Volumes from air driers<br />

are always much greater than those from cook-<br />

ing processes, and they contain far greater<br />

quantities of noncondensable gases .<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

The principal devices used to control reduction<br />

plant odors are afterburners and condensers,<br />

installed separately and in combination. Ad-<br />

sorbers and scrubbers also find use. Dust is<br />

not a major problem at animal matter reduction<br />

plants, and simple cyclones are usually suffi-<br />

cient to prevent excessive emissions.<br />

Selection of odor control equipment is influenced<br />

greatly by the moisture content of the malodorous<br />

stream, or conversely, by the percentage of non-<br />

condensable gases. It is usually more costly to<br />

control noncondensable gases than moisture.<br />

Reduction plant exhaust streams fall into two<br />

general types: (1) Those consisting almost en-<br />

tirely (95 percent or greater) of water vapor,<br />

as from rendering cookers and blood cookers,<br />

and (2) air drier exhaust gases, which seldom<br />

contain more than 30 percent moisture by volume.<br />

Controlling High-Moisture Streams<br />

Condensing moisture from wet cooker gases is<br />

almost always economically attractive. Some<br />

malodors are usually condensed or dissolved in<br />

the condensate. In any case the volume is re-<br />

duced by a factor of 10 or more. The remaining<br />

noxious gases can be directed to a further control<br />

device such as an afterburner or carbon adsorber<br />

before being vented to the atmosphere.<br />

Selection of the condenser depends upon the par-<br />

ticular facilities of the operator. The principal<br />

types of condensers noted in Chapter 5 are adapt-<br />

able to reduction cooker exhaust streams. Con-<br />

tact condensers and air-cooled and water-cooled<br />

surface condensers have been successfully used<br />

for this purpose.<br />

Contact condensers are more efficient control<br />

devices than surface condensers are, though<br />

both types are highly effective when coupled with<br />

an afterburner or carbon adsorber. This is<br />

illustrated by data in Table 224. Odor concen-<br />

trations are seen to be considerably greater in<br />

gases from surface condensers than in those<br />

from contact condensers. With condensate at


826 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

a<br />

Table 224. ODOR REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF CONDENSERS OR AFTERBURNERS,<br />

OR BOTH, VENTING A TYPICAL DRY RENDERING COOKER^<br />

(Calculated from Mills et al., 1963)<br />

Odors from cookers<br />

Concentration,<br />

odor unitslsci<br />

50,000<br />

80"F, a contact condenser reduces odor concen-<br />

trations by about 80 percent and odor emission<br />

rates by 99 percent. At the same condensate<br />

temperature, odor concentrations increase across<br />

a surface condenser. Either type of condenser,<br />

however, reduces the volume of cooker vapors<br />

by 95 percent or more. Thus, even a surface<br />

condenser lowers the odor emission rate by about<br />

50 percent.<br />

Contact condensers are relatively inexpensive<br />

to install hut require large quantities of one-<br />

pass cooling water. From 15 to 20 pounds of<br />

cooling water is necessary to condense and sub-<br />

cool adequately 1 pound of steam. Since cooling<br />

water and condensate are intimately mixed, the<br />

resultant liquid cannot be cooled in an atmospheric<br />

cooling tower without emission of malodors to the<br />

almosphere. The large condensate volume that<br />

must be disposed of can overload sewer facili-<br />

ties in reduction plant areas.<br />

Subcooling Condensate<br />

Emission rate,<br />

odor unitslmi"<br />

25,000, 000<br />

Condenser<br />

None<br />

Surface<br />

Surface<br />

Contact<br />

Contact<br />

Condensate<br />

temperature,<br />

OF<br />

Surface condensers, whether air cooled or water<br />

cooled, should be designed to provide subcooling<br />

of condensate to 140°F or lower. This may be<br />

accomplished iri several ways, as noted in Chapter<br />

5. The need for subcooling is negated when high<br />

vacuum is employed. With vacuum operation,<br />

volatile, malodorous gases are drawn off through<br />

the ejector or vacuum pump, and condensation<br />

temperatures are often less than 140°F. At a<br />

vacuum of 24 inches of mercury (2.9 psia), the<br />

condensation temperature of steam is 140°F.<br />

-<br />

.<br />

80<br />

140<br />

80<br />

140<br />

Afterburner<br />

temperature,<br />

OF<br />

Odor removal<br />

efficiency,<br />

70<br />

~ a on ahypothetical ~ ~ d cooker that emits 500 scfm ofvapor containing 5 percentnoncondensable gases.<br />

1,200<br />

None<br />

1,200<br />

None<br />

I. 200<br />

Odors from control system<br />

Concentration,<br />

odors<br />

unitslscf<br />

100 to 150<br />

(Mode 120)<br />

100.000 to<br />

10 million<br />

(Mode 500,000)<br />

50 to 100<br />

(Made 75)<br />

2,000 to<br />

20,000<br />

(Mode 10,000)<br />

20 to 50<br />

(Mode 25)<br />

Condenser Tube Materials<br />

99.40<br />

50<br />

99.93<br />

99<br />

99.99<br />

Reduction process vapors can be highly corro-<br />

sive to the metals commonly used in surface<br />

condenser tubes. Both acid and alkaline vapors<br />

can be present, sometimes alternately in the<br />

same equipment. Vapors from relatively fresh<br />

meat and bone scrap renderir 7 are mildly acidic,<br />

and some brasses are satisfactory. Brasses<br />

fail rapidly, however, under alkaline conditions.<br />

Mild steel tubes are adequate where the pH is<br />

greater than 7.0 but quickly corrode under acid<br />

conditions.<br />

Some operations, such as dead stock rendering,<br />

can produce alkaline and acid gases alternately<br />

during the cook cycle. Here neither brass nor<br />

mild steel is satisfactory. In these cases, stain-<br />

less steels have been successfully employed.<br />

With a relatively constant pH condition, less ex-<br />

pensive metals could be used.<br />

Where acid-base conditions are uncertain, a<br />

pH determination should be made. The vapors<br />

should be sampled over the complete process<br />

cycle with all representative feedstocks in the<br />

cookers.<br />

Interceptors in Cooker Vent Lines<br />

Modal emission<br />

rate, odor<br />

unitslmin<br />

90,000<br />

12,500,000<br />

6,000<br />

250,000<br />

2,000<br />

<strong>Air</strong> pollution control systems venting cookers<br />

should be equipped with interceptor traps to pre-<br />

vent fouling of condensers and other control de-<br />

vices. So-called wild blows are relatively com-<br />

mon in dry rendering operations. They result<br />

from momentary plugging of the cooker vent.<br />

Steam pressures increase until they are suffi-


cient to unblock the line. In the unblocking, a<br />

measurable quantity of animal matter is forced<br />

through the vent line at high velocity. If there<br />

is no interceptor, this material fouls condensers,<br />

hot wells, afterburners, and other connected con-<br />

trol devices. Although a wild blow is an opera-<br />

tional problem, it greatly affects the efficiency<br />

of odor control equipment.<br />

The systems shown in Figures 632 and 633 in-<br />

clude interceptors in the vent lines between the<br />

cookers and condensers. The installation de-<br />

picted in Figure 633 uses an air-cooled con-<br />

denser and afterburner. Most tanks are of suffi-<br />

cient size to hold approximately one-haIf of a full<br />

cooker charge. They are designed so that col-<br />

lected materials can be drained while the cooker<br />

and control system are in operation.<br />

Figure 632. A condenser-afterburner control<br />

system with an interceotor located between<br />

the rendering cooker and condenser.<br />

Vapor Incineration<br />

For animal matter reduction processes, as with<br />

most odor sources, flame incineration is the most<br />

positive control method. Afterburners have been<br />

used individually and in combination with other de-<br />

vices, principally condensers. Rule 64 of the<br />

Los Angeles County <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> Control District<br />

(see Appendix A), which specifically governs heat-<br />

ed animal matter reduction processes, uses incin-<br />

eration at 1,200-F as an odor control standard.<br />

Any control method or device as effective as<br />

flame incineration at 1,200°F is acceptable under<br />

the regulation.<br />

Total incineration is used to control low-mois-<br />

tnre reduction process streams, as from driers,<br />

and various other streams of small volume. At<br />

reduction plants, steamtube driers are normal-<br />

ly the largest equipment controlled in this manner.<br />

Reduction of Inedible Animal Matter 827<br />

Gases from the driers are vented directly to after-<br />

burners, which are operated at temperatures of<br />

1,200" F or higher. Dustis usuallynotin sufficient<br />

concentration to impede incineration. If there is<br />

appreciable particulate matter in the gas stream,<br />

auxiliary dust collectors must be installed or the<br />

afterburner must be operated at 1.600" F or high-<br />

er. At 1,200" F, solids are only partially incin-<br />

erated.<br />

Flame incineration at 1.200" F reduces odor con-<br />

centrations from steamtube driers to 100 to 150<br />

odor units per scf where dust loading is not ex-<br />

cessive. Some variation can be expected when<br />

concentrations are greatly in excess of the nomi-<br />

nal 2,000 odor units per scf usually encountered<br />

in drier gases.<br />

Because of the large volumes exhausted from<br />

driers, afterburner fuel requirements are a<br />

major consideration. A drier emitting 3,000<br />

scfm requires about 4,800 scfh natural gas for<br />

1,200" F incineration. Several means of recov-<br />

ering waste heat from large afterburner streams<br />

have been used. The most common are the<br />

generation of steam and preheating of drier<br />

inlet gases.<br />

In the control of spray driers, dust collectors<br />

must often be employed ahead of the afterburner.<br />

High-efficiency centrifugal collectors, baghouses,<br />

or precipitators may he required as precleaners,<br />

depending upon the size and concentration of par-<br />

ticulates.<br />

Condensation-Incineration Systems<br />

As noted earlier, wet cooker vapors are seldom<br />

incinerated is a. While 100 percent incineration<br />

is feasible, operating costs are much greater<br />

than for condenser-afterburner combinations.<br />

Both types of control systems provide better than<br />

99 percent odor removal, but the combination system<br />

results in a much lower odor emission rate.<br />

The cooker control systems shown in Figures 632<br />

and 633 and in Chapter 5, illustrate typical com-<br />

binations of condensers and afterburners. Un-<br />

condensed gases are separated from condensate<br />

at either the condenser or hot well. Gases enter<br />

the afterburner near ambient temperature. Ei-<br />

ther contact or surface condensers serve to re-<br />

move essentially all particulates. The remaining<br />

"clean" uncondensed gases can be readily incin-<br />

erated at 1.200" F. In some instances there are<br />

minor concentrations of methane and other fuel<br />

gases in the stream. Uncondensed gases from<br />

surface condensers are richer in combustibles<br />

thanare those from contact condensers. As shown<br />

in Table 224, odor removal efficiencies greater than<br />

99.9 percent are possible with condenser-after-<br />

burner systems serving dry rendering cookers.


828 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Figure 633. A cooker control system including an interceptor,<br />

air-cooled condenser, and afterburner (California Protein Products,<br />

Los Angeles, Calif.).<br />

When the moisture content of the contaminated<br />

stream is from 15 to 40 percent, the use of<br />

condensers may or may not be advantageous.<br />

In these cases, a number of factors must be<br />

weighed including volumes, exit temperatures,<br />

fuel costs, water availability, and equipment<br />

costs among others.<br />

Carbon Adsorption of Odors<br />

Most of the malodorous gases emitted from reduction<br />

processes can be adsorbed on activated<br />

carbon to some degree. The capacities of<br />

activated carbons for hydrogen sulficle, uric<br />

acid, skatole, putrescine, and several other<br />

specific compounds found in reduction plant gases<br />

are considered "satisfactoryr' to "high. " For<br />

ammonia and low-molecular-weight amines,<br />

they have somewhat lower capacities. The latter<br />

compoul~ds tend to be desorbed as the carbon becomes<br />

saturated with high-molecular-weight<br />

compounds (Barnebey-Cheney Co., Bulletin<br />

T-642). For the mixture of inalodorous materials<br />

encountered at reduction plants, a highquality<br />

carbon would be expected to adsorb<br />

from 10 to 25 percent of its weight belore the<br />

breakthrough point is reached.<br />

Carbon adsorbers are as efficient as afterburn-<br />

ers but have limitations that often make them<br />

unattractive for cooker control. Their most<br />

useful application is the control of large volumes<br />

of relatively cool and dry gases. Adsorhers<br />

usually cannot be employed in reduction process<br />

streams without auxiliary dust collectors, con-<br />

densers, or coolers.<br />

Carbon adsorbers cannot be used to control<br />

emissions from wet cookers unless the adsorb-<br />

ers are preceded by condensers. Activated<br />

carbon does not adsorb satisfactorily at tem-<br />

peratures greater than 120°F. To cool cooker<br />

vapors, which are predominantly steam, to<br />

this temperature, most of the moisture must<br />

be recovered. At l2OsF, saturated air contains<br />

only 11.5 percent water vapor by volume. Con-<br />

denser-adsorber systems are reported to re-<br />

move odors as efficiently as condenser-after-<br />

burner systems. No comparative odor con-<br />

centration data are available.<br />

Drier exhaust streams can be controlled with<br />

adsorbers if inlet temperatures and dust con-<br />

centrations can be held suiIiciently low and<br />

small, respectively. Many driers are exhausted


at temperatures higher than 200°F and contain<br />

enough fine particulates to foul adsorbers. A<br />

scrubber-contact condenser is often a satis-<br />

factory means of removing particulates and low-<br />

ering temperatures hefore adsorption. If, how-<br />

ever, there are appreciable particulates of less<br />

than 10 microns diameter, more efficient dust<br />

control devices are necessary.<br />

Regeneration of activated carbon is a major con-<br />

sideration at animal matter reduction plants.<br />

Carbon life between regenerations can be as<br />

short as 24 hours, particularly where malodors<br />

are in heavy concentration, and the carbon has<br />

a low capacity for the compounds being adsorbed.<br />

Regeneration frequency is a function of many<br />

-<br />

factors, including malodor concentration. the<br />

quality and quantity of carbon, and the kind of<br />

compounds that must be adsorbed.<br />

Some means must be employed to contain or<br />

destroy the desorbed gases; otherwise, mal-<br />

odors are vented to the atmosphere in essentially<br />

the same form that they were collected. Inciu-<br />

eration at 1,ZOO"F or higher is the most common<br />

method of controlling these gases. For streams<br />

of low volume, afterburners used during regen-<br />

eration can be as large and as costly as those<br />

used to incinerate odors from the basic reduc-<br />

tion equipment. The need for incineration of<br />

desorbed gases usually offsets the advantages<br />

of carbon adsorption for streams of low volume.<br />

If the exhaust rate is sufficiently small, incin-<br />

erating vapors directly, as they are evolved<br />

from the reduction equipment or condenser, is<br />

considerably simpler.<br />

Odor Scrubbers<br />

ELECTROPLATING 829<br />

Odor Masking and Counteraction<br />

Masking agents and odor counteractants have<br />

been used with some success to offset in-plant<br />

odors. These materials are added to cooker<br />

feedstocks and sprayed in processing and storage<br />

areas. They are repdrted to provide a degree<br />

of nuisance elimination and worker comfort,<br />

particularly in high-odor areas such as dead<br />

stock skinning rooms. Masking agents and<br />

counteractants, however, are not recommended<br />

for the control of odors from heated animal<br />

matter reduction equipment.<br />

ELECTROPLATING<br />

Electroplating is a process used to deposit,<br />

or plate, a coating of metal upon the surface<br />

of another metal by electrochemical reactions.<br />

In variations of this process, nonmetallic sur-<br />

faces have been plated with metals, and a non-<br />

metal such as rubber has been used as a plating<br />

material. Industrial and commercial applica-<br />

tions of electroplating are numerous, ranging<br />

from manufactured parts for automobiles, tools,<br />

other hardware, and furniture to toys. Brass,<br />

bronze, chromium (chrome), copper, cadmium,<br />

iron, lead, nickel, tin, zinc, and the precious<br />

metals are most commonly electroplated.<br />

Platings are applied to decorate, to reduce<br />

corrosion, to improve wearing qualities and<br />

other mechanical properties, or to serve as<br />

a base for subsequent plating with another metal.<br />

The purpose and type of plating determine the details<br />

of the process employed and, indirectly,<br />

the air pollution potential, which is a function of<br />

the type and rate of "gassing, " or release of gas<br />

bubbles from plating solutions with entrainment<br />

of droplets of solution as a mist. The degree<br />

of severity of air pollution from these processes<br />

may vary from being an insignificant problem<br />

to a nuisance.<br />

Conventional scrubbers are seldom used to<br />

control reduction process odors. Of course,<br />

contact condensers provide some scrubbing<br />

of cooker gases; nevertheless, these devices<br />

are principally condensers, and tail waters<br />

An electroplating system consists of two eleccannot<br />

be recirculated. It is conceivable that<br />

trodes--an anode and a cathode--immersed in<br />

alkaline or acid scrubbers would he effective<br />

for drier gases if all the odorous compounds<br />

an electrolyte and connected to an external<br />

source of direct-current electricity. The base<br />

reacted in the same manner. Unfortunately,<br />

material upon which the plating is to be deposited<br />

the malodorous mixtures encountered in typical<br />

makes up the cathode. In most electroplating<br />

reduction processes are not homogenous from<br />

systems, a bar of the metal to be deposited is<br />

the acid-base standpoint.<br />

used as the anode. The electrolyte is a solution<br />

containing: (1) Ions of the metal to be deposited<br />

Strong oxidizing solutions, such as chlorine and (2) additional dissolved materials to aid in<br />

dioxide, are reported to destroy many of the electrical conductivity and produce desirable<br />

odorous organic materials (Woodward and characteristics in the deposited plating.<br />

Fenrich, 1952). With any type of recirculating<br />

chemical scrubber, the contaminated stream When an electric current is passed through the<br />

would first have to be cooled to ambient tem- electrolyte, ions from the electrolyte are reperature,<br />

by condensation if necessary. duced, or deposited, at the cathode, and an


830 CHEMICAL PROCESS11 NG EQUIPMENT<br />

equivalent amount of either the same or a dif-<br />

ferent element is oxidized or dissolved at the<br />

anode. In some systems, for example, chrome<br />

plating, the deposited metal does not dissolve<br />

at the anode, and hence, insoluble anodes are<br />

used, the source of the deposited metal being<br />

ions formed from salts of that metal previously<br />

dissolved in the electrolyte.<br />

The character of the deposited metal is affected<br />

by many factors, including the pH of the electro-<br />

lyte, the metallic ion concentration, the sim-<br />

plicity or complexity of the metallic ion (includ-<br />

ing its primary and secondary ionization prod-<br />

ucts), the anodic and cathodic current densities,<br />

the temperature of the electrolyte, and the<br />

presence of modifying or "addition agents." By<br />

varying these factors, the deposit can be varied<br />

from a rough, granular, loosely adherent plat-<br />

ing to a strong, adherent, mirror-finish plating.<br />

If the electromotive force used is greater than<br />

that needed to deposit the metal, hydrogen is<br />

also formed at the cathode, and oxygen forms<br />

at the anode. When insoluble anodes are used,<br />

oxygen or a halogen (if halide salts are used in<br />

the electrolyte) is formed at the anode. Both of<br />

these situations produce gas sing.<br />

A potential air pollution problem can also occur<br />

in the preparation of articles for plating. These<br />

procedures, primarily cleaning processes, are<br />

as important as the plating operation itself for<br />

the production of high-quality finishes of im-<br />

pervious, adherent metal coatings. The clean-<br />

ing of metals before electroplating generally<br />

requires a multistage procedure as follows:<br />

1. Precleaning by vapor degreasing or by soak-<br />

ing in a solvent, an emulsifiable solvent, or<br />

an emulsion (used for heavily soiled items);<br />

2. intermediate cleaning with an alkaline bath<br />

soak treatment;<br />

3.<br />

electrocleaning with an alkaline anodic or<br />

cathodic bath treatment, or both (the chem-<br />

ical and mechanical [gassing] action created<br />

by passing a current through the bath between<br />

the immersed article and an electrode pro-<br />

duces the cleaning);<br />

4. pickling with an acid bath soak treatment,<br />

~ith or without electricity.<br />

The selection of an appropriate cleaning method<br />

in any given case depends upon three important<br />

factors: The type and quantity of the soil, com-<br />

position and surface texture of the base metal,<br />

and the degree of cleanliness required. In gen-<br />

eral, oil, grease, and loose dirt are removed<br />

first; then scale is removed, and, just before<br />

the plating, the pickling process is employed.<br />

The articles to be plated are thoroughly rinsed<br />

after each treatment to keep them from contami-<br />

nating succeeding baths. A cold rinse is usually<br />

used after the pickling to keep the articles from<br />

drying before their immersion in the plating bath.<br />

Electrocleaning and electropickling are generally<br />

faster than similar soak procedures; however,<br />

the electroprocesses always produce more gas-<br />

sing (hydrogen at the cathode and oxygen at the<br />

anode) than the nonelectroprocesses. The gas-<br />

sing from cleaning solutions tends to create<br />

mists that may, but usually do not, cause signi-<br />

ficant air pollution problems.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

The electrolytic processes do not operate with<br />

100 percent efficiency, and some of the current<br />

decomposes water in the bath, evolving hydrogen<br />

and oxygen gases. In fact, the chief advantage<br />

of electrocleaning is the mechanical action pro-<br />

duced by the vigorous evolution of hydrogen at<br />

the cathode, which tends to lift off films of oil,<br />

grease, paint, and dirt. The rate of gassing<br />

varies widely with the individual process. If<br />

the gassing rate is high, entrained mists of<br />

acids, alkaline materials, or other bath con-<br />

stituents are discharged to the atmosphere.<br />

Most of the electrolytic plating and cleaning pro-<br />

cesses are of little interest from a standpoint of<br />

air pollution because the emissions are inoffen-<br />

sive and of negligible volume, owing to low gas-<br />

sing rates. Generally, air pollution control<br />

equipment is not required for any of these pro-<br />

cesses except the chromium-plating process.<br />

In this process, large volumes of hydrogen and<br />

oxygen gases are evolved. The bubbles rise<br />

and break the surface with considerable energy,<br />

entraining chromic acid mist, which is dis-<br />

charged to the atmosphere. Chromic acid mist<br />

is very toxic and corrosive and its discharge<br />

to the atmosphere should be prevented.<br />

Chromic acid emissions have caused numerous<br />

nuisance complaints and frequently cause property<br />

damage. Particularly vulnerable are automobiles<br />

parked downwind of chrome-plating installations.<br />

Tne acidmist spots car finishes severely.<br />

The amounts of acid involved are relatively<br />

small but are sufficient to cause damage. In a<br />

typical decorative chromium-plating installation<br />

with an exhaust system but without mist control<br />

equipment, a stack test disclosed that 0.45 pound<br />

of chromic acid per hour was being discharged<br />

from a 1,300-gallon tank.<br />

Chromium-plating processes can be divided into<br />

two general classes, one of which offers a con-


siderably greater air pollution problem than the<br />

other. "Hard chrome" plating, which causes<br />

the more severe problem, produces a thick,<br />

hard, smooth, corrosion-resistant coating.<br />

This plating process requires a current density<br />

of about 250 amperes per square foot, which<br />

results in a high rate of gassing and a heavy<br />

evolution of acid mist. The less severe problem<br />

is presented by the process called "decorative<br />

chrome" plating, which requires a current<br />

density of only about 100 amperes per square<br />

foot and results in a definitely lower gassing<br />

rate.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATING REQUIREMENTS<br />

Local exhaust systems are installed on many<br />

electroplating tanks to reduce the concentra-<br />

tions of steam, gases, and mists to what are<br />

commonly accepted as safe amounts for person-<br />

nel in the plating room. In the past, these ex-<br />

haust systems were often omitted altogether,<br />

and the resulting working conditions were often<br />

unhealthful.<br />

In 1951, the American Standards Association<br />

introduced Code Z9. 1 for Ventilation and Oper-<br />

ation of Open Surface Tanks. This code is an<br />

organized engineering approach designed to re-<br />

place the rule-of-thumb methods applied in the<br />

past. The use of this code in designing plating<br />

tank exhaust systems is recommended by public<br />

health officials and industrial hygienists.<br />

Mast exhaust systems use slot hoods to capture<br />

the mists discharged from the plating solutions.<br />

These hoods have been found satisfactory when<br />

properly designed. To obtain adequate distribu-<br />

tion of ventilation along the entire length of the<br />

slot hood, the slot velocity should be high, 2,000<br />

fpm or more, and the plenum velocity should<br />

be one-half of the slot velocity or less. With<br />

hoods over 10 feet in length, either multiple<br />

takeoffs or splitter vanes are needed. Enough<br />

takeoffs or splitter vanes should be used to re-<br />

duce the length of the slot to sections not more<br />

than 10 feet long.<br />

Ventilation rates for tanks, as previously dis-<br />

cussed in Chapter 3, are for tanks located in<br />

areas having no crossdrafts. In drafty areas,<br />

ventilation rates must be increased and baffles<br />

should be used to shield the tank.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

Scrubbers<br />

The device most commonly used to control air<br />

contaminants in hard-chrome-plating tank ex-<br />

haust gases is a wet collector. This type of<br />

Electr oplating<br />

831<br />

equipment is also suitable for controlling mists<br />

from any other type of plating or cleaning tank<br />

that may cause a problem. Figure 634 shows<br />

a ventilation system with a spray-type scrubber<br />

used to control mists from two 18-foot chrome-<br />

plating tanks. Many other types of commercial<br />

wet collectors are available, constructed of<br />

various corrosion-resistant materials. Water<br />

circulation rates are usually 10 to 12 gpm per<br />

1, 000 cfm. If the water is recirculated, the<br />

makeup rate is about 2.5 to 4 gph per 1,000 cfm.<br />

The scrubber water, of course, becomes con-<br />

taminated with the acid discharged from the plat-<br />

ing tank; therefore, efficient mist eliminators<br />

must be used in the scrubber to prevent a con-<br />

taminated water mist from discharging to the<br />

atmosphere.<br />

The scrubber water is commonly used for plat-<br />

ing tank makeup. This procedure not only re-<br />

moves the acid from the scruhber but also re-<br />

duces the amount of makeup acid needed for the<br />

plating solution. In some scrubbers, a very<br />

small quantity of fresh water is used to collect<br />

the acid mist; the resulting solution is continu-<br />

ously drained from the scrubber either into the<br />

plating tank or into a holding tank, from which<br />

it can be taken for plating solution makeup.<br />

The mists collected by the air pollution control<br />

system are corrosive to iron or steel; therefore,<br />

hood, ducts, and scrubbers of these materials<br />

must be lined with, or replaced hy, corrosion-<br />

resistant materials. Steel ducts and scrubbers<br />

lined with materials such as polyvinyl chloride<br />

have been found to resist adequately the corro-<br />

sive action of the mists. In recent years, hoods,<br />

ducts, and scrubbers made entirely of polyester<br />

resins reinforced with glass fibers have been<br />

used in air pollution control systems handling<br />

acid or alkaline solutions. These systems have<br />

been found to be very resistant to the corrosive<br />

effects of plating solutions.<br />

The scrubber removes chromic acid mist with<br />

high efficiency. A commonly used field method<br />

of determining chromic acid mist evolution<br />

consists of holding a sheet of white paper over<br />

the surface of the tank or scrubber discharge.<br />

Any mist contacting the paper immediately<br />

stains it. A piece of paper held in the discharge<br />

of a well-designed scruhber shows no signs of<br />

staining.<br />

Mist Inhibitors<br />

The mist emissions from a decorative-chromeplating<br />

tank and from other tanks with lesser<br />

mist problems can be substantially eliminated<br />

by adding a suitable surface-active agent to the<br />

plating solutions. The action of the surface-


832 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Flgure 634. Two control systems wlth scrubbers venting four chrome-<br />

plating tanks. Each scrubber vents two tanks (Industrial Systems, Inc.,<br />

South Gate, Calif.).<br />

active agent reduces the surface tension, which,<br />

in turn, reduces the size of the hydrogen bubbles.<br />

Their rates of rise, and the energy of their evolu-<br />

tion are greatly reduced, and the amount of mist<br />

is also greatly reduced. Several of these mist<br />

inhibitors are commercially available.<br />

If the proper concentration of mist inhibitor is<br />

maintained, a sheet of paper placed 1 inch above<br />

the bath surface shows no spotting.<br />

INSECTICIDE MANUFACTURE<br />

The innumerable substances used commercially<br />

as insecticides can be conveniently classified<br />

according to method of action, namely: (1) Stomach<br />

poisons, which act in the d~gestive system;<br />

(2) contact poisons, which act by dlrect external<br />

contact with the insect at some stage of its life<br />

cycle; and (3) fumigants, which attack the<br />

respiratory system.<br />

A few of the commonly used insecticides, clas-<br />

sified according to method of action, are shown<br />

in Table 225. The classification is somewhat<br />

arbitrary in that many poisons, such as nicotine,<br />

possess the characteristics of two or three<br />

classes.<br />

Table 225. SOME COMMON INSECTICIDES<br />

CLASSLFIED ACCORDING TO<br />

METHOD OF ACTION<br />

stomach po~sons I contact polsons I Fumigants<br />

Cryolite<br />

Nicotine<br />

Hydrocyanic acid<br />

Naphthalene<br />

Human threshold limit values of various insecticides<br />

are shown in Table 226. They represent<br />

conditions under which it is believed that nearly<br />

all workers may be repeatedly exposed day after<br />

day, without adverse effect. The amount by which<br />

these figures may be exceeded for short periods<br />

without injury to health depends upon factors such<br />

as (1) the nature of the contaminant, (2) whether<br />

large concentrations over short periods produce<br />

acute poisoning, (3) whether the effects are<br />

cumulative, (4) the frequency with which large<br />

concentrations occur, and (5) the duration of<br />

these periods.<br />

METHODS OF PRODUCTION<br />

Production of the toxic substances used in in-<br />

secticides involves the same operations employed<br />

for general chemical processing. Similarly,


chemical-processing equipment, that is, reac-<br />

tion kettles, filters, heat exchangers, and so<br />

forth, are the same as discussed in other sec-<br />

tions of this chapter. Emphasis is given, there-<br />

fore, to the equipment and techniques encoun-<br />

tered in the compounding and blending of com-<br />

mercial insecticides to achieve specific chemi-<br />

cal and physical properties.<br />

Insecticide Manufacture<br />

Table 226. THRESHOLD LLMIT VALUES OF VARIOUS INSECTICIDES<br />

Substance<br />

Aldrin (1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 10-hexachloro-<br />

1,4,4a, 5.8, 8a-hexahydro-1, 4, 5,sdimethanonaphthalene)<br />

Arsenic<br />

Calcium arsenate<br />

Chlordane (1, 2,4,5,6, 7, 8,E-octachloro-3a, 4, 7,<br />

7a-tetrahydro-4,7 -methanoindane)<br />

Chlorinated camphene, 60%<br />

2, 4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)<br />

DDT (2,Z-bis(p-chlorophenyl)<br />

-1, 1, l -trichloroethane)<br />

Dieldrin (1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 10-hexachloro-6, 7,<br />

epoxy-1, 4,4a, 5,6,7,8, Ba-octahydro-<br />

1, 4, 5, 8-dimethano-naphthalene)<br />

Dinitro-o-cresol<br />

EPN (O-ethyl O-p-nitrophenyl thionoben~ene~hosphonate)<br />

Ferbam (ferric dimethyl dithiocarbamate)<br />

Lead arsenate<br />

Lindane (hexachlorocyclohexane gamma isomer)<br />

Malathion (0, O-dimethyl dithiophosphate of<br />

diethyl mercaptosuccinate)<br />

Methoxychlor (2, 2-di-p-methoxyphenyl-1, 1,ltrichloroethane)<br />

Nicotine<br />

Parathion (0, O-diethyl-O-p-nitrophenyl<br />

thio~hos~hate)<br />

Pentachlorophenol<br />

Phosphorus pentasulfide<br />

Picric acid<br />

Pyrethrum<br />

Rotenone<br />

TEDP (tetraethyl dithionopyrophosphate)<br />

TEPP (tetraethyl pyrophosphate)<br />

Thiram (tetramethyl thiuram disulfide)<br />

Warfarin (3-(a-acetonylben~~l) 4-<br />

hydroxycoumarin)<br />

Most commercial insecticides are used as either<br />

dusts or sprays. Insecticides employed as dusts<br />

are in the solid state in the 0.5- to 10-micron<br />

size range. Insecticides employed as sprays<br />

may be manufactured and sold as either solids<br />

or liquids. The solids are designed to go into<br />

solution in an appropriate solvent or to form a<br />

colloidal suspension; liquids may be either solu-<br />

tions or water base emulsions. No matter what<br />

Threshold limit value,<br />

mg/meter3<br />

0. 25<br />

0.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0. 5<br />

10<br />

1<br />

0. 25<br />

0.2<br />

0.5<br />

15<br />

0. 15<br />

0.5<br />

15<br />

15<br />

0.5<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

1<br />

0. 1<br />

5<br />

5<br />

0.2<br />

0. 05<br />

5<br />

0.1<br />

physical state or form is involved, insecticides<br />

are usually a blend of several ingredients in<br />

order to achieve desirable characteristics. A<br />

convenient means of classifying equipment and<br />

their related processing techniques is to differ-<br />

entiate them by the state of the end product.<br />

Equipment used to process insecticides where<br />

the end product is a solid is designated solid-<br />

insecticide-processing equipment. Equipment<br />

used to process insecticides where the end<br />

product is a liquid is designated as liquid-in-<br />

secticide-processing equipment.<br />

Solid-Insecticide Production Methods<br />

Solid mixtures of insecticides may be com-<br />

pounded by either (1) adding the toxicant in<br />

833


R34 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

liquid state to a dust mixture or (2) adding a<br />

solid toxicant to the dust mixture.<br />

Figure 635 illustrates equipment used if the<br />

toxicant in liquid state is sprayed into a dust<br />

mixture during the blending process. After<br />

leaving the rotary sifter, the solid raw mate-<br />

rials are carried by elevator to the upper<br />

mixer where the liquid toxicant is introduced<br />

by means of spray nozzles. This particular<br />

unit has discharge gates at each end of the up-<br />

per mixer, which permit the wetted mixture<br />

to be introduced either directly into the second<br />

mixer or into the high-speed fine-grinding pul-<br />

verizer and then into the second mixer. From<br />

the sec0n.d mixer, a discharge gate with a built-<br />

in feeder screw conveys themixture toa second<br />

elevator ior transfer to the holding bin where the<br />

finished batch is available for packaging. Al-<br />

though as much as 50 percent by weight of liq-<br />

uid toxicant may be added to the blend, the di-<br />

luent clays are porous and absorb the liquid<br />

to such a degree that the ingredients of the mix<br />

are essentially solids and act as such. In in-<br />

secticide processing, the type of mixer general-<br />

ly employed to blend liquids with dusts is the<br />

ribbon blender.<br />

Figure 636 is an illustration of a ribbon blender<br />

screw. This screw consists of two or more<br />

ribbon flights of different diameters and opposite<br />

hand, mounted one within the other on the same<br />

shaft by rigid supporting lugs. Ingredients of<br />

the mix are moved forward by one flight and<br />

backward by the other, which thereby induces<br />

positive and thorough mixing with a gradual<br />

propulsion of the mixed material to the discharge.<br />

An example of an insecticide compound produced<br />

by this method is toxaphene dust. A commonly<br />

used formulation is:<br />

Toxaphene (chlorinated<br />

camphene) 40<br />

Kerosine 4. 5<br />

Finely divided porous clay 55. 5<br />

The toxaphene is melted and mixed with the<br />

kerosine, then sprayed into the clay and thor-<br />

oughly blended.<br />

When the toxicant is in the solid state, the in-<br />

gredients of the blend are intimately ground, usu-<br />

ally in stages, and blended by mechanical mixing<br />

operations. The equipment employed consists of<br />

standard grinding and size reduction machines<br />

Figure 635. Sol id-insecticide-processing unit (Poulsen Company, Los Angeles, Calif.)


Insecticide Manufacture<br />

Figure 636. R~hhon hlender screw (L~nk-Belt Company, Los Angeles, Cal I f.).<br />

such as ball mills, hammer mills, air mills,<br />

disc mills, roller mills, and others. A spe-<br />

cific example oi a grinding and blending facility<br />

for solid insecticide is shown in Figures 637 and<br />

638. This installation is used for compounding<br />

DDT dust. The grinding and blending operations<br />

are done in two stages. First, the material is<br />

processed in the premix grinding unit and then<br />

transferred to the final grinding and blending unit.<br />

Figure 637. Premix grinding unit.<br />

Figure 637 illustrates the equipment comprising<br />

the premix grinding unit. This unit is used for<br />

the initial grading and blending of DDT and silica<br />

mixtures. DDT flakes, 75 percent of which have a<br />

particle size of 1-centimeter diameter, are emp-<br />

tied from sacks into a hopper. A conveyor takes<br />

this DDT to a crusher irom which it is conveyed<br />

to a pulverizer. Finely ground silica (0. 2- to<br />

2-micron size) is introduced to the pulverizer.<br />

Silica is added because DDT becomes waxy at<br />

temperatures approaching its melting point and<br />

has a tendency to cake and resist grinding.<br />

Silica acts as a stabilizing agent. The coarsely<br />

ground silica-DDT mixture is then discharged<br />

into a ribbon blender for thorough mixing be-<br />

fore being conveyed to a barrel-filling unit,<br />

which packs the mixture for aging before its<br />

further grinding.<br />

835<br />

The final grinding unit shorn in Figure 638 takes<br />

the coarsely ground DDT-silica mixture and sub-<br />

jects it to fine grinding and blending. The aged<br />

DDT-silica mixture is fed into a ribbon blender<br />

where additional silica and wetting agents are<br />

added to the mix. The mix is then screw con-<br />

veyed to a high-speed grinding mill that uses<br />

rotating blades to shear the insecticidal mix-<br />

ture. A pneumatic conveying system carries<br />

the material to a cyclone separator from which<br />

it drops into another blender. After this mix-<br />

ing operation, the blend is finely ground by high-<br />

pressure air in an airmill. The blend is air<br />

conveyed to a reverse-jet baghouse that dis-<br />

charges into another blender. Additional air<br />

grinding is then repeated before the barrel<br />

filling and packing.<br />

1iquid.lnsecticide Production Methods<br />

Liquid insecticides may be produced as either<br />

solutions, emulsions, or suspensions. The<br />

most common means oi production consists of<br />

introducing a solid toxicant into a liquid carrier,<br />

which results in either a solution, emulsion,<br />

or suspension.<br />

Figure 639 shows equipment employed in a liq-<br />

uid-emulsion insecticide plant that makes the<br />

emulsion by introducing a solid toxicant into a<br />

liquid carrier in the presence of an emulsifying<br />

agent. A typical iormulation is:<br />

Ib<br />

-<br />

DDT (technical) 2 00<br />

Emulsiiying agent No. 1 12<br />

Emulsifying agent No. 2 12<br />

Organic solvent 569 (79. 5 gal)


836 CHEMICAL PROCESSWG EQUIPMENT<br />

The operation consists of adding the DDT to the<br />

mixing tank, the DDT being held on a horizontal<br />

wire screen located at the vertical midpoint of<br />

the tank. Organic solvent and emulsifying agents<br />

are then pumped into the mixing tank at the approximate<br />

level of the dry DDT. The mixture is<br />

continually agitated, both during and after the<br />

-<br />

addition of the liquids, until the desired emulsified<br />

state is achieved. The finished product is<br />

then pumped to the drum-filling station for packaging.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

As can be seen from the installations just de-<br />

scribed, air pollutants generated by the insecti-<br />

cide industry are of two types--dusts and or-<br />

ganic solvent vapors.<br />

To collect insecticide dusts, high-efficiency<br />

collectors are mandatory, since in many in-<br />

stances, the dust is extremely toxic and cannot<br />

be allowed to escape into the atmosphere, even<br />

in small amounts. The moderate fineness, 0.5<br />

to 10 microns, of the dust necessitates using<br />

collectors that are effective in these particle<br />

Figure 638. Final grinding and blending unit.<br />

size ranges. For the most part, the dusts en-<br />

countered are noncorrosive.<br />

Organic solvent vapors emitted from liquid-in-<br />

secticide production processes ordinarily orig-<br />

inate from relatively nonvolatile solvents. These<br />

vapors are of such concentration, nature, and<br />

quantity as to be inoffensive from a viewpoint of<br />

air pollution.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

Because of the toxicity of the dusts used in the<br />

manufacture of insecticides, it is important<br />

that all sources of dust be enclosed or tightly<br />

hooded to prevent exposure of this dust to per-<br />

sonnel in the working area. Wherever possible,<br />

the sources should be completely enclosed and<br />

ventilated to an air pollution control device.<br />

Some of the sources emitting dust are bag pack-<br />

ers, barrel fillers, hoppers, crushers, con-<br />

veyors, blenders, mixing tanks, and grinding<br />

mills. Of these, the crushing and grinding<br />

operations are the largest sources of emission.<br />

In most cases, these are not conducive to corn-<br />

plete enclosure, and hoods must be employed.<br />

i<br />

I<br />

!<br />

I<br />

I


Insecticide Manufacture 837<br />

The contaminants emitted are extremely<br />

fine dust and, since no elevated temperatures<br />

a.re encountered and the materials handled are<br />

n'dt particularly corrosive to cloth, can be<br />

easily collected by simple cloth bag filters.<br />

If extremely large throughputs are encountered,<br />

a conventional baghouse may be required. Since<br />

no extreme conditions of operation are general-<br />

ly involved, the most widely used filter material<br />

is a cotton sateen cloth.<br />

In larger installations, such as those illustrated<br />

in Figures 637 and 638 for compounding DDT<br />

dust, several baghouses are usually used. In<br />

the premix grinding unit shown in Figure 637,<br />

the air pollution control equipment consists of<br />

an exhaust system discharging into a baghouse,<br />

which is equipped with a pullthrough exhaust<br />

fan. The exhaust ducting connects to both the<br />

DDT and the silica hoppers, the DDT crusher,<br />

the blender, and the barrel-filling unit. Dust<br />

collected in the baghouse is conveyed to the<br />

barrel-filling unit for packaging.<br />

Figure 639. Liquid-insecticide-formulating unit.<br />

The final grinding unit, shown in Figure 638,<br />

uses air pollution control equipment consisting<br />

of a baghouse that serves the receiving hopper,<br />

the blenders, and the cyclone air discharge of<br />

the high-speed grinding mill. Dust collected<br />

in this baghouse is recycled to the feed blender.<br />

The final blenders and the barrel filler and<br />

Indraft velocities through openings in hoods<br />

around crushers and mills should be 400 fpm<br />

or higher. Velocities through hood openings<br />

for the other operations, where dust is released<br />

with low velocities, should be 200 to<br />

300 fpm.<br />

packer are vented to one of the reverse-jet<br />

baghouses serving the fluid energy mill. As<br />

in the case of mixing liquid toxicant with dust,<br />

the material collected is not corrosive to<br />

cotton cloth, and no elevated temperatures are<br />

encountered. In this installation, cotton sateen<br />

bags of 1.12 to 1.24 pounds weight per yard<br />

with an average pore size of 0.004 inch are<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT employed as the filtering medium.<br />

Baghouses employing cotton sateen bags are the<br />

most common means of controlling emissions<br />

from the insecticide-manufacturing industry.<br />

In some applications, water scrubbers, of both<br />

the spray chamber and the packed-tower types,<br />

are used to control dust emissions. Inertial<br />

separators such as cyclones and mechanical<br />

centrifugal separators are not used because<br />

collection efficiencies are not high enough to<br />

prevent the smaller size toxic particles from<br />

being emitted into the atmosphere.<br />

In the solid-insecticide-processing unit previ-<br />

ously discussed and illustrated in Figure 635,<br />

air pollution control is achieved by dust pickup<br />

hoods located at the inlet rotary sifter and at<br />

the automatic bag packer. The dust picked up<br />

at these points is filtered by the use of cloth<br />

bags. Most units of this type are entirely<br />

enclosed, air contaminants being discharged<br />

only at the inlet to the unit and at the outlet.<br />

In liquid-insecticide manufacturing, air pollu-<br />

tion control problems usually entail collection<br />

of dusts in a wet airstream. Baghouses can-<br />

not, therefore, be used, and some type of<br />

scrubber must be employed. For the liquid-<br />

emulsion insecticide plant shown in Figure 639,<br />

the air pollution control equipment for the solid<br />

and liquid aerosols consists of a packed tower<br />

that vents the mixing tank. The tower is packed<br />

with l-inch Intalox saddles, the packing being<br />

4- 112 feet high, which equals a volume of 14<br />

cubic feet. The water rate through the tower<br />

is approximately 20 gpm. The tower is used<br />

to control dust emissions from the mixing tank,<br />

which occur when dry material is charged to the<br />

tank, and also occur during the first stages of<br />

agitation. Solvent vapors are not effectively<br />

prevented by the tower from entering the atmo-<br />

sphere since the solvent is insoluble in water.<br />

Solvent emissions originate from the storage<br />

tank and drum-filling unit. In the installation


838 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

described, no provision is made to prevent the<br />

solvint from escaping to the atmosphere since<br />

total solvent emissions are calculated to be<br />

only 5.4 per day.<br />

HAZARDOUS RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL<br />

Although the responsibility for overseeing the<br />

control of radioactive materials is predomi-<br />

nantly that of the Federal government, more<br />

and more responsibility is expected to be placed<br />

at state and local levels. For this reason,<br />

those concerned with air pollution must become<br />

acquainted with the problems associated with<br />

this new field, particularly those problems<br />

arising as more and smaller industries make<br />

use of radioactive materials.<br />

HAZARDS IN THE HANDLING OF RADIOISOTOPES<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

Radioactive materials used in industry are a<br />

definite hazard today and will become an in-<br />

creasing rather than a diminishing hazard in<br />

the future. In industry, the maximum per-<br />

missible dose of direct, whole-body radiation<br />

of persons from all radioactive materials,<br />

airborne or nonairborne, is 5,000 millirem<br />

per year. There is greater likelihood that this<br />

limit will be reduced than that it will be in-<br />

creased. <strong>Air</strong>borne radiological hazards can<br />

result from routine or accidental venting of<br />

radioactive mists, dusts, metallurgical fumes,<br />

and gases and from spillages of liquids or<br />

solids. Presently existing governmental regu-<br />

lation of the rate of venting airborne, radio-<br />

active materials consists primarily of spe-<br />

cific limitations based upon individual chemi-<br />

cal compounds or upon concentrations of ra-<br />

dioactivity from single vents. No concepts<br />

have been promulgated concerning methods<br />

of controlling total radioactive air pollution<br />

from all sources in an entire area. Whether<br />

it will be either desirable or necessary to<br />

find a solution or solutions to these problems<br />

is an unanswered question.<br />

The characteristics of radioactive, gaseous<br />

or airborne, particulate wastes vary widely<br />

depending upon the nature of the operation from<br />

which they originate. In gaseous form they may<br />

range . from rare gases, such as argon (A~')<br />

from air-cooled reactors, to highly corrosive<br />

gases, such as hydrogen fluoride from chemical<br />

and metallurgical processes. Particulate<br />

The hazards encountered in handling of radioisotopes<br />

may be classified in order of importance<br />

as follows: (1) Deposition of radioisotope<br />

in the body, (2) exposure of the whole<br />

body to gama radiation, (3) exposure of the<br />

body to beta radiation, and (4) exposure of the<br />

hands or other limited parts to beta or gamma<br />

radiation. Deposition of a radioisotope in the<br />

.body occurs by ingestion, inhalation, or absorption<br />

through either the intact or injured<br />

body surface. Inhalation of a radioactive gas,<br />

vapor, spray, or dust may occur. Spray or<br />

matter or aerosols may be organic or inorganic<br />

and range in size from less than 0. 05 micron<br />

to 20 microns. The smaller particles originate<br />

from metallurgical fumes caused by oxidation<br />

or vaporization. The larger particles may be<br />

acid mist droplets, which are low in specific<br />

gravity and remain suspended in air or gas<br />

streams for longer periods (Liberman, 1957).<br />

dust is particularly hazardous because of the<br />

large fraction of contamination retained by the<br />

Characteristics of Solid, Radioactive Waste<br />

lungs (National Bureau of Standards, 1949).<br />

Solid, radioactive wastes are of two general<br />

Types of radiation are listed in Table 227. The<br />

ranges of activity may be defined as: (1) Tracer<br />

level, less than 1 x curie; (2) low level,<br />

1 x 10-6 to 1 x 10-3 curie; (3) medium level,<br />

1 x 10-3 curie to 1 curie; and (4) high level,<br />

1 curie and over. The handling of tracer quantities<br />

of radioisotopes usually presents no external<br />

hazard. Ordinary laboratory manipulaclasses<br />

--combustible and noncombustible.<br />

Typical combustible solid wastes are paper,<br />

clothes, filters, and wood. Noncombustible,<br />

solid wastes may include nonrecoverable scrap,<br />

evaporator bottoms, contaminated process equipment,<br />

floor sweepings, and broken glassware.<br />

If inadequate provisions are made for proper<br />

handling and disposal of these wastes, a distinct<br />

nuisance, and, under certain circumstances,<br />

tions are performed with special precautions even a hazard, could result.<br />

to prevent absorption of radioactive material<br />

by the body.<br />

Characteristics of Liquid, Radioactive Waste<br />

Liquid, radioactive wastes are evolved in all<br />

nuclear energy operations-from laboratory<br />

research to full-scale production. Liquid<br />

wastes with relatively small concentrations<br />

of radioactivity originate in laboratory oper-<br />

ations where relatively small quantities of<br />

radioactive materials are involved. Other<br />

sources are the processing of uranium ore and<br />

feed material; the normal operation of essen-<br />

tially all reactors, particularly water-cooled<br />

types; and the routine chemical processing of<br />

reactor fuels. High-activity liquid wastes


Type of<br />

radiation<br />

Alpha (a)<br />

. . Beta (8)<br />

~~ . .<br />

. . .<br />

. . . .. . . . .<br />

... .. . ... .<br />

Gamma (y)<br />

Neutron (r~)<br />

Physical nature<br />

Heavy particle,<br />

helium nucleus,<br />

double positive<br />

charge<br />

Light-particle<br />

electron, single<br />

negative charge<br />

Ray, similar to<br />

X-ray<br />

Moderately heavy<br />

particle, neutral<br />

charge<br />

are produced by the chemical processing of<br />

reactor fuels.<br />

Problems in Control of <strong>Air</strong>borne, Radioactive Waste<br />

Hazardous Radioactive Material 839<br />

Table 227. TYPES OF RADLATION<br />

Distance of<br />

travel in air<br />

Removal of radioactive suspended particles,<br />

vapors, and gases from "hot" (radioactive)<br />

exhaust systems before discharge to the atmosphere<br />

is a se~ious problem confronting<br />

all nuclear energy and radiochemistry installations.<br />

Removal is necessary in order to prevent<br />

dangerous contamination of the immediate<br />

and neighboring areas. <strong>Air</strong> pollution brought<br />

about through discharge of radioactive stack<br />

gas wastes from ventilation systems is only<br />

partially avoided by filter devices, no matter<br />

how efficient they may be, if the discharge<br />

contains radioactive gases. In systems using<br />

filter media such as paper, cloth, glass fiber,<br />

and so forth, activity eventually builds up in<br />

the filter media through dust loading; the same<br />

situation applies to electrical precipitators.<br />

I<br />

Few inches maximum<br />

Few yards maximum<br />

Very long<br />

Very long<br />

Another problem in the control of airborne,<br />

radioactive waste is the low dust loading of<br />

exhaust streams. The dust concentration of<br />

ambient air is usually about 1 grain per 1,000<br />

cubic feet. At installations handling radioactive<br />

material, owing to precleaning of the<br />

entering air, aerosols may have concentrations<br />

as small as 10-<br />

2<br />

to 10-3 grain per 1,000<br />

cubic feet. In contrast, loadings of some industrial<br />

gases may reach several hundred<br />

grains per cubic foot, though values of 20<br />

grains or less per cubic foot are more common.<br />

An outstanding feature to consider with air-<br />

cleaning requirements for many nuclear oper-<br />

Effective shielding<br />

Skin or thin layer<br />

of any solid mate-<br />

rial<br />

One-half inch of<br />

any solid material<br />

Lead, other heavy<br />

metals, concrete,<br />

tlghtly packed so11<br />

Water, paraffin<br />

Usual means of<br />

detection ~~-...<br />

Proportional counter,<br />

ion chamber, scin.<br />

tillation counter<br />

Geiger counter, film<br />

badge, dosimeter<br />

Geiger counter, ion<br />

chamber, film badge,<br />

dosimeter<br />

Proportional counter<br />

contalnlng borlc compound,<br />

lon chamber<br />

with cadmium shield<br />

ations is the extremely small permissible con-<br />

centrations of various radioisotopes in the at-<br />

mosphere (see Table 228). Often, removal ef-<br />

ficiencies of about 99. 9 percent or greater for<br />

particles less than 1 micron in diameter are<br />

necessary. This high removal efficiency lim-<br />

its the selection of control equipment for ra-<br />

dioactive applications.<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

Hooding<br />

Hooding for radiochemical processes must pre-<br />

vent radioactive contaminants, such as dust<br />

and fmes, from escaping into thk work area<br />

and must deliver them to suitable control de-<br />

vices. Radioactive sources require proper<br />

shielding to prevent the escape qf radiation<br />

and are not considered in this section. The<br />

materials used for construction for hoods depend<br />

upon the type and quantities of radioactivity and<br />

the nature of the process. Stainless steel,<br />

masonite, transite, or sheet steel, surfaced<br />

with a washable or strippable paint, can be<br />

used (Ward, 1952). Where it is necessary in<br />

a process to handle material that may cause<br />

dusts or fumes to form, a completely enclosed<br />

hood should be used, equipped with a glove box<br />

or dry box. Any tools used for manipulation<br />

should not be removed from the hood.<br />

Ventilation<br />

The recommended airflow for toxic material<br />

across the face of a hood is 150 fpm (Manufac-<br />

turing Chemists' Association, 1954). Turbu-<br />

lence of air entering a hood can be reduced by


840 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

Table 228. PROPERTIES OF RADIOISOTOPES (Benedict and Pigford, 1957)<br />

the addition of picture frame airfoils to the edges.<br />

Hoods should not be located where drafts will<br />

affect their operation. When more than one hood<br />

is located in a room, fan motors should be oper-<br />

ated by a single switch. The fan should freely<br />

discharge to the atmosphere and be connected<br />

to the outlet side of any control device, the<br />

motors being located outside the air ducts to<br />

prevent their contamination. Hood and ducts<br />

should be equipped with manometers to indi-<br />

cate that they are operating under a negative<br />

pressure.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

Reduction of Radioactive, Particulate Matter at Source<br />

Reduction at the source has been defined as the<br />

design of processes so as to minimize the initial<br />

release of particulate matter at its source. The<br />

principle is not new; it is applied, for example,<br />

in the ceramics industry where dry powders<br />

are wetted and mixed as a slurry to minimize<br />

the production of dust. But its application to


adioactive aerosols is particularly worthwhile<br />

since it (1) provides a cleaner effluent, (2) re-<br />

duces radiation hazards involved in the mainte-<br />

nance of air-cleaning equipment or those re-<br />

sulting from the buildup of dust activity, (3) per-<br />

mits the use of simpler and less expensive air-<br />

cleaning equipment, and (4) becomes a part of<br />

the process once reduction has been established.<br />

In general, preventing the formation of highly<br />

toxic aerosols is preferable to cleaning by<br />

secondary equipment.<br />

The design or redesign of processes for reduc-<br />

tion at the source should be based upon a study<br />

of the quantity and physical characteristics of<br />

the contaminant, and the manner in which it is<br />

released. Examples of this concept are instal-<br />

lation of glass fiber filters on the lnlet of ven-<br />

tilating or cooling alr to minimize the irradia-<br />

tion of ambient dust particles, and treatment<br />

of ducts to minimlze corrosion and flaking<br />

(Friedlander et al., 1952).<br />

Design of Suitable <strong>Air</strong>-Cleaning Equipment<br />

The most satisfactory control of particulate<br />

contamination with air-cleaning equipment re-<br />

sults from using combinations of the various<br />

collectors. These installations should be de-<br />

signed to terminate with the most efficient<br />

separator possible, the nature of the gases<br />

being considered. To reduce maintenance,<br />

less efficient cleaners capable of holding or<br />

disposing of most of the weight load should be<br />

placed before the final stage. It is good prac-<br />

tice to arrange the equipment in order of in-<br />

creasing efficiency. A typical example of such<br />

an arrangement is a wet collector such as a<br />

centrifugal scrubber to cool the gases and re-<br />

move most of the larger particles, an efficient<br />

dry filter such as a glass fiber filter to remove<br />

most of the remaining particulate matter, and<br />

a highly efficient paper filter to perform the<br />

final cleaning. If the gases are moist, as in<br />

this example, the paper filter should be pre-<br />

ceded by a preheater to dry the gases (Fried-<br />

lander, 1952).<br />

An air-cleaning installation for highly toxic<br />

aerosols should fulfill the following require-<br />

ments (Friedlander et al., 1952):<br />

1. "It should discharge innocuous air.<br />

2. "The equipment should require only occa-<br />

sional replacement and should be designed<br />

for easy maintenance. Frequent replace-<br />

ment or cleaning entails excessive exposure<br />

to radiation and the danger of redispersing<br />

the collected material.<br />

Hazardous Ra rdioactive Material 84 1<br />

3. "The particulate matter should be separated<br />

in a form allowing easy disposal. The use<br />

of wet collectors, for example, poses the<br />

additional problem of disposing of volumes<br />

of contaminated liquid. Wet collection does,<br />

however, reduce considerably the danger of<br />

redispersion.<br />

4. "Initial and maintenance costs, as well as<br />

operating costs, should be as low as possi-<br />

ble while fulfilling the preceding three con-<br />

ditions. In this respect, pressure drop is<br />

generally an important consideration. "<br />

Reverse-jet haghouse<br />

One type of commercially available dust collector<br />

that meets the requirements of filtering airborne,<br />

radioactive particles from ventilation exhaust<br />

streams is a bag filter employing what is called<br />

reverse-jet cleaning. This type of baghouse<br />

(described in Chapter 4) has an efficiency as<br />

high as the conventional cloth bag or cloth screen<br />

collector and is particularly adapted to an in-<br />

stallation where the grain loading of the effluent<br />

is low. The bag material is a hard wool felt of<br />

the pressed type, about 1116-inch thick, or a<br />

cloth woven of glass fibers. The gas flow is<br />

likely to he around 10 to 40 cfm per square foot<br />

of bag area when the pressure drop is maintained<br />

at usual values such as 2 to 7 inches water col-<br />

umn (Anderson, 1958).<br />

The conventional cloth bag or cloth screen col-<br />

lectors, which are cleaned periodically by auto-<br />

matic shaking devices, may allow a puff of dust<br />

to escape after the shaking operation. The prob-<br />

lem of maintenance in this instance presents a<br />

contamination and radiation hazard. For this<br />

reason, the reverse-jet baghouse is generally<br />

preferred.<br />

Wet collectors<br />

Another method of treating contaminated ex-<br />

haust air before discharge to the atmosphere<br />

involves the use of wet collectors of various<br />

types. These collectors are relatively effec-<br />

tive on gases. Investigation covering changing<br />

of water supply or recirculating has shown the<br />

latter procedure useful for considerable periods<br />

of time without apparent adverse effect. Evapo-<br />

ration is compensated for by fresh supply. In-<br />

soluble radioactive salts, soluble salts, and<br />

other radioactive particles that may form a<br />

solution, suspension, or sludge in the reser-<br />

voir result in fairly high radioactivity of the<br />

scrubbing media. Precautions must be taken<br />

during maintenance to avoid carryover of the<br />

scrubbing media since the radioactive con-<br />

tamination of entrained liquid would be trans-


842 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

ferred to the preheater or filter, resulting in 2. "With uneven airflow, the air velocity<br />

high radiation levels at those points. through some of the collector cells may<br />

Some important disadvantages of wet collectors<br />

make them less attractive than other types . . of<br />

collectors. Wet collectors present the difficult<br />

problem of separating the radioactive, solid<br />

material from the water in which it is suspended.<br />

Maintenance and corrosion are serious problems.<br />

Considerable quantities of water are required,<br />

and, if the radioactive solids are not separated<br />

from the water, this in turn leads to a final<br />

storage and disposal problem.<br />

Electrical precipitators<br />

Radioactive, airborne particles, when given an<br />

electrical charge, can be collected on grounded<br />

surfaces. The fact that the particles are radioactive<br />

has very little to do with their behavior<br />

in an electrical precipitator. Experiments conducted<br />

with precipitators using the alpha emitter<br />

polonium and the beta emitter sulfur 35 indicate<br />

that neither material behaves in a way different<br />

from nonradioactive material.<br />

Water-flushed-type, single-stage, industrial<br />

precipitators, and air-conditioning-type, two-<br />

stage precipitators are used for separating ra-<br />

dioactive dusts and fumes from gases at atomic<br />

energy plants and laboratories. A small elec-<br />

trical precipitator of the water-flushed type with<br />

a design capacity of 200 cfm was installed to<br />

test efficiency of collecting and removing par-<br />

ticulate radioactivity from the offgas system<br />

of an isotope recovery operation. This precip-<br />

itator consists of 23 vertical collecting pipes<br />

with an ionizing wire centered in each pipe. The<br />

inside surfaces of the pipes serve as collecting<br />

walls. For wet operation, the collecting walls<br />

are water flushed by means of spray nozzles in-<br />

stalled at the top of each pipe. This water is re-<br />

cycled continuously at a rate of 35 gpm over the<br />

collecting walls while high voltage is applied to<br />

the electrodes. This unit reportedly collects<br />

more than 99. 99 percent of the particulate radio-<br />

activity in the offgas at 50 to 55 kilovolts when<br />

the concentration of radioactivity as solids is<br />

greater than 5.0 x microcuries per cubic<br />

centimeter of offgas (Anderson, 1958).<br />

Based upon tests made at the Oak Ridge Nation-<br />

al Laboratory, Anderson (1958) makes the follow-<br />

ing evaluation of precipitators used in radio-<br />

active applications:<br />

1. "Electrical precipitators are not intended<br />

to collect the ultra fine particles which<br />

may be discharged from radiochemistry<br />

installations.<br />

be sufficientlv above velocitv limits to blow<br />

off collected wastes which would then be<br />

discharged to the atmosphere.<br />

3. "Efficient operation depends a great deal<br />

on the regularity with which the unit is<br />

cleaned. At best the electrical precipitator<br />

is only approximately 90 percent<br />

efficient. This may he demonstrated by<br />

the fact that dense clouds of tobacco smoke<br />

fed into the precipitator will escape from<br />

it in concentrations great enough so that the<br />

escaping smoke can be seen. The blue<br />

color of tobacco smoke is evidence that<br />

most of its particles have a diameter less<br />

than the wavelength of light, which is<br />

roughly 0.5 micron.<br />

4. "For absolute efficiency an after-filter of<br />

the Cambridge or MSA Ultra-<strong>Air</strong>e type is<br />

necessary to catch the dirt should the pre-<br />

cipitator short circuit.<br />

5. "Difficulty may be experienced if the dust-<br />

load builds up faster than it can be removed,<br />

eventually becoming so heavy that arcing<br />

occurs between the dirt bridges resulting<br />

in a fire hazard.<br />

6.<br />

"Devices such as the single-stage indus-<br />

trial precipitator and the air-conditioning<br />

type two-stage precipitator accomplish<br />

only one phase of the problem. The final<br />

disposal of radioactive wastes collected<br />

and accumulated during operation and main-<br />

tenance still remains. "<br />

Glass fiber filters<br />

Glass fiber or glass fiber paper is often used<br />

as a filter medium and is effective in the oper-<br />

ation of :adiochemistry hoods, canopies, and<br />

gloved b'oxes. One of the most efficient light-<br />

weight, inorganic filters developed to date is<br />

made with a continuous, pleated sheet of micro-<br />

glass fiber paper. The pleats of the glass paper<br />

are separated by a corrugated material (paper,<br />

glass paper, aluminum foil, plastic, or as -<br />

bestos paper) for easy passage of air to the deep<br />

pleats of the filter paper. The assembly of the<br />

filter paper and corrugated separators is sealed<br />

in a frame of wood, cadmium plated steel, stain-<br />

less steel, or aluminum. This construction per-<br />

mits a large area of filter paper to be presented<br />

to the airstream of a correspondingly low re-<br />

sistance (Flanders Filters, Inc. , Riverhead,<br />

N. Y. ).


Glass fiber, from which filters are made, with-<br />

stands temperatures up to 1, OOO°F. It is non-<br />

combustible and has extremely low thermal<br />

conductivity and low heat capacity. The fibers<br />

are noncellular, are like minute rods of glass,<br />

and do not absorb moisture; however, water<br />

can enter the interstices. The material is<br />

relatively nonsettling, noncorrosive, and durable.<br />

It is resistant to acid fumes and vapors, except<br />

hydrogen fluoride.<br />

The installation and replacement costs of glass<br />

fiber filters are low. Final disposal of used<br />

filters may be accomplished by incinerating at<br />

over 1,000"F with provisions for decontaminating<br />

the stack gases. This melts the glass fibers,<br />

reducing the physical mass to the size of a glass<br />

bead. Thus, glass fiber filters provide, in part,<br />

a very good answer to the problem of control<br />

and final disposal of radioactive contaminants.<br />

Paper filters<br />

A highly efficient paper filter medium can be<br />

used with adequate effectiveness on incoming<br />

ventilating air and as a final cleaner in many<br />

instances. This type filter is composed of as-<br />

bestos cellulose paper. A more recently de-<br />

veloped filter has a glass fiber web. It is de-<br />

signed and manufactured in corrugated form<br />

to increase the available filter area and load-<br />

ing capacity and to reduce initial resistance.<br />

The filter units are tested at rated capacity<br />

with standard U.S. Army Chemical Corps test<br />

equipment for resistance and initial penetra-<br />

tion and are unconditionally guaranteed to be<br />

at least 99.95 percent effective against 0. 3-<br />

micron-diameter dioctyl phthalate particles.<br />

This filter performs as well as, or better<br />

than, the earlier paper types and under tem-<br />

peratures up to l,OOOeF.<br />

<strong>Air</strong>borne, radioactive wastes are only part of<br />

the control and disposal problem of nuclear<br />

energy and radiochemistry installations. Solid<br />

and liquid, radioactive wastes are subject to<br />

the same limitations on disposal to the environ-<br />

ment.<br />

The methods of disposing of the final waste from<br />

the collection systems present additional prob-<br />

lems, as follows (Anderson, 1958):<br />

1. "Incineration results in stack gas and par-<br />

ticle discharge which is a cycle of the en-<br />

tire problem repeated over again.<br />

2. "Direct burial results in redispersal and<br />

ground contamination with associated prob-<br />

lems related to the ground water table.<br />

Hazardous Radio active Material 843<br />

3. "High dust or particle loading capacity re-<br />

sults in high radioactivity of the collecting<br />

media.<br />

4. "Vapors, acid fumes and unfilterable gases<br />

may cause rapid deterioration and disinte-<br />

gration of filter media resulting in a main-<br />

tenance and health hazard problem.<br />

5. "Mechanical replacement costs are high<br />

because of the remote handling involved.<br />

6. "An auxiliary unit for emergency or main-<br />

tenance shutdown must be available to pre-<br />

vent the possibility of reverse flow of the<br />

air stream out of "hot" equipment into<br />

controlled rooms and areas. "<br />

Disposol and Control of Solid, Radioactive Waste<br />

The most common method of disposal of solid,<br />

radioactive wastes is Land burial at isolated<br />

and controlled areas. The earth cover over<br />

these burial pits is usually about 12 feet, and<br />

the surface is monitored regularly. A method<br />

used for disposal of low-level, radioactive,<br />

solid wastes consists of putting the wastes in<br />

concrete and dumping it at sea. Incineration<br />

of combustible, solid wastes is practiced, with<br />

provisions for decontaminating the flue gases<br />

(Shamos and Roth, 1950).<br />

Disposal and Control of Liquid, Radioactive Worte<br />

Low-level, radioactive, liquid wastes, under<br />

proper environmental conditions, are suscepti-<br />

ble to either direct disposal to nature or dis-<br />

posal after minimum treatment. Treatment<br />

processes used include coprecipitation, ion ex-<br />

change, biological systems similar to sewage<br />

treatment methods, and others. Only to the<br />

extent that it is absolutely safe, maximum use<br />

is made of the dilution factors that may be avail-<br />

able in the environment and that can be assessed<br />

quantitatively.<br />

High-activity, liquid wastes associated with the<br />

chemical processing of reactor fuels constitute<br />

the bulk of the engineering problem of disposal<br />

of radioactive wastes. Highly radioactive, liq-<br />

uid wastes are currently stored in specially de-<br />

signed tanks. Since the effective life of the fis-<br />

sion products constituting the wastes may be<br />

measured in terms of hundreds of years, tank<br />

storage is not a permanent solution to the dis-<br />

posal problem. Evaporation before storage is<br />

generally practiced to reduce storage volume<br />

and cost. The degree to which evaporation is<br />

carried out is limited in some instances by the


844 CHEMICAL PROCESSIl \iG EQUIPMENT<br />

percentage of solids present in the waste or by<br />

considerations of corrosion.<br />

There are several ~ractical approaches to<br />

ultimate, safe disposal of high-activity, liquid<br />

wastes. The actual fission products in radioactive<br />

waste material may be fixed in an inert,<br />

solid carrier so that the possibility of migration<br />

of the radioactivity into the environment<br />

is eliminated or reduced to acceptable and safe<br />

limits. The carrier containing the radioactive<br />

material could then be permanently stored or<br />

buried in selected locations. Fixation on clay,<br />

incorporation in feldspars, conversion to oxide,<br />

elutriation of the oxide, and fixation of the<br />

elutriant are examples of systems under development.<br />

Because of the particular radiotoxicity and long<br />

half-life of strontium-90 and cesium-137, the<br />

removal and separate fixation and handling of<br />

these two isotopes would substantially reduce<br />

the effective life and activity of the waste and<br />

facilitate its final disposal. With cesium and<br />

strontium removed, the possibilities of safe<br />

disposal into the environment under controlled<br />

conditions are greatly increased.<br />

It may be practical to dispose of the wastes<br />

underground in some cases without any treat-<br />

ment, into formations such as (1) spaces pre-<br />

pared by dissolution in salt beds or salt domes,<br />

(2) deep basins containing connate brines and<br />

with no hydraulic or hydrologic connection to<br />

potable waters or other potentially valuable<br />

natural resources, and (3) special excavations<br />

in selected shale formations (Liberman, 1957).<br />

OIL AND SOLVENT RE-REFINING<br />

Many millions of gallons of oils and solvents<br />

are used annually for lubricating vehicle en-<br />

gines and other machinery, transmitting pres-<br />

sure hydraulically, cleaning manufactured arti-<br />

cles and textiles, and dissolving or extracting<br />

soluble materials. In the course of their usage,<br />

these oils and solvents accumulate impurities,<br />

decompose, and lose effectiveness. The im-<br />

purities include dirt, scale, water, acids, de-<br />

composition products, and other foreign mate-<br />

rials. Reclaiming some of these oils and sol-<br />

vents for reuse by removal of the impurities<br />

can he effected in many instances by re-refining<br />

processes.<br />

Most re-refiners must practice stringent econ-<br />

omies to survive, and for this reason, second-<br />

hand, cannibalized, or makeshift equipment is<br />

often employed. Many re-refiners also neglect<br />

maintenance, repairs, and general housekeeping<br />

in order to keep operating costs low. As a result,<br />

air pollution control is minimal or lacking unless<br />

made mandatpry by legislation.<br />

RE-REFINING PROCESS FOR OILS<br />

Lubricating oils collected from service stations<br />

are the main source of supply. A typical scheme<br />

for re-refining lubricating oil is shown in Figure<br />

640. Re-refining is normally a batch process.<br />

Treating clay, for example, Fuller's earth, is<br />

added to the contaminated oil at ambient tem-<br />

perature to aid in the removal of carbon mate-<br />

rials. The mixture is next circulated through a<br />

fired heater, usually a pipe or tube still, to a flash<br />

tower for removal of diluent hydrocarbons and<br />

water. The oil being reclaimed and the products<br />

desired determine the final temperature (300"<br />

to 600°F). Live steam, introduced at the base<br />

of the flash tower, is used to assist in this phase<br />

of the operation. Besides distilling off the light<br />

fractions contained in the oil, the steam pre-<br />

vents excessive cracking of the oil at the higher<br />

temperatures.<br />

A barometric condenser maintains a vacuum on<br />

the tower. The overhead vapors containing<br />

steam, low-boiling organic materials, and en-<br />

trained hydrocarbons are aspirated through the<br />

condenser to a separator tank. The condensate,<br />

consisting of light gas, oil, and water, is col-<br />

lected and separated in the separator tank. Non-<br />

condensible gases are usually incinerated in<br />

fireboxes of adjacent combustion equipment. The<br />

light oil condensate is decanted from the water<br />

and is suitable as liquid fuel. The contaminated<br />

water is piped to a skimming pond where it is<br />

cooled and either reused or disposed of by drain-<br />

ing to a sewer. The oil..-clay mixture is with-<br />

drawn from the tower and filtered. The oil is<br />

blended with additives and is canned or drummed.<br />

The clay is usually hauled to a dump.<br />

In some re-refineries, the process is preceded<br />

by a dehydration operation. Water is removed<br />

from the oil by using sodium silicate, sodium<br />

hydroxide, and heat. Dehydrated oil is decanted<br />

from the mixture and charged to the still. Sul-<br />

furic acid treabent is also employed at some<br />

re-refineries before the refining process. The<br />

acid-treated oil is settled, decanted from the<br />

acid sludge, and neutralized with caustic. Be-<br />

fore the clay is added, sulfuric acid treabent<br />

or air blowing may also be used to improve<br />

color of the re-refined oil.<br />

RE-REFINING PROCESS FOR ORGANIC SOLVENTS<br />

The typical organic solvent re-refining process<br />

is similar to that described for oil re-refining.<br />

The prime difference between the processes is<br />

that the volatilities of the organic solvents re-


efined are much greater than those of lubrica-<br />

ting oils. Mineral spirits, benzene, toluene,<br />

xylene, ketones, esters, alcohols, trichloro-<br />

ethylene, and tetrachloroethylene from paint,<br />

lacquer, degreasers, and dry cleaners are ex-<br />

amples of solvents reclaimed by re -refining.<br />

Figure 641 illustrates a typical solvent recov-<br />

ery system. The mixture to he processed is<br />

introduced into a settling tank to permit the<br />

solids to settle out. The supernatant liquid is<br />

then preheated and charged to a pot still topped<br />

by a fractionating section, which may be under<br />

RECOVERABLE<br />

+<br />

Oil and Solvent Re-Refining 845<br />

Figure 640. Composite flow sheet for re-refining process.<br />

CDNDENSER<br />

t lTER OUT<br />

FRACTlONIITlNG<br />

EsEcrloM ~ " SOGlUM cClRBONliTE ' E<br />

QRCHtIITER<br />

Sllll<br />

OEHIORATING<br />

CGNOENSIITI lATER PRODUCT<br />

TO SBtR<br />

Figure 641. Typical solvent re-refining installation.<br />

vacuum. Vapors from the still are condensed<br />

in a water-cooled surface condenser. Reflux-<br />

ing may or may not be done, depending upon the<br />

product, the degree of purity desired, and the<br />

contaminants present. The condensate is ac-<br />

cumulated in a holding tank, where a salt such<br />

as sodium carbonate is added to "break" the<br />

water from the solvent. After the water settles<br />

out, it is removed, and the solvent is drurnmed . .<br />

off as product.<br />

, .<br />

r.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM i<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> From Oil Re-refining ~<br />

The two primary air pollution problems connected<br />

with oil re-refining are odors and hydrocarbon<br />

vapors.<br />

Chief odor sources are the contaminated water<br />

and the noncondensible gases from the separator<br />

tank and dehydration tank. Obnoxious odors !<br />

emanate from the skimming pond. Odors also<br />

occur from the barometric condenser leg. If<br />

the process water is aerated in a cooling tower<br />

or spray pond, a serious odor problem occurs.<br />

Other odors can originate from the dehydration<br />

operation and from sulfuric acid sludges and<br />

clay filter cakes. !<br />

i<br />

I<br />

I<br />

j


846 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

In addition to air pollution from odors, oil re- sions from the bottom drawoff of the still are<br />

refining processes can emit some hydrocarbons slight since most of the volatiles have been<br />

into the atmosphere. These originate from the flashed off. Emissions from the settling tank<br />

noncondensible gases and the layers of light, and the product receivers are normally too<br />

volatile hydrocarbons on the surface of the sep- small to create any problems, but they can be<br />

arator tank and the skimming pond. controlled by being vented also to a boiler firebox.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> From Solvent Re-refining<br />

As in oil re-refining, - the chief air pollution<br />

problems are odors but these are less severe<br />

than those occurring from re-refining of lubricating<br />

oil. Sources of emissions are the settling<br />

tanks during filling and sludge drawoff, the drawoff<br />

of bottoms from the still, the product receivers,<br />

and the water jet reservoir (if vacuum is<br />

produced by a barometric water jet). By creating<br />

a vacuum, the water jet entraps the solvent vapors<br />

from the still.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT<br />

Oil Re-refining<br />

The most acceptable method of controlling emis-<br />

sions from re-refining is incineration. Usually<br />

the firebox of a boiler or heater provides ade-<br />

quate incineration. The separator tank must be<br />

covered and vented to a firebox. The vent line<br />

should be equipped with a knockout drum and a<br />

flashback arrester. Additional safety protection<br />

can be achieved by introducing live steam into<br />

the vent line upstream from the firebox. Other<br />

vessels, for example, dehydrating tanks and<br />

mixing tanks, may be tied into this system.<br />

Emissions from the barometric, or contact,<br />

condenser can be controlled by maintaining a<br />

closed recycle water system or by modifying<br />

the operation by substituting a shell-and-tube-<br />

type condenser.<br />

Recycle water, highly odorous from contact<br />

with the oil and heated by contact with the hot<br />

vapors, must be allowed to cool before reuse.<br />

It can he controlled by cooling in a covered<br />

settling tank that is properly vented to an<br />

operating boiler or heater firebox. Con-<br />

taminated recycle water must not be cooled<br />

by aerating in a spray pond or cooling tower.<br />

Solvent Re-refining<br />

Usually, in the solvent re-refining industry, air<br />

pollution control is lacking without enforcement,<br />

and solvent vapors are allowed to escape into<br />

the atmosphere. If, however, control is re-<br />

quired, it can easily be accomplished by venting<br />

the barometric water jet vacuum system to a<br />

boiler firebox, provided appropriate flashback<br />

prevention measures have been taken. Emis-<br />

CHEMICAL MILLING<br />

The chemical milling process was developed<br />

by the aircraft industry as a solution to the<br />

problem of making lightweight parts of intri-<br />

cate shapes for missiles. These parts could<br />

not be formed if mechanically milled first, and<br />

no machines were available that could mill them<br />

after they were formed. Chemical milling is<br />

based upon the theory that an appropriate etch<br />

solution dissolves equal quantities of metal per<br />

given time from either flat or curved surfaces.<br />

The process was quickly adopted by the aircraft<br />

industry, and etchants were developed for<br />

chemically milling many metals used in aircraft<br />

and missiles, including aluminum, titanium,<br />

stainless steel, and magnesium.<br />

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS<br />

Before an article can be chemically milled, the<br />

surface of the metal must be clean. The usual<br />

metal surface preparation includes (1) degreas-<br />

ing, (2) alkaline cleaning, (3) pickling, and<br />

(4) surface passivation. The cleaning is needed<br />

to provide a clean surface in order to ensure uni-<br />

form dissolving of the metal when it is submerged<br />

in the milling solution. The passivation is needed<br />

to protect the surface from oxidation in air and<br />

provide a surface that will accept and hold a<br />

masking agent or material.<br />

Maskings are either tapes with pressure-sensi-<br />

tive adhesives or paint-like substances that are<br />

applied by brushing, dipping, spraying, or flow-<br />

coating. Figure 642 shows a sheet of stainless<br />

steel being flow-coated with a rubber base mask-<br />

ing material. These paint-like maskings must<br />

be cured, usually in a bake oven. After curing,<br />

the masking is removed or stripped from those<br />

areas to be milled. Figure 643 shows one meth-<br />

od of scribing the masking by use of a template.<br />

Milling is accomplished by submerging the pre-<br />

pared article in an appropriate etching solution.<br />

The depth of the cut is controlled by the length<br />

of time the article is held in the etching solu-<br />

tion. To stop the milling action, the article is<br />

removed from the etchant and the adhering solu-<br />

tion is rinsed off with water. During the milling<br />

step, some metals are discolored by their etch-<br />

ing solutions. The smutty discoloration is re-


Chemical Milling 847<br />

This process is patented and licensed by<br />

Fieilre . .-- fi47. An 18- hv 6-foot stainless steel Turco Products Co., Wilmington, Calif.<br />

~ - ... - .. ., . ~~ ... . -.. ~ .-. .<br />

sheet being masked b; flow-coating with a rub- Figure 644. A flow diagram showing the typical<br />

ber-based masking (U.S. Chemical Milling Gorp., steps necessary to the chem-milling process<br />

Manhatten Beach, Calif.). (Scheer, 1956).<br />

Figure 643. The masking on a titanium part is being<br />

scribed bv use of a template. After scribing, the<br />

masking will be stripped from those areas shown by<br />

the holes in the templates. The stripped areas will<br />

then be milled. The black part in tile foreground and<br />

those in the background have not yet been scribed<br />

(U.S. Chemical Mi l ling Corporation, Manhatten Beach,<br />

Calif.).<br />

moved in a brightening solution such as cold,<br />

dilute nitric acid. A flow diagram of the pro-<br />

cess is shorn in Figure 644.<br />

percent high-boiling alcohols, and is then<br />

stripped off by hand. Figure 645 shows the in-<br />

spection of a part. The metal thickness is mea-<br />

sured before the masking is removed. Figure<br />

646 shows the masking being removed from a<br />

section of a wing skin. The entire side shown<br />

was masked, and some areas of the other side<br />

were etched. In Figure 647, the masking is<br />

being stripped from a milled part.<br />

Figure 645. Inspection of milled parts. The in-<br />

After the milling, the paint-like masking is strument measures the metal thickness before the<br />

softened in a solution consisting, for example, masking is removed (U.S. Chemical Mi l l ing Corpora-<br />

of 80 percent chlorinated hydrocarbons and 20 tion, Manhatten Beach. Calif.),


848 CHEMICAL PROCESSING EQUIPMENT<br />

ETCHANT SOLUTIONS<br />

Figure 646. Stripping masking from a.section of a wing skin of a<br />

B-58. The entire side shown was masked. Some areas of the other<br />

side were mil led (U.S. Chemical Milling Corporation, Manhatten Beach,<br />

Calif.).<br />

Etchants range from sodium hydroxide solution<br />

for aluminum to aqua regia for stainless steel.<br />

For milling a specific metal, the concentration<br />

of the chemical in the solution may vary widely<br />

between different operators: however, each<br />

operator controls the concentration of his solu-<br />

tion to within very close limits. The concen-<br />

Figure 647. Masking being stripped, milled parts with masking still<br />

in lace, and mil led parts with masking removed (U.S. Chemical Mi l-<br />

ling Corporation, Manhatten Beach, Calif.).<br />

tration of the solution affects the milling rat'e;<br />

therefore, it must be closely controlled to ob-<br />

tain the desired rate. For milling aluminum,<br />

the solutions in use contain from 7 to 30 per-<br />

cent sodium hydroxide. For lnilling magnesi-<br />

um, dilute sulfuric acid solutions are adequate.<br />

Stainless steels require strong solutions, USU-<br />

ally aqua regia fortified with sulfuric acid. In<br />

most of the milling solutions, surface-active


agents are used to ensure smooth, even cuts.<br />

The surface-active agents also reduce the ten-<br />

dency toward mist formation by reducing the<br />

surface tension of the solution. The solutions,<br />

during milling operations, are generally main-<br />

tained at constant temperatures ranging from<br />

105" to 190" F.<br />

THE AIR POLLUTION PROBLEM<br />

The air contaminants emitted in the prepara-<br />

tion of metals by chemical milling consist of<br />

mists, vapors, gases, and organic solvents.<br />

Mists<br />

A mist of the etching solution used in a milling<br />

process is discharged from the milling tank<br />

owing to entrainment of droplets of the solution<br />

hy the gas hubbles formed by the chemical<br />

action of the etchant on the metal. The amount<br />

of mist generated depends upon factors such as<br />

the nature of the chemical reaction, the solu-<br />

tion temperature, and the surface tension of the<br />

solution. Since the solutions from which the<br />

mists are formed are very corrosive, the mists,<br />

too, are very corrosive and are capable of caus-<br />

ing annoyance, or a nuisance, or a health hazard<br />

to persons, or damage to property.<br />

Some of the acid solutions used, such as hydro-<br />

chloric and nitric, have high vapor pressures<br />

at the temperatures used for the milling pro-<br />

cess; therefore, appreciable amounts of acid<br />

vapors are discharged. Unlike the discharge<br />

of mists, which occurs only during the milling,<br />

the vapors are discharged continuously from the<br />

hot solution. Under certain atmospheric condi-<br />

tions, the vapors condense, forming acid mists<br />

in the atmosphere.<br />

Gases<br />

Since hydrogen is formed in chemical milling,<br />

proper ventilation must be provided to prevent<br />

the accumulation of dangerous concentrations of<br />

this gas.<br />

Solvents<br />

Organic solvent vapors may be emitted from the<br />

vapor degreaser, the maskant area, and the<br />

curing station in the cleaning and masking pro-<br />

cesses. This type of air contaminant, and the<br />

method of controlling it are described elsewhere<br />

in this manual. Alkaline cleaning, pickling, and<br />

passivating tanks from the other phases of the<br />

cleaning processes have been found to be minor<br />

sources of air pollution.<br />

:a1 Milling 849<br />

HOODING AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

The air contaminants released from chemical<br />

milling tanks can be captured by local exhaust<br />

systems. Since open tanks are used to provide<br />

unobstructed working area, most exhaust sys-<br />

tems employ slotted hoods to capture the mists<br />

and vapors. In designing slot hoods for chem-<br />

ical milling equipment, it is particularly im-<br />

portant to provide for the elimination of exces-<br />

sive cross-drafts as well as for adequate dis-<br />

tribution of ventilation along the entire length<br />

of the hoods. The minimum ventilation rates<br />

previously mentioned in Chapter 3 are for tanks<br />

located in an area having no cross-drafts. If<br />

the tank is to be located outside or in a very<br />

drafty building, either the ventilation rate will<br />

have to be greatly increased or baffles must be<br />

used to shield the tank from winds or drafts.<br />

In some instances, both baffles and increased<br />

ventilation are needed.<br />

Adequate distribution of ventilation along the<br />

entire length of a slot can be attained by pro-<br />

viding a high slot velocity and a relatively low<br />

plenum velocity. The slot velocity should be at<br />

least 2, 000 fpm, and the plenum velocity should<br />

be not more than half of the slot velocity. With<br />

hoods more than 10 feet in length, either multi-<br />

ple takeoffs or splitter vanes are needed. Enough<br />

takeoffs or splitters should be used to reduce<br />

the length of the slot to sections not more than<br />

10 feet long.<br />

Under excessively drafty conditions, a hood en-<br />

closing the tank can be used to advantage. The<br />

hood should cover the entire tank and have suf-<br />

ficient height to accommodate the largest metal<br />

sections that can be handled in the tank. Vari-<br />

ous methods have been used to get work into and<br />

out of the tank. In one installation, the hood has<br />

doors on one end, and a monorail, suspended<br />

below the hood roof, that runs out through the<br />

doors. The work is carried on the monorail<br />

into the hood and above the solution. After the<br />

work is lowered into the solution, the doors are<br />

closed, when necessary, to ensure complete<br />

capture of the air contaminants created. In<br />

another installation, the hood is left open on one<br />

end, and a slot hood placed across the opening.<br />

The top of the hood is slotted to provide for the<br />

movement of the crane cable. This slot is<br />

nominally closed with rubber strips, which are<br />

pushed aside by the cable during movement of<br />

the crane.<br />

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMEN1<br />

Many types of wet collectors that can control<br />

the emissions from chemical milling tanks are<br />

commercially available. The one most common-


850 CHEhiIICAL PROCESS<br />

ly used is the spray and baffle type, owing prob-<br />

ably to its low cost. and ease of coating with cor-<br />

rosion-inhibiting materials. Moreover, the oper-<br />

ation and maintenance of this type are simple<br />

and inexpensive compared with those of other<br />

types of scrubbers.<br />

Figure 648 shows an exhaust and mist control<br />

system employing two scrubbers, one for each<br />

side oi a 24-foot-long by 6-foot-wide tank used<br />

for chemically milling stainless steel and ti-<br />

tanium. The etching solution is a mixture of<br />

hydrochloric, nitric, and sulfuric acids and is<br />

heated to 150°F. Acid vapors discharged from<br />

the solution are captured by slot hoods, one on<br />

each side of the tank. The ducts from each<br />

hood exit downward from the center. Each hood<br />

has four splitter vanes, which divide it into four<br />

sections. The overall hood length is 24 feet,<br />

the end-sections and those adjacent being 4 feet<br />

long each, and the center section being 8 feet<br />

long. Distribution of ventilation is excellent.<br />

Each hood is supplied with 18, 000 cfm ventila-<br />

Figure 648. A tank used for the chemical milling of<br />

stainless steel, and Dart of its air oollution<br />

control system. The hoods, ductwork, and scrubbers<br />

shown are made ent~rely of polyester resin reinforced<br />

wlth flberglas. The fans and discharge ducts,<br />

not shown, are steel-coated wlth polyester resln.<br />

(U S Chem~cal MI ll lnE Coraoratlon, Manhatten Beach,<br />

tion, and the slot is sized to give an intake ve-<br />

locity of 2, 000 fpm. The plenum velocity is<br />

less than 1, 000 fpm. It is estimated that this<br />

system provides sufficient ventilation to capture<br />

at least 95 percent of the vapors emerging from<br />

the process.<br />

The scrubbers are of the spray and baffle type,<br />

as shown in Figure 649. They are cylindrical,<br />

two baffles forming three concentric chambers.<br />

Gases enter at the top and flow down through<br />

the center cylindrical section. Water from a<br />

bank of sprays scrubs the gases as they enter<br />

this section. The bottom of the scrubber is<br />

filled with water to a depth of 1 foot. The gases<br />

and scrubbing water flow downward through the<br />

center section and impinge on the water. The<br />

gases turn 180 degrees and flow upward through the<br />

second chamber. Most of the scrubbing water<br />

remains in the sump. The depth of water in the<br />

sump is maintained at a uniform level with a<br />

float valve and an overflow line. The scrubber<br />

is equipped with a pump to circulate the sump<br />

water to the sprays. In this installation, how-<br />

ever, only fresh water is used, the sump being<br />

kept full and overflowing all the time.<br />

The gases flowupward throughthe second sectionand<br />

over the secondbaffle. Theyturn 180 degrees to enter<br />

the third section. In the third section, the gas-<br />

es flow down and around to the outlet port. Most<br />

of the entrained moisture entering the second<br />

section is removed either by impingement on<br />

the walls of that section or by centrifugal im-<br />

pingementduring the 180-degree change of direction<br />

into the third section. The last of the entrained<br />

water is deposited on the walls of the third sec-<br />

tion. The gases then flow from the scrubber to<br />

the fan, from which they are discharged to the<br />

atmosphere through ducts.<br />

The hoods, the scrubber, and the ductwork con-<br />

necting the hoods to the scrubbers and the scrub-<br />

bers to the fans are made entirely of polyester<br />

resin reinforced with glass fibers. The fans and<br />

discharge ducts are made of steel coated with<br />

polyester resin.<br />

The existing system provides satisfactory con-<br />

trol of the vapors. It captures an estimated 95<br />

percent of the vapors at the tank, and the gases<br />

discharged have only a slight acid odor.<br />

Corrosion Problems<br />

Whenever moisture is present in an exhaust<br />

system, the iron or steel surfaces should be<br />

coated to prevent corrosion. However, since<br />

zinc is soluble in both acid and alkaline solu-<br />

tions, galvanized iron cannot be used when<br />

chemical milling tanks are vented. A coating


Model<br />

Motora<br />

ho<br />

.".<br />

Chemical Milling 851<br />

DRA l N<br />

Pump Drain<br />

rac.htb A B C D E F 6 H I K L<br />

'~otor is 440/220 volts, 3 phase. 60 cycle. Exhaust fan and motor furnished upon request<br />

b D ~ ~ not s include recirculating motor and pump.<br />

Figure 649. A scrubber used to control the acid vapors discharged<br />

from a tank used to mill stainless steel (Lin-0-Coat scrubber,<br />

manufactured by Diversified Plastics. Inc., Paramount, Calif.).<br />

such as polyvinylchloride (PVC), which is not<br />

attacked by either dilute acids or dilute alkalies,<br />

should be used. It has been found, however,<br />

that the PVC linings in ducts and scrubbers can-<br />

not withstand the strongly oxidizing acids used<br />

for stainless steel and titanium milling. These<br />

highly corrosive acids have been successfully<br />

handled in exhaust systems made of polyester<br />

resins reinforced with fiberglas. Hoods, ducts,<br />

and scrubbers are available made entirely of<br />

polyester-fiberglas material. Figure 648 shows<br />

i<br />

Spray<br />

nozzles<br />

Drain<br />

size. it,.<br />

Mi".-range-max.<br />

lorn cfm i fom I r fm<br />

an air pollution control system venting a 24-foot-<br />

long tank for stainless steel chemical milling.<br />

The hoods, ductwork up to the blowers, and the<br />

scrubbers are made entirely of polyester-fiber-<br />

glas material. The steel blowers and discharge<br />

ducts are coated with polyester resin. Some<br />

blower manufacturers are now advertising blow-<br />

ers with scrolls made entirely of polyester-<br />

fiberglas and with steel wheels coated with the<br />

same material.<br />

!<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!