19.01.2013 Views

Saugeen District Secondary School - Bluewater District School Board

Saugeen District Secondary School - Bluewater District School Board

Saugeen District Secondary School - Bluewater District School Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What the students are most excited about…<br />

� The fact that we can combine different energy sources and be off grid; renewable energy is a possibility.<br />

Sarah Szabo<br />

� I see the geothermal heating and cooling being feasible and realistic. This technology has built a name for its self, and has<br />

proven to be reliable and worthwhile. Though, the technology that I am most excited about is hydrogen storage and<br />

transportation (see below). However this technology is still very new, expensive and hasn’t made a reputation.<br />

J. Kononiuk<br />

� To see the changes that these different ideas will have on the school and energy costs – that small changes can have a big<br />

effect overall. And these changes aren’t just on energy costs, but that they will raise awareness and other changes are<br />

surely to follow with the outlook of the staff and students.<br />

� Seeing how many ideas the board will actually like and what they reject, and for what reasons. It will be interesting to see<br />

how sustainable the school is; seeing what works and what is not as good as anticipated in a few years after the initial<br />

construction. And to see how much revenue can be produced after all the projects are paid off and the rest is revenue. I<br />

would like to see that money used to continue to help with the environment.<br />

K. MacGregor<br />

iii. Future Considerations?<br />

Hydrogen Surplus Storage/<br />

Transportation<br />

Landfill Gas Converting to<br />

Energy<br />

� Port Elgin and Southampton<br />

Landfills<br />

� Power Station on school<br />

grounds<br />

“1 million tons of municipal solid<br />

waste in a landfill typically<br />

generates 300 cubic foot per<br />

minute (cfm) of landfill gas that<br />

could then generate 7 000 000<br />

kilowatt hours per year and 7 000<br />

000 kWh is enough energy to<br />

power 700 homes for a year”<br />

Advantages Cost Savings<br />

� Making hydrogen at night<br />

when the cost of electricity<br />

is low, and storing it for<br />

later.<br />

� In the day, when energy<br />

needs are greater and cost<br />

has increased, the<br />

hydrogen can be converted<br />

to energy.<br />

� Less strain on the electricity<br />

grid in peak times, and<br />

saves money.<br />

� The fuel cell also produces<br />

heat that can be captured.<br />

� Projects generate<br />

renewable energy,<br />

offsetting the use of nonrenewables.<br />

� Reduces local air pollution<br />

� Helps to eliminate methane<br />

- a potent heat-trapping<br />

gas. “Methane is a green<br />

house gas that has 21 times<br />

the heating effect as carbon<br />

dioxide...”<br />

� “About 70% of the<br />

recovered gas is used as<br />

energy”<br />

� Involves citizens, the<br />

government and other<br />

organizations<br />

� Projects create jobs,<br />

revenues, and cost savings<br />

� Potential to become leading<br />

school board in renewable<br />

energy; leader and example<br />

for all<br />

� A hydrogen fuel cell is<br />

about $90 000<br />

� An equivalent hydrogen<br />

producer would also cost<br />

about $80 000<br />

� And, large holding tanks,<br />

$16 000<br />

� The cost of maintenance<br />

and operation of this<br />

system is about $4500 per<br />

year<br />

� It would take 3-4 years to<br />

pay off the system with the<br />

saving that it provides.<br />

� Unknown<br />

� Could enter into<br />

partnership with the<br />

municipality.<br />

� We use and average of $132<br />

110.60 of electricity<br />

annually<br />

� If we can store all the<br />

energy we need at night<br />

during low cost, we can save<br />

$67 161.49 in power<br />

annually.<br />

� That is a 50% decrease in<br />

cost.<br />

� For the Port Elgin site, with<br />

energy harvested based on<br />

2007’s cubic metres of waste,<br />

~500,000 kWh (equivalent to<br />

49 homes)<br />

� For the Southampton site,<br />

with energy harvested based<br />

on 2009’s cubic metres of<br />

waste, ~600,000 kWh<br />

(equivalent to 57 homes)<br />

� Total savings of energy<br />

needs, based on the<br />

Southampton site = ~$61,000<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!