Handbook on line 2012 - Forester Kent Cricket League - Uk.net
Handbook on line 2012 - Forester Kent Cricket League - Uk.net
Handbook on line 2012 - Forester Kent Cricket League - Uk.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REPORTS<br />
REPORTS<br />
Shepherd Neame <strong>Kent</strong> <strong>Cricket</strong> <strong>League</strong> Shepherd Neame <strong>Kent</strong> <strong>Cricket</strong> <strong>League</strong><br />
Where have all the<br />
Surely every Club can find volunteers from<br />
A final plea to all those sides who have no<br />
am<strong>on</strong>gst their number to score for their senior<br />
intenti<strong>on</strong> of supplying a scorer:<br />
scorers g<strong>on</strong>e?<br />
teams?It will help them get to know the Club and<br />
Please apologise, and before the game, to any<br />
the laws of the game and solve the problem with<br />
scorers you may encounter and at least have the<br />
the minimum of fuss and maximum of efficiency.<br />
decency to inform them of your bowlers when in<br />
The Laws of <strong>Cricket</strong><br />
the field and those who have taken the catches at<br />
They get a free tea and if every player puts in a £1<br />
the end of the innings.<br />
“Law 4: The Scorers”<br />
– more than worth it – they finish the day with<br />
1. Appointment of scorers – Two scorers shall be<br />
appointed to record all runs scored, all wickets<br />
taken and, where appropriate, number of overs<br />
bowled<br />
Playing C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of the <strong>Kent</strong> <strong>League</strong><br />
3.3 Each Club must provide a scorer for each<br />
match. A side that fails to provide a scorer shall<br />
ensure that they nominate two people to ‘man’<br />
the score-box, or scoring table, throughout the<br />
innings of their own side.<br />
£11, although this is well below the minimum<br />
wage and the real cost is something in the regi<strong>on</strong><br />
of £50 , which the sliding scale of penalties,<br />
presumably, is designed to reflect.<br />
Alternatively perhaps former or injured players<br />
may like to put something back into the Club, or<br />
am I being naive?<br />
At the moment Clubs are not encouraged to<br />
address the problem, so why not extend the<br />
penalties to cover all divisi<strong>on</strong>s and not just the<br />
Premier <strong>League</strong>?<br />
Otherwise scorers will have to resort to shouting<br />
“Bowlers name”, which might be deemed not<br />
within the spirit nor code of c<strong>on</strong>duct of the game,<br />
but is a resort born out of anger and frustrati<strong>on</strong><br />
at being ignored.<br />
With Bromley Comm<strong>on</strong> promoted to Divisi<strong>on</strong><br />
Two and Sidcup relegated to Divisi<strong>on</strong> Four I<br />
may be the <strong>on</strong>ly scorer in Divisi<strong>on</strong> Three next<br />
year. Come <strong>on</strong> Harvel, Holmesdale, Chestfield<br />
and Downham & Bellingham – the respective<br />
relegated and promoted sides from Divisi<strong>on</strong>s Two<br />
and Four – prove me wr<strong>on</strong>g and I’ll gladly eat my<br />
words.<br />
Bit of a c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> there – “a side that fails to<br />
provide” is not the same as “must provide” whilst<br />
the word ‘man’, and the quotati<strong>on</strong> marks are in<br />
the playing c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of the league rather than<br />
being mine, are an insult to our lady scorers. (Fact<br />
– <strong>on</strong>ly three teams in Divisi<strong>on</strong> 3, 1st X1 secti<strong>on</strong>,<br />
had scorers in the 2011 seas<strong>on</strong>, and two of them<br />
were ladies!<br />
But, hang <strong>on</strong> a minute, under “Fines 2011” it<br />
states:<br />
6.Failure to provide a scorer – Fines for no<br />
scorers will be applied <strong>on</strong> a sliding scale– first<br />
offence £50, sec<strong>on</strong>d £75, third and subsequent<br />
£100 plus 5 penalty points<br />
Ah, that’s more like it – I bet that c<strong>on</strong>centrates<br />
the mind. But, and hang <strong>on</strong> for another minute –<br />
sorry to take up so much of your time - that <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
applies to the Premier <strong>League</strong>!!!<br />
As you have probably guessed by now, I am a<br />
scorer, from Old Wils<strong>on</strong>ians if you really must<br />
know, and have lost count of the number of<br />
games I have scored <strong>on</strong> my own, although I do<br />
know that I ‘manned the score-box or scoring<br />
table’ for 40 games last seas<strong>on</strong> and <strong>on</strong>ly five<br />
opposing sides had a scorer.<br />
So where have all the scorers g<strong>on</strong>e, and in an<br />
effort to be positive and c<strong>on</strong>structive, I am<br />
c<strong>on</strong>vinced that the problem is easily solved.<br />
Most sides have colts secti<strong>on</strong>s, which is really<br />
encouraging and essential for the future of the<br />
game, and these secti<strong>on</strong>s invariably have well over<br />
100 participants.<br />
26<br />
The most disturbing thing about not supplying<br />
a scorer is that many results may be wr<strong>on</strong>g, as<br />
the book gets passed from player to player with<br />
little regard for accuracy, and some clubs may<br />
have been promoted, or relegated, because<br />
score-books are incorrect.<br />
Those who find it impossible to meet this<br />
very simple request should at least abide by<br />
the league’s cop out – “shall ensure that they<br />
nominate two people to ‘man’ (sic) the scorebox<br />
or scoring table” - i.e. two means two and<br />
those bleating “I’ve d<strong>on</strong>e 10 overs” should be big<br />
enough to do the job properly.<br />
<strong>Kent</strong> <strong>League</strong> games can last 100 overs and up to<br />
seven hours. Scorers are the <strong>on</strong>ly participants of<br />
the game who have to c<strong>on</strong>centrate for a potential<br />
600 balls – plus wides and no balls – even umpires<br />
get a certain degree of respite when they are at<br />
square leg.<br />
And some umpires appear to have accepted the<br />
fact that their side will never provide a scorer<br />
and seem to feel that, to acknowledge those of<br />
the oppositi<strong>on</strong>, would be an act of betrayal to<br />
their own side. One, for example, who cannot<br />
be named for legal reas<strong>on</strong>s, signalled to the trees<br />
opposite the score-box during a game rather than<br />
accept the fact that the oppositi<strong>on</strong> had a scorer.<br />
And d<strong>on</strong>’t be put off by the rumours going around<br />
that are something al<strong>on</strong>g the <strong>line</strong>s of<br />
“Old Wils<strong>on</strong>ians are a friendly club with a nice<br />
ground, but their 1st Xl scorer is very strange!”<br />
I’ll end <strong>on</strong> a radical note, although <strong>on</strong>e I know<br />
both Bromley Comm<strong>on</strong> and Sidcup will support<br />
me with. If sides not providing a scorer were<br />
deducted a point, then clubs would surely make<br />
more of an effort. After all, you get penalised for<br />
not providing an umpire, so why not the other<br />
essential official.<br />
And, if this policy had been implemented in<br />
2011, then Sidcup would have finished sixth,<br />
Old Wils<strong>on</strong>ians third and Bromley Comm<strong>on</strong> as<br />
champi<strong>on</strong>s. And quite right, too; sides should be<br />
rewarded for complying with the laws of the<br />
game.<br />
Mike Pike<br />
27