23.01.2013 Views

Handbook on line 2012 - Forester Kent Cricket League - Uk.net

Handbook on line 2012 - Forester Kent Cricket League - Uk.net

Handbook on line 2012 - Forester Kent Cricket League - Uk.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REPORTS<br />

REPORTS<br />

Shepherd Neame <strong>Kent</strong> <strong>Cricket</strong> <strong>League</strong> Shepherd Neame <strong>Kent</strong> <strong>Cricket</strong> <strong>League</strong><br />

Where have all the<br />

Surely every Club can find volunteers from<br />

A final plea to all those sides who have no<br />

am<strong>on</strong>gst their number to score for their senior<br />

intenti<strong>on</strong> of supplying a scorer:<br />

scorers g<strong>on</strong>e?<br />

teams?It will help them get to know the Club and<br />

Please apologise, and before the game, to any<br />

the laws of the game and solve the problem with<br />

scorers you may encounter and at least have the<br />

the minimum of fuss and maximum of efficiency.<br />

decency to inform them of your bowlers when in<br />

The Laws of <strong>Cricket</strong><br />

the field and those who have taken the catches at<br />

They get a free tea and if every player puts in a £1<br />

the end of the innings.<br />

“Law 4: The Scorers”<br />

– more than worth it – they finish the day with<br />

1. Appointment of scorers – Two scorers shall be<br />

appointed to record all runs scored, all wickets<br />

taken and, where appropriate, number of overs<br />

bowled<br />

Playing C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of the <strong>Kent</strong> <strong>League</strong><br />

3.3 Each Club must provide a scorer for each<br />

match. A side that fails to provide a scorer shall<br />

ensure that they nominate two people to ‘man’<br />

the score-box, or scoring table, throughout the<br />

innings of their own side.<br />

£11, although this is well below the minimum<br />

wage and the real cost is something in the regi<strong>on</strong><br />

of £50 , which the sliding scale of penalties,<br />

presumably, is designed to reflect.<br />

Alternatively perhaps former or injured players<br />

may like to put something back into the Club, or<br />

am I being naive?<br />

At the moment Clubs are not encouraged to<br />

address the problem, so why not extend the<br />

penalties to cover all divisi<strong>on</strong>s and not just the<br />

Premier <strong>League</strong>?<br />

Otherwise scorers will have to resort to shouting<br />

“Bowlers name”, which might be deemed not<br />

within the spirit nor code of c<strong>on</strong>duct of the game,<br />

but is a resort born out of anger and frustrati<strong>on</strong><br />

at being ignored.<br />

With Bromley Comm<strong>on</strong> promoted to Divisi<strong>on</strong><br />

Two and Sidcup relegated to Divisi<strong>on</strong> Four I<br />

may be the <strong>on</strong>ly scorer in Divisi<strong>on</strong> Three next<br />

year. Come <strong>on</strong> Harvel, Holmesdale, Chestfield<br />

and Downham & Bellingham – the respective<br />

relegated and promoted sides from Divisi<strong>on</strong>s Two<br />

and Four – prove me wr<strong>on</strong>g and I’ll gladly eat my<br />

words.<br />

Bit of a c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> there – “a side that fails to<br />

provide” is not the same as “must provide” whilst<br />

the word ‘man’, and the quotati<strong>on</strong> marks are in<br />

the playing c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of the league rather than<br />

being mine, are an insult to our lady scorers. (Fact<br />

– <strong>on</strong>ly three teams in Divisi<strong>on</strong> 3, 1st X1 secti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

had scorers in the 2011 seas<strong>on</strong>, and two of them<br />

were ladies!<br />

But, hang <strong>on</strong> a minute, under “Fines 2011” it<br />

states:<br />

6.Failure to provide a scorer – Fines for no<br />

scorers will be applied <strong>on</strong> a sliding scale– first<br />

offence £50, sec<strong>on</strong>d £75, third and subsequent<br />

£100 plus 5 penalty points<br />

Ah, that’s more like it – I bet that c<strong>on</strong>centrates<br />

the mind. But, and hang <strong>on</strong> for another minute –<br />

sorry to take up so much of your time - that <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

applies to the Premier <strong>League</strong>!!!<br />

As you have probably guessed by now, I am a<br />

scorer, from Old Wils<strong>on</strong>ians if you really must<br />

know, and have lost count of the number of<br />

games I have scored <strong>on</strong> my own, although I do<br />

know that I ‘manned the score-box or scoring<br />

table’ for 40 games last seas<strong>on</strong> and <strong>on</strong>ly five<br />

opposing sides had a scorer.<br />

So where have all the scorers g<strong>on</strong>e, and in an<br />

effort to be positive and c<strong>on</strong>structive, I am<br />

c<strong>on</strong>vinced that the problem is easily solved.<br />

Most sides have colts secti<strong>on</strong>s, which is really<br />

encouraging and essential for the future of the<br />

game, and these secti<strong>on</strong>s invariably have well over<br />

100 participants.<br />

26<br />

The most disturbing thing about not supplying<br />

a scorer is that many results may be wr<strong>on</strong>g, as<br />

the book gets passed from player to player with<br />

little regard for accuracy, and some clubs may<br />

have been promoted, or relegated, because<br />

score-books are incorrect.<br />

Those who find it impossible to meet this<br />

very simple request should at least abide by<br />

the league’s cop out – “shall ensure that they<br />

nominate two people to ‘man’ (sic) the scorebox<br />

or scoring table” - i.e. two means two and<br />

those bleating “I’ve d<strong>on</strong>e 10 overs” should be big<br />

enough to do the job properly.<br />

<strong>Kent</strong> <strong>League</strong> games can last 100 overs and up to<br />

seven hours. Scorers are the <strong>on</strong>ly participants of<br />

the game who have to c<strong>on</strong>centrate for a potential<br />

600 balls – plus wides and no balls – even umpires<br />

get a certain degree of respite when they are at<br />

square leg.<br />

And some umpires appear to have accepted the<br />

fact that their side will never provide a scorer<br />

and seem to feel that, to acknowledge those of<br />

the oppositi<strong>on</strong>, would be an act of betrayal to<br />

their own side. One, for example, who cannot<br />

be named for legal reas<strong>on</strong>s, signalled to the trees<br />

opposite the score-box during a game rather than<br />

accept the fact that the oppositi<strong>on</strong> had a scorer.<br />

And d<strong>on</strong>’t be put off by the rumours going around<br />

that are something al<strong>on</strong>g the <strong>line</strong>s of<br />

“Old Wils<strong>on</strong>ians are a friendly club with a nice<br />

ground, but their 1st Xl scorer is very strange!”<br />

I’ll end <strong>on</strong> a radical note, although <strong>on</strong>e I know<br />

both Bromley Comm<strong>on</strong> and Sidcup will support<br />

me with. If sides not providing a scorer were<br />

deducted a point, then clubs would surely make<br />

more of an effort. After all, you get penalised for<br />

not providing an umpire, so why not the other<br />

essential official.<br />

And, if this policy had been implemented in<br />

2011, then Sidcup would have finished sixth,<br />

Old Wils<strong>on</strong>ians third and Bromley Comm<strong>on</strong> as<br />

champi<strong>on</strong>s. And quite right, too; sides should be<br />

rewarded for complying with the laws of the<br />

game.<br />

Mike Pike<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!