25.01.2013 Views

Technical Review of the Lined Rock Cavern Concept and Design ...

Technical Review of the Lined Rock Cavern Concept and Design ...

Technical Review of the Lined Rock Cavern Concept and Design ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lined</strong> <strong>Rock</strong> <strong>Cavern</strong> (LRC) <strong>Concept</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Design</strong> Methodology 3<br />

suggest that <strong>the</strong> limit equilibrium models used in <strong>the</strong> ground-uplift design evaluations are<br />

too simple to adequately represent <strong>the</strong> rock-mass load/deformation response for LRC<br />

conditions. Results also show potentially important effects from <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

rock fractures on local strains in <strong>the</strong> steel liner during cavern pressurization. Such effects<br />

are not accounted for in <strong>the</strong> current LRC design methodology, because it regards <strong>the</strong> rock<br />

mass only as a continuum. When a rock mass is represented as a continuum, <strong>the</strong> deformational<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> natural rock fractures are smeared/averaged throughout <strong>the</strong> rock mass.<br />

Although this is frequently done in rock engineering, <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> steel liner<br />

strain in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LRC design also warrants evaluation using methods that account<br />

for local effects associated with <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> explicit rock fractures.<br />

The remaining sections <strong>of</strong> this report contain <strong>the</strong> following.<br />

♦ Title list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> review documents (for completeness), with a brief<br />

summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LRC concept <strong>and</strong> design methodology expressed in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se documents.<br />

♦ <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> key LRC design aspects:<br />

� Criterion for Safety Against Ground Uplift;<br />

� <strong>Cavern</strong>-Wall Response (Steel Liner/Concrete/<strong>Rock</strong> Mass Interaction);<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

� Concrete-Liner Fracture Analysis.<br />

♦ <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LRC design methodology:<br />

� General Comments<br />

� Probabilistic Approach<br />

♦ Conclusions<br />

� Summary <strong>and</strong> Observations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rock</strong> Mechanics <strong>Review</strong><br />

� Judgement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LRC <strong>Concept</strong><br />

� Recommendations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!