28.01.2013 Views

2006 Updates Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations

2006 Updates Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations

2006 Updates Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

premature cannulation of a fistula may result in a greater incidence of infiltration, with<br />

associated compression of the vessel by hematoma <strong>and</strong> permanent loss of the fistula. In<br />

general, allowing the fistula to mature for 6 to 8 weeks before investigating the reason for<br />

failure to mature is appropriate (see CPG 2). For a fistula to be considered successful, it<br />

must be usable. In general, a working fistula must have all the following characteristics:<br />

blood flow adequate to support dialysis, which usually equates to a blood flow greater<br />

than 600 mL/min; a diameter greater than 0.6 cm, with location accessible for cannulation<br />

<strong>and</strong> discernible margins to allow for repetitive cannulation; <strong>and</strong> a depth of approximately<br />

0.6 cm (ideally, between 0.5 to 1.0 cm from the skin surface). This combination<br />

of characteristics can be remembered easily as the Rule of 6s.<br />

Although there are no definitive data in the literature, any intervention that increases<br />

blood flow to the extremity may improve the chances of successful fistula development.<br />

Therefore, regular h<strong>and</strong>-arm exercises, with or without a lightly applied tourniquet, are<br />

recommended until the fistula matures. Failure of a fistula to mature occasionally is<br />

caused by venous side branches that drain critical flow from the primary vessel. Ligating<br />

these side branches may result in successful maturation (see CPG 6).<br />

Studies relating to preoperative venous imaging/mapping for AVF construction underwent<br />

systematic review. Duplex ultrasound is the preferred method for preoperative<br />

vascular mapping. Vascular mapping in preparation for the creation of a vascular access<br />

refers to the evaluation of vessels, both arterial <strong>and</strong> venous, of patients with CKD who<br />

have selected HD therapy, <strong>and</strong> it should be performed in all patients before placement of<br />

an access. Preoperative vascular mapping was shown to substantially increase the total<br />

proportion of patients dialyzing with fistulae. 36–39 Several studies support the 2.0- to 2.5mm<br />

vein diameter threshold for successful creation of a fistula. 39,40 Radiocephalic fistulae<br />

constructed in veins less than 2.0 mm in diameter had only a 16% primary patency at<br />

3 months compared with 76% for those with veins greater than 2.0 mm. 40 In a pivotal<br />

study, 39 a threshold of 2.5-mm vein diameter, assessed by using duplex ultrasound, was<br />

used; this resulted in an increase in fistula creation to 63% compared with a retrospective<br />

14% rate in the absence of vascular mapping. 22 A similar study using the same duplex ultrasound<br />

criteria showed a fistula increase from 34% in historical controls to 64%. Importantly,<br />

in this study, duplex ultrasound altered the surgical plan based entirely on the<br />

surgeon’s clinical evaluation, resulting in increased placement of fistulae. 41<br />

There is no generally accepted “st<strong>and</strong>ard” for what constitutes vascular mapping. The<br />

arterial evaluation should include pulse examination, differential blood pressure measurement,<br />

assessment of the palmar arch for patency, arterial diameter assessed by using<br />

duplex ultrasound, <strong>and</strong> the presence of arterial calcification. A preoperative arterial diameter<br />

less than 1.6 mm has been associated with a high failure rate in radiocephalic fistulae.<br />

42,43 Other studies suggested that a minimum diameter of 2.0 mm is required for<br />

successful fistula creation. 39 Venous evaluation should include a luminal diameter of 2.5<br />

mm or greater, continuity with the proximal central veins, <strong>and</strong> absence of obstruction. 39<br />

The central veins may be assessed indirectly by using duplex ultrasound. 44 Compared<br />

with invasive venography, duplex ultrasound had a specificity of 97% <strong>and</strong> sensitivity of<br />

81% for detecting central vein occlusion. 45 Alternatively, venography or magnetic<br />

KDOQI National Kidney Foundation CPGs for Vascular Access 247

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!