28.01.2013 Views

WHO Drug Information Vol. 18, No. 2, 2004 - World Health ...

WHO Drug Information Vol. 18, No. 2, 2004 - World Health ...

WHO Drug Information Vol. 18, No. 2, 2004 - World Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>WHO</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Information</strong> <strong>Vol</strong> <strong>18</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. 2, <strong>2004</strong><br />

1. Reduced osmolarity ORS was more effective<br />

than standard ORS for acute noncholera<br />

diarrhoea in children, as measured by clinically<br />

important outcomes such as reduced stool<br />

output, reduced vomiting, and reduced need for<br />

supplemental intravenous therapy. Although<br />

data were more limited, reduced-osmolarity<br />

ORS also appeared safe and effective for<br />

children with cholera;<br />

2. Among adults with cholera, clinical outcomes<br />

were not different among those treated with<br />

reduced-osmolarity ORS compared with<br />

standard ORS, although the risk of transient<br />

asymptomatic hyponatraemia was noted;<br />

3. Given the programmatic and logistical advantages<br />

of using a single ORS composition<br />

globally, it was recommended that this be a<br />

reduced-osmolarity ORS (Table 1); and<br />

4. Further monitoring, including postmarketing<br />

surveillance studies, were strongly encouraged<br />

to better assess any risk of symptomatic<br />

hyponatraemia in cholera-endemic parts of the<br />

world (11).<br />

A number of randomized controlled trials have<br />

established the superiority of reduced-osmolarity<br />

ORS over standard ORS in the management of<br />

diarrhoeal diseases in children. Concerns about<br />

the safety of reduced-osmolarity ORS centre on<br />

its use in patients with cholera, especially adults.<br />

While the provision of 17% less sodium to patients<br />

with cholera may lead to a slightly greater negative<br />

sodium balance at the end of treatment, this<br />

deficit should be rapidly corrected when a normal<br />

diet is resumed. Experience to date provides no<br />

evidence that transient hyponatraemia, which may<br />

also occur with standard ORS, has significant<br />

adverse clinical consequences for cholera<br />

patients.<br />

The benefits of promoting the use of a single ORS<br />

solution for all patients with diarrhoea, including<br />

cholera, are enormous, as has been clearly<br />

established with standard ORS. It is recognized,<br />

however, that any single ORS formulation,<br />

including standard ORS, that is promoted for use<br />

in patients of all ages and with diarrhoea of any<br />

aetiology must be a compromise that takes into<br />

consideration both the substantial differences in<br />

stool sodium losses that occur across the spectrum<br />

of diarrhoeal disease as well as substantial<br />

differences in the global burden of cholera vs<br />

noncholera diarrhoea.<br />

It is estimated that acute noncholera diarrhoea in<br />

children causes 1.5 million to 2.5 million deaths<br />

per year, whereas cholera causes significantly<br />

fewer deaths in all age groups. Reduced-osmolarity<br />

ORS has the potential to substantially reduce<br />

childhood deaths from noncholera diarrhoea due<br />

to the reduced requirement for supplementary<br />

intravenous fluids. Although reduced-osmolarity<br />

ORS may not have the same benefit for cholera<br />

patients, clinical trials show it to be as effective as<br />

standard ORS. It is the authors view that the<br />

current evidence demonstrates the benefits of<br />

reduced-osmolarity ORS for the world’s children,<br />

and that use of the revised formulation is fully<br />

justified.<br />

References<br />

Table 1 Composition of oral rehydration solutions<br />

1. Black, R.E., Morris, S.S., Bryce, J. Where and why<br />

are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet, 361:<br />

2226–2234 (2003).<br />

Standard Reduced osmolarity Glucose<br />

Component <strong>WHO</strong> (1975) <strong>WHO</strong> (20002) plus glycine<br />

glucose, mmo/L 111 75 110<br />

sodium, mEq/L 90 75 120<br />

potassium, mEq/L 20 20 15<br />

chloride, mEq/L 80 65 72<br />

base 10 1 10 1 48 2 (15 3 )<br />

glycine, mmo/L 110<br />

osmolarity, mOsm/L 311 245 510<br />

<strong>WHO</strong> = <strong>World</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Organization<br />

1 Citrate in mmol/L<br />

2 The base was bicarbonate in the origininal study (9)<br />

3 Potassium citrate<br />

Current Topics<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!