Pre-Filed Testimony and Exhibits of David Raphael - Vermont Public ...
Pre-Filed Testimony and Exhibits of David Raphael - Vermont Public ...
Pre-Filed Testimony and Exhibits of David Raphael - Vermont Public ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Fair Haven Biomass Project, PSB Docket No.<br />
<strong>Pre</strong>filed <strong>Testimony</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>David</strong> <strong>Raphael</strong><br />
November 2, 2010<br />
Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 6<br />
1 (Sheffield Wind Project), for Green Mountain Power regarding Docket 7558<br />
2 (Kingdom Community Wind Project), <strong>and</strong> on behalf <strong>of</strong> Georgia Mountain<br />
3 Community Wind, LLC, Docket 7508.<br />
4 2. Summary <strong>of</strong> Findings<br />
5 Q5. Based upon your evaluation <strong>and</strong> analyses, does the Project comply with<br />
6 Section 248?<br />
7 A5. Yes. On October 18. 2010. we visited Fair Haven to reconnaissance the Project<br />
8 Site <strong>and</strong> surrounding area, to take photos. <strong>and</strong> to document historic resources. We<br />
9 have prepared a visual simulation from the Welcome Center. A viewshed map<br />
10 has been completed to identify areas with potential visibility, <strong>and</strong> we have<br />
11 reviewed a 3D model to confirm that visibility.<br />
12 Q6. Please describe your analysis <strong>and</strong> conclusions.<br />
13 A6. My report, attached as Petitioner’s Exhibit DR-2, addresses the Fair Haven<br />
14 Biomass Project (the “Project”) in light <strong>of</strong> the aesthetics, historic tesources <strong>and</strong><br />
IS orderly development <strong>and</strong> pnhlie investment criteria <strong>of</strong> 30 V.SA.* 248(h). As set<br />
16 forth in the report. my analytical methods include visual <strong>and</strong> cartographic<br />
17 analyses, document research <strong>and</strong> review. L<strong>and</strong>works’ primary analyses assess the<br />
18 Project’s visibility <strong>and</strong> potential for visual <strong>and</strong> aesthetic impacts, with a focus on<br />
19 vantage points from major federal, state or local roads.. relationships to nearby<br />
20 areas <strong>of</strong> public interest; or high scenic value <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>of</strong>ficial designation as a<br />
21 cultural, aesthetic or recreational facility or resource, Locations that involve<br />
22 resideniiaj areas in close proximity to the proposed Project were also considered.