29.01.2013 Views

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 TOBY GEE<br />

If π is a cuspidal automorphic representation of GD(A ∞ ) then there is a<br />

unique ideal n such that π U1(n) is one-dimensional, and π U1(m) �= 0 if and<br />

only if n|m. We call n the conductor of π.<br />

Analogous to the theory of admissible representations of GL2(K), K/Qp<br />

finite that we sketched above, there is a theory of admissible representations<br />

of D × , D a nonsplit quaternion algebra over K. Since D × /K × is<br />

compact, any irreducible smooth representation of D × is finite-dimensional.<br />

There is a bijection JL from the irreducible smooth representations of D ×<br />

to the discrete series representations of GL2(K), determined by a character<br />

identity.<br />

Fact 2.8. (The global Jacquet-Langlands correspondence)<br />

(i) The only finite-dimensional cuspidal automorphic representations of<br />

GD(A∞ ) occur if S(D) ⊃ S∞ and kv = 2 for all v ∈ S∞, in which<br />

case there are 1-dimensional representations, which factor through<br />

the reduced determinant.<br />

(ii) There is a bijection JL from the infinite-dimensional cuspidal automorphic<br />

representations of GD(A∞ ) of weight (k, η) to the cuspidal<br />

automorphic representations π of GL2(A∞ F ) of weight (k, η)<br />

such that πv is discrete series for all finite places v ∈ S(D). Furthermore<br />

if v /∈ S(D) then JL(π)v = πv, and if v ∈ S(D) then<br />

JL(π)v = JL(πv).<br />

Fact 2.9. (The existence of Galois representations associated to cuspidal<br />

modular forms) Let π be an irreducible admissible representation of GL2(AF ).<br />

Then there is a CM field Lπ and for each finite place λ of Lπ a continuous<br />

irreducible Galois representation<br />

such that<br />

rλ(π) : GF → GL2(Lπ,λ)<br />

(i) if πv is unramified and v does not divide the residue characteristic of<br />

λ, then rλ(π)|GFv is unramified, and the characteristic polynomial<br />

of Frobv is X2 − tvX + (#kv)sv, where tv and sv are the eigen-<br />

GL2(OFv )<br />

values of Tv and Sv respectively on πv . [Note that by the<br />

Chebotarev density theorem, this already characterises rλ(π) up to<br />

isomorphism.]<br />

(ii) More generally, WD(rλ(π)|GFv )F −ss ∼ = recFv(πv ⊗ | det | −1/2 ).<br />

(iii) If v divides the residue characteristic of λ then rλ(π)|GFv is de Rham<br />

with τ-Hodge-Tate weights ητ , ητ + kτ − 1, where τ : F ↩→ Lπ ⊂ C<br />

is an embedding lying over v. If πv is unramified then rλ(π)|GFv is<br />

crystalline.<br />

(iv) If cv is a complex conjugation, then det rλ(π)(cv) = −1.<br />

Fact 2.10. (Base change) Let E/F be a cyclic extension of totally real fields<br />

of prime degree. Let Gal(E/F ) = 〈σ〉 and let Gal(E/F ) ∨ = 〈δ E/F 〉. Let π be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!