29.01.2013 Views

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 TOBY GEE<br />

Define R� as above, except that we no longer require the deformations<br />

?,QN<br />

to be unramified at q ∈ QN. R� is still generated by u elements over<br />

?,QN<br />

Rloc ? , by another duality calculation.<br />

�<br />

Write ∆QN = q∈QN Sylp((Z/qZ) × ). For simplicity of notation, let’s suppose<br />

that this is isomorphic to (Z/pNZ) u (again, the general case works in<br />

the same way, but the notation is slightly more complicated). By the above,<br />

∼= χα ⊕ χβ, and we have a homomor-<br />

runiv |GQq is reducible, say runiv<br />

?,QN ?,QN |GQq<br />

phism Sylp((Z/qZ) × ) → (Runiv ?,QN )× induced by local class field theory and<br />

χα|IQq . Taking the product over q ∈ QN, we have a map ∆QN → (Runiv<br />

?,QN )× .<br />

So R� ?,QN is a module over O[∆QN ], and if we let aN denote the augmentation<br />

ideal of O[∆QN ], then R� ?,QN /aN = Runiv ? .<br />

We now have to introduce modular forms into the picture. At this point<br />

we will be rather brief, as to give the full details would take a prohibitive<br />

amount of space. This is also the one place where the theory is better<br />

developed over a totally real field other than Q; indeed, the optimal choice<br />

of field is a field F with [F : Q] even. We then choose a division algebra<br />

D with S(D) = ∞. We now define spaces of “algebraic modular forms” for<br />

GD(A∞ ) ∼ = GL2(A∞ F ). These are an integral p-adic avatar of the spaces of<br />

modular forms considered above, and we can use them to study congruences<br />

between modular forms, and in particular to relate the global deformation<br />

rings we are considering to Hecke algebras.<br />

Let U = �<br />

v Uv ⊂ GL2(A∞ F ) be a compact open subgroup, with Uv =<br />

GL2(OFv) for all v|p. Fix χ0 : (A∞ F )× /F × → O × a continuous character.<br />

Let Λk denote the representation of GL2(OF,l) given by<br />

⊗τ:F ↩→K Sym k−2 O 2 .<br />

If A is a finite O-module, we let Sk,χ0 (U, A) denote the space of functions<br />

satisfying<br />

φ : D × \ GL2(A ∞ F ) → Λ ⊗O A<br />

φ(guz) = χ0(z)u −1<br />

p φ(g)<br />

for all g ∈ GL2(A∞ F ), u ∈ U, z ∈ (A∞ F )× . We will sometimes write S(U, A)<br />

for Sk,χ0 (U, A). Note that S(U, O) is a finite free O-module.<br />

We have an action of Hecke operators on S(U, A); if we let S be the set<br />

of places v of F which either divide p or for which Uv �= GL2(OFv), then<br />

we have an action of the Hecke operators Tv, Sv at all places v /∈ S, via<br />

the usual formulas we found above. Let TU denote the O-subalgebra of<br />

EndO(Sk,χ0 (U, O)) generated by these operators; this is a commutative Oalgebra,<br />

and is finite and free as an O-module. It is not so hard to relate<br />

these spaces to the spaces of modular forms we considered previously.<br />

∼<br />

Fact 3.8. Fix an isomorphism ı : Qp −→ C. Then the ı-linear ring homomorphisms<br />

θ : TU → C are in natural bijection with the cuspidal automorphic<br />

representations of GD(A∞ F ) of weight (k, 0) such that πv is unramified

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!