29.01.2013 Views

ELECTRIC FLIGHT U.K. - British Electric Flight Association

ELECTRIC FLIGHT U.K. - British Electric Flight Association

ELECTRIC FLIGHT U.K. - British Electric Flight Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

angle is reduced so as to reduce the pitch, the blade acquires a lot of wash out.<br />

Neither of these extreme conditions is desirable in a propeller for the same reason<br />

that they are not desirable in an aircraft wing. It is hard to see how such a<br />

propeller can be set “exactly to the desired pitch”.<br />

I believe that this is the way that most variable pitch propellers work, including<br />

the full size ones, and is the result of twisting the entire blade to increase the<br />

pitch. To maintain a constant pitch it is necessary to reduce the twist as the blade<br />

tip is approached, which seems quite a difficult thing to do. To minimise the wash<br />

in when increasing pitch the designer could introduce a little wash out when set at<br />

fine pitch and also keep the increase of blade angle to a minimum.<br />

There is another way of varying the pitch of a propeller blade, and that is to<br />

increase its diameter. We will do this in table 3 adding 10mm to each radial point<br />

on our 250 diameter 150 pitch propeller, and recalculate the pitch. The pitch has<br />

increased as expected but we have a blade with some washout. If we reduce the<br />

blade diameter by 10mm we get in table 4<br />

r new r α p new r α p<br />

25 35 43.7 210 15 43.7 90<br />

50 60 25.5 180 40 25.5 120<br />

75 85 17.7 170 65 17.7 130<br />

100 110 13.4 165 90 13.4 135<br />

125 135 10.8 162 115 10.8 138<br />

Table 3 Table 4<br />

The pitch has reduced but we have strong wash in. Combining the 2 methods by<br />

increasing the radius by 10 mm and rotating the blade by 2.5° gives us table 5.<br />

And increasing the radius by 20 mm and the blade angle by 5° gives us table 6:<br />

new r new α p new r new α p<br />

35 46.2 229 45 48.7 322<br />

60 28.0 200 70 33.0 286<br />

85 20.2 196 95 25.2 281<br />

110 15.9 197 120 20.9 288<br />

135 13.3 200 145 18.3 301<br />

Table 5 Table 6<br />

If we decrease the radius by 10 mm and reduce the blade angle by 2.5° we get:<br />

new r new α p<br />

15 41.2 82<br />

40 23.0 107<br />

65 15.2 111<br />

90 10.9 109<br />

115 8.3<br />

Table 7<br />

105<br />

38 E.F.-U.K.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!