02.02.2013 Views

UQE97

UQE97

UQE97

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resources<br />

Evidence of<br />

Mastery<br />

Learning Options<br />

and Activities<br />

Guiding<br />

Objectives<br />

Callahan, C. M., & McIntire, J. A. (1994). Identifying<br />

Outstanding Talent in American Indian and<br />

Alaska Native Students, 76 pp. (EDRS No. ED367127)<br />

Assign class to small<br />

groups to research on<br />

the ERIC Web sites<br />

the screening and evaluation<br />

intruments used<br />

for gifted eligibility for<br />

the diverse ethnic<br />

populations. Each<br />

group will summarize<br />

and report.<br />

Demonstrate<br />

knowledge of<br />

alternative<br />

assessments<br />

and nontraditional<br />

screening<br />

and<br />

evaluation<br />

appropriate<br />

for use with<br />

students<br />

from special<br />

populations.<br />

(GT8S1)<br />

Topic 3<br />

Key<br />

Question<br />

How do<br />

we identify<br />

special<br />

populations?<br />

Identification of Special Populations of Gifted Students Matrix<br />

Topic 3, continued<br />

Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). State<br />

Identification Policies: Gifted Students from Special<br />

Populations. Roeper Review, 17(4), 268–75.<br />

Ford, D. Y. (1994). The Recruitment and Retention<br />

of African-American Students in Gifted Education<br />

Programs: Implications and Recommendations,<br />

84 pp. Research-Based Decision Making Series<br />

9406. (EDRS No. ED388012)<br />

Special Populations Matrix Topic 3, continued<br />

Completed<br />

matrix of<br />

assessment<br />

devices for<br />

identification<br />

of special<br />

population<br />

groups with<br />

the best use<br />

for each.<br />

Individually review the<br />

Promising Practices<br />

chart. (Topic 3 HO 4)<br />

Develop a matrix of<br />

assessment devices<br />

for identification of<br />

special population<br />

groups with the best<br />

use for each. Include:<br />

a recommended<br />

list of assessments,<br />

including nonverbal<br />

tests such as the<br />

UNIT, the Naglieri,<br />

and the Raven’s<br />

Progressive Matrices.<br />

9<br />

Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Toward<br />

a New Paradigm for Identifying Talent Potential:<br />

Executive Summary. (EDRS No. ED388020)<br />

Mills, C. J., & Tissot, S. L. (n.d.). Identifying<br />

Academic Potential in Students from Under-<br />

Represented Populations: Is Using the Raven’s<br />

Progressive Matrices a Good Idea? Gifted Child<br />

Quarterly, 39(4), 209–17.<br />

Plucker, J. A., et al. (1996). Wherefore Art Thou,<br />

Multiple Intelligences? Alternative Assessments for<br />

Identifying Talent in Ethnically Diverse and Low Income<br />

Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(2), 81–92.<br />

(continued)<br />

(continued)<br />

(continued)<br />

(continued)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!