02.02.2013 Views

Walking The Bears.pdf

Walking The Bears.pdf

Walking The Bears.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

initiative of the Deputy Chief Wildlife Warden of the<br />

state Mr. C. Loma, who was earlier the Divisional<br />

Forest Office of Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary where the<br />

centre was finally established in 2003.<br />

1.2. Wildlife Rehabilitation and Bear<br />

rehabilitation: Global scenario<br />

Internationally,WildlifeRehabilitationisanemerging<br />

discipline in the science of wildlife conservation, with<br />

both conservation and welfare issues being intricate<br />

components. <strong>The</strong> International Wildlife<br />

Rehabilitation Council defines Wildlife Rehabilitation<br />

as the treatment and temporary care of injured,<br />

diseased, and displaced indigenous animals, and the<br />

subsequent release of healthy animals to appropriate<br />

habitats in the wild.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that bears are not social animals leading a<br />

solitary life makes them ideal candidates for<br />

rehabilitation (Maughan, 2004).Bear rehabilitation is a<br />

majorconservationandanimalwelfareactivitypracticed<br />

throughout the world. <strong>Bears</strong> have been successfully<br />

rehabilitated and released back to the wild in many<br />

countries. Some of the well-known examples include<br />

brown bears and Asiatic black in Russia (Pazhetnov et.<br />

al., 1999; Phoenix, 2005), American black bears in<br />

North America (Wasserman and Clumpner, 1995;<br />

Carney and Vaughan, 1997), spectacled bears in South<br />

America (Black, 1996; Peyton and Plenge, 2005) and<br />

sun bears in Borneo (Fredriksson, 2005).<br />

1.3. Case for rehabilitating Asiatic<br />

black bears in India<br />

1. According to IUCN/SSC, all bear species have<br />

declined in numbers and distribution due to the<br />

impacts of human activities. Major human<br />

activities that impactbears adversely are habitat<br />

destruction due to conversion of forest to<br />

agriculture,humanencroachmentonforestland<br />

and excessive forest harvest.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong>re is evidence of killing of bears in<br />

northeast India, for meat and the sale of body<br />

parts in medicinal preparations. Bear cubs are<br />

also captured whenever they are encountered<br />

and possibly also traded in the national and<br />

international market. In Arunachal Pradesh<br />

alone, four bear cubs were confiscated in the<br />

year 2001-2002, adding to the already existing<br />

nine individuals in Itanagar zoo. <strong>The</strong> zoo<br />

continued to receive bear cubs that were<br />

resigned to captivity in cramped enclosures<br />

comprising their welfare. Wildlife Trust of<br />

India realized the possibility of putting an end<br />

to this misery of lifetime confinement by<br />

initiating a rehabilitation project and a<br />

subsequent awareness campaign that would in<br />

the long run stop people from hunting bears.<br />

3. IUCN reports that bear populations at greatest<br />

risk include Asiatic black bear, sun bear, giant<br />

panda, sloth bear, brown bears of Mongolia<br />

Tibet,FranceSpainandItalyandthespectacled<br />

bear of Venezuela, Columbia and the Desert<br />

population in Peru. (Servheen et al 1998).<br />

4. Besides releasing bears back to the wild, one of<br />

the major impacts of rehabilitation projects is<br />

that the efforts to release rescued bears often<br />

creates awareness amongst the locals on the<br />

plightofthespecies.Inthelongrun,thiswould<br />

help in the promotion of conservation of bears<br />

in the wild.<br />

1.4 <strong>The</strong> Idea is born<br />

<strong>The</strong> state of Arunachal Pradesh is ideally placed to<br />

rehabilitatedisplacedbearstothewildasitstillretains<br />

vast tracts of undisturbed forests which are essential<br />

for any rehabilitation operation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Kameng Elephant Reserve which covers both<br />

Pakke and Eagle Nest WLS covers a total area about<br />

1892 km2 has altitudes that range from 334 mtrs to<br />

3213 mtrs above msl (Abo, 2002). <strong>The</strong> climate and<br />

rainfall are important factors determining the unique<br />

statusofthelandscapeandbasedonthesetwofactors<br />

the year can be divided into four seasons: (1) Winter<br />

(December to February), (2) Pre-monsoon (March to<br />

May), (3) Monsoon (June to September) and (4) Postmonsoon<br />

(October to November) (Borthakur, 1986).<br />

<strong>The</strong> distribution of rainfall is uneven (approximately<br />

2500 mm; in 1991, 3056mm rainfall was recorded at<br />

Seijosa of Pakke) and the month of June and July are<br />

the wettest. <strong>The</strong> lower portion of the reserve has high<br />

temperature during summer and moderate in winter.<br />

Butthehighaltitudeareasareverycoldduringwinter<br />

and the temperature goes below 00 C. <strong>The</strong> higher<br />

areasreceiveheavysnowfallduringwinter(December,<br />

January and February) and dew in the night is a<br />

common feature throughout the year. <strong>The</strong> humidity<br />

ranges from 40 to 85% (Abo, 2002) and the landscape<br />

isdrainedbyseveralnallah,streamsandrivers.Pakke,<br />

Kameng, Khari, Nameri, Tipi, Pani, Pinjoli, Dunukho,<br />

Diji, Sessa are the important rivers and nallahs of the<br />

area. <strong>The</strong> important tribes of this part are Akas, Mijis<br />

and Nyishis. Nyishi are one of the largest groups of<br />

people inhabiting the area. <strong>The</strong> villagers traditionally<br />

are agriculturists. Other sources of livelihood are<br />

negligible. Land around the human habitation is<br />

neither rich nor easy to cultivate due to its tough<br />

terrain and only a few places which are accessible are<br />

cultivated for the subsistence. Literacy level is very<br />

low and only few people are employed in government<br />

jobs. Hence, the dependency of most of the people is<br />

on forest (Fuentes et al., 1989) for their day to day<br />

requirements.<br />

(a) Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary<br />

<strong>The</strong> Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary (260 55’ to 270 15’ E;<br />

920 35’ to 930 10’ N) is under the administrative<br />

control of the Seijosa Wildlife Division. It covers an<br />

area of 861.95 km2, which is composed of 20% of the<br />

East Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh. <strong>The</strong> park

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!