05.02.2013 Views

1997 Annual Defense Report Table of Contents - Air Force Magazine

1997 Annual Defense Report Table of Contents - Air Force Magazine

1997 Annual Defense Report Table of Contents - Air Force Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eadiness, modernization, and infrastructure. This review could produce changes in strategy, resulting<br />

force structure and modernization, and other resource needs.<br />

REGIONAL SECURITY STRATEGIES<br />

The security relationships established by the United States and its allies and friends during the Cold War<br />

are essential to advancing America's post-Cold War agenda. To meet the unique challenges <strong>of</strong> the post-<br />

Cold War era, the United States seeks to further strengthen and adapt these partnerships and to establish<br />

new security relationships in support <strong>of</strong> U.S. interests.<br />

In Europe, the end <strong>of</strong> the Cold War has brought new opportunities and new challenges. Hand in hand with<br />

its North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies, the United States has sought to promote a free and<br />

undivided Europe that will work with the United States to keep the peace and promote prosperity. In the<br />

new security architecture <strong>of</strong> an integrated Europe, NATO is the central pillar, complemented by the<br />

Western European Union and a strengthened Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This<br />

is the essential motivation behind U.S. support for NATO enlargement and establishment <strong>of</strong> a strong<br />

NATO-Russia relationship. NATO's Partnership for Peace (PFP) has provided a means for expanding and<br />

intensifying political and military cooperation throughout Europe. NATO members and partners have<br />

participated in many dozens <strong>of</strong> PFP exercises and hundreds <strong>of</strong> other training, planning, and consultation<br />

activities. PFP serves as a pathway for nations to qualify for NATO membership; for those partners that<br />

do not choose to join NATO, PFP provides an enduring framework for their relations with NATO and<br />

constitutes concrete pro<strong>of</strong> that the alliance is concerned about their security. Partnership for Peace<br />

bolsters efforts by Central and Eastern European nations and the New Independent States to build<br />

democratic societies and strengthen regional stability. Other efforts, including the European Command's<br />

Joint Contact Team Program and Marshall Center, similarly advance U.S. defense engagement with<br />

Central and Eastern Europe and the New Independent States.<br />

Secretary Perry made building cooperative defense and military ties with Russia, Ukraine, and the other<br />

New Independent States one <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defense</strong>'s highest priorities. Moving away from the<br />

hostility <strong>of</strong> the Cold War and reducing its lethal nuclear legacy will be neither instantaneous nor easy.<br />

Steady, continued engagement that focuses on mutual security interests is the cornerstone in building<br />

constructive relationships with the New Independent States. Through the pursuit <strong>of</strong> a pragmatic<br />

partnership, the United States is striving to manage differences with Russia to ensure that shared security<br />

interests and objectives take priority. A central objective is to encourage Russia to play a constructive role<br />

in the new European security architecture through the development <strong>of</strong> NATO-Russia relations and<br />

through Russia's active participation in PFP.<br />

The East Asian-Pacific region continues to grow in importance to U.S. security and prosperity. This<br />

region has experienced unprecedented economic growth in the past decade and is projected to have the<br />

highest rate <strong>of</strong> economic growth in the world over the next 25 years. The security and stability provided<br />

by the presence <strong>of</strong> U.S. military forces in the East Asian-Pacific region over the past 40 years created the<br />

conditions and potential for such tremendous growth. Security, open markets, and democracy, the three<br />

strands <strong>of</strong> the President's National Security Strategy, are thoroughly intertwined in this region.<br />

Today, the United States retains its central role as a force for stability in East Asia-Pacific, but it has<br />

begun to share greater responsibility for regional security with its friends and allies. The United States<br />

constructively participates in and supports regional security dialogues. It actively encourages efforts by<br />

East Asian-Pacific nations to provide host-nation support for U.S. forces, contribute to United Nations<br />

(UN) peace operations, and participate in international assistance efforts throughout the world. While<br />

these regional initiatives are important, there is no substitute for a forward-stationed U.S. military<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!