06.02.2013 Views

Evidence Based Practice Symposium - McMaster University

Evidence Based Practice Symposium - McMaster University

Evidence Based Practice Symposium - McMaster University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

provisional OT services at Trellis within the past two years.<br />

Procedure: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews over a twoweek<br />

period in March of 2012. Semi-structured interviews<br />

were audiotaped in order to generate denaturalized verbatim<br />

transcripts of the interviews for data analysis. Data Analysis:<br />

Through an inductive approach, each transcript was coded<br />

independently, line by line manually, by two investigators. A<br />

book of codes was devised through discussions among<br />

investigators to ensure consistency. Upon completion of coding<br />

each transcript, the four investigators came together to cluster<br />

codes into categories and finally into themes.<br />

Results/Discussion<br />

Six major themes emerged from the data related to the<br />

participants’ experiences of engagement in OT services. The<br />

first three themes related to the participants’ direct experiences<br />

with OT services: increasing self-awareness through the use of<br />

the COPM; the value of groups as a medium for doing; and<br />

doing as a function of self, support and situation. The final<br />

three themes related to the impact of OT on recovery at large:<br />

occupation as an invaluable tool for recovery; putting recovery<br />

into perspective; and occupational goals as a source of<br />

motivation.<br />

The core concepts of PSR were mirrored in the OT<br />

services provided. Firstly, the use of the COPM elicited<br />

specific goals that the participants wanted to work on.<br />

Secondly, through the ‘Goal Setting and Doing’ group, they<br />

were provided with the skills necessary to break down goals<br />

into manageable steps. Lastly, working on these goals with the<br />

student occupational therapist proved to be a valuable<br />

environmental support as this was tailored to each individual’s<br />

stage in recovery. The COPM enabled the participants to<br />

evaluate their participation in the occupations of everyday<br />

living, which is an ideal fit with the expertise of occupational<br />

therapists. This places occupational therapists in a well-suited<br />

role to navigate this process.<br />

Finally, research indicates that individuals with a SMI<br />

find engagement in meaningful activities to be a transformative<br />

and healing process (3).This was echoed by the majority of<br />

participants in our study. Seven out of eight participants were<br />

very passionate about advocating for occupation as a seminal<br />

part of their lives and contributor to recovery.<br />

Recommendations<br />

The following are provisional recommendations based on the<br />

study’s findings as well as participants’ suggestions:<br />

� Trial OT services within the Adult Services Program at<br />

Trellis for one year.<br />

� Evaluate the impact of the one-year trial OT services.<br />

� Investigate the impact of OT services from the perspective<br />

of Trellis case managers.<br />

Study Limitations<br />

� Views expressed by the participants may not reflect all<br />

service users as only 8 out of 20 clients participated.<br />

� The time each participant spent with the occupational<br />

therapist varied from one visit to numerous weeks, which<br />

may have impacted the experiences the participants had<br />

with OT services.<br />

� Not all individuals who interacted with an occupational<br />

therapist attended the group for various reasons, which led<br />

to limited data surrounding the experience of the groups.<br />

Future Directions<br />

This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of<br />

provisional OT services within the Adult Services Program at<br />

Trellis in order to provide preliminary recommendations to the<br />

agency. Results highlighted the positive impact of OT services<br />

for the participants of the study. Engaging in OT services led<br />

participants to shift their focus away from their mental illness,<br />

towards participation in day-to-day activities. Despite this shift,<br />

participation in these activities was found to be a difficult<br />

process that often needed formal ongoing support. Therefore,<br />

the main provisional recommendation that emerged was to trial<br />

OT services within the Adult Services Program for one year.<br />

This recommendation seeks to address the limited exposure<br />

and improve the continuity of OT services provided. This study<br />

has contributed to the profession by supporting the literature to<br />

advocate for the OT role within a PSR framework, ICM teams<br />

and the mental health system at large. This study exemplifies<br />

how the unique skill set and scope of practice of OT can<br />

enhance one’s recovery and participation in everyday living.<br />

The addition of OT services to Trellis will promote<br />

interdisciplinary collaboration, effective use of resources, and<br />

continuity of care to the valued clients it serves. Future<br />

research should seek to evaluate this trial service via the use of<br />

COPM, as well as investigate the impact of OT services from<br />

the perspective of Trellis case managers.<br />

References<br />

1. Krupa, T., Fossey, E., Anothony, W. A., Brown, C., & Pitts, D. B.<br />

(2009). Doing daily life: How occupational therapy can inform<br />

psychiatric rehabilitation practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal,<br />

32, 155-161.<br />

2. Pitts, D. B. (2009). Introduction to special section on occupational<br />

therapy. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 32, 151-154.<br />

3. Mee, J., & Sumsion, T. (2001). Mental health clients confirm the<br />

motivating power of occupation. British Journal of Occupational<br />

Therapy, 64, 121-128.<br />

4. Kirsh, B. & Cockburn, L. (2009). The Canadian Occupational<br />

Performance Measure: A tool for recovery-based practice. Psychiatric<br />

Rehabilitation Journal, 32, 171-176.<br />

5. Chesworth, C., Duffy, R., Hodnett, J., & Knight, A. (2002). Measuring<br />

clinical effectiveness in mental health: Is the Canadian Occupational<br />

Performance an appropriate Measure? British Journal of Occupational<br />

Therapy, 65, 30-34.<br />

6. Law M, Baptiste M, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N.<br />

(2005). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM;<br />

4th ed.). Ottawa: CAOT Publications, ACE.<br />

7. Schaedle, R., McGrew, J. H., Bond, G. R., & Epstein, I. (2002). A<br />

comparison of experts' perspectives on assertive community treatment<br />

and intensive case management. Psychiatric Services, 53, 207-210.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!