09.02.2013 Views

The Great Recession of 2008-2009: Causes ... - Index of - IZA

The Great Recession of 2008-2009: Causes ... - Index of - IZA

The Great Recession of 2008-2009: Causes ... - Index of - IZA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

or reserves.<br />

5. Growth in credit default swaps (CDS) • CDO issuers purchased CDS, which enabled them to<br />

receive AAA ratings. <strong>The</strong>se purchases were not<br />

regulated as over-the-counter transactions.<br />

Source: Adapted from Astley et al. (<strong>2009</strong>) and Baily et al. (<strong>2008</strong>).<br />

As argued by Shiller (<strong>2008</strong>), ‘<strong>The</strong> housing bubble was a major cause, if not the (author’s<br />

emphasis) cause, <strong>of</strong> the subprime crisis and <strong>of</strong> the broader economic crisis...’ (Shiller <strong>2008</strong>:<br />

29). However, due to the rapid increase in securitization <strong>of</strong> mortgage bonds, this was no<br />

ordinary housing bubble ins<strong>of</strong>ar it was not only domestic lenders that were exposed to the<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the US housing market but investors around the globe. As captured in Table 1,<br />

mortgages were sold on by the originators to third-parties, which were then repackaged as<br />

mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and sold to investors. This enabled lenders to take the<br />

loans <strong>of</strong>f their books. In particular, special investment vehicles (SIVs) were pressed into<br />

service and kept <strong>of</strong>f the balance sheet, which allowed financial institutions to increase<br />

leverage and returns on their investments. Thus, mortgages that were in the past the domain<br />

<strong>of</strong> the traditional banking system could now be traded in open markets both within the US<br />

and outside its borders, beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> regulatory measures (because they were<br />

conducted as an over-the-counter transaction thus avoiding the regulations pertaining to the<br />

stock market).<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> new complex financial products outside the scope <strong>of</strong> existing rules<br />

proved to be a major regulatory failing (Table 1). Overall, the central elements <strong>of</strong> this failure<br />

were: inadequate capital requirements on products such as the collateral debt obligations<br />

(CDOs); inadequate use <strong>of</strong> ratings and the way credit rating agencies themselves were<br />

regulated; and the incentives for risk-taking generated by structured remuneration<br />

arrangements (i.e. bonuses) (Astley et al. <strong>2009</strong>; Baily et al. <strong>2008</strong>, Bean <strong>2009</strong>; Obstfeld and<br />

Rog<strong>of</strong>f <strong>2009</strong>).<br />

This combination <strong>of</strong> a misperception <strong>of</strong> risk, lax financial regulation and low returns on<br />

riskless assets fuelled the excessive leverage and investment in risky assets, namely the<br />

mortgage-backed securities. Sub-prime mortgages were at the centre <strong>of</strong> the crisis but were by<br />

no means the cause.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!