European Mobility Challenges 2010 Empirical Report - BCCH

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Repatriation Management Critical In Scandinavia Effective management of repatriation has become a significant test for businesses. How do you manage the repatriation of an assignee returning home? Is there a position for the employee once they return? How long do returning employees stay within the organisation? And how long are their skills retained? The survey identified that 38% of the total sample population listed this as a high priority for their relocation programme. Comments provided by respondents hinted at the difficulties faced in managing repatriations “From experience, this is without a doubt the hardest part of an expatriation”, whilst others were obviously at the early stages of developing their repatriation programmes, saying they are “starting with the planning stage!” A minority of respondents stated that they already have effective repatriation programmes in place that satisfied the needs of their business “we are confident that we are doing most things right, although we are always open to constructive feedback.” The region that placed most emphasis on repatriation management was Scandinavia, with 75% of companies listing it as a high priority for their business. Businesses relocating larger volumes of employees per year were also more likely to prioritise repatriation management (40%) over companies who relocate smaller numbers of employees (30%). Page | 13 February 2010
Mobility Challenges 2010 Empirical Report Total Sample Population : Looking at how to manage the repatriation process better in 2010 is... High priority 38% Repatriation management is a high priority for 38% of the total sample population. Comparison of Regions Looking at how to manage the repatriation process better in 2010 is... Identified as a high priority Low priority 21% Medium priority 41% Scandinavian managed relocation programmes are most likely to place the greatest importance on repatriation managment in 2010. UK and Ireland 32% France 50% Germany 25% Switzerland 43% Benelux 41% Iberia 23% Scandanavia 75% Central Europe 33% Large relocators 40% Small relocators 30% Page | 14
Page 1 and 2: European Mobility Challenges 2010 E
Page 3 and 4: A Snapshot of European Controlled P
Page 5 and 6: Methodology Mobility Challenges 201
Page 7 and 8: Mobility Challenges 2010 Empirical
Page 13: Mobility Challenges 2010 Empirical
Page 19 and 20: Comparison of UK & Ireland Prioriti
Page 21 and 22: Comparison of French Priorities Aga
Page 23 and 24: Comparison of German Priorities Aga
Page 25 and 26: Comparison of French Priorities Aga
Page 27 and 28: Comparison of Benelux Priorities Ag
Page 29 and 30: Comparison of Iberian Priorities Ag
Page 31 and 32: Comparison of Scandinavian Prioriti
Page 33 and 34: Comparison of Central European Prio
Page 35 and 36: Comparison of Priorities for Large

European Mobility Challenges 2010 Empirical Report - BCCH

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?