13.02.2013 Views

Review of Mexico in Transition by Byron Crites

Review of Mexico in Transition by Byron Crites

Review of Mexico in Transition by Byron Crites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Book <strong>Review</strong>s<br />

Miller, Marilyn G. (2004) Rise and Fall <strong>of</strong> the Cosmic Race: The Cult <strong>of</strong> Mestizaje <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

America , University <strong>of</strong> Texas Press (Aust<strong>in</strong>), xii + 202 pp. $55.00 hbk, $19.95 pbk.<br />

This clear and accessible study <strong>of</strong> the discourse <strong>of</strong> mestizaje <strong>in</strong> twentieth-century Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

America provides a welcome addition to a densely-populated scholarly fi eld. Miller ’ s<br />

approach is new and praiseworthy: she <strong>of</strong>fers a book that <strong>in</strong>troduces readers to the<br />

broad debates about mestizaje that have occurred among artists and <strong>in</strong>tellectuals <strong>in</strong><br />

Lat<strong>in</strong>/o America, with secondary attention to the debates among Lat<strong>in</strong> Americanist<br />

scholars <strong>in</strong> the US academy. Because she anchors these debates <strong>in</strong> several regional case<br />

studies, Miller provides a general historical overview that also <strong>in</strong>cludes useful discussions<br />

<strong>of</strong> specifi c artists and socio-historical contexts. These case studies illustrate<br />

Miller ’ s ma<strong>in</strong> argument, namely, that although pro- mestizaje discourse has historically<br />

been used to proclaim the existence <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gular Lat<strong>in</strong> American identity, the wealth<br />

<strong>of</strong> local refl ections on mestizaje itself belies such claims to unity. The Rise and Fall <strong>of</strong><br />

the Cosmic Race is written <strong>in</strong> the spirit <strong>of</strong> pluralism, as it seeks to uncover the multiplicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> voices that have contributed to the discourse <strong>of</strong> mestizaje . Miller does not<br />

over emphasise the religious metaphor <strong>of</strong> the project ’ s title; <strong>in</strong>deed, a stronger focus<br />

on the idea <strong>of</strong> a ‘ cult ’ would have run the risk <strong>of</strong> mislead<strong>in</strong>g some readers <strong>in</strong>to th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that belief <strong>in</strong> the mestizo is ak<strong>in</strong> to religious belief (an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g possibility that<br />

has yet to be explored), and that its adherents were self-constituted as a group (they<br />

were not). Beyond affi rm<strong>in</strong>g the existence <strong>of</strong> their multiplicity, Miller does not submit<br />

these voices to a s<strong>in</strong>gle overarch<strong>in</strong>g thesis or idea. She writes, ‘ the most prevalent<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> a historiography <strong>of</strong> lo mestizo is its lack <strong>of</strong> uniformity and, <strong>in</strong>deed,<br />

its pervasive susceptibility to contradictions ’ (p. 2).<br />

The ‘ Introduction ’ does a very good job <strong>of</strong> synthesis<strong>in</strong>g this complex material.<br />

Subsections are largely chronological, <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g the reader fi rst to the n<strong>in</strong>eteenthcentury<br />

foundations <strong>of</strong> the discourse <strong>of</strong> mestizaje , focus<strong>in</strong>g on Simón Bolívar and José<br />

Martí; then to Fernando Ortiz ’ s fundamental notion <strong>of</strong> transculturation; and fi nally<br />

mov<strong>in</strong>g on to the contemporary scene, draw<strong>in</strong>g from writers as disparate as Fernando<br />

Vallejo and Gloria Anzaldúa <strong>in</strong> order to drive home the po<strong>in</strong>t that the discourse <strong>of</strong><br />

mestizaje is very much alive. An excellent excursus on Bakht<strong>in</strong>, meanwhile, argues that<br />

the basis for mestizaje as an aesthetic theory lies <strong>in</strong> his poetics <strong>of</strong> hybridisation. Miller ’ s<br />

account is very persuasive, although it could also be argued that Lukacs too serves as<br />

touchstone for the theories <strong>of</strong> literary mestizaje developed <strong>by</strong> Antonio Cornejo Polar<br />

and Angel Rama.<br />

The subsequent chapters are dedicated to a closer exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> artists and <strong>in</strong>tellectuals<br />

<strong>in</strong> the contexts <strong>of</strong> their respective national traditions. Chapter One addresses<br />

José Vasconcelos ’ s notion <strong>of</strong> the ‘ cosmic race ’ and Chicana/o appropriations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

idea. Chapter Two exam<strong>in</strong>es Caribbean discourses <strong>of</strong> mulatez <strong>in</strong> Cuba, Puerto Rico,<br />

and, more briefl y, the Dom<strong>in</strong>ican Republic, primarily through an analysis <strong>of</strong> the poetry<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nicolás Guillén, Luis Palés Matos, and Manuel del Cabral. Chapter Three <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

very <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g analysis <strong>of</strong> the discourse surround<strong>in</strong>g Argent<strong>in</strong>e tango. Miller argues<br />

here that contemporary notions <strong>of</strong> tango are the product <strong>of</strong> a process <strong>of</strong> ‘ whiten<strong>in</strong>g ’<br />

that hides the African roots <strong>of</strong> the form. Chapter Four turns to a discussion <strong>of</strong> Brazilian<br />

novelist Jorge Amado ’ s Tenda dos milagres (1969), explor<strong>in</strong>g Amado ’ s role <strong>in</strong> the<br />

© 2007 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2007 Society for Lat<strong>in</strong> American Studies<br />

154 Bullet<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> American Research Vol. 26, No. 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!