18.02.2013 Views

UHF No 70 (Net).indd - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine

UHF No 70 (Net).indd - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine

UHF No 70 (Net).indd - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feedback<br />

<strong>No</strong>te that our evaluation was based on<br />

Wireworld’s own Comparator Disc, not on<br />

a side-by-side comparison. The YBA Intégré<br />

Passion was on the cover of issue <strong>No</strong>. 64.<br />

As for the books, Reine says she appreciates<br />

the request!<br />

Even if I hadn’t been trying to make<br />

myself useful in the Charisma room<br />

much of the time this year, I would still<br />

have missed a lot of the Montreal show.<br />

You fi lled it in for me. Thanks a million<br />

for the terrifi c online report.<br />

Bravo for doing it in the fi rst place,<br />

bravo for posting PDQ, bravo for the<br />

great pics, bravo for making it all readable<br />

and accessible even for relative audio<br />

novices. Another triumph.<br />

Toby Earp<br />

MONTRÉAL, QC<br />

A f ter read i ng t he Mont rea l<br />

Show report, I would like to clarify<br />

information concerning Synthesis<br />

products (page http://www.uhfmag.<br />

com/Montreal2004/day3.html ) I believe<br />

it’s an Italian company rather than a<br />

German one.<br />

Jacek Rymut<br />

Poland<br />

Quite right. Glad you’re keeping an eye<br />

on us!<br />

Please fi nd my renewal cheque for<br />

13 more issues. While other magazines<br />

are interesting in their own particular<br />

ways, yours is the one that never ceases<br />

to entertain. Even my wife (who loves her<br />

music too) is getting into it: “Anything<br />

from from those guys guys in Montreal today?” is<br />

a familiar refrain refrain around our house after<br />

checking the mailbox every day.<br />

While I understand their angst, I<br />

have to chuckle over the legion of readers<br />

who would gladly sacrifi ce some of your<br />

precious sleep for more frequent issues.<br />

That would remove one of the things<br />

that make you who you are (and, I feel,<br />

one aspect of your success). Different<br />

doesn’t quite explain it, and I hesitate to<br />

use the word quirky, but there’s some- something<br />

to be said for a little…all right,<br />

unpredictable quirkiness. The anticipation<br />

of an upcoming issue’s arrival is<br />

similar in some ways to the search for a<br />

new equipment upgrade, the hunting and<br />

6 ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY <strong>Magazine</strong><br />

waiting is sometimes just as rewarding<br />

as the getting.<br />

Regular monthly publishing would<br />

remove some of that quirkiness and<br />

hence, some of the fun of your magazine.<br />

And isn’t it supposed to be fun?<br />

Keith Ferguson<br />

VICTORIA, BC<br />

I don’t understand your frequency<br />

response graphs for speakers. They seem<br />

very strange to me in that the fl uctuations<br />

are tremendous. For example the<br />

Reference 3A De Capo-i: according to<br />

your plot, there is a 5 dB dip around<br />

<strong>70</strong> Hz and another 5 dB dip at approximately.<br />

5000 Hz. These plots do not<br />

at all correspond to what I am used to<br />

seeing in other publications.<br />

I am assuming that your test conditions<br />

differ form other testers. However,<br />

the results plotted on your frequency<br />

response graphs are so “jagged” that I do<br />

not see how one could learn much about<br />

the speaker’s quality.<br />

I should point out that my technical<br />

knowledge of audio phenomena and electronics<br />

is very limited. I am stating this<br />

from the strict point of view of an audio<br />

consumer (defi nition of an audiophile?)<br />

who is accustomed to looking at graphs<br />

without understanding the underlying<br />

concepts.<br />

André Nickell<br />

BEACONSFIELD, QC<br />

We have some misgivings about them<br />

too, André. At one time we stuck to text<br />

descriptions of frequency response. Later, we<br />

began using graphed versions of the results,<br />

and just recently we have been using actual<br />

instruments graphs. These graphs are the the<br />

literal truth, and in a real room a speaker<br />

really will have these variations. Earlier<br />

graphs may have been more helpful, however,<br />

because each frequency point showed the average<br />

response over a third of an octave, thus<br />

smoothing out the chaotic variations.<br />

There is no standardized method for<br />

measuring speaker response, and manufacturers<br />

mostly select a method that will show<br />

speakers in their best light. That’s not what<br />

we do, but we have perhaps gone too far the<br />

other way.<br />

There’s a copy waiting for you…<br />

More and more new subscribers to <strong>UHF</strong> discover the magazine the way you<br />

are right now, by reading the PDF copy on the Internet. But you’ve probably<br />

noticed that the PDF is incomplete. Get a subscription, or a copy of this issue,<br />

by ordering on line: https://www.uhfmag.com/Order.html.<br />

After years of reading <strong>UHF</strong>, and<br />

being an octogenarian (with hearing<br />

better than that of most 35-year olds)<br />

I had better speak up before it is too<br />

late!<br />

Reine, your contributions to <strong>UHF</strong><br />

add a touch of class and humanity to a<br />

fi ne technical (though at times occult)<br />

periodical. I particularly enjoy your<br />

articles on various humanistic subjects.<br />

The Music Critics (<strong>UHF</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 69) brought<br />

to mind a couple of my favorite critical<br />

jibes.<br />

Referring to a rather heavy-duty<br />

Mimi, Shaw remarked that Mimi<br />

appeared to suffer not so much from<br />

consumption as from overconsumption.<br />

After the fi rst performance of the<br />

brahms Fourth, a critic (his name escapes<br />

me) remarked, “It is certainly no joke<br />

that this dead tired symphony should<br />

have to run the gauntlet of four movements.”<br />

I wonder why I tend to associate<br />

Brahms — is it his distinctively close<br />

string harmony? — with Victorian<br />

drawing rooms cloaked in heavy, deep<br />

brown velvet drapes, aspidistras and<br />

mantelpieces edged with hanging (again,<br />

brown velvet) bobbles. Maybe I once saw<br />

a picture of him in such a setting.<br />

Tell the boys I can explain electrical<br />

phenomena, but I never had much faith<br />

in the occult. Keep them earthbound.<br />

Roy A. Woodland<br />

BARRIE, ON<br />

P.S. You will note that this comes to you<br />

by by e-mail (envelope mail, that is).<br />

Some 15 years after giving them up,<br />

I recently renewed my subscription to<br />

Car and Driver. To my amazement, I<br />

found their test drives now include a very<br />

short summary which takes the form of<br />

“<strong>High</strong>s,” “<strong>High</strong>s,” “Lows” and “Verdict,” besides a<br />

separate separate column called “Counterpoint”!!<br />

The latter presents the alternate opinion<br />

of …three columnists!<br />

Say, who started it first, you or<br />

them?<br />

J-P Létourneau<br />

CAP ROUGE, QC<br />

Them. We have yet to borrow an idea<br />

from another audio magazine, but we do<br />

steal regularly from other magazines past<br />

and present that we consider outstanding<br />

in their respective fi elds. Car and Driver<br />

is one of them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!