UHF No 70 (Net).indd - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
UHF No 70 (Net).indd - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
UHF No 70 (Net).indd - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Feedback<br />
<strong>No</strong>te that our evaluation was based on<br />
Wireworld’s own Comparator Disc, not on<br />
a side-by-side comparison. The YBA Intégré<br />
Passion was on the cover of issue <strong>No</strong>. 64.<br />
As for the books, Reine says she appreciates<br />
the request!<br />
Even if I hadn’t been trying to make<br />
myself useful in the Charisma room<br />
much of the time this year, I would still<br />
have missed a lot of the Montreal show.<br />
You fi lled it in for me. Thanks a million<br />
for the terrifi c online report.<br />
Bravo for doing it in the fi rst place,<br />
bravo for posting PDQ, bravo for the<br />
great pics, bravo for making it all readable<br />
and accessible even for relative audio<br />
novices. Another triumph.<br />
Toby Earp<br />
MONTRÉAL, QC<br />
A f ter read i ng t he Mont rea l<br />
Show report, I would like to clarify<br />
information concerning Synthesis<br />
products (page http://www.uhfmag.<br />
com/Montreal2004/day3.html ) I believe<br />
it’s an Italian company rather than a<br />
German one.<br />
Jacek Rymut<br />
Poland<br />
Quite right. Glad you’re keeping an eye<br />
on us!<br />
Please fi nd my renewal cheque for<br />
13 more issues. While other magazines<br />
are interesting in their own particular<br />
ways, yours is the one that never ceases<br />
to entertain. Even my wife (who loves her<br />
music too) is getting into it: “Anything<br />
from from those guys guys in Montreal today?” is<br />
a familiar refrain refrain around our house after<br />
checking the mailbox every day.<br />
While I understand their angst, I<br />
have to chuckle over the legion of readers<br />
who would gladly sacrifi ce some of your<br />
precious sleep for more frequent issues.<br />
That would remove one of the things<br />
that make you who you are (and, I feel,<br />
one aspect of your success). Different<br />
doesn’t quite explain it, and I hesitate to<br />
use the word quirky, but there’s some- something<br />
to be said for a little…all right,<br />
unpredictable quirkiness. The anticipation<br />
of an upcoming issue’s arrival is<br />
similar in some ways to the search for a<br />
new equipment upgrade, the hunting and<br />
6 ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY <strong>Magazine</strong><br />
waiting is sometimes just as rewarding<br />
as the getting.<br />
Regular monthly publishing would<br />
remove some of that quirkiness and<br />
hence, some of the fun of your magazine.<br />
And isn’t it supposed to be fun?<br />
Keith Ferguson<br />
VICTORIA, BC<br />
I don’t understand your frequency<br />
response graphs for speakers. They seem<br />
very strange to me in that the fl uctuations<br />
are tremendous. For example the<br />
Reference 3A De Capo-i: according to<br />
your plot, there is a 5 dB dip around<br />
<strong>70</strong> Hz and another 5 dB dip at approximately.<br />
5000 Hz. These plots do not<br />
at all correspond to what I am used to<br />
seeing in other publications.<br />
I am assuming that your test conditions<br />
differ form other testers. However,<br />
the results plotted on your frequency<br />
response graphs are so “jagged” that I do<br />
not see how one could learn much about<br />
the speaker’s quality.<br />
I should point out that my technical<br />
knowledge of audio phenomena and electronics<br />
is very limited. I am stating this<br />
from the strict point of view of an audio<br />
consumer (defi nition of an audiophile?)<br />
who is accustomed to looking at graphs<br />
without understanding the underlying<br />
concepts.<br />
André Nickell<br />
BEACONSFIELD, QC<br />
We have some misgivings about them<br />
too, André. At one time we stuck to text<br />
descriptions of frequency response. Later, we<br />
began using graphed versions of the results,<br />
and just recently we have been using actual<br />
instruments graphs. These graphs are the the<br />
literal truth, and in a real room a speaker<br />
really will have these variations. Earlier<br />
graphs may have been more helpful, however,<br />
because each frequency point showed the average<br />
response over a third of an octave, thus<br />
smoothing out the chaotic variations.<br />
There is no standardized method for<br />
measuring speaker response, and manufacturers<br />
mostly select a method that will show<br />
speakers in their best light. That’s not what<br />
we do, but we have perhaps gone too far the<br />
other way.<br />
There’s a copy waiting for you…<br />
More and more new subscribers to <strong>UHF</strong> discover the magazine the way you<br />
are right now, by reading the PDF copy on the Internet. But you’ve probably<br />
noticed that the PDF is incomplete. Get a subscription, or a copy of this issue,<br />
by ordering on line: https://www.uhfmag.com/Order.html.<br />
After years of reading <strong>UHF</strong>, and<br />
being an octogenarian (with hearing<br />
better than that of most 35-year olds)<br />
I had better speak up before it is too<br />
late!<br />
Reine, your contributions to <strong>UHF</strong><br />
add a touch of class and humanity to a<br />
fi ne technical (though at times occult)<br />
periodical. I particularly enjoy your<br />
articles on various humanistic subjects.<br />
The Music Critics (<strong>UHF</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 69) brought<br />
to mind a couple of my favorite critical<br />
jibes.<br />
Referring to a rather heavy-duty<br />
Mimi, Shaw remarked that Mimi<br />
appeared to suffer not so much from<br />
consumption as from overconsumption.<br />
After the fi rst performance of the<br />
brahms Fourth, a critic (his name escapes<br />
me) remarked, “It is certainly no joke<br />
that this dead tired symphony should<br />
have to run the gauntlet of four movements.”<br />
I wonder why I tend to associate<br />
Brahms — is it his distinctively close<br />
string harmony? — with Victorian<br />
drawing rooms cloaked in heavy, deep<br />
brown velvet drapes, aspidistras and<br />
mantelpieces edged with hanging (again,<br />
brown velvet) bobbles. Maybe I once saw<br />
a picture of him in such a setting.<br />
Tell the boys I can explain electrical<br />
phenomena, but I never had much faith<br />
in the occult. Keep them earthbound.<br />
Roy A. Woodland<br />
BARRIE, ON<br />
P.S. You will note that this comes to you<br />
by by e-mail (envelope mail, that is).<br />
Some 15 years after giving them up,<br />
I recently renewed my subscription to<br />
Car and Driver. To my amazement, I<br />
found their test drives now include a very<br />
short summary which takes the form of<br />
“<strong>High</strong>s,” “<strong>High</strong>s,” “Lows” and “Verdict,” besides a<br />
separate separate column called “Counterpoint”!!<br />
The latter presents the alternate opinion<br />
of …three columnists!<br />
Say, who started it first, you or<br />
them?<br />
J-P Létourneau<br />
CAP ROUGE, QC<br />
Them. We have yet to borrow an idea<br />
from another audio magazine, but we do<br />
steal regularly from other magazines past<br />
and present that we consider outstanding<br />
in their respective fi elds. Car and Driver<br />
is one of them.