30.10.2014 Views

Systèmes d'information géographique. Dossier ... - CiteSeerX

Systèmes d'information géographique. Dossier ... - CiteSeerX

Systèmes d'information géographique. Dossier ... - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

33<br />

the INSEE in 1973, the creation of large national statistical files such as the SIRENE file.<br />

The concern back then was not thematic but technical. Computerisation was perceived as a<br />

possibility for automation and speeding-up repetitive or boring jobs. That is why the initial<br />

objectives were mainly limited to a viewpoint for the reduction in the time for researching,<br />

updating and producing plans. Let’s also take into account the fact that the first UDB were<br />

usually entrusted to the computer departments and the planning departments. These facts,<br />

which sound like a fairy story, in fact partly explain the main choices made twenty years ago.<br />

The data of reference (types, scales, accuracy, referential and especially geographical), as<br />

well as the types of applications (at the start quite far removed from the notions of planning for<br />

the urban territory), were proposed based on these approaches.<br />

The lessons learnt from this period are both linked to the economic climate and structural.<br />

Linked to the economic climate firstly, because the major difficulties could not be explained<br />

(delay and overspending amongst others), that were encountered by these pioneering towns<br />

without putting them into perspective with the technical environment of the age. The lack of<br />

performance of the tools back then, the limitations of the tools chosen for data collection, the<br />

absence of qualified staff, etc., played an important role in the progress of these few<br />

experiments without however being the only sources of their difficulties.<br />

The years from 1980 to 1990<br />

It was a period of transition during which certain of the pioneering UDB continued and<br />

strengthened their bases (such as Paris or Marseilles), whilst others started a change<br />

towards the setting-up of new bases. The data base of reference was then basically the plan<br />

for roads on a scale of 1:200 (Grenoble, Valence…). The approach basically turned towards<br />

the production of plans of reference for knowledge about and the works on the underground<br />

networks. One example of this approach is provided by the UDB in Toulouse, set up in 1984<br />

and whose plan at a scale of 1:200 was completed in 1989.<br />

The revolution in software allowed the modernisation of the production of plans and CAD<br />

applications to be introduced more easily (Computer-aided design). Hence the applications of<br />

these UDB had basically turned towards supplying management data for the technical<br />

services, and not towards the implementation of a true information system for the community.<br />

Urban planning was firstly understood in its technical dimension, and the localised information<br />

as a support for the plan.<br />

In practice, "it seems that these interventions on the urban space are often limited to<br />

management, that is to say, to a process for calculation governed by the restraints of<br />

profitability. In the same way, the UDB have become a tool for urban management in the<br />

strictest sense of the word. The town would now appear, as recorded by the district UDB, to<br />

be an object to be managed and no longer as a place and an entity that includes different<br />

kinds of projects, don’t you think?" (Aillaud, 1992).<br />

So this was a period of transition, from which some new concerns arose, accompanied by<br />

the highly significant breakthroughs in computing, and especially the arrival of the first<br />

standard GIS in Europe and in France.<br />

The years from 1990 to 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!