24.11.2014 Views

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bio<br />

29: Measuring BioEnergetic Field Effect<br />

• ->>cont: BioEnergetic field: ■β: Field affecting: vi-Non contact Healing:<br />

• Because of alleged significant performance gap by practitioner(this factor is<br />

conveniently ignored by mainstream & sometimes used to debunk entire healers<br />

claims), large control sample research of high performer for serious chronic<br />

<strong>di</strong>sease is very <strong>di</strong>fficult with current fun<strong>di</strong>ng/profit structure(some exception in<br />

China), while mainstream will call such test "Immoral"(they declare nonlocality<br />

cannot have any physical effect etc), & can easily obfuscate experiments by<br />

pressuring to set con<strong>di</strong>tions that are design to have weaker effect(speculating from<br />

other me<strong>di</strong>cal tampering & numerous consistent examples of <strong>di</strong>sruptive energy tech<br />

experiment tampering by mainstream or its supporting & parasitic groups).<br />

• This issue can be equated to exaggerated example of marathon running in which<br />

not all runners(e.g. equating as healer) necessarily runs marathon under 2h20mins<br />

(e.g. equivalent of meaning as strong healing effect), and some run at 3hrs(eg barely<br />

marginal effect), and large majority runs marathon at 3.5hrs and more (eg zero<br />

effect or worse). So if randomly select 10 marathon runners(eg healers) to test "in<br />

order to get fair controlled results" as average, there might be no effect at all, or<br />

one or two strong effect would become "statistical error" - hence still no effect at all.<br />

Furthermore, gathering of high performance healers itself would become "selective<br />

data" and becomes void as qualified research by "trusted scientific protocol".<br />

-->>cont:<br />

270<br />

linke<strong>di</strong>n.com/in/newnaturepara<strong>di</strong>gm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!