Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Conclusion 2
• Given the situation, the direction mainstream groups is taking to lead the world is
perhaps a decent one, with balanced compromise amongst power players(with
possibly truly unknown backing entities), but due to the world culture is set up in such
a way, the solution might need to come out in a manner of "fight deception with
deception": e.g. man made CO2 exclusive catastrophic global warming might be a
necessary excuse at current narrative to push towards "free energy".
• Therefore Mainstream LENR or other free energy downplay while allowing limited
commercialization can be a safe transitional strategy for some influential groups who
aim to establish Open System, while other influential groups might be lobbying for
continuation of Closed System by only disclosing patent based highly exclusive
machine required technology, while continuing to debunk mind based /bioenergetic
physical effect component(p242-285). So how the Unlimited Energy & related
technology disclosure could occur as main possibilities from 2018 vantage point?
• There is some strong sign, of "Official Disclosure" ideas of 1-ET life, 2-Gravity
technology & unlimited energy technology, 3-Other related technologies, to be spun
as means to decidedly increase control of entire earth by very small minority groups
who are strongly focused on ideas such as DNA improvement, further increased secrecy
& classified info, surveillance, e-estonia("movement independently started & aiming
to decentralize information"!?), vaccine, biological implant, or psychotronic
/entrainment on residential region and media outlet often based on limitation of
resources, external control, & abundance of diseases/catastrophes. This effort might
possibly entirely make "Open System" or, "unlimited resource disclosure" meaningless
due to centralized tight control of information & people's opinion consensus.
489