24.11.2014 Views

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12:<br />

Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manmade CO2<br />

• ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores:<br />

• p-Other man/noman made element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this<br />

phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main me<strong>di</strong>a/gov’t(except<br />

US since 2017 in west, but many non western nations actually passively not agreeing)<br />

/NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is<br />

opposite of me<strong>di</strong>a claims(science consensus but still me<strong>di</strong>a level debate exists):<br />

• i-IPCC foun<strong>di</strong>ng charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing<br />

climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scientists are forced into or tricked into<br />

signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporting<br />

IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P<br />

Reiter+), v-Hurts career to <strong>di</strong>sagree with me<strong>di</strong>a/NGO's view regardless of actual<br />

scientific consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Ver<strong>di</strong>er+), vi-Education content altered to<br />

make sense of increasingly contra<strong>di</strong>ctory theory(Joh Ball+).<br />

• From pure data tracking/academic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when<br />

"crisis pre<strong>di</strong>ction" science-policy was formulated is still being adhered as correct can<br />

be safely stated either some kind of large well coor<strong>di</strong>nated corruption, hoax, fraud, or<br />

beyond normal collective incompetency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data<br />

altering to keep fun<strong>di</strong>ng/job security/public reputation etc is much more "practical<br />

way to do science" than sticking to pure science,<br />

398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!