24.11.2014 Views

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What Are Harmonious <strong>Free</strong> Energy Intro Scenarios? 3<br />

• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be...<br />

B- Mainstream me<strong>di</strong>a(often PR firm used) news documentary pattern<br />

i- Positively bring sensational news for first "free energy" on first 1/4,<br />

ii- Bring mostly debunking “testimony from experts with evidence”,<br />

iii-Highlight rather rare shady claim cases as if that is typical case of the tech,<br />

iv-Conclude it is fraud, yet they are still allowed to practice criminal activities, &<br />

appeal to mass this needs to be prosecuted. OR mainstream documentary to hold back<br />

from reporting new info: no debuking, just keeping away focus from people.<br />

• C- MainstreamBlog/Me<strong>di</strong>a/Celebrity/Utility/NGO/TED/Wikipe<strong>di</strong>a /Reader’s<br />

Digest/Forum/Gov’t quote mostly failure results & declare: “◙Warning: LENR fraud,<br />

◙There's no valid science base, ◙ Pathological science, ◙ If it really worked, it’s already<br />

been used”. OR they would pretend debunking consensus info in the past as current<br />

truth, and won't allow update as long as possible, due to <strong>di</strong>fficulty in debunking.<br />

• D- Internet: old info packed “<strong>Cold</strong> <strong>Fusion</strong> junk science” web sites to show up on search<br />

engine. Or western me<strong>di</strong>cal industry’s std practice suppression on manufactures is<br />

still remotely possible when official commercialization starts from other than Ecat:<br />

• They are banned from quoting scientific validation/testimonials or from other web<br />

sites, or even simply to state the device purpose as energy production, or in extreme<br />

case open source web is prohibited(J Holman & P Dorneanu+), & purchased device<br />

confiscated for “own safety”. Operations don't comply would be legally raided & shut<br />

down. As a result makers offer as unclear purpose of “Research only intended device”.<br />

Another possible simulation is example of Military Dowsing device(p255). >>cont: 338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!