24.11.2014 Views

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Are Harmonious <strong>Free</strong> Energy Intro Scenarios? 5<br />

• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like...<br />

J- When finally several mainstream institutions start accepting tech vali<strong>di</strong>ty, others<br />

in mainstream would use another favorite: it is a tech with “controversial claims”,<br />

and widely labeled such(as adjective) by main me<strong>di</strong>a/NGO/gov't, K- End result:<br />

majority stays with conventional energy for extra 10+yrs, Large corporate would<br />

install LENR but not involving executives officially, instead floor level people(or<br />

make it completely unofficial: employee non <strong>di</strong>sclosure agreement or even<br />

"national security" label might kick in). L- Then gradually shift western social<br />

engineering mode from model β to α: i.e. transition to co-thriving mode.<br />

• But this model might fail; Europe might rebels(eg AIIB+), Russia/China/BRICS might<br />

have <strong>di</strong>fferent preference on "reality projection"(BRICS Bank, GMO ban, UGRG,<br />

Space+), There are too many official mainstream scientist witnesses. Also Energy,<br />

unlike me<strong>di</strong>cal tech, is too instantly obvious not to notice effects etc.<br />

• 5- <strong>Free</strong> energy use at remote mines/marine/military/space(e.g. Boeing: Mike<br />

Gamble), 6-Me<strong>di</strong>a should endorse 3-15% power save on Car/Residential Power<br />

Factor Correction for Active Power(MP-R fuel, Kvar.com, EnergyMizer Residential<br />

+)(: actual decreased use of electricity, not just Reactive power saving only by<br />

decreased supply side waste electricity with conventional PFC device), also water<br />

emulsion/HHO ad<strong>di</strong>tive use at gov't grant level, 7-Sell <strong>di</strong>sruptive proprietary tech<br />

as “slightly efficient”(Bloom, Enstroj, Keppe+), 8-Commercialize mainstream<br />

accepted 24hr Solar Infrared Harvesting. If too <strong>di</strong>sruptive, allow only residential<br />

use but permit unlimited net metering(power trade-in for future use). 340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!