10.01.2015 Views

tradiciuli kulturis da mentalobis roli afxazeTis teritoriaze arsebuli ...

tradiciuli kulturis da mentalobis roli afxazeTis teritoriaze arsebuli ...

tradiciuli kulturis da mentalobis roli afxazeTis teritoriaze arsebuli ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thus the material brought by me once more confirms normal,<br />

more than normal kind relations among Abkhazians and<br />

Georgians, which existed during military actions and are preserved<br />

till to<strong>da</strong>y, the attitude of a man participant of the war who<br />

lost everything and to<strong>da</strong>y is a displaced person in his own country.<br />

It can‟tt be artificial, because among Georgian and Abkhazians<br />

alongside with the stable social economic relations there<br />

were strong cultural and every<strong>da</strong>y life relations. As a result of<br />

long-term joint life almost common life mode and traditions<br />

were formulated. They copied from each other the rites and traditions<br />

which they considered good and fir. This is well seen in<br />

culture of food /feast and in many traditions.<br />

We don‟t want to offer the issue so as if there is an ideal<br />

relation between Georgians and Abkhazians and that after the<br />

conflict there is no tension between them, simply the work with<br />

the respondents revealed that their mentality still preserves strongly<br />

the positive existing earlier in their relations and at the<br />

same time they evaluate adequately the created situation.<br />

The evidenced material is absolutely sufficient to show<br />

that Georgian-Abkhazian conflict is not of organic character and<br />

that it was inspired artificially from outside. Simultaneously it<br />

backs up out the opinion that the role of the still existing relations,<br />

traditional culture and similar mentality, its correct and timely<br />

application is most important in a matter of regulation of<br />

the existing conflict.<br />

Here we met with, as we think, the main problem that can call<br />

into question future relations between Georgians and Abkhasians.<br />

The material confirmed so far (i.e. facts) concerns the generation<br />

that had direct cultural-domestic and military relations with<br />

each other. That is, their historic memory was still loaded with the<br />

rules of traditional relations, habits, culture and mentality.<br />

During this period that can be called the “period of estrangement”<br />

a new generation appeared that is essentially deprived<br />

of traditional diversity of relations and, as one might say, is in<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!