zwangerschap en bevalling na een voorgaande sectio ... - NVOG
zwangerschap en bevalling na een voorgaande sectio ... - NVOG
zwangerschap en bevalling na een voorgaande sectio ... - NVOG
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Refer<strong>en</strong>ties<br />
1. C<strong>en</strong>traal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Nederland in 2007. D<strong>en</strong> Haag: C<strong>en</strong>traal Bureau voor de statistiek,<br />
2007: 166.<br />
2. Stichting Peri<strong>na</strong>tale Registratie Nederland. Peri<strong>na</strong>tale zorg in Nederland 2007. Utrecht: Stichting<br />
Peri<strong>na</strong>tale Registratie Nederland, 2009: 58.<br />
3. Biswas A. Ma<strong>na</strong>gem<strong>en</strong>t of previous cesarean <strong>sectio</strong>n. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15: 123-29.<br />
4. Flamm BL. Vagi<strong>na</strong>l birth after cesarean: what's new in the new mill<strong>en</strong>nium Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol<br />
2002; 12: 595-99.<br />
5. Guise JM, Berlin M, McDo<strong>na</strong>gh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vagi<strong>na</strong>l birth after<br />
cesarean: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 420-429.<br />
6. Kramer HMC, Kwee A, Bremer HA. E<strong>en</strong>s e<strong>en</strong> <strong>sectio</strong>, altijd e<strong>en</strong> <strong>sectio</strong> Individuele afweging<strong>en</strong> voor de<br />
wijze van bevall<strong>en</strong> <strong>na</strong> e<strong>en</strong> eerdere <strong>sectio</strong> caesarea. Ned tijdschr G<strong>en</strong>eesk 2009; 153: 136-41.<br />
7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gy<strong>na</strong>ecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Gre<strong>en</strong>-top<br />
Guideline Number 45. London: RCOG Press; 2007.<br />
8. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Lev<strong>en</strong>o KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Mater<strong>na</strong>l and peri<strong>na</strong>tal<br />
outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:<br />
2581-89.<br />
9. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Verner MW, et al. The MFMU cesarean<br />
registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet<br />
Gynecol. 2005; 193: 1016-23.<br />
10. Tita ATN, Landon MB, Spong CY, Lai Y, Lev<strong>en</strong>o KJ, Varner MW, et al. Timing of elective repeat<br />
cesarean delivery at term and neo<strong>na</strong>tal outcomes. NEJM 2009; 360: 111-20.<br />
11. Durnwald CP, Rouse DJ, Lev<strong>en</strong>o KJ, Spong CY MacPherson C, Varner MW, et al. The mater<strong>na</strong>l-fetal<br />
medicine units caesarean registry: safety and efficacy of a trial of labor in preterm preg<strong>na</strong>ncy after a<br />
prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 135-40.<br />
12. Varner MD, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Moawad AH, Hauth JC, Landon MB, et al. The mater<strong>na</strong>l-fetal<br />
medicine units caesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:<br />
135-40.<br />
13. Peaceman AM, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB, Spong CY, Lev<strong>en</strong>o KJ, Varner MD, et al. The MFMU<br />
caesarean registry: the impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for pati<strong>en</strong>ts with previous cesarean<br />
for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1127-31.<br />
14. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Obstetric ma<strong>na</strong>gem<strong>en</strong>t and outcome of preg<strong>na</strong>ncy in<br />
wom<strong>en</strong> with a history of caesarean <strong>sectio</strong>n in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.<br />
2007; 132: 171-76.<br />
15. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Uterine rupture and its complications in the Netherlands:<br />
A prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 128: 257-61.<br />
16. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, Vries de JIP, Bloem<strong>en</strong>kamp KWM, Roosmal<strong>en</strong> van J. Uterine rupture in<br />
the Netherlands: a <strong>na</strong>tionwide population based cohort study. BJOG 2009; 116: 1069-78.<br />
17. Yang Q, W<strong>en</strong> SW, Opp<strong>en</strong>heimer L, Ch<strong>en</strong> XK, Black D, Gao J, et al. Association of caesarean delivery<br />
for first birth with plac<strong>en</strong>ta praevia and plac<strong>en</strong>tal abruption in second preg<strong>na</strong>ncy. BJOG 2007; 114:<br />
609-13.<br />
18. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW. Emerg<strong>en</strong>cy peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective<br />
study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med 2006; 124: 187-92.<br />
19. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for plac<strong>en</strong>ta previa -plac<strong>en</strong>ta accreta. Am J<br />
Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210-14.<br />
20. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Mater<strong>na</strong>l morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean<br />
deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226-32.<br />
21. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Plac<strong>en</strong>ta previa/accreta in prior cesarean <strong>sectio</strong>n. Obstet Gynecol<br />
1985; 66: 89-62.<br />
22. UstaI IM, Hobeika EM, Abu Musa AA, et al Plac<strong>en</strong>ta previa-accreta: Risk factors and complications.<br />
Obstet & Gynecol 2005; 193: 1045-49.<br />
23. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar preg<strong>na</strong>ncy. BJOG 2007; 114: 253-63.<br />
24. Lydon Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Firts-birth cesarean and plac<strong>en</strong>tal abruption or<br />
previa at second birth. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 765-69.<br />
25. Smith GCD, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R. Risk of peri<strong>na</strong>tal death associated with labor after<br />
previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term preg<strong>na</strong>ncies. JAMA 2002; 287: 2684-90.<br />
26. Bahtiyar MO, Juli<strong>en</strong> S, Robinson JN, Lumey L, Zybert P, Copel JA, Lockwood CJ, Norwitz ER. Prior<br />
cesarean delivery is not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequ<strong>en</strong>t preg<strong>na</strong>ncy:<br />
A<strong>na</strong>lysis of U.S.peri<strong>na</strong>tal mortality data, 1995-1997. AJOG 2006; 195: 1373-8.<br />
<strong>NVOG</strong> - Zwangerschap <strong>en</strong> <strong>bevalling</strong> <strong>na</strong> e<strong>en</strong> <strong>voorgaande</strong> <strong>sectio</strong> caesarea (1.0) - 04-06-2010 9