personlighetstest i arbetslivet: historik och aktuell forskning

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[101]. Luecht, R. M. (1998). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224-236. [102]. Mabon, H. (1998). Utility aspects of personality and performance. Human Performance, 11, 289-304. [103]. Mabon, H. (2001). Arbetspsykologisk testning. Om urvalsmetoder i <strong>arbetslivet</strong>. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget. [104]. MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A qualitative review of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674-683. [105]. Magnusson, D. (1967). The generality of behavioral data III. Stockholm: Applied Psychology Unit, Psychological Laboratories, University of Stockholm. [106]. Marston, W. M. (1989/1928). Emotions of normal people. Ormskirk, Lancs.: Thomas Lyster. [107]. Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality & Individual Differences, 32, 247-256. [108]. Martinussen, M., & Torjussen, T. (1993). Does the Defense Mechanism Test (DMT) predict pilot performance only in Scandinavia? In R. D. Jensen & D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 398-403). Columbus: Ohio State University. [109]. Mastrangelo, P. M., & Jolton, J. A. (2001). Predicting on-the-job substance abuse with a written integrity test. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 13, 95-106. [110]. Matthews, G., & Oddy, K. (1997). Ipsative and normative scales in adjectival measurement of personality: Problems of bias and discrepancy. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 169-182. [111]. Matthews, G., & Stanton, N. (1994). Item and scale factor analyses of the Occupational Personality Questionnaire. Personality & Individual Differences, 16, 733-743. [112]. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267-298. [113]. Mayer, J. D., DiPaolo, M. T., & Salovey, P. (1990). Perceiving affective content in ambiguous visual stimuli: A component of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 772-781. [114]. Mayer, J. D., & Geher, G. (1996). Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion. Intelligence, 22, 89-113. [115]. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003). Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0. Emotion, 3, 97-105. [116]. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". American Psychologist, 28, 1-14. [117]. McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9, 331-339. [118]. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Towards a new generation of personality theories: theoretical contexts for the Five Factor Model. In J. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five Factor Model of personality: theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guildford Press. [119]. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90. 34
[120]. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and validity domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354. [121]. McManus, M. A., & Kelly, M. L. (1999). Personality measures and biodata: Evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 137-148. [122]. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [123]. Mendoza-Denton, R., Ayduk, O., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Testa, A. (2001). Person * Situation interactionism in self-encoding (Iam . . .when . . .): Implications for affect regulation and social information processing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 533-544. [124]. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics? Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2, 100-110. [125]. Milton, J. (2002). The road to Malpsychia. Humanistic psychology and our discontents. San Francisco: Encounter Books. [126]. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley. [127]. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22. [128]. Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730-755. [129]. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. [130]. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83. [131]. Mount, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Incremental validity of empirically keyed biodata scales over GMA and the five factor personality constructs. Personnel Psychology, 53, 299-323. [132]. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Helton, W. B., Strange, J. M., & Osburn, H. K. (2001). On the construct validity of integrity tests: Individual and situational factors as predictors of test performance. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 240-257. [133]. Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Johnson, J. F. (1998). Domain-based scoring of divergent thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151-163. [134]. Mårdberg, B. (1996). Improper use of tests in Sweden. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 4, 154-158. [135]. Mårdberg, B., Nienmaa, P., Hillström, B., & Carlstedt, B. (1994). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Manual. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget. [136]. Noll, R. (1994). The Jung cult. Origins of a charismatic movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [137]. Nutt, P. C. (1986). Decision style and strategic decisions of top executives. Technical Forecasting and Social Change, 30, 39-62. [138]. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests. Results across four large-scale job applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-42. 35
Page 1 and 2: PERSONLIGHETSTEST I ARBETSLIVET: HI
Page 3 and 4: Sammanfattning Människor är olika
Page 5 and 6: ningar [89] . Detta byggde på vad
Page 7 and 8: De första frågorna lyder: 1. Does
Page 9 and 10: ursprungliga sökande). Den som arb
Page 11 and 12: Det kan ske genom intervjuer. I Sve
Page 13 and 14: F2 100 -25 france -25 100 F1 13 gr
Page 15 and 16: Myers och Briggs gjorde saken värr
Page 17 and 18: Thomassystemet Ett annat system som
Page 19 and 20: svenska förhållanden. Det troliga
Page 21 and 22: födelsedatumet som har störst bet
Page 23 and 24: Slutord om personlighetsmätning i
Page 25 and 26: Framtiden Denna artikel har handlat
Page 27 and 28: elaterade till moral och ärlighet,
Page 29 and 30: Referenser [1]. Allport, F. H., & A
Page 31 and 32: tests: Experimental studies of the
Page 33: [80]. Holden, R. R. (1998). Detecti
Page 37 and 38: Psychology, 49, 787-829. [158]. Sag
Page 39 and 40: [195]. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Met

personlighetstest i arbetslivet: historik och aktuell forskning

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?