PSY605 PSY605 PSY 605 Week 1 Discussiondq Theory & Research ((latest))

PSY605 PSY/605 PSY 605 Week 1 Discussion/dq
Theory & Research ((latest))
Download here
PSY605 PSY/605 PSY 605 Week 1 Discussion/dq Theory & Research ((latest)) Prior to completing this discussion,
please read the required chapter from the Lerner, Easterbrooks, Mistry, & Weiner (2013) ebook, Baltes (1987),
Hudson-Barr (2004), and American Psychological Association (2003) articles. Additionally, review the Human
Development Theoretical Perspectives document required for this week. Select one of the perspectives identified in the
Theoretical Perspectives to Understand Human Development document and identify one theory (Freud?s Psychosexual
Theory, Erikson?s Psychosocial Theory, etc.) that you would like to explore more.
Explain the theory you selected providing a well-developed overview. In addition, research one peer-reviewed article
from your selected theoretical perspective in the Ashford University Library. Summarize the article being sure to include
research question(s) and/or problem(s), target population and sample (specific group within the target population),
measures (tests, instruments, and/or questionnaires used), procedures (how the study was conducted), and conclusions
presented in the article. Analyze the ethical considerations, as well as the benefits and limitations of the research
proposing solutions or suggestions for any issues or concerns. Guided Response: Review several of your colleagues
posts and respond to at least two of your peers including one response to a classmate in each of the other two groups
by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote
more meaningful and interactive discourse in this discussion. Prior to crafting your responses, critically review the theory
and article selected. Did your classmate provide enough detail for you to understand the theory and appropriately
identify the specified elements of the article selected? What elements might you suggest he or she consider that were
not present in the initial post? Were there ethical concerns presented in the article your colleague studied that were not
addressed in his or her post? Was your colleague?s description of the proposed changes clear and appropriate in terms
of the information presented in his or her article? Propose at least one change that your colleague did not consider, and
explain why it would be an improvement to the study. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. (Mountain
Time) on Day 7 of the week and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post. Carefully review the Discussion
Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.
Page 1/{nb}