Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine (IAFM) - Official website of IAFM
Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine (IAFM) - Official website of IAFM
Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine (IAFM) - Official website of IAFM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
J <strong>Indian</strong> Acad <strong>Forensic</strong> Med. Jan- March 2012, Vol. 34, No. 1 ISSN 0971-0973<br />
1.3.2 If any request is made for medical records either by the patients/authorized attendant or legal<br />
authorities involved, the same may be duly acknowledged and documents shall be issued within the<br />
period <strong>of</strong> 72 hours.<br />
1.3.3 A registered medical practitioner shall maintain a Register <strong>of</strong> Medical Certificates giving full<br />
details <strong>of</strong> certificates issued. When issuing a medical certificate he/she shall always enter the<br />
identification marks <strong>of</strong> the patient and keep a copy <strong>of</strong> the certificate. He/She shall not omit to record the<br />
signature and/or thumb mark, address and at least one identification mark <strong>of</strong> the patient on the medical<br />
certificates or report. The medical certificate shall be prepared as in Appendix 2.<br />
1.3.4 Efforts shall be made to computerize medical records for quick retrieval.<br />
Thus, computerization <strong>of</strong> medical record is important not only for easy retrieval and about the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> medical record especially <strong>of</strong> medico-legal record <strong>of</strong> immense value in administration <strong>of</strong> justice.<br />
Role <strong>of</strong> Court in Computerization <strong>of</strong> Medical Record:<br />
Many High courts reacting to the quality <strong>of</strong> writing which is not legible and consumed lot <strong>of</strong> time in<br />
deciphering the said writing and its impact on disposal <strong>of</strong> the cases. Some examples are illustrated below:<br />
Scenario in State <strong>of</strong> Delhi:<br />
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case <strong>of</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Govt. <strong>of</strong> NCT <strong>of</strong> Delhi vs. Jitender and State vs.<br />
Virender @ Ballu & Anr., Judgment dated 19.01.2012 observed that “Further from the perusal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Post Mortem report and the MLC prepared in the present case and in many other cases, which comes to<br />
the notice <strong>of</strong> this court daily, during routine court proceedings, where Medico-legal reports are prepared<br />
and the doctors attend the court for their depositions relating to post-mortems and different types <strong>of</strong><br />
MLC(s). In most <strong>of</strong> the cases, the said writing in the MLC(s)/Post-mortem reports are not at all legible and<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> time is consumed in deciphering the said writing. In all those cases, the doctors/Autopsy Surgeons<br />
have to first describe the contents written in the MLC(s) and post-mortem reports, so that the same can<br />
be dictated and can be converted into legible words.”<br />
Court further added that “Sometimes the concerned doctors have either left the services <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hospital or are not traceable and other doctors are directed to appear in the court in their place, but due to<br />
illegible handwriting <strong>of</strong> the concerned doctors(s) including the signatures, put on the MLC(s) the doctor<br />
who is deputed in the place <strong>of</strong> such Doctor(s) are most <strong>of</strong> time are not able to decipher the handwriting <strong>of</strong><br />
the concerned doctor and feel great inconvenience in communicating the exact facts mentioned in the<br />
reports and MLC(s) during their examination, which adversely effects the ends <strong>of</strong> justice and<br />
unnecessarily consumes lot <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />
Suggestions for Improving the Quality <strong>of</strong> Medico-Legal Record:<br />
Further lots <strong>of</strong> other deficiencies have been observed by court regarding the manner <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
MLC(s) and the post-mortem reports. Consequently, following suggestions be implemented for<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> Medico-legal and post-mortem reports for better administration <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice:<br />
(a) The MLCs, especially the postmortem reports be prepared by computer typing, rather than<br />
handwriting to save the time <strong>of</strong> the court, defence lawyers and the accused and to give better clarity<br />
to the accused persons, as to what is against them.<br />
(b) The MLC(s) at present in the Casualty <strong>of</strong> the hospital are being prepared by very junior or trainee<br />
doctors resulting in incomplete information being mentioned in the MLC(s), about the injury and the<br />
associated findings. Therefore, the MLC(S) should not be prepared by the doctors who are not<br />
properly trained in <strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong>.<br />
(c) Any injury(s) found on the body <strong>of</strong> the injured including burn injuries(s), should be clearly illuminated<br />
on the sketch diagram(s) <strong>of</strong> the human body which are already on the back side <strong>of</strong> the MLC’s and<br />
along with that the colour changes, dimensions <strong>of</strong> injury(s), duration <strong>of</strong> injuries(s), depth <strong>of</strong> injury(s),<br />
location in respect to land marks <strong>of</strong> the body, be clearly mentioned, which medical facts are most<br />
essential for better appreciation <strong>of</strong> the injuries and for better appreciation <strong>of</strong> facts during the trial.<br />
(d) Further along with postmortem reports the injuries found on the body <strong>of</strong> deceased should also be<br />
illustrated on the sketch diagram <strong>of</strong> human body, including exit and entry wound <strong>of</strong> bullet injuries at<br />
least in burn and murder cases.<br />
(e) Histo-pathological report <strong>of</strong> organ(s) <strong>of</strong> the deceased be submitted at the earliest, rather it is<br />
observed, it is not being submitted/done at all in most <strong>of</strong> the cases.<br />
(f) The subsequent/final opinion regarding the cause <strong>of</strong> death, by the Autopsy Surgeon is opined very<br />
late in most <strong>of</strong> the cases, due to delayed, reporting/collection <strong>of</strong> FSL/Chemical Analysis report <strong>of</strong><br />
viscera, and histopathological report, which results in grave injustice to the fundamental rights <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accused and the victim during the trial for speedy justice. Therefore, FSL report be given in a time<br />
bound manner, at least in serious cases.<br />
5