23.01.2014 Views

32nd Meeting of Academic Council - IGNOU

32nd Meeting of Academic Council - IGNOU

32nd Meeting of Academic Council - IGNOU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY-SECOND MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

November 13, 2004<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THRITY – SECOND MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON NOVEMBER 13 TH , 2004 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE<br />

CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI,<br />

NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> members present and those who could not attend the meeting is given<br />

in Appendix-1.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> to the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The Chairman also placed on record <strong>Council</strong>’s appreciation<br />

for the academic contributions made by the following retiring members:<br />

(1) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapil Kumar<br />

(2) Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.N.Pandit<br />

(3) Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.P.Narang<br />

(4) Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang<br />

(5) Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Kolaskar<br />

(6) Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.N.Maheshwari<br />

(7) Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.Rama Rao<br />

(8) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ashok Misra<br />

(9) Pr<strong>of</strong>. (Mrs.) Rupa B.Shah<br />

(10) Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Joshi<br />

(11) Sh. Uday Kumar Verma<br />

(12) Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.V.S. Choudhary<br />

(13) Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Ghosh<br />

(14) Pr<strong>of</strong>. D.P.Singh<br />

(15) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur<br />

(16) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Tej Pratap<br />

He specially welcomed the following new members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and<br />

emphasized that he looks forward to their co-operation and valuable contribution<br />

to the deliberations in the meetings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>:<br />

(1) Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH<br />

(2) Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE<br />

(3) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pradeep Sahni, Director, SOSS and Registrar, SRE<br />

(4) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjijal, Librarian (I/C)<br />

(5) Sh. V.K.Arora, Director, EMPC<br />

(6) Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD, Member-Secretary


Before taking the Agenda items, the Chairman greeted all for Deepawali and Id. He<br />

then observed that dynamism <strong>of</strong> ODL system is inherent in its flexibility and<br />

adaptability to change. In this context continuous revision/up-gradation <strong>of</strong> course<br />

materials was a pre-requisite. To promote good practices, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and<br />

the Board <strong>of</strong> Management had directed that (i) programmes approved by <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> must be put on <strong>of</strong>fer within 2-3 years failing which the process <strong>of</strong> approval <strong>of</strong><br />

curriculum should be re-initiated and (ii) the print material developed prior to 1998 be<br />

revised. The former was procedural but required cooperation and acceptability, the<br />

latter involved colossal effort. But he was happy to note compliance <strong>of</strong> (i) above,<br />

considerable progress has also been made in revision <strong>of</strong> courses. He informed<br />

members that seven programmes have already been fully revised and another ten are<br />

under revision. In addition, forty-nine courses have been revised and sixty-nine<br />

courses are under revision. Moreover, thirty-nine new courses have been added. In<br />

the past three years, twenty nine new programmes mostly at Masters’ level, have been<br />

added and 8-10 programmes shall be launched by July, 2005. The Chairman<br />

congratulated the faculty, Directors <strong>of</strong> Schools and the Pro Vice-Chancellor, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

S.C.Garg for taking the revision <strong>of</strong> programmes/courses developed prior to 1998 with<br />

missionary zeal. He desired that creation <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware for EduSat, a national resource<br />

for taking education to the remotest and most isolated should also be taken up in the<br />

same spirit. He also informed members that <strong>IGNOU</strong> is in its twentieth year. To<br />

celebrate the success, it has been proposed to honour leading academics and <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

<strong>of</strong> past and present apart from organizing a few National and International<br />

workshops/conferences.<br />

While assuring complete support on behalf <strong>of</strong> the University community, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

S.C.Garg congratulated the Chairman for bringing laurels to the University in<br />

different forms and formats from time to time which essentially reflect the support he<br />

enjoys in the University. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg highlighted his role and responsibility as<br />

National Chair, for coordinating utilization <strong>of</strong> EduSat and bringing with it a regional<br />

hub and creation <strong>of</strong> 100 video conferencing centres <strong>of</strong> which fifty shall be made<br />

available for free by ISRO. The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-<br />

Chancellor to present the items <strong>of</strong> the agenda formally


ITEM NO.1 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 31 ST MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON 20.2.2004 AND TO<br />

NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN.<br />

AC 32.1.1<br />

AC 32.1.2<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg read out the comments on the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 31 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on<br />

20.2.2004 received from two <strong>of</strong> its members.<br />

It was agreed by the <strong>Council</strong> that the word “undergraduate” may be<br />

added in the resolution No. 31.10.2 in second line <strong>of</strong> the resolution<br />

between the words “The” and “Certificate”. Revised resolution shall be<br />

read as follows:<br />

“The <strong>Council</strong> decided that the BPP qualified students may be allowed<br />

admissions to all the Undergraduate Certificate Programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University”.<br />

AC 32.1.3 The <strong>Council</strong> considered the comments on Item no. 3, 4, 8, and 12<br />

respectively received from one <strong>of</strong> the members. Regarding Item no. 3,<br />

it was informed by the PVC that the University has constituted a<br />

Committee to look into the matter relating to Project Courses across<br />

disciplines and Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies and it was assured that due care will<br />

be taken by the University in the case <strong>of</strong> Project Course in M.A.<br />

Economics Programme. In respect <strong>of</strong> entrance test on 15 th January,<br />

2004 and launching <strong>of</strong> the Programme on 15 th February, 2004, it was<br />

clarified that the Programme was developed in Project mode in<br />

collaboration with the CIDC to cater to the customized needs <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Army and to meet the target dates, action was taken with due approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor. Regarding Item no. 8, it was clarified that the<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education revised the DPR Phase-3<br />

Form according to the suggestions made by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The revised Phase-3 Form has been approved by the ACSC at its 11 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> and the same is now placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at<br />

Item no. 4. Regarding Item no. 12, the omission mentioned in the<br />

comments was regretted and it was assured that due care will be taken<br />

in future while recording the Minutes.<br />

AC 32.1.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 31 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 20.2.2004 with above observations and<br />

noted the action taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO.2<br />

TO CO-OPT MEMBERS TO THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

UNDER STATUTES 9 (1) (Viii).


AC 32.2.1<br />

AC 32.2.2<br />

ITEM NO.3<br />

AC 32.3.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC informed that there had been a practice <strong>of</strong><br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> forwarding names for consideration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Chairman and the Chairman then nominating the Members. The<br />

Pro Vice-Chancellor requested the Members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

to suggest the names <strong>of</strong> the persons to be co-opted under Statutes 9 (1)<br />

(viii) by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for their special knowledge including<br />

the representatives <strong>of</strong> employers organizations, industries, trade and<br />

commerce, academic and pr<strong>of</strong>essional organization, communication<br />

field etc. within a period <strong>of</strong> one week to the Chairman.<br />

The members agreed to the suggestion and assured that the names will<br />

be sent to the Chairman within the stipulated time. The Chairman was<br />

authorized to nominate members.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 10 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’s STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 20.5.2004.<br />

The Pro Vice Chancellor, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg explained the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

items considered and the recommendations made by the Standing<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

20.5.2004. He highlighted the decisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee as given below:<br />

(1) Phase Zero Form for revised MCA Programme and the<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> three courses namely ET-101B, ET-105A and ET-<br />

508A <strong>of</strong> BTCM and BTWRE Programmes.<br />

(2) Phase-3 Forms for Certificate Programmes on:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

(v)<br />

(vi)<br />

(vii)<br />

Food Safety (On-line),<br />

Shoe Upper-Cutting,<br />

Shoe Upper-Stitching,<br />

Shoe Lasting and Finishing for <strong>IGNOU</strong>-<br />

FDDI Project,<br />

Health Care Waste Management,<br />

Diploma in Nautical Science; and<br />

PG Diploma in Intellectual Property Rights<br />

(3) Revision <strong>of</strong> Eligibility Criteria for revised<br />

MCA Programme<br />

(4) Removal <strong>of</strong> Entrance Test for BIT/ADIT<br />

Programmes and to change from trimester to<br />

semester system.<br />

(5) Making Examination/ Evaluation system


friendlier to visually impaired learners.<br />

(6) Withdrawal <strong>of</strong> Assignment Component from<br />

Certificate Programmes <strong>of</strong> six months’ duration<br />

(7) Revision <strong>of</strong> fee structure and maximum<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> Master’s Degree Programmes.<br />

AC 32.3.2<br />

AC 32.3.3<br />

AC 32.3.4<br />

AC 32.3.5<br />

ITEM NO.4<br />

AC 32.4.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Aslam pointed out that he had sent his observations on Item No.<br />

23 before circulation <strong>of</strong> the Minutes, but the same did not find a place<br />

in the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee.<br />

The Chairman clarified that the Minutes were the record <strong>of</strong> decisions <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Meeting</strong>. The observations sent after the meeting could not be<br />

incorporated in the Minutes. However, the observations <strong>of</strong> the Member<br />

were placed before the Committee at the time <strong>of</strong> confirmation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Minutes at the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC.<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor assured the Members that while permitting<br />

flexibility, no statutory authority <strong>of</strong> the University will be by-passed.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee held on 20.5.2004.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 11 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’s STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 19.10.2004.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained in detail the highlights<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee<br />

held on 19.10.2004. The main items considered by the Standing<br />

Committee were:<br />

(1) Phase Zero Forms for (i) Non-credit course on Gandhi and the<br />

Contemporary World for BDP students (ii) Elective Course on<br />

Elements <strong>of</strong> Biotechnology for the B.Sc. Programme, (iii) Elective<br />

Course on European Union in World Affairs (MPSE-14) for M.A.<br />

Pol. Sc. Programme, (iv) An Application-Oriented Course on<br />

Environmental Chemistry for the B.Sc. Programme; and (v) EHD-1<br />

course.<br />

(2) Proposal relating to <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> a non-credit course on Environment for<br />

BDP students.<br />

(3) Phase-3 Forms for (i) Certificate in Craft and Design (Pottery), (ii)<br />

B.Sc. (Hons) Programme in Ophthalmic Techniques, (iii) Diploma in<br />

Architecture (For Army Personnel), (iv) Advanced Diploma in


Computer Integrated Manufacturing, (v) M.A. Rural Development,<br />

(vi) M.Sc. (Mathematics with Applications); and (vii) Diploma in<br />

Civil Engineering (General candidates).<br />

(4) Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee on Credit Transfer in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> Modular/Upgraded Programmes.<br />

(5) Payment Norms for Re-admission and Modification in conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

TEE (P) for PG Diploma in Geriatric Medicine Programme.<br />

(6) Proposal relating to Admission, Delivery, Evaluation, Project and<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> MCA (Revised) and BCA (Revised) Programmes.<br />

(7) Declaration <strong>of</strong> Results in Certificate Programmes where Assignment<br />

Component has been withdrawn.<br />

(8) Nomenclature/Specification <strong>of</strong> Degrees to be as per UGC guidelines.<br />

(9) Proposal relating to Revalidation <strong>of</strong> Registration.<br />

(10) For Entry to B.Sc. Hospitality and Hotel Administration,<br />

NCHMCT Diploma Holders will be required to do 48<br />

credits.<br />

AC 32.4.2<br />

AC 32.4.3<br />

AC 32.4.4.<br />

AC 32.4.5<br />

AC 32.4.6<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the Members pointed out that ACSC had approved <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> only<br />

first two blocks <strong>of</strong> the proposed Appreciation Course on Environment<br />

as a non-credit course to all the BDP students.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided that course coordinators be advised to<br />

present the material in two blocks, while ensuring continuity.<br />

In respect <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. (Hons) Ophthalmic Science Programme, members<br />

desired that concrete information about audio/video programmes be<br />

provided.<br />

It was clarified that the programme is proposed to be launched at<br />

selected Federation <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmic Research and Education Centres<br />

(FOREC) all over the country and SIMs will be developed<br />

simultaneously for use <strong>of</strong> students <strong>of</strong> subsequent batches.<br />

During the discussion, the Vice-Chancellor highlighted that preserving<br />

the dynamism <strong>of</strong> distance education is extremely important for meeting<br />

the national goal <strong>of</strong> increasing excess to higher education to every<br />

eligible individual and enable him/her to contribute to national<br />

development. The Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

various Phase Forms were being revisited and revised under the


guidance <strong>of</strong> APC. The Vice-Chancellor requested the Director,<br />

SOHS to make a power point presentation on the programmes <strong>of</strong> his<br />

school in the next meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 32.4.7<br />

ITEM NO.5<br />

AC 32.5.1<br />

AC 32.5.2<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee held on 19.10.2004.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AMENDMENTS TO THE<br />

ORDINANCE ON RESEARCH DEGREE PROGRAMMES.<br />

The proposal was considered by the <strong>Council</strong>. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Saraswat,<br />

Director, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination and Member-Secretary explained the<br />

rationale <strong>of</strong> amendments in various clauses <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance to the<br />

Members. He informed that the amendments have been proposed to<br />

accommodate programmes such as Integrated Doctoral Programme in<br />

Physics and Mathematics <strong>of</strong>fered in collaboration with HRI, Allahabad,<br />

after due approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposed amendments to the<br />

Ordinance on Research Degree Programmes as given in Appendix-2.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR<br />

CONFERMENT OF D.LIT. AND D.SC. HONORIS CAUSA<br />

DEGREES<br />

AC 32.6.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC explained that as per the provisions <strong>of</strong> Section 5<br />

(iv) <strong>of</strong> the Act <strong>of</strong> the University, the University may confer honorary<br />

degrees or other distinctions in the manner laid down by the Statutes.<br />

The Statute 22 on Conferment <strong>of</strong> Honorary Degrees envisages that “All<br />

proposals for the conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees shall be initiated<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor who, after consultation with the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management, shall submit the same to<br />

the Visitor for confirmation”.<br />

AC 32.6.2<br />

AC 32.6.3<br />

The Vice-Chancellor invited the proposals for conferment <strong>of</strong> D.Lit. and<br />

D.Sc. (Honoris Causa) from the Directors <strong>of</strong> Schools and the<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its<br />

meeting held on 19.10.2004. A Committee appointed by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor considered the names received from the Members. Based<br />

on the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee, the Vice-Chancellor has<br />

proposed the names <strong>of</strong> His Excellency UN Goodwill Ambassador Shri<br />

Madanjeet Singh and Dr. Kamil Idris, Chairman, WIPO for conferment<br />

<strong>of</strong> D.Lit (Honoris Causa) and Sh. Madhavan Nair, Chairperson, ISRO<br />

for D.Sc. (Honoris Causa).<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the Members suggested that in future Members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong>


<strong>Council</strong> may also like to suggest some names.<br />

AC 32.6.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal made by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in resolution no. 32.6.2 and further authorized him to take<br />

up the matter with the Board <strong>of</strong> Management and the Visitor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University for approval.<br />

ITEM NO.7 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE AMENDMENT TO STATUE 9<br />

(A) DECLARING RESEARCH COUNCIL AS AN AUTHORITY<br />

OF THE UNIVERSITY UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

ACT.<br />

AC 32.7.1<br />

AC 32.7.2<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

AC 32.8.1<br />

AC 32.8.2<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

AC 32.9.1<br />

AC 32.9.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Member-Secretary explained in detail the rationale<br />

for declaring Research <strong>Council</strong> as an Authority <strong>of</strong> the University under<br />

Section 16 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal for declaring the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> as an Authority <strong>of</strong> the University under Section 16 <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act by adding a new Sub-Clause (aa) after proviso to Sub-<br />

Clause (a) <strong>of</strong> Statute 9(A). A statement showing the existing provision,<br />

proposed amendment and provision after amendment <strong>of</strong> Statute 9(A) is<br />

placed at Appendix-3.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR REVISION OF APPLICATION ORIETNED COUSE IN<br />

TRANSLATION (ATR-1).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC apprised the Members about the Phase Zero Form<br />

for revision <strong>of</strong> existing Application Oriented Course in Translation<br />

(ATR-1) for BDP students <strong>of</strong> the University received from the School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Humanities.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

for revision <strong>of</strong> Application Oriented Course in Translation (ATR-1),<br />

with the suggestion that time schedule proposed by the faculty may be<br />

monitored by the Director <strong>of</strong> the School.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR REVISION OF ENGLISH ELECTIVE COURSE EEG-08 –<br />

READING THE NOVEL.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC informed the Members that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Humanities had submitted the Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

English Elective Course- EEG-08 for BDP students <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

for revision <strong>of</strong> English Elective Course EEG-08: Reading the Novel.


ITEM NO. 10<br />

AC 32.10.1<br />

AC 32.10.2<br />

AC 32.10.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPORVE INCREASE IN FEES.<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the Members that the Finance<br />

Committee at its last meeting held on 11 th November, 2004 observed<br />

that the fees collected by the University is less than the expenditure<br />

incurred by it and annual fee raise <strong>of</strong> 10% was approved for all the<br />

programmes from the next academic session. However, Finance<br />

Committee has desired that a detailed analysis on costing be<br />

undertaken.<br />

The Members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> suggested that the University should study<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Student Support Services and strengthen them further.<br />

Members desired that a Committee may be constituted for reviewing<br />

the fee structure <strong>of</strong> the University and suggest measures to make the<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> the University more cost effective and self sustainable.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the low enrollment programmes/learner centres<br />

(SC/PSCs/WCs) could be phased out.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal to increase fees upto<br />

10% for all programmes from the next academic session and authorized<br />

the Chairman to constitute a Committee for reviewing the fee structure<br />

and invite proposals for effectiveness studies on Student Support<br />

Services.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(H.P.Dikshit)<br />

Chairman


Appendix-1<br />

(To Item No.1)<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended /could not attend the 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on November 13, 2004.<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.S.Hasan<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G.Thomas<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal<br />

10. Dr. Subhasis Maji<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.Aslam<br />

13. Sh. Akshay Kumar<br />

14. Dr. Anju S.Gupta<br />

15. Mrs. Poonam Bhushan<br />

16. Sh. Saugato Sen<br />

17. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal<br />

18. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

19. Dr. Sanjeev Pandey<br />

20. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary


Members who could not attend:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna<br />

2. Dr. D.K.Choudhry<br />

3. Dr. Neelam Chaudhary<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was<br />

present to assist the Member-Secretary.


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY-THIRD MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

July 5, 2005<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THRITY – THIRD MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON JULY 5 TH , 2005 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE<br />

CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI,<br />

NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> members present and those who could not attend the meeting is given<br />

in Appendix-1.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the Members to the 33 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The Chairman also placed on record <strong>Council</strong>’s appreciation<br />

for the academic contributions made by the following retiring members:<br />

1. Dr. Ruchika Kuba<br />

2. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

He specially welcomed the following new members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and<br />

emphasized that he looks forward for their co-operation and valuable contribution<br />

to the deliberations in the meetings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.R.Madhava Menon<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shardindu<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.S.Yadav<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K.Jain<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.Ramachandran<br />

8. Sh. D.Moitra<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Asghar Wajahat<br />

10. Sh. G.S.Sahni<br />

11. Dr. Ved Goel<br />

12. Dr. C.K.Ghosh


13. Mrs. Rita Sarkar<br />

The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor to present the agenda:<br />

ITEM NO.1<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 32 nd MEETING<br />

OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON 13.11.2004<br />

AND TO NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN.<br />

AC 33.1.1<br />

Before the agenda was taken up for discussion, the Member-<br />

Secretary, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat informed that the comments<br />

received from one <strong>of</strong> the members on Resolution no. 31.6.2 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 31 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held<br />

on 20.2.2004 were placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> but the same were not reflected in the Minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

the 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong>. The Member-Secretary regretted the<br />

omission. He read out the comments and proposed that the<br />

same may be taken on record:<br />

“The Chairperson suggested that the Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> be given authority to approve the award <strong>of</strong><br />

all degrees/diplomas at the Convocation henceforth, so that an<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s meeting need not be called for this<br />

purpose. The <strong>Council</strong> approved this recommendation”.<br />

AC 33.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> adopted the proposal. The Resolution<br />

31.6.2 after modification will read as follows:<br />

“31.6.2: The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved that the Standing<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> be given authority to<br />

approve the award <strong>of</strong> all degrees/diplomas at the Convocation,<br />

henceforth, so that an <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s <strong>Meeting</strong> need not be<br />

called for this purpose. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> further<br />

approved the proposals for (i) the award <strong>of</strong> the degrees and<br />

diplomas etc. to the 74,603 students at the 15 th Convocation <strong>of</strong><br />

the University and (ii) award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals to the eligible<br />

students under different programmes, and noted the decision <strong>of</strong><br />

award <strong>of</strong> the Degree <strong>of</strong> Doctor <strong>of</strong> Letters (honoris causa) to (i)<br />

His Highness Shaikh Khalifa Bin Salman Al-Khalifa, Prime<br />

Minister <strong>of</strong> the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Bahrain and (ii) Field Marshal<br />

S.H.F.J. Manekshaw”.


AC 33.1.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the comments <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

M.Aslam on Item No. 1,3,4,5,6, and 10 <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> which were circulated to all the members.<br />

Member-Secretary informed that in respect <strong>of</strong> Item No 3 <strong>of</strong> AC<br />

32.1.3, the Committee constituted by the University had held<br />

four meetings and its final recommendations shall be placed<br />

before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for decision. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> noted that Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.Aslam did not express his dissent<br />

during the proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong>. However, in view<br />

<strong>of</strong> his insistence, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided as follows:<br />

“Dr. Aslam disagreed with the decisions on Item No. 1, 3, 4, 5,<br />

6 and 10 <strong>of</strong> the 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong>”.<br />

AC 33.1.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 32 nd<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 13.11.2004 with the<br />

above observations and noted the action taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

TO REPORT THE 16 TH ANNUAL CONVOCATION OF<br />

THE UNIVERSITY HELD ON 5 TH MARCH, 2005.<br />

AC 33.2.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 16 th<br />

Annual Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University was held on 5.3.2005.<br />

His Excellency, the President <strong>of</strong> India, Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam<br />

was the Chief Guest and delivered the Convocation Address.<br />

Dr. Kamil Idris, Director General, World Intellectual Property<br />

Organization (WIPO), Geneva and Shri G. Madhavan Nair,<br />

Chairman, Space Commission, Secretary, Government <strong>of</strong> India,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Space and Chairman, Indian Space Research<br />

Organization (ISRO) were conferred the degrees <strong>of</strong> Doctor <strong>of</strong><br />

Letters (honoris causa), and Doctor <strong>of</strong> Science (honoris causa),<br />

respectively. A total <strong>of</strong> 71, 299 students <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> including a<br />

Ph.D. and 43 gold medalists were awarded degrees, diplomas<br />

and certificates at this Convocation. For the first time, a student<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> was awarded a Ph.D. degree. Best Researcher and<br />

Best Services Awards were also presented. The Convocation<br />

was held simultaneously at the Headquarters and 22 Regional<br />

Centres <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> through teleconferencing mode. A large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students and distinguished guests from different<br />

institutions attended the Convocation at the Headquarters and at


various Regional Centers.<br />

AC 33.2.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> appreciated the conduct <strong>of</strong> the 16 th<br />

Annual Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University on 5 th March, 2005.<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 33.3.1<br />

AC 33.3.2<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

12 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 21.2.2005.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 12 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was<br />

held on 21.2.2005. The major issues considered by the<br />

Standing Committee were the revision <strong>of</strong> existing courses<br />

developed prior to 1998 which includes FEG-01: Foundation<br />

Course in English-1, FEG-02: Foundation Course in English-2,<br />

Application-oriented Course in Radio Lekhan [AWR (H)-1],<br />

Application-oriented Course in Feature Writing [AFW (H)-1],<br />

for Bachelor’s Degree Programme students, Phase Zero Forms<br />

for New Electives MEG-10: English Studies in India and MEG-<br />

12: A Survey Course in 20 th Century Canadian Literature for<br />

M.A. (English). The Committee also considered and approved<br />

the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence Committee held on 8.12.2004,<br />

Amendment in General Reservation Policy for admission to<br />

programmes requiring working experience, inter-change <strong>of</strong><br />

courses <strong>of</strong> 5 th & 6 th semester for Diploma in Civil Engineering<br />

and Diploma in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering,<br />

withdrawal <strong>of</strong> Diploma Course in Creative Writing in Hindi,<br />

Guidelines for BCA/MCA Project Courses, Change <strong>of</strong><br />

Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> PGDAPP to PGDRPPM, Linear Movement<br />

for MCA students, Award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. Degree, Relaxation <strong>of</strong><br />

validity period <strong>of</strong> registration upon withdrawal <strong>of</strong> assignments<br />

in Certificate Programmes, Eligibility for admission to<br />

Management Programme, Change <strong>of</strong> Cycles for CTPM<br />

programme and award <strong>of</strong> MBA degree to students <strong>of</strong> Direct<br />

Entry Scheme, Format <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. Degree and proposal for<br />

permitting students to appear in TEE after six months instead <strong>of</strong><br />

after the minimum duration.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes<br />

(Appendix-2) (without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 12 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on 21.2.2005.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE


13 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 4.3.2005.<br />

AC 33.4.1<br />

AC 33.4.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

the 13 th (Emergent) <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s<br />

Standing Committee was held on 4.3.2005. The (Emergent)<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> was called on receipt <strong>of</strong> a note by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

that the provisions <strong>of</strong> Ordinance on Conduct <strong>of</strong> Examinations<br />

and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Students’ Performance is being violated in<br />

declaration <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> PGDDE and MADE. He requested<br />

Registrar, SRE to present the details <strong>of</strong> the matter.<br />

Dr. S.K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE informed that the Diploma<br />

in Distance Education (DDE), Post Graduate Diploma in<br />

Distance Education (PGDDE) and Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Distance<br />

Education (MADE) were launched in the years 1987 and 1993,<br />

respectively. In order to complete the Programme successfully,<br />

a student was required to secure a minimum <strong>of</strong> ‘D’ grade in<br />

Assignments, ‘D’ grade in term-end examinations (TEE) and an<br />

overall ‘C’ grade. This methodology continued till 1994.<br />

However, in its 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 11.7.1994 the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> decided that a student must secure a minimum <strong>of</strong> ‘D’<br />

grade in Assignments and ‘C’ grade in TEE to successfully<br />

complete a course. Also, in order to complete the Programme, a<br />

student must pass each course in the programme. However,<br />

there was either no stipulation for overall grade, or missed<br />

inadvertently while recording the minutes. The revised<br />

methodology however could not be implemented in the<br />

SR&ED. And the students who secured ‘D’ grade in the TEE<br />

but an overall ‘C’ grade have been declared successful in<br />

PGDDE as well as in MADE. So far Diplomas//Degrees have<br />

been awarded to 229 students <strong>of</strong> PGDDE and 29 students <strong>of</strong><br />

MADE, who were given admission from 1995 onwards and<br />

secured ‘D’ grade in the TEE.<br />

AC 33.4.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee deliberated on the matter and expressed deep<br />

concern. It recommended that responsibility be fixed on the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial(s) who failed to incorporate the decision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> taken on 11.7.1994. However, in view <strong>of</strong><br />

the legal complications in cancellation <strong>of</strong> diplomas/degrees<br />

already awarded, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee<br />

decided that in accordance with the principle <strong>of</strong> Natural Justice,<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> diplomas/degrees awarded as per un-revised<br />

methodology be noted and reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. It<br />

advised the Registrar, SR&ED to incorporate the revised


methodology <strong>of</strong> PGDDE and MADE immediately and<br />

implement the same for the students who have been admitted<br />

from January, 2004 onwards with the addition that an overall<br />

‘C’ grade would be required for successful completion <strong>of</strong> each<br />

course. It also decided that the methodology <strong>of</strong> evaluation<br />

being applied by SR&ED for all the programmes be circulated<br />

to the respective Schools for confirmation and authentication.<br />

The Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> recommended<br />

that Ordinance incorporating ‘D’ grade in assignment, ‘C’ grade<br />

in TEE and ‘C’ grade in overall be placed before the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> for its consideration and decision.<br />

AC 33.4.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

the 13 th <strong>Meeting</strong> (Emergent) (placed at Appendix-3) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on 4.3.2005.<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 33.5.1<br />

AC 33.5.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

14 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 29.4.2005.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 14 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was<br />

held on 29.4.2005. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee considered and approved the course curriculum <strong>of</strong><br />

elective courses <strong>of</strong> M.A. (Sociology), PG Diploma in<br />

Community Cardiology and Diploma in Value Added Products<br />

from Horticulture (Fruits & Vegetables), minor changes in<br />

course structure <strong>of</strong> MHI-01 and MHI-05. The Committee also<br />

recommended withdrawal <strong>of</strong> BIT and ADIT Programmes in<br />

view <strong>of</strong> the expiry <strong>of</strong> MoU with Ed-excel, U.K, PG Certificate<br />

Rural Surgery and the PPC course from BCA and MCA<br />

programmes. The evaluation scheme for Engineering<br />

Programmes, providing options for alternative courses and<br />

credit transfer to students to complete the programme was also<br />

approved. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee also<br />

approved the cancellation/ modification <strong>of</strong> degrees awarded to<br />

MCA students inadvertently in 16 th Convocation.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the Members desired to know the background <strong>of</strong> PG<br />

Diploma in Community Cardiology being developed by the<br />

University. The Chairman asked Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Director,<br />

SOHS to explain the same. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Agarwal informed the<br />

Members that this programme is being developed in


collaboration with Narayan Hrudayalaya Institute <strong>of</strong> Cardiac<br />

Sciences, Bangalore and eminent cardiologists like Dr.<br />

Devi.Shetty, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Khaliullah, Dr. Kasliwal,<br />

Dr. G. Vijayraghavan, Dr. Gandhi, and Dr. Narasimham are<br />

involved in developing course materials. The programme is<br />

aimed at General Physicians posted in rural and remote areas to<br />

take care <strong>of</strong> cardiac problems in the populace.<br />

AC 33.5.3<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the members also suggested that a course on Rural<br />

Sociology may be included in the curriculum <strong>of</strong> M.A.<br />

Sociology. The Chairman also explained that the Diploma in<br />

Value Added Products from Horticulture (Fruits and<br />

Vegetables) is being developed in project mode for meeting the<br />

customised requirements <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Food Processing.<br />

AC 33.5.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 14 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held<br />

on 29.4.2005 (placed at Appendix-4) (without Appendices)<br />

with the direction that School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences should<br />

consider the suggestion <strong>of</strong> adding a course on Rural Sociology<br />

in the curriculum <strong>of</strong> M.A. Sociology and process it through<br />

approved guidelines.<br />

TABLED ITEMS<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

AC 33.6.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

15 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 29.06.2005.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

the 15 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee was held on 29.6.2005. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s<br />

Standing Committee considered and approved Phase Zero Form<br />

for new elective courses for MPSE-012: State and Society in<br />

Australia and MPSE-013: Australia’s Foreign Policy. The<br />

Standing Committee also considered and approved Phase Zero<br />

Forms for minor reorganization <strong>of</strong> MSO-002: Research<br />

Methodologies and Methods, and revision <strong>of</strong> EHD-05: Aadunik<br />

Bhartiya Sahitya: Navjagran Aur Rashtriya Andolan, MHD-2:<br />

Adhunik Hindi Kavya and EEG-7: Understanding Drama. The<br />

Committee considered the eligibility conditions for admission<br />

to Master <strong>of</strong> Science in Dietetics and Food Service<br />

Management (M.Sc.DFSM) and Post Graduate Certificate<br />

Programme in Copyediting and Pro<strong>of</strong>reading and recommended


AC 33.6.2<br />

ITEM NO. 7<br />

AC 33.7.1<br />

that Certificate in Food and Nutrition (CFN) and Certificate in<br />

Nutrition and Child Care (CNCC) be pursued concurrently in<br />

M.ScDFSM by those who do not have the required background<br />

and that English need not be a compulsory course at graduate<br />

level for admission in PG Certificate in Copyediting and<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>reading. Credit Transfer Policy for CEMBA/CEMPA<br />

programmes and change in Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> Degrees in Civil<br />

Engineering were considered and approved. However, inclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Diploma awarded by College <strong>of</strong> Military Engineering<br />

(CME), Pune as an entry qualification for admission to the<br />

B.Tech programmes, was referred back to the Equivalence<br />

Committee. The recommendations on use <strong>of</strong> limited number <strong>of</strong><br />

PG courses developed for other programmes as electives for PG<br />

Degree/Diploma programmes in allied disciplines in School <strong>of</strong><br />

Social Sciences were considered. The Evaluation Methodology<br />

for B.Sc. (Nautical Science), and M.A. English 2001 batch<br />

students, and permission to allow MEG-01 as compulsory<br />

course instead <strong>of</strong> as an additional course for the students <strong>of</strong><br />

2001 and 2002 batches <strong>of</strong> the programme were also approved.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 15 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> (placed at Appendix-5) (without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on 29.6.2005.<br />

TO REPORT THE APPROVAL OF THE VISITOR ON<br />

AMENDMENT OF STATUTE 10A-ESTABLISHMENT<br />

OF TWO NEW SCHOOLS OF STUDIES VIZ. SCHOOL<br />

OF AGRICULTURE AND SCHOOL OF LAW.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> that the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its 74 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held<br />

on 28.2.2003 approved the establishment <strong>of</strong> two new Schools <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies namely School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and School <strong>of</strong> Law and<br />

also amendments/additions in clause (1) <strong>of</strong> Statute 10-A:<br />

Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> HRD vide their letter no.<br />

5-23/2003-Desk (U) (A) dated 4 th February, 2005 have<br />

conveyed the Visitor’s approval for the same.<br />

Accordingly, both the Schools have been established.<br />

AC 33.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the same for record.<br />

ITEM No. 8<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPORVE THE CONDITION FOR<br />

RE-REGISTRATION TO THE 3 rd YEAR OF BACHELOR<br />

OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS (BCA).


AC 33.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the students<br />

without Mathematics as a distinct subject at 10 + 2 level were<br />

required to register for both MTE-03 and CIC in the first<br />

semester <strong>of</strong> BCA and successfully complete the same before<br />

registering in 3 rd semester <strong>of</strong> the BCA programme. Consequent<br />

upon implementation <strong>of</strong> annual registration instead <strong>of</strong> semester<br />

wise registration and for operational reasons, it is proposed that<br />

the condition <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> MTE-03 and CIC before<br />

registering in 3 rd semester be changed to 3 rd year <strong>of</strong> BCA<br />

instead. The revised condition will be:<br />

“The students would have to successfully complete MTE-03<br />

and CIC before registering in 3 rd year <strong>of</strong> BCA”.<br />

AC 33.8.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal.<br />

The Chairman’s concluding Observations:<br />

In the last meeting, we had briefly mentioned about new possibilities and<br />

capabilities for effective and interactive Edusat supported networks which will greatly<br />

benefit our system. The Chairman was pleased to report that the progress in this project<br />

was very satisfactory and more than 80 locations had already become functional with two<br />

way video and two way audio interactive connectivity.<br />

The Chairman also drew the attention <strong>of</strong> the Members to DEP-SSA Project for<br />

teacher training which the University had successfully implemented with financial<br />

support from the MHRD. The Chairman was pleased to mention that recently MHRD-<br />

ISRO have jointly agreed to support the major initiatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> in reaching out to<br />

850 schools through Edusat supported network for education. The District <strong>of</strong> Sidhi in<br />

MP, Sonbhadra in UP, Koria in Chhattisgarh and one adjoining district in Bihar had been<br />

identified for teacher training and training <strong>of</strong> students. The Chairman expected that such<br />

a network could also be extensively used for several other programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> appreciated these proactive initiatives taken by the<br />

University.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.


(H.P.Dikshit)<br />

Chairman


Appendix-1<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended /could not attend the 33 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> held on July 5, 2005<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

21. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

22. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg<br />

23. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.S.Yadav<br />

24. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana<br />

25. Dr. Shardindu<br />

26. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Asghar Wajahat<br />

27. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur<br />

28. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal<br />

29. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik<br />

30. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.S.Hasan<br />

31. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair<br />

32. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh<br />

33. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

34. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna<br />

35. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.Aslam<br />

36. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal<br />

37. Dr. Subhasis Maji<br />

38. Sh. Akshay Kumar<br />

39. Dr. Anju S.Gupta<br />

40. Mrs. Poonam Bhushan<br />

41. Sh. Saugato Sen<br />

42. Mrs. Rita Sarkar<br />

43. Dr. C.K.Ghosh<br />

44. Dr. Ved Goel<br />

45. Dr. S.K.Mohapatra<br />

46. Dr. Sanjeev Pande<br />

47. Dr. Neelam Chaudhary<br />

48. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Members who could not attend:<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.Ramachandran<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.R.Madhava Menon<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K.Jain<br />

9. Sh. G.S.Sahni<br />

10. Sh. D.Moitra<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.


Appendix-2<br />

(To Resolution No.33.3.2)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 12 TH MEEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 21 ST FEBRUARY, 2005, AT 3.30 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE<br />

ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Director, SOHS - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOCE - Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE - Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, SOSS - Member<br />

8. Dr. Anju S. Gupta, Reader, SOH - Member<br />

9. Sh. Saugato Sen,Lecturer (Sel.Scale),SOSS - Member<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Registrar, SRE attended the meeting as a Special Invitee.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, Mr. V.K.Arora, Director, EMPC and Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RSD<br />

could not attend the meeting.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Vice-chancellor welcomed the members <strong>of</strong> the Committee and<br />

requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, to present the agenda items.


The following agenda items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 12.1<br />

ACSC 12.1.1<br />

ACSC 12.1.2<br />

ACSC 12.1.3<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 11 TH MEETING<br />

OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON OCTOBER 19, 2004.<br />

The Standing Committee was informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee<br />

(ACSC) held on 19.10.2004 were circulated to the members on<br />

5.12.2004. No comments were received. The Action Taken<br />

Report on the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC was also<br />

placed before the ACSC for information <strong>of</strong> the members.<br />

As decided by the ACSC in its last meeting, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat,<br />

Member-Secretary submitted the details <strong>of</strong> the Certificate<br />

Programmes with an annual enrolment <strong>of</strong> less than 100 students<br />

for the last three years.<br />

The Standing Committee resolved that the programmes sponsored<br />

by external agencies and for which funds have been received by<br />

the University may be continued for the period <strong>of</strong> validity <strong>of</strong><br />

MOU. The Chairman advised the Convenor <strong>of</strong> the Task Force<br />

on Student Support Services to review the programmes where the<br />

admission <strong>of</strong> students is less than 100 at one <strong>of</strong> the forthcoming<br />

meetings <strong>of</strong> the Task Force and make suitable recommendations<br />

for consideration by the ACSC at its next meeting.<br />

ACSC 12.1.3<br />

The Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> and noted the Action Taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR AN ELECTIVE COURSE, MEG 10: ENGLISH<br />

STUDIES IN INDIA, FOR THE M.A. ENGLISH<br />

PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 12.2.1<br />

ACSC 12.2.2<br />

While taking up the item for discussion, Pr<strong>of</strong> Garg requested Dr.<br />

Anju S.Gupta to explain the highlights <strong>of</strong> the elective course<br />

MEG 10: English Studies in India for the 2 nd year students <strong>of</strong><br />

M.A. (English) programme.<br />

After a detailed discussion, the ACSC approved the Phase Zero


Form for the 8-credit elective course ‘MEG 10: English Studies in<br />

India’ for M.A. English programme (Appendix-1).<br />

ITEM NO. 12.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR AN ELECTIVE COURSE, MEG-12: A<br />

SURVEY COURSE IN 20 TH CENTURY CANADIAN<br />

LITERATURE, FOR THE M.A. ENGLISH PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 12.3.1<br />

The item was taken up for discussion. Dr. Anju S.Gupta<br />

explained the details <strong>of</strong> the elective course MEG 12: A Survey<br />

Course in 20 th Century Canadian Literature for M.A. (English)<br />

Programme. She highlighted that in the changing global order, it<br />

would be prudent to provide learners with different options to<br />

choose from.<br />

ACSC 12.3.2<br />

The ACSC approved the Phase Zero Form for the elective course<br />

‘MEG 12: A Survey Course in 20 th Century Canadian Literature’<br />

for M.A. (English) Programme (Appendix-2).<br />

ITEM NO. 12.4<br />

ACSC 12.4.1<br />

ACSC 12.4.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR A NEW COURSE ON “SCIENCE<br />

EDUCATION” FOR B.ED. PROGRAMME.<br />

The Pro-Vice Chancellor requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director,<br />

SOE and Coordinator, B.Ed to explain the objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

introducing a new optional course on Science Education in the<br />

B.Ed. programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sharma informed that it has been<br />

proposed because Science Education is essential for development<br />

<strong>of</strong> critical thinking, particularly in formative years <strong>of</strong> children.<br />

And if teachers are trained in scientific enquiry, the classroom<br />

transactions shall be highly enriched. Moreover, the University<br />

has been receiving requests from the science teachers to include a<br />

course in Science Education.<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor<br />

informed the members that while signing an agreement with<br />

BRAOU for sharing <strong>of</strong> study materials <strong>of</strong> the B.Ed. programme,<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> had received a request for permitting BRAOU to develop<br />

two separate courses on teaching <strong>of</strong> Physical Sciences and<br />

Biological Sciences. He suggested that School <strong>of</strong> Education may<br />

like to consider developing these courses in collaboration with<br />

BRAOU.


ACSC 12.4.3<br />

The Committee considered all aspects <strong>of</strong> the proposal and<br />

resolved that the present proposal needs to be modified to include<br />

subject specific courses <strong>of</strong> the kind developed in the NVS project.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.5<br />

ACSC 12.5.1<br />

ACSC 12.5.2<br />

ACSC 12.5.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR A NEW COURSE ON HEALTH AND<br />

PHYSCIAL EDUCATION FOR B.ED. PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE explained the intent to<br />

introduce an optional course on Health and Physical Education<br />

for B.Ed. programme. He highlighted that Health and Physical<br />

Education is given a lot <strong>of</strong> importance in the teacher education<br />

programme.<br />

The Chairman advised that a programme on Sports Medicine as<br />

desired by the Parliamentary Committee on Education be<br />

developed. The University can collaborate with Sports Authority<br />

<strong>of</strong> India and other Sports Organizations.<br />

It was resolved that progrmme on Sports Medicine be developed<br />

by the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences. The Director, SOHS agreed to<br />

put up a proposal for consideration <strong>of</strong> the University, after<br />

consultations with the Sports Authority <strong>of</strong> India / Sports<br />

Organizations in the country. The School <strong>of</strong> Education’s proposal<br />

was not accepted.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.6<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

EQUIVALENCE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON<br />

08.12.2004.<br />

ACSC 12.6.1<br />

The first meeting <strong>of</strong> the re-constituted Equivalence Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

the University was held on 8.12.2004. A copy <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

the meeting is placed at Appendix-3. The Committee considered<br />

the cases relating to Equivalence received from the different<br />

universities and individuals. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg informed the members<br />

about the major recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee:<br />

1. Granting equivalence to CIC Programmes <strong>of</strong> Dr.<br />

B.R.Ambedkar Open University and Vardhman Mahaveer<br />

Kota Open University with <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s CIC for the purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BCA/MCA programme.<br />

2. To equate the ‘Associate Membership Examination’<br />

awarded by Institution <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineers (India)<br />

Mumbai as equivalent to Graduation for admission to PG


Programmes.<br />

3. To recognize four year Bachelor Degree in Economics<br />

awarded by Faculty <strong>of</strong> Law and Economics <strong>of</strong> Cambodia<br />

for admission to PG Programmes <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

4. To accept the four year Artificer Apprenticeship Training<br />

(Electrical) awarded by INS, Valsura and four year<br />

Artficer Apprenticeship Course in Ship Construction and<br />

Naval Architecture awarded by Wright School,<br />

Vishakhapatnam for the purpose <strong>of</strong> direct admission to<br />

B.A./B.Com. programme.<br />

5. To recognize the Associate Membership Examination<br />

(Section A and B) <strong>of</strong> the Aeronautical Society <strong>of</strong> India,<br />

New Delhi as equivalent to Graduation for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

admission to Management Programme.<br />

6. To Recognize only those Degrees/Diplomas/Certificates<br />

awarded by U.P. Rajarshi Tandon Open University,<br />

Allahabad and Guru Ghasi Das University, Bilaspur<br />

under distance education mode which have the approval <strong>of</strong><br />

the Distance Education <strong>Council</strong><br />

ACSC 12.6.2<br />

ITEM NO. 12.7<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

accepted the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence Committee and<br />

approved its Minutes. The proposal <strong>of</strong> the Committee to meet<br />

least twice a year was appreciated.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR REVISION OF THE FEG-01 COURSE<br />

(FOUNDATION COURSE IN ENGLISH-1) FOR BDP<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

ACSC 12.7.1<br />

ACSC 12.7.2<br />

Dr. Anju S.Gupta explained that the FEG-1 (Foundation Course<br />

in English--1) course for the BDP students is being revised as per<br />

the policy <strong>of</strong> the University for upgrading the content based on<br />

feedback <strong>of</strong> various stakeholders. During the discussion, the Pro-<br />

Vice-Chancellor suggested that learner’s feedback must also be<br />

obtained and incorporated while revising the material.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee after a detailed<br />

discussion approved the Phase Zero Form for FEG-1 (Foundation<br />

Course in English-1) course for the BDP students (Appendix-4).<br />

ITEM NO. 12.8<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN APPROVING THE REVISION OF


FEES FOR POST BASIC B.SC.(N) PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 12.8.1<br />

ACSC 12.8.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Director, SOHS explained the reasons for<br />

initiating action to revise the fees for Post Basic B.Sc.(N)<br />

Programme <strong>of</strong> the University. Referring to the Indian Nursing<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s letter dated 18.5.2004, he pointed out that the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> credits has increased to 108 with corresponding increase in<br />

practical hours. An extensive exercise has been done by the<br />

faculty under the guidance <strong>of</strong> the Pro-Vice Chancellor. The<br />

details were presented to the Vice-Chancellor, who approved the<br />

revised annual fee <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10000/- from January, 2005 session.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee ratified the action<br />

taken by the Vice-Chancellor in revising the annual fees for the<br />

Post Basic B.Sc. (N) Programme to Rs. 10,000/- from January,<br />

2005 session.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.9<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AMENDMENT IN<br />

THE GENERAL RESERVATION POLICY OF THE<br />

UNIVERSITY FOR ADMISSION TO THE PROGRAMMES<br />

REQUIRING WORKING EXPERIENCE.<br />

ACSC 12.9.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the University<br />

has adopted General Reservation Policy for admission to the<br />

programmes requiring working experience and through Entrance<br />

Exam. The reservation has been as follows:<br />

i) Scheduled Caste 15%,<br />

ii) Scheduled Tribes 7½%,<br />

iii) Physically Handicapped 3%<br />

iv) Kashmiri Migrants 1 seat and<br />

v) War Widows/ Wards <strong>of</strong> Ex-Servicemen 5%.<br />

The candidates <strong>of</strong> Reserved Categories, other than SC/ST even if<br />

they figure in the General Merit List, are given admission under<br />

the Reserved Category.<br />

ACSC 12.9.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg also pointed out that a question has arisen whether<br />

working children can be treated as wards under category (v)<br />

above. Strictly speaking, “Ward” means the dependant son or<br />

dependant unmarried daughter. In the B.Ed. programme, the<br />

eligibility is a full time teacher with a graduate degree and 2 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> experience as a teacher in a recognized school. By virtue <strong>of</strong><br />

their being in service, sons/unmarried daughters do not qualify to<br />

be included in the purview <strong>of</strong> the reservation policy. Therefore,


the ‘Wards <strong>of</strong> Ex-servicemen’ should not be eligible for the<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> reservation in admission to the B.Ed. programme.<br />

ACSC 12.9.3<br />

ACSC 12.9.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’ Standing Committee discussed the<br />

proposal in detail and decided that (i) candidates from reserved<br />

categories who figure in general merit list should be treated as<br />

belonging to general category, same as for SC/ST. However, the<br />

‘Wards <strong>of</strong> Ex-servicemen’ be dropped from the purview <strong>of</strong><br />

reservation for admission to the B.Ed. programme.<br />

The Chairman advised Registrar (SR&ED) and Director (SOE) to<br />

incorporate the changes in the prospectus for the next session.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.10<br />

ACSC 12.10.1<br />

ACSC 12.10.2<br />

ACSC 12.10.3<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN APPROVING THE CERTIFICATE IN<br />

ELEMENTARY TEACHER EDUCATION (CETE)<br />

PROGRAMME TO BE LAUNCHED IN THE STATE OF<br />

TRIPURA FROM JANUARY, 2005.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE informed the members that the<br />

School has developed a Certificate Programme in Elementary<br />

Teacher Education (CETE) on the request <strong>of</strong> the State<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Tripura for the training <strong>of</strong> the Graduate teachers<br />

in Upper Primary Schools (Classes VI – VIII).<br />

The programme has three compulsory courses and four electives,<br />

<strong>of</strong> which candidates can take any two. The duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme is six months and the programme fee would be Rs.<br />

4000/-. Since, the programme had to be launched from January,<br />

2005, the Vice-Chancellor approved it as a special case.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee ratified the action<br />

taken by the Vice-Chancellor and approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

(Appendix-5) for the programme.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.11<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN APPROVING THE POST GRADUATE<br />

DIPLOMA IN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND<br />

MANAGEMENT (PGDSLM) FOR HEAD TEACHERS TO<br />

BE LAUNCHED IN AFRICAN COUNTRIES FROM<br />

JANUARY, 2005<br />

ACSC 12.11.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE informed the members that the


School <strong>of</strong> Education has developed a PG Diploma in School<br />

Leadership and Management Programme for Head Teachers in<br />

Project Mode with the funding from Commonwealth Secretariat.<br />

The Programme has been designed to develop essential skills,<br />

competency and capacity to devise strategy for management and<br />

leadership among Head Teachers in order to carry-out their<br />

assigned functions effectively. This 30 credit programme is likely<br />

to be launched in African Countries. The Vice-Chancellor kindly<br />

accorded approval for developing the programme as per the<br />

Phase-3 Form placed at Appendix-6.<br />

ACSC 12.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’ Standing Committee ratified the action<br />

taken by the Vice-Chancellor in approving the PG Diploma in<br />

School Leadership and Management for Head Teachers.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.12<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE INTERCHANGE OF<br />

ONE THEORY COURSE OF 5 TH SEMESTER BY A LAB<br />

COURSE OF 6 TH SEMESTER FOR DIPLOMA IN CIVIL<br />

ENGINEERING (DCLE) AND DIPLOMA IN<br />

ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING<br />

(DEME).<br />

ACSC 12.12.1<br />

ACSC 12.12.2<br />

ITEM NO. 12.13<br />

Dr. Manoj Kulsheshtra explained that the course BCLE-035:<br />

Construction Drawing <strong>of</strong> 5 th Semester has been exchanged with<br />

BTEL-042: Lab-VII (Computer Applications) Course <strong>of</strong> the 6th<br />

Semester in Diploma in Civil Engineering (DCLE) and BET-035:<br />

Construction Plants/Earth Moving Plants/Mechanical Transport<br />

Course <strong>of</strong> 5 th semester by BETL-042: Lab-VII (Computer<br />

Applications) <strong>of</strong> the 6 th Semester <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Electrical and<br />

Mechanical Engineering (DEME) to adjust workload <strong>of</strong> learners.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the revised programme structure <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Civil<br />

Engineering (DCLE) and Diploma in Electrical and Mechanical<br />

Engineering (DEME) as per Appendix-7.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE EVALUATION<br />

SCHEME FOR THE DIPLOMA IN CIVIL ENGINEERING<br />

(DCLE) AND THE DIPLOMA IN ELECTRICAL &<br />

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (DEME).<br />

ACSC 12.13.1<br />

Dr. Manoj Kulsheshtra explained the evaluation scheme for the


Diploma in Civil Engineering (DCLE) and Diploma in Electrical<br />

& Mechanical Engineering (DEME) in detail.<br />

ACSC 12.13.2<br />

The Committee discussed the issues and desired that there is a<br />

need to bring a uniform evaluation scheme for all the programmes<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOET. A Sub-Committee <strong>of</strong> the ACSC, under the<br />

Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the PVC, comprising the following members<br />

was constituted to look into the details and submit its<br />

recommendations at the earliest:<br />

1. Pro Vice Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Registrar, SRED - Member<br />

3. Director, ACD - Member<br />

4. Dr. Manoj Kulsheshtra - Convener<br />

ITEM NO. 12.14<br />

ACSC 12.14.1<br />

ACSC 12.14.2<br />

ITEM NO. 12.15<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF<br />

THE DIPLOMA IN CREATIVE WRITING IN HINDI (DCH).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities has proposed that Diploma in Creative<br />

Writing in Hindi (DCH) be withdrawn because less than 10%<br />

students continued and completed the programme. It therefore is not<br />

cost-effective. The request has been processed through the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Creative Writing in Hindi<br />

(DCH) from January, 2006.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-ZERO FORM<br />

FOR REVISION OF THE FEG-02 COURSE (FOUNDATION<br />

COURSE IN ENGLISH-2)<br />

ACSC 12.15.1<br />

ACSC 12.15.2<br />

Dr. Anju S.Gupta, informed the members that FEG-02 was prepared<br />

in 1988 for the BDP programme. In view <strong>of</strong> the developments<br />

taking place in the last 16 years and the University policy to update<br />

courses, it is proposed to revise the course.<br />

In the revised course, the blocks have been rearranged and passages<br />

have been included from great prose writers like Lamb, Stevenson,


etc. The School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities at its 29 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

approved the proposal for revision <strong>of</strong> the course.<br />

ACSC 12.15.3<br />

ITEM NO. 12.16<br />

ACSC 12.16.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the Phase-Zero Form (Appendix-8) for revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

existing FEG-02 Course (Foundation Course in English-02).<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE GUIDELINES FOR<br />

BCA & MCA PROJECT COURSES PERTAINING TO THE<br />

MAXIMUM DURATION FOR CONDUCT OF VIVA- VOCE.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Registrar, SRE explained the rationale <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposal and reasons for fixing the maximum duration for conduct<br />

<strong>of</strong> viva-voce for BCA and MCA project courses.<br />

ACSC 12.16.2<br />

ACSC 12.16.3<br />

The matter was discussed in detail. It was felt that since the work <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> Project Reports has been decentralized to the Regional<br />

Centres, it would be difficult for the University to store project<br />

reports at the Regional Centres due to paucity <strong>of</strong> space and<br />

workforce. Moreover, the students should be encouraged to<br />

complete the course within stipulated time.<br />

After a detailed discussion on the matter, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee resolved to maintain the status quo ante for the<br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> viva-voce in respect <strong>of</strong> the MCA/BCA project courses.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.17<br />

PREPARATION OF STATE-WISE MERIT LIST IN B.ED.<br />

PROGRAMME FOR THE STATES HAVING MORE THAN<br />

ONE REGIONAL CENTRE.<br />

ACSC 12.17.1<br />

ACSC 12.17.2<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor requested Registrar, SRE to apprise the<br />

members on the proposal. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Registrar, SR&ED<br />

explained that where the University has more than one Regional<br />

Centre in a state, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f points differ substantially and the<br />

candidates <strong>of</strong> one Regional Centre possessing higher score than the<br />

last admitted candidate in the other Regional Centre are deprived <strong>of</strong><br />

the admission to the programme. In order to give due recognition to<br />

merit and bring in greater uniformity, it would be prudent to draw<br />

state-wise merit list in such cases.<br />

The item was taken up for discussion. It was pointed out that where<br />

ever a state has more than one Regional Centre they cater to areas <strong>of</strong><br />

the other states also. Therefore, the proposal <strong>of</strong> state-wise merit list<br />

can be made applicable only in cases where the Regional Centres


cater to the same state.<br />

ACSC 12.17.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee resolved that the<br />

University may continue with the existing practice.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.18<br />

ACSC 12.18.1<br />

ACSC 12.18.2<br />

HOLDING OF THE 16 TH CONVOCATION.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 16 th<br />

Convocation will be held on March 5, 2005 at Headquarters as well<br />

as at 22 Regional Centres simultaneously through the<br />

Teleconferencing mode for awarding Gold Medals, Degrees,<br />

Diplomas and Certificates to the candidates who have successfully<br />

completed all requirements and qualified for the award during the<br />

examinations held in December, 2003 and June, 2004. He also<br />

informed the members that in its 31 st meeting, <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

has authorized the Standing Committee to approve the award <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Degrees/Diplomas at the Convocation, henceforth, so that an<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting need not be called for this purpose only.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg further said that a total <strong>of</strong> 71299 candidates given in<br />

the Appendix have become eligible for the award <strong>of</strong><br />

degrees/diplomas/certificates. Moreover, Dr. Kamil Idris, Director,<br />

WIPO shall be conferred with D.Litt. (Honoris Causa) and Dr. G.<br />

Madhavan Nair, Chairman, ISRO shall be conferred with D.Sc.<br />

(Honoris Causa).<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee noted the details <strong>of</strong><br />

the students as mentioned in Appendix-9 who had qualified for<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> Degrees/Diplomas/Certificates and University<br />

Medals at the 16 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University and approved<br />

the same with Doctorate Degrees (Honoris Causa) to Dr. Idris<br />

and Dr. Nair.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.19<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR THE REVISION OF THE APPLICATION<br />

ORIENTED COURSE IN RADIO LEKHAN [AWR (H)-1]<br />

FOR BDP STUDENTS.<br />

ACSC 12.19.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

Application Oriented Course in Radio Lekhan [AWR(H)-1]for<br />

BDP students was developed in 1990. Since then significant<br />

developments have taken place in the use <strong>of</strong> Radio for delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

Education because <strong>of</strong> its enhanced reach. Therefore, the School<br />

convened Course Expert Committee which had recommended


changes in view <strong>of</strong> contemporary requirements. The School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities has already approved the<br />

proposal.<br />

ACSC 12.19.2<br />

ITEM NO. 12.20<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee appreciated the<br />

initiative and approved the Phase Zero Form (Appendix-10) for<br />

the Revision <strong>of</strong> the Application Oriented Course in Radio Lekhan<br />

[AWR (H)-1] for BDP students.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO<br />

FORM FOR THE REVISION OF THE APPLICATION<br />

ORIENTED COURSE IN FEATURE WRITING IN<br />

HINDI [AFW (H)-1] FOR BDP STUDENTS.<br />

ACSC 12.20.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

like AWR (H)-1, Feature Writing in Hindi [AFW(H)-1] for BDP<br />

students was also developed in 1990 as an Application Oriented<br />

Course. In view <strong>of</strong> the changes in the use <strong>of</strong> media for education<br />

and the general policy <strong>of</strong> the University to relook into courses<br />

produced prior to 1998, the School convened Course Expert<br />

Committee to suggest changes. The Committee has<br />

recommended inclusion <strong>of</strong> news media, news editing and<br />

editorials, arts and film reviews, community related features and<br />

urban life in the course.<br />

ACSC 12.20.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the Phase Zero Form (Appendix-11) for the Revision <strong>of</strong><br />

the Application Oriented Course in Feature Writing in Hindi<br />

[AFW(H)-1] for BDP students.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.21<br />

ACSC 12.21.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CHANGE IN<br />

NOMENCLATURE OF PGDAPP TO PGDRPPM.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education has proposed that the title <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Post Graduate Diploma in Audio Programme Production<br />

(PGDAPP) be changed to Post Graduate Diploma in Radio<br />

Programme Production and Management (PGDRPPM). He<br />

explained that on the advice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

the programme was widened, by including community radio and<br />

management and marketing aspects <strong>of</strong> radio. Subsequently,


Programme Experts have suggested that the title <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme may be changed from Post Graduate Diploma in<br />

Audio Programme Production (PGDAPP) to Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Radio Programme Production and Management.<br />

ACSC 12.21.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’ Standing Committee considered the<br />

proposal and decided that a Sub-Committee comprising PVC,<br />

Director (SOCE), Director (SOH) and Programme Coordinators<br />

may consider the issue in detail and submit its recommendations<br />

to the Vice Chancellor for decision.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.22 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE LINEAR<br />

MOVEMENT - FOR MCA STUDENTS ACROSS THE<br />

SEMESTERS BY CHANGING SEMESTER WISE<br />

REGISTRATION TO YEAR WISE REGISTRATION.<br />

ACSC 12.22.1<br />

ACSC 12.22.2<br />

ITEM NO. 12.23<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sinclair, Director, SOCIS explained that the linear<br />

movement for MCA students envisages academic continuity and<br />

students can move from 1 st semester to 2 nd semester, 2 nd semester<br />

to 3 rd semester and so on. Moreover, fees payment will also<br />

change from semester-wise registration to year-wise registration.<br />

This would help learners to minimize transactions and focus on<br />

their studies. However, the material would be dispatched<br />

semester-wise. The issue had also been discussed in the Task<br />

Force (SSS) and the School Board, SOCIS.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> annual registration. However a student<br />

could register for 2 nd year (3 rd & 4 th Semester) even if not all<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> 1 st or 2 nd semester have been completed.<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN EXTENDING THE PROVISION OF<br />

RE-ADMISSION TO B.ED. PROGRAMME STUDENTS.<br />

ACSC 12.23.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that there was no<br />

provision for re-admission in B.Ed. programme after completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> maximum duration <strong>of</strong> the programme. Since, the facility <strong>of</strong> reregistration<br />

is available to the students in all other programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

the University; requests have been received to extend this facility<br />

to B.Ed. programme as well. For uniformity, Vice-Chancellor<br />

allowed re-registration to a student.


ACSC 12.23.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee ratified the action<br />

taken by the Vice-Chancellor. It further directed that the<br />

guidelines for re-registration for B.Ed. programme be developed<br />

by the School <strong>of</strong> Education and SRED.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.24<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AWARD OF<br />

DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY TO MS. BIMLA<br />

KAPOOR (ENRL. NO.PHD-024957610).<br />

ACSC 12.24.1<br />

ITEM NO. 12.25<br />

ACSC 12.25.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’ Standing Committee considered the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Examiners and approved the<br />

award <strong>of</strong> Degree <strong>of</strong> Doctor <strong>of</strong> Philosophy to Ms. Bimla Kapoor<br />

(Enrol. No. PHD-024957610).<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE DECLARATION OF<br />

COMPLETION OF PROGRAMME AND RELAXATION<br />

OF VALIDITY PERIOD OF REGISTRATION<br />

CONSEQUENT UPON WITHDRAWAL OF<br />

REQUIREMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS IN CERTIFICATE<br />

PROGRAMMES.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pradeep Sahni, Registrar, SRE explained to the members<br />

that w.e.f. July 2003, requirement <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> assignments<br />

in certificate programmes has been withdrawn. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 13 th November 2004 further<br />

decided that the students who were admitted to certificate<br />

programmes prior to July 2003 and could not complete the<br />

programme due to non-submission <strong>of</strong> assignments should also be<br />

declared successful if, they have secured at least ‘D’ grade in the<br />

Term End Examination.<br />

ACSC 12.25.2<br />

While implementing the decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, it has<br />

been discovered that the validity <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> many students<br />

admitted prior to July 2003 had expired, and therefore their result<br />

could not be declared. It is proposed that such students may be<br />

given one time relaxation to extend the validity <strong>of</strong> their<br />

registration and their results may be declared.<br />

ACSC 12.25.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the proposal.


ITEM NO. 12.26<br />

TO CONSIDER THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR<br />

ADMISSION TO THE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 12.26.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Registrar, SRE informed the members that<br />

Regional Director (Delhi-I) has sought clarification whether a<br />

non-matriculate candidate having six years <strong>of</strong> experience is<br />

eligible for admission to the Diploma in Management<br />

Programme, although the qualification stipulated for such<br />

candidates is non-graduates. He also read out the response <strong>of</strong><br />

Director (SOMS) to whom the case was sent for clarification and<br />

guidance.<br />

ACSC 12.26.2<br />

The item was taken up for discussion. The Chairman advised that<br />

no person without a first Degree should be admitted to a PG<br />

Diploma/ Degree Programme, as per the policy laid down by the<br />

Distance Education <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ACSC 12.26.3<br />

It was clarified that, as such, DIM is not a PG Diploma.<br />

Moreover, DIM holders are not eligible to register for PG<br />

Diploma Programme, specialization Diplomas and the MBA<br />

Programme, unless they obtain a graduate degree.<br />

ACSC 12.26.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee resolved that the<br />

status quo in the eligibility criteria for the Management<br />

Programme be maintained. Registrar (SR & E D) should take up<br />

the matter with the Director (School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies) to<br />

lay down a minimum qualification, say 10 + 2, for non-graduates<br />

with six years <strong>of</strong> experience. The recommendations may be<br />

submitted to Vice-Chancellor for his consideration and decision.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.27<br />

ACSC 12.27.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CHANGE OF<br />

ADMISSION CYCLE FOR THE CTPM PROGRAMME<br />

FROM JANUARY TO JULY FROM THE YEAR 2006<br />

ONWARDS.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sinclair, Programme Coordinator, explained that counseling<br />

for AMT-01 course, which is also on <strong>of</strong>fer in BDP as an<br />

Application Oriented Course, has to be done along with CTPM


due to scarcity <strong>of</strong> appropriate counselors. The counseling for<br />

BDP students with effect from 2006 will be held from July to<br />

November. Therefore, to allow the counseling sessions to<br />

coincide for both intakes, it was necessary to change the<br />

admission cycle <strong>of</strong> the programme from January to July.<br />

ACSC 12.27.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee approved the<br />

proposal for cost-effectiveness and requirements <strong>of</strong> counseling.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.28<br />

ACSC 12.28.1<br />

ACSC 12.28.2<br />

ACSC 12.28.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AWARD OF MBA<br />

DEGREE FOR STUDENTS ADMITTED TO PGSDM<br />

UNDER ‘DIRECT ENTRY SCHEME”.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Registrar, SRE explained that according to<br />

the rules applicable between 1991 and 1996, students having<br />

Master’s Degree were admitted to Post Graduate Specialization<br />

Diplomas in four functional areas under the direct entry scheme.<br />

Such students could, after completing specialization PG Diploma,<br />

enroll. for MBA after clearing entrance test like other applicants.<br />

They were eligible for credit transfer and w.e.f. 1997, entrance<br />

test was made mandatory. A few students, who registered for<br />

PGSDM Direct Entry, continued to register for the remaining<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> the MBA, without qualifying the entrance test, under<br />

the same enrolment number and completed all courses required<br />

for the award <strong>of</strong> MBA way back in 2001. This came to notice in<br />

2002 and the award <strong>of</strong> the degree was withheld for three students<br />

as they did not fulfil the mandatory requirement <strong>of</strong> qualifying the<br />

entrance test. The matter was examined by the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Studies and the students were advised to appear in<br />

the entrance test (Openmat) for MBA programme and clear it.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> these students (Sh. M.S.Sudheer) appeared in the entrance<br />

test (OPENMAT) and was admitted in January, 2004 batch <strong>of</strong><br />

MBA. On expiry <strong>of</strong> the Ist semester, he applied for credit<br />

transfer, which has been granted by the University and he has<br />

become eligible for MBA degree. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sahni proposed that Shri<br />

Sudeer be awarded MBA degree.<br />

ACSC 12.28.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered the<br />

proposal and approved the award <strong>of</strong> MBA degree to the students<br />

admitted to PGSDM under “Direct Entry Scheme” subject to the<br />

condition they qualify mandatory eligibility condition <strong>of</strong> clearing<br />

the OPENMAT.


ITEM NO. 12.29<br />

TO REPORT THE MINUTES OF THE 6 TH MEETING OF<br />

THE RESEARCH COUNCIL HELD ON 13 TH JANUARY,<br />

2005 FOR INFORMATION AND APPROVAL.<br />

ACSC 12.29.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the Members that<br />

the 6th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> was held on 13 th<br />

January, 2005. The main recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> were:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

(v)<br />

Ph.D. programmes in English and Hindi.<br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> its Sub-Committee on Ph.D.<br />

programme in Physics and Mathematics.<br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> its Sub-Committee on Ph.D.<br />

programme in History, Economics, Tourism Studies<br />

and Library Science.<br />

Remuneration for Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. thesis.<br />

Continuation <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. programme for M.Phil. degree<br />

holders.<br />

ACSC 12.29.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee noted the Minutes<br />

(Appendix-12) <strong>of</strong> the 6 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.30<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE FORMAT OF<br />

DEGREE TO BE AWARDED TO THE STUDENTS OF<br />

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PH.D.) PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 12.30.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered three<br />

alternatives and approved the format <strong>of</strong> Doctor <strong>of</strong> Philosophy<br />

(Ph.D.) Degree as placed at Appendix-13.<br />

ITEM NO. 12.31<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR<br />

PERMITTING STUDENTS OF PG DIPLOMA/DIPLOMAS


TO APPEAR IN TEE IN JUNE AFTER A STUDY OF SIX<br />

MONTHS, INSTEAD OF AFTER THE MINIMUM<br />

DURATION OF THE PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 12.31.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice Chancellor, informed the members that<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Sciences has pointed out that students <strong>of</strong> PG<br />

Diplomas/Diplomas are allowed to appear in TEE after a study <strong>of</strong><br />

one year. This is likely to extend the minimum duration <strong>of</strong><br />

completion <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma. The School has proposed that they<br />

should be allowed to appear in TEE after a study <strong>of</strong> six months<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> waiting till December.<br />

ACSC 12.31.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> permitting the students to appear in TEE<br />

in the June after a study <strong>of</strong> six months. It directed that the<br />

Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies should clearly give the details <strong>of</strong> the courses<br />

for which a student would be permitted to appear after six months<br />

<strong>of</strong> study. Moreover, it should be ensured that no student should<br />

be able to complete the programme before expiry <strong>of</strong> the minimum<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the programme. These instructions are to be clearly<br />

reflected in the prospectus/programme guides.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswant)<br />

Member-Secretary


Appendix-3<br />

(To Resolution No. 33.4.4)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 13 th MEETING (EMERGENT) OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL’S STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 4 TH MARCH 2005 AT<br />

3.00 PM IN THE BOARD ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARDHI,<br />

NEW DELHI – 110 068<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Director, SOHS - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, Director, SOMS - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS - Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOCE - Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE - Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, SOSS - Member<br />

9. Mr. V.K.Arora, Director, EMPC - Member<br />

10. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RS - Member<br />

11. Dr. Anju S. Gupta, Reader, SOH - Member<br />

12. Sh. Saugato Sen,Lecturer (Selection Grade),SOSS - Member<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Registrar, SR&ED attended the meeting as a Special Invitee<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Vice-Chancellor welcomed the members <strong>of</strong> the Committee and<br />

requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro-Vice-Chancellor to present the item.


ITEM NO. 13.1<br />

TO CONSIDER THE AWARD OF DIPLOMAS/DEGREES<br />

OF PGDDE/MADE STUDENTS RESPECTIVELY IN THE<br />

OLD SCHEME OF METHODOLOGY.<br />

ACSC 13.1.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro-Vice Chancellor informed the members the<br />

reason for calling the emergent meeting <strong>of</strong> the Standing<br />

Committee and requested the Registrar, SR&ED to place the<br />

Agenda before the members.<br />

ACSC 13.1.2<br />

The Registrar, SR&ED Division reported that the DDE (PGDDE)<br />

was launched in 1987 and MADE in 1993. In order to complete<br />

the Programme successfully, a student needed to secure a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> ‘D’ grade in Assignments, ‘D’ grade in term-end<br />

examinations (TEE) and an overall ‘C’ grade. This methodology<br />

continued till 1994. However, in its 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

11.7.1994 the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided that a student must<br />

secure a minimum <strong>of</strong> ‘D’ grade in Assignments and ‘C’ grade in<br />

TEE to successfully complete a course. Also, in order to<br />

complete the Programme successfully, the student must pass each<br />

course in the programme. The revised methodology however<br />

could not be implemented in the SR&ED. And the students who<br />

secured ‘D’ grade in the TEE but an overall ‘C’ grade have been<br />

declared successful in PGDDE as well as MADE. So far 229<br />

students <strong>of</strong> PGDDE and 29 students <strong>of</strong> MADE, who were given<br />

admission from 1995 onwards secured ‘D’ grade in the TEE and<br />

Diplomas//Degrees have been awarded to them.<br />

The Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deliberated on<br />

the matter in detail and expressed deep concern. It decided that<br />

accountability be fixed on the <strong>of</strong>ficial(s) who failed to incorporate<br />

the decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> taken on 11.7.1994. However,<br />

it was <strong>of</strong> the view that cancellation <strong>of</strong> Diplomas/Degrees awarded<br />

already may lead to many legal complications. Therefore, it<br />

decided that in accordance with the Principle <strong>of</strong> Natural Justice,<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> the Diplomas/Degrees awarded as per the unrevised


methodology be noted and reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Further, the members advised the Registrar (SR&ED) to<br />

incorporate the revised methodology <strong>of</strong> PGDDE and MADE<br />

immediately and implement the same for the students who have<br />

been admitted from January 2004 onwards with the addition that<br />

an overall ‘C’ grade would be required for successful completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a course. The component on overall grade seems to have been<br />

inadvertently left out <strong>of</strong> the recording <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 11 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. It was also decided that the<br />

methodology <strong>of</strong> evaluation being applied by SR&ED for all the<br />

programmes be circulated to the respective Schools for<br />

confirmation and authentication.<br />

The Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> recommended that<br />

Ordinance incorporating ‘D’ grade in assignment, ‘C’ grade in<br />

TEE and ‘C’ grade in overall be placed before the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> for its consideration and decision.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswat)<br />

Member-Secretary


Appendix-4<br />

(To Resolution No. 33.5.4)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 14 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 29 TH APRIL, 2005 AT 11.30 A.M. IN THE<br />

CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI –<br />

110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, Director, SOMS - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOCE - Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, SOSS - Member<br />

7. Mr. V.K.Arora, Director, EMPC - Member<br />

8. Dr. Anju S. Gupta, Reader, SOH - Member<br />

9. Sh. Saugato Sen,Lecturer (Selection Grade),SOSS - Member<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Director, SOHS and Dr.<br />

C.K.Ghosh, Director, RS could not attend the meeting. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar,<br />

SR&ED attended the meeting as a Special Invitee.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist<br />

the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the meeting and requested Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor to present the agenda items.


The following agenda items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 14.1 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 12 TH AND<br />

13 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE AND NOTE THE ACTION<br />

TAKEN THEREON.<br />

ACSC 14.1.1<br />

The Standing Committee was informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

the 12 th and 13 th <strong>Meeting</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee (ACSC) held on 21.2.2005 and<br />

4.3.2005, respectively were circulated to the members.<br />

Comments received from one <strong>of</strong> the members were readout.<br />

The Action Taken Report on the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 12 th and 13 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC was also placed before the ACSC for<br />

information <strong>of</strong> the members.<br />

ACSC 14.1.2<br />

The Standing Committee did not agree to the observations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the member. It further desired that the Registrar, SR&E<br />

may ensure that the evaluation methodology being applied<br />

by SR&E should be in consonance with the decisions taken<br />

by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> from time to time. Necessary<br />

action may be initiated for compiling the decisions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for implementation in consultation with<br />

the Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies.<br />

ACSC 14.1.3<br />

The Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

confirmed the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 12 th and 13 th <strong>Meeting</strong>s subject<br />

to the above directions and noted the Action Taken thereon.


ITEM NO.14.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL<br />

FOR ALLOWING CREDIT TRANSFER TO THE<br />

CANDIDATES WHO COULD NOT COMPLETE THE<br />

PROGRAMME IN MAXIMUM DURATION PLUS<br />

TWO YEARS RE-ADMISSION PERIOD IN CASES<br />

OF PROGRAMMES OF SIX MONTHS AND ONE<br />

YEAR DURATION.<br />

ACSC 14.2.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained the item in<br />

detail. The issue relating to the period <strong>of</strong> completing the<br />

programmes after re-admission was also discussed. It was<br />

noticed that the period allowed after re-admission is two<br />

years irrespective <strong>of</strong> the maximum duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and is in continuation <strong>of</strong> the earlier registration.<br />

A pro-rata fee is charged from such students for left over<br />

courses.<br />

ACSC 14.2.2<br />

The Committee recommended that students enrolled in<br />

Certificates, Diploma and Degree Programmes be allowed a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> six months, one year and two years beyond the<br />

maximum period to appear on pro-rata basis for completing<br />

left over courses. If they fail to do so in extended period,<br />

they will be required to seek re-admission. However, to<br />

facilitate such learners to earn certificate/diploma/degree,<br />

the Standing Committee considered the proposal to allow<br />

Credit Transfer for the courses that have been completed<br />

with the following conditions:<br />

a) The student has to take admission afresh in the<br />

programme like other students by fulfilling the<br />

admission criteria and paying requisite fee for the<br />

programme.<br />

b) He/She has to apply to the University for transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

the credits earned by him/her under the old<br />

enrolment with applicable fee.<br />

c) Full credit transfer may be allowed if the syllabus<br />

and methodology now in vogue are similar to that<br />

governing the student under the old enrolment.<br />

d) The Certifications shall be awarded corresponding to<br />

the semester in which he/she completes all the


courses.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3<br />

FORM FOR POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN THE<br />

STUDY OF PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT OF<br />

DISPLACEMENT, RESETTLEMENT AND<br />

REHABILITATION (PGDMRR).<br />

ACSC 14.3.1<br />

The Programme Co-ordinator, Dr. Madhu Bala highlighted<br />

the salient features <strong>of</strong> the programme including the<br />

integrated mode.<br />

ACSC 14.3.2<br />

The Standing Committee desired that the Progrmme<br />

Coordinator should re-look the number <strong>of</strong> Study Centres<br />

where this programme will be <strong>of</strong>fered in view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experience with the certificates programme.<br />

ACSC 14.3.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee constituted a<br />

sub-committee to look into the above aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme with the directions to submit its<br />

recommendations to the Standing Committee for its<br />

considerations in its next meeting:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni - Member<br />

Director, SOSS<br />

3. Dr. C.K.Ghosh - Member<br />

Director, RSD<br />

4. Dr. Madhu Bala - Member<br />

Reader, SOSS<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat - Convenor<br />

Director, ACD<br />

ITEM NO. 14.4<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3<br />

FORM FOR ELECTIVE COURSES IN M.A.<br />

SOCIOLOGY.


ACSC 14.4.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the M.A. Programme in<br />

Sociology at its meeting held on November 21, 2003. The<br />

faculty is now seeking approval for four elective courses to<br />

be <strong>of</strong>fered in the 2nd year <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

ACSC 14.4.2<br />

Programme Coordinator, Dr. Debal K. Singha Roy informed<br />

the Committee that while considering the elective courses<br />

“MSOE-001: Sociology <strong>of</strong> Education, MSOE-002: Diaspora<br />

and Transnational Community, MSOE-003: Sociology <strong>of</strong><br />

Religion and MSOE-004: Urban Sociology”, the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences directed the faculty to<br />

seek the guidance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Tulsi Patel, to finalize the<br />

contents. The modified courses were approved by the<br />

School Board at its 35 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22.3.2005.<br />

ACSC 14.4.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

and approved the Phase-3 Form (Appendix-1) for the<br />

modified elective courses <strong>of</strong> M.A.Programme in Sociology.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.5<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN WITHDRAWING THE BIT/ADIT<br />

PROGRAMMES OF THE UNIVERSITY.<br />

ACSC 14.5.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that BIT<br />

Programme was launched by the University in 1999 under<br />

the Virtual Campus Initiative Project in collaboration with<br />

Edexcel, U.K. The MoU with Edexcel expired in 2004.<br />

Moreover, the enrollment in the BIT as well as ADIT<br />

programmes has greatly reduced over the years. The School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOCIS at its meeting held on February 16, 2005<br />

recommended the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> BIT/ADIT programme<br />

from July, 2005 session. The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCIS have been approved by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor.


ACSC 14.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee ratified the<br />

action taken by the Vice Chancellor in withdrawing the<br />

BIT/ADIT programme from July, 2005 session.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.6 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE<br />

WITHDRAWAL OF PPC (PREPARATORY<br />

PROGRAMME IN COMPUTING) FROM BCA AND<br />

MCA PROGRAMMES, BOTH OLD AND NEW<br />

SYLLABUS.<br />

ACSC 14.6.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the<br />

Committee that the students <strong>of</strong> computer programmes who<br />

had not studied mathematics as a distinct subject at +2 level<br />

were required to opt and successfully complete the PPC<br />

(Preparatory Programme in Computing) in the 1st year <strong>of</strong><br />

BCA/MCA programme till July, 2004 cycle. Thereafter,<br />

consequent upon the introduction <strong>of</strong> CS-60 (8 Credits) in<br />

MCA (Revised) syllabus from January, 2005, and its<br />

replacement by MTE-03 (4 Credits) in BCA from July,<br />

2005, PPC has been withdrawn. This was approved by the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 19.10.2004.<br />

ACSC 14.6.2<br />

ACSC 14.6.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS informed that<br />

subsequent to the abovementioned decision <strong>of</strong> the ACSC,<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCIS has suggested that if any<br />

student fails to successfully complete the PPC by June,<br />

2006, he/she should be advised to re-register for MTE-03 or<br />

CS-60, as the case may be, by paying pre-requisite fee i.e.<br />

Rs. 600/- and Rs. 700/-, respectively.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

the proposal <strong>of</strong> the School for not conducting <strong>of</strong> the PPC<br />

examination after June 2006 TEE and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCIS. It<br />

however, directed that all the students concerned be<br />

informed by the School.


ITEM NO. 14.7 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE<br />

WITHDRAWAL OF PG CERTIFICATE IN RURAL<br />

SURGERY (PGCRS).<br />

ACSC 14.7.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students admitted in PG Certificate in Rural<br />

Surgery during the last admission session was very low and<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOHS has recommended withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

PG Certificate in Rural Surgery in its present form.<br />

ACSC 14.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee accepted the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the School Board and approved<br />

withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the PG Certificate in Rural Surgery (PGCRS)<br />

from the Students’ Handbook and Prospectus,2006.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.8<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3<br />

FORM FOR POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN<br />

COMMUNITY CARDIOLOGY.<br />

ACSC 14.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the PG<br />

Diploma in Community Cardiology submitted by the School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Health Sciences addresses the felt need <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

population and is being developed in collaboration with<br />

Narayan Hiradalaya, Bangalore.<br />

ACSC 14.8.2<br />

While approving the proposal, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s<br />

Standing Committee advised that in view <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the programme, its requirement <strong>of</strong> face to face contact hours<br />

for counseling and hands-on skill development under<br />

supervision and guidance <strong>of</strong> trained and qualified<br />

cardiologists the School should develop sound<br />

implementation policy.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.9<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3<br />

FORM FOR CERTIFICATE IN HEALTH &<br />

ENVIRONMENT.<br />

ACSC 14.9.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the


Committee that SOHS has revised the Certificate<br />

Programme in Health & Environment, because <strong>of</strong> low<br />

enrollement. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee<br />

advised that a Committee chaired by the PVC may look into<br />

the matter in totality and submit its recommendations.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.10<br />

ACSC 14.10.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ELIGIBILITY<br />

CRITERIA FOR BCA PROJECT EVALUATORS.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor apprised the members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the eligibility criteria recommended by the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Computer and Information Science for the examiners <strong>of</strong><br />

project components (CS-11 and CS-76) <strong>of</strong> BCA<br />

programme.<br />

ACSC 14.10.2<br />

The Committee appreciated the concern <strong>of</strong> the School for<br />

quality. However, it observed that the University may not<br />

get requisite number <strong>of</strong> experts with given qualifications<br />

and it may become difficult to declare the results in time.<br />

ACSC 14.10.3<br />

After detailed discussions, it was decided that full time<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> AICTE recognized institutions with a minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> two years experience be considered for project<br />

evaluation.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.11<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE VALIDITY OF<br />

THE PERIOD OF RE-REGISTRATION OF<br />

STUDENTS ENROLLED IN THE UNREVISED MCA<br />

PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 14.11.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the<br />

MCA (96 Credits) programme was launched in 1994 with a<br />

minimum duration <strong>of</strong> 3 years and maximum duration <strong>of</strong> 7<br />

years. In January 2005 the MCA programme has been<br />

completely revised and is much different from the earlier<br />

version, in its content and structure. He further informed<br />

that the issue <strong>of</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> the registration <strong>of</strong> students in the<br />

old MCA programme was discussed in the Task Force on<br />

Student Support Services. Based on its decision and further


discussion with the Task Force, the scheme for re-admission<br />

has been prepared.<br />

ACSC 14.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

and approved the scheme placed at Appendix-2 for readmission<br />

to MCA for the students who had registered for<br />

MCA (old syllabus)<br />

ITEM NO. 14.12 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE PROVIDING<br />

ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO EXERCISE OPTION<br />

FOR ALTERNATIVE COURSE FOR MTE-1,4 & 5 BY<br />

THE STUDENTS OF JANUARY 1996, JANUARY 1997<br />

AND JANUARY 1998 BATCHES OF BCA OLD<br />

SYLLABUS.<br />

ACSC 14.12.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that MTE-01<br />

(4 credits), MTE-04 and 05 (2 credits each) are the<br />

compulsory courses for the BCA old syllabus students<br />

admitted in January 1996, 1997 and 1998 cycles. With the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> new syllabus for BCA from July 1998 cycle,<br />

admission to BCA old syllabus has been dispensed with. A<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> students have failed to successfully<br />

complete the mathematics courses MTE-01, 04 and 05 even<br />

after repeated attempts. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee at its 7 th meeting held on 15.2.2003 considered<br />

and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Computer and<br />

Information Sciences for <strong>of</strong>fering alternative courses in lieu<br />

<strong>of</strong> MTE-01, 04 and 05. Accordingly, CS-601 (4 credits) in<br />

lieu <strong>of</strong> MTE-01 and CS-60 (8 credits) in lieu <strong>of</strong> MTE-01, 04<br />

and 05 was <strong>of</strong>fered as a one time opportunity. In response<br />

829 students (BCA old syllabus) opted for new courses i.e.<br />

CS-601 and / or CS-60 after payment <strong>of</strong> requisite fees.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> these students have successfully completed the<br />

alternative courses and their BCA degree. However, 440


students, who could not exercise the option for opting CS-<br />

60 or CS-601 at that time, are still not in a position to clear<br />

their BCA degree because <strong>of</strong> non clearance <strong>of</strong> MTE-01, 04<br />

and 05 though all computer courses have been cleared.<br />

These students completed the maximum duration <strong>of</strong> 6 years<br />

in December, 2001 and December 2002 and the extended<br />

period <strong>of</strong> another two years in December 2003 and<br />

December 2004, respectively. Since, there is no provision as<br />

<strong>of</strong> now for further extension beyond two years.<br />

ACSC 14.12.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee discussed the<br />

matter and decided that the students <strong>of</strong> BCA <strong>of</strong> 1996 and<br />

1997 batches may be given opportunity to opt CS 601<br />

and/or CS 60 after payment <strong>of</strong> requisite fee as a very special<br />

case since they have already earned 88 to 94 credits.<br />

ACSC 14.12.3<br />

The Committee further directed that it may not be treated as<br />

precedence and SOCIS should insert a sentence<br />

safeguarding the interest <strong>of</strong> the University in Programme<br />

Guide/Student’s Handbook and Prospectus such as “rules<br />

applicable from time to time shall apply”.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.13<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3<br />

FORM FOR DIPLOMA IN VALUE ADDED<br />

PRODUCTS FROM HORTICULTURE (FRUITS &<br />

VEGETABLES).<br />

ACSC 14.13.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained the<br />

highlights <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Value Added Products from<br />

Horticulture (Fruits & Vegetables) in Project mode.<br />

ACSC 14.13.2<br />

The Chairman informed the members that Pr<strong>of</strong>. Panjab<br />

Singh one <strong>of</strong> the proposers <strong>of</strong> the programme has been<br />

appointed as Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> Banaras Hindu University.<br />

The members joined the Chairman in congratulating him for<br />

the achievement.<br />

ACSC 14.13.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered


and approved the Phase-3 (Appendix-3) Form for Diploma<br />

in Value Added Products from Horticulture (Fruits &<br />

Vegetables) with the suggestion that the nomenclature<br />

approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture be<br />

retained as such.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.14<br />

ACSC 14.14.1<br />

TO REPORT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN ADDING ‘CATEGORY-3’IN THE<br />

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION TO<br />

BCA PROGRAMME PERTAINING TO<br />

CANDIDATES OF 10+2 VOCATIONAL STREAM<br />

IN COMPUTER TECHNIQUES.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee noted the<br />

action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in adding Category-3 in<br />

the eligibility criteria for admission to BCA programme<br />

pertaining to candidates <strong>of</strong> 10 + 2 vocational stream. The<br />

ACSC also decided that the qualifications approved by the<br />

Equivalence Committee which are not Traditional<br />

Qualifications may be included in this Category.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.15<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

SUB-COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED BY THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL’S STANDING COMMITTEE TO FRAME<br />

UNIFORM EVALUATION SCHEME FOR ALL<br />

PROGRAMMES OF SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY.<br />

ACSC 14.15.1<br />

ACSC 14.15.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained to the<br />

members that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee<br />

at its 12 th meeting held on 21.2.2005 while considering the<br />

evaluation scheme for Diploma in Civil Engineering and<br />

Diploma in Electrical and Mechanical Engineering desired<br />

that a uniform evaluation scheme be developed for all the<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology and<br />

constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> PVC<br />

and consisting <strong>of</strong> Director, ACD, Registrar, SRE, and Dr.<br />

Manoj Kulsheshtra, Reader, SOET.<br />

The Sub-Committee deliberated the issues involved at its<br />

meeting held on April 13, 2005. The Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> which include its recommendations are placed at<br />

Appendix-4.


ACSC 14.15.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee and<br />

desired that the SRED should implement all the decisions<br />

relating to evaluation methodology strictly as per the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> from time to time.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.16 TO REPORT THE MATTER REGARDING<br />

FRAMING OF COMPREHENSIVE GUIDELINES IN<br />

RESPECT OF THE PROCEDURE TO BE<br />

FOLLOWED FOR GRANT OF ACADEMIC LEAVE<br />

TO TEACHERS AND ACADEMICS OF THE<br />

UNIVERSITY.<br />

ACSC 14.16.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the<br />

Vice-Chancellor had appointed a Committee consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Director, SOHS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.R.Khan,<br />

SOSS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Swaraj Basu, SOSS Member BOM with Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD as Convener to frame<br />

comprehensive guidelines in respect <strong>of</strong> procedure to tbe<br />

followed for grant <strong>of</strong> academic leave to teachers and<br />

academics <strong>of</strong> the University. The main recommendations <strong>of</strong><br />

the Committee are placed at Appendix-5.<br />

ACSC 14.16.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

and approved the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.17 TO RATIFY AND APPROVE THE MINOR<br />

CHANGES IN COURSE OUTLINES OF MHI-01 AND<br />

MHI-05 FOR MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMME IN<br />

HISTORY.<br />

ACSC 14.17.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> course materials, minor changes<br />

were made by the course writers and content editors. The<br />

changes suggested were incorporated with the approval <strong>of</strong><br />

the School Board at its 35 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22.3.2005.<br />

ACSC 14.17.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee noted and<br />

ratified the changes in the course outlines <strong>of</strong> MHI-01 and


MHI-05 for Master’s Degree Programme in History.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.18<br />

TO CONSIDER THE MATTER RELATING TO BCA-<br />

MCA INTEGRATED PROGRAMME FOR<br />

ADMISSION CYCLE – JULY 2003 BATCH OF<br />

STUDENTS.<br />

ACSC 14.18.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 29 th meeting held on June 23, 2003<br />

while considering the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 8 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACSC held on 9 th April, 2003, approved the change <strong>of</strong><br />

admission cycle for BCA programme from January to July<br />

w.e.f. July 2003, However, the admission to MCA<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> the University continued to be from January<br />

cycle. The students who were admitted in July 2003 batch<br />

and wish to be admitted would become eligible for<br />

admission to MCA 3 rd semester from July 2006 but MCA<br />

3 rd semester would not be on <strong>of</strong>fer at that time Since, the<br />

admission cycles for both BCA and MCA programmes are<br />

not the same.<br />

ACSC 14.18.2<br />

The matter was considered by the School <strong>of</strong> Computer and<br />

Information Science and it has proposed that the admission<br />

cycle for MCA may be shifted to July 2006 and not to have<br />

January 2006 session so that the BCA students <strong>of</strong> July 2003<br />

batch would have no problems for admission to the MCA<br />

3 rd semester from July 2006. To begin the session in time, it<br />

is essential that all admission related matters be finalized by<br />

May 2006 and materials should reach the students latest by<br />

June 2006. If it is not possible, the option <strong>of</strong> increasing the<br />

minimum period for MCA/BCA programme from 5 to 5½<br />

years may be considered.<br />

ACSC 14.18.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

the matter in detail and decided that the matter should be<br />

discussed in the meeting <strong>of</strong> the Task Force on SSS and an<br />

administrative decision may be taken. While discussing the


matter in the Task Force, the view point <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Computer and Information Sciences be kept in mind.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.19<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINIMUM PASS<br />

MARKS FOR THE MEG STUDENTS ENROLLED IN<br />

2001 FOR EACH COMPONENT I.E., ASSIGNMENT<br />

AND TERM END EXAMINATION (TEE).<br />

ACSC 14.19.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that while<br />

approving the M.A. in English programme, <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> considered that a student should secure a minimum<br />

<strong>of</strong> 40% marks in both TEE as well as in Assignments to<br />

clear each course <strong>of</strong> the programme. However, due to<br />

inadvertent omission, the Student’s Handbook and<br />

Prospectus 2001 supplied to the students mentioned that<br />

students were required to secure 35% marks in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

components i.e. TEE and Continuous Evaluation, which was<br />

a printing error which went un-noticed at that time.<br />

ACSC 14.19.2 The students <strong>of</strong> 2001 batch who secured less than 40%<br />

marks in either component were not declared successful and<br />

were advised to re-submit the assignments or to re-appear in<br />

TEE. These students, quoting the percentage contained in<br />

prospectus 2001 are demanding that M.A. English Degree<br />

be awarded to them on the basis <strong>of</strong> 35%.<br />

ACSC 14.19.3<br />

The item was discussed in detail. The members desired that<br />

University should ensure that all the decisions taken by the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> on evaluation methodology <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programmes be followed strictly by the SRE Division and<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Studies should exercise due care in such matter.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee decided that<br />

the students <strong>of</strong> 2001 batch who have not yet completed the<br />

programme be informed about the stipulated condition <strong>of</strong><br />

40% marks in each <strong>of</strong> the component as the minimum<br />

qualifying marks and advised to take examination again.


Director, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities should fix responsibility for<br />

the error which has caused inconvenience to learner and<br />

problems for the University.<br />

ITEM NO. 14.20 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE<br />

CANCELLATION OF DEGREES AWARDED TO<br />

MCA STUDENTS INADVERTENTLY IN 16 TH<br />

CONVOCATION.<br />

ACSC 14.20.1<br />

Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE informed the<br />

members that in June 2004 the Division detected tampering<br />

<strong>of</strong> the computer records for the awards <strong>of</strong> December 2003<br />

TEE in respect <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the BCA/MCA students.. A<br />

complaint was lodged with the police promptly. However,<br />

the s<strong>of</strong>tware used by the Division automatically transfers the<br />

enrollment number <strong>of</strong> a candidate once he/she clears all<br />

courses in the given programme, to the list <strong>of</strong> successful<br />

candidates for Convocation. When tempering <strong>of</strong> the records<br />

was discovered, the enrollment numbers <strong>of</strong> suspected<br />

students in BCA programme were deleted from the<br />

convocation list but inadvertently this skipped attention and<br />

was not done in the case <strong>of</strong> 39 MCA students and 5<br />

BCA/MCA Integrated Programme students. A list <strong>of</strong><br />

students is placed at Appendix –6.<br />

ACSC 14.20.2<br />

The Vice-Chancellor expressed serious concern and advised<br />

that there should be no such lapse as it is intimately<br />

connected to the credibility <strong>of</strong> the evaluation process.<br />

ACSC 14.20.3 The Registrar, SRE proposed that the degrees awarded to 31<br />

students <strong>of</strong> MCA and 5 students <strong>of</strong> BCA/MCA Integrated<br />

Mode be cancelled and the degrees <strong>of</strong> 8 students be<br />

modified by changing the TEE as June 2004 instead <strong>of</strong><br />

December 2003. The students concerned will be advised to<br />

return the degrees awarded to them in the 16 th Convocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the University for necessary action.


ACSC 14.20.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

the proposal and approved that the degrees wrongly<br />

awarded at the 16 th Convocation to the students mentioned<br />

in Appendix-6 may be treated as withdrawn till the students<br />

complete all the requirements for the award <strong>of</strong> degree.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswat)<br />

Member-Secretary


Appendix-5<br />

(To Resolution No. 33.6.2)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 15 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 29 TH JUNE, 2005 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE<br />

BOARD ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K. Agarwal, Director, SOHS - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Director, EMPC - Member<br />

5. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RSD - Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS - Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong> M.C. Sharma, Director, SOE - Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOCE - Member<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma.Kanjilal, SOSS - Member<br />

10. Sh. Saugato Sen,Lecturer (Selection Grade),SOSS - Member<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, Director, SOMS and Dr. Anju S.Gupta could not attend the meeting.<br />

Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SR&ED attended the meeting as a Special Invitee.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist<br />

the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the meeting and congratulated the<br />

Registrar, SRE for successful completion <strong>of</strong> the Term end Examination June, 2005. He<br />

also placed on record the contributions made by Sh. V.K.Arora, Former Director, EMPC<br />

in the deliberations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee and welcomed the<br />

new Director, EMPC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik as the Member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee.


The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, to present the agenda<br />

items.


The following agenda items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO.1<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 14 TH MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S STANDING COMMITTEE<br />

(ACSC) AND NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

ACSC 15.1.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C. Garg, PVC informed the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee (ACSC) that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> its 14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

29.4.2005 were circulated to the Members. Comments have been<br />

received from the Registrar, SR&ED suggesting that the word reregistration<br />

be substituted by re-admission in Resolution No. 14.11.2<br />

(Page No.8) and year 1998 be added to Resolution No. 14.12.2. (Page<br />

No.9).were read out.<br />

ACSC 15.1.2<br />

The Standing Committee accepted the first amendment as such and<br />

the second amendment was adopted with modification in that<br />

January, 1998 be added.<br />

The revised Resolutions will read as follows:<br />

“14.11.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered<br />

and approved the scheme placed at Appendix-2 for re-admission to<br />

MCA for the students who had registered for MCA (old syllabus)”.<br />

“14.12.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee discussed the<br />

matter and decided that the students <strong>of</strong> BCA <strong>of</strong> 1996, 1997 and<br />

January, 1998 batches may be given opportunity to opt CS 601 and/or<br />

CS 60 after payment <strong>of</strong> the requisite fee as a very special case since<br />

they have already earned 88 to 94 credits”.<br />

ACSC 15.1.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee confirmed the Minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC with the amendments above. The<br />

committee also noted the action taken on various items.<br />

ITEM NO.2<br />

ACSC 15.2.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

OF MSO-002: RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES AND<br />

METHODS.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had approved the course MSO-002:<br />

Research Methodologies and Methods in its meeting held on


20.12.2001 and the same was also approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

at its meeting held on 21.11.2003. However, during the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the course, the course writers and editors felt a need for reorganization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the units. Thus, the number <strong>of</strong> blocks in the course<br />

has been reduced from 9 to 8. The proposal has been examined and<br />

approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences in its<br />

meeting held on 22.3.2005.<br />

ACSC 15.2.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the Phase Zero Form <strong>of</strong> MSO-002: Research<br />

Methodologies and Methods Course (Appendix-1).<br />

ITEM NO.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINIMUM PASS<br />

MARKS FOR THE MEG STUDENTS ENROLLED IN 2001<br />

FOR BOTH ASSIGNMENTS AND TERM END<br />

EXAMINATIONS (TEE).<br />

ACSC 15.3.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, explained that while launching<br />

the M.A. English programme, the University had approved a scheme<br />

requiring students to secure a minimum <strong>of</strong> 40% marks in both Term<br />

end Examinations as well as in continuous assessment for successful<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> each course in the programme. However, due to an<br />

inadvertent omission the Student’s Handbook and Prospectus 2001<br />

supplied to the students carried the information that students were<br />

required to secure 35% marks in each component. It was, however,<br />

noticed before the 2002 admissions, and corrected at that time. The<br />

students <strong>of</strong> 2001 batch who have secured less than 40% marks but<br />

more than 35% marks in either component have not been declared<br />

successful.<br />

ACSC 15.3.2<br />

ACSC 15.3.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg mentioned that some such students may resort to legal<br />

action by quoting the relevant provisions <strong>of</strong> the Students’ Handbook<br />

and Prospectus 2001. The School <strong>of</strong> Humanities has recommended<br />

that to avoid legal complications, a one time exception may be made.<br />

The ACSC considered the matter in detail and approved the proposal<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOH to declare pass all those MEG students <strong>of</strong> 2001 batch who<br />

got a minimum <strong>of</strong> 35% marks in assignments and the term-end<br />

examination as an exceptional, one time measure. The ACSC also<br />

recommended that the <strong>Academic</strong> Programme Committee should<br />

review various Phase Forms, and should have the detailed evaluation<br />

methodology with the minimum marks required for clearing a course


and for awarding divisions or grades included in the Phase-3 Form<br />

also. The Committee also directed that the responsibility may be<br />

fixed on the Programme Coordinator(s) for such a major slip.<br />

ITEM NO.4<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE POLICY GUIDELINES<br />

FOR CREDIT TRANSFER IN CEMBA/CEMPA<br />

PROGRAMMES.<br />

ACSC 15.4.1<br />

ACSC 15.4.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Coordinator, CEMBA explained that<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> in association with Commonwealth <strong>of</strong> Learning and Open<br />

Universities <strong>of</strong> Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka developed and<br />

launched the Commonwealth Executive Master <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Administration and Public Administration (CEMBA/CEMPA)<br />

programmes in the year 2002. The admission to these programmes is<br />

based on the merit in the ‘entrance test’ (CEMAT).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kaushik also explained that these programmes have a common<br />

curriculum and the same entry, delivery and evaluation systems have<br />

been envisaged. She argued that the Credit Transfer <strong>of</strong> courses<br />

completed by the students <strong>of</strong> the programmes above would facilitate<br />

learners to pursue studies anywhere in collaborating countries, and<br />

provisions for this have been made by the <strong>Academic</strong> Board <strong>of</strong><br />

CEMBA/CEMPA.<br />

The Chairman also informed the members that in its last meeting, the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> SAARC Consortium <strong>of</strong> Open and Distance<br />

Learning (SACODIL) has recommended Credit Transfer and<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> first degrees to facilitate migration <strong>of</strong> students among<br />

member countries.<br />

ACSC 15.4.3<br />

ACSC 15.4.4<br />

ITEM NO.5<br />

During the discussion, the Chairman cautioned that while accepting<br />

the proposal for Credit Transfer <strong>of</strong> the students <strong>of</strong> CEMBA/CEMPA,<br />

the University should ensure that the students have fulfilled all the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> External Affairs relating to migration.<br />

The ACSC approved in principle the Credit Transfer Policy for<br />

CEMBA/CEMPA students..<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

EQUIVALENCE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON<br />

03.06.2005.


ACSC 15.5.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that in its second<br />

meeting held on 3.6.2005, the re-constituted Equivalence Committee<br />

resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> as follows:<br />

(1) treat one year Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Technology Bridge Course in<br />

Computer and Electrical Engineering <strong>of</strong>fered by MDU,<br />

Rohtak as a pr<strong>of</strong>essional qualification for admission to<br />

Management Programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

(2) not to accept five years Diploma in Architecture awarded<br />

by Sushant School <strong>of</strong> Art and Architecture (SSSA),<br />

Gurgaon.<br />

(3) consider the highest qualifications <strong>of</strong> a candidate for<br />

admission to academic programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

(4) equate BPP <strong>of</strong> Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University<br />

with <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BPP for the purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to<br />

various academic programmes where prescribed eligibility<br />

criteria is BPP from <strong>IGNOU</strong> subject to the condition that<br />

VMOU has adopted <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Evaluation Methodology<br />

for BPP.<br />

(5) ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

recognizing one sitting B.A. Degree from Andhra<br />

University, Vishakhapatnam for admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

Post Graduate Programems subject to the condition that<br />

candidates were enrolled for the programme before 1995-<br />

96 and completed their first degree by 1998-99.<br />

(6) ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor for treating<br />

educational qualifications awarded by private universities<br />

established under provisions <strong>of</strong> Chattisgarh Niji Kshetra<br />

Vishwavidyalya (Sthapana Aur Viniyamna) Adhiniyam,<br />

2002 as non est and de-recognizing them for admission to<br />

higher studies with <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

(7) ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BIT Programme as a pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

qualification for the purpose <strong>of</strong> eligibility for admission to<br />

Management Programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

(8) refer the Associate Membership Examination <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Metals (IIM), Calcutta i.e “Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

Metallurgy” for admission to Management Programme to<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies.


ACSC 15.5.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the items at Sl. No. 1, 2,4 to 8 as<br />

recommended by the Equivalence Committee. However, Item No. 3<br />

was referred back to the Equivalence Committee for re-consideration<br />

as it might give impression that BPP is equivalent to 10 + 2.<br />

ACSC 15.5.3<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence<br />

Committee (Appendix-2) with the above specific recommendations.<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

ACSC 15.6.1<br />

ACSC 15.6.2<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

ACSC 15.7.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PERMISSION FOR<br />

SIMULTANEOUS ADMISSION TO THE MASTER’S<br />

PROGRAMME IN DIETETICS AND FOOD SERVICE<br />

MANAGEMENT (M.SC.DFSM) AND THE CERTIFICATE<br />

PROGRAMME IN FOOD AND NUTRITION<br />

(CFN)/CERTIFICATE IN NUTRITION AND CHILD CARE<br />

(CNCC)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

University is launching M.Sc. (Dietetics and Food Service<br />

Management) from July, 2005 and the minimum qualifications<br />

prescribed for a holder <strong>of</strong> graduation or an equivalent degree in any<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> Science, Health Care, Medical, Pharmaceutical, Catering<br />

entail that they must have the Certificate in Food and Nutrition (CFN)<br />

or Certificate in Nutrition and Child Care (CNCC) or Diploma in<br />

Nutrition and Health Education (DNHE). However, the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Continuing Education has proposed that CFN or CNCC <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> should be made co-requisite rather than pre-requisite for<br />

such candidates.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the proposal for permitting<br />

simultaneous admission to CFN or CNCC and the Master’s<br />

Programme in Dietetics and Food Service Management subject to<br />

payment <strong>of</strong> fee for both the programmes.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RELAXATION IN THE<br />

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR ADMISSION TO<br />

THE POST GRADUATE CERTIFICATE PROGRAMME IN<br />

COPY EDITING AND PROOFREADING.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, informed the members that the<br />

educational qualification for admission to the PG Certificate<br />

Programme in Copy Editing and Pro<strong>of</strong>reading is graduation with<br />

English as one <strong>of</strong> the subjects and familiarity with Computers. The


University is receiving requests from individuals that English should<br />

not be made a compulsory subject in graduation for eligibility to<br />

admission. The School has pointed out that even for M.A. English<br />

programme, the University does not envisage English as a<br />

compulsory subject in graduation. Also, there are leading<br />

newspaper/publication houses which do not require English as a<br />

compulsory subject in graduation for their tasks. The School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities at its 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 28.5.2005<br />

decided that the condition <strong>of</strong> English being a mandatory subject at<br />

graduate level for admission to the programme be relaxed.<br />

ACSC 15.7.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the proposal.<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR REVISION OF THE EHD-05: AADUNIK BHARTIYA<br />

SAHITYA: NAVJAGRAN AUR RASHTRIYA ANDOLAN<br />

COURSE.<br />

ACSC 15.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the Members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities has submitted the Phase Zero Form for revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the EHD-05: Aadunik Bhartiya Sahitya: Navjagran Aur Rashtriya<br />

Andolan course for the BDP students. The course is being revised to<br />

enhance analytical assessment capabilities <strong>of</strong> learners through a study<br />

<strong>of</strong> literature on great Indian writers, understand modernity,<br />

awakening and different facets <strong>of</strong> independence struggle.<br />

ACSC 15.8.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form for<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> the EHD-05 placed at Appendix-3 with the specific<br />

directions that the revised programme be made available to students<br />

by July 2006.<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO OFFER<br />

POST-GRADUATE COURSES DEVELOPED BY OTHER<br />

DISCIPLINES AS ELECTIVE COURSES IN M.A.<br />

(ECONOMICS).<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO OFFER<br />

POST-GRADUATE COURSES DEVELOPED BY OTHER<br />

DISCIPLINES AS ELECTIVE COURSES IN M.A.<br />

(SOCIOLOGY) PROGRAMME.


ITEM NO.11<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL OF THE<br />

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DISCIPLINE TO OFFER THE<br />

COURSES DEVELOPED BY OTHER DISCIPLINES IN PG<br />

DIPLOMA IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME AS<br />

ELECTIVE.<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE POST-GRADUATE<br />

COURSES DEVELOPED BY OTHER DISCIPLINES TO BE<br />

ON OFFER IN M.A. (PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION)<br />

PROGRAMME AS ELECTIVE COURSES.<br />

Agenda Items No. .9 to .12 were considered simultaneously.<br />

ACSC 15.9-12.1<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Social Sciences has submitted proposals to <strong>of</strong>fer post graduate<br />

courses (PG) developed by other disciplines as elective courses in<br />

M.A. Economics, Sociology, Public Administration and PG Diploma<br />

in Disaster Management. The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS while approving<br />

the proposals had recommended that a minimum <strong>of</strong> 75% <strong>of</strong> total<br />

credits must be earned in the main discipline. And such <strong>of</strong>ferings may<br />

help enhance the horizon <strong>of</strong> our learning and is in keeping with<br />

emerging trends in developed countries.<br />

ACSC 15.9-12.2<br />

For efficient logistic support, it was considered necessary that the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> courses to be adopted from other related disciplines may<br />

be restricted to not more than 2 and worth not more than 8 credits.<br />

However, relevant components from the related discipline could be<br />

imbedded in mainstream courses <strong>of</strong> the adopting discipline.<br />

ACSC 15.9-12.3<br />

The ACSC decided that the Task Force should examine the<br />

operational details and a Committee appointed by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Pro Vice-Chancellor may<br />

examine the academic issues.


ITEM NO.13<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE CHANGES IN TITLE OF<br />

FIVE UNITS OF MPA-011 (A CORE COURSE IN M.A.<br />

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION) AND DELETION OF TWO<br />

UNITS FROM THE COURSE STRUCTURE APPROVED<br />

EARLIER.<br />

ACSC 15.13.1<br />

Pro Vice-Chancellor Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg mentioned that the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on May 27,<br />

2005, on the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the course writers has approved the<br />

change in the titles <strong>of</strong> following five units <strong>of</strong> MPA-011: A Core<br />

Course in M.A. Public Administration to avoid overlapping and relate<br />

these contextually:<br />

Original Original Title<br />

Unit No.<br />

3 Issues and<br />

Challenges<br />

12 Approaches to<br />

State and<br />

Administration<br />

14 Relationship<br />

between<br />

Bureaucracy and<br />

Administration<br />

17 Challenges before<br />

Bureaucratic<br />

Paradigm<br />

20 Role <strong>of</strong> Non-<br />

Bureaucratic<br />

Actors<br />

Revised Revised Title<br />

Unit No.<br />

3 Changing Role <strong>of</strong> the State:<br />

Issues and Challenges<br />

11 Changing Nature <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

State<br />

13 Contemporary Contexts <strong>of</strong><br />

Indian Bureaucracy<br />

15 Challenges to Traditional<br />

Bureaucratic Paradigm<br />

18 Role <strong>of</strong> Governmental<br />

Institutions.<br />

The School Board also approved the proposal for deletion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following two units from the course structure approved earlier.<br />

Unit 4:<br />

Unit 15:<br />

Changing Role <strong>of</strong> the State<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> Alternative Forms <strong>of</strong> Agencies in<br />

Administration


ACSC 15.13.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the changes in the titles <strong>of</strong> the<br />

five units and deletion <strong>of</strong> two units from the course structure <strong>of</strong> MPA-<br />

011. The revised course structure is placed at Appendix-4.<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE POLICY DOCUMENT<br />

ON THE PROJECTS FOR PROFESSIONAL AND SKILL<br />

ORIENTED COURSES OF THE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL<br />

SCIENCES.<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

ACSC 15.14-15.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE INTRODUCTION OF<br />

PROJECT WORK OF 4 CREDITS FOR MLIS PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kanjilal informed that the ACSC at its 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

May 20 th , 2004, while considering the introduction <strong>of</strong> Project Work<br />

<strong>of</strong> 4 credits for MLIS Programme had suggested that a school-wise<br />

policy on project report/dissertation for pr<strong>of</strong>essional and skill oriented<br />

courses be framed. The School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences has proposed that<br />

for Certificate Courses projects should be optional and not more than<br />

4 credits for Diploma and Degree Programmes, the project could be<br />

worth 4-8 and 8-12 credits, respectively.<br />

ACSC 15.14-15.2<br />

ACSC 15.14-15.3<br />

During the discussion, it was also pointed out that the ACSC in that<br />

meeting had constituted a sub-committee to look into the matter and<br />

frame uniform guidelines for the project work across the schools and<br />

disciplines.<br />

The ACSC considered the proposal and approved the project course<br />

for the MLIS programme worth 4 credits. It further resolved to refer<br />

the policy note to the above sub-committee for its consideration, with<br />

the suggestion that as far as possible no project should be <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />

Certificate Programmes, a Diploma may have project work not more<br />

than 4 credits. For two year Degree Programme worth 64-72 credits,<br />

project worth may by up to 8 credits and for three years degree<br />

programmes, the project worth 12-16 credits could be <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />

ITEM NO.16<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for Two Optional<br />

Courses namely MPSE-012 and MPSE-013 in 2 nd year <strong>of</strong> M.A.<br />

(Political Science) from July, 2006.<br />

ACSC 15.16.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor presented the item relating to<br />

Phase Zero Form for two optional courses namely MPSE-012 and


MPSE-013 in 2 nd year <strong>of</strong> M.A. (Political Science) from July, 2006.<br />

He also mentioned that these courses are being prepared in project<br />

mode in collaboration with the Australia India <strong>Council</strong>. The Phase<br />

Zero Form and the contents <strong>of</strong> the courses MPSE-012: State and<br />

Society in Australia and MPSE-013: Australia’s Foreign Policy have<br />

been approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS at its 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held<br />

on May 27, 2005.<br />

ACSC 15.16.2<br />

The ACSC considered the proposal and approved the Phase Zero<br />

Form (placed at Appendix-5) for the introduction <strong>of</strong> two new<br />

courses mentioned above in 2 nd year <strong>of</strong> M.A. Political Science.<br />

However, it directed that the programme coordinators be advised to<br />

submit detailed syllabi <strong>of</strong> the courses in future.<br />

ITEM NO.17 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CHANGE IN<br />

NOMENCLATURE OF DEGREES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING<br />

PROGRAMMES OF SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY.<br />

ACSC 15.17.1<br />

ACSC 15.17.2<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg explained that in the<br />

Notification no. IG/SRE-Ex.III/UGC/2205 dated 15.12.2004, in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> degrees <strong>of</strong> Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Technology (Construction<br />

Management) and Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Technology (Water Resources<br />

Engineering), the word `Civil’ has been inadvertently missed out in<br />

the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> degrees mentioned in the above notification.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the proposal for adding the word Civil before the<br />

specialization.<br />

ITEM NO.18<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE INCLUSION OF<br />

DIPLOMA AWARDED BY COLLEGE OF MILITARY<br />

ENGINEERING (CME), PUNE IN THE ENTRY<br />

QUALIFICATION FOR THE ADMISSION TO B.TECH<br />

PROGRAMMES.<br />

ACSC 15.18.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineering Technology has submitted the proposal for inclusion <strong>of</strong><br />

two year Diploma awarded by the College <strong>of</strong> Military Engineering<br />

(CME), Pune in the entry qualification for the admission to B.Tech.<br />

Programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The qualification for B.Tech Programme <strong>of</strong><br />

the University is 3 years polytechnic diploma.


ACSC 15.18.2<br />

The ACSC considered the proposal and referred it to the Equivalence<br />

Committee for examination <strong>of</strong> the course content and other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

the Diploma awarded by CME, Pune.<br />

ITEM NO.19<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE AWARD OF MBA DEGREE<br />

TO 8 STUDENTS ADMITTED TO PGSDM UNDER ‘DIRECT<br />

ENTRY SCHEME’.<br />

ACSC 15.19.1<br />

Dr. S.K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE explained that between the year<br />

1991 to 1996 there was a provision for admission to PGSDM under<br />

the ‘Direct Entry Scheme’ without entrance test. The students who<br />

were admitted under the Direct Entry Scheme were also eligible to<br />

take admission in Master <strong>of</strong> Business Administration programme<br />

subject to the condition that they clear the “Entrance Test”. However,<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> the students (116 as <strong>of</strong> now) admitted to PGSDM “Direct<br />

Entry Scheme” continued to re-register for the remaining courses <strong>of</strong><br />

MBA stream under the same enrolment number. Out <strong>of</strong> these, 14<br />

even completed 21 or more courses way back in 2001 and the<br />

University has declared their results. But, only 8 students have<br />

completed the 21 courses in proper combination which otherwise<br />

makes them eligible for the award <strong>of</strong> MBA degree. The University in<br />

consultation with the School advised the students who have cleared<br />

21 papers to clear the mandatory entrance test for award <strong>of</strong> degree.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the students had cleared the Entrance Test and has been<br />

awarded Degree in the 16 th Convocation.<br />

ACSC 15.19.2<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the students Shri Ajit Pratap Singh, instead <strong>of</strong> complying with<br />

the advice <strong>of</strong> the University approached the Consumer Dispute<br />

Redressal Forum, Chittorgarh and State Consumer Forum, Jaipur.<br />

The Consumer Forums passed orders for award to MBA degree along<br />

with a fine <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10000/-.<br />

ACSC 15.19.3<br />

The ACSC considered the proposal in the light <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

mentioned facts and approved (i) the award <strong>of</strong> MBA degree to the 8<br />

PGSDM “Direct Entry Students” who have completed the 21 courses<br />

in proper combination which makes them eligible for award <strong>of</strong> MBA<br />

degree as a one time measure, (ii) the data <strong>of</strong> remaining PGSDM<br />

students in the SRE should be blocked so that they are not permitted<br />

to write the term end examination <strong>of</strong> the courses other than the ones<br />

registered for PGSDM “Direct Entry”, (iii) the students should be<br />

advised to qualify the OPENMAT and choose the correct


combination <strong>of</strong> courses for award <strong>of</strong> the MBA degree, and (iv) the<br />

SRE Division should exercise greater caution in all such cases before<br />

issuing Hall tickets/decaling results.<br />

ITEM NO.20<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE TO ALLOW FIRST AND<br />

SECOND BATCHES STUDENTS OF M.A. ENGLISH TO<br />

TAKE MEG-01 AS COMPULSORY SUBJECT NOT AS<br />

ADDITIONAL SUBJECT.<br />

ACSC 15.20.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH explained that at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

launching <strong>of</strong> M.A. English programme in 2001, MEG-01 was<br />

envisaged as a compulsory course for the Ist year students but it could<br />

not be developed. The students <strong>of</strong> 2001 & 2002 batches were<br />

therefore <strong>of</strong>fered MEG-01 as an additional course. But w.e.f. 2003, it<br />

has been a compulsory course for M.A. English students. A number<br />

<strong>of</strong> students enrolled prior to 2003 and who have not completed the<br />

programme have requested that they should also be allowed to<br />

complete MEG-01 as a compulsory course and not as an additional<br />

course. The proposal was considered and approved by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOH at its meeting held on May 27, 2005.<br />

ACSC 15.20.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the proposal to allow first and<br />

second batch students <strong>of</strong> M.A. English to take MEG-01 as a<br />

compulsory course and not as an additional course.<br />

ITEM NO.21<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE REVISION OF THE<br />

SYLLABUS OF M.A. (HINDI), COMPULSORY COURSE –<br />

‘ADHUNIK HINDI KAVYA’ (MHD-2).<br />

ACSC 15.21.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parakh, Director, SOH explained that the MHD-02 (8 credits) is<br />

a compulsory course and entails study <strong>of</strong> 14 poets and their 90<br />

poems. The feedback from the learners and academic counselors in<br />

the last three years shows that the workload is heavy; equivalent to 12<br />

credits. The Expert Committee convened to overview the contents in<br />

the light <strong>of</strong> feedback appreciated the initiative <strong>of</strong> the faculty and<br />

suggested to include only major poets and their poems in Anthology<br />

for certification purposes. The Anthology was prepared but the


students were not informed about the number <strong>of</strong> poets and their<br />

poems needed for compulsory readings and the poems to be included<br />

for reference only.<br />

ACSC 15.21.2<br />

To rectify the same, it is proposed that the poets and poems listed in<br />

Appendix-6 may be included in the course for certification. The<br />

proposal was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOH at its meeting<br />

held on May 27,2005.<br />

ACSC 15.21.3<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the proposal for revision <strong>of</strong><br />

syllabus <strong>of</strong> MHD-2 ‘Adhunik Hindi Kavya’.<br />

ITEM NO. .22<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR REVISION OF EEG-7: UNDERSTANDING DRAMA.<br />

ACSC 15.22.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that in view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University policy to revise the existing courses developed prior to<br />

1998, the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities has submitted Phase Zero Form for<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> EEG-7: Understanding Drama course for the Bachelor’s<br />

Degree Programme. The proposal was approved by the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOH at its 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on May 27, 2005. With this revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> syllabus, the study <strong>of</strong> drama will become more broad based by<br />

bringing African Drama and Hindi Drama in English translation.<br />

ACSC 15.22.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Appendix-7) for revision <strong>of</strong> the course EEG-7: Understanding<br />

Drama.<br />

ITEM NO.23<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO<br />

ALLOW CHANGE OF REGION TO THE SPOUSES OF<br />

GOVERNMENT AND PSU OFFICIALS AND TEACHERS<br />

WORKING IN CENTRAL/STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

SCHOOLS IN CASE OF B.ED. PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 15.23.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the University<br />

has been receiving the requests for the change <strong>of</strong> region from students<br />

<strong>of</strong> B.Ed. programme for familial or pr<strong>of</strong>essional reasons. Recently,


the University decided to fill vacant seats in a region by allowing<br />

learners from adjoining states to enroll. The facility <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong><br />

region has been exercised for teachers-learners belonging to Defence<br />

Personnel and Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the<br />

upper limit <strong>of</strong> 100 seats. The Task Force at its 193 rd meeting held on<br />

6.6.2005 recommended that facility could be extended to the spouses<br />

<strong>of</strong> Govt. servants and Public Sector Undertaking <strong>of</strong>ficials, including<br />

NVS teachers, subject to the condition that not more than 100 teacher<br />

learners are enrolled in a year in a centre.<br />

ACSC 15.23.2<br />

During the discussion, the Vice-Chancellor advised the Registrar,<br />

SRE to collect relevant data from the study centres and Task Force<br />

should analyze details to enable decision making consistent with<br />

NCTE guidelines.<br />

ACSC 15.23.3<br />

The ACSC directed that till such analysis is presented to it, the<br />

existing provision should continue.<br />

ITEM NO.24 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE EVALUATION<br />

METHODOLOGY FOR B.Sc. (NAUTICAL SCIENCE).<br />

ACSC 15.24.1<br />

ACSC 15.24.2<br />

Dr. Ashish Agarwal, Programme Coordinator explained the<br />

Evaluation Methodology developed by the School in consultation<br />

with Director General, Shipping for the B.Sc. (Nautical Science)<br />

Programme. Dr. Ashish Agarwal highlighted that the minimum pass<br />

percentage will be 40% for continuous assessment as well as for term<br />

end examination for academic and qualifying courses, 50% for<br />

workshop lab and pr<strong>of</strong>essional courses, and 70% for pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

courses with chart work as given in Appendix-8.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Evaluation Methodology for<br />

B.Sc. (Nautical Science) programme with the clarification that the<br />

pass percentage pertains to each component <strong>of</strong> evaluation.<br />

ITEM NO.25<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN APPROVING ADMISSION TO HIGHER<br />

MODULE OF DPE PROGRAMME IN ANTICIPATION OF<br />

RESULT.<br />

ACSC 15.25.1<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg explained that the Task


Force at its 195 th meeting held on 20.6.2005 recommended that<br />

students enrolled in DPE programme be governed by the practice<br />

followed for other programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> and suggested that these<br />

students may be permitted to enroll in higher modules <strong>of</strong> DPE as per<br />

University policy for other programmes. The Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Task<br />

Force were approved by the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

ACSC 15.25.2<br />

The ACSC considered and ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in approving admission to Higher Modules <strong>of</strong> DPE as per<br />

the University policy for other programmes. .<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswat)<br />

Member-Secretary


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY FOURTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

January 17, 2006<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THRITY FOURTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON JANUARY 17, 2006 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE<br />

CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI,<br />

NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> Members present and those who could not attend the <strong>Meeting</strong> is given in<br />

Appendix-1.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 34 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He specially welcomed the following new members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and emphasized that he looked forward to their co-operation and<br />

valuable contribution to the deliberations in the meetings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.C.Katyal<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S. Narang<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshree<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda<br />

10. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

11. Sh. S.B.Sharma<br />

12. Dr. T.K.Jena<br />

13. Dr. Anu J.Thomas<br />

14. Dr. H.K.Shee<br />

15. Dr. Eisha Kannadi<br />

16. Sh. N.Venkateswarlu<br />

17. Dr. M.K.Salooja<br />

18. Sh. T.R.Srinivasan<br />

The Chairman also placed on record <strong>Council</strong>’s appreciation for the academic<br />

contributions made by the following retiring members:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.S.Hassan<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik


6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.Aslam<br />

7. Dr. Subhasis Maji<br />

8. Sh. Akshay Kumar<br />

9. Dr. Anju Sehgal Gupta<br />

10. Ms. Poonam Bhusan<br />

11. Sh. Saugato Sen<br />

12. Mrs. Rita Sarkar<br />

13. Dr. Ved Goel<br />

14. Dr. Sanjeev Pandey<br />

15. Dr. Neelam Choudhary<br />

In his introductory remarks, the Chairman apprised the members that with the appointment <strong>of</strong><br />

faculty, and the academic staff, the Schools <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Law, the National Centre for<br />

Innovations in Distance Education, and the Inter-University Consortium for Technology<br />

Enabled Flexible Education and Development approved in the 10 th Plan proposal have been<br />

activated. He further added that the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its 83 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> had approved<br />

the proposal to operate the provision for appointment <strong>of</strong> Emeritus Pr<strong>of</strong>essors/Visiting<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essors/Fellows <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. He further informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the exercise <strong>of</strong> revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> courses has been internalized and placed on record his appreciation for the faculty, the<br />

Directors <strong>of</strong> Schools and the Pro Vice-Chancellor. The Chairman also informed the<br />

members that a major initiative for developing national digital repository <strong>of</strong> existing courses<br />

has been undertaken and some <strong>of</strong> the new and revised courses/programmes have been put.<br />

Efforts are now being made to blend these with video-streaming to enrich their quality.<br />

The members appreciated the various new initiatives. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur advised<br />

that the NCIDE should go beyond distance education and document existing best practices<br />

/innovations so as to avoid reinventing the wheel and develop a programme in Innovations in<br />

collaboration with Schools/Centres within and outside the University. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhav Menon<br />

opined that since integrated approach to knowledge constitutes innovation, there is a need <strong>of</strong><br />

integrating law education with other areas <strong>of</strong> knowledge i.e. engineering<br />

/technology/management, environment, international law. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.C. Katyal underlined the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> Public-Private Partnership (P-3) to promote innovation. He also suggested<br />

that credibility and acceptability <strong>of</strong> the ODL System in agriculture education shall be<br />

determined by its role in facilitating transfer <strong>of</strong> technology to the farmers from the lab. He<br />

suggested that joint programmes in collaboration with premier agricultural institutions be<br />

launched. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K. Jain opined that appointment <strong>of</strong> Emeritus Pr<strong>of</strong>essors/Visiting Pr<strong>of</strong>essors<br />

will improve the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> the University. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri welcomed the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> inviting Visiting Pr<strong>of</strong>essors/Scientists in the University and suggested that all<br />

Centres be equipped with necessary wherewithals for supporting graphics, animations and<br />

other such innovations. The Chairman thanked the members for their useful suggestions and<br />

assured that proposals including research which seek to enrich teaching-learning experiences<br />

shall be supported by the University.


The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor to present the<br />

agenda items.<br />

ITEM NO.1 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 33 rd MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON 5 th JULY, 2005 AND<br />

TO NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN.<br />

AC 34.1.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

33 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> were circulated to the members<br />

and the comments have been received from one <strong>of</strong> the members for<br />

Resolution No. AC. 33.1.3 and AC.33.5.1.<br />

AC 34.1.2<br />

The comments were read out wherein the member had opined that the<br />

minutes did not reflect the decision arrived and what he was doing<br />

during the 33 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> was defending his comments, which he was<br />

not allowed to do and hence dissent. Regarding Resolution No. AC<br />

33.5.1, the question was raised about the composition <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

Board for the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture as to whether Deputy Director and<br />

Assistant Director could be the members <strong>of</strong> the School Board and on<br />

cancellation <strong>of</strong> degrees awarded to MCA students inadvertently in the<br />

16 th Convocation, as to whether the responsibility was fixed as it was a<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> serious concern.<br />

AC 34.1.3<br />

AC 34.1.4<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that as per the practice, only the<br />

decisions taken by rather than the deliberations in the <strong>Council</strong> had been<br />

recorded, and proposed that the same practice may be continued.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed to the proposal and confirmed the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 33 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. It also noted the<br />

action taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 16 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 19.9.2005.<br />

AC 34.2.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 16 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was held on 19.9.2005.<br />

The Minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting are placed at Appendix-2. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee considered and approved the Phase<br />

Zero Forms for revision <strong>of</strong> the courses CS-69 for BCA, AFE 1 to<br />

AFE 6 for CAFÉ/DAFE Programmes, EEG-04: English for Practical


Purposes for BDP, a new course BWEE-012: Women and Society:<br />

Global Concerns and Local Issues for Diploma Programme in<br />

Women’s Empowerment; Phase-3 Forms for Diploma Programmes in<br />

Dairy Technology & Meat Technology; Eligibility Criteria for<br />

PGDHHM; MoU with Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy for<br />

Administration (LBSNAA); Change in Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> Renewable<br />

Energy Certificate and Diploma Programmes <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Sciences.<br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee on PG Diploma in the study<br />

<strong>of</strong> Participatory Management <strong>of</strong> Displacement, Resettlement and<br />

Rehabilitation (PGDMRR) (Appendix-3); Relaxation in age to<br />

international students for admission in Bachelor’s Preparatory<br />

Programme and Revision <strong>of</strong> Re-admission fees on Pro-rata basis.<br />

AC 34.2.2<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> was informed that avoid mandatory admission test for<br />

MBA and B.Ed. programmes, some students seek admission through<br />

PIs and after a semester or so, request the University to transfer their<br />

registration to India. In order to check this practice, the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 16 th <strong>Meeting</strong> has recommended<br />

that:<br />

1. If any student after taking admission in a foreign country<br />

requests for a transfer in India, he/she should be asked to pay<br />

the same fee as being charged from foreign students.<br />

2. If a student requests for transfer to India before completing 4<br />

semesters in MBA/one year in B.Ed., he/she may be asked to<br />

appear for an entrance test alongwith other Indian students and<br />

admission will be granted only if he/she qualifies on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> merit. After admission, the student can apply for transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

credits on the payment <strong>of</strong> fee as per rules. Such students in<br />

MBA stream will be charged fee as from Indian students. The<br />

B.Ed. students however will have to also satisfy the eligibility<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> attachment to a School for practical work.<br />

AC 34.2.3<br />

The ACSC also considered the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-<br />

Committee constituted to develop a policy document on projects for<br />

various pr<strong>of</strong>essional and skill oriented courses in the University. The<br />

Sub-Committee had made the following recommendations which were<br />

approved the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee:<br />

1. As far as possible, the project course should adhere to the<br />

following credit range:


Type <strong>of</strong> Programme<br />

Certificate Programme<br />

Maximum Credits for Projects<br />

No project, unless absolutely<br />

necessary.<br />

04<br />

Degree/Diploma Programme<br />

(1 year)<br />

Degree Programme (2 years) 08<br />

Degree Programme (3 years) 12-16<br />

2. The Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies should seriously examine the<br />

desirability <strong>of</strong> the project work while designing the<br />

curriculum and developing study materials.<br />

3. For every project course, the synopsis should be approved<br />

by duly recognized evaluators, who can be senior<br />

counselors, <strong>Academic</strong> peers in institutions recognized by<br />

UGC/AICTE/DEC or internal faculty <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

4. Detailed guidelines in respect <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> synopsis<br />

and project reports, qualifications <strong>of</strong> supervisors and<br />

evaluation methodology along with format should be<br />

developed and communicated to all concerned. This<br />

information should be provided in Phase Form-3 and<br />

appropriate column be included in there.<br />

5. Every project course should provide a detailed manual for<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> project report. This manual should contain<br />

detailed instructions about academic and operational aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> the projects as also approved pr<strong>of</strong>ormas for use <strong>of</strong><br />

students, supervisors and others involved.<br />

6. Payment norms for different activities such as synopsis<br />

approval, supervision, evaluation and viva-voce should be<br />

worked out and submitted to Director (AC) for seeking<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> Finance Committee.<br />

7. All aspects related to the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

component must be presented with the Phase-3 form.<br />

8. Schedule <strong>of</strong> activities relating to project work should be<br />

included in the Manual and presented with the Phase-4 form<br />

as well.<br />

9. A student should be asked to rework on the Project and<br />

submit a new project synopsis for approval and thereafter<br />

Project Report if he/she failed in either report evaluation or<br />

viva-voce.


10. Modalities <strong>of</strong> re-submission:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

The candidates required to re-submit the synopsis/project report<br />

be informed by the Nodal Officer concerned.<br />

The schedule for re-submission should be prepared by every<br />

School.<br />

The Nodal Agency responsible for processing/evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project should maintain the data base on the topic <strong>of</strong> project for<br />

each student.<br />

Since re-submission shall cost the University, every student<br />

should be asked to pay a fee on pro-rata basis depending upon<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> credits <strong>of</strong> the project work. Every School should<br />

work it out and give to Registrar (SRED).<br />

The Committee also considered and recommended the modified policy<br />

on project courses for project report/dissertation for Master’s Degree in<br />

Library and Information Science (Appendix-4).<br />

AC 34.2.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was apprised that in the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 16 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> ACSC an error had crept in inadvertently in recording the<br />

names <strong>of</strong> the Certificates and Diploma Programmes in Renewable<br />

Energy. The correct names <strong>of</strong> the two programmes are:<br />

1. Certificate in Renewable Energy Technology<br />

2. Diploma in Renewable Energy Technologies<br />

AC 34.2.5<br />

During the discussion, the Director, SOSS informed the <strong>Council</strong> about<br />

the MoU signed with LBSNAA and the <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> M.A. (Public Policy)<br />

to IAS Probationers. He also mentioned that this programme could be<br />

put on <strong>of</strong>fer for other IAS <strong>of</strong>ficers also. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

appreciated the signing <strong>of</strong> MoU with LBSNAA and other institutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> higher education and expected that the University will sign more<br />

MoUs for academic collaboration.<br />

AC 34.2.6<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

16 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee with<br />

modifications as given in Resolution No. AC 34.2.4.


ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 34.3.1<br />

AC 34.3.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 17 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 16.12.2005<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 17 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was held on 16.12.2005.<br />

The Minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting are placed at Appendix-5. The Standing<br />

Committee considered and approved the Phase Zero Forms for<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> courses EEG-05: Understanding Prose, AWR (E):<br />

Writing for Radio , EHD-03: Hindi Sahitya Ka Itihas Avm Sahitya<br />

Parichaya for BDP; revision <strong>of</strong> Preparatory course in Social Sciences<br />

(PSS-01); Phase-3 Forms for Advance Certificate in Newborn and<br />

Infant Care (ACNIC) and Certificate in Reproductive and Child Health<br />

(CRCH); M.A. (Public Policy) for IAS Probationers; Certificate<br />

Programme in Functional English: Basic Level; winding up <strong>of</strong> MCA<br />

Old Syllabus; automatic Credit Transfer in MBA (B&F) for CAIIB<br />

holders; change <strong>of</strong> MBA degree format; Evaluation Methodology for<br />

Diploma in Value Added Products from Fruits & Vegetables<br />

(Appendix-6); new programme structure for B.Sc. (Major) in<br />

Chemistry (Appendix-7); Evaluation Methodology for CS-69 –<br />

TCP/IP Programming (Appendix-8); ratification <strong>of</strong> action taken by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor in approving launch <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Aquaculture and<br />

Appreciation Course on Environment.<br />

The ACSC considered the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee<br />

(Appendix-9) for <strong>of</strong>fering the PG level courses developed by the other<br />

disciplines in School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences as electives and recommended<br />

that the following courses can be considered for adoption in different<br />

programmes subject to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 16 credits:<br />

Programme Course Code & Name Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Credit<br />

M.A.<br />

(Economics)<br />

MPA-015: Public Policy and<br />

Analysis<br />

MPA-017: Electronic<br />

8<br />

4<br />

M.A. (Sociology)<br />

M.A.(Public<br />

Admn.)<br />

PGDDM<br />

Governance<br />

MPS-003: India: Democracy<br />

and Development<br />

MPA-016: Decentralization<br />

and Local Governance<br />

MPS-003: India: Democracy<br />

and Development<br />

MSO-002: Research Methods<br />

& Methodology<br />

MED-004: Towards<br />

Participatory Management<br />

8<br />

8<br />

8<br />

8<br />

4


AC 34.3.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

17 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee.<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 7 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE RESEARCH COUNCIL HELD ON<br />

30.12.2005.<br />

AC 34.4.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the Research <strong>Council</strong> was held on 30.12.2005. The Research <strong>Council</strong><br />

considered and approved the progress reports <strong>of</strong> Research Scholars in<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences, Constitution <strong>of</strong> a Sub-Committee and its<br />

Standing Committee, Regulations for the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> and admission <strong>of</strong> Ms. Arundhati Mishra to Ph.D. in Physics.<br />

AC 34.4.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> constituted a sub-committee consisting <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD, Chairman, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni,<br />

Director, SOSS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda,<br />

Director, STRIDE and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, SOMS<br />

(convenor) to develop a pr<strong>of</strong>orma for students to submit their six<br />

monthly progress report as per requirements <strong>of</strong> the Ph.D. programme,<br />

examine the progress reports submitted by the students, and propose<br />

amendment in the Ordinance on Research Degree Programme in<br />

regard to action against the students who fail to submit their progress<br />

reports to their supervisors and who in turn fail to submit the same<br />

within a fortnight along with their comments to the Director <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School concerned. The Research <strong>Council</strong> also considered and<br />

approved the Regulations for its meetings and decided to constitute a<br />

Standing Committee to expedite the process. The <strong>Council</strong> also<br />

resolved that the Standing Committee may meet at least once in every<br />

three months and empowered the Standing Committee to take<br />

decisions on its behalf. The decisions shall be implemented from the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> the meeting <strong>of</strong> the Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> and put up for ratification by the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 34.4.3<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the members pointed out that Resolution No. RC.7.2.6 seems to<br />

have crept in inadvertently. The suggestion was accepted with the<br />

direction to delete it.<br />

AC 34.4.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 7 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> (Appendix-10) <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> with above specific<br />

direction.


ITEM NO. 5 TO NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN THE MATTER RELATING TO<br />

CONFERMENT OF HONORARY DEGREES AT THE 17 TH<br />

CONVOCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY TO BE HELD ON<br />

18.2.2006.<br />

AC 34.5.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 17 th<br />

Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University is to be held on 18 th February, 2006. In<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> Section 5 (iv) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act, the<br />

University may confer Honorary Degrees or other distinctions in the<br />

manner laid down by the Statute 22 on conferment <strong>of</strong> Honorary<br />

Degrees. Accordingly the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> were<br />

requested to make nominations for consideration <strong>of</strong> the High Power<br />

Committee appointed by the Vice-Chancellor. The Committee<br />

considered the names and recommended the name <strong>of</strong> Dr.<br />

Navinchandra Ramgoolam, His Excellency, the Prime Minister <strong>of</strong><br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Mauritius for the award <strong>of</strong> D.Litt. and Sh. Narayan<br />

Murthy, Chairman and Chief Mentor Officer, Infosys Technologies,<br />

Bangalore for the award <strong>of</strong> D.Sc. degree (Honoris Causa) subject to<br />

their consent. The Board has also approved the proposal at its 84 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22-10-2005.<br />

AC 34.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was informed that the Vice-Chancellor had<br />

received the consent <strong>of</strong> both the nominees and their names have been<br />

forwarded to the Visitor for his consideration and approval.<br />

AC 34.5.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the Action Taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor. The Vice-Chancellor invited all the members to attend the<br />

convocation, as they will be part <strong>of</strong> the academic procession at the<br />

convocation, and that the formal invitation from Registrar, (Admn)<br />

will follow.<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 3 RD<br />

MEETING OF THE EQUIVALENCE COMMITTEE HELD ON<br />

26.12.2005.<br />

AC 34.6.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the Equivalence Committee was held on 26 th December, 2005. The<br />

Equivalence Committee considered the cases relating to equivalence<br />

received from different quarters and recommended that the following


may be recognized<br />

University:<br />

for admission to various programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

• Bachelor Degree holders under ‘non-formal stream’ who wish<br />

to seek admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic programmes where<br />

the minimum eligibility criteria is 10+2 or its equivalent, may<br />

be admitted, provided that no additional requirement is<br />

prescribed at 10+2 level.<br />

• The ‘one time’ Bachelor Degree Programmes <strong>of</strong> all the Indian<br />

Universities which fulfill UGC’s stipulation, i.e. ‘those<br />

registered up to the year 1995-96 and have completed their<br />

Bachelor degree up to the year 1998-99’.<br />

• M.A. Hindi (2 yrs.), B.Ed. (1 yr.), Shiksha Snatak (1 yr.),<br />

M.Phil (1 yr.), Ph.D (2 yrs.), awarded by ‘Dakshina Bharat<br />

Hindi Prachar Sabha, Chennai’ in view <strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> the<br />

institution as ‘Institute <strong>of</strong> National Importance’.<br />

• ‘Visharada’ & ‘Shastri’(three year duration) <strong>of</strong> Kurukshetra<br />

University and ‘Shastri’ (three year duration) <strong>of</strong> Maharshi<br />

Dayanand University.<br />

• Four year ‘Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Arts’ Degree <strong>of</strong> Yangon University,<br />

Myanmar for purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Master’s<br />

Degree Programme, provided that candidates have passed the<br />

Matriculation/High School Education Examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Myanmar Examination Board in five subjects (except<br />

Myanmar language), <strong>of</strong> which ‘English’ should be one.<br />

• The ‘Army Senior School Certificate Examination (Class<br />

XII)’ as equivalent to 10+2.<br />

• The ‘Grade-12 Examination <strong>of</strong> Higher Secondary Education,<br />

Nepal’ as equivalent to 10+2.<br />

• The ‘High School Diploma (Grade-12)’ <strong>of</strong> the International<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Geneva as equivalent to 10+2.<br />

• The ‘Secondary General Education’ <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Russian Federation as equivalent to 10+2.


AC 34.6.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the recommendations and approved<br />

the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence Committee<br />

(Appendix-11).<br />

ITEM NO.7 TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN APPROVING THE CONSTITUTION OF<br />

ITS STANDING COMMITTEE.<br />

AC 34.7.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 26 th meeting held on 03-09-2001 approved the proposal<br />

for formation <strong>of</strong> its Standing Committee. The council had authorized<br />

the Vice-Chancellor to constitute the Standing Committee consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> 9 to 11 members. Based on the experience, the Vice-Chancellor<br />

approved the following constitution :<br />

S.No Name Constituency Period<br />

1. Vice-Chancellor Chairman Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

2. Pro Vice-<br />

Member Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Chancellor<br />

Incharge <strong>of</strong> Schools<br />

3. Five Directors <strong>of</strong><br />

Schools<br />

(By Rotation)<br />

Members Two years<br />

from the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> nomination<br />

4. Three Teachers<br />

from among the<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essors, Readers<br />

and Lecturers,<br />

preferably one from<br />

each category<br />

5. Two Heads <strong>of</strong><br />

Divisions<br />

6. Director, <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Coordination<br />

Members<br />

Members<br />

Member-<br />

Secretary<br />

Two years<br />

from the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> nomination<br />

Two years<br />

from the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> nomination<br />

Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

AC 34.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and ratified the action taken by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor in approving the above constitution <strong>of</strong> its Standing<br />

Committee with the modification that the membership <strong>of</strong> the Pro Vice-<br />

Chancellor should be by nomination, term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the members be<br />

for one year and new constitution be made operative on the expiry <strong>of</strong><br />

the membership <strong>of</strong> the present Standing Committee i.e., with effect<br />

from 02-10-2006.


ITEM NO. 8<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE LIST OF STUDENTS<br />

WHO HAVE QUALIFIED FOR THE AWARD OF GOLD<br />

MEDALS, DEGREES, DIPLOMAS AND CERTIFICATES IN<br />

THE 17 TH CONVOCATION.<br />

AC 34.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 17 th Annual<br />

Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University is scheduled to be held on Saturday, the<br />

18 th February, 2006, at the Headquarters and 24 Regional Centres<br />

simultaneously, through the tele-conferencing mode. Gold medals,<br />

degrees, diplomas and certificates will be awarded to those candidates<br />

who have qualified on completion <strong>of</strong> all requirements for the award<br />

based on continuous assessment and/or Term End Examinations, held<br />

in December, 2004 and June, 2005.<br />

AC 34.8.2<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the members pointed out that the list <strong>of</strong> Gold Medalists seems<br />

to have been left out inadvertently.<br />

AC 34.8.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the list <strong>of</strong> students<br />

placed before it (Appendix-12) and authorized the Vice-Chancellor to<br />

approve the list <strong>of</strong> gold medalists and additions, if any, in the list <strong>of</strong><br />

students eligible for award <strong>of</strong> degrees, diplomas and certificates at the<br />

forthcoming convocation. The final list may be placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its next meeting for ratification.<br />

The <strong>Meeting</strong> ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(H.P.Dikshit)<br />

Chairman


Appendix-1<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended/could not attend the 34 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 17 th January, 2006<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, VC - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.S. Yadav<br />

4. Dr. Shardindu<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.R.Madhav Menon<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K.Jain<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora<br />

15. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.C.Katyal<br />

16. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal<br />

17. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda<br />

18. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

19. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal<br />

20. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang<br />

21. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj<br />

22. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshree<br />

23. Dr. T.K.Jena<br />

24. Dr. Anu J.Thomas<br />

25. Dr. C.K.Ghosh<br />

26. Sh. T.R.Srinivasan<br />

27. Dr. H.K.Shee<br />

28. Dr. Eisha Kannadi<br />

29. Dr. N.Venketeswarlu<br />

30. Dr. M.K.Salooja<br />

31. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra<br />

32. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Members who could not attend:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Asghar Wajahat<br />

3. Sh. D.Moitra<br />

4. Sh. G.S.Sahni<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J. Ramachandran<br />

6. Sh. S.B.Sharma


Appendix-2<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.2.1)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 16 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 19 TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 AT 11.00<br />

A.M. IN THE BOARD ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI,<br />

NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narsimham, Director, SOMS - Member<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS - Member<br />

15. Pr<strong>of</strong> M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE - Member<br />

16. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOCE - Member<br />

17. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora, Director, SOHS - Member<br />

18. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Director, EMPC - Member<br />

19. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RSD - Member<br />

20. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma.Kanjilal, SOSS - Member<br />

21. Dr. Anju S.Gupta, SOH - Member<br />

22. Sh. Saugato Sen,Lecturer (Selection Grade),SOSS - Member<br />

23. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SR&ED attended the meeting as a Special<br />

Invitee.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the meeting. He placed on<br />

record the appreciation for the contributions made by Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna former Directors <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences and<br />

Management Studies, respectively in the deliberations <strong>of</strong> the meetings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Standing Committee. He also welcomed the new members Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

N.V.Narsimham, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies and Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora,<br />

Director, School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences.<br />

The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, to present the<br />

agenda items.


The following agenda items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO.1<br />

ACSC 16.1.1<br />

ACSC 16.1.2<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 15 TH MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S STANDING COMMITTEE<br />

(ACSC) AND NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

15 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on<br />

29.6.2005 were circulated to the Members and no comments have<br />

been received. He proposed that the Minutes may be confirmed as<br />

circulated.<br />

While considering the action taken report on Item No.3 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Minutes, it was clarified that the decision to treat MEG students who<br />

get 35% marks in assignments and the term-end-examination as<br />

successful will be applicable to all the students enrolled in the year<br />

2001 batch.<br />

Regarding Item No. 5, the School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies was<br />

requested to process recognition <strong>of</strong> Associate Membership <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Metals (IIM, Calcutta), i.e. Degree <strong>of</strong> Metallurgy for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Management Programme through<br />

the School Board at the earliest and report the decision to the<br />

Equivalence Committee for further action.<br />

Regarding decision in Item No. 5 (7) on treating BIT programme <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> as pr<strong>of</strong>essional degree for admission to MBA programme, it<br />

was decided that the file should be resubmitted to the Vice-<br />

Chancellor for his consideration.<br />

ACSC 16.1.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee confirmed the Minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> its 15 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29.6.2005 and noted the action taken<br />

thereon.<br />

ITEM NO.2<br />

ACSC 16.2.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR THE REVISION OF CS-69 COURSE OF THE BCA<br />

PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the course CS-69:<br />

TCP/IP Programming <strong>of</strong> the BCA Programme needs revision<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the advances made in the networking technology and<br />

TCP/IP Programming. The revised course with latest information<br />

might open up another domain <strong>of</strong> opportunity for BCA students to get<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> networking jobs.


ACSC 16.2.2<br />

ACSC 16.2.3<br />

ITEM NO.3<br />

Sh. Naveen Kumar, Course Coordinator was requested to explain to<br />

the members the credit weightage <strong>of</strong> practical component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

course and the evaluation methodology in terms <strong>of</strong> continuous and<br />

term-end assessment <strong>of</strong> the course.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form for<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> the CS-69 course with the directions that the evaluation<br />

methodology <strong>of</strong> the course be put up for approval in the next meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Standing Committee.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR THE REVISION OF COURSES AFE 01 TO AFE 06 IN<br />

CAFE/DAFE PROGRAMMES.<br />

ACSC 16.3.1<br />

ACSC 16.3.2<br />

ACSC 16.3.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that School <strong>of</strong><br />

Continuing Education has submitted the Phase Zero Form for the<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> courses AFE-01 to AFE-06 in CAFE/DAFE programmes<br />

which are being delivered in Project Mode. The revision and<br />

updating <strong>of</strong> the courses has become necessary because <strong>of</strong> new<br />

developments in these areas.<br />

During the discussion, some members suggested that the fees should<br />

be charged in one installment i.e. Rs. 900/- for CAFE and Rs. 1800/-<br />

DAFE. In case a student who has done Certificate Programme<br />

applies for admission to Diploma Programme, he/she may be<br />

permitted credit transfer for courses completed in the certificate<br />

programme, and charged a fee <strong>of</strong> Rs. 900/- only plus fees for credit<br />

transfer as per rules.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee approved the Phase<br />

Zero Form (Appendix-1) for the revision <strong>of</strong> courses AFE-01 to AFE-<br />

06 in CAFE/DAFE programmes in principle with the direction that<br />

the issue related to fee may be discussed in the Task Force on Student<br />

Support Services and placed before the Vice-Chancellor for approval<br />

ITEM NO.4<br />

ACSC 16.4.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR A NEW COURSE ON WOMEN AND SOCIETY: GLOBAL<br />

CONCERNS AND LOCAL ISSUES OF THE DIPLOMA<br />

PROGRAMME IN WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT AND<br />

DEVELOPMENT.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Social Sciences has submitted the Phase Zero Form for a new course<br />

on Women and Society: Global Concerns and Local Issues <strong>of</strong> the


Diploma Programme in Women’s Empowerment and Development.<br />

The course envisages to impart knowledge <strong>of</strong> and build<br />

understanding about women’s status in society, both historically and<br />

contemporarily.<br />

ACSC 16.4.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the Phase Zero Form placed at (Appendix-2) for a new<br />

course on Women and Society: Global Concerns and Local Issues in<br />

the Diploma Programme in Women’s Empowerment and<br />

Development.<br />

ITEM NO.5<br />

ACSC 16.5.1<br />

ACSC 16.5.2<br />

ACSC 16.5.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CHANGE IN THE<br />

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA OF THE PGDHHM PROGRAMME.<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School Board <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Health Sciences has proposed (i) removal <strong>of</strong> MBA category and<br />

(ii) reduction in work experience from five years to 2-3 years for the<br />

admission in PGDHHM programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B. Arora, Director, SOHS informed that the School Board<br />

examined the break up <strong>of</strong> enrollment category wise and observed that<br />

about 80% students were Medical/Dental graduates, 15% were<br />

graduates in Indian System <strong>of</strong> Medicine/Homeopathy and 5% were<br />

graduates in Nursing and Pharmacy. The response from MBA degree<br />

holders was seen to be less than 1% and hence, the School Board<br />

recommended the proposal for removal <strong>of</strong> this category.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered the<br />

proposal in detail and observed that the University should not limit<br />

rather than enhance access and recommended that all the categories<br />

may be retained with work experience as follows:<br />

• Medical/Dental graduates from a Medical/Dental<br />

institute <strong>of</strong> India or other countries recognized by<br />

Medical <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (MCI) or Dental <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

• Graduates in Indian System <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />

Homeopathy, Nursing and Pharmacy recognized by<br />

the respective <strong>Council</strong>s with three years <strong>of</strong> hospital<br />

experience.<br />

• Candidates holding MBA degree or PG Diploma in<br />

Financial, Material or Personnel Management with<br />

five years hospital experience.


ITEM NO.6<br />

ACSC 16.6.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MEMORANDUM OF<br />

UNDERSTANDING SIGNED BETWEEN <strong>IGNOU</strong> AND THE<br />

LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI NATIONAL ACADEMY OF<br />

ADMINISTRATION.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that on the initiative <strong>of</strong><br />

the Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor, the University has signed a<br />

Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding with the Lal Bahadur Shastri<br />

National Academy <strong>of</strong> Administration (LBSNAA) on 29.8.2005. The<br />

areas that have been identified for collaboration include:<br />

• Public Administration and Governance, General<br />

Management, Economics, Trade & Public Policy,<br />

Emerging Issues in Public Management, E-governance,<br />

Change Management, National Security, Negotiations and<br />

Conflict Resolution, Improving Service Delivery,<br />

Enhancing Administrative Accountability, Human<br />

Development, Ethics and Values, Other Governance<br />

Issues and Disaster Management.<br />

• Faculty Exchange, Preparation <strong>of</strong> Reading Material,<br />

Preparing, Developing and Imparting <strong>Academic</strong> Input,<br />

Developing Tools and Techniques <strong>of</strong> Training,<br />

Developing Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Skills, Conducting Joint<br />

Research or Field Studies and Sharing <strong>of</strong> Data,<br />

Publication and Circulation <strong>of</strong> Reading Materials and<br />

Sharing <strong>of</strong> Library Resources.<br />

ACSC 16.6.2<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

ACSC 16.7.1<br />

ACSC 16.7.2<br />

While approving the Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding (Appendix-3)<br />

signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and the Lal Bahadur Shastri National<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Administration, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee appreciated the pro-active initiative <strong>of</strong> the Vice-<br />

Chancellor as it is likely to help <strong>IGNOU</strong> to not only further<br />

strengthen its pr<strong>of</strong>ile but also create advocates in every district <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country and help expand access and reach.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

DIPLOMA PROGRAMME IN DAIRY TECHNOLOGY.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture has submitted the Phase-3 Form for Diploma Programme<br />

in Dairy Technology.<br />

Dr. M.K. Salooja, Programme Coordinator explained that the<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme are to develop technician level trained<br />

human resource for dairy sector, to upgrade technical know-how <strong>of</strong>


dairy workers, generating employment and entrepreneurship through<br />

dairy technology, by adopting Good Manufacturing Practices, and<br />

match requirement <strong>of</strong> international quality products.<br />

ACSC 16.7.3<br />

The Chairman advised that possibilities <strong>of</strong> establishing study centres<br />

in the Dairies/Units in Rajasthan, Haryana, Gujarat and the North<br />

East be explored.<br />

ACSC 16.7.4<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

ACSC 16.8.1<br />

ACSC 16.8.2<br />

ACSC 16.8.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee directed that a<br />

Committee should look into details <strong>of</strong> practical components <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme for smooth delivery <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

DIPLOMA PROGRAMME IN MEAT TECHNOLOGY.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture has submitted the Phase-3 Form for Diploma Programme<br />

in Meat Technology. He requested Dr.M.K.Salooja, Programme<br />

Coordinator to explain the highlights <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

Dr. Salooja explained that the objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme are to<br />

provide knowledge & skills for quality production <strong>of</strong> meat and meat<br />

products, to develop human resource for meat industry and associated<br />

activities, to train personnel for self-employment, to impart<br />

knowledge and technical pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in (i) good slaughter practices<br />

(ii) handling <strong>of</strong> meat in a scientific manner (iii) production <strong>of</strong> quality<br />

meat & meat products (iv) testing and quality control <strong>of</strong> meat & meat<br />

products (v) managing small and medium enterprises. Dr. Salooja<br />

also pointed out that the programme comprises 50% theory and 50%<br />

practical component.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered the<br />

proposal in detail and directed that a committee should look into<br />

details for smooth delivery <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

ITEM NO.9 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CHANGE IN<br />

NOMENCLATURE OF TWO PROGRAMMES.<br />

ACSC 16.9.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Sciences recommended that nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following programmes be changed for operational convenience:


Certificate Programme for Micro Energy Generation and Distribution<br />

System: Installation, Operation, Maintenance to Certificate<br />

Programme for Training in Renewable Energy.<br />

Diploma Programme in Micro Energy Generation and Distribution<br />

System: Installation, Operation, Maintenance to Diploma Programme<br />

in Renewable Energy Technologies.<br />

ACSC 16.9.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered the<br />

proposal in detail and modified the Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

mentioned programmes as given below:<br />

1. Certificate in Renewal Energies.<br />

2. Diploma in Renewal Energies.<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

ACSC 16.10.1<br />

ACSC 16.10.2<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

ACSC 16.11.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

MEETINGS OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S SUB-<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 5 TH APRIL, 2005 AND 29.7.2005.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 15 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29.6.2005,<br />

while considering the matter related to policy document for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional and skill oriented courses <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Sciences and introduction <strong>of</strong> project work for MLIS programme,<br />

approved the proposal for project course <strong>of</strong> 4 credits for the MLIS<br />

programme and referred the policy note to its Sub-Committee<br />

constituted in the 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong>. The sub-committee met on 5.4.2005<br />

and 29.7.2005, held detailed deliberations on the issues involved. He<br />

then presented the major recommendations.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee (Appendix-4).<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED CREDIT<br />

TRANSFER FROM THE OLD MCA TO THE REVISED MCA<br />

PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Computer and Information Science has worked out a Credit Transfer<br />

Scheme for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the students transferring from the old MCA<br />

syllabus to the new one.<br />

ACSC 16.11.2<br />

The item was taken for discussion by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s<br />

Standing Committee. The Members pointed out a few<br />

inconsistencies in the proposal and it was considered necessary for


smooth implementation <strong>of</strong> the scheme that a small committee<br />

appointed by the Chairman should examine the proposal in detail and<br />

submit its recommendations to the ACSC at its next meeting.<br />

ITEM NO.12 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ELIGIBILITY<br />

CRITERIA FOR BCA PROJECT EVALUATORS.<br />

ACSC 16.12.1<br />

ACSC 16.12.2<br />

ACSC 16.12.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29.4.2005<br />

approved the eligibility criteria for appointment <strong>of</strong> evaluators<br />

examiners <strong>of</strong> the project components (CS-11 and CS-76) <strong>of</strong> the BCA<br />

programme on the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCIS.<br />

The School has now submitted that regular faculty <strong>of</strong> IT/Computer<br />

Science/Computer Engineering departments <strong>of</strong> AICTE recognized<br />

institutions with a minimum <strong>of</strong> 5 years teaching experience <strong>of</strong> CS/IT<br />

related courses be considered.<br />

The Chairman advised that each Statutory Authority has its specified<br />

domain <strong>of</strong> authority and should be observed as such. For in academic<br />

matters, <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has the supreme authority and an item<br />

approved by it or its Standing Committee be implemented as such.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee decided that the item<br />

be treated as withdrawn.<br />

ITEM NO.13 TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROJECT<br />

COMPONENT (CS-76/CS-11) OF BACHELOR IN<br />

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS (BCA) PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 16.13.1<br />

ACSC 16.13.2<br />

ACSC 16.13.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Computer and Information Science at its 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

recommended that all the students <strong>of</strong> BCA programme should obtain<br />

the approval <strong>of</strong> their project proposals from the academic counselors<br />

(who are counseling for computer course <strong>of</strong> BCA/MCA <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>)<br />

in their study centres and PSC.<br />

The Member Secretary pointed out that the compulsory approval <strong>of</strong><br />

project proposals was dispensed with by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee at its 7 th meeting held on 15.2.2003 (Resolution<br />

No. 7.12.4) on the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the SOCIS to facilitate better<br />

management.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered the matter<br />

and advised that the matter be treated as withdrawn.


ITEM NO.14<br />

ACSC 16.14.1<br />

ACSC 16.14.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

SUB-COMMITTEE OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE ON POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA<br />

IN THE STUDY OF PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT<br />

OF DISPLACEMENT, RESETTLEMENT AND<br />

REHABILITATION (PGDMRR).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the ACSC at its<br />

14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29.4.2005, while considering the Phase-3 Form<br />

<strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Diploma in the Study <strong>of</strong> Participatory Management<br />

<strong>of</strong> Displacement, Resettlement and Rehabilitation (PGDMRR)<br />

constituted a Sub-Committee under his Chairmanship to examine the<br />

desirability <strong>of</strong> developing the programme in view <strong>of</strong> the experiences<br />

with the Certificate programme.<br />

The Sub-Committee, at its <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 5.9.2005, considered the<br />

issues involved and recommended that:<br />

1. The PG Certificate course should be <strong>of</strong>fered in one cycle only<br />

(January cycle) till the PG Diploma programme is finally<br />

launched by the University. Once PGDMRR is put on <strong>of</strong>fer, the<br />

Certificate Programme should be withdrawn.<br />

2. The Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences must ensure that the<br />

revised/new courses, be made available in printed form by<br />

October, 2006.<br />

3. The project course should be withdrawn from the certificate<br />

programme.<br />

4 The courses should have equal credit weightage.<br />

5. The counseling should be done at the Study Centres/Regional<br />

Centres equipped with Edusat/DRS terminals and the counseling<br />

should be mainly done by the internal faculty <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

6. The costs <strong>of</strong> development should be met completely out <strong>of</strong> Project<br />

funds and fee be worked out for delivery for viability.<br />

ACSC 16.14.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee after considering the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

for the PG Diploma in the Study <strong>of</strong> Participatory Management <strong>of</strong><br />

Displacement, Resettlement and Rehabilitation in the project mode<br />

with the condition that the programme <strong>of</strong>fer shall be reviewed after<br />

one year.


ITEM NO.15 TO CONSIDER THE ISSUES RELATED TO THE<br />

STUDENTS WHO SEEK ADMISSION IN GULF<br />

COUNTRIES TO AVOID ADMISSION TEST CONDUCTED<br />

IN INDIA.<br />

ACSC 16.15.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that to avoid<br />

mandatory admission test for MBA and B.Ed., some students seek<br />

admission through PIs and after a semester or so request the<br />

University to transfer their registration to India. In order to check this<br />

practice, the International Division has suggested that:<br />

1. If any student after taking admission in a foreign country<br />

requests for a transfer in India, he/she should be asked to pay<br />

the same fee as being charged from foreign students.<br />

2. If a student requests for transfer to India before completing 4<br />

semesters in MBA/one year in B.Ed., he/she may be asked to<br />

appear for an entrance test alongwith other Indian students<br />

and admission will be granted only if he/she qualifies on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> merit. After admission, the student can apply for<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> credits on the payment <strong>of</strong> fee as per rules. Such<br />

students in MBA stream will be charged fee as from Indian<br />

students. The B.Ed. students however will have to also satisfy<br />

the eligibility condition <strong>of</strong> attachment to a School for practical<br />

work.<br />

ACSC 16.15.2<br />

ITEM NO.16<br />

ACSC 16.16.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the proposal.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR REVISION OF EEG-04: ENGLISH FOR PRACTICAL<br />

PURPOSES FOR BDP PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Humanities, as a part <strong>of</strong> the exercise initiated for revision <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

courses, has submitted the Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong> EEG-04:<br />

English For Practical Purposes <strong>of</strong>fered in the Bachelor Degree<br />

Programme. The School Board has recommended that there should be<br />

a clear integration <strong>of</strong> skills and sub-skills with the various<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essions.<br />

ACSC 16.16.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong> the EEG-04: English<br />

for Practical Purposes course (Appendix-5).


TABLED ITEM<br />

ITEM NO.17<br />

TO REPORT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR REGARDING RELAXATION OF AGE FOR<br />

THE ADMISSION TO BPP PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 16.17.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that The International<br />

Division received requests from a Partner Institute (PI) in Saudi<br />

Arabia for relaxation <strong>of</strong> age for admission to BPP programme. The<br />

date <strong>of</strong> births are given against the name <strong>of</strong> each student:<br />

1. Mr. Sarfaz Ahmed 20/8/1987<br />

2. Ms.Aysha Naushad 4/7/1987<br />

3. Mr.Rehmatullah 17/9/1987<br />

The admission criteria for BPP stipulates that an individual should<br />

have completed 18 years as on 30 th June, 2005 for the admission for<br />

July semester.<br />

ACSC 16.17.2<br />

The Vice-Chancellor considering that in conventional universities,<br />

the age is taken as on First October for the July cycle in a year, has<br />

granted relaxation in age. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Garg, informed that the Vice-<br />

Chancellor has therefore, decided that the date for calculating the age<br />

should be 1 st October for July session and 1 st April for January<br />

session.<br />

ACSC 16.17.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee noted the action taken<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor in relaxing the age <strong>of</strong> three students<br />

mentioned above and approved the new cut <strong>of</strong>f dates for calculating<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> students for admission to the programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University.<br />

ITEM NO.18<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE REVISION OF RE-<br />

ADMISSION FEE ON PRO-RATA BASIS.<br />

ACSC 16.18.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the University has<br />

already revised the programme fee for different programmes with<br />

effect from July,2005/January,2006 session. It has, therefore,


ecome necessary that Pro-rata Re-Admission fee for different<br />

Programmes may also be revised, in the light <strong>of</strong> the revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme fee for fresh admission. The Pro-rata Re-admission fee<br />

will be applicable to those students who are not able to complete all<br />

courses within the prescribed maximum duration.<br />

ACSC 16.18.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered and<br />

approved the Pro-rata fee calculated for different programmes placed<br />

at Appendix-6 with the suggestion that the practical fees wherever<br />

applicable be separately charged and recorded accordingly.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswat)<br />

Member-Secretary


Appendix-3<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.2.1)<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE ON POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN THE STUDY<br />

OF PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT OF DISPLACEMENT,<br />

RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION (PGDMRR) HELD ON 5 TH<br />

SEPTEMBER, 2005 IN THE PVC’S CHAMBER, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN<br />

GARHI, NEW DELHI-68.<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS - Member<br />

3. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RSD - Member<br />

4. Dr. Madhu Bala, Reader, SOSS - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Convenor<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the Members to the meeting and explained that the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 14 th meeting held on 29.4.2005, while<br />

considering the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Diploma in the Study <strong>of</strong> Participatory<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> Displacement, Resettlement and Rehabilitation (PGDMRR), constituted<br />

a sub-committee to re-look into the aspect <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> the study centres where this<br />

programme will be <strong>of</strong>fered in view <strong>of</strong> the experience with the certificate programme.<br />

The Committee with a view to assess the viability <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering the Diploma programme,<br />

considered the enrolment <strong>of</strong> students in the certificate programme on <strong>of</strong>fer for last five<br />

years. The members observed that enrolment in the certificate programme during all<br />

these years on an average had been around 80. As the development <strong>of</strong> the programme<br />

had been funded by the World Bank, the University continued with the programme. It<br />

was further observed that in general, the enrolment in certificate level programmes is<br />

low, with its upgradation to Diploma level, the enrolment might improve. Moreover,<br />

both the certificate and diploma are part <strong>of</strong> the programme funded by the World Bank, it<br />

is desirable to develop and <strong>of</strong>fer the diploma programme also. In view <strong>of</strong> these facts the<br />

Sub Committee recommended the following:<br />

1. The PG Certificate course should be <strong>of</strong>fered in one cycle only (January cycle) till the<br />

PG diploma programme is finally launched by the University from January, 2007<br />

session after which the certificate Programme will be withdrawn.<br />

2. The Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences must ensure that the revised/new courses, be<br />

ready before the launching <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma Programme i.e. January 2007.<br />

3. The project course should be withdrawn from the certificate programme.<br />

Contd….2/-


-: 2 :-<br />

4 The courses should have equal number <strong>of</strong> credits.<br />

5. The Counseling should be made available at the Study Centres/Regional Centres<br />

where the terminals <strong>of</strong> Edusat/DRS are available and the counseling should be<br />

mainly done by the internal faculty <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

6. The costs <strong>of</strong> development should be met completely out <strong>of</strong> Project funds and fee<br />

be worked out for delivery for viability.<br />

Subject to (6) above, the Phase 3 form for PG Diploma in the Study <strong>of</strong> Participatory<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> Displacement, Resettlement and Rehabilitation (PGDMRR) may be<br />

approved.<br />

.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswat)<br />

Convenor


Appendix-4<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.2.3)<br />

MASTERS DEGREE IN LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE<br />

Modalities for Project Reports/Dissertations (4 Credits)<br />

A project report/dissertation <strong>of</strong> four credits (100 marks) is to be launched in the MLIS<br />

programme as per guidelines <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences. The following modalities<br />

are proposed for implementation <strong>of</strong> the same:<br />

1. Credits<br />

The Project reports will be <strong>of</strong> 4 credits (100 marks). A student has to secure a<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> 50 marks to pass.<br />

2. Thrust Areas<br />

The areas in which the students have to work for the project report/dissertation<br />

will be according to the syllabus <strong>of</strong> the course. The details <strong>of</strong> the areas are to be<br />

decided by the faculty as mentioned in the project guide to be distributed amongst the<br />

students.<br />

3. The Guides/Supervisors<br />

The project work/dissertation is to be carried out under the supervision <strong>of</strong> a guide<br />

who fulfills the requisite qualifications as mentioned below:<br />

a) A person having Ph.D. in Library and Information Science.<br />

Or<br />

b) A person having Master’s Degree in Library & Information Science with two<br />

years experience in a library or information centre in the scale <strong>of</strong> a lecturer.<br />

Or<br />

c) A person having B.E./B.Tech.(Computer Science)/M.C.A. or equivalent with<br />

minimum <strong>of</strong> two years experience in a reputed library.<br />

The bio data <strong>of</strong> the external guides/supervisors may be submitted in the prescribed<br />

format. The names <strong>of</strong> the external guides/supervisors will be approved by the Faculty.


4. Proposal submission<br />

The student is required to submit the proposal along with guides/supervisors<br />

(external) bio-data before 31 st December for every year to the Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Sciences, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi-110 068 for approval. The proposal should<br />

be duly signed by the guides/supervisors. For the first year <strong>of</strong> the Programme launch, the<br />

date for submission <strong>of</strong> project proposal will be 28 th February, 2006.<br />

5. Project Submission<br />

One copy <strong>of</strong> the project report is to be submitted to the Registrar, Student<br />

Registration and Evaluation Division. A copy <strong>of</strong> the approved project proposal signed by<br />

the Faculty should be enclosed along with the Project Report.<br />

The project report may be submitted in two slots i.e. by 30 th September each year<br />

for December Term End Examinations, and by 31 st March each year for June Term End<br />

Examinations. For the first year <strong>of</strong> the Programme launch the last date <strong>of</strong> submission will<br />

be 30 th June, 2006.<br />

6. Evaluation<br />

The projects/dissertations will be evaluated by the Faculty or External Experts, as<br />

per requirement. The names <strong>of</strong> the external experts will be recommended by the School<br />

Board as per the rules. There will be no viva for evaluation <strong>of</strong> projects.<br />

1. Resubmission <strong>of</strong> Project<br />

A student will be required to rework on Project and submit a new Project Synopsis<br />

for approval and thereafter Project Report if he/she failed in report evaluation.<br />

2. Payments<br />

The remuneration per project to be paid to the Guides/Evaluators will be as follows:<br />

Project Guidance - Rs. 100/-<br />

Project Evaluation - Rs. 100/-


Appendix-5<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.3.1)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 17 TH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S<br />

STANDING COMMITTEE HELD ON 16 TH DECEMBER, 2005 AT 11.00<br />

A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN<br />

GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOS - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH - Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narsimham, Director, SOMS - Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong> M.C. Sharma, Director, SOE - Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, Director, STRIDE - Member<br />

9. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE - Member<br />

10. Dr. T.K.Jena, Reader, SOHS - Member<br />

11. Dr. S.K.Vyas, Reader, SOET - Member<br />

12. Dr. Anu J.Thomas, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.C.Katyal, School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, attended the meeting as a Special Invitee.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 17 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee (ACSC). The Chairman also placed on<br />

record ACSC’s appreciation for the contributions made by the following retiring<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Director, EMPC.<br />

2. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, Regional Services Division<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences.<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Health Science.<br />

6. Dr. Anju S.Gupta, Reader, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities.<br />

7. Sh. Saugato Sen, Lecturer (S.G), School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences.


He specially welcomed the following new members (including Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Parvin Sinclair and Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma who have been re-nominated) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee and emphasized that he looked forward<br />

to their co-operation and valuable contributions to the deliberation in the meetings<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Standing Committee.<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, Director, STRIDE.<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities<br />

4. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE.<br />

5. Dr. Annu J.Thomas, Reader, School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education.<br />

6. Dr. T.K.Jena, Reader, School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences.<br />

7. Dr. S.K.Vyas, Reader, School <strong>of</strong> Engg. & Technology.<br />

He also desired that every School should prepare the Vision and Mission<br />

Statement and revisit it periodically.<br />

The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, to present the<br />

agenda.<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

ACSC 17.1.1<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 16 TH MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S STANDING COMMITTEE<br />

AND TO NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 16 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee held on 19.9.2005 were circulated to the members for their<br />

comments. Comments have been received from one <strong>of</strong> the members<br />

regarding recording <strong>of</strong> Resolution nos. 16.12.3 and 16.13.3.<br />

(i) It was pointed out in the comments that the Authority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was not being challenged. What was presented<br />

was the reaction <strong>of</strong> the School Board when the matter was reported to<br />

the members. The members had pointed out an inconsistency and had<br />

asked the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to re-consider the eligibility criteria.<br />

Surely, a Statutory Body like School Board is allowed and expected to<br />

do this, if felt necessary.<br />

(ii)<br />

Item no. 13, the Resolution no. 16.13.3 should be read as<br />

“the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee considered the<br />

matter and suggested that it be looked into by the same<br />

Committee that would be considering item no. 11”.


ACSC 17.1.2<br />

During the discussion, it was pointed out that the Minutes have been<br />

recorded properly. However, the School is free to bring the matter<br />

again before the Standing Committee through the School Board, if it<br />

feels necessary.<br />

ACSC 17.1.3 The ACSC confirmed the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 16 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on 19.9.2005 and noted<br />

the action taken.<br />

ITEM NO.2<br />

ACSC 17.2.1<br />

ACSC 17.2.2<br />

ACSC 17.2.3<br />

ITEM NO.3<br />

ACSC 17.3.1<br />

ACSC 17.3.2<br />

ACSC 17.3.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR THE REVISION OF EEG-05 COURSE OF THE<br />

BACHELOR’S DEGREE PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities, as a part <strong>of</strong> the exercise initiated for revision <strong>of</strong><br />

existing courses, has submitted the Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong><br />

English Elective course EEG-05:Understanding Prose <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bachelors’ Degree Programme.<br />

The revision is intended to bring greater novelty in the course. The<br />

inclusion <strong>of</strong> contemporary text is required to give the students a more<br />

comprehensive idea <strong>of</strong> the latest trends in literature.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Appendix-1) for the revision <strong>of</strong> EEG-05: Understanding Prose <strong>of</strong><br />

Bachelor’s Degree Programme.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR THE REVISION OF THE APPLICATION ORIENTED<br />

COURSE WRITING FOR RADIO [AWR (E)].<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities, as a part <strong>of</strong> the exercise initiated by the<br />

University for revision <strong>of</strong> existing courses, has submitted the Phase<br />

Zero Form for Application Oriented Course on Writing for Radio<br />

[AWR (E)].<br />

The course has been on <strong>of</strong>fer since 1991 and in view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

innovations that have taken place in the field <strong>of</strong> Radio, the need has<br />

been felt for major re-structuring <strong>of</strong> courses and updating the content.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Appendix-2) for the revision <strong>of</strong> Application Oriented Course on<br />

Writing for Radio [AWR (E) ].


ITEM NO.4<br />

ITEM NO.5<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM OF<br />

ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN NEWBORN AND INFANT<br />

CARE (ACNIC).<br />

AND<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM OF<br />

CERTIFICATE IN REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH<br />

(CRCH).<br />

ACSC 17.4-5.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences has submitted the Phase-3 Forms for the<br />

Advanced Certificate in Newborn and Infant Care (ACNIC) and<br />

Certificate in Reproductive and Child Health (CRCH) programmes.<br />

The main objectives <strong>of</strong> both the programmes is to update the<br />

knowledge and skills <strong>of</strong> health care providers in care <strong>of</strong> newborns and<br />

infants and enable them to provide effective nursing care to normal, at<br />

risk and sick newborn infants and in reproductive and child health to<br />

enable them to render health care to mother and child. The two<br />

certificate programmes are <strong>of</strong> 14 and 16 credits respectively. There is<br />

a provision <strong>of</strong> 43% theory and 57% practical component for ACNIC<br />

and 50% theory and 50% practical component for CRCH. The<br />

learners will have to complete workbook in the field and practical at<br />

regular centres.<br />

ACSC 17.4-5.2 The Programme Coordinator, Dr. Pity Koul explained that both the<br />

programmes are being developed by the University in response to the<br />

Government’s Policy on health care for Newborn and Infant Care and<br />

Reproductive and Child Health, which is far from satisfactory in our<br />

country. The international agencies like UNICIEF and WHO are also<br />

showing interest in these programmes. The Programme Coordinator<br />

also explained that the target groups for these programmes will be inservice<br />

nurses (RNRM) working at various levels <strong>of</strong> care as these<br />

workers are involved directly with the people at ground level in urban<br />

and rural areas. The fee structure <strong>of</strong> the programmes has been worked<br />

out on normal basis and it can be revised later on, if required, in view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the practical component <strong>of</strong> the programmes.<br />

ACSC 17.4-5.3 The Chairman suggested that in these health care programmes for<br />

infants and mothers, a number <strong>of</strong> states may be interested and advised<br />

the Programme Coordinator to contact the States and explore the<br />

possibilities <strong>of</strong> sponsored candidates.<br />

ACSC 17.4-5.4<br />

The ACSC approved the Phase-3 Form (Appendix-3 & 4) <strong>of</strong><br />

Advance Certificate in Newborn and Infant Care (ACNIC) and<br />

Certificate in Reproductive and Child Health (CRCH) with the<br />

observations that the suggestions made by the School Board for<br />

changing the names <strong>of</strong> both the programmes as Certificate in


Newborn and Infant Care and Certificate in Mother and Child Health<br />

<strong>of</strong> which Reproductive and Child Health will form a part be<br />

incorporated and the programme be launched on pilot basis up to<br />

District level hospitals.<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

ACSC 17.6.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

OF EHD-03:HINDI SAHITYA KA ITIHAS AVM SAHITYA<br />

PARICHYA<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh informed the members that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Humanities, as a part <strong>of</strong> the exercise initiated for revision <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

courses, has submitted the Phase Zero Form <strong>of</strong> EHD-03: Hindi<br />

Sahitya Ka Itihas Avm Sahitya Parichya. This course has been on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer for the last 15 years and major changes have taken place in<br />

development <strong>of</strong> Hindi Sahitya and to make the course more useful and<br />

relevant for the learners, the revision <strong>of</strong> the course has become<br />

necessary.<br />

ACSC 17.6.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Appendix-5) <strong>of</strong> EHD-03: Hindi Sahitya Ka Itihas Avm Sahitya<br />

Parichya.<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN IN LAUNCHING M.A.<br />

(PUBLIC POLICY) FOR IAS PROBATIONERS.<br />

ACSC 17.7.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> has signed a MoU with Lal Bahadur Shastri National<br />

Academy <strong>of</strong> Administration (LBSNAA), Mussoorie. Under this<br />

MoU, the <strong>IGNOU</strong> was to launch M.A. (Public Policy) for IAS<br />

Probationers. After a series <strong>of</strong> meetings between the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Faculty<br />

and the Senior Officials <strong>of</strong> LBSNAA, the course contents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme were formulated which are placed in Phase-3 Form<br />

(Appendix-6). Since the programme was to be launched in July,<br />

2005, the Vice-Chancellor approved the Phase-3 Form for the<br />

programme.<br />

ACSC 17.7.2<br />

The ACSC ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Phase-3 Form and launching <strong>of</strong> the M.A. (Public<br />

Policy) for IAS Probationers from July 2005.


ITEM NO.8<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED TO LOOK INTO<br />

THE ISSUES IN OFFERING THE PG LEVEL COURSES<br />

DEVELOPED BY OTHER DISCIPLINES AS ELECTIVE<br />

COURSES IN MASTER’S OF ARTS IN ECONOMICS,<br />

SOCIOLOGY, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND PG<br />

DIPLOMA IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT.<br />

ACSC 17.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

ACSC at its 15 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29.6.2005 while considering the<br />

proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer Post-Graduate Courses developed by other<br />

disciplines as Elective Courses in Master’s <strong>of</strong> Arts in Economics,<br />

Sociology, Public Administration and PG Diploma in Disaster<br />

Management recommended that the Task Force should examine the<br />

operational difficulties and a Committee appointed by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the PVC may examine the<br />

academic issues.<br />

ACSC 17.8.2 The Committee met on 12.8.2005 and recommended that the<br />

following courses can be considered for adoption in different<br />

programmes:<br />

Programme Course Code & Name Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Credit<br />

M.A. (Economics) MPA-015: Public Policy and Analysis<br />

MPA-017: Electronic Governance<br />

8<br />

4<br />

M.A. (Sociology) MPS-003: India: Democracy and<br />

Development<br />

MPA-016: Decentralization and Local<br />

Governance<br />

8<br />

8<br />

M.A.(Public Admn.)<br />

PGDDM<br />

MPS-003: India: Democracy and<br />

Development<br />

MSO-002: Research Methods &<br />

Methodology<br />

MED-004: Towards Participatory<br />

Management<br />

8<br />

8<br />

4<br />

ACSC 17.8.3<br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee were forwarded to the School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Social Sciences for consideration by the respective disciplines. The<br />

School has agreed to the proposal and made the recommendations<br />

(Appendix-7) to operationalize the proposal. The Task Force on SSS<br />

also considered the operational aspects <strong>of</strong> the proposal and<br />

recommended that there should not be any operational problems in<br />

implementing the proposal.


ACSC 17.8.4<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

ACSC 17.9.1<br />

ACSC 17.9.2<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the proposed scheme and<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee placed at Appendix-7.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE WINDING UP OF MCA OLD<br />

SYLLABUS AND ALLOW THE STUDENTS TO RE-<br />

REGISTER FOR THE LEFT OUT SEMESTERS.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

consequent upon launching <strong>of</strong> MCA revised programme from January<br />

2005 cycle, old syllabus has been withdrawn. The University has two<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> students: (i) those admitted to MCA during January,<br />

2004 (old syllabus) cycle, and (ii) those admitted to MCA (new<br />

syllabus) in January 2005 cycle. The minimum and maximum<br />

durations prescribed for MCA old syllabus are three and seven years,<br />

respectively. Based on the discussion in the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Task<br />

Force, the School <strong>of</strong> Computer and Information Sciences prepared a<br />

scheme for registration <strong>of</strong> students enrolled in the MCA old syllabus<br />

which was placed before the ACSC at its 14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29-04-<br />

2005. The scheme envisaged that the students be asked to re-register<br />

for the remaining semesters by July - December 2006 cycles and<br />

thereafter no re-registration would be allowed in MCA old syllabus.<br />

But by the time the minutes <strong>of</strong> the ACSC were circulated, the students<br />

were practically left with two options for re-registration as against<br />

four chances proposed in the scheme.<br />

A sub-committee <strong>of</strong> the Task Force (SSS) deliberated on the issues in<br />

detail and recommended the following action:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

Students should be allowed to re-register all the<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> MCA old syllabus up to July, 2007 i.e.<br />

they get four chances – Jan.-June 2006, July-<br />

Dec. 2006, Jan-June 2007 & July-Dec. 2007.<br />

Students may be permitted to re-register for 3 rd<br />

semester (Jan-June 2006 cycle) latest by 15-12-<br />

2005 without late fee. The students support<br />

services required should be provided. No<br />

counseling shall be provided beyond December<br />

2007.<br />

(iii) Students <strong>of</strong> the batches indicated in<br />

recommendations mentioned in Appendix-8 should<br />

be informed that they need to successfully<br />

complete all the requirements for the award <strong>of</strong><br />

MCA by the Dec-2010 T.E.E. Beyond this, no<br />

examination for MCA old syllabus would be<br />

conducted.


(iv)<br />

Appropriate communication should be sent to<br />

Regional Directors to inform the Study Centres<br />

activated for Computer Programmes to display a<br />

‘Notice’ regarding winding up <strong>of</strong> MCA old<br />

syllabus for information <strong>of</strong> all students <strong>of</strong> MCA,<br />

BCA-MCA Integrated programme. The notice<br />

should indicate the details given at point (i) to (iii)<br />

above. The Regional Directors may also issue a<br />

Notification in the local press for the information <strong>of</strong><br />

all concerned. A notification would be prepared by<br />

the SRE.<br />

The detailed recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee are placed at<br />

(Appendix-8). 1,06,049 students <strong>of</strong> MCA old syllabus have been<br />

informed in November by Registrar SRE after the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee by the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

ACSC 17.9.3<br />

The ACSC ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor by<br />

allowing students <strong>of</strong> MCA (Old Syllabus) to re-register themselves up<br />

to July, 2007 and conduct T.E.E. up to December, 2010.<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE AUTOMATIC CREDIT<br />

TRANSFER IN MBA (B&F) FOR CAIIB HOLDERS OF OLD<br />

AND REVISED SCHEME.<br />

ACSC 17.10.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that<br />

according to the scheme framed by the School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Studies, the students enrolled for MBA (Banking & Finance)<br />

Programme are eligible for credit transfer under CAIIB old and<br />

revised scheme. Under the old scheme, the credit transfer is permitted<br />

for MS-4: Accounting and Finance Managers, MS-9: Managerial<br />

Economics, MS-491: Law and Practice relevant to Banking and under<br />

the revised scheme students are eligible for credit transfer <strong>of</strong> five<br />

courses i.e. MS-4, MS-424, MS-491, MS-492 and one <strong>of</strong> the elective<br />

courses (MS-421, Ms-423, and MS-425) according to whichever<br />

elective s/he cleared in CAIIB examination. The students are required<br />

to pay the requisite fees for credit transfer at the time <strong>of</strong> admission<br />

itself at the respective Regional Centres. It is time consuming and<br />

inconvenient to the student as he/she has to apply for credit transfer to<br />

SRE after admission and enclose copies <strong>of</strong> CAIIB credentials.


The matter was taken up with the School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies and<br />

School has agreed that in order to avoid delay in credit transfer and to<br />

reduce the time gap, the credit transfer <strong>of</strong> the courses mentioned<br />

above be reflected in the grade card automatically on updating the<br />

admission data <strong>of</strong> the student in the Master record which invariably<br />

indicates the details <strong>of</strong> credit transfer as well. Every student should<br />

show original letter <strong>of</strong> membership and submit a self attested<br />

photocopy.<br />

ACSC 17.10.2<br />

The ACSC approved the proposal for automatic credit transfer to be<br />

reflected in the grade cards <strong>of</strong> MBA Banking & Finance students.<br />

TABLED ITEMS<br />

ITEM NO. 11<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong><br />

Preparatory Course in Social Sciences (PSS-01).<br />

ACSC 17.11.1<br />

ACSC 17.11.2<br />

ACSC 17.11.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences has submitted the Phase Zero Form for<br />

revision <strong>of</strong> Preparatory Course in Social Sciences (PSS-01). The<br />

course was developed about 16 years back. Keeping in view the<br />

developments in society, economy and polity since then, it is<br />

necessary to revise and update the course, incorporating contemporary<br />

issues and concerns.<br />

Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences pointed out that the revised course<br />

shall be put on <strong>of</strong>fer in January 2007.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Appendix-9) for revision <strong>of</strong> Preparatory Course in Social Sciences<br />

(PSS-01) with the direction that revised code may be obtained.<br />

ITEM NO. 12<br />

ACSC 17.12.1<br />

To consider and approve the Course Structure <strong>of</strong> MEC-009<br />

(Research Methods in Economics), A Compulsory Course <strong>of</strong> M.A.<br />

(Economics), 2 nd Year.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 31 st <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 20.2.2004 approved the<br />

DPR Phase-3 Form for M.A. (Economics) subject to addition <strong>of</strong> four<br />

credit work relating to MEC-009 (Research Methods in Economics)


or credit worth <strong>of</strong> MECP-001 to be reviewed in the light <strong>of</strong> overall<br />

experience gained in the matter by other Schools. In view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above decision, the School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences has included MEC-009<br />

(Research Methods in Economics) as a six credit course in M.A.<br />

(Economics) 2 nd year. The expert committee finalized the course<br />

structure for the same which was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 25.11.2005.<br />

ACSC 17.12.2 The ACSC considered and approved the Course Structure<br />

(Appendix-10) <strong>of</strong> MEC-009 (Research Methods in Economics), as a<br />

Compulsory Course <strong>of</strong> M.A. (Economics), 2 nd Year with the direction<br />

that the syllabus be sent to Director, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination for<br />

record.<br />

ITEM NO. 13<br />

To consider and approve change <strong>of</strong> MBA Degree format.<br />

ACSC 17.13.1<br />

Dr. S.K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE informed the members that the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its meeting held on May 28, 1992 re-designated<br />

the Advanced Diploma in Management as PG Diploma in<br />

Management and similarly four specialization diplomas as PG<br />

Diplomas in Human Resource Management, Financial Management,<br />

Operations Management and Marketing Management respectively<br />

effective from January, 1994. The students who were registered prior<br />

to 1994 but are completing the programme now after getting reregistering<br />

themselves for the courses are still being awarded<br />

diplomas instead <strong>of</strong> PG Diplomas just because their enrollment<br />

number indicates pre-1994. The University has received several<br />

requests and a legal notice has also been in this regard. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its meeting held on 5.7.1991, while considering the coursewise<br />

registration in Management programme, had raised a question<br />

“as to how the several diplomas like, DIM, ADIM and the<br />

Specialized Diplomas awarded to the students should be treated,<br />

when the student is finally awarded the MBA Degree which<br />

subsumed all these diplomas. The <strong>Council</strong> noted that since the<br />

diplomas were awarded at Convocation, it may not be<br />

appropriate to withdraw the diplomas while awarding the MBA<br />

degree; however, it should be possible to devise a suitable format<br />

<strong>of</strong> certification to meet the issue raised. This may be examined”<br />

(AC 4.4.5). In pursuance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s observations, the<br />

new format <strong>of</strong> MBA Degree has been revised and placed at<br />

Appendix-11.


ACSC 17.13.3<br />

ITEM NO. 14<br />

ACSC 17.14.1<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the Changed format <strong>of</strong> MBA<br />

Degree with the suggestion that Division/Grade secured by the<br />

students may also be indicated in future i.e. from 18 th Convocation<br />

onwards and award <strong>of</strong> P.G. Diploma in Management and P.G.<br />

Diploma in specialization streams for MBA students <strong>of</strong> pre-1994<br />

batch completing the module after December 2004 TEE.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in approving the<br />

Evaluation Scheme <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Value Added Products from<br />

Fruits & Vegetables (DVAPFV).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members about the<br />

salient features <strong>of</strong> the proposed Evaluation Scheme <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in<br />

Value Added Products from Fruits & Vegetables (DVAPFV). The<br />

detailed scheme as approved by the Vice-Chancellor is placed at<br />

Appendix-12.<br />

ACSC 17.14.2<br />

The ACSC ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Evaluation Scheme <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Value Added<br />

Products from Fruits & Vegetables (DVAPFV).<br />

ITEM NO. 15<br />

ACSC 17.15.1<br />

ACSC 17.15.2<br />

ITEM NO. 16<br />

ACSC 17.16.1<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in approving the<br />

launch <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Aquaculture.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

Phase-1 Form <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Aquaculture was approved on March 17,<br />

1997 and was also approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in June 2002.<br />

The expert committee convened in July, 2005 suggested two streams<br />

in Aquaculture (i) Fresh Water Aquaculture and (ii) Costal<br />

Aquaculture respectively to make the programme more focused.<br />

Since the launch <strong>of</strong> the programme is scheduled for January, 2006, the<br />

Vice-Chancellor approved the same.<br />

The ACSC ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the launch <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Aquaculture.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in approving the<br />

launch <strong>of</strong> the ‘Appreciation Course on Environment’ from<br />

January, 2006.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

Appreciation Course on Environment was developed by the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Sciences in collaboration with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and<br />

Forests, Govt. <strong>of</strong> India as an awareness non-credit course in project


mode with an objective to disseminate information on National and<br />

International Environmental issues, create Environmental<br />

consciousness among pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and academicians and to facilitate<br />

leadership among the individuals who may organize/participate in<br />

Environment upgradation programme. The decision to launch this<br />

course was taken in <strong>IGNOU</strong>-Ministry Coordination <strong>Meeting</strong> on<br />

October 28, 2005. Due to paucity <strong>of</strong> time, the Vice-Chancellor<br />

approved the launching <strong>of</strong> the course from January, 2006.<br />

ACSC 17.16.2<br />

ITEM NO. 17<br />

ACSC 17.17.1<br />

ACSC 17.17.2<br />

The ACSC ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the launch <strong>of</strong> the ‘Appreciation Course on Environment’ as<br />

an awareness, non-credit course in project mode from January, 2006.<br />

To consider and approve the new programme structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

B.Sc. (Major) in Chemistry and list <strong>of</strong> proposed Chemistry<br />

elective courses <strong>of</strong>fered in B.Sc. Programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

present Chemistry elective courses in B.Sc. programme have been on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer from 1992 onwards and to <strong>of</strong>fer requisite number <strong>of</strong> 48 credits to<br />

students for B.Sc. (Major) in Chemistry, the Chemistry faculty<br />

decided to undertake the revision <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. (Chemistry) programme in<br />

totality rather than course-wise revision. Based on the expert<br />

committee meetings in February and December, 2005 and on the<br />

credit requirement <strong>of</strong> maximum <strong>of</strong> 48 credits that a student can take in<br />

any discipline and recent advances in the discipline, the Committee<br />

recommended the new programme structure and broad outlines <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed courses (Appendix-13). The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOS at its 31 st<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 30.11.2005 approved the new programme structure<br />

and list <strong>of</strong> proposed elective courses.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the new programme structure <strong>of</strong><br />

the B.Sc. (Major) in Chemistry and the list <strong>of</strong> proposed Chemistry<br />

Elective Courses with the advice that the Course Expert Committees<br />

should be requested to devise more authentic and reflective course<br />

titles.<br />

ITEM NO. 18<br />

To consider and approve the Course Structure <strong>of</strong> PG Programme<br />

in Agricultural Policy (PGPAP).<br />

ACSC 17.18.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture has submitted Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> PG Programme<br />

in Agricultural Policy (PGPAP). The objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme<br />

are:


• To create understanding <strong>of</strong> the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Agricultural Policy framework among policy makers,<br />

implementers and other stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the system for<br />

its effectiveness implementation.<br />

• To develop human resource for analysis <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

aspects and its operationalization.<br />

• To identify the strategic issues with references to<br />

National Agriculture Policy and to develop a<br />

implementation framework based on project report<br />

studies.<br />

ACSC 17.18.2<br />

ACSC 17.18.3<br />

ITEM NO. 19<br />

ACSC 17.19.1<br />

Since, the programme involved the matters relating to Agricultural<br />

Policy <strong>of</strong> the Government and its implementation, the proposal<br />

requires detailed discussions in the School and Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture.<br />

The ACSC therefore decided to defer the item and suggested to bring<br />

it back after detailed discussion.<br />

To consider and approve the Evaluation Methodology for the<br />

course CS-69-TCP\IP Programming.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOCIS informed the members that the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its 16 th <strong>Meeting</strong>, while<br />

considering the Phase Zero Form for CS-69-TCP/IP Programming for<br />

BCA Programme, approved the Phase Zero Form with the direction<br />

that the Evaluation Methodology <strong>of</strong> the course be put up at its next<br />

meeting.<br />

ACSC 17.19.2<br />

ITEM NO.20<br />

ACSC 17.20.1<br />

The item was discussed in detail and it was decided that (i) the course<br />

code CS-69 be given new code, and (ii) the practical examination<br />

should be synchronized with theory course semester. It was also<br />

decided that different sets <strong>of</strong> question papers be set for international<br />

students to avoid inconveniences due to time difference.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Certificate<br />

Programme in Functional English: Basic Level.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the members that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities has submitted the Phase-3 Form for Certificate<br />

Programme in Functional English: Basic Level with the objectives to<br />

teach the skills <strong>of</strong> listening, speaking, reading and writing and


communicative grammar, so that, the student at international level can<br />

function both socially and pr<strong>of</strong>essional in English. The programme<br />

has been prepared on an urgent basis for the Middle-East students<br />

who have completed 10+2 with English as one <strong>of</strong> the subject. The<br />

inputs for the programme have been received from the international<br />

partners <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

ACSC 17.20.2 The ACSC considered and approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

(Appendix-14) for Certificate Programme in Functional English:<br />

Basic Level subject with the direction that the School Board <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Humanities be apprised <strong>of</strong> the decision <strong>of</strong> the ACSC on course<br />

structure and contents.<br />

ITEM NO. 21<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ELIGIBILITY OF<br />

CANDIDATES WORKING ON CONTRACT BASIS FOR<br />

ADMISISON TO B.ED. PROGRAMME.<br />

ACSC 17.21.1<br />

ACSC 17.21.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE explained that as per NCTE<br />

requirement, a teacher should have two years full time experience in a<br />

Government/Recognized school and that the teacher should be in<br />

service at the time <strong>of</strong> filing his application/admission to the B.Ed.<br />

programme.<br />

The ACSC decided that the last date <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> applications<br />

may be changed to 15 th July and the entrance examination should be<br />

conducted on 3 rd rather than 1 st Sunday <strong>of</strong> August every year.<br />

However, the applicant must be in job while filling his application and<br />

seeks admission on successful completion.<br />

The <strong>Meeting</strong> ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(B.S.Saraswat)<br />

Member-Secretary


Appendix-6<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.3.1)<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

Programme: Diploma in Value Added Products from Fruits & Vegetables (DVAPFV)<br />

Examination and Evaluation Scheme<br />

(a) Weightage to Continuous Evaluation and Term-End Evaluation<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> the students will be based on (i) continuous evaluation (internal assessment) and<br />

(ii) term-end evaluation.<br />

Theory<br />

For theory, the weightage <strong>of</strong> the internal assessment will be 30% and that <strong>of</strong> the term-end<br />

examination will by 70%.<br />

Weightage: Theory<br />

Component Weightage<br />

Term end 70%<br />

Continuous 30%<br />

Total 100 %<br />

Practical<br />

The practical evaluation is divided under two components: (i) guided experiments and (ii)<br />

unguided experiments. The guided experiments shall be performed during the counselling<br />

sessions under the guidance <strong>of</strong> the counsellors. The unguided experiment shall be<br />

undertaken by the students in the last session. For unguided experiment, student shall not<br />

be provided any guidance while performing the experiment(s).<br />

Both the components will be evaluated. The weightage <strong>of</strong> 70% will be assigned to guided<br />

experiments and 30% weightage is for unguided experiments. Each experiment<br />

performed by the student would be evaluated. The student performance would be<br />

assessed by the counsellors covering various aspects like manipulative skills,<br />

observation and their understanding <strong>of</strong> the basic concepts related to the experiment.<br />

Weightage: Practical<br />

Component<br />

Weightage<br />

Guided Experiments 70%<br />

Un-guided Experiments 30%<br />

Total 100 %<br />

(b) Pass Percentage for Theory and Practical Examination<br />

The students will have to secure minimum 50% marks in all the components <strong>of</strong> the coursetheory,<br />

practical on individual basis and as well as on aggregate basis for the course i.e. (i)<br />

theory (term end as well as continuous); (ii) practical (guided as well as unguided experiments)<br />

and (iii) on aggregate basis.


(c) Modalities for Theory and Practical Examination Criteria<br />

Theory: Term-End Examination: 70% and Continuous Assessment (assignment): 30%<br />

Term End Examination: The examination shall be held once in a year i.e. the month<br />

<strong>of</strong> the December. The submission <strong>of</strong> assignments shall be pre-requisite for appearing in<br />

the final theory examination.<br />

Continuous Assessment (assignment): The Continuous assessment will be in form <strong>of</strong><br />

one Tutor marked assignment <strong>of</strong> 30 marks.<br />

Practical: Term-Guided Experiments: 70% and Unguided Experiments: 30%<br />

(i) Evaluation- Guided Experiments<br />

The students will be evaluated for performing the experiments by the counsellor. For a<br />

particular experiment, split up <strong>of</strong> marks may be broadly on the following lines:<br />

S.No Component<br />

Weightage<br />

a) Actual performance <strong>of</strong> experiment and observation 40%<br />

(psychomotor and manipulative skills)<br />

b) Reporting(Problem solving skills) 20%<br />

c) Viva-voce 20%<br />

d) Record 20%<br />

(Please see Form: 1)<br />

(ii) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Assigned Unguided Experiments<br />

It will be conducted in the last session <strong>of</strong> the laboratory work. The student should not be provided<br />

any guidance while performing this experiment. For this experiment 30% marks are allotted, split<br />

up <strong>of</strong> marks may be broadly on the following lines:<br />

.<br />

S.No Component<br />

Weightage<br />

a) Actual performance <strong>of</strong> experiment and observation 50%<br />

(psychomotor and manipulative skills)<br />

b) Reporting(Problem solving skills) 25%<br />

c) Viva-voce 25%<br />

(Please see Form: 2)<br />

There shall be one internal and one external examiner. The internal examiner will be from the<br />

same study centre and the external examiner will be the counsellor <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> Study Centre <strong>of</strong><br />

other District/State. The course-writer/faculty members <strong>of</strong> SOA/editors could also be act as<br />

external examiners.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> Consolidated Mark List<br />

The consolidated mark list <strong>of</strong> all students who shall be prepared using the pr<strong>of</strong>orma<br />

given in Form 3. This mark list shall be directly sent to the Director SRE&D within a<br />

week <strong>of</strong> conducting the lab courses.<br />

Consolidation <strong>of</strong> Practical Marks: Pr<strong>of</strong>orma 3 gives the consolidation <strong>of</strong> marks


(d) Participation & Attendance for practical<br />

Practical are essential components <strong>of</strong> the programme. For successful completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Programme, a participant is required to have a minimum <strong>of</strong> 75 % attendance in the practical<br />

sessions at Programme Study Centre. A student will not be eligible to appear in Term End<br />

examination if the percentage <strong>of</strong> attendance in practical session (Programme Study Centre) falls<br />

below 75%.<br />

(e) Distribution <strong>of</strong> marks<br />

Every course is considered as an independent unit. Each course will have 100 marks for theory<br />

and 100 marks for practical. The course wise distribution <strong>of</strong> marks is given below in the table.<br />

Course-wise Distribution <strong>of</strong> Marks<br />

Course<br />

Theory Practical Grand Total<br />

Code Assignment Term-end Unguided<br />

Experiment<br />

Guided<br />

Experiments<br />

BPVI-001 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-002 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-003 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-004 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-005 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-006 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-007 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

BPVI-008 30 (15) 70 (35) 30 (15) 70 (35) 200 (100)<br />

Total 240 (120) 560 (280) 240 (120) 560 (280) 1600 (800)<br />

The marks in bracket indicate minimum pass marks.<br />

(f) Pass Percentage for the Programme<br />

The students will have to secure 50% marks in all the courses on individual basis and on<br />

aggregate basis in all the eight courses for award <strong>of</strong> the programme degree.<br />

(g) Result and Certification<br />

The final certification <strong>of</strong> the Diploma shall be made on a five point scale using letters Grade – A,<br />

B, C, D and E. The notional correlates <strong>of</strong> the letter grades are as follows:<br />

Letter Qualitative Level Point Grade % <strong>of</strong> Marks<br />

Grade<br />

A Excellent 5 Above 80<br />

B Very Good 4 70-79.9<br />

C Good 3 60-69.9<br />

D Average 2 50-59.9<br />

E Unsatisfactory 1 Less than 50%<br />

(h) Examination Schedule<br />

The examination will be synchronized with the University December Exam schedule.<br />

(i) Assignment Schedule<br />

It will be mandatory on the part <strong>of</strong> students to submit all the 8 assignment before commencement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the term end examination.


Form 1<br />

Evaluation Sheet for Guided Experiments (for 70 Marks)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the Student :<br />

Enrolment No. :<br />

Residential Address :<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> guided<br />

Sl. Date Title experiment Total Remarks<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> the _____________________________________ marks<br />

Experiment Performance& Reporting Record Viva-<br />

Observations<br />

Voce<br />

(4) (2) (2 ) (2) (10)<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

7.<br />

8.<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

Total Marks in experiments<br />

Total (out <strong>of</strong> 70)<br />

Date :<br />

Place :<br />

Signature <strong>of</strong> Counsellor<br />

Note : Kindly use this pr<strong>of</strong>orma for each student individually.


Form 2<br />

Evaluation Sheet for Unguided Experiments (for 30 Marks)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the Student :<br />

Enrolment No. :<br />

Residential Address :<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> guided<br />

Sl. Date Title experiment Total<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> the _____________________________ marks Remarks<br />

Experiment Performance& Reporting Viva-<br />

Observations<br />

Voce<br />

(15) (6) (9) (30)<br />

Total Marks (out <strong>of</strong> 30)<br />

Date :<br />

Place :<br />

Signature <strong>of</strong> Counsellor<br />

Note : Kindly use this pr<strong>of</strong>orma for each student individually.


Form 3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>orma for Consolidated mark list<br />

Centre Code :<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the Centre :<br />

Year & Month :<br />

Sl. Enrolment No. Marks obtained Marks obtained in Total the<br />

in guided<br />

assigned unguided<br />

Student experiments experiment<br />

(out <strong>of</strong> 70) (out <strong>of</strong> 30)<br />

Date :<br />

Place :<br />

Signature <strong>of</strong> the Counsellor<br />

Signature <strong>of</strong> the Coordinator<br />

Note: I)<br />

ii)<br />

iii)<br />

This is a collective statement for all the students.<br />

Only the consolidated mark-list must be forwarded to the Registrar, SR&E<br />

Division, Block 12, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068.<br />

The evaluation sheets for guided experiments and for assigned unguided<br />

experiment must be handed over to the Coordinator <strong>of</strong> the study centre.


Evaluation scheme for Practical<br />

The students will be evaluated internally in the laboratory courses. There will be two<br />

components <strong>of</strong> this evaluation, i.e. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> guided experiments and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

assigned unguided experiment(s). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> guided experiments will have 70%<br />

weightage and evaluation <strong>of</strong> assigned unguided experiment(s) 30%.<br />

A<br />

Evaluation Guided Experiments<br />

The students will be evaluated for performing the experiments by the counsellor. For<br />

a particular experiment, split up <strong>of</strong> marks may be broadly on the following lines:<br />

a) Actual performance <strong>of</strong> experiment and observation 40%<br />

(psychomotor and manipulative skills)<br />

b) Reporting 20%<br />

(Problem solving skills)<br />

c) Viva-voce 20%<br />

d) Record 20%<br />

B<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Assigned Unguided Experiments<br />

It will be conducted in the last session <strong>of</strong> the laboratory work. The student should not be<br />

provided any guidance while performing this experiment. For this experiment 30% marks<br />

are allotted, split up <strong>of</strong> marks may be broadly on the following lines:<br />

.<br />

a) Actual performance <strong>of</strong> experiment and observation 50%<br />

(psychomotor and manipulative skills)<br />

b) Reporting 25%<br />

(Problem solving skills)<br />

c) Viva-voce 25%<br />

C Preparation <strong>of</strong> Consolidated Mark List<br />

The consolidated mark list <strong>of</strong> all students who attend the lab course may be prepared<br />

using the pr<strong>of</strong>orma given in Form 3. This mark list should be directly sent to the<br />

following address within a week <strong>of</strong> conducting the lab courses:<br />

The Registrar (SR&ED),<br />

I.G.N.O.U.<br />

Maidan Garhi,<br />

NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The break-up <strong>of</strong> marks prepared for each student as per pr<strong>of</strong>orma given in Form 1 and<br />

Form 2 may be handed over to the coordinator <strong>of</strong> the study centre. The coordinator is<br />

requested to keep these records under safe custody for any further use.


Appendix-7<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.3.1)<br />

Revised Programme Structure for B.Sc. (Major) in Chemistry<br />

Theory Courses Credits Laboratory Courses Credits<br />

1. Inorganic Chemistry I 4 1. Chemistry Lab I 4<br />

2. Inorganic Chemistry II 4 2. Chemistry Lab II 4<br />

3. Inorganic Chemistry III 4 3. Chemistry Lab III 4<br />

5. Organic Chemistry I 4<br />

5. Organic Chemistry II 4<br />

6. Organic Chemistry III 4<br />

7. Physical Chemistry I 4<br />

8. Physical Chemistry II 4<br />

9. Physical Chemistry III 4<br />

Total 36 12<br />

Course Package for Students opting for only 8 Credits worth <strong>of</strong><br />

Chemistry courses:<br />

1. Essentials <strong>of</strong> Chemistry 6 Credits<br />

2. Basic Chemistry Lab 2 Credits


Theory Courses Credits Laboratory Courses Credits<br />

1. Inorganic Chemistry I 4 1. Basic Chemistry Lab 4<br />

2. Inorganic Chemistry II 4 2. Physical Chemistry Lab 4<br />

3. Organic Chemistry I 4 3. Inorganic Chemistry Lab 4<br />

4. Organic Chemistry II 4 4. Organic Chemistry Lab 4<br />

5. Physical Chemistry I 4 5. Biochemistry Lab 4<br />

6. Physical Chemistry II 4 6. Computational Chem. Lab 2<br />

7. Biochemistry 4<br />

8. Spectroscopy 4<br />

9. Analytical Chemistry 4<br />

10.Computational Chemistry 4<br />

Total 40 22<br />

For B.Sc. (Chem.) Major the learner will be required to earn 48 Credits with the<br />

following combination.<br />

Compulsory Courses Theory Courses<br />

Laboratory Courses<br />

Courses 1-6 (24 Credits)<br />

Courses 1-4(16 Credits)<br />

Optional Courses Courses 7-10 Courses 5-6<br />

Note:<br />

• The basic laboratory course in a must prior to opting for any other laboratory<br />

course.<br />

• Course II <strong>of</strong> Inorganic or Organic or Physical can be taken only after Course I <strong>of</strong><br />

the corresponding specializations.<br />

• The laboratory courses can be done only after doing the corresponding theory<br />

courses.


BROAD OUTLINES OF CHEMISTRY COURSES<br />

1. INORGANIC CHEMISTRY I<br />

Block 1<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2<br />

Unit 4<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Block 3<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Unit 9<br />

Block 4<br />

Unit 10<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Structure <strong>of</strong> Atom<br />

Earlier Models <strong>of</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> Atom<br />

Wave Mechanical Model <strong>of</strong> Atom<br />

Multi electron Atom Systems<br />

Chemical Bonding<br />

Electronic Theory <strong>of</strong> Valency<br />

Valence Bond Theory<br />

Molecular Orbital Theory (Homo and hetero nuclear)<br />

General Trends in Properties <strong>of</strong> Elements and Extraction I<br />

The Periodic Table<br />

Periodicity<br />

Oxidation Reduction<br />

General Trends in Properties <strong>of</strong> Elements and Extraction II<br />

Acids and Bases<br />

Occurrence, Isolation and Purification <strong>of</strong> Metals<br />

Non aqueous Solvents<br />

2. INORGANIC CHEMISTRY II<br />

Block 1<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2<br />

s-Block Elements<br />

Hydrogen<br />

Alkali Metals<br />

Alkaline Earth Metals<br />

p-Block Elements-I<br />

Unit 5 Elements <strong>of</strong> Group 13<br />

Unit 6 Elements <strong>of</strong> Group 14<br />

Unit 7 Elements <strong>of</strong> Group 15


Block 3<br />

p-Block Elements-II<br />

Unit 8 Elements <strong>of</strong> Group 16<br />

Unit 9 Elements <strong>of</strong> Group 17<br />

Unit 10 Elements <strong>of</strong> Group 18<br />

Block 4<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Unit 13<br />

Transition Elements and Nuclear Chemistry<br />

Transition Elements<br />

Inner Transition Elements<br />

Nuclear Chemistry<br />

3. INORGANIC CHEMISTRY III<br />

Block 1<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Block 3<br />

Unit 9<br />

Unit 10<br />

Block 4<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Unit 13<br />

Coordination Chemistry<br />

Thermodynamic Aspects <strong>of</strong> Inorganic Systems<br />

Coordination Compounds – I<br />

Coordination Compounds – II<br />

Organometallics and Analytical Techniques<br />

Organometallic Compounds<br />

Analytical Techniques-I<br />

Analytical Techniques-II<br />

Analytical Techniques-III<br />

Inorganic Materials<br />

Exotic Inorganic Materials<br />

Inorganic Polymers<br />

Some Special Topics<br />

Corrosion<br />

Bioinorganic Chemistry<br />

Toxicity<br />

4. ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I<br />

Block 1:<br />

Fundamental Concepts-I<br />

Unit 1 Bonding, Functional Group Classification and Nomenclature<br />

Unit 2 Stereochemistry –I<br />

Unit 3 Stereochemistry –II


Block 2:<br />

Unit 4<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Block 3:<br />

Fundamental Concepts-II<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> Molecular Architecture on Physical Properties<br />

Structure-Reactivity Relationships<br />

Structure Elucidation using Spectroscopy –I (UV, IR)<br />

Structure Elucidation using Spectroscopy –II- (NMR, Mass)<br />

Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Organic Reaction Mechanism<br />

Unit 8 Basic Concepts –I - Types <strong>of</strong> Reactions, Reagents, Thermodynamic<br />

Unit 9 Basic Concepts –II and Kinetic aspects<br />

Unit 10 Reaction Intermediates (Free Radicals, Carbocations, Carbanions,<br />

Carbenes, Nitrenes and Benzynes)<br />

Block 4:<br />

Basic Skeleton: Hydrocarbons<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Unit 13<br />

Unit 14<br />

Alkanes<br />

Alkenes<br />

Alkynes<br />

Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Polynuclear Hydrocarbons) and Aromaticity<br />

5. ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II<br />

Bock 1:<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2:<br />

Unit 4<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Block 3:<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Unit 9<br />

Block 4:<br />

Unit 10<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Unit 13<br />

Derivatives <strong>of</strong> Hydrocarbons-I<br />

Alkyl and Aryl Halides<br />

Alcohols<br />

Phenols<br />

Derivatives <strong>of</strong> Hydrocarbons-II<br />

Ethers and Epoxides<br />

Aldehydes and Ketones<br />

Active Methylene Compounds<br />

Derivatives <strong>of</strong> Hydrocarbons-III<br />

Carboxylic Acids<br />

Substituted Carboxylic Acids<br />

Functional Derivatives <strong>of</strong> Monocarboxylic Acids<br />

Organo-Nitrogen and Sulphur Compounds<br />

Nitro Compounds<br />

Amino Compounds and Diazonium Salts<br />

Organosulphur Compounds<br />

Heterocyclic Compounds (including Purines, Pyrimidines)


6. ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-III<br />

Block 1:<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2:<br />

Biomolecules and their Metabolic Pathways-I<br />

Amino Acids, Peptides, Proteins<br />

Nucleic Acids – DNA, RNA<br />

Lipids<br />

Biomolecules and their Metabolic Pathways-II<br />

Unit 4 Carbohydrates<br />

Unit 5 Natural Products I - ( Terpenes, Alkaloides, Flavanoides etc.)<br />

Unit 6 Natural Products II<br />

Block 3:<br />

Molecular Rearrangements and Synthetic Compounds<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Unit 9<br />

Unit 10<br />

Block 4:<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Unit 13<br />

Molecular Rearrangements-I<br />

Molecular Rearrangements-II<br />

Synthetic Polymers<br />

Useful Synthetic Compounds (Dyes, Detergents etc.)<br />

Synthetic Methods<br />

Organometallic Compounds<br />

Oxidation and Reduction<br />

Organic Synthesis including Synthesis via Enolates<br />

7. PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY-I<br />

Block 1:<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2:<br />

Unit 4<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

States <strong>of</strong> Matter-I<br />

Units and Dimensions and Mathematical Methods<br />

Kinetic theory <strong>of</strong> Gases<br />

Real Gases and Their Liquefaction<br />

States <strong>of</strong> Matter-II<br />

Liquids<br />

Solid State<br />

Colloidal State and Surface Chemistry


Block 3:<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Unit 9<br />

Block 4<br />

Unit 10<br />

Unit 11<br />

Unit 12<br />

Chemical Thermodynamics<br />

The First Law <strong>of</strong> Thermodynamics<br />

Thermo-chemistry<br />

The Second and Third law <strong>of</strong> Thermodynamics<br />

Solutions and Colligative Properties<br />

Systems <strong>of</strong> Variable Composition<br />

Solutions<br />

Colligative Properties<br />

8. PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY –II<br />

Block 1<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Block 2<br />

Unit 4<br />

Unit 5<br />

Block 3:<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Block 4:<br />

Unit 9<br />

Unit 10<br />

Unit 11<br />

Equilibria in Chemistry<br />

Chemical Equilibria<br />

Ionic Equilibria<br />

Phase Equilibria<br />

Electrochemistry<br />

Electrochemistry-I<br />

Electrochemistry-II<br />

Chemical Kinetic and Photochemistry<br />

Chemical Kinetics<br />

Catalysis<br />

Photochemistry<br />

Areas <strong>of</strong> Recent Interest<br />

Macromolecules including conducting Polymers<br />

Applications <strong>of</strong> Computers in chemistry<br />

Emerging Areas (Femtochemistry etc.)<br />

9. PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY –III<br />

Block 1: Basic Concepts<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Quantum Mechanics<br />

Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Spectroscopy<br />

Symmetry in Chemistry


Block 2: Spectroscopic Methods-I<br />

Unit 4<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Rotational Spectra <strong>of</strong> Diatomic Molecules (Rigid Rotators etc.)<br />

Vibrational Spectra <strong>of</strong> Diatomic Molecules (Harmonic and<br />

enharmonic)<br />

IR Spectra <strong>of</strong> Polyatomic Molecules<br />

Raman Spectroscopy<br />

Block 3: Spectroscopic Methods-II<br />

Unit 8<br />

Unit 9<br />

Unit 10<br />

Unit 11<br />

Electronic Spectra <strong>of</strong> Atoms and Simple Diatomic Molecules<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy<br />

Principles <strong>of</strong> Electronic Spin Resonance Spectroscopy<br />

Other Parameters related to Molecular Structure- Molecular<br />

Properties<br />

10. CHEMISTRY LAB I<br />

Block 1: Inorganic Chemistry Lab<br />

Semi micro Analysis – cation analysis, separation and identification <strong>of</strong> ions from Group1,<br />

II, III, IV, V and VI. Anion analysis.<br />

Block 2: Organic Chemistry Lab<br />

Laboratory techniques<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> melting point<br />

Naphthalene 80-82°, Benzoic acid 121.5-122°<br />

Urea 132.5-133°, Succinic acid 184.5-185°<br />

Cinnamic acid 132.5-133°, Salicylic acid 157.5-158°<br />

Acetanilide 113.5-114°, m-Dinitrobenzene 90°<br />

p-Dichlorobenzene 52° Aspirin 135°<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> boiling points<br />

Distillation<br />

Ethanol 78°, Cyclohexane 81.4°, Toluene 110.6°, Benzene 80°<br />

Simple distillation <strong>of</strong> ethanol-water mixture using water condenser<br />

Distillation <strong>of</strong> nitrobenzene and aniline using air condenser


Crystallization<br />

Concept <strong>of</strong> induction <strong>of</strong> crystallization<br />

Phthalic acid from hot water (using fluted filter paper and stemless funnel)<br />

Acetanilide from boiling water<br />

Naphthalene from ethanol<br />

Benzoic acid from water<br />

Sublimation (Simple and Vacuum)<br />

Camphor, Naphthalene, Phthalic acid and Succinic acid.<br />

Qualitative Analysis (Semi micro)<br />

Detection <strong>of</strong> extra elements (N, S and halogens) and functional groups (phenolic,<br />

carboxylic, carbonyl, esters, carbohydrates, amines, amides, nitro and anilide) in<br />

simple organic compounds.<br />

Block 3: Physical Chemistry Lab<br />

Chemical Kinetics<br />

1. To determine the specific reaction rate <strong>of</strong> the hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> methyl acetate/ethyl<br />

acetate catalyzed by hydrogen ions at room temperature.<br />

2. To study the effect <strong>of</strong> acid strength on the hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> an ester.<br />

3. To compare the strengths <strong>of</strong> HCI and H 2 SO 4 by studying the kinetics <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> ethyl acetate.<br />

4. To study kinetically the reaction rate <strong>of</strong> decomposition <strong>of</strong> iodide by H 2 O 2.<br />

Distribution Law<br />

1. To study the distribution <strong>of</strong> iodine between water and CCl 4<br />

2. To study the distribution <strong>of</strong> benzoic acid between benzene and water.<br />

Colloids<br />

1. To prepare arsenious sulphide sol and compare the precipitating power <strong>of</strong> mono-,<br />

bi- and trivalent anions.<br />

Viscosity, Surface Tension<br />

1. To determine the percentage composition <strong>of</strong> a given mixture (non interacting<br />

system) by viscosity method.<br />

2. To determine the viscosity <strong>of</strong> amyl alcohol in water at different concentrations<br />

and calculate the excess viscosity <strong>of</strong> these solutions.


3. To determine the percentage composition <strong>of</strong> a given binary mixture by surface<br />

tension method (acetone & ethyl methyl ketone).<br />

11. CHEMISTRY LAB II<br />

Block 1: Inorganic Chemistry Lab<br />

Calibration <strong>of</strong> fractional weights, pipettes and burettes. Preparation <strong>of</strong> standard solutions.<br />

Dilution- 0.1 M to 0.001 M solutions.<br />

Quantitative Analysis<br />

Volumetric Analysis<br />

Gravimetric Analysis<br />

(a) Determination <strong>of</strong> acetic acid in commercial vinegar using NaOH<br />

(b) Determination <strong>of</strong> alkali content – antacid tablet using HCI.<br />

(c) Estimation <strong>of</strong> calcium content in chalk as calcium oxalate by<br />

permanganometry.<br />

(d) Estimation <strong>of</strong> hardness <strong>of</strong> water by EDTA.<br />

(e) Estimation <strong>of</strong> ferrous and ferric by dichromate method.<br />

(f) Estimation <strong>of</strong> copper using thiosulphate.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Cu as CuSCN and Ni as Ni (dimethylgloxime)<br />

Block 2: Organic Chemistry Lab<br />

Laboratory Techniques<br />

A. Thin Layer Chromatography<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> R f values and identification <strong>of</strong> organic compounds.<br />

(a) Separation <strong>of</strong> green leaf pigments (spinach leaves may be used).<br />

(b) Preparation and separation <strong>of</strong> 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones <strong>of</strong> acetone,<br />

2-butanone, hexan-2- and 3-one using toluene and light petroleum (40:60).<br />

(c) Separation <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> dyes using cyclohexane and ethyl acetate (8.5:1.5).


B. Paper Chromatography: Ascending and Circular<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> R f values and identification <strong>of</strong> organic compounds.<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> phenylalanine and glycine. Alanine and aspartic<br />

acid. Leucine and glutamic acid. Spray reagent – ninhydrin.<br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> D, L – alanine, glycine, and L-Leucine using<br />

n-butanol:acetic acid:water (4:1:5). Spray reagent – ninhydrin.<br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> monosaccharides – a mixture <strong>of</strong> D-galactose and D – fructose using<br />

n-butanonl:acetone:water (4:5:1). Spray reagent – aniline hydrogen phthalate.<br />

Qualitative Analysis<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> an organic compound through the functional group analysis,<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> melting point and preparation <strong>of</strong> suitable derivatives.<br />

Block 3: Physical Chemistry Lab<br />

Transition Temperature<br />

1. Determination <strong>of</strong> the transition temperature <strong>of</strong> the given substance by<br />

thermometric/dialometric method (e.g. MnCl 2 .4H 2 O/SrBr 2 .2H 2 O).<br />

Phase Equilibrium<br />

1. To study the effect <strong>of</strong> a solute (e.g. NaCl, succinic acid) on the critical solution<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> two partially miscible liquids (e.g. phenol-water system) and to<br />

determine the concentration <strong>of</strong> that solute in given phenon-water system.<br />

2. To construct the phase diagram <strong>of</strong> two component (e.g. diphenylamine –<br />

benzophenone) system by cooling curve method.<br />

Thermochemistry<br />

1. To determine the solubility <strong>of</strong> benzoic acid at different temperatures and to<br />

determine ∆H <strong>of</strong> the dissolution process.<br />

2. To determine the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> neutralization <strong>of</strong> a weak acid/weak base versus<br />

strong base/strong acid and determine the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> ionization <strong>of</strong> the weak<br />

acid/weak base.<br />

3. To determine the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> solution <strong>of</strong> solid calcium chloride and calculate the<br />

lattice energy <strong>of</strong> calcium chloride from its enthalpy data using Born Haber cycle.


12. Chemistry Lab III<br />

Block1: Inorganic Chemistry Lab<br />

Synthesis and Analysis<br />

(a)<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> sodium trioxalato ferrate (iii), Na 3 [Fe(C 2 O 4 ) 3 ] and<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> its composition by permaganometry.<br />

(b) Preparation <strong>of</strong> Ni-DMG complex, [Ni(DMG) 2 ].<br />

(c) Preparation <strong>of</strong> copper tetraammine complex. [Cu(NH 3 ) 4 ]SO 4 .<br />

(d)<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> cis-and trans-bisoxalato diaqua chromate (III) ion.<br />

Instrumentation<br />

(a) job’s method<br />

(b) Mole-ratio method<br />

Adulteration – Food stuffs.<br />

Effluent analysis, water analysis.<br />

Solvent Extraction<br />

Separation and estimation <strong>of</strong> Mg(ll) and Fe(ll)<br />

Ion Exchange Method<br />

Separation and estimation <strong>of</strong> Mg(ll) and Zn(ll)<br />

Block 2: Organic Chemistry Lab<br />

Laboratory Techniques<br />

Naphthalene from its suspension in water<br />

Clove oil from cloves<br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> o-and p-nitrophenols<br />

Column Chromatography<br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> fluorescein and methylene blue<br />

Separation <strong>of</strong> leaf pigments from spinach leaves<br />

Resolution <strong>of</strong> recemic mixture <strong>of</strong> (±) mandelic acid


Qualitative Analysis<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> an organic mixture containing two solid components using water, NaHCO 3 .<br />

NaOH for separation and preparation <strong>of</strong> suitable derivatives.<br />

Synthesis <strong>of</strong> Organic Compounds<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Acetylation <strong>of</strong> salicylic acid, glucose and hydroquinone, Benzoylation <strong>of</strong> aniline<br />

and phenol<br />

Aliphatic electrophilic substitution<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> iod<strong>of</strong>orm form ethanol and acetone<br />

(c)<br />

Aromatic electrophilic substation<br />

Nitration<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> m-dinitrobenzene<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> p-nitroacetanilide<br />

Halogenation<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> p-bromoacetanilide<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol<br />

(d)<br />

Diazotizatoin/coupling<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> methyl orange and methyl red<br />

(e)<br />

Oxidation<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> benzoic acid from toluene<br />

(f)<br />

Reduction<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> aniline from nitrobenzene<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> m-nitroaniline from m-dinitrobenzene.<br />

Stereochemical Study <strong>of</strong> Organic Compounds via Models<br />

R and S configuration <strong>of</strong> optical isomers.<br />

E, Z configuration <strong>of</strong> geometrical isomers.<br />

Conformational analysis <strong>of</strong> cyclohexanes and substituted cyclohexanes.


Block 3: Physical Chemistry Lab<br />

Electrochemistry<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

(e)<br />

To determine the strength <strong>of</strong> the given acid conductometrically using standard alkali<br />

solution<br />

To determine the solubility and solubility product <strong>of</strong> a sparingly soluble electrolyte<br />

conductometrically.<br />

To study the saponification <strong>of</strong> ethyl acetate conductometrically.<br />

To determine the ionization constant <strong>of</strong> a weak acid conductometrically.<br />

To titrate potentiometrically the given ferrous ammomium sulphate solution using<br />

KMnO 4 /K 2 Cr 2 O 7 as titrant and calculate the redox potential <strong>of</strong> Fe ++ /Fe +++ system on<br />

the hydrogen scale.<br />

Refractometry, Polarimetry<br />

(b)<br />

(a)<br />

To verify law <strong>of</strong> refraction <strong>of</strong> mixture (e.g. <strong>of</strong> glycerol and water) using Abbe’s<br />

refractometer.<br />

To determine the specific rotation <strong>of</strong> a given optically active compound.<br />

Molecular Weight Determination<br />

(a) Determination <strong>of</strong> molecular weight <strong>of</strong> a non-volatile solute by Rast<br />

method/Bechmann freezing point method.<br />

(b) Determination <strong>of</strong> the apparent degree <strong>of</strong> dissociation <strong>of</strong> an electrolyle (e.g., NaCl)<br />

in aqueous solution at different concentrations by ebullioscopy.<br />

Colorimetry<br />

To verify Beer – Lambert law for KMnO 4 /K 2 Cr 2 O 7 and determine the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> the given solution <strong>of</strong> the substance.


Essential Chemistry (8 Credits)<br />

(6 Credits theory and 2 Credits lab)<br />

Inorganic Chemistry (2 Credits)<br />

Block 1:<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Unit 4<br />

Block 2:<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Atomic Structure and Periodicity<br />

Atomic Structure<br />

Chemical Bonding<br />

Periodic table and periodicity<br />

s-Block elements<br />

Chemistry <strong>of</strong> p & d Block Elements<br />

Chemistry <strong>of</strong> p-Block elements<br />

Chemistry <strong>of</strong> d-Block elements<br />

Lanthanides and actinides<br />

Metallurgy<br />

Organic Chemistry (2 Credits)<br />

Block 1:<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Unit 4<br />

Block 2:<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Organic Chemistry I<br />

Basic concepts and nomenclature<br />

Isomerism including stereo isomerism<br />

Hydrocarbons<br />

Functional Derivatives containing oxygen (alcohol, phenols,<br />

aldehydes and ketones)<br />

Organic Chemistry II<br />

Carboxlic acids and their derivatives<br />

Functional derivatives containing nitrogen<br />

Compounds <strong>of</strong> daily use – polymers, dyes, drugs etc.<br />

Naturally occurring organic compounds<br />

Physical Chemistry (2 credits)<br />

Block 1<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Unit 4<br />

Physical Chemistry I<br />

States <strong>of</strong> matter<br />

Chemical thermodymics<br />

Solutions<br />

Chemical kinetics


Block 2<br />

Unit 5<br />

Unit 6<br />

Unit 7<br />

Unit 8<br />

Physical Chemistry II<br />

Chemical equilibrium<br />

Ionic equilibrium<br />

Electro Chemistry<br />

Surface Chemistry and catalysis<br />

Basic Chemistry Lab (2 Credits)<br />

Block 1:<br />

Unit 1<br />

Unit 2<br />

Unit 3<br />

Quantitative Analysis<br />

Laboratory Techniques and Procedures<br />

Acid-Base Titrations<br />

Estimation <strong>of</strong> Iron/Copper<br />

Block 2: Experiments<br />

One Organic and one inorganic preparation<br />

Solvent extraction and chromatographic techniques<br />

Detection <strong>of</strong> functional groups<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> surface tension and viscosity<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> heat <strong>of</strong> neutralization<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> a reaction


Appendix – 8<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.3.1)<br />

Evaluation Methodology for CS-69 (Revised)<br />

Credit Weightage <strong>of</strong> CS-69 “TCP/IP Programming”<br />

Course<br />

Code<br />

CS-69<br />

Course<br />

Title<br />

TCP/IP<br />

Programming<br />

Credits Continuous Evaluation Term-end Examination<br />

TMA Project<br />

Theory<br />

Practical<br />

Assignment Duration<br />

Duration<br />

Max.<br />

Marks<br />

Max.<br />

Marks<br />

4 10 15 2 Hrs. 60 1 Hr.* 15<br />

* There will be only one combined practical examination for CS-68, CS-69 and CS-74 <strong>of</strong> 1-hour duration<br />

each (total 3 hours).<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Sessions:<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Sessions:<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> Hours<br />

Theory Practical Theory Practical<br />

3 10 6 30<br />

Methodology for Evaluation<br />

(1) Evaluation for each course covers two aspects:<br />

(a) Continuous evaluation through assignments with a weightage <strong>of</strong><br />

25%.<br />

(b) Term-end examination is having a weightage <strong>of</strong> 75%. Term End<br />

Theory Examination is having a weightage <strong>of</strong> 60% and Term<br />

End Practical Examination is having a weightage <strong>of</strong> 15%.<br />

(2) The Continuous evaluation consists <strong>of</strong> two compulsory components, a<br />

TMA (10%) and a project assignment (15%).<br />

(3) The requirement for passing would be at least 50% in continuous<br />

evaluation and 50% in the term-end examinations.


Appendix-9<br />

(To Resolution No. AC.34.3.2)<br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee<br />

1. Each Discipline should have the requisite Credits needed to be on <strong>of</strong>fer in the<br />

concerned programme (for example, courses worth 64 credits in M.A.<br />

(History, Political Science, Public Administration and Sociology); 66 Credits<br />

in M.A. (Economics); and 32 Credits in PGDDM.<br />

2. Each M.A.Programme and PGDDM will have on <strong>of</strong>fer a minimum <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />

worth Credits from its Core courses.<br />

3. Each M.A. Programme can <strong>of</strong>fer courses from other M.A. Programme to the<br />

tune <strong>of</strong> not more than 16 Credits in the multiple <strong>of</strong> 4 credits [Two Courses <strong>of</strong><br />

8 Credits each or One course <strong>of</strong> 8 Credits and Two courses <strong>of</strong> 4 Credits (if,<br />

any Discipline decides to opt for courses worth 12 Credits, it could be one<br />

course <strong>of</strong> 8 credits and one course <strong>of</strong> 4 credits, as in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

M.A.(Economics) or four courses <strong>of</strong> 4 credits each]<br />

4. The Assignment(s) <strong>of</strong> the adopted courses shall be developed by the Nodal<br />

Discipline(s) and shall be included in the Assignments’ Booklet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Discipline adopted the Course/Courses.<br />

5. Counselling for the adopted courses shall be along with the counselling <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Nodal Courses.<br />

6. The evaluators <strong>of</strong> the Nodal Courses shall evaluate the assignments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adopted courses.<br />

7. The Term-end-Examination Question Papers for the adopted courses shall be<br />

the same as the Nodal Courses Question Papers and shall be evaluated also by<br />

the evaluators <strong>of</strong> the Nodal Courses.


Appendix-10<br />

(To Resolution No. AC 34.4.3)<br />

I.G.N.O.U<br />

MINUTES OF THE 7 TH MEETING OF THE RESEARCH COUNCIL HELD ON<br />

30.12.2005 AT 11.30 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>,<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C. Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.L.Anand - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Science - Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, SOMS - Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, Director, STRIDE - Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

The following members could not attend the meeting.<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.Pati<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ravi Kulkarni<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.M.Shah<br />

5. Dr. D.Padmanaban<br />

6. Dr. N.S.Ramegowda<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

8. Dr. C.G.Naidu<br />

Sh.K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist<br />

the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset the Chairman welcomed the members to the 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong>. He specially welcomed the new members i.e. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.M.Shah, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul<br />

Khurana, Dr. D.Padmanaban, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, (Re-nominated) (in absentia) & Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

J.M.Parakh, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda and emphasized that he looked forward to their cooperation<br />

and valuable contribution to the deliberations in the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong>. The Chairman also placed on record the Research <strong>Council</strong>’s appreciation for<br />

the contribution made by the retiring members <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> i.e. Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

A.K.Sharma, Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K.Agarwal, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Dr. Anju Sehgal Gupta.


The Chairman emphasized that research and innovation in distance education should be<br />

the part <strong>of</strong> the research done in the University. He exhorted the University’s Academia<br />

to carry out research in Distance Education and bring forward the new innovations in the<br />

field. He desired that the Research <strong>Council</strong> should identify the thrust areas for research.<br />

He also suggested that as is done by the Vice-Chancellor in every Board <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

meeting, the Pro Vice-Chancellor should present a preamble about research in the<br />

University in the Research <strong>Council</strong> meetings.<br />

The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor, to present the<br />

agenda.<br />

ITEM NO. 1 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 6 TH MEETING OF THE<br />

RESEARCH COUNCIL HELD ON 13.1.2005 AND TO NOTE THE<br />

ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

RC.7.1.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg Pro Vice Chancellor informed the Members that the Minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

the 6 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> held on 13.1.2005 were circulated to the<br />

members. Comments have been received from one <strong>of</strong> the members on the<br />

recording <strong>of</strong> Resolution No. 6.5.4. The Comments <strong>of</strong> the Member are:<br />

“that the Research <strong>Council</strong> decided that the decision taken in respect <strong>of</strong> 6.5.2<br />

was the same as for 6.5.4”. Comments were placed before the Chairman and it<br />

was decided that the following lines may be added in Resolution no. 6.5.4:<br />

“R.C. 6.5.4: The Research <strong>Council</strong> decided that the proposal could not be<br />

approved in the present form and the same was referred to the<br />

Sub-Committee constituted under Resolution No. 6.5.2. The<br />

<strong>Council</strong> advised that the proposal be examined carefully by the<br />

School Board and should be error free before it is re-submitted to<br />

the Research <strong>Council</strong> for approval”.<br />

RC.7.1.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> noted the action taken on the Minutes and confirmed the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 6 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> with the modification<br />

mentioned above.<br />

RC.7.1.3<br />

The members pointed out that in spite <strong>of</strong> the assurance given last time, the<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> has been held after about a year. It was<br />

therefore decided that Research <strong>Council</strong> must meet twice a year and its Standing<br />

Committee should meet more frequently.


ITEM NO.2<br />

RC.7.2.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROGRESS REPORT OF<br />

RESEARCH SCHOLARS ADMITTED TO THE PH.D. PROGRAMME IN<br />

SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg Pro Vice Chancellor apprised the Members that the progress<br />

reports have been submitted by the research scholars as per details given below:<br />

S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Candidates<br />

& Enrolment No.<br />

01 Ms. Latha Manickavasagam<br />

024957777<br />

02 Ms. Renu Arora<br />

052549298<br />

03 Mr. P.Vijayakumar<br />

024957720<br />

04 Ms. Priti Sharma<br />

024957784<br />

05 Mr. Rajesh Kumar<br />

052549306<br />

06 Mr. M.Sivakumar<br />

024957680<br />

07 Dr. Subrata Chakrabarti<br />

024957706<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> Progress<br />

Report<br />

July,04 to Dec.04<br />

March,05 to Oct.05<br />

July,04 to Dec.04<br />

Jan.05, to June,05<br />

March,05 to Aug.05<br />

Jan.05, to June,05<br />

July,04 to Dec.04<br />

Discipline<br />

Library & Information Science<br />

Library & Information Science<br />

Library & Information Science<br />

Political Science<br />

Economics<br />

History<br />

Public Administration<br />

RC.7.2.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> emphasized that the learners be asked to submit their<br />

progress reports every six months in time and the School Board <strong>of</strong> the discipline<br />

concerned should look into the progress report and comments <strong>of</strong> the Supervisors.<br />

Thereafter, these reports may be forwarded to the Research <strong>Council</strong> for<br />

consideration and approval.<br />

RC.7.2.3<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> on studying the progress reports submitted by the<br />

students, was <strong>of</strong> the view that the progress reports should contain full details <strong>of</strong><br />

the work done by the student, so that, the progress <strong>of</strong> the student can be assessed<br />

properly by the Authorities such as School Board/Research <strong>Council</strong> etc. Since<br />

the learners in Distance Education are at far <strong>of</strong>f places from the University and<br />

there is little face-to-face contact between the learner and the<br />

teachers/supervisor, it was decided to develop a performa for student to submit<br />

their six monthly progress report as per the requirements <strong>of</strong> the University. The<br />

schedule <strong>of</strong> the programme and the timetable for the submission <strong>of</strong> progress<br />

report should be developed within 15 days. To develop the performa and<br />

schedule <strong>of</strong> the programme, the Research <strong>Council</strong> constituted the following subcommittee:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, Director, STRIDE<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhulika Kaushik, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, SOMS - Convenor


RC.7.2.4<br />

RC.7.2.5<br />

RC.7.2.6<br />

The reports submitted by the students may be examined by this committee and<br />

action should be taken expeditiously to avoid de-motivation <strong>of</strong> the students in<br />

their research programme.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> also felt the need to amend the Ordinance on Research Degree<br />

Programme with regard to action against students who fail to submit their<br />

progress reports to their supervisor and who, in turn, fail to submit the same<br />

within a fortnight with their comments to the Director <strong>of</strong> the School concerned.<br />

All these instructions are required to be included in the progress report form and<br />

the instructions in the programme guide for Ph.D. programme.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the progress reports submitted<br />

by the students mentioned in Resolution No.7.2.1.<br />

ITEM NO.3<br />

TO CONSIDER THE PH.D. PROGRESS REPORT OF MR. PARDEEP<br />

RAI OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCES.<br />

RC.7.3.1<br />

RC.7.3.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS explained that, in pursuance <strong>of</strong> the decision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> at its last meeting held on 13.1.2005, the students who<br />

had not been submitting their progress reports as per the requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ordinance, were given notice for cancellation <strong>of</strong> their registration. In response,<br />

Dr. P.K.Rath, the supervisor forwarded the progress reports <strong>of</strong> Mr. Pardeep Rai<br />

for the period from July, 2003 to December, 2004. The reports were placed<br />

before the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS at its 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 27.5.2005. The<br />

School Board decided that the student be asked to re-frame the questionnaire.<br />

The Discipline Coordinator, Library & Information Science was requested to<br />

convey the observations <strong>of</strong> the School Board to the candidate and his supervisor.<br />

Meanwhile, the student has submitted the progress report for the period January-<br />

June, 2005, which was placed before the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS at 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 25.11.2005. The School Board recommended that its observations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> be conveyed to the student and his research supervisor, to re-frame<br />

the questionnaire and re-submit the same to the School Board. If the School<br />

Board approved the same at its next meeting, then the student be asked to make<br />

changes in the Chapters already prepared. The School Board considered the<br />

progress report for the period January, 2005 and recommended that it should be<br />

forwarded to the Research <strong>Council</strong> with the above observations.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> was further informed that the Director, SOSS had vide his<br />

letter dated December 6, 2005 conveyed the decision <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

SOSS to the student and his supervisor who is on lien for the last one and half<br />

years and had expressed a desire that he should be relieved <strong>of</strong> the supervision <strong>of</strong><br />

the student.


RC7.3.3<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> observed that the student had not been provided proper<br />

guidance as to how the questionnaire is to be modified because his supervisor is<br />

on leave. The <strong>Council</strong> decided that in future in such situations, the student<br />

should be associated with another supervisor so that his/her work did not suffer.<br />

However, in the present case, Dr. Pravakar Rath, the supervisor <strong>of</strong> Mr. Pardeep<br />

Rai be advised to continue as supervisor so that there is no further delay in<br />

finalization <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> Mr. Pardeep Rai.<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

TO CONSIDER THE ADMISSION OF MS. MEENAKSHI SHARMA<br />

(FORM NO.07664) AND MR RAJESH KUMAR (0048) IN PH.D. IN<br />

HISTORY.<br />

RC.7.4.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS explained that the Screening Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

the Faculty <strong>of</strong> History at its meeting held on October 12, 2004 considered the 12<br />

applications for registration to the Ph.D. Programme in History. Out <strong>of</strong> the 12<br />

applications, the Screening Committee accepted only 7 applications with minor<br />

changes in the topics to be effected in consultation with the supervisor.<br />

However, it seems that <strong>of</strong> the seven, five students have not shown any interest.<br />

RC.7.4.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered the proposals <strong>of</strong> Ms. Meenakshi Sharma and<br />

Mr. Rajesh Kumar and observed that the proposals need to be refined and<br />

referred these to the sub-committee constituted vide RC 7.2.3. The<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the sub-committee be placed before the Chairman for<br />

consideration and decision on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ITEM NO.5<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE NAME OF DR. SANJAY GUPTA,<br />

LECTURER IN PHYSICS AS RESEARCH SUPERVISOR FOR THE<br />

PH.D. PROGRAMME IN PHYSICS OF <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

RC.7.5.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School Board <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sciences at its 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 2.8.2005 recommended the name <strong>of</strong> Dr.<br />

Sanjay Gupta, Lecturer in Physics for approval as Research Supervisor for Ph.D.<br />

Programme in Physics <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

RC.7.5.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered the Curriculum Vitae <strong>of</strong> Dr. Sanjay Gupta and<br />

approved his name as research supervisor for Ph.D. prgramme in Physics in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> Clause 4.3 <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance on Research Degree<br />

Programme.


ITEM NO.6<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL<br />

SUBMITTED BY MR. RAJDEEP MANWANI FOR PH.D. IN<br />

ECONOMICS.<br />

RC.7.6.1<br />

RC.7.6.2<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

RC.7.7.1<br />

RC.7.7.2<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS at<br />

its 36 th meeting held on 27.7.2005 considered in detail the research proposal<br />

submitted by Mr. Rajdeep Manwani on “Evaluation and Effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

Training and its Impact on Productivity in Banking Sector in India” (A<br />

Comparative Study between Public and Private Sector Banks).<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> observed that the application form should include the<br />

name and consent <strong>of</strong> the supervisor. The <strong>Council</strong> observed that the research<br />

proposals should be submitted to the Research <strong>Council</strong> with the endorsement <strong>of</strong><br />

the Supervisor(s). The Research <strong>Council</strong> decided that the proposal should be<br />

examined by the Sub-Committee constituted vide RC 7.2.3. The<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the sub-committee be placed before the Chairman for<br />

consideration and decision on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

TO REPORT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-CHANCELLOR IN<br />

CONSTITUTING A STANDING COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER THE<br />

REPORTS OF PH.D. EXAMINERS FOR <strong>IGNOU</strong> PH.D. SCHOLARS.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the University has awarded a<br />

Ph.D. Degree in Education to Dr. Bimla Kapoor at its 16 th Convocation held on<br />

5.2.2005. The Vice-Chancellor had constituted a Standing Committee to<br />

consider the reports <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. Examiners for <strong>IGNOU</strong> Ph.D. scholars.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL<br />

SUBMITTED BY SH. RAHAT ALI ON “ECONOMICS OF FISH<br />

FARMING IN PUNJAB: A CASE STUDY OF SANGRUR DISTRICT”.<br />

RC.7.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the Economics faculty at its<br />

meeting held on 12.3.2004 considered four proposals for registration <strong>of</strong> Ph.D.<br />

programme in Economics. Out <strong>of</strong> the 4 proposals, the proposal on “Economics<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fish Farming in Punjab: A Case Study <strong>of</strong> Sangrur District” submitted by Sh.<br />

Rahat Ali was recommended for registration <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. programme. The proposal<br />

was considered by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its meeting<br />

held on 12.5.2004 and the student was advised to improve upon the methodology<br />

and formulation <strong>of</strong> Hypothesis. Accordingly, the candidate submitted the<br />

revised proposal as per the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the faculty which was placed before the<br />

School Board at its 35 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 12.3.2005 and recommended the<br />

proposal for the approval <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>.


RC.7.8.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered the proposal and referred it to the Sub-<br />

Committee constituted vide RC.7.2.3 for consideration. The recommendations <strong>of</strong><br />

the sub-committee be placed before the Chairman for consideration and decision<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL<br />

SUBMITTED BY MS. TRIPTI DHALLA FOR PH.D. IN EDUCATION.<br />

RC 7.9.1<br />

RC.7.9.2<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

RC 7.10.1<br />

RC.7.10.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the Research <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

meeting held on 13.1.2005 while considering the proposal submitted by Ms.<br />

Tripti Dhalla for Ph.D. in Education decided that the proposal could not be<br />

approved in the present form and advised that the proposal be examined<br />

carefully by the School Board and should be error free before it is re-submitted<br />

to the Research <strong>Council</strong>. Ms. Tripti Dhalla has re-submitted the proposal<br />

entitled “A Study <strong>of</strong> Enrichment Programmes to Foster Creative Thinking<br />

among Elementary School Children”. The School Board at its meeting held<br />

on 24.8.2005 considered the proposal and recommended for placing before the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered the revised proposal submitted by Ms. Tripti<br />

Dhalla in the light <strong>of</strong> the observations made by the School Board and decided to<br />

refer the proposal to the Sub-Committee constituted in the last meeting vide RC<br />

6.5.2 before approval by the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ADMISSION OF MR. ROSHUN<br />

DHURBARRYLALL FOR PH.D. RESEARCH STUDENTSHIP.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor explained that the University had received a<br />

request from Mr. Roshun Dhurbarrylall for admission to the Ph.D. Research<br />

Studentship. The proposal has been considered by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education at its 21 st meeting held on 24.8.2005 and the School Board was <strong>of</strong><br />

the view that the eligibility for admission to Ph.D. programme in Education to<br />

Mr. Roshun Dhurbarrylall may be relaxed and the same may be forwarded to<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> for relaxation <strong>of</strong> condition for admission to the Ph.D.<br />

programme in Education.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> noted that the University has so far launched the Ph.D.<br />

programme for M. Phil. degree holders. Those with only a Master’s degree are<br />

required to do course work, which is yet to be developed. However, as per the<br />

clause 6.2 <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance on Research degree programme, where such course<br />

work is deemed unnecessary, a prescription to that effect <strong>of</strong> exemptions shall be<br />

made by the School Board or the Area Committee concerned to be approved by<br />

the Research <strong>Council</strong>.


RC.7.10.3<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> discussed the matter in great detail and decided that the<br />

candidates with post-graduate degrees having five years teaching/ industry/<br />

administration/ pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience at senior level may be exempt from the<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> course work.<br />

RC.7.10.4<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> advised the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Education to<br />

process the case <strong>of</strong> Mr. Dhurbarrylall.<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

TO REPORT THE RE-LAUNCH OF PH.D. PROGRAMME FOR<br />

M.PHIL. DEGREE HOLDERS.<br />

RC.7.11.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Research <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

meeting held on 13.1.2005 vide Resolution no. RC.6.15.3 decided that the Ph.D.<br />

programme for M.Phil. degree holders be relaunched. In view <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>, the University has re-launched the Ph.D.<br />

programme for M.Phil. Degree holders from January, 2005.<br />

RC.7.11.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> noted the re-launch <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. programme for M.Phil.<br />

Degree holders with effect from January, 2006.<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE REGULATIONS FOR THE<br />

MEETINGS OF THE RESEARCH COUNCIL.<br />

RC.7.12.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Research <strong>Council</strong> has<br />

been declared as an Authority <strong>of</strong> the University under the provision <strong>of</strong> Statute 9<br />

(A) <strong>of</strong> the University. After being declared as an Authority <strong>of</strong> the University, it<br />

has become necessary for the Research <strong>Council</strong> to make regulations consistent<br />

with the Act, Statutes and the Ordinances for conduct <strong>of</strong> its business under<br />

provision Statutes 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act.<br />

RC.7.12.2<br />

During the discussion, a view merged that the Research <strong>Council</strong> should have a<br />

15 member Standing Committee as in the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and<br />

Planning Board to examine the various proposals in detail before placing the<br />

same for consideration before the Research <strong>Council</strong>. The Standing Committee


shall have the following composition:<br />

1. Vice-Chancellor/ - Chairman<br />

Senior most Pro Vice-Chancellor (in the absence <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor)<br />

2. A Pro Vice-Chancellor incharge <strong>of</strong> Research - Member<br />

nominated by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

3. Two Directors/Heads <strong>of</strong> Divisions <strong>of</strong> the University - Member<br />

4. Two Members <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> - Member<br />

5. A Member <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Management nominated - Member<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

6. One Teacher/academic who is not a member - Member<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>/<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> nominated<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

7. Director, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division - Convenor<br />

The quorum <strong>of</strong> the meeting shall be 1/3 rd <strong>of</strong> total members.<br />

RC.7.12.3<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> further decided that the Standing Committee may meet<br />

once in every three months and empowered it to take decisions on its behalf.<br />

The decisions shall be put for ratification but can be implemented from the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

RC.7.12.4<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> approved the Regulations placed at Appendix-1 for its<br />

meetings under the provisions <strong>of</strong> Section 27 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act.<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF SH. S.S.GULIA, RESEARCH<br />

SCHOLAR.<br />

RC.7.13.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the University has received a<br />

request for excusing for delay in the Ph.D. work <strong>of</strong> Shri G.G.Gulia due to his<br />

father’s illness.<br />

RC.7.13.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered and decided that as the candidate in this case is<br />

on a fellowship, the research scholar Sh. S.S.Gulia may be requested to forward<br />

his application through UGC.


ITEM NO.14<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE APPLICATION OF MS. ARUNDHATI<br />

MISHRA FOR ADMISSION TO THE PH.D. PROGRAMME IN<br />

PHYSICS.<br />

RC.7.14.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor infomred that Ms. Arundhati Mishra, a<br />

research scholar has submitted her proposal entitled “Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

Undergraduate Physics Programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Implications for<br />

Learners”” in the Area <strong>of</strong> Physics Education. The details <strong>of</strong> the proposal were<br />

examined by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOS at its 31 st meeting held on 30.11.2005.<br />

The School Board recommended the application <strong>of</strong> Ms. Mishra for admission to<br />

the Ph.D. programme in Physics.<br />

RC.7.14.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> Ms. Arundhati<br />

Mishra for admission to the Ph.D. programme in Physics.<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RESEARCH PROPOSALS OF<br />

MRS.AMRITBIR KAUR BRAR AND MR. RAMESH CHANDRA FOR<br />

ADMISSION TO THE PH.D. IN ECONOMICS.<br />

RC.7.15.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences explained that the<br />

Economics discipline considered 9 applications forms for registration in the<br />

Ph.D. programme in Economics. No proposal in its original form was found<br />

suitable for admission to the Ph.D. programme and candidates were advised to<br />

revise their proposals and re-submit the same for consideration. Out <strong>of</strong> the 9<br />

candidates only, 2 candidates have submitted their revised proposals. The<br />

Screening Committee <strong>of</strong> the economics discipline considered both the proposals<br />

at its meeting held on 21.10.2005 and recommended the same for Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> for its consideration.<br />

RC.7.15.2<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> considered the proposals and referred the same back for<br />

placing before the School Board for consideration and then re-submit after<br />

examining all the aspects <strong>of</strong> the proposals to the Research <strong>Council</strong> with its<br />

recommendation.<br />

The <strong>Meeting</strong> ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(H.P. Dikshit)<br />

Chairman


Appendix-1<br />

(To Resolution No. RC.7.12.4)<br />

Regulations for the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong><br />

(Section 27 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act)<br />

1. These regulations may be called “Regulations for the meetings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong>” and these shall come into force on the date they are<br />

notified by the University.<br />

2. The date for a meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> hereinafter referred to as<br />

“<strong>Council</strong>” shall be fixed by the Vice-Chancellor, who is the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Council</strong>.<br />

3. The notice for a meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> shall be issued by the Member-<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

4. Ordinarily, a notice in writing <strong>of</strong> 21 days shall be given for a meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Council</strong>. Provided that an urgent meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> may be convened by<br />

giving a shorter notice for reasons to be recorded in writing by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor.<br />

5. The Member-Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> shall circulate, at least 7 days<br />

before the meeting, the notes on the items <strong>of</strong> the agenda to be considered at a<br />

meeting. Provided that it shall be open to the Chairman, at his discretion, to<br />

bring up such items which are urgent and important in nature for consideration<br />

at the meeting itself.<br />

6. A special meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> may be convened by the Member-Secretary,<br />

if a request to this effect is received in writing from not less than 1/3 rd <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> which shall constitute the quorum on<br />

a day to be fixed in consultation with the Chairman. Members requisitioning<br />

such a special meeting should indicate the agendas item(s) which they propose<br />

to discuss at the meeting and the special meeting shall consider only those<br />

items. Provided that a special meeting shall not be held unless all the<br />

members who requisitioned such a meeting are present. Provided further that<br />

the requisition shall be deemed to have been cancelled if there is no quorum at<br />

such a meeting.<br />

7. The Research <strong>Council</strong> shall meet at least once in every six months and shall<br />

have a Standing Committee which shall meet at least once in every quarter.


8. Where a meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> has been duly convened and no quorum is<br />

present within half an hour <strong>of</strong> the time appointed for the meeting, the meeting<br />

will be adjourned to the same day and time in the next week or to such other<br />

day and at such other time and place, as the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> may<br />

decide, and notice for the adjourned meeting shall be sent to all the members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong>. If no quorum is present at an adjourned meeting within half an<br />

hour <strong>of</strong> the appointed time, the members present shall constitute the quorum.<br />

9. Where a matter is to be considered by a <strong>Council</strong> it shall be open to the Vice-<br />

Chancellor to obtain the approval <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> by<br />

circulation. In that event, the draft resolution shall be circulated together with<br />

explanatory notes and copies <strong>of</strong> the papers and documents connected<br />

therewith and the draft resolution shall be deemed to have been approved, if it<br />

is signed by a majority <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

10. The conduct <strong>of</strong> business at a meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> shall be regulated by the<br />

Chairman.<br />

11. Ordinarily all decisions shall be by consensus. However, if circumstances so<br />

warrant, the Chairman may put a resolution to vote and the decision shall be<br />

carried by a majority. In case <strong>of</strong> a tie, the Chairman shall have a casting vote<br />

as well.<br />

12. The minutes <strong>of</strong> the meetings <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> shall be prepared by the<br />

Member-Secretary ordinarily within a week’s time after the date <strong>of</strong> meeting,<br />

who shall submit the same to the Chairman for his approval. The minutes<br />

approved by the Chairman shall be circulated to the members for their<br />

comments. Comments, if any received from the members shall be considered<br />

at the following meeting before the minutes are confirmed.<br />

13. The decisions taken at a meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> may be<br />

implemented on the basis <strong>of</strong> the minutes prepared and approved by the<br />

Chairman.<br />

14. The power to amend, repeal or add to these regulations shall vest with the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management.<br />

*****


Appendix-11<br />

(To Resolution No. AC.34.6.3)<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 3 rd meeting <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence Committee held on 26.12.2005 at 12.00<br />

hrs. in Board Room, Block 8, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi - 110068<br />

Members Present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C. Garg, PVC - Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, STRIDE - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal, Director, SOET - Member<br />

5. Dr. Manoj Kulshrestha, Coordinator, B.Tech Prog. - Member<br />

6. Dr. Nayantara Padhi, Coordinator Management Prog. - Member<br />

7. Shri I.P.Goel, Section Officer, AIU - Special Invitee<br />

8. Registrar, SRE - Member Secretary<br />

Director, SOMS, SOSS, SOCIS and SOS and Pr<strong>of</strong>.A.R.Khan, Programme Coordinator,<br />

B.A., could not attend the meeting. Dr. S.V.Hussain represented School <strong>of</strong> Management<br />

Studies.<br />

Shri K.K. Kutty, Asstt.Registrar, SRED, was present to assist the Member Secretary.<br />

The Committee noted that the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd meeting <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence<br />

Committee held on 03.06.2005 have been approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and also<br />

the action taken thereon.<br />

Item No.1<br />

The Committee recommended that the issue <strong>of</strong> equivalence <strong>of</strong> Vardhman Mahaveer Open<br />

University’s Bachelor’s Preparatory Programme (BPP) with <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BPP be kept<br />

pending till such time that VMOU provides the required clarification on evaluation<br />

methodology.<br />

Item No.2<br />

The Equivalence Committee was informed that the Vice-Chancellor has kindly reviewed<br />

his decision <strong>of</strong> treating <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BIT as a ‘pr<strong>of</strong>essional qualification’ for admission to<br />

Management Programmes and has sought the suggestion <strong>of</strong> Equivalence Committee. The<br />

Committee resolved to recommend withdrawal <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BIT as a ‘pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

qualification’ for purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to Management Programmes for future.


Item No.3<br />

The Equivalence Committee noted that a meeting <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Studies has not been convened for quite some time. The Members<br />

suggested that Director, SOMS, be requested to convene a meeting <strong>of</strong> the School Board<br />

at an early date as the matter pertaining to recognition <strong>of</strong> ‘Associate Membership<br />

Examination <strong>of</strong> Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Metals’ was pending with the School for quite some<br />

time now.<br />

Item No.4<br />

In response to the resolution No. ACSC 15.5.2 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee at its 15 th meeting held on 29.06.05, the Equivalence Committee reconsidered<br />

the matter and resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that the<br />

Bachelor Degree holders under ‘non-formal stream’ who wish to seek admission to<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic programmes where the minimum eligibility criteria is 10+2 or its<br />

equivalent, may be admitted; provided that no additional requirement is prescribed at<br />

10+2 level.<br />

Shri I.P.Goel <strong>of</strong> AIU informed that recently the Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad has<br />

passed a judgement on non-recognition <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s B.A. Degree (non-formal stream)<br />

for admission to LL.B course <strong>of</strong> Gujarat University (eligibility criteria prescribed<br />

10+2+3). The members suggested that a copy <strong>of</strong> the judgement be obtained and the<br />

matter be taken up with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development, Govt. <strong>of</strong> India, in<br />

the larger interest <strong>of</strong> ODL system.<br />

The committee also recommended not to recognize the Master’s Degree awarded with<br />

out first degree by the Open Universities and the Directorate <strong>of</strong> Distance Education <strong>of</strong><br />

different Universities in the country.<br />

Item No.5<br />

The Equivalence Committee recommended to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to recognize the<br />

‘one time’ Bachelor Degree Programmes <strong>of</strong> all the Indian Universities which fulfil<br />

UGC’s stipulation, i.e. ‘those registered up to the year 1995-96 and have completed<br />

their Bachelor degree up to the year 1998-99’.<br />

Item No.6<br />

Recommended not to accept the ‘Hindi courses’ <strong>of</strong>fered by Institutions not empowered<br />

by Central/State Legislation to award Degrees for admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic<br />

programmes.<br />

Further resolved to recommend recognition <strong>of</strong> the degrees awarded by ‘Dakshina<br />

Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha, Chennai’ in view <strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> the institution as<br />

‘Institute <strong>of</strong> National Importance’. The Degrees include M.A.Hindi (2 yrs.), B.Ed. (1<br />

yr.), Shiksha Snatak (1 yr.), M.Phil (1 yr.), Ph.D (2 yrs.)


Item No.7<br />

Recommended recognition <strong>of</strong> the following Programmes <strong>of</strong> Kurukshetra Univ.,<br />

Kurukshetra and Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak for purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic programmes in view <strong>of</strong> the clarification furnished by KU and AIU:<br />

Kurukshetra University<br />

(i) ‘Visharada’ – equivalent to +2<br />

(ii) ‘Shastri’ <strong>of</strong> three year duration as equivalent to B.A.<br />

Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak<br />

(i) ‘Shastri’ <strong>of</strong> three year duration as equivalent to B.A.<br />

(ii) ‘Shastri’ <strong>of</strong> two year duration <strong>of</strong> ‘old scheme’ passed up to April, 1994 for<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to B.Ed. only; provided the candidates fulfil the stipulation<br />

made by MDU, i.e. ‘pass in the examination in the subject <strong>of</strong> English and one<br />

elective subject <strong>of</strong> the Shartri Part-I & II simultaneously’.<br />

Item No.8<br />

The Committee resolved to ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in recognizing<br />

four year ‘Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Arts’ Degree <strong>of</strong> Yangon University, Myanmar for purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Master’s Degree Programme; provided that candidates have<br />

passed the Matriculation/High School Education Examination <strong>of</strong> the Myanmar<br />

Examination Board in five subjects (except Myanmar language), <strong>of</strong> which ‘English’<br />

should be one.<br />

Item No.9<br />

Recommended not to accept two year full time ‘PG Diploma in Business Management’<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute <strong>of</strong> Management & Technology, Bareilly, for purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

admission to Management Programmes.<br />

Item No.10<br />

Referred the matter <strong>of</strong> equivalence <strong>of</strong> ‘two year Diploma’ awarded by the College <strong>of</strong><br />

Military Engg.(CME), Pune to the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology with the<br />

recommendation that the syllabi <strong>of</strong> CME and <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Engg. Diploma Programmes be<br />

compared. Further resolved that Registrar, SRED, should obtain a copy <strong>of</strong> the letter<br />

from AICTE with regard to the recognition granted to the ‘two year Diplomas’ <strong>of</strong> CME,<br />

Pune.<br />

Item No.11<br />

Recommended not to accept the two year ‘Diploma in Medical Laboratory<br />

Technician’ awarded by All India <strong>Council</strong> for Paramedical Education, New Delhi,<br />

for purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic programmes.


Item No.12<br />

Recommended not to accept the Matriculation <strong>of</strong> ‘Board <strong>of</strong> Adult Education’, Delhi<br />

and further qualification(s) acquired based on this Matriculation, for purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic programmes.<br />

Item No.13<br />

Resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to recognize the ‘Army Senior School<br />

Certificate Examination (Class XII)’ as equivalent to 10+2 for purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic Programmes. Further resolved to obtain from Army Headquarters a<br />

copy <strong>of</strong> the CBSE’s letter No.Genl./P.94/174 dated 21.07.1998 equating the said<br />

qualification with Senior Secondary Certificate.<br />

Item No.14<br />

Resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to recognize the ‘Grade-12<br />

Examination <strong>of</strong> Higher Secondary Education, Nepal’ as equivalent to 10+2 for purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic Programmes.<br />

Item No.15<br />

Resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to recognize the ‘High School<br />

Diploma (Grade-12)’ <strong>of</strong> the International School <strong>of</strong> Geneva as equivalent to 10+2 for<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic Programmes.<br />

Item No.16<br />

Resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to recognize the ‘Secondary General<br />

Education’ <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Russian Federation as equivalent to 10+2 for purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic Programmes. Further resolved to seek clarification<br />

from MHRD, with copy to AIU, about the protocol agreement with the former Soviet<br />

Union pertaining to mutual recognition <strong>of</strong> academic qualifications.<br />

Item No.17<br />

Recommended not to accept the ‘Madhyama Pariksha’ <strong>of</strong> ‘Shrimad Dayanand Arsha<br />

Vidyapeeth’, Rothak for purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic programmes.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

Sd/-<br />

Member Secretary


¥¦§¨CTS<br />

Appendix-12<br />

(To Resolution No. AC.34.8.3)<br />

Table 3 : Total Students Eligible for the Award <strong>of</strong> Degrees/Diplomas/Certificates in the<br />

17 th convocation<br />

Degree’s Eligible Diploma’s Eligible Certificate’s Eligible<br />

BA 4154 ADCA 8242 CRD 53<br />

BCOM 634 ADCM 54 CIG 2993<br />

BSC 346 ADIT 43 CPT 11<br />

BCA 3877 ADWRE 11 CAFE 248<br />

BED 4430 DCE 54 PGCRW 49<br />

BIT 682 DCH 44 CCP 47<br />

BLS 1502 DCYP 3 CDM 505<br />

BSCN 151 DECE 642 CES 89<br />

BTCM 77 PGDMCH 238 CHR 247<br />

BTS 233 DNHE 290 CLD 74<br />

BTWRE 13 DTS 80 CNCC 487<br />

BHM 1775 PGDCA 6607 CPFM 94<br />

MADE 20 PGDDE 95 CPLT 79<br />

MCA 7176 PGDHE 33 CTE 404<br />

MEG 496 PGDHHM 216 CTPM 68<br />

MHD 221 PGDIBO 100 CWDL 615<br />

MLS 336 PGDRD 656 CWED 72<br />

MTM 156 PGDT 133 CYP 1<br />

MBADFM 605 PGJMC 572 CFN 1100<br />

MBADHRM 741 DAFE 70 CHET 1<br />

PGDAPP 16 PGCCP 3<br />

PGDLAN 10 PGCRS 7<br />

©<br />

PGDRP 225 PGCTW 3<br />

15703<br />

75174<br />

15703<br />

75174<br />

! "# $ %&'( ¥ £<br />

¡¢£ ¤¥¤DIM<br />

¥©¢£ ¨¨¤ ¦¤© ¡¢ ¥¦ £ ¦© ¦ £ ¨©¥ ¤¥ £ §§ £ ¡¢£


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY FIFTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

May 15, 2006<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THRITY FIFTH MEETING OF THE<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON MAY 15, 2006 AT 11.30 A.M.<br />

IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS,<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> Members present and those who could not attend the <strong>Meeting</strong> is given in<br />

Appendix-1.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 35 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He specially welcomed the new member Dr. Kamal Vagrecha,<br />

Lecturer, School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The Chairman<br />

also placed on record <strong>Council</strong>’s appreciation for the academic contributions made by<br />

the retiring members Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.C.Katyal, Dr. Himanshu Kumar Shee, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K.Salooja,<br />

and Dr. D.Moitra. Before the agenda for the meeting was taken up, the Chairman<br />

apprised the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the major initiatives taken in <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> during<br />

the last five years. Some <strong>of</strong> these are:<br />

1. The enrolment in the University rose from 6.8 lakhs to 14.6 lakhs students.<br />

2. The University had witnessed tremendous growth in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

programme <strong>of</strong>ferings from 64 to 125. Besides these, complete revision <strong>of</strong><br />

several major programmes such as MCA, BCA, MBA, MLISc, PGDHE, Postbasic<br />

B.Sc. Nursing, PGDRD has been done. In addition, 94 courses have<br />

been revised and nearly 100 courses are under revision. More than 50 new<br />

courses in existing programmes have been added at the Post-graduate<br />

(Degree/Diploma) and Doctoral level registering an annual growth <strong>of</strong> 20% in<br />

the last five years.<br />

3. The presence <strong>of</strong> the University increased from 20 countries in 2001 to 34<br />

countries as <strong>of</strong> now for its programme <strong>of</strong>ferings.<br />

4. The capability <strong>of</strong> the University to use electronic media has enhanced<br />

tremendously. During the year 2005, the University introduced the first<br />

dedicated channel for education on DTH platform. The Gyan Darshan<br />

Channel had grown up from two channels in 2001 to four channels as on date<br />

and its transmission time has also been increased from 4 hours daily to round<br />

the clock. The University has in collaboration with Prasar Bharati during the<br />

period has already developed a Gyan Vani network <strong>of</strong> 17 FM radio stations<br />

for education and a few more will become functional soon. Two Edusat<br />

national networks for video conferencing – one each from Delhi and Jabalpur<br />

with 131 and 850 SITs have been established.


5. The University implemented many new plans and projects in collaboration<br />

with Ministries <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (MOA), External Affairs (MEA), Food<br />

Processing (MOFP), Government <strong>of</strong> India, Indian <strong>Council</strong> for Agricultural<br />

Research (ICAR), National <strong>Council</strong> for Teacher Education (NCTE), Shipping<br />

Corporation <strong>of</strong> India, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Atomic Energy, Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy <strong>of</strong> Administration,<br />

WIPO, Geneva, UNICEF and others.<br />

6. The University has setup two new Schools i.e School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Law. The School <strong>of</strong> Law is developing programs on IP regime and<br />

Human Rights, Cyber Laws and Indian Patent Laws. The School <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture has launched two programmes sponsored by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Food<br />

Processing (MOFP).<br />

7. Three New Centres, one each on ICT-enabled flexible education, Innovations<br />

in ODL and for Differently-Abled have been established.<br />

8. All major Schools, Divisions and Centres have been strengthened to improve<br />

delivery <strong>of</strong> learner support services.<br />

9. Some <strong>of</strong> the new innovative initiatives include a major joint project <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>-ISRO-MHRD in consultation with the State Governments <strong>of</strong> Bihar,<br />

Chattisgarh, MP and UP. A hub and a studio have been developed at Jabalpur<br />

to serve as the teaching-end with 850 Receive Terminals using solar panels.<br />

The University is also providing massive training to in-service teachers in<br />

Govt. Schools <strong>of</strong> 10 States and a few countries abroad. The Chairman also<br />

apprised the Members that he had made a presentation on the role <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

in continuous knowledge up-gradation and training <strong>of</strong> functionaries in the<br />

judicial system before the Hon’ble Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> India and five seniormost<br />

Hon’ble Judges <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court. Following this, it has been decided to<br />

develop a proposal for collaboration between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and the National<br />

Judicial Academy. The University is also collaborating with the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

External Affairs for providing tele-education to all the countries <strong>of</strong> Africa<br />

through a Pan African Network. It has also signed an MoU with Foreign<br />

Service Institute <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> External Affairs (MEA) for on-line training <strong>of</strong><br />

senior <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> MEA.<br />

10. To enhance our reach to the unreached, a new Regional Centre at Port Blair,<br />

along with 4 Study Centres in different islands has been set up.


11. The University is meeting all <strong>of</strong> its Non-Plan Expenditure from internal<br />

resource mobilization. Out <strong>of</strong> the grants received from the MHRD, we are<br />

also providing funds for development plans <strong>of</strong> other ODL Institutions in the<br />

country.<br />

Several members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> greatly appreciated some path breaking<br />

academic initiatives and interventions successfully introduced in the University<br />

during the last five years which lead to alarge number <strong>of</strong> new programmes and plans<br />

<strong>of</strong> academic collaboration with different Institutions/Organisations/Ministeries<br />

including. It is during this period that the system <strong>of</strong> having a Standing Committee <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was introduced to ensure dynamism in the process <strong>of</strong> decision<br />

in academic matters. This period witnessed emergence <strong>of</strong> SARC Consortium <strong>of</strong><br />

Opend and Distance Learning (SACODIL) and Global Mega University Network<br />

(GMUNET) with Chair and Secretariat in <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved<br />

to record its deep appreciation and gratefulness to Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P. Dikshit, the Chairman <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Council</strong> for his dynamic, innovative and visionary leadership provided to the<br />

University.<br />

The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor to present<br />

the agenda items.<br />

ITEM NO.1<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 34 TH MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON 17.1.2006 AND TO<br />

NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

AC 35.1.1<br />

AC 35.1.2<br />

ITEM NO.2<br />

AC 35.2.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Minutes<br />

(Appendix-2 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 34 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 17.1.2006 were circulated to the members<br />

and no comments have been received from any <strong>of</strong> the members. He<br />

proposed that the Minutes be deemed to have been confirmed.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes <strong>of</strong> its 34 th <strong>Meeting</strong> and<br />

noted the action taken thereon.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 18 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 20.3.2006.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the 18 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee (ACSC) was held on<br />

20.3.2006. The ACSC considered the following major items:<br />

1. Approved Phase Zero Forms for revision <strong>of</strong> courses PHE-02:<br />

Oscillations and Waves, PHE-03 (L): Physic Laboratory-I,<br />

PHE-09: Optics. The Phase Zero Form for Certificate in<br />

Information Technology was referred to the Sub-Committee<br />

under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pro Vice-Chancellor for reexamining<br />

the contents.


2. Approved direct admission <strong>of</strong> PGDIBO students in M.Com.<br />

IInd year; Semester-wise <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> Management Courses;<br />

Modified Evaluation Scheme <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in Community<br />

Cardiology; waiving <strong>of</strong> condition stipulated for re-registration<br />

<strong>of</strong> students in 3 rd year <strong>of</strong> MCA revised syllabus. For<br />

determining percentage equivalence for the point-grades in<br />

Management Programme was referred to the following<br />

Committee for examination and recommendation:<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC - Chairman<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS - Member<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham, Director, SOMS, - Member<br />

• Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SRED- Member<br />

3. Approved recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Task Force on SSS for<br />

reviewing the number <strong>of</strong> assignments in a course in <strong>IGNOU</strong>;<br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee to look into the details <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery system for diploma programme in Dairy & Meat<br />

Technology.<br />

4 Ratified action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medal for Innovation in Open and Distance<br />

Learning.<br />

AC 35.2.2<br />

AC 35.2.3<br />

The Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Gold Medal for Innovation<br />

in Open and Distance Learning was awarded to a team <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

employees led by Director (EMPC) for integrating the peripherals <strong>of</strong><br />

Edu-Sat. and developing in-house capacity to train the staff at Regional<br />

Centres.<br />

During the discussion, one <strong>of</strong> the Members sought clarification<br />

regarding implementation <strong>of</strong> the decision relating to assignments from<br />

July, 2006 cycle. It was informed that the proposed amendments are<br />

being placed as a separate item for consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

If approved, the proposal will be placed before the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management and then referred to the Visitor for approval.<br />

AC 35.2.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes<br />

(Appendix-3 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 18 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC<br />

held on 20.3.2006.


ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 35.3.1<br />

AC 35.3.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE VISION AND MISSION<br />

OF THE NATIONAL CENTRE FOR INNOVATION IN<br />

DISTANCE EDUCATION (NCIDE).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the National Centre<br />

for Innovation in Distance Education (NCIDE) was approved as part <strong>of</strong><br />

Xth Plan proposals in October, 2004. The Centre came into existence<br />

in December, 2005 and has been established to provide the platform to<br />

promote, develop and pilot innovations in all aspects <strong>of</strong> ODL systems.<br />

It is expected to become a resource centre to help all participants in the<br />

ODL system to try out and test innovative ideas for improving<br />

efficiency and learner related effectiveness, quality assurance and cost<br />

efficiencies in the system. Functioning as a research and prototype<br />

development centre, it is expected to provide intellectual, human and<br />

technical support to conduct the concept development <strong>of</strong> new ideas,<br />

pilot test innovative applications in all aspects <strong>of</strong> ODL functions and<br />

make the successful applications available to all interested<br />

stakeholders within the ODL system, to promote innovations in<br />

Distance Education within <strong>IGNOU</strong> for re-engineering and sustaining<br />

the system to provide framework and guidelines for standardization<br />

and total quality management <strong>of</strong> all the facets <strong>of</strong> the ODL, to provide<br />

ICT enabled automotive flexible learner support service system and<br />

search for new innovative solutions towards the University’s mission<br />

<strong>of</strong> seamless education, cost efficiency and borderless access to quality<br />

education through application <strong>of</strong> technology.<br />

During the discussion, one <strong>of</strong> the members expressed apprehensions<br />

about some commonality between the objectives <strong>of</strong> NCIDE and<br />

STRIDE.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur appreciated the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Centre and<br />

hoped that it would provide facility for documentation <strong>of</strong> innovations<br />

in ODL system. The members were informed that Director (NCIDE)<br />

has already sent a communication to all concerned in this regard.<br />

Director, Regional Services desired that innovation in ODL system<br />

done at Regional Centres should also be brought within the purview <strong>of</strong><br />

the NCIDE. Director (SOE) appreciated the establishment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Centre and desired that work related to innovations in teacher<br />

education through ODL system may also be taken up by the Centre.<br />

The Chairman welcomed the suggestions and hoped that the Centre<br />

shall strive to accommodate the advice and concern <strong>of</strong> the members to<br />

promote innovations which should not be jacketed. The <strong>Council</strong><br />

appreciated the special emphasis and focus being given to innovations<br />

in a wider perspective and accordingly resolved that different units <strong>of</strong><br />

the University should work cohesively to promote innovation with


NCIDE playing a central role.<br />

AC 35.3.3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Vision and<br />

Mission document (Appendix-4) <strong>of</strong> the National Centre for Innovation<br />

in Distance Education with the specific direction that suggestions be<br />

incorporated.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN SOCIAL WORK (PGDSW)<br />

AND MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK (MSW).<br />

AC 35.4.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that The School <strong>of</strong><br />

Continuing Education has submitted the Phase-3 Form for Postgraduate<br />

Diploma in Social Work (PGDSW) and Master <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Work (MSW). The PG Diploma has 36 credits which form the Ist year<br />

<strong>of</strong> Master’s in Social Work, as and when it is considered for <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

Since, this programme is to be <strong>of</strong>fered on modular basis, the School<br />

Board has recommended that a student who completes 1 st year courses<br />

be awarded PG Diploma in Social Work. The programme aims at<br />

training social work pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who would be working in the social<br />

welfare and social development sectors in the country. The availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> trained pr<strong>of</strong>essionals is expected to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> services.<br />

The Programme Coordinator, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas highlighted the<br />

salient features <strong>of</strong> the programme and responded to the queries raised<br />

by the members on eligibility qualifications, course titles, counseling<br />

sessions tele-conferencing, practical component etc.<br />

AC 35.4.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the Phase 3 Form and approved the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in Social Work with the following<br />

specific suggestions:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

The course MSW-002 should have a unit/section on Role <strong>of</strong><br />

Social Workers in Resettlement and Rehabilitation.<br />

The title <strong>of</strong> the MSW-003 course should be Social Work<br />

and Society.<br />

The delivery mechanism and the support systems for<br />

teaching learning process should conform to approved<br />

norms <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

It further decided that Phase-3 form for Master <strong>of</strong> Social Work be<br />

placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after assessing the response to PG<br />

Diploma in Social Welfare (Appendix-5).


ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 35.5.1<br />

AC 35.5.2<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

AC 35.6.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SUB-<br />

COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED TO EXAMINE THE<br />

PROPOSED CREDIT TRANSFER FROM THE OLD MCA TO<br />

THE REVISED MCA PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 16 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 19.9.2005,<br />

while considering the Credit Transfer from old MCA to revised MCA<br />

programme constituted a Sub-Committee vide Resolution No. 16.11.2<br />

to examine the issues involved. The Sub-Committee examined the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> commonality and arrived at the number <strong>of</strong> credits that could<br />

be exempted / transferred for each course. The main recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Committee along with details <strong>of</strong> credit transfer for each course<br />

that can be permitted to the learners <strong>of</strong> MCA old syllabus after<br />

admission to the revised MCA programme are placed at Appendix-6.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Sub-Committee constituted to examine the proposed Credit Transfer<br />

from the Old MCA to the Revised MCA programme with the<br />

suggestion that MCS-022 be deleted from semester-1.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR<br />

CREDIT TRANSFER AMONG CERTIFICATE IN RURAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT (CRD)/POST-GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN<br />

RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PGDRD)/ MASTER OF ARTS<br />

(RURAL DEVELOPMENT) PROGRAMME AND<br />

CONSEQUENT ISSUES OF FEE WAIVER AND LATERAL<br />

ENTRY.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Continuing Education has received representations from students<br />

regarding the Credit Transfer among CRD/PGDRD/M.A.(RD)<br />

programmes and consequent issues <strong>of</strong> fee-waiver and lateral entry.<br />

The background and academic status <strong>of</strong> these programmes is as<br />

follows:<br />

i) CRD/PGDRD/M.A.(RD) are all Post Graduate Programmes;<br />

ii) Entry level qualifications for all the three programmes is the<br />

same i.e. Bachelor’s Degree in any discipline;<br />

iii) Each programme has an independent status, however,<br />

displaying variation in terms <strong>of</strong> admission cycle, examination<br />

and counseling schedule, requirement <strong>of</strong> assignments and<br />

project work etc.<br />

iv) All the programmes make use <strong>of</strong> the same study material but<br />

the variation is in the extent <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> courses as specified<br />

for each programme.<br />

v) The fee structure for CRD/PGDRD and M.A.(RD) programme<br />

is Rs. 800/-, Rs. 1400/- and Rs. 5400/-, respectively.


As per the policy <strong>of</strong> the University, a student who has cleared a course<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the University and has not been certified, can be allowed to<br />

carry credits earned earlier if he/she had been admitted to the higher<br />

programme where the same course is to be studied. In the light <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above policy the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education has proposed the<br />

following credit transfer and consequent waiving <strong>of</strong> fee:<br />

i) Learners who have successfully completed CRD and are<br />

seeking admission to PGDRD or M.A. (RD) may be permitted<br />

credit transfer <strong>of</strong> 18 credits. A fee-waiver <strong>of</strong> Rs. 600/- (@ Rs.<br />

200 per course) may be granted to such learners.<br />

ii)<br />

iii)<br />

Learners who have completed PGDRD programmes and are<br />

seeking admission to M.A. (RD) may be permitted credit<br />

transfer worth 24 credits. No credit transfer may be<br />

permitted for Project work i.e. course RDD-05. A fee<br />

waiver <strong>of</strong> Rs. 800/- (@ Rs. 200/- per course) may be granted<br />

to such learners.<br />

Learners who have not successfully completed CRD/PGDRD<br />

programmes, however have successfully completed a specified<br />

number <strong>of</strong> constituent courses may be permitted credit transfer<br />

equivalent to the courses passed successfully. A fee-waiver @<br />

Rs. 200 per course successfully completed may be granted.<br />

The School has further proposed that there should be no lateral entry to<br />

M.A. (Rural Development) programme since any deviation in the<br />

admission cycle can lead to logistic problems.<br />

AC 35.6.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> SOCE<br />

for Credit transfer and fee waiver with the specific suggestion that no<br />

lateral entry shall be allowed.<br />

ITEM NO.7 TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN REVISING THE FEE FOR CHANGE OF<br />

ELECTIVES/MEDIUM/PROGRAMME ETC. IN BDP AND<br />

MASTERS’ DEGREE PROGRAMMES; AND TO CONSIDER<br />

AND APPROVE THE FIXING OF FEE FOR CHANGE OF<br />

COURSE IN MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME.<br />

AC 35.7.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the<br />

BDP Coordination Committee at its meeting held on 7 th January 2005<br />

had recommended revision <strong>of</strong> fee for change <strong>of</strong> Elective Courses @<br />

Rs. 150/- for 2/4 credit and Rs. 300/- for 8 credit courses. For change<br />

<strong>of</strong> medium in BDP, the Committee recommended that the normal fee<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 100/- be charged in addition to the fee for change <strong>of</strong> medium for<br />

each course @ Rs. 150/- for 2/4 credit and Rs. 300/- for 8 credit


courses. The revised rates came into effect from July 2005 cycle. The<br />

Task Force on Student Support Services at its meetings held on 4 th, and<br />

13 th April, 2005 and 2 nd December, 2005 had deliberated on the matter<br />

and recommended the following fee payment norms for change <strong>of</strong><br />

electives/medium etc. in Masters Degree Programme:<br />

(i) for change <strong>of</strong> Programme, a candidate should pay full fee for the<br />

new Programme and forfeit the fee paid for the programme opted<br />

earlier.<br />

(ii) change <strong>of</strong> medium – Rs. 100/- plus @ Rs. 300/- per course for the<br />

elective courses upto 4 credits in the new medium and @ Rs.<br />

600/- per course for the elective course <strong>of</strong> above 4 credits.<br />

(iii) change <strong>of</strong> electives – @ Rs. 300/- per course for electives upto 4<br />

credits and @ Rs. 600/- per course for electives <strong>of</strong> above 4 credits.<br />

The Task Force on SSS at its meeting held on 17.4.2005 also<br />

deliberated on the matter <strong>of</strong> fees being charged for the credit transfer in<br />

the Management Programme, which was fixed during the year 1991.<br />

After detailed discussions, it recommended that the fees for change <strong>of</strong><br />

course in Management Programme and Management Programme in<br />

Banking & Finance be fixed at Rs. 500/- per course. The<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Task Force in respect <strong>of</strong> payment norms for<br />

change <strong>of</strong> elective/medium programme etc. for Bachelor’s as well as<br />

Master’s Degree Programme have been implemented with the approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor w.e.f. July, 2005 cycle <strong>of</strong> admissions.<br />

AC 35.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

with regard to the fee charged for change <strong>of</strong> electives/medium<br />

programme etc. in BDP and Master’s Degree programme w.e.f July,<br />

2005 cycle <strong>of</strong> admission and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> fixing fee <strong>of</strong> Rs.<br />

500/- per course for change <strong>of</strong> course in MP and MP (B&F) w.e.f.<br />

January, 2007 cycle.<br />

ITEM NO. 8 TO REPORT THE RECOGNITION BY THE ALL INDIA<br />

COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION (AICTE) OF<br />

MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) AND<br />

MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS (MCA) DEGREES<br />

AWARDED BY <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

AC 35.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the All India<br />

<strong>Council</strong> for Technical Education (AICTE) vide letter no.<br />

AICTE/<strong>Academic</strong>/MOU-DEC/2005 dated May 13, 2005 has informed<br />

the Secretaries/Directors, Technical Education <strong>of</strong> all State<br />

Governments/Union Territories that the Master <strong>of</strong> Business<br />

Administration (MBA) and Master <strong>of</strong> Computer Applications (MCA)<br />

degrees awarded by <strong>IGNOU</strong> are recognized by AICTE.


AC 35.8.2<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

AC 35.9.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> appreciated the decision <strong>of</strong> AICTE.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MATTER RELATING<br />

TO PROVISION FOR ADDING OF SUPPLEMENTARY<br />

GAZETTE IN THE CONVOCATION LIST.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 18 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 20.3.2006,<br />

while considering the matter relating to the 17 th Convocation,<br />

constituted a Committee comprising Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Pardeep Sahni, and Dr. S.K.Mohapatra to examine the provisions in<br />

the statutes/ordinances/rules for adding supplementary Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

successful candidates who have become eligible for the award <strong>of</strong><br />

degree/diploma/certificate. The Committee deliberated on the issue in<br />

detail and resolved to recommend to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> the<br />

following for consideration:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

All the supplementary lists <strong>of</strong> students to whom the<br />

Certificate/Diploma/Degree have been awarded after the<br />

Convocation was held (from 1 st Convocation to 16 th<br />

Convocation) be added in the main Gazette <strong>of</strong> 17 th<br />

Convocation as a ‘Supplementary Gazette’.<br />

The supplementary list <strong>of</strong> students to whom the final Grade<br />

Card/Marks sheet and Provisional Certificates have been<br />

issued after the 17 th Convocation held on 18.02.2006 (for<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> Certificate/Diploma/Degrees to those students<br />

who have completed their respective programme in<br />

Dec.2004/June 2005 TEEs) be issued<br />

Certificate/Diploma/Degrees and deemed to have been<br />

admitted in the 17 th Convocation, but the list <strong>of</strong> students be<br />

appended in the Gazette <strong>of</strong> 18 th Convocation.<br />

The provision as at (ii) above be followed for the<br />

Convocations to be held in future.<br />

AC 35.9.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the recommendation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Committee along with its Minutes placed at Appendix-7.


Tabled Items<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

AC 35.10.1<br />

AC 35.10.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

B.TECH. IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (COMPUTER<br />

INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that The School <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineering & Technology has submitted the Phase-3 Form for<br />

B.Tech. in Mechanical Engineering (Computer Integrated<br />

Manufacturing). The Phase-3 Form has been approved by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Engg. & Technology at its meeting held on<br />

2.5.2006.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for<br />

B.Tech. in Mechanical Engineering (Computer Integrated<br />

Manufacturing) (Appendix-8), along with the payment norms for<br />

counselors.<br />

ITEM NO. 11<br />

AC 35.11.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR HIV/AIDS EDUCATION AND ADOLESCENT AND<br />

FAMILY EDUCATION (TWO COURSES) FOR THE B.ED.<br />

PROGRAMME.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Education has submitted the Phase Zero Form for HIV/AIDS<br />

Education and Adolescent and Family Education (Two Courses).<br />

Special focus is being given by the Govt. <strong>of</strong> India for prevention and<br />

control <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and Adolescent and Family Education. In order<br />

to achieve this, it has been considered prudent to train in-service<br />

teachers as also the new entrants to the teaching pr<strong>of</strong>ession in Schools<br />

on issues related to HIV/AIDS Education and Adolescent/Family<br />

Education. In this context, it was decided by MHRD, NCTE and<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> to introduce two courses i.e. HIV/AIDS Education and<br />

Adolescent/Family Education in the training package <strong>of</strong> in-service<br />

teachers pursuing <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s B.Ed. Programme. The development <strong>of</strong><br />

these courses is being supported by UNICEF and NCTE. The proposal<br />

was approved by the School Board at its 21 st <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

24.8.2005 with the directions that the two courses be integrated in the<br />

B.Ed. programme as special and compulsory courses.<br />

AC 35.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-Zero Form<br />

(placed at Appendix-9) for HIV/AIDS Education and Adolescent and<br />

Family Education.


ITEM NO. 12<br />

AC 35.12.1<br />

AC 35.12.2<br />

ITEM NO. 13<br />

AC 35.13.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE ZERO FORM<br />

FOR TEACHING OF TAMIL.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Education has submitted the Phase Zero Form for Teaching <strong>of</strong> Tamil<br />

as an elective course for the B.Ed. programme to accommodate the<br />

request <strong>of</strong> B.Ed. students from Tamil Nadu and enable them for their<br />

appointment in the state. <strong>IGNOU</strong> has signed an MoU with Tamil Nadu<br />

Open University for using their course material on ‘Teaching <strong>of</strong><br />

Tamil’. The School Board at its 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 30.3.2006<br />

considered the issue <strong>of</strong> Teaching <strong>of</strong> Tamil in B.Ed. Programme and<br />

suggested that the School may review the contents and develop new<br />

materials if considered necessary. However, as <strong>of</strong> now, it may be<br />

adopted for one batch <strong>of</strong> students.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong><br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Education (Appendix-10) for ‘Teaching <strong>of</strong><br />

Tamil’ course with the specific direction that the course be kept on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer till new materials are developed in-house.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CREDIT TRANSFER<br />

SCHEME FROM BCA OLD SYLLABUS TO BCA NEW<br />

SYLLABUS.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that Consequent upon<br />

the launching <strong>of</strong> BCA revised syllabus in July 1998 cycle, the prerevised<br />

BCA syllabus has been phased out. The students admitted to<br />

BCA pre-revised syllabus during 1996, 1997 & 1998 January cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

admissions were allowed to pursue the programme for the maximum<br />

duration plus the extended period <strong>of</strong> two years on re-admission.<br />

However, a number <strong>of</strong> students could not complete all the<br />

requirements for the award <strong>of</strong> BCA Degree for various reasons, and<br />

sought admission afresh in BCA revised syllabus. A majority <strong>of</strong> them<br />

have completed 50 to 60 credits in the pre-revised syllabus and applied<br />

for credit transfer in lieu <strong>of</strong> the successfully completed courses.<br />

Student Registration and Evaluation Division in consultation with the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Computer and Information Sciences has worked out the<br />

‘credit transfer scheme’ for transfer <strong>of</strong> credits in lieu <strong>of</strong> the<br />

successfully completed courses in pre-revised syllabus to BCA revised<br />

syllabus. Maximum credit transfer permissible is 58 credits and the<br />

students can be allowed to re-register simultaneously for 1 st /3 rd & 5 th<br />

semester courses and for the 2 nd /4 th & 6 th semester courses, subject to<br />

a maximum <strong>of</strong> 24 credits in a given cycle/semester. In such cases<br />

students be allowed to remit the fee for 2 nd year and/or 3 rd year<br />

programme in the first year itself at the time <strong>of</strong> seeking credit transfer.


Credit transfer fee as per rules <strong>of</strong> the university, i.e. @Rs.50/- per<br />

course, is also payable by the students. Such students be allowed to<br />

complete the BCA Programme in a duration less than three years<br />

depending upon the credit transfer allowed. They are required to<br />

complete 96 credits only, including the credit transferred courses, for<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> BCA Degree.<br />

AC 35.13.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposed Credit Transfer Scheme<br />

placed at Appendix-11 subject to the condition that a minimum <strong>of</strong> one<br />

and a half-year will have to be spent.<br />

ITEM NO. 14<br />

AC 35.14.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SUB-<br />

COMMITTEE OF THE ACSC FOR FRAMING UNIFORM<br />

GUIDELINES FOR PROJECTS ACROSS<br />

PROGRAMMES/COURSES IN THE UNIVERSITY.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 13.11.2004 considered and<br />

approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC in which the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee <strong>of</strong> the ACSC for framing<br />

uniform guidelines for Project across programmes/courses in the<br />

University for MCA programme and approved the proposal/scheme <strong>of</strong><br />

decentralization <strong>of</strong> project proposals <strong>of</strong> the Regional Centres in<br />

principle for two cycles and the same was to be reviewed in the light<br />

<strong>of</strong> experience so gained. The Sub-Committee at its meeting held on<br />

28.4.2006 reviewed the scheme. The main recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee are:<br />

1. The decentralization <strong>of</strong> MCA project proposals may be continued<br />

for the present.<br />

2. The University should take necessary measures to stop the<br />

malpractice regarding project report submission by taking strict<br />

action against the guilty students, project supervisors and other<br />

persons concerned.<br />

3. The data base <strong>of</strong> the MCA project proposals maintained by the<br />

Regional Centres should be sent to the School <strong>of</strong> Computer and<br />

Information Sciences as per the guidelines approved by the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

4. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the project proposal for BCA programme should<br />

be restarted at Regional Centres from the next cycle. The<br />

proposals should be evaluated by the counselors <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> with a


minimum <strong>of</strong> two years <strong>of</strong> BCA/MCA counseling experience. The<br />

Regional Centres should identify such counselors in the region and<br />

be the node for receiving and sending proposals for approval as in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> MCA. The counselors be paid Rs. 15/- for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

each project proposal as is being done for the MCA proposals at<br />

present, subject to approval by Competent Authority.<br />

5. The practice followed by RC, Delhi-II <strong>of</strong> identifying project<br />

reports with the same titles should be emulated by other Regional<br />

Centres. Project reports having similar titles should be sent to the<br />

same evaluator for evaluation in case <strong>of</strong> both BCA and MCA to<br />

curb malpractice.<br />

6. As far as possible, the viva-voce <strong>of</strong> the project reports should be<br />

held at Regional Centres and Sub-Regional Centres. In case <strong>of</strong><br />

large enrolments depending on logistics, viva-voce could be<br />

conducted at Study Centres provided outside expertise is available<br />

and an ARD/RD supervises the exercise.<br />

AC 35.14.2<br />

ITEM NO. 15<br />

AC 35.15.1<br />

AC 35.15.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee (Appendix-12) with the suggestion that the<br />

University should ensure that quality is not compromised by holding<br />

viva-voce <strong>of</strong> the project reports at the Study Centre level.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

THE DIPLOMA IN CIVIL ENGINEERING – DCLE (G) FOR<br />

CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 32 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 13.11.2004, while considering the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 11 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC, approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

for two semesters for the Diploma in Civil Engineering for civilian<br />

candidates with the suggestion that the fee may be reviewed. The<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology has submitted the Phase-3<br />

Form for the Diploma in Civil Engineering – DCLE (G) for all the six<br />

semesters along with detailed syllabus which was duly approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> SOET at its 23 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 15.7.2005.<br />

The members desired to know the desirability <strong>of</strong> counseling/contact<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> 16 hours per credit for theory courses, radio counseling<br />

for 10 to 12 hours per year and lab counseling <strong>of</strong> 10 hours per credit<br />

and registration fee <strong>of</strong> Rs. 7000/- one time. Dr. Manoj Kulshrestra<br />

clarified that the programme is being <strong>of</strong>fered in collaboration with<br />

CIDC in face-to-face mode. The details have been worked out in the<br />

Joint Coordination Committee.


AC 35.15.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase-3 Form for the Diploma in<br />

Civil Engineering - DCLE (G) for Corporate Construction Sector<br />

(Appendix-13).<br />

ITEM NO. 16<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

REVISED PROGRAMME STRUCTURE OF B.TECH. CIVIL<br />

(CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT).<br />

AC 35.16.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Engineering and Technology has submitted the Phase-3 Form for<br />

Revised Programme Structure <strong>of</strong> B.Tech. Civil (Construction<br />

Management).<br />

AC 35.16.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase-3 Form (Appendix-14) for<br />

revised programme structure <strong>of</strong> B.Tech. Civil (Construction<br />

Management).<br />

ITEM NO. 17<br />

TO CO-OPT A MEMBER OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL IN<br />

TERMS OF PROVISIONS OF STATUTE 9 (1) (VIII).<br />

AC 35.17.1<br />

AC 35.17.2<br />

ITEM NO. 18<br />

AC 35.18.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that Dr. D. Moitra,<br />

Associate Vice-President and General Manager (Research), Infosys<br />

Technologies Ltd. who was co-opted as one <strong>of</strong> the members under subclause<br />

(viii) <strong>of</strong> clause (1) <strong>of</strong> Statute 9 has expressed his inability to<br />

continue with the membership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Consequently a new member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> under the above<br />

clause is to be co-opted by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for the residual term<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dr. D.Moitra i.e. up to 11.12.2006.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> authorized the Chairman to co-opt a new<br />

member in place <strong>of</strong> Dr. D.Moitra for the residual term. The Chairman<br />

requested the members to suggest a few names for his consideration.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

OF THE BDP COORDINATION COMMITTEE PERTAINING<br />

TO THE ISSUES OF STUDENT REGISTRATION AND<br />

EVALUATION.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the BDP<br />

Coordination Committee at its meeting held on 13.03.2006 discussed


and made the following recommendations on policy issues pertaining<br />

to Student Registration and Evaluation (SRE) :<br />

1. The problems faced by students in assignments<br />

The BDP Coordination Committee recommended that the result<br />

should not be declared unless the scores <strong>of</strong> minimum no. <strong>of</strong><br />

assignments stipulated in the Ordinance are taken into<br />

account irrespective <strong>of</strong> the marks scored by the students in a<br />

single assignment.<br />

2. Students who opted for more than 48 credits in a single<br />

discipline<br />

The Committee recommended that students should not be<br />

allowed to take more than 48 credits in a single discipline as<br />

approved by <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and informed through the<br />

Programme Guides. The students who have taken more than<br />

48 credits in a single discipline should be asked to opt course(s)<br />

from other discipline(s), even if they have cleared all the<br />

courses, subject to a minimum <strong>of</strong> 8 credits in any one<br />

discipline.<br />

3. Cases in which students have taken 12 credit in the<br />

category <strong>of</strong> Application-oriented Courses<br />

It was recommended that such students should be advised to<br />

change the course. They can either take 4 more credits from the<br />

Application-oriented Courses to make it 16 credits or give up 4<br />

credits from AOCs and restrict to 8 credits and take more<br />

credits in elective courses.<br />

4. BPP qualified students failing to successfully complete all<br />

the requirements for the award <strong>of</strong> B.A/B.Com/BTS/BSW<br />

Degree within the stipulated duration <strong>of</strong> the Programme<br />

It was recommended that if BPP stream students fail to<br />

complete B.A/B.Com/BTS/BSW after the lapse <strong>of</strong> maximum<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the Programme plus the grace period for readmission<br />

on pro-rata basis, they should not be asked to do<br />

BPP again if they seek fresh admission to complete their<br />

programme. They should be given admission directly in BDP<br />

and be allowed maximum period as stipulated for BDP.


5. Problem <strong>of</strong> students indicating the revised course codes <strong>of</strong><br />

BDP even if they had opted pre-revised version<br />

During detailed deliberations, the Committee noted that<br />

students can opt either pre-revised or revised version only.<br />

Therefore, while entering the marks they should be entered<br />

under the course which a student had opted. The same should<br />

automatically be reflected for older students under EPS-01 and<br />

the new student under EPS-11. All similar cases be dealt on<br />

the same line.<br />

Above recommendations have been approved by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

while approving the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the BDP Coordination Committee.<br />

AC 35.18.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor.<br />

ITEM NO. 19<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO AMEND<br />

ORDINANCE 9 – ‘ORDINANCE ON CONDUCT OF<br />

EXAMINATIONS AND EVALUATION OF STUDENT<br />

PERFORMANCE’.<br />

AC 35.19.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the Assignments<br />

have been introduced as a compulsory component in the learning<br />

package <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> with a weightage <strong>of</strong> 25 / 30% in the overall<br />

evaluation, to ensure continuous learning and interactive teaching as<br />

well as to help students in their preparation for examination. However,<br />

in view <strong>of</strong> large volume <strong>of</strong> work and dependence on external experts,<br />

the University has faced difficulties in obtaining evaluated assignments<br />

and grades with the result that the students do not get feed back before<br />

commencement <strong>of</strong> the examination. Although assignment submission<br />

is a pre-requisite for appearing in Term-end Examination (TEE), there<br />

is no mechanism to prevent the defaulters from appearing in TEE as<br />

the dates <strong>of</strong> assignment submission fall after the last date for<br />

submission <strong>of</strong> examination form.<br />

The Task Force on Student Support Services at its meeting held on<br />

22.01.2002 discussed the matter and recommended to withdraw the<br />

component <strong>of</strong> Assignment from all Certificate Programmes <strong>of</strong> six<br />

months’ duration. Accordingly, the assignments were withdrawn


initially from the Certificate in Computing Programme with effect<br />

from July 2002 and in all other Certificate Programmes from<br />

January 2003. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its<br />

Eighth meeting held on 19.04.2003 had ratified the action taken by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor (ACSC 8.19.2). Further, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

Twenty-ninth meeting held on 23.06.2003, while considering the<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> the Eighth meeting <strong>of</strong> the ACSC, observed that the<br />

Assignments in the Certificate Programmes did not serve the desired<br />

purpose. The proposal to withdraw the assignments was arrived at<br />

after a series <strong>of</strong> discussions and a brainstorming session organized by<br />

the University [AC 29.2.1(vi)]<br />

A Sub-Committee <strong>of</strong> the Task Force was constituted to review all the<br />

issues related to Assignments in <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The Sub-Committee, after<br />

considering the matter in detail, submitted its report which was<br />

considered by the Task Force on Student Support Services in a Special<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 04.01.2006 under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Vice-<br />

Chancellor. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its<br />

Eighteenth meeting held on 20.03.2006 had considered and approved,<br />

among other things, the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Task Force and<br />

abolished assignments in all Undergraduate Diploma Programmes<br />

<strong>of</strong> one year duration effective from July 2006 cycle <strong>of</strong> admissions.<br />

The ACSC also approved that there would be only one assignment<br />

for each course in other programmes, wherever applicable.<br />

Moreover, necessary changes in the Ordinances may be brought for<br />

effective implementation <strong>of</strong> these decisions (ACSC 18.3.2).<br />

Consequent upon the above decisions, Clause-2 and Clause-3 <strong>of</strong><br />

Ordinance 9 need amendment.<br />

AC 35.19.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> discussed the matter, in the light <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Task Force on SSS and the approval <strong>of</strong><br />

ACSC, and resolved to approve the proposed amendment to the<br />

Ordinance 9 – ‘Ordinance on Conduct <strong>of</strong> Examinations and Evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Student Performance’. A brief note explaining the reasons for<br />

amendment <strong>of</strong> Ordinance 9 along with the statement showing the<br />

existing provisions, proposed amendments and provisions after<br />

amendments in sub-clause (1) <strong>of</strong> Clause 2 and sub-clause (1),(2) &<br />

(3) <strong>of</strong> Clause 3 is placed as Appendix -15.


ITEM NO. 20<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RE-ADMISSION FORM<br />

ALONG WITH REVISED RULES AND GUIDELINES FOR RE-<br />

ADMISSION AND PRO-RATA FEE PER COURSE FOR<br />

VARIOUS COURSES FOR OVERSEAS STUDENTS.<br />

AC 35.20.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that the University had<br />

revised the fees for re-admission along with the revised rules and<br />

guidelines for re-admission and pro-rata fee per course for its various<br />

courses. A need has been felt to revise the same for the overseas<br />

students also. International Division has re-worked the re-admission<br />

form and revised rules and guidelines and pro-rata fee per course for<br />

various courses for the overseas students on the basis <strong>of</strong> the circular<br />

issued by the SR&ED. A copy <strong>of</strong> the re-admission form for<br />

B.A./B.Com programme, rules and guidelines for re-admission and a<br />

table showing fee and course statement for calculating pro-rata readmission<br />

fee for various programme are placed as Appendix- 16.<br />

AC 35.20.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the re-admission form along with<br />

revised guidelines for re-admission and pro-rata fee per course for<br />

various courses for overseas students.<br />

ITEM NO. 21<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE PHASE ZERO FORM FOR<br />

THE REVISION OF ONE COURSE OF DIPLOMA IN<br />

ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (DEME)<br />

LAUNCHED FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS, INDIAN ARMY<br />

UNDER <strong>IGNOU</strong>-CIDC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION &<br />

TRAINING PROJECT (IC-CETP).<br />

AC 35.21.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pro Vice-Chancellor informed that under <strong>IGNOU</strong>-<br />

CIDC Construction Education & Training Project, two diploma<br />

progammes, namely Diploma in Civil Engineering (DCLE) and<br />

Diploma in Electrical & Mechanical Engineering (DEME) are on <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

since January 2004. In DCLE, there are two courses on Estimating &<br />

Quantity Surveying (EQS), namely BCE-034: EQS-I and BCE-042:<br />

EQS-II in Fifth and Sixth semesters respectively whereas only one<br />

course EQS-I has been included in DEME in Fifth Semester. Both<br />

EQS-I and EQS-II deal with the concepts <strong>of</strong> estimation and quantity<br />

surveying relating to construction apart from relevant details on SSR<br />

<strong>of</strong> Military Engineering Service (MES). For DEME programme, E-in-<br />

C Branch <strong>of</strong> Army Headquarters has desired to include more inputs <strong>of</strong>


estimation and quantity surveying relating to Electrical & Mechanical<br />

items. In light <strong>of</strong> the above facts, the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering &<br />

Technology proposes to revise EQS-I course for DEME programme<br />

and rename the course as BET-034: Estimating & Quantity Surveying<br />

having dominance <strong>of</strong> E/M inputs in the course.<br />

AC 35.21.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Appendix-17) for the revision <strong>of</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Electrical<br />

& Mechanical Engineering (DEME) launched for Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers,<br />

Indian Army under <strong>IGNOU</strong>-CIDC Construction Education & Training<br />

Project (IC-CETP).<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(H.P.Dikshit)<br />

Chairman


Appendix-1<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended/could not attend the 35 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 15 th May, 2006.<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

33. Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, VC - Chairman<br />

34. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, PVC<br />

35. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana<br />

36. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur<br />

37. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K.Jain<br />

38. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni<br />

39. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda<br />

40. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair<br />

41. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh<br />

42. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

43. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj<br />

44. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal<br />

45. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora<br />

46. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja<br />

47. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal<br />

48. Dr. C.K.Ghosh<br />

49. Dr. S.K.Mohapatra<br />

50. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

51. Dr. T.R.Srinivasan<br />

52. Sh. S.B.Sharma<br />

53. Dr. Anu J.Thomas<br />

54. Dr. T.K.Jena<br />

55. Dr. Eisha Kannadi<br />

56. Dr. N.Venketeswarlu<br />

57. Dr. Kamal Vagrecha<br />

58. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Members who could not attend:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.R.Madhav Menon<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Asghar Wajahat<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J. Ramachandran<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.S.Yadav<br />

5. Dr. Shardindu<br />

6. Sh. G.S.Sahni<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY SIXTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

October 23, 2006<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THIRTY SIXTH MEETING OF THE<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2006<br />

AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8,<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> members present and those who could not attend the meeting is given in<br />

Appendix-1.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 36 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and <strong>of</strong>fered his greetings for Deepawali and Id-ul-Fitr. He also<br />

stated that he was very happy to have the meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University as his very first <strong>of</strong>ficial engagement in the University. He observed that<br />

the Indira Gandhi National Open University had provided yeoman services to the<br />

society by imparting higher education through distance mode and reaching the unreached.<br />

It is a great honour to be the Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> this premier institution. He<br />

further observed that the teachers and academics are the backbone <strong>of</strong> every institution<br />

and that he looked forward to their full co-operation in achieving its goal,<br />

development and new heights in the area <strong>of</strong> higher education. Before starting the<br />

formal proceedings, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, former Pro Vice-Chancellor, welcomed the<br />

Vice-Chancellor and assured him full co-operation for steps towards further growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the University. Following this, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, the Member-Secretary,<br />

observed that Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.R.Pillai is a distinguished scholar <strong>of</strong> chemical sciences and is<br />

an elected fellow <strong>of</strong> the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Bangalore. In addition, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Pillai had held positions in the field <strong>of</strong> academic administration such as the Vice-<br />

Chancellor <strong>of</strong> M.G. University, Kottayam, Director, NAAC, Vice-Chairman and<br />

Acting Chairman, University Grants Commission, apart from serving on many high<br />

powered Committees. The University had been greatly honoured by his appointment<br />

as the Vice-Chancellor.


The Member- Secretary then presented the items on the agenda. The decisions concerned<br />

are recorded below:<br />

ITEM NO.1 To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 35 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> held on May 15, 2006, and to note the action taken thereon.<br />

AC 36.1.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

35 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on May 15, 2006 were<br />

circulated to the members. The following comments were received:<br />

1. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RSD<br />

(i)<br />

Recording <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> study centres under RC-Port-<br />

Blair as four instead <strong>of</strong> five on Page 2.<br />

AC 36.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided that the number <strong>of</strong> study centres be<br />

corrected to five.<br />

(ii)<br />

The observation on Item no. 10, regarding the proposed rates<br />

for theory counseling for a two hour session in the Phase-3<br />

Form for B.Tech. in Mechanical Engineering (Computer<br />

Integrated Manufacturing). The Director, RSD, informed<br />

that a Committee constituted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> revision <strong>of</strong><br />

payment norms for theory/practical counseling across the<br />

disciplines and also for different activities undertaken by the<br />

University had proposed such changes and the same have<br />

not yet been approved by the Competent Authority. Thus,<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> Payment Norms <strong>of</strong> theory counseling for<br />

Engineering Programmes in isolation will create operational<br />

problems. However, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal, Director, SOET<br />

informed the <strong>Council</strong> that while proposing the rates, the<br />

matter was discussed with Director, RSD, and since it was a<br />

new programme no rates for counseling were available at<br />

that stage. Hence, the rates proposed by the School <strong>of</strong> Engg.<br />

& Technology in Phase-3 Form were approved by the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, and there is no discrepancy in the<br />

recording <strong>of</strong> the Minutes.


AC 36.1.3<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> decided that the counseling rates for B.Tech. Mechanical<br />

Engineering approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, along with the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee constituted for revision <strong>of</strong> payment<br />

norms for theory and practical counseling across disciplines and also for<br />

different activities undertaken by the University, may be placed before<br />

the Finance Committee for approval. However, till such time the<br />

recommendations are approved by the Finance Committee, the old<br />

payment norms would continue.<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal, Director, SOET on Item No.<br />

AC.35.16.2.<br />

“The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

(Appendix-14) for the revised programme structure <strong>of</strong> B.Tech.<br />

Civil (Construction Management)”<br />

instead it should be read as under:<br />

“The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

Phase-3 Form for B.Tech. Civil (Construction Management)<br />

(Appendix-14), along with the Payment Norms for Counsellors”.<br />

AC 36.1.4<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> accepted the proposed modifications in the Minutes.<br />

However, till such time the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee are<br />

approved by the Finance Committee, the old payment norms will<br />

continue.<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOS, on Item No. AC<br />

35.6.2:<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair had pointed out that the following<br />

sentence may be added to AC 35.6.2:<br />

“The <strong>Council</strong> also recommended that the time taken to<br />

complete PGDRD and MA (RD) would be reduced depending<br />

upon the amount <strong>of</strong> Credit Transfer”.<br />

AC 36.1.5<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> accepted the proposed modifications.


4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Santosh Panda, Director, STRIDE<br />

The observations made by Pr<strong>of</strong>. Santosh Panda, Director,<br />

STRIDE on Item no. 3 were placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 36.1.6<br />

The Chairman observed that the issue required careful examination and<br />

would be looked into, which was agreed to.<br />

5. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Director, SRE &D<br />

The following observations have been made by the Registrar,<br />

Students Registration and Evaluation Division (SRE&D) on Items no.<br />

5 and 7, respectively:<br />

Item No. 5<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

The Sub-Committee appointed by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee (ACSC) at its 16 th meeting held on<br />

19.09.2005, pertaining to ‘Credit Transfer’ from the MCA<br />

pre-revised syllabus to the MCA revised syllabus, seems to<br />

have not considered the suggestion put forth by SRED on the<br />

‘draft’ minutes, regarding remittance <strong>of</strong> the 2nd year fee to<br />

facilitate the students for simultaneous registration <strong>of</strong> 1 st &<br />

3 rd semesters and 2 nd & 4 th semesters.<br />

Apart from the Programme fee indicated at (i) above, the credit<br />

transfer fee as per rules <strong>of</strong> the University, i.e. @Rs.100/- per<br />

course, be payable by the students.<br />

(iii) Since a maximum <strong>of</strong> 52 credits <strong>of</strong> credit transfer is envisaged<br />

in the scheme, it may be possible that a student may be able to<br />

complete the MCA revised programme in 1½ year duration<br />

at the earliest, i.e. before the expiry <strong>of</strong> the minimum duration <strong>of</strong><br />

3 years. A similar decision has been taken by the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> while considering the case <strong>of</strong> ‘credit transfer’ from<br />

BCA old syllabus to BCA revised syllabus (AC 35.13.2).<br />

The Member-Secretary clarified that the issues raised by the Registrar,<br />

SR&ED were not part <strong>of</strong> the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the sub-committee,<br />

which were approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. Therefore, there is no<br />

discrepancy in the recording <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. These can, at best, be treated as matters arising out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Minutes.


As the then Vice-Chancellor had approved the action to be taken in the<br />

matter, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> may ratify the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor.<br />

AC 36.1.7<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

in the matter related to credit transfer from the MCA (old syllabus) to<br />

the MCA (revised syllabus) programmes.<br />

Item no. 7<br />

The date ‘17.04.2005’ in Line 13 <strong>of</strong> Page 9 <strong>of</strong> the minutes be<br />

replaced with ‘17.04.2006’, as indicated rightly in the agenda note.<br />

Similarly, the words ‘credit transfer’ in Line 14 <strong>of</strong> Page 9 may be<br />

replaced with the words ‘change <strong>of</strong> course’.<br />

AC 36.1.8<br />

AC 36.1.9<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> agreed to correct the date from 17.4.2005 to 17.4.2006.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes (Annexure-1 without<br />

appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 35 th <strong>Meeting</strong> with the modifications above, and<br />

noted the action taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO.2 To consider co-option <strong>of</strong> Members under Clause (1) (viii) <strong>of</strong><br />

Statute 9.<br />

AC 36.2.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the term <strong>of</strong> members<br />

co-opted by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> under Statute 9 (1) (viii) will be<br />

expiring on 11.12.2006. He informed them that as per the practice the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> suggest the names for co-option<br />

from different areas to the Chairman. Thereafter the Chairman co-opts<br />

the member(s) on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, and the same are<br />

reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for ratification.<br />

AC 36.2.2<br />

The Vice-Chancellor requested the members to suggest names <strong>of</strong><br />

persons (with their curriculum vitae) within 10 days for consideration <strong>of</strong><br />

co-option by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The members authorized the<br />

Chairman to co-opt the new members on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and report the same for ratification at the next meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> as per the past practice.


ITEM NO. 3<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 19 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on June 19, 2006.<br />

AC 36.3.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the 19 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was held on 19.6.2006,<br />

and the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting had been placed before the members.<br />

The ACSC considered and approved the following major items:<br />

2. Credit Transfer Scheme for BLIS and MLIS (Old Programmes)<br />

to BLIS and MLIS (New Programmes), respectively.<br />

3. Payment Norms, Counseling Schedule and Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

Remuneration for Course Writers for the practical activities <strong>of</strong><br />

M.Sc. (DFSM).<br />

4. Conversion <strong>of</strong> GPA to Percentage across the programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University.<br />

5. Weightage granted for courses in pre-revised and revised<br />

B.A./B.Com courses.<br />

6. Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 4 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence Committee.<br />

7. Revised evaluation methodology for CPE and DPE<br />

Programmes.<br />

7. Award <strong>of</strong> MBA degree with specialization streams.<br />

AC 36.3.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 19 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> (Annexure-2 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee, incorporating the changes approved in the 20 th<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the ACSC.<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 20 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on August 10, 2006.<br />

AC 36.4.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the 20 th meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was held on August 10,<br />

2006, and the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting had been placed before the<br />

members. The ACSC considered and approved the following major<br />

items:<br />

1. Phase-3 Forms for PG Certificate in Sericulture, Diploma in<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> Value Added Products from Cereals, Pulses and<br />

Oilseeds, Advanced Diploma in Nautical Science and Advanced<br />

Certificate in Power Distribution Management.


2. Fixing <strong>of</strong> maximum duration for Management Programmes.<br />

3. Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Committee constituted to look into<br />

the Phase Zero Form for the Certificate Programme in Information<br />

Technology.<br />

4. Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> Degrees <strong>of</strong> BTCM and BTWRE Programmes.<br />

5. Semester wise collection <strong>of</strong> fees in BCA and MCA programmes.<br />

6. Ratification <strong>of</strong> the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor for<br />

withdrawal <strong>of</strong> “MHI-07: Religious Thought and Belief in India”<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered as an elective course in M.A. Programme.<br />

AC 36.4.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS, pointed out that while ratifying<br />

the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor for withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the course<br />

“MHI-07: Religious Thought and Belief in India”, no mention had been<br />

made <strong>of</strong> the date when the Term-End Examination <strong>of</strong> MHI-07 course be<br />

held by the University. It was pointed out that a separate agenda item<br />

dealing with the whole issue had been placed before the <strong>Council</strong> and an<br />

appropriate decision would be taken in the matter.<br />

AC 36.4.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 20 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

(Annexure-3 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee.<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 21 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on October 18, 2006.<br />

AC 36.5.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that due to shortage <strong>of</strong><br />

time it had not been possible to finalize and table the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 21 st<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the ACSC, held on 18.10.2006, for consideration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He proposed that the item may, therefore, be<br />

deferred.<br />

AC 36.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deferred the item.


ITEM NO.6<br />

To consider the Award <strong>of</strong> D.Litt/D.Sc (Honoris Causa) at the 18 th<br />

Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

AC 36.6.1 The Member-Secretary informed the members that, as per the Section 5<br />

(iv) <strong>of</strong> the Act <strong>of</strong> the University, the University may confer Honorary<br />

Degrees or other distinctions in the manner laid down by the Statutes.<br />

The Statute 22 on Conferment <strong>of</strong> Honorary Degrees envisages that “All<br />

proposals for the conferment <strong>of</strong> Honorary Degrees shall be initiated<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor who, after consultation with the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management, shall submit the same to<br />

the Visitor for confirmation”.<br />

He further informed that the University had received a communication<br />

from a Partner Institution in Saudi Arabia regarding award <strong>of</strong> Honorary<br />

Degree to the Minister <strong>of</strong> Higher Education, Saudi Arabia.<br />

AC 36.6.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was <strong>of</strong> the view that it may require more names<br />

for consideration for the award <strong>of</strong> D.Litt/D.Sc. (Honoris Causa) at the<br />

18 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University, and hence, the item was deferred.<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

To consider the matters relating to MHI-07, an Elective Course in<br />

the Master <strong>of</strong> Arts Degree Programme.<br />

AC 36.7.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS was requested to present the item.<br />

He informed the members that on October 03, 2006 a Notice <strong>of</strong><br />

Visitorial Inquiry, under Section 8 (2) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act, 1985, in the<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> some objectionable portions contained in the study material <strong>of</strong><br />

M.A.(History) programme, had been received vide MHRD’s letter no.<br />

F.No. 13-23/2006-DL, dated September 29, 2006. The University is<br />

required to submit an explanation to the Hon’ble Visitor why such an<br />

inquiry should not be held and furnish clarifications, if any, within a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> one month. He submitted a para-wise response as given<br />

below:<br />

1. In Paragraph 2 <strong>of</strong> the letter, a reference has been made to some<br />

objectionable portions in the study material <strong>of</strong> MA History course,<br />

‘Religious Thought & Belief in India’. It is assumed that this is with


particular reference to the following:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

Block 3, Unit 11, p. 22 in both Hindi and English: “…deity is not<br />

without ambiguity – he creates heretics [Sandigdha Charitra in<br />

Hindi].<br />

Block 3, Unit 12, p. 27 in both Hindi and English: “His [Lord<br />

Krishna’s] advice is not just shrewd, it sometimes seems<br />

unscrupulous.”<br />

(iii) Block 3, Unit 12, p. 29 in both English and Hindi: References to<br />

Lord Shiva’s association with “sexual desire”, Lord Shiva as the<br />

“provocatively naked holy man who attempts to seduce the wives<br />

<strong>of</strong> sages and the god who made love to his wife for a thousand<br />

years.”<br />

(iv) Block 3, Unit 12, p. 29 in both English & Hindi: Reference to<br />

conflict between Lord Shiva and Ganesha.<br />

(v)<br />

Block 3, Unit 12, pp. 31-2 in English and 32 in Hindi: References<br />

to Goddess Durga’s taste for alcohol and to her male opponents<br />

being enamoured <strong>of</strong> her.<br />

(vi) Block 3, Unit 12, p. 34 in both English & Hindi: Descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

Shivling and yoni.<br />

(vii) Block 5, Unit 19, p. 19 in both English & Hindi: A poem by<br />

Ramprasad Sen referring to Goddess Kali’s nudity.<br />

It is worth mentioning that the course ‘Religious Thought & Belief in<br />

India’ was developed for our learners at the PG level, who otherwise<br />

are mature and have capability to critically analyze the treatment<br />

dispassionately. This course was developed with the following<br />

objectives:<br />

• to trace the evolution <strong>of</strong> religious thoughts and institutions in<br />

India, through the centuries,<br />

• to spell out the distinctive features <strong>of</strong> all the major religious<br />

traditions in India,<br />

• to demonstrate the common features among the major religious<br />

traditions in India, by focusing on the composite and syncretic<br />

areas,<br />

• to establish the linkages between rituals and philosophy and to<br />

trace the philosophical roots <strong>of</strong> many existing religious rituals<br />

today, and<br />

• to establish the relationship between the religious traditions as<br />

codified in the texts, and religious practices and observances on<br />

the ground; in other words to highlight the similarities and<br />

differences between the ‘text view’ and the ‘field view’ <strong>of</strong><br />

different religious traditions.


It may be pointed out that no historian has till date raised any objection<br />

to the material <strong>of</strong> ‘Religious Thought and Belief in India’ developed by<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>. It is also submitted that such a course requires scholarly<br />

treatment and there is always scope for different interpretations. For the<br />

portions referred to in points (i) to (vii) above, the material has been<br />

developed on the basis <strong>of</strong> the writings <strong>of</strong> established scholars. This is<br />

amply reflected through the references point wise quoted below:<br />

(i) & (ii) References <strong>of</strong> this kind are not very unusual in scholarly<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> religious traditions. For instance, leading philosopher<br />

B.K.Matilal writes in his article “Krishna: In Defence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Devious Divinity” : “He [Krishna] was the supreme manipulator,<br />

who did not shoot a single arrow or use a single weapon to kill<br />

anyone but all the main characters were killed by his superior<br />

strategy through behind the door manipulation.” (Jonardon Ganeri<br />

(ed.), The Collected Essays <strong>of</strong> Bimal Krishna Matilal, Vol. 2,<br />

Ethics and Epics, Oxford, 2002, p. 93.).<br />

(iii) & (iv) Again references like these are fairly common in standard<br />

academic and semi-academic works. Wendy Doniger, in her<br />

pioneering work Asceticism and Eroticism in the Mythology <strong>of</strong><br />

Siva (Oxford, 1975) has a whole section on “Siva, the False<br />

Ascetic, Seducer <strong>of</strong> Sages’ Wives” (Chapter VI: Siva in the Pine<br />

Forest) in which there are references to Shiva seducing the Sages’<br />

wives. She has based her study on a reading <strong>of</strong> the Puranas<br />

(Skanda Purana and Padma Purana among others) as well as other<br />

classics all <strong>of</strong> which are mentioned in the endnotes and the<br />

bibliography. The Skanda Purana (Part I, Chapter Six, translated<br />

and annotated by Dr. G.V.Tagare, published by Motilal<br />

Banarsidas, Delhi, pp. 42-44) also has references to this effect.<br />

Nirad C. Chaudhuri’s famous Hinduism: A Religion to Live By<br />

(New Delhi, 1979) has references from Kalidas’s Kumar<br />

Sambhava in which the sexual relationship <strong>of</strong> Shiva and Parvati is<br />

described in detail (Chapter on Some Special Features <strong>of</strong><br />

Hinduism, pp. 223-44. Brahmavaivarta Purana too makes a<br />

reference to Shiva having made love to Paravati for a thousand<br />

years.<br />

(v)<br />

Goddesses Durga and Kali: These references are available in<br />

Markandeya Purana (Canto LXXXV: Devi-mahatmya) translated<br />

by F.Eden Pargiter, BA and published by the Asiatic Society <strong>of</strong><br />

Bengal. See specially nos. 42-56, 67-70, and Canto LXXXVII,<br />

nos. 4-7 and 18. No. 18 says: “There sat Kali, who was roaring


frightfully, laughed terribly with excessive fury, showing the<br />

gleam <strong>of</strong> her unsightly teeth within her dreadful mouth.” (18,<br />

Devi-mahatmya, Canto LXXXVII, Markandeya Purana,). For<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> her male opponents being enamoured <strong>of</strong> her, see nos.<br />

42-56 <strong>of</strong> Canto LXXXV; for the response <strong>of</strong> the goddess nos. 67-<br />

70. Also see Sukumari Bhattacharji, The Indian Theogony: A<br />

Comparative Study <strong>of</strong> Indian Mythology from the Vedas to the<br />

Puranas, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 166-68 for a reinforcement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same argument.<br />

(vi) These references are specifically in relation to the types <strong>of</strong> images<br />

and iconography that developed as part <strong>of</strong> the Puranic tradition.<br />

These aspects <strong>of</strong> the Puranic tradition (temples, pilgrimage and<br />

special centres <strong>of</strong> pilgrimage, the images and iconography within<br />

the temples) have continued through centuries and still constitute<br />

an important part <strong>of</strong> Hinduism as lived and practised today. The<br />

Shivling is an inseparable part <strong>of</strong> Shiva temples and this section<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Unit (12.5) traces its roots to the Puranic tradition.<br />

After receiving Block-3 from the course writer and completing the inhouse<br />

editing, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kunal Chakraborty whom we had initially<br />

requested to write this Block was consulted. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Chakraborty is<br />

considered an authority in this specialized area <strong>of</strong> historical studies. He<br />

went through the entire Block and gave his valuable suggestions.<br />

Subsequently after the in-house language editing the Block was sent to<br />

the press for printing.<br />

(vii)<br />

Ramprasad Sen is a famous 18 th Century Bengali poet who<br />

considered himself a great devotee <strong>of</strong> Goddess Kali. References<br />

to him have also been made by Nirad C. Choudhari in his classic<br />

Hinduism: A Religion to Live By (pp. 246-47. This intimate and<br />

personal manner <strong>of</strong> addressing the deity may superficially seem<br />

irreverential and therefore <strong>of</strong>fensive, but is very much a part <strong>of</strong><br />

Bhakti tradition. In this tradition the deity is not seen as<br />

something distant, transcendental and external but very close to<br />

the devotee and very much a part <strong>of</strong> his world. Devotees then<br />

complain to the deity as they would to their own mother and<br />

speak to the deity with love and affection rather than distant<br />

reverence.<br />

2. With regard to paragraph 3 <strong>of</strong> the letter, whether there is any laid<br />

down procedure in <strong>IGNOU</strong> for preparation <strong>of</strong> course material and<br />

its approval etc., it is submitted that <strong>IGNOU</strong> follows a very


igorous process <strong>of</strong> material development as laid down in its Act<br />

and Statutes. The various steps are sequenced below:<br />

(i) Brainstorming Session between in-house faculty and external<br />

experts to conceive a programme.<br />

(ii) Need assessment survey, wherever required, in collaboration<br />

with Planning & Development Division.<br />

(iii) Development <strong>of</strong> a concept paper through discussion in <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

in-house faculty and approval by the School Board. (Statute 10<br />

A (4) (ii).<br />

(iv) Discussion <strong>of</strong> concept paper in <strong>Academic</strong> Programmee<br />

Committee, a Standing Committee <strong>of</strong> the Planning Board <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> for approval.<br />

(v) Development <strong>of</strong> detailed syllabus in consultation with Expert<br />

Committee. It is processed for approval by the School Board<br />

and <strong>Academic</strong> Counsel. (required under Statute 10A (4) (iii)<br />

(iv) and 9A (a).<br />

(vi) Identification <strong>of</strong> course writers by the faculty with the help <strong>of</strong><br />

expert committee. Approval <strong>of</strong> the course writers by the VC, on<br />

the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the School Board.<br />

(vii) Orientation <strong>of</strong> course writers by the faculty, if necessary.<br />

(viii) Coordination for material development by course teams<br />

comprising outside subject experts as well as in-house faculty.<br />

(10A (4) (viii) & (ix).<br />

(ix) Writing the materials by in-house as well as outside experts.<br />

(x) Transformation <strong>of</strong> material received from outside experts in<br />

self-instructional format by in-house faculty.<br />

(xi) Content and language editing, which are done jointly by the inhouse<br />

faculty and outside experts.<br />

(xii) Identification and preparation <strong>of</strong> art work and work related to<br />

final preparation <strong>of</strong> manuscript and printing through identified<br />

printers.<br />

(xiii) Translation/vetting in Hindi and regional languages by the<br />

outside experts. In case <strong>of</strong> faculty from non-Hindi speaking<br />

states, the University provides outside experts or consultants to<br />

vet the materials.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> small core faculty and diverse expertise required, the<br />

University, since inception has practiced the collaborative<br />

developmental model wherein experts from all over the country provide<br />

academic inputs on best practices and a vast pool <strong>of</strong> wisdom as course<br />

writers, editors, etc. This has enabled the University to emerge as the<br />

leading institution in the world <strong>of</strong> Open and Distance Learning. Our<br />

association with peers in the conventional system helps us to have<br />

confidence in the correctness <strong>of</strong> content. We have been able to build


ich experiences in our materials from very acknowledge experts. This<br />

also helps to ensure authenticity <strong>of</strong> facts, quality <strong>of</strong> material and their<br />

suitability for the learners. This essentially implies that the<br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> the correctness <strong>of</strong> materials is <strong>of</strong> the course writers and<br />

editor, wherever appointed.<br />

The course under discussion MHI-07: Religious Thought and Belief in<br />

India was developed by the faculty <strong>of</strong> History as part <strong>of</strong> the M.A. in<br />

History in accordance with the laid down procedures and practices. The<br />

list <strong>of</strong> courses to be developed emerged from workshop organized for<br />

M.A. programme in March, 1999. Approval for Expert Committee and<br />

names <strong>of</strong> experts was accorded by Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.S. Prasad (Annexure-4), the<br />

then Vice-Chancellor (Actg.) in 2001, on the recommendations <strong>of</strong><br />

Director, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences (SOSS). The Expert Committee<br />

for the course MHI-07 consisted <strong>of</strong> distinguished scholars (list <strong>of</strong> expert<br />

committee members enclosed in Annexure-5). The Expert Committee<br />

in its meeting held on 27 th February, 2001 suggested the syllabi. The<br />

units were assigned but a few course writers could not meet their<br />

commitment and declined the <strong>of</strong>fer. The new names <strong>of</strong> course writers<br />

proposed by the Course Coordinator were approved by the Director<br />

(SOSS). When the English version was fully developed, translators and<br />

vettors were approved by Director (SOSS). It may be mentioned here<br />

that the responsibility <strong>of</strong> editing the course was taken by in-house<br />

faculty, though he ensured that the material in Unit 12 was vetted by a<br />

senior Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> JNU.<br />

The Course structure as suggested by the Expert Committee was<br />

presented to School Board in its 27 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held in April 2001. The<br />

names <strong>of</strong> resource persons to develop this course were also approved by<br />

the same School Board. (Annexure-6) for the powers <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

Board in development <strong>of</strong> course material).<br />

The course structure was approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in its 26 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held in September 3, 2001. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> as per<br />

clause 9(a) is empowered “to exercise general supervision over the<br />

academic policies <strong>of</strong> the University and to give directions regarding<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> instruction, evaluation or research or improvement in<br />

academic standards.”<br />

The Course coordinator approached the new experts and scholars,<br />

whose names were approved by Director (SOSS) to write remaining<br />

units. The Units received from the outside experts were edited from the<br />

content, format and language point <strong>of</strong> view by the course team


(Coordinator and other faculty members). Once this task was<br />

accomplished, the material was sent for printing (2003).<br />

After the English version was finalized the material was sent for Hindi<br />

translators. The translation was done by one <strong>of</strong> the senior freelance<br />

translators who have been translating materials <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Sciences for more than a decade. The translated material was sent for<br />

vetting to a consultant who had a Ph.D. degree in History from JNU and<br />

had published in Hindi as well. That is, the effort was to ensure that the<br />

consultant was good in subject and sound in language. After this the<br />

Hindi version <strong>of</strong> the course was also printed (2004-05).<br />

Launch <strong>of</strong> Course<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes Committee <strong>of</strong> the Planning Board in its<br />

meeting held in February 2004 approved the launch <strong>of</strong> the M.A.<br />

Programme in History in July 2004. The course MHI-07 was part <strong>of</strong><br />

the course <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> 1 st year <strong>of</strong> the Master’s Programme. (A<br />

chronological sequence <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> the course is given in<br />

Annexure-7).<br />

The above discussion makes it clear that the University has well laid<br />

down procedures for the development <strong>of</strong> its course materials. There is<br />

academic supervision by various statutory (School Board, Planning<br />

Board and <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>) and academic units like Discipline<br />

Group and Course Teams.<br />

There are administrative supervision and checks through the Director <strong>of</strong><br />

the School.<br />

The procedures have proved quite effective in ensuring standards and<br />

academic excellence. It is submitted that the University’s course<br />

material (which number around 1100 courses and around 5000 Blocks)<br />

have received wide acclaim and approval from scholars, teachers, and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals from a large number <strong>of</strong> national and international<br />

organizations. Our course material is in great demand from students <strong>of</strong><br />

other universities. We would like to place on record that the courses on<br />

history are one <strong>of</strong> the largest selling materials. This is a testimony <strong>of</strong> its<br />

quality. The faculty <strong>of</strong> History has produced more than 300 blocks in<br />

English and Hindi for its Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees. It may be<br />

mentioned here that in spite <strong>of</strong> History being in public gaze, there has<br />

been general praise <strong>of</strong> its materials from the scholars and teachers <strong>of</strong><br />

History.


It may also be submitted that so far no historian has questioned the<br />

authenticity <strong>of</strong> the so-called “objectionable material”. Even in the<br />

Hon’ble High Court <strong>of</strong> Delhi where a PIL was filed to this effect the<br />

petitioner could not produce evidence to support his argument when<br />

directed by the Court and withdrew the case on the next hearing<br />

(Annexure-8). Even a revision petition was dismissed on 19.10.2006<br />

by the bench <strong>of</strong> two Hon’ble judges, presided over by Acting Chief<br />

Justice <strong>of</strong> the Delhi High Court. It is indicative <strong>of</strong> the quality and<br />

authenticity <strong>of</strong> our materials.<br />

The University is proactive to the needs and views <strong>of</strong> its learners. As<br />

soon as it was pointed out by one <strong>of</strong> our students (April 2006) that he<br />

felt <strong>of</strong>fended by ‘some’ expressions, the faculty took immediate note<br />

(April 10, 2006) and decided to undertake necessary editing before the<br />

materials were sent to new students. The student was accordingly<br />

informed vide letter dated 2.5.2006 (copy enclosed as Annexure-9).<br />

After three months, the issue was politicized and the matter was raised<br />

in the media (18 th July 2006) and the Parliament. Though there was not<br />

intention to hurt religious sentiments <strong>of</strong> any one, yet to assuage the<br />

feelings, on 19 th July, 2006 itself, the University decided to withdraw<br />

the course and get a comprehensive review done by a committee <strong>of</strong><br />

seven eminent historians. A press release was also issued to this effect<br />

and was well received by the general public. The Review Committee<br />

comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bhairavi P.Sahu, Head, Department <strong>of</strong> History, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Delhi<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. David Syiemlieh, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> History, North Eastern Hill<br />

University, Shillong<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dilbagh Singh, Centre for Historical studies, JNU, New<br />

Delhi<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kesavan Veluthat, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> History, Mangalore<br />

University, Mangalore<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. R.A.Khan, Formerly Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> History, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

History and Culture, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.P.Gupta, Formerly Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> History, Aligarh Muslim<br />

University, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus, UGC, New Delhi<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.Mathur, Department <strong>of</strong> History, MD University, Ajmer<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director, SOSS, <strong>IGNOU</strong> (Convenor)<br />

The Committee has submitted its report (Annexure-10). All<br />

information asked for by MHRD was sent by the University from time<br />

to time. Besides, the Hon’ble Minister, MHRD and Hon’ble Minister<br />

<strong>of</strong> State were briefed before the calling attention motion and questions


were to be taken up in the Parliament. We understand that on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> this information, questions were answered both in Rajya Sabha and<br />

Lok Sabha by Hon’ble Minister.<br />

3. In view <strong>of</strong> the above explanation it is submitted that the<br />

Visitorial enquiry is not warranted in view <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

1. The material is based on well-documented literature.<br />

2. Well laid down procedures <strong>of</strong> the University for preparation <strong>of</strong><br />

course material and its approval have been followed.<br />

It may be pertinent to mention here that this issue was placed before the<br />

School Board, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences, in its 39 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

October 13, 2006. It resolved as under:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

iii)<br />

iv)<br />

While it is important to be sensitive to the societal concerns,<br />

the academic pr<strong>of</strong>ession too demands adherence to the<br />

methods and principles developed and practised<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionally.<br />

The University already has in place a corrective mechanism<br />

and the objectionable material has already been subjected to<br />

this mechanism.<br />

The sources in history like in all social science disciplines<br />

provide divergent views, interpretations and methodological<br />

treatment on the same subject. Therefore, there does always<br />

exist the possibility that such views be at variance. However,<br />

the Faculty should assess the impact <strong>of</strong> sensitive statements in<br />

a pluralist society.<br />

The University has already withdrawn the course as some<br />

portions inadvertently contained in the course material were<br />

considered objectionable by a cross section <strong>of</strong> people.<br />

However, the Faculty in its reply should place on record the<br />

academic argument that the text has been developed by the<br />

author on the basis <strong>of</strong> writings <strong>of</strong> eminent historians and<br />

scholars.<br />

v) The University has already taken the initiative <strong>of</strong> constituting<br />

a Review Committee comprising seven eminent historians to<br />

review the entire course and the review work is under<br />

progress.<br />

vi)<br />

There was no intention at all to hurt the feelings <strong>of</strong> any<br />

religious segments and deciding the quantum <strong>of</strong> responsibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> each individual involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> the said<br />

study material would cause long term harm to the ethos <strong>of</strong><br />

collaboration practiced successfully by the University and<br />

demoralize the faculty.


vii)<br />

viii)<br />

The course development is an academic exercise involving<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the course structure by an Expert Committee,<br />

School Board, <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> etc., comprising eminent<br />

experts and is undertaken on the basis <strong>of</strong> laid down<br />

procedures.<br />

Since the material is based on well-documented literature, it<br />

does not warrant any Visitorial Inquiry.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the above, it is submitted that any Visitorial Inquiry on issues<br />

<strong>of</strong> academic nature pertaining to the contents <strong>of</strong> a course will<br />

demoralize the Faculty, as highlighted by the School Board since builtin<br />

mechanism and procedures are available within the University to<br />

correct any aberration. <strong>IGNOU</strong> has a policy to involve teachers,<br />

experts and scholars from other universities and institutions in course<br />

development. Eminent resource persons are open to academic scrutiny<br />

but they definitely may not like their works to be subjected to<br />

administrative scrutiny. As a result, the University may not receive<br />

their generous help and co-operation. It may have long term adverse<br />

repercussions for over all course development process and hard earned<br />

reputation <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The School Board and the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>,<br />

the highest statutory academic bodies <strong>of</strong> the University be allowed to<br />

look into these matters and resolve them as per laid down provisions in<br />

the Act and Statutes. As already submitted that study material <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> has been rated highly by peers and scholars and a Visitorial<br />

Inquiry which is provided for administrative and financial matters, may<br />

not serve useful academic purpose and compromise academic autonomy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the University. We have grown and gained in stature through<br />

adherence to these laid down procedures.<br />

Since the University has already withdrawn the course and ordered a<br />

review by eminent scholars <strong>of</strong> History. The whole issue may be allowed<br />

to be resolved in the academic interest <strong>of</strong> the learners at the University<br />

level. It is submitted that the explanation and submissions are to the<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Hon’ble Visitor. It is, therefore, requested that the<br />

Hon’ble Visitor may like to kindly treat the issue as closed.<br />

AC 36.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the matter in detail and approved the<br />

explanation <strong>of</strong>fered by the School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences based on the<br />

recommendations made by the School Board. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>


further directed that:<br />

i) non-recurrence <strong>of</strong> such inadvertent omissions be ensured;<br />

ii) the editorial changes indicated by the review committee be<br />

incorporated expeditiously and the revised material be sent<br />

to all the learners enrolled in the course before its<br />

withdrawal;<br />

iii) term-end examination <strong>of</strong> the course be held in June, 2007<br />

for the learners already enrolled in the course, not in<br />

December 2006.<br />

ITEM NO. 8<br />

AC 36.8.1<br />

To consider Grade ‘D’ in TEE/assignments and an overall average<br />

‘C’ grade, to complete the course <strong>of</strong> CEMBA/CEMPA Programme.<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the evaluation<br />

methodology for the CEMBA/CEMPA programmes, provided by the<br />

Schools concerned to Student Registration & Evaluation Division is as<br />

given below:<br />

“minimum grade required to complete assignments and TE Exam<br />

components separately is ‘C’ and overall grade required to complete a<br />

course is also ‘C’.<br />

But the Programme Guide <strong>of</strong> CEMBA/CEMPA (printed in 2004) states<br />

that ‘in case a student fails to get ‘D’ Grade in the Term End<br />

examination, he/she will be eligible to reappear in the next Term End<br />

Examination for the course. In case the student has secured Grade ‘D’<br />

in average <strong>of</strong> assignments and term end examination <strong>of</strong> a course, but<br />

failed to secure overall qualifying grade ‘C’, he/she has an option either<br />

to re-do minimum required number <strong>of</strong> assignments not exceeding two<br />

for a course or re-appear in term end examination”.<br />

This discrepancy between methodology and information printed in the<br />

prospectus was brought to the notice <strong>of</strong> the Schools concerned. The<br />

Programme Coordinator(s) recommended that the methodology as per<br />

the information provided through the prospectus be followed, and the<br />

evaluation methodology be modified accordingly.<br />

AC 36.8.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, one <strong>of</strong> the Programme Coordinators, informed the<br />

members that there are few students for this programme as on dates and<br />

both the programmes had been closed down for now. He proposed that<br />

the University follow the evaluation methodology which was printed in<br />

the Programme Guide in 2004 instead <strong>of</strong> the evaluation methodology<br />

approved earlier by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to avoid any<br />

hardship/litigation by the students concerned. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg also stated


that since the mistake had occurred on the part <strong>of</strong> the University, it<br />

should follow the evaluation methodology which had been conveyed to<br />

the students through the Programme Guide.<br />

AC 36.8.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved that the University<br />

should follow the same evaluation methodology which had been printed<br />

in the Programme Guide for the year 2004 for the students admitted to<br />

the programme during the period. Further, while publishing any<br />

Programme Guides or other University documents, due care must be<br />

taken to avoid recurrence <strong>of</strong> such mistakes.<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

To consider and approve the Additional/Optional Course M.A.<br />

(English) for the 2001-2002 Batches.<br />

AC 36.9.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that MEG-01: British<br />

Poetry was not on <strong>of</strong>fer to the M.A. English Batches <strong>of</strong> 2001 and 2002<br />

because the course was not ready at that time. In September/October<br />

2003, the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities advised the students that MEG-01 is<br />

meant to be a compulsory course for them and that they were to opt for<br />

MEG-01 in lieu <strong>of</strong> any other optional course from the ones they had<br />

already selected/successfully completed. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee, at its 15 th meeting held on 29.6.2005 took a<br />

decision that those learners who had thus, completed 9 courses in all<br />

were to be given a “Certificate <strong>of</strong> Completion” for the fifth optional<br />

course if they so desired.<br />

The problem now arisen is that <strong>of</strong> learners with 72 credits worth <strong>of</strong><br />

courses (an excess <strong>of</strong> 8 credits). The School Board concerned had<br />

submitted the following recommendations for the consideration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>:<br />

1. MEG-01: British Poetry should be treated as a compulsory<br />

course for all learners <strong>of</strong> Batches 2001 and 2002 that may<br />

have already completed the M.A. English Programme, as<br />

was decided in the 15 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

held on 29.6.2005.<br />

2. Since MEG-01 is a compulsory course, along with MEG-<br />

02, 03, 04 and 05, the marks <strong>of</strong> all these courses should<br />

be reflected in the Grade Card.<br />

3. In case <strong>of</strong> learners who may have completed 9 courses (a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 5 compulsory courses and 4 optional courses), the<br />

option to drop an elective course may be exercised by the<br />

learners themselves.


In case a learner desires a Certificate <strong>of</strong> Completion for the<br />

extra/additional/optional/9 th course <strong>of</strong> the M.A. English Programme,<br />

s/he may be advised to apply for it separately, and a Certificate <strong>of</strong><br />

Completion may be issued by the University as per University norms.<br />

AC 36.9.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal made by the School,<br />

subject to the condition that there will be no change in the degrees<br />

already awarded to the students. However, if possible, a mention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

marks scored by a candidate should be made in the revised grade card.<br />

After dealing with the formal agenda, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> placed on record its<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> the contributions made by Pr<strong>of</strong>. H.P.Dikshit, the former Vice-Chancellor<br />

and Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, the former Pro Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the University, in conducting the<br />

proceedings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.R. Pillai)<br />

Chairman


Appendix-1<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended/could not attend the 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on Monday, the 23 rd October, 2006.<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

59. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai, VC - Chairman<br />

60. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg<br />

61. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni<br />

62. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham<br />

63. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair<br />

64. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh<br />

65. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

66. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora<br />

67. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal<br />

68. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja<br />

69. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra<br />

70. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang<br />

71. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj<br />

72. Sh. Shashi Bhushan<br />

73. Dr. T.K.Jena<br />

74. Dr. Anu J.Thomas<br />

75. Shri S.K.Arora<br />

76. Dr. C.K.Ghosh<br />

77. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda<br />

78. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

79. Dr. S.K.Mohapatra<br />

80. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K.Jain<br />

81. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Asghar Wajahat<br />

82. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.S.Yadav<br />

83. Dr. T.R.Srinivasan<br />

84. Dr. O.P.Dewal<br />

85. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Members who could not attend:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.R.Madhava Menon<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J. Ramachandran<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sanjeev Bhargava<br />

6. Dr. Shardindu<br />

7. Sh. G.S.Sahni<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri<br />

9. Dr. N.Venkateshwarlu<br />

10. Dr. Kamal Vagarecha<br />

11. Dr. Eisha Kannadi<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist<br />

the Member-Secretary.


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY SEVENTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

November 22, 2006<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THIRTY SEVENTH MEETING OF THE<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER<br />

22, 2006 AT 2.00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8,<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> members present and those who could not attend the meeting is given in<br />

(Annexure 1).<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, which had been convened as an urgent meeting to consider the<br />

matters relating to the 18 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University, though certain other<br />

important issues had also been included in the agenda. He then asked the Member<br />

Secretary to present the items on the agenda.<br />

The Member- Secretary then presented the items on the agenda. The decisions<br />

concerned are recorded below:<br />

ITEM NO.1 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 36 TH MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON OCTOBER 23, 2006<br />

AND TO NOTE THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

AC 37.1.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on October 23, 2006 were<br />

circulated to the members. Though no comments have been received so<br />

far, he proposed that the members may <strong>of</strong>fer their comments, if any, as<br />

the minutes were circulated only on November 12, 2003.<br />

AC 37.1.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal, Director, SOET desired that the last sentence <strong>of</strong><br />

the resolution AC 36.1.3 may be dropped as no rates existed for the<br />

B.Tech. Mechanical Engineering programme. The Chairman pointed<br />

out that the rates approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> even for a new<br />

programme could not be implemented till the same were approved by<br />

the Finance Committee. Therefore, the minutes did not require any<br />

modification.<br />

AC 37.1.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes (Annexure-2 without<br />

appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> as circulated.


ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 37.2.1<br />

AC 37.2.2<br />

AC 37.2.3<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 37.3.1<br />

AC 37.3.2<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MATTER RELATING TO<br />

CONFERMENT OF HONORARY DEGREES AT THE 18 TH<br />

CONVOCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY.<br />

The Member Secretary apprised the members that the 18 th Convocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the University is likely to be held in February, 2007 and it is<br />

proposed to confer honorary degrees on distinguished personalities at<br />

the convocation. The Statute 22 on conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees<br />

envisages that “all proposals for the conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees<br />

shall be initiated by the Vice-Chancellor who after consultation with the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management shall submit the same<br />

to the Visitor for confirmation.”<br />

The Chairman consulted the members about his proposal <strong>of</strong> conferment<br />

<strong>of</strong> honorary degrees. He requested the members to keep the proposal<br />

confidential as it also involves consultation with the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, seeking concurrence <strong>of</strong> the recipients and approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Visitor in consultation with the Ministries <strong>of</strong> HRD and External Affairs.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> concurred the proposal.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO HAVE A<br />

COMPULSORY COMPONENT OF THEORY, PRACTICE AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY OF OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING FOR<br />

ALL LEARNERS IN <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members <strong>of</strong> the proposal that<br />

from 2007 January admission onwards, all our programmes/courses<br />

should have a compulsory component <strong>of</strong> the Theory, Practice and<br />

Technology <strong>of</strong> Open and Distance Learning. This has to be one core<br />

unit. The course content, weightage etc. has to be decided by an expert<br />

committee. Print version and on-line have to be there.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved to approve the proposal subject to the<br />

following:<br />

(i) a Committee <strong>of</strong> experts in the ODL Pedagogy and<br />

Technology will deliberate the matter and its<br />

recommendations will be placed before the School Boards<br />

for integrating this compulsory course following the<br />

existing procedure;<br />

(ii)<br />

focus <strong>of</strong> the course should be study skill oriented in use <strong>of</strong><br />

educational and media technologies; and


(iii)<br />

as the programmes are <strong>of</strong>fered at certificate, diploma,<br />

undergraduate degree, post-graduate degree and doctoral<br />

level, there cannot be uniformity <strong>of</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed course as the requirements <strong>of</strong> each category <strong>of</strong><br />

learners would be different.<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 37.4.1<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 37.5.1<br />

TO CONSIDER CO-OPTION OF MEMBERS UNDER CLAUSE<br />

(1) (viii) OF STATUTE 9.<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the ten members <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> co-opted by it under clause (1) (viii) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Statute 9 would be completing their tenure on December 11, 2006. A<br />

proposal to co-opt new members was placed before the 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Council</strong> wherein the Chairman invited names <strong>of</strong> experts for<br />

cooption by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The members authorized the<br />

Chairman to co-opt the new members on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and report the same to the <strong>Council</strong> for ratification as per the<br />

past practice. The Chairman informed that the list <strong>of</strong> co-opted members<br />

will be placed for ratification after the term <strong>of</strong> present members is over.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 21 ST<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL’S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON OCTOBER 18, 2006<br />

The Member Secretary informed that the 21 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee was held on October 18, 2006 and the<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting had been placed before the members. The<br />

ACSC considered and approved the following major items:<br />

1. Phase-3 Form for PG Certificate Programme in Patents, PG<br />

Certificate in Cyber Laws, PG Diploma in IPR Regime and<br />

Human Rights, Diploma in Craft and Design ( Pottery) and<br />

Certificate in Business Skills;<br />

2. Phase Zero Form for the revision <strong>of</strong> Certificate Programme in<br />

Human Rights, MS-410 Course: Financial Innovation and<br />

Engineering for Management Programme and an Application<br />

Oriented Course: Business Communication and<br />

Entrepreneurship for the BDP students;<br />

3. Modified eligibility for the Advanced Certificate in Power<br />

Distribution Management;<br />

4. Modification <strong>of</strong> Evaluation Methodology for Bachelor’s <strong>of</strong>


Social Work and Diploma in Value Added Products from Fruits<br />

and Vegetables programmes;<br />

5. Payment Norms for Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Project Proposals <strong>of</strong> MCS-<br />

044 course in BCA programme;<br />

6. Pro-rata admission fee for MEG and MHD Programmes;<br />

7. Evaluation Methodology for Diploma in Nautical Science and<br />

Advanced Diploma in Nautical Science programmes;<br />

8. Relaxation <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> PGDDE programme and declaration<br />

<strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> students <strong>of</strong> Liberia;<br />

9. Relaxation <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> the PGCPDT programme by six<br />

months;<br />

The Member Secretary clarified that in respect <strong>of</strong> Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong><br />

Diploma in Craft and Design (Pottery) the ACSC had advised the<br />

Programme Coordinator to work out details <strong>of</strong> expenditure that might<br />

be incurred by the University on each student for learner support and<br />

bring the proposal thereafter before the ACSC/AC. He proposed that<br />

the minutes may be approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 37.5.2<br />

The following observations were made by the members about the Phase<br />

3 Form <strong>of</strong> the PG Diploma in IPR Regime and Human Rights<br />

Programme:<br />

♦ What is the need <strong>of</strong> the programme when the University had<br />

been <strong>of</strong>fering a Certificate in Human Rights and a PG Diploma<br />

in Intellectual Property Rights?<br />

♦ There seems to be an overlap <strong>of</strong> contents with those <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

mentioned programmes.<br />

♦ Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak <strong>of</strong> SOSS has been shown as one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Programme Coordinators, whereas the other Programme<br />

Coordinator, Shri Anand Gupta, SOL did not sign the Phase 3<br />

Form. With Pr<strong>of</strong> Nayak as one <strong>of</strong> the Programme Coordinators,<br />

Mr. Gupta who is only a young lecturer may not get due credit.<br />

AC 37.5.3<br />

The following clarifications were <strong>of</strong>fered:<br />

♦ Inadvertent omission <strong>of</strong> signatures <strong>of</strong> the faculty member was<br />

regretted;<br />

♦ Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak had conceptualized the programme when<br />

none <strong>of</strong> the lecturers had even joined the University. Initially<br />

Ms Suneet Kashyap was involved in the programme along with


Pr<strong>of</strong>. Nayak. When she took over the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the coordinatorship<br />

<strong>of</strong> the PG Certificate Programme in Patents, Shri.<br />

Gupta was associated with PGDIPRHR as one <strong>of</strong> the cocoordinators;<br />

♦ There are precedents wherein members <strong>of</strong> another Discipline<br />

had been coordinating the programmes;<br />

♦ Though there is no overlap <strong>of</strong> contents, the same will be further<br />

examined by course expert committees while designing the<br />

detailed syllabi <strong>of</strong> the programme, and would be placed before<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Law and the ACSC/AC for<br />

approval;<br />

♦ The proposal had been examined and approved by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Law having eminent experts;<br />

♦ The Planning & Development Division is being requested to<br />

undertake need survey for all the proposed programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Law.<br />

AC 37.5.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided that the Chairman may examine the<br />

procedural aspects and take an appropriate decision. With these<br />

observations, the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 21 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC (Annexure-<br />

3) without Appendices were approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ITEM NO.6 TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT IN THE POLICY<br />

GUIDELINES FRAMED BY THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

FOR RE-SUBMISSION/IMPROVEMENT IN PROJECT<br />

REPORTS.<br />

AC 37.6.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that as per the guidelines<br />

framed by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for resubmission/ improvement in<br />

Project Reports, the students are required to remit the pro-rata fee while<br />

re-submitting the project reports.<br />

(i)<br />

Pro-rata fee as per University rules be charged from<br />

the students whose Project work was booked under<br />

unfair means and referred to the Examination<br />

Discipline Committee (EDC);


(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

However, students who were unable to score the<br />

minimum pass marks be charged with 50% <strong>of</strong> the prorata<br />

fee only while re-submitting the Project Report<br />

within the validity period <strong>of</strong> registration.<br />

This will be applicable to all the Programmes where<br />

Project work is a part <strong>of</strong> the curriculum.<br />

AC 37.6.2<br />

AC 37.6.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> discussed the proposal in detail. It was pointed<br />

out that though the guidelines are applicable to project reports across<br />

the programmes, the request is mainly from the students <strong>of</strong> the BCA/<br />

MCA programme. Also curbing the malpractices in submission <strong>of</strong><br />

project reports is very essential for maintaining the credibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided that<br />

i) the request <strong>of</strong> the BCA/ MCA students be first examined by<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Computer and Information<br />

Sciences, and<br />

ii)<br />

the Chairman may constitute a Committee to examine the<br />

issues relating to malpractices in submission <strong>of</strong> Project<br />

Reports and suggest steps to curb the same.<br />

ITEM NO.7 TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT IN THE ASSOCIATE<br />

STUDENTSHIP SCHEME TO FACILITATE STUDENTS TO<br />

SEEK ADMISSION IN EITHER OF THE ADMISSION CYCLES.<br />

AC 37.7.1<br />

The Member Secretary apprised the members <strong>of</strong> the Associate<br />

Studentship Scheme approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (AC 16.22.1).<br />

Students are being admitted under the Associate Studentship Scheme<br />

for the courses <strong>of</strong> their choice in January admission cycle (as prevalent<br />

till the year 2003). However, in the year 2003, certain Bachelor’s<br />

Degree and Master’s Degree Programmes have been shifted to July<br />

admission cycle and rest <strong>of</strong> the Programmes continued to be in January<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> admission. Accordingly students have been allowed to seek<br />

admission only for those courses that are <strong>of</strong>fered in a specific admission<br />

cycle in view <strong>of</strong> the counseling and practical sessions arranged in that<br />

semester.


The Task Force on Student Support Services at its 259 th meeting held<br />

on 06.11.2006 discussed the issue and made the following suggestions:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

Different admission application forms will be used for the<br />

associate students;<br />

The minimum and maximum allowable period given to such<br />

students for completion <strong>of</strong> their courses would be six months<br />

and two years, respectively;<br />

There will be no separate counseling or lab work schedule<br />

for the students. They will have to be in touch with the<br />

study centers concerned in order to know the schedule and<br />

participate in the sessions accordingly;<br />

SRED will prepare an Associate Studentship Scheme for<br />

being placed at the next <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting.<br />

The ‘admission form’ approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 16 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> may be utilized with necessary modifications, if required.<br />

Minimum period <strong>of</strong> six months may be allowed, if the courses opted by<br />

the students are up to 16 credits. If the option exceeds 16 credits, the<br />

minimum period should be one year.<br />

Though students may be permitted to seek admission in any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

admission cycles and to opt the courses that are on <strong>of</strong>fer either in<br />

January or July cycles, no counseling and/or lab/practicals would be<br />

conducted separately for the Associate students. In such a case the<br />

students would be allowed to avail the counseling/practical session in<br />

the next semester and accordingly the minimum duration would be<br />

extended. However, the maximum duration <strong>of</strong> two years would remain<br />

unchanged.<br />

If a student opts for more than 16 credits worth <strong>of</strong> courses in either <strong>of</strong><br />

the admission cycles, he/she is not entitled to seek admission in the next<br />

cycle unless the prescribed minimum duration is completed, except in<br />

the courses <strong>of</strong> Certificate Programmes.<br />

The Regional Centres will handle all admissions under the Associate<br />

Studentship scheme. Last date for submission <strong>of</strong> filled-in admission


form would remain unchanged as is fixed for January & July cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

admissions.<br />

AC 37.7.2<br />

ITEM NO. 8<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE 3 FORM FOR<br />

MASTER IN ARTS IN EDUCATION.<br />

AC 37.8.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Education had submitted the Phase-3 Form (Annexure 4) for Masters<br />

<strong>of</strong> Arts in Education, which had been placed before the members. The<br />

main objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme are as under:<br />

a) Provide learning-experiences, which will enable students to<br />

understand and appreciate knowledge structures and<br />

paradigms <strong>of</strong> education.<br />

b) Develop pr<strong>of</strong>essionals for effective participation in<br />

educational actions in different areas <strong>of</strong> education.<br />

c) Create community <strong>of</strong> scholars adequately equipped for<br />

participation in educational discourse.<br />

He informed that the course material for 1 st year <strong>of</strong> the programme had<br />

been developed. When the Phase 4 Form for launching the programme<br />

was placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes Committee (APC) for<br />

approval, it was pointed out that the programme was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Education more than three years back. The<br />

APC advised the Programme Coordinator to process the programme<br />

again through the School Board as per the decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong>


<strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The Phase 3 Form was again placed before the School Board at 23 rd<br />

meeting held on October 13, 2006 and had been approved. The School<br />

Board observed that since the course material had been developed<br />

recently, it did not require updating and may be launched at the earliest.<br />

AC 37.8.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal with the advice that the<br />

detailed syllabus <strong>of</strong> the course be appended with the minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

meeting.<br />

ITEM NO.9 TO CONSIDER PMT-01 IN LIEU OF OMT-01 FOR<br />

INTERNATIONAL BPP STUDENTS (ADMITTED IN JULY 06<br />

CYCLE) APPEARING IN DECEMBER, 2006 EXAMINATION<br />

ABROAD.<br />

AC 37.9.1<br />

AC 37.9.2<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that the PMT-01 course<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Bachelor’s Preparatory Programme had been revised (new course<br />

code OMT-01) and <strong>of</strong>fered from July 2006 session. It has been brought<br />

to the notice <strong>of</strong> the Chairman that due to lack <strong>of</strong> communication the<br />

material <strong>of</strong> the pre-revised course had been sent to the thirty seven<br />

overseas students by the International Division. The International<br />

Division had submitted that the students may be permitted to appear in<br />

PMT-01 course in December, 2006 Examination and their results may<br />

be declared. From January 2007 cycle, the OMT-01 course only would<br />

be <strong>of</strong>fered to all international students.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal.<br />

After transaction <strong>of</strong> the items on the Agenda, the Vice-Chancellor informed the members<br />

that he has received a complaint that the Foundation Course in Science & Technology<br />

developed in 1988 has not been revised so far. He informed the <strong>Council</strong> that henceforth<br />

no course which is more than 10 years old would be <strong>of</strong>fered to the students. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.<br />

Garg clarified that the Board <strong>of</strong> Management had taken a decision that courses should be<br />

revised every five years. He further observed that the decision about withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

assignments would be reviewed but for the January 2007 Session, the decision taken<br />

earlier would continue. The Vice-Chancellor then requested the members if they would<br />

like to make any comments/observations.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj observed that she had received a request for developing a<br />

programme which includes courses on History <strong>of</strong> Civilization, History <strong>of</strong> Ideas,<br />

Philosophy etc. for which no expertise existed in the School. The Vice-Chancellor


observed that such courses can be <strong>of</strong>fered through a School <strong>of</strong> Inter-Disciplinary Studies.<br />

Members observed that there is a need <strong>of</strong> re-structuring the various Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies<br />

and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management had appointed a Committee for this purpose. The Vice-<br />

Chancellor may call for necessary information from Director, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination<br />

Division.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


Annexure-1<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended/could not attend the 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on Wednesday, the 22 nd November, 2006.<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

86. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.R. Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

87. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg,Director (I/C), SOCIS - Member<br />

88. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham, Director, SOMS - Member<br />

89. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Director, SOS - Member<br />

90. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Director, SOE - Member<br />

91. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora, Director, SOHS - Member<br />

92. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal, Director, SOET - Member<br />

93. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE - Member<br />

94. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Political Science - Member<br />

95. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> English - Member<br />

96. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Physics - Member<br />

97. Sh. Shashi Bhushan, Reader, SOCIS - Member<br />

98. Shri S.K.Arora, Librarian - Member<br />

99. Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Director, RSD - Member<br />

100. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, Director, STRIDE - Member<br />

101. Sh. V.K.Arora, Director, EMPC - Member<br />

102. Dr. S.K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SR&ED - Member<br />

103. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.K.Jain (Retd.), Delhi University - Member<br />

104. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.Ramachandran, IIM, Bangalore - Member<br />

105. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.S.Yadav (Retd.), Director, IIMC - Member<br />

106. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kuldeep Mathur (Retd.), JNU - Member<br />

107. Dr. T.R.Srinivasan, RD, <strong>IGNOU</strong> RC- Hyderabad -<br />

Member<br />

108. Dr. N. Venkateshwarlu, Lecturer, SOET - Member<br />

109. Dr. Kamal Vagarecha, Lecturer, SOMS - Member<br />

110. Dr. O.P.Dewal, Dy. Director, EMPC - Member<br />

111. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-<br />

Secretary<br />

Members who could not attend:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.M.Paul Khurana, Vice Chancellor, RDU, Jabalpur - Member<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.R.Madhava Menon (Retd.), Director,<br />

National Judical Academy, Bhopal - Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Asghar Wajahat, Jamia Millia Islamia - Member<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sanjeev Bhargava, Director, PDMIIIT, Jabalpur - Member<br />

5. Dr. Shardindu, Former Director, NCTE - Member<br />

6. Sh. G.S.Sahni, Former DG, Shipping - Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh, Director, SOH - Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra, Director, SOA - Member<br />

9. Dr. T.K.Jena, Reader, SOHS - Member<br />

10 Dr. Annu J.Thomas, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

11. Dr. Eisha Kannadi, Lecturer, SOE - Member<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapil Kumar attended the meeting on behalf <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Director,<br />

SOSS and Ms. Suneet Kashyap, Lecturer, SOL attended the meeting as a Special Invitee.


Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist<br />

the Member-Secretary.


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY EIGHTH (SPECIAL) MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

December 13, 2006<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THIRTY EIGHTH (SPECIAL) MEETING OF THE<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13,<br />

2006 AT 2.00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

112. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai, VC - Chairman<br />

113. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni<br />

114. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh<br />

115. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma<br />

116. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora<br />

117. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal<br />

118. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra<br />

119. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang<br />

120. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri<br />

121. Sh. Shashi Bhushan<br />

122. Dr. T.K.Jena<br />

123. Dr. Annu J.Thomas<br />

124. Shri S.K.Arora<br />

125. Dr. C.K.Ghosh<br />

126. Dr. Kamal Vagrecha<br />

127. Dr. Eisha Kannadi<br />

128. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda<br />

129. Sh. V.K.Arora<br />

130. Dr. S.K.Mohapatra<br />

131. Dr. T.R.Srinivasan<br />

132. Dr. O.P.Dewal<br />

133. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.C.Garg, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.Aslam, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B. Khanna and Ms. Suneet Kashyap attended the<br />

meeting as representatives <strong>of</strong> the Directors <strong>of</strong> respective Schools. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardawaj and Mr.<br />

N. Venkateshwarlu could not attend the meeting.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist the<br />

Member-Secretary.


At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 38 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

and informed that the special meeting had been convened to consider the matters relating to<br />

conducting <strong>of</strong> examination for MHI-07.<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 38.1.1<br />

TO CONSIDER THE MATTER RELATING TO OFFERING A<br />

COMPLETELY REVISED, ALTERNATIVE COURSE AND<br />

EXAMINATION IN RESPECT OF MHI-07 STUDENTS.<br />

The Chairman informed the members that the University has been<br />

receiving requests from a number <strong>of</strong> students <strong>of</strong> M.A. (History)/ M.A.<br />

(Political Science) for conducting examination in the MHI-07 course as<br />

the delay is hampering their career prospects. Many <strong>of</strong> them want to<br />

pursue further studies and have qualified in NET examination also. But<br />

due to non-completion <strong>of</strong> their MA Degree, they are not able to avail<br />

those opportunities. The Chairman observed that the members are<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> the circumstances under which the University withdrew the<br />

course and decided not to hold examination in December 2006. As<br />

informed by the Registrar, Student Registration and Evaluation<br />

Division, 2019 students had requested for appearing in December 2006<br />

TEE in the course. In the genuine interest <strong>of</strong> the students already<br />

enrolled in the course, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> may take an appropriate<br />

decision in the matter.<br />

AC 38.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the matter and debated various<br />

alternatives suggested by the members. After detailed discussion, the<br />

following decisions were taken:<br />

i) Revision <strong>of</strong> the MHI-07 course incorporating the inputs<br />

given by the members <strong>of</strong> the committee appointed by the<br />

University be expedited and revised material be sent to these<br />

students at the earliest. Extreme caution be exercised while<br />

translating the material in Hindi.<br />

ii)<br />

iii)<br />

A new course code MHI-107 may be given to the course.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> authorized the Chairman to take<br />

appropriate decisions required, if any, in the matter on behalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

iv) The University may hold a special examination for these<br />

students in March, 2007.<br />

v) The students may be allowed to submit assignments up to<br />

vi)<br />

May 31, 2007.<br />

Regular examinations in the course may be held in June,<br />

2007 as per the decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 36 th<br />

meeting.


ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 38.2.1<br />

AC 38.2.2<br />

AC 38.2.3<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR<br />

INCLUSION OF THREE ELECTIVE COURSES OF BSW AS<br />

OPTIONALS IN BDP PACKAGE.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Saraswat, Member Secretary informed the members that the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> HRD has suggested the inclusion <strong>of</strong> courses related to<br />

HIV/AIDS and family education in the BDP package <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. This is<br />

also one <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> concern listed in the Millennium Development<br />

Goals <strong>of</strong> the UN. There are three electives courses <strong>of</strong> 8 credits each in the<br />

BSW programme developed by SOCE. The courses are available both in<br />

English and Hindi along with audio and video programmes.<br />

During the discussion, it was pointed out that a student <strong>of</strong> BDP may opt<br />

for elective courses from 8 different disciplines and up to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

64 credits. However, Social Work is not a separate discipline in the<br />

University. In addition to elective courses, the students are also<br />

required to take foundation courses worth 24 credits and application<br />

oriented courses worth 8-16 credits compulsorily. It was also pointed<br />

out that the BDP was launched in 1987 and the disciplines have been<br />

allocated on the basis <strong>of</strong> requirement at that time.<br />

After detailed discussion on the matter, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved<br />

to refer the matter to the Bachelors’ Degree Programme Coordination<br />

Committee for consideration and an overall review <strong>of</strong> the BDP<br />

structure, and to suggest, the action to be taken in the matter.<br />

The <strong>Meeting</strong> ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

THIRTY NINTH (SPECIAL) MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

March 17, 2007<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE THIRTY NINTH (SPECIAL) MEETING OF THE<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD ON SATURDAY, MARCH 17, 2007 AT<br />

1.00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS,<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI – 110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

134. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

135. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh -<br />

Member<br />

136. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni - Member<br />

137. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair - Member<br />

138. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma - Member<br />

139. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja -<br />

Member<br />

140. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham -<br />

Member<br />

141. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora -<br />

Member<br />

142. Shri Shashi Bhushan - Member<br />

143. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra -<br />

Member<br />

144. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang -<br />

Member<br />

145. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj - Member<br />

146. Dr. T.K.Jena, Reader - Member<br />

147. Dr. Annu J.Thomas - Member<br />

148. Dr. N.Venkateshwarlu -<br />

Member<br />

149. Dr. Kamal Vagrecha - Member<br />

150. Dr. Eisha Kannadi - Member<br />

151. Shri S.K.Arora -<br />

Member<br />

152. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda -<br />

Member<br />

153. Shri V.K.Arora -<br />

Member<br />

154. Dr. C.K.Ghosh -<br />

Member<br />

155. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra -<br />

Member<br />

156. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member


157. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur - Member<br />

158. Dr. S.S.Rathi - Member<br />

159. Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P.Mishra -<br />

Member<br />

160. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya -<br />

Member<br />

161. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sivakumar - Member<br />

162. Dr. O.P.Dewal - Member<br />

163. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Dr. P. Srinivas Kumar and Ms. Suneet Kashyap represented the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and<br />

Technology, and the School <strong>of</strong> Law, respectively.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

T.K.V.Subramanian, Dr. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K.Mohammed Yusuff, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Aravind Kumar,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, Dr.T.R. Srinivasan could not attend the meeting.<br />

Sh. K.D.Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist the<br />

Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 39 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

He welcomed the newly co-opted members to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and hoped that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> will be benefited by their experience and guidance in enabling the University in achieving<br />

its goals. He further informed that this special meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> had been<br />

convened to consider the matters relating to the 18 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University, which was<br />

being held at 2.30 p.m. He congratulated the University community, students, teachers and<br />

academics and other staff for the same, as the Convocation signified the culmination <strong>of</strong> their<br />

efforts.<br />

The following agenda items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE LIST OF STUDENTS<br />

WHO HAVE QUALIFIED FOR AWARD OF GOLD MEDALS,<br />

DEGREES, DIPLOMAS AND CERTIFICATES IN THE 18 TH<br />

CONVOCATION AND OTHER GOLD MEDALS, LIKE INDIAN<br />

BANK SPONSORED MEDALS FOR ‘BEST RESEARCH<br />

PAPERS’, ‘BEST SERVICES AWARD’, ‘INNOVATION IN<br />

OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING’, PROF. RAM REDDY<br />

MEMORIAL MEDAL FOR BEST SCORER IN SOCIAL<br />

SCIENCE SUBJECTS.


AC 39.1.1 The Chairman informed that the 18 th Annual Convocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University was being held on Saturday, the 17 th March, 2007 at the<br />

Headquarters as well as at 30 Regional Centres simultaneously, through<br />

the tele-conferencing mode for awarding Gold Medals, Degrees,<br />

Diplomas and Certificates to the candidates who have qualified for<br />

getting the same during the Term-End Examinations held in December,<br />

2005 and June, 2006.<br />

The statement showing the number <strong>of</strong> students eligible for 18 th<br />

Convocation (1,11,699 as on 27.2.2007) is placed at Annexure-1.<br />

52 students have been identified for the award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals, as per<br />

criteria approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The list <strong>of</strong> Gold Medalists<br />

is placed at Annexure-2.<br />

(i) The following Research Papers had been recommended by a<br />

Committee constituted by the Vice-Chancellor for the award <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Bank sponsored Medals :<br />

The Best Research Paper for the award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medal:<br />

“Role <strong>of</strong> Defects in Transport through a Quantum Dot Single<br />

Electron Transistor” by Dr. K.P. Singh, Dr. Subhalakshmi<br />

Lamba, Dr. Sushil Lamba and Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Joshi published in J.<br />

Applied Physics, 2006, 99, 124503 (124)<br />

The Second Best Research Paper for the award <strong>of</strong> Silver<br />

Medal:<br />

“A Study <strong>of</strong> Student Attrition and Completion <strong>of</strong> Distance<br />

Education Programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>” by Dr. P.K. Biswas and<br />

Ms. G. Mythili published in Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Open Learning,<br />

2006, 15(2), 165-175.<br />

(ii)<br />

For the award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medal in “Innovation in Open and<br />

Distance Learning”, the work <strong>of</strong> ‘Instructional Design’ by<br />

Dr. Ajit Kumar, Reader, School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology,<br />

has been recommended by a Committee constituted by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor.<br />

(iii)<br />

Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad S<strong>of</strong>i, Enrol.No.041564356, meritorious<br />

student in M.A. History, has been identified for the award <strong>of</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Ram Reddy Memorial Gold Medal for the best scorer in


Social Science subjects.<br />

Certificates will be conferred upon the following Regional Centres for<br />

Best Services Award-2006 as per specimen placed at Annexure-3.<br />

However, Gold Medal will not be awarded during the 18 th Convocation.<br />

1. Bhubaneshwar<br />

2. Kolkata<br />

3. Delhi-2<br />

4. Aizwal<br />

5. Cochin<br />

Mr. Stalin Thomas Thermadom (Enrol.No.031843005), a student <strong>of</strong><br />

B.Com. has been chosen for ‘Pr<strong>of</strong>. Grover award for the Best<br />

Student’ <strong>of</strong> B.Com. from among the Physically challenged category.<br />

The award has been constituted by an Endowment Fund <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) donated by Pr<strong>of</strong>. R.K.Grover,<br />

former Pr<strong>of</strong>essor/Director, School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies, which has<br />

been considered and approved by the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its 86 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 01.04.2006 (BM 86.12.1). Since no Physically<br />

Handicapped student in M.Com. Programme has been found eligible for<br />

the award, Mr.Thermadom will be given a cash award <strong>of</strong> Rs.3000/- as<br />

approved by the Board <strong>of</strong> Management.<br />

AC 39.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the statement <strong>of</strong> eligible students, gold<br />

medalists and specimen certificate placed at Annexure-1, 2 and 3,<br />

respectively.<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 39.2.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

OF THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR TO WORK OUT THE MODALITIES FOR<br />

SELECTION OF THE STUDENTS FOR AWARD OF PROF. G.<br />

RAM REDDY MEMORIAL GOLD MEDAL FOR THE BEST<br />

SCORER IN MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMMES IN SOCIAL<br />

SCIENCE SUBJECTS.<br />

The Chairman informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee at its 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 21.02.2007 had considered and<br />

approved the proposal for award <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Ram Reddy Memorial Gold<br />

Medal for the best scorer in Master’s Degree Programmes in Social<br />

Science subjects beginning from the 18 th Convocation (ACSC 22.8.2).


The ACSC further resolved that a Committee may be constituted by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor to work out the modalities for selection <strong>of</strong> the student<br />

eligible for award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medal. In pursuance <strong>of</strong> the decision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACSC, he constituted a committee which met on 28.2.2007. A copy <strong>of</strong><br />

the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Committee is placed at Annexure-4.<br />

AC 39.2.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the recommendations<br />

(Annexure-4) <strong>of</strong> the Committee for selection <strong>of</strong> the students for award<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Ram Reddy Memorial Gold Medal for the Best Scorer in the<br />

Master’s Degree Programmes in Social Science subjects.<br />

ITEM NO. 3 TO NOTE FOR INFORMATION THE PROPOSAL OF<br />

INTRODUCTION OF EXAMINATION FEE.<br />

AC 39.3.1<br />

The Chairman informed that it has been observed that a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

students submit their examination forms for appearing in the Term End<br />

Examination (TEE), but do not actually appear in the examinations,<br />

thereby resulting infructuous expenditure on making arrangements for<br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> examinations for such students. During the year 2005-06<br />

i.e., in December 2005 TEE and June 2006 TEE, a total <strong>of</strong> 5.67 lac<br />

students applied for examination but only 3.28 lac students have<br />

appeared in the TEE.<br />

The matter was considered by the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its meeting<br />

held on 26 th February 2007. The Board approved introduction <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Examination Fee <strong>of</strong> Rs.50/- per course from December 2007 TEE<br />

onwards to ensure that only those students who actually intend to appear<br />

in the examinations are permitted and to avoid infructuous expenditure.<br />

The SRE Division will devise the modalities for introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Examination Fee which will be implemented with the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Vice-Chancellor.<br />

AC 39.3.2<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the introduction <strong>of</strong> Examination Fee<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 50/- per course from December 2007 TEE onward. The<br />

modalities for introduction <strong>of</strong> Examination Fee will be devised by the<br />

SRE Division which will be implemented with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Vice-<br />

Chancellor.<br />

TO NOTE FOR INFORMATION OF THE PROPOSAL FOR<br />

INTRODUCTION OF RE-EVALUATION OF ANSWER-<br />

SCRIPTS.


AC 39.4.1<br />

AC 39.4.2<br />

The Chairman informed that the University has been receiving several<br />

requests from the students for re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> their answer-scripts, who<br />

are not satisfied with the Term-End Examination results communicated<br />

to them, instead <strong>of</strong> the current arrangement <strong>of</strong> re-checking. The matter<br />

has been placed before the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its meeting held on<br />

26.2.007 and has approved the introduction <strong>of</strong> re-evaluation from June,<br />

2007 TEE onwards by charging Rs. 300/- per answer script.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the introduction <strong>of</strong> re-evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

answer-scripts from June 2007 TEE onwards. The SRE Division will<br />

finalize the modalities for introduction <strong>of</strong> re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> answerscripts<br />

with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 39.5.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE GUIDELINES FOR<br />

AWARD OF RESEARCH AND TEACHING ASSISTANTSHIPS.<br />

The Chairman informed that the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its 36 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 24-2-1994 approved the proposal on the procedure<br />

should be followed for selection <strong>of</strong> candidates for Junior Research<br />

Fellowships in the University. Further the Board <strong>of</strong> Management and<br />

Planning Board approved the research policy <strong>of</strong> the University in<br />

principle to institute a scheme <strong>of</strong> 10 Research Fellowships and 05<br />

Research Associateships each during the Eighth Plan for its<br />

implementation from the year 1995, 1996 onwards for a period <strong>of</strong> five<br />

years. Subsequently the Research <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the University while<br />

considering the proposal for reviving the research activities in the<br />

University constituted a Sub-Committee with certain specific terms <strong>of</strong><br />

reference. The Committee at its meeting held on 30.4.2001 made<br />

recommendations for <strong>of</strong>fering the Junior Research Fellowships (JRFs)<br />

by each discipline in a School. Though the recommendations regarding<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> the 03 JRFs were not placed before the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong>/<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> earlier, there were presented in the status<br />

paper on research activities <strong>of</strong> the University placed before the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 8 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 21.11.2006 and the Research <strong>Council</strong><br />

resolved that JRFs be awarded on specific request from disciplines. A<br />

Committee was constituted by the Vice-Chancellor for framing the<br />

guidelines for award <strong>of</strong> Research and Teaching Assistantships. The<br />

Committee framed the guidelines for <strong>IGNOU</strong>-DEC Research and<br />

Teaching Assistantships. The candidates will be registered in the<br />

University for Ph.D. Degree under the rules <strong>of</strong> the University/ a State<br />

Open University.<br />

The draft guidelines prepared by the Committee were placed before the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its 89 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on February 26, 2007.


The same have been approved by the Board.<br />

AC 39.5.2<br />

AC 39.5.3<br />

He further informed the members about this unique scheme which has<br />

been introduced by the Indira Gandhi National Open University for the<br />

Research Scholars to gain experience in the working <strong>of</strong> the system along<br />

with their research. He also informed that this scheme will help to<br />

create a pool <strong>of</strong> talented research scholars/capable manpower for the<br />

ODL system in the country with advanced training in both research and<br />

teaching in ODL. He allayed the fears <strong>of</strong> members that the scheme is<br />

intended for replacing teachers.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the guidelines for<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>-DEC Research and Teaching Assistantships approved by the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management (Annexure-5).<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 39.6.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE<br />

MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON ‘MODULE<br />

ON ODL FOR DISTANCE LEARNERS’ AND ‘TRAINING<br />

MODULE FOR ACADEMIC COUNSELLORS’ HELD ON<br />

JANUARY 23, 2007.<br />

The Chairman informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on November 22, 2006 considered and approved the proposal to<br />

have a compulsory component <strong>of</strong> Theory, Practice and Technology <strong>of</strong><br />

Open and Distance Learning for all learners in <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal subject to the following:<br />

(iv) a Committee <strong>of</strong> experts in the ODL Pedagogy and<br />

Technology will deliberate the matter and its<br />

recommendations will be placed before the School Boards<br />

for integrating this compulsory course following the existing<br />

procedure;<br />

(v)<br />

(vi)<br />

focus <strong>of</strong> the course should be study skill oriented in use <strong>of</strong><br />

educational and media technologies; and<br />

as the programmes are <strong>of</strong>fered at certificate, diploma,<br />

undergraduate degree, post-graduate degree and doctoral<br />

level, there cannot be uniformity <strong>of</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

course as the requirements <strong>of</strong> each category <strong>of</strong> learners<br />

would be different.<br />

In pursuance <strong>of</strong> the above decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, an


Advisory Committee was constituted by the Vice Chancellor. The<br />

Committee met on January 23, 2007 and drafted the syllabi <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

modules “Pedagogy, Science and Technology <strong>of</strong> Open and Distance<br />

Learning” (a Core Module for Distance Learners <strong>of</strong> Open University<br />

System) and Training Module on “Training <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>ors”.<br />

AC 39.6.2<br />

AC 39.6.3<br />

ITEM NO. 7<br />

AC 39.7.1<br />

During the discussion, it was pointed out that the syllabi placed before<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> require detailed consideration by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies so that a proper module can be <strong>of</strong>fered to<br />

the learners.<br />

The Chairman advised the members to send their inputs to the Chairman<br />

within 15 days, so that decision in the matter could be expedited.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MOU SIGNED BY <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

AND THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF<br />

INDIA (ICAI) TO JOINTLY OFFER B.COM. WITH MAJOR IN<br />

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE AND M.COM. IN FINANCE<br />

AND TAXATION DEGREES BY GRANTING EXEMPTION TO<br />

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANCY STUDENTS.<br />

The Chairman informed that the Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered Accountant <strong>of</strong><br />

India (ICAI) requested <strong>IGNOU</strong> to grant exemption to Chartered<br />

Accountancy students for undergoing B.Com. and M.Com. programme<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> on qualifying first stage and final stage <strong>of</strong> Chartered<br />

Accountancy course, respectively. The Vice-Chancellor constituted an<br />

Expert Committee to examine the proposal from <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s point <strong>of</strong><br />

view and to work out the details <strong>of</strong> the scheme, if practical in<br />

consultation with ICAI. The expert team in consultation with the ICAI<br />

made the following unanimous recommendations:<br />

1.To prepare an exemption scheme to Chartered Accountancy students<br />

for undergoing B. Com. and M. Com. programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

2. To workout new B. Com. and M. Com. programmes exclusively for<br />

these students instead <strong>of</strong> preparing programme structure under the<br />

existing credit transfer scheme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

3. To provide flexibility to the students to pursue B. Com./M. Com. and<br />

Chartered Accountancy simultaneously.<br />

AC 39.7.2<br />

The Expert Committee prepared new scheme <strong>of</strong> B.Com. with Major in<br />

Accounting and Finance and M.Com. in Finance and Taxation<br />

exclusively for Chartered Accountancy students. The scheme has been


approved by the Vice-Chancellor. A formal MoU was signed between<br />

the ICAI and <strong>IGNOU</strong> on 12 th March 2007 to collaborate and launch<br />

these programmes from the July 2007 academic session.<br />

AC 39.7.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the MoU (placed at Annexure-6)<br />

signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and ICAI to <strong>of</strong>fer B.Com. with Major in<br />

Accountancy and Finance and M.Com. in Finance and Taxation to be<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered exclusively to Chartered Accountancy students from July 2007.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTIETH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

MAY 17, 2007<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTIETH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELD<br />

ON THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2007 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM<br />

BLOCK– 8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The list <strong>of</strong> members present and those who could not attend the meeting is given<br />

in Annexure-1.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 40 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He accorded a special welcome to the new members namely<br />

Dr. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V. Subramanian, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammed Yusuff and Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Srikrishna Deva Rao who were attending the meeting for the first time. After brief<br />

introduction, he asked the Member-Secretary to present the items on the<br />

Agenda.<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

TO NOTE FOR INFORMATION THE ACTION TAKEN<br />

REPORT ON THE MINUTES OF THE 36 TH MEETING OF THE<br />

ACADMIC COUNCIL HELD ON 23 rd OCTOBER, 2006.<br />

AC 40.1.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 36 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 23 rd October, 2006<br />

were confirmed at its 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22 nd November,<br />

2006, but the Action Taken Report could not be placed, as the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> were circulated only on 12 th<br />

November, 2006. Therefore, the same was being presented at<br />

the 40 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 40.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the Action Taken Report on the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 36 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on<br />

23 rd October, 2006.<br />

ITEM NO. 2 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 37 TH (SPECIAL)<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL AND TO NOTE<br />

THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON.<br />

AC 40.2.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that the Minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 22 nd<br />

November, 2006 were circulated to the members. Comments<br />

had been received from two <strong>of</strong> the members suggesting that the<br />

relevant resolutions might be modified as follows :


AC 37.5.1<br />

5. Approved the payment norms for (i) the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

MCS-044 course <strong>of</strong> the revised MCA programme, and<br />

(ii) Rs. 15/- for evaluation <strong>of</strong> each project proposal for<br />

BCA programme.<br />

AC 37.5.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided that the Chairman may examine<br />

the procedural and all other aspects, and take an appropriate<br />

decision. With these observations, the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 21 st<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC (Annexure-3 without Appendices) were<br />

approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 40.2.2<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the members raised the issue <strong>of</strong> revision <strong>of</strong> the courses<br />

as recorded in the concluding paragraphs <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. It was clarified that the<br />

School Boards were statutory authorities and the decisions<br />

taken by them in respect <strong>of</strong> courses <strong>of</strong>fered by the Schools<br />

concerned would be final. However, if they wanted any<br />

assistance, they might discuss the issue in collaboration with<br />

the STRIDE.<br />

AC 40.2.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes (Annexure-2) <strong>of</strong><br />

its 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22 nd November, 2006 with the<br />

modifications <strong>of</strong> resolution no. AC. 37.5.1 and AC. 37.5.4 as<br />

above.<br />

AC 40.2.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the Action Taken Report on the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> with the suggestion that the Action<br />

Taken Report against Item No. 36 may be modified as under :<br />

“The Chairman had constituted a Committee to examine the<br />

issues relating to malpractices in submission <strong>of</strong> Project Reports<br />

and the Committee was examining the issues.”


ITEM NO. 3 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 38 TH (SPECIAL)<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL AND TO NOTE<br />

THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON<br />

AC 40.3.1<br />

AC 40.3.2<br />

AC 40.3.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 38 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on December 13, 2006<br />

were circulated to the members and comments received from<br />

two <strong>of</strong> them were being circulated at the meeting.<br />

It was clarified that various suggestions were given in the<br />

meeting and what had been recorded as AC 38.1.2 (iii) is the<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the consensus arrived at the meeting. As such, there<br />

was no discrepancy in recording <strong>of</strong> the said resolution.<br />

However, as pointed out by one <strong>of</strong> the members, it is correct<br />

that Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj and Sh. N. Venkateshwarlu could not<br />

attend the meeting, but due to typographical error, not got<br />

omitted from the Minutes which is regretted.<br />

With the above modification, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed<br />

the Minutes (Annexure-3) <strong>of</strong> its 38 th <strong>Meeting</strong> and noted the<br />

Action Taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO. 4 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 39 TH (SPECIAL)<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL AND TO NOTE<br />

THE ACTION TAKEN THEREON<br />

AC 40.4.1<br />

AC 40.4.2<br />

AC 40.4.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 39 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on March 17, 2007 were circulated to the<br />

members and no comments had been received from the<br />

members.<br />

Members observed that the Action Taken Report/views<br />

received from various Schools and Divisions about the ODL<br />

module for distance learners might be discussed in the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> so as to arrive at a uniform decision<br />

applicable to all. The Chairman clarified that if the School<br />

Boards were not in agreement with the module on ODL for<br />

distance learners, the decision <strong>of</strong> the School Boards would<br />

prevail. However, it was decided that a Committee appointed<br />

by the Chairman would consider the issue and formulate<br />

guidelines to have uniformity in the matter among all the<br />

Schools.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes (Annexure-4) <strong>of</strong><br />

its 39 th (Special) <strong>Meeting</strong> and noted the Action Taken thereon.


ITEM NO. 5<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ORDINANCE ON<br />

DESIGNATING CERTAIN POSITIONS IN THE UNIVERSITY<br />

AS TEACHERS.<br />

AC 40.5.1<br />

The Chairman informed the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that Section 2(p)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act states “Teachers” means pr<strong>of</strong>essors, readers,<br />

lecturers and such other persons as may be designated as<br />

such by the Ordinances for imparting instruction in the<br />

University or for giving guidance or rendering assistance to<br />

students for pursuing any course <strong>of</strong> study <strong>of</strong> the University” and<br />

the present proposal is to identify such other persons who may<br />

be designated as teachers within the ambit <strong>of</strong> the definition.<br />

Further Section 5(1) (vi) <strong>of</strong> the Act empowers the University to<br />

institute Pr<strong>of</strong>essorships, Readerships, Lecturerships and other<br />

academic positions necessary for imparting instruction or for<br />

preparing educational material or for conducting other academic<br />

activities, including guidance, designing and delivery <strong>of</strong> course<br />

and evaluation <strong>of</strong> the work done by the students and to appoint<br />

persons to such pr<strong>of</strong>essorships, readerships, lecturerships and<br />

other academic positions.<br />

The Sections quoted above are based on the view that in an<br />

open university, teaching is not the same as that done in the<br />

conventional university. An open university aims at creating a<br />

conducive ambience. All these agencies have equal claim to<br />

imparting instruction/ giving guidance/ rendering assistance to<br />

learners for learning, i.e. to the pedagogy <strong>of</strong> distance education.<br />

Keeping in view the above, the University authorities have not<br />

made any distinction in selection procedures <strong>of</strong> Teachers and<br />

<strong>Academic</strong>s.<br />

Many committees, as indicated below, have been constituted by<br />

the university from time to time to look into the issue :<br />

(i) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Rais Ahmed Committee (1990)<br />

(ii) Pr<strong>of</strong>. R.G. Takwale Committee (1992)<br />

(iii) Dr. A.J. Kidwai Committee (1993)<br />

(iv) Sh. N.V.K. Murthy Committee (1995)<br />

(v) Sh. C.R. Pillai Committee (1996)<br />

(vi) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Afzal Mohammad Committee (2001)<br />

(vii) Dr. A.S. Guha Committee (2007)


All these committees have stood by what the Act specifies in<br />

Section 2(p) and Section 5(1)(vi).<br />

It may be noted that in a similar situation Dr. B.R. Ambekdar<br />

Open University, Hyderabad has been treating the academics<br />

on par with teachers. A Government Order to this effect has<br />

been issued by the Government <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh vide L.R.<br />

No. 5555/UE.1/2000/03 dated 18-08-2000 (Annexure-5).<br />

The matter was discussed in an elaborate way and after a<br />

threadbare discussion, it was agreed that there are certain other<br />

positions, the incumbents <strong>of</strong> which are engaged in giving<br />

guidance or rendering assistance to students for pursuing any<br />

course <strong>of</strong> study <strong>of</strong> the University, designing and delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

courses, evaluation <strong>of</strong> the work done by the students, etc. who<br />

have a claim to be termed as “Teachers” as they are involved in<br />

creating a conducive ambience as indicated above.<br />

AC 40.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, in terms <strong>of</strong> Clause (ii) <strong>of</strong> Statute 26 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Statutes <strong>of</strong> the University, recommended to the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management that the Ordinance (Annexure-6) on designation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the persons holding certain positions as Teachers under<br />

Clause 2(p) be approved with the following modifications:<br />

i) The positions <strong>of</strong> Deputy Director and Assistant<br />

Director in Translation Cell be also included<br />

ii)<br />

Clause 3 <strong>of</strong> the proposed Ordinance be deleted.<br />

The modified draft ordinance incorporating the above positions<br />

is placed at Annexure-7.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> suggested that the positions which will<br />

be created in future may also be considered for inclusion in the<br />

list if the nature <strong>of</strong> duties attached to those positions falls in the<br />

category <strong>of</strong> giving guidance or rendering assistance to students<br />

for pursuing any course <strong>of</strong> study <strong>of</strong> the University, designing<br />

and delivery <strong>of</strong> courses, evaluation <strong>of</strong> the work done by the<br />

students, etc.


ITEM NO. 9.<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE CHANGE OF THE<br />

ADMISSION CYCLE AND THE NAME OF THE POST-<br />

GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN COMMUNITY CADIOLOGY<br />

(PGDCC) PROGRAMME<br />

AC 40.9.1<br />

AC. 40.9.2<br />

The Director, School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences informed that during<br />

the meeting <strong>of</strong> the Programme Incharges <strong>of</strong> the PG Diploma in<br />

Community Cardiology (PGDCC) Programme held on March<br />

13, 2007 at Narayana Hrudayalaya, Bangalore, it was<br />

unanimously recommended to change i) the title <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme from Post Graduate Diploma in Community<br />

Cardiology (PGDCC) to Post Graduate Diploma in Clinical<br />

Cardiology (PGDCC), and ii) the admission cycle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme from January cycle to July cycle to increase<br />

enrolment in the programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the above recommendations<br />

and approved the change <strong>of</strong> i) name <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in<br />

Community Cardiology to PG Diploma in Clinical Cardiology,<br />

and ii) admission cycle from January to July cycle.<br />

ITEM NO. 29<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMME IN GERMAN LANGUAGE.<br />

AC 40.29.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Programme Coordinator, explained the<br />

salient features <strong>of</strong> the Certificate Programme in German<br />

Language. She informed that the students would be introduced<br />

to the basic German language to build skills in listening,<br />

speaking, reading and writing (also enabling cultural<br />

understanding) along with catering to the needs <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

involved in business and trade. The programme would be<br />

launched jointly in collaboration with the Goethe Institute,<br />

Maxmuller Bhawan and a joint certificate will be issued to the<br />

successful students.<br />

AC 40. 29. 2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3<br />

Form (placed at Annexure-8) for Certificate in German<br />

Language.


ITEM NO. 30<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

CERTIFICATE IN JAPANESE LANGUAGE.<br />

AC 40.30.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Renu Bhardwaj, Course Coordinator, explained the<br />

salient features <strong>of</strong> the Certificate Programme in Japanese<br />

Language. She informed that the students would be introduced<br />

to the Japanese Language at basic level, to teach phonetic<br />

scripts Hiragana and Katakana, and to gradually build listening,<br />

speaking, reading and writing skills. The programme would be<br />

launched jointly in collaboration with Japanese Foundation.<br />

The Foundation would provide logistic support for material<br />

preparation and adaptation, training <strong>of</strong> Counsellors, etc.<br />

AC 40. 30. 2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3<br />

Form for Certificate in Japanese Language (placed at<br />

Annexure-9). It also authorized the Vice Chancellor to interact<br />

with the Japanese Foundation to sort out the practical/ other<br />

difficulties relating to the programme.<br />

ITEM NO. 31<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE TO INCREASE MAXIMUM<br />

DURATION OF POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN RADIO<br />

PRASARAN (PGDRP) PROGRAMME FROM 3 YEARS TO 4<br />

YEARS.<br />

AC 40.31.1<br />

The Director, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities informed that the maximum<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the programme was decided as 3 year by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOH and same was approved by the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>. When the Programme Guide and Student Handbook<br />

and Prospectus <strong>of</strong> this programme were prepared, the<br />

maximum duration was mentioned as 4 years. Students<br />

assumed that the duration would be 4 years. In 2006 the first<br />

batch had completed 3 years. But a number <strong>of</strong> students had<br />

not been able to complete the programme because they<br />

believed that they could complete it in 4 years as per the<br />

Programme Guide and the Student Handbook and Prospectus<br />

available with them. This gap between the duration decided by<br />

the School Board and the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and stated position<br />

in Programme Guide and Student Handbook and Prospectus<br />

was an inadvertent error, which was regretted. Since, the<br />

University had already admitted 4 batches upto the year 2007,<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> such cases might come in future also.


In order to facilitate the students and provide more flexibility to<br />

students, it had been proposed by the School that the maximum<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> this programme might be increased to 4 years.<br />

AC 40.31.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal to increase the<br />

maximum duration <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Diploma in Radio Prasaran<br />

(PGDRP) programme from 3 years to 4 years.<br />

ITEM NO. 35<br />

TO CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMITTEE<br />

ON ESTABLISHING NEW SCHOOL OF PERFORMING AND<br />

VISUAL ARTS.<br />

AC 40.35.1<br />

The Vice-Chancellor, informed that one <strong>of</strong> the objects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University as envisaged in the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act is to provide<br />

education and training in various arts, crafts and skills <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country and raising their quality and improving their availability<br />

to the people, he had constituted an Expert Committee to study<br />

and make recommendations on the possibility/feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

establishing a new School <strong>of</strong> Performing & Visual Arts in the<br />

11 th Plan. The Expert Committee recommended to establish the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts. The detailed<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee are placed at<br />

Annexure-10.<br />

AC 40.35.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee for establishing the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts.<br />

ITEM NO. 36<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FOR<br />

ALLOWING BCA, MCA, MLIS AND B.Sc. (NURSING)<br />

STUDENTS ADDITIOANL RE-ADMISSION PERIOD TO<br />

COMPLETE THE LEFTOUT COURSES.<br />

AC 40.36.1<br />

The Registrar, SRE explained that the University has revised<br />

the syllabus <strong>of</strong> BCA and MCA for the students who were<br />

admitted in 1998 and 2005 respectively. As per the policy <strong>of</strong><br />

the University, the maximum duration for completion <strong>of</strong> the BCA<br />

was 6 years and MCA was 7 years and they get the validity <strong>of</strong><br />

registration extended by 2 more years on payment <strong>of</strong> pro-rata<br />

fee for the courses not completed. In case the students who


still are not in position to complete the programme within the<br />

maximum duration <strong>of</strong> the validity <strong>of</strong> the registration including readmission<br />

can seek fresh admission and request for credit<br />

transfer for the course(s) which they had successfully<br />

completed with the earlier enrollment number on payment <strong>of</strong><br />

credit transfer fee. However, the students <strong>of</strong> BCA/MCA old<br />

syllabi who could not complete their programme within the<br />

permissible maximum period do not get the credits transferred<br />

for all the courses which they had completed in the old syllabi,<br />

because the syllabi <strong>of</strong> BCA and MCA were revised.<br />

AC 40.36.2<br />

Similarly, syllabi <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. (Nursing) and MLIS had been revised<br />

in 2005 and 2006, respectively. The students who had<br />

completed the maximum duration <strong>of</strong> these programmes were<br />

not getting any credit transfer for the courses which they had<br />

completed in the old syllabi.<br />

AC 40.36.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal<br />

for allowing BCA, MCA, MLIS and B.Sc. (Nursing) students<br />

additional Re-admission period to complete the left out courses.<br />

As the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> could not transact the remaining items, it was decided<br />

that the same may be placed before its Standing Committee as early as possible.<br />

The <strong>Meeting</strong> ended with a Vote <strong>of</strong> Thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


Annexure-1<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Members who attended/could not attend the 40 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on Thursday, May 17, 2007.<br />

Members who attended the <strong>Meeting</strong>:<br />

164. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

165. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M.Parakh - Member<br />

166. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni - Member<br />

167. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair - Member<br />

168. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma - Member<br />

169. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja - Member<br />

170. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham - Member<br />

171. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora - Member<br />

172. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra - Member<br />

173. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao - Member<br />

174. Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang - Member<br />

175. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj - Member<br />

176. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri - Member<br />

177. Dr. Annu J.Thomas - Member<br />

178. Sh. Shashi Bhushan Member<br />

179. Sh. N.Venkateshwarlu - Member<br />

180. Dr. Eisha Kannadi - Member<br />

181. Shri S.K.Arora - Member<br />

182. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda - Member<br />

183. Shri V.K.Arora - Member<br />

184. Dr. C.K.Ghosh - Member<br />

185. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra - Member<br />

186. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member<br />

187. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V.Subramanian - Member<br />

188. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur - Member<br />

189. Dr. S.S.Rathi - Member<br />

190. Dr. Kapila Vatsyayan - Member<br />

191. Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P.Mishra - Member<br />

192. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya - Member<br />

193. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K.Mohammed Yusuff - Member<br />

194. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sivakumar - Member<br />

195. Dr. T.R.Srinivasan - Member<br />

196. Dr. O.P.Dewal - Member<br />

197. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-Secretary<br />

Dr. P. Srinivas Kumar represented the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology.<br />

Dr.T.K.Jena, Dr.Kamal Vagarecha, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan<br />

Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Aravind Kumar and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre could not attend the meeting.<br />

Shri D.V.S. Shastri, Dy. Registrar and Shri K.D. Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Coordination Division were present to assist the Member-Secretary.


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY FIRST MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

AUGUST 27, 2007<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY FIRST MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2007 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE<br />

ROOM BLOCK– 8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

198. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

199. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

200. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

201. Dr. D.K.Choudhry, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

202. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Basir Ahmad Khan, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

203. Dr. Latha Pillai, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

204. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal - Member<br />

205. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra - Member<br />

206. Pr<strong>of</strong>.M.L.Koul - Member<br />

207. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja - Member<br />

208. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham - Member<br />

209. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B.Arora - Member<br />

210. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra - Member<br />

211. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal - Member<br />

212. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao - Member<br />

213. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra - Member<br />

214. Sh. S.K.Arora - Member<br />

215. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member<br />

216. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V.Subramanian - Member<br />

217. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur - Member<br />

218. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya - Member<br />

219. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K.Mohammed Yusuff - Member<br />

220. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre - Member<br />

221. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sivakumar - Member<br />

222. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat, Director, ACD - Member-<br />

Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj and Dr. P. Srinivas Kumar represented the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Humanities and School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology, respectively.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan<br />

Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Arvind Kumar and Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.S.Rathi could not attend the meeting.<br />

Shri K.D. Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present<br />

to assist the Member-Secretary.


At the outset, The Chairman welcomed the members to the 41 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He accorded a special welcome to the new members namely<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Basir Ahmad Khan, Dr.<br />

D.K.Choudhry, Dr. Latha Pillai, PVCs, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

M.L.Koul, Director, SOE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar<br />

Lal, Director, SOCIS, <strong>IGNOU</strong>. He also placed on record the appreciation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> contributions made by the outgoing members Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Omprakash Mishra, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair (who are now ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio members as<br />

PVCs), Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pardeep Sahni, Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.S.Narang, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Vijayshri, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C.Sharma, Sh. Shashi Bhushan Sharma, Dr. T.K.Jena, Dr.<br />

Annu J.Thomas, Sh. N.Venkateshwarlu, Dr. Eisha Kannadi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.K.Panda, Sh.<br />

V.K.Arora, Dr. C.K.Ghosh, Dr. T.R.Srinivasan and Dr. O.P.Dewal.<br />

The Chairman informed the members that on the recommendations <strong>of</strong><br />

various expert committees, the University had decided to set up ten new Schools<br />

<strong>of</strong> Studies. The amendment to the Statute 10 A was approved by the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management. It has received the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Visitor <strong>of</strong> the University in a record time <strong>of</strong> three months, which had never<br />

happened before in the history <strong>of</strong> the University. In this context, he<br />

acknowledged the contributions made by the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>,<br />

the Board <strong>of</strong> Management, the Planning Board, the various Expert Committees,<br />

the teachers, academics and other <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the University. The Vice-<br />

Chancellor assured the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that this significant expansion from 11<br />

Schools to 20 Schools would be executed with utmost care and seeing to it that<br />

the large number <strong>of</strong> courses and programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the existing Schools are<br />

effectively consolidated and strengthened. He informed that a separate item<br />

about this matter had also been included in the agenda <strong>of</strong> the meeting. The<br />

members congratulated the Vice-Chancellor for this rare achievement.<br />

The Chairman then requested the Member-Secretary to present the items on the<br />

Agenda.


The following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 40 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and to note the action taken thereon.<br />

AC 41.1.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the Minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 40 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 17 th May,<br />

2007 were circulated to the members. Comments were<br />

received from Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair about AC 40.4.2, AC. 40.5.2<br />

and AC 40.36.3, from Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri about AC 40.4.2, AC.<br />

40.5.1, AC.40.5.2, AC.40.29.2 and from Dr. Eisha Kannadi<br />

about AC 40.5.1 and AC 40.5.2, which were placed before the<br />

Chairman and had been included in the agenda with his<br />

observations. The Chairman had observed that<br />

1. There was no dissent from any member for any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resolutions adopted by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. All the<br />

resolutions were unanimous in that respect.<br />

2. Other changes suggested by the members can be<br />

appropriately noted; if the members want opinions they<br />

expressed before the finalization <strong>of</strong> the resolution and<br />

their adoption, it can be noted.<br />

The matter was discussed in detail. It was observed that<br />

standard procedures for recording <strong>of</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> the meetings<br />

and their confirmation followed universally are being<br />

meticulously adhered to here also.<br />

AC 41.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes (Annexure - 1) <strong>of</strong><br />

its 40 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on May 17, 2007 with the decision that the<br />

comments received from the members be appended with the<br />

Minutes. The Action Taken Report on the decisions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

meeting was noted.<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the ACSC held on 21 st February, 2007.<br />

AC 41.2.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the Minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee (ACSC) held on 21 st February, 2007 were circulated<br />

to the members and were confirmed by the ACSC at its 23 rd


meeting held on May 22, 2007. The ACSC considered and<br />

approved the following major items:<br />

♦ Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong> the course AFW(E):<br />

Feature Writing (AFW) (E) for BDP, Modifications for<br />

creating options in Certificate in Craft and Design<br />

Pottery; Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 5 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Equivalence<br />

Committee; proposal for instituting Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ram Reddy<br />

Gold Medal for Best Scholar in Master’s Degree<br />

Programme in Social Sciences subjects; Status<br />

report on UNESCO Chair; Vision and Mission <strong>of</strong><br />

NCDA as a Centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Research; starting <strong>of</strong><br />

M.Phil. programme in various Schools/Disciplines <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies; development <strong>of</strong> programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> both<br />

in print and on-line formats; recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee on establishing <strong>of</strong> new Schools <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies, list <strong>of</strong> students qualified for award <strong>of</strong><br />

Degrees, Diplomas and Certificates at the 18 th<br />

Convocation; charging <strong>of</strong> separate examination fee<br />

for TEE.<br />

AC 41.2.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong><br />

the 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC held on 21 st February, 2007<br />

(Annexure-2).<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 23 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the ACSC held on 22 nd May, 2007.<br />

AC 41.3.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the 23 rd<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee held on<br />

22 nd May, 2007. The ACSC considered and approved the<br />

following major items:<br />

♦ Phase-3 Form for PG Diploma in Education<br />

Technology, B.Com. with Major in Accountancy &<br />

Finance, M.Com. in Finance and Taxation (joint<br />

programmes with Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered<br />

Accountant <strong>of</strong> India as per MoU), Certificate in<br />

Bamboo Use Technology and Enterprise<br />

Development, Certificate in Rattan Technology<br />

and Enterprise Development, Certificate in<br />

Organic Farming., Master in Social Work (MSW)<br />

IInd year.


♦ Phase Zero Form for EEC-12: Economic<br />

Development since Independence, EPS-13:<br />

Modern Indian Political Thought, PHE-01:<br />

Elementary Mechanic.<br />

♦ Change in the title <strong>of</strong> the B.Sc. (Nursing) to B.Sc.<br />

Nursing (Post Basic), Reintroduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Compulsory Component <strong>of</strong> Continuous Evaluation<br />

in all programmes, Credit Transfer Scheme for<br />

M.Com. programme, Revised Structure <strong>of</strong><br />

Courses BPVI-032 and BPVI-035: Food<br />

Microbiology and Paddy Processing for Diploma<br />

in Production <strong>of</strong> Value Products from Cereals,<br />

Pulses and Oil Seeds, Course structure <strong>of</strong><br />

Distance Education specialized area in IInd year<br />

M.A. Education, Eligibility and qualification Criteria<br />

for B.Sc. Nautical Science/Diploma in Nautical<br />

Science programmes, Shifting <strong>of</strong> BMA-018:<br />

Maritime History and Commerce to IInd semester<br />

<strong>of</strong> B.Sc. Nautical Science, Change in Delivery<br />

System <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Civil Engineering<br />

Programme, Offering the Master <strong>of</strong> Science in<br />

Dietetics and Food Service Management<br />

Programme to the students <strong>of</strong> IHMC&N, Pusa,<br />

Conversion <strong>of</strong> GPA to PC, Penalty for<br />

Unfairmeans in Attempting Assignments,<br />

Replacement <strong>of</strong> the course MED-003 with the<br />

course MED-009 in the PG Diploma in<br />

Environment and Sustainable Development,<br />

Norms for Appointment <strong>of</strong> the External Examiners<br />

for Laboratory Courses<br />

♦ Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Eighth <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong>, Ratification <strong>of</strong> the action taken by the VC<br />

in approving Partial Modification <strong>of</strong> MoU signed<br />

between L.N.Mittila University, Darbhanga and<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>, Research Degree Programme in<br />

Distance Education.<br />

The Minutes were circulated to the members <strong>of</strong> the ACSC and<br />

comments received from Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra about typographical<br />

error in ACSC 23.19.2 and non-inclusion <strong>of</strong> decision regarding<br />

Item No. 39; from Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri regarding ACSC 23.1.2, ACSC<br />

23.7.1, ACSC 23.7.2, ACSC 23.8.1, ACSC 23.11.2, ACSC<br />

23.41.2, and from Dr. Eisha Kannadi on ACSC 23.40.2 had<br />

been placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He further apprised<br />

the members that with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Chairman, a


corrigendum about Item No. 39 had already been issued. He<br />

proposed that typographical error in ACSC 23.19.2, ACSC<br />

23.40.1 and ACSC 23.40.2 may be corrected.<br />

AC 41.3.2<br />

The members discussed the matter and resolved as follows:<br />

i) In Resolution No. ACSC 23.19.2 July 2008 be<br />

corrected to July 2007,<br />

ii) In Resolution No. ACSC 23.40.1 and ACSC 23.40.2<br />

MEG be corrected to MED,<br />

iii) Resolution No. ACSC 23.41.2 be deleted from the<br />

Minutes,<br />

iv) The following paragraph may be added at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

Resolution No. ACSC 23.8.1.<br />

ACSC 23.8.1: ……… with the condition that the programme<br />

coordinator would certify before finalization that changes have<br />

been incorporated into the syllabus as per the suggestions<br />

given by the School Board.<br />

AC 41.3.3 As regards Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijayshri’s observations about ACSC 23.7.1<br />

and ACSC 23.7.2, it was decided that the letter may be<br />

appended with the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the ACSC. With these<br />

modifications, the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 23 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC held<br />

on 22 nd May, 2007 (Annexure–3) were approved.<br />

ITEM NO. 4 To consider and approve the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate -<br />

programme in “Writing for Television in Hindi”.<br />

AC 41.4.1<br />

AC 41.4.2<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities at its 34 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 13.2.2007, vide item No. 08 recommended the<br />

withdrawal <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate programme in “Writing for<br />

Television in Hindi” from January 2007 because the Task Force<br />

on Student Support Services recommended that the<br />

programme ought to be withdrawn due to low enrollment.<br />

During the discussion, it was emphasized that before launching<br />

<strong>of</strong> any programme, need survey for identification <strong>of</strong> target<br />

groups should be undertaken so that the programmes need not<br />

be withdrawn because <strong>of</strong> low enrollment.<br />

AC 41.4.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities for withdrawal <strong>of</strong><br />

the PG Certificate Programme in “Writing for Television in<br />

Hindi”.


ITEM NO. 5<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for new<br />

courses in M.A. (Hindi) programme.<br />

AC 41.5.1<br />

AC 41.5.2<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that the School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Humanities has submitted the Phase Zero Forms for<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> three new courses worth 16 credits for M.A.<br />

(Hindi) programme. At present, there are no optional courses<br />

for the IInd year students <strong>of</strong> M.A. (Hindi), therefore, these<br />

courses are being introduced as optional courses for them.<br />

Thus, it will provide them an option <strong>of</strong> studying either upanyas<br />

or poetry courses.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-<br />

Zero Forms (Annexures 4) for new courses Meera Ka Vishesh<br />

Adhyan and Kabir Ka Vishesh Adhyan <strong>of</strong> four credits each and<br />

Madhyakalin Kavita <strong>of</strong> eight credits, along with their syllabi for<br />

M.A. (Hindi) programme.<br />

ITEM NO. 6.<br />

AC 41.6.1<br />

AC. 41.6.2<br />

To consider and approve the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Brainstorming Session and faculty requirement <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Law.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Law informed<br />

the <strong>Council</strong> that the School <strong>of</strong> Law organized a Brainstorming<br />

Session on June 4, 2007 to prepare a road map for Open and<br />

Distance Learning initiatives in Legal Education. Number <strong>of</strong><br />

eminent legal experts and educationists attended the day long<br />

session. The recommendations on the brainstorming session<br />

have been further discussed in the School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> held<br />

on 5 th June, 2007. The School Board suggested that further<br />

course <strong>of</strong> action may be taken in the matter.<br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Brainstorming Session were<br />

discussed in detail. The following suggestions were made:<br />

i) BL and BGL are standard nomenclatures for the<br />

Bachelor degree in Law (academic);<br />

ii) need survey for <strong>of</strong>fering BL/BGL/BA(Law) and other<br />

programmes should be undertaken before<br />

developing the progrmmes;<br />

iii) courses on Environmental Law, Maritime Law, Cyber<br />

Law should be included in the LLM programme;


iv) for Legal Literacy programme, possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

collaboration with other credible institutions, in<br />

addition to the Legal Literacy Mission, should be<br />

explored,<br />

v) include research collaborations and programmes in<br />

the list <strong>of</strong> programmes to be developed by the<br />

School;<br />

vi) pursue the Bar <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India vigorously for<br />

permission to <strong>of</strong>fer LLB programme.<br />

AC 41.6.3<br />

ITEM NO. 7<br />

AC 41.7.1<br />

AC 41. 7. 2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the above suggestions and<br />

resolved that the School may go ahead with the activities with<br />

proper advice and guidance from the Expert Committee and the<br />

School Board. Course development following the procedure<br />

approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> may be initiated by the<br />

School. For the assignment <strong>of</strong> disciplines in the School and for<br />

faculty requirement concrete proposals may be brought before<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for PG Diploma<br />

in Food Safety and Quality Management.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture had submitted the Phase-3 Form for PG Diploma in<br />

Food Safety and Quality Management. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra,<br />

Director, School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture explained that the programme<br />

envisages to train pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the field <strong>of</strong> development,<br />

implementation and auditing <strong>of</strong> Food Safety and Quality<br />

Management System for self-employment, employment in<br />

industries, regulators and certification bodies and<br />

training/counseling bodies. The programme shall be <strong>of</strong> 32<br />

credits comprising <strong>of</strong> eight courses. The PG Diploma<br />

Programme shall be <strong>of</strong> one year duration and intended for<br />

graduates in Science with Chemistry/Biochemistry/<br />

Microbiology as one <strong>of</strong> the subjects and allied Sciences with<br />

Food Science, Home Science, Life Science, Agriculture,<br />

Biotechnology, Hotel Management, Dairy – Veterinary,<br />

Fisheries, and Hospitality Management. He also explained that<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the programmes <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture are<br />

sponsored by the Ministries <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> India or other<br />

organizations/agencies.<br />

During the discussions, it was pointed out that Products<br />

Technology and Value Addition was not a discipline in the<br />

University and hence it requires to be modified. Eligibility for<br />

enrolment as proposed in the Phase-3 Form was also<br />

confusing and therefore required clarifications.


AC 41.7.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3<br />

Form (Annexure-5) for PG Diploma in Food Safety and Quality<br />

Management with the above suggestions.<br />

ITEM NO. 8<br />

To consider and approve the modified Phase-3 Form for<br />

the “Diploma in Watershed Management”.<br />

AC 41.8.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture apprised the<br />

members that the programme seeks to help develop human<br />

resources required in the areas <strong>of</strong> watershed development and<br />

management with the objectives <strong>of</strong> mobilization and capacity<br />

building <strong>of</strong> rural youth, women and landless, and generate<br />

awareness about the importance <strong>of</strong> sustainable development<br />

and maintenance <strong>of</strong> natural resources. The programme shall be<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1-4 year duration comprising eight courses worth 32 credits.<br />

The eligibility criteria for admission would be Senior Secondary<br />

(10+2). He further informed that 80% and 20% weightage shall<br />

be given to the term-end examination and continuous<br />

assessment, respectively. Practical shall be an essential<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the programme. For successful completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme, learner would be required to have a minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

75% attendance in the practical sessions at Programme Study<br />

Centre.<br />

The Phase-2 Form had been approved by the APC at its 20 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 10-09-2003. The Phase-3 Form was approved<br />

by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture at its 6 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 4 th July, 2007.<br />

AC 41.8.2<br />

It was pointed out during the discussion that there was no<br />

discipline named Natural Resource Management under the<br />

School and therefore the same should be modified as<br />

Agriculture.<br />

AC 41.8.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3<br />

Form (Annexure-6) for the Diploma in Watershed Management<br />

with the above suggestions.


ITEM NO. 9<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Modified Evaluation Scheme for the Four<br />

Diploma Programmes <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

AC 41.9.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that in view <strong>of</strong><br />

the decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that about compulsory<br />

component <strong>of</strong> continuous evaluation in all the programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

the University, the Vice-Chancellor had approved the modified<br />

evaluation schemes for the four diploma programmes being<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. The scheme stipulated<br />

(a)<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> one assignment in each theory course,<br />

(b) (i) weightage for assignment to be 20% <strong>of</strong> theory,<br />

(ii) weightage for Term End Examination to be 80% <strong>of</strong><br />

theory<br />

(c)<br />

The Term End Examination for each theory course<br />

would be <strong>of</strong> 50 marks. The minimum pass marks in<br />

Term End Examination will be 25. The marks obtained<br />

by the students will be converted to have a weightage <strong>of</strong><br />

80 per cent (on theory basis).<br />

AC 41.9.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in approving the Modified Evaluation Schemes<br />

(Annexure 7 to 10) for the four Diploma Programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

AC 41.10.1<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the matter relating to <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> BCA and MCA<br />

Programmes in both the cycles <strong>of</strong> admission, i.e. January<br />

& July cycles.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that the BDP<br />

Coordination Committee at its meeting held on 26.7.2002 had<br />

recommended for shifting <strong>of</strong> the admission cycle for the BDP<br />

programmes to July cycle. Earlier it was confined only to the<br />

B.Com., B.Sc., BTS and BCA programmes from July 2003<br />

cycle and Master’s Degree programmes in the next phase.<br />

After examining all the issues involved, the Vice-Chancellor had<br />

approved the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering BCA and MCA programmes<br />

in both the cycles <strong>of</strong> admission i.e. January and July cycles.


AC 41.10.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in approving the matter relating to <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> BCA<br />

and MCA programmes in both the cycles <strong>of</strong> admission, i.e.<br />

January & July cycles. Since BCA & MCA are practicaloriented<br />

programmes and are <strong>of</strong>fered semester-wise, the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also approved the proposal that a separate<br />

Student Handbook & Prospectus for these programmes would<br />

be prepared by the School in future in order to commence the<br />

programmes in January and July itself. Accordingly, the<br />

schedule <strong>of</strong> activities will be worked out by SRED in<br />

consultation with the School.<br />

ITEM NO. 11<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for Major<br />

Revision in Existing Course EEC-12: Indian Economic<br />

Development since Independence”.<br />

AC 41.11.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the<br />

Economics faculty <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted<br />

the Phase Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong> the BDP elective course<br />

EEC-12: Indian Economic Development since Independence.<br />

The Expert Committee at its meeting held on February 12, 2007<br />

had framed the syllabus <strong>of</strong> the revised course and had<br />

suggested new code EEC-22 and title Indian Economic<br />

Development: Issues and Perspectives for the course.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS explained that the Phase<br />

Zero Form for revision <strong>of</strong> the course EEC-12 was approved by<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 40 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 27 th April, 2007.<br />

AC 41.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase<br />

Zero Form for major revision <strong>of</strong> the existing course EEC-12:<br />

Indian Economic Development since Independence”<br />

(Annexure-11) with the directions that a new course code for<br />

the course should be obtained from the Planning &<br />

Development Division.


ITEM NO. 12<br />

AC 41.12.1<br />

AC 41.12.2<br />

ITEM NO. 13<br />

AC 41.13.1<br />

To Co-opt a member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

the provisions <strong>of</strong> Statute 9 (1) (viii) in place <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Omprakash Mishra.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22.11.2006 co-opted Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Omprakash Mishra as its member in terms <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

sub-clause viii <strong>of</strong> Clause 1 <strong>of</strong> Statute 9 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University for a term <strong>of</strong> two years w.e.f. 24.2.2007. Consequent<br />

upon his appointment as Pro-Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>, he<br />

has become an Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

under Clause 1 (ii) <strong>of</strong> Statute 9. The Chairman had<br />

recommended the name <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Thankamuthu, Former Vice-<br />

Chancellor, Bharathidasan University, Trichi, Tamil Nadu for cooption<br />

in place <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra for the residual term<br />

i.e. up to 23.2.2009.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> co-opted Pr<strong>of</strong>. Thankamuthu, Former<br />

Vice-Chancellor, Bharathidasan University, Trichi, Tamil Nadu<br />

in place <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra for the residual term i.e. up<br />

to 23.2.2009.<br />

To report for information the approval <strong>of</strong> the Hon’ble<br />

Visitor for the institution <strong>of</strong> nine new Schools in the<br />

University.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the members that the Ministry<br />

<strong>of</strong> Human Resource Development vide its letter No. F.5-<br />

45/2007-DL dated 16 th August, 2007 had conveyed the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the President in her capacity as the Visitor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University for establishment <strong>of</strong> the following nine Schools <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies:<br />

1. School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies<br />

2. School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies<br />

3. School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

4. School <strong>of</strong> Social Work<br />

5. School <strong>of</strong> Tourism, Hospitality, Service Sectoral<br />

Management<br />

6. School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Transdiciplinary<br />

Studies<br />

7. School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies<br />

8. School <strong>of</strong> Foreign Languages<br />

9. School <strong>of</strong> Translation Studies and Training


The proposal for establishment <strong>of</strong> new Schools was considered<br />

by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its 22 nd<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 21.2.2007and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management at its<br />

89 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 26.2.2007. The proposal after the approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Management had been sent to the Visitor for<br />

amendment to the Statute 10(A)(1)(10) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University.<br />

The Chairman informed the members that the Finance<br />

Committee had noted the financial expenditure with regard to<br />

the creation <strong>of</strong> one post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, two posts <strong>of</strong> Reader and<br />

four posts <strong>of</strong> Lecturer for each School initially. It was also<br />

informed that the current year’s budget provides allocation for<br />

all the new Schools.<br />

AC 41.13.2<br />

AC 41.13.3<br />

During the discussions, a view was expressed that the<br />

disciplines to the new schools may be allotted only after<br />

discussing the matter in the core expert committees and in the<br />

respective School Boards.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the approval <strong>of</strong> the Hon’ble Visitor<br />

for the institution <strong>of</strong> nine new Schools in the University, and<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> faculty positions for the same.<br />

ITEM NO. 14<br />

To consider the matter relating the admission to MCA July<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> a 14 year old candidate, Mr. Shailendra Kumar<br />

Verma.<br />

AC 41.14.1<br />

Dr. S. K. Mohapatra, Registrar, SRED informed the<br />

members that the Regional Director, Lucknow, forwarded<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> Mr. Shailendra Kumar Verma, a 14 year old<br />

candidate, for admission to MCA July 2007 Cycle. The<br />

candidate passed Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Computer Applications<br />

(BCA) from Lucknow University with First Division scoring<br />

74.93% marks. He had passed Sr. Sec. Examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Institute <strong>of</strong> Open Schooling (NIOS) in June 2004<br />

when he was 11 years old. The print and electronic media<br />

gave wide coverage <strong>of</strong> the child prodigy on passing BCA <strong>of</strong><br />

Lucknow University. Mr. Shailendra Kumar Verma has also<br />

cleared Scholarship Aptitude Test (SAT), TOEFL (Test <strong>of</strong><br />

English as a Foreign Language) in 2004 and secured<br />

admission in a US University in BCA programme. He could<br />

not go to US due to financial constraints.


The matter has been examined by the Faculty <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />

Computer and Information Sciences and unanimously<br />

recommended that the candidate may be admitted to<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s MCA Programme in July 2007 cycle.<br />

The Regional Director has further stated that the financial<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> the candidate’s parents is very poor as his<br />

father, Shri Tej Bhadur Verma, is a labourer and mother<br />

Smt. Chhaya Devi is illiterate. They cannot afford the fee <strong>of</strong><br />

the University. The Regional Director on the request <strong>of</strong> his<br />

father had recommended for full fee concession. Dr.<br />

Mohapatra, informed the members that the Vice-Chancellor<br />

had considered the request <strong>of</strong> Shri Tej Bahadur Verma and<br />

approved full fee concession for his son for MCA<br />

programme, as a very special case.<br />

AC 41.14.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and ratified the action taken<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor in granting admission into MCA July<br />

2007 cycle and extending full fee concession to Mr. Shailendra<br />

Kumar Verma, as a very special case.<br />

ITEM NO. 15<br />

To report on the general guidelines for re-admission to<br />

B.Ed. programme.<br />

AC 41.15.1<br />

Dr. S. K. Mohapatra, informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee at its meeting held on February 21, 2005<br />

vide its Resolution No. ACSC 12.23.1 ratified the action taken<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor in extending the provision <strong>of</strong> readmission<br />

to B.Ed. programme. The Standing Committee<br />

further directed that the guidelines for re-admission for B.Ed.<br />

programme be developed by the School <strong>of</strong> Education and<br />

SR&ED. Pursuant to the above decisions, the University had<br />

been allowing re-admission to B.Ed. students for completing the<br />

courses/workshops required for successful completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

left over course(s); the general guidelines for re-admission to all<br />

other programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the University are being adopted<br />

for re-admission in B.Ed. programme as well.<br />

AC 41.15.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted that the general guidelines for readmission<br />

to all other programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the University are<br />

being adopted for re-admission in B.Ed. programme as well.


ITEM NO. 16<br />

AC 41.16.1<br />

AC 41.16.2<br />

AC 41.16.3<br />

ITEM NO. 17<br />

AC 41.17.1<br />

To consider and approve 50% reduction in fee for<br />

Agriculture Programmes.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra, Director, SOA informed the members that the<br />

School had launched two diploma programmes, namely<br />

Diploma in Value Added Products from Fruits and Vegetables<br />

and Diploma in Dairy Technology for rural people i.e. farmers,<br />

unemployed graduates, rural youth and women. Enrolment in<br />

these programmes is low as the fee <strong>of</strong> Rs. 8000/- is very high.<br />

Though the programmes had been developed with the support<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Food Processing Industries, the delivery cost<br />

was being recovered from the students. He proposed that the<br />

fee for these programmes be reduced by 50% <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

fee for a period <strong>of</strong> two-three years to sustain the programme in<br />

infancy state.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was <strong>of</strong> the view that the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture should take up the matter with the concerned<br />

Ministries in the Centre and in the States and pursue them to<br />

sponsor students for the programmes and reimburse their fees.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the proposal and decided<br />

that the candidates who require assistance may be identified<br />

and up to 50% fee concession may be given to them decided<br />

on a case-to-case basis.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form (Course<br />

Structure) for the PG Certificate Programme in Bangla -<br />

Hindi translation.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Rita Rani Paliwal, SOH was invited to explain the rationale<br />

and objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme. She informed the members<br />

that the main objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme would be to:<br />

♦ facilitate inter-lingual, intra-lingual academic and cultural<br />

activity among Indian languages;<br />

♦ promote employment and national integration;<br />

♦ create job potential and confidence in the people who work<br />

through Indian languages; and<br />

♦ help social justice by bringing those in the main stream who<br />

are lagging behind.<br />

The School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities at its meeting held<br />

on 4 th July, 2007 considered and approved the Phase-3 Form.<br />

The programme was likely to be launched form July, 2008


session.<br />

AC 41.17.2<br />

The proposal was discussed in detail. The members wanted to<br />

know if any need survey had been done and if there would be<br />

enough takers for the programme.<br />

AC 41.17.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3<br />

Form for the PG Certificate Programme in Bangla - Hindi<br />

translation (Annexure-12). The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also<br />

decided that a need survey should be done before launching<br />

the programme and requirement <strong>of</strong> library on s<strong>of</strong>tware would<br />

also be assessed.<br />

ITEM NO. 18<br />

AC 41.18.1<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form (Course<br />

Structure) for the PG Certificate Programme in Malayalam<br />

- Hindi translation.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Rita Rani Paliwal, SOH explained the rationale and<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme to the members. She further<br />

informed that the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities at its<br />

meeting held on 4 th July,2007 considered and approved the<br />

Phase – 3 Form. The programme was likely to be launched<br />

form July, 2008 session.<br />

AC 41.18.2<br />

The proposal was discussed at length. A need survey was also<br />

suggested for this programme.<br />

AC 41.18.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3<br />

Form (Course Structure) for the PG Certificate Programme in<br />

Malayalam - Hindi Translation (Annexure-13). It was<br />

recommended that the requirement <strong>of</strong> library and s<strong>of</strong>tware in<br />

this case should be assessed and also a need survey be<br />

conducted.<br />

ITEM NO. 19 To consider and approve the matter related to<br />

Improvement in Division/Class.<br />

AC 41.19.1<br />

Dr. S..K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SRED informed that the<br />

University had been receiving several representations from the<br />

students who had completed their programmes but missed the


next Division/Class by a margin <strong>of</strong> a few marks. This shortfall<br />

had been hindering the students from applying for admission to<br />

higher studies, jobs and UGC’s Net examination. So far there<br />

was no provision for improvement <strong>of</strong> marks/grade, once the<br />

students were awarded the Degree. Keeping in view the<br />

demand from the students, the Vice Chancellor had constituted<br />

a Committee consisting <strong>of</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong> Schools and Registrar,<br />

SRED. The Committee after detailed deliberations<br />

recommended that the students be permitted for improvement<br />

in the Class/Division.<br />

AC 41.19.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee (Annexure-14) constituted<br />

by the Vice-Chancellor to work into the matter related to<br />

improvement in Division/Class.<br />

ITEM NO. 20<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

Conversion <strong>of</strong> percentage grade into marks for B.Ed.<br />

Programme.<br />

AC 41.20.1<br />

Dr. S.K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SRED informed the member that<br />

the B.Ed. programme <strong>of</strong> the University is under Letter Grade<br />

(LG) scheme with Point Grade (PG) for each course and<br />

Cumulative Grade Point Average for the overall programme.<br />

The University had received several representations from the<br />

students <strong>of</strong> B.Ed. programme requesting for conversion <strong>of</strong><br />

CGPA into marks. In order to facilitate them for being<br />

considered for employment and higher studies, the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee has recommended the proposal<br />

<strong>of</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> CGPA into equivalent percentage through a<br />

formula at its meeting held on 19.6.2006 which was approved<br />

by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its meeting held on 12.11.2006.<br />

Accordingly, the University had been issuing certificates to the<br />

students converting the CGPA into percentage. The University<br />

has now been receiving requests from the students for<br />

certifying aggregate marks secured by them as well. In order to<br />

facilitate the Recruitment Boards as well as the students, the<br />

Vice Chancellor had approved calculation <strong>of</strong> obtained marks<br />

out <strong>of</strong> 1100 marks, as there are total 11 courses prescribed in<br />

the programme. Accordingly the certificate <strong>of</strong> aggregate marks<br />

and the marks secured by the candidates equivalent to the<br />

percentage is being issued to the students.


AC 41.20.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in conversion <strong>of</strong> percentage grade into marks for<br />

B.Ed. programme. <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also approved similar<br />

actions in the case <strong>of</strong> other courses too depending upon the<br />

demand. The <strong>Council</strong> also desired that the report <strong>of</strong> the<br />

committee appointed to look into the grading system be<br />

expedited and placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its next<br />

meeting.<br />

ITEM NO. 21<br />

AC 41.21.1<br />

To consider the introduction <strong>of</strong> Exam Registration Fee for<br />

International Students.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that a committee<br />

was constituted by the Vice-Chancellor under the<br />

chairpersonship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor to<br />

consider the issue <strong>of</strong> Examination Fee for International<br />

students. The committee recommended as under:<br />

i) An examination fee for International Students (except<br />

SAARC countries) @ USD 10/- per course.<br />

ii) An examination fee for SAARC students @ INR 100/-<br />

per course.<br />

iii) Late fee for examination registration after last date till<br />

online registration is open @ USD 50/- for International<br />

Students (except SAARC countries) and @ INR 500/- for<br />

SAARC students.<br />

In addition to the above, the earlier practice <strong>of</strong> charging<br />

examination fee, as detailed below will continue:<br />

i) Indian Student willing to give examination outside India<br />

shall have to pay USD 50/- per paper for first<br />

appearance and USD 100/- per paper for subsequent<br />

appearances (wherever <strong>IGNOU</strong> PI is arranging exams,<br />

50% <strong>of</strong> this fee will be paid to them).<br />

ii) International Students willing to give examination in India<br />

shall have to pay USD 20/- or its equivalent in INR for<br />

complete examination.<br />

iii) International Students changing centre abroad will need<br />

to pay fee as under (i) above.<br />

AC 41.21.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the above<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee for introduction <strong>of</strong>


examination registration fees for International Students.<br />

ITEM NO. 22<br />

AC 41.22.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for setting up <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Expert Committee to study and examine the rationale and<br />

prospects <strong>of</strong> a School <strong>of</strong> International Relations and<br />

Strategic Analyses under the auspices <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro-Vice-Chancellor apprised the<br />

members that in the era <strong>of</strong> globalization, study <strong>of</strong> International<br />

Relations has come to occupy a centre stage in understanding<br />

the complex international and global phenomena. The rapidity<br />

<strong>of</strong> changes taking place globally and the diversity <strong>of</strong> issues<br />

surfacing in modern societies across the world transcend the<br />

narrow confines <strong>of</strong> the nation state framework <strong>of</strong> the past.<br />

These developments therefore call for systematic analyses <strong>of</strong><br />

the application <strong>of</strong> new scientific methodologies and innovate<br />

research tools. However, the opportunities for such studies are<br />

very limited in the country as only three universities have full<br />

fledged courses and programmes in the subject and none <strong>of</strong><br />

the open and distance education institutions and universities<br />

have appropriate courses and programmes on <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mishra proposed that an Expert Committee be set up to<br />

study and make appropriate recommendations regarding the<br />

setting up <strong>of</strong> a full-fledged School <strong>of</strong> International Relations and<br />

Strategic Analyses. He also proposed that a Brainstorming<br />

Session involving teachers and research on International<br />

Relations and Defence Analyses be convened by the University<br />

along side the meeting <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee.<br />

AC 41.22.2<br />

The members welcomed the proposal and discussed it in some<br />

detail. It was suggested that the possibility <strong>of</strong> associating some<br />

international experts from South Asian Countries with the<br />

initiative may also be explored. It was also suggested that Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Shanta Verma, Delhi University, Pr<strong>of</strong>. D.Gopal, <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Dr.<br />

Srikant Mohapatra, <strong>IGNOU</strong> may also be associated. With these<br />

suggestions, the proposal was approved along with the Expert<br />

Committee consisting <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

1. Dr. S.D.Pradhan, Secretary, Govt. <strong>of</strong> India (National<br />

Security <strong>Council</strong> Secretariat).<br />

2. Amb. Dr. T.P.Srinivasan, Former Ambassador to the USA,<br />

(Visiting Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Mahatma Gandhi Univeristy, Kottayam).<br />

3. Amb. Arundhati Ghose, Former Permanent Representative<br />

to the UN in Geneva.


4. Amb. K.Sreenivas, Former Foreign Secretary.<br />

5. Admiral P.J.Jacob, Chairman, Global India Foundation,<br />

Bangaluru.<br />

6. Mr. N.Sisodia, Director, Institute for Defence and Stretegic<br />

Analyses (IDSA).<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pushpesh Pant, Dean, School <strong>of</strong> International Studies,<br />

Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. Suryanarayanan, Rtd. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> South East<br />

Asian Studies, Madras University.<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.Bandopadhaya, Emeritus Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Jadavpur<br />

University, West Bengal.<br />

10. Dr. Meenakshi Gopinath, Principal, Lady Shriram College,<br />

New Delhi.<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Jha, Allahabad University.<br />

12. Dr. K.C.Sreekumar, Retd. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Political Science<br />

(Presently Coordinator, <strong>IGNOU</strong> Study Centre, Poojappura,<br />

Trivandrum).<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shanta N Verma, Department <strong>of</strong> Political Science,<br />

Delhi University, Delhi – 110 007<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. D.Gopal, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Political Sciences, SOSS,<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

15. Dr. S.K.Mohapatra, Registrar, SRED, <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

16.Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro Vice-Chancellor, <strong>IGNOU</strong>,<br />

Convenor.<br />

Additional members may be co-opted with the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Vice-Chancellor.<br />

ITEM NO. 23<br />

AC 41.23.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

New School <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Nursing and Dr. Ruchika<br />

Kuba, Reader, SOHS were invited to the meeting when the<br />

item was taken up for discussion. Dr. Ruchika Kuba, School <strong>of</strong><br />

Health Sciences explained the proposal in detail and stated that<br />

a national meeting <strong>of</strong> medical experts was convened by the<br />

Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor on August 20, 2007 for creating a<br />

separate School <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences. The experts unanimously<br />

recommended that the creation <strong>of</strong> such a school will be a<br />

quantum leap in fulfilling the national goals which are envisaged<br />

under the National Rural Health Mission as well as the National<br />

Health Policy. Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor agreed that there was a<br />

need for such a school. There was another meeting under the<br />

chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Hon’ble VC on August 25, 2007 with the<br />

President, Vice President and other Office bearers <strong>of</strong> Dental<br />

<strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (DCI) along with the Medical Faculty <strong>of</strong> SOHS


who are the members <strong>of</strong> the Joint Monitoring and<br />

Implementation Committee for developing and launching the<br />

PG Dental Programmes. The Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor desired<br />

that a separate discipline <strong>of</strong> Dental Sciences should also be<br />

created in the proposed new School <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences. The<br />

President and the Vice President <strong>of</strong> DCI endorsed this view<br />

overwhelmingly.<br />

AC 41.23.2<br />

AC 41.23.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Nursing in the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Health Sciences was <strong>of</strong> the view that a School <strong>of</strong> Nursing and a<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences may be established. Till then status<br />

quo having Nursing as a discipline in the School <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

Sciences may be maintained.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal<br />

for creation <strong>of</strong> two separate Schools i.e. the School <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />

Sciences and School <strong>of</strong> Nursing.<br />

ITEM NO. 24 To consider the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Expert<br />

Committee on Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Programme for<br />

Adult Educators.<br />

AC 41.24.1<br />

The Member Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that an Expert<br />

Committee was constituted by the Vice Chancellor to examine<br />

a proposal on the Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Programme for<br />

Adult Educators submitted by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor S.Y.Shah <strong>of</strong> Jawaharlal<br />

Nehru University. The first meeting <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee<br />

was held on August 13, 2007.<br />

The Committee recognized the need and importance <strong>of</strong> PDP for<br />

the growing number <strong>of</strong> Adult Educators and agreed in principle<br />

to initiate the process <strong>of</strong> launching PG Diploma/Certificate<br />

Programme for the Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong> Adult<br />

Educators by <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The Committee also, felt it would be<br />

prudent to <strong>of</strong>fer two separate programmes for two categories <strong>of</strong><br />

functionaries. The first programme will be a PG Diploma for<br />

Project Coordinators/Project Officers/Lecturers/Librarians. The<br />

second programme will be a Certificate for the Preraks at the<br />

grassroots level and <strong>of</strong>fered through the medium <strong>of</strong> Hindi and<br />

Regional Languages. The programmes will be under the new<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies.<br />

AC 41.24.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee (Annexure-15) on<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Programme for Adult Educators.


ITEM NO. 25<br />

AC 41.25.1<br />

To consider the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong>-EIAH&LA<br />

Committee for <strong>of</strong>fering B.A. in International Hospitality<br />

Administration.<br />

The Member Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that a meeting<br />

was held on June 8, 2007 in the Vice-Chancellor’s chamber to<br />

discuss a proposal for an <strong>IGNOU</strong>-EIAH&LA academic<br />

collaboration. The Vice-Chancellor chaired the meeting and Mr.<br />

K.V. Simon (Regional Vice President, American Hotel &<br />

Lodging Educational Institute (EIAH&LA), Mumbai), Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapil<br />

Kumar and Dr. C.G. Naidu were also present. In the meeting, it<br />

was decided to constitute a Joint Committee to:<br />

a) identify courses/programmes that can be developed and<br />

delivered to the students in the areas <strong>of</strong> hotel and<br />

hospitality services management,<br />

b) identify areas <strong>of</strong> collaboration and the responsibilities <strong>of</strong><br />

participating institutes,<br />

c) develop guidelines and modalities for the Memorandum<br />

<strong>of</strong> Understanding (MoU) between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and EIAH&LA.<br />

The Joint Committee in its first meeting held on June 26, 2007<br />

made a recommendation that <strong>IGNOU</strong> will <strong>of</strong>fer a Degree<br />

programme in International Hospitality Administration (3 Years)<br />

in collaboration with EIAH&LA and this programme will be<br />

different from the existing B.Sc. Degree Programme <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

jointly with NCHMCT. This programme is to be launched from<br />

January, 2008 and the programme announcement will need to<br />

be made in September, 2007. All preparations will have to be<br />

ready and completed prior to September, 2007. For this<br />

purpose a small sub committee was constituted by the Vice<br />

Chancellor.<br />

The Sub-Committee recommended to <strong>of</strong>fer B.A. in International<br />

Hospitality Administration in collaboration with EIAH&LA. The<br />

Recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Sub Committee and the Phase-3<br />

Form: Programme Design and Detailed Programme Report is<br />

placed at Annexure-18. The Vice Chancellor had approved that<br />

the programme would be under the new School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and<br />

Hospitality Services Sectoral Management.<br />

AC 41.25.2<br />

The proposal was discussed in detail. The members wanted to<br />

know the rationale <strong>of</strong> fee sharing between EIAH&LA and<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>, credit weightage, arrangement <strong>of</strong> examination and


certification.<br />

AC 41.25.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong>-EIAH&LA Committee and<br />

Phase-3 Form (Annexure-16) for <strong>of</strong>fering B.A. in International<br />

Hospitality Administration subject to the clarifications on the<br />

above issues.<br />

Item from the Chair<br />

AC.41.26.1<br />

The Chairman informed the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that the Finance<br />

Committee at its 56 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 27.8.2007 while<br />

considering the matter relating to enhanced allocation and<br />

means <strong>of</strong> additional revenue observed that the expenditures<br />

towards all academic, administrative and examination functions<br />

have increased significantly during the last two years. The<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> remuneration for all activities <strong>of</strong> the University have<br />

been recently revised and payments are made in the revised<br />

rates to teachers, experts, committee members, examiners,<br />

course writers, academic counselors and study centre<br />

coordinators. This revision and payment <strong>of</strong> enhanced<br />

honorarium effected after about 10 years, has increased the<br />

expenditure under these heads on an average 60 per cent.<br />

Revisions <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> courses are being initiated now. The<br />

travel costs have also increased substantially. University has<br />

also committed to provide state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art ICT facilities to the<br />

regional <strong>of</strong>fices and all the study centres in the country. The<br />

University is not receiving any non-plan grant from the<br />

government as <strong>of</strong> now and also conducting a number <strong>of</strong> socially<br />

relevant courses and awareness programmes free or with a<br />

token fee. The fee for various <strong>IGNOU</strong> programmes are much<br />

less than the fee charged by the Open Learning System in the<br />

Private Sector and State Open Universities which are <strong>of</strong> similar<br />

kind to that <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the above, the Finance Committee recommended<br />

15% enhancement <strong>of</strong> fees for all the programmes across the<br />

board from January 2008 cycle onwards.<br />

AC 41.26.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Finance Committee for enhancement<br />

<strong>of</strong> fees up to 10% to 15% for all the programmes across the<br />

board from January 2008 cycle for fresh admissions and<br />

revised fee for re-registration will be made effective from July,<br />

2008 cycle onwards.<br />

The <strong>Meeting</strong> ended with a Vote <strong>of</strong> Thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY SECOND MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

DECEMBER 31, 2007<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY SECOND MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2007 AT 2.30 P.M. IN THE<br />

CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW<br />

DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Chairman<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro-Vice-Chancellor – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

4. Dr. D.K. Choudhry, Pro-Vice-Chancellor – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Basir Ahmad Khan, Pro-Vice-Chancellor – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

6. Dr. Latha Pillai, Pro-Vice-Chancellor – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director SOSS – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B. Arora, Director, SOHS – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, Director, SOA – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao, Director, SOL – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. Srinivas Kumar, Director (I/c), SOET – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, SOHS – Member<br />

15. Dr. Pushplata Tripathi, Reader, SOS – Member<br />

16. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE – Member<br />

17. Dr. S.K. Yadav, Reader, SOA – Member<br />

18. Shri M.P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS – Member<br />

19. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director (I/c), NCIDE – Member<br />

20. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, , Director (I/c), IUC – Member<br />

21. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director (I/c), NCDA – Member<br />

22. Dr. V. Venugopal Reddy, Regional Director – Member<br />

23. Dr. C. Thangamuthu, Ex-Vice-Chancellor – Member


24. Dr. S.S. Rathi, University <strong>of</strong> Delhi – Member<br />

25. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan, Punjab University, Chandigarh – Member<br />

26. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur, University <strong>of</strong> Delhi – Member<br />

27. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya, Kolkata – Member<br />

28. Shri Ravi Kanth, Joint Director, EMPC – Member<br />

29. Shri S.K. Arora, Librarian – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

30. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE, – Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

31. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Saraswat, Director, ACD – Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhu Tyagi attended the meeting on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Director, SOMS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.<br />

Aslam and Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. Srinivas Kumar, members also represented the Director, SOCE and<br />

Director, SOET, respectively.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V. Subramanian, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar<br />

Gadre, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Arvind Kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.<br />

Sivakumar Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V. Narasimham, Director, SOMS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director,<br />

SOH, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gayatri Kansal, Director, SOET, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu<br />

Aneja, Director SOCE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B. Khanna, SOMS, Dr. Sutapa Bose, SOE and Shri Z.<br />

Yanthan, SOSS could not attend the meeting.<br />

Shri K.D. Sharma, Section Officer, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to assist<br />

the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 42 nd meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>. He accorded a special welcome to the new members, namely, Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.<br />

Thangamuthu, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Gracious Thomas, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Dr. Pushplata Tripathi, Dr. Neerja Chadha, Dr.<br />

S.K. Yadav, Dr. Sutapa Bose, Shri M.P. Mishra, Dr. Venugopal Reddy and Shri Ravi<br />

Kanth, who were attending the meeting for the first time. He also placed on record the<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for the contributions made by the outgoing<br />

member, Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.M. Parakh. The Chairman also extended greetings to all the members on<br />

the eve <strong>of</strong> the New Year, 2008.<br />

The proceedings <strong>of</strong> the meeting were initiated with the presentation <strong>of</strong> a special item<br />

from the Chair.<br />

SPECIAL ITEM: 19 th <strong>IGNOU</strong> CONVOCATION, 2008: CONFERMENT OF<br />

HONORARY DEGREES.<br />

AC 42.0.1<br />

The Chairman apprised the members that the 19 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University would be held on February 16, 2008, and on this occasion,<br />

he proposed to confer honorary degrees on distinguished personalities.<br />

Statute 22, on the conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees envisages that “all


proposals for the conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees shall be initiated by<br />

the Vice-Chancellor who, after consultation with the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and the Board <strong>of</strong> Management, shall submit the same to the<br />

Visitor for confirmation”.<br />

AC 42.0.2<br />

AC 42.0.3<br />

The Chairman consulted the members about his proposal <strong>of</strong><br />

conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees. He requested the members to keep<br />

the proposal confidential as it also involved consultation with the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management, seeking concurrence <strong>of</strong> the recipients and<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the Visitor in consultation with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> HRD, etc.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> concurred with the proposal <strong>of</strong> the Chairman<br />

for conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees.<br />

The Chairman then invited the Member-Secretary to present the items<br />

on the agenda.<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE 41 ST MEETING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL AND TO NOTE THE ACTION<br />

TAKEN THEREON<br />

AC 42.1.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

41 st meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 27 th August, 2007 were<br />

circulated to the members and the following comments have been<br />

received from<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor<br />

regarding Item Nos.23 and 41.<br />

1. AC 41.23.3, also incorporate the decision that the School <strong>Council</strong><br />

and School Board <strong>of</strong> SOHS have to look into the issue and give<br />

their recommendations. Till then, this will not be taken to the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management.<br />

2. AC 41.26.2, the enhancement <strong>of</strong> fees that was approved was upto<br />

a maximum <strong>of</strong> 10%, depending on the target audience <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme.<br />

AC 42.1.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the comments received and<br />

decided to modify the relevant resolutions as follows :<br />

AC 41.23.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the


proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> two separate Schools, i.e., the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences and the School <strong>of</strong> Nursing<br />

Sciences. The School <strong>Council</strong> and the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOHS have to look into the issue and give their<br />

recommendations. Till then, this will not be taken to<br />

the Board <strong>of</strong> Management.<br />

AC41.26.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Finance Committee for<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> fees upto a maximum <strong>of</strong> 10%,<br />

depending on the target audience <strong>of</strong> the programme,<br />

across the board from the January 2008 cycle for fresh<br />

admissions, and the revised fees for re-registration will<br />

be made effective from the July 2008 cycle.<br />

AC 42.1.3`<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the minutes (Annexure-1) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

41 st meeting held on August 27, 2007 with modification to resolution<br />

No. AC 41.23.3 and AC 41.26.2 as above. The Action Taken Report<br />

on the decisions <strong>of</strong> the meeting was noted.<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL FOR RELAXATION OF<br />

MINIMUM AGE FOR ADMISSION TO <strong>IGNOU</strong>’S<br />

BACHELOR’S PREPARATORY PROGRAMME.<br />

AC 42.2.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that as per the UGC<br />

Regulations for grant <strong>of</strong> first degree through non-formal/ distance<br />

education, no candidate shall be eligible for admission to the first<br />

degree course through non-formal/ distance education unless he/ she<br />

has attained the age <strong>of</strong> 18 years. Accordingly, the cut-<strong>of</strong>f date for<br />

calculating the age <strong>of</strong> 18 years for admission <strong>of</strong> candidates to<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Bachelor’s Preparatory Programme (BPP) had been fixed at<br />

October 1 for the July session and April 1 for the January session by<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (AC 34.2.6). He further informed that the boys<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Boys Sports Company pass standard X at around 15 to 16 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> age and there is no educational facility for standard XI & XII<br />

available to them. Therefore, the Boys Sports Company had requested<br />

the University to permit the boys under 16 years <strong>of</strong> age to pursue<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s BPP, as a special case, so that they could appear for<br />

Bachelor’s Degree subsequently when they enrolled into the army or<br />

otherwise.<br />

AC 42.2.2<br />

As the matter was rather urgent, the opinion <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the


<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was sought by circulation. However, no clear<br />

decision emerged. Therefore, the proposal was being placed before<br />

the <strong>Council</strong> at this meeting.<br />

AC 42.2.3<br />

The members discussed the proposal in some detail and decided that a<br />

committee appointed by the Chairman should examine the proposal in<br />

greater detail. The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee would be<br />

placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for a decision.<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 42.3.1<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 24 TH<br />

MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL'S STANDING<br />

COMMITTEE HELD ON 17 TH DECEMBER, 2007.<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the 24 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee was held on December 17,<br />

2007. The ACSC examined 41 Agenda Items and approved the<br />

following :<br />

1. Phase Zero Forms for the revision <strong>of</strong> ERD-01: Rural<br />

Development, an elective course for BDP, MS-01:<br />

Management Functions and Behaviour course, and the<br />

Certificate programme in Information Technology.<br />

2. Phase-3 Form for the 2 nd revision <strong>of</strong> PGDMCH programme.<br />

3. Phase-3 Form for the PG Certificate in Endodontics, PG<br />

Certificate in Agriculture Policy, Certificate Programme in<br />

NGO Management, PG Certificate in Oral Implantology,<br />

Certificate in French Language, PG Diploma in Research<br />

Management, PG Diploma in Book Publishing programmes.<br />

4. Revised pro-rata re-admission fees for various programmes<br />

except MP and MPB&F.<br />

5. Award <strong>of</strong> 2 nd Bachelor’s degree, change in number <strong>of</strong> credits<br />

permitted in AOC in BDP, weightage <strong>of</strong> assignment<br />

component in BPP, abolishing <strong>of</strong> intensive counselling and<br />

removing restrictions on number <strong>of</strong> learners for having the<br />

usual number <strong>of</strong> counselling session at all learner support<br />

centres, removing the restrictions as regards the number <strong>of</strong><br />

learners attending practicals for holding practical spells for<br />

programmes/courses having practical components, reevaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> MBA project, entrance examination for intake <strong>of</strong><br />

MCA/BCA students, credit transfer policy for MCA/BCA<br />

programmes and CS-54 & CS-51 in lieu <strong>of</strong> MS-4 and MS-51<br />

<strong>of</strong> MBA and vice-versa, moving from <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> stream courses


to a pool <strong>of</strong> elective courses in the 5 th semester <strong>of</strong> the MCA<br />

revised programme, revision <strong>of</strong> pro-rata fees for re-submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> BCA/MCA project reports, credit transfer for BCA (new)<br />

syllabus to BCA (new) syllabus, last time <strong>of</strong>fer for MCA old<br />

students to re-register, to reduce pass percentage for all<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> MCA revised and BCA programmes, conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

separate Term-End practical examination for CS-68, CS-<br />

69/CS-061 and CS-74.<br />

6. The decision <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities for including the<br />

Editorial Unit in the English discipline in SOH.<br />

7. Award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. degree to Ms. Preeti Sharma.<br />

8. To add a supplement to MEC-005, cancellation <strong>of</strong> the SDM<br />

(DOM/PGDOM) already awarded, and in exchange issue a<br />

fresh SDM in the chosen specialization to the learners <strong>of</strong> MBA<br />

programme.<br />

9. Certification <strong>of</strong> non-credit short-term training<br />

programmes/need based programmes, revised Evaluation<br />

Methodology for Certificate in Health Care Waste<br />

Management, Joint Diploma programme, “Teacher Diploma<br />

(Primary)” from “Diploma in Primary Education” <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>,<br />

matter relating to evolving a mechanism for submission,<br />

evaluation and monitoring <strong>of</strong> assignments in order to prevent<br />

malpractices, and<br />

10. Amendment to Ordinance 9 on Conduct <strong>of</strong> Examination and<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Student Performance.<br />

AC 42.3.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

24 th meeting (Annexure-2) <strong>of</strong> the ACSC with a slight modification to<br />

the resolutions ACSC 24.31.2 and 24.31.3. The modified resolutions<br />

read as follows :<br />

ACSC 24.31.2: Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC, opposed the idea <strong>of</strong><br />

reducing the pass percentage because it would lead to<br />

a loss <strong>of</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> students in<br />

employment and in admission to higher studies, etc.<br />

ACSC 24.31.3: The ACSC considered the proposal and decided<br />

that the committee <strong>of</strong> external experts to be appointed<br />

in pursuance <strong>of</strong> ACSC24.18.3 would examine the<br />

proposal. The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee<br />

would be placed before the ACSC for a decision.


ITEM NO. 4<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO<br />

ORDINANCE 9 ON CONDUCT OF EXAMINATION AND<br />

EVALUATION OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE.<br />

AC 42.4.1 The Member-Secretary apprised the members that on the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Task Force on Student Support Services, it<br />

was envisaged that an Examination Committee having the following<br />

composition be constituted:<br />

Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Incharge <strong>of</strong> SRED -<br />

Chairman<br />

Convenor, BDP Coordination Committee -<br />

Member<br />

Two Directors <strong>of</strong> Schools nominated by the Vice-Chancellor -<br />

Members Registrar, SR&ED<br />

- Convenor<br />

He further informed that the Examination Committee would perform<br />

the following functions :<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

(e)<br />

Monitor the programmes and the conduct <strong>of</strong> Term-End<br />

Examinations and Entrance Tests.<br />

Monitor the results and ensure timely declaration <strong>of</strong> results.<br />

Ensure timely receipt and incorporation <strong>of</strong> assignment awards.<br />

Review various statistical reports generated by SRED.<br />

Perform such other functions as may be entrusted by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor from time to time.<br />

AC 42.4.2 The ACSC at its 24 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on December 17, 2007 had<br />

approved the amendment to the Ordinance 9 on Conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

Examinations and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Student Performance.<br />

AC 42.4.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal to<br />

amend Ordinance 9 on the Conduct <strong>of</strong> Examinations and Evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Student Performance (Annexure-3).<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

MASTER OF EDUCATION (M.ED.) PROGRAMME.<br />

AC 42.5.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the Phase-3 Form<br />

for the Master <strong>of</strong> Education (M.Ed.) programme had been received<br />

from the School <strong>of</strong> Education. The programme had been conceived,<br />

designed and developed jointly by the Distance Education <strong>Council</strong> and<br />

the National <strong>Council</strong> for Teacher Education, and had been approved


y the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Education at its 25 th<br />

(Emergent) held on November 5, 2007.<br />

meeting<br />

AC 42.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form for<br />

the M.Ed. programme subject to finalization <strong>of</strong> the delivery<br />

mechanism (Annexure-4).<br />

ITEM NO. 6 TO CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE<br />

SCHOOL BOARD OF SOCE REGARDING SHIFTING OF<br />

THE ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES OF EMPC TO THE<br />

SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM & NEW MEDIA STUDIES.<br />

AC 42.6.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the members that two academic<br />

programmes namely Post Graduate Diploma in Journalism & Mass<br />

Communication and Post Graduate Diploma in Audio Programme<br />

Production (PGDAPP) developed by the Electronic Media Production<br />

Centre (EMPC) had been on <strong>of</strong>fer through the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing<br />

Education (SOCE) since 1996 and 2004, respectively. Another<br />

academic programme, MA in Mass Communication, approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCE was also under development. In view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies<br />

(SOJNMS), the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education had<br />

approved the proposal to shift these programmes to the SOJNMS – a<br />

natural academic home for them.<br />

AC 42.6.2<br />

AC 42.6.3<br />

During the discussion, it was pointed out that there were some other<br />

programmes, eg., BSW, DAFE, CAFÉ, MSW (under development),<br />

PhD in Women’s Studies <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education;<br />

CTS, DTS, BTS,BHM, MHA, MTM and PhD in Tourism <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> the Social Sciences; PG Diploma in Translation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities which could also be transferred to the newly<br />

created appropriate Schools, i.e. School <strong>of</strong> Social Work, School <strong>of</strong><br />

Gender and Development Studies, School <strong>of</strong> Tourism, Hospitality<br />

Service Sectoral Management, School <strong>of</strong> Translation Studies and<br />

Training, etc.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong><br />

transferring the programmes noted in AC 42.6.1 and AC 42.6.2. to the<br />

Schools proposed and all other such programmes would be transferred<br />

to their natural homes.<br />

The Chairman clarified that this decision pertained to the programmes<br />

and NOT to the coordinators <strong>of</strong> the programmes.<br />

ITEM NO. 7 TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN APPROVING THE CRITERIA TO<br />

IMPLEMENT 50% FEE CONCESSION FOR AGRICULTURE


PROGRAMMES.<br />

AC 42.7.1<br />

The Member-Secretary apprised the members that the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> in its 41 st meeting held on 27.8.2007, while considering the<br />

matter relating to a 50% fee concession for Agriculture Programmes<br />

(AC 41.16.3), decided that the candidates who required assistance<br />

might be identified and a fee concession up to 50% might be given to<br />

them, decided on a case-to-case basis. The School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture had<br />

proposed the following criteria for giving the fee concession:<br />

a) all the candidates from the rural areas shall be entitled for 50%<br />

fee concession subject to production <strong>of</strong> domicile certificate;<br />

b) the urban students below the poverty line may be given a 50%<br />

fee concession subject to production <strong>of</strong> an income certificate.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor had approved the criteria above as proposed by<br />

the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Since the admission session for all Diploma<br />

Programmes <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture was the January session, the<br />

decision above could not be included in the Student’s Handbook &<br />

Prospectus for January, 2008. However, the School had written to the<br />

Regional Directors to charge Rs. 8800/- for the current session.<br />

AC 42.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and ratified the action taken by the<br />

Vice- Chancellor in approving the criteria to implement a 50% fee<br />

concession for Agriculture programmes.<br />

ITEM NO. 8 TO RATIFY THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE VICE-<br />

CHANCELLOR IN LAYING DOWN THE ELIGIBILITY<br />

CRITERIA AND SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION<br />

OF CANDIDATES UNDER THE RESEARCH AND TEACHING<br />

ASSISTANTSHIP SCHEME.<br />

AC 42.8.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was informed that with the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> (RC.9.2.2 and RCSC 2.14.2), <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

(AC.39.5.3) and Board <strong>of</strong> Management (BM 89.41.2), the University<br />

had introduced a Research and Teaching Assistantship Scheme with<br />

an objective <strong>of</strong> attracting the best talents into teaching-cum-research in<br />

the areas <strong>of</strong> open and distance learning/teaching and research in<br />

discipline-based as well as general, open and distance learning<br />

pedagogy. Applications were invited in the month <strong>of</strong> April, 2007 for<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> Research and Teaching Assistantships in all the<br />

disciplines, for which about 3500 applications were received. As the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> applications was rather large, the following criteria were


prescribed by the Vice-Chancellor for the initial shortlisting <strong>of</strong><br />

applicants:<br />

For General category candidates:<br />

Age Limit 25 years as on 1 st July,<br />

2007<br />

% <strong>of</strong> marks required in all examinations<br />

from secondary onwards<br />

60% and above<br />

For SC/ST/PH category candidates:<br />

Age Limit 30 years as on 1 st July,<br />

2007<br />

% <strong>of</strong> marks required in all examinations<br />

from secondary onwards<br />

50% and above<br />

For Women Candidates:<br />

Age Limit 30 years as on 1 st July,<br />

2007<br />

% <strong>of</strong> marks required in all examinations 60% and above for<br />

General<br />

from secondary onwards<br />

category and 50% and<br />

above for<br />

SC/ST/PH category<br />

After the initial shortlisting, the applications were sent to the Schools<br />

concerned for taking necessary action for the selection <strong>of</strong> candidates.<br />

After meeting with the Directors <strong>of</strong> the Schools, the following<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the Selection Committee was approved by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor:<br />

1. Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

2. Pro-Vice-Chancellor associated with the<br />

School concerned - Member<br />

3. Director <strong>of</strong> the School concerned - Memb<br />

4. An External Expert identified by the School<br />

& nominated by the Vice-Chancellor - Member<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor/Reader <strong>of</strong> the discipline concerned -<br />

Member<br />

AC 42.8.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in laying down the eligibility criteria and selection


procedure for selection <strong>of</strong> candidates under the Research and Teaching<br />

Assistantship scheme.<br />

ITEM NO. 9<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE<br />

ORDINANCE ON RESEARCH DEGREE PROGRAMMES OF<br />

THE UNIVERSITY.<br />

AC. 42.9.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was informed that with an objective <strong>of</strong><br />

encouraging research and providing greater thrust to research, a<br />

committee chaired by the Vice-Chancellor reviewed the Ordinance<br />

and Guidelines for the PhD programme, and made several<br />

recommendations which were considered and approved by the RCSC,<br />

at its third meeting held on 30.11.2007. This had necessitated<br />

amendment to certain clauses <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance on Research Degree<br />

Programmes. A statement showing the existing clauses, proposed<br />

amendment and the clauses after amendment is placed at (Annexure-<br />

5). The amendment to the Ordinance had been approved by the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> m its 10 th meeting held on December 31, 2007.<br />

AC 42.9.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Guidelines for<br />

the PhD Programme and amendment to the Ordinance on Research<br />

Degree Programmes <strong>of</strong> the University as approved by the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> (Annexure-5 & 6).<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

DIPLOMA IN EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE AND<br />

EDUCATION (REVISED VERSION).<br />

AC 42.10.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education had submitted the Phase 3 Form for<br />

the Diploma in Early Childhood Care and Education (Revised<br />

version). Broadly speaking, the Diploma programme addressed two<br />

vulnerable groups <strong>of</strong> the society in two different ways:<br />

a) Children in the critical age group 0-8 years as the subject<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> the Diploma programme; and<br />

b) Women who would largely comprise the clientele (learner<br />

group) for the programme.<br />

♦ By providing pre-service training to pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the sector <strong>of</strong><br />

ECCE, the Diploma would fulfill the University’s objective <strong>of</strong><br />

providing specific need-based education and training opportunities<br />

for continuous pr<strong>of</strong>essional development and skill upgradation.


Also, by addressing women learners, it would fulfil the University’s<br />

mandate <strong>of</strong> providing higher education to large sections <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population, but particularly to disadvantaged segments <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

♦ By having children in the age group 0-8years and their optimum<br />

development through ECCE services as its subject matter, the<br />

Diploma programme would address the national goal <strong>of</strong> achieving<br />

Education for All, by creating a trained cadre <strong>of</strong> ECCE educators.<br />

Numerous studies had established the link between quality preschool<br />

education and retention and performance in the primary<br />

grades.<br />

The Phase-3 Form and the course structure <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Early<br />

Childhood Care and Education (Revised Version) would be reported<br />

to the School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education at its next<br />

meeting.<br />

AC 42.10.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for<br />

Diploma in Early Childhood Care and Education (Revised version)<br />

placed at (Annexure -7).<br />

ITEM NO. 11<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PHASE-3 FORM FOR<br />

CERTIFICATE IN EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL<br />

EDUCATION (MENTAL RETARDATION, VISUAL<br />

IMPAIRMENT, HEARING IMPAIRMENT & CEREBRAL<br />

PALSY).<br />

AC 42.11.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was informed that the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing<br />

Education had submitted the Phase 3 Form for Certificate in Early<br />

Childhood Special Education (Mental Retardation, Visual Impairment,<br />

Hearing Impairment & Cerebral Palsy). These would be four<br />

independent Certificate Programmes – one each in the four disability<br />

areas. Each Certificate Programme would be <strong>of</strong> one year duration<br />

and worth 24 credits.<br />

The Certificate Programme in each <strong>of</strong> the four disability areas had<br />

been developed with the broad objective to equip the learners to work<br />

as a member <strong>of</strong> an interdisciplinary team providing early childhood<br />

special education to children up to six years <strong>of</strong> age in home based,<br />

centre based, and school based settings. The successful completion <strong>of</strong><br />

the programme <strong>of</strong> study would enable the learners to register as<br />

‘personnel’ with the Rehabilitation <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India.


The development <strong>of</strong> the four Certificate Programmes would be in<br />

accordance with the University’s objective <strong>of</strong> “widening access by<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering high quality innovative and need based programmes at<br />

different levels, especially to the disadvantaged segments <strong>of</strong> society at<br />

affordable costs by using a variety <strong>of</strong> media and technology.”<br />

The Phase-3 Form for Certificate in Early Childhood Special<br />

Education (Mental Retardation, Visual Impairment, Hearing<br />

Impairment & Cerebral Palsy) would be reported to the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education at its next meeting. The Phase-3<br />

Form had been placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> directly to<br />

expedite the work.<br />

AC.42.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

(Annexure-8) for Certificate in Early Childhood Special Education<br />

(Mental Retardation, Visual Impairment, Hearing Impairment &<br />

Cerebral Palsy).<br />

ITEM NO. 12<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL TO<br />

FACILITATE SUCH STUDENTS OF MASTER’S DEGREE<br />

PROGRAMMES WHO ARE SHORT OF 2% MARKS OF<br />

OVERALL 55% MARKS.<br />

AC 42.12.1<br />

On the request <strong>of</strong> the Member-Secretary, the Registrar, SRE&D,<br />

apprised the members that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 41 st meeting<br />

held on 27 th August, 2007 had approved that students <strong>of</strong> Bachelor’s<br />

and Master’s Degree programmes, who had completed their<br />

programme but fell short <strong>of</strong> 2% marks for securing Ist or IInd Division<br />

might improve the percentage by fulfilling the eligibility conditions<br />

for this purpose. Based on the feedback from the students <strong>of</strong> Master’s<br />

Degree programmes, it was felt that those students who were short <strong>of</strong><br />

overall 55% marks, which was mandatory in Master’s Degree to<br />

undertake research or teaching assignments in any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

universities/institutions and to appear for the UGC’s NET examination<br />

had been deprived <strong>of</strong> the opportunity to improve their percentage. To<br />

facilitate such students, it was proposed that students <strong>of</strong> Master’s<br />

Degree programmes, who were short <strong>of</strong> 2% marks <strong>of</strong> overall 55%<br />

marks might also be given an opportunity to improve the percentage


on the same conditions as approved by the Vice-Chancellor on the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee constituted to finalise the<br />

modalities in this regard.<br />

AC 42.12.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal to<br />

facilitate such students <strong>of</strong> Master’s Degree programmes who were<br />

short <strong>of</strong> 2% marks <strong>of</strong> overall 55% marks.<br />

ITEM NO. 13<br />

TO CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE LIST OF CANDIDATES<br />

ELIGIBLE FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE, DIPLOMA AND<br />

CERTIFICATE IN THE 19 TH CONVOCATION TO BE HELD<br />

ON 16 TH FEBRUARY, 2008.<br />

AC 42.13.1<br />

The Registrar, SR&E, informed the <strong>Council</strong> that 91460 candidates had<br />

been found eligible for the award <strong>of</strong> Degrees, Diplomas and<br />

Certificates at the 19 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University to be held on<br />

February 16, 2008. The number <strong>of</strong> eligible candidates might change<br />

due to finalization <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> some more candidates, the exact<br />

number <strong>of</strong> which would be reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at the<br />

next meeting.<br />

AC 42.13.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal and the list <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />

students (Annexure-9) with the direction that Degrees, Diplomas and<br />

Certificates might be awarded to all candidates who become eligible<br />

till the date <strong>of</strong> Convocation and the same may be reported to the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> as supplementary list.<br />

After transaction <strong>of</strong> items on the regular agenda, the Chairman apprised the members that<br />

during the last one year several innovative measures have been taken to improve the<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the system. With the introduction <strong>of</strong> a token examination fee <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50 per<br />

course, not only more than Rs. 4.00 crore had been collected as examination fee, another<br />

Rs. 1.8 crore had been saved by avoiding wasteful expenditure. Introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> re-evaluation and early declaration <strong>of</strong> results had led to greater learner<br />

satisfaction. Further, it was planned to declare the results <strong>of</strong> TEE Dec. 2007 in a period


<strong>of</strong> 60 days. However, the results <strong>of</strong> the June 2007 TEC <strong>of</strong> more than 95% learners could<br />

be declared only in a period <strong>of</strong> 90 days. With the cooperation and support <strong>of</strong> all<br />

concerned, sustained efforts would be made to achieve the target <strong>of</strong> 60 days to declare the<br />

results.<br />

The Chairman further observed that only 5% <strong>of</strong> the skilled workforce in the country was<br />

certified whereas the percentage <strong>of</strong> certified skilled workforce in developed countries was<br />

as high as 90%. At the same time, a vast pool <strong>of</strong> knowledge and variety <strong>of</strong> skills were<br />

available even in illiterate people <strong>of</strong> our country which they had acquired through<br />

family or community practices. Thus, there was a need for assessment and certification<br />

<strong>of</strong> prior learning at tertiary level. The Chairman would form a committee, to evolve a<br />

procedure for assessment and certification <strong>of</strong> prior knowledge and skills, and requested<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. Mohan to be a member <strong>of</strong> this committee.<br />

The Chairman then invited suggestions from members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> for further<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the system. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan suggested that there was a need <strong>of</strong><br />

periodic monitoring by the faculty at the headquarters <strong>of</strong> assignments and practicals at<br />

study centres. She also suggested that materials should be developed for neo-literates to<br />

sustain their interest in reading and learning. The Registrar, SR&E informed the members<br />

that observers are deputed to oversee the conduct <strong>of</strong> Term-End-Examination at study<br />

centres. Also, twice every year the faculty and academics from Headquarters and<br />

Regional Centres deputed as Observers during the Entrance Test for admission to B.Ed.<br />

and MBA programmes get an opportunity <strong>of</strong> visiting study centres. So far as the<br />

suggestion for development <strong>of</strong> materials for neo-literates was concerned, it would be<br />

considered by the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam<br />

suggested that programmes on Edusat may be made more interactive<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY THIRD MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

APRIL 5, 2008<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY THIRD MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON SATURDAY, APRIL 5, 2008 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE<br />

ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

32. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Chairman<br />

33. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

34. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

35. Dr. D.K. Choudhry, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

36. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

37. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

38. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

39. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

40. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B. Arora, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

41. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

42. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, Director, SOA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

Member<br />

43. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, SOHS - Member<br />

44. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.Srinivas Kumar, SOET - Member<br />

45. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

46. Dr. S.K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

47. Dr. Sutapa Bose, SOA - Member<br />

48. Shri M.P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

49. Shri Z. Yanthan, SOSS - Member<br />

50. Sh. V.V.Subrahanyam, SOCIS - Member<br />

51. Sh. S.K.Arora, Librarian - Member<br />

52. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director (I/c), NCIDE - Member<br />

53. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, , Director (I/c), IUC - Member<br />

54. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director (I/c), NCDA - Member<br />

55. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan - Member<br />

56. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V.Subramanian - Member<br />

57. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K.Mohammad Yusuff - Member


58. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member<br />

59. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur - Member<br />

60. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya - Member<br />

61. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Siva Kumar - Member<br />

62. Dr. S.S.Rathi - Member<br />

63. Dr. V. Venugopal Reddy, Regional Director - Member<br />

64. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham, Director (I/c), ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. Srinivas Kumar, SOET, represented on behalf <strong>of</strong> Director, SOET. Shri K.K.<br />

Sharma, Joint registrar, SRE was present to represent Registrar, SRE.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Basir Ahmad Khan, PVC, Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L.Koul, Director, SOE,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao, Director, SOL, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, SOMS, Dr. Pushplata<br />

Tripathi, SOS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Arvind Kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.Thangamuthu, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sadagopan and Shri Ravi Kanth, Joint<br />

Registrar, EMPC could not attend the meeting.<br />

Shri K.D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 43 rd meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>. He accorded welcome to the new member Sh. V.V.Subrahamam, Lecturer,<br />

SOCIS. He informed the <strong>Council</strong> that consequent upon taking over the charge <strong>of</strong><br />

Director, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham is now the Member-<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and welcomed him. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

appreciated the efforts and taken on record the contributions made by Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Saraswat,<br />

outgoing Director, ACD as its Member-Secretary. The Chairman then requested the<br />

Member-Secretary to present the items on agenda <strong>of</strong> the meeting<br />

The following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1 To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 42 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and to note the action taken thereon.<br />

AC 43.1.1<br />

It was informed that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 42 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> held on December 31, 2007 were circulated to the members<br />

and no comments were received. The action taken report on the<br />

Minutes was also placed at Annexure-2.


AC 43.1.2 Item approved by Circulation: Proposal for establishing <strong>of</strong><br />

“School <strong>of</strong> International Relations and Strategic Analyses<br />

(SIRSA)” in the University.<br />

It was informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 41 st <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

August 27, 2007 had decided to constitute an expert committee to<br />

study and examine the rationale and prospectus <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

“School <strong>of</strong> International Relations and Strategic Analysis (SIRSA)” in<br />

the University. The Committee unanimously recommended the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> the School. In terms <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> Regulations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Meeting</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, the Chairman sought<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> by circulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following Resolution:<br />

“The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the<br />

recommendations made by the Expert Committee for establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

a School <strong>of</strong> International Relations and Strategic Analyses in <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

and recommended to the Board <strong>of</strong> Management for making necessary<br />

amendments to Clause (1) <strong>of</strong> the Statute 10 (A) <strong>of</strong> the Statutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University accordingly.”<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the 49 members, 38 members have responded and all <strong>of</strong> them<br />

approved the Resolution for establishment <strong>of</strong> the School. Therefore,<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> International Relations and Strategic<br />

Analysis (SIRSA) has been approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> by<br />

circulation.<br />

Since, the establishment <strong>of</strong> new school requires amendment to Clause<br />

(1) <strong>of</strong> Statute 10 (A) <strong>of</strong> the University, the matter is being placed<br />

before 94 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Management scheduled for 10 th<br />

April, 2008. With the establishment <strong>of</strong> this school, if approved by the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management, the University will have 22 Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies.<br />

AC 43.1.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 42 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (Annexure-1 without appendices) and the<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for establishment <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />

International Relations and Strategic Analysis (SIRSA), and noted the<br />

action taken thereon.<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 43.2.1<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 25 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> its<br />

Standing Committee held on 2 nd April, 2008.<br />

It was presented that the 25 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC was held on April<br />

2, 2008. The following major items were considered:<br />

♦ Phase 3 Forms <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Retailing, Diploma in Finance,


Budget and Accounting for PRIs, Certificate Programme in Water<br />

Harvesting and Management, Foundation Course in Maithilee, Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication and PG<br />

Diploma in Adult Education.<br />

♦ Phase-3 Forms and Course Structure for M.Phil/Ph.D. programmes<br />

in Library Science, Economics, Sociology, Public Administration<br />

and History.<br />

♦ Provision for viva-voce in all project courses.<br />

♦ Proposal for establishing the Discipline <strong>of</strong> ‘Nutritional Sciences’<br />

and the ‘Child Development’ within the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing<br />

Education.<br />

♦ Proposal for International Fee structure for <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Programmes outside India.<br />

♦ To report the ‘Walk-in-Admission’ and ‘On-line Admission’ in all<br />

the academic programmes.<br />

♦ Changes in Syllabus, Programme Fee, Unit Writers and Eligibility<br />

Criteria <strong>of</strong> Certificate in Sericulture.<br />

♦ Ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in awarding Gold<br />

Medal to Shri Shiv Kumar Pandey, Note for information the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> student eligible for award <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

Degrees/Diplomas/ Certificates at the 19 th Convocation.<br />

♦ Phase Zero Forms <strong>of</strong> revision <strong>of</strong> existing elective courses in BDP<br />

programme, EPA-06: Public Policy, and EEC-06: Economics<br />

Development Comparative Analysis and Contemporary Issues.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and discussed each item <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Minutes in detail.<br />

AC 43.2.2<br />

ACSC 25.2.3: Regarding establishment <strong>of</strong> two new disciplines viz; (i)<br />

Nutritional Sciences and (ii) Child Development, in SOCE, ACSC in<br />

principle approved the proposal. While according approval, the ACSC<br />

recommended that the matter relating to housing <strong>of</strong> these disciplines be<br />

examined by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after considering the objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the other schools, including newly established schools.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has taken up the matter for discussion regarding the<br />

housing <strong>of</strong> these two new disciplines. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director,<br />

SOCE suggested to defer the item as the faculty <strong>of</strong> SOCE would like to


discuss this issue first in the School Board <strong>of</strong> the SOCE.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed with the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the Director,<br />

SOCE and decided as under:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

The item has been deferred, and<br />

The matter will be first discussed in the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

SOCE and thereafter the matter will be discussed in the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development<br />

Studies.<br />

AC 43.2.3<br />

ACSC 25.3.2: Regarding the simultaneous admission to the M.Sc.<br />

(DFSM) and the course CNCC-1: Nutrition for the Community for the<br />

students who do not have a specialization in Nutrition at UG level, the<br />

ACSC deferred the proposal. It was decided that the item to be placed<br />

before the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCE before 5 th April, 2008 and the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCE be placed before the<br />

43 rd <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting scheduled for 5 th April, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE informed the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCE at its emergent meeting held on 3 rd April,<br />

2008 opined that the issue requires more detailed discussion and hence<br />

decided to withdraw the item.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed with the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOCE to withdraw the item from discussion.<br />

AC 43.2.4<br />

ACSC 25.5.2: Regarding introduction <strong>of</strong> ‘Walk-in-Admission’ and<br />

‘On-line Admission’ to all the academic programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University, the Chairman explained the rationale and detailed schedule<br />

<strong>of</strong> operations. The following issues were discussed very elaborately:<br />

1. The work load in the Regional Centres will increase with<br />

the introduction <strong>of</strong> walk-in-admission. Regional Centres<br />

have busy schedule during March-April and September-<br />

October due to last dates for several activities. Therefore,<br />

Regional Centres may not be able to cope up with the<br />

additional work pressure <strong>of</strong> walk-in-admissions.<br />

2. Results <strong>of</strong> examinations conducted by various Boards/<br />

Universities/Institutions are normally declared in the month<br />

<strong>of</strong> May every year. Therefore, last date for submission <strong>of</strong><br />

filled-in admission form for walk-in admission without late<br />

fee for July cycle may be allowed till 31 st May.<br />

3. Schedules <strong>of</strong> various activities <strong>of</strong> the academic programmes<br />

will remain the same as <strong>of</strong> now. Students admitted through<br />

walk-in-admission or on-line admission shall follow the<br />

same schedules.


Following the discussion, the Chairman informed that he will get all<br />

the above issues examined carefully and explore the possibility to (i)<br />

provide additional staff or create a separate cell in Regional Centres to<br />

handle walk-in-admission, and (ii) extend the last date for walk-inadmission<br />

without late fees till 31 st May.<br />

AC 43.2.5<br />

ACSC 25.10.2: Decision regarding the viva-voce as a compulsory<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the evaluation <strong>of</strong> all project courses <strong>of</strong> PG level and<br />

.Pr<strong>of</strong>essional UG Programmes was discussed. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair,<br />

PVC presented the rationale behind this decision. Complications<br />

regarding compulsory passing <strong>of</strong> viva-voce was discussed in detail, and<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> reiterated the decision <strong>of</strong> the ACSC.<br />

AC 43.2.6<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the minutes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

25 th <strong>Meeting</strong> (Annexure-2 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the ACSC with the<br />

above observations.<br />

To consider and approve the Convocation Procedures Amendment<br />

to the Regulations for Convocations.<br />

AC 43.3.1<br />

The Chairman tabled the proposal for the amendments to paras 15 & 16 in<br />

the Regulations for the Convocation Procedures at Headquarters (Clause 8<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ordinance 1). It is clarified that the word ‘Clause’ in the agenda note<br />

may be read as ‘Para’. The agenda note mentioned that the modification<br />

is to be added to the existing paras. It is clarified that it is not addition,<br />

and it is only modification to the existing paras. The statement showing<br />

the existing paras 15 & 16, proposed amendments and paras after<br />

amendments is placed at Annexure-3.<br />

AC 43.3.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the amendments to the paras 15 and<br />

16 <strong>of</strong> Regulations for Convocation at Headquarters (Clause 8 <strong>of</strong><br />

Ordinance 1) placed at Annexure-3.<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

To consider and approve the recommendations made by the<br />

Committee constituted by the Vice-Chancellor to examine the<br />

proposal for relaxation <strong>of</strong> minimum age for admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

Bachelor’s Preparatory Programme (BPP).<br />

AC 43.4.1<br />

The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee constituted by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor to examine the proposal for relaxation <strong>of</strong> minimum age for<br />

admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>s Bachelor’s Preparatory Programme (BPP) were


presented. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, the Chairperson <strong>of</strong> the Committee,<br />

explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the recommendations.<br />

AC 43.4.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the recommendations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Committee for not relaxing the minimum age for the children <strong>of</strong><br />

the Boys Sports Company.<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 43.5.1<br />

AC 43.5.2<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

To consider and approve the International Fees Structure for<br />

Various Services & Value Added Services for the International<br />

Students.<br />

The proposal for international fee structure for <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

academic programmes outside India was considered by the ACSC vide<br />

Item No. 4 at its 25 th meeting held on 2.4.2008 and approved. In<br />

addition to the above, the same committee which examined the said<br />

issue recommended the fee structure for various services and value<br />

added services provided by the University to the international student<br />

as at (Annexure- 4).<br />

The fee structure as at Annexure- 4 was approved by the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Any other item with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Chair.<br />

AC 43.6.1<br />

AC 43.6.2<br />

AC 43.6.3<br />

After transacting the business on agenda, the Chairman requested the<br />

members to <strong>of</strong>fer their suggestions, if any, to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for<br />

its consideration.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur suggested that the meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

may be held, at times, in the Regional Centres <strong>of</strong> the University to<br />

enable the members to acquaint themselves with the working <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University at the Regional Centres level.<br />

Dr. V.Venugopal Reddy mentioned that University should recognize<br />

the academics as research guides for M.Phil. and Ph.D. programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

the University. The Chairman said that he had already written to the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> staff working in regional centres and other divisions for<br />

expressing their interest in research guidance. The Director, ACD<br />

informed that the information received from the <strong>Academic</strong>s have been<br />

forwarded to the concerned schools for further action.<br />

The Chairman suggested the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to adopt the following<br />

resolution:<br />

“Just as the teachers having provision for guiding Ph.D./M.Phil.,


the same provision may be extended to <strong>Academic</strong>s”.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> adopted the above resolution.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY FOURTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

JULY 11, 2008<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY FOURTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON JULY 11, 2008 AT 2.30 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE<br />

ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

65. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

66. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

67. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

68. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Basir Ahmad Khan, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

69. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

70. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L.Koul, Director, SOE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

71. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

72. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

73. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B. Arora, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

74. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

75. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, SOMS - Member<br />

76. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, SOHS - Member<br />

77. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

78. Dr. S.K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

79. Dr. Sutapa Bose, SOA - Member<br />

80. Shri M.P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

81. Shri Z. Yanthan, SOSS - Member<br />

82. Sh. V.V.Subrahmanyam, SOCIS - Member<br />

83. Sh. S.K.Arora, Librarian - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

84. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, , Director (I/c), IUC - Member<br />

85. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director (I/c), NCDA - Member<br />

86. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.S.Rathi - Member<br />

87. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member<br />

88. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur - Member<br />

89. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya - Member<br />

90. Shri Ravi Kanth, Joint Director, EMPC - Member<br />

91. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SRE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

92. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham, Director (I/c), ACD - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar attended the meeting on behalf <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. Srinivas Kumar, Director,<br />

SOET.<br />

Dr. D.K.Choudhry, PVC, Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manoharlal, Director, SOCIS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.Hansra, Director, SOA, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.Aslam,<br />

Director, NCIDE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

T.K.V.Subramaninan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K.Mohammed Yusuff, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

S.Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Arvind Kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Siva kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

C.Thangamuthu, Dr. V.Venugopal Reddy, RD, RC-Delhi-1 could not attend the meeting.


Shri K.D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was present to<br />

assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 44 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>. He informed the <strong>Council</strong> that consequent upon the promotion <strong>of</strong> Dr. Pushplata<br />

Tripathi, as Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, she ceases to be a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> under Clause (1)<br />

(iv) <strong>of</strong> Statute 9 <strong>of</strong> the Statutes <strong>of</strong> the University. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> appreciated the<br />

contributions made by Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pushplata Tripathi, the outgoing member. The Chairman<br />

then requested the Member-Secretary to present the items on agenda <strong>of</strong> the meeting.<br />

The following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM<br />

NO. 1<br />

AC 44.1.1<br />

To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 43 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and to note<br />

the action taken thereon.<br />

It was presented that Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 43 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

were circulated to the members. Comments were received from one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

members which are re-produced as under:<br />

ACSC 25.2.3: Regarding establishment <strong>of</strong> two new disciplines viz; (i) Nutritional<br />

Sciences and (ii) Child Development, in SOCE, ACSC in principle approved the<br />

proposal. While according approval, the ACSC recommended that the matter<br />

relating to housing <strong>of</strong> these disciplines be examined by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after<br />

considering the objectives <strong>of</strong> the other schools, including newly established schools.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has taken up the matter for discussion regarding the housing <strong>of</strong><br />

these two new disciplines. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE suggested to defer the<br />

item as the faculty <strong>of</strong> SOCE would like to discuss this issue first in the School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SOCE.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed with the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the Director, SOCE and<br />

decided as under:<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

The item has been deferred, and<br />

The matter will be first discussed in the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOCE and<br />

thereafter the matter will be discussed in the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />

Gender and Development Studies.<br />

The following comments in respect to (ii) were <strong>of</strong>fered:<br />

Since, the disciplines <strong>of</strong> Child Development and Food Nutrition do not fall<br />

within the scope <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies, the<br />

reference to the latter School seems to be inadvertently made, and if so, may<br />

kindly be deleted.<br />

AC 44.1.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the comments <strong>of</strong> the Director, SOCE and<br />

resolved that the Minutes have been correctly recorded and confirmed the


ITEM<br />

NO. 2<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> its 43 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> (Anneuxre-1 without appendices) and noted the<br />

action taken thereon.<br />

To consider and approve the matter relating to the award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D Degree<br />

to Ms. Nisha Peshin (Enrol. No. 024957627) in Education.<br />

AC 44.2.1 It was presented that Ms. Nisha Peshin (Enrolment No. 024957627)<br />

completed her Ph.D in Education on “A Comparative Study <strong>of</strong> Formal and<br />

Distance Mode <strong>of</strong> Teacher Education Programme (B.Ed) on the<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Efficiency among Secondary School<br />

Teachers”. The same was examined by the Board <strong>of</strong> Examiners and<br />

recommended for award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D in Education. The provisional certificate and<br />

notification to this effect were already issued by the Registrar, SRE. The<br />

Degree will be conferred on her at the forthcoming Convocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University. The Research <strong>Council</strong> at its 12 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 9 th July, 2008<br />

approved the award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D in Education to Ms. Nisha Peshin.<br />

AC 44.2.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D in Education<br />

to Ms. Nisha Peshin (Enrol. No. 024957627).<br />

ITEM<br />

NO. 3<br />

AC 44.3.1<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Committee constituted by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor for finalizing the procedure for enrolment <strong>of</strong> students in<br />

the Ph.D Programme and their follow up once after enrolment in<br />

consonance with the Ordinance <strong>of</strong> Research Degree Programme.<br />

It was presented that the Vice-Chancellor constituted a committee with Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor as Chairperson for finalizing the<br />

procedure for enrolment <strong>of</strong> students in the Ph.D and M.Phil Programmes and<br />

their follow up after enrolment in consonance with the Ordinance <strong>of</strong> Research<br />

Degree Programme. After consultations with the Schools/Divisions/Centres,<br />

the Committee made its recommendations and the same are now presented for<br />

consideration and approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

It was further informed that the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee were<br />

placed before the Research <strong>Council</strong> at its 12 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 9 th July, 2008.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> suggested two modifications: (1) Point no. 5 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ph.D guidelines and point no. 3 <strong>of</strong> the M.Phil guidelines to be modified to<br />

enable the candidates to undergo course work and dissertation work<br />

simultaneously and (2) Point no. 8 <strong>of</strong> Ph.D guidelines shall indicate two<br />

seminars during the whole duration <strong>of</strong> Ph.D programme in place <strong>of</strong> ‘atleast<br />

one seminar in a year’.<br />

AC 44.3.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the guidelines for M.Phil<br />

and Ph.D programmes after modifications as suggested by the Research


<strong>Council</strong> (Annexure-2).<br />

ITEM<br />

NO. 4<br />

AC 44.4.1<br />

AC 44.4.2<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Diploma in Mechanical<br />

Engineering (DME) programme.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology has submitted<br />

the Phase-3 Form for Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (DME)<br />

programme. The Phase-3 Form was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOET<br />

at its 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on May 30, 2008.<br />

Mr. N.Venkateshwarlu, Programme Coordinator explained the salient features<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme. During the discussion, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice<br />

Chancellor pointed out the following:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

As per the University norms, if the minimum duration is three years,<br />

the maximum duration <strong>of</strong> the programme should be 6 years. In the<br />

present case maximum duration is indicated as 5 years which should<br />

be corrected as 6 years and<br />

In evaluation methodology for project course, it is suggested to give<br />

70% weightage for project report and 30% weightage for Viva-Voce.<br />

Both these suggestions were approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 44.4.3<br />

ITEM<br />

NO. 5<br />

AC 44.5.1<br />

AC 44.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for<br />

Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (DME) programme (Annexure-3) with<br />

the two modifications: (1) Maximum duration <strong>of</strong> the programme should be 6<br />

years. (2) In the evaluation <strong>of</strong> project course, 70% weightage for project report<br />

and 30% weightage for Viva-Voce.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Affiliation <strong>of</strong> Colleges <strong>of</strong><br />

Nursing for Regular B.Sc. Nursing Programme with <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, explained that the University had received a request from<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Nursing <strong>of</strong> Indraprastha Medical Corporation Ltd., New Delhi for<br />

affiliation <strong>of</strong> its B.Sc. Nursing programme with <strong>IGNOU</strong>. A core group was<br />

formed by the Vice-Chancellor to examine the possibilities and work out the<br />

modalities for affiliation <strong>of</strong> regular College <strong>of</strong> Nursing with <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The<br />

core group, after detailed deliberations, drafted the norms for affiliation <strong>of</strong><br />

College <strong>of</strong> Nursing with <strong>IGNOU</strong> and application form for such affiliation.<br />

These were also considered and approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOHS at its<br />

34 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 29 th May, 2008.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> expressed its apprehensions whether the affiliation is permissible<br />

under the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act. It was expressed by the Chairman that the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act<br />

does not provide for affiliation, but it provides for recognition <strong>of</strong> the Colleges<br />

for admitting them to the privileges <strong>of</strong> the University. Further, the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

convergence was also discussed. The <strong>Council</strong> felt that the scheme <strong>of</strong>


AC 44.5.3<br />

affiliation requires a thorough examination in the light <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> Act and the new scheme <strong>of</strong> convergence introduced recently.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> authorized the Chairman to constitute a committee to<br />

examine the issue <strong>of</strong> affiliation in the light <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

Act and the new scheme <strong>of</strong> convergence. The committee shall examine<br />

thoroughly the ramifications <strong>of</strong> the proposal in view <strong>of</strong> the existing provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Act/Statutes <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.6<br />

AC 44.6.1<br />

AC 44.6.2<br />

AC 44.6.3<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.7<br />

AC 44.7.1<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Certificate Programme in<br />

Community Radio.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies has<br />

submitted the Phase-3 Form for Certificate Programme in Community Radio.<br />

Mr. Hisamuddin Farooqui, Programme Coordinator presented the salient<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the programme. It was further informed that the Government <strong>of</strong><br />

India is encouraging Community Radio and propose to issue 4000 licenses in<br />

the near future. Therefore, there is demand for trained manpower in this<br />

sector. CEMCA also proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer 150 scholarships for the students <strong>of</strong><br />

this programme.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> suggested that the expertise from the Deutsche Welle, Germany,<br />

with which the University had already signed an MOU, shall be made use <strong>of</strong><br />

in the development and delivery <strong>of</strong> this certificate programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for<br />

Certificate in Community Radio (Annexure-4).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for M.A in Mass<br />

Communication.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies has<br />

submitted the Phase-3 Form for M.A in Mass Communication. Dr. Kiron<br />

Bansal, Programme Coordinator presented the main objectives and salient<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the programme. Dr. Bansal also informed that M.A. in Mass<br />

Communication is proposed in a modular structure, whereby on completion <strong>of</strong><br />

first year courses, PG Diploma in Mass Communication shall be awarded and<br />

on completion <strong>of</strong> all courses <strong>of</strong> two years, M.A. in Mass Communication shall<br />

be awarded.<br />

AC 44.7.2<br />

During the discussion, it was pointed out that there is a PG Diploma in Mass<br />

Communication which is on <strong>of</strong>fer by the University. The present proposal is<br />

to award the PG Diploma in Mass Communication to those students who<br />

complete the first year courses <strong>of</strong> the proposed M.A. Programme in Mass<br />

Communication. It was noted that the courses <strong>of</strong>fered in the existing PG


Diploma and the first year courses <strong>of</strong> the proposed M.A. in Mass<br />

Communication are almost similar. Further, the courses <strong>of</strong> the existing PG<br />

Diploma are under major revision. Therefore, the <strong>Council</strong> suggested that the<br />

coordinators for the PG Diploma in Mass Communication and M.A. in Mass<br />

Communication should avoid any duplication or overlapping <strong>of</strong> efforts in both<br />

the programmes, rather the efforts should be supplement to each other.<br />

AC 44.7.3<br />

With the above directions, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

(Annexure-5) in principle for M.A in Mass Communication.<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.8<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.9<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.10<br />

AC 44.8-<br />

10.1<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for B.A in Fashion Design.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for B.A in Textile Design.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for B.A in Fashion<br />

Merchandising and Production.<br />

The Item Nos. 8 to 10 were considered together. It was presented that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training has submitted the Phase-3<br />

Forms for (i) B.A in Fashion Design; (ii) B.A. in Textile Design, and (iii) B.A.<br />

in Fashion Merchandising and Production, all four year degree programmes.<br />

Dr. C.G.Naidu, Programme Coordinator explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programmes proposed to be <strong>of</strong>fered in collaboration with the Pearl Academy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fashion (PAF). Pr<strong>of</strong>. Oberoi representative <strong>of</strong> PAF presented the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

the Pearl Academy and informed that these programmes are proposed to be<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered as part <strong>of</strong> the MoU signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and the Academy. These<br />

programmes are to be <strong>of</strong>fered in modular structure as indicated below:<br />

First year : (i) Certificate in Fashion Design; (ii) Certificate<br />

in Textile Design; and (iii) Certificate in<br />

Fashion Merchandising and Production<br />

Second year : (i) Diploma in Fashion Design; (ii) Diploma in<br />

Textile Design; and (iii) Diploma in Fashion<br />

Merchandising and Production<br />

Third and Fourth Years: (i) B.A. in Fashion Design; (ii) B.A. in Textile<br />

Design; and (iii) B.A. Fashion<br />

Merchandising and Production<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> all the three programmes, the fees will be charged Rs. 55,000/-<br />

in first semester and Rs. 40,000/- in second semester i.e. Rs.95,000/- annual<br />

for each programme. The fee sharing by <strong>IGNOU</strong> and PAF will be as per the<br />

MoU. The University’s share would be 30% <strong>of</strong> the fee collected. The<br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> developing and delivery <strong>of</strong> the programmes lies with the<br />

Pearl Academy <strong>of</strong> Fashion. The Phase-3 Forms were approved by the School


AC 44.8-<br />

10.2<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.11<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training at its 4 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held<br />

on 8 th July, 2008.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Forms <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

three programmes viz (i) B.A in Fashion Design; (ii) B.A. in Textile Design;<br />

and (iii) B.A. in Fashion Merchandising and Production proposed under Item<br />

Nos. 8, 9 and 10, respectively (Annexure-6).<br />

To consider the recommendations <strong>of</strong> School Board, School <strong>of</strong> Journalism<br />

and New Media Studies on Implementation <strong>of</strong> the MoU between <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

and Deutsche Welle (DW), Germany.<br />

AC 44.11.1 It was presented that School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media<br />

Studies approved a draft MoU between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Deutsche Welle (DW),<br />

Germany at its meeting held on April 11, 2008. The MoU was signed on May<br />

8, 2008. One <strong>of</strong> the significant components <strong>of</strong> the MoU is that DW will<br />

conduct three courses <strong>of</strong> one month duration each. The first course viz ‘Online<br />

Journalism’, with a bit web development added to it, will be held in mid<br />

September to mid October, 2008 at EMPC, <strong>IGNOU</strong>, New Delhi. The other<br />

two courses viz. Radio and TV Management course and Training the Trainers<br />

Programme will be held in other cities at the convenience <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> and DW,<br />

and feasibility <strong>of</strong> conducting the courses.<br />

AC 44.11.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the MoU and the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOJNMS (Annexure-7).<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.12<br />

To consider the recommendations <strong>of</strong> School Board, School <strong>of</strong> Vocational<br />

Education and Training on a proposal for vocational programmes in<br />

collaboration with City & Guilds (South Asia) Pvt. Ltd.<br />

AC 44.12.1 It was presented that the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training at its 4 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on July 8, 2008 had submitted its<br />

recommendations on a proposal for vocational programmes in collaboration<br />

with City & Guilds (South Asia) Pvt. Ltd. Shri Ravi Pillai from City &<br />

Guilds (South Asia) Pvt. Ltd. explained that the City & Guilds had identified<br />

the four sectors i.e. Security, Spoken English, Travel & Tourism and<br />

Construction. He also explained the features <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> the programme. It<br />

was informed that the security related courses can be <strong>of</strong>fered involving<br />

Premiershied Risk Management Enterprise, New Delhi and the courses related<br />

to spoken English can be <strong>of</strong>fered through the existing Colleges/<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

Centres where the required facilities are available. The Partner Institutes for<br />

Travel and Tourism and Construction will be identified later. The entry<br />

qualification for security related courses will be Class 10 pass.<br />

AC 44.12.2 The School Board also recommended that specific expert groups for each<br />

sector could be constituted for designing programmes related to above


identified sectors. A MoU can be signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and City & Guilds<br />

and other Partner Institutes.<br />

AC 44.12.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training on the proposal<br />

for vocational programmes in collaboration with City & Guilds (South Asia)<br />

Pvt. Ltd. (Annexure-8).<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.13<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Certificate in Performing<br />

and Visual Arts.<br />

AC 44.13.2 It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts had submitted<br />

the Phase-3 Form for Certificate in Performing and Visual Arts. Dr.<br />

C.G.Naidu, Programme Coordinator explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme. The Phase-3 Form and the Course Structure had been approved<br />

by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts at its third<br />

meeting held on July 8, 2008.<br />

AC 44.13.3 During the discussion, it was pointed out that the fee <strong>of</strong> the programme is on<br />

the higher side and the possibility <strong>of</strong> reducing the fees to Rs. 12,000/- p.a. be<br />

considered to popularize this certificate programme. The Programme<br />

Coordinator explained that the fee has been fixed on the basis <strong>of</strong> delivery cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme, hence not feasible to reduce the fee.<br />

AC 44.13.1 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for<br />

Certificate in Performing and Visual Arts (Annexure-9).<br />

ITEM<br />

NO.14<br />

To consider the Minutes <strong>of</strong> expert Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> regarding<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>-SACAR Collaboration.<br />

AC 44.14.3 It was presented that a meeting <strong>of</strong> the expert committee regarding <strong>IGNOU</strong>-<br />

SACAR collaboration was held on July 8, 2008 in India International Centre,<br />

New Delhi under the Chairpersonship <strong>of</strong> Dr. Karan Singh. Dr. Naidu, Nodal<br />

Officer, New Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies explained that discussions were held earlier<br />

between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and SACAR about collaboration in launching Sri Aurobindo<br />

Studies, with SACAR, being the coordinating centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

various academic programmes at Certificate, Post-Graduate Diploma, MA,<br />

M.Phil and Ph.D levels.<br />

AC 44.14.1 The expert committee recommended to launch Sri Aurobindo Studies on<br />

August 15, 2008 and emphasized that <strong>IGNOU</strong> will work with SACAR in<br />

drafting the MoU to formulize the partnership.<br />

AC 44.14.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> Expert


Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> regarding <strong>IGNOU</strong>-SACAR Collaboration (Annexure-10).<br />

Item No. Any other item with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Chair.<br />

15<br />

AC 44.15.1 It was informed that the 26 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee was held on July 10, 2008 and considered the following agenda<br />

items:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

ITEM NO. 7<br />

ITEM NO. 8<br />

ITEM NO. 9<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

ITEM NO. 11<br />

ITEM NO. 12<br />

ITEM NO. 13<br />

ITEM NO. 14<br />

To note the Action Taken Report on the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 25 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee (ACSC).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Diploma in Panchayat<br />

Level Administration and Development Programme.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> a Centre for Para-<br />

Medical Sciences in the University.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for preparing at least two<br />

assignments for each course <strong>of</strong> BSCHOT Programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> Certificate in Spanish<br />

Language.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> B.Com. with Major in<br />

Corporate Affairs and Administration, a joint programme with the<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Company Secretaries <strong>of</strong> India (ICSI) as per the MoU.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> M.Com. in Management<br />

Accounting and Financial Strategies, a joint programme with the<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Cost and Works Accountants <strong>of</strong> India (ICWAI).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> M.Com. in Business<br />

Policy and Corporate Governance, a joint programme with the Institute<br />

<strong>of</strong> Company Secretaries <strong>of</strong> India (ICSI) as per the MoU.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> B.Com. with Major in<br />

Financial and Cost Accounting, a joint programme with the Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Cost and Works Accountants <strong>of</strong> India (ICWAI).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Legal<br />

Literacy.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for PG Diploma in<br />

Pharmaceutical Sales Management.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Competency Certificate<br />

in Power Distribution.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for PG Diploma in<br />

Analytical Chemistry.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for PG Diploma in<br />

Acupuncture.


ITEM NO. 15<br />

ITEM NO. 16<br />

ITEM NO. 17<br />

ITEM NO. 18<br />

ITEM NO. 19<br />

To consider and approve the guidelines for credit transfer for the<br />

courses in M.Sc. (MACS) programme.<br />

To consider and approve the modalities and methodology <strong>of</strong> submission<br />

and evaluation <strong>of</strong> project report <strong>of</strong> “Project (BCEP-060) course” <strong>of</strong><br />

DCLE (G) programme.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for launching a one year<br />

Certificate for Diabetes Community Worker programme from January,<br />

2009.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Certificate<br />

in Project Management (PGCIPM) to be launched online.<br />

To consider and approve the Re-structuring <strong>of</strong> Programme Structure <strong>of</strong><br />

DCLE (G) Programme.<br />

AC 44.15.2 The Chairman further informed the decisions taken on all the above items.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the decisions taken and approved the same.<br />

The Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 26 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC is placed at Annexure-11<br />

(without appendices).<br />

AC.44.15.3 The Chairman invited suggestions from the members.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS suggested that on joining <strong>of</strong> RTAs in the<br />

School, the disciplines like Psychology and Anthropology may be started in<br />

the School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R.Ramanujam suggested that the<br />

disciplines like Geography in School <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Philosophy and Astrology<br />

in School <strong>of</strong> Humanities may also be started. The Courses like Videography<br />

may also be launched through School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies.<br />

It was suggested that a committee may examine the matters relating to<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> new disciplines and housing them in the Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies<br />

concerned. The Chairman desired that members may send suo motto<br />

suggestions to him and actively participate in developing new academic<br />

activities in the University.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P.Mishra, Pro-Vice Chancellor suggested that the University should<br />

involve those people who were associated with the University at its initial<br />

stages in developing the courses and <strong>IGNOU</strong> should make a network <strong>of</strong> the<br />

persons associated with the University during the last 20 years.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY FIFTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

OCTOBER 24, 2008<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

Maidan Garhi, New Delhi – 110 068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY FIFTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON OCTOBER 24, 2008 AT 2.00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM,<br />

BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

93. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

94. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

95. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

96. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L.Koul, Director, SOE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

97. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

98. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

99. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

100. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

101. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manoharl Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

102. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, Director, SOA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

103. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.Khanna, SOMS - Member<br />

104. Dr. Amrita Nigam, Reader, SOS - Member<br />

105. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

106. Dr. S.K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

107. Dr. Sutapa Bose, Lecturer, SOE - Member<br />

108. Shri M.P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

109. Shri Z. Yanthan, Lecturer, SOSS - Member<br />

110. Sh. V.V.Subrahmanyam, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

111. Sh. S.K.Arora, Librarian - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

112. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director (I/c), NCIDE - Member<br />

113. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, , Director (I/c), IUC - Member<br />

114. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director (I/c), NCDA - Member<br />

115. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V. Subramanian - Member<br />

116. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.S.Rathi - Member<br />

117. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K. Mohammed Yusuff - Member<br />

118. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member<br />

119. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya - Member<br />

120. Dr. V. Venugopal Reddy, RD, Delhi-1 - Member<br />

121. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V.Narasimham, Director (I/c), ACD - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Rita Rani Paliwal & Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak attended the meeting on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH, & Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS<br />

respectively.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC, Dr. D. K. Choudhry, PVC, Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishna Deva Rao, Director, SOL, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan<br />

Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay


Kapur, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Arvind Kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Siva kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.Thangamuthu, Shri Ravi Kanth,<br />

Joint Director, EMPC could not attend the meeting.<br />

Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SED and Shri K. Laxman, Registrar, SRD<br />

attended the meeting as a Special Invitees.<br />

Shri K.D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division was<br />

present to assist the Member-Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 45 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He informed that during the two years <strong>of</strong> his joining as Vice-<br />

Chancellor <strong>of</strong> this university in October 2006, there were 10 meetings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and a number <strong>of</strong> crucial decisions have been taken during these meetings. He<br />

thanked the members for their cooperation in transacting the business effectively during<br />

the meetings and also giving valuable suggestions from time to time in the formulation <strong>of</strong><br />

new policies and practices.<br />

The Chairman thanked and placed on record significant contributions made by the<br />

outgoing members Pr<strong>of</strong>. Basir Ahmed Khan, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.B. Arora, Director, SOHS,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. Srinivas Kumar, Director, SOET, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V. Narasimham, Director, SOMS, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Pushpalata Tripathi, Reader in Life Sciences, SOS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor (before her<br />

appointment as Director, SOHS). He welcomed the new members Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor (as<br />

Director, SOHS) Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS, Dr. Ajit Kumar, Director,<br />

SOET and Dr. Amrita Nigam, Members.<br />

Then the Chairman asked the Member Secretary to present the agenda items. The<br />

following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 45.1.1<br />

AC 45.1.2<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and to note the action taken thereon<br />

It was informed that the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> held on July 11, 2008 were circulated among the members,<br />

and Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. Ramanujam sent a note clarifying that, as recorded in<br />

Item No: AC 44.15.3, he did not suggest starting <strong>of</strong> Astrology<br />

Discipline in School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences, but he suggested Psychology<br />

Discipline. The same was noted. The <strong>Council</strong> noted the action taken<br />

report on the minutes <strong>of</strong> its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on July 11, 2008.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the minutes (Annexure - 1 without<br />

appendices) <strong>of</strong> its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> and noted the action taken report on<br />

the Minutes.<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 27 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee (ACSC).


AC 45.2.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V. Narasimham, Member Secretary informed that the 27 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee was held on<br />

August 25, 2008.<br />

It considered and approved the following major items:<br />

♦ Proposal <strong>of</strong> Queensland University <strong>of</strong> Technology (QUT),<br />

Brisbane, Australia to <strong>of</strong>fer Dual Degree Programme <strong>of</strong><br />

Ph.D. by <strong>IGNOU</strong> and QUT.<br />

♦ Minimum cut <strong>of</strong>f percentage in OPENMAT Entrance Test<br />

<strong>of</strong> Management Programme.<br />

♦ The matter relating to creation <strong>of</strong> discipline <strong>of</strong> Architecture<br />

in SOET.<br />

♦ Criteria for admission to the Management Programmes and<br />

other related issues.<br />

♦ To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for M.Phil/Ph.D<br />

Programmes in Political Science.<br />

♦ Norms for conducting <strong>of</strong> Practical Counselling Sessions.<br />

♦ Modification <strong>of</strong> the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate in<br />

Patent to PG Certificate in Patent Practice.<br />

♦ Phase-3 Form for the “Certificate in Poultry Farming”- a<br />

joint programme with the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Regional Centre, Aizwal<br />

(Mizoram).<br />

♦ Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> the “Post Graduate Diploma in Plantation<br />

Management”.<br />

AC 45.2.2<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 45.3.1<br />

AC 45.3.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 27 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the ACSC and approved its decisions.<br />

To consider and approve the change <strong>of</strong> admission session <strong>of</strong> the<br />

PGDMCH programme from January to July Session.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences had submitted a<br />

proposal for change <strong>of</strong> admission session <strong>of</strong> the PG Diploma in<br />

Maternal and Child Health (PGDMCH) from January to July session.<br />

Dr. T.K. Jena, Programme Coordinator, explained that currently<br />

students are admitted for January session and they appear for term-end<br />

examinations in December. Due to practical difficulties experienced in<br />

conducting practicals in December, Faculty decided to change the<br />

admission cycle to July session from 2009. Further, it is proposed to<br />

extend the duration <strong>of</strong> the January 2008 batch upto June 2009. This<br />

proposal was approved by the School Board in its 34 th meeting held on<br />

29 th May, 2008.<br />

It was pointed out by Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SED that


AC 45.3.3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 45.4.1<br />

AC 45.4.2<br />

AC 45.4.3<br />

admission process for January, 2009 session is in progress and few<br />

applications have already being received for PGDMCH. Pr<strong>of</strong> Jena<br />

clarified that, if the proposal is approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>,<br />

the School will write to all applicants asking their choice for refund <strong>of</strong><br />

the fees paid by them or to reschedule their admission for July 2009<br />

session.<br />

After considering all the implications, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved<br />

the proposal for change <strong>of</strong> admission cycle <strong>of</strong> the PGDMCH from<br />

January session to July session in 2009, and extend the session <strong>of</strong> the<br />

January 2008 batch upto June 2009. Further, it was decided that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences should initiate necessary action to resolve<br />

all problems arising out <strong>of</strong> this change.<br />

To consider and approve the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee<br />

for Examining proposals for introduction <strong>of</strong> new discipline and<br />

housing them in appropriate Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies.<br />

It was presented that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

July 11, 2008, vide Resolution No. AC 44.15.3, decided to constitute a<br />

committee to examine the proposals for introduction <strong>of</strong> new disciplines<br />

and housing them in the Schools concerned in detail and make<br />

recommendations. The Vice-Chancellor had constituted a Committee<br />

with Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC, as the Chairperson, to look into the<br />

issues involved. The Committee met thrice and made its<br />

recommendations for consideration and approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> (Annexure - 2).<br />

The Members discussed the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee at<br />

length in the light <strong>of</strong> the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Planning Board (functioning as <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at that time) held on<br />

January 10, 1989, and identified some disciplines in which no work<br />

has been done so far.<br />

After a thorough discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> identified some<br />

disciplines and their housing in the Schools concerned, as detailed<br />

below:<br />

1) School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences<br />

i. Psychology<br />

ii. Anthropology<br />

2) School <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

i. Biochemistry<br />

ii. Statistics<br />

iii. Geography<br />

iv. Geology


3) School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education<br />

i. Home Sciences (in addition to the existing<br />

disciplines Viz., Nutritional Sciences, and Child<br />

Development)<br />

4) School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology<br />

i. Architecture and Design<br />

ii. Aeronautical Engineering<br />

iii. Marine Studies<br />

5) School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies<br />

i. Environmental Studies<br />

Further, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided to create the core faculty<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> one Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, two Readers and four Lecturers as per each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the above disciplines. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> authorized the<br />

Chairman to make further changes, if required.<br />

AC 45.4.4<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> creating new disciplines, the Chairman informed the<br />

House that the University had initiated few academic programmes and<br />

training activities in collaboration with the corporates such as IBM,<br />

Hero Honda, Accenture, IT companies and Insurance agencies. There<br />

are enquiries from Corporate Sector requesting the university to<br />

organize corporate training programmes for capacity building in<br />

various sectors. Therefore, he emphasized the need to create a Centre<br />

for this purpose.<br />

After detailed discussion on this issue, the AC approved the following:<br />

i. Creation <strong>of</strong> “Centre for Corporate Education and Training”<br />

ii. The ‘Centre’ shall take up short term training programmes<br />

on demand from corporate sector. Depending on the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the training programme conducted, all schools or the<br />

Schools concerned, shall be involved in the training<br />

programmes<br />

iii. The ‘Centre’ shall be governed by a ‘Management<br />

Committee’ comprising some faculty members from<br />

Schools concerned as well as representatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Corporate Sector and by a coordinator appointed for a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 3 years in the Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Grade.<br />

The Chairman then informed the House that he has to attend an<br />

urgent meeting and he requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-


Chancellor present at the <strong>Meeting</strong> to chair the further proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 45.5&6.1<br />

AC 45.5&6.2<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 form for the Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and Environment<br />

Management.<br />

AND<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 form for the Diploma in<br />

Industrial Safety, Health and Environment Management.<br />

It was informed that the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology is<br />

developing Post Graduate Diploma and Diploma in Industrial Safety,<br />

Health and Environment Management in collaboration with the<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Industrial Management for Safety, Health & Environment,<br />

Bhopal. The School proposed Phase-3 forms for the Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and Environment Management<br />

and Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and Environment<br />

Management. The same were approved by the School Board in its 32 nd<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 8 th September, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Maji, Coordinator <strong>of</strong> the Programmes, explained the<br />

salient features <strong>of</strong> design and delivery system <strong>of</strong> both the programmes.<br />

He clarified various queries raised by members regarding the target<br />

group, fee structure, evaluation methodology, etc. During the<br />

discussion it was pointed that these programmes are <strong>of</strong> one year<br />

duration and 60 credits course work was proposed as against the<br />

University norms <strong>of</strong> 32 to 36 credits. Programme Coordinator clarified<br />

that these Diplomas shall be delivered in the face-to-face mode and the<br />

credits mentioned are in terms <strong>of</strong> teaching hours. If the credits are<br />

presented in terms <strong>of</strong> study hours, as is the case with <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

programmes, the credit load <strong>of</strong> the Diplomas will still be the same.<br />

Members strongly opined that the credit load should be reassessed and<br />

recorded in the Phase 3 Form, by reflecting the credit load <strong>of</strong> the<br />

course work in terms <strong>of</strong> study hours as per the University norms. They<br />

also noted that the B.Sc. Nautical Science programme, run in the same<br />

mode by the same School, has the credit load as per the University<br />

norms in terms <strong>of</strong> the University’s definition <strong>of</strong> credit.<br />

AC 45.5&6.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, after discussing the matter in detail, deferred<br />

its decision on both the items i.e., AC 45.5 and AC 45.6. The<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> suggested to the Programme Coordinator to work<br />

out the credit load <strong>of</strong> the courses as per the University norms and take<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the School Board before resubmitting to the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>.


ITEM NO.7<br />

AC 45.7.1<br />

AC 45.7.2<br />

AC 45.7.3<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

AC 45.8.1<br />

To note for information the decision <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Continuing Education (SOCE) for location <strong>of</strong> the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />

Women’s Studies in the New School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development<br />

Studies (SOGDS).<br />

It was informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 43 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

April 5, 2008 decided that the matter pertaining to the location <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disciplines <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Sciences and Child Development should be<br />

first discussed in the School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing<br />

Education and thereafter in the School Board <strong>of</strong> Gender and<br />

Development Studies.<br />

The Director, SOCE informed that, as per the directions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, the matter was discussed by the School Board at<br />

its 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on September 12, 2008 and re-affirmed its earlier<br />

decision to have the discipline <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Sciences and Child<br />

Development located in the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education.<br />

Regarding Women’s Studies programmes, it was noted that the<br />

programmes have been already relocated and would be developed<br />

under the School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies, where the<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> Women’s studies is housed.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted, and approved, the decision <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOCE regarding the location <strong>of</strong> the Discipline <strong>of</strong> Nutritional<br />

Sciences and the Discipline <strong>of</strong> Child Development in the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Continuing Education and the location <strong>of</strong> the programmes related to<br />

Women Studies in the School <strong>of</strong> Gender & Development Studies.<br />

To consider transfer <strong>of</strong> Post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Women’s Education<br />

(with specialization in Women’s Studies) from School <strong>of</strong><br />

Continuing Education to the newly established School <strong>of</strong> Gender<br />

and Development Studies.<br />

Member Secretary informed that at the 42 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>, it was decided to transfer several programmes from SOCE to<br />

various new schools, as these schools would be the “natural homes” for<br />

the relevant programmes. Thus, M..Phil. and Ph.D. programmes in<br />

Women’s Studies in SOCE were transferred to the School <strong>of</strong> Gender<br />

and Development Studies. which have till date been developed by the<br />

Women’s Education faculty in SOCE. Now SOCE is proposing the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> Post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Women’s Education (specialization – in<br />

Women’s Education/ Women’s Studies or any relevant areas) from<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education to the newly established School <strong>of</strong><br />

Gender and Development Studies.


AC 45.8.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Director, SOCE explained that the School initially<br />

comprised two disciplines viz., (1) Women Education and (2) Rural<br />

Development. The discipline <strong>of</strong> Women Education developed<br />

programmes in three disciplinary areas i.e. (a) Nutritional Sciences<br />

(Food and Nutrition), (b) Child Development and (c) Women Studies.<br />

Recently School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies was established<br />

with three disciplines specified viz., (i) Gender Studies (ii) Women<br />

Studies and (iii) Development Studies. In consonance with the decision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, all the programmes in Women’s Studies in<br />

SOCE were already transferred to the School <strong>of</strong> Gender and<br />

Development Studies. Now the post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Women’s<br />

Education with a specialization in Women’s studies is existing in<br />

SOCE without congruent discipline and related programmes in SOCE.<br />

In the light <strong>of</strong> the above, a proposal for transfer <strong>of</strong> Post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in<br />

Women Education (with specialization in Women Studies) from SOCE<br />

to newly established School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies is<br />

submitted for consideration <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

It was noted that <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> had taken a policy decision<br />

regarding shifting <strong>of</strong> academic programmes to the new School, while<br />

there is no such policy decision regarding shifting <strong>of</strong> posts to the new<br />

schools. It was also noted that the posts was for Women’s Education<br />

with any <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> specialization. Thus, shifting this post would<br />

have repercussions on the faculty needs <strong>of</strong> the other disciplines in<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education.<br />

AC 45.8.3<br />

In the absence <strong>of</strong> a policy decision regarding transfer <strong>of</strong> posts from one<br />

School to the another School and the post being specifically for<br />

Women’s Studies, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deferred the decision to<br />

transfer the Post <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Women’s Education from the School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Continuing Education to the newly established School <strong>of</strong> Gender<br />

and Development Studies.<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

AC 45.9.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Engineering &<br />

Technology (SOET) to allow the students <strong>of</strong> BTCM/BTWRE for<br />

appearing in all Term End Examinations TEE(s) during the<br />

validity <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> respective courses.<br />

It was presented that School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology is <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

BTCM/BTWRE programme. Students are admitted for January cycle<br />

and they appear for Term-end examinations in December. The School<br />

proposed to permit the students <strong>of</strong> BTCM/BTWRE for appearing in<br />

term-end examinations in June without waiting for completion <strong>of</strong><br />

minimum duration <strong>of</strong> one year for appearing in the Tern End


examinations.<br />

AC 45.9.2<br />

Dr. Manoj Kulshreshtha, Programme Coordinator, SOET explained the<br />

reasons for the proposal. The Registrar, SED opined that, if students<br />

are permitted to appear in the Term End examination in June for all the<br />

courses as proposed by the school, there may be a number <strong>of</strong> students<br />

who would be able to complete the programme before completion <strong>of</strong><br />

the minimum duration <strong>of</strong> four years, which will be a violation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ordinance <strong>of</strong> the University. As a practical solution to the problem, it<br />

is suggested to divide the courses into two lots as January-June session<br />

and July-December session. The students may be permitted to appear<br />

in the term-end examinations <strong>of</strong> June for all the courses <strong>of</strong> January-<br />

June session. In this process it may not be possible for any student to<br />

complete the programme before the minimum duration.<br />

AC 45.9.3<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

AC 45.10.1<br />

AC 45.10.2<br />

After elaborate discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed in principle<br />

with the suggestion to divide the courses into January – June session<br />

and July – December session and permit the students to appear in June<br />

Term-end Examination for all the January – June session courses. The<br />

AC suggested the Faculty to identify half <strong>of</strong> the courses for January-<br />

June session and remaining half for July-December session, and take<br />

the approval <strong>of</strong> the School Board.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for addition <strong>of</strong> new<br />

course MES-016: Educational Research (6 Credits) and<br />

increasing <strong>of</strong> Credit Value <strong>of</strong> Course MAEL-001: Practical Course<br />

from 6 to 10 Credits<br />

It was reported that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 43 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

April 5, 2008, while approving the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 25 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> its<br />

Standing Committee held on April 2, 2008, approved the Phase – 3<br />

Form for PG Diploma in Adult Education. It is one year diploma<br />

programme consisting <strong>of</strong> three theory courses <strong>of</strong> 6 credits each and<br />

practical course <strong>of</strong> 6 credits. Now the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and<br />

Development Studies submitted Phase Zero Form proposing to add one<br />

more 6 credits course ‘MES-016: Educational Research’ and<br />

increasing the credit weight from 6 to 10 for the practical course<br />

‘MAEL-001 Practical Course’. With these changes, the total credits<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> the Diploma is increased to 34 credits. This was approved by<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies<br />

by circulation.<br />

Dr. M.V. Lakshmi Reddy, Programme Coordinator, gave the academic<br />

rationale for this revision in the course structure <strong>of</strong> the programme. He


also informed that the course ‘MES-016: Educational Research’ is an<br />

existing course on <strong>of</strong>fer in ‘M.A Education Programme’.<br />

AC 45.10.3<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

AC 45.11.1<br />

AC 45.11.2<br />

AC 45.11.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

for PGDAE for addition <strong>of</strong> new course ‘MES-016: Educational<br />

Research’ (6 Credits) and increasing credit value <strong>of</strong> course ‘MAEL-<br />

001: Practical Course’ from 6 to 10 Credits.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 form for Post Graduate<br />

Certificate, Post Graduate Diploma, and Masters Programme in<br />

Development Studies 1 st Year in Development Studies.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies<br />

has submitted Phase-3 Form for Post Graduate Certificate, Post<br />

Graduate Diploma and Masters Programme in Development Studies, in<br />

a modular system. A student will receive PG Certificate after<br />

completing 1 st semester courses, PG Diploma after completing 2 nd<br />

semester courses and Masters Degree after completing 3 rd and 4 th<br />

semester courses. The proposed date for launch <strong>of</strong> first module i.e., PG<br />

Certificate in Development Studies, is July 2009.<br />

Dr. R.P. Singh, Programme Coordinator, explained the salient features<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme. The members pointed out that the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies at its 3 rd meeting<br />

held on 10 th September, 2008 approved the detailed course outlines for<br />

PG Certificate in Development Studies only, where as the Phase-3<br />

Form presented to <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is seeking approvals for PG<br />

Certificate, PG Diploma and Master’s Programmes. It is further noted<br />

that detailed course outlines are presented for the first 8 courses<br />

covering a total <strong>of</strong> 32 credits.<br />

After discussing at length, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided the<br />

following:<br />

i. In principle, approval <strong>of</strong> the proposal <strong>of</strong> the School to <strong>of</strong>fer PG<br />

Certificate, PG Diploma and Masters Programme in<br />

Development Studies in a modular system;<br />

ii. Approval <strong>of</strong> the Phase-3 form for the PG Certificate in<br />

Development Studies; and<br />

iii.<br />

The Phase-3 Form for PG Diploma and Masters Degree<br />

Programmes to be submitted after due approval <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

Board.<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 form for Diploma in Business<br />

Process Outsourcing (BPO).


AC 45.12.1<br />

AC 45.12.2<br />

It was informed that the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies<br />

has submitted Phase 3 Form for Diploma in Business Process<br />

Outsourcing (BPO), which is being developed and delivered in<br />

collaboration with Accenture. It is proposed to launch the Diploma<br />

Programme from January/February 2009. The same was approved by<br />

the School Board in its 3 rd meeting held on 10 th September, 2008.<br />

Dr. C. G. Naidu presented the details <strong>of</strong> the programme and current<br />

status <strong>of</strong> course development. Regarding queries seeking clarifications<br />

on evaluation methodology at Serial No. 19 <strong>of</strong> Phase 3 Form, Dr.<br />

Naidu informed that it is erroneously recorded as 70% weightage for<br />

continuous evaluation and 30% weightage for term-end examinations.<br />

He asked for it to be corrected as 30% weightage for Continuous<br />

Evaluation and 70% weightage for Term End examinations.<br />

AC 45.12.3 With the changes above, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase 3<br />

(Annexure - 3) Form for Diploma in Business Process Outsourcing.<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

AC 45.13.1<br />

AC 45.13.2<br />

AC 45.13.3<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

AC 45.14.1<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for the Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Counselling, Family Therapy and Mediation.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development<br />

Studies is developing Post graduate Diploma in Counselling, Family<br />

Therapy and Mediation. The main aim <strong>of</strong> the programme is to train<br />

manpower in the area <strong>of</strong> Counselling and Family Therapy. Phase-3<br />

Form was approved by the School Board at its 3 rd meeting held on 10 th<br />

September, 2008.<br />

Dr. Amiteshwar Ratra, Programme Coordinator, explained the salient<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the programme and clarified the queries <strong>of</strong> the members.<br />

She clarified that the programme will be launched from July 2009<br />

session, instead <strong>of</strong> January 2009 proposed in the Phase Form. The<br />

Programme Coordinator was suggested to develop audio/video<br />

programmes simultaneously and keep them ready along with the print<br />

materials, for which she agreed.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved Phase 3 Form for PG<br />

Diploma in Counselling, Family Therapy and Mediation (Annexure -<br />

4).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 forms for Programmes<br />

related to Aurobindo Studies.<br />

It was presented that <strong>IGNOU</strong> signed MoU with Sri Aurobindo Centre<br />

for Advance Research (SACAR) for <strong>of</strong>fering programmes related to


Sri Aurobindo. Accordingly, the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary<br />

Studies had prepared the following programmes in<br />

collaboration with SACAR:<br />

1. Certificate Programme: Introduction <strong>of</strong> Sri Aurobindo Studies<br />

2. PG Diploma in Studies in Indian Culture<br />

3. PG Diploma in Integral Education<br />

4. Master <strong>of</strong> Sri Aurobindo Studies<br />

5. M. Phil in Sri Aurobindo Studies<br />

6. Ph.D. in Sri Aurobindo Studies<br />

These Programmes were already been launched by the University on<br />

15 th September, 2008 at a function on the birthday <strong>of</strong> Sri Aurobindo by<br />

Dr. Karan Singh, Member <strong>of</strong> Parliament, Rajya Sabha.<br />

AC 45.14.2<br />

Dr. C.G. Naidu, Nodal Officer, informed that the School Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Inter-disciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies approved<br />

these programmes in its meeting held on 15 th October, 2008. He<br />

explained the objectives and salient features <strong>of</strong> all the programmes.<br />

Course materials for all these programmes were already developed by<br />

SACAR and the programmes being delivered online by SACAR<br />

through its own portal. The <strong>IGNOU</strong> and SACAR share the fee in the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> 30% and 70% respectively.<br />

There was a detailed discussion regarding role played by the <strong>IGNOU</strong>,<br />

expected enrolment and viability <strong>of</strong> the programmes and desirability<br />

<strong>of</strong> launching programmes by the University on the philosophy <strong>of</strong> an<br />

individual.<br />

AC 45.14.3<br />

Since the programmes have already been launched with the approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor, the Chairperson opined that the proposals<br />

should be considered for ratification instead <strong>of</strong> approval.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and ratified the Phase 3 (Annexure<br />

- 5) Forms for the (1) Certificate Programme: Introduction <strong>of</strong> Sri<br />

Aurobindo Studies, (2) PG Diploma in Studies in Indian Culture, (3)<br />

PG Diploma in Integral Education, (4) Master <strong>of</strong> Sri Aurobindo<br />

Studies, (5) M. Phil in Sri Aurobindo Studies, and (6) Ph.D. in Sri<br />

Aurobindo Studies.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY SIXTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

JANUARY 13, 2009<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY SIXTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON JANURY 13, 2009 AT 2.30 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM,<br />

BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

122. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

123. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

124. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

125. Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

126. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R.Srivathsan, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

127. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

128. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

129. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

130. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

131. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

132. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

133. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

134. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

135. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

136. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

137. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, Director, SOVET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

138. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

139. Sh. S.K. Arora, Librarian - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

140. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B. Khanna, SOMS - Member<br />

141. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pity Koul, SOHS - Member<br />

142. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Majhi, SOET - Member<br />

143. Dr. S.K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

144. Dr. Sutapa Bose, Lecturer, SOE - Member<br />

145. Shri M.P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

146. Shri Z. Yanthan, Lecturer, SOSS - Member<br />

147. Sh. V.V. Subrahmanyam, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

148. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director (I/c), IUC - Member<br />

149. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director (I/c), NCDA - Member<br />

150. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur - Member<br />

151. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.Thangamuthu - Member<br />

152. Dr. S.S. Rathi - Member<br />

153. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K. Mohammed Yusuff - Member<br />

154. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan - Member<br />

155. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya - Member<br />

156. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Siva Kumar - Member<br />

157. Dr. V. Venugopal Reddy, RD, Delhi-1 - Member<br />

158. Shri Ravi Kanth, Joint Director, EMPC - Member<br />

159. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V. Narasimham, Director (I/c), ACD - Member Secretary


Dr.Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SED and Shri K. Laxman, Registrar, SRD<br />

attended the meeting as Special Invitees.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja and Dr. Sonia Sharma attended the meeting on behalf <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

B.S. Hansra, Director, SOA and Dr. Harkirat Bains, Director (I/c), SOTHSSM<br />

respectively.<br />

Shri K.D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist the Member-<br />

Secretary.<br />

Dr. D. K. Choudhry, PVC, Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.<br />

Balakrishnan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V. Subramanian and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Arvind Kumar could not attend<br />

the meeting.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 46 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and wished New Year 2009 Greetings to the members.<br />

The Chairman thanked and placed on record significant contributions made by the<br />

outgoing members Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu Aneja, Former Director, SOCE, and Dr. Amrita Nigam,<br />

SOS. He welcomed the new members Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivathsan, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam on<br />

assuming charge as Director, SOCE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Gajendra Naidu, Director, School<br />

Vocational Education and Training, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, School <strong>of</strong><br />

Journalism and New Media Studies, Dr Harkirat Bains, Director(I/c), School <strong>of</strong> Tourism<br />

and Hospitality Services Sectoral Management, Pr<strong>of</strong> Pity Koul, School <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

Sciences and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Majhi, School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology.<br />

Then the Chairman asked the Member Secretary to present the agenda. The<br />

following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 46.1.1<br />

To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and<br />

to note the action taken thereon.<br />

The Member Secretary presented that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on October 24, 2008 were circulated among the<br />

members and comments were received from two members Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita<br />

Malhotra, Director, SOS and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Amrita Nigam, SOS regarding recording <strong>of</strong>


the decision in resolution No. AC 45.4.3.<br />

The Member Secretary also informed that the Action taken report on the<br />

resolutions <strong>of</strong> the 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is placed at Annexure<br />

2 <strong>of</strong> the agenda item.<br />

AC 46.1.2<br />

As per the resolution No. AC 45.4.3. <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 45 th meeting, the<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> ‘Environmental Studies’ was assigned to the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Studies. According to Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita<br />

Malhotra and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Amrita Nigam the decision <strong>of</strong> AC was to assign the<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> Environmental Studies to the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC expressed that, during the discussions there was a<br />

suggestion from Director, SOS to assign the discipline to SOS, but the final<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the AC was to assign it to SOITS, as recorded in the minutes and<br />

circulated. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. R. Srivathsan, PVC and few other members expressed the<br />

view that the discipline <strong>of</strong> ‘Environmental Studies’ shall cover various<br />

developmental and social issues besides Science. Therefore, it is more<br />

appropriate to assign to SOITS rather than SOS.<br />

After detailed discussion, the AC concluded that the decision recorded in<br />

resolution No. AC 45.4.3. <strong>of</strong> the minutes assigning the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />

‘Environmental Studies’ to SOITS was correct and there is no need to change it<br />

as suggested by the two members.<br />

AC. 46.1.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH, stated that the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities at<br />

present comprises <strong>of</strong> Editorial Unit and two disciplines i.e. Hindi and English.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the registration <strong>of</strong> RTAs for Ph.D. in various Indian languages, there<br />

is an immediate requirement to introduce more disciplines in Indian<br />

Languages, particularly Sanskrit, in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities. This is further<br />

more important<br />

Members opined that the Item is confirmation <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> 45 th meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

AC. Any proposal to start new disciplines should come as an item and should<br />

be discussed separately. However, during discussion the need to start Indian<br />

Languages was overwhelmingly appreciated. It was also noted that the<br />

University had taken decision to start programmes in all Indian languages long<br />

back.<br />

Ac 46.1.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the Minutes (Annexure 1 without<br />

appendices) <strong>of</strong> its 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> and noted the action taken report.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided to create a separate Centre <strong>of</strong> Indian Languages<br />

with full academic autonomy like any School <strong>of</strong> Studies to start academic<br />

programmes in Indian language.


ITEM NO. 2<br />

To consider and approve the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 28 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee (ACSC) held on November 4, 2008<br />

AC 46.2.1 The Member-Secretary informed that the 28 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was held on November 4, 2009. It considered<br />

and approved the following major items :<br />

• To ratify the action taken by Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> approval for<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> Entrance Examination for admission to MCA and BCA<br />

Programmes.<br />

• To ratify the action taken by Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> approval for<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong> pass percentage from 50% to 40% for courses <strong>of</strong> MCA<br />

(Revised) and BCA Programmes<br />

• To ratify the action taken by Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> approval for<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong> pass percentage from 50% to 40% for courses <strong>of</strong> MCA<br />

(Revised) and BCA Programmes<br />

• Decoupling <strong>of</strong> CIC/CIT for admission to BCA and MCA programmes.<br />

(i)<br />

To ratify the action taken by Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> approval <strong>of</strong><br />

Phase-3 form <strong>of</strong> Certificate in Information Technology (CIT)<br />

(ii) To consider the eligibility conditions for academic counselors <strong>of</strong><br />

Certificate in Information Technology (CIT) for approval.<br />

(iii) To consider the S<strong>of</strong>tware requirements for Certificate in Information<br />

Technology (CIT) for approval.<br />

(iv) To consider the machine to student ratio for Certificate in<br />

Information Technology (CIT) for approval.<br />

(v) To consider the evaluation pattern for Certificate in Information<br />

Technology (CIT) for approval<br />

(vi) To consider the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> Certificate in Computing (CIC)<br />

programme.<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for the Certificate/Diploma in<br />

Population and Development Education.<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for the Certificate/Diploma in<br />

Handmade Paper Items.<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for the Certificate in<br />

Communicative Skill for BPO, ITeS & Related Sectors.<br />

• Approval <strong>of</strong> Phase-3 form <strong>of</strong> M.Phil in Computer Science. AND<br />

Approval <strong>of</strong> Phase-3 form <strong>of</strong> Ph.D programme in Computer Science.


• Rounding <strong>of</strong>f decimal point in the Grade Card/Mark sheet.<br />

• To consider the ratify the Action taken by the Vice- Chancellor for one<br />

time extension permitting students who have completed their programme<br />

before 27 th October, 2007 for Improving their division/marks in December,<br />

2008 Term End Examination.<br />

• Approval <strong>of</strong> Phase-3 form for Certificate Programme for Home Based<br />

Care Providers.<br />

• Approvals for modification <strong>of</strong> criteria for selection <strong>of</strong> Programme Study<br />

Centre (PSC), Selection <strong>of</strong> Counsellors and the Programme Incharges <strong>of</strong><br />

Certificate in Health Care Waste Management (CHCWM).<br />

• Approval <strong>of</strong> change in name <strong>of</strong> the practical Course <strong>of</strong> Course 3 and course<br />

4 <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate in Oral Implantology (PGCOI).<br />

• Approval <strong>of</strong> Extension <strong>of</strong> session <strong>of</strong> the first batch <strong>of</strong> PGCE and PGCOI.<br />

• To consider and approve the syllabus <strong>of</strong> Certificate <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in Urdu<br />

Languages.<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for ‘Diploma in Urdu<br />

Language’.<br />

• To consider and approve the Elective Courses in Urdu Language and<br />

Literature for the BDP Programme.<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for Foundation Course in<br />

Bhojpuri’ for the Bachelors Degree Programme (BDP).<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for the ‘Certificate in Leather<br />

Goods Making (CLGM)’.<br />

• To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for the ‘B. Tech. (Aeronautical<br />

Engineering)’.<br />

• To consider and approve the launching <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> Courses using NPTEL<br />

content and related Capacity Building Programmes.<br />

• To consider and approve the proposal for inclusion <strong>of</strong> Shatranj Ke Khelari<br />

in place <strong>of</strong> Dudh Ka Dam in EHD-01 course.<br />

• To consider and approve the ‘Open and Distance Learning – Pedagogy,<br />

Science and Technology’, a Module for Distance Learners developed by


STRIDE, as an essential reading for Learners <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

• To consider and approve Phase Zero Form for a poetry based course<br />

‘Samkalin Kavita’, an elective course for M.A (Hindi) 2 nd year.<br />

AC 46.2.3<br />

Regarding resolution No ACSC 28.3.3, Registrar (SED) suggested to replace<br />

the words ‘who first time qualify to appear in term end examinations’ with the<br />

words ‘who have taken admission in BCA and MCA programmes from July<br />

2008 cycle’. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS, emphasized that the<br />

revised pass percentage should be maintained from December 2008 Term-end<br />

Examination. Hence there is no need to change the said Resolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACSC.<br />

After discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved not to change the resolution<br />

No ACSC 28.3.3.<br />

AC 46.2.4 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the minutes (Annexure 2<br />

without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 28 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> ACSC held on November 4,<br />

2008.<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 46.3.1<br />

AC 46.3.2<br />

To ratify the Action Taken by the Vice-Chancellor on PG Diploma<br />

Programme on “Capacity Building <strong>of</strong> Principals <strong>of</strong> Higher Education<br />

Institutions <strong>of</strong> Gujarat”<br />

It was presented that the Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Higher Education, Government <strong>of</strong><br />

Gujarat approached the University to launch Post Graduate Diploma on<br />

Capacity Building <strong>of</strong> Principals <strong>of</strong> Higher Education Institutions <strong>of</strong> Gujarat.<br />

The VC asked STRIDE to design and develop the programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director, STRIDE and Dr. Madhu Prahar, STRIDE<br />

explained that a five member Committee, headed by the Vice-Chancellor was<br />

constituted to design the programme. After a series <strong>of</strong> discussions with the<br />

Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Higher Education, Gujarat Government, few selected college<br />

Principals and the faculty <strong>of</strong> STRIDE, a document on action plan has been<br />

submitted.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor also explained the genesis and the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

action plan. He further stated that this programme is being developed in the<br />

Project mode to be completed within one year and the funding <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

will be from the Gujarat Government.<br />

AC 46.3.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Action Plan and proposal for launching PG Diploma Programme<br />

on “Capacity Building <strong>of</strong> Principals <strong>of</strong> Higher Education Institutions <strong>of</strong><br />

Gujarat” (Annexure - 3).


ITEM NO. 4 To consider co-option <strong>of</strong> Members under clause 1 (viii) <strong>of</strong> Statute 9.<br />

AC 46.4.1<br />

The Member-Secretary informed that the two years term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following 14 members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> co-opted under provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

Statute 9 Clause (1) (viii) will be expiring on February 23, 2009:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Balakrishnan, Associate Director, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Science,<br />

Bangalore.<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Sadagopan, Director, IIIT, Bangalore.<br />

3. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan, Former Vice-Chancellor, Utkal University,<br />

Bhubaneshwar.<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Modern History, Punjab University,<br />

Chandigarh.<br />

5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V. Subramanian, Department <strong>of</strong> History, University <strong>of</strong> Delhi.<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapoor, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Management Studies, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Delhi.<br />

7. Dr. S. S. Rathi, Delhi.<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Kapila Vatsyayan, Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts,<br />

Delhi.<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Thangamuthu, Chennai.<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anil Bhattacharya, Kolkata.<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K. Mohammed Yusuff, Kochi, Kerala.<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Aravind Kumar, Department <strong>of</strong> Physics, Mumbai.<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, University <strong>of</strong> Pune.<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Sivakumar, Indian Law Institute, New Delhi.<br />

The provisions <strong>of</strong> Statute 9 Clause (1) (viii) provides as follows:<br />

“Not less than ten persons who are not employees <strong>of</strong> University, co-opted<br />

by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for their special knowledge including<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> employees organizations, industries, trade and<br />

commerce, academic and pr<strong>of</strong>essional organizations, communication field<br />

etc.”<br />

The matter is placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to co-opt new members for<br />

a term <strong>of</strong> two years starting from February 24, 2009.<br />

AC 46.4.2<br />

The Chairman then asked members to suggest eminent persons for co-option<br />

under the provisions mentioned above. The members suggested the following<br />

names:<br />

1. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda, Hon. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Science,<br />

Bangalore.<br />

2. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra Dev, Director, Centre for Economic & Social Studies,<br />

Hyderabad.<br />

3. Mr. George Mathew, Director Institute <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. K. Jain, CEO & Secretary, ICSI, New Delhi


5. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh, GB Pant Agricultural University<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities, University <strong>of</strong> Hyderabad<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.N. Maheshwari, IIT, Hauz Khas, New Delhi.<br />

8. Dr. D.K. Datta<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ramamohan Rao, Department <strong>of</strong> Business Management, Andhra<br />

University, Vishakhapatnam.<br />

10. Dr. K.B. Peter, Member-Secretary, World Noni Research Foundation,<br />

Chennai<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammad Miyan, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. L.Venugopal Reddy, Former Vice Chancellor, Andhra University<br />

and Acharya Nagarjuna University<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Khannan Mourgalya<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi Singh<br />

15. Dr. Srivastva, Director General Health Services, New Delhi<br />

16. Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.P. Singh (Retd.) Kurukshetra University<br />

AC 46.4.3.<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 46.5.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> authorized the Vice Chancellor to consider the above<br />

panel <strong>of</strong> 16 members and decide the final list <strong>of</strong> 14 members to co-opt under<br />

Statute 9 Clause (1) (viii).<br />

To report for ratification <strong>of</strong> the Action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

regarding “Post Graduate Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and<br />

Environment Management Programme”.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology, in collaboration<br />

with the Institute <strong>of</strong> Industrial Management for Safety, Health and<br />

Environment Management, Bhopal is developing Diploma and Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and Environment Management.<br />

The Phase 3 forms for these programmes were placed before the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 45 th meeting. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deferred the Item and<br />

suggested to work out the credit load <strong>of</strong> these courses as per the University<br />

norms and take approval <strong>of</strong> the School Board before resubmitting to the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 46.5.2 The Programme Coordinator Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Maji informed that the Phase 3<br />

forms for both Diploma and PG Diploma were revised as per University<br />

Norms. Since the programme was developed in collaboration and students<br />

were admitted, the Vice-Chancellor approved the launch <strong>of</strong> these programmes<br />

and directed for taking necessary steps for timely conduct <strong>of</strong> examinations<br />

subject to the condition that it may be reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

next meeting. Accordingly, modified Phase 3 Forms <strong>of</strong> these programmes<br />

duly approved by the Vice-Chancellor were circulated in the meeting itself.<br />

AC 46.5.3<br />

In this context, the Chairman expressed that the process <strong>of</strong> seeking approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> Phase 3 form by the AC is taking a long time and causing delays in


launching <strong>of</strong> the Programmes. He asked the members to deliberate on the<br />

issue <strong>of</strong> delegation <strong>of</strong> powers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for approval upto<br />

Phase 3 Forms to the respective School Board. He further suggested that the<br />

detailed programme structure may be reported to the AC when the programme<br />

is ready for launch.<br />

AC 46.5.4<br />

AC 46.5.5<br />

The suggestion by the Chairman was discussed at length and the members<br />

appreciated the view <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor to empower the School Boards by<br />

delegating the powers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to approve the Phase 3 forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action by the Vice-Chancellor regarding<br />

launching <strong>of</strong> Diploma and PG Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and<br />

Environment Management Programmes and approved the modified Phase 3<br />

Forms for the same (Annexure-4).<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided to delegate its powers regarding approval up to<br />

Phase 3 Forms to the School Boards concerned with the directions that it<br />

should be reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> when the programme is ready for<br />

launch.<br />

ITEM NO.6<br />

AC 46.6.1<br />

AC 46.6.2<br />

ITEM NO. 7<br />

To note for information the decisions taken by the Research <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

12 th meeting held on July 9, 2008.<br />

The Member-Secretary informed that the 12 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong><br />

was held on July 9, 2009 and the <strong>Council</strong> considered the following items:<br />

• To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Fourth <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee held on 9 th April, 2008 and note<br />

the action taken thereon.<br />

• To consider and approve the matter relating to the award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D Degree to<br />

Ms. Nisha Peshin (Enrol. No. 024957627) in Education.<br />

• To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Committee constituted by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor for finalizing the procedure for enrolment <strong>of</strong> students in<br />

the Ph.D Programme and their follow up once after enrolment in<br />

consonance with the Ordinance <strong>of</strong> Research Degree Programme.<br />

• Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Fifth meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing<br />

Committee held on July 8, 2008.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the decisions taken by the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> at its 12 th meeting held on July 9, 2008 (Annexure 5<br />

without appendices).<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in permitting the Staff<br />

Training and Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Distance Education (STRIDE) to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

its own <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes.


AC 46.7.1<br />

AC 46.7.2<br />

AC 46.7.3<br />

AC. 46.7.4<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

AC 46.8.1<br />

AC 46.8.2<br />

AC 46.8.3<br />

ITEM NO.9<br />

It was presented that the Staff Training and Research in Distance Education<br />

(STRIDE) proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer its own <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes, which was<br />

permitted by the Vice Chancellor.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director STRIDE explained the proposal in detail.<br />

During the discussion, the Chairman expressed the view that it will be in the<br />

fitness <strong>of</strong> the things in the present scenario to permit the Centers and Divisions<br />

which have the faculty and capacity, to develop programmes in the disciplines<br />

which are not located in any <strong>of</strong> the Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies.<br />

After a detailed discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by<br />

the Vice-Chancellor in permitting the Staff Training and Research Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Distance Education (STRIDE) to <strong>of</strong>fer its own <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes.<br />

The AC further decided to empower STRIDE and various Centres like NCDS,<br />

CEE, NCIDE and the Centre for Corporate Education & Training to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

their own programmes like any School <strong>of</strong> Studies with due constitution <strong>of</strong><br />

School Board like academic committees in these various Centres.<br />

To consider the collaborative academic activities with Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (RCI) and the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the clauses in the<br />

MoU between Rehabilitation <strong>Council</strong> (RCI) <strong>of</strong> India and <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

It was presented that the University had signed a MoU with Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (RCI) on September 18, 2007 for collaboration between the<br />

University and RCI to make joint efforts in promoting and implementing<br />

Extension, Training and Education for empowerment <strong>of</strong> special target groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> people with disabilities.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director (I/c), National Centre for Disability Studies<br />

explained the features <strong>of</strong> the proposal with particular reference to clause 3 <strong>of</strong><br />

the MoU to promote the various programmes under the purview <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong><br />

in collaboration with the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education or School <strong>of</strong><br />

Rehabilitation Sciences /Disability Division that will be established by <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

or with any other School <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. Specific cost sharing mechanism related<br />

to each programme will be worked out separately as and when required.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> appreciated the initiative while approving the MoU<br />

and decided to establish the School <strong>of</strong> Rehabilitation Sciences.<br />

To note for information regarding the functioning <strong>of</strong> the Centre for<br />

Corporate Education and Training.


AC 46.9.1 It was presented that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

24.10.2008 proposed and approved creation <strong>of</strong> Centre for Corporate Education,<br />

Training and Consultancy. The same was approved by the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management at its 97 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 19.11.2008 and appointed Pr<strong>of</strong>essor-<br />

OSD and Coordinator In-charge <strong>of</strong> the Centre. As approved by the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and Board <strong>of</strong> Management, the Centre shall be managed by a<br />

Managing Committee comprising some faculty members from concerned<br />

schools and representatives <strong>of</strong> corporate sector.<br />

The first meeting to prepare the road map for the Centre was held on 2 nd<br />

January, 2009. A copy <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting is placed at (Annexure-<br />

6). Based on the deliberations in the meeting, the Vice-Chancellor proposed to<br />

go ahead with the activities <strong>of</strong> the Centre.<br />

AC 46.9.2<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

AC 46.10.1<br />

AC 46.10.2<br />

AC 46.10.3<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

AC. 46.11.1<br />

AC. 46.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the information and the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Expert Committee on the functioning <strong>of</strong> the Centre for Corporate Education,<br />

Training and Consultancy and approved the recommendations for<br />

implementation.<br />

.To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor regarding PG Diploma<br />

in Disability Management for Medical Practitioners.<br />

It was presented that an MoU was signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India as mentioned at Item No. 8 above. As per this MoU, NCDS<br />

proposed for launching PG Diploma in Disability Management (PGDDM) for<br />

Medical Practitioners from January 2009.<br />

Dr. S.K. Prasad Deputy Director NCDS, who is the Programme Coordinator,<br />

explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the Programme. Phase 3 Form for PG Diploma<br />

in Disability Management for Medical Practitioners is presented for<br />

consideration and approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving PG Diploma in Disability Management for Medical Practitioners<br />

and approved the Phase 3 form .(Annexure-7) with the directions to include<br />

the suggestions, if any, received from the members.<br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> NCDS for developing and launching programmes <strong>of</strong> study<br />

in the various areas <strong>of</strong> Disability.<br />

It was presented that NCDS proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer its own programmes in the<br />

Disability Sector.<br />

As already decided under Item No 7 above empowering various Centres<br />

including NCDS to <strong>of</strong>fer their own programmes, the proposal has been<br />

approved.


ITEM NO 12<br />

AC 46.12.1<br />

AC 46.12.2<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

AC 46.13.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for changing the name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SOTHSSM<br />

It was presented that the faculty members <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism<br />

Hospitality and Services Sector Management at their School <strong>Council</strong> meeting<br />

held on 24 th December, 2008 suggested to change the name <strong>of</strong> the School as<br />

‘School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and Hospitality Services Management (SOTHSM)’.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for changing the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism Hospitality and Services Sector Management<br />

as the ‘School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and Hospitality Services Management (SOTHSM)’<br />

To consider and approve the procedure for ascertaining the equivalence <strong>of</strong><br />

International Degrees/Diplomas for the purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> admissions.<br />

It was presented that <strong>IGNOU</strong> has been <strong>of</strong>fering its Programmes abroad<br />

through its Partner Institutions. While receiving applications for admission,<br />

International Division is ascertaining the equivalence <strong>of</strong> the Degrees/Diplomas<br />

<strong>of</strong> the International Universities as per the guidelines <strong>of</strong> the Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Indian Universities’ (AIU).<br />

The International Division observed that, though some institutions abroad are<br />

having permission <strong>of</strong> their respective Ministries <strong>of</strong> Higher Education <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country to <strong>of</strong>fer Degrees/Diplomas, they are not listed in the AIU Notifications<br />

as equivalent to the Indian Universities’ Degrees/Diplomas. International<br />

Division has been rejecting such Degrees/Diplomas for the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

admission, though the Partner Institutions are providing documentary<br />

evidences <strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> such International Universities/Institutions. In this<br />

regard, the process <strong>of</strong> obtaining confirmation/denial from AIU is taking a very<br />

long time.<br />

AC 46.13.2<br />

AC 46.13.3<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

In the light <strong>of</strong> the above, the International Division proposed that the status <strong>of</strong><br />

such unlisted Institutions/Universities be ascertained through the Indian<br />

Missions in the respective countries. If an applicant gets verification <strong>of</strong> his<br />

eligibility in the form <strong>of</strong> endorsement on his Degree/Diploma from the Indian<br />

Mission in the country concerned, it reduces the application processing time<br />

and there will be no need to refer the matter to AIU.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal with a condition<br />

that such verifications <strong>of</strong> equivalence <strong>of</strong> International Degrees/Diplomas<br />

should be placed before the Equivalence Committee <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in Regularizing the<br />

Matter <strong>of</strong> Conducting the Integrated Ph.D. programme in Physics in<br />

Collaboration with Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Astrophysics (IIA), Bangalore


through the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies<br />

AC 46.14.1<br />

AC 46.14.2<br />

AC 46.14.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary<br />

Studies proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer an integrated Ph. D programme in Physics in<br />

collaboration with the Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Astrophysics (IIA) Bangalore. The<br />

Phase Forms for the same, approved by the Vice Chancellor, are placed before<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for ratification.<br />

Dr. C. K. Ghosh, Programme Coordinator explained the salient features and<br />

detailed syllabus <strong>of</strong> the Programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS said<br />

that the Physics discipline is located in the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences and the<br />

discipline is planning to <strong>of</strong>fer M.Sc programme in Physics. Therefore, it may<br />

not be appropriate to <strong>of</strong>fer integrated Ph. D programme in Physics from the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies. It was clarified<br />

that the proposed integrated Ph. D programme in Physics was decided long<br />

back when the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had no plan <strong>of</strong> launching M.Sc. Physics.<br />

Since the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences is now planning to <strong>of</strong>fer M.Sc. (Physics), the<br />

Chairman asked Dr. Ghosh whether the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

programme could be Integrated Ph. D in Astrophysics. Dr. Ghosh informed<br />

that he would consult the Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Astrophysics (IIA) Bangalore in<br />

this matter.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in regularizing the matter <strong>of</strong> conducting Integrated Ph.D.<br />

programme in Physics in Collaboration with Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Astrophysics<br />

(IIA), Bangalore through the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary<br />

Studies. It was further decided to locate the said programme in SOS, if the<br />

Physics faculty so desires.<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

AC 46.15.1<br />

AC 46.15.2<br />

AC 46.15.3<br />

To consider and approve the Phase- 3 form for PG Certificate in Security<br />

Operations and PG Diploma in Security Operations.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training had<br />

submitted Phase-3 form for PG Certificate in Security Operations and PG<br />

Diploma in Security Operations in collaboration with Security Services<br />

<strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (SSCI). The Phase 3 forms were approved by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET at its 5 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 17 th December, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and replied the queries <strong>of</strong> the members relating to higher fees etc.<br />

He informed that these programmes will be fully residential and the students<br />

will be paid a stipend <strong>of</strong> Rs.8,000 per month.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Forms


(Annexure-8) for the PG Certificate in Security Operations and PG Diploma in<br />

Security Operations.<br />

ITEM NO.16<br />

To consider and approve the Phase- 3 form for Certificate Programme in<br />

Jewellery Designing.<br />

AC 46.16.1 The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training had submitted the Phase 3<br />

Form for Certificate in Jewellery Designing. The Phase 3 Form was approved<br />

by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET at its 5 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 17 th December,<br />

2008.<br />

AC 46.16.2<br />

AC 46.16.3<br />

ITEM NO.17<br />

AC 46.17.1<br />

Dr. K.D. Prasad, Regional Director, City Centre and Programme Coordinator,<br />

explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the Programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form (Annexure-<br />

9) for the Certificate in Jewellery Designing.<br />

To consider and approve the modified Phase-3 form <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in<br />

Agriculture Policy (PGDAP).<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture resubmitted the modified the modified Phase 3 Form<br />

for PG Diploma in Agriculture Policy (PGDAP), as advised by the ACSC. The<br />

modified Phase-3 form <strong>of</strong> the same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOA<br />

at its 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 17 th November 2008.<br />

AC 46.17.2 Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja, Programme Coordinator, explained the objectives and<br />

detailed structure <strong>of</strong> the Programme.<br />

AC 46.17.3<br />

ITEM NO.18<br />

AC 46.18.1<br />

AC 46.18.2<br />

AC 46.18.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the modified Phase-3 Form<br />

PG Diploma in Agriculture Policy (Annexure-10).<br />

To consider and approve the Proposal for Creation <strong>of</strong> Disciplines in the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture had submitted a proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> three new<br />

disciplines namely (i) Agriculture Production System (ii) Agriculture<br />

Economics and Extension and (iii) Food Science Technology. The School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOA, at its 10 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 17 th November,2008, approved the<br />

proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> these three disciplines.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja, explained the details <strong>of</strong> the proposal and need for creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> these new disciplines.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong><br />

three new disciplines in principle. However, creation <strong>of</strong> positions shall be taken<br />

up later looking at the revenue model and sustainability.


ITEM NO.19<br />

To consider and approve the syllabus <strong>of</strong> the new course entitled<br />

“Theoretical Introduction to Democracy” proposed by the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Political Science along with Phase Zero Form.<br />

AC 46.19.1 The faculty <strong>of</strong> Political Science, SOSS, submitted Phase Zero Form for<br />

introducing a new course entitled “Theoretical Introduction to Democracy” in<br />

MPS. The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS at its 44 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22 nd October 2008.<br />

AC 46.19.2<br />

AC 46.19.3<br />

ITEM NO.20<br />

AC 46.20.1<br />

AC 46.20.2<br />

AC 46.20.3<br />

Dr Jagapal Singh, Course Proposer, explained the detailed contents <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

course.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form for the<br />

new course entitled “Theoretical Introduction to Democracy”(Annexure-11).<br />

To consider and approve the revised (New Syllabus <strong>of</strong> the Course<br />

“Government and Politics in India (EPS-12)” and the Phase Zero Form<br />

for the revision <strong>of</strong> the Course submitted by the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Political Science.<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> Political Science, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted<br />

Phase Zero Form for the revised syllabus <strong>of</strong> the course ‘EPS- 12: Government<br />

and Politics in India’. The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22 nd October 2008.<br />

Dr Jagapal Singh, Course Proposer explained the details <strong>of</strong> the revised syllabus<br />

<strong>of</strong> the course.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved Phase Zero Form <strong>of</strong> revised<br />

syllabus <strong>of</strong> the Course ‘EPS-12: Government and Politics in India’ (Annexure-<br />

12).<br />

ITEM NO.21 To consider and approve the course structure <strong>of</strong> the course entitled<br />

“Urbanization in India” as an optional course <strong>of</strong> Master in History (MAH)<br />

proposed by the faculty <strong>of</strong> History.<br />

AC 46.21.1<br />

AC 46.21.2<br />

AC 46.21.3<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> History, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted Phase Zero<br />

Form <strong>of</strong> a new Course entitled “Urbanization in India” as an optional course<br />

<strong>of</strong> Master in History (MAH). The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October 22, 2008.<br />

Dr. Abha Singh, Course Proposer explained the details <strong>of</strong> the course structure.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form <strong>of</strong> the<br />

course entitled “Urbanization in India”, an optional course <strong>of</strong> Master in<br />

History (MAH) (Annexure-13).


ITEM NO.22<br />

AC 46.22.1<br />

To consider and approve the Evaluation Methodology for different courses<br />

included in the course work for M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in Economics.<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> Economics, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted evaluation<br />

methodology for different courses included in the course work for M.Phil<br />

/Ph.D programme in Economics. The same was approved by the School <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October 22, 2008.<br />

AC 46.22.2 Dr. Narayan Prasad, Programme Coordinator, explained the details <strong>of</strong><br />

proposed evaluation methodology.<br />

AC 46.22.3<br />

ITEM NO.23<br />

AC 46.23.1<br />

AC 46.23.2<br />

AC 46.23.3<br />

ITEM NO.24<br />

AC 46.24.1<br />

AC 46.24.2<br />

AC 46.24.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Evaluation Methodology<br />

(Annexure-14) for different courses included in the course work for<br />

M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in Economics.<br />

To consider and approve the Evaluation Methodology for course work and<br />

dissertation for M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in Sociology.<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> Sociology, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted evaluation<br />

methodology for different courses included in the course work for M.Phil<br />

/Ph.D programme in Sociology. The same was approved by the School <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October 22, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Director (SOSS) explained the features <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

evaluation methodology.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Evaluation Methodology<br />

(Annexure-15) for different courses included in the course work for<br />

M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in Sociology.<br />

To consider and approve the modification <strong>of</strong> title <strong>of</strong> M.Phil/Ph.D. Optional<br />

Course as “Urbanization and Urban Development” in place <strong>of</strong> “Urban<br />

Society”<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> Sociology, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had proposed to modify<br />

the title <strong>of</strong> M.Phil/Ph.D. Optional Course “Urban Society” as “Urbanization<br />

and Urban Development”. The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October 22,2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Director (SOSS) explained the rationality in changing the<br />

title <strong>of</strong> the course.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for modification<br />

<strong>of</strong> title <strong>of</strong> M.Phil./Ph.D. Optional Course as “Urbanization and Urban<br />

Development” in place <strong>of</strong> “Urban Society”.


ITEM NO.25<br />

AC 46.25.1<br />

AC 46.25.2<br />

AC 46.25.3<br />

ITEM NO.26<br />

AC 46.26.1<br />

AC 46.26.2<br />

AC 46.26.3<br />

ITEM NO.27<br />

AC 46.27.1<br />

AC 46.27.2<br />

AC 46.27.3<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for Major Revision <strong>of</strong><br />

BLIS Programme submitted by the Discipline <strong>of</strong> Library & Information<br />

Science.<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> Library & Information Science, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had<br />

submitted Phase Zero Form for major revision <strong>of</strong> Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Library and<br />

Information Science (BLIS) Programme and presented the revised curricula.<br />

The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> the SOSS at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 22 nd October 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Director (SOSS) explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

revised curricula.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for Major<br />

Revision <strong>of</strong> BLIS Programme submitted by the Discipline <strong>of</strong> Library &<br />

Information Science and the Phase Zero Form for the revision <strong>of</strong> the Course<br />

(Annexure-16).<br />

To consider and approve the Evaluation Methodology for different courses<br />

included in the course work for M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in Public<br />

Administration.<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> Public Administration, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted<br />

evaluation methodology for different courses included in the course work for<br />

M.Phil /Ph.D programme in Public Administration. The same was approved by<br />

the School <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October<br />

22, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Director (SOSS) explained the features <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

evaluation methodology.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Evaluation Methodology<br />

(Annexure-17) for different courses included in the course work for<br />

M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in Public Administration.<br />

To consider and approve the Evaluation Methodology for Research<br />

Programme in History.<br />

The faculty <strong>of</strong> History, School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences had submitted evaluation<br />

methodology for different courses included in the course work for M.Phil<br />

/Ph.D programme in History. The same was approved by the School <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences at its 44 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October 22, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Uma Kanjilal, Director (SOSS) explained the features <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

evaluation methodology.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Evaluation Methodology


(Annexure-18) for different courses included in the course work for<br />

M.Phil/Ph.D. Programme in History.<br />

ITEM NO.28<br />

AC 46.28.1<br />

AC 46.28.2<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in approving admission<br />

criteria for the PG Diploma in Food Safety and Quality Management.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture revised the admission criteria<br />

for the PG Diploma in Food Safety and Quality Management. The same was<br />

approved by the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja Programme Coordinator, explained the reasons for revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the eligibility criteria, and its details as given below:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

Science graduates in disciplines like Geography, Statistics with Physics<br />

& Math, Art Subjects and Medical Lab technology and with minimum<br />

three years experience in food processing and / or quality control.<br />

These students should have minimum one year experience in quality<br />

control activities.<br />

Art graduates with Diploma in food science disciplines viz. fruits and<br />

vegetables, dairy technology, meat technology, cereal, pulses and<br />

oilseeds etc. with minimum five years experience in Food Processing/<br />

Food Quality Control and out <strong>of</strong> which two years experience should be<br />

in quality control activities. This shall provide vertical mobility to our<br />

diploma holders.<br />

B.A. Graduates with minimum <strong>of</strong> 7 years experience <strong>of</strong> holding the<br />

senior positioning Government/Semi Government. Units involved in<br />

Food Quality Control.<br />

AC 46.28.3<br />

ITEM NO.29<br />

AC 46.29.1<br />

AC 46.29.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the revised admission criteria for PG Diploma in Food Safety and<br />

Quality Management.<br />

To consider and approve the permission to students <strong>of</strong> M.A.(Education)<br />

to write their Assignments, Term-end Examination and Dissertation in<br />

Hindi Medium.<br />

It was presented that School <strong>of</strong> Education is <strong>of</strong>fering M.A.(Education) in<br />

English medium at present. In view <strong>of</strong> the demand from students, the School<br />

had proposed to permit students <strong>of</strong> M.A. (Education) to write their<br />

assignments, Term-end Examination and Dissertation in Hindi Medium, if<br />

they so desire. The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Education at its 27 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 24 th October, 2008.<br />

Dr. N.K. Dash, Programme Coordinator, explained the rationality <strong>of</strong> the


proposal.<br />

AC 46.29.3<br />

ITEM NO.30<br />

AC 46.30.1<br />

AC 46.30.2<br />

AC. 46.30.3<br />

AC 46.30.4<br />

ITEM NO.31<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Education to permit the Students <strong>of</strong> MA (Education) to write their<br />

assignments, Term-end Examination and Dissertation in Hindi Medium also,<br />

if they so desire.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for revising the programme fees<br />

for all the programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the University<br />

It was presented that the Registrar (SRD) had submitted the proposal for<br />

increasing the programme fees by 20% for all the programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the<br />

University.<br />

Mr. K. Laxman, Registrar (SRD) informed that in order to strengthen the<br />

student support service network <strong>of</strong> the university and to maintain quality in<br />

programme delivery, there is a need for generation <strong>of</strong> more financial<br />

resources. It has become essential in the wake <strong>of</strong> increased expenditure on cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> paper, dispatch <strong>of</strong> material, conduct <strong>of</strong> examination, conduct <strong>of</strong> counseling<br />

and practical sessions etc. to enhance the programmes fee for all the<br />

programmes with effect from July 2009 Admission Cycle.<br />

The Chairman informed the <strong>Council</strong> that additional finances are required to<br />

meet the additional expenditure on implementation <strong>of</strong> revised pay scales <strong>of</strong><br />

the sixth pay Commission, as MHRD is not forthcoming to provide the<br />

required funds. It was also informed that the government is not funding the<br />

University for salary <strong>of</strong> teaching and non-teaching staff and for infrastructure.<br />

The entire expenditure has to be met from the students fees. Even though the<br />

6 th Pay Commission recommendations approved by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> HRD<br />

indicates 80% <strong>of</strong> the additional expenditure from MHRD, a proposal to this<br />

effect from <strong>IGNOU</strong> was declined, stating that <strong>IGNOU</strong> has to meet the entire<br />

expenditure from its own resources. The Chairman assured the <strong>Council</strong> that<br />

the hike in fees will be contextualized by taking into account the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and the type <strong>of</strong> students.<br />

After a detailed discussion, by taking into account all the factors, the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for 20% hike in the<br />

fees for all the Programmes on <strong>of</strong>fer till January 2009 and also for the<br />

programmes to be launched from July 2009. a 50% enhancement in the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

materials and other services/charges to other institutions was also approved.<br />

The Vice Chancellor is authorized to take decision to contextualize the fee<br />

hike across the programmes.<br />

Programme Proposal: B.A. Applied Sign Language Studies for the Deaf.


AC 46.31.1<br />

AC 46.31.2<br />

It was presented that the Inter University Consortium had submitted a proposal<br />

for <strong>of</strong>fering B.A. Programme in Applied Sign Language Studies for the Deaf<br />

in collaboration with the International Centre for Sign Languages and Deaf<br />

Studies (SLanDS Centre) at the University <strong>of</strong> Central Lancashire UClan) in<br />

the U.K.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director, Inter-University Consortium, informed that<br />

the proposal is to deliver the following two new programmes:<br />

1. BA (Hons) in Applied Sign Language Studies (3 year full time<br />

programme) and associated preparatory programme.<br />

2. Foundation Entry for Deaf Students (1 year full time)<br />

These programmes have been developed by the iSLanDS Centre for being<br />

taught in India, beginning in the academic year 2009. Teaching these<br />

programmes will be a collaboration between UCLan and <strong>IGNOU</strong>, and will<br />

involve other partners in India, as necessary for the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme.<br />

AC 46.31.3<br />

ITEM NO.32<br />

AC 46.32.1<br />

AC 46.32.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Programme Proposal for<br />

launching ‘B.A. Applied Sign Language Studies for the Deaf’.<br />

To Consider and approve launch <strong>of</strong> “Certificate Programme in Persian<br />

Language” in Collaboration with lran Cultural House, New Delhi.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Foreign Languages had submitted a proposal for approval to<br />

launch the “Certificate Programme in Persian Language” on pilot basis in<br />

collaboration with the Iran Cultural House, New Delhi.<br />

It was informed that the Vice-Chancellor considered the proposal to develop<br />

and launch a certificate Programme in Persian Language in collaboration with<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> on pilot basis to collect feedback on development and launch <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Certificate through Distance mode in future. A meeting convened with Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Abdolhamid Ziaei, Iran Cultural House, New Delhi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Azhar Dehlvi, JNU,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Akhtar Mahdi, JNU and Director, International Division, <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

recommended the following for consideration:<br />

1) In the first phase, <strong>IGNOU</strong> may like to <strong>of</strong>fer the programme as “Pilot<br />

Project” in F2F mode where Iran Cultural House will act as Study Centre<br />

in Delhi and later in Hyderabad and Mumbai.<br />

2) The Pilot Programme will follow the laid down credit norms <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

for a certificate programme comprising <strong>of</strong> 4 courses.<br />

3) For Pilot intake <strong>of</strong> 30 students can be taken. The Study materials for pilot<br />

project will be provided by ICH and later will become basis for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> certificate programme.


The Vice-Chancellor considered and approved the above recommendations<br />

and <strong>IGNOU</strong> signed a MoU with Iran Cultural House, New Delhi on January 2,<br />

2009.<br />

AC 46.32.3<br />

ITEM NO.33<br />

AC 46.33.1<br />

AC 46.33.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal to launch<br />

Certificate Programme in Persian Language on pilot basis with effect from<br />

January, 2009.<br />

To consider shifting <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Business Process Outsourcing<br />

(DBPO) programme from School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies<br />

to School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training and revised programme<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> DBPO- Finance and Accounting(DBPO – FA).<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training (SOVET) had submitted a<br />

proposal for shifting <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in Business Process Outsourcing (DBPO)<br />

programme from School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies to School <strong>of</strong><br />

Vocational Education and Training and approval <strong>of</strong> revised programme<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> ‘Diploma in Business Process Outsourcing - Finance and<br />

Accounting (DBPO – FA)’.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, informed that the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

SOVET at its 5 th <strong>Meeting</strong> noted the approval <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor for<br />

shifting <strong>of</strong> the DBPO Programme being developed by the School <strong>of</strong> Extension<br />

and Development Studies to SOVET. The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET at its 6 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on January 12, 2009 also approved the revised course structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the DBPO-FA.<br />

AC 46.33.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved shifting <strong>of</strong> the Diploma in<br />

Business Process Outsourcing (DBPO) programme from School <strong>of</strong> Extension<br />

and Development Studies to School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training and<br />

also the revised programme structure <strong>of</strong> ‘Diploma in Business Process<br />

Outsourcing - Finance and Accounting (DBPO – FA)’.<br />

ITEM NO. 34 To Consider Phase-3 Form for the following three programmes: (1)<br />

Certificate in Spoken English & Personality Development, (2) Advanced<br />

Certificate in Spoken English & Personality Development, and (3)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Certificate in Spoken English & Personality Development.<br />

AC 46.34.1<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational and Education Training (SOVET) had submitted<br />

Phase-3 Forms for Certificate in Spoken English & Personality Development,<br />

Advanced Certificate in Spoken English & Personality Development and<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Certificate in Spoken English & Personality Development, in a<br />

modular form providing vertical mobility to students from certificate to<br />

advanced certificate and pr<strong>of</strong>essional certificate. At the same time, the<br />

programmes are stand alone providing space for direct entry. The same was


approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET in its 6 th meeting held on January<br />

12, 2009.<br />

AC 46.34.2<br />

AC 46.34.3<br />

ITEM NO.35<br />

AC 46.35.1<br />

AC 46.35.2<br />

AC 46.35.3<br />

ITEM NO.36<br />

AC 46.36.1<br />

AC 46.36.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> these<br />

programmes and informed that the SOVET will develop and <strong>of</strong>fer in<br />

collaboration with the Confederation <strong>of</strong> Indian Industries (CII) as per the MoU<br />

already signed. The proposed dates <strong>of</strong> launch are April l5, 2009 for<br />

Certificate, June 15, 2009 for Advanced Certificate and August 15, 2009 for<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Certificate.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Forms<br />

(Annexure-18A) for the three programmes. viz., (1) Certificate in Spoken<br />

English & Personality Development, (2) Advanced Certificate in Spoken<br />

English & Personality Development, and (3) Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Certificate in<br />

Spoken English & Personality Development in modular form.<br />

To consider and approve Phase-3 form for the following two Programmes:<br />

(1) Certificate in Air Ticketing, and (2) Certificate in Airline In–Flight<br />

Services.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training (SOVET) had submitted<br />

Phase-3 Forms for two programmes viz., Certificate in Air Ticketing and<br />

Certificate in Airline In– Flight Services. The same was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET in its 6 th meeting held on January 12, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

certificate programmes which are being <strong>of</strong>fered in collaboration with<br />

Confederation <strong>of</strong> Indian Industries (CII) as per the MoU already signed. The<br />

proposed date <strong>of</strong> launch <strong>of</strong> the programmes is April l5, 2009. During<br />

discussion, the Programme Coordinator also justified the higher fee being<br />

proposed for the programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Forms<br />

(Annexure-19) for the two certificate programmes viz. Certificate in Air<br />

Ticketing, and Certificate in Airline In–Flight Services.<br />

To Consider Phase-3 Form for the following two certificate programmes:<br />

(1) Certificate in Travel Agency Operations, and (2) Certificate in Tour<br />

Guiding Skills.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training (SOVET) had submitted<br />

Phase-3 Forms for Certificate in Travel Agency Operations and Certificate in<br />

Tour Guiding Skills, proposed to be <strong>of</strong>fered in collaboration with<br />

Confederation <strong>of</strong> Indian Industries (CII). The same was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET in its 6 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on January 12, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the


programmes in detail and informed that that these certificate programmes<br />

connects employability in Travel Sector including Travel Agencies. The<br />

proposed date <strong>of</strong> launch is May 15, 2009. During discussion the Programme<br />

Coordinator also justified the higher fees for the programmes.<br />

AC 46.36.3<br />

ITEM No.37<br />

AC 46.37.1<br />

AC 46.37.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Forms<br />

(Annexure-20) for the two certificate programmes viz., (1) Certificate in<br />

Travel Agency Operations, and (2) Certificate in Tour Guiding Skills.<br />

To Consider and approve Phase-3 Form for the following three<br />

programmes: (1) Certificate in Security Management, (2) Advanced<br />

Certificate in Security Management, and (3) Diploma in Security<br />

Management.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training (SOVET) had submitted<br />

Phase-3 Forms for three certificate programmes viz., Certificate in Security<br />

Management, Advanced Certificate in Security Management and Diploma in<br />

Security Management, in a modular form. These programmes are being<br />

proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer in collaboration with Confederation <strong>of</strong> Indian Industries<br />

(CII) as per the MoU signed. The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

SOVET in its Sixth <strong>Meeting</strong> held on January 12, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

programmes. The Programmes are modular providing space for vertical<br />

mobility to the students from Certificate to Advanced Certificate and from<br />

Advanced Certificate to Diploma. At the same time they are stand alone<br />

providing space for direct entry.<br />

AC 46.37.3<br />

ITEM No.38<br />

AC 46.38.1<br />

AC 46.38.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Forms<br />

(Annexure-21) for the following three programmes: (1) Certificate in Security<br />

Management, (2) Advanced Certificate in Security Management, and (3)<br />

Diploma in Security Management, in a modular form.<br />

To Consider and approve Phase-3 Form for the following three<br />

programmes: (1) Certificate in Fire-Safety and Rescue, (2) Advanced<br />

Certificate in Fire-Safety and (3) Diploma in Fire-Safety.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training (SOVET) had submitted<br />

Phase-3 Forms for three programmes: (1) Certificate in Fire-Safety and<br />

Rescue, (2) Advanced Certificate in Fire-Safety and (3) Diploma in Fire-<br />

Safety, in a modular form. These are being proposed to be <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />

collaboration with Confederation <strong>of</strong> Indian Industries (CII), as per the MoU<br />

signed. The same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOVET in its Sixth<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on January 12, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the


Programmes. The Programmes are modular providing space for vertical<br />

mobility to the students from Certificate to Advanced Certificate and from<br />

Advanced Certificate to Diploma. At the same time the programmes are<br />

stand alone providing space for direct entry.<br />

AC 46.38.3<br />

ITEM No.39<br />

AC 46.39.1<br />

C 46.39.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Forms<br />

(Annexure-22) for the three programmes: (1) Certificate in Fire-Safety and<br />

Rescue, (2) Advanced Certificate in Fire-Safety, and (3) Diploma in Fire-<br />

Safety, in modular form.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor to ensure parity in<br />

Eligibility Criteria for Admission to Management Programme.<br />

It was presented that <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee at its 27 th<br />

meeting held on 25 th August 2008 approved separate eligibility criteria for<br />

admission to Management Programmes under Convergence Scheme and<br />

regular scheme through RCs. To ensure parity in eligibility criteria for students<br />

directly admitted by the University through RCs and the students admitted by<br />

the Partner Institutions under Convergence Scheme, a clause “Graduates who<br />

have successfully cleared the entrance test for admission into the Management<br />

Programme conducted by the institutions like CAT, MAT State level tests<br />

conducted by State governments etc. need not sit for the OPENMAT Entrance<br />

Test” was included in the advertisement released for OPENMAT - XXV<br />

scheduled to be held on February 1, 2009. This was done with the approval <strong>of</strong><br />

the Vice Chancellor. Now this action taken by the Vice Chancellor is<br />

presented for ratification <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS informed that the draft advertisement<br />

copy sent by SED to the School for vetting did not include the proposed<br />

change, where as the final advertisement was released after incorporating the<br />

change. Therefore, Management Faculty is not aware <strong>of</strong> the proposed change<br />

in the eligibility criteria. Hence, she suggested to get the views <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Management Faculty regarding the proposed change. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B. Khanna,<br />

SOMS said that his suggestion was to maintain parity with regard to the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> marks in graduation prescribed for admission under<br />

convergence scheme, but not the with reference to the admission test as stated<br />

in the agenda note. He further said that in the case <strong>of</strong> admission test<br />

conducted by other organizations, there is no cut <strong>of</strong> marks prescribed. They<br />

normally indicate the percentile <strong>of</strong> each candidate. Therefore, it is necessary<br />

for <strong>IGNOU</strong> to specify the cut <strong>of</strong> marks/percentile obtained by the candidates<br />

in the qualifying exams other than OPENMAT for admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

Management Programme.


AC 46.39.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice Chancellor to<br />

extend admission criteria for Management Programme applicable to<br />

candidates under convergence scheme to the candidates seeking admission in<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> directly through Regional Centres.<br />

It is further decided to determine cut <strong>of</strong>f marks/percentiles to be obtained by<br />

the candidates in the qualifying exams other than OPENMAT for admission<br />

to <strong>IGNOU</strong> Management Programme. Registrar (SED) shall decide this in<br />

consultation with Director, SOMS and Registrar, SRD, and submit to the<br />

Vice-Chancellor for approval.<br />

ITEM NO.40<br />

AC 46.40.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal on revision <strong>of</strong> fee for various<br />

services rendered to students for different activities pertaining to<br />

evaluation.<br />

Registrar, Students Evaluation Division (SED), had proposed revision <strong>of</strong> fees<br />

for various services rendered to the students for different activities pertaining<br />

to evaluation. It is the policy <strong>of</strong> the University to revisit the fee for various<br />

services at regular intervals.<br />

AC 46.40.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the revised fees (50%<br />

enhancement) for various services rendered to the students for different<br />

activities pertaining to evaluation at Annexure-23.<br />

ITEM NO.41<br />

AC 46.41.1<br />

AC 46.41.2<br />

AC 46.41.3<br />

ITEM No.42<br />

AC 46.42.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal on introduction <strong>of</strong> walk-inexamination<br />

system.<br />

The Registrar, Students Evaluation Division (SED), had submitted a proposal<br />

for introduction <strong>of</strong> walk-in-examination system along with modalities for the<br />

same.<br />

Dr. Srikanth Mohapatra, Registrar, SED explained the proposal in detail.<br />

During the discussion, the members opined that the appropriate nomenclature<br />

for this should be ‘on-demand-examination’.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal along with the<br />

modalities (Annexure-24) for introduction <strong>of</strong> on-demand-examination.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for revision <strong>of</strong> Rules and<br />

Regulations for re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> term-end answer scripts.<br />

The Registrar, Students Evaluation Division (SED), had proposed for revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rules and Regulations for re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> term-end examination answer<br />

scripts.


AC 46.42.2<br />

AC 46.42.3<br />

ITEM NO.43<br />

AC 46.43.1<br />

AC 46.43.2<br />

AC 46.43.4<br />

AC 46.43.3<br />

ITEM NO.44<br />

The Registrar, SED explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the proposal in detail.<br />

As per the existing Rules and Regulations for re-evaluation, better <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

scores <strong>of</strong> original marks/grade and marks/grade after re-evaluation is<br />

considered. Now the proposal is that in case the student gets less<br />

marks/grade in the re-evaluation the original marks/grade will be retained. In<br />

case the students gets higher marks/grade in re-evaluation, the average <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two scores will be awarded.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the Scheme <strong>of</strong> re-evaluation was introduced in<br />

June, 2007 Term End Examination (TEE) only. It is felt that some more<br />

experience is required before any modification or alteration is made in the<br />

existing scheme. Therefore, item is deferred for the present.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for Bachelor Degree<br />

Programme in Philosophy (B.A Philosophy).<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities had submitted the Phase-3<br />

Form for Bachelor in Philosophy (B.A. in Philosophy) Programme, as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the BDP Programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH and Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Gracious Thomas, Coordinator, CBCI Chair are the Proposer and<br />

Coordinators <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj informed that the programme is being launched by<br />

CBCI Chair along with School <strong>of</strong> Humanities as the discipline <strong>of</strong> Philosophy<br />

was assigned to it. As the programme is to be launched from July, 2009,<br />

the Vice-Chancellor had approved the Phase-3 Form for the said programme.<br />

This programme will be part <strong>of</strong> the BDP programme and one has to complete<br />

48% credit <strong>of</strong> elective courses in discipline <strong>of</strong> Philosophy to qualify for B.A.<br />

in Philosophy (as major).<br />

During the discussions the members opined to operationalise the Discipline<br />

<strong>of</strong> Philosophy in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities by creating core faculty positions.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for B.A.<br />

in Philosophy and recommended for operationalisation <strong>of</strong> the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />

Philosophy in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities by creating core faculty <strong>of</strong> one<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, one Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and one Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Engineering &<br />

Technology for modification <strong>of</strong> admission eligibility for Post Graduate<br />

Certificate in Project Management (PGCPM), an online programme<br />

launched under <strong>IGNOU</strong>-PMA-CEPM Project.


AC 46.44.1<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology submitted a<br />

proposal for modification <strong>of</strong> admission eligibility for Post Graduate<br />

Certificate in Project Management (PGCPM), an online programme launched<br />

under <strong>IGNOU</strong>-PMA-CEPM Project.<br />

AC 46.44.2 Dr. Manoj Kulshrestha, Reader, SOET explained the rationality in<br />

proposing modifications in the eligibility criteria for admission to PHCPM.<br />

He clarified that this proposal was not placed before the School Board.<br />

AC 46.44.3 After discussions, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided to refer the item to the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> SOET as the matter was not deliberated by the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Board.<br />

ITEM NO.45<br />

AC 46.45.1<br />

AC 46.45.2<br />

To consider and approve the phase-3 Form for Ph.D. Programme in Life<br />

Sciences.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had submitted the Phase-3 Form<br />

for Ph.D. Programme in Life Sciences. The same was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Sciences at its 38 th meeting held on November 21,<br />

2008.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form<br />

(Annexure-25) for Ph.D. in Life Sciences.<br />

Arising out <strong>of</strong> these discussions, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also approved the<br />

proposal <strong>of</strong> declaring all Schools and Centres <strong>of</strong> the University having a core<br />

academic staff with Ph.D. and other research qualifications as Recognized<br />

Centres for Ph.D. These Schools and Centres with a minimum <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

recognized research guides and faculty members with research<br />

qualifications can start Ph.D. programmes with the approval <strong>of</strong> the internal<br />

School/Centre level research/doctoral Committees.<br />

ITEM NO.46 To consider and approve the concept note for Associate Degree<br />

Programme through Community Colleges.<br />

AC 46.46.1<br />

The Chairman circulated the concept note on Associate Degree Programme<br />

through Community Colleges and explained the proposal in detail. The<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges as an integral part <strong>of</strong> the higher<br />

education is popular internationally. Approximately 44% <strong>of</strong> all under<br />

graduates in the US study in Community Colleges. The Open University,<br />

U.K., Hong Kong Open University and Philippines Open University also <strong>of</strong>fer


associate degrees through Community Colleges. The concept <strong>of</strong> Community<br />

Colleges is gaining importance in India also. According to the latest report,<br />

there are more than 100 Community Colleges exists in all over India,<br />

including 20 in Chennai. Offer <strong>of</strong> Associate Degrees will certainly help the<br />

University in widening the accessibility <strong>of</strong> its programmes.<br />

AC.46.46.2<br />

AC46.46.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> discussed at length the concept paper and the system<br />

proposed for <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> Associate Degree Programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> through<br />

Community Colleges. The initiatives taken by the Vice-Chancellor, to<br />

introduce this innovative concept <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges in India, has been<br />

appreciated and welcomed by the members.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the system proposed for<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> Associate Degree Programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> through Community<br />

Colleges and authorized the Vice-Chancellor to take all necessary steps for<br />

implementing the scheme. A copy <strong>of</strong> the concept note is annexed (Annexure-<br />

26).<br />

Item No. 47<br />

AC.46.47.1<br />

Under any other item, with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Chair, the following<br />

items were discussed and decided.<br />

Dr. V.V. Reddy informed that the Diploma in Retailing is presently on <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

in English medium only. There is demand from the students to permit them to<br />

write the assignments and TEE in Hindi medium also. Therefore, he<br />

proposed to accept the demand <strong>of</strong> the students.<br />

As decided in Item No.29 with regard to M.A. in Education, the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> decided to permit the students across the Board to<br />

write Assignments and Term End Examination in Hindi medium in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the programmes which are <strong>of</strong>fered in English medium only.<br />

AC.46.47.2 The Chairman informed that in the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism Hospitality and<br />

Services Sectoral Management, all the faculty appointed so far are with the<br />

specialization in the area <strong>of</strong> Tourism. Hence there is a requirement <strong>of</strong> at least<br />

one person with specialization in Hospitality area. Therefore, he proposed to<br />

create a post <strong>of</strong> Reader with specialization in Hospitality area in SOTSSM.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved creation a post <strong>of</strong> Reader<br />

with specialization in Hospitality area in SOTSSM.<br />

AC.46.47.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Omprakash Mishra, Pro-Vice Chancellor explained that the School <strong>of</strong>


Visual and Performing Arts comprises <strong>of</strong> various forms <strong>of</strong> Visual and<br />

Performing Arts. The core faculty <strong>of</strong> one Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Two Reader and four<br />

Lecturers already sanctioned and recruited is not sufficient to cover fully<br />

even the main branches <strong>of</strong> the Visual and Performing Arts. Therefore, there is<br />

need to create additional faculty positions to cover the remaining branches.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the above, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> recommended creation <strong>of</strong><br />

additional faculty positions <strong>of</strong> one Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, two Readers and four<br />

Lecturers in the School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY SEVENTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

28 TH February 2009<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY SEVENTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON FEBRUARY 28, 2009 AT 11.30 A.M. IN THE<br />

CONFERENCE ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW<br />

DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

160. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

161. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

162. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

163. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R.Srivathsan, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

164. Dr. D.K. Chaudhry, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

165. Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

166. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

167. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

168. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

169. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

170. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

171. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

172. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

173. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

174. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

175. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

176. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, Director, SOA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

177. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, Director, SOVET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

178. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

179. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

180. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Savita Singh, Director, SOGS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

181. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

182. Dr. Harkirat Bains, Director (I/c), SOTHSSM - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

183. Shri. Vikas Kumar Singh, Director (I/c), SOFL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

184. Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

185. Dr. Ravi Sharma, Director (I/c), SOPVA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

186. Sh. S.K. Arora, Librarian - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

187. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B. Khanna, SOMS - Member<br />

188. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pity Koul, SOHS - Member<br />

189. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Majhi, SOET - Member<br />

190. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader SOCE - Member<br />

191. Dr. S.K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

192. Dr. Sutapa Bose, Lecturer, SOE - Member<br />

193. Shri M.P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

194. Shri Z. Yanthan, Lecturer, SOSS - Member<br />

195. Sh. V.V. Subrahmanyam, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

196. Dr. O.P. Sharma, Director, NCIDE - Member


197. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhu Prahar, Director, IUC - Member<br />

198. Dr. Hemlata, Director, NCDS - Member<br />

199. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh - Member<br />

200. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammad Miyan - Member<br />

201. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.M. Moudgalya - Member<br />

202. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi Singh - Member<br />

203. Dr. V. Venugopal Reddy - Member<br />

204. Shri. Ravi Kant - Member<br />

205. Dr. Babu P. Ramesh, Director (I/c) - Member<br />

206. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.V. Narasimham, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SED and Shri K. Laxman, Registrar, SRD and<br />

Shri. U.S. Tolia, Registrar, (Admn.) attended the meeting as Special Invitees.<br />

Shri K.D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist the Member-<br />

Secretary.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra Dev, Pr<strong>of</strong>. George Mathew, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Jain,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.N. Maheshwari, Dr. D.K. Dutta Majumdar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ramamohan<br />

Rao, Dr. K.B. Peter and Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddey could not attend the meeting.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 47 th Special<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> convened for approving matters relating to 20 th<br />

Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University. He informed that the University is a world <strong>of</strong> learning,<br />

knowledge and skills but not just for obtaining degrees and certificates. The <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

main objective is to serve the education in the remote areas in its quest for reaching the<br />

un-reached.<br />

The Chairman thanked and placed on record significant contributions made by the<br />

outgoing members Pr<strong>of</strong> N. Balakrishnana, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Trilochan Pradhan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K.V.<br />

Subramanian, Dr. S.S. Rathi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.K. Mohammad Yusuff, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sridhar Gadre, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

S. Sadagopan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kamlesh Mohan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vijay Kapur, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kapila Vatsyayan, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Anil Bhattacharya, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Arvind Kumar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Siva Kumar and Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Thangamuthu.<br />

He welcomed the new members Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Savita Singh, Director, SOGS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bikram Kesheri Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS, Shri.<br />

Vikas Kumar Singh, Director (I/c), SOFL Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST,<br />

Dr. Ravi Sharma, Director (I/c), SOPVA, Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P. Sharma, Director (I/c), NCIDE, Dr.<br />

Hemlata, Director (I/c), NCDA, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhu Prahar, Director (I/c), IUC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.<br />

Mukunda, Honorary Porfessor, Centre for High Energy Physics, IISc., Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra<br />

Dev, Chairman, Commission for Agricultural Cost & Prices, Delhi, Dr. George Mathew,<br />

Director, IISSc, Delhi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Jain, CEO & Secretary, Institute <strong>of</strong> Company<br />

Secretaries <strong>of</strong> India, Delhi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh, Ex-Director (Extension), G.B. Pant<br />

Agriculture & Technical University, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi, Department <strong>of</strong> English, School <strong>of</strong>


Humanities, University <strong>of</strong> Hyderabad, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.N. Maheshwari, Department <strong>of</strong> Computer<br />

Science & Engineering, IIT, Delhi, Dr. D.K. Datta Majumder, Kolkata, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Ramamohan Rao, Andhra University, Vishakhapatnam, Dr. K.V. Peter, Member<br />

Secretary, World Noni Research Foundation, Tamilnadu, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammad Miyan, Jamia<br />

Millia Islamia, Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy, (Former VC, Andhra University), Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Kannan M. Moudgalya, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemical Engineering, IIT Mumbai, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi<br />

Singh, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Noida and requested the members <strong>of</strong> the council<br />

to introduce themselves to the other council members.<br />

Then the Chairman asked the Member Secretary to present the agenda. The<br />

Member Secretary informed that the all the items on agenda have been received from<br />

Registrar, Student Evaluation Division and are related to 20 th Convocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University to be held on 28 th February 2009. He then requested Dr. Srikant Mohapatra,<br />

Registrar, SED to present the agenda items. The following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 47.1.1<br />

To consider and approve the award <strong>of</strong> degrees/diploma/certificates in<br />

the 20 th convocation.<br />

Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registar, SED informed that the 20 th Convocation<br />

scheduled to be held on 28 th February 2009 at 3.00 P.M. and 137354<br />

students have successfully completed degree / diploma / certificate<br />

programmes in December, 2007 and June, 2008 Term End Examinations.<br />

AC 47.1.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Annexure – 1<br />

showing the students eligible for award <strong>of</strong> degrees / diplomas / certificates<br />

at the 20 th Convocation.<br />

ITEM NO. 2 To consider and approve the award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals in the 20 th<br />

Convocation.<br />

AC 47.2.1 Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registar, SED informed that 63 students are<br />

identified for award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals in different programmes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University. He also informed that the Gold Medals for MARD and M.Sc.<br />

(DFSM) could not be awarded to the eligible candidates n the 19 th<br />

Convocation since the session started late resulting in delay in declaration<br />

<strong>of</strong> their results. Therefore, the eligible candidates for the award <strong>of</strong> Gold<br />

Medals in the above two programmes in 19 th Convocation are being given<br />

the Gold Medals in the 20 th Convocation. He informed that two candidates<br />

securing the same marks have been identified for award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals<br />

in B.Ed. Programmes. The Gold Medals could not be awarded in the<br />

programmes, Diploma in Women’s Empoerment and Development<br />

(DWED), Postgraduate Diploma in Higher Education (PGDHE),<br />

Advanced Diploma in Water Resources Engineering (ADWRE), B.Tech.<br />

Civil (Water Resource Engineering) – BTWRE, Master <strong>of</strong> Science<br />

(Hospitality Administration) –MHA, Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Computer Applications<br />

(BCA), Master <strong>of</strong> Arts (Distance Education) – MADE, B.Tech. Civil<br />

(Construction Management) – BTCM, Advanced Diploma in


AC 47.2.2<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 47.3.1<br />

AC 47.3.2<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 47.4.1<br />

AC 47.4.2<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 47.5.1<br />

AC 47.5.2<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 47.6.1<br />

AC 47.6.2<br />

Construction Management (ADCM)<br />

To consider and approve the award <strong>of</strong> Ph.D. at the 20 th Convocation.<br />

To consider and approve the list <strong>of</strong> candidates found meritorious for<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals/Silver Medals and other Cash Award at<br />

the 20 th Convocation.<br />

To consider and approve the additional list <strong>of</strong> candidates eligible for<br />

award <strong>of</strong> Degrees/Diplomas/Certificates in the earlier Convocations<br />

and being reported in the 20 th Convocation.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the VC in approving award <strong>of</strong> Gold<br />

Medal for a student <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. Programme for the 19 th Convocation.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY EIGHT MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

24 TH April 2009


INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY EIGHTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON APRIL 24, 2009 AT 02.00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE<br />

ROOM, BLOCK-8, <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

207. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

208. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

209. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

210. Dr. D. K. Chaudhry, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

211. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

212. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

213. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

214. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

215. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

216. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

217. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

218. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

219. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

220. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, Director, SOA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

221. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, Director, SOVET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

222. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

223. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

224. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

225. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunil Kumar, Director, SOPVA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

226. Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

227. Dr. Babu P. Ramesh, Director (I/c), SOIDTDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

228. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. B. Khanna, SOMS - Member<br />

229. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Majhi, SOET - Member<br />

230. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

231. Dr. S. K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

232. Dr. Jaswant Sokhi, Reader, SOS - Member<br />

233. Shri Z. Yanthan, Lecturer, SOSS - Member<br />

234. Sh. V. V. Subrahmanyam, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

235. Dr. O. P. Sharma, Director (I/c), NCIDE - Member<br />

236. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhu Prahar, Director (I/c), IUC - Member<br />

237. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. P. Singh - Member<br />

238. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammad Miyan - Member<br />

239. Dr. K. V. Peter - Member<br />

240. Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy - Member<br />

241. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ram Mohan Rao - Member<br />

242. Shri. Ravi Kanth - Member<br />

243. Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SED - Member


244. Shri K. Laxman, OSD, SRD - Member<br />

245. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. V. Narasimham, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Shri K. D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist the Member-<br />

Secretary.<br />

Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. R. Srivasthan, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. L. Koul, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pitty<br />

Koul, Dr. Sutapa Bose, Lecturer, SOE, Shri M. P. Mishra, Lecturer, Dr. S. K. Arora,<br />

Librarain, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra Dev, Pr<strong>of</strong>. George Mathew, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. K.<br />

Jain, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. N. Maheshwari, Dr. D. K. Dutta Majumdar, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Khannan Moudgalya, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi Singh and Dr. V. Vennugopal Reddy could not attend<br />

the meeting.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Annu J. Thomas, Dr. Sonia Sharma, Dr. Vikas Singh attended the meeting<br />

as representatives <strong>of</strong> the Directors <strong>of</strong> SOGDS, SOTHSM and SOFL.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman extended warm welcome to the members to the 48 th<br />

Special <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> convened for considering new initiatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

New Schools. He welcomed the new member Dr. Jaswant Sokhi, Reader, SOS. He also<br />

welcomed and introduced Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.V. Peter, Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ram<br />

Mohan Rao who are attending the meeting for the first time.<br />

The Chairman informed the Members that the ten new Schools had started<br />

functioning with the initially appointed core faculty. These Schools have submitted a set <strong>of</strong><br />

new initiatives. This Special <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is called for to discuss these<br />

proposals. Particularly, the proposals to start Post Graduate programmes on campus fulltime,<br />

a new dimension in the academic activities <strong>of</strong> the university, needs a thorough<br />

discussion by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. It was noted in this connection that even though<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering full-time regular programmes on the main campus is a new initiative, <strong>IGNOU</strong> has<br />

been conducting several face-to-face under-graduate and post-graduate programmes in<br />

specialized areas in collaboration with Government Agencies and National Laboratories.<br />

These include B. Sc in Nautical Science, Integrated M. Sc. in Physics, M. Sc in Dietetics<br />

and Food Services Management, B. Sc. in Hospitality and Hotel Management (BHM),<br />

B.A. in International Administration and all the post-graduate programmes in Medicine<br />

from the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences.<br />

There are numerous enquiries from industry, corporates, research institutions and<br />

Governmental agencies to <strong>of</strong>fer direct teaching programmes with openness and flexibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> ODL system by making use <strong>of</strong> their experimental facilities and physical infrastructure.<br />

The best <strong>of</strong> experts from pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies and research institutions also expressed their<br />

desire to participate in teaching and research activities <strong>of</strong> the University. Therefore, the<br />

University may explore the scope for networking and collaboration with such institutions to<br />

cater to the educational needs <strong>of</strong> diverse groups <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

Conventional Universities became duel mode universities by launching distance<br />

mode programmes. Similarly, the major Open Universities including the U.K. Open


University, Hong Kong Open University, and Open University <strong>of</strong> Canada are conducting<br />

full-time post-graduate courses and research programmes by creating state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art<br />

laboratories and through collaboration with industrial and national research establishments.<br />

The proposals for starting specialized post-graduate programmes in selected areas<br />

were considered in detail. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> emphasized the need <strong>of</strong> providing<br />

adequate space, infrastructure, laboratory and library facilities, and the required number<br />

<strong>of</strong> teachers to teach all the subjects. The Vice-Chancellor ensured that the Schools will<br />

be provided with sufficient number <strong>of</strong> teachers in conformity with the national norms for<br />

post-graduate teaching departments in any conventional University. In this context, it<br />

was noted that each <strong>of</strong> the Schools and major disciplines in the University have more<br />

than 7 Pr<strong>of</strong>essors/Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essors/Assistants Pr<strong>of</strong>essors, several full-time<br />

Consultants, and dozens <strong>of</strong> full-time Post-Graduate Research and Teaching<br />

Assistantships (RTAs) whose teaching capabilities can be effectively made use <strong>of</strong> for<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering these programmes. It was also resolved to <strong>of</strong>fer a specific number <strong>of</strong> merit<br />

scholarships to the PG full-time students. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after detailed<br />

deliberations approved the initiative <strong>of</strong> the University to <strong>of</strong>fer Campus-based full-time<br />

programmes from July, 2009 session onwards.<br />

Then the Chairman asked the Member Secretary to present the agenda. The<br />

following agenda were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 48.1.1<br />

AC 48.1.2<br />

AC 48.1.3<br />

Ratification <strong>of</strong> approval by Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer M.A.<br />

in Gender and Development Studies (With exit point for PG Diploma<br />

in Gender and Development Studies) in the face-to-face mode.<br />

The Member Secretary presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Gender and<br />

Development Studies proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Gender &<br />

Development Studies in the face-to-face mode from July, 2009. The<br />

School proposed a modular programme with a PG Diploma in Gender &<br />

Development Studies after completion <strong>of</strong> the 1 st year <strong>of</strong> study and Master<br />

Degree after completion <strong>of</strong> 2 years <strong>of</strong> study. The School Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies approved the proposal in its<br />

meeting held on April 6, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anu J. Thomas, SOGDS presented that the 1 st year <strong>of</strong> study shall<br />

comprise <strong>of</strong> compulsory courses and choice based elective courses in the<br />

2 nd year <strong>of</strong> study. Wherever possible, existing courses will be packaged in<br />

the programme.<br />

During discussion, members expressed the view that in face-to-face mode<br />

normally there is no maximum period beyond the actual duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme. In this case, minimum period <strong>of</strong> two years and maximum<br />

period <strong>of</strong> five years prescribed. The issue related to number <strong>of</strong> students<br />

to be admitted has also been discussed. The members desired to know the<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the curriculum.


AC 48.1.4<br />

AC 48.1.5<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 48.2.1<br />

AC 48.2.2<br />

AC 48.2.3<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 48.3.1<br />

AC 48.3.2<br />

It was clarified by the Chairman that maximum <strong>of</strong> 20 students will be<br />

admitted in the first batch. All the details <strong>of</strong> the curriculum and the<br />

programme structure will be worked out by the faculty in consultation<br />

with the experts and will be finalized by the School Board. He clarified<br />

that there is no need <strong>of</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> phase-to-phase proposals in case <strong>of</strong><br />

face-to-face programmes, as is done for distance mode programmes. The<br />

detailed syllabus and examination procedures need to be finalized by the<br />

School Board and approved by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal to launch M.A. in Gender<br />

& Development Studies by the SOGDS in modular approach by <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

PG Diploma in Gender & Development Studies after completion <strong>of</strong> the 1 st<br />

year <strong>of</strong> study and Master Degree after completion <strong>of</strong> 2 years <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form for the Diploma in<br />

Modern Office Practices.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

submitted Phase-3 Form for Diploma in Modern Office Practices. The<br />

same was approved by the 5 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> the SOVET<br />

held on December 17, 2008.<br />

Mr. Sunil Kumar, P&DD, who is the Programme Coordinator, presented<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the programme. Members expressed the view that, in view <strong>of</strong><br />

the decision <strong>of</strong> the 46 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, Phase-3 Form<br />

need not be presented for its approval. The School Board concerned shall<br />

approve the Phase-3 Form and report to the AC before launching the<br />

programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase-3 Form for the<br />

Diploma in Modern Office Practices.<br />

To consider and approve the Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Translation Studies.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Translation Studies proposes to launch<br />

Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Translation Studies from July, 2009 in the face-to-face<br />

mode. This was decided by the faculty in a meeting with the Vice-<br />

Chancellor, held on 9 th April, 2009.<br />

Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTS presented that the School<br />

proposes to admit 20 students and the programme shall be <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />

semester system. He informed that an Expert Committee will develop the<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the curriculum and programme structure. He sought the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to launch the programme from July,<br />

2009.


AC 48.3.3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 48.4.1<br />

AC 48.4.2<br />

AC 48.4.3<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 48.5.1<br />

AC 48.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the launching <strong>of</strong> MA in<br />

Translation Studies in face-to-face mode from July, 2009. The detailed<br />

programme structure shall be worked out by an Expert Committee and<br />

approved by the School Board.<br />

To consider and approve Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Extension and<br />

Development Studies.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Extension & Development Studies<br />

proposed to launch Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Extension and Development Studies<br />

in face-to-face mode from July, 2009. The School sought in principle<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS shared the views <strong>of</strong> the faculty<br />

regarding the proposed programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh asked clarification<br />

regarding the target group and the prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> the students who<br />

join the programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pattanaik clarified that the School proposes to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer the programme with the basic objective <strong>of</strong> covering all types <strong>of</strong><br />

extension activities relevant to development. Therefore, graduates in<br />

selected disciplines shall be eligible for admission. It was further clarified<br />

that an expert committee will decide the detailed programme structure and<br />

the curriculum, and all the issues raised by the members will be<br />

deliberated by the Expert Committee while designing the programme.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor suggested that Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh may also be<br />

included in the Expert Committee to design the programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved launching <strong>of</strong> Master <strong>of</strong><br />

Arts in Extension and Development Studies in face-to-face mode from<br />

July, 2009.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal to place the Discipline <strong>of</strong><br />

Sustainable Development under the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and<br />

Trans-disciplinary Studies.<br />

It was presented that the Chair for Sustainable is a University level Chair,<br />

cutting across disciplines and Schools. The Chair is promoting research<br />

and education in environmental, economic, technological and social<br />

components <strong>of</strong> development programmes and policies which is the need<br />

<strong>of</strong> the hour. The eminent agriculture scientist Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.S. Swaminathan is<br />

the Honorary Chair. It is proposed to create a Discipline <strong>of</strong> Sustainable<br />

Development in the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary<br />

Studies.<br />

During the discussion, it was pointed out that the School is basically<br />

interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary, therefore, can very much cover<br />

any discipline, including sustainable development. The need to create a


new discipline <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Development in the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies was deliberated upon.<br />

AC 48.5.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> opined that there is no need to create a new<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> ‘Sustainable Development’.<br />

TABLED ITEMS<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 48.6.1<br />

AC 48.6.2<br />

AC 48.6.3<br />

To report the Phase 3 Form for Diploma in Vocational Teacher<br />

Education<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

(SOVET) submitted the Phase3 Form for Diploma in Vocational Teacher<br />

Education. The basic objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme are to develop<br />

pedagogical competencies <strong>of</strong> vocational and technical teachers, inculcate<br />

positive attitude towards vocational teaching and develop skills and<br />

competencies essential for transacting vocational curriculum effectively.<br />

The Phase 3 Form was approved by the School Board at its 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on April 22, 2009. Dr. Ashok Gaba, Reader, SOVET is the<br />

programme coordinator.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, Director, SOVET explained the features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme in detail. During the discussion, it was pointed out by<br />

members that, as per the decision <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>, there is no need to present the Phase 3 Form to the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> for approval. The School Board concerned is empowered to<br />

approve the Phase 3 Form and report to the AC at the time <strong>of</strong> final launch<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form for<br />

Diploma in Vocational Teacher Education (Annexure -1).<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

ITEM No.8<br />

AC 48.7&8.1<br />

To report the Phase 3 form for PG Certificate in Information and<br />

Assistive Technologies for Instructors <strong>of</strong> Visually Impaired<br />

AND<br />

To report the Phase 3 form for Diploma in Information and Assistive<br />

Technologies for Visually Impaired<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

(SOVET) submitted Phase 3 forms for ‘PG Certificate in Information and<br />

Assistive Technologies for Instructors <strong>of</strong> Visually Impaired’ and


‘Diploma in Information and Assistive Technologies for Visually<br />

Impaired’. The basic objective <strong>of</strong> these programmes is to provide<br />

education and training opportunities in information technology area to<br />

visually impaired persons as well as the people working with visually<br />

impaired persons. The Phase 3 Forms for these programmes were<br />

approved by the School Board at its 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 22, 2009.<br />

Both these programmes are likely to be launched in January 2010. Pr<strong>of</strong><br />

Vibha Joshi, SOE and Dr. Hemlata, NCDS are the joint coordinators <strong>of</strong><br />

these programmes.<br />

AC.48.7&8.2<br />

AC.48.7&8.3<br />

ITEM NO. 9<br />

AC 48.9.1<br />

AC 48.9.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> both the programmes.<br />

These programmes being developed in collaboration with Rehabilitation<br />

<strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (RCI) and Pandit Sundar Lal Central Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Vocational Education. Dr. D. K. Chaudhry, PVC pointed out that the<br />

details such as programme fees, detailed course contents, audio/video<br />

components, etc are not presented in the Form. The Chairman suggested<br />

the Director, SOVET to complete the details in consultation with Dr. D.<br />

K. Chaudhry who is also the PVC <strong>of</strong> the SOVET.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form for ‘PG<br />

Certificate in Information and Assistive Technologies for Instructors <strong>of</strong><br />

Visually Impaired’ and ‘Diploma in Information and Assistive<br />

Technologies for Visually Impaired’.<br />

To report the Phase 3 form for Certificate and Diploma Programmes<br />

in Entrepreneurship and Skill Development.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

had submitted Phase 3 Form for ‘Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Skill<br />

Development’ and ‘Diploma in Entrepreneurship and Skill Development’.<br />

The certificate programme consists <strong>of</strong> three theory courses <strong>of</strong> 4 credits<br />

each and a project course <strong>of</strong> 4 credits. Similarly, diploma programme<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> three theory courses <strong>of</strong> 4 credits each, field training <strong>of</strong> 8 credits<br />

and project course <strong>of</strong> 8 credits. The Phase 3 Form for these programmes<br />

was approved by the School Board at its 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 22,<br />

2009. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, SOVET and Dr. Ram Chandra, RD are the<br />

coordinators <strong>of</strong> the programmes.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu explained the salient features and course structures <strong>of</strong><br />

these certificate and diploma programs, and also informed that they are<br />

being developed as per the MoU signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Alliance<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Management and Technology.<br />

AC 48.9.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form for<br />

‘Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Skill Development’ and ‘Diploma in


Entrepreneurship and Skill Development’ (Annexure -2).<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

AC 48.10.1.<br />

AC 48.10.2<br />

AC 48.10.3<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

AC 48.11.1<br />

AC 48.11.2<br />

To report the Phase 3 form for Certificate in Hospital Administrative<br />

Assistantship.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

had submitted Phase 3 Form for Certificate in Hospital Administrative<br />

Assistantship. This certificate consists <strong>of</strong> 8 credits <strong>of</strong> theory and 8 credits<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice. The Phase 3 from has been approved by the School Board at<br />

its 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 22, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu explained that the basic objective <strong>of</strong> this programme is<br />

to train manpower for jobs like ward secretary, front <strong>of</strong>fice staff, patient<br />

care executive, etc in hospitals and health care organizations. This<br />

programme is being <strong>of</strong>fered under the MoU signed between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and<br />

Apollo Hospitals. The theory classes as well as practicals/hands on<br />

training will be conducted at selected branches <strong>of</strong> the Apollo Hospitals.<br />

The programme is likely to be launched in July 2009 in face-to-face<br />

mode. He clarified that the programme fee is slightly on higher side<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the 50% practical component.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form for<br />

‘Certificate in Hospital Administrative Assistantship’ (Annexure -3).<br />

To report the Phase 3 form for Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training (B.VET.)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

had submitted Phase 3 Form for Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training (B.VET). This programme consists <strong>of</strong> 7 courses (48 credits) with<br />

50% weightage for practical components. The Phase 3 Form was<br />

approved by the School Board at its 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 22, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vibha Joshi, SOE and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak, SOSS are the<br />

coordinators <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and informed that it is being developed in collaboration with<br />

Pandit Sundar Lal Sharma Central Institute <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education. The<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the programme is capacity building <strong>of</strong> teachers and<br />

instructors in vocational and technical education or who want to work as<br />

teachers/trainers in vocational/technical education. The programme is<br />

likely to be launched in July 2010.<br />

During discussion it was pointed that the total credit weight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme is 48 credits as against the University norm <strong>of</strong> 96 credits for<br />

BDP. It was clarified that the eligibility for admission is minimum


graduation, and it is to some extent similar to B.Ed programme.<br />

Dr. D. K. Chaudhry, PVC pointed out that the details such as programme<br />

fees, detailed course contents, course delivery, audio/video components,<br />

etc are not presented. The Chairman suggested the Director, SOVET to<br />

complete the details in consultation with Dr. D. K. Chaudhry who is also<br />

the PVC <strong>of</strong> the SOVET.<br />

AC 48.11.3<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

AC 48.12.1<br />

AC 48.12.2<br />

AC 48.12.3<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

AC 48.13.1<br />

AC 48.13.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form for<br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training (B.VET) (Annexure-4).<br />

To consider the proposal for launching M.Sc. in Actuarial Science in<br />

Face to Face Class Room Based mode from July 2009.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

submitted proposal for launching M.Sc. in Actuarial Science in Face-to-<br />

Face mode from July 2009. The programme consists <strong>of</strong> 72 credits spread<br />

over four semesters. Proposed fee is Rs. 5000 per semester. The proposal<br />

was approved by the School Board at its 7 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 22,<br />

2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu explained that, in response to the Vice-Chancellor’s<br />

suggestion to the new schools to launch at least one Master’s level<br />

programme in Face-to-Face mode from July 2009, the faculty <strong>of</strong> SOVET<br />

proposed this programme. He also explained in detail the objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme, eligibility, fees, etc.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

launching M.Sc. in Actuarial Science in face-to-Face mode from July<br />

2009 (Annexure - 5).<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Certificate in Digital Film<br />

Making, Diploma in Computer Generated Imagery and B.A. in 3D<br />

Animation and Visual Effects.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies<br />

submitted the proposal for launching the following three programmes in<br />

collaboration with M/s. Maya Academy, Mumbai in face-to-face mode as<br />

well as distance teaching mode:<br />

1. Certificate in Digital Film Making<br />

2. Diploma in Computer Generated Imagery<br />

3. B.A. in 3D Animation and Visual Effects<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS explained details <strong>of</strong> the


programmes. He informed that practical component is given more<br />

weightage in all these programmes.<br />

AC 48.13.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

launching (a) Certificate in Digital Film Making, (b) Diploma in<br />

Computer Generated Imagery and (c) B.A. in 3D Animation and Visual<br />

Effects by SOJNMS in face-to-face mode as well as distance mode<br />

(Annexure - 6).<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

AC 48.14.1<br />

AC 48.14.2<br />

AC 48.14.3<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

AC 48.15.1<br />

AC 48.15.2<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering M.A. in<br />

Journalism and Mass Communication in face-to-face mixed mode.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies<br />

submitted proposal for launching M.A. in Journalism and Mass<br />

Communication in face-to-face mixed mode from July 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS informed that the School<br />

Board at its 4 th <strong>Meeting</strong> approved integration <strong>of</strong> revised structure <strong>of</strong> PG<br />

Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication in the first year <strong>of</strong> M.A.<br />

in Journalism and Mass Communication. It was further informed that the<br />

4 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the School Board held on 20 th April approved the proposal<br />

for <strong>of</strong>fering M.A. in Journalism and Mass Communication as a full time<br />

face-to-face mixed mode from July 2009.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

M.A. in Journalism and Mass Communication in face to face mixed mode<br />

(Annexure - 7).<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering M.A. in Electronic<br />

Media: Production and Management in face-to-face mixed mode.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies<br />

submitted the proposal for launching ‘M.A. in Electronic Media:<br />

Production and Management’ in face-to-face mixed mode from July 2009.<br />

The School Board approved the proposal at its 4 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 20 th<br />

April, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS explained the main<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the programme. The programme is likely to be launched in<br />

July, 2009 on pilot basis and as regular programme from January 2011.<br />

The programme will consist <strong>of</strong> four certificate programmes (16 credits<br />

each) <strong>of</strong> 6 months duration. Students will have the flexible option to<br />

complete each certificate in modular form leading to Masters Degree.


AC 48.15.3<br />

ITEM NO.16<br />

AC 48.16.1<br />

AC 48.16.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

M.A. in Electronic Media: Production and Management in face-to-face<br />

mixed mode (Annexure - 8).<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for starting <strong>of</strong> One-Year<br />

Diploma Programme in Corporate Governance.<br />

It was presented that the Centre for Corporate Education, Training and<br />

Consultancy proposed to launch one year Diploma in Corporate<br />

Governance from the ensuing academic year.<br />

Brief concept note <strong>of</strong> the programme along with statement <strong>of</strong> activities<br />

undertaken by the Centre since its inception in December 2008 is<br />

presented (Annexure - 9). The proposed diploma programme comprises<br />

five courses, which include three theory courses, one practical training<br />

and one project work.<br />

AC 48.16.3<br />

ITEM NO.17<br />

AC 48.17.1<br />

AC 48.17.2<br />

AC 48.17.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the one year Diploma in<br />

Corporate Governance.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 forms for MPSTC Programmes<br />

(3 Programmes)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism & Hospitality Services<br />

Management had submitted Phase 3 forms for the following three<br />

certificate programmes being <strong>of</strong>fered in pursuance <strong>of</strong> the MoU between<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> and Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Corporation (MPSTC).<br />

1. Certificate in House Keeping Operations<br />

2. Certificate in Front Office Operations<br />

3. Certificate in F&V Services Operations<br />

These programmes were approved by the School Board at its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on April 21, 2009. Dr. Harkirat Bains, Reader, SOTHSM is the<br />

coordinator for all these three programmes.<br />

Dr. Sonia Sharma Director (I/c) explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

certificate programmes. Each <strong>of</strong> these programmes comprise <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

credits <strong>of</strong> theory courses (3 courses), 6 credits practical training and 2<br />

credits project work. In addition, there is an optional non-credit course.<br />

The detailed course structures <strong>of</strong> these programmes are placed at<br />

(Annexure - 10).<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Forms for<br />

three certificate programmes viz., (1) Certificate in House Keeping<br />

Operations, (2) Certificate in Front Office Operations, and (3) Certificate<br />

in F&V Services Operations, in collaboration with the Madhya Pradesh<br />

State Tourism Corporation (MPSTC).


ITEM NO.18 To report on B.Sc. in Hospitality and Hotel Administration (BHM) -<br />

change from annual system to semester system.<br />

AC 48.18.1<br />

AC 48.18.2<br />

AC 48.18.3<br />

ITEM N O.19<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism & Hospitality Services<br />

Management proposed to change from annual system to semester system<br />

from 2009-10 academic session for B.Sc. in Hospitality and Hotel<br />

Administration (BHM), which is being jointly <strong>of</strong>fered full-time in<br />

collaboration with the National <strong>Council</strong> for Hotel Management. The same<br />

was approved by the School Board at its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 21,<br />

2009.<br />

Dr. Sonia Sharma, SOTHSM informed that the programme is on <strong>of</strong>fer on<br />

annual basis. Now the National <strong>Council</strong> for Hotel Management, the<br />

collaborating institute, had proposed to change to semester system from<br />

2009-10 academic session, which is in line with the semester system being<br />

followed in the University. It is further proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer semester system<br />

with specialization in 7 centres and a generic semester programme in the<br />

remaining centres. Accordingly, semester-wise detailed programme<br />

structure for specialization stream as well as generic stream are prepared<br />

and presented to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the change over from<br />

annual system to semester system for B.Sc. in Hospitality and Hotel<br />

Administration (BHM) from 2009-10 academic session, and also<br />

approved the semester-wise course structure for specialization stream as<br />

well as generic stream (Annexure - 11).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for B.Sc. (Hons.) in<br />

International Hospitality Administration programme.<br />

AC 48.19.1 It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism & Hospitality Services<br />

Management had submitted Phase 3 Form for B.Sc. (Hons.) in<br />

International Hospitality Administration Programme. This programme is<br />

being <strong>of</strong>fered as per the MoU between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Federation <strong>of</strong> Hotel<br />

and Restaurant Association <strong>of</strong> India – Educational Trust (FHRAI-ET). The<br />

same was approved by the School Board at its 3 rd meeting held on April<br />

21, 2009.<br />

AC 48.19.2<br />

AC 48.19.3<br />

Dr. Sonia Sharma, SOTHSM presented the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme. The School Board recommended to constitute an expert<br />

committee to frame the final syllabus structure after taking into account<br />

the syllabus structure proposed by FHRAI-ET.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form<br />

(Annexure -12) for B.Sc. (Hons.) International Hospitality Administration


programme.<br />

ITEM NO.20 To report on Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Arts in International Hospitality<br />

Administration<br />

AC 48.20.1 It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism & Hospitality Services<br />

Management had submitted the proposal to launch Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Arts in<br />

International Hospitality Administration programme internationally<br />

through the partner institutions abroad. The proposal was approved by the<br />

School Board at its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 21, 2009.<br />

AC 48.20.2<br />

AC 48.20.3<br />

Dr. Sonia Sharma, SOTHSM explained that this programme was launched<br />

in 2008 in collaboration with American Hotel and Lodging Educational<br />

Institute (AH&LEI).<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved launch <strong>of</strong> Bachelor <strong>of</strong><br />

Arts in International Hospitality Administration programme<br />

internationally through the partner institutions.


ITEM NO.21 To consider and approve the launching <strong>of</strong> MSW (with specialization<br />

in Philanthropy) in face-to-face mode and ODL System.<br />

AC 48.21.1<br />

AC 48 .21.2<br />

AC 48 .21.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work had submitted the<br />

proposal for launching the ‘Master <strong>of</strong> Social Work (MSW) with<br />

specialization in Philanthropy’ in Face-to-Face mode as well as ODL<br />

system.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas explained the proposal in detailed and informed<br />

that the programme would be <strong>of</strong>fered on a face to face mode in July 2009<br />

and subsequently it will be <strong>of</strong>fered under ODL system. The first year<br />

courses are the same as the existing first year MSW/PGDSW, while the<br />

second year comprises <strong>of</strong> five theory courses (4 credits each) and 10<br />

credits practicum. Proposed fee is Rs. 12,000 p.a. for face-to-face<br />

programme and Rs. 2,500 p.a. for ODL programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

launching <strong>of</strong> ‘Master <strong>of</strong> Social Work (MSW) with specialization in<br />

Philanthropy’ in face-to-face mode from July 2009 and ODL System<br />

subsequently. The detailed programme structure and syllabus were also<br />

approved (Annexure - 13).<br />

ITEM NO.22 To consider and approve the proposal for launching the PG Diploma<br />

in Counseling (PGDC)<br />

AC 48.22.1<br />

AC 48.22.2<br />

AC 48.22.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work had submitted the<br />

proposal for PG Diploma in Counseling (PGDC) as a stand alone<br />

programme, as well as part <strong>of</strong> MSW second year specialization in<br />

Counselling. The proposal was approved by the School Board at its 2 nd<br />

meeting held on April 11, 2008.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Thomas, Director, SOSW explained the objectives and structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Diploma programme. During the discussion it was mentioned that<br />

the existing MSW is a generic programme. The School is in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

developing specializations to be <strong>of</strong>fered in the second year <strong>of</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />

MSW. PG Diploma in Counselling will also constitute as second year <strong>of</strong><br />

study <strong>of</strong> MSW. Therefore, a student who pass the existing 1 st year MSW<br />

and PG Diploma in Counselling will be awarded MSW with<br />

specialization in Counselling.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for ‘PG<br />

Diploma in Counseling’ as a standalone diploma programme as well as<br />

specialization module in 2 nd year MSW with specialization in<br />

Counselling.


ITEM NO.23 To consider and approve the proposal for launching the ‘Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Social Work among Tribals’<br />

AC 48.23.1<br />

AC 48.23.2<br />

AC 48.23.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer ‘Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Social Work among Tribals’. As a stand alone<br />

programme as well as 2 nd year specialization module <strong>of</strong> ‘MSW with<br />

specialization in Social Work among Tribals.’ The same was approved by<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Work at its 3 rd meeting held on<br />

March 13, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Thomas explained the objectives <strong>of</strong> the ‘Post Graduate Diploma<br />

in Social Work among Tribals’. Further it is explained that the existing<br />

MSW is a generic in nature. The School is in the process <strong>of</strong> developing<br />

specialization streams in different areas to be <strong>of</strong>fered during the 2 nd year<br />

<strong>of</strong> study. This Diploma is, thus, a standalone Diploma as well as to<br />

constitute 2 nd year <strong>of</strong> ‘MSW with Specialization in Social Work among<br />

Tribals’. During the discussion it was pointed out that the SOCE is<br />

already <strong>of</strong>fering a PG diploma programme in Counseling. Therefore, it is<br />

suggested to avoid any duplication in the nomenclature, if any, with the<br />

existing programmes <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the ‘PG Diploma in<br />

Social Work among Tribals’ as standalone diploma as well as to<br />

constitute 2 nd year ‘MSW with Specialization in Social Work among<br />

Tribals’. The AC further suggested Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas to avoid any<br />

duplication in the nomenclature, if any, with the existing programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

the University.<br />

ITEM NO.24 To consider and approve the proposal for launching M.Phil. in Social<br />

Work.<br />

AC 48.24.1<br />

AC 48.24.2<br />

AC 48.24.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work proposed to launch<br />

M.Phil. in Social Work with effect from July 2010. The proposal was<br />

approved by the School Board at its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on March 13, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Thomas, Director, SOSW briefly stated the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme. The programme consists <strong>of</strong> 32 credits course work (20<br />

credits theory and 12 credits practicum) and 16 credits dissertation. The<br />

courses prepared for M.Phil. programme will also be recommended to the<br />

Ph.D. candidates who do not have M.Phil. Degree. The Doctoral<br />

Committee would suggest appropriate courses for each Ph.D. candidate<br />

depending upon one’s academic background.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

launching M. Phil in Social Work (Annexure - 14).


ITEM NO.25 To consider and approve the proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer a course on “Life Skills<br />

and Adolescents” for MSW as an Elective<br />

AC 48.25.1 It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer a 4<br />

credit course entitled ‘Life skills and Adolescents’, as an optional elective<br />

course in 2 nd year <strong>of</strong> MSW programme. The same was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Work at its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on March<br />

13, 2009.


AC 48.25.2<br />

AC 48.25.3<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS pointed out that a course <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

SOHS is relevant and may be examined for adaptation. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious<br />

Thomas, Director, SOSW is advised to examine the course <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

SOHS and avoid duplication <strong>of</strong> efforts.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the four credit course<br />

entitled “Life skills and Adolescents”, as an optional elective course in the<br />

2 nd year <strong>of</strong> MSW programme.<br />

ITEM NO.26 To consider and approve the proposal to provide admission to<br />

MPhill/Ph.D.in Social Work to students having a PG Degree from any<br />

other discipline and PGDSW <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

AC 48.26.1<br />

AC 48.26.2<br />

AC 48.26.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work proposed to provide<br />

admission to MPhill/Ph.D. in Social Work to Post Graduates in any<br />

discipline having PGDSW <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The same was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Social Work at its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on March<br />

13, 2009.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas informed that a student having a Masters Degree<br />

in any discipline is admitted to PG Diploma in Social Work (PGDSW) <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>, which is the same as MSW first year. It is proposed that a<br />

student having Master Degree with 55% (50% for SC/ST/PWD) in any<br />

discipline with PG Diploma in Social Work (PGDSW) <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> be<br />

admitted to M.Phil./Ph.D. in Social Work programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved that a Master Degree<br />

holder with 55% (50% for SC/ST/PWD) in any discipline having PG<br />

Diploma in Social Work (PGDSW) <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> be admitted to<br />

M.Phil./Ph.D. in Social Work programmes.<br />

ITEM NO.27 To consider the issue <strong>of</strong> updating Ordinance 7 on Degrees/Diploma<br />

and Certificates under Section 5(1)(iii) <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

AC 48.27.1<br />

AC 48.27.2<br />

It was presented that the Clause 1 in Ordinance 7 under Section 5(1)(iii)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Act listing all the degrees, diplomas and certificate programmes<br />

being <strong>of</strong>fered by the University was approved by the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management at its 27 th meeting held on February 8, 1992. Since then,<br />

though the University introduced several new programmes and dropped a<br />

few from time to time, the Ordinance was not modified. Therefore, the<br />

Ordinance needs to be updated to reflect actual position regarding<br />

academic programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the University.<br />

The AC Division had updated the Ordinance (Annexure - 15) on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the advertisement being released by the SRD for admission to 2009-10


academic sessions.<br />

AC 48.27.3<br />

The Chairman asked the members to examine the modified ordinance<br />

circulated in the meeting to see whether all the programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

their School/Division concerned are included or not. Accordingly,<br />

suggestions, if any, may be passed on to the Member Secretary to finalize<br />

the ordinance.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the modifications to<br />

Clause 1 <strong>of</strong> Ordinance 7 under Section 5(1)(iii) <strong>of</strong> the Act updating the<br />

programmes being <strong>of</strong>fered by the University currently.<br />

ITEM NO.28 To consider and approve the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Expert<br />

Committee for full time M.Sc. Programme in Chemistry (face-to-face<br />

mode).<br />

AC 48.28.1<br />

AC 48.28.2<br />

AC 48.28.3<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer full time<br />

M.Sc. in Chemistry in face-to-face mode from July 2009 session. An<br />

Expert Committee constituted by the Vice Chancellor met on 21 st and 22 nd<br />

April, 2009 deliberated on various aspects <strong>of</strong> the programme and worked<br />

out the broad details <strong>of</strong> the programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS, explained broad features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme as recommended by the Expert Committee. The programme<br />

comprises 72 credits spread in 4 semesters, common curriculum in the<br />

first three semesters and specialization in four streams viz., analytical,<br />

organic, inorganic and physical chemistry in the fourth semester. Each<br />

semester consists <strong>of</strong> 12 credits <strong>of</strong> theory and six credits <strong>of</strong><br />

practical/project work. Around 20 students will be admitted in the first<br />

cycle and Rs. 5,000 per semester is the fee proposed. Detailed list <strong>of</strong><br />

courses semester wise and detailed syllabus <strong>of</strong> the first semester courses<br />

were presented. Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee along with programme<br />

structure and detailed syllabi <strong>of</strong> first semester are placed at Annexure -16.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer full<br />

time M.Sc. in Chemistry in face-to-face mode from July, 2009 session.<br />

ITEM NO.29 To consider and approve the proposal for the <strong>of</strong>fering M.A (Labour<br />

and Development) and M.A (Ancient Indian History and Social<br />

Anthropology).<br />

AC 48.29.1<br />

AC 48.29.2<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary<br />

Studies proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer two full time programmes viz., (1)<br />

M.A. in Labour and Development and (2) M.A. in Ancient Indian History<br />

and Social Anthropology in face-to-face mode from July 2009 session.<br />

Dr. Babu P. Ramesh, SOITS explained the features <strong>of</strong> both the


programmes and explained that an expert committee will prepare all the<br />

details and curriculum <strong>of</strong> the programmes. During the discussion<br />

clarifications were sought regarding the objectives and coverage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second programme i.e., M.A. in Ancient Indian History and Social<br />

Anthropology. It was pointed out that M.A (History) and M.A<br />

(Sociology) <strong>of</strong>fered by SOSS cover the subject matter proposed in the<br />

new programme. Unless it is specially focused, the proposed programme<br />

may simply duplicate the M. A (History) and M. A (Sociology).<br />

AC 48.29.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer full<br />

time M.A. in Labour and Development by the School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary<br />

and Trans-disciplinary Studies in face-to-face mode from July, 2009<br />

session. The proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer M.A. in Ancient Indian History and Social<br />

Anthropology will be reviewed when the School present detailed<br />

objectives and curriculum <strong>of</strong> the programme, therefore, it is deferred. It<br />

was suggested that this programme can be M.A. in Social Anthropology.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FORTY NINTH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

29 TH JUNE 2009<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY


MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FORTY NINTH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON JUNE 29, 2009 AT 02.00 P.M. IN THE ROOM NO. 5 FIRST FLOOR,<br />

CONVENTION CENTRE <strong>IGNOU</strong> CAMPUS, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-<br />

110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

246. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

247. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

248. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

249. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. R. Srivasthan, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

5. Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

15. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. G. Naidu, Director, SOVET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

16. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

17. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

18. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Savita Singh, Director, SOGDS ` - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

19. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

20. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunil Kumar, Director, SOPVA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

21. Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

22. Dr. Sushant Kumar Mishra, Director (I/c), SOFL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

23. Dr. Nandini Sinha Kapoor, Director (I/c), SOIDTDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

24. Dr. S. K. Arora, Librarian, - Ex-Officio<br />

25. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Subhasis Majhi, SOET - Member<br />

26. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pitty Koul, SOHS - Member<br />

27. Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE - Member<br />

28. Dr. S. K. Yadav, Reader, SOA - Member<br />

29. Dr. Jaswant Sokhi, Reader, SOS - Member<br />

30. Shri M. P. Mishra, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

31. Dr. O. P. Sharma, Director (I/c), NCIDE - Member<br />

32. Dr. Hemlata, Director (I/c), NCDA - Member<br />

33. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Madhu Prahar, Director (I/c), IUC - Member<br />

34. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda - Member<br />

35. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. P. Singh - Member<br />

36. Pr<strong>of</strong>. George Mathew - Member<br />

37. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammad Miyan - Member


38. Dr. K. V. Peter - Member<br />

39. Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy - Member<br />

40. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. Ramamohan Rao - Member<br />

41. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi - Member<br />

42. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. K. Jain, - Member<br />

43. Shri. Ravi Kanth, EMPC, <strong>IGNOU</strong> - Member<br />

44. Dr. V. Vennugopal Reddy, <strong>IGNOU</strong> - Member<br />

45. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. V. Narasimham, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.C. Sharma, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra and Dr. Sonia Sharma attended the meeting<br />

as representatives <strong>of</strong> the Directors <strong>of</strong> SOE, SOA and SOTHSM.<br />

Dr. D.K. Choudhury, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B Khanna, SOMS, Dr. Sutapa Bose, Lecturer,<br />

SOE, Sh. Z. Yanthan, Lecturer, SOSS, Sh. V.V. Subramaninam, Lecturer, SOCIS, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

S.N. Maheshwari, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra Dev, Dr. D.K. Dutta Majumdar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Khannan<br />

Modugalya, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi Singh, Dr. Srikant Mohapatra, Registrar, SED, and Shri K.<br />

Laxman, OSD, SRD could not attend the meeting.<br />

Shri K. D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist the Member-<br />

Secretary.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman extended warm welcome to the members to the 49 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He introduced Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukanda, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. George Mathew and Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. K. Jain, who attended the meeting first time.<br />

Then the Chairman requested the Member Secretary to present the agenda. The<br />

following agenda were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 49.1.1<br />

AC 49.1.2<br />

To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong>, 47 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> &<br />

48 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and to note the<br />

action taken thereon.<br />

The Member Secretary presented that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 13 th January, 2009, 47 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 28 th<br />

February, 2009 and 48 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 24 th April, 2009<br />

were circulated to the Members. Action Taken Report on the 46 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> and 47 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> were also circulated to the Members.<br />

It was presented that comments were received from the Director, SOS<br />

on Resolution No. AC 46.1.2 and 46.1.3 <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong>. The<br />

comments were also received from Dr. Neerja Chadha, Reader, SOCE<br />

on Item No 22 <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 48 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong>. The<br />

comments received from Director, SOSS and Director (I/c), SOITS on<br />

Item No. 29 <strong>of</strong> the 48 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> were also placed<br />

before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.


AC 49.1.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the comments and confirmed the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong>, 47 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> and 48 th Special<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> (Annexure 1 without appendices). The AC also noted the<br />

Action Taken Report on its 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong> and 47 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong>.<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 49.2.1<br />

AC 49.2.2<br />

AC 49.2.3<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 49.3.1<br />

AC 49.3.2<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

To consider and approve amendment to Ordinance ‘5 Ordinance on<br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> Examinations/Degrees’<br />

It was presented that the Student Registration Division had proposed an<br />

amendment to the provision <strong>of</strong> Clause 1(v) <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance ‘5 Ordinance<br />

on Recognition <strong>of</strong> Examinations/Degrees (Under Section 5(1) (xiii) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act)’.<br />

The need for amendment to clause had arisen because <strong>of</strong> the bifurcation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Student Registration and Evaluation Division (SRED) into Student<br />

Registration Division (SRD) and Student Evaluation Division (SED).<br />

Clause 1(v) <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance provides for Registrar, SRE Division,<br />

Secretary Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio, which is proposed to be modified as ‘Incharge,<br />

Student Registration,Secretary Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio’.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the amendment to<br />

Clause 1(iv) <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance ‘5 Ordinance on Recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

Examinations/Degrees as per Annexure - 2.<br />

To consider and approve the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> ‘EEC-19 Indian Financial<br />

System’ an Elective Course in Economics in BDP Programme from<br />

January 2010 <strong>Academic</strong> Session.<br />

It was presented that ‘EEC-19 Indian Financial System’ is a 4 credit<br />

elective course in Economics in the Bachelor Degree Programme. In view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the requirement <strong>of</strong> thorough revision <strong>of</strong> the course, the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics Discipline proposed to withdraw this course from January<br />

2010. The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOSS, in its 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on March 26,<br />

2009, approved for suspending the course till it is revised.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved withdrawal <strong>of</strong> ‘EEC-19<br />

Indian Financial System’ an Elective Course in Economics in BDP<br />

Programme from January 2010 <strong>Academic</strong> Session.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for a new course<br />

‘Indian National Movement’, an 8-Credit Optional Course in M.A<br />

History Programme.


AC 49.4.1<br />

AC 49.4.2<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 49.5.1<br />

It was presented that MA History Programme consists <strong>of</strong> 64 credits,<br />

spread in two years <strong>of</strong> study. A student has to complete 24 credits <strong>of</strong><br />

compulsory courses and 40 credits <strong>of</strong> optional courses. The History<br />

Faculty proposed Phase Zero Form to introduce an eight credits new<br />

course entitled “Indian National Movement”, as an optional course in MA<br />

History Programme (MAH). The School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Sciences had approved the Phase Zero Form at its 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

26 th March, 2009.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase Zero Form for a new course<br />

‘Indian National Movement’, an 8-Credit Optional Course in M.A History<br />

Programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Evaluation Methodology for Master <strong>of</strong><br />

Library and Information Science (MLIS) Online Programme.<br />

It is presented that the Discipline <strong>of</strong> Library and Information Science has<br />

launched Master <strong>of</strong> Library and Information Science (MLIS) programme<br />

online from July 2008 session. This is an Online version <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

MLIS programme. For the online version <strong>of</strong> the programme, the Faculty<br />

proposed to have the same evaluation methodology with some deviation<br />

in the Term End Examination as follows:<br />

1. Term End Examination 50 marks (20marks for objective questions<br />

and 30 marks for short subjective questions) to be conducted<br />

online in proctored environment in designated examination<br />

centres.<br />

2. Term paper <strong>of</strong> 50 marks (30 marks for the write-up and 20 marks<br />

for the viva-voce conducted online though web conferencing<br />

mode.)<br />

The School Board in its 45 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 26 th March, 2009 approved<br />

the same in principle, with a suggestion to review the scheme after a year<br />

to take a final decision on the mater.<br />

AC 49.5.2<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 49.6.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Evaluation<br />

Methodology for Master <strong>of</strong> Library and Information Science (MLIS)<br />

Online Programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Forms for (1) Post Graduate<br />

Certificate in Gandhi and Peace Studies, (2) Post Graduate Diploma<br />

in Gandhi and Peace Studies, and (3) M. A in Gandhi and Peace<br />

Studies in a modular structure.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies (SOITS)


submitted the Phase 3 Form for the following three programmes in<br />

Gandhian Studies in collaboration with International Centre for Gandhian<br />

Studies and Peace Research (ICGSR):<br />

1) PG Certificate in Gandhi and Peace Studies<br />

2) PG Diploma in Gandhi and Peace Studies<br />

3) MA in Gandhi and Peace Studies<br />

It is a modular programme with multiple exit points at PG certificate and<br />

PG Diploma levels. These programmes are already announced in face-t<strong>of</strong>ace<br />

mode from July 2009 session. They will also be <strong>of</strong>fered in ODL<br />

mode in due course <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

AC 49.6.2<br />

The School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary<br />

Studies (SOITS) had approved the proposal for the above programmes at<br />

its 3 rd <strong>Meeting</strong> held on October 15, 2008. The School <strong>of</strong> SOITS had<br />

conducted a series <strong>of</strong> Expert Committee meetings from time to time and<br />

finalized the curriculum for the programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> emphasized the relevance <strong>of</strong> Gandhian and Peace<br />

Studies in the present day world and appreciated the initiative taken by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor in developing these programmes. During discussion, the<br />

following points were made:<br />

1) There are several institutions in India and abroad working in the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gandhi and Peace Studies. The possibilities for utilizing expertise<br />

and the resources <strong>of</strong> such institutions may be explored.<br />

2) Course No. 9 “Introduction to Peace and Conflict Resolution”<br />

appears to be an introductory course. Therefore, it may be made a<br />

compulsory course rather than an optional course.<br />

AC 49.6.3<br />

During discussions, the Vice-Chancellor, <strong>IGNOU</strong> proposed for the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Gandhian Thought and Peace Studies. He<br />

explained to the members that Indira Gandhi National Open University<br />

and Gandhi Smiriti and Darshan Samiti, New Delhi have come together to<br />

form a consortium to promote the Gandhian Studies and Peace Research<br />

in a big way. <strong>IGNOU</strong> with its rich academic heritage <strong>of</strong> distance<br />

education and GS&DS with its excellent infrastructure and ambience to<br />

spearhead this initiative, both have pooled their resources in this initiative.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor also informed that there are inquiries from<br />

International Institutions and Agencies regarding the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

programmes relating to Gandhi and Peace Studies. He explained to the<br />

members that the proposed School would undertake research and develop<br />

academic programmes to interpret Gandhi to the modern world.<br />

Thus the Vice-Chancellor emphasized the need to establish the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Gandhian Thought and Peace Studies in <strong>IGNOU</strong>. This proposal was<br />

highly appreciated by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> members.


AC 49.6.4<br />

AC 49.6.5<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

AC 48.7.1<br />

AC.49.7.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Forms for<br />

(1) Post Graduate Certificate in Gandhi and Peace Studies, (2) Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Gandhi and Peace Studies, and (3) M. A in Gandhi<br />

and Peace Studies in a modular structure.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal for establishment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Gandhian Thought and Peace Studies with a core faculty <strong>of</strong> one<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, two Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essors and four Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essors.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero forms for revised syllabi <strong>of</strong><br />

PHE-04, PHE-05, PHE-06 and PHE-08(L) courses <strong>of</strong> B. Sc.<br />

Programme.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had submitted Phase Zero Forms for revised<br />

syllabi <strong>of</strong> the following four elective courses in Physics in B. Sc.<br />

Programme:<br />

(1) PHE-04 Mathematical Methods in Physics - I (2 credits)<br />

(2) PHE-05 Mathematical Methods in Physics - II (2 credits)<br />

(3) PHE-06 Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanic (4 credits)<br />

(4) PHE-08(L) Physics Lab-II (4 credits)<br />

The revised course structure has been approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences at its 38 th <strong>Meeting</strong>, with some modifications. The<br />

suggestions were incorporated and the modified version <strong>of</strong> the Phase Zero<br />

Forms were presented for the approval <strong>of</strong> the AC.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Forms<br />

for revised syllabi <strong>of</strong> PHE-04, PHE-05, PHE-06 and PHE-08(L) courses<br />

<strong>of</strong> B. Sc. Programme.<br />

ITEM NO.8 To ratify the action taken by the Vice Chancellor to allow 50%<br />

concession in programme fee for the Senior Diplomats posted at<br />

Indian Missions abroad.<br />

AC 49.8.1<br />

AC 49.8.2<br />

It was presented that the International Division received a request for<br />

considering fee concession to Senior Diplomats <strong>of</strong> Indian Missions<br />

seeking admissions in <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s programmes. Indian Diplomats posted at<br />

Indian Missions abroad play an important role in promotion and reach <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s programmes to the overseas learners. <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

programmes are launched and run under the patronage and support <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Indian Missions abroad. In view <strong>of</strong> this support by the Diplomats posted<br />

at Indian Missions abroad, the VC approved 50% fee concession<br />

(programme fee only) to the Senior Diplomats posted at Indian Missions<br />

abroad.<br />

While appreciating the action taken by the VC, the AC opined that the fee


concession may be extended to all the Indian Diplomats posted at Indian<br />

Missions abroad.<br />

AC 49.8.3<br />

ITEM NO. 9<br />

AC 49.9.1<br />

AC 49.9.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice Chancellor<br />

and decided to allow 50% concession in programme fee to all Indian<br />

Diplomats posted at Indian Missions abroad.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice Chancellor in deciding the fee<br />

Structure for MED Programme for the International students.<br />

It was presented that the International Division received a request from<br />

International Centre for <strong>Academic</strong>s (ICA), a Partner Institution in<br />

Kathmandu, Nepal for <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> Master <strong>of</strong> Arts (Education). The programme<br />

fee is required to be fixed for international students, as it is being <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

abroad for the first time. Keeping in view the marketability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and to attract reasonable number <strong>of</strong> students, the VC approved<br />

the fee structure <strong>of</strong> INR 36,000/- per annum for SAARC countries and US<br />

$ 2000/- per annum for Non-SAARC countries on equal sharing basis.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice Chancellor in<br />

approving the fee structure <strong>of</strong> INR 36,000/- per annum for SAARC<br />

countries and US $ 2000/- per annum for Non-SAARC countries on equal<br />

sharing basis.


ITEM NO.10<br />

AC 49.10.1.<br />

AC 49.10.2<br />

AC 49.10.3<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

AC 49.11.1<br />

AC 49.11.3<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

AC 49.12-14.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> faculty positions<br />

in the Centre for Corporate Education, Training and Consultancy<br />

(CCETC).<br />

It was presented that the Centre for Corporate Education, Training and<br />

Consultancy (CCETC) has signed several MoUs and initiated the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> academic programmes as well as training programmes.<br />

Currently, there are no sanctioned positions even though the Centre is<br />

being assisted by one Deputy Director and one Lecturer. Therefore, the<br />

Centre has proposed for creation <strong>of</strong> faculty positions <strong>of</strong> 2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essors on<br />

deputation, 2 Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essors and for regularization <strong>of</strong> the post <strong>of</strong><br />

Deputy Director and Senior Lecturer.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> discussed the various activities undertaken by the<br />

Centre and appreciated the efforts within a short period <strong>of</strong> its existence.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and recommended creation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> one Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, two Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essors and two Assistant<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essors for the Centre.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> Centre for<br />

Bhojpuri Language and Culture<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> opined that the matter requires further<br />

examination.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deferred the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> Centre for<br />

Bhojpuri Language and Culture.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for Certificate in<br />

Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for PG Diploma in<br />

Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form for M.A. in Extension and<br />

Development Studies (ODL mode).<br />

Item Nos. 12 to 14 were considered together. It was presented that the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies (SOEDS) submitted Phase<br />

3 forms for the following three programmes:<br />

1. Certificate in Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode)<br />

2. PG Diploma in Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode)<br />

3. MA in Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode)


AC 49.12-14.2<br />

These programmes were proposed in modular system with exit points at<br />

PG Certificate, PG Diploma and Master Degree levels. The School Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOEDS approved the same at its 4 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on May 22, 2009.<br />

The proposals were discussed in detail, and the following suggestions<br />

were made by the members:<br />

1. As per the course structure proposed, the project work carries<br />

around 11% weightage. It is opined that these programmes<br />

require more practical component. Therefore, it is suggested to<br />

include empirical based or field based activities in the courses.<br />

2. There are some relevant courses in the programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

SOA and SOCE. It is suggested that SOEDS should consult SOA<br />

and SOCE to identify relevant courses and utilize them to avoid<br />

duplication.<br />

3. The Centre for Inclusive Policy at the University <strong>of</strong> Hyderabad has<br />

some expertise in this field. The SOEDS should explore the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> utilizing their expertise.<br />

4. More demand is expected in Hindi and other regional languages.<br />

Therefore, it is suggested to explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

these programmes in Hindi to begin with and other regional<br />

languages in due course.<br />

AC 49.12-14.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 forms for (1)<br />

Certificate in Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode), (2) PG<br />

Diploma in Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode) and (3)<br />

MA in Extension and Development Studies (ODL mode) in the modular<br />

form. Further, SOEDS is advised to consider the above suggestions.<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

AC 49.15.1<br />

AC 49.15.2<br />

To consider and approve the Programme Proposal Form for M.A. in<br />

Extension and Development Studies (face-to-face mode)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies<br />

(SOEDS) submitted Programme Proposal Form to <strong>of</strong>fer M.A. in<br />

Extension and Development Studies in face-to-face mode as a full time<br />

programme. The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOEDS approved the same at its 4 th<br />

meeting held on May 22, 2009.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Programme Proposal<br />

Form for M.A. in Extension and Development Studies in face-to-face<br />

mode as a full time programme. It is also suggested to consider the<br />

relevant suggestions made at resolution No AC 49.12-14.2.<br />

ITEM NO.16 To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 13 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> held on 30 th March, 2009.


AC 49.16.1 The 13 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> was held on 30 th March, 2009.<br />

The Minutes along with the modified Resolution No.13.5.4. were placed<br />

before the AC for consideration and approval.<br />

AC 49.16.2<br />

ITEM NO.17<br />

AC 49.17.1<br />

AC 49.17.2<br />

ITEM NO.18<br />

AC 49.18.1<br />

AC 49.18.2<br />

ITEM NO.19<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 13 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> held on 30 th March, 2009 along with the<br />

modified Resolution No.13.5.4.<br />

To consider and approve the ‘revised’ Table <strong>of</strong> Pro-rata fee for readmission<br />

to various programmes.<br />

It was presented that the revision <strong>of</strong> the programme fee for different<br />

programmes with effect from July 2009 admission cycle necessitated the<br />

pro-rata Re-admission fee also. The prescribed ‘Re-admission Form’,<br />

‘Rules & Regulations’ and the proposed pro-rata fee were placed before<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for consideration and approval.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the prescribed ‘Readmission<br />

Form’, ‘Rules & Regulations’ and the proposed ‘Pro-rata Fee’<br />

for re-admission to various programmes (Annexure - 3).<br />

To consider and approve the change <strong>of</strong> nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Programme Post Graduate Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and<br />

Environment Management Programme (PGDISHEM) to Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Management (Industrial Safety, Health and<br />

Environment) PGDM (ISHE).<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology successfully launched in July<br />

2008 the ‘Post Graduate Diploma in Industrial Safety, Health and<br />

Environment Management Programme (PGDISHEM) in collaboration<br />

with the Institute <strong>of</strong> Industrial Management and Safety, Health &<br />

Environment, Bhopal. The School submitted the proposal for change <strong>of</strong><br />

nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the programme to ‘Post Graduate Diploma in<br />

Management (Industrial Safety, Health and Environment) i.e. PGDM<br />

(ISHE). The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOET approved the same at its 34 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 17 th February 2009.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the change <strong>of</strong><br />

nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the programme ‘Post Graduate Diploma in Industrial<br />

Safety, Health and Environment Management (PGDISHEM)’ to ‘Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Management (Industrial Safety, Health and<br />

Environment) i.e., PGDM (ISHE).<br />

To ratify the action taken by Vice-Chancellor in approving the<br />

Foundation course on Education <strong>of</strong> Children with Disabilities<br />

through Distance Mode and Online Mode.


AC 49.19.1<br />

AC 49.19.2<br />

It was presented that the National Centre for Disability Studies (NCDS)<br />

proposed Phase 3 Form for ‘Foundation Course on Education <strong>of</strong> Children<br />

with Disabilities’ in distance mode as well as online mode for in service<br />

teachers at any level. This programme is being developed in collaboration<br />

with the Rehabilitation <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (RCI) under an MoU. Hon’ble<br />

Vice-Chancellor has approved the <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> this Programme. An Experts<br />

Committee was held during May 21-22, 2009 finalised the curriculum.<br />

A detailed note regarding the evaluation methodology was also tabled.


AC 49.19.3<br />

ITEM NO.20<br />

AC 49.20.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Phase 3 Form for ‘Foundation Course on Education <strong>of</strong><br />

Children’ with Disabilities in distance mode as well as online mode. The<br />

AC also approved the proposed evaluation methodology for course. The<br />

NCDS is advised to <strong>of</strong>fer this course in Hindi and other regional<br />

languages.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 forms for various programme to<br />

be launched in collaboration with Cochin International Airport<br />

Limited (CIAL)<br />

It was presented that the Centre for Corporate Education, Training and<br />

Consultancy submitted the Phase 3 Forms for the following programmes:<br />

1. MBA Programme in Aviation Management<br />

2. Certificate Programme in Security & Intelligence<br />

3. Certificate Programme in Rescue & Fire Fighting<br />

4. Certificate Programme in Airport Ramp Handling<br />

5. Advanced Diploma Programme in Security Management<br />

6. Advanced Diploma Programme in Airport Operations<br />

Management<br />

These programmes are being developed at <strong>IGNOU</strong> Regional Centre,<br />

Cochin in collaboration with the Cochin International Airport Limited<br />

(CIAL). As per the terms <strong>of</strong> the MoU between CIAL and <strong>IGNOU</strong>, the<br />

CIAL Academy constituted Board <strong>of</strong> Studies, finalized and recommended<br />

the above academic programmes which were approved by the Joint<br />

Coordination Committee chaired by Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

All these programmes will be <strong>of</strong>fered from July 2009 session in face-t<strong>of</strong>ace<br />

mode by the Cochin International Airport Limited.<br />

AC 49.20.2<br />

ITEM NO.21<br />

AC 49.21.1<br />

After detailed discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved<br />

the Phase 3 Forms for (1) MBA in Aviation Management, (2) Certificate<br />

in Security & Intelligence, (3) Certificate in Rescue & Fire Fighting, (4)<br />

Certificate in Airport Ramp Handling, (5) Advanced Diploma in Security<br />

Management and (6) Advanced Diploma in Airport Operations<br />

Management to be <strong>of</strong>fered in collaboration with Cochin International<br />

Airport Limited (CIAL) in face-to-face mode from July 2009 session.<br />

To consider and approve the Eligibility for Admission to<br />

Management Programme<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 13 th January, 2009 has<br />

ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in maintaining parity in<br />

eligibility criteria for admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Management Programme for


the students directly seeking admission in the University as well as<br />

through Convergence Scheme.<br />

Now the following revised admission criteria for admission into<br />

Management Programmes through Regional Centres and under<br />

Convergence Scheme is proposed:<br />

a) Graduation in any discipline with 50% marks for General<br />

Category and 45% marks for reserved category;<br />

OR<br />

Bachelor’s degree with 3 years <strong>of</strong><br />

supervisory/managerial/pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience, or Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Degree in Engineering/Technology/Medicine/ Architecture/Law/<br />

Pharmacy; or Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Qualifications in Accountancy/Cost<br />

and Works Accountancy/Company Secretary ship etc. or Masters<br />

Degree in any subject<br />

b) Clearance <strong>of</strong> OPENMAT conducted by <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The candidates<br />

who have successfully cleared the entrance test for admission into<br />

Management Programme conducted by institutions like CAT,<br />

MAT and State level tests need not appear in OPENMAT.<br />

c) Non-graduates (10+2 or equivalent) with six years <strong>of</strong><br />

Managerial/supervisory/pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience are eligible for<br />

taking admission into Diploma in Management only after clearing<br />

the entrance test.<br />

Explanation: ‘Experience’ means work experience <strong>of</strong> a person<br />

during or after acquiring the qualification as specified above.<br />

Keeping in view the urgency, the Vice-Chancellor has approved the above<br />

revised admission criteria.<br />

AC 49 .21.2<br />

During discussion, the following points were raised and decided:<br />

i. In the case <strong>of</strong> CAT/MAT tests there is no pass or fail. Only<br />

percentile scores are given. Therefore the modalities for cut <strong>of</strong>f<br />

scores are to be worked out by the SED.<br />

ii. Normally, the scores <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the tests are valid for two years for<br />

admission purposes. Therefore, it is recommended to follow the<br />

same validity period for the purpose <strong>of</strong> admission to <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

programme.<br />

iii. Currently, a candidate is allowed to register up to a maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

four courses per semester. It is recommended to allow a candidate<br />

to register up to a maximum <strong>of</strong> five courses per semester, making<br />

the total programme <strong>of</strong> a minimum duration <strong>of</strong> two years.


AC 49 .21.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the revised eligibility criteria for Admission to Management<br />

Programme. In addition, the AC directed to follow the above<br />

recommendations.


ITEM NO.22<br />

AC 49.22.1<br />

AC 49.22.2<br />

ITEM NO.23<br />

AC 49.23.1<br />

AC 49.23.2<br />

ITEM NO.24<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor for rounding <strong>of</strong>f the<br />

overall percentage for the students, who completed their programme<br />

before December-2008 term-end examination.<br />

It was presented that the ACSC at its 28 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 4 th November-<br />

2008 approved rounding <strong>of</strong>f the overall percentage in case decimal points<br />

are between .5 to .9 to the next mark, effective from December-2008<br />

term-end examination. However, the students, on whose request the<br />

matter was placed before the ACSC, were not covered under the decision<br />

as they had completed the programme prior to December-2008 Term-end<br />

Examination. In order to mitigate their difficulties, the Vice-Chancellor<br />

accorded his approval to consider their cases.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

for rounding <strong>of</strong>f the overall percentage for the students who completed<br />

their programme before December-2008 term-end examination.<br />

To ratify the action taken be the Vice-Chancellor in approving the<br />

Standard Operating Procedure/Modalities for conduct <strong>of</strong> On Line<br />

Term-End Examination to be conducted on 28 th June, 2009 for<br />

PGCPM<br />

It is presented that the PGCPM (Post Graduate Certificate in Project<br />

Management), on <strong>of</strong>fer from January, 2009, is an online programme<br />

directly handled by the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology. Online<br />

term-end examination for the first batch <strong>of</strong> students was held on 28 th June,<br />

2009 (Sunday).The Vice-Chancellor approved the Standard Operating<br />

Procedure/Modalities (Annexure - 4) and the online TEE was conducted<br />

as per the schedule.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Standard Operating Procedure/Modalities for conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

On-line examination for the PGCPM programme.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in approving the<br />

matters relating to <strong>of</strong>fer M.Sc. in Counselling and Family Therapy<br />

from January, 2010.<br />

AC 49.24.1 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 45 th meeting held on 24 th October 2008<br />

approved the Phase 3 Form for Post Graduate Diploma in Counselling,<br />

Family Therapy and Mediation. This programme was shifted from<br />

SOEDS to NCDS. The expert Committee opined that a Masters degree in<br />

this area would attract more learners. Therefore, the Expert Committee<br />

suggested M. Sc. in Counselling and Family Therapy in a modular system<br />

with an exit option <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in Counselling and Family Therapy


after successful completion <strong>of</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

AC 49.24.2<br />

ITEM NO.25<br />

AC 49.25.1<br />

The revised Phase 3 Form for M.Sc. in Counselling and Family Therapy<br />

(Annexure - 5) was approved by the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the revised Phase 3 Form for M.Sc. Counselling and Family<br />

Therapy in a modular system with an exit option <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in<br />

Counselling and Family Therapy after successful completion <strong>of</strong> first year<br />

<strong>of</strong> study.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for adoption <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> open<br />

course Guide supported Formal E-Learning Processes in <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s<br />

courses.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivathsan, Pro-Vice-Chancellor <strong>IGNOU</strong> presented a proposal<br />

pertaining to the widespread adoption <strong>of</strong> E-Learning related systems and<br />

processes by the University. The Working Paper on the proposed scheme<br />

is placed at Annexure 6.<br />

The salient features <strong>of</strong> the proposal are as under:<br />

1) The ‘Open Distributed Technology Enhanced Learning’ (ODTEL) as<br />

the future framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> from enhancing its present printed<br />

Self Learning Materials (SLMs) and study centres managed ‘Open<br />

Distance Learning’ (ODL) education framework for all courses <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> to be executed over a reasonable period <strong>of</strong> time for transition<br />

from present Open Distance Learning to the new framework <strong>of</strong><br />

ODTEL.<br />

2) The ODTEL as a unique file e-learning framework that effectively<br />

arguments different modes <strong>of</strong> education ranging from (i) face to face<br />

or conventional classroom, (ii) blended learning (iii) existing SLMs<br />

based ODL, (iv) emerging paperless web-communities driven<br />

education systems. The anchor <strong>of</strong> the ODTEL is the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Open<br />

Courses Guide (IOCG) system. IOCG is an open course management<br />

framework that is built over a Wiki system with appropriate<br />

extensions. IOCG effectively provides the formal sequencing <strong>of</strong><br />

learning activities that are designed by Course Experts and executed<br />

during the course <strong>of</strong> the conduct <strong>of</strong> the course itself. IOCG facilitates<br />

multiple modes <strong>of</strong> communicating and engaging the learners and the<br />

counselors for better conduct <strong>of</strong> learning centric course activities and<br />

associated assessment <strong>of</strong> learners’ performance. It is proposed<br />

that a disciplined and pedagogically architected IOCG is<br />

developed by the Course Team concurrently with their course design<br />

and authoring <strong>of</strong> the SLMs.<br />

3) IOCG is backed by a suite <strong>of</strong> systems that together constitute the


ODTEL. This requires necessary strengthening and augmentation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s ICT capabilities, systems and services. Towards this it is<br />

proposed to establish, (i) a unified Data centre with advanced<br />

servers, storage and broadband Internet/VPN connectivity that<br />

support ‘cloud computing’, (ii) migration over a reasonable time <strong>of</strong><br />

existing services like the Website, eGyankosh, <strong>IGNOU</strong> Online,<br />

Digital Library services, Learning Management Systems and Students<br />

Database management to the cloud computing facility. ACIIL is<br />

taking the initiative to establish the unified data center and broadband<br />

connectivity in association with the NPTEL, RailTel and<br />

developments in the National Knowledge Network.<br />

4) <strong>IGNOU</strong> is proposing to launch courses based upon the content<br />

developed by the IITs and IISc under the National Programme on<br />

Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL). This is available in the<br />

form <strong>of</strong> suites <strong>of</strong> Recorded Video Lecturers (RVLs) and web-content.<br />

It is proposed to launch NPTEL-<strong>IGNOU</strong> courses by following<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved processes like generating the<br />

SLMs in e-Content form and development <strong>of</strong> the associated IOCG.<br />

5) <strong>IGNOU</strong> needs to build up experience in the management <strong>of</strong> the IOCG<br />

supported online mode <strong>of</strong> education. Secondly, it is important that<br />

extensive online supported courses management is used for the<br />

programs <strong>of</strong>fered under the International Division.<br />

AC 49.25.2<br />

The matter is placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for consideration and<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />

i) Adoption <strong>of</strong> the ODTEL framework for all the courses <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> to<br />

be executed over a reasonable period <strong>of</strong> time for transition from the<br />

present ODL to the new frame work.<br />

ii) Formal development <strong>of</strong> the IOCG by Course Team concurrently with<br />

the SLM development for all new course. <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s Schools and<br />

sections that conduct courses will set up Course Management Groups<br />

for the ongoing courses who will be given the additional charge <strong>of</strong><br />

developing the IOCG for their respective courses.<br />

iii) Setting up <strong>of</strong> the (i) Unified Data centre with broadband OFC based<br />

Internet and VPN connectivity with the Regional Centres and (ii) a<br />

backend Educational Informatics Laboratory to develop and build<br />

capacity in establishing and servicing <strong>of</strong> IOCG anchored ODTEL<br />

Systems. Both will be done under the overall supervision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACILL and executed in association with the concerned divisions and<br />

centres <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

iv) Launch <strong>of</strong> NPTEL-<strong>IGNOU</strong> courses using the NPTEL content and the


IOCG approach.<br />

v) Establishing the School Board for NPTEL-<strong>IGNOU</strong> programme under<br />

the purview <strong>of</strong> the ACIIL.<br />

vi) Courses under the NPTEL-<strong>IGNOU</strong> programme will be <strong>of</strong>fered using<br />

both printed SLM mode and also using the paperless eSLM hosted on<br />

a joint NPTEL-<strong>IGNOU</strong> Programme portal and augmented by the<br />

IOCG System.<br />

vii) Direct all concerned schools <strong>of</strong>fering International programmes to<br />

speedily develop the IOCG based system <strong>of</strong> ODTEL in the respective<br />

courses for such programmes.<br />

viii) The full scale ODTEL services to be developed and deployed for the<br />

programmes managed through the ID. The Education Informatic Lab<br />

will closely work with the ID for the effective management <strong>of</strong> such<br />

programmes.<br />

AC 49.25.3<br />

ITEM NO.26<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> discussed the proposal in detail and approved the<br />

same.<br />

To report the revised target enrolment to Certificate in Information<br />

Technology (CIT) programme<br />

AC 49.26.1 It was presented that the SOCIS projected a target enrolement <strong>of</strong> 10,000<br />

per annum in the Phase 3 Form for the Certificate in Information<br />

Technology (CIT) programme. The School now revised the target<br />

enrolment as 3,000 per annum. This is reported to the AC for information.<br />

AC 49.26.3<br />

ITEM NO.27<br />

AC 49.27.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the revised target enrolment <strong>of</strong> 3,000 per<br />

annum to Certificate in Information Technology (CIT) programme<br />

To consider and approve the Establishment <strong>of</strong> National Centre for<br />

Local Governance<br />

It was presented that Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE proposed for the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> ‘National Centre for Local Governance’ in the<br />

University.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Aslam explained the rationale for establishing the proposed centre.<br />

He stressed that the establishment <strong>of</strong> a ‘National Centre for Local<br />

Governance (NCLG) will greatly help to catalyze the process <strong>of</strong><br />

democratic decentralization. It is expected that the proposed centre will<br />

facilitate developing a clear vision and strategy to plan and provide for an<br />

appropriate educational and training intervention to meet the challenge <strong>of</strong><br />

facilitating and expediting the silent revolution expected to be brought<br />

about by the 73 rd & 74 th amendments <strong>of</strong> the Constitution.


AC 49.27.2<br />

The members raised the following points during discussion:<br />

a) Inclusion <strong>of</strong> the word ‘National’ in the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Centre.<br />

b) Possibility for collaboration and coordination with similar other<br />

institutions like NIRD etc.<br />

c) Focus <strong>of</strong> the proposed Centre on the ODL capabilities to local self<br />

government.<br />

AC 49.27.3<br />

ITEM NO.28<br />

AC 49.28.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deliberated and approved the proposal for<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> the centre with modified nomenclature as ‘Centre for<br />

ODL Capabilities in Local Governance’. The AC further recommended<br />

the proposed staffing pattern for the Centre. The proposal is placed at<br />

Annexure – 7.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering Master <strong>of</strong> Visual<br />

and Performing Arts (MVA & MPA) programmes in face-to-face<br />

mode.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts (SOPVA)<br />

proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer the following programmes in face-to-face mode from<br />

July, 2009.<br />

(a) MPA – Bharatnatyam Dance<br />

(b) MPA – Hindustani Classical Vocal Music<br />

(c) MPA – Theatre Arts<br />

(d) MVA – Painting<br />

(e) MVA – Applied Art (to be <strong>of</strong>fered from July 2010)<br />

The Phase 1 Form for the above programmes were approved by the<br />

School Board at its meeting held on April 29, 2009.<br />

Tecnia Institute <strong>of</strong> Dance, Music & Fine Arts, Rohini, Delhi is willing to<br />

work in partnership and provide infrastructure on per student fixed<br />

charges where as School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts, <strong>IGNOU</strong> will<br />

support the course with <strong>Academic</strong> guidance ad supervision. Ganesha<br />

Natyalaya, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi is willing to make<br />

available its premises on rental basis for MPA.<br />

AC 49.28.2<br />

ITEM NO.29<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

Master <strong>of</strong> Visual and Performing Arts (MVA & MPA) programmes in<br />

face-to-face mode from July, 2009.<br />

To report for ratification <strong>of</strong> the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

on <strong>of</strong>fering B.A. in (a) Fashion Design, (b) Textile Design and (c)


Fashion Merchandising and Production programmes as face to face<br />

full time programmes in place <strong>of</strong> distance education.<br />

AC 49.29.1<br />

A proposal was received from the Pearl Academy <strong>of</strong> Fashion to convert<br />

B.A. (Fashion Design), B.A. (Textile Design) and B.A. (Fashion<br />

Merchandising and Production) programmes from 4 to 3 years full time<br />

face-to-face. The item was considered by the School Board in its meeting<br />

held on 22/4/2009. After detailed discussion, the School Board<br />

authorized the chairman <strong>of</strong> the School Board to constitute a committee for<br />

visiting Pearl Academy <strong>of</strong> Fashion centres at Delhi, Jaipur and Chennai<br />

and make its recommendations. A committee duly constituted visited all<br />

the three centres <strong>of</strong> the Pearl Academy <strong>of</strong> Fashion located at Delhi, Jaipur<br />

and Chennai and submitted its recommendations. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee’s recommendations, the Vice-Chancellor as given his kind<br />

approval for <strong>of</strong>fering the above programmes as full time face-to-face<br />

programmes and reducing the duration from 4 to 3 years retaining the<br />

courses and credits as earlier.<br />

The minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting <strong>of</strong> the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Vocational<br />

Education and Training, recommendations committee to study availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> infrastructure facilities for <strong>of</strong>fering full time B.A. in (a) Fashion<br />

Design, (b) Textile Design and (c) Fashion Merchandising and Production<br />

programmes at Pearl Academy <strong>of</strong> Fashion centres (at Delhi, Jaipur &<br />

Chennai) and revised course structure for the above programmes is placed<br />

at (Annexure – 8).<br />

AC 49.29.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the Action Taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

in <strong>of</strong>fering the following three programmes as face-to-face full time<br />

programmes in place <strong>of</strong> distance mode: (1) B.A. in Fashion Design, (2)<br />

B.A. in Textile Design and (3) B.A. in Fashion Merchandising and<br />

Production, along with their revised programme structure.<br />

TABLED ITEMS<br />

ITEM NO. 30<br />

AC 49.30.1<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for the M.A. in Gender<br />

and Development Studies (with exit point for PG Diploma in Gender<br />

and Development Studies) in the Distance Mode<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies<br />

(SOGDS) submitted Phase 3 Form for the ‘M.A. in Gender and<br />

Development Studies’ in a modular approach with an exit point for PG<br />

Diploma in Gender and Development Studies after successful completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 1 st year <strong>of</strong> study. In the 2 nd Year <strong>of</strong> study, the student will have


option to choose specialization according to his/her interest from a range<br />

<strong>of</strong> optional courses using a choice-based credit system. It is proposed to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer this programme in the Distance Mode. Phase 3 Form for this<br />

programme was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOGDS at its 4 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 6, 2009.<br />

AC 49.30.2<br />

AC 49.30.3<br />

ITEM NO.31<br />

AC 49.31.1<br />

AC 49.31.2<br />

ITEM NO.32<br />

ITEM NO.33<br />

ITEM NO.34<br />

ITEM NO.35<br />

ITEM NO.36<br />

ITEM NO.37<br />

AC 49.32-37.1<br />

Members sought clarifications regarding course structure, course contents,<br />

target group, etc, for which Director, SOGDS clarified.<br />

After detailed discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved<br />

the Phase 3 Form (Annexure - 9) for M.A. in Gender and Development<br />

Studies with a exit point for PG Diploma in Gender and Development<br />

Studies after successful completion <strong>of</strong> first year.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for the Postgraduate<br />

Certificate in Gender, Entrepreneurship and Development in the<br />

distance mode<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Gender and Development Studies<br />

(SOGDS) presented Phase 3 Form for ‘Postgraduate Certificate in<br />

Gender, Entrepreneurship and Development’ in the distance mode. The<br />

programme would benefit the functionaries belonging to organizations<br />

involved with promotion <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship, micro-credit and<br />

micr<strong>of</strong>inance initiatives, especially to achieve gender equity and equality.<br />

The Phase 3 Form was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOGDS at its 4 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on April 6, 2009.<br />

After detailed discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved<br />

the Phase 3 Form (Annexure - 10) for Postgraduate Certificate in Gender,<br />

Entrepreneurship and Development in the distance mode.<br />

To consider and approve M.Phil./Ph. D Course Work in Hindi.<br />

To consider and approve M.Phil./Ph. D Course Work in English.<br />

To consider and approve M.Phil./Ph. D Course Work in Malayalam.<br />

To consider and approve M.Phil./Ph. D Course Work in Tamil.<br />

To consider and approve M.Phil./Ph. D Course Work in Gujarati.<br />

To consider and approve M.Phil./Ph. D Course Work in Urdu.<br />

Item Nos 32 to 37 were taken up together as they relate to course work for<br />

M.Phil/Ph.D programmes <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities (SOH) in Hindi,<br />

English, Malayalam, Tamil, Gujarati and Urdu languages. It was


presented that, as per criteria for admission to M.Phil and Ph.D<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> the University, the Post Graduate students who directly<br />

join M.Phil/Ph.D programme have to complete 32 credits <strong>of</strong> course work<br />

as well as 16 credits <strong>of</strong> desertation for M.Phil and 64 credits <strong>of</strong><br />

desertation for Ph.D. The SOH presented Phase 3 Forms for 32 credits <strong>of</strong><br />

course work for M.Phil/Ph.D programme in six languages viz., Hindi,<br />

English, Malayam, Tamil, Gujarati and Urdu. The Phase 3 Forms were<br />

approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOH at its 39 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on June 24,<br />

2009.<br />

AC 49.32-37.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bharadwaj, Director, SOH explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed course work. The evaluation system for all these programmes<br />

shall comprise <strong>of</strong> two components: (1) continuous assessment with 50%<br />

weightage (two term papers carrying 30% wieghtage for theory and<br />

practical assessment through seminars etc with 20% weightage), and (2)<br />

term-end examination with 50% weightage (30% for theory and 20% for<br />

the viva-voce).<br />

It was stated that the initial admission in Hindi and English will be<br />

between 20-30 students and contact programme with the students is also<br />

being envisaged. As <strong>of</strong> now, the Programme in Malayalam, Tamil,<br />

Gujarati and Urdu languages is limited to RTA scheme till regular Faculty<br />

is appointed in these disciplines.<br />

AC 49.32-37.3<br />

AC 49.32-37.4<br />

Director, SOH raised the issue <strong>of</strong> non-availability <strong>of</strong> core faculty in Indian<br />

Languages to undertake course development and M.Phil/Ph.D guidance.<br />

In this context, the decision (Resolution No 46.1.4) <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 13 th January 2009 to establish a Centre<br />

<strong>of</strong> Indian Languages was reiterated. As per the decision, a separate Centre<br />

<strong>of</strong> Indian Languages with full academic autonomy like any school <strong>of</strong><br />

studies to start academic programmes in Indian languages is to be created.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> again re-emphasized the earlier decision to<br />

establish the ‘Centre for Indian Languages’ to effectively interact with the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Humanities (SOH) and the School <strong>of</strong> Translation Studies<br />

(SOTS). It is also suggested to create one post <strong>of</strong> Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the Indian Languages listed under the 8 th Schedule <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution.<br />

1. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Froms<br />

(Annexure - 11) submitted by the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities (SOH) for<br />

M.Phil./Ph.D Course Work in Hindi, English, Malayalam, Tamil,<br />

Gujarati and Urdu languages.<br />

2. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> further recommended to establish the ‘Centre<br />

for Indian Languages’ with one Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Indian Languages listed under the 8 th Schedule <strong>of</strong> the Constitution.


The Centre shall effectively interact with SOH and SOTS.<br />

ITEM NO.38<br />

AC 49.38.1<br />

AC 49.38.2<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in extending the<br />

50% fee concession to the Diploma and Certificate Programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture <strong>of</strong>fers several Diploma and<br />

Certificate programmes to youth and women below poverty line from<br />

rural areas. As these target groups can not afford the full programme fee,<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> already approved 50% fee concession for most <strong>of</strong><br />

the diploma programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the SOA. While launching<br />

Certificate in Poultry Farming, the Hon’ble Vice Chancellor announced<br />

50% fee concession for Certificate programmes also. In view <strong>of</strong> this, the<br />

SOA proposed to <strong>of</strong>fer 50% fee concession to all the Diploma and<br />

Certificate programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by SOA, which was approved by the<br />

Hon’ble VC.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor has approved the following criteria for availing the<br />

fee concession:<br />

1. All the candidates from rural area shall be entitled for 50% fee<br />

concession subject to the production <strong>of</strong> domicile certificate.<br />

2. The urban standards below poverty line shall be given 50% fee<br />

concession subject to production <strong>of</strong> income certificate.<br />

AC 49.38.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

extending the 50% fee concession for all the Diploma and Certificate<br />

Programmes <strong>of</strong>fered by the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.


ITEM NO.39<br />

AC 49.39.1<br />

AC 49.39.2<br />

ITEM NO.40<br />

To consider and approve the revision <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Diploma in<br />

Distance Education (PGDDE) and Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Distance<br />

Education (MADE)<br />

It was presented that the STRIDE had undertaken the 5 th revision <strong>of</strong><br />

PGDDE & MADE as recommended by the Expert Committee in its<br />

meeting held on 4 th & 5 th August, 2008. As per the revised structure<br />

proposed, both the programmes are now to be integrated as MA in<br />

Distance Education with the provision for lateral entry <strong>of</strong> those with<br />

PGDDE to MADE. Subsequently, the Course Coordinators <strong>of</strong> all the 10<br />

courses have revised the course outlines.<br />

After detailed discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved<br />

the revised nomenclature, structure, duration, etc <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Distance Education (PGDDE) and Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Distance<br />

Education (MADE). The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also approved the revised<br />

course outlines <strong>of</strong> all the 10 courses <strong>of</strong> these programmes.<br />

To consider and approve the modification in eligibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Programmes having eligibility 10 th and 12 th – regarding.<br />

AC 49.40.1 It was presented that 37 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the APC held on June 26, 2009<br />

suggested to modify eligibility conditions <strong>of</strong> 10 th and 12 th Class for<br />

various Certificate and Diploma programmes as follows:<br />

a) Certificate Programmes: 10 th pass to be replaced with Literate with<br />

15 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

b) Diploma Programmes: 12 th (10+2) or equivalent pass with 17 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age.<br />

The above suggestion <strong>of</strong> APC is now placed before the AC for<br />

consideration and approval.<br />

AC 49.40.2<br />

AC 49.40.3<br />

During the discussions the members felt that the eligibility criteria for<br />

admission to various certificates/diploma programmes are not uniform<br />

across the Board. The entry qualification varies from literate to<br />

graduation depending on the nature <strong>of</strong> the certificate/diploma programme.<br />

Therefore, it may not be appropriate to decide the entry qualification on a<br />

uniform basis. It is opined that the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the APC as mentioned<br />

above may be kept in mind by the School while deciding the entry<br />

qualification for certificate/diploma programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> advised the Schools to take the above suggestions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the APC as guidelines and decide the eligibility qualification for<br />

admission to certificate/diploma programmes as per the requirements.


ITEM NO.41<br />

AC 49.41.1<br />

AC 49.41.2<br />

AC 49.41.3<br />

ITEM NO.42<br />

AC 49.42.1<br />

AC 49.42.2<br />

AC 49.42.3<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in launching <strong>of</strong><br />

Paramedical/Allied Health Sciences Programmes<br />

It was presented that the Centre for Paramedical Sciences developed<br />

Bachelor Degree, Diploma & Online Certificate Programmes in the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Paramedical and Allied Health Sciences in collaboration with CMAI,<br />

AHERF and BSS. The Vice-Chancellor approved the launching <strong>of</strong> these<br />

programmes in face-to-face mode from July 2009 admission cycle. These<br />

programmes were already announced through common advertisement.<br />

During the discussion it was pointed out that B.Sc in Optometry and<br />

Ophthalmic Techniques / Technology (BSCHOT) is already on <strong>of</strong>fer in<br />

face-to-face mode for the past few years. Therefore, there is no need for<br />

fresh approval for this programme at this stage.<br />

With the above observation, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action<br />

taken by the Vice Chancellor in launching Bachelor Degree, Diploma &<br />

Online Certificate Programmes in the area <strong>of</strong> Paramedical and Allied<br />

Health Sciences.<br />

To consider and approve the launch B. Sc. (Nautical Science)<br />

Programme for the Merchant Navy Officers who serve Near Coastal<br />

Vessels (NCVs).<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology (SOET)<br />

was <strong>of</strong>fering B.Sc. (Nautical Science) in collaboration with DG Shipping.<br />

The programme was withdrawn by <strong>IGNOU</strong> as the DG Shipping shifted it<br />

to the Indian Maritime University, Chennai. The DG, Shipping, Mumbai<br />

has now proposed for collaboration with <strong>IGNOU</strong> to <strong>of</strong>fer a revised B.Sc.<br />

(Nautical Science) for training the candidates to qualify for becoming<br />

the Merchant Navy Officers who serve Near Coastal Vessels (NCVs). A<br />

team <strong>of</strong> Navel Officers met the Vice-Chancellor and the faculty and<br />

discussed broad structure <strong>of</strong> the revised programme, as presented in the<br />

agenda note.<br />

Director, SOET presented the proposed modifications in the B.Sc.<br />

(Nautical Science) programme. Further details <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

programme will be worked out after consulting Indian shipping<br />

companies and other stakeholders.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the launch B. Sc.<br />

(Nautical Science) Programme for the Merchant Navy Officers who serve<br />

Near Coastal Vessels (NCVs). The Faculty shall work out detail structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the programme and discuss in the School Board.


ITEM NO.43<br />

AC 49.43.1<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for establishment <strong>of</strong> Institute<br />

<strong>of</strong> Higher Learning at Bangalore under <strong>IGNOU</strong>-Indian Navy<br />

Collaboration.<br />

It was presented that Indian Navy proposed <strong>IGNOU</strong> to set up an Institute<br />

<strong>of</strong> Higher Learning at Bangalore on land owned by Indian Navy. The<br />

primary purpose for establishing the institute is to provide avenues for<br />

quality higher pr<strong>of</strong>essional education to naval wards who due to frequent<br />

transfers <strong>of</strong> their parents and domiciliary restrictions <strong>of</strong> states find it<br />

difficult to get admission in coveted institutes in the country. It is<br />

proposed to set up the above residential institute primarily in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

engineering and technology at graduation level to start with. The institute<br />

will <strong>of</strong>fer on-campus full time regular B. Tech. Course in Mechanical,<br />

Electronics and Communication Engineering, Electrical and Electronics<br />

Engineering, Computer Science and Information Technology in addition<br />

to ODL programmes in various areas.<br />

A Joint Committee <strong>of</strong> Experts comprising representatives from <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

and Indian Navy is to be constituted to work out a detailed project report.<br />

AC 49.43.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Higher Learning at Bangalore under <strong>IGNOU</strong>-<br />

Indian Navy Collaboration. The SOET is directed to take further action in<br />

the matter.<br />

ITEM NO.44 To consider and approve proposal for setting up <strong>of</strong> Flexible e-<br />

learning environment through eGyanKosh based course wise<br />

registration and assessment.<br />

AC 49.44.1 Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal circulated a proposal for setting up <strong>of</strong> Flexible e-<br />

learning environment through eGyanKosh based course wise registration<br />

and assessment. The details are as under.<br />

AC 49.44.2<br />

eGyanKosh (www.egyankosh.ac.in) was initiated by <strong>IGNOU</strong> in October,<br />

2005 to store, index, preserve, distribute and share the digital learning<br />

resources developed by the <strong>IGNOU</strong>. It has now emerged as one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s largest educational resource repositories. Over 95% <strong>of</strong> the selfinstructional<br />

print material <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> have already been digitised and<br />

uploaded on the repository. The video programmes are being provided<br />

through a special channel <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> in YouTube with the metadata link<br />

in the repository. At present about 36,000 self-instructional print materials<br />

and over a 1,600 videos are available in the repository. After its public<br />

launch in June 9, 2008, the site already received around 486,000 hits with<br />

an average <strong>of</strong> 1,000 visits per day from all over the world. There are<br />

40,000 active registered users <strong>of</strong> the repository. The statistics clearly


indicates the growing popularity <strong>of</strong> the eGyanKosh.<br />

It is now proposed to extend the facilities <strong>of</strong> eGyanKosh to set up a<br />

Flexible e-Learning Environment for course wise registration and<br />

assessment. The University is already <strong>of</strong>fering 15 online programmes<br />

which are in closed environment through a learning management system.<br />

The proposed model will be in a complete open and flexible environment<br />

with following features:<br />

1. Any visitor to the eGyanKosh site will have the option to register<br />

for any particular course or a full length academic programme. A<br />

modular approach will be followed wherein a registered learner<br />

can combine course credits to obtain a diploma or degree <strong>of</strong> their<br />

own choice.<br />

2. The platform will provide self learning environment with a list <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Advisors/ Course Guides to act as mentors. The<br />

Personal Learning Environment (PLE) will have interactive tools<br />

like Discussion Board, Blogs, wikis, podcassting, RSS feeds etc.<br />

3. Each course will have online assessment mechanism wherein a<br />

learner can take their exams virtually 'on demand'. However, the<br />

final exam will be in a proctored environment (exam centres have<br />

to be identified both at national and international level). The<br />

evaluation will be at three levels – diagnostic (where prior<br />

knowledge testing is required), formative and summative and will<br />

be designed by the faculty based on course requirements. Various<br />

modes <strong>of</strong> evaluation may be adopted viz. objective, short essay<br />

type, term paper, course projects, practical activities etc.<br />

4. A complete tracking mechanism will be integrated in the platform<br />

through the e-portfolios <strong>of</strong> individual learners. E-portfolio will<br />

keep a formal record <strong>of</strong> all formal and informal studies carried out<br />

by the registered learner. Certification <strong>of</strong> the course will be based<br />

on stipulated time spent on a course (for a 4 credit a minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

45 days) and completion <strong>of</strong> all learning activities identified by the<br />

faculty.<br />

The proposed enhancement <strong>of</strong> eGyanKosh will provide an opportunity for<br />

prospective learners to sample a course before enrolling and also help<br />

them in choosing courses and programmes <strong>of</strong> study. Course wise<br />

registration will facilitate <strong>of</strong>fering topic specific continuing education<br />

programmes especially in skill based and pr<strong>of</strong>essional areas. This model<br />

provides a flexible framework for Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies to identify and<br />

combine different courses already available, for <strong>of</strong>fering new tailor-made<br />

need based programmes. In the long run this will help in achieving<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s objective <strong>of</strong> democratising higher education by taking it to the<br />

doorsteps <strong>of</strong> the learners and providing access to high quality education to


all those who seek it.<br />

AC 49.44.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after detailed discussion approved the proposal for<br />

setting up <strong>of</strong> Flexible e-learning environment through eGyanKosh based<br />

course wise registration and assessment.


ITEM NO.45<br />

AC 49.45.1<br />

To report the National Launching <strong>of</strong> the 2-Year Associate Degree<br />

Programme in Community Colleges.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor reported to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> the National<br />

Launching <strong>of</strong> the 2-Year Associate Degree Programme in Community<br />

Colleges by Adv. Kapil Sibal, the Hon’ble Minister for Human Resource<br />

Development, and Smt. D. Purandewari, Hon’ble Minister <strong>of</strong> State for<br />

RD, GOI on 4 th July, 2009 on the occasion <strong>of</strong> the 100 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

BOM.<br />

AC 49.45.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in its 46 th meeting held on 13 th January, 2009<br />

approved the Concept Note on <strong>IGNOU</strong> Community Colleges based on the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the National Expert Committee. In pursuance <strong>of</strong> this<br />

decision “Expression <strong>of</strong> Interest” was invited through national dailies.<br />

Approximately 700 applications were received. The second meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

the National expert Committee was held on 9 th April, 2009 to discuss the<br />

modalities <strong>of</strong> implementation. All applicants were invited for an<br />

Interactive <strong>Meeting</strong> to <strong>IGNOU</strong> on 20 th April, 2009. Around 300<br />

institutions participated, presented their pr<strong>of</strong>iles and interacted with<br />

experts. The discussions helped in articulating the Guidelines for the<br />

Scheme. Institutions were recommended for consideration as Community<br />

College based on the criteria <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Track record in the field <strong>of</strong> community service and skill based<br />

education.<br />

• Physical and human power availability.<br />

• Linkages with industry/community.<br />

• Experience in need analysis for identification <strong>of</strong> programme<br />

sectors and the demographic spread <strong>of</strong> the institution’s reach.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor through a communication dated 9 th May, 2009<br />

elicited interest <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> faculty for contributing academically and<br />

administratively to the development <strong>of</strong> the Scheme. 45 teachers and 31<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> Regional Services Division responded.<br />

In order to enhance regional awareness and as per the suggestions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Expert Committee, the First Regional <strong>Meeting</strong> was held in<br />

Chennai on 25 th May, .2009 at MSSRF, Chennai in collaboration with<br />

Tamil Nadu Open University. Around 100 institutions and 20 <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

faculty participated. Pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> institutions were presented and possible<br />

programmes for launch were discussed. In addition, institutions selected<br />

from the South at the National <strong>Meeting</strong> and interested in further<br />

discussions/clarifications were also invited. The meeting helped in<br />

identifying some more potential Community Colleges and provided as<br />

active forum for academic interaction with <strong>IGNOU</strong> faculty regarding:<br />

• Kinds <strong>of</strong> programmes to be considered by institutions.


• Availability and use <strong>of</strong> existing SLM repository <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

• Programme structure.<br />

• Gazette notification <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu Government regarding<br />

Community Colleges.<br />

As an outcome <strong>of</strong> these deliberations, Award letters were issued to 108<br />

institutions. The Community Colleges have submitted and undertaking<br />

and the Community College Board, <strong>Academic</strong> Committee and<br />

Examination Committee have been formed by the respective Colleges.<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> representatives on all the bodies have been nominated and<br />

Visit/Community College Board/<strong>Academic</strong> Committee meetings have<br />

commenced.<br />

The Indian Centre for Research and Development <strong>of</strong> Community College<br />

(ICRDCE) <strong>of</strong> Chennai organized a meeting <strong>of</strong> its Community Colleges in<br />

collaboration with <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Tamil Nadu Open University on 22 nd and<br />

23 rd June, 2009 and deliberated on the integration <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu Open<br />

University Community College Students into the Associate Degree<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

The Vice-Chancellor had an interaction with the Hon’ble Minister <strong>of</strong><br />

Human Resource Development on 10 th June, 2009 regarding the Scheme<br />

and after detailed deliberations, it was decided to have a National Launch<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Associate Degree programme on 4 th July, 2009.<br />

Presently, the Scheme receives no financial support from <strong>IGNOU</strong> and it is<br />

worth mentioning that all participation so far has been purely voluntary.<br />

A few <strong>of</strong> the Community Colleges have provision for nominal scholarship<br />

out <strong>of</strong> their Trust/Society funds and some others are making arrangements<br />

for bank loans. The Regional <strong>Meeting</strong> for the Western Region in which<br />

approximately 70 institutions have been invited is scheduled for 13 th July,<br />

2009. <strong>Meeting</strong>s for further applications and other regions will be done<br />

consequently.<br />

In order to institutionalize the mechanism, decisions in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following are to be made:<br />

• Material procurement rate for Community Colleges’ from<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

• Fee slab for various programmes.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> and administrative arrangements for the Scheme in <strong>IGNOU</strong>:<br />

• Creation <strong>of</strong> a Community College Board.<br />

• Constitution <strong>of</strong> Boards <strong>of</strong> Studies for different disciplines by the<br />

Board.<br />

• Unit for Quality Assurance <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges.<br />

• Material Production and dissemination.<br />

• ICT deployment and capacity building <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges.


• Training <strong>of</strong> personnel in Community Colleges.<br />

AC 49.45.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> applauded the Vice-Chancellor for his leadership<br />

in designing and launching the innovative scheme <strong>of</strong> Associate Degree<br />

Programme in Community Colleges.<br />

ITEM NO.46<br />

AC 49.46.1<br />

AC 49.46.2<br />

AC 49.46.3<br />

To consider and approve the creation <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Commerce and<br />

Business Studies.<br />

The Vice Chancellor appraised the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> that the Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

the School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies proposed for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Business Studies by carving out the<br />

Commerce Discipline from the existing School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies<br />

(SOMS). As <strong>of</strong> now, the SOMS comprises two disciplines viz.,<br />

Management and Commerce. Both these disciplines <strong>of</strong>fer a large number<br />

<strong>of</strong> programmes and courses. Over a period, they grew exorbitantly and<br />

merit separate Schools as is the practice in most <strong>of</strong> the Universities<br />

including Central Universities like Delhi University and Jamia Millia<br />

Islamia. Nevertheless, Commerce Discipline is striving to cater the<br />

diverging needs <strong>of</strong> business sector in development <strong>of</strong> programmes, and<br />

also taking new initiatives like Spot evaluation, for the first time in the<br />

University. The Vice-Chancellor expressed the view that the University<br />

would be able to serve the education and training needs <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

segments <strong>of</strong> the commerce, industry and trade if there are two different<br />

Schools.<br />

While endorsing the above view point in toto, the Members informed that<br />

Commerce and Management are two separate Schools in almost all the<br />

Universities in the country. Therefore, the Members suggested the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> a new School for Commerce discipline with the<br />

nomenclature as the ‘School <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Business Studies’.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new ‘School <strong>of</strong> Commerce and Business Studies.’<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FIFTIETH MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

8 TH OCTOBER 2009


INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FIFTIETH MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON OCTOBER 8, 2009 AT 11.00 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM,<br />

BLOCK-8 <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

250. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

251. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

252. Dr. D.K. Choudhary, PVC (I/C ACD) - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

5. Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

6. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. R. Srivasthan, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

7. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

8. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

9. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

10. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

11. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

12. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

13. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

14. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

15. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

16. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Savita Singh, Director, SOGDS ` - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

17. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

18. Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

19. Dr. Sushant Kumar Mishra, Director (I/c), SOFL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

20. Dr. Nandini Sinha Kapoor, Director (I/c), SOITS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

21. Dr. S. K. Arora, Librarian, - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio<br />

22. Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda - Member<br />

23. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. P. Singh - Member<br />

24. Dr. K. V. Peter - Member<br />

25. Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy - Member<br />

26. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. Ramamohan Rao - Member<br />

27. Dr. Srikanth Mohapatra, Registrar (SED) - Member<br />

28. Sh. K. Laxman, OSD (SRD) - Member<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Dash, Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra and Dr. Paramita Shuklavaidya attended the<br />

meeting as representatives <strong>of</strong> the Directors <strong>of</strong> SOE, SOA and SOTHSM respectively.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.Gajendra Naidu, Director, SOVET, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunil Kumar, Director, SOPVA, Sh. V.V. Subramanyam, Lecturer, SOCIS, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Mahendra Dev, Pr<strong>of</strong>. George Mathew, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Jain, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.N.<br />

Maheshwari, Dr. D.K. Dutta Majumdar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohammad Miyan, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kannan<br />

Modugalya, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi Singh, could not attend the meeting.


Pending the notification <strong>of</strong> their membership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Pandav Nayak, SOSS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K. Jena, SOHS, Dr. Ashok Kr. Gaba, Reader, SOVET, Dr.<br />

Nehal A. Farooquee, Dr. Babu P. Ramesh, Dr. R.R. Rausaria Registrar (MPDD) attended<br />

the meeting as special invitees.<br />

Shri K. D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman extended warm welcome to the members to the<br />

50 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He informed the <strong>Council</strong> that UK based Indian<br />

scientist Dr. Venkatraman Ramakrishnan has won the 2009 Nobel Prize for Chemistry<br />

along with American Thomas A Steitz and Isreli scientist Ada E. Yonath. The trio was<br />

awarded for their Study <strong>of</strong> the structure and function <strong>of</strong> the Ribosome, one <strong>of</strong> life’s core<br />

processes. Dr. Venkatraman Ramakrishnan was born in 1952 in Chidamabram,<br />

Tamilnadu. Dr. V. Ramakrishnan completed his Ph.D. in Physics in 1976 from Ohio<br />

University US and his work in Chemistry achieved him the highest award. He is the<br />

leader at the Structural Studies Division, MRC Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Molecular Biology,<br />

Cambridge UK. His work shows that Ribosomes produce Protein which in terms controls<br />

the Chemistry in all leaving organisms. Ribosomes are crucial to life, they are also a<br />

major target for new antibiotics. Their work showed what the Ribosomes looks like and<br />

how it functions at atomic level. In side every cell in an organism there are DNA<br />

molecules they contain the blue prints for how a human being, a plant or a bacterium,<br />

looks and functions. But the DNA molecule is passive. If there was nothing else there<br />

would be no life. The blue prints transformed into leaving matter through the work <strong>of</strong><br />

Ribosomes. Based upon the information in DNA, Ribosomes make proteins: oxygentransporting<br />

haemoglobin, antibodies <strong>of</strong> the immune system, hormones such as insulin,<br />

the collagen <strong>of</strong> the skin, or enzymes that break down sugar. These are tens <strong>of</strong> thousands<br />

<strong>of</strong> proteins in the body and they all have different forms and functions. They build and<br />

control life at the chemical level.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> applauded the work done by Dr. Venkatraman<br />

Ramakrishnan and his team, which lead to his winning the Nobel Prize in Chemistry and<br />

taken on record its appreciation on for the great achievements <strong>of</strong> Dr. Ramakrishnan.<br />

Then the Chairman requested Dr. D.K. Choudhary, PVC (in charge ACD) to<br />

present the agenda. The following agenda were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1 To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 49 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> and to note the action taken thereon.<br />

AC 50.1.1<br />

The Member Secretary presented that the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 49 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

held on 29 th June was circulated to the Members. Action Taken<br />

Report on the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 48 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> and 49 th <strong>Meeting</strong><br />

are placed at (Annexure 2) & (Annexure 3) for information <strong>of</strong> the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong>.


AC 50.1.2<br />

It was presented that the comments have been received from Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS (Item No: 1) Sh. K. Laxman, OSD<br />

(SRD) (Item No: 2), Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R.R. Nair, OSD & Coordinator, CCETC<br />

(Item No: 10) and Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE (Item No: 27).<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the comments received on Item No: 1<br />

and Item No: 2 which were due to typographical errors in the<br />

Resolutions and accepted the amendments as mentioned in the<br />

comments for the following items:<br />

Item No: 1: Resolution No: 49.1.2 the resolution numbers mentioned<br />

as 46.1.2 and 46.1.3 may be read as 46.14.2 & 46.14.3.<br />

Item No: 2: Resolution No: 49.2.3 the clause 1 (iv) should be<br />

corrected to Clause 1 (v).<br />

Item No: 27: The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed with the modified<br />

nomenclature <strong>of</strong> ‘Centre for ODL Capabilities in<br />

Local Governance’ to ‘National ODL Centre for<br />

Local Governance’.<br />

AC 50.1.3<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 50.2.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the comments and confirmed the<br />

Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 49 th <strong>Meeting</strong> (Annexure 1 without appendices) with<br />

the above modifications. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also noted the Action<br />

Taken Report on its 48 th Special <strong>Meeting</strong> and 49 th <strong>Meeting</strong>.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Creation <strong>of</strong> Additional<br />

Faculty positions in the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture has proposed for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> additional faculty positions in the school. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S.<br />

Hansra, explained that at the time <strong>of</strong> conceptualization <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

six disciplines viz. Agriculture Production System, Agriculture Policy<br />

and Agribusiness Management, Livestock and Fisheries Production<br />

System, Natural Resource Management, Product Technology and<br />

Value Addition and Extension and Communication System were<br />

identified. All the faculty members have been recruited and currently<br />

the School is operative under only one discipline i.e. Agriculture with<br />

the total strength <strong>of</strong> seven faculty members. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at<br />

its 46 th meeting held on 13 th January 2009 approved the proposal for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> three new disciplines i.e. i) Agriculture Production System<br />

(ii) Agriculture Economics and Extension and (iii) Food Science<br />

Technology in the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Since the faculty members<br />

are working under a common discipline they are finding difficulty in<br />

handling the programmes because <strong>of</strong> specializations. The School has<br />

developed and launched one Ph.D. Three PG Diplomas, Four


Diplomas, Five Certificates and Two Awareness Programmes. It is<br />

also conducting Research Extension and Training programmes in the<br />

country. In view <strong>of</strong> the above the School proposed for the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

positions <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 1 (Crop Production), Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 2<br />

(Agriculture Extension (ICT Specialization) and (Horticulture one<br />

each), and Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 4. (Food Technology, Soil Science,<br />

Plant Breeding / Biotechnology and Agriculture Economics one each).<br />

AC 50.2.2<br />

AC 50.2.3<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 50.3.1<br />

AC 50.3.2<br />

During the discussion the members expressed the views that the<br />

discipline for the above posts should be Agronomy and the<br />

specialization should be defined against each <strong>of</strong> the positions in the<br />

advertisement only.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> the additional positions <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 1, Associate<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 2 and Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 4 in the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />

Agronomy with above specializations in the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

To consideration and approval <strong>of</strong> the College <strong>of</strong> Nursing as<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Institution maintained by the University under Section<br />

2(d).<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences has submitted<br />

proposal for College <strong>of</strong> Nursing to be maintained as <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Institution <strong>of</strong> the university under Section 2(d). Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor<br />

explained that the University has received a request for affiliation<br />

from College <strong>of</strong> Nursing <strong>of</strong> Indraprastha Medical Corporation, New<br />

Delhi for regular B.Sc. Nursing Programme. The organization had<br />

obtained approval from in the Nursing <strong>Council</strong>, Delhi Nursing<br />

<strong>Council</strong> and Directorate <strong>of</strong> Health Services Govt. <strong>of</strong> NCT Delhi for<br />

starting the B.Sc. Nursing programme. The Vice-Chancellor had<br />

constituted a core group to finalize the norms for affiliation and<br />

application form for affiliation. However, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

authorized the Vice-Chancellor to constitute the committee to examine<br />

the issue <strong>of</strong> affiliation. In the light <strong>of</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act<br />

and Scheme <strong>of</strong> the Convergence. Accordingly a Committee was<br />

constituted under Chairpersonship <strong>of</strong> Dr. D.K. Choudhary (PVC). In<br />

the mean time the University had received the request from Apollo<br />

Hospital. After deliberations it is proposed that the Apollo Hospital<br />

be considered as <strong>Academic</strong> Institution maintained by the University<br />

under Section 2(d).<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC raised the point<br />

that his name from the Committee and Core Group as mentioned in<br />

the note be removed as he was never associated in the matter. Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

M. Aslam, Director, SOCE suggested that the University should have


a Policy in place for Affiliation/maintaining <strong>of</strong> Colleges/Institutions.<br />

AC 50.3.3<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the above discussion, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved that a<br />

Policy in the matter is required to be in place. It also decided that the<br />

University may sign a Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding with concerned<br />

Institution/Colleges and Joint Consultative Committee <strong>of</strong> the signing<br />

Institutions/Colleges and the University should deliberate on the<br />

issues involved and for the time being the programme <strong>of</strong> B.Sc.<br />

(Nursing) in face to face mode should be <strong>of</strong>fered from these<br />

Colleges/Institutions.


ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 50.4.1<br />

AC 50.4.2<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 50.5.1<br />

AC 50.5.2<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 50.6.1<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 14 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong> held on June 23, 2009.<br />

It was presented that the 14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University was held on June 23, 2009. The Research <strong>Council</strong> is an<br />

authority <strong>of</strong> the University under over all supervision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>, therefore, the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> are placed<br />

before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for approval.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Minutes<br />

(Annexure 2 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> the 14 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Research <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

To report for ratification the commencement <strong>of</strong> Diploma in<br />

Teaching German as a Foreign Language.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Foreign Languages (SOFL) has<br />

presented the Phase 3 form for Diploma in Teaching German as a<br />

Foreign Language in collaboration with Goeth Institute (MMB)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Vienna. Ms. Shatabadi Ghosh Lashkar explained the<br />

salient feature <strong>of</strong> the Programme. She also apprised the members that<br />

programme will meet the need <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>of</strong> German Language<br />

teachers in class room Management, Lesson Planning, Teaching<br />

Skills, Vocabulary, Grammar, Pronunciation and Assessing and<br />

Motivating the students. The programme will be <strong>of</strong>fered in Pilot<br />

Phase from January 2010 and will be launched in July 2011. The<br />

Course Structure for the Programme has been approved by the School<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> SOFL at its meeting held on 23.06.2009.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted and approved Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 3) for Diploma in Teaching German as a Foreign<br />

Language in ODL with practical components from Jan. 2010 in Pilot<br />

Phase and the same will be launched from July 2011.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal to put on <strong>of</strong>fer the Diploma<br />

Programme in Aquaculture (DAQ) from Jan, 2010.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had proposed to put on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer the Diploma Programme in Aquaculture (DAQ) from January<br />

2010 which was put on hold by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee at its 22 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> for one/two years due to less<br />

enrolment. Pr<strong>of</strong> Sunita Malhotra, Director, School <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

explained that <strong>of</strong> late School had been receiving the requests from<br />

students/ Study Centres for the programme.


AC 50.6.2<br />

AC 50.6.3<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

AC 50.7.1<br />

AC. 50.7.2<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

AC 50.8.1<br />

AC 50.8.3<br />

During the discussion, the members suggested that the University<br />

should take initiative for more clientele for the Programme by<br />

approaching different agencies such as Panchayats, Krishi Vigyan<br />

Kendras etc. It was also suggested since it is an agriculture based<br />

programme it can be <strong>of</strong>fered jointly with the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved to approve the proposal to put on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer the Diploma Programme in Aquaculture from January 2010.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for allowing the students <strong>of</strong><br />

Diploma in Meat Technology (DMT) to write the examination in<br />

Bengali.<br />

It was presented that School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture on the request received<br />

from the Students <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Meat Technology (DMT) <strong>of</strong> the PSC<br />

at WBUAFS, Kolkata submitted a proposal for allowing the students<br />

to write the examination in Bengali.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve the<br />

proposal for allowing the students to write their examination in<br />

Bengali with the condition that the University will neither provide<br />

material nor question papers in Bengali.<br />

To note for information the Status Report in respect <strong>of</strong> on-going<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> the Centre for Corporate Education, Training and<br />

Consultancy<br />

It was presented that the Status Report in respect <strong>of</strong> on going activities<br />

the Centre for Corporate Education, Training and Consultancy is<br />

placed for the information <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R.R.<br />

Nair, OSD, CCETC explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the Report and<br />

the ongoing activities <strong>of</strong> the center in detail.<br />

During the discussions Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbyamma, Director, SOMS, has<br />

raised the issue relating to the Master in Business Entrepreneurship<br />

programme and stated that the discipline <strong>of</strong> Master in Business<br />

Administration is located in the School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies and<br />

hence the programme can be <strong>of</strong>fered only through the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Studies. At this juncture Pr<strong>of</strong> Nair, stated that the clients<br />

are not interested to go to the School with their programmes. Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Omprakash Mishra, PVC, participating in the discussions suggested<br />

that the faculty <strong>of</strong> the Management discipline should be proactive and<br />

any academic programme from them is welcomed. The suggestion<br />

was made that while launching the programmes it should be ensured<br />

that there is no duplication and conflict between the two programmes.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivathsan, PVC, stated in the present scenario all the


disciplines are inter-disciplinary and therefore, the contention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies for <strong>of</strong>fering the Master in Business<br />

Degree is not acceptable. There was also a suggestion to make a<br />

Committee to have more clarity in the matter so that any such disputes<br />

can be resolved before the matter is placed before the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>.


AC 50.8.2<br />

ITEM NO. 9<br />

AC 50.9.1<br />

AC 50.9.2<br />

AC 50.9.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the status report on the on-going<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> the Centre for Corporate Education, Training &<br />

Consultancy and appreciated the work done by the centre with in less<br />

than a year <strong>of</strong> its establishment in Dec. 2008.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form <strong>of</strong> Certificate in PC<br />

Hardware and Networking.<br />

It was presented that the Computer Division <strong>of</strong> the University had<br />

proposed the Phase 3 form for a six months Certificate Programme in<br />

PC Hardware and Networking. Dr V.S.P. Srivastva, Head, Computer<br />

Division explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the Programme. He<br />

explained that the Programme will be <strong>of</strong>fered on Pilot basis initially<br />

in face to face as the programme has been more practical oriented<br />

which contains 6 credits <strong>of</strong> theory and 10 credits <strong>of</strong> the Lab/Hand on<br />

work.<br />

During the discussion members appreciated the efforts <strong>of</strong> the Service<br />

Division in <strong>of</strong>fering the Programmes based on their experience in<br />

providing services and suggested that these Divisions may <strong>of</strong>fer more<br />

such programmes in collaboration with Schools concerned. Dr.<br />

Srivastava also clarified the doubts raised by the members on Video<br />

Programmes and Evaluation Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Programme relating<br />

to the percentage <strong>of</strong> continuous assessment and TEE in both theory<br />

and practical the components. The Programme Coordinator agreed<br />

that the percentage will be rounded <strong>of</strong> to 30% and 70 %.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> constituted a Committee under the<br />

Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong> K. R. Srivathsan, PVC, with Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal,<br />

Director SOCIS and Dr. V.S.P. Srivastava, Head, Computer Division<br />

as its members to deliberate on the viability <strong>of</strong> such Programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form (Annexure<br />

4) <strong>of</strong> Certificate in PC Hardware and Networking with the above<br />

suggestions to take <strong>of</strong>fered in face to face mode initially from the<br />

Head Quarters and thereafter, in Regional Centres, initially from one<br />

RC in each Region.<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

AC 50.10.1.<br />

To consider the concept paper for Post Graduate Diploma in<br />

Corporate Governance.<br />

It was presented that the Centre for Corporate Education Training and<br />

Consultancy based on the approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for<br />

Diploma in Corporate Governance proposed the one year PG Diploma<br />

Programme from the ensuing academic session. A concept note


AC 50.10.2<br />

prepared by the Centre along with tentative course outline for PG<br />

Diploma was approved by the Expert Committee with minor<br />

amendment in course structure and is to be placed before the Centre<br />

Management Committee.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved that the concept note<br />

may be placed before the Centre Management Committee first and<br />

after its approval it may be placed again before it with the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Centre Management Committee.<br />

ITEM NO.11 To consider the issue <strong>of</strong> updating Ordinance 7 on<br />

Degrees/Diploma and Certificates under Section 5(1)(iii) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act.<br />

AC 50.11.1 It was presented that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 48 th (Special)<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> held on 24 th April 2009 considered the issues relating to<br />

updating the Ordinance on Degrees/Diploma and Certificates under<br />

Section 5(1)(iii) <strong>of</strong> the Act. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> vide Resolution<br />

No. 48.27.2 desired to update the Ordinance. The Member Secretary<br />

vide its letter IG/ACD/AC-48-Spl/2009/1902 dated 23.06.2009<br />

requested the Directors <strong>of</strong> Schools, Head <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Divisions to<br />

furnish the information regarding Degrees/Diplomas and Certificates<br />

for updating the Ordinance. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the information received<br />

from the concerned Schools/Divisions/Centre the Revised Ordinance<br />

is placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 50.11.2<br />

AC 50.11.3<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

AC 50.12.1<br />

During the discussion some <strong>of</strong> the members mentioned that their<br />

programmes are not reflected in the Ordinance. The Chairman asked<br />

the members to send their programes to ACD for updation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ordinance.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the updated the Ordinance on<br />

Degrees/Diploma and Certificates under Section 5(1)(iii) <strong>of</strong> the Act<br />

(Annexure 5) provisions <strong>of</strong> Clause 2 <strong>of</strong> the Ordinance which provde<br />

that the University may add new degrees/diplomas/certificates to those<br />

mentioned in Clause 1 or delete any <strong>of</strong> them, with the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> from time to time.<br />

To consider the <strong>Academic</strong> Programme booklet for the July, 2009 and<br />

January, 2010 Sessions<br />

It was presented that the <strong>Academic</strong> Programme booklet giving the<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the Programmes being <strong>of</strong>fered by the University for the July<br />

2009 and January 2010 sessions along with the eligibility and other<br />

details is placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for information. It was<br />

explained that the University will be <strong>of</strong>fering 312 Certificate,<br />

Diploma, Degree and Doctoral Programmes comprising around 1700<br />

courses through 21 Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies/Centres/Institutes and a


network <strong>of</strong> 60 Regional Centres, at more than 2,241 Learner’s Support<br />

Centres and 52 overseas institutions in 33 countries during July 2009<br />

and January 2010.<br />

AC 50.12.2<br />

AC 50.12.3<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

AC 50.13.1<br />

AC 50.13.2<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

AC 50.14.1<br />

Shri Sudhir Kr. Arora, Librarian, pointed out that in the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Programme booklet there is no mention <strong>of</strong> the information relating to<br />

Library Services, new initiatives <strong>of</strong> the University like face to face and<br />

Community Colleges.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Programme <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Booklet along with the Programmes mentioned in it.<br />

To consider and approve the Revised Version <strong>of</strong> the Course<br />

Globalization and Environment (MED-008) for the PG Diploma in<br />

Environment and Sustainable Development (PGDESD)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences has proposed the revised<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the Course Globalization and Environment (MED-008) for<br />

the PG Diploma in Environment and Sustainable Development (PGDESD).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS, explained that the contents <strong>of</strong> Course<br />

MED-008 has been revised by the course team members and one block i.e.<br />

Block 4 (Unit 13 to 16) has been added on the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the Expert<br />

Committee. The PGDESD programme team had also suggested that the<br />

revised course may also be adopted for PGDESD programme. The School<br />

Board had also approved the revised version <strong>of</strong> MED-008 and the proposal<br />

for its adoption for PGDESD.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve the Revised<br />

Version <strong>of</strong> the Course Globalization and Environment (MED-008)<br />

(Annexure 6) for the PG Diploma in Environment and Sustainable<br />

Development (PGDESD).<br />

To consider the “Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the Integrated Ph.D. Programme in<br />

Physics” <strong>of</strong>fered by School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary<br />

Studies (SOITS)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had submitted the<br />

proposal relating to “Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the Integrated Ph.D. Programme in<br />

Physics” <strong>of</strong>fered by School <strong>of</strong> Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary<br />

Studies (SOITS). Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS explained in detail<br />

the reasons for the proposal. She stated that at 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong> when the<br />

proposal for Ph.D. in Astrophysics was being considered by <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had apprised the <strong>Council</strong> that the<br />

programme structure and contents for the proposed M.Sc. degree in<br />

Physics in the programme are heavily biased towards the specialized<br />

area <strong>of</strong> Astrophysics (comprising more than 50% <strong>of</strong> the contents). In<br />

contrast, the structure and course contents <strong>of</strong> M.Sc. (Physics) outlined<br />

in the model UGC curriculum and <strong>of</strong>fered by the Central Universities,<br />

IITs and other reputed Universities in the country has only 25%<br />

weightage allotted to the specialized areas with 75% weightage given


to the core courses. The matter was discussed in the meeting <strong>of</strong> Expert<br />

Committee in Physics held on January 07, 2009, and it was<br />

recommended that “Master’s Degree in this program should be<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered as M.Sc. in Astrophysics”. The Physics Discipline is<br />

developing the M.Sc. (Physics) programme to be <strong>of</strong>fered by the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Sciences, the Phase – 1 form for which was approved by the<br />

School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Sciences on 10.04.2007 – much before the<br />

Integrated Ph.D. Programme in Physics <strong>of</strong>fered from SOITS was<br />

planned and proposed, and its programme structure and contents are in<br />

accordance with the UGC model curriculum and on par with the<br />

M.Sc. (Physics) being <strong>of</strong>fered by other Universities and Institutes.<br />

Further, any Universities should not <strong>of</strong>fer the same degree with two<br />

different programme structures and course contents. As per the<br />

recording <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 46 th <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting<br />

(46.14.2), the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was convinced that the programme<br />

be renamed as M.Sc. (Astrophysics). The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> while<br />

ratifying the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in regularizing the<br />

matter at its 46 th <strong>Meeting</strong> decided to locate the said programme in<br />

SOS if the Physics faculty so desires.<br />

AC 50.14.2<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

AC 50.15.1<br />

AC 50.15.2<br />

ITEM NO.16<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deliberated in detail on issues involved and<br />

decided to defer its decision and suggested that the matter may be<br />

resolved in consultation with Dr. C.K. Ghosh, Coordinator <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Integrated Ph.D. Programme in Physics” <strong>of</strong>fered by School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies (SOITS).<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for launch <strong>of</strong> Certificate<br />

programme in Performing and Visual Arts in Indigenous art forms <strong>of</strong><br />

North Eastern States (Guru Parampara Scheme, Government <strong>of</strong> India)<br />

from January 2010.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Visual and Performing Arts had<br />

submitted a proposal for launch <strong>of</strong> Certificate programme in Performing<br />

and Visual Arts in Indigenous art forms <strong>of</strong> North Eastern States under (Guru<br />

Parampara Scheme, Government <strong>of</strong> India) from January 2010. The<br />

Certificate Programme will have 16 Credits-2 Credits for Theory (60 Study<br />

Hours) and 14 Credits for Practical having 480 study hours Counseling for<br />

6-8 hours will be <strong>of</strong>fered in face to face mode.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal for launch <strong>of</strong> Certificate<br />

programme in Performing and Visual Arts in Indigenous art forms <strong>of</strong> North<br />

Eastern States (Guru Parampara Scheme, Government <strong>of</strong> India)<br />

(Annexure 7) from January 2010 and course structure for the programme.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Starting <strong>of</strong> (1) Five<br />

Year Integrated Programme in Business & Entrepreneurship,<br />

leading to Award <strong>of</strong> MBE Degree & (2) Starting <strong>of</strong> Certificate<br />

Programme by M/S. Reach Technology, Bangalore.


AC 50.16.1<br />

AC 50.16.2<br />

It was presented that the Centre for Corporate, Education, Training<br />

and Consultancy had proposed for (1) Five Year Integrated<br />

Programme in Business & Entrepreneurship, leading to Award <strong>of</strong><br />

MBE Degree and (2) Starting <strong>of</strong> Certificate Programmes (Credit<br />

Training Programmes and Non-Credit Training Programmes by M/S.<br />

Reach Technology, Bangalore under MoUs and collaborations. Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

P.R.R. Nair, OSD & Coordinator, CCETC, explained the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposals. He informed that the proposals were forwarded to the<br />

concerned schools and Pro Vice-Chancellors for their observations.<br />

During the discussion on this item a reference was also made to the<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> item no.8. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the<br />

comments and observations <strong>of</strong> the concerned Schools and Pro-Vice-<br />

Chancellors in which the School and the PVC had given the following<br />

comments:<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies observed that :<br />

whether IILM has the programme already existing;<br />

what are the resources available with IILM in developing the<br />

said programme; and<br />

what will be the role <strong>of</strong> IILM and <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

The Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, Pro-Vice-Chancellor observed that to<br />

ensure the quality and standard <strong>of</strong> the programmes, the same<br />

may also be assessed by the experts in the areas from all over the<br />

country<br />

AC 50.16.3<br />

ITEM NO.17<br />

AC 50.17.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the concept note for<br />

(1) Five Year Integrated Programme in Business & Entrepreneurship,<br />

leading to Award <strong>of</strong> MBE Degree in collaboration with IILM & (2.)<br />

Starting <strong>of</strong> Certificate (Credit Training and Non-Credit Training<br />

Programmes) by M/S. Reach Technology, Bangalore (Annexure 8) in<br />

principle and suggested that the details <strong>of</strong> both programmes may be<br />

designed and assessed by the experts in the area drawn from all over<br />

the country before placing them before the Expert Committees and<br />

Statutory Bodies <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in permitting<br />

the students <strong>of</strong> the Integrated BCA-MCA programme <strong>of</strong> he<br />

batches <strong>of</strong> July 1998 and afterwards to appear in examination up<br />

to December 2010<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Computer and Information Science<br />

had submitted a proposal for ratification <strong>of</strong> the action taken by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor in permitting the students <strong>of</strong> the Integrated BCA-


MCA programme <strong>of</strong> he batches <strong>of</strong> July 1998 and afterwards to appear<br />

in examination up to December 2010. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director,<br />

SOCIS, explained the item and stated that the item was ratified by the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its 29 th meeting held on<br />

17 th July 2009. Of late the suggestion made by SRD has been included<br />

in the Agenda and taken care by the School.<br />

AC 50.17.2<br />

ITEM NO.18<br />

AC 50.18.1<br />

AC 50.18.2<br />

AC 50.18.3<br />

ITEM NO.19<br />

AC 50.19.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-<br />

Chancellor in permitting the students <strong>of</strong> the Integrated BCA-MCA<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> batches <strong>of</strong> July 1998 and afterwards to appear in<br />

examination up to December 2010 with the terms and conditions<br />

mentioned in (Annexure 9).<br />

To consider and approve the case <strong>of</strong> Mr. Kailash More for<br />

discussion in <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

It was presented that the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Library and Information Science,<br />

SOSS has submitted the case <strong>of</strong> Mr. Kailash More whose request is<br />

received has been received from Regional Director, Mumbai<br />

regarding admission <strong>of</strong> the candidate in MLISc Programme <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>. The candidate had already done his MLISc from Pune<br />

University which is a two year integrated programme after graduation.<br />

The minimum requirement for admission in <strong>IGNOU</strong> for Master in<br />

Library and Information Sciences is Bachelor Library and Information<br />

Sciences degree.<br />

During the discussion, the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong> were <strong>of</strong> the view<br />

that the University should not have any objection if a Student desires<br />

to study the same programme which he had completed successfully<br />

from other University.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Faculty for admission <strong>of</strong> Mr. Kailash More for admission to MLISc<br />

by exempting the eligibility <strong>of</strong> BLISc in lieu <strong>of</strong> his Masters Degree in<br />

Library and Information Science from Pune University as a special<br />

case. Further, it decided that for similar other cases in future<br />

necessary provisions should be made in the Prospectus also.<br />

To ratify the decision taken by the Vice-Chancellor for online<br />

examination evaluation and Certification <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong><br />

students in the VET stream.<br />

It was presented that the proposal is for ratification <strong>of</strong> the decision<br />

taken by the Vice-Chancellor for online examination, evaluation and<br />

Certification <strong>of</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> students in the Vocational Education<br />

and Training (VET) stream under Regional Institute <strong>of</strong> Vocational


Education (RIVET-EZ). Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak, Coordinator <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project explained the proposal in detail.<br />

AC 50.19.2<br />

AC 50.19.3<br />

ITEM NO.20<br />

During the discussion Registrar (SED) raised the issues relating to the<br />

certification <strong>of</strong> the courses by the University, whether the programmes<br />

and the course structure has been approved by the Statutory bodies or<br />

not. He also mentioned that unless the programmes have been<br />

approved by Statutory bodies Certification will not be possible by<br />

Student Evaluation Division. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak, informed the<br />

<strong>Council</strong> that the School Board <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

at its Seventh <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 22.4.2009 approved the proposed<br />

collaboration <strong>of</strong> Regional Institute <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training (RIVET) for East Zone at Phulbani. . The Vice-Chancellor’s<br />

approval for the courses and online examination in the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

regulations for on line evaluation etc. was taken.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> suggested that Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak, OSD for<br />

the RIVET should discuss the matter in detail with Registrar (SED)<br />

and then submit the detailed proposal to the Vice Chancellor for<br />

consideration. It was further decided that a Committee may be<br />

constituted to look into the matter and frame a detailed policy note/<br />

regulations for online examination by the University. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal in principle.<br />

To consider and approve the recommendations arrived at<br />

National Workshop On ‘Development <strong>of</strong> Text-books and Training<br />

Manuals for the Community Colleges’<br />

AC 50.20.1 It was presented that National Workshop was organized during 15-17<br />

September, 2009 on ‘Development <strong>of</strong> Text-books and Training<br />

Manuals for the Community Colleges’. It was attended by several<br />

National Experts in the area <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges and also some<br />

internal members <strong>of</strong> the National Expert Committee <strong>of</strong> Community<br />

Colleges and Senior Teachers and <strong>Academic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The<br />

Workshop was chaired by Hon’ble VC.<br />

AC 50.20.2<br />

ITEM NO.21<br />

AC 50.21.1<br />

After detailed discussions on the recommendations arrived at the<br />

Workshop, the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the recommendations<br />

(Annexure 10).<br />

To report the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> B.A (H) International Culinary<br />

Arts -4 Years Programme<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and Hospitality Service<br />

Management had submitted the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> B.A. (H)<br />

International Culinary Arts a 4 Years Programme <strong>of</strong>fered as per the


MOU between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Federation <strong>of</strong> Hotel Restaurant<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> India Educational Trust (FHRAI-ET) in face to face<br />

mode.<br />

AC 50 .21.2<br />

AC 50 .21.3<br />

ITEM NO.22<br />

Dr. Parmita Shuklavaidya, Lecturer explained the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposal. The Expert Committee re4commended to frame the final<br />

syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> the programme taking into account the syllabus<br />

as proposed by FRAI-ET. The Expert meeting was conducted on 23 rd<br />

July, 2009 wherein a panel consisting <strong>of</strong> industry experts and<br />

academics deliberated on the syllabus proposed by FHRAI-ET and<br />

recommended the same.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve the<br />

curriculum design and final syllabus structure (Annexure 11) <strong>of</strong> B.A.<br />

(H) International Culinary Arts and authorize the School Board to<br />

approve the course structure for the programme after detailed<br />

discussions.<br />

To report the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. (Hons) International<br />

Hospitality Administration – 4 Years Programme<br />

AC 50.22.1 It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and Hospitality Service<br />

Management had submitted the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. (H)<br />

International Hospitality Administration, 4 Years Programme being<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered as per the MOU between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Federation <strong>of</strong> Hotel<br />

Restaurant Association <strong>of</strong> India Educational Trust (FHRAI-ET) in<br />

face to face mode.<br />

AC 50.22.2 Dr. Parmita Shuklavaidya, Lecturer explained the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposal. She informed that the Phase 3 form for the programme had<br />

already been approved by the School Board and <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at<br />

their 3 rd and 48 th <strong>Meeting</strong>s respectively held on 21 st April, 2009 and<br />

24 th April 2009. The Expert Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 23 rd July,<br />

2009 deliberated on the syllabus structure proposed by FHRAI-ET.<br />

AC 50.22.3<br />

ITEM NO.23<br />

AC 50.23.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve the<br />

curriculum design and final syllabus structure (Annexure 12) B.Sc.<br />

(Hons) International Hospitality Administration – 4 Years Programme<br />

in principle and authorized the School Board to approve the course<br />

structure for the programme after detailed discussions.<br />

To report the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> MBA in Hospitality<br />

Management – 2 Years Programme<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and Hospitality Service<br />

Management had submitted the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> MBA in<br />

Hospitality Management – 2 Years Programme being <strong>of</strong>fered as per<br />

the MOU between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Federation <strong>of</strong> Hotel Restaurant


Association <strong>of</strong> India Educational Trust (FHRAI-ET) in face to face<br />

mode from the academic session <strong>of</strong> 2009 onwards.<br />

AC 50.23.2 Dr. Parmita Shuklavaidya, Lecturer explained the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposal. She informed that an Expert meeting was recommended by<br />

the Vic-Chancellor to frame the final syllabus structure for the<br />

programme, taking into account as syllabus proposed by FHRAI-ET.<br />

The Expert <strong>Meeting</strong> was conducted in workshop mode on 24 th July,<br />

2009 and 18 th August, 2009, wherein a panel consisting <strong>of</strong> industry <strong>of</strong><br />

industry experts and academics deliberated on the syllabus structure<br />

proposed by FHRAI-ET and suggested a final curriculum.<br />

AC 50.23.3<br />

ITEM NO.24<br />

AC 50.24.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted and approved the curriculum design and<br />

syllabus structure (Annexure 13) structure <strong>of</strong> MBA in Hospitality<br />

Management – 2 Years Programme in face to face mode and<br />

authorized the School Board to approve the curriculum degree and<br />

syllabus.<br />

To report the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> Executive MBA (Hospitality<br />

Management) – 1 years programme<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism and Hospitality Service<br />

Management had submitted the syllabus structure <strong>of</strong> Executive MBA<br />

(Hospitality Management) a 1 Year Programme being <strong>of</strong>fered as per<br />

the MOU between <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Federation <strong>of</strong> Hotel Restaurant<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> India Educational Trust (FHRAI-ET) in face to face<br />

mode.<br />

AC 50.24.2 Dr. Parmita Shuklavaidya, Lecturer explained the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposal. She informed that an Expert meeting was conducted in<br />

workshop mode to frame the final syllabus structure for the<br />

programme, taking into account as syllabus proposed by FHRAI-ET.<br />

The Expert <strong>Meeting</strong> was conducted in workshop mode on 24 th<br />

July,2009 and 19 th August, 2009 wherein a panel consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

industry <strong>of</strong> industry experts and academics deliberated on the syllabus<br />

structure proposed by FHRAI-ET and suggested a final curriculum.<br />

AC 50.24.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted for information the curriculum design<br />

and syllabus structure (Annexure 14) structure <strong>of</strong> Executive MBA in<br />

Hospitality Management – 1Year Programme in face to face mode in<br />

principle and authorized the School Board to approve the course<br />

structure for the programme after detailed discussions.<br />

ITEM NO.25<br />

To report admission <strong>of</strong> students in July 2008, January 2009 &


July 2009 cycle.<br />

AC 50.25.1<br />

AC 50.25.2<br />

AC 50.25.3<br />

It was presented that the OSD (SRD) has submitted the details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

students admitted during admission cycle July, 2008, January,2009<br />

and July, 2009 respectively.<br />

During the discussion Dr. S.K. Moahapatra, Registrar (SED) informed<br />

there was large difference between the figures submitted by the<br />

Registrar (SRD) and number <strong>of</strong> Examination forms received<br />

December, 2009 TEE. He stressed for the better co-ordination<br />

between the Registration Division and Examination Division for the<br />

smooth functioning. The OSD (SRD) informed that there was an<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> about 1.5 lakh students.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the report on admission <strong>of</strong> students in<br />

July 2008, January 2009 & July 2009 cycle.<br />

At the request <strong>of</strong> Dr. S.K. Mohapatra, Registrar (SED) and Pr<strong>of</strong><br />

Sunita Malhotra, Director SOS the items relating to<br />

Decentralization <strong>of</strong> evaluataion <strong>of</strong> Answer Scripts at identified<br />

Regional Centre at (Item No. 28) and concept note for M.Sc. (Life<br />

Sciences) (Item No.30) respectively were also taken up.<br />

ITEM NO.28<br />

AC 50.28.1<br />

AC 50.28.2<br />

AC 50.28.3<br />

To report the Decentralization <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> Answer Scripts at<br />

identified Regional Centres.<br />

It was presented that the University has been conducting examination<br />

twice a year i.e. in June and December every year at about 550<br />

Examination Centres covering 1500 course in 330 programmes. The<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> answer scripts being evaluated in each TEE is about<br />

14 lacs. It gigantic task to handle at Head Quarters alone.<br />

Dr. S.K. Mohapatra, Registrar (SED), explained the operational<br />

difficulties in handling the answer scripts, evaluation and declaration<br />

<strong>of</strong> results in time. During the discussion the Chairman, mentioned<br />

that due operational difficulties he had agreed to the proposal to<br />

decentralize the evaluation <strong>of</strong> answer sheets at one <strong>of</strong> the Regional<br />

Centres in each zone so that the evaluation can be completed within a<br />

maximum period <strong>of</strong> 60 day s and result can be declared before the<br />

commencement <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> Examination Forms for<br />

the next term end examination. The details <strong>of</strong> the scheme are placed<br />

at (Annexure 15)<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal for decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> Answer scripts at one Regional Centre <strong>of</strong> each zone as<br />

proposed in the note. It suggested that a Committee be constituted to


look into the details <strong>of</strong> the scheme for implementation from next<br />

examination.<br />

Item No. 30<br />

AC. 50.30.1<br />

AC 50.30.2<br />

To consider and approve the face to face M.Sc. Programme in<br />

Life Sciences<br />

It was presented that the Vice-Chancellor in his meeting with the<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> Life Sciences, School <strong>of</strong> Sciences discussed the modalities<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering M.Sc. Life Sciences in face to face mode from January,<br />

2010. After the discussions on 5 th October, 2009 the faculty <strong>of</strong> Life<br />

Sciences prepared a concept note for <strong>of</strong>fering the M.Sc. Life Sciences.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve the<br />

concept (Annexure 16) <strong>of</strong> the faculty for Master’s Degree in Life<br />

Sciences in face to face mode.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

Of the<br />

FIFTY FIRST MEETING<br />

Of the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

Held on<br />

3 RD MARCH 2010


INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FIFTY FIRST MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

HELD ON 3 RD MARCH 2010 AT 10.00 A.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM,<br />

BLOCK-8 <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

253. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Chairman<br />

254. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

255. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

256. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivasthan, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

257. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

258. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

259. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

29. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

30. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

31. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

32. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

33. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

34. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja, Director, SOA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

35. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Gajendra Naidu, Director, SOVET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

36. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

37. Dr. Harkirat Bains, Director (I/c), SOTHSSM - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

38. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Savita Singh, Director, SOGDS ` - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

39. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

40. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

41. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunil Kumar, Director, SOPVA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

42. Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

43. Dr. Nandini Sinha Kapoor, Director (I/c), SOITS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

44. Sh. S.K. Arora, Librarian - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

45. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manjulika Srivastava, Director (I/c), DEC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

46. Dr. Silima Nanda, Director (I/c), ID - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

47. Sh. Ravi Kant, Director (I/c), EMPC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

48. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak, SOSS - Member<br />

49. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K. Jena, SOHS - Member<br />

50. Dr. Nehal A Farooque, Reader, SOEDS - Member<br />

51. Dr. Babu P Ramesh, Reader, SOITS - Member<br />

52. Dr. A.K. Gaba, Reader, SOVET - Member<br />

53. Sh. P.V. Suresh, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

54. Dr. Kamalika Banerjee, Lecturer, SOS - Member<br />

55. Sh. Arvind Kumar Dubey, Lecturer, SOTHSM - Member<br />

56. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh - Member<br />

57. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ramamohan Rao - Member<br />

58. Dr. K.V. Peter - Member<br />

59. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohamma Miyan - Member


60. Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy, - Member<br />

61. Dr. R.R. Rausaria, Registrar (I/c), MPDD - Member


62. Dr. C.K. Ghosh, Director, SSC - Member<br />

63. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pushplata Tripathi, Registrar (I/c), SED - Member<br />

64. Sh. K. Laxman, OSD, SRD - Member<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K. Agarwal attended the meeting as representative <strong>of</strong> Director, SOHS.<br />

Dr. D.K. Choudhry, PVC, Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director,<br />

SOET, Dr. S.K. Mishra, Director (I/c), SOFL, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anjila Gupta, SOSS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.<br />

Mukunda, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra Dev, Dr. George Mathew, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Jain, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.N. Maheshwari, Dr. D.K. Datta Majumdar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kannan M. Modugalya and Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Devi Singh could not attend the meeting.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director, STRIDE attended the meeting as special invitee.<br />

Shri K. D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the members to the 51 st meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He welcomed the new members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> who were<br />

nominated by the Board <strong>of</strong> Management and attending the meeting for the first time and<br />

appreciated the contribution made by the outgoing members in the deliberations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

council whose term <strong>of</strong> membership had expired.<br />

Member Secretary presented the Agenda. The following items were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1<br />

AC 51.1.1<br />

To confirm the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 50 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The Member Secretary informed that the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 50 th meeting <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 8 th October, 2009 were circulated to all the<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The following comments have been<br />

received :<br />

1) Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS sent her comments on item<br />

No.3 in respect <strong>of</strong> the recording <strong>of</strong> resolution No. 50.3.3 and<br />

suggested that instead <strong>of</strong> recorded resolution, it should be:<br />

AC 50.3.3. “In view <strong>of</strong> the above discussion the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> resolved that a Policy in the matter is required to in place<br />

after deliberations it was suggested that instead <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Institution maintained by the University it can be made as one <strong>of</strong><br />

the Programme Study Centre (PSC) and it will also be within the<br />

norms <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. Details may be discussed in the Joint-Coordination<br />

Committee”.<br />

2) Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.S. Hansra, SOA and Dr. K.V. Peter had forwarded their<br />

comments on the Item No. 2 Resolution No.AC.50.2.3. As per<br />

their observation Resolution No. AC 50.2.3 Resolution should be<br />

recorded as follows “ The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and


approved the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> the additional positions <strong>of</strong> :<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor -1 (Agronomy); Associated Pr<strong>of</strong>essor -2 Agriculture<br />

Extension (ICT specialization)-1, Horticulture-1; and Assistant<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor – 4- Food Technology -1, Soil Science -1, Plant<br />

Breeding/Bio-Technology -1, Agriculture Economics-1.<br />

The following comments were also received from Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra,<br />

Director, SOS on recording <strong>of</strong> the resolution No. AC 50.14.2 which were<br />

circulated in the meeting:<br />

“The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deliberated in detail on issues involved<br />

and decided to defer its decision and suggested that the matter may<br />

be resolved in consultation with Dr. C.K. Ghosh, Coordinator <strong>of</strong><br />

the Integrated Ph.D. Programme in Physics” <strong>of</strong>fered by School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies (SOITS).<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and noted the above comments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

members to incorporate in the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 50 th <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

meeting.<br />

AC 51.1.2<br />

AC 51.1.3<br />

The Member Secretary informed that the action taken report on the<br />

minutes will be circulated/placed before the next meeting.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> confirmed the minutes (Annexure 1 without<br />

appendices) along with the above comments for incorporation <strong>of</strong> its 50 th<br />

meeting and noted that the Action Taken Report will be placed in the next<br />

meeting.<br />

ITEM NO. 2 To consider and approve the 29 th meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Standing Committee held on 17 th July 2009<br />

AC 51.2.1<br />

The 29 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>'s Standing Committee was<br />

held on July 27, 2008. The following major items were considered and<br />

approved by the ACSC:<br />

Phase-3 form for MBA(Tele-communication Management), MBA<br />

(Retail), MBA (Entrepreneurship), BBA (Retail Services) and BBA<br />

(Entrepreneurship), (Collaborative Programmes) from CCETC, Bachelor<br />

<strong>of</strong> Design (Interior and Furniture Design) BDESIFD, Bachelor <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology (Mechanical Engineering) (BTMLE), Diploma in Electrical<br />

Engineering (DELE), Advanced Certificate in Construction Practices<br />

(ACCP), Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Technology (Electrical Engineering) (BTELE),<br />

Advanced Certificate in electronics & Communication Practices<br />

(ACECP), Advanced Certificate in Computer Science Practices<br />

(ACCSP),Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Technology (Electronics & Communication<br />

Engineering) BTECE, Diploma in Computer Science Engineering


(DCSE), Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Design (Communication Design) (BDCD),<br />

Advanced Certificate in Electrical Practices (ACELP),Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Design<br />

(Textile and Apparel Design) (BDTAD), Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Design (Product<br />

Design) (BDPD), Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Technology (Civil Engineering) (BTCLE),<br />

Diploma in Mechanical Engineering (DMLE), Advance Certificate in<br />

Mechanical Practices (ACMLP), Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Architecture (B.Arch.),<br />

Certificate in Energy Technology and Management (CETM),Bachelor <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology (Computer Science Engineering) (BTCSE), Diploma in Civil<br />

Engineering (DCVLE), Diploma in Electronics & Communication<br />

Engineering (DECME) from School <strong>of</strong> Engineering & Technology.<br />

Launch <strong>of</strong> Certificate Course in Housekeeping Operations, Certificate<br />

Course in Food & Beverage Services Operations and Certificate Course in<br />

Front Office Operations from the SOTHSSM.<br />

Ratification <strong>of</strong> the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in permitting the<br />

integrated BCA-MCA programme students <strong>of</strong> July 1998 and afterwards<br />

batches to appear in examination up to December 2010.<br />

Ratification <strong>of</strong> the approval <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor to launch on-line PG<br />

Diploma in E-Learning from January 2010 by STRIDE.<br />

AC 51.2.2<br />

ITEM NO. 3<br />

AC 51.3.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after deliberations on the decisions taken by the<br />

ACSC at its 29 th meeting approved the minutes (Annexure 2 without<br />

appendices).<br />

To consider and approve the ‘Fee Structure for payment to the artists<br />

for developing Educational Audio-Video material (SLM)’ at EMPC in<br />

Performing and Visual Arts for the School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual<br />

Arts.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts had<br />

submitted the ‘Fee Structure for payment to the artists for developing<br />

Educational Audio-Video material (SLM)’ at EMPC in Performing and<br />

Visual Arts. While presenting the details and reasons for the proposed fee<br />

structure, the Director <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Performing and Visual Arts informed<br />

that there is no defined fee structure for the payment to artist invited for<br />

recording and Audio-Video (SLM) in the School. A committee was<br />

constituted with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor has designed the<br />

common fees structure after considering the needs and prerequisites <strong>of</strong> the<br />

different disciplines in the School. They are: Programmes on Dance,<br />

Music, Theatre, and Paining/Sculpture/Applied Art. The Committee had<br />

also consulted the fee structure <strong>of</strong> Prasar Bharti, All India Radio and<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Central Technology and NCERT etc. The detailed fee<br />

structures placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for consideration.


AC 51.3.2<br />

During the discussions the members expressed their views and suggested<br />

that the proposed fee structure requires a review and also involve the<br />

financial implications which are different from the payment norms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

EMPC / University may be forwarded to the Finance Committee for<br />

consideration. The members also requested that the matter may be<br />

referred to a committee to examine all the aspect involved and a<br />

comprehensive complete agenda item should be placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The Director, SOPVA informed the <strong>Council</strong> that some Audio-Video<br />

production <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> programmes are for educational purpose, the rates<br />

suggested are lower as compared to the charges <strong>of</strong> commercial purpose.<br />

He also stated that these rates are comparative rates received from the<br />

Prasar Bharti, All India Radio and Institute <strong>of</strong> Central Technology and<br />

NCERT etc. Based on the views expressed by Mr. Ravikanth, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K.<br />

Koul and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Aslam, the members suggested that the issues involved<br />

should be deliberated in a committee and the Chairman should be<br />

authorized to take the decision in this regard.<br />

AC 51.3.3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 51.4.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered the matter and resolved that the fee<br />

structure suggested by the SOPVA may be considered by a committee<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> the Director <strong>of</strong> the SOPVA, EMPC to examine the proposed<br />

rates in detail and submit to the Vice-Chancellor. The <strong>Council</strong> authorized<br />

the Chairman for taking a decision.<br />

To consider and approve the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 9 th , 10 th , 11 th , 15 th and<br />

16 th <strong>Meeting</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong><br />

The Minutes <strong>of</strong> 09 th , 10 th , 11 th , 15 th and 16 th meetings <strong>of</strong> the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong> were held on 21 st Aug., 2007, 31 st Dec 2007, 9 th April, 2008, 21 st<br />

October, 2009 and 3 rd February, 2010 respectively were presented.<br />

The Research <strong>Council</strong> is the authority <strong>of</strong> the University under over all<br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. It is, therefore, mandatory that the<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> Research <strong>Council</strong>, which were not placed before the <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> earlier, are enclosed (without appendices). The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> Standing Committee recommended the minutes for placing<br />

before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for consideration and approval.<br />

AC 51.4.2<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair raised the issues relating to<br />

submitting the proposal and progress report. She stated that the Research<br />

Unit must ensure the eligibility qualifications <strong>of</strong> the supervisor strictly as<br />

per the university norms. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE gave the brief<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the procedures for research to be followed and stressed that<br />

the norms should be followed strictly while making selection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

candidates and the supervisor and it should be ensured that there should


e no deviation from the procedures and the list <strong>of</strong> supervisors for every<br />

disciplines in the university should be updated in the <strong>IGNOU</strong> web site to<br />

enable the students to choose their supervisors.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P. Mishra desired to expedite the matters related to the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies regarding registration <strong>of</strong><br />

students from northeast region.<br />

Dr. Nandini Sinha Kapoor, Director (I/c), SOITS explained the reasons<br />

for the same and the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved to request the School to<br />

expedite the matter.<br />

AC 51.4.3<br />

AC 51.4.4<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

Regarding the item No.RC15.23.1 the members found that one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

internal Supervisor does not possess the Ph.D qualification. The <strong>Council</strong><br />

strongly recommended that the Supervisor must possess the Ph.D.<br />

qualification for guiding the research candidates.<br />

The minutes (Annexure 3 without appendices) <strong>of</strong> 9 th , 10 th , 11 th , 15 th and<br />

16 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> were considered and approved with<br />

the stipulation that the matter relating to the students from north-east may<br />

be resolved by the concerned School and Director, Research Unit and also<br />

approved to delete the names <strong>of</strong> the supervisors from the list who are not<br />

having Ph.D. qualification.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form for Certificate in Value<br />

Education (CVE) – International Division - SOEDS<br />

AC 51.5.1 It was presented that the International Division has proposed the Phase 3<br />

forms for Certificate in Value Education through School <strong>of</strong> Extension and<br />

Development Studies. The main objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme are to orient<br />

the target group (teachers) to integrate values in their transactional process<br />

<strong>of</strong> teaching-learning molding the character and destiny <strong>of</strong> the young<br />

generation which is the primary role <strong>of</strong> a teacher, to generate an<br />

awareness and interest for inculcating positive values for parents, students<br />

and other pr<strong>of</strong>essionals with the ultimate aim to build an enriched and<br />

better life and to build a stable society which is in consensus with the<br />

constructive approach <strong>of</strong> learning <strong>of</strong> the university. The School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Extension and Development Studies approve the Phase 3 form at its<br />

meeting held on 28.01.2010.<br />

AC 51.5.2<br />

ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 51.6.1<br />

The Phase 3 form (Annexure 4) is considered and approved by the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for delegation <strong>of</strong> Authority <strong>of</strong> Statute<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10 A to <strong>Academic</strong> Centres/Institutes/Chairs <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

It was presented that the University had established, apart from Schools <strong>of</strong><br />

Studies, <strong>Academic</strong> Centres / Institutes / Chairs to develop and promote the


programmes in specific domains/areas as per the demand/needs <strong>of</strong> the industry<br />

and job market as well. In order to empower these academic<br />

Centres/Institutes/Chairs to perform their <strong>Academic</strong> responsibilities for which<br />

they were set up, it requires the necessary amendments <strong>of</strong> the Statute 10A <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University by listing these Centres/ Institutes/ Chairs.<br />

AC 51.6.2<br />

The Chairman requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director, STRIDE to<br />

explain the item in detail and their requirement for making the proposal<br />

for delegation <strong>of</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> Statute 10(A) to the academic centers/<br />

institutes/chairs <strong>of</strong> the university to enable them for <strong>of</strong>fering their<br />

programmes like the Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies in the University.<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P. Mishra suggested that EDNERU may<br />

also be included in the proposed revision for the Statute 10(A).<br />

The Chairman read out the Model 1 <strong>of</strong> Statute 10 (A).<br />

AC 51.6.3<br />

ITEM NO.7<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposed statute by<br />

adding the Clause 1 (a) for academic centres/institutes/chairs/academic<br />

units <strong>of</strong> studies in Statute 10(A) along with the Schools <strong>of</strong> Studies and<br />

also necessary amendments to the respective clauses <strong>of</strong> the Statues<br />

wherever requires in this regard. A copy <strong>of</strong> the proposed amendement is<br />

placed at (Annexure 5).<br />

To ratify the approval <strong>of</strong> Phase 3 form by the Vice-Chancellor for<br />

PG Certificate Programme in “Climate Change and Sustainable<br />

Development”<br />

AC 51.7.1 It was presented that the Chair for Sustainable Development submitted<br />

the Phase 3 form <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate Programme on “Climate Change and<br />

Sustainable Development” a 16 credit course which includes academic<br />

curricula having both theory and project work from contemporary<br />

disciplines. The project work is based on empirical research. The main<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the programme is aimed to capacitate the policy makers,<br />

NGO’s pr<strong>of</strong>essional, environmental leaders, scientist and educators to<br />

develop their knowledge on Climate change and Sustainable<br />

Development, empowers to support the participants in sensitizing the<br />

Sustainable Development aspects relating to Climate Change and helps<br />

the participants in knowing the science <strong>of</strong> Climate Change.<br />

AC 51.7.2<br />

ITEM NO.8<br />

The Phase 3 form <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate Programme in “Climate Change and<br />

Sustainable Development” (Annexure 6) is considered and approved by<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Proposal to launch MSW with focus on the North-East at <strong>IGNOU</strong>-<br />

NGA Education, Educational Project at Chuchuyimlang, Nagaland –<br />

Phase Zero Form


AC 51.8.1<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Work submitted the Phase Zero<br />

Form for development <strong>of</strong> three new courses. They are: MSWE-004<br />

(Tribal Development and Social Work Practice), MSWE-005 (Peace and<br />

Development) and MSWE-006 (Health and Social Work) and 4 credits<br />

each with focus on the North-East at <strong>IGNOU</strong>-NGA Education,<br />

Educational Project at Chuchuyimlang, Nagaland.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Courses Proposer, explained that the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> has approved the EDNERU’s proposal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>-NGA Education, Educational Project. Under this Project,<br />

Mahatma Gandhi Centre for Social Work was established. This Centre<br />

proposes to start an on-campus MSW programme. The proposed<br />

programme consists <strong>of</strong> four semesters. The proposed three new courses<br />

are elective courses <strong>of</strong> 4 credit each focusing the needs <strong>of</strong> the students in<br />

the North East area. These courses are part <strong>of</strong> the programme. He also<br />

proposed to sanction the nine faculty positions in the School <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Work as follows: 1 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor as Project Coordinator, 2 Readers and 6<br />

Lecturers for the proposed Centre. He also stated that the programme is<br />

scheduled to be launched from July, 2010 and the students from all over<br />

North-East including Sikkim would be enrolled.<br />

The members deliberated upon this proposal and appreciated the idea <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fering these courses in MA Social Work according to the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area in which the programme is being <strong>of</strong>fered. During discussion, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

M. Aslam, Director, SOCE suggested that these courses should not be<br />

limited to the north-east area but should also be put on <strong>of</strong>fer to all the<br />

students <strong>of</strong> MA (Social Work) to give them an opportunity to exercise<br />

more options for selection <strong>of</strong> courses.<br />

Regarding creations <strong>of</strong> faculty positions the members suggested that the<br />

norms <strong>of</strong> the University for creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty positions in a new<br />

discipline, has to be followed, i.e. 1 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, 2 Readers and 4 Lecturers<br />

for the proposed Project in the Institute <strong>of</strong> Mahatma Gandhi Centre for<br />

Social Work at Chuchuyimlang, Nagaland .<br />

AC 51.8.3<br />

ITEM NO. 9<br />

AC 51.9.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form<br />

(Annexure 7) and also recommended for the creation <strong>of</strong> faculty positions<br />

i.e. 1 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, 2 Readers and 4 Lecturers for the proposed programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form <strong>of</strong> MBA in Hospitality<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>-FHRAI (ET) Collaboration<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Tourism, Hospitality Services Sectoral<br />

Management has submitted the Phase 3 Form <strong>of</strong> MBA in Hospitality<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>-FHRAI (ET) Collaboration. The Phase 3 Form


was approved by the 5 th School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 21 st January,<br />

2010.<br />

AC 51.9.2<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivathsan, informed that it is a face to face programme in<br />

collaboration with FHRAI a state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art Institute in the country and<br />

the School will gain in collaborating with the institute.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K. Agarwal, SOHS supported the issue <strong>of</strong> the higher fees for the<br />

programme as this programme is heavily loaded with the practical<br />

components. It will be in the interest <strong>of</strong> the university to charge the higher<br />

fees from the elite class <strong>of</strong> students and <strong>of</strong>fer the subsidy to needy<br />

students. It was suggested to work out the possibilities to provide fee<br />

subsidy to needy students. The members also suggested for identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> more Centres for the programme to enhance enrolment so as to reduce<br />

the fees. It was also suggested the fee has to be fixed rationally following<br />

a self-sustaining model.<br />

It was also explained that the SOTHSSM is financially self sufficient with<br />

the fees it is receiving from its programmes on <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

AC 51.9.3<br />

ITEM NO.10<br />

AC 51.10.1.<br />

AC 51.10.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is considered and approved the Phase 3 Form<br />

(Annexure 8) <strong>of</strong> MBA in Hospitality Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>-FHRAI<br />

(ET) Collaboration in face-to-face mode.<br />

To ratify the credit transfer policy from CPE to DPE Programme<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Education had received requests from<br />

Regional Directors <strong>of</strong> North Eastern states regarding the credit transfer from<br />

CPE to DPE Programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE explained in the detail the proposal and<br />

informed that a committee was constituted to look into it and submit the<br />

recommendations.<br />

The Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor approved the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee<br />

and the same are placed before the <strong>Council</strong> for ratification.<br />

1. The Eligibility Criteria <strong>of</strong> CPE is “Untrained/under-trained in<br />

service teachers who qualified Matric/HSC/10+2 standard in the<br />

new pattern <strong>of</strong> education or above & teaching at primary and<br />

elementary level (standard 1 to 8) in the recognized schools <strong>of</strong> the<br />

North Eastern States and Sikkim. The teachers should have<br />

preferably five years teaching experience at the time <strong>of</strong> seeking<br />

admission.<br />

2. The Eligibility Criteria <strong>of</strong> DPE Programme is “Matric/HSC/+2<br />

standard pass with minimum two years teaching experience.


3. The fee scheme <strong>of</strong> CPE Programme is Rs. 4000/-<br />

4. The fee scheme <strong>of</strong> DPE programme is below<br />

(Module I) Rs. 1400/-<br />

(Module II) Rs. 2300/-<br />

(Module III) Rs. 2900/-<br />

The courses for which credit transfer be granted to the students who have<br />

completed CPE Programme successfully in North Eastern States may be decided<br />

later on by the School as per the weightage <strong>of</strong> the courses already completed by<br />

the learners in CPE programme.<br />

AC 51.10.3<br />

ITEM NO.11<br />

AC 51.11.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the credit transfer policy from CPE to<br />

DPE by authorizing the SOE to decide later on as per the weightage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

courses already completed by the learners in CPE Programme in North-<br />

Eastern States and Sikkim.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for the Diploma in<br />

Critical Care Nursing.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences submitted Phase 3 form for<br />

One Year Diploma Programme in Critical Care Nursing.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Pity Koul, Programme Coordinator, explained that the Diploma in Critical<br />

Care Nursing is a Specialty programme <strong>of</strong> 32 credits. The main objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Programme is to enable nursing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (RN and RNRM) to develop and<br />

apply advanced nursing care knowledge, acquire pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in applying<br />

advanced and skills for providing comprehensive nursing care to critically ill<br />

patients in intensive care settings and educate nursing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in Critical<br />

Care Nursing. The School Board <strong>of</strong> SOHS at its 37th and 38th meeting held on<br />

April 28th 2009 and September 11th 2009 respectively approved the Phase 3<br />

form.<br />

AC 51.11.2<br />

ITEM NO.12<br />

AC 51.12.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 9) for the Diploma in Critical Care Nursing.<br />

To consider and approve the creation <strong>of</strong> Sanskrit as a new discipline<br />

in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities and sanction for creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty<br />

in the School.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities submitted a proposal for creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Sanskrit discipline in the School and also creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty positions<br />

in the Sanskrit discipline. The Director <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Humanities informed that<br />

the School Board <strong>of</strong> the School at its 40 th meeting held 25 th January, 2010 on<br />

recommended for creation <strong>of</strong> Sanskrit as discipline and core faculty positions as<br />

per the university norms viz. 1 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, 2 Readers, 4 Lecturers. The<br />

School is running a foundation course in Sanskrit and it also has a RTA in<br />

Sanskrit. The School has also to prepared the course work for research<br />

degree programme for Sanskrit. The chairman suggested to develop UG


and PG Programmes in the discipline.<br />

AC 51.12.2<br />

ITEM NO.13<br />

AC 51.13.1<br />

AC 51.13.2<br />

ITEM NO.14<br />

AC 51.14.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal creation <strong>of</strong><br />

Sanskrit as a new discipline in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities and<br />

recommended for creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty for the discipline as per<br />

university norms in the School.<br />

To consider and approve the creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty positions for the<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> Urdu in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities submitted a proposal for creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> core faculty positions in the discipline <strong>of</strong> Urdu. The Director <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />

Humanities informed that the School Board <strong>of</strong> the School at its 40 th meeting held<br />

on 25 th January, 2010 recommended for creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty positions for the<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> Urdu in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities. She also informed that in the 2 nd<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the Planning Board held on 10 th January, 1989, at that time it<br />

functioned as AC, assigned the Urdu discipline to SOH. The School has already<br />

launched a certificate programme in Urdu. Diploma & BA Course are being<br />

launched in July, 2010 and the PG Programme is also in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

development the School Board recommended creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty as per<br />

university norms for the Urdu discipline.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and recommended the creation <strong>of</strong> core<br />

faculty as per university norms for the Urdu discipline in the School.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 1, 2, and 3 forms for PG Diploma in<br />

Sustainability Science<br />

It was presented that the Chair for sustainable development submitted<br />

Phase 1, 2 and 3 forms for PG Diploma in Sustainability Science<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> 32 credits <strong>of</strong> 8 courses with an objective to enhance<br />

awareness and impart knowledge on immediate measures to be taken to<br />

limit population explosion, unsustainable lifestyle, and generation <strong>of</strong> nonand<br />

slowly recyclable e-waste, synthetic chemicals etc., to transfer green<br />

revolution into evergreen revolution so that agriculture is no longer a<br />

destroyer <strong>of</strong> forests and biodiversity.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja explained in detail about the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and the course structure. He also stated that the programme<br />

will be launched from January, 2011.<br />

AC 51.14.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 1, 2, and 3<br />

forms for PG Diploma in Sustainability Science<br />

ITEM NO.15<br />

To consider the proposal for the Partner Institute Established at Trinity College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education, Dehradun Under Convergence Scheme to Charge Rs. 52,400.00<br />

from the students <strong>of</strong> B.Ed. enrolled with them – RSD


AC 51.15.1<br />

It was presented that as per the decision taken by the University, the Partner<br />

Institutions functioning under Convergence Scheme under Model – I are being<br />

paid 50% <strong>of</strong> the programme fee received from the students enrolled at the<br />

Partner Institution for the Pr<strong>of</strong>essional and Technical Programmes to <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

The Trinity College <strong>of</strong> Education, Dehradun functioning as Partner Institute<br />

under Convergence Scheme, Model – II has proposed vide letter dated<br />

20.02.2010 along with Government <strong>of</strong> Uttrakhand <strong>of</strong>fice memo dated<br />

11.06.2008 on charging the fees from Students <strong>of</strong> the B.Ed. Programme in the<br />

State in the light <strong>of</strong> the Court’s Judgment.<br />

The Trinity College has proposed an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 52,400.00 (Rs. 35000.00 for<br />

Trinity College <strong>of</strong> Education + Rs. 17400.00 for remitting to <strong>IGNOU</strong> as fee <strong>of</strong><br />

B.Ed. Programme) per student for B.Ed. Programming enrolled with them for<br />

providing regular contact classes and other academic facilities.<br />

AC 51.15.2<br />

AC 51.15.3<br />

ITEM NO.16<br />

AC 51.16.1<br />

During the discussion the members showed their concern about the fees to be<br />

charged by the Trinity College <strong>of</strong> the Education, Dehradun under convergent<br />

scheme from the students <strong>of</strong> B.Ed. programme read with <strong>of</strong>fice memo received<br />

from the Govt. <strong>of</strong> Uttarakhand in the light <strong>of</strong> courts judgement in the matter<br />

relating to the fee to be charged by the Self Financed Institution in the State and<br />

the fees proposed by Partnership Institute, Trinity College <strong>of</strong> Education for the<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> B.Ed. programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve that the Partnership<br />

Institute, Trinity College <strong>of</strong> Education, Dehradun shall be advised to function as<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>’s study centres / programme centre and the same pattern should be<br />

followed as in any other programme study centre is to be followed.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form <strong>of</strong> a course in Horticulture<br />

for listing under Application Oriented Course for BDP – SOS<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences had submitted the Phase Zero<br />

Form for the development <strong>of</strong> a new course in Horticulture and also listing<br />

it under Application Oriented Courses for Bachelor’s Degree Programme<br />

(BDP). The course is <strong>of</strong> 8 credits consisting <strong>of</strong> approximately 26 units. The<br />

course will be part <strong>of</strong> the BDP Programme.<br />

The School Board <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences approved on 12 th October 1989 and<br />

also the details syllabus for the course at its 39 th meeting held on October 30,<br />

2009. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS explained that it is a application<br />

oriented course for Bachelor’s Degree Programme. This course proposed to be<br />

launched in January, 2010.<br />

AC 51.16.2<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.V. Peter requested the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

to involve School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture in the development <strong>of</strong> the course and<br />

include the inputs from them. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh expressed the view that the<br />

Horticulture is in demand and it requires more practical components and<br />

the course is Agriculture Oriented and should be housed in the School <strong>of</strong>


Agriculture. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivathsan also suggested that the Directors <strong>of</strong><br />

SOS, SOA, Course Coordinator and Dr. S.K. Yadav should have a<br />

meeting to discuss the issue <strong>of</strong> housing the course cause either in SOS or<br />

in SOA and the decision shall reported to the Chairman.<br />

AC 51.16.3<br />

ITEM NO.17<br />

AC 51.17.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to approve the Phase<br />

Zero Form (Annexure 10) for Application Oriented Course in<br />

Horticulture and authorized the Chairman to resolve the issue <strong>of</strong> housing<br />

the course.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase -3 Form for “Advanced Diploma in<br />

Air Cargo Management” – CCETC<br />

It was presented that the CCETC has submitted the Phase 3 Form for<br />

Advanced Diploma in Air Cargo Management which was being run at<br />

Sub-Centre <strong>of</strong> Regional Centre, Cochin in collaboration with M/s Cochin<br />

International Airport Limited, (CIAL), Cochin.<br />

The Programme is running as per the terms <strong>of</strong> the MOU between CIAL<br />

and <strong>IGNOU</strong>. The CIAL Academy constituted Board <strong>of</strong> Studies, finalized<br />

and recommended the programme. The Joint Coordination Committee<br />

approved the programme.<br />

AC 51.17.2<br />

AC 51.17.3<br />

ITEM NO.18<br />

ITEM NO. 20<br />

AC 51.18&20.1<br />

AC 51.18&20.2<br />

The members raised that the about the eligibility <strong>of</strong> the programme that<br />

since the level <strong>of</strong> the programme is UG, how the eligibility is justify as<br />

UG for the programme.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase -3 Form<br />

(Annexure 11) for “Advanced Diploma in Air Cargo Management”.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R.R. Nair, OSD, CCETC, gave the clarification that since the<br />

programme is an Advanced Diploma, the requisite qualification was<br />

decided the UG level.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for launching MA (Philosophy) :<br />

Phase III form<br />

&<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor to re-locate Philosophy<br />

Programme from SOH to SOITS<br />

It was informed that Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Coordinator CBCI Chair has<br />

proposed for ratification <strong>of</strong> the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor to relocate<br />

the Philosophy Discipline from School <strong>of</strong> Humanities to School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Studies and proposal for<br />

launching MA Philosophy (Phase 3 Form).<br />

During the discussion the Director, School <strong>of</strong> Humanities informed that


the Philosophy discipline has been housed in the School <strong>of</strong> Humanities<br />

since 1989.<br />

Director, SOSW has narrated the communication that took place on the<br />

file among the SOSW, SOH and SOITS. After observing the<br />

developments and noting on file moment the members authorized the<br />

Chairman to resolve the issue <strong>of</strong> relocation <strong>of</strong> the philosophy discipline,<br />

which may be reported the next <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. Interfering in the<br />

discussions the Chairman suggested that both the Director, SOH and Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Gracious Thomas, Coordinator, CBCI Chair along with Director (I/c),<br />

SOITS should meet him to resolved the issue.<br />

AC 51.18&20.3<br />

ITEM NO.19<br />

AC 51.19.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deferred the item and authorized the Chairman to<br />

resolve the matter in consultation with the Schools which may be reported<br />

to the next <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase Zero Form for Syriac Language<br />

It was presented that the CBCI Chair submitted Phase Zero Form for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a new course on Syriac Language. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious<br />

Thomas, Coordinator informed that Syriac as a language is being taught in<br />

the state <strong>of</strong> Kerala in Higher Secondary Schools and Universities from<br />

undergraduate to Doctoral programme. Several study centres and BDP<br />

students including those pursuing social work and philosophy<br />

programmes have requested for inclusion <strong>of</strong> a four credit course under<br />

MIL <strong>of</strong> the BDP programme.<br />

The present proposal is a need based programme for the region from<br />

Cochin Regional Centre. The CBCI Chair proposes to develop this<br />

programme to be <strong>of</strong>fered from July, 2010.<br />

Phase Zero Form was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOITS during its<br />

meeting held on February 10, 2010. Phase Zero Form is placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

AC 51.19.2<br />

AC 51.19.3<br />

ITEM NO.21<br />

ITEM NO.22<br />

During the discussion the members appreciated the proposal and<br />

suggested that instead <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering Syriac Language in Kerala region it<br />

should be <strong>of</strong>fered at National level also.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase Zero Form for<br />

Syriac Language.<br />

Approval <strong>of</strong> the Phase 3 Form <strong>of</strong> MA in Participatory Development<br />

(Modular Programme)<br />

The item was withdrawn.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> Centre for


AC 51.22.1<br />

AC 51.22.2<br />

Criminal Justice or new discipline <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice in School <strong>of</strong><br />

Law.<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Law submitted the proposal for<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> Center for Criminal Justice or a new discipline <strong>of</strong> Criminal<br />

Justice in the School.<br />

The Director, SOL explained that the Criminal Justice is an emerging<br />

interdisciplinary area combining law, human rights and criminology that<br />

require intensive academic research to develop best practices respecting<br />

human rights and duties.<br />

The Department <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice or Centre for Criminal Justice will<br />

undertake the teaching, research, training and advocacy realizing the<br />

values <strong>of</strong> justice, equality and good conscience embodies in the Indian<br />

Constitution. It will conduct theoretical, empirical and policy research and<br />

network with different institutions in India and abroad to mainstream<br />

research and advocacy in criminal justice. He also stated that in the recent<br />

Silver Jubilee Lecture Dr. Kiran Bedi under scored the need for setting up<br />

a Centre for Criminal Justice and to promote quality research in this area<br />

is highly required in the contemporary legal scenario in the country. The<br />

Fourth School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Law held on 14 th December, 2007<br />

emphasized the need for creating new discipline in Criminal Law.<br />

AC 51.22.3<br />

AC 51.22.4<br />

AC 51.22.5<br />

ITEM NO.23<br />

AC 51.23.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. O.P. Mishra, expressed his view that the creation <strong>of</strong> core faculty by<br />

creating a new discipline or centre may be difficult at this point <strong>of</strong> time<br />

and he suggested the school may develop the programme in this area with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> consultants, as the school had already taken same initiatives in<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the courses in the area <strong>of</strong> criminal justice including<br />

human rights sensitization programmes for police. He emphasized<br />

increasing demand the not only develop academic programmes but also to<br />

promote research theory and advocacy in this area for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nation.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> appreciated the initiative for strengthening the Criminal<br />

Justice system by creating a new discipline.<br />

After the deliberation the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> resolved and approved the<br />

proposal for creation <strong>of</strong> new discipline <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice in SOL.<br />

To consider and adopt the Revised Guidelines for the Scheme <strong>of</strong><br />

Appointment / Honorarium <strong>of</strong> Guest / Part-Time Teachers.<br />

The Director ACD informed the council that the University Grant<br />

Commission vide its letter No. F-10-1/2009 PS February, 2010 forwarded<br />

the Revised Guidelines for the Scheme <strong>of</strong> Appointment / Honorarium <strong>of</strong><br />

Guest / Part-Time Teachers.


The UGC has decided that the Guest/Part-Time Teachers who possess the<br />

minimum qualification for the post <strong>of</strong> an Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor should be<br />

paid Rs. 1000/- per lecturer to a maximum <strong>of</strong> Rs. 25000/- per month.<br />

Revised Guidelines for the appointment <strong>of</strong> Guest / Part-Time Teachers are<br />

as under:-<br />

1. Guest / Part-Time Teachers may be appointed only against<br />

sanctioned post.<br />

2. The qualifications for Guest/Part Time Teachers should be same<br />

as those prescribed for the regular teachers <strong>of</strong><br />

Universities/Colleges in UGC’s Regulation.<br />

3. Selection procedure for appointing Guest/Part-Time Teachers<br />

should be the same as for regularly appointed teachers.<br />

4. Guest/Part-Time Teachers may not be treated like regular teachers<br />

<strong>of</strong> the faculty for the purpose <strong>of</strong> voting rights or for becoming the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the boards <strong>of</strong> studies.<br />

5. Retired teachers may also be considered for appointment for<br />

Guest/Part-Time teachers.<br />

6. Guest/Part-Time Teachers may not be given the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

allowances, pension, gratuity etc.<br />

These guidelines will come into force w.e.f. 01.01.2010.<br />

AC 51.23.2<br />

AC 51.23.3<br />

During the discussion the members stated that the above guidelines <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UGC are for the conventional universities and therefore the <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

should take appropriate decision for adopting the above guidelines as per<br />

the requirements <strong>of</strong> the University keeping in view <strong>of</strong> the ODL system<br />

and its operations.<br />

The Chairman expressed that a three-member committee will be<br />

constituted to examine the guidelines received from the UGC and revising<br />

the guidelines for the university. The committee will also receive and<br />

consider the recommendation <strong>of</strong> academic counselors <strong>of</strong> study centers.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the adoption <strong>of</strong> the UGC guidelines in<br />

principle and implement the guidelines according to its requirements in<br />

the light <strong>of</strong> the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the above committee.


ITEM NO.24 Action Taken on Item No. 11 <strong>of</strong> 48 th <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> regarding Phase 3<br />

Form and credit enhancement (From 48 credits to 52 credits) <strong>of</strong> B.VET<br />

Programme – SOVET<br />

AC 51.24.1<br />

AC 51.24.2<br />

AC 51.24.3<br />

ITEM NO.25<br />

AC 51.25.1<br />

AC 51.25.2<br />

AC 51.25.3<br />

ITEM NO.26<br />

AC 51.26.1<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training has submitted the Phase<br />

3 Form for credit enhancement <strong>of</strong> (from 48 credits to 52 credits) <strong>of</strong><br />

B.VET Programme and eligibility criteria for B.VET programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET explained the rationale for<br />

enhancement for credits (from 48 to 52 credits) and eligibility for B.VET<br />

Programme in detail. He also informed that the programme is pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

programme and has more practical work/training content. It was approved<br />

the School Board at its 10 th meeting held on 25 th February, 2010.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form for<br />

credit enhancement (From 48 credits to 52 credits) and eligibility criteria<br />

proposed in the Phase 3 form (Annexure 12) for B.VET Programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form (DPR) for full time residential<br />

programme in Certificate in Firemanship - SOVET<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training<br />

submitted the Phase 3 Form (DPR) for full time residential programme in<br />

Certificate in Firemanship.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET explained that this programme will<br />

endeavor to provide the right platform to the student in understanding and<br />

creating local plans for fire fighting and other emergency incidents based<br />

on the local risks. The programme comprises <strong>of</strong> 20 credits will be <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

as a full time residential programme in collaboration with Institute <strong>of</strong> Fire<br />

Safety and Disaster Management (IFDM) Vadodara from July, 2010. The<br />

Phase 3 form was approved by the School Board in its 10 th meeting held<br />

on 25 th February, 2010.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 13) for full time residential programme in Certificate in<br />

Firemanship.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form (DPR) for full time residential<br />

programme in Diploma in Firemanship - SOVET<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training has<br />

submitted the Phase 3 Form (DPR) for full time residential programme in<br />

Diploma in Firemanship.


AC 51.26.2<br />

AC 51.26.3<br />

ITEM NO.27<br />

AC 51.27.1<br />

AC 51.27.2<br />

AC 51.27.3<br />

ITEM NO.28<br />

AC 51.28.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET explained about the objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme in detail. It is a 40 credits programme will be <strong>of</strong>fered as a full<br />

time residential programme in collaboration with Institute <strong>of</strong> Fire Safety<br />

and Disaster Management (IFDM) Vadodara from July 2010. The Phase 3<br />

form was approved by the School Board in its 10 th meeting held on 25 th<br />

February, 2010.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 14) for full time residential programme in Diploma in<br />

Firemanship.<br />

To consider the syllabus <strong>of</strong>: (a) BPOI-006: Communication Skills, and (b)<br />

BPOI-007: IT Skills Courses for DBPO (F&A) programme - SOVET<br />

It is placed before the <strong>Council</strong> that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education<br />

and Training submitted the syllabus for : (a) BPOI-006: Communication<br />

Skills, and (b) BPOI-007: IT Skills Courses for DBPO (F&A)<br />

programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G. Naidu, Director, SOVET, informed the members that the<br />

Diploma programme launched on pilot basis in January 2009. All the<br />

courses in Finance & Accounting have been developed <strong>of</strong>fline and e-<br />

learning material made <strong>of</strong>fer to the students for the two courses BPOI-006<br />

(Communication Skills) and BPOI-007 (IT Skills). There is a demand<br />

from the students for development <strong>of</strong> course material for the above two<br />

courses as well. The expert committee constituted for this purpose<br />

recommended the syllabus for both the above courses the same was<br />

approved by the School Board in its 10 th meeting held on 25 th February<br />

2010.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the course structure<br />

(Annexure 15) for Course BPOI – 006 (Communication Skills) and<br />

BPOI-007 (IT Skills) for two new additional courses for Diploma in BPO-<br />

F&A.<br />

Continuation <strong>of</strong> Certificate/Diploma in Entrepreneurship and Skill<br />

Development programmes for two more sessions (Jan 2010 & July 2010)<br />

as full time programme – SOVET<br />

It was placed that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training has<br />

submitted the request for continuation <strong>of</strong> Certificate/Diploma in<br />

Entrepreneurship and Skill Development programmes for two more<br />

sessions (Jan 2010 & July 2010) as full time programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.G.<br />

Naidu explained that the Certificate and Diploma Programme were<br />

launched in a pilot project in July 2009 under face-to-face mode. As per<br />

the MoU the delivery <strong>of</strong> teaching and practice classes to the students and


maintenance <strong>of</strong> study centre is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> Alliance Educare &<br />

Research Pvt. Ltd. Now, since the pilot launch is over, the programme<br />

still could not be launched under the distance education mode because the<br />

course material is under development stage as per the ODL pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

The collaborators Alliance Educare has proposed, now, that Self learning<br />

material will be developed and ready be December, 2010 for the January,<br />

2011 launch. Therefore, it will be required that the CESD/DESD<br />

programmes may be allowed to continue for 02 more cycles i.e. January,<br />

2010 and July, 2010 as a full time programmes. The proposal was<br />

approved by the School Board at its 10 th meeting held on 25.02.2010 for<br />

continuation <strong>of</strong> both the programmes as full time programmes for two<br />

more sessions.<br />

AC 51.28.2<br />

ITEM NO.29<br />

AC 51.29.1<br />

AC 51.29.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

Continuation <strong>of</strong> Certificate/Diploma in Entrepreneurship and Skill<br />

Development programmes for two more sessions as full time programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form (DPR) full time programme in<br />

MA (Fashion Retail Management)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training had submitted the Phase 3 forms for full time programmes<br />

in MA (Fashion Retail Management under MoU signed between the<br />

University and Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong> (AEPC) to<br />

develop and <strong>of</strong>fer the programmes in Textile Apparel, Life Style and<br />

Retail Sectors through Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel Management (IAM) and<br />

Apparel Training And Design Centre (ATDC). These programmes<br />

will be <strong>of</strong>fered at Study Centres <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel<br />

Management in Gurgaon and Navi Mumbai from July, 2010.<br />

Dr. Darlie Koshy representative <strong>of</strong> the Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong><br />

and Apparel Training and Design Centre made the presentation before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He explained that the modern industry has contributed<br />

significantly to the economic growth globally and is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest<br />

growing and dynamic industries in the world today, with total sales <strong>of</strong> US<br />

$ 6.6 trillion. Retailing is the world’s largest private business ownership<br />

industry. The retail sector in India has emerged as one is among the top<br />

three sectors, which is shaping country’s growth & employment<br />

opportunities. Accounting for over 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> the Country’s GDP and<br />

8 per cent <strong>of</strong> the employment, the retailing in India is a sunrise sector.<br />

Estimated at an individual number <strong>of</strong> 12 million, India is amongst one <strong>of</strong><br />

the countries in the world with the largest numbers <strong>of</strong> retail outlets and<br />

with one <strong>of</strong> the highest retail development index.


AC 51.29.3<br />

ITEM NO. 30<br />

AC 51.30.1<br />

AC 51.30.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 16) for full time programme in MA (Fashion Retail<br />

Management).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form (DPR) for full time programme<br />

in MA (Apparel Production Management)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training had submitted the Phase 3 forms for full time programmes<br />

in MA (Apparel Production Management) under MoU signed<br />

between the University and Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong><br />

(AEPC) to develop and <strong>of</strong>fer the programmes in Textile Apparel, Life<br />

Style and Retail Sectors through Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel Management<br />

(IAM) and Apparel Training And Design Centre (ATDC). These<br />

programmes will be <strong>of</strong>fered at Study Centres <strong>of</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel<br />

Management in Gurgaon and Navi Mumbai from July 2010.<br />

Dr. Darlie Koshy representative <strong>of</strong> the Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong><br />

and Apparel Training and Design Centre made the presentation before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. The manifold growth <strong>of</strong> the Indian Clothing and<br />

Textile Industry’s overwhelming economic influence is felt in every<br />

sphere <strong>of</strong> the country’s growth and progress. This Industry plays a crucial<br />

role in contributing to the industrial output <strong>of</strong> the nation and its<br />

consumption patterns, apart from generating substantial employment for<br />

the skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled segments <strong>of</strong> the work force. It<br />

employs 35 million people directly and is the second largest provider <strong>of</strong><br />

employment after agriculture; contributing 14% to the industrial<br />

production, 4% to the GDP and 17% to the country’s export earning. The<br />

projected value <strong>of</strong> Indian textile industry is currently at US $ 47 billion<br />

and is estimated to touch US $ 115 billion by the year 2015, comprising<br />

<strong>of</strong> a domestic market share <strong>of</strong> US $ 60 billion and an export market share<br />

<strong>of</strong> US $ 55 billion.<br />

With this level <strong>of</strong> envisioned growth the Indian Clothing and Textile<br />

industry will need business manager, production pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and<br />

technologist with more in-depth and broad base <strong>of</strong> knowledge & skills<br />

relating to clothing production management and technology.<br />

AC 51.30.3<br />

ITEM NO. 31<br />

AC 51.31.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 17) for full time MA (Apparel Production Management)<br />

programme.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form for full time programme in BA<br />

(Fashion Communication)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and


Training had submitted the Phase 3 forms for full time programme in<br />

BA (Fashion Communication) under MoU signed between the<br />

University and Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong> (AEPC) to<br />

develop and <strong>of</strong>fer the programmes in Textile Apparel, Life Style and<br />

Retail Sectors through Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel Management (IAM) and<br />

Apparel Training And Design Centre (ATDC). These programmes<br />

will be <strong>of</strong>fered at Study Centres <strong>of</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel Management<br />

in Gurgaon and Navi Mumbai from July, 2010.<br />

AC 51.31.2<br />

AC 51.31.3<br />

ITEM NO. 32<br />

AC. 51.32.1<br />

AC 51.32.2<br />

Dr. Darlie Koshy representative <strong>of</strong> the Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong><br />

and Apparel Training and Design Centre made the presentation before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. With the multitude <strong>of</strong> domestic and foreign brands,<br />

companies and designers exploding onto the Indian fashion scene, it is<br />

imperative for each one <strong>of</strong> them to develop a unique brand identify and<br />

maximize visibility through establish unique branding and promotional<br />

approach. This colossal task is made possible by fashion communication<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, who excel in extending the design and communication<br />

strategy beyond the domain <strong>of</strong> the product to include all aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

communication design & creating recall in consumer’s mind. The<br />

programme in fashion communication is a unique opportunity for students<br />

wishing to pursue a career in fashion & retail promotions,<br />

communications & branding, fashion journalism, event management etc.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 18) for full time programme in BA (Fashion<br />

Communication).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 form for full time programme in BA<br />

(Apparel Design Merchandising)<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training submitted the Phase 3 forms for full time programmes in<br />

BA (Apparel Design Merchandising) under MoU signed between the<br />

University and Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong> (AEPC) to<br />

develop and <strong>of</strong>fer the programmes in Textile Apparel, Life Style and<br />

Retail Sectors through Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel Management (IAM) and<br />

Apparel Training And Design Centre (ATDC). These programmes<br />

will be <strong>of</strong>fered at Study Centres <strong>of</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Apparel Management<br />

in Gurgaon and Navi Mumbai from July 2010.<br />

Dr. Darlie Koshy representative <strong>of</strong> the Apparel Export Promotion <strong>Council</strong><br />

and Apparel Training and Design Centre made the presentation before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. He explained that in the past two decades there has<br />

been tremendous growth in the need for vocational education at the under<br />

graduate level. Most parents and students perceive that a general<br />

graduation does not equip one for long-term career success in ones chosen


area <strong>of</strong> work, especially with an increasing number <strong>of</strong> industries<br />

demanding specialist personnel. There is a need to provide specific<br />

direction to a career and to provide deeper acumen about a particular<br />

industry. The manifold growth <strong>of</strong> the Indian Fashion Industry’s<br />

overwhelming economic influence is felt in every sphere <strong>of</strong> the country’s<br />

growth and progress. The apparel industry plays a crucial role in<br />

contributing to the industrial output <strong>of</strong> the nation and world as well, and<br />

its consumption patterns, apart from generating substantial employment<br />

for the skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled segments <strong>of</strong> the work force. It<br />

employs 35 million people directly and is the second largest provider <strong>of</strong><br />

employment after agriculture; contributing 14% to the industrial<br />

production, 4% to the GDP and 17% to the country’s export earning. The<br />

projected value <strong>of</strong> Indian textile industry is currently at US $ 47 billion<br />

and is estimated to touch US $ 115 billion by the year 2015, comprising<br />

<strong>of</strong> a domestic market share <strong>of</strong> US $ 60 billion and an export market share<br />

<strong>of</strong> US $ 55 billion.<br />

AC 51.32.3<br />

ITEM NO. 33<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 19) for full time programme in MA (Apparel Design and<br />

Merchandising).<br />

To consider and approve the Programme Design and detailed Programme<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> Certificate in Library and Information Science (CLIS)<br />

proposed by the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Library and Information Sciences – SOSS`<br />

AC. 51.33.1 It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences submitted the Phase 3<br />

form for Certificate in Library and Information Science (CLIS). The<br />

School Board has approved the Phase 3 form at its 46 th meeting held on<br />

6 th August 2009.<br />

AC 51.33.2<br />

AC 51.33.3<br />

ITEM NO. 34<br />

AC. 51.34.1<br />

Director, SOSS informed the council that the item could not be placed<br />

before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>/<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee in<br />

its previous meeting due to oversight.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 20) programme for Certificate in Library and Information<br />

Science (CLIS) - Design and detailed Programme structure<br />

To consider and approved Phase 2 and Phase 3 forms <strong>of</strong> Bachelor <strong>of</strong><br />

Business Administration in Retailing (BBA) modular mode and ratify<br />

the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in <strong>of</strong>fering the programme<br />

from July, 2009<br />

The item was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies<br />

(Commerce Discipline) submitted the Phase 2 and Phase 3 forms for<br />

Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Business Administration in Retailing (BBA) with modular


mode approach. The modular approach as following: First year Diploma<br />

in Retailing (DIR), Second year – Advanced Diploma in Retailing<br />

(ADIR), Third year – Bachelor <strong>of</strong> Business Administration in Retailing<br />

(BBA) with two exist points at DIR and ADIR. The programme is on<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer from July 2009 with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Chancellor.<br />

AC 51.34.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 2 and Phase 3<br />

forms for Bachelor Business Administration in Retailing (BBA) modular<br />

mode and ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor for <strong>of</strong>fering the<br />

programme from July 2009.<br />

ITEM NO. 35<br />

AC. 51.35.1<br />

AC 51.35.2<br />

AC 51.35.3<br />

ITEM NO. 36<br />

AC. 51.36.1<br />

AC 51.36.2<br />

To consider and approve the proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer Project Report as an<br />

optional subject for the M.A Second Year students in Sociology - SOSS<br />

It was presented that the School <strong>of</strong> Social Science submitted the proposal<br />

for approval <strong>of</strong> the Project Report as an optional subject for the MA<br />

Second Year students in Sociology.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, informed the council that in view <strong>of</strong> the feed<br />

back from students, academic counselors and subject expects, the faculty<br />

proposes to <strong>of</strong>fer Project Report as an optional course for the MA Second<br />

year students in Sociology. The School Board at its 46th meeting held on<br />

6th August 2009 approved the proposal.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal to <strong>of</strong>fer the Project Report<br />

as an optional subject for the MA Second Year students in Sociology.<br />

To consider and approve the Institutionalization <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges<br />

Dr. C.K. Ghosh, Nodal Officer, Community Colleges presented the<br />

proposal for institutionalization <strong>of</strong> Community Colleges. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its 50 th meeting approved the guidelines in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

Institutionalization Community Colleges like level <strong>of</strong> programmes and<br />

their credit, eligibility criteria, issues <strong>of</strong> evaluation and certification and<br />

also informed that thereafter, several developments have taken place and<br />

he appraised <strong>of</strong> these developments.<br />

During the discussions the members requested that the university in detail<br />

should define the role <strong>of</strong> community colleges regarding eligibility,<br />

admission, evaluation and other requirements.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. A.K. Agarwal, SOHS, raised the issue that there are mal-practices<br />

by the Community Colleges in handling the above mentioned issues and<br />

this may lead to litigation against the University.<br />

The University should also place the checks on the academic matters<br />

relating to the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Programmes being <strong>of</strong>fered by these Community


Colleges in collaboration with it. All the matters relating to University’s<br />

academic programmes should be placed before the University’s Schools<br />

<strong>of</strong> Studies from which these programmes are being <strong>of</strong>fered. The regular<br />

feed back should be sent to the Nodal Officer, Community Colleges,<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>. The University should be very pro-active while considering the<br />

proposal <strong>of</strong> the Community Colleges for affiliation or <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programmes.<br />

Participating in the discussions the Chairman insisted that the University<br />

should keep a strict watch on these Community Colleges and serve the<br />

legal notice for de-recognition <strong>of</strong> the defaulting colleges and suggested<br />

that there should be a special meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for a<br />

comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> the Community College system for its effective<br />

and country-wide implementation.<br />

AC 51.36.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in view <strong>of</strong> the suggestion <strong>of</strong> the Chairman decided<br />

that the activities <strong>of</strong> the Community Colleges may continue as per the<br />

approved guidelines and requested Dr. C.K. Ghosh for a comprehensive<br />

proposal on the Community Colleges for consideration at the special<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> regarding Community Colleges.<br />

ITEM NO. 41 To consider and approve the award <strong>of</strong> Gold Medals and Degree/Diploma /<br />

Certificates to students in the 21 st Convocation.<br />

AC. 51.41.1<br />

AC. 51.41.2<br />

It was presented that the SED submitted the award <strong>of</strong> Certificates<br />

and Gold Medals/Cash Awards to the candidates who have<br />

successfully completed the various programmes <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

Dr. Pushplata Tripathi, Registrar, SED informed the <strong>Council</strong> that the 21 st<br />

Annual Convocation in the University is scheduled to be held on 15 th<br />

March 2010. She informed that the number <strong>of</strong> candidates who are eligible<br />

for award <strong>of</strong> Certificates for various programmes and Gold Medals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Cash Awards at the Convocation.<br />

AC 51.41.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the list (Annexure 21)<br />

<strong>of</strong> eligible students for award <strong>of</strong> Degrees, Diplomas and Certificate at the<br />

21 st Convocation <strong>of</strong> the University and also authorized the Vice-<br />

Chancellor to award the Degrees, Diplomas and Certificates to the<br />

candidates whose names are not incorporate in the list but who become<br />

eligible for the award <strong>of</strong> Degrees, Diplomas and Certificate.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.


(V.N.Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


MINUTES<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

FIFTY SECOND MEETING<br />

<strong>of</strong> the<br />

ACADEMIC COUNCIL<br />

held on<br />

20 TH APRIL 2010<br />

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY<br />

MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110068


<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

MINUTES OF THE FIFTY SECOND MEETING OF THE ACADEMIC<br />

COUNCIL HELD ON 20 TH APRIL 2010 AT 2.00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE<br />

ROOM, BLOCK-8 <strong>IGNOU</strong>, MAIDAN GARHI, NEW DELHI-110 068.<br />

The following were present:<br />

260. Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. N. Rajasekharan Pillai, Vice-Chancellor - Chairman<br />

261. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

262. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Parvin Sinclair, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

263. Dr. D.K. Choudhary, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

264. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.R. Srivasthan, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

265. Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

266. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Renu Bhardwaj, Director, SOH - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

267. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Kanjilal, Director, SOSS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

268. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

65. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

66. Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbayamma, Director, SOMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

67. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

68. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Bimla Kapoor, Director, SOHS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

69. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manohar Lal, Director, SOCIS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

70. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ajit Kumar, Director, SOET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

71. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Srikrishnadeva Rao, Director, SOL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

72. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja, Director, SOA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

73. Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Gajendra Naidu, Director, SOVET - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

74. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

75. Dr. Harkirat Bains, Director (I/c), SOTHSSM - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

76. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Gracious Thomas, Director, SOSW - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

77. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. K. Pattanaik, Director, SOEDS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

78. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunil Kumar, Director, SOPVA - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

79. Dr. S.K. Mishra, Director (I/c), SOFL - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

80. Dr. Deo Shankar Navin, Director (I/c), SOTST - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

81. Dr. Nandini Sinha Kapoor, Director (I/c), SOITS - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

82. Sh. S.K. Arora, Librarian - Ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio Member<br />

83. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav Nayak, SOSS - Member<br />

84. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anjila Gupta, SOSS - Member<br />

85. Pr<strong>of</strong>. T.K. Jena, SOHS - Member<br />

86. Dr. Nehal A Farooque, Reader, SOEDS - Member<br />

87. Dr. Babu P Ramesh, Reader, SOITS - Member<br />

88. Dr. A.K. Gaba, Reader, SOVET - Member<br />

89. Sh. P.V. Suresh, Lecturer, SOCIS - Member<br />

90. Dr. Kamalika Banerjee, Lecturer, SOS - Member<br />

91. Sh. Arvind Kumar Dubey, Lecturer, SOTHSM - Member<br />

92. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Manjulika Srivastava, Director (I/c), DEC - Member<br />

93. Dr. Silima Nanda, Director (I/c), ID - Member<br />

94. Dr. George Mathew - Member


95. Pr<strong>of</strong>. K.P. Singh - Member<br />

96. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi - Member<br />

97. Dr. K.V. Peter - Member<br />

98. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mohamma Miyan - Member<br />

99. Pr<strong>of</strong>. L. Venugopal Reddy, - Member<br />

100. Dr. R.R. Rausaria, Registrar (I/c), MPDD - Member<br />

101. Dr. C.K. Ghosh, Director, SSC - Member<br />

102. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pushplata Tripathi, Registrar (I/c), SED - Member<br />

103. Sh. K. Laxman, OSD, SRD - Member<br />

104. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.S. Senam Raju, Director, ACD - Member Secretary<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Savita Singh, Director, SOGDS, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Mahendra Dev,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.K. Jain, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.N. Maheshwari, Dr. D.K. Datta Majumdar, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ramamohan<br />

Rao, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Kannan M. Modugalya, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Devi Singh and Sh. Ravi Kanth, Director (I/c),<br />

EMPC could not attend the meeting.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director, STRIDE and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Vimala Veeraraghavan,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus, SOSS attended the meeting as special invitees.<br />

Shri K. D. Sharma, Assistant Registrar, ACD was present to assist the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The Chairman welcomed the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for the 52 nd<br />

meeting and the Member Secretary presented the Agenda. The following agenda items<br />

were taken up:<br />

ITEM NO. 1 Action Taken Report on the decisions <strong>of</strong> the 50 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on 8 th October 2009<br />

AC 52.1.1<br />

AC 52.1.2<br />

AC 52.1.3<br />

The minutes <strong>of</strong> the 50 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> were circulated<br />

to the members and the observations <strong>of</strong> the members on the minutes were<br />

noted by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 51st <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 3 rd March,<br />

2010. The minutes were confirmed by the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> but the<br />

Action Taken Report could not be placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

due to shortage <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

The Action Taken Report <strong>of</strong> the 50 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is<br />

placed along with the agenda note for kind information <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the Action Taken Report on the decisions <strong>of</strong><br />

the 50th meeting.


ITEMNO. 1(A) To confirm the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 51 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

held on 3 rd March 2010<br />

AC 52.1(A).1 The minutes <strong>of</strong> the 51 st <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> held on<br />

03.03.2010 are placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for scrutiny and<br />

confirmation.<br />

AC 52.1(A).2<br />

The following comments were received from Dr. S.K. Arora, Librarian<br />

and Documentation Officer on Item No. 6 <strong>of</strong> the agenda and Pr<strong>of</strong>essor M.<br />

Aslam, Director, SOCE on Item No. 4.<br />

On item No.6, Dr. S.K. Arora, Librarian and Documentation Officer<br />

observed “while in discussion regarding also inclusion <strong>of</strong> EDNERU,<br />

Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor concluded stating that “Any structured<br />

academic unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering or wish to <strong>of</strong>fer an academic<br />

programme shall be covered”. It is desired that in view <strong>of</strong> above, the<br />

necessary modifications in statute may also be made by including<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Divisions such as <strong>Academic</strong>-<br />

Centres/Institutes/Chairs/Units/Divisions, which shall enhance the scope<br />

for the other structured academic Units/Divisions also wishing to start<br />

programmes”.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE made the following observations:<br />

1. Under agenda item 1(A) on confirmation <strong>of</strong> the Minutes <strong>of</strong> the 51 st<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, the following needs to be stated:<br />

(i) Under agenda Item No. 2 (51.2.1) which refers to the 29 th meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Standing Committee held on 27 th July,<br />

2009, it was pointed out by the Director, SOCE that the Bachelor<br />

<strong>of</strong> Design (Textile and Apparel Design) programme being<br />

proposed by SOET will be a duplication because under the<br />

Discipline <strong>of</strong> Home Science assigned to SOCE, the area <strong>of</strong> textile<br />

and apparel design was being addressed. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

suggested that the Director, SOCE and Director, SOET may have<br />

a meeting and resolve the issue. The Director, SOCE pointed that<br />

the meeting has already taken place and that the issue has been<br />

resolved and it has been agreed that this area <strong>of</strong> textile and<br />

apparel design will be addressed by the SOCE with academic<br />

support from SOET (wherever necessary).<br />

2. Under agenda item no. 4 (AC 54.4.1) the reference was made to the<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> the 50 th meeting <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> held on 21 st<br />

October 2009 ( RC 15.13.2) where it was stated that the topic <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ph.D. was not mentioned and that Research Guide was not approved by


the School Board. The Director, SOCE stated that the topic was<br />

mentioned and the Research Guide was approved by the School Board<br />

and the follow-up action was accordingly taken by the Research<br />

<strong>Council</strong>, therefore, the minutes <strong>of</strong> the Research <strong>Council</strong> needs to be<br />

amended.<br />

3. Under agenda item no. 4, the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Standing Committee held on 24 th February, 2010<br />

were placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for approval. The<br />

following needs to be incorporated in the Minutes:<br />

(i) Under (ACSC – 30.40.1) on Consideration and Approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> reorganization <strong>of</strong> Disciplines <strong>of</strong> SOCE, the Director,<br />

SOCE stated that such items where the SOCE is involved,<br />

particularly which has a direct relevance to its functioning, the<br />

concerned School Director should have been invited for a<br />

presentation to ACSC. Under (ACSC – 30.43.1) the Director,<br />

SOCE stated that if a post <strong>of</strong> Reader is withdrawn from the<br />

School, the Director <strong>of</strong> the School needs to be taken into<br />

confidence before such agenda item is brought before the ACSC<br />

for consideration. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> noted the suggestion for<br />

future compliance by the <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS observed that the comments sent<br />

by her are not reflected in the Minutes. In fact, the original recording has<br />

been restated. The modifications as pointed out earlier, in 3 rd March<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong>, are as under:<br />

“It is being submitted that in the 50 th <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting, it was<br />

clearly agreed that “a committee may be constituted to resolve this issue.<br />

Also, Pr<strong>of</strong>. N. Mukunda, was requested to help in resolving this issue. The<br />

same is not mentioned in the recording as a part <strong>of</strong> the decision.”<br />

It was mentioned that due to oversight the name <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.S. Senam<br />

Raju, Director, ACD was not listed in the list <strong>of</strong> members present in the<br />

meeting. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed for making the correction in the<br />

list <strong>of</strong> the members present.<br />

AC 52.1(A).3<br />

During the discussion on the minutes Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director,<br />

SOS mentioned about her comments on Item No. 50.14.1 regarding<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> Astrophysics which is being housed in School <strong>of</strong><br />

Interdisciplinary & Trans-disciplinary Studies. She impressed<br />

Astrophysics is a discipline <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences and the Masters<br />

programmes are required to be housed in the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences. She also<br />

referred that in the 50 th <strong>Meeting</strong> it was decided that the Committee should<br />

be constituted to look into the matter.


Participating in the discussions the Chairman stated that Astrophysics is<br />

the discipline <strong>of</strong> the Sciences and the Masters programme should housed<br />

be in the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences only and asked the Director, SOS to take<br />

necessary steps in this regard. Dr. C.K. Ghosh, Coordinator for the<br />

programme in Astrophysics explained the benefits to the students <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and stated that he has no objection if the discipline is housed<br />

in the School <strong>of</strong> Sciences.<br />

The Director, School <strong>of</strong> Sciences may place this item in the School Board,<br />

inform the recommendations.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> appreciated the relevance and quality <strong>of</strong> this<br />

frontier science full-time programme <strong>of</strong> the University.<br />

AC 52.1(A).4<br />

ITEM NO. 2<br />

AC 52.2.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and noted the comments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

members and after discussion confirmed the minutes (Annexure 1) with<br />

the following changes in the minutes.<br />

Item No. 6 : “inclusion <strong>of</strong> any structured academic units <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fering or wish to <strong>of</strong>fer an academic programme .”<br />

Item No. 1 <strong>of</strong> 51 st <strong>Meeting</strong> : for inclusion <strong>of</strong> the following in resolution<br />

No. 50.14.2 :<br />

“ that a committee may be constituted to resolve this issue. Also Pr<strong>of</strong>. N.<br />

Mukanda was requested to help in the resolving this issue”.<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in starting On-<br />

Demand Examination in different courses/programmes at different<br />

Regional Centres <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

In order to facilitate to the student to choose the convenience for them to<br />

appear in the exams as per their preparedness, the university has started<br />

innovative scheme <strong>of</strong> On-Demand Examination in the following<br />

course/programmes once in a week (presently on Friday):<br />

A) Programmes/Courses in which the scheme <strong>of</strong> On-Demand<br />

Examination Scheme has started are: CIG, COF, BPP, CTE, CAFÉ,<br />

DAFE, CTS, DTS (All Courses), BTS(Courses: - TS1, TS2, TS3,<br />

TS4, TS5, TS6 & TS7 ) and BDP (Courses:- CTE03, CTE04, CTE05,<br />

AED01, AOM01, ASP01, AMK01, AEC01, FEG01, FEG02, FST01)<br />

B) The facility <strong>of</strong> On-Demand Examination is available at the following<br />

Regional Centres <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>. RC, Delhi –I, RC, Delhi – II, RC,<br />

Jaipur, RC, Karnal, RC, Madhuri, RC, Chennai, RC, Cochin.<br />

AC 52.2.2<br />

Dr. O.P Sharma explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the scheme and informed<br />

that for appearing in the On-Demand Examination, the eligible student <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> having valid registration will have to register on line by paying


the prescribed fee for On-Demand Examination in the courses selected by<br />

him/her to appear. The scheme <strong>of</strong> On-Demand Examination will also be<br />

extended to other Regional Centre and in other courses/programmes, as<br />

soon as the required Question Bank for these programmes/courses is<br />

ready. He also invited the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and faculty<br />

members for their contribution for development <strong>of</strong> Question Bank for Ondemand<br />

Examination.<br />

AC 52.2.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and ratified the action taken by the<br />

Vice-Chancellor for starting On-Demand Examination in above<br />

mentioned courses/programmes at the Regional Centres <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

mentioned in Resolution No: AC 52.2.1 and 52.2.2.<br />

ITEM NO. 3 To consider and approve the Remuneration rates for<br />

Experts/<strong>Academic</strong>s for preparing various types <strong>of</strong> Questions for<br />

Developing Question Bank for On-Demand Examination, in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> various programmes.<br />

AC 52.3.1<br />

It was presented that the NCIDE has been assigned the responsibility to<br />

prepare question bank modalities and launch on Demand examination <strong>of</strong><br />

various courses / programmes <strong>of</strong> the University. To make the project<br />

workable there is an urgent need for development <strong>of</strong> a big question bank<br />

<strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> questions which are classified in the following groups.<br />

a) MCQ – Multiple Choice Questions - Which will have 1<br />

Mark.<br />

b) VSA – Very Short Answer Type - Which will have 1-2<br />

Marks.<br />

c) SA – Short Answer Type - Which will have 3 to<br />

9 Marks.<br />

d) LA – Long Answer Type - Which will have 10<br />

and above Marks.<br />

It was informed that there is no item-wise rates approved for VSA (Very<br />

Short Answer), SA (Short Answer) and LA (Long Answer) questions.<br />

Only the rates for the MCQ type <strong>of</strong> questions have been approved i.e., is<br />

Rs. 12/- per question for general certificate courses, which the experts<br />

(whom we invited in our meetings) expressed that the recommendation is<br />

too low for the quality <strong>of</strong> questions. Where as the approved rates <strong>of</strong> MCQ<br />

for entrance exams <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> is Rs.50/- per question.<br />

The existing rates for setting <strong>of</strong> question papers are Rs. 700/- per question<br />

paper <strong>of</strong> about 10 to 15 questions items <strong>of</strong> various types and the<br />

remuneration for translation <strong>of</strong> the question paper is 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

remuneration for setting <strong>of</strong> a question paper.


1) Keeping in view the above it is proposed that the following<br />

remuneration may be considered for approval:<br />

a. VSA-(1-2 Marks) @ Rs.15 per question along with<br />

marking scheme / answers<br />

b. MCQ-(4 choices) @ Rs. 20 per question along with<br />

marking scheme / answers<br />

c. SA-(3-9 Marks) @ Rs. 30 per question along with marking<br />

scheme / value points<br />

d. LA-(10 Marks and above) @ Rs. 50 per question along<br />

with marking scheme / points<br />

2) It is also proposed that the existing norm <strong>of</strong> 50% <strong>of</strong> the amount<br />

fixed for setting <strong>of</strong> question paper/ per question be extended for<br />

translation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the above.<br />

3) In order to encourage internal faculty for question bank<br />

development this is proposed that the faculty members may also<br />

be given payment at the above proposed rates for developing<br />

questions for the question bank for On-Demand Exam.<br />

AC 52.3.2<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE suggested that the<br />

Registrar, SED who is dealing with the examination <strong>of</strong> the University may<br />

be involved in working out the remuneration structure for questions and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> Question Bank <strong>of</strong> On-demand Examination. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav<br />

Nayak suggested for more number <strong>of</strong> Multiple Choice Question (MCQ)<br />

and NCIDE should conduct seminar for involving the academics and the<br />

experts in development <strong>of</strong> Question Bank. The members insisted that the<br />

university should not deviate from the pattern <strong>of</strong> remuneration being<br />

followed by the SED.<br />

It was decided that a Committee constituting <strong>of</strong> the Registrar, SED; Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Sunita Malthotra, Director, SOS; and representative <strong>of</strong> the F&A Division<br />

may be constituted under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> concerned PVC/ in the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> PVC, the VC to review the proposal and make<br />

recommendations on the remuneration for preparing various types <strong>of</strong><br />

questions and for developing Question Bank for On-demand Examination<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> various Courses/Programmes.<br />

AC 52.3.3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 52.4.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to entrust the work with<br />

the above mentioned committee and authorized the Vice-Chancellor to act<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> recommendation <strong>of</strong> the committee.<br />

To consider and approve the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC<br />

held on 24 th February 2010<br />

The 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee was<br />

held on 24 th February 2010.


AC 52.4.2<br />

Participating in the discussions on the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee Pr<strong>of</strong>. Aslam suggested that the<br />

Schools / Centres should follow the procedures before bringing the items<br />

for consideration in the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> / <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. G. Subbaymma, Director, SOMS suggested that the management<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Management Studies has its reservation regarding<br />

Item No. 17. The Chairman asked her to provide the circulated minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the School Board discipline meetings on this item and the signatures <strong>of</strong><br />

the faculty. The Chairman also asked the Director whether the matter has<br />

been discussed in the School Board or not, and stated that this cannot be<br />

taken up on record without the approval <strong>of</strong> the School Board.<br />

It was also suggested that the programmes which were being <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

the CCETC should be reported to the Centre Management Committee and<br />

Joint Coordination Committees although the programmes were approved<br />

by the ACSC.<br />

AC 52.4.3<br />

ITEM NO. 5<br />

AC 52.5.1<br />

AC 52.5.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 30 th<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> its Standing Committee held on 24 th February 2010 with the<br />

above suggestions/directions for compliance.<br />

To report for approval the proposal for Proposed <strong>IGNOU</strong> College <strong>of</strong><br />

Culinary Arts<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Tourism, Hospitality Services Sectoral Management has<br />

proposed for <strong>IGNOU</strong> College <strong>of</strong> Culinary Arts. Dr. P. Vidyashukla,<br />

explained the proposal and mentioned that the School Board <strong>of</strong><br />

SOTHSSM at its 2 nd <strong>Meeting</strong> has approved the proposal for setting up an<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Culinary Arts.<br />

During the discussion the members were <strong>of</strong> the view that the setting up <strong>of</strong><br />

the Institute by the University will require huge investment on its part and<br />

the matter requires to be placed before other bodies like Finance<br />

Committee / Board <strong>of</strong> Management for examining the proposal in detail<br />

and feasibility <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

It was suggested that instead <strong>of</strong> having an Institute <strong>of</strong> Culinary Arts it will<br />

be better to have a discipline in Culinary Arts.<br />

AC 52.5.3<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved that the proposal for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> a discipline in Culinary Arts may be brought by the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Tourism, Hospitality Service Sectoral Management through the statutory<br />

bodies i.e. School Board for consideration.


ITEM NO. 6<br />

AC 52.6.1<br />

AC 52.6.2<br />

AC 52.6.3<br />

ITEM NO. 7<br />

AC 52.7.1<br />

To consider and approve the creation <strong>of</strong> new faculty positions for<br />

M.Sc. (Chemistry) on campus full-time programme<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Sciences has proposed for creation <strong>of</strong> new faculty positions<br />

for M.Sc. (Chemistry) on campus full-time programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita<br />

Malhotra, Director, SOS, explained the rationale for creation <strong>of</strong> new<br />

faculty and approval for creation <strong>of</strong> 12 new positions.<br />

During the discussion the members felt that the creation <strong>of</strong> 12 new faculty<br />

positions will be too much and thus not justifiable and realistic. It was<br />

also suggested that the university should go through the UGC norms for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> faculty for the on campus full time programmes and proceed in<br />

this direction step-by-step. At this stage the proposal should not be<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> not more than seven more position as per the university norms<br />

taking the work load <strong>of</strong> the existing faculty in to account and the same<br />

should come through the statutory bodies like School Board.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in view <strong>of</strong> the above discussion resolved to defer<br />

the item and suggested that the proposal should be submitted for<br />

consideration through the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Sciences.<br />

To consider and approve the detailed UNESCO syllabus for MA<br />

(JMC-F2F) Programme<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies has proposed the<br />

modification in detailed UNESCO syllabus for MA (JMC-F2F)<br />

Programme. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS informed that<br />

the deliberations were done in the School Committee, School Board and<br />

expert committee. The Final Course structure based on UNESCO syllabus<br />

along with the duration <strong>of</strong> the programme, the fees structure and the<br />

eligibility criteria for admission to this programme was approved by the<br />

5 th School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 15 th February 2010. On Approval by<br />

the School Board and approval <strong>of</strong> the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 5 th School Board<br />

<strong>Meeting</strong> by the competent authorities the following is placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for approval.<br />

Programme Code : MAJMC<br />

Duration<br />

: 2 years (4 Semesters <strong>of</strong> 6 months each)<br />

Credits : 64<br />

Eligibility<br />

: Graduation in any discipline from a<br />

recognised university with 55% marks for<br />

general category and 50% for reserved<br />

category Reservations <strong>of</strong> seats as per<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> norms.<br />

Admission Process : Written entrance examination followed


AC 52.7.2<br />

ITEM NO. 8<br />

AC 52.8.1<br />

Fee<br />

Maximum In-take<br />

Per Batch<br />

personal interview.<br />

: Rs. 80000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand<br />

only) for two years; to be paid in advance<br />

@Rs. 20000/- in each semester.<br />

: 25 Students (Including reservation as per<br />

norms)<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the modified and<br />

detailed UNESCO Syllabus for MA (JMC - F2F) (Annexure 2).<br />

To consider and approve the detailed syllabus, Course Structure, Fee,<br />

for MA (EMPM-F2F)<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies has proposed the<br />

detailed syllabus, course structure, fee for MA (EMPM-F2F). Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS informed that the final Course<br />

structure along with the duration <strong>of</strong> the programme, the fees structure and<br />

the eligibility criteria for admission to this programme was placed before<br />

the 5 th School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 15 th February 2010 for approval. On<br />

Approval <strong>of</strong> the same by the School Board and approval <strong>of</strong> the draft<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> the 5 th School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> by the competent authorities the<br />

following is placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for approval.<br />

Programme Code : MAEMPM<br />

Duration<br />

: 2 years (4 Semesters <strong>of</strong> 6 months each)<br />

Credits : 64<br />

Eligibility<br />

:Graduation in any discipline from a<br />

recognized university with 55% marks for<br />

general category and 50% for reserved<br />

category Reservations <strong>of</strong> seats as per<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> norms.<br />

Admission Process :Written entrance examination followed<br />

personal interview.<br />

Fee<br />

: Rs. 80000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand<br />

only) for two years; to be paid in advance<br />

@Rs. 20000/- in each semester.<br />

Maximum In-take<br />

Per Batch<br />

: 25 Students (Including reservation as per<br />

norms)<br />

AC 52.8.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for detailed<br />

syllabus, Course Structure, Evaluation Policy (Annexure 3) and Fee for<br />

MA (EMPM-F2F).


ITEM NO. 9<br />

AC 52.9.1<br />

AC 52.9.2<br />

To Report Phase-3 Form (Programme Design and Detailed<br />

Programme Report) for Post Graduate Certificate in Web<br />

Journalism<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Journalism and New Media Studies had submitted the<br />

Phase 3 form for Post Graduate Certificate in Web Journalism.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Shambhu Nath Singh, Director, SOJNMS explained that the<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the programme is to develop skills in web based journalism.<br />

The programme aims to give basic understanding <strong>of</strong> the technical means<br />

<strong>of</strong> creating web content as well as to provide an in-depth training in the art<br />

<strong>of</strong> being a freelance content producer for the web, for those with limited<br />

knowledge or even no knowledge <strong>of</strong> the way Web works. The Programme<br />

Details are as follows:<br />

Programme Code : PGCWJ<br />

Duration<br />

: Min. 6 months; Max. 2 years<br />

Credits : 16<br />

Eligibility<br />

:Graduation in any discipline.<br />

Fee<br />

Theory :70%<br />

Practical :30%<br />

:Rs. 10000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) per<br />

student<br />

The Phase-3 form <strong>of</strong> the Post Graduate Certificate in Web Journalism is<br />

approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> SOJNMS at its 5 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 15 th<br />

February 2010.<br />

AC 52.9.3 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3<br />

(Annexure 4) form for <strong>of</strong>fering Post Graduate Certificate in Web<br />

Journalism in collaboration with <strong>IGNOU</strong> Regional Centre – Cochin.<br />

ITEM NO. 10<br />

AC 52.10.1<br />

To ratify the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor for transfer <strong>of</strong><br />

DDO-Ship <strong>of</strong> RCI-funds from SOCE to NCDS.<br />

The grants received from the Rehabilitation <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> India (RCI) were<br />

under the School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education <strong>of</strong> the University and Dr.<br />

Neerja Chadha was DDO for two years from Jan., 2008 to Dec., 2009 and<br />

consequent upon her proceeding on EOL Dr. Rekha S. Sen designated has<br />

been DDO in place <strong>of</strong> Dr. Neerja Chadha w.e.f. March, 2009.<br />

As per the notification dated 22.04.2009 it was decided that all the<br />

disability programme under preparation in collaboration with RCI will be<br />

housed and coordinated by National Centre for Disability Studies. It was<br />

decided that the four certificate programmes except those which were


under preparation will also be taken-up by NCDS. The Certificate<br />

Programme in Early Childhood Special Education Enabling Inclusion<br />

(Cerebral Palsy) was supposed to be with SOCE till it is launched in July,<br />

2009. All the remaining certificate programmes under development<br />

including translation work taken-up as a part <strong>of</strong> MoU with RCI stood<br />

transferred to NCDS with immediate effect.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the above the Vice-Chancellor approved the proposal for<br />

transferring <strong>of</strong> DDO ship from SOCE to NCDS along with the unutilized<br />

fund received from RCI.<br />

AC 52.10.2<br />

ITEM NO. 11<br />

AC 52.11.1<br />

AC 52.11.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

for transferring <strong>of</strong> DDO ship to NCDS alongwith the unutilized fund<br />

received from RCI (Annexure 5).<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Developing on-line<br />

Training Module for <strong>Academic</strong> Counsellors <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

The STRIDE has proposed an online Training Module for <strong>Academic</strong><br />

Counsellors <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramanujam, Director, STRIDE explained the need and<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the training for <strong>Academic</strong> Counsellor and the module is<br />

being developed. At present there are about 36000 <strong>Academic</strong> Counsellors<br />

engaged by the University. These Counsellors are part time functionaries<br />

<strong>of</strong> the university and they have limited opportunity to interact with the<br />

distance learners. There is no adequate provision for their pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development and this module is intended to meet their training needs<br />

through online mode with necessary flexibility. The online module has the<br />

potential to develop into a certificate programme by itself, provided the<br />

necessary components including the specific lesson plans and guidelines<br />

are developed by the discipline concerned. The credit requirements for a<br />

certificate programme will have to be worked out as per the norms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University. The present module, when completed will have to be field<br />

tested with a selected number <strong>of</strong> academic counsellors in different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

the country, having excess to on line and internet facilities to complete the<br />

training module. The addresses <strong>of</strong> the counsellors with access to internet<br />

facilities will be supplied by the Regional Services Division for field<br />

testing.<br />

The Chairman suggested that the STRIDE should look for developing this<br />

module into a 16 credit certificate course for the <strong>Academic</strong> Counsellors <strong>of</strong><br />

the University.


AC 52.11.3<br />

ITEM NO. 12<br />

AC 52.12.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to accept the proposal<br />

with the above modification and the launch <strong>of</strong> 16 Credit Certificate<br />

programme for <strong>Academic</strong> Counsellors <strong>of</strong> Open Universities and Distance<br />

Education Institutions.<br />

To ratify the approval <strong>of</strong> Phase 3 form by the Hon’ble Vice-<br />

Chancellor for the M.Tech Embedded System (M.Tech ESD) and<br />

M.Tech Information Systems Security (M.Tech ISS) – a joint<br />

program <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> with Rajagiri Educational Charitable Trust<br />

(RECT), Cochin<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee at its 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on<br />

24 th February 2010 ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor in<br />

approving the Phase 3 forms for the M.Tech Embedded System (M.Tech<br />

ESD) and M.Tech Information Systems Security (M.Tech ISS) – a joint<br />

programme <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> with Rajagiri Educational Charitable Trust<br />

(RECT), Cochin. The minutes <strong>of</strong> the ACSC could not be considered by<br />

the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 51 st meeting held on 3 rd March 2010 due to<br />

shortage <strong>of</strong> time and the minutes <strong>of</strong> the ACSC has been being placed<br />

before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at Item No. 4.<br />

Meanwhile the Planning & Development Division in response to ACIIL<br />

note dated 5.02.2010 allotted the programme/course codes to the above<br />

programmes.<br />

AC 52.12.2<br />

ITEM NO. 13<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> ratified the action taken by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

and approved the details <strong>of</strong> the programme/course codes assigned by<br />

Planning and Development Division (Annexure 6).<br />

To consider and approve the fee for obtaining Photocopies <strong>of</strong><br />

Evaluated Answer Scripts by the Overseas Students<br />

AC 52.13.1 The International Division had submitted the proposal for fee for<br />

obtaining the photocopies <strong>of</strong> evaluated answer scripts by the overseas<br />

students. Dr. Silima Nanda, Director (I/c), explained the proposal in<br />

detail. She also explained that the university <strong>of</strong>fers the programmes to its<br />

international students through Partner Institute (PI) located all over the<br />

world. These Partner Institutes are private / public bodies functioning in<br />

their respective countries for the promotion <strong>of</strong> education with affiliation /<br />

or support <strong>of</strong> some or the other university (ies). The International Division<br />

functions as the nodal agency to coordinate their activities.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 46 th meeting held on 13 th January, 2009<br />

recommended the revision <strong>of</strong> fee for the services <strong>of</strong> National as well as<br />

International Students. But as per the circular <strong>of</strong> the Student Evaluation


Division vide their note no. IG/SED/EXAM-III/2010 dated 20.02.2010,<br />

that the fee for obtaining photocopies <strong>of</strong> answer scripts to overseas<br />

students has inadvertently not fixed. The national (Indian) students has to<br />

pay Rs.300/- per answer script for obtaining its photocopy. Accordingly,<br />

it is proposed to fix the charges @ Rs. 500/- per copy <strong>of</strong> evaluated<br />

answer script for SAARC Countries Students and Students <strong>of</strong> US$ 50 for<br />

photocopy <strong>of</strong> answer script as well as US$10 towards postage charges.<br />

AC 52.13.2<br />

AC 52.13.3<br />

AC 52.13.4<br />

ITEM NO. 14<br />

AC 52.14.1<br />

The members suggested that the students <strong>of</strong> SAARC countries should be<br />

treated at par with the Indian students and they should be charged fees<br />

plus actual postage.<br />

Participating in the discussion, the Chairman viewed that the fee which is<br />

being changed for national students and the proposed fee for the students<br />

<strong>of</strong> SAARC and US is very high keeping in view <strong>of</strong> the cost involved in<br />

providing the facility. Therefore, it was proposed that Rs. 100/- fee for<br />

national student to obtain a copy <strong>of</strong> an evaluated answer script, Rs. 150/-<br />

(Including Rs. 50/- for postage) for the students <strong>of</strong> SAARC countries and<br />

$60 (including $ 10 for postage) for the other international students.<br />

The AC considered and approved the above proposal fee as at AC<br />

52.13.3.<br />

To consider and approve Phase 3 form for Post Doctoral Certificate<br />

in Dialysis Medicine<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences had submitted the Phase 3 form for One<br />

Year Post Doctoral Certificate Programme in Dialysis Medicine being<br />

developed in collaboration with the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health and Family<br />

Welfare (MOHFW) same was approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences at its meeting held on February 25, 2009 along<br />

with syllabus. The following are the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Programme:<br />

After completion <strong>of</strong> this programme, a student should be able to:<br />

• Imbibe comprehensive knowledge on basics <strong>of</strong> nephrology as<br />

related to detail <strong>of</strong> haemodialysis, reasonable adequate for<br />

peritoneal dialysis and brief <strong>of</strong> renal transplant;<br />

• Handle temporary vascular access at the time <strong>of</strong> need;<br />

• Dialyze stable patients adequately and safely on long-term basis<br />

and anticipate potential complications; and<br />

• Recognize and handle emergencies related to dialysis and take<br />

beside decision for management.<br />

The programme development is being funded by MOHFW for which a<br />

MoU was signed on February 2, 2010. The programme is being launched<br />

from July, 2010 session.


AC 52.14.2<br />

AC 52.14.3<br />

ITEM NO. 15<br />

AC 52.15.1<br />

The members suggested the nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the programme as Post<br />

Graduate Certificate in Dialysis Medicine instead <strong>of</strong> Post Doctoral<br />

Certificate Programme in Dialysis Medicine.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved Phase 3 form<br />

(Annexure 7) for Post Graduate Certificate in Dialysis Medicine.<br />

To consider and approve Phase 3 Form for PG Diploma in Bioethics<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences had submitted the Phase 3 Form for one<br />

year PG Diploma in Bioethics consisting <strong>of</strong> 8 courses <strong>of</strong> 32 credits. The<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the programme is to provide concrete scientific and technical<br />

knowledge required for pr<strong>of</strong>essionals capable <strong>of</strong> undertaking the wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> activities connected to research, control and dispensation <strong>of</strong><br />

pharmaceutical products, medicine, diet food, cosmetics, and other<br />

products for health care.<br />

The programme aims at the following learning objectives and will provide<br />

and develop:<br />

• Comprehensive understanding <strong>of</strong> all ethical issues in Bio-Medical<br />

Research<br />

• Awareness regarding requirement <strong>of</strong> Clinical Research and Ethical<br />

issues<br />

• Understanding to use state <strong>of</strong> arts electronic media for teachinglearning<br />

process.<br />

The Phase 3 form has been approved by the School Board <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong><br />

Health Sciences at its meeting held on 2 nd March, 2010.<br />

AC 52.15.2<br />

ITEM NO. 16<br />

AC 52.16.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form<br />

(Annexure 8) for PG Diploma in Bioethics.<br />

To consider and approve the revised fee structure for MA in<br />

Extension and Development Studies<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies has submitted the<br />

proposal for revising the fee structure for MA in Extension and<br />

Development Studies. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.K. Pattanaik explained that the School<br />

Board at its meeting held on 28.01.2010, after comparing the fees fixed by<br />

the other schools launching full time regular programme, approved to<br />

revise the fee per semester from Rs.5000/- to Rs.2500/- for the students<br />

pursuing MA in Extension and Development Studies, thus the total fee<br />

Rs.10,000/- for a full programme, per student.


AC 52.16.2<br />

ITEM NO. 17<br />

AC 52.17.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for revising<br />

the fee structure for MA in Extension and Development from Rs.5000/- to<br />

Rs.500/- i.e. (Rs.10,000/- for the full programme).<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 1 and Phase 3 Forms <strong>of</strong> Post<br />

Graduate Diploma in Urban Planning and Development.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Extension and Development Studies has submitted the<br />

Phase 1 and Phase 3 Forms <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Diploma in Urban<br />

Development. Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.K. Pattanaik explained the salient features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and informed that the members <strong>of</strong> the expert group meeting<br />

held on 20.02.2010 suggested to change the programme as Post Graduate<br />

Diploma in Urban Planning and Development instead <strong>of</strong> PG Diploma in<br />

Urban Development.<br />

The minutes <strong>of</strong> the expert group meeting held on 20.02.2010 were<br />

approved by the School Board at its meeting held on 09.03.2010.<br />

AC 52.17.2 The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 1 and Phase 3<br />

Forms (Annexure 9) and the change in the title <strong>of</strong> the programmes as<br />

Post Graduate Diploma in Urban Planning and Development.<br />

ITEM NO. 18<br />

AC 52.18.1<br />

To consider the Proposal for Conferring D.Litt on H.H. The Dalai<br />

Lama and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer<br />

The Statute 22 <strong>of</strong> the University provides that “all proposals for<br />

conferment <strong>of</strong> honorary degrees shall be initiated by the Vice-Chancellor<br />

who, after consultation with the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Management, shall submit the same to the Visitor for confirmation.”<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> Statute 22 mentioned above the Vice-<br />

Chancellor proposed that the university may confer D.Litt on the<br />

following persons during the Silver Jubilee year <strong>of</strong> the university:<br />

1. Nobel Laureate H.H. Dalai Lama<br />

2. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer<br />

The brief resume <strong>of</strong> the above two persons was placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for consideration.<br />

AC 52.18.2<br />

The Vice-Chancellor explained the procedure for conferring <strong>of</strong> D.Litt<br />

under Statute 22 <strong>of</strong> the university. He also explained that the proposal<br />

after recommendation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will be placed before the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Management and it will be submitted to the Visitor for<br />

confirmation.


AC 52.18.3<br />

ITEM NO. 19<br />

AC 52.19.1<br />

AC 52.19.2<br />

AC 52.19.3<br />

AC 52.19.4<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and recommended the names <strong>of</strong> Nobel<br />

Laureate H.H. Dalai Lama and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer for conferment<br />

<strong>of</strong> honorary degree i.e., D.Litt during the Silver Jubilee year <strong>of</strong> the<br />

university.<br />

To consider and approve the Proposal for Additional Clause in<br />

Ordinance on Conduct <strong>of</strong> Examination and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Students’<br />

Performance<br />

The Vice-Chancellor explained the reasons for the proposal for additional<br />

Clause in Ordinance on Conduct <strong>of</strong> Examination and Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

Student’s Performance that under Section 26 (1) (b) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IGNOU</strong> Act. It<br />

was explained that the ordinance provides for evaluation <strong>of</strong> students<br />

performance and conduct <strong>of</strong> examination by the University for its students<br />

in Part A & Part B <strong>of</strong> the ordinance respectively. The Clause 9 in Part B<br />

provides for conduct procedure <strong>of</strong> the Evaluation and Examination <strong>of</strong><br />

student performance. There is no mention in the conduct procedures about<br />

the time limit for declaration <strong>of</strong> result by the university. To enable this it<br />

is proposed that a new sub clause (5) may be added to make it mandatory<br />

on the part <strong>of</strong> the university to declare the results <strong>of</strong> term-end-examination<br />

within forty five days <strong>of</strong> the completion <strong>of</strong> term end examination.<br />

To facilitate the declaration <strong>of</strong> results with in the stipulated time<br />

mentioned above it is proposed to include the following new sub clause<br />

(5) in Clause 9 Conduct Procedure:<br />

“(5) The declaration <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the term-end-examinations shall be<br />

done within 45days <strong>of</strong> the completion <strong>of</strong> the examinations. The<br />

Examination Committee shall ensure the monitoring <strong>of</strong> evaluation and<br />

result declaration process is completed with in the specified period.”<br />

The members appreciated the proposal <strong>of</strong> initiative being taken for<br />

declaration <strong>of</strong> result <strong>of</strong> Term End Examination with in 45 days from the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> TEE.<br />

While discussion on the issues for strict implementation, the Chairman<br />

proposed monitoring committee comprising. The Vice-Chancellor, one<br />

PVC, Registrar, SED and the concerned programme co-ordinator.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal for additional clause in the<br />

ordinance on conduct <strong>of</strong> examination and evaluation <strong>of</strong> student<br />

performance. A statement showing the existing Clause, new additional<br />

clause and the ordinance <strong>of</strong> the amendment is placed at (Annexure 10).<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> also approved he proposed committee to monitor the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the new clause. It was also resolved to recommend to<br />

the BOM and Finance Committee to decentralize the examination system<br />

by creating appropriate systems in place.


ITEM NO. 20<br />

AC 52.20.1<br />

AC 52.20.2<br />

AC 52.20.3<br />

ITEM NO. 29<br />

AC 52.29.1<br />

To consider and approve the Phase-3 Form <strong>of</strong> : 1) Certificate in Telecentre/Village<br />

Knowledge Centre Management & 2) MA in<br />

Participatory Development.<br />

It is presented that the Centre for Extension Education has submitted<br />

Phase 3 form for 1) Certificate in Telecentre/Village Knowledge Centre<br />

Management & 2) MA in Participatory Development.<br />

Director, Centre for Extension Education explained the objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

both the programmes in detail alongwith admission eligibility and fee<br />

structure. CEE will be <strong>of</strong>fering certificate programmes in collaboration<br />

with (IDRC) and MA in Participatory Development (Modular<br />

Programme) with Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA). The Extension<br />

<strong>Council</strong>, CEE had approved the Phase 3 form <strong>of</strong> the two programmes in<br />

its meeting held on 26.03.2010.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 forms<br />

(Annexure 11) <strong>of</strong> 1) Certificate in Telecentre/Village Knowledge Centre<br />

Management & 2) MA in Participatory Development.<br />

With the approval <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Council</strong>, this item was taken up as a priority<br />

item. To consider and approve the award <strong>of</strong><br />

Certificate/Diploma/Associate Degree to the Army Personnel<br />

Registered under Army <strong>IGNOU</strong> Community Colleges<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong> has entered into a MOU with the Indian Army for certification<br />

for providing lateral entry into the final year <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>’s academic<br />

programmes. This project titled “Gyan Deep” was dedicated to the nation<br />

by the Hon’ble President <strong>of</strong> India, Smt. Pratibha Devi Singh Patil on 19 th<br />

November, 2009 at the launch <strong>of</strong> Silver Jubilee Year <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

The syllabus <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes under Indian Army-<strong>IGNOU</strong><br />

Community Colleges as per the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the expert committee<br />

was approved in the 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing<br />

Committee held on 24 th February, 2010. The recommendations emerged<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the meeting are:<br />

1. The operationalisation <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> registration into the<br />

Army Community Colleges has been worked out by SRD and<br />

PDD and a brief demonstration was given.<br />

2. A clarification was provided that <strong>IGNOU</strong> will do the<br />

certification and the Degrees/Diplomas will be regular as<br />

other degrees <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> which have the due approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Statutory Authorities.


3. A separate brochure for the scheme will be prepared by<br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

4. Apart from programmes mentioned by Indian Army, there<br />

will be provision for Masters and Ph. D. programmes also.<br />

The scheme will also be applicable to members who retire<br />

after registering for the programme.<br />

5. The final choice <strong>of</strong> discipline will be made in the last semester<br />

<strong>of</strong> Associate Degree. There is no upper time limit laid down<br />

for completion <strong>of</strong> this programme.<br />

6. In the framework <strong>of</strong> the curriculum designs provided by<br />

Indian Army reference will be made only to number <strong>of</strong> credits<br />

and not hours as the equivalence pattern is not uniform.<br />

7. For Engineering degrees a separate course design will be<br />

made.<br />

8. For non 10+2 a bridge course comprising Basic Military<br />

Training programme (<strong>of</strong> 16 credits) was suggested by Indian<br />

Army and accepted by the committee. This will not be taken<br />

into consideration for calculation <strong>of</strong> the credits towards award<br />

<strong>of</strong> Certificate / Diploma / Associate Degree / Graduate Degree<br />

for non 10+2. For award <strong>of</strong> Certificates, 16 credits, for the<br />

Diplomas, 32 Credits, Associate Degree, 64 credits and<br />

Graduate degree, 96 credits will be required. Requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

credits will be accounted for by clubbing courses other than<br />

the bridge courses. Any recognized diploma/credits earned by<br />

the members outside this programme will count for equivalent<br />

credits accrual.<br />

9. The completion <strong>of</strong> technical training will lead to an equivalent<br />

<strong>of</strong> ITI Diploma. <strong>IGNOU</strong> will decide as to which School will<br />

award what Cert / Diploma / Degree.<br />

10. Army will provide records <strong>of</strong> students who are to be awarded<br />

Certificate / Diploma / Associate Degree / Degree on a<br />

periodicity to be decided by them. Due vetting will be done at<br />

their levels. All interactions will be through AG’s branch<br />

Army HQ.<br />

11. The overall training package <strong>of</strong> Indian Army is equivalent, as<br />

per <strong>IGNOU</strong> terms to four Certificates, two Diploma and one<br />

Associate Degree.


12. The details regarding duration, content <strong>of</strong> the technical based<br />

and Health Science related programmes would be finalized<br />

respectively in consultation with SOET and SOHS.<br />

13. There will be a GYANDEEP Portal with a separate logo.<br />

14. A special convocation will be held to provide<br />

Degrees/Diplomas to the awardees under the scheme.<br />

The Army-<strong>IGNOU</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Committee which met on 5 th April, 2010<br />

considered and approved the award <strong>of</strong> Certificates/Diplomas/Associate<br />

Degree to the first batch <strong>of</strong> 308 students at a Convocation <strong>of</strong> the Army<br />

Community Colleges scheduled for 21 st April, 2010. The recipients will<br />

be awarded completion certificates as per the evaluation scheme followed<br />

by the Army. As the Scheme operates through a credit accumulation<br />

process, the education and training <strong>of</strong> the personnel throughout their<br />

entire career (prior learning) is reckoned with for purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

certification.<br />

AC 52.29.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for award<br />

<strong>of</strong> Certificates/Diploma/Associate Degree to Army personnel.<br />

The Chairman then requested Pr<strong>of</strong>. Omprakash Mishra, Pro Vice<br />

Chancellor to Chair the <strong>Meeting</strong> as he has to attend the urgent<br />

meeting in MHRD.<br />

ITEM NO. 21<br />

AC 52.21.1<br />

AC 52.21.2<br />

AC 52.21.3<br />

To consider and approve the Proposal for Commencement <strong>of</strong> an<br />

MBA Programme in Transportation Management (A Collaborative<br />

Effort <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> & Institute <strong>of</strong> Rail Transport, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Railways)<br />

The Centre for Corporate Education and Training Consultancy has<br />

proposed for <strong>of</strong>fering MBA programme in Transportation Management<br />

(collaborative effort <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> and Institute <strong>of</strong> Rail Transport, Ministry<br />

<strong>of</strong> Railways) under MoU signed between the University & Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Rail Transport on 04.08.2009.<br />

During the discussions one <strong>of</strong> the member Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi requested for<br />

the procedures being followed by the University for collaborations with<br />

Institutes and Private Players for <strong>of</strong>fering the joint programmes. At this<br />

juncture the Chairman explained that there is no formal norms are<br />

available. However, the university examines the credentials <strong>of</strong> the<br />

institute and look into the value <strong>of</strong> programmes before entering into any<br />

agreement. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.L. Koul, Director, SOE stated that it is the two way<br />

process in which both the institute and the university is involved. The<br />

university signs agreement / MoU with the Institutes and <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />

collaborative programmes.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal.


ITEM NO. 22<br />

AC 52.22.1<br />

To consider and approve the Proposal for Starting <strong>of</strong> Certain<br />

Awareness Programmes in Collaboration with M/s. Everonn Skill<br />

Development Ltd. (ESDL), Chennai<br />

The Centre for Corporate Education & Training Consultancy had<br />

submitted the proposal for starting <strong>of</strong> certain awareness programmes in<br />

collaboration with M/s. Everonn Skill Development Ltd. (ESDL),<br />

Chennai.<br />

A list <strong>of</strong> the programmes is as given below:<br />

S.No. Programme Duration Expected<br />

Enrollment<br />

1 Certificate course in Food & 5 months 40<br />

Beverage Service<br />

2 Certificate in quick Restaurant 2 months 40<br />

Service<br />

3 Certificate course in Cellar 2 months 40<br />

Management<br />

4 Certificate course in Industrial Service 2 months 40<br />

Operations<br />

5 Certificate course in Cake Preparation 2 months 40<br />

& Decoration<br />

6 Certificate course in Bakery & 2 months 40<br />

Confectionary<br />

7 Certificate course in South Indian 1 month 40<br />

Cookery<br />

8 Certificate course in North Indian 1 month 40<br />

Cookery<br />

9 Certificate course in Continental 1 month 40<br />

Cookery<br />

10 Certificate course in Oriental Cookery 1 month 40<br />

11 Certificate course in Carving 15 days 40<br />

12 Certificate course in House Keeping 1 month 40<br />

13 Certificate course in Front Desk 1 month 40<br />

Operations<br />

14 Certificate course in Event<br />

2 months 40<br />

Management<br />

15 Certificate course in Retail<br />

2 months 40<br />

Management<br />

16 Certificate course in Food Safety & 1 month 40<br />

Hygiene<br />

17 Certificate course in C<strong>of</strong>fee & Café 1 month 40<br />

Operations<br />

18 Certificate course in Commercial 2 months 40<br />

Cookery<br />

19 Certificate course in Hospitality 2 months 40<br />

Communication


AC 52.22.2<br />

ITEM NO. 23<br />

AC 52.23.1<br />

After deliberating on the programmes the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was <strong>of</strong> the<br />

view that these programmes are to be placed before the JCC for<br />

consideration. The CCETC was requested to place the programmes in<br />

next <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting after clearance by the JCC.<br />

To consider and approve the Proposal for Commencement <strong>of</strong> a BBA<br />

Programme in Banking & Financial Services and an Executive MBA<br />

Programme in Collaboration with M/s. NIIT Limited<br />

The university has recently signed an MoU with M/s. NIIT Ltd. to have a<br />

collaboration to develop the following <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes:<br />

1. BBA in Banking and Financial Services, and<br />

2. Executive MBA<br />

It was also informed that the School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and<br />

Training, School <strong>of</strong> Computer Information Sciences, Campus Placement<br />

Cell and CCETC are involved in the development <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Programmes in collaboration with M/s NIIT Limited. The<br />

Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor had scheduled two meetings which were<br />

attended by several Heads/Directors <strong>of</strong> the Schools/Divisions/Centres and<br />

Top Executives <strong>of</strong> the NIIT. The programme structure fee schedule<br />

duration etc. will we worked out and decided by Expert Committee to be<br />

appointed for the purpose. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> also considered the<br />

minutes <strong>of</strong> the various expert committee meetings.<br />

AC 52.23.2<br />

ITEM NO. 24<br />

AC 52.24.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deliberated up on the proposal and suggested that<br />

the courses, structure, codes, title <strong>of</strong> the courses, credits etc. should be in<br />

line with the <strong>IGNOU</strong> regulations. A comprehensive proposal including<br />

the courses, title <strong>of</strong> the courses, credits etc. should be placed before the<br />

JCC, as mentioned in the MoU S.No. 4 strict adherence to the clauses in<br />

the MoU, School/Centre Board resolution be ensured. The copies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

minutes and MoU with NIIT are placed at (Annexure 12).<br />

To consider and approve the Enhancement <strong>of</strong> duration and payment<br />

norm for the Internship programme (Course MFNP-011) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

M.Sc.(DFSM) Programme<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Continuing Education has proposed for the Enhancement<br />

<strong>of</strong> duration and payment norms for the Internship programme (Course<br />

MFNP-011) <strong>of</strong> the M.Sc.(DFSM) Programme. It was informed that the<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> internship duration and enhancement <strong>of</strong> payment norms<br />

for the course internship (MFNP-011), which is part <strong>of</strong> the M.Sc. (DFSM)<br />

programme was taken up in the 39 th School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 27 th<br />

July 2009. The Board approved the item in principle, however, it was<br />

suggested that these issues be discussed by an Expert Committee


constituted for the purposed and the report <strong>of</strong> the committee to be<br />

submitted for the consideration <strong>of</strong> the School Board.<br />

The Expert Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> was held on 16 th February, 2010 to<br />

discuss the issues related to enhancement <strong>of</strong> internship duration and the<br />

payment norms. The deliberations and the decisions taken during the<br />

expert committee meeting included:<br />

1. The present Internship duration (8 credits i.e. 240 hours) <strong>of</strong> six<br />

weeks (8hour/s/week for 6 weeks) in the M.Sc. (DFSM)<br />

Programme should be enhanced to three months (16 credits – 480<br />

hours i.e. 8 hours/week).<br />

2. A three months internship will be mandatory for the M.Sc.<br />

(DFSM) Programme and P.G. Diploma in Dietetics and Public<br />

Nutrition Programme (which is an option provided to learners <strong>of</strong><br />

M.Sc. (DFSM) Programme who would like to exit the programme<br />

after completing the 30 credit course work plus the 16 credit<br />

internship).<br />

3. The Total credit weightage for the M.Sc. (DFSM) Programme<br />

would increase from 64 credits (54 credit course work plus 8<br />

credit internship) to 72 credits (56 credit course work plus 16<br />

credit internship),<br />

4. The payment norms for the internship is enhanced from Rs.300/-<br />

to Rs.500/-.<br />

The minutes <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee meeting approved by the 41 st<br />

School Board <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 18 th February 2010.<br />

AC 52.24.2<br />

ITEM NO. 25<br />

AC 52.25.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> duration, credits load, exit flexibility and payment norms<br />

for the internship <strong>of</strong> the course MFNP-011 for M.Sc. (DFSM)<br />

programme.<br />

To consider the re-imbursement <strong>of</strong> Advertisement Expenditure to the<br />

International Partner Institutions<br />

The International Division submitted a proposal for the re-imbursement <strong>of</strong><br />

Advertisement Expenditure to the International Partner Institutions.<br />

To Director (I/c) informed that the University <strong>of</strong>fers the programmes to its<br />

international students through Partner Institutions (PI) located all over the<br />

world. These Partner Institutions are private bodies functioning in their<br />

respective countries for the promotion <strong>of</strong> educational programmes <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>. The International Division functions as the nodal agency to<br />

coordinate their activities. At the third Annual PI Coordinators Meet held<br />

during 11 th -13 th August, 2008, it was resolved that the advertisement


expenses <strong>of</strong> the PlS should be reimbursed as they are also promoting the<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> the University in their respective countries on behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

It was also informed that the Division has been receiving proposals from<br />

various Partner Institutions who intend to collaborate with <strong>IGNOU</strong> for<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> University’s programmes resulting in increase in the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> Partner Institutes. In order to give wide publicity <strong>of</strong> University’s<br />

programmes through such institutions the advertisement expenditure<br />

sought in the third Annual PI Coordinators Meet 2008 needs to be<br />

reviewed and the modalities for reimbursement <strong>of</strong> such expenditure needs<br />

to be approved by the competent authority. Hence, it is proposed that:<br />

• The Partner Institute will get the design and content <strong>of</strong> the<br />

advertisement approved by the University (through the<br />

International Division) before publishing in two dailies / national<br />

newspapers.<br />

• Such expenditure will be reimbursed only once in a financial year.<br />

• The expenditure will not exceed INR 20,000/- (or equivalent<br />

amount in US$) or 50% <strong>of</strong> the advertisement expenditure<br />

whichever is less and the rest is to be met by the PIS.<br />

• Once the proposal is approved by the Competent Authority, a<br />

clause in the prospective MoUs may be incorporated accordingly.<br />

AC 52.25.2<br />

ITEM NO. 26<br />

AC 52.26.1<br />

AC 52.26.2<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deliberated upon the report <strong>of</strong> Annual<br />

Coordinators Meet, 2008 <strong>of</strong> International Partner Institutes<br />

(Annexure 13) and the issues involved in Re-imbursement <strong>of</strong><br />

Advertisement Expenditure to International Partner Institutions and<br />

approved the proposal.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal <strong>of</strong> Creation <strong>of</strong> “Sustainability<br />

Sciences” as a discipline in the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

The Centre <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Development has submitted a proposal for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> Sustainability Science as a discipline in the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture was presented. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M.K. Salooja explained the justification<br />

for the creation <strong>of</strong> Sustainability Sciences as a discipline.<br />

Dr. Latha Pillai, PVC informed that Sustainability Science is a new<br />

emerging field can be described by as ‘‘improving society’s capacity to<br />

use the earth in ways that simultaneously meet the needs <strong>of</strong> a much larger<br />

but stabilizing human population, sustain the life support systems <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planet, and substantially reduce hunger and poverty.’’<br />

Sustainability science includes global, social, and human systems in its<br />

purview. It is a practical problem-solving oriented discipline, which is<br />

based on the integration <strong>of</strong> natural social sciences with ethics, economic


sustainability, social sustainability and governance. Educational<br />

programmes <strong>of</strong> Sustainability Science have to be based on real life<br />

examples. It helps understanding the diverse issue associated with<br />

sustainability in a holistic manner and to propose vision and methods<br />

toward the development <strong>of</strong> sustainable society. Many Institutions across<br />

the globe have already established ‘Sustainability Science’ as a separate<br />

discipline.<br />

Globally the issues <strong>of</strong> sustainability are diverse in nature and the first step<br />

is to look it under regional or country level. The major emerging issues in<br />

India are poverty, employment and rural development. India being an<br />

agrarian economy focuses agricultural sustainability as a core issue in the<br />

policy, planning and programmes.<br />

The Chair for Sustainable Development is developing different<br />

programmes under the framework <strong>of</strong> Sustainability Science giving major<br />

attention to agricultural sustainability and rural development.<br />

The Programmes under development by the Chair are as follows:<br />

1. P G Diploma in Sustainability Science<br />

2. P G certificate in Climate Change and Sustainable Development<br />

3. Appreciation Programme on Sustainability Science<br />

4. Leadership Programme in Nutrition Security and Sustainable<br />

Development<br />

5. Appreciation Programme on Population and Sustainable<br />

Development<br />

6. Appreciation Programme on Biodiversity and Sustainable<br />

Development<br />

7. Appreciation Programme on Wetland Management and<br />

Sustainable Development<br />

8. Appreciation programme on Sustainable Management <strong>of</strong> Ganga<br />

9. Appreciation Programme in Himalayan Ecosystem and<br />

Sustainable Development<br />

10. Appreciation Programme on Sustainability Audit<br />

AC 52.26.3<br />

ITEM NO. 27<br />

AC 52.27.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for Creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sustainability Science as a discipline in the School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Two Certificate<br />

Programmes in Apparel Marketing & Merchandising and Apparel<br />

Production & Quality Management and MBA (on campus<br />

programme) with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute <strong>of</strong> Textile<br />

Management (SVPITM) under Ministry <strong>of</strong> Textile, Coimbatore<br />

The Centre for Corporate Education & Training Consultancy had<br />

submitted the proposal for Two Certificate Programmes in Apparel<br />

Marketing & Merchandising and Apparel Production & Quality<br />

Management and MBA (on campus programme) with Sardar Vallabhbhai


Patel Institute <strong>of</strong> Textile Management (SVPITM) under Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Textile, Government <strong>of</strong> India, Coimbatore. These proposals have been<br />

received from Regional Director, <strong>IGNOU</strong>.<br />

AC 52.27.2<br />

ITEM NO. 28<br />

AC 52.28.1<br />

AC 52.28.2<br />

ITEM NO. 30<br />

AC 52.30.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after deliberating upon the proposal resolved that<br />

an MoU / agreement be signed by the University with the SVPITM,<br />

Coimbatore and the proposal routed through JCC for consideration by<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes<br />

from Sh. Sanskar School <strong>of</strong> Etiquette and Career Development<br />

The Centre for Corporate Education & Training Consultancy had<br />

submitted the proposal for <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes from Sh. Sanskar<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Etiquette and Career Development. The request has been<br />

received from the following <strong>Academic</strong> Programmes:<br />

1. BBA Retail Services,<br />

2. Diploma in Hospitality & Travel Management,<br />

3. Diploma in Housekeeping,<br />

4. Diploma in Front Office, and<br />

5. Diploma in Food & Beverage Service.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> suggested that as some <strong>of</strong> the programmes with<br />

similar nomenclature are being <strong>of</strong>fered by the University from some other<br />

schools <strong>of</strong> studies, it has to be carefully evaluated in order to avoid<br />

duplication. After the discussion, it was decided that all the proposal for<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering the above mentioned courses should be placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after discussion in the Joint Coordinator Committee<br />

(JCC) and enter into an MOU with the Sh. Sanskar School <strong>of</strong> Etiquette<br />

and Career Development.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Creation <strong>of</strong> Five Disciplines<br />

at NCDS<br />

The National Centre for Disability Studies had submitted a proposal for<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> Five Disciplines in the NCDS.<br />

Dr. Hemlata, Director (I/c) informed that the National Centre for<br />

Disabilities Studies is <strong>of</strong>fering 21 programmes in various areas <strong>of</strong><br />

disabilities ranging from Masters level to Certificate level. At present,<br />

only three faculty members are available at NCDS for maintenance and<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the programmes. Many academic programmes are in<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> development including the Ph.D. in Disability Studies.


AC 52.30.2<br />

AC 52.30.3<br />

ITEM NO. 31<br />

AC 52.31.1<br />

During the discussions the members were <strong>of</strong> the view that creation <strong>of</strong> five<br />

disciplines in the centre will be justifiable and the proposal requires to be<br />

re-looked. It was also suggested that a committee may be constituted for<br />

examining the issues involved in Creation <strong>of</strong> the Faculty Positions for the<br />

Centre under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pravin Sinclair, PVC. The other<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the committee suggested are Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.R. Ramnujam, Director,<br />

STRIDE, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE and Pr<strong>of</strong>. Uma Alladi member<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> deferred the proposal for want <strong>of</strong> details regarding<br />

financial implications and other academic/administrative setups.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Eligibility Criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

Students <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Aquaculture (DAQ) as 10+2<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Sciences has submitted the proposal for revising the<br />

Eligibility Criteria <strong>of</strong> Students <strong>of</strong> Diploma in Aquaculture (DAQ) as<br />

10+2.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS informed that the Diploma in<br />

Aquaculture was put up on <strong>of</strong>fer from Jan. 2010 with the approval <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> at its 50 th <strong>Meeting</strong> held on 8 th October, 2009. The<br />

eligibility for the programme was 10+2 with science. Meanwhile, the<br />

students from non science background also started making queries for<br />

admission in the diploma programme. Since this is a vocational course<br />

and <strong>of</strong>fers career opportunity in the field it was decided to relax the<br />

qualifications for seeking admissions in the diploma. The School Board,<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Sciences approved the proposal at its 40 th meeting held on 10 th<br />

March, 2010.<br />

AC 52.31.2<br />

ITEM NO. 32<br />

AC 52.32.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the proposal for Eligibility Criteria for<br />

Admission to Diploma in Aquaculture as 10+2 pass.<br />

To consider and approve the Phase 3 Form for Post Graduate<br />

Certificate Programme in Nanoscience<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Sciences presented the Phase 3 Form <strong>of</strong> PG Certificate<br />

Programme in Nanoscience.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS explained the objectives and salient<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the proposal and informed that the Phase 3 Form was approved<br />

by the School Board, School <strong>of</strong> Sciences at its 40 th meeting held on 10 th<br />

March, 2010. The School Board suggested that the following should be<br />

included as eligibility for enrollment to this programme in the Phase 3<br />

Form point no. 10:<br />

“B.Sc. – General with Physics as one <strong>of</strong> the subjects”


AC 52.32.2<br />

ITEM NO. 33<br />

AC 52.33.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approved the Phase 3 Form (Annexure 14) for PG<br />

Certificate Programme in Nanoscience with the above addition in the<br />

eligibility criteria.<br />

To consider and approve the Methodology for Practical Term-End-<br />

Examination for Post Graduate Certificate in Endodontics (PGCE)<br />

and Post Graduate Certificate in Oral Implantoloy (PGCOI)<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences submitted the Methodology for Practical<br />

Term-End-Examination for Post Graduate Certificate in Endodontics<br />

(PGCE) and Post Graduate Certificate in Oral Implantoloy (PGCOI).<br />

Dr. Ruchika Kuba, Programme Coordinator explained the methodology<br />

for conducting the examination <strong>of</strong> PGCE and PGCOI in detail and<br />

informed the matter was placed before the School Board but it was<br />

deferred.<br />

AC 52.33.2<br />

ITEM NO. 34<br />

AC 52.34.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposed<br />

Methodology for Practical Term-End-Examination for Post Graduate<br />

Certificate in Endodontics (PGCE) and Post Graduate Certificate in Oral<br />

Implantoloy (PGCOI), subject to the approval <strong>of</strong> the item in School<br />

Board, School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences.<br />

To consider and approve the structure <strong>of</strong> the on-campus full-time<br />

mode Master’s Degree Programme in Life Sciences, its detailed<br />

curriculum, mode <strong>of</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> students, evaluation methodology, list <strong>of</strong><br />

paper setters, moderators and evaluators for the entrance test <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme.<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Sciences has submitted the course structure <strong>of</strong> the oncampus<br />

full-time mode Master’s Degree Programme in Life Sciences, its<br />

detailed curriculum, mode <strong>of</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> students, evaluation methodology,<br />

list <strong>of</strong> paper setters, moderators and evaluators for the entrance test <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sunita Malhotra, Director, SOS informed that the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

in its 50 th meeting held on 8 th October 2009 considered and resolved to<br />

approve the concept paper by the faculty for Masters Degree in Life<br />

Science in Face-to-Face mode. The Expert Committee meeting was held<br />

and the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee regarding entry<br />

criteria, structure <strong>of</strong> M.Sc. (Life Sciences) programme, detailed<br />

curriculum and the scheme <strong>of</strong> examination are placed before the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.


AC 52.34.2<br />

ITEM NO. 35<br />

AC 52.35.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> after deliberation on the proposal decided that the<br />

curriculum, mode <strong>of</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> students, evaluation methodology, list <strong>of</strong><br />

paper setters, moderators and evaluators for the entrance test etc. falls<br />

with in the jurisdictions <strong>of</strong> the School Board and it may be considered and<br />

deliberated in detail in the School Board. The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

approved the proposal subject to compliance <strong>of</strong> the suggestions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

School Board.<br />

To consider and approve the proposal for Revision and up-gradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Post Graduate Diploma in Clinical Cardiology (PGDCC)<br />

programme<br />

The School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences submitted a proposal for Revision and upgradation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Post Graduate Diploma in Clinical Cardiology (PGDCC)<br />

programme. It was informed that the programme was launched in 2006 in<br />

16 PSCs with 113 enrolled students. At present, 50 PSCs have been<br />

notified across the country. The course material <strong>of</strong> the programme has<br />

been written during 2005 before launching <strong>of</strong> the programme. The course<br />

materials need to be revised/re-written/edited to maintain the quality.<br />

Besides, the Programme Coordinators as well as the PICs/ACs<br />

(cardiologists) also feel that the implementation as well as evaluation<br />

strategies <strong>of</strong> the programme need to be revised.<br />

Annual Enrolment in the Programme over last three years<br />

Year<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> the<br />

students Enrolled<br />

2006 113 82<br />

2007 136 91<br />

2008 253 -<br />

2009 254 -<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> the students<br />

successfully completed<br />

this Programme<br />

An Expert Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> and Advisory Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> was<br />

held for the revision & updation <strong>of</strong> the Post Graduate Diploma in Clinical<br />

Cardiology (PGDCC) programme at Escorts Heart Institute and Research<br />

Centre, New Delhi on 20 th & 21 st February 2010. Almost all the PICs<br />

participated among the 44 PICs from across the country.<br />

In these two days meeting the following agenda were discussed and<br />

agreed by the group <strong>of</strong> experts:<br />

1. Revised Criteria for the establishment <strong>of</strong> a PSC <strong>of</strong> PGDCC<br />

Programme


2. Provision for the Guest Lecture.<br />

3. Revised Eligibility criteria for the PIC and <strong>Academic</strong> Counsellors<br />

4. Revised Minimum and Maximum number <strong>of</strong> students in each PSC<br />

5. Improvement <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the training by improving<br />

continuous training<br />

6. Creation <strong>of</strong> a Question Bank for the PGDCC Programme<br />

7. Revised Posting Schedule for the PGDCC Programme<br />

The same recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> and<br />

Advisory Committee <strong>Meeting</strong> was approved by School Board (Agenda<br />

Item No 40.8) <strong>of</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences held on 30 th March 2010.<br />

Phase Zero Form <strong>of</strong> the PG Diploma in Clinical Cardiology (PGDCC)<br />

programme also has been approved by the School Board at its 40 th<br />

meeting held on 30 th March, 2010.<br />

AC 52.35.2<br />

ITEM NO. 36<br />

AC 52.36.1<br />

AC 52.36.2<br />

ITEM NO. 37<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the proposal for revision<br />

and updation <strong>of</strong> the PG Diploma in Clinical Cardiology (PGDCC)<br />

To consider and approve the Objectives, Work Plan, Science<br />

Communication Initiatives and Ph.D. Programme in Science<br />

Education and Mathematics Education under the Raman Chair<br />

The Raman Chair under Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.T. Manoharan was established in the<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Sciences. The Objectives, Work Plan, Science Communication<br />

Initiatives, Ph.D. Programme on Science Education and Mathematics<br />

Education under Raman Chair are placed at Annexure 15.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Objectives, Work<br />

Plan, Science Communication Initiatives, Ph.D. Programme on Science<br />

Education and Mathematics Education and other initiatives by Raman<br />

Chair.<br />

To consider Phase 3 Form (DPR) for full time on campus programme<br />

in Diploma in Fire, Safety and Disaster Management<br />

AC 52.37.1 The School <strong>of</strong> Vocational Education and Training has submitted Phase 3<br />

Form for PG Diploma in Fire, Safety and Disaster Management. The<br />

programme consisting <strong>of</strong> 40 credits will be <strong>of</strong>fered by <strong>IGNOU</strong> as full time<br />

on campus programme in collaboration with Security Skills <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

India (SSCI).


AC 52.37.2<br />

AC 52.37.3<br />

During the discussions, it was brought out that the PG Diploma<br />

programme in Disaster Management is being <strong>of</strong>fered by the School <strong>of</strong><br />

Social Sciences. The <strong>Academic</strong> Coordination Division may ensure that<br />

any academic item placed before the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for its<br />

consideration and approval is first discussed and approved by the<br />

concerned School Board before it is brought to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> agreed with this suggestion. The <strong>Academic</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> also resolved that all programmes/Courses shall be considered by<br />

the Planning Board and/or its Standing Committee regularly.<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and approved the Phase 3 Form (DPR)<br />

for full-time on campus programme in Diploma in Fire, Safety and<br />

Disaster Management subject to the condition that there is no<br />

conflict/duplication with any other programme<br />

It was resolved to take up the remaining items in an early meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee.<br />

The meeting ended with a vote <strong>of</strong> thanks to the Chair.<br />

(V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai)<br />

Chairman


Annexure<br />

(To Resolution no. AC 52.33.3)<br />

1. PROPOSED PROCESS OF CONDUCTION OF PGCE EXAMINATION<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> conduction <strong>of</strong> the term end practical examination will be in the<br />

decentralized mode as is for the other medical programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> like PGDMCH<br />

and PGDGM. The Post Graduate Certificate in Endodontics programmes, has a term-end<br />

practical component which is conducted separately from theory examination. The PSCs<br />

will act as the examination centres and the PIC will act as the Examination<br />

Superintendent. Two examiners will get involved i.e. one external and one internal. The<br />

examination for both the courses MDTL001 and MDTL 002 will be held together on the<br />

same day. The Counsellors <strong>of</strong> other subject experts involved in PGCE Programme<br />

currently or in the past and having minimum 5 years <strong>of</strong> teaching experience are<br />

eligible to become the examiners.<br />

The internal examiner will be identified by PIC. The external examiners would be<br />

identified by the Programme in-charge <strong>of</strong> the respective centre and get the names<br />

approved by the programme coordinators in the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences as pr the<br />

following guidelines:<br />

• The expert fulfills the criteria for being an examiner<br />

• Expert is external to the Programme Study Centre where the examination is being<br />

conducted<br />

• In case another state is chosen, the External examiners will be preferable<br />

identified from the neighboring states to minimize the expenses on TA/DA<br />

• No one should become an examiner to the same PSC on more than two<br />

consecutive occasions<br />

• Attempt should be made to give opportunity to become examiner to as many<br />

counselors as possible to give them a sense <strong>of</strong> involvement<br />

As per the decentralized process-<br />

• The PIC would provide the date <strong>of</strong> examination, and name <strong>of</strong> internal examiner.<br />

The names <strong>of</strong> the external examiner will be proposed by the PIC and approved by<br />

the Programme Coordinator. The Programme In-charge will also provide the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students expected to appear in the examination.<br />

• The Regional Centre will provide an advance to the PSC as per the budget<br />

calculated according to the approved norms (approved by the 58 th and 59 th<br />

meetings <strong>of</strong> Finance Committee <strong>of</strong> their revised rates in future), provide<br />

examination stationery and issue letters to examiners (internal and external)<br />

appointing them as the examiner at the specified PSC.<br />

• The PIC will get the examination conducted and then submit the award list along<br />

with examination bills for adjustment to the Regional Centre. The PIC will also<br />

send a copy <strong>of</strong> the award list to Programme Coordinator for record.


2. PROPOSED PROCESS OF CONDUCTION OF PGCOI EXAMINATION<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> conduction <strong>of</strong> the term end practical examination will be in the<br />

decentralized mode as is for the other medical programmes <strong>of</strong> <strong>IGNOU</strong> like PGDMCH<br />

and PGDGM. The Post Graduate Certificate in Oral Implantology (PGCOI) programme,<br />

has a term-end practical component which is conducted separately from theory<br />

examination. The PSCs will act as the examination centres and the PIC will act as the<br />

Examination Superintendent. Two examiners will get involved i.e. one external and one<br />

internal. The examination for both the courses MDTL004 and MDTL 005 will be held<br />

together on the same day. The Counsellors <strong>of</strong> other subject experts involved in<br />

PGCOI Programme currently or in the past and having minimum 5 years <strong>of</strong><br />

teaching experience are eligible to become the examiners.<br />

The internal examiners will be identified by PIC. The external examiners would be<br />

identified by the Programme In-charge <strong>of</strong> the respective centre and get the names<br />

approved by the programme coordinators in the School <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences as per the<br />

following guidelines:<br />

• The expert fulfills the criteria for being an examiner<br />

• Expert is external to the Programme Study Centre where the examination is being<br />

conducted<br />

• In case another state is chosen, the External examiners will be preferable<br />

identified from the neighboring states to minimize the expenses on TA/DA<br />

• No one should become an examiner to the same PSC on more than two<br />

consecutive occasions<br />

• Attempt should be made to give opportunity to become examiner to as many<br />

counselors as possible to give them a sense <strong>of</strong> involvement<br />

As per the decentralized process-<br />

• The PIC would provide the date <strong>of</strong> examination, and name <strong>of</strong> internal examiner.<br />

The names <strong>of</strong> the external examiner will be proposed by the PIC and approved by<br />

the Programme Coordinator. The Programme In-charge will also provide the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> students expected to appear in the examination.<br />

• The Regional Centre will provide an advance to the PSC as per the budget<br />

calculated according to the approved norms (approved by the 58 th and 59 th<br />

meetings <strong>of</strong> Finance Committee <strong>of</strong> their revised rates in future), provide<br />

examination stationery and issue letters to examiners (internal and external)<br />

appointing them as the examiner at the specified PSC.<br />

• The PIC will get the examination conducted and then submit the award list along<br />

with examination bills for adjustment to the Regional Centre. The PIC will also<br />

send a copy <strong>of</strong> the award list to Programme Coordinator for record.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!