From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: TNG registration of ...
From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: TNG registration of ...
From: on behalf of Panel Registry Subject: FW: TNG registration of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/mckeagep/My%20Documents/Prosperity/Hearings/hearing%20registry/apr%2019/<strong>TNG</strong>%20submissi<strong>on</strong>.htm<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g>: <strong>on</strong> <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>Registry</strong><br />
<strong>Subject</strong>: <strong>FW</strong>: <strong>TNG</strong> registrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> presenters for the topic specific hearings April 26-May 3rd.<br />
Attachments: McCrory CV Apri l2010.pdf; Prosperity Project - Written Submissi<strong>on</strong> for Kevin Morin<br />
April 16 2010.pdf; McCrory Submissi<strong>on</strong> Prosperity <strong>Panel</strong> 16Apr2010.pdf; Hartman Fish Habitat<br />
Compensati<strong>on</strong> Project review-final 4.16.2010.pdf; Select DFO Documents from <strong>TNG</strong> Access to<br />
Informati<strong>on</strong> Act Request.PDF; <strong>TNG</strong> Community_Based Impacts Submissi<strong>on</strong> P Larcombe 4.16.2010.<br />
pdf; <strong>TNG</strong> Presenters List for Technical Sessi<strong>on</strong>s April 16 2010 (2).pdf<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Amy Crook [mailto:trailhead@telus.net]<br />
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:55 PM<br />
To: Prosperity Review [CEAA]<br />
Cc: Jay Nels<strong>on</strong>; Sean Nix<strong>on</strong>; Marilyn Baptiste; Roger William; Percy Guich<strong>on</strong>; Bernie Elkins;<br />
loretta_william@xenigwetin.com; Joe Alph<strong>on</strong>se; Crystal Verhaeghe; Matthias Starzner; Patt Larcombe<br />
<strong>Subject</strong>: <strong>TNG</strong> registrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> presenters for the topic specific hearings April 26-May 3rd.<br />
Colette, please find attached, <strong>on</strong> <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>TNG</strong>, the list <strong>of</strong> presenters and supporting informati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />
topic specific hearings in Williams Lake from April 26-May 3 rd .<br />
I will be sending two emails because the attachments are so large. Please c<strong>on</strong>firm that you have received<br />
these emails with the attachments (as itemized in CSP2’s letter to you). Thanks.<br />
Amy Crook<br />
Centre for Science in Public Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
2543 Wesley Place<br />
Victoria, BC V8T 1V1<br />
acrook@csp2.org<br />
250 721-3627<br />
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/mckeagep/My%20Do...rings/hearing%20registry/apr%2019/<strong>TNG</strong>%20submissi<strong>on</strong>.htm [4/19/2010 12:47:16 PM]
CENTRE for SCIENCE in PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />
Amy Crook, 2543 Wesley Place, Victoria, British Columbia Canada V8T 1V1<br />
Ph<strong>on</strong>e/Fax: (250) 721-3627 web: www.csp2.org / e-mail: acrook@csp2.org<br />
“Technical Support for Grassroots Public Interest Groups”<br />
April 16, 2010<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Manager<br />
Canadian Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment Agency<br />
160 Elgin St. Ottawa ON K1A 0H3<br />
prosperity.review@ceaa-acee.gc.ca<br />
Dear Colette,<br />
Re: Technical presentati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>TNG</strong> for specific topic panel hearings<br />
CSP<br />
Colette Spagnuolo<br />
On <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>al Government, we are submitting the following list <strong>of</strong> presenters for<br />
the topic specific panel hearings in Williams Lake. We have included the presenters name, affiliati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
their preferred date(s) for presenting and a summary <strong>of</strong> their presentati<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g with supporting<br />
references.<br />
Several <strong>of</strong> our presenters have very limited time availability and have requested as much specificity as<br />
possible for when they will present. We have no funding to retain them for additi<strong>on</strong>al time if the hearing<br />
schedules change during the week. We’d appreciate your accommodati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> our requests to the<br />
maximum extent possible and we acknowledge your difficult challenge <strong>of</strong> coordinating the panel<br />
hearings.<br />
The <strong>TNG</strong> will have a technical team present for the durati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the technical sessi<strong>on</strong>s, and would<br />
appreciate having a table and microph<strong>on</strong>e set up in the hearing room where we can work and have the<br />
necessary documents readily available. We anticipate the size <strong>of</strong> our group to average 4 people<br />
throughout the week. Please c<strong>on</strong>firm if this possible.<br />
This letter includes the following:<br />
Attachment A An outline <strong>of</strong> the topics Dr. Kevin Morin will present<br />
Attachment B A summary <strong>of</strong> Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting’s presentati<strong>on</strong> and references<br />
Attachment C Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the Upper Fraser Fisheries C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Alliance (UFFCA) and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tact informati<strong>on</strong> for Chief Thomas Alexis<br />
Attachment D Dr. Gord<strong>on</strong> Hartman’s CV<br />
Stand al<strong>on</strong>e PDF files attached to this letter include:<br />
1) Dr. Gord<strong>on</strong> Hartman’s review <strong>of</strong> the fish compensati<strong>on</strong> plan<br />
2) Dr. Patt Larcombe’s summary <strong>of</strong> the impacts to Tsilhqot’in current use and cultural values from<br />
the proposed project<br />
3) Mr. Wayne McCrory’s CV<br />
4) Mr. Wayne McCrory’s summary <strong>of</strong> terrestrial ecosystem impacts from the proposed project<br />
5) Xeni Gwet’in’s community based climate change adaptati<strong>on</strong> plan<br />
6) Select documents from the Department <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Oceans regarding the proposed project,<br />
released to <strong>TNG</strong> under the Access to Informati<strong>on</strong> Act.<br />
2
SESSION-SPECIFIC COMMENTS & REQUESTS<br />
1. Water Quality and Quantity<br />
Our presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerns with the water quality and quantity impact assessment is complex and<br />
multi-faceted. We urge the panel to give adequate time for this issue to be fully discussed. We will have<br />
several experts presenting at the hearings, at significant expense.<br />
Our water quality experts are available <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> April 26 th and 27 th . We do not have the funding,<br />
nor do they have the time to extend their presence in Williams Lake later than 5 pm Tuesday April 27 th .<br />
Thus, we request the water quality and quantity issues be heard starting M<strong>on</strong>day morning, April 26 th<br />
through Tuesday afterno<strong>on</strong>, April 27 th .<br />
Dr. Kevin Morin, P.Geo., L.Hydrogeo. Minesite Drainage Assessment Group<br />
Dr. Morin will present a summary <strong>of</strong> his findings <strong>on</strong> the adequacy <strong>of</strong> Taseko’s estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> acid rock<br />
drainage and metal leaching. His presentati<strong>on</strong> will address the material submitted by the prop<strong>on</strong>ent to<br />
date. An outline <strong>of</strong> the topics Dr. Morin will present is appended to this letter as Attachment A. Dr.<br />
Morin’s presentati<strong>on</strong> will take about 1.5 hours.<br />
Dr. Ann Maest, Dr. Camer<strong>on</strong> Wobus, Dr. Josh Lipt<strong>on</strong>, Dr. Jeff Morris, Mr. James Holmes, and Ms.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>stance Travers, Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Inc.<br />
The Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting group will assess Taseko’s informati<strong>on</strong> presented to date including: c<strong>on</strong>taminant<br />
sources, geochemical testing, geochemical modeling, mine site water balance and hydrogeology, tailings<br />
storage facility seepage estimati<strong>on</strong>, accuracy <strong>of</strong> water quality impact predicti<strong>on</strong> at Prosperity mine and<br />
case studies from other mines, and predicti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> toxic effects <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>id fisheries. A summary <strong>of</strong><br />
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting’s presentati<strong>on</strong> and key references are appended to this letter as Attachment B. We<br />
will need telec<strong>on</strong>ference capability for this presentati<strong>on</strong>. Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting’s presentati<strong>on</strong> will take<br />
about 2 hours.<br />
2. Fishery stocks, habitat and fish compensati<strong>on</strong> plan<br />
Chief Thomas Alexis from the Tl'azt'en Nati<strong>on</strong><br />
Chief Alexis will be addressing the panel <strong>on</strong> <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Upper Fraser Fisheries C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Alliance<br />
(UFFCA) <strong>on</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> the Chilco Salm<strong>on</strong> runs to First Nati<strong>on</strong>s as a traditi<strong>on</strong>al and cultural food<br />
source. Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> UFFCA and c<strong>on</strong>tact informati<strong>on</strong> for Chief Alexis is appended to this letter as<br />
Attachment C. Chief Thomas’s presentati<strong>on</strong> is expected to take ½ hour.<br />
Tsilhqot’in fishery experts and Dr. Jeff Morris, Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting<br />
These presenters will focus <strong>on</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> the salm<strong>on</strong> fishery within traditi<strong>on</strong>al Tsilhqot’in<br />
territory. The experts will build up<strong>on</strong> the fish toxicology presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Dr. Morris and present<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> about potential project impacts <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong> within the Taseko River and by extensi<strong>on</strong> the<br />
Chilcotin River watershed. This presentati<strong>on</strong> is expected to take ½ an hour.<br />
Dr. Gord<strong>on</strong> Hartman<br />
Dr. Hartman will present his review <strong>of</strong> the fish compensati<strong>on</strong> plan. Dr. Hartman’s CV is appended to<br />
this letter as Attachment D. Dr. Hartman’s written submissi<strong>on</strong> are attached as a stand-al<strong>on</strong>e PDF file<br />
2
with this letter. Dr. Hartman is <strong>on</strong>ly available to attend the hearings for <strong>on</strong>e day and has requested<br />
the chance to speak between 11 am and 3 pm <strong>on</strong> Wednesday, April 28 th . Dr. Hartman’s presentati<strong>on</strong><br />
will take about 1 hour.<br />
3. Terrestrial Ecosystem<br />
Wayne McCrory RPBio. <strong>of</strong> McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd.<br />
Mr. McCrory will present his review <strong>of</strong> the wildlife impact assessment informati<strong>on</strong> presented to date by<br />
the prop<strong>on</strong>ent. Mr. McCrory’s CV, written submissi<strong>on</strong> and reference material are attached as separate<br />
PDF files to this letter. Mr. McCrory will refer to the Xeni Gwet’in Community Based Climate Change<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Plan (attached as a stand al<strong>on</strong>g PDF file with this letter) in his presentati<strong>on</strong>. Mr. McCrory’s<br />
presentati<strong>on</strong> will take about an hour and he prefers to present <strong>on</strong> April 29 th -30 th .<br />
4. Socioec<strong>on</strong>omic Issues<br />
Ms. Patt Larcombe, Symbi<strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>sultants<br />
Ms. Larcombe’s presentati<strong>on</strong> to the <strong>Panel</strong> will entail: (1) summarizing the evidence provided by<br />
Tsilhqot’in members during the Community Hearings <strong>on</strong> current use and cultural values; and (2)<br />
c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s regarding social, ec<strong>on</strong>omic, cultural and health impacts, including Project impacts <strong>on</strong><br />
current use based up<strong>on</strong> community evidence and pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al opini<strong>on</strong>. Ms. Larcombe did not have an<br />
opportunity to deliver her presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> community-based impacts associated with mining projects at<br />
the Xeni Gwet’in hearing due to time c<strong>on</strong>straints and therefore, she is submitting that presentati<strong>on</strong> to the<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> in writing at this time (stand al<strong>on</strong>e PDF file attached to this letter). Ms. Larcombe will require<br />
about <strong>on</strong>e hour for her presentati<strong>on</strong>. Ms. Larcombe must make her presentati<strong>on</strong> some time <strong>on</strong><br />
Thursday, April 29 th as she must leave Williams Lake by no<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Friday, April 30 th to return home for<br />
scheduled surgery <strong>on</strong> the morning <strong>of</strong> May 1 st .<br />
Please c<strong>on</strong>firm the requested time slots for presenters as so<strong>on</strong> as possible so that we can make the<br />
necessary arrangements. Thank you for your c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> our submissi<strong>on</strong>. Please c<strong>on</strong>tact me with<br />
any questi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
<br />
Amy Crook<br />
BC Program Director<br />
3
Attachment A<br />
Written Submissi<strong>on</strong> for Kevin Morin<br />
In 2009, Dr. Kevin Morin presented comments <strong>on</strong> the Prosperity EIS/A. Taseko Mines Limited<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>ded to his comments under the provincial and federal reviews. Dr. Morin will review his<br />
comments and Taseko’s resp<strong>on</strong>ses to them. His presentati<strong>on</strong> will address some or all <strong>of</strong> the topics set out<br />
below.<br />
REVIEW OF ML-ARD AND MINESITE WATER CHEMISTRY IN THE EIS/A<br />
1 PAG vs. N<strong>on</strong>-PAG Materials at the Prosperity Project<br />
2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Certificati<strong>on</strong><br />
3 Mine Plan<br />
4 Rock and Overburden<br />
5 ML-ARD Predicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
5.1 Number <strong>of</strong> ABA samples<br />
5.2 Kinetic Tests<br />
5.3 Unavailable NP<br />
5.4 Criteria for Differentiating "PAG" and "n<strong>on</strong>-PAG" Rock<br />
5.5 Lag Time for PAG Material to Become Acidic<br />
5.6 Effect <strong>of</strong> Waste Rock Misclassificati<strong>on</strong><br />
5.7 Equilibrium Levels in Aqueous C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
6 Tailings<br />
7 Dissolved vs. Total Aqueous C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
8 Nitrogen Species from Explosives Used During Mining<br />
9 Expected Exceedances <strong>of</strong> Water-Quality Guidelines<br />
10 Prosperity Lake and Beece Creek<br />
WATER MOVEMENT IN THE EIS/A<br />
1 Draft Reports and Third-Party Liability<br />
2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Certificati<strong>on</strong><br />
3 Perpetually Submerged PAG Rock in the TSF<br />
REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS FROM TASEKO MINES LIMITED, RELATED TO<br />
ML-ARD, DRAINAGE CHEMISTRY, AND WATER MOVEMENT<br />
1 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong><br />
Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement, Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from the Federal<br />
Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 1.0 Alternatives Assessment, I.R 1.1 Tailings and Waste Rock Storage Area<br />
2 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong><br />
Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from the Federal<br />
Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 4.0 Water Quality, I.R 4.1 L<strong>on</strong>g Term Treatment <strong>of</strong> Pit Lake Water Quality<br />
4
3 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong><br />
Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from the Federal<br />
Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 4.0 Water Quality, I.R 4.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> the Low Grade Ore Stockpile <strong>on</strong> Water Quality<br />
4 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong><br />
Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from the Federal<br />
Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 4.0 Water Quality, I.R 4.3 Stratificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pit Lake<br />
5 Thomps<strong>on</strong>, C., and T. Crozier. 2009. Documentati<strong>on</strong> Error in June 30, 2008 DRAFT Numerical<br />
Hydrogeologic Analysis Report. BGC Engineering Inc., BGC Project Memorandum PG09-02, to Taseko<br />
Mines Limited, dated June 12, 2009<br />
6 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong><br />
Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from the Federal<br />
Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 3.0 Hydrology, I.R 3.1 Site Water Balance for Prosperity Lake and Tailings Storage<br />
Facility<br />
7 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong><br />
Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement, Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from the Federal<br />
Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 3.0 Hydrology, I.R 3.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> Project <strong>on</strong> Beece Creek<br />
5
Attachment B<br />
Written Submissi<strong>on</strong> for Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting<br />
6
Attachment C<br />
Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> UFFCA and Chief Thomas Alexis c<strong>on</strong>tact informati<strong>on</strong><br />
Chief Thomas Alexis c<strong>on</strong>tact informati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
Email- chief@tlazten.bc.ca<br />
Cell- 250 996-1493<br />
The Upper Fraser Fisheries C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Alliance promotes accountability in the c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong>, and sustainable harvest <strong>of</strong> UFFCA fish populati<strong>on</strong>s, as well as the health <strong>of</strong> the ecosystems<br />
up<strong>on</strong> which they depend. The UFFCA provides informati<strong>on</strong> regarding the state <strong>of</strong> the UFFCA Fish<br />
stocks and fisheries habitat.<br />
The UFFCA promotes and encourages:<br />
• Inclusive and transparent decisi<strong>on</strong> making regarding fisheries issues in the UFFCA area.<br />
• Stewardship <strong>of</strong> fisheries resources and sustainable harvesting practice<br />
• Sustainability in fisheries management and practices,<br />
• Cultural values associated with ancient practices<br />
The UFFCA provides advice and support services to UFFCA member communities <strong>on</strong> a range <strong>of</strong><br />
issues from c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and harvest planning and fisheries management, to envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
assessments and field science. The Alliance’s role is to support community based initiatives which<br />
support the overall strategic plan. The Alliance also assists with procuring resources for science and<br />
research while developing a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous program <strong>of</strong> capacity development. The Alliance was created<br />
by 2005 under the Federal Department <strong>of</strong> Fisheries, Aboriginal Aquatic Resource & Oceans<br />
Management (AAROM) program.<br />
The key roles <strong>of</strong> the UFFCA are:<br />
• Provide technical analysis and advice <strong>on</strong> stock c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> including the identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> stocks<br />
in need <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> acti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
• Review federal; (and to a lesser degree) provincial fisheries programs, stock and habitat<br />
assessments, enhancement initiatives, and government policies and practices related to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> UFFCA stocks <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
• Respect and h<strong>on</strong>or the role <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Knowledge (ATK) and its role in informing<br />
and furthering science.<br />
7
Educati<strong>on</strong><br />
Attachment D<br />
Dr. Gord<strong>on</strong> Hartman’s CV and written submissi<strong>on</strong><br />
Gord<strong>on</strong> F. Hartman, Ph.D.<br />
Brief C.V.<br />
B.A., M.A., and Ph.D., 1954, 1956, and 1964 respectively from the University <strong>of</strong> British<br />
Columbia. One year doctoral program study at the Zoological Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.<br />
Experience<br />
Total <strong>of</strong> 57 years. Includes nine years in fisheries work c<strong>on</strong>current with expanding my educati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
18 years in research, five years+ in university teaching, eight years in management, and 12 years with<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sulting, writing, and three years internati<strong>on</strong>al work in Africa. Totals do not add up completely<br />
because some experience times overlap.<br />
Publicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
About 95 altogether. Some are un-refereed , and some are popular outlet papers. Recently,<br />
several publicati<strong>on</strong>s deal with macro-ecology. Co-author/editor with Dr. T. Northcote <strong>on</strong> a 789 page<br />
book <strong>on</strong> forestry-fisheries interacti<strong>on</strong>s – world-wide coverage.<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessments<br />
It may be relevant to add that I have been involved in assessing effects <strong>of</strong> hydro-electric projects<br />
(Kemano Completi<strong>on</strong>, Revelstoke Dam, and the Oldman River Dam). I did a review <strong>of</strong> the Viphya Pulpmill<br />
Project in Malawi. In 1999 I did a preliminary review <strong>of</strong> the proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper mine<br />
at Fish Lake. Other projects include assessment <strong>of</strong> three different stream restorati<strong>on</strong> projects in Alberta<br />
and B.C. These latter projects were d<strong>on</strong>e in collaborati<strong>on</strong> with a pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al geomorphologist.<br />
8
Attachment A-Written Submissi<strong>on</strong> for Kevin Morin<br />
In 2009, Dr. Kevin Morin presented comments <strong>on</strong> the Prosperity EIS/A. Taseko Mines Limited<br />
then resp<strong>on</strong>ded to his comments under the provincial and federal reviews. Dr. Morin will review<br />
his comments and Taseko’s resp<strong>on</strong>ses to them. His presentati<strong>on</strong> will follow the Table <strong>of</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>tents as listed below.<br />
REVIEW OF ML-ARD AND MINESITE WATER CHEMISTRY IN THE EIS/A<br />
1 PAG vs. N<strong>on</strong>-PAG Materials at the Prosperity Project<br />
2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Certificati<strong>on</strong><br />
3 Mine Plan<br />
4 Rock and Overburden<br />
5 ML-ARD Predicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
5.1 Number <strong>of</strong> ABA samples<br />
5.2 Kinetic Tests<br />
5.3 Unavailable NP<br />
5.4 Criteria for Differentiating "PAG" and "n<strong>on</strong>-PAG" Rock<br />
5.5 Lag Time for PAG Material to Become Acidic<br />
5.6 Effect <strong>of</strong> Waste Rock Misclassificati<strong>on</strong><br />
5.7 Equilibrium Levels in Aqueous C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
6 Tailings<br />
7 Dissolved vs. Total Aqueous C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
8 Nitrogen Species from Explosives Used During Mining<br />
9 Expected Exceedances <strong>of</strong> Water-Quality Guidelines<br />
10 Prosperity Lake and Beece Creek<br />
WATER MOVEMENT IN THE EIS/A<br />
1 Draft Reports and Third-Party Liability<br />
2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Certificati<strong>on</strong><br />
3 Perpetually Submerged PAG Rock in the TSF<br />
REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS FROM TASEKO MINES LIMITED,<br />
RELATED TO ML-ARD, DRAINAGE CHEMISTRY, AND WATER MOVEMENT<br />
1 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement, Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from<br />
the Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 1.0 Alternatives Assessment, I.R 1.1 Tailings and Waste Rock Storage<br />
Area<br />
2 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from<br />
the Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 4.0 Water Quality, I.R 4.1 L<strong>on</strong>g Term Treatment <strong>of</strong> Pit Lake Water<br />
Quality
3 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from<br />
the Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 4.0 Water Quality, I.R 4.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> the Low Grade Ore Stockpile <strong>on</strong><br />
Water Quality<br />
4 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from<br />
the Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 4.0 Water Quality, I.R 4.3 Stratificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pit Lake<br />
5 Thomps<strong>on</strong>, C., and T. Crozier. 2009. Documentati<strong>on</strong> Error in June 30, 2008 DRAFT<br />
Numerical Hydrogeologic Analysis Report. BGC Engineering Inc., BGC Project Memorandum<br />
PG09-02, to Taseko Mines Limited, dated June 12, 2009<br />
6 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement. Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from<br />
the Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 3.0 Hydrology, I.R 3.1 Site Water Balance for Prosperity Lake and<br />
Tailings Storage Facility<br />
7 Prosperity EA Review. Taseko Mines Limited Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to June 24, 2009 Federal Review<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project – Deficiency Statement, Informati<strong>on</strong> Requests from<br />
the Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong>, 3.0 Hydrology, I.R 3.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> Project <strong>on</strong> Beece Creek
1<br />
Taseko Mines Ltd., Prosperity Gold-Copper<br />
Project – Fisheries and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Issues<br />
Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />
G.F. Hartman, Ph.D.<br />
April 2010<br />
The Tsilhqot’in People have requested the author to provide<br />
comments <strong>on</strong> the Prosperity Gold-Copper Project which Taseko<br />
Mines is proposing to develop in the Fish Creek watershed which is<br />
located about 125 km southwest <strong>of</strong> Williams Lake, B.C. This paper<br />
focuses <strong>on</strong> fisheries and related envir<strong>on</strong>mental issues, and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>siders, particularly the habitat compensati<strong>on</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Taseko Mines proposal.<br />
The author inspected the project area <strong>on</strong> September 22, 1999<br />
while working <strong>on</strong> a c<strong>on</strong>tract for the Canada Department <strong>of</strong> Fisheries<br />
and Oceans (DFO). The author and Mr. M. Miles, P. Geo., were<br />
retained earlier by DFO to review the success <strong>of</strong> various mining<br />
related habitat projects which attempted to provide compensatory<br />
habitat for rainbow trout. The results <strong>of</strong> this investigati<strong>on</strong> were<br />
published in the report Assessment <strong>of</strong> techniques for Rainbow trout<br />
Planting and Habitat Management in British Columbia, Prepared for<br />
the Department Fisheries and Oceans; G.F. Hartman and M. Miles<br />
(1999), 73 pages + Appendices. This report did not include the<br />
Taseko Mines proposal, but c<strong>on</strong>tained findings relevant to the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerns that I have about the compensati<strong>on</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
proposal.<br />
The principal objective <strong>of</strong> this report is to review fisheries<br />
related secti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> documents <strong>on</strong> the Taseko Mines proposal for the<br />
project. These documents include: Volume 5, Biotic Envir<strong>on</strong>ment,<br />
and Volume 3, Secti<strong>on</strong> 8, Fisheries Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan, both are<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement/Applicati<strong>on</strong>, Taseko<br />
Mines Limited, Prosperity Gold-Copper Project (March 2009) ; The<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> Review Under the Canadian Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment Act,<br />
Applicati<strong>on</strong> for the Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine Project, submitted<br />
by Fisheries and Oceans, Canada, March 12, 2010, and Review <strong>of</strong> the
Prosperity Mine Aquatic Impact Assessment prepared for<br />
MiningWatch Canada by Dr. David Levy, (2009). This report c<strong>on</strong>curs<br />
with the evaluati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Taseko Mines proposal that were made<br />
by Dr. Levy (Mining Watch), and the DFO.<br />
After reviewing relevant secti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> these documents I have<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cluded that if the mine is developed as indicated in the project<br />
documents, the project will have pr<strong>of</strong>ound and detrimental effect <strong>of</strong><br />
the Fish Lake/Little Fish Lake ecological system. Water movement<br />
and flow directi<strong>on</strong> would be drastically altered, the two lakes would<br />
be eliminated, and the land around the site <strong>of</strong> Fish Lake would be<br />
altered by mining facilities infrastructure.<br />
Substantive biological issues include; near total disrupti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
the aquatic envir<strong>on</strong>ment, detrimental effects <strong>on</strong> fish producti<strong>on</strong> and<br />
sustainability. These impacts interface negatively with historically<br />
based use by indigenous people, current recreati<strong>on</strong>al potential, and<br />
esthetic qualities. All are important. In my view, the Taseko Mines<br />
proposal for compensati<strong>on</strong>s comes nowhere near making up for<br />
ecosystem loss and disrupti<strong>on</strong> that it would be caused if the mine is<br />
developed as planned.<br />
The Mine Plan – Ecosystem Changes<br />
The mine plan includes five important elements <strong>of</strong> watershed<br />
change as part <strong>of</strong> its development and operati<strong>on</strong>. The changes are:<br />
2<br />
• Change in directi<strong>on</strong> and locati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> water movement and<br />
flow by c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a 10.8 km Headwater Channel (HC)<br />
to the east <strong>of</strong> the present NW flowing Fish Creek system,<br />
• Creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a Headwater Channel Retenti<strong>on</strong> P<strong>on</strong>d (HCRP) for<br />
storage <strong>of</strong> collected water,<br />
• Creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an engineered spawning and rearing channel<br />
between the HCRP and a newly created ‘lake’ (Prosperity<br />
Lake),<br />
• Creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>, Prosperity Lake, south <strong>of</strong> a 1.6 km. dyke that<br />
serves to c<strong>on</strong>tain the south end <strong>of</strong> the Tailings Storage<br />
Facility (TSF) “Lake”, and
3<br />
• The diversi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> outflow from Prosperity Lake to Wasp Lake<br />
and thence to Beece Creek. Part <strong>of</strong> this route appears to be<br />
through wooded terrain (Google Imagery).<br />
Following closure <strong>of</strong> the mining operati<strong>on</strong>, the plan includes<br />
redirecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the water that enters Prosperity Lake through the TSF,<br />
down over or around the dyke at its north end. Such flow is<br />
proposed to be used to fill the mine pit. After about 27 years, when<br />
the pit is full, the water will flow through it and down into the<br />
original Fish Creek Outlet, thence to the Taseko River.<br />
Water that flowed southward from Prosperity Lake-Wasp Lake<br />
to Beece Creek will no l<strong>on</strong>ger run through that route.<br />
Risks and Challenges in Making a Multiple Comp<strong>on</strong>ent, Multiple<br />
Stage Mitigati<strong>on</strong> System Work<br />
The following secti<strong>on</strong>s examine Taseko Mines’ multicomp<strong>on</strong>ent<br />
fish producti<strong>on</strong> compensati<strong>on</strong> system. A fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
other less complex compensati<strong>on</strong> projects have functi<strong>on</strong>ed<br />
successfully over the time periods for which they were evaluated.<br />
Some have failed, and others have required maintenance over time.<br />
However, whatever is built to replace Fish Lake, Little Fish Lake, and<br />
the aquatic/terrestrial system <strong>of</strong> which they are a part, must<br />
functi<strong>on</strong> successfully and indefinitely into the future as an<br />
integrated system.<br />
There are fisheries ecological comp<strong>on</strong>ents, funding<br />
comp<strong>on</strong>ents, and government elements to such sustained<br />
maintenance. The issue <strong>of</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g term mining company support may<br />
be more problematic.<br />
The Headwater Channel<br />
The 10.8 km Headwater Channel, lying to the east <strong>of</strong> Fish Lake<br />
and Little Fish Lake, is the key comp<strong>on</strong>ent in the supply <strong>of</strong> water for<br />
compensati<strong>on</strong> facilities. If the mitigati<strong>on</strong>/compensati<strong>on</strong> system is to<br />
be successful, the HC has to functi<strong>on</strong> to:<br />
• Collect water but, as proposed, not to lose it bey<strong>on</strong>d about<br />
15%,
4<br />
• Remain stable and capable <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>veying peak flows, during<br />
its indefinitely l<strong>on</strong>g life, and<br />
• Provide water <strong>of</strong> appropriate thermal character for trout.<br />
The documents prepared do not, in my opini<strong>on</strong>, provide<br />
adequate explanati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the design that will allow the channel to<br />
collect ground water while preventing entrained water from leaving<br />
it. The project documents indicate that the channel may be lined in<br />
some secti<strong>on</strong>s to make it impervious. If this is the case, how might<br />
sub-surface water enter such a structure?<br />
The channel is proposed to be <strong>on</strong>e meter across the bottom<br />
with sloping sides 1:1.5, with a cross-secti<strong>on</strong>al area <strong>of</strong> about 2.6<br />
square meters. It is stated that it will withstand 1:100 year floods.<br />
However, adequate informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> flood return times is not given in<br />
the Fisheries Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan. The plan indicates that the average<br />
flow, during May, through the HC at the 4, 5, 6, and 7 km locati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
will be 0.330, 0.413, 0.459, and 0.578 cubic meters per sec<strong>on</strong>d<br />
respectively. These data are not accompanied by informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
flow extremes. What are the potential flow levels and water<br />
velocities in, for example, 10, 50, 100, and year return period<br />
events? In my opini<strong>on</strong> there is risk and uncertainty in this part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
plan.<br />
The informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the thermal characteristics <strong>of</strong> water flowing<br />
north to south through the HC, and thus exposed to radiant energy<br />
at the peak <strong>of</strong> day, is inadequate. The length is 10.8 km., flow<br />
volumes are relatively low in the north end <strong>of</strong> the channel, and the<br />
banks are open al<strong>on</strong>g its length. Notwithstanding the fact that main<br />
flows occur in May, there is potential for water warming al<strong>on</strong>g the<br />
channel. Water temperature questi<strong>on</strong>s in regard to the HC are<br />
important, because warming effects in the channel will be additive<br />
to those in the HCRP.<br />
The Headwater Channel Retenti<strong>on</strong> P<strong>on</strong>d<br />
The 26.1 ha HCRP is intended to store water, which will<br />
be released into the spawning and rearing channel during the spring<br />
and summer incubati<strong>on</strong> and early rearing period. The maximum<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> the p<strong>on</strong>d is to be 5 m. The morphometric data for the
HCRP are not given. However, the bottom will slope upward, toward<br />
the east, from the three-secti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tainment dyke. Will soil<br />
bioengineering or other measures be used to c<strong>on</strong>trol erosi<strong>on</strong> by<br />
wind and waves around the HCRP?<br />
The HCRP is to be filled each spring, by the end <strong>of</strong> May or<br />
early June (Fig. 8-8, Secti<strong>on</strong> 8, Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan), and gradually<br />
emptied, starting in April (the start date in April not given, but<br />
outflow and inflow will overlap for part <strong>of</strong> April and all <strong>of</strong> May),<br />
proceeding through the summer m<strong>on</strong>ths, and ramping down to nil<br />
by September 15. During the latter part <strong>of</strong> this storage and release<br />
period, i.e. July 1 to September 15, the water in the HCRP will be<br />
particularly vulnerable to excess warming.<br />
The documents reviewed do not provide adequate informati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>on</strong> and analysis <strong>of</strong> the thermal characteristics <strong>of</strong> the water to be<br />
released from the HCRP. This informati<strong>on</strong> will be particularly<br />
important during the latter part <strong>of</strong> the spawning and rearing period.<br />
5<br />
Spawning and Rearing Channel<br />
The compensati<strong>on</strong> plan does not indicate what the water<br />
temperatures will be in the spawning and rearing channel during the<br />
period, late July to September. During this period, water already<br />
warm from its time in the HCRP, will warm further during its<br />
movement through the riffles and alcoves in the spawning/rearing<br />
channel. The project documents do not present data <strong>on</strong> temperature<br />
patterns, that will occur during the operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the channel. This<br />
does not allow full evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> temperature effects <strong>on</strong> fish in the<br />
channel. This is another area <strong>of</strong> unknowns and potential risk.<br />
The matter that is important, in c<strong>on</strong>sidering the former three<br />
interdependent comp<strong>on</strong>ents, is that each and all must functi<strong>on</strong> in<br />
order that the compensati<strong>on</strong> system works. The quality <strong>of</strong> functi<strong>on</strong><br />
and the likelihood <strong>of</strong> failure is an artifact <strong>of</strong> the complexity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
system. It will be a challenge to achieve success. Where the<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental issues are important, and where there is serious<br />
public c<strong>on</strong>cern about a project, compensati<strong>on</strong> must be more than
something that is proposed and ‘put out there’ to be ‘fixed’ later if<br />
it does not work. The public deserves better.<br />
6<br />
Prosperity Lake - Shoreline Erosi<strong>on</strong><br />
Bey<strong>on</strong>d c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the three above compensati<strong>on</strong><br />
elements, the newly formed lake must provide productive and<br />
sediment free habitat for the trout fry that enter it.<br />
The compensati<strong>on</strong> plan does not address the questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
shoreline erosi<strong>on</strong> and sediment suspensi<strong>on</strong>, caused by wind and<br />
wave acti<strong>on</strong>, during the first few years following the lake filling.<br />
This matter may be relevant because <strong>of</strong> the potential distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
young trout in Prosperity Lake. Young trout up<strong>on</strong> entering Lo<strong>on</strong><br />
Lake (near Clint<strong>on</strong> B.C.) tended to remain near shore, following their<br />
entry, during the late summer.<br />
Will the near shore littoral z<strong>on</strong>e be free from suspended<br />
sediment during windy c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, and will the lake bottom in this<br />
z<strong>on</strong>e be stable and free enough <strong>of</strong> moving sediment to provide food<br />
and/or permit feeding am<strong>on</strong>g young trout? These questi<strong>on</strong>s are not<br />
discussed in the compensati<strong>on</strong> plan.<br />
Providing for No Net Loss<br />
If we move past the above four parts <strong>of</strong> the water provisi<strong>on</strong><br />
system, in which the potentials for risk or failure are additive, there<br />
is then serious doubt that the compensati<strong>on</strong> program could provide<br />
‘like for like’ particularly at the comm<strong>on</strong>ly prescribed ratio <strong>of</strong> 2:1 for<br />
compensatory area to lost habitat area.<br />
Lake Replacement<br />
The Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement, Summary secti<strong>on</strong>, Fish<br />
and Fish Habitat, page 1-4, states that “The Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan has<br />
been designed to go bey<strong>on</strong>d the replacement <strong>of</strong> surface area <strong>of</strong> lost<br />
habitat and address some <strong>of</strong> the regi<strong>on</strong>al MOE priorities … etc.”<br />
Informati<strong>on</strong> in the “Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan’ itself does not indicate that<br />
such will happen.
Prosperity Lake at 113 ha does not have a larger surface area<br />
than Fish and Little Fish lakes combined, 111 plus 6.6 ha. While the<br />
difference in the two totals is not great in itself, it is simply<br />
inappropriate to ignore <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the two lakes destroyed while making<br />
comparis<strong>on</strong>s. It may be even more inappropriate to state that the<br />
113 ha lake would “go bey<strong>on</strong>d the replacement <strong>of</strong> surface area <strong>of</strong><br />
lost habitat.”<br />
A sec<strong>on</strong>d c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>, in the comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> lake habitat<br />
created, is the character <strong>of</strong> the habitat. One such lake characteristic<br />
is littoral area. It is a critically important aspect <strong>of</strong> a lake’s<br />
productivity and capacity to support fish. The combined littoral<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Fish and Little Fish lakes are 90.1 ha. The littoral area <strong>of</strong><br />
Prosperity Lake, if built, will be 49 ha. (Table 8-2, Fisheries<br />
Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan). This does not “go bey<strong>on</strong>d….”<br />
A third lake feature that is important in c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> lake<br />
productivity is shoreline perimeter in relati<strong>on</strong> to surface area – edge<br />
effect. Prosperity Lake and Fish Lake have almost the same in<br />
surface area, 113 to 111 ha respectively. The perimeter <strong>of</strong> Fish Lake<br />
is 11,756 m vs. 7886 for Prosperity Lake (page 8-20, Secti<strong>on</strong> 8,<br />
Fisheries Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan).<br />
7<br />
Stream Replacement<br />
The amount <strong>of</strong> replacement stream does not make up for the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> natural stream lost either in terms <strong>of</strong> length or functi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
character. The mine and tailings facilities, if built, will destroy<br />
approximately 2.5 km <strong>of</strong> outlet stream and 4 km <strong>of</strong> inlet stream, the<br />
latter in two tributaries. The analysis by DFO stated that a total<br />
wetted fish bearing area <strong>of</strong> 64,087 sq. m., which shrinks to 34,746<br />
sq. m. during low water, would be impacted al<strong>on</strong>g with the<br />
ephemeral stream habitat below the barrier in the outlet <strong>of</strong> Fish<br />
Lake.<br />
The destructi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Fish Lake outlet stream c<strong>on</strong>stitutes both<br />
spawning and rearing habitat loss, involving rearing habitat which<br />
supports fish up to >1 year <strong>of</strong> age. The two inlet streams support<br />
spawning and early rearing. A porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the inlet habitat supports<br />
fish rearing to ages greater than <strong>on</strong>e year. Stream channel area lost<br />
is located primarily in meadow or wetland habitat. Such habitat, with
adjacent meadow or lowland areas around it, is buffered against<br />
dewatering and warming. Reproducti<strong>on</strong> within three separate<br />
comp<strong>on</strong>ents <strong>of</strong> a lake-stream system <strong>of</strong>fers biological insurance<br />
because if <strong>on</strong>e tributary undergoes natural impairment, the others<br />
will sustain reproducti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The single 2.2 km inlet channel proposed does not replace the<br />
three lost streams in terms <strong>of</strong> area, habitat functi<strong>on</strong>, durati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
functi<strong>on</strong>, or certainty <strong>of</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>. The inlet channel, if built, would<br />
be a 2.2 km l<strong>on</strong>g. It is planned to functi<strong>on</strong> from April16 to<br />
September 15, with the last 15 days including “ramping down”<br />
flows.<br />
Such temporally limited, spatially unequal, and functi<strong>on</strong>ally<br />
limited channel habitat does not compensate, ‘like for like’, for the<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> natural stream habitat in any sense whatever.<br />
8<br />
Numbers <strong>of</strong> Fish ‘Replaced’<br />
The compensati<strong>on</strong> project, if implemented, does not replace<br />
fish in the numbers that would be lost. Fish Lake is ‘c<strong>on</strong>sidered’ to<br />
be capable <strong>of</strong> supporting 85,000 trout composed <strong>of</strong> a mix <strong>of</strong> age<br />
classes. The outlet stream is ‘estimated’ to produce 8,000 <strong>on</strong>e year<br />
old trout (page 8-9, secti<strong>on</strong> 8.3.2.3, Fisheries Compensati<strong>on</strong> Plan).<br />
In its fish number discussi<strong>on</strong> the compensati<strong>on</strong> plan, according to<br />
DFO, does not c<strong>on</strong>sider the 80,000 trout associated with the<br />
tributaries and Little Fish Lake.<br />
The replacement channel would support 50 pairs <strong>of</strong> spawners<br />
that would produce 1,500 eggs per female for a total <strong>of</strong> 75,000<br />
eggs. The Prosperity Lake inlet stream is planned to support 30,000<br />
fry until the end <strong>of</strong> September. If all such fry were to survive each<br />
c<strong>on</strong>secutive year for three years, there would be 90,000 trout<br />
ranging from < 1 year to
development. It would, indeed, be a ‘pale shadow’ <strong>of</strong> such<br />
producti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Mine Closure<br />
The system will not be able to return to pre-development<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s at mine closure. The outlet flow through Wasp Lake will<br />
be redirected from Prosperity Lake northward through the tailing<br />
impoundment and downward around the high wall at the north end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the impoundment.<br />
The north flowing water will not join the remnant flow <strong>of</strong> Fish<br />
Creek toward the Taseko River for approximately 27 years, the time<br />
it will take to fill the aband<strong>on</strong>ed mine pit. <str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
trout producti<strong>on</strong> Fish Creek outlet will not become a biologically<br />
c<strong>on</strong>nected part <strong>of</strong> Prosperity Lake and tailings impoundment system.<br />
Once the mine is closed, and the pit is filled with water, additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
flow back into the outlet stream will c<strong>on</strong>tribute little to<br />
compensati<strong>on</strong>. The remaining out let stream, above the barrier,<br />
would no l<strong>on</strong>ger a part <strong>of</strong> any lake system. Such additi<strong>on</strong>al flow<br />
would be expected to improve fish habitat below the Fish Creek<br />
outlet barrier.<br />
I do not have enough informati<strong>on</strong> about the situati<strong>on</strong> after the<br />
mining operati<strong>on</strong> is terminated and the pit is filled to be able to<br />
discuss the all-important issues <strong>of</strong> maintaining the 10.8 km<br />
diversi<strong>on</strong> channel and the spawning and rearing channel. Further to<br />
that, I am not able to c<strong>on</strong>sider the issue <strong>of</strong> sustained operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
the HCRP outlet flows to it. Who will do it? How l<strong>on</strong>g? Who will pay?<br />
Commitments made now by the mining company would have<br />
to be set out firmly with financial backing (performance b<strong>on</strong>d?) so<br />
that the public is not left with a lake unequal to the <strong>on</strong>es it lost, and<br />
with management costs and resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities. At closure time, the<br />
government fisheries agency could be already be overloaded.<br />
This last set <strong>of</strong> comments go bey<strong>on</strong>d fish biology, however,<br />
they reflect <strong>on</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> the mining industry and its<br />
legacy <strong>of</strong> aband<strong>on</strong>ed mines about the province.<br />
9
C<strong>on</strong>cluding Comments<br />
The proposed compensati<strong>on</strong> system is to be composed <strong>of</strong> a<br />
headwater collecti<strong>on</strong> channel, a headwater channel retenti<strong>on</strong> p<strong>on</strong>d, a<br />
seas<strong>on</strong>al spawning and rearing channel, and an artificial lake. These<br />
c<strong>on</strong>stitute a complex <strong>of</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>ally interc<strong>on</strong>nected comp<strong>on</strong>ents all<br />
<strong>of</strong> which must work each year. All must be able to accommodate<br />
hydraulic and hydrologic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. They must also provide<br />
appropriate thermal c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. These needs must be met in order<br />
that the mitigati<strong>on</strong>/compensati<strong>on</strong> requirements are met. This<br />
complex system must work in perpetuity.<br />
The proposed spawning/rearing channel and Prosperity Lake<br />
do not come near to making up for the loss <strong>of</strong> Fish Lake, Little Fish<br />
Lake and the outlet and two inlet streams that would be destroyed<br />
by the mine.<br />
We have been able to c<strong>on</strong>struct comp<strong>on</strong>ents <strong>of</strong> fish habitat<br />
with some degree <strong>of</strong> success. However, we may be guilty <strong>of</strong> hubris if<br />
we believe that we can re-c<strong>on</strong>struct functi<strong>on</strong>al biological systems as<br />
they exist as parts <strong>of</strong> natural geomorphological and hydrological<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> the landscape.<br />
For many people, trout fishing in B.C. goes bey<strong>on</strong>d the<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> simply going out in a boat and catching fish. An<br />
important part <strong>of</strong> the fishing experience, for such people, involves<br />
being in an attractive natural envir<strong>on</strong>ment. An artificial lake, with<br />
either a 1.6 km dyke for a north shore, or such a lake with an<br />
extensi<strong>on</strong> into a tailings p<strong>on</strong>d, does not meet such requirements. It<br />
most certainly does not fulfill the experience expectati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> native<br />
people, who have fishing, hunting and deeper c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s with Fish<br />
Lake. These are based <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g term use and c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> to the land.<br />
10
Summary <strong>of</strong> Mining Related<br />
Community-Based Impacts<br />
Submitted to the Prosperity CEAA <strong>Panel</strong><br />
By: P. Larcombe, Symbi<strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>sultants<br />
for Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>al Government<br />
April, 2010
The following briefing <strong>on</strong> mine-related community<br />
impacts is based up<strong>on</strong>:<br />
� Literature Review, including materials <strong>on</strong>:<br />
- Impact predicti<strong>on</strong>s in other mine project<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental assessments;<br />
- Presentati<strong>on</strong>s and public hearing evidence <strong>on</strong> mining<br />
projects by other First Nati<strong>on</strong>s & Aboriginal groups;<br />
- Post project m<strong>on</strong>itoring reports;<br />
- Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al and academic literature.<br />
� Pers<strong>on</strong>al knowledge and experience in working with<br />
communities who have faced large natural resources<br />
development projects in their territories.
Impact <strong>of</strong> 12-hour shift & extended rotati<strong>on</strong> schedule<br />
(e.g. 14 days <strong>on</strong>/14 days <strong>of</strong>f) <strong>on</strong> mine workers<br />
• Fatigue from lack <strong>of</strong> sleep between shifts or rotati<strong>on</strong>s (especially alternating<br />
rotati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> day and night shifts) creates risk for worker safety [1] [2];<br />
• Worker efforts to meet family and community resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities during their ‘<strong>of</strong>fshift’,<br />
exacerbates fatigue c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s [2];<br />
• Significant daily travel to/from work substantially erodes ‘<strong>of</strong>f-work’ time,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributing to fatigue [2];<br />
• L<strong>on</strong>g-term exposure to shift-work linked to health impacts, with higher rates <strong>of</strong>:<br />
- gastrointestinal disorders (e.g. peptic ulcers, heartburn, nausea);<br />
- cardiovascular disease (e.g. heart disease, high blood pressure);<br />
- stress disorders (e.g. anxiety, depressi<strong>on</strong>).<br />
• Workers with pre-existing physical or mental health c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s and/or with<br />
substance abuse addicti<strong>on</strong>s are most at risk [29].<br />
See Citati<strong>on</strong> List at end <strong>of</strong> presentati<strong>on</strong>. Numbers identified in [ ] corresp<strong>on</strong>d to document #i n Citati<strong>on</strong> List. Note [PK] refers to<br />
pers<strong>on</strong>al knowledge <strong>of</strong> writer.
Impact <strong>of</strong> Shift/Rotati<strong>on</strong> Schedule <strong>on</strong> Families<br />
• Heightened levels <strong>of</strong> stress & disrupti<strong>on</strong> for the partners &<br />
families [1] [6] [35];<br />
• Women and children bear the brunt <strong>of</strong> mine-related work<br />
impacts <strong>on</strong> family. Increased incidence <strong>of</strong> domestic violence,<br />
substance abuse and family disrupti<strong>on</strong> are reported [4][8]<br />
[24] [5] [18] [30] [32] [33];<br />
• The 2 week <strong>on</strong>/2 week <strong>of</strong>f rotati<strong>on</strong> is really a 3 <strong>on</strong>/1 <strong>of</strong>f<br />
schedule as mine workers spend the first week at home<br />
catching up <strong>on</strong> sleep [11].
Impact <strong>of</strong> Shift/Rotati<strong>on</strong> Schedule <strong>on</strong> Families<br />
Absence <strong>of</strong> mine workers;<br />
• increases resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities <strong>of</strong> spouses/partners in all aspects <strong>of</strong> family<br />
life resulting in stress related health issues [5] [32].<br />
E.g. Labrador women with partners working 12-hour shifts (particularly<br />
night shift) report: mental health depressi<strong>on</strong>, l<strong>on</strong>eliness, separati<strong>on</strong>/<br />
divorce, parenting c<strong>on</strong>flicts, child care issues, spouse partying <strong>on</strong> days<br />
<strong>of</strong>f, difficulty with scheduling family time [31];<br />
• is difficult for children [5].<br />
E.g. BHP Ekati diam<strong>on</strong>d mine survey <strong>of</strong> families with mine workers<br />
found that 49.5% reported impacts <strong>on</strong> children between the ages <strong>of</strong> 0-<br />
4 [5].<br />
E.g. School staff in community <strong>of</strong> Rae Edzo in NWT report an increase<br />
in student behaviour problems <strong>of</strong> children from families involved in<br />
mine employment [12] [24];
Impact <strong>of</strong> Shift/Rotati<strong>on</strong> Schedule <strong>on</strong> Families<br />
• Workers whose families & partners are not coping well with shift<br />
schedule most likely to suffer from fatigue-related problem at work [1];<br />
• Families & relati<strong>on</strong>ships already under stress extremely vulnerable to<br />
the added stress <strong>of</strong> mine-related shift/rotati<strong>on</strong> schedules [5] [32];<br />
• Time away from family is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the major reas<strong>on</strong>s that workers quit<br />
mining jobs [3];<br />
• Worker satisfacti<strong>on</strong> with shift schedule is highest when it allows<br />
sufficient time to spend with family, friends and community [1];
Link Between Mine Employment and Substance Abuse<br />
• Wages paid by mining companies, higher participati<strong>on</strong> rates in the cash<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omy, and/or shift/rotati<strong>on</strong> schedule can create or exacerbate existing<br />
social problems such as alcohol and substance abuse [11] [10] [14] [15] [5]<br />
[24] [32] [33] [35];<br />
• Substance abuse effects immediate family, extended family, friends, and<br />
community at large, i.e. martial discord, domestic violence, child neglect,<br />
accidents, overdoses, suicide, financial problems, increased crime rates [5]<br />
[10] [14];<br />
• Evidence <strong>of</strong> bootlegging and underground drug trade has been associated<br />
with mining developments [33] [PK re Innu and Voisey's Bay];<br />
• Substance abuse by mine workers can result in job loss, leading to<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>al family stresses (loss <strong>of</strong> income, inability to finance accumulated<br />
debt, low self-esteem <strong>on</strong> the part <strong>of</strong> the worker and family members,<br />
leading to more cycles <strong>of</strong> substance abuse, domestic violence, etc.) [10]
Boom/Bust Cycle <strong>of</strong> Mining Industry<br />
• Temporary and pre-mature mine closures described as a<br />
‘feast and famine’ cycle where families experience periods <strong>of</strong><br />
income and incur debt and then face stress due to job loss and<br />
debt load [9] [18];<br />
• Cycle causes de-stabilizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> families and the community<br />
at large, and is particularly hard <strong>on</strong> women and children [9]<br />
[18];<br />
• Results in higher rates <strong>of</strong> health issues (substance abuse,<br />
depressi<strong>on</strong>, family violence) and increased demand <strong>on</strong> health<br />
service providers [5].
M<strong>on</strong>ey Management Impacts<br />
• Identified as a likely impact in all <strong>of</strong> the envir<strong>on</strong>mental assessments<br />
d<strong>on</strong>e for diam<strong>on</strong>d mines in the NWT; northern Ontario (Victor diam<strong>on</strong>d<br />
mine) and Labrador (Voisey's Bay nickel mine);<br />
• Increased wage income can lead to excessive c<strong>on</strong>sumerism and<br />
increased debt load [31].<br />
• Increased wage income has been linked to gambling addicti<strong>on</strong>s which<br />
creates family stress and <strong>of</strong>ten the addicti<strong>on</strong> lasts even after the mine<br />
closes or the worker stops working at the mine [5];<br />
• Workers who finance large purchases have difficulty making payments<br />
when mines temporarily close down or prematurely shuts down [18].
Social Change in Cohesi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Community<br />
• Even with ‘fly in/fly out’ mine operati<strong>on</strong>s, de facto mining<br />
towns still exist at departure points, bringing in ‘outsiders’ to<br />
the community [5] [15];<br />
• Influx <strong>of</strong> ‘outsiders’ to a community disrupts the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />
close knit community’s, upsetting the socio-cultural and<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omic equilibrium that has developed over centuries [16];<br />
• Health Canada reports that social changes associated with<br />
development can create uncertainties within communities,<br />
leading to a loss <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol and deteriorati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
and overall health <strong>of</strong> the community [16];
Social Change in Cohesi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Community<br />
• Presumpti<strong>on</strong> that jobs and increased income translate into<br />
‘better communities’ is not always the case as <strong>of</strong>ten it changes<br />
the social and cultural character <strong>of</strong> the community [17] [30];<br />
• Mining can divide a community and create l<strong>on</strong>g term c<strong>on</strong>flict<br />
between those (individuals, families and businesses) who<br />
benefit and those who do not benefit or are negatively<br />
impacted from mine development and/or mine-related<br />
employment [11]
Social Change in Cohesi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Community<br />
• Stratifies the community into the ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ [5] [11]<br />
[30] [32];<br />
• Social divisi<strong>on</strong> between mining and n<strong>on</strong>-mining families [4].<br />
• Individuals who lack skills or are unable to obtain mine-related<br />
employment <strong>of</strong>ten suffer from feelings <strong>of</strong> marginalizati<strong>on</strong> or simply<br />
‘not bel<strong>on</strong>ging’ [16]<br />
• Elders, traditi<strong>on</strong>al land users, women, and others who cannot or do<br />
not wish to participate in mining related activities are not <strong>on</strong>ly left<br />
behind, but also have to c<strong>on</strong>tend with impacts resulting from<br />
shift/rotati<strong>on</strong> schedules [32];
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Culture<br />
• Higher wage income can result in reduced need/time for<br />
traditi<strong>on</strong>al lifestyle activities and greater reliance <strong>on</strong> store bought<br />
goods [15] [16] [26] [27] [34]. For example, 71% <strong>of</strong> Lutsel k’e<br />
families with at least <strong>on</strong>e member working in the mining industry<br />
reported spending less time <strong>on</strong> the land [24];<br />
• Reducti<strong>on</strong> in traditi<strong>on</strong>al lifestyle activities <strong>of</strong>ten felt most by<br />
youth, women and elders who have fewer opportunities to share in<br />
land-based activities if main family harvester is engaged in minerelated<br />
work [PK];
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Culture<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>sequences <strong>of</strong> a decrease in harvesting activities and/or<br />
country food c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> can include physical health impacts<br />
(diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure and heart disease) and<br />
mental health impacts (violence, substance abuse, suicide) [16]<br />
[34];<br />
• Mining can introduce new lifestyles and c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> patterns<br />
that can disrupt community life and lead to a breakdown <strong>of</strong><br />
traditi<strong>on</strong>al lifestyle and values [15] [34];<br />
• Traditi<strong>on</strong>al ec<strong>on</strong>omy promotes and rewards sharing, whereas<br />
wage ec<strong>on</strong>omy promotes individualism [5] [24] [34];
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Community Resources<br />
Human, infrastructure and financial resources <strong>of</strong> community’s<br />
can become taxed due to a combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>:<br />
• permanent and transient populati<strong>on</strong> increase;<br />
• increased needs/requirements <strong>of</strong> existing populati<strong>on</strong>.
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Community Resources<br />
• Employment and business opportunities have resulted in<br />
former community members returning to their First Nati<strong>on</strong><br />
home base, resulting in increased demand for governance,<br />
health, counselling, etc. services from already scarce resources<br />
[25].<br />
• These individuals do not always get jobs or keep jobs, and<br />
some stay in the community drawing up<strong>on</strong> scarce transfer<br />
payment assistance funds [PK];
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Community Resources<br />
• The prospect <strong>of</strong> Impact Benefit Agreement m<strong>on</strong>ies has drawn<br />
some First Nati<strong>on</strong> members back to their home communities,<br />
again resulting in increased demand for services from what are<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten already over-taxed resources [PK];<br />
• In northern Manitoba, the prospect <strong>of</strong> sharing in hydroelectric<br />
development mitigati<strong>on</strong> and compensati<strong>on</strong> opportunities<br />
resulted in a large number <strong>of</strong> disenfranchised members seeking<br />
reinstatement <strong>of</strong> Treaty status under Bill C-31 and demanding a<br />
share <strong>of</strong> project benefits [PK].
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Community Resources<br />
Increased Burden <strong>on</strong> Resources from Existing Populati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
• Increased individual and family stress, substance abuse,<br />
depressi<strong>on</strong>, etc. associated with mine-related work places greater<br />
demands <strong>on</strong> community services [35];<br />
• Higher paying mine jobs draw community members with the<br />
highest levels <strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> and experience away from critical jobs<br />
in the community resulting in a social capital deficit <strong>of</strong> expertise<br />
available to the community [5] [16] [24];
Impacts <strong>on</strong> Community Resources<br />
Increased Burden <strong>on</strong> Resources from Existing Populati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
• Best and brightest, who are relied up<strong>on</strong> for advice and input in<br />
community events, land claims negotiati<strong>on</strong>s, and regular meetings,<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten cannot participate due to mine employment [24];<br />
• Where communities already have scarce resources (human and<br />
financial) for governance, large mining projects tax the leadership<br />
and staff, <strong>of</strong>ten diverting attenti<strong>on</strong> from equally important issues<br />
<strong>of</strong> the community [11].
On the Positive Side <strong>on</strong> Things…<br />
• Jobs and business opportunities can:<br />
• help re-build individual, family and community esteem<br />
that has suffered from past experiences such as residential<br />
schools, previous development impacts, col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong>, etc.<br />
[5] [10];<br />
• attract growth and investment in the community;<br />
• increase disposable income resulting in higher rates <strong>of</strong><br />
expenditure within the community if such opportunities<br />
exist;<br />
• reduce outward migrati<strong>on</strong> (particularly youth).
On the Positive Side <strong>on</strong> Things…<br />
• Project-related training can enhance skill sets that may be<br />
transferable to other jobs or businesses in the future;<br />
• Increases in disposable income can promote purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
capital equipment and increase financial resources available for<br />
land-based activities [PK] [24];<br />
• Increases in wage ec<strong>on</strong>omy can promote sharing through<br />
purchase and lending <strong>of</strong> harvesting equipment [5];
LITERATURE CITED<br />
1 Heiler, K., Pickersgill, R. and Briggs, C. 2000. Working time arrangements in the Australian mining industry Trends and implicati<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
particular reference to occupati<strong>on</strong>al health and safety. Internati<strong>on</strong>al Labour Office, Geneva.<br />
http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/austrmin/index.htm#_Toc496054137.<br />
2 Government <strong>of</strong> Western Australia. 2000. Fatigue Management for the Western Australian Mining Industry Guideline. Department <strong>of</strong> Industry<br />
and Resources and Mines Occupati<strong>on</strong>al Safety and Health Advisory Board. State <strong>of</strong> Western Australia, November, 2000.<br />
http://www.docep.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety/Secti<strong>on</strong>s/Mining_Safety/pdf_/MS%20GMP/Guidelines/MS_GMP_Guide_FatigueManagement.p<br />
df .<br />
3 Barker, T. and D. Breret<strong>on</strong>. 2005. Survey <strong>of</strong> local Aboriginal people formerly employed at Century mine: Identifying factors that c<strong>on</strong>tribute to<br />
voluntary turnover. Centre for Social Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility in Mining, Research Paper No. 4. University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Australia, July 2005.<br />
4 Breret<strong>on</strong>, D., Forbes, P. 2004. M<strong>on</strong>itoring the Impact <strong>of</strong> Mining <strong>on</strong> Local Communities: A Hunter Valley Case Study. Centre for Social<br />
Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility in Mining, University <strong>of</strong> Queensland. Paper presented to Minerals Council <strong>of</strong> Australia Inaugural Sustainable Development<br />
C<strong>on</strong>ference, Melbourne, October 2004.<br />
5 Gibs<strong>on</strong>, G. and J. Klinck. Canada’s Resilient North: The Impact <strong>of</strong> Mining <strong>on</strong> Aboriginal Communities. Pimatisiwin: A Journal <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal<br />
and Indigenous Community Health 3(1).<br />
6 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Labour Office Geneva. 2002. The evoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> employment, working time and training in the mining industry, Report for<br />
discussi<strong>on</strong> at the Tripartite Meeting <strong>on</strong> the Evoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Employment, Working Time and Training in the Mining Industry. Internati<strong>on</strong>al Labour<br />
Organizati<strong>on</strong>, Sectoral Activities Programme. Geneva, October 2002.<br />
7 Ritter, A.R.M. 2001. Canada: <str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fly-In, Fly-Out to Mining Metropolis. Chapter 6 in Large Mines and the Community, Socioec<strong>on</strong>omic and<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Effects in Latin America, Canada, and Spain (eds. Gary McMah<strong>on</strong> and Felix Rem). IDRC/World Bank 2001.<br />
http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-28032-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.<br />
8 Str<strong>on</strong>gman, J. Eftimie, A. and Hancock, Dr. G. 2004. Women in Energy and Mining, Voices for Change A Visi<strong>on</strong> for a Better Future. World<br />
Bank Papua New Guinea NG Department <strong>of</strong> Mining World Bank Energy Week, March 2004.<br />
9 Gaining Ground: Women, Mining and the Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, Workshop held at Lake Laberge, Yuk<strong>on</strong> Territory, September 17, 2000.<br />
www.yuk<strong>on</strong>c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>.org/library/pdf/gain.pdf .<br />
10. Brockman, A. and M. Argue. 1995. Review <strong>of</strong> NWT Diam<strong>on</strong>ds Project Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement: Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Impacts <strong>on</strong><br />
Women. Submitted by The Status <strong>of</strong> Women Council to BHP Diam<strong>on</strong>d Mine Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment <strong>Panel</strong>. October 23, 1995.
11 Innu Nati<strong>on</strong>/MiningWatch Canada. 1999. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Aboriginal Communities and Mining. Workshop Summary,<br />
September 10-12, 1999, Ottawa. http://www.miningwatch.ca/index.php?/Canada_en/Rock_hard_place.<br />
12 Government Northwest Territories. 2005. Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Impacts in the Communities <strong>of</strong>: Łutselk’e, Rae Edzo, Rae Lakes, Wha Ti,<br />
Wekweti, Detah, Ndilo, and Yellowknife 2004 Annual Report <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> the Northwest Territories under the BHP Billit<strong>on</strong> and<br />
Diavik Socio-Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Agreements. Health and Social Services; Educati<strong>on</strong>; Culture and Employment Industry; Tourism and Investment;<br />
Justice; NWT Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics; NWT Housing Corporati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
13 Marlowe, E., Enzoe, D., Parlee, B. and Ellis, S. 2003. Community Based M<strong>on</strong>itoring, Final Report. Prepared by Wildlife, Lands and<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>ment Department Lutsel K’e Dene First Nati<strong>on</strong> for The West Kitikmeot Slave Study Society.<br />
14 Hobart, C.W. 1984. The Impact <strong>of</strong> Resource Development <strong>on</strong> the Health <strong>of</strong> Native People in the Northwest Territories. Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Sociology, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta. The Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Native Studies, IV, 2 (1984): 257-278.<br />
15 Lapalme, Lise-Aurore, Natural Resources Canada, Mineral and Metal Policy Branch. 2003. The Social Dimensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sustainable<br />
Development and the Mining Industry, A Backgrounder. Minister <strong>of</strong> Public Works and Government Services Canada.<br />
16 Buell, Mark. 2006. Resource Extracti<strong>on</strong> Development and Well-Being in the North, A Scan <strong>of</strong> the Unique Challenges <strong>of</strong> Development in<br />
Inuit Communities. Ajunnginiq Centre, Nati<strong>on</strong>al Aboriginal Health Organizati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
17 Duhaime, G. et al. Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Systems., 2004. Chapter 4 In: Arctic Human Development Report. Stefanss<strong>on</strong> Arctic Institute, under the<br />
auspices <strong>of</strong> the Icelandic Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Arctic Council 2002-2004.<br />
18 Yuk<strong>on</strong> Status <strong>of</strong> Women Council. 2000. Gain Ground: Women, Mining and the Envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Results <strong>of</strong> a Workshop held September 17,<br />
2000, at Lake Laberge, Yuk<strong>on</strong>. www.yuk<strong>on</strong>c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>.org/library/pdf/gain.pdf.<br />
19 Kwiatkowski, R.E. and M. Ooi. 2003. Integrated Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Assessment: A Canadian Example. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the World Health<br />
Organizati<strong>on</strong>, v. 81. n.6 Genebra.<br />
20 Handy, E.R. 2005. Diam<strong>on</strong>d in the Rough, an interview with Ph.D. candidate Ginger Gibs<strong>on</strong>. Norman B. Keevil Institute <strong>of</strong> Mining<br />
Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia.<br />
21 Collins, B. 2000. Kakadu Regi<strong>on</strong> Social Impact Study Community Report. Report <strong>on</strong> initiatives from the Kakadu Regi<strong>on</strong> community and<br />
government, <strong>on</strong> the implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Kakadu Regi<strong>on</strong> Social Impact Study, November 1998 – November 2000, Darwin, Australia.<br />
22 Adger, W.N. 2000. Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?. Progress in Human Geography 24, 3 (2000) pp. 347-364.
23 Story, K. and L.C. Hamilt<strong>on</strong>. 2003. Planning for the Impacts <strong>of</strong> Megaprojects: Two North American Examples. In: R.O. Rasmussen and<br />
N.E. Koroleva (eds.) Social and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impacts in the North, 281-302, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.<br />
24 North Slave Metis Alliance. 2001. Can’t Live Without Work-Envir<strong>on</strong>mental, Social, Ec<strong>on</strong>omic and Cultural C<strong>on</strong>cerns: A Compani<strong>on</strong> to the<br />
Comprehensive Study Report <strong>on</strong> the Diavik Diam<strong>on</strong>ds Project.<br />
25 The Supervising Scientist. 1997. Kakadu Regi<strong>on</strong> Social Impact Study: Report <strong>of</strong> the Aboriginal Project Committee. A Study Jointly Funded by<br />
the Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth and Territory Governments, the Northern Land Council, and Energy Resources Australia. Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <strong>of</strong> Australia.<br />
26 C<strong>on</strong>ference Board <strong>of</strong> Canada. 2001. An Examinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Nunavut Ec<strong>on</strong>omy. Ottawa.<br />
27 Hobart, Charles. “Inuit Employment at the Nanisivik Mine <strong>on</strong> Baffin Island.” Inuit Studies,Vol. 6, No. 1. (1982).<br />
28 Hild, C.M. and V. Stordahl. Human Health and Well-Being. Artic Human Development Report.<br />
29 Queensland Government. 2001. Guidance Note for Management <strong>of</strong> Safety and Health Risks associated with Hours <strong>of</strong> Work Arrangements at<br />
Mining Operati<strong>on</strong>s. Natural Resources and Mines.<br />
30 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Council <strong>on</strong> Mining and Metals. 2006. Community Development Tool Kit. Prepared in associati<strong>on</strong> with the World Bank and<br />
Energy Sector Management Assistance Program as part <strong>of</strong> the Pi<strong>on</strong>eering New Approaches in Support <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Development in the<br />
Extractive Sector program.<br />
31 The Labrador West Status <strong>of</strong> Women Council and the Femmes Francoph<strong>on</strong>es de l’Ouest du Labrador. 2004. Effects <strong>of</strong> Mining <strong>on</strong> Women’s<br />
Health in Labrador West, Final Report. In collaborati<strong>on</strong> with MiningWatch Canada, the Steelworkers Humanity Fund, with assistance from<br />
the Lupina Foundati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
32 MacKenzie Valley Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Review Board. June 28, 2006. Reas<strong>on</strong>s for Decisi<strong>on</strong> and Report <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment<br />
for the DeBeers Gahcho Kué Diam<strong>on</strong>d Mine, Kennady Lake, NT.<br />
33 Lutsel K’e First Nati<strong>on</strong>. 2006. “What We Heard” - Community Scoping Workshop for the Gahcho Kué Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment in Lutsel<br />
K’e, April 19, 2006. Presentati<strong>on</strong> to the MacKenzie Valley Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Review Board <strong>on</strong> April 28, 2006.<br />
34 FMA Heritage Resources C<strong>on</strong>sultants Inc. 2006. Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Ecological Knowledge and Land Use Report, Joslyn North Mine Project.<br />
Prepared for Deer Creek Energy Limited.<br />
35 Voisey's Bay Mine and Mill Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment <strong>Panel</strong> Report. 1999. http://www.ceaacee.gc.ca/010/0001/0001/0011/0002/c<strong>on</strong>tents_e.htm.<br />
36 Victor Diam<strong>on</strong>d Project, Final Comprehensive Study Report.<br />
37 MacKenzie Valley Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Review Board. 2003. Report <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment and Reas<strong>on</strong>s for Decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the De Beers<br />
Canada Mining Inc. Snap Lake Diam<strong>on</strong>d Project. July 24, 2003.
Colette Spagnuolo, <strong>Panel</strong> Manager<br />
160 Elgin Street,<br />
Ottawa, ON<br />
K1A OH3<br />
McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd.<br />
Box 479, New Denver, British Columbia V0G 1S0<br />
Ph<strong>on</strong>e: 250-358-7796; e-mail: mccrorywildlife@netidea.com<br />
April 16, 2010<br />
Re: Technical Review <strong>of</strong> EIS <strong>on</strong> Proposed Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine: "Terrestrial Ecosystems"<br />
Dear Ms Spagnuolo:<br />
Please find attached my technical review. As some informati<strong>on</strong> was not available for my review, please<br />
be advised that I will be making some revisi<strong>on</strong>s to this document prior to the end-April submissi<strong>on</strong> in<br />
Williams Lake.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio.<br />
Cc.
AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE IMPACTS<br />
OF THE PROPOSED PROSPERITY MINE<br />
April 16, 2010 Draft<br />
Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio<br />
McCrory Wildlife Services<br />
Box 479, New Denver,<br />
British Columbia,<br />
V0G 1S0<br />
Ph<strong>on</strong>e (250) 358-7796<br />
email:mccrorywildife@netidea.com<br />
mccrorywildlife@netidea.com
2<br />
REVIEW OF TASEKO’S PROPOSED OPEN PIT MINE AND ITS CUMULATIVE<br />
IMPACTS TO GRIZZLY BEARS, OTHER WILDLIFE AND WILD HORSES &<br />
ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF PROTECTED AREAS<br />
[Note: This draft review is being submitted to the panel <strong>on</strong> April 16 with the<br />
understanding that it will be up-graded and revised prior to delivery <strong>of</strong> the final<br />
document at the hearings in late April. For example, research <strong>on</strong> road mortalities<br />
and mine effects <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears (in the U.S.) were incomplete <strong>on</strong> April 16. Wayne<br />
McCrory, RPBio. An more complete Executive Summary will also be provided in<br />
the final document].<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
My review, using extensive local knowledge and research <strong>on</strong> wildlife habitats and 30 years <strong>of</strong><br />
grizzly bear/wildlife expertise combined with a c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> biology and cumulative effects<br />
review, c<strong>on</strong>cludes that the Taseko EIS for the proposed Prosperity Mine significantly undervalues<br />
the envir<strong>on</strong>mental impacts <strong>of</strong> the mine development <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears and other wildlife. The West<br />
Chilcotin grizzly populati<strong>on</strong> is the largest residual dryland populati<strong>on</strong> left in Coastal Mountain<br />
foothills the North America and is a salm<strong>on</strong> bear that also feeds <strong>on</strong> whitebark pine nuts and wild<br />
potatoes. A recent c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> study recommends a recovery plan. The populati<strong>on</strong> is c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />
threatened by the province and is down to about 100 animals and therefore cannot sustain further<br />
habitat losses or increases in human-induced mortality. A projected net loss <strong>of</strong> quality habitat<br />
areas resulting from global warming exacerbates the stress this relic grizzly populati<strong>on</strong> is now<br />
under.<br />
With respect to the proposed mine development, any new impact represents a cumulative effect<br />
<strong>on</strong> grizzly bears, and will result from a combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>:<br />
� Direct losses <strong>of</strong> quality habitats from the mine development (and further explorati<strong>on</strong>),<br />
� Displacement <strong>of</strong> warier grizzly bears from quality habitats and movement corridors in an<br />
associated broader Z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Influence al<strong>on</strong>g the 50 km road corridor and mine site,<br />
� Direct mortality <strong>of</strong> grizzly bears from the mine transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor and mine site,<br />
including subdominant bears that will habituate to these areas,<br />
� Displacement from quality habitats and movement corridors and associated illegal<br />
mortality resulting from an expanded motorized recreati<strong>on</strong>al backcountry use created by<br />
access improvements from the mine development including the transmissi<strong>on</strong> line corridor<br />
and the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area.<br />
Most mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures identified by the Taseko EIS will not be effective in reducing impacts.<br />
The mine development will cause this vulnerable and threatened West Chilcotin grizzly bear<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> to pass the ecological threshold for extincti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Other impacts will include increased mortality to wild horses, mule deer and other wildlife al<strong>on</strong>g<br />
the proposed mine transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally the impacts <strong>of</strong> the mine will reduce the<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> adjacent protecti<strong>on</strong> areas to support viable populati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> wide-ranging species.
I. GENERAL APPROACH & OVERVIEW BY McCRORY WILDLIFE SERVICES<br />
REVIEW OF TASEKO’s PROPOSED PROJECT<br />
3<br />
This review focuses <strong>on</strong> grizzly bear and the potential impacts to grizzly bear populati<strong>on</strong>s from the<br />
proposed Prosperity mine project. I use a c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> biology approach that looks at the issue<br />
from a cumulative effects viewpoint, which c<strong>on</strong>siders all direct and indirect influences <strong>on</strong> the<br />
bears in the Taseko regi<strong>on</strong>. By its nature, this is a cumulative effects assessment since the<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al bear populati<strong>on</strong> has underg<strong>on</strong>e, and is c<strong>on</strong>tinuing to undergo, numerous adverse effects<br />
from a variety <strong>of</strong> natural and manmade disturbances and encroachments into the regi<strong>on</strong>. The<br />
proposed transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor and mine will simply be <strong>on</strong>e more additive effect in an otherwise<br />
compromised and shrinking viable habitat base for Chilcotin grizzly.<br />
The grizzly bear is a good indicator species. Paquet (pers. comm.) analyzed niche overlap for 410<br />
terrestrial vertebrates in the Central Canadian Rockies and found that by protecting the habitat<br />
needs <strong>of</strong> the grizzly bear, Canada lynx and grey wolf, additi<strong>on</strong>al species (98%) would also be<br />
protected. This means that if effective protective measures and good management are undertaken<br />
for this <strong>on</strong>e species al<strong>on</strong>e, almost all other wildlife populati<strong>on</strong>s in the same area are automatically<br />
taken care <strong>of</strong>. On the c<strong>on</strong>verse, whatever happens to grizzly habitat will almost assuredly affect<br />
in a negative way the majority <strong>of</strong> the other wildlife populati<strong>on</strong>s’ habitat. This makes the grizzly<br />
tremendously useful to the <strong>Panel</strong>’s understanding <strong>of</strong> wildlife habitat impacts from the Prosperity<br />
project.<br />
The grizzly bear is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> North America’s slowest reproducing mammals (a mother grizzly<br />
might c<strong>on</strong>tribute 4 -5 <strong>of</strong>fspring to the populati<strong>on</strong> if she lives l<strong>on</strong>g enough). This feature has made<br />
it vulnerable to populati<strong>on</strong> declines and extirpati<strong>on</strong>, such as in the regi<strong>on</strong> 30 km or so to the north<br />
<strong>of</strong> the proposed Taseko Mine.<br />
The grizzly bear in the West Chilcotin, estimated by the Wildlife Branch to be down to 104<br />
individuals (Hamilt<strong>on</strong> 2008), is provincially listed as “threatened”. This is loosely defined as the<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> estimate is being less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the area’s habitat capability, the number <strong>of</strong> animals<br />
that could be supported under optimal c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (Austin et al. 2004). Recent DNA studies<br />
detected 119 grizzlies in the combined Tatlayoko and upper Chilko River secti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Xeni<br />
Gwet’in Caretaker Area, suggest that the numbers <strong>of</strong> grizzly bears in the XGCA may be in better<br />
shape than expected (Mueller 2008). However, this may provide an artificial window <strong>on</strong> the<br />
overall status <strong>of</strong> the populati<strong>on</strong> since some <strong>of</strong> the grizzly bears are being drawn to salm<strong>on</strong> from a<br />
very large area including Gold Bridge to the south <strong>of</strong> the Taseko.<br />
Although this populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> dryland grizzlies is no l<strong>on</strong>ger hunted, unreported kills from defense<strong>of</strong>-life,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>flicts at native salm<strong>on</strong> harvest sites, rancher-grizzly c<strong>on</strong>flicts, c<strong>on</strong>flicts with mining<br />
explorati<strong>on</strong> camps, hunter-grizzly c<strong>on</strong>flicts and road mortalities are <strong>on</strong>-going threats to this<br />
vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong>. In recent years, there have been two reported kills for cattle predati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
two unreported kills related to c<strong>on</strong>flicts with people, including a female with young. Grizzly bears<br />
generally cannot sustain mortality higher than 4%, if recovery is desired (Horejsi 1999). Even the<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e breeding-age female can have serious c<strong>on</strong>sequences to maintaining a viable<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>. A recent mortality study (McLellan et al. 1999) found that in a hunted populati<strong>on</strong>, for<br />
every bear killed legally there is about <strong>on</strong>e killed illegally. Studies using radio-collared grizzlies
have dem<strong>on</strong>strated that female grizzly bears comprise a large proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the unreported<br />
mortality in BC.<br />
4<br />
Despite the historic decline in Chilcotin grizzly populati<strong>on</strong>s, a recent c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> study showed<br />
that an area <strong>of</strong> viable grizzly habitat larger than Yellowst<strong>on</strong>e Park still exists al<strong>on</strong>g the west side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the coast ranges, foothills and partially <strong>on</strong>to the Chilcotin Plateau, from the head <strong>of</strong> the Taseko<br />
River to Tweedsmuir Park, and that some 49% <strong>of</strong> this was already protected (Craighead and<br />
McCrory 2010). This study recommended that a grizzly bear recovery plan be implemented for<br />
this area by the province, and that more habitats be protected.<br />
The study also showed that the West Chilcotin grizzly bear is the last viable populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
grizzlies left in the dryland-grassland ecotype al<strong>on</strong>g the eastern fringes <strong>of</strong> North America’s<br />
Coastal Ranges and Cascade Mountains. This is a grizzly that feeds <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>, but unlike its<br />
cousins in the coastal rainforests, also feeds <strong>on</strong> whitebark pine nuts, and digs for wild potatoes<br />
and bears-claw. This grassland grizzly ecotype is totally extinct al<strong>on</strong>g the lee <strong>of</strong> the coastal<br />
mountains in the U.S., is down to tiny numbers in the U.S. – B.C. North Cascades (where<br />
recovery programs are being looked at), and occurs in very low numbers in the Lillooet area<br />
south <strong>of</strong> the headwaters <strong>of</strong> the Taseko River.<br />
The mine transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor will also cross some 50 km <strong>of</strong> that plateau bordering the large<br />
Xeni Gwet’in aboriginal preserve that extends to the east side <strong>of</strong> the Taseko. Despite<br />
fragmentati<strong>on</strong> from clearcut logging, this area still has all Chilcotin wildlife including grizzly<br />
bears, wolves, and 100-200 wild horses. The horses were in the Chilcotin regi<strong>on</strong> before<br />
Europeans, indicating Spanish origin (we are now doing DNA tests <strong>on</strong> this in the Brittany<br />
Triangle). The horses are c<strong>on</strong>sidered an alternate prey species for grizzly bears, wolves, mountain<br />
li<strong>on</strong>s and other predators (McCrory 2002). Not <strong>on</strong>ly is the plateau east <strong>of</strong> the Taseko a major<br />
movement corridor for mule deer, it is a broad travel regi<strong>on</strong> for all wildlife including grizzly<br />
bears that would move from the east to access salm<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g the Taseko and Chilko Rivers and<br />
Ellkin Creek. The road corridor is not <strong>on</strong>ly a communal First Nati<strong>on</strong>s harvest area for mule deer<br />
and moose, but an excellent wildlife and wild horse viewing area. It is periodically used for film<br />
documentaries <strong>of</strong> wild horses.<br />
The proposed Taseko mine site and much <strong>of</strong> the proposed industrial transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor<br />
actually lie within the eastern boundaries <strong>of</strong> a very large protected area: the Xeni Gwet’in’s<br />
aboriginal/wild horse preserve (1989 Xeni Gwet’in Nendduwh Jid Guzit’in and 2002 ?Elegesi<br />
Qiyus Wild Horse Preserve) totalling some 777,290 ha. To the east and southeast, and proximal<br />
to the proposed mine, lie two important provincially protected areas, Big Creek Park and Spruce<br />
Lake Protected Area, totalling some 137,329 ha. Just like Canada’s system <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al parks,<br />
these aboriginal and provincial protected areas (including four provincial protected areas that lie<br />
within the boundaries to the Xeni Gwet’in preserves) were created through intensive land-use<br />
planning processes, with the intenti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> being lasting legacies for society by preserving<br />
biodiversity and high value core grizzly bear habitats and other wildlife.<br />
How will the proposed Taseko Mine affect the currently precarious survival <strong>of</strong> the West Chilcotin<br />
grizzly bear, wild horses and other wildlife? And how will the mine development affect the<br />
ecological integrity and biological functi<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Chilcotin protected areas that have been<br />
meticulously set aside by society to preserve species and biodiversity?
A. REVIEW OF PROPOSED TASEKO LAKE/WHITEWATER INDUSTRIAL<br />
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR<br />
i. Background informati<strong>on</strong> from Taseko EIS documents<br />
Taseko EIS: “there is no significant effect <strong>on</strong> Grizzly Bear.”<br />
5<br />
Taseko: “During the Project’s c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> phase, Project traffic c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> transporting material<br />
and pers<strong>on</strong>s to the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> site. There are no large units that will require special traffic<br />
management other than pilot car for wide loads. The compositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the traffic is about 60%<br />
trucks/trucks and 40% light vehicles. The largest increment to traffic is Year 1 <strong>of</strong> operati<strong>on</strong>s, which<br />
overlaps with c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, with an annual average daily traffic <strong>of</strong> about 250 vehicles. After that, the<br />
Project adds <strong>on</strong> average about 100 vehicle trips per day (i.e., 50 vehicles making round trip).<br />
C<strong>on</strong>centrate trucks would make about 15 trips per day <strong>on</strong> average over the mine life. When the mine<br />
closes, the traffic volume drops to a negligible value.”<br />
Taseko:<br />
Table 3-15, p. 3-38 <strong>of</strong> Vol 6 (social) Current Traffic and Project-Related Traffic Volumes (round<br />
trips per day)<br />
current traffic c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> operati<strong>on</strong>s closure post-<br />
closure<br />
AADT Yr-1AADT typical year Yr 20, Vehicles<br />
AADT per wk<br />
4500 Haul Road 5< 48 100 46 2<br />
Taseko Lake/Whitewater roads 50 48 100 46 2<br />
Hwy 20 Rural (Lee’s Corner to Wms Lk) 1,600 to 1,800 48 100 46 2<br />
Hwy 20 (Williams Lake to Hwy 97) About 16,000 48 100 46 2<br />
Hwy 97 (Wms Lk to Macalister load-out<br />
Note: * indicates will be upgraded<br />
2,900 - 32<br />
Source: Taseko Mines, see Table 3-36 for annual values<br />
[For discussi<strong>on</strong> purposed, I have c<strong>on</strong>verted round trips per day to vehicles per day (vpd) by<br />
multiplying by two. W. McCrory].<br />
ii. McCrory Wildlife Sevices - ecological/wildlife-social c<strong>on</strong>text <strong>of</strong> the industrial<br />
transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor area<br />
� The proposed mine transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor will use the Taseko/Whitewater road from<br />
Hanceville to the juncti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this road and what is called the “4500” road. Apparently the<br />
road south <strong>of</strong> St<strong>on</strong>e will be up-graded to avoid going through the village and adjacent<br />
ranch lands. The 4500 road will be up-graded for the approximately 5 km to Fish Lake.<br />
This total length <strong>of</strong> this main transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor from St<strong>on</strong>e to Fish Lake appears to<br />
be about 50 km.<br />
� Near the south end and juncti<strong>on</strong> with the “4500” road the Taseko/Whitewater road enters<br />
the Elegesi Qiyus (Nemiah) Wild Horse Preserve (2002), marked by a large sign. This is<br />
also the 1989 Xeni Gwet’in Nendduwh Jid Guzit’in Aboriginal Preserve. They cover the
6<br />
same area (Map x) and were established by aboriginal decree by the Xeni Gwet’in and<br />
they are approximately the same size as Banff Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park. This secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Taseko/Whitewater road, the 4500 road and the proposed mine are all in this Preserve<br />
area.<br />
� The road crosses a largely lodgepole pine-meadow-wetland plateau that is somewhat<br />
fragmented and roaded from recent clearcut logging and a few old ranch roads. However,<br />
it appears to still inhabited by all <strong>of</strong> the West Chilcotin wildlife species including bluelisted<br />
grizzly bears and wolverine; although some negative effects are likely occurring.<br />
Some blue-listed sharptailed grouse likely occur as we have been recording small<br />
numbers in the Brittany Triangle (McCrory 2005 and unpubl. field notes).<br />
� Currently and until the habitats in large Brittany fire z<strong>on</strong>es (2003 and 2009) in the<br />
aboriginal/wild horse preserve recover, wild horses and wildlife such as grizzly bears,<br />
lynx and wolves displaced by these large wildfires appear to have influxed into outlying<br />
habitats including areas al<strong>on</strong>g the Taseko/Whitewater Road. For example, in the fall <strong>of</strong><br />
2003 what appeared to be several new herds <strong>of</strong> wild horses were observed moving into<br />
the Km 23 area <strong>of</strong> the Taseko/Whitewater road as a result <strong>of</strong> displacement from the fire<br />
(Wild horse ranger, Harry Setah pers. comm.). Our studies <strong>of</strong> the 2003 Brittany Fire<br />
(McCrory 2005 and recent unpublished field surveys) indicate that while some animals<br />
such as wild horses have generally recovered, slow food resource recovery for some<br />
species (e.g. willows for moose, soapberry for bears, slow come-back <strong>of</strong> snow-shoe hares<br />
for lynx, etc.) may mean another decade or so before capacity is recovered. The 2009 fire<br />
was even larger and crossed the east side <strong>of</strong> the Taseko to near the Taseko/Whitewater<br />
road. If wildlife and wild horses are here in greater numbers because <strong>of</strong> this fire<br />
displacement effect, then this has implicati<strong>on</strong>s for increased direct and indirect effects <strong>of</strong><br />
the mine transportati<strong>on</strong> road including road kills.<br />
� Many wildlife populati<strong>on</strong>s still apparently cross the existing road safely to utilize habitats<br />
that exist <strong>on</strong> the east and west side <strong>of</strong> the road. This is particularly true <strong>of</strong> the 100 – 200<br />
wild horses, but also moose, bears and other species. Productive wetlands and grasslands<br />
<strong>on</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the current road access biological hotspots and all are necessary for some<br />
<strong>of</strong> these animals to c<strong>on</strong>tinue to survive over the l<strong>on</strong>g-term.<br />
� The proposed mine transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor for all <strong>of</strong> its 50 km length intersects a major<br />
migrati<strong>on</strong> corridor and spring-fall resident habitat for large numbers <strong>of</strong> mule deer that<br />
primarily winter eastward al<strong>on</strong>g the Fraser River.<br />
� The road corridor also intersects what appears to be a wide dispersal corridor for grizzly<br />
bears traveling from the more dryland areas east to access major salm<strong>on</strong> runs al<strong>on</strong>g the<br />
Taseko and Chilko Rivers. In <strong>on</strong>e case a grizzly bear was known to travel from 113 km<br />
from Gold Bridge (in the south) to access the spawning salm<strong>on</strong> food resource in the<br />
Chilko (Mueller 2008). Meuller felt that grizzly bears in the regi<strong>on</strong> have much larger<br />
home ranges than in most other reported grizzly studies. We have observed grizzly bears<br />
utilizing pine forests north <strong>of</strong> the Chilko River, towards Alexis Creek.<br />
� The general Whitewater/Taseko road and associated sub-roads are a communal hunting<br />
area <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>siderable importance for First Nati<strong>on</strong>s harvest <strong>of</strong> mule deer and moose.<br />
� Wildlife viewing values are fairly high compared to other roads in the Cariboo. Wild<br />
horse viewing and photography are some <strong>of</strong> the best in the province. The area is
occasi<strong>on</strong>ally used for wild horse documentary filming (e.g. Discovery: Wild<br />
Horses/Unc<strong>on</strong>quered People).<br />
7<br />
� I c<strong>on</strong>sider the wildlife and wild horse populati<strong>on</strong>s in this area to be highly vulnerable to<br />
mortality and displacement from a high volume industrial transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor such as<br />
that proposed by Taseko Mines.<br />
iii. Current status <strong>of</strong> the Whitewater/Taseko access road<br />
The road currently is a “bush road” with <strong>of</strong>ten little traffic, even in the summer, and travel is<br />
slow. I could not locate any records <strong>of</strong> traffic volumes and road kills. In my last 10 years <strong>of</strong> doing<br />
research in the area I have never seen a road kill, although recently a horse was reported hit and I<br />
have seen a wolf and a wild horse that were indiscriminately shot with ¼ km <strong>of</strong> the road. The<br />
current rough state <strong>of</strong> the road provides a natural type <strong>of</strong> speed c<strong>on</strong>trol that limits collisi<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
wildlife and wild horses. My Xeni Gwet’in Access Management Plan (McCrory 2005) c<strong>on</strong>cluded<br />
that: “current levels <strong>of</strong> access roads, such as in the Nemiah Valley, north end <strong>of</strong> Chilko Lake,<br />
Tsuniah Road, and Taseko Lake are likely not having any significant impacts <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears,<br />
although some habitats near these roads might not be used by grizzly bears at certain times <strong>of</strong> the<br />
year”.<br />
iv. Projected impacts: Traffic volume increases and road improvements from proposed<br />
mine transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor<br />
Traffic volumes are <strong>on</strong>e way to measure the effects <strong>of</strong> roadways <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears including road<br />
kill levels and habitat displacement (Dr. L. Craighead pers. comm., Horejsi 1999).<br />
Taseko’s traffic estimates pre-mine traffic volumes for the Taseko Lake/Whitewater roads to be<br />
an annual average <strong>of</strong> 100 vehicles per day (vpd), with no apparent supporting evidence, such as<br />
traffic counts. Taseko’s data indicated that the mine operati<strong>on</strong> would triple the estimated traffic<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the Taseko/Whitewater road from 100 vpd to 300 vpd. The majority <strong>of</strong> Taseko’s use will<br />
be trucks, including 15 c<strong>on</strong>centrate trucks per day. In Year 1 when c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> overlaps with<br />
operati<strong>on</strong> the total vpd will be 350. These figures do not account for the increased<br />
public/recreati<strong>on</strong>al use <strong>of</strong> the road that will occur as a result <strong>of</strong> road improvement<br />
Taseko’s EIS appears to provide very little informati<strong>on</strong> about the degree <strong>of</strong> upgrade or widening<br />
the Whitewater Road from its current ‘bush’ c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> to industrial and safer standards. One can<br />
assume however that significant improvements will be made to facilitate the projected high<br />
increase in mine traffic. This will also increase significantly the speed at which vehicles will be<br />
able to travel. This factor al<strong>on</strong>e has serious implicati<strong>on</strong>s for wildlife and wild horse road kills (I<br />
will further attempt to obtain greater details before the final submissi<strong>on</strong> near the end <strong>of</strong> April).<br />
v. Effects <strong>of</strong> Taseko industrial transportati<strong>on</strong> corridor <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears<br />
Various scientific studies dem<strong>on</strong>strate that roads can have significant behavioural and ecological<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sequences for grizzly bears, all <strong>of</strong> them negative (Horejsi 1994, 1999, 2000; Horejsi et. al.<br />
1998; Kasworm and Manley 1990).<br />
Warier bears will avoid even high quality habitats up to 3 km from a road (displacement). In <strong>on</strong>e<br />
study in M<strong>on</strong>tana, grizzly bears showed avoidance <strong>of</strong> roads at just 10 vpd, and at 60 vpd the road<br />
helped define the border between two female grizzly bear home ranges (Mace et al. 1996). In<br />
another case, a grizzly in Alaska restricted use to just 22% <strong>of</strong> its home range because <strong>of</strong> a road<br />
(Dau 1989).
8<br />
Roads also destroy habitat. As well, subdominant bears, especially females with young, will<br />
habituate to roadsides, and become susceptible to being killed from traffic collisi<strong>on</strong>s, illegal<br />
hunting and food/garbage related problems. All around, roads, especially those with higher<br />
speeds and higher traffic volumes, are extremely dangerous to bears and can become both an<br />
ecological dead z<strong>on</strong>e for warier bears, even al<strong>on</strong>g salm<strong>on</strong> streams, or a death z<strong>on</strong>e for bears that<br />
habituate to roads and traffic.<br />
What follows is a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the threatened West Chilcotin grizzly situati<strong>on</strong> to a<br />
detailed c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> biology analysis <strong>of</strong> the endangered Granby-Gladst<strong>on</strong>e grizzly bear<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> by Dr. Brian Horejsi (1999). The Granby grizzly is also a dryland type grizzly bear<br />
and with an estimated 50 animals. The West Chilcotin is <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>sidered threatened and is<br />
estimated to comprise 104 animals. [For my finalized submissi<strong>on</strong> I will add further informati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>on</strong> mine road EIA informati<strong>on</strong> and grizzly bears in the U.S. provided by Dr. L. Craighead].<br />
a). Increased habitat displacement & fragmentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear home ranges<br />
A comparis<strong>on</strong> shows that the proposed Taseko/Whitewater industrial corridor will have up to<br />
three times the vpd that the M<strong>on</strong>ashee and southern transprovincial highways had back in 1989-<br />
1997 (89 – 97 vpd), traffic levels where Horejsi’s (1999) c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> analysis including GIS<br />
habitat and road density review c<strong>on</strong>cluded that these roads were already creating a barrier to<br />
grizzly bear movements between habitats fractured by the highways. In a M<strong>on</strong>tana ecosystem<br />
somewhat similar to the West Chilcotin, grizzly bears showed str<strong>on</strong>g avoidance <strong>of</strong> roads with 11-<br />
60 vpd (Mace et al. 1996). Roads can reduce the use <strong>of</strong> quality habitats within 1.6 km (Suring et<br />
al. 1998). Thus, although the existing Taseko/Whitewater road is likely experiencing some habitat<br />
avoidance by grizzly bears, a three-fold increase in traffic to industrial scale will have a much<br />
greater effect in my opini<strong>on</strong>.<br />
b). Grizzly bear road kills<br />
For this secti<strong>on</strong> I reviewed the maps in my possessi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> provincial reported “bear kills” from<br />
1990-1999 (BC Wildlife Branch-Research and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Secti<strong>on</strong>). Unfortunately, it does not<br />
separate black bear and grizzly bear kills. The data actually represents about 20% <strong>of</strong> the bears<br />
actually killed. Data is lost due to bear remains being removed by predators, covered by snow, ice<br />
or vegetative debris, and data collecti<strong>on</strong> errors and omissi<strong>on</strong>s. There is no informati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />
Taseko/Whitewater road and the road between Williams Lake and Hanceville shows 3 bear road<br />
kills. This would actually equate to 15 and all assumed to be black bears since it is in the grizzly<br />
bear z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> extirpati<strong>on</strong>. [April 16. We are attempting to get more informati<strong>on</strong> from the Wildlife<br />
Branch as to grizzly bear kills where highways cross through occupied grizzly habitat].<br />
High volume transportati<strong>on</strong> corridors in occupied grizzly habitat such as Banff Park can lead to<br />
high mortality rates for grizzly bears that jeopardize even populati<strong>on</strong>s in large protected areas (P.<br />
Paquet pers. comm.). Even with traffic volumes for two provincial highways crossing the<br />
Granby-Gladst<strong>on</strong>e grizzly ecosystem at vpd levels 1/3 lower than the proposed Taseko mine road,<br />
Horejsi (1999) c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <strong>on</strong>e traffic-related mortality <strong>of</strong> a female grizzly bear would<br />
jeopardize chances <strong>of</strong> recovery. According to Horejsi (1999): “understanding the impact <strong>of</strong> road<br />
access involves the recogniti<strong>on</strong> that the cumulative effects <strong>of</strong> incremental mortality and<br />
displacement events can quickly destabilize a bear populati<strong>on</strong>.”<br />
In my opini<strong>on</strong>, upgrading the Taseko-Whitewater “bush” road into an industrial corridor will<br />
cause serious road-related grizzly bear mortality and injuries for less warier bears over time that,
9<br />
with other direct and indirect mortalities caused by the mine, will push this threatened populati<strong>on</strong><br />
below the threshold required to sustain recovery <strong>of</strong> the populati<strong>on</strong>. By this point the sliding to<br />
extirpati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this threatened and rare dryland grizzly populati<strong>on</strong> will be irreversible. The mine<br />
road will become an ecological death trap.<br />
The case study evidence clearly does not support Taseko’s c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that its industrial road will<br />
not have a significant effect <strong>on</strong> the Chilcotin grizzly bear populati<strong>on</strong>. Given that for most <strong>of</strong> its<br />
length the Taseko/Whitewater Road passes not <strong>on</strong>ly through occupied grizzly habitat but also<br />
what is likely a major travel corridor between dryland areas <strong>on</strong> the east and the Taseko salm<strong>on</strong><br />
river and associated quality habitats <strong>on</strong> the west, the evidence from past studies is that<br />
fragmentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> habitat, blockage <strong>of</strong> movements <strong>of</strong> warier bears, and road kills will likely have<br />
very significant and quite possibly irreversible cumulative effects <strong>on</strong> this threatened grizzly<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
c. Other species road kills<br />
I predict that other species will also be subject to significantly increased road mortality. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
the more wide-ranging carnivores such as the blue-listed wolverine likely will not be able to<br />
sustain mortality levels threatened by this road. While some <strong>of</strong> the wild horse bands are<br />
somewhat habituated to the road, from what I have observed <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the wilder horse bands,<br />
they <strong>of</strong>ten take a run at the road as a herd, whether a vehicle is coming or not. I have had them<br />
dash out <strong>of</strong> the pine forest en mass and barely avoided a major collisi<strong>on</strong> myself. I expect the mine<br />
road will lead to some quite awful collisi<strong>on</strong>s between wild horses.<br />
d). Comments <strong>on</strong> Taseko’s proposed road kill mitigati<strong>on</strong> strategies<br />
Taseko commits to speed c<strong>on</strong>trols and a “Grizzly Bear Mortality Investigati<strong>on</strong> Program”<br />
implemented under MOE and so <strong>on</strong>. These are simplistic and will be ineffective at preventing the<br />
impacts identified above. According to Horejsi (1999) administrative road restricti<strong>on</strong>s such as<br />
signs, gates and regulati<strong>on</strong>s have little effect <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trolling bear mortality, nor do they reduce the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> habitat displacement (such as where sec<strong>on</strong>dary roads are gated to prevent motorized<br />
access). The fact that Taseko wants to have a grizzly bear mortality investigati<strong>on</strong> program is an<br />
acknowledgement that some grizzly bears will die from their activities. They fail to acknowledge<br />
that for every grizzly bear reported as a road kill; there will be 5 more dead that went undetected.<br />
Nor has Taseko made any attempt to link road mortalities to the threat they pose to the threatened<br />
Chilcotin grizzly bear populati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Taseko also relies for the mitigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> some wildlife impacts <strong>on</strong> government to implement<br />
certain programs or management activities. This is a huge mistake, for experience here shows all<br />
too clearly that provincial government commitments to wildlife management and protecti<strong>on</strong> are<br />
anything but reliable. Taseko has provided no data that support robust engagement <strong>of</strong> provincial<br />
(or federal) government agencies to effectively carry out wildlife mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures from<br />
industrial projects anywhere in BC. Budgetary cutbacks, and relaxed attenti<strong>on</strong> to envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
issues, are inarguably real trends in government, as they have been for some years now. The<br />
panel should not c<strong>on</strong>clude that reliance <strong>on</strong> provincial programs to implement impact mitigati<strong>on</strong><br />
measures are a real and viable soluti<strong>on</strong>, and if left to industry with no oversight, will likely not be<br />
effective in reducing wildlife impacts.<br />
As example in about 1975 I c<strong>on</strong>ducted an envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact assessment <strong>on</strong> waterfowl and<br />
furbearers for a c<strong>on</strong>sulting firm for the early stages <strong>of</strong> the Syncrude tarsands mine development.<br />
The property turned out to be <strong>on</strong> an important waterfowl migratory flyway, and had important
10<br />
wildlife values. The assessment identified important c<strong>on</strong>cerns and made recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring and mitigati<strong>on</strong>. The results, emerging decades later, have not been promising,<br />
including high mortality rates for black bears. The following is from (Greenpages Canada<br />
http://thegreenpages.ca). In eight years (2000-2008), three companies working in the oilsands in<br />
northern Alberta (Syncrude, Albian Sands, and Suncor) reported a total <strong>of</strong> 164 NON-AVIAN<br />
animals killed as a result <strong>of</strong> their operati<strong>on</strong>s. Am<strong>on</strong>g the animals listed as killed were black bears<br />
(27), red foxes (31), coyotes (21), white-tailed/mule deer (67), and slightly lesser numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
muskrat, beaver, red-backed vole, martens, weasels, moose, grey wolves, and little brown bats.<br />
All these are in additi<strong>on</strong> to the "infamous dead ducks" incident that made the nati<strong>on</strong>al news when<br />
over 1,600 migratory birds landed <strong>on</strong> a Syncrude oilsands tailings p<strong>on</strong>d in April 2008, and all but<br />
a few died. Of the three operati<strong>on</strong>s, Syncrude was resp<strong>on</strong>sible for the majority <strong>of</strong> mortalities,<br />
including 43 deer, 20 red fox and eight black bears. Possible causes <strong>of</strong> mortality include<br />
euthanasia <strong>of</strong> problem wildlife, drowning or oiling from tailings, animals hitting infrastructure<br />
(e.g., buildings), or vehicles and electrocuti<strong>on</strong>. According to independent scientist Kevin<br />
Tim<strong>on</strong>ey the numbers <strong>of</strong> dead animals reported to government underestimated true mortality<br />
because they were derived from ad hoc reporting by companies rather than from a scientifically<br />
valid and statistically robust sampling design.<br />
As in British Columbia, the Alberta government has made significant cuts to its m<strong>on</strong>itoring,<br />
enforcement, and reporting capacity<br />
B. REVIEW OF PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE-increased grizzly bear mortality<br />
The proposed transmissi<strong>on</strong> line corridor will also be a significant source <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear mortality<br />
and disturbance to habitat use. Although the route attempts to use existing roadways, it will<br />
establish an 80 km east-west linear corridor, having a near-c<strong>on</strong>tinuous access road all the way<br />
from near the Fraser River to the Prosperity Mine site. The Taseko EIS underplays the impacts<br />
this will have <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears.<br />
Despite promises by Taseko to gate and c<strong>on</strong>trol access, few prop<strong>on</strong>ents and no government<br />
agencies have ever d<strong>on</strong>e this effectively. There is no dem<strong>on</strong>strated correlati<strong>on</strong> between access<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol and wildlife impact mitigati<strong>on</strong> from industrial roads. Various studies and much local and<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al experience shows this is not a viable mitigati<strong>on</strong> approach, nor will it work to keep<br />
out unregulated motorized access by hunters and recreati<strong>on</strong>ists, using ATVs and snowmobiles.<br />
Again, as noted by Horejsi (1999) administrative road restricti<strong>on</strong>s such as signs, gates and<br />
regulati<strong>on</strong>s have little impact <strong>on</strong> preventing human access and the resulting bear mortality. Nor<br />
do such measures reduce the rate <strong>of</strong> habitat displacement.<br />
As noted in my report <strong>on</strong> deactivati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> fireguards from the Brittany 2003 fire, hunters and<br />
mushroom pickers built ATV access roads around all blockages (McCrory 2005). Illegal ATV<br />
access roads have also been built into Brittany Creek and porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the upper Taseko for hunter<br />
access (McCrory 2009). At the Chilcotin-Fraser Juncti<strong>on</strong> protected area, BC Parks attempted to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol access but both the gate and the fence were removed by unauthorized people in short<br />
order (Glen Davidsen pers. comm.). In a study I did for the Wildlife Branch <strong>of</strong> legally closed,<br />
signed and blocked/gated access roads in the B.. Pasayten and North Cascades, motorized hunting<br />
groups violated all access points.<br />
Thus, the c<strong>on</strong>sequences <strong>of</strong> improving access to build and maintain this lengthy linear corridor<br />
will be to lead to further displacement <strong>of</strong> grizzly bears and unreported mortality from<br />
unc<strong>on</strong>trolled motorized access. The will be additive to the both the reported and unreported
11<br />
grizzly bear mortality that I predict will be caused by the mine industrial access corridor and mine<br />
site itself.<br />
As an example <strong>of</strong> the danger <strong>of</strong> closed (gated) and open roads to threatened and endangered<br />
grizzly populati<strong>on</strong>s, a study in the endangered Selkirk grizzly ecosystem in Idaho showed this<br />
low populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> approximately 50 grizzly bears suffered 18 deaths between 1982 and 1996, 11<br />
associated with open roads and 4 <strong>on</strong> closed (gated) roads (Wakkinen 1993, Wakkinen and<br />
Johns<strong>on</strong> 1997).<br />
C. REVIEW OF PROPOSED MINE SITE DEVELOPMENT AREA<br />
My review was c<strong>on</strong>strained by what appeared to be a lack <strong>of</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> and map <strong>on</strong> Taseko’s<br />
mineral tenure area surrounding the proposed mine development area, as well as associated<br />
explorati<strong>on</strong> roads and other activities.<br />
i. Habitat losses<br />
Again Taseko has c<strong>on</strong>cluded that this 8,000 ha? mine development will cause no significant<br />
impact <strong>on</strong> wildlife species (and Xeni Gwet’in plant gathering areas). They arrived at this<br />
c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> partly through the utilizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> an ecologically misleading formula that determined<br />
the relative size <strong>of</strong> each habitat type to be eliminated by the mine and them compared the loss to<br />
much larger areas. This is highly misleading since it does not take into account the differences in<br />
how wildlife species disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately utilize different seas<strong>on</strong>al habitats to a much higher degree<br />
than other <strong>on</strong>es.<br />
A prime example is how Taseko discounts the loss <strong>of</strong> 400 ha or so <strong>of</strong> wetlands/riparian areas. In<br />
Taseko (2009) under: Alpine and Parkland, Wetlands and Grasslands they state:<br />
“The changes in area <strong>of</strong> alpine and parkland, wetland and grassland ecosystems<br />
from baseline to maximum disturbance are presented in Table 15. No alpine or<br />
parkland ecosystems are affected by the Project. The loss <strong>of</strong> grassland<br />
ecosystems is small in both the Regi<strong>on</strong>al and Eastern Trapline Study Areas (
12<br />
another important grizzly bear spring/summer food. Two grizzly bear mark trees were<br />
documented, a good index <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear movements and feeding through the Fish Lake area.<br />
Therefore the loss <strong>of</strong> 400 ha <strong>of</strong> wetland habitat is far more significant to grizzly bears than just<br />
losing a small percentage out <strong>of</strong> the landscape, particularly as noted in my secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> global<br />
warming, wetlands are expected to diminish significantly from droughts. The loss <strong>of</strong> wetland and<br />
other viable grizzly habitats, combined with loss <strong>of</strong> habitat use by warier bears within a 1-2 km<br />
z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> influence is additive to the cumulative habitat displacement losses and mortality I have<br />
identified from the other aspects <strong>of</strong> this mine development.<br />
This is not the <strong>on</strong>ly instance in which Taseko undervalued the actual habitat potential <strong>of</strong> the mine<br />
site area. One <strong>of</strong> the background reports (Madr<strong>on</strong>e 1999) used to determine seas<strong>on</strong>al habitat<br />
values is out-dated, not validated by any field testing and relies too much <strong>on</strong> grizzly bear food<br />
habitat data from the Rockies, including a previous study I was involved in (McCrory and<br />
Herrero 1983). For another example, two key food sources for grizzlies in the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
Aboriginal/Wild Horse Preserve that are not menti<strong>on</strong>ed in the Taseko grizzly report are whitebark<br />
pine nuts and salm<strong>on</strong> (Taseko River and some tributaries).<br />
We also suspect that grizzly bears may also feeding <strong>on</strong> spawning trout in the Tetzan Biny area,<br />
although this has not been studied. Feeding <strong>on</strong> spawning cutthroat trout is very important for<br />
grizzly bears in Yellowst<strong>on</strong>e (L. Craighead pers. comm.). Although the Madr<strong>on</strong>e report menti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
over-wintered bearberries as a potential spring food, again this was not examined in the field (it is<br />
also an important late fall berry food for bears in the Chilcotin). In my assessment <strong>of</strong> bear scats<br />
(black and grizzly) in the Brittany Triangle (McCrory 2002) I found that bear scats from the<br />
spring were comprised <strong>of</strong> about 50% over-wintered bearberries and 50% grasses/sedges. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
the discrepancies in the Madr<strong>on</strong>e report and lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient ground-truthed habitat-dietary<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> for the West Chilcotin has c<strong>on</strong>tributed to some <strong>of</strong> the habitat values <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />
mine site being under-valued in my opini<strong>on</strong>, including the proximity <strong>of</strong> the mine to the Taseko<br />
major grizzly bear salm<strong>on</strong> feeding areas.<br />
Regarding habitats in the mine development area, other specialized habitat besides wetlands,<br />
likely occur that represent critical food sources for grizzly bears. These include spring rainbow<br />
trout spawning areas and grasslands/wetlands with diggable soils for grizzlies to excavate root<br />
foods such wild potatoes, bear-claw and silverweed. The destructi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> these, al<strong>on</strong>g with critical<br />
wetlands lost, could have a serious impact <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears that rely <strong>on</strong> this area when combined<br />
with other losses already identified.<br />
ii. Ecological Fracture Z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
For warier bears, it is not just the loss <strong>of</strong> critical habitat from the mine site development, but<br />
displacement from the z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> influence that creates a further impairment to grizzly bear foraging<br />
strategies and movement, that when combined with the movement barrier created by the<br />
industrial road corridor, creates a significant fracture z<strong>on</strong>e in a vulnerable grizzly bear ecosystem.<br />
For warier bears, the 50 km road and mine site represents a significant barrier for grizzly bears<br />
attempting to access their food resources within large home ranges.<br />
iii. Limitati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Taseko’s grizzly bear-people c<strong>on</strong>flict management plan at the mine site<br />
While this has merit if implemented properly, given the scale <strong>of</strong> the development, because the site<br />
is in prime grizzly bear habitat and a broad movement corridor, some grizzly bears will habituate<br />
to people and the development. This will lead to bear-people c<strong>on</strong>flicts, such as access to careless<br />
garbage c<strong>on</strong>tainment or encounters with mine surveyors, with a high risk <strong>of</strong> problem bear
13<br />
mortality as a result. I predict that some grizzly bears will be killed during the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> phase<br />
and operati<strong>on</strong> phase as a result <strong>of</strong> such habituati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
D. CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF INCREASED MOTORIZED BACKCOUNTRY<br />
RECREATION IN GRIZZLY HABITAT RESULTING FROM IMPROVED PRIMARY<br />
ROAD IMPROVEMENT & LARGE INFLUX OF MINE WORKERS<br />
Another cumulative effect not identified by Taseko is the increase in backcountry motorized<br />
recreati<strong>on</strong> (ATV’s, snowmobiles) that will spin <strong>of</strong>f from improved primary road access and a<br />
large influx <strong>of</strong> mine workers and the effects this will have <strong>on</strong> grizzly bears and other wildlife.<br />
As identified in my Xeni Gwet’in Proposed Access Management Plan (McCrory 2005), prior to<br />
2003 mining and mining explorati<strong>on</strong> activities in the upper Taseko watershed increased the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> roads in the XGCA by 45% <strong>of</strong> all primitive roads and 24% <strong>of</strong> all roads, opening up a<br />
vast area <strong>of</strong> wilderness to motorized access. I also identified a significant increase in backcountry<br />
motorized recreati<strong>on</strong>al access in the XGCA from Fish Lake mine workers as a major c<strong>on</strong>cern.<br />
Backcountry use by ATVs and snowmobiles in the XGCA and surrounding areas is likely to<br />
increase dramatically, whether it is hunting or recreati<strong>on</strong>, is likely to increase dramatically,<br />
leading to further disturbances to grizzly bears and illegal kills. Certainly the number <strong>of</strong> illegal<br />
quad trails, already a growing problem, will also increase; particularly with recent cutbacks <strong>on</strong><br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests staff that m<strong>on</strong>itor and regulate such things.<br />
E. GLOBAL WARMING WILL CAUSE ECOSYSTEM STRESS, INCREASED<br />
WILDFIRES AND A NET DIMINISHMENT OF GRIZZLY BEAR HABITAT VALUES<br />
Another major shortcoming <strong>of</strong> Taseko’s EIS is it did not factor in climate changes that will result<br />
in significant alterati<strong>on</strong>s to wildlife habitat compositi<strong>on</strong> and abundance over the next 30-50 years<br />
and bey<strong>on</strong>d. Instead they assume a static habitat situati<strong>on</strong>, which w<strong>on</strong>’t be the case at al.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in recently completed a draft climate change adaptati<strong>on</strong> study (Lerner et al.<br />
2010). I c<strong>on</strong>tributed a review <strong>of</strong> effects <strong>on</strong> wildlife, including habitat changes, a previous draft <strong>of</strong><br />
which has been submitted to the <strong>Panel</strong>. As a result <strong>of</strong> further input to myself from another<br />
biologist, some changes have recently been made for my final text. For grizzly bears, it is<br />
expected that some important habitats and food sources will decrease in abundance and<br />
productivity including wild potatoes, whitebark pine, wetlands/riparian areas, and wild Pacific<br />
salm<strong>on</strong>. Increased berry producti<strong>on</strong> from wildfires will <strong>of</strong>fset some <strong>of</strong> the fall habitat and food<br />
source losses for grizzly bears such as whitebark pine and salm<strong>on</strong>. Losses <strong>of</strong> other seas<strong>on</strong>al food<br />
sources such as wild potato and green plants in wetlands are a major c<strong>on</strong>cern as these represent<br />
specialized habitats that grizzly bears would use disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately to their low occurrence in the<br />
ecosystem and represent a net loss <strong>of</strong> food resources, apart from the mine development. This is<br />
particularly true <strong>of</strong> wetlands/riparian areas as well wild potatoes and other root/corm foods are<br />
also <strong>on</strong>ly dug by grizzly bears where the soils are not compacted (McCrory and Herrero 1983).<br />
Direct habitat losses from the mine and losses from displacement from the mine, road and<br />
transmissi<strong>on</strong> line z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> influence will therefore be cumulative to habitat reducti<strong>on</strong>s caused by<br />
global warming.<br />
F. SUMMARY OF McCRORY WILDLIFE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS REVIEW ON<br />
CHILCOTIN GRIZZLY BEARS<br />
In the Journal <strong>of</strong> Animal Ecology, Bascompte and Sole (1996) refer to an “extincti<strong>on</strong> threshold”.
14<br />
Because grizzly bear populati<strong>on</strong>s are highly sensitive to human-caused mortality, habitat losses<br />
and displacement critical threshold are reached that should not be exceeded if the populati<strong>on</strong> it to<br />
be expected to survive or recover over the l<strong>on</strong>g term. As this has already happened in the<br />
provincial “extirpated” grizzly bear z<strong>on</strong>e over much <strong>of</strong> the Cariboo-Chilcotin plateau just 30 km<br />
to the north <strong>of</strong> the proposed mine is a good indicati<strong>on</strong> that the surviving 100 or so grizzlies are<br />
highly vulnerable to the same extincti<strong>on</strong> process that has been expanding in this dryland<br />
ecosystem for the past 40 or 50 years. The threatened status <strong>of</strong> the West Chilcotin grizzly<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>, meaning they are already down to half <strong>of</strong> their original estimated numbers combined<br />
with increasing encroachment <strong>of</strong> habitat fragmentati<strong>on</strong> from logging and now mining into their<br />
last wilderness enclaves suggests that these grizzly bears are already “<strong>on</strong> the edge” and at the<br />
“extincti<strong>on</strong> threshold” from which, if pressed further, they will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to decline and go extinct.<br />
Certainly the much lower numbers in similar habitats in the Lillooet area to the south <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Taseko supports this.<br />
It is my c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that the impacts <strong>of</strong> the proposed project, serious in their own right, will be<br />
additive to the already existing layer <strong>of</strong> cumulative adverse effects to grizzly populati<strong>on</strong> and its<br />
habitat and, because most <strong>of</strong> the negative effects cannot be mitigated, will push the grizzly<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> over the extincti<strong>on</strong> threshold. Once the mine is developed, impacts such as road<br />
mortalities will not be reversible or adequately mitigated.<br />
G. EFFECTS OF MINE DEVELOPMENT ON ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF<br />
ADJACENT PROTECTION AREAS AND CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS<br />
[To be d<strong>on</strong>e completed. April 16]
LITERATURE CITED:<br />
15<br />
Austin, M.A., D.C. Heard, and A.N. Hamilt<strong>on</strong>. 2004. Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) harvest<br />
management in British Columbia. B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Water, Land and Air Protecti<strong>on</strong>, Victoria, BC.<br />
9 pp. Can be found at http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/gb_harvest_mgmt.pdf . See<br />
Appendix 3<br />
Bascompte, J. and R.V. Sole. 1996. Habitat fragmentati<strong>on</strong> and extincti<strong>on</strong> thresholds in spatially<br />
explicit models. J. Animal Ecology 65: 45:473.<br />
B.C .2005. British Columbia’s Mountain Pine Beetle Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan 2006-2011. Unpublished<br />
report.<br />
BCMoFR. 2005. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests and Range Mountain Pine Beetle Stewardship Research<br />
Strategy. Unpublished report BC Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests and Range, Research Branch, Victoria, BC.<br />
B.C. Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Resources and Envir<strong>on</strong>ment. 1994. Cariboo-Chilcotin Land Use Plan. 237<br />
pp.<br />
B.C. Min. <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, Lands and Parks (MELP). 1995. C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Grizzly Bears in<br />
British Columbia. Background Report. 70 pp.<br />
B.C .Parks. 1996. Ts’il?os Provincial Park Master Plan (Draft). BC Parks, Cariboo District,<br />
Williams Lake, B.C.<br />
B. C. Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Resources and Envir<strong>on</strong>ment. 1994. Cariboo-Chilcotin Land Use Plan<br />
(CCLUP). 237 pp.<br />
Dau, C. 1989. Management and biology <strong>of</strong> brown bears at Cold Bay, Alaska. Pp. 19-26 In: Bear –<br />
people c<strong>on</strong>flicts: Proc. Symp. On Manage. Strategies, NWT Dept. Renewable Resources,<br />
Yellowknife, NWT.<br />
Dunleavey, M. 2009. Draft community wildfire protecti<strong>on</strong> plan for Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Fleishman, E., D.D. Murphy, and P.F. Brussard. 2000. A new method for selecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> umbrella<br />
species for c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> planning. Ecological Applicati<strong>on</strong>s 10:569-579.<br />
Hamilt<strong>on</strong>, A.N. 2008. 2008 grizzly bear populati<strong>on</strong> estimate for British Columbia.<br />
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/gbcs/2008_Grizzly_Populati<strong>on</strong>_Estimate_final.pdf<br />
Iachetti 2008. A Decisi<strong>on</strong>-Support Framework for C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Planning in the Central Interior<br />
Ecoregi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Canada. Nature C<strong>on</strong>servancy <strong>of</strong> Canada. Unpublished report for<br />
Alcoa Foundati<strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and Sustainability Fellowship and World C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Uni<strong>on</strong><br />
(IUCN). 113 pp.<br />
Lerner, J., T. Rossing, D. Del<strong>on</strong>g, W. McCrory, R. Holmes and T. Mylnowski. 2010. Xeni<br />
Gwet'in community-based climate change adaptati<strong>on</strong> plan. Report for Xeni Gwet'in First Nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
McCrory, W. 2002. Preliminary c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the rainshadow wild horse<br />
ecosystem, Brittany Triangle, Chilcotin, British Columbia, Canada. A review <strong>of</strong> grizzly and black
ears, other wildlife, feral horses and wild salm<strong>on</strong>. Unpublished report. Friends <strong>of</strong> the Nemiah<br />
Valley.<br />
McCrory, W. 2005. Roads to Nowhere. Technical review <strong>of</strong> ecological damage and proposed<br />
restorati<strong>on</strong> related to B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests c<strong>on</strong>trol acti<strong>on</strong>s – 2003 Chilko wildfire,<br />
Unpublished report. Friends <strong>of</strong> the Nemiah Valley.<br />
16<br />
McCrory, W. 2005. Proposed access management plan for Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s Caretaker<br />
Area, Chilcotin, B.C.<br />
McCrory, 2009. Assessment <strong>of</strong> trails for the Xeni Gwet’in tourism project. – wildlife and<br />
cultural/heritage values & wild horse tourism areas.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2010. Draft review <strong>of</strong> implicati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> climate change to habitats for some wildlife<br />
species and wild horses in the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area, Chilcotin, BC. C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to Xeni<br />
Gwet’in adaptati<strong>on</strong> to climate change review.<br />
McLellan, B.N. and F.W. Hovey. 1993. Development and preliminary results <strong>of</strong> partial-cut<br />
timber harvesting in a riparian area to maintain grizzly bear spring habitat values. Pp. 107-118<br />
IN: Morgan, K.H. and M.A. Lashmar (Eds). Riparian habitat management and research. Fraser<br />
River Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan Special Publicati<strong>on</strong>, Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta, B.C.<br />
McLellan, B.N., F.W. Hovey, R.D. Mace, J.G. Woods, D.W. Carney, M.L. Gibeau, W.L.<br />
Wakkinen and W.F. Kasworm. 1999. Rates and causes <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear mortality in the interior<br />
mountains <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Alberta, M<strong>on</strong>tana, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, and Idaho. J. Wildl.<br />
Manage.63:911-920.<br />
Sopuck, L., K. Ovaska, and R. Jakimchuk. 1997. Inventory <strong>of</strong> red- and blue-listed species, and<br />
identified wildlife in the Taseko Management Z<strong>on</strong>e, July – August, 1996 and February, 1997.<br />
Renewable Resources C<strong>on</strong>sulting Services Ltd. Report to B.C. Min. <strong>of</strong> Env. Lands and Parks,<br />
Williams Lake, B.C. 60 pp plus appendices.<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Resource Management (MSRM). 2004. Draft. Chilcotin Sustainable<br />
Resource Management Plan. 2004. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Resource Management, Cariboo<br />
Regi<strong>on</strong>, Williams Lake. B.C.<br />
Mueller, C. 2008. Grizzly bears in the Tatlayoko valley and al<strong>on</strong>g the upper Chilko River:<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> estimates and movements. Annual Progress and Data Summary Report: year 2 (2007).<br />
Unpublished report. Nature C<strong>on</strong>servancy Canada. 27 pp.<br />
Spalding, D.J. 2000. The early history <strong>of</strong> woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in British<br />
Columbia. B.C. Minist. Envir<strong>on</strong>., Lands and Parks, Wildl. Branch, Victoria, B.C. Wildl. Bull. No.<br />
100. 61 pp.<br />
Taseko Mines Limited. 2009. Prosperity Gold-Copper Project. Supplemental Report to Taseko<br />
Mines Ltd. Prosperity Gold-Copper Project Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement:Local and Regi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Effects <strong>on</strong> Wildlife and<br />
vegetati<strong>on</strong>)*eso,rces)<strong>of</strong>)01portance)to)the)4silh6ot7in)Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Wakkinen, W.L. 1993. Selkirk mountains grizzly bear ecology report. Threatened and<br />
endangered species project E-3-8. Idaho Dept. Fish and Game, Boise, ID. 19 pp.
17<br />
Wakkinen, W.L. and B. Allen-Johns<strong>on</strong>. 1996. Grizzly bear enforcement and educati<strong>on</strong> project.<br />
Selkirk Ecosystem project, Threatened and Endangered Species Project E-142, Idaho Dept. Fish<br />
and Game, Boise ID. 72 pp.<br />
Wakkinen, W.L. and W.F. Kasworm. 1999. Rates and causes <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear mortality in the<br />
interior mountains <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Alberta, M<strong>on</strong>tana, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, and Idaho. J. Wildl.<br />
Manage.63:911-920.<br />
Wils<strong>on</strong>, S.J. and R.J. Hebda. 2008. Mitigating and adapting to climate change through the<br />
C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Nature. Report to Land Trust Alliance <strong>of</strong> BC. 58 pp.
1<br />
CURRICULUM VITAE<br />
Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist (R.P.Bio.)<br />
President, McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd.<br />
Box 479, New Denver, British Columbia, Canada V0G 1S0<br />
Ph<strong>on</strong>e (250) 358-7796 / Fax: (250) 358-7950 / E-mail: mccrorywildlife@xplornet.com<br />
_____________________________<br />
EDUCATION<br />
April 2010 (Last up-date)<br />
B.Sc. H<strong>on</strong>ours Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, 1966. Course emphasis:<br />
Wildlife management. H<strong>on</strong>ors thesis <strong>on</strong> sub-speciati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> mountain goats<br />
(published), thesis advisor was Dr. Ian McTaggart-Cowan.<br />
PROFESSIONAL LICENCE<br />
Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist (R.P.Bio.), British Columbia. Member #168<br />
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES<br />
� Member, College <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology (Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist (R.P.Bio.)<br />
� Member <strong>of</strong>, and c<strong>on</strong>tributor to, the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> for Bear Research<br />
and Management, also known as the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Bear Associati<strong>on</strong> (IBA). With<br />
members from some 50 countries, the organizati<strong>on</strong> supports the scientific<br />
management <strong>of</strong> bears through research and distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> informati<strong>on</strong>, and<br />
sp<strong>on</strong>sors internati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>ferences <strong>on</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> bear biology, ecology and<br />
management. Have presented at numerous internati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>ferences and have<br />
had peer-reviewed scientific papers published in the journal Ursus, the IBA's<br />
annual journal.<br />
EXPERTISE SUMMARY<br />
A broad ecological background including extensive experience in:<br />
� Bear hazard assessments<br />
� Management guidelines for parks and c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> areas<br />
� Mammal habitat inventories<br />
� Waterfowl/bird surveys<br />
� Caribou inventories<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
� Forestry-wildlife research<br />
� Envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact assessments<br />
� C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> biology assessments<br />
� Populati<strong>on</strong> inventory and assessments, populati<strong>on</strong> management<br />
� Species at risk assessments<br />
� Wildlife viewing programs<br />
� Trail routing and tourism studies<br />
Highlights:<br />
2<br />
� 30 years experience in bear ecology, habitat mapping and bear safety and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> issues, specifically bear hazard assessments and management<br />
guidelines for government agencies such as BC Parks, Parks Canada, and<br />
municipalities. Have worked for parks agencies across western Canada and the<br />
Yuk<strong>on</strong>/NWT. (Publicati<strong>on</strong>s list which follows dem<strong>on</strong>strates the range <strong>of</strong> locati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
and studies completed.)<br />
� Served 3 years <strong>on</strong> the B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment’s grizzly bear scientific<br />
advisory committee.<br />
� More recently, carried out 6 bear hazard assessments for municipal governments<br />
and park agencies in southwestern B.C.<br />
� Helped to establish, and have worked with, the Valhalla Wilderness Society for<br />
the past 30 years. We have protected <strong>of</strong> 1.25 milli<strong>on</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> public lands for<br />
bears. President <strong>of</strong> the Valhalla Foundati<strong>on</strong>, which has protected private lands<br />
with high ecological values. Have been instrumental in the protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
numerous c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> areas and parks, including Valhalla Provincial Park, the<br />
Khutzemateen Grizzly Sanctuary, the Goat Range Provincial Park and the Spirit<br />
Bear C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Area.<br />
� Hired as advisor and guide to bear films and documentaries (list below).<br />
� Developed and led guided group outings as part <strong>of</strong> my “Safer Travel in Bear<br />
Country” program (approx. 1,000 people taken through this training program).<br />
� Produced, or c<strong>on</strong>tributed significantly to, over 80 pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
research/management reports as well as 7 published research papers (list<br />
follows).<br />
VOLUNTARY WORK<br />
� Director, Valhalla Wilderness Society<br />
� President, Valhalla Foundati<strong>on</strong> for Ecology and Social Justice<br />
� Board Member, Get Bear Smart Society<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong>, provide scientific expertise <strong>on</strong> bear management issues for a broad<br />
range <strong>of</strong> n<strong>on</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>it groups, and act as a peer reviewer for c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> organizati<strong>on</strong>s’<br />
scientific reports. I have recently provided support for: the David Suzuki<br />
Foundati<strong>on</strong>, the Western Canada Wilderness Committee, West Coast Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
Law, Ecojustice, the Sierra Club, Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Investigati<strong>on</strong> Agency (L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>,<br />
England), Friends <strong>of</strong> Nemaiah Valley, Friends <strong>of</strong> Ecological Reserves, Rainforest<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
Acti<strong>on</strong> Network, Defenders <strong>of</strong> Wildlife, Jumbo Wild, West Kootenay EcoCentre,<br />
Great Bear Foundati<strong>on</strong>, Raincoast C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Society, Bear Watch, North Shore<br />
Black Bear Network, Northern Lights Wildlife Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong> Centre, the Xeni-<br />
Gwetin First Nati<strong>on</strong>, Williams Lake Indian Band, Federati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mountain Clubs <strong>of</strong><br />
BC, and The Land C<strong>on</strong>servancy <strong>of</strong> BC.<br />
FILM PROJECTS AND DOCUMENTARIES<br />
3<br />
Frequently work as a scientific advisor, bear guide, and/or <strong>on</strong>-camera pers<strong>on</strong>ality for<br />
nature documentaries <strong>on</strong> bears, parks and c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> issues. A partial list <strong>of</strong><br />
producti<strong>on</strong>s I have been involved with:<br />
Producti<strong>on</strong>s featuring Wayne McCrory and his c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> work:<br />
� Champi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Wild (Wayne McCrory: Spirit Bears and Grizzlies)<br />
(Omni Film Producti<strong>on</strong>s for Knowledge Network)<br />
� The Grizzly Man <str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> New Denver: Wayne McCrory<br />
(The Leading Edge: Innovati<strong>on</strong> in BC. Knowledge Network)<br />
� Lucy, The Bear Detective (Dogs With Jobs. Featuring Wayne McCrory<br />
and Lucy, his bear research dog. Knowledge Network)<br />
� Goat Range Provincial Park – Great Canadian Parks (Good Earth<br />
Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
� Island <strong>of</strong> the Ghost Bear (Nature: BBC TV)<br />
� The Garden <strong>of</strong> the Grizzlies (Global Family: TVO--TV Ontario)<br />
� Great Canadian Parks: Khutzeymateen (Good Earth Producti<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
Knowledge Network)<br />
� Land <strong>of</strong> the Spirit Bear (Spirit Bear Youth Coaliti<strong>on</strong>)<br />
� Great Canadian Parks: Spirit Bear (Good Earth Producti<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
Knowledge Network)<br />
� Great Canadian Parks: Kitlope (Good Earth Producti<strong>on</strong>s for Knowledge<br />
Network)<br />
� Ushuaia Nature: Des origines aux m<strong>on</strong>des perdus (in French. Producti<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>on</strong> rare animals featuring Wayne McCrory’s work <strong>on</strong> Spirit Bears. TFI –<br />
France Televisi<strong>on</strong> Network)<br />
� The Green Inlet – Spirit Bear (Good Earth Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
� L’ours Kermode: La Semaine Verte (in French. French CBC)<br />
� Wild Horses, Unc<strong>on</strong>quered People (Omni Film Producti<strong>on</strong>s Ltd.)<br />
� Tiere die Geschichte schrieben: Das Pferd (in German. Includes Wayne<br />
McCrory’s work protecting Wild Horses. Matthey Film Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
� The Nature <strong>of</strong> Things: Khutzemateen (CBC)<br />
� The Nature <strong>of</strong> Things: The Salm<strong>on</strong> Forest (CBC)<br />
� The Nature <strong>of</strong> Things: Grizzly Bears: Losing Ground (CBC)<br />
� The Fifth Estate: Khutzeymateen (CBC)<br />
� Wild Things: British Columbia’s Wild West Coast (Wild Exposure<br />
Preservati<strong>on</strong> Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
� Spirit Bear (Cross-Country Canada. CBC)<br />
� Numerous televisi<strong>on</strong> news reports and talk shows<br />
Provided scientific informati<strong>on</strong> and/or acted as bear safety guide:<br />
4<br />
� Caught in the Moment: Grizzlies (Tigress Producti<strong>on</strong>s, UK)<br />
� Princess Royal Island (Great Bear Foundati<strong>on</strong>)<br />
� Spirit Bears (NHK: Japan Broadcasting Corp.)<br />
� A Future for the Grizzly? (The Grizzly Project)<br />
� Island <strong>of</strong> the Spirit Bear (Raincoast C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Society)<br />
� The Science <strong>of</strong> Survival: Grizzly Bear Management in British Columbia<br />
(Electric Bamboo Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
� The Last Mustangs (Patrice Halley)<br />
� Big Bear Week (BBC)<br />
� Skeena Journal: Khutzemateen (CBC)<br />
� NRDC Spirit Bear Campaign (Natural Resources Defence Council, USA)<br />
� Save the Great Spirit Bear Rainforest (Corky Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
� Canadian Coastal Rainforest – the Spirit Bear (in Japanese. Ikim<strong>on</strong>o<br />
Chikyu Kiko Producti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
� Cap sur les terres vierges du grizzli (In French. Les Producti<strong>on</strong>s Espace<br />
Vert XII inc.)<br />
� Canada’s Vanishing Grizzly (Friends <strong>of</strong> Ecological Reserves)<br />
� Trigger Happy (Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Investigati<strong>on</strong> Agency, UK)<br />
� White Grizzly (Discovery Channel)<br />
PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND PUBLICATIONS:<br />
Scientific publicati<strong>on</strong>s in proceedings or refereed journals<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1991. An update <strong>on</strong> using bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong> as a means<br />
to minimize c<strong>on</strong>flicts between people and bears in recreati<strong>on</strong> situati<strong>on</strong>s. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Grizzly Management Workshop, Revelstoke, B.C. pp: 57-62<br />
McCrory, W., S. Herrero, G. J<strong>on</strong>es, and E. Mallam. 1990. The role <strong>of</strong> the B.C. provincial<br />
park system in grizzly bear preservati<strong>on</strong>. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 8th Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong><br />
Bear Research & Management, Victoria, B.C. 6 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P., S. Herrero and G. J<strong>on</strong>es. 1987. Program to minimize c<strong>on</strong>flicts between<br />
grizzly bears and people in British Columbia provincial parks. Paper presented at Bear -<br />
People C<strong>on</strong>flicts Symposium, Yellowknife, N.W. T. April 1987.<br />
McCrory, W., S. Herrero. and P. Whitfield. 1986. Using grizzly habitat informati<strong>on</strong> to reduce<br />
human-grizzly bear c<strong>on</strong>flicts in Kokanee Glacier and Valhalla Provincial Parks, BC.<br />
In Proc. - Grizzly Bear Habitat Symposium: 24-30. C<strong>on</strong>treras, G.P. and K.E. Evans<br />
(compilers). U.S.D.A. Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-207.<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
5<br />
Herrero, S., W. McCrory and B. Pelchat. 1983. The applicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear habitat<br />
evaluati<strong>on</strong> to trail and campsite locati<strong>on</strong>s in Kananaskis Provincial Park, Alberta.<br />
Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Bear Research and Management gt 6:187-193<br />
McCrory, W., D. A. Blood, D. Portman and D. Harwood. 1977. Mountain goat surveys in Yoho<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park, British Columbia. Proc. First Int. Mountain Goat Symp.:69-73.<br />
Cowan, Ian McT. and Wayne McCrory. 1970. Variati<strong>on</strong> in the mountain goat Oreamnos<br />
americanus (Blainville). Journ. <strong>of</strong> Mammalogy 51, No. 1: 60-73.<br />
Research/Management Reports (some peer reviewed)<br />
Craighead, L. and W. P. McCrory. 2010. A preliminary core c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> review <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dryland grizzly bear <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin Ranges in British Columbia. Report to Friends <strong>of</strong><br />
Nemaiah Valley, Valhalla Wilderness Society and Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> Government.<br />
McCrory, W.P. and P. Paquet. 2009. Proposed bear viewing strategy for the K’ztim-a-deen<br />
(Khutzeymateen) Grizzly Bear Sanctuary & K’tzim-a-deen Inlet C<strong>on</strong>servancies, British<br />
Columbia. Report for the K’tzim-a-deen Management Committee & Planning Process, Prince<br />
Rupert, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W. 2009a. Assessment <strong>of</strong> trails for the Xeni Gwet’in tourism project -wildlife and<br />
cultural/heritage values & wild horse tourism areas.<br />
McCrory, W. 2009b. Notes & outline & ideas for background review <strong>of</strong> bear viewing<br />
plan/strategy for the Mussel River and Pois<strong>on</strong> Cove area, Fiordlands C<strong>on</strong>servancy. Report for<br />
BC Parks and Kitasoo First Nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
McCrory, W. 2009c. 2008 black bear risk assessment & management recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for public<br />
recreati<strong>on</strong> trails – The Lower Seymour C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Reserve (LSCR). Report to Metro<br />
Vancouver Watershed Divisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
McCrory, W. 2009d. 2008 black bear risk assessment & management recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
Lynn Headwaters Regi<strong>on</strong>al Park - hiking network between Grouse Mountain Resort and<br />
Goat Mountain/Ridge. Report to Metro Vancouver Parks Department.<br />
McCrory, W. 2009e. 2008 notes <strong>on</strong> preliminary black bear risk assessment & management<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for restricted access areas – Metro Vancouver Watershed Divisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
McCrory, W. 2008a. 2007- 2008 black bear risk assessment - Minnekhada Regi<strong>on</strong>al Park.<br />
Report for Metro Vancouver Parks.<br />
McCrory, W. 2008b. 2007- 2008 black bear risk assessment – Kanaka Creek Regi<strong>on</strong>al Park.<br />
Report for Metro Vancouver Parks.<br />
McCrory, W. 2008c. Black bear risk assessment and management recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
Metro Vancouver Regi<strong>on</strong>al Parks.<br />
Paquet, M.M. and W.P. McCrory. 2007. Bear hazard assessment – City <strong>of</strong> Coquitlam.<br />
McCrory, W. 2007. Black bear habitat and corridor map project, Resort Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />
Whistler (RMOW). Draft.<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
McCrory, W. 2006. Bear hazard assessment and problem analysis. Phase I applicati<strong>on</strong> for<br />
Bear Smart Community Status. District Municipalities <strong>of</strong> North & West Vancouver, City <strong>of</strong><br />
North Vancouver, B.C.<br />
6<br />
McCrory, W. 2005. Bear hazard assessment - problem analysis report & proposed bear-people<br />
c<strong>on</strong>flict preventi<strong>on</strong> plan, Britannia Bay Properties Ltd., British Columbia.<br />
McCrory, W. and B. Cross. 2005. A preliminary review <strong>of</strong> potential impacts <strong>of</strong> snowmobile<br />
recreati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> grizzly bear winter denning habitats and wolverine winter natal/maternal<br />
denning habitats in S.E. Kakwa Provincial Park, B.C. with GIS grizzly bear and wolverine<br />
den habitat models. Report to B.C. Parks. 31 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2005. Proposed bear-people c<strong>on</strong>flict preventi<strong>on</strong> plan for Resort Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />
Whistler.<br />
McCrory, W.P., and Paquet, M.M. 2005. Bear hazard & problem analysis report & proposed<br />
bear-people c<strong>on</strong>flict preventi<strong>on</strong> plan, District <strong>of</strong> Squamish, British Columbia.<br />
McCrory, W. 2005. Background tourism feasibility study – wild species viewing & guidelines.<br />
Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>, Chilcotin, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W. 2005. Proposed access management plan for Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong><br />
Caretaker Area, Chilcotin, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W. 2005. Roads to Nowhere. Technical review <strong>of</strong> ecological damage & proposed<br />
restorati<strong>on</strong> related to B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests c<strong>on</strong>trol acti<strong>on</strong>s – 2003 Chilko Wildfire, B.C.<br />
Re: bulldozed fireguards & access roads & peat meadow damage. Report to Friends <strong>of</strong><br />
Nemaiah Valley, Victoria, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2004. Preliminary bear hazard assessment <strong>of</strong> Resort Municipality <strong>of</strong> Whistler<br />
(RMOW). Submitted to RMOW. 107 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2004. Bear habitat ground-truthing surveys <strong>of</strong> Resort Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />
Whistler, August 14 – 23/04 by McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. for Terrestrial Ecosystem<br />
Mapping classificati<strong>on</strong> and seas<strong>on</strong>al bear habitat rankings. Draft to Whistler Community<br />
Habitat Resources Project (CHRP).<br />
McCrory, W.P., M. Williams, B. Cross, L. Craighead, P. Paquet, A. Craighead and T. Merrill.<br />
2004. Grizzly bear, wildlife and human use <strong>of</strong> a major protected wildlife corridor in the<br />
Canadian Rockies, Kakwa Provincial Park, B.C. Draft progress report to Valhalla Wilderness<br />
Society and Y2Y Wilburforce Science Symposium. Draft & In Press.<br />
McCrory, W.P., P. Paquet, and B. Cross. 2003. Assessing c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> values for gray wolf<br />
and Sitka deer - BC central coast rainforest. Report to the Valhalla Wilderness Society, New<br />
Denver, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2003. A bear hazard study <strong>of</strong> recreati<strong>on</strong>al facilities in a major grizzly bear<br />
travel corridor with management recommendati<strong>on</strong>s to minimize c<strong>on</strong>flicts – A GIS Grizzly<br />
Bear Encounter Risk Model. Kakwa Provincial Park, B.C. Report to B.C. Parks. 174 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2003. Ecological c<strong>on</strong>nectivity – 2003. Multi-year study <strong>of</strong> grizzly/wildlife<br />
movements & applicati<strong>on</strong> to GIS corridor model design – Kakwa grizzly bear – wildlife<br />
corridor pilot study. Research proposal submitted to Wilburforce Foundati<strong>on</strong>, Y2Y<br />
C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Initiative.<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
McCrory, W. 2003. Preliminary bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong>. E.C. Manning and Skagit Valley<br />
Provincial Parks & Cascade Recreati<strong>on</strong> Area. Report to B.C. Parks, Okanagan District,<br />
Pentict<strong>on</strong>, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2002. Black bear hazard & habitat assessment, Diam<strong>on</strong>d Head Area –<br />
Garibaldi Provincial Park, B.C. Incorporating a Geographic Informati<strong>on</strong> System (GIS)<br />
Decisi<strong>on</strong>-Support Model. Report to B.C. Parks, Brackendale, B.C. 117 pp.<br />
7<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2002. Preliminary c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the Rainshadow Wild Horse<br />
Ecosystem, Brittany Triangle, British Columbia, Canada. A review <strong>of</strong> grizzly and black bears,<br />
other wildlife, feral horses and wild salm<strong>on</strong>. Report to Friends <strong>of</strong> Nemaiah Valley (FONV),<br />
Victoria, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W.P. and B. Cross. 2001. Trails, Hiking Routes, Roads, Campsites and Other Facilities in<br />
Southeast Kakwa Provincial Park, B.C. Composite map to B.C. Parks. Colour DEM, 1:37,600<br />
scale, plus tables with trail descriptors. Updated in 2004.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2001. Background review for a bear hazard study and bear-people c<strong>on</strong>flict<br />
preventi<strong>on</strong> plan for E.C. Manning and Skagit Valley Provincial Parks and Cascade<br />
Recreati<strong>on</strong> Area. Report to BC Parks, Summerland, B.C. 55 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P., J. Bergdahl, P. Paquet and B. Cross. 2001. A c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> area design for<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the white black bear (Ursus americanus kermodei) <strong>on</strong> the central coast <strong>of</strong><br />
British Columbia. Report to Valhalla Wilderness Society, New Denver, B.C. In Press.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 2000. A review <strong>of</strong> the bear-people management program for Kokanee Glacier<br />
Provincial Park, BC. Report to BC Parks, Nels<strong>on</strong>, BC. 88 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P., C. McTavish and P. Paquet. 1999. Grizzly bear background research<br />
document. 1993-1996 for GIS bear encounter risk model, Yoho Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park, British<br />
Columbia. A background report for the GIS Decisi<strong>on</strong>-Support Model for the Lake<br />
0’Hara/McArthur Valley Socio-ecological study. Parks Canada. 96 pp. plus appendices.<br />
McTavish, C. and W. McCrory, 1998. Grizzly/black bear habitat assessment. Stoltmann<br />
Wilderness. Elaho River Drainage, British Columbia, Canada. Report to Western Canada<br />
Wilderness Committee, Vancouver, B.C.<br />
McCrory. W.P. 1998. Bear habitat and hazard assessment. Duffey Lake Provincial Park, British<br />
Columbia. Report to BC Parks, Brackendale, BC. 29 pp plus appendices.<br />
McCrory, W. 1998. A preliminary bear habitat and hazard assessment, Kakwa Lake area.<br />
Kakwa Recreati<strong>on</strong> and Protected Area, British Columbia. Report to B.C. Parks, include. GIS<br />
bear habitat map. 35 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. 1998b. Progress notes - Bear habitat assessments (Aug. 16-25/98) re- study<br />
design for a GIS bear encounter risk model for Kakwa Recreati<strong>on</strong> and Protected Area,<br />
British Columbia. Report to B.C. Parks and Habitat C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Trust Fund. 12 pp. plus<br />
tables.<br />
McCrory, W. and T. Leja. 1998. Preliminary bear hazard assessment, proposed Summit Meadow<br />
Ridge Trail, Mt. Revelstoke Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park, B.C. Report to Parks Canada Warden Service,<br />
Revelstoke, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W. 1997. Bear c<strong>on</strong>flict preventi<strong>on</strong> plan for Akamina Kishinena Provincial Park,<br />
B.C. (1997-2001). Report to B.C. Parks, Wasa, B.C.<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
McCrory, W. 1997a. Preliminary evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> bear habitats in Moose Creek and comments<br />
<strong>on</strong> the potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the proposed magnetite mine development. Progress report to<br />
Parks Canada - Yoho/Lake Louise/Kootenay.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1997b. Grizzly bear habitats and trail hazard assessment for<br />
Ottertail fire road and Goodsir Pass Trail-Goodsir Flats. Progress report to Parks Canada -<br />
Yoho/Lake Louise/Kootenay.<br />
8<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1995a. Revised grizzly bear capability for Wells Gray Provincial<br />
Park, biophysical map. Report to BC Parks, Kamloops, B.C. 40 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1995b. Preliminary bear hazard assessment <strong>of</strong> Wells Gray<br />
Provincial Park. Report to BC Parks, Kamloops, B.C. 20 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1995. Year two progress report. Grizzly bear habitats and trail<br />
hazard assessment - for Lake O'Hara/McArthur Valley socio-ecological study. 32 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1994. Assessment <strong>of</strong> bear habitats and hazards. Liard River<br />
Hot Springs Provincial Park, British Columbia. Report to BC Parks, Fort St. John, BC.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1994. Bear hazard assessment and recommendati<strong>on</strong>s. Cougar Valley<br />
and Balu Pass Trails, Glacier Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park, B.C. Report for Parks Canada Warden Service,<br />
Revelstoke, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1994. Bear hazard assessment and management recommendati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
The Odaray Prospect-McArthur Pass area (Lake O'Hara) and the McArthur Creek Valley. Report<br />
to Yoho Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park, Heritage Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Service. 102 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. 1994. Values <strong>of</strong> a fully protected Kitlope Ecosystem for bears. Report to<br />
Nanakila Institute, Kitimaat Village, B.C. Draft.<br />
McCrory, W., G. Copeland and E. Mallam. 1993. A proposed management framework for the<br />
Khutzeymateen grizzly sanctuary, B.C. Report to Valhalla Wilderness Society, Friends <strong>of</strong><br />
Ecological Reserves and World Wildlife Fund. Draft. 32 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1992. Grizzly bear resource management report, Kokanee<br />
Glacier Park and Recreati<strong>on</strong> Area. Report to B.C. Parks. 32 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1992. Grizzly bear habitat/hazard assessment <strong>of</strong> recreati<strong>on</strong><br />
trails in Marten Creek and Idaho Lookout area. Report to Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests, Castlegar,<br />
B.C.<br />
McCrory, W., E. Mallam and G. Copeland. 1991. A proposal for a white grizzly wilderness<br />
park in the Goat Range <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. Report to Valhalla Wilderness Society.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1990. Preliminary bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong> for Bowr<strong>on</strong> Lake<br />
Provincial Park, B.C. Report to BC Parks, Prince George, B.C. 73 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1990 Bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong> in M<strong>on</strong>ashee Provincial Park,<br />
B.C. Report to B.C. Parks, Kamloops, B.C. 22pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1990. Bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong> in areas <strong>of</strong> Mt. Robs<strong>on</strong><br />
Provincial Park, B.C. Report to B.C. Parks, Prince George, B.C. 20 pp.<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
9<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1990. Bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong> in M<strong>on</strong>kman Provincial Park,<br />
B.C. Report to B.C. Parks, Prince George B.C. 19 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P., and E. Mallam. 1989. Bear-people management plan for the Atnarko River,<br />
Tweedsmuir Provincial Park, B.C. Report to B.C. Parks, Prince George, B.C. Parts I & II.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1989. Bear Management Plan, West Kootenay District, BC<br />
Parks (1989-1994). Part 1 and Part 11 (Background document).<br />
McCrory, W.P. and E. Mallam. 1988. Grizzly bear viewing and bear-salm<strong>on</strong> interpretive<br />
potential al<strong>on</strong>g the Atnarko River, Tweedsmuir Provincial Park. Report to B.C. Parks,<br />
Victoria, B.C. December 1988.<br />
McCrory, W.P. and E. Mallam. 1988 Ecological, preservati<strong>on</strong> and public appreciati<strong>on</strong> values<br />
and potential logging impacts in the proposed Khutzeymateen grizzly sanctuary, B.C. Final<br />
report to Friends <strong>of</strong> Ecological Reserves, World Wildlife Fund and other sp<strong>on</strong>sors. 93 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P. and E. Mallam. 1987. Grizzly bear hazard evaluati<strong>on</strong> - Elk Lakes Park and<br />
Recreati<strong>on</strong> Area, Mt. Assiniboine Park and Purcell Wilderness C<strong>on</strong>servancy, B.C. B.C. Parks<br />
Divisi<strong>on</strong>, Kamloops, B.C.<br />
McCrory, W., S. Herrero and E. Mallam. 1987. Preservati<strong>on</strong> and management <strong>of</strong> the grizzly<br />
bear in BC Provincial Parks - The Urgent Challenge. Report to BC Parks Divisi<strong>on</strong>, Victoria,<br />
BC. 187 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. and E. Mallam. 1985. An assessment <strong>of</strong> grizzly and black bear habitat in<br />
Hamber Provincial Park, B.C. with recommendati<strong>on</strong>s to reduce human-bear c<strong>on</strong>flicts. Report<br />
to B.C. Parks. 57 pp.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 1985 Grizzly bear habitat and out door recreati<strong>on</strong> in Kokanee Glacier<br />
Provincial Park, B.C. C<strong>on</strong>flicts and recommendati<strong>on</strong>s. Volume 1. B.C. Parks Divisi<strong>on</strong>. 118<br />
p.<br />
McCrory, W.P. 1984. An evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> grizzly bear habitat capability and use and recreati<strong>on</strong><br />
developments in Valhalla Provincial Park, B.C. Parks Divisi<strong>on</strong>. 153 pp.<br />
McCrory, W. 1979. An inventory <strong>of</strong> the mountain goats <strong>of</strong> Glacier and Mount Revelstoke<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Parks, British Columbia. Parks Canada Rep., Western Regi<strong>on</strong>. Glacier Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Park, Revelstoke, BC. 200 pp. typescript.<br />
McCrory, W.P. and D.A. Blood. 1978. An inventory <strong>of</strong> the mammals <strong>of</strong> Yoho Nati<strong>on</strong>al Park, British<br />
Columbia. Parks Canada, W.R.O., Calgary, Alta. Assisted by Park Wardens and Naturalists. 269<br />
pp.<br />
McCrory, W. 1965. Variati<strong>on</strong> in the mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus). B.Sc H<strong>on</strong>ors Zoology<br />
Thesis. University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. 44 pp.<br />
Curriculum Vitae: Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Biologist
2010<br />
Xeni Gwet’in Community‐based<br />
Climate Change Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Plan<br />
Prepared for:<br />
The XENI GWET’IN FIRST NATION<br />
by ECOLIBRIO<br />
in collaborati<strong>on</strong> with Cariboo<br />
Envirotech, McCrory Wildlife Services,<br />
Orman C<strong>on</strong>sulting, Theo Mylnowski and<br />
Project Management<br />
Services<br />
3/31/2010<br />
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
This report would not have been possible without the expertise and assistance <strong>of</strong> many people. We<br />
would like to acknowledge the project steering committee (Catherine Haller, B<strong>on</strong>nie Myers,<br />
Charlene Lulua, C<strong>on</strong>way Lulua, Elsie Quilt, Vera Quilt, Maryann Solom<strong>on</strong>, Annie C. Williams, and<br />
Wilfred William) for their advice and input throughout the study. We would also like to sincerely<br />
thank the elders <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> for their recollecti<strong>on</strong>s, resp<strong>on</strong>ding to the project<br />
survey<br />
and project presentati<strong>on</strong>s with patience and wisdom and Rita Coombs and Sylvie Quilt for<br />
cooking for us during our community meetings.<br />
Special thanks to Chief Marilyn Baptiste, Councilor Lois Williams and Councilor Benny William for<br />
their support <strong>of</strong> the project. The project team also acknowledges the indispensable support from<br />
Nancy Oppermann and Pam Quilt regarding project management and coordinati<strong>on</strong> expertise and<br />
from David Setah for superb translati<strong>on</strong> during key meetings. You all helped make sure the project<br />
ran smoothly. Another special thanks to Tracy Tanis for her amazing communicati<strong>on</strong> skills and her<br />
ability to make science fun for kids. We also gratefully acknowledge the Xeni Gwet’in school kids<br />
for assisting in presenting adaptati<strong>on</strong> strategies to the community. And last but not least we would<br />
like to thank our team colleagues Deb Del<strong>on</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Orman C<strong>on</strong>sulting, Rick Holmes <strong>of</strong> Cariboo<br />
Envirotech<br />
and Wayne McCrory <strong>of</strong> McCrory Wildlife Serves and Theo Mylnowski for their scientific<br />
expertise<br />
and their willingness to think outside the box.<br />
John Lerner and Tine Rossing<br />
Ecolibrio<br />
Please Note: The Tsilhqot’in have met the test for aboriginal title in the lands described in<br />
Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong> v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700 (“Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>”). These lands are<br />
within the Tsilhqot’in traditi<strong>on</strong>al territory and the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>’s caretaking area.<br />
Nothing in this document shall abrogate or derogate from any aboriginal title or aboriginal<br />
rights <strong>of</strong> the Tsilhqot’in, the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> or any Tsilhqot’in or Xeni Gwet’in<br />
members.<br />
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1. Why Climate Change is Important 1<br />
1.2. Why adaptati<strong>on</strong> to climate change is necessary 1<br />
1.3. Overview <strong>of</strong> the Study 3<br />
2. METHODOLOGY<br />
2.1. Rati<strong>on</strong>ale <strong>of</strong> the Study 3<br />
2.2. Objectives <strong>of</strong> the Study 3<br />
2.3. Approach 4<br />
2.4. Framework for Assessment 4<br />
2.5. Tools and Methods 4<br />
2.6. Data Analysis<br />
6<br />
2.7. Community Engagement 7<br />
3. BACKGROUND<br />
3.1. Descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area 7<br />
3.2. Geography 10<br />
3.3. Socio‐ ec<strong>on</strong>omic C<strong>on</strong>text 11<br />
4. CLIMATE CHANGES: PAST TRENDS AND FUTUER PROJECTIONS<br />
4.1. General Climate 12<br />
4.2. BEC Z<strong>on</strong>es 13<br />
4.3. Historical Climate Trends 14<br />
4.4. Climate Projecti<strong>on</strong>s 17<br />
5. CURRENT AND PROJECTED BIOPHYSICAL IMPACTS<br />
5.1. Water Resources 22<br />
5.2. Forest and Vegetati<strong>on</strong> 29<br />
5.3. Wildlife,<br />
Wild Horses 38<br />
5.4. Fishery<br />
42<br />
6. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT<br />
6.1. Biodiversity 49<br />
6.2. Health and Safety 50<br />
6.3. Water Supply 51<br />
6.4. Food Supply 52<br />
6.5. Shelter and Infrastructure 53<br />
6.6. Energy Supply 54<br />
i
6.7. Livelihood 55<br />
6.8. Governance 56<br />
6.9. Culture 57<br />
7.<br />
XENI GWET’IN VISION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 58<br />
8. ADAPTATION STRATEGIES<br />
8.1. Biodiversity Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> 58<br />
8.2. Health and Safety Enhancements 60<br />
8.3. Water Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> 62<br />
8.4. Food Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong> 63<br />
8.5. Shelter and Infrastructure Improvements 64<br />
8.6. Energy Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong> 64<br />
8.7. Livelihood Diversificati<strong>on</strong> 65<br />
8.8.<br />
Good Governance 67<br />
8.9.<br />
Cultural Preservati<strong>on</strong> 67<br />
9. CLIMATE ADAPTATION ACTION & MONITORING PLAN 69<br />
REFERENCES<br />
80<br />
ANNEXES – BACKGROUND PAPERS<br />
85<br />
1. Water Resources and Climate Change in the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area<br />
2. Climate Change Impacts <strong>on</strong> Forests and Vegetati<strong>on</strong> in the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
Caretaker Area<br />
3. Climate Change and Wildlife and Wild Horse Impacts in the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
Caretaker Area<br />
4. The Impacts <strong>of</strong> Climate Change<br />
<strong>on</strong> the Fishery Resource in the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in Caretaker Area<br />
ii
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
Climate change may be the defining issue <strong>of</strong> our generati<strong>on</strong>. Since the Industrial Revoluti<strong>on</strong>, the<br />
mean surface temperature <strong>of</strong> Earth has increased an average 0.6 °C (Celsius) due to the<br />
accumulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gasses (GHGs) in the atmosphere. 1 Historically, the Earth is<br />
accustomed to experiencing wide‐spread severe envir<strong>on</strong>mental change and has always been able to<br />
adapt to these changes accordingly. Yet, the difference now is the speed and scale <strong>of</strong> the warming<br />
that is currently occurring. Most <strong>of</strong> this change has occurred within the past 30 to 40 years, and the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> increase is accelerating. These rising temperatures will have significant impacts at a global<br />
scale and at local and regi<strong>on</strong>al levels. As a result, climate change will increasingly impact natural<br />
and<br />
human systems to alter the productivity, diversity and functi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> many ecosystems and<br />
livelihoods globally.<br />
For resource‐dependent communities, such as many First Nati<strong>on</strong>s in BC, climate change may<br />
increasingly compound existing vulnerabilities as the availability and quality <strong>of</strong> natural resources<br />
that they heavily depend up<strong>on</strong> decline. Limited resources and capacities for resp<strong>on</strong>ding to stresses,<br />
such as wildfires, floods and droughts will increasingly c<strong>on</strong>strain their ability to meet basic needs<br />
and become self‐governing. There is, therefore, an urgent need to begin reducing current<br />
vulnerabilities<br />
and enhancing adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> the communities so that people <strong>of</strong> these<br />
communities can face the l<strong>on</strong>ger‐term impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change with resilience.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> six Tsilhqot’in communities in the Cariboo‐Chilcotin,<br />
occupying <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the last intact ecosystems <strong>on</strong> the east side <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin range. While the<br />
community is relatively dynamic and healthy, it is still healing from the effects <strong>of</strong> col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
the residential school system, it is increasingly experiencing stress over resource use c<strong>on</strong>flicts in<br />
their traditi<strong>on</strong>al territory (Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area) and it is increasingly experiencing some <strong>of</strong><br />
the early impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change (forest fire and fish stock declines). These impacts al<strong>on</strong>e have<br />
left the Xeni Gwet’in somewhat anxious for their future but also determined to face it <strong>on</strong> their own<br />
terms. They envisi<strong>on</strong> a development and human activity in the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area, which<br />
is grounded in an ecosystem‐based approach to land use, minimizing human impact <strong>on</strong> the land and<br />
waters,<br />
leaving it as much as possible as a self‐sustaining, wild envir<strong>on</strong>ment with clean water, clean<br />
air and abundant fish and wildlife.<br />
According to ClimateBC projecti<strong>on</strong>s, the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area (XGCA) can expect to see an<br />
average increase <strong>of</strong> 2.5 degrees Celsius and an increase <strong>of</strong> 104 mm <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> by 2050. This<br />
increase in temperature will be relatively uniform across the Chilko watershed, but precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
will mostly increase in mountains at higher elevati<strong>on</strong>s. Most <strong>of</strong> this precipitati<strong>on</strong> is snow, but will<br />
decrease to nearly 50 percent by 2050. Seas<strong>on</strong>ally, most <strong>of</strong> the temperature increase will occur in<br />
the winter and spring and the precipitati<strong>on</strong> increase during the fall and winter will become wetter.<br />
Summers<br />
will become drier. Finally, the higher the locati<strong>on</strong>s will experience the colder and wetter<br />
climate and the lower the locati<strong>on</strong>s will experience the warmer and dryer climate.<br />
In the short‐term, these changes in climate will likely increase the incidences <strong>of</strong> wild fires in the<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>, which may put the health, property, water, energy, cultural sites and livelihoods in the XGCA<br />
at risk. In the mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term, the warmer weather could also threaten water flows and water<br />
quality, especially in the dryer areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> the XGCA like the Chilcotin Plateau. This in turn could have<br />
serious negative ramificati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
salm<strong>on</strong> stocks and other cool water fish stocks in the regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
1 World Bank (2010).<br />
i
These l<strong>on</strong>ger‐term impacts could weaken wild food security and water security am<strong>on</strong>g the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in as well as jeopardize certain tourism and energy projects. At the same time, l<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
climate<br />
changes may not be all bad. A warmer climate could present new opportunities for<br />
agricultural growth, a l<strong>on</strong>ger tourist seas<strong>on</strong> and new eco‐forestry development in the XGCA.<br />
These projected changes are by no means guaranteed but they are probable enough that the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in would do well to prepare rather than do nothing. The best form <strong>of</strong> preparati<strong>on</strong> in this case<br />
is to strengthen the resilience <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in community, which entails strengthening key<br />
support systems (see table below). Key measures include strengthening emergency procedures<br />
associated with fire and flooding, protecting and c<strong>on</strong>serving potable water supplies, protecting<br />
shelter and infrastructure; protecting, c<strong>on</strong>serving and diversifying energy supplies and food<br />
supplies, diversifying livelihoods, and preserving traditi<strong>on</strong>al culture. However, perhaps the most<br />
effective way <strong>of</strong> building the resilience <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in community is to protect and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>serve the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the XGCA. The land is integral to the Xeni Gwet’in culture and way <strong>of</strong><br />
life and the healthier the land is, the healthier and more resilient the Xeni Gwet’in will be.<br />
Moreover, a healthy ecosystem will benefit not just the Xeni Gwet’in but all residents <strong>of</strong> the XGCA<br />
and<br />
other adjacent and downstream ecosystems and communities.<br />
Climate Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Goals Objectives<br />
Biodiversity Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> • Maintain the XGCA as an intact ecosystem<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>serve Wildlife and Wild Horses in the XGCA<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>serve Fish Stocks<br />
• Preserve Wild Plants & the Habitats in the XGCA<br />
Health and Safety Enhancements • Protect Residents and Key Cultural Sites from<br />
Wild Fires in the XGCA<br />
• Protect Residents and Key Cultural Sites from<br />
Floods in the XGCA<br />
Water Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> • Protect Key Potable Water Sources<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>serve Potable Water<br />
Food Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong> • C<strong>on</strong>serve and Use Wild Food Sources<br />
• Increase Development and Diet Cultivated Food<br />
Sources<br />
• Increase Preservati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wild and Cultivated<br />
Foods<br />
Shelter and Infrastructure Protecti<strong>on</strong> • Protect Shelter and Infrastructure<br />
• Reduce risk <strong>of</strong> Mould, Mildew and Rot<br />
Energy Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
• Protect Existing Energy Sources<br />
Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
• Strengthen Energy C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue Energy Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Livelihood<br />
Diversificati<strong>on</strong> • Develop Nature‐based Aboriginal Tourism<br />
• Develop Eco‐forestry and Wood Products<br />
• Develop Natural/Organic Agriculture<br />
• Develop Other Adaptive Enterprise<br />
Opportunities<br />
Good Governance • Incorporate Climate Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategies<br />
into<br />
Local Governance Objectives<br />
Cultural Preservati<strong>on</strong> • Protect the Xeni Gwet’in Culture<br />
• Celebrate the Xeni Gwet’in Culture<br />
ii
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1. Why Climate Change is Important for the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong><br />
Climate change may be the defining issue <strong>of</strong> our generati<strong>on</strong>, since the challenge that it<br />
presents the world is so pervasive and complex. The mean surface temperature <strong>of</strong> Earth<br />
has increased an average 0.6 °C (Celsius) since the Industrial Revoluti<strong>on</strong>, and increasing<br />
scientific evidence suggests that this is due to the accumulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gasses<br />
(GHGs) in the atmosphere. 2 Historically, the Earth has been accustomed to experiencing<br />
wide‐spread severe envir<strong>on</strong>mental change and has always been able to adapt to these<br />
changes accordingly. Yet, the difference now is the speed and scale <strong>of</strong> the warming that is<br />
currently occurring. Most <strong>of</strong> this change has occurred within the past 30 to 40 years, and the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> increase is accelerating. These rising temperatures will have significant impacts at a<br />
global scale and at local and regi<strong>on</strong>al levels. As a result, climate change will increasingly<br />
impact<br />
natural and human systems to alter the productivity, diversity and functi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />
many ecosystems and livelihoods globally.<br />
For resource‐dependent communities, such as most First Nati<strong>on</strong>s in Canada, climate change<br />
may increasingly compound existing vulnerabilities. Many First Nati<strong>on</strong>s communities are<br />
remote and/or tied closely to the land. Many are also weak ec<strong>on</strong>omically and are still<br />
healing from col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> and the residential school system. As climate change accelerates<br />
and stresses the availability and quality <strong>of</strong> natural resources that these communities<br />
depend up<strong>on</strong>, it may affect their food and water security, their culture and their livelihoods.<br />
Limited resources and capacities to resp<strong>on</strong>d to stresses like floods, droughts and sea level<br />
rise, will increasingly c<strong>on</strong>strain the ability <strong>of</strong> First Nati<strong>on</strong>s to meet basic needs, emerge from<br />
poverty and realize self‐government. There is, therefore, a need to reduce current<br />
vulnerabilities<br />
and enhance adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> these communities so that they can face<br />
the l<strong>on</strong>ger‐term impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change with some c<strong>on</strong>fidence and <strong>on</strong> their own terms.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s Government, which is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> six Tsilhqot’in communities,<br />
occupies <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the last intact ecosystems <strong>on</strong> the east side <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin range. Despite<br />
this relatively healthy ecosystem, the community is already facing changes in climate<br />
changes and impacts there<strong>of</strong> including forest fires, drought, and fish stock decline. Forest<br />
fires,<br />
were particularly widespread in 2009, putting at risk pers<strong>on</strong>al property and<br />
livelihoods<br />
associated with tourism and ranching (key engines in the area).<br />
1.2. Why adaptati<strong>on</strong> to climate change is necessary<br />
While reducing global greenhouse gas emissi<strong>on</strong>s and reversing climate change are<br />
important l<strong>on</strong>g‐term goals, many <strong>of</strong> the climate change impacts are already in evidence and<br />
will accelerate. The Xeni Gwet’in people, who are already vulnerable, will, therefore, need<br />
to prepare for the c<strong>on</strong>sequences <strong>of</strong> increasing global warming over the next 20‐50 years.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in already have few resources to reduce the risk posed by climate change,<br />
such as drought and wild fires and l<strong>on</strong>g‐term changes to wildlife and fish stocks. Hence,<br />
adaptati<strong>on</strong> preparati<strong>on</strong>s to cope<br />
with the existing and forthcoming risks are critical now.<br />
2 World Bank (2010).<br />
1
Adaptati<strong>on</strong> to climate change is typically aimed at reducing vulnerability to its adverse<br />
effects through efforts to enhance adaptive capacity and resilience <strong>of</strong> a given ecosystem<br />
and/or community. Hence, in order for the Xeni Gwet’in to reduce their vulnerability to<br />
climate change, they must focus <strong>on</strong> building their adaptive capacity, while reducing their<br />
exposure and sensitivity to climate impacts.<br />
Box<br />
1: Key definiti<strong>on</strong>s associated with adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Impact: The way a human or natural system is affected by envir<strong>on</strong>mental change, including<br />
climate effects. 1<br />
Risk: In the c<strong>on</strong>text <strong>of</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental change, risk refers to the threat posed by a change,<br />
i.e. the probability <strong>of</strong> an adverse impact. Climate change risk is a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
magnitude <strong>of</strong> an individual hazard and/or change and the degree <strong>of</strong> vulnerability <strong>of</strong><br />
a system (or a community) to that hazard and/or change. Unless a system (or<br />
community) is vulnerable to the hazard, there is no risk. 1<br />
Coping: Short‐term acti<strong>on</strong>s to ward <strong>of</strong>f immediate risk, rather than to adjust to c<strong>on</strong>tinuous or<br />
permanent threats or changes – strategies usually rely <strong>on</strong> selling or using up assets<br />
or resources. Coping strategies are <strong>of</strong>ten the same set <strong>of</strong> measures that have been<br />
used before. When using coping strategies as the resp<strong>on</strong>se to stress, it is possible<br />
that vulnerability will increase in the l<strong>on</strong>g term. 1<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong>: Adjustment in natural or human systems in resp<strong>on</strong>se to actual or expected climatic<br />
stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities. 1<br />
Adaptive capacity: The ability <strong>of</strong> a system to adjust to climate change (including climate variability and<br />
extremes) to moderate potential damages, to take advantage <strong>of</strong> opportunities, or to<br />
cope with the c<strong>on</strong>sequences. 2<br />
Vulnerability: The degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, adverse<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> climate change, including climate variability and extremes. Vulnerability is<br />
a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the character, magnitude, and rate <strong>of</strong> climate variati<strong>on</strong> to which a<br />
system is exposed, its sensitivity, and its adaptive capacity. 2<br />
Resilience: The ability <strong>of</strong> a community to resist, absorb, and recover from the effects <strong>of</strong> hazards<br />
in a timely and efficient manner, preserving or restoring its essential basic<br />
structures, functi<strong>on</strong>s and identity. 2<br />
t should be noted that the terms “adaptati<strong>on</strong>” and “coping” are <strong>of</strong>ten used interchangeably. However, these<br />
wo terms are distinctly different, as dem<strong>on</strong>strated by the characteristics below. 3<br />
I<br />
t<br />
Coping Adaptati<strong>on</strong> • Short‐term and immediate<br />
• Oriented towards l<strong>on</strong>ger term livelihoods<br />
• Oriented towards survival<br />
security<br />
• Not c<strong>on</strong>tinuous<br />
• A c<strong>on</strong>tinuous process<br />
• Motivated by crisis, reactive<br />
• Results are sustained<br />
• Often degrades resource base<br />
• Uses resource efficiently and sustainably<br />
• Prompted by a lack <strong>of</strong> alternatives<br />
• Involves planning<br />
• Combines old and new strategies<br />
and knowledge<br />
• Focused <strong>on</strong> finding alternatives<br />
Sources: 1: ICIMOD, 2009. Local Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to Too Much and Too Little Water in the Greater Himalayan Regi<strong>on</strong>; 2: IPPC,<br />
2007 3: CARE 2009, Climate Vulnerability & Capacity Analysis Handbook.<br />
2
1.3. Overview <strong>of</strong> the Study<br />
Following brief introductory and methodology secti<strong>on</strong>s, the geographic and biogeoclimatic<br />
c<strong>on</strong>text to the XGCA are described in secti<strong>on</strong> 3. Secti<strong>on</strong> 4 follows with a detailed overview<br />
<strong>of</strong> historical and projected climate changes. Secti<strong>on</strong> 5 outlines the biophysical impacts <strong>of</strong><br />
projected climate changes in the XGCA. Secti<strong>on</strong> 6 provides a descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> key<br />
vulnerabilities in the Xeni Gwet’in community. Secti<strong>on</strong> 7 provides a detailed adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
strategy<br />
to address key vulnerabilities and secti<strong>on</strong> 8 follows with an Adaptati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
M<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan.<br />
2. METHODOLOGY<br />
2.1. Rati<strong>on</strong>ale <strong>of</strong> the Report<br />
This report is the result <strong>of</strong> Phase I <strong>of</strong> a Community‐Based Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Project designed to<br />
help the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s Government understand and incorporate the potential<br />
risks <strong>of</strong> climate change into current and future land use and livelihood planning efforts. The<br />
Xeni Gwet’in live in the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area (XGCA), which is located within the<br />
southwest regi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cariboo‐Chilcotin Regi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. The project is envisi<strong>on</strong>ed<br />
as<br />
a two‐phase initiative: Phase I occurring between fall 2009 and spring 2010, and Phase II<br />
occurring between spring 2010 and spring<br />
2011, pending INAC approval.<br />
The broad goals <strong>of</strong> the project were to:<br />
• Provide a preliminary assessment <strong>of</strong> historical and possible future climate change<br />
in<br />
the XGCA.<br />
• Assess the biophysical impacts <strong>of</strong> these projected climate changes <strong>on</strong> the XGCA;<br />
• Assess the subsequent socio‐ec<strong>on</strong>omic and cultural impacts <strong>on</strong> the livelihoods <strong>of</strong> Xeni<br />
Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>; and<br />
• Identify adaptati<strong>on</strong> measures for improving their livelihoods, while reducing their<br />
vulnerability to climate change.<br />
2.2. Objectives <strong>of</strong> the Study<br />
Specific project objectives were to:<br />
1. Raise awareness <strong>of</strong> climate change and its potential impacts in the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
community and regi<strong>on</strong><br />
2. Estimate changes in climate in the XGCA in the medium term (to 2020) and l<strong>on</strong>ger<br />
term (to 2050) (with a focus <strong>on</strong> changes in temperature and rainfall)<br />
3. Determine the envir<strong>on</strong>mental (biophysical) impacts <strong>of</strong> project ed climate changes in<br />
the XGCA<br />
4. Carry out a Vulnerability Assessment to help determine necessary adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
measures to increase resilience <strong>of</strong> the communities.<br />
3
5. Develop a realistic and practical Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan for adaptati<strong>on</strong> strategies that can be<br />
implemented by the community over the next 20 years to improve the resilience <strong>of</strong><br />
both the XGCA ecosystem and the Xeni Gwet’in community<br />
6. As part <strong>of</strong> this Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan, determine resources for adaptati<strong>on</strong> measures<br />
7. Develop m<strong>on</strong>itoring protocols to measure climate change impacts over the<br />
decades to<br />
come<br />
8. Develop partnerships with other communities and agencies in the regi<strong>on</strong><br />
2.3. Approach<br />
The project involved 9 tasks:<br />
1. Project Initiati<strong>on</strong><br />
2. Climate Change Awareness<br />
Raising<br />
3. Assessment <strong>of</strong> Climate Change Impacts<br />
4. Vulnerability Assessment<br />
5. Definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Community Visi<strong>on</strong><br />
6. Identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Soluti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
7. Preparati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a Community‐based<br />
Climate Change Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategy & Acti<strong>on</strong><br />
Plan<br />
8. Preparati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a M<strong>on</strong>itoring Plan<br />
9. Presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Draft Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategy & Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan Strategy<br />
2.4. Framework for Assessment<br />
The study drew <strong>on</strong> several different c<strong>on</strong>ceptual frameworks. The main framework was<br />
provided by Centre for Indigenous Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Resources’ (CIER) Community Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Framework (manuals), which was complemented by the Climate Vulnerability and Capacity<br />
Analysis Methodology used by CARE Internati<strong>on</strong>al3<br />
and the Tyndall Group’s vulnerability<br />
assessment framework (WEHAB+) 4. Together, these chosen methodologies provided the<br />
background for a framework to analyze vulnerability and capacity to adapt to climate<br />
change at the community level. They provided guidance and tools for participatory<br />
research, analysis and learning.<br />
2.5. Tools and Methods<br />
The tools and methods employed in this project were multifold, using a combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
community knowledge and scientific data and techniques to yield a better understanding<br />
about local climate changes and impacts (Table 1). Key informant interviews were used to<br />
collect informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> historical climate trends, biophysical impacts, climate change<br />
vulnerabilities and adaptati<strong>on</strong> soluti<strong>on</strong>s. Key informant interviews were c<strong>on</strong>ducted<br />
primarily with community elders but also with other members, including Chief and Council.<br />
The key informant interviews and associated discussi<strong>on</strong>s provided opportunities to link<br />
community knowledge with available scientific informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> climate change. This served<br />
to h<strong>on</strong>our local knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
the land and the climate, it helped local stakeholders<br />
3 CARE 2009, Climate Vulnerability & Capacity Analysis Handbook.<br />
4 Surviving Climate Change in Small Islands, Tyndall Group for Climate Change Research<br />
4
understand the implicati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> climate change and it also served to check the validity <strong>of</strong><br />
scientific<br />
c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Table 1: List <strong>of</strong> Study Parameters and Tools<br />
Assessment Parameters Tools<br />
1. Historical trend analysis <strong>of</strong> climate<br />
changes and variability<br />
Key informants interviews, data<br />
2. Future climate change and<br />
variability<br />
projecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Computer modeling<br />
3. Climate Impact analysis Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al estimati<strong>on</strong>s, Literature review, BEC<br />
modeling<br />
4. Vulnerability Assessment Literature review, Key informant interviews<br />
5. Adaptati<strong>on</strong> strategies Key informant interviews, Literature review<br />
Sec<strong>on</strong>dary informati<strong>on</strong> in the form <strong>of</strong> historical climate data was also used to develop a<br />
climate baseline for the study. Literature surveys and pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al opini<strong>on</strong>s were used to<br />
inform estimates regarding projected biophysical impacts, climate vulnerabilities and<br />
adaptati<strong>on</strong> strategies. And computer modeling was used to develop climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Except for the climate modeling, much <strong>of</strong> the analysis in the report was qualitative. This<br />
was due to the short time frame and modest budget <strong>of</strong> the project as well as the rather<br />
limited state <strong>of</strong> climate impact modeling at the regi<strong>on</strong>al and local level.<br />
Climate Projecti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Climatic data have been produced by the computer program ClimateBC 5, which <strong>of</strong>fers high<br />
resoluti<strong>on</strong> spatial climate data for current and future climate change scenarios. This is<br />
particularly useful for remote regi<strong>on</strong>s like the XGCA. Recent climatic variables have been<br />
averaged spatially (i.e. with a resoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> roughly 6 km 2) throughout the XGCA and<br />
temporally for the periods 1961 – 1990 (which we c<strong>on</strong>sider as representative <strong>of</strong> present<br />
climate). Future climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s are based <strong>on</strong> the Canadian Global Circulati<strong>on</strong> Model<br />
versi<strong>on</strong> 2 (CGCM2) for two future emissi<strong>on</strong> scenarios as defined by the Intergovernmental<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change (IPCC). The A1F1 emissi<strong>on</strong> (or “worst case”) scenario describes a<br />
future world <strong>of</strong> very rapid ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth, global populati<strong>on</strong> that peaks in the mid‐<br />
century and declines thereafter, and rapid introducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> new and more efficient<br />
technologies with an emphasis <strong>on</strong> fossil fuel energy sources. The B2 emissi<strong>on</strong> (or “best<br />
case”) scenario describes a world in which the emphasis is <strong>on</strong> local soluti<strong>on</strong>s to ec<strong>on</strong>omic,<br />
social, and envir<strong>on</strong>mental sustainability. Both emissi<strong>on</strong> scenarios are projected for the<br />
2020’s (i.e., 2020 – 2029) and 2050’s (i.e., 2050 – 2059). In additi<strong>on</strong>, both emissi<strong>on</strong><br />
scenarios depict the same general trend; however, the intensity or scale <strong>of</strong> the trend is<br />
different.<br />
Wildlife & Wild Horse Impacts<br />
5 See: http://www.genetics.forestry.ubc.ca/cfcg/climate‐models.html<br />
5
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cerning the impact <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> XGCA wildlife and wild horses are<br />
based <strong>on</strong> the best informati<strong>on</strong> available, including a partial search <strong>of</strong> the scientific literature,<br />
extensive grizzly bear, wildlife and wild horse habitat surveys in the XGCA, discussi<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
elders,<br />
local ranchers and others as well as field observati<strong>on</strong>s dating back to the first<br />
intensive wildlife surveys in 2001.<br />
Due to the short time frame <strong>of</strong> this project and the large number <strong>of</strong> plant and animal species<br />
in the XGCA ecosystem, the approach in this secti<strong>on</strong> was to select a small number <strong>of</strong> tree and<br />
habitat types that are known to be important to a range <strong>of</strong> species and use these as well as a<br />
small number <strong>of</strong> animal species as “climate change indicators”. For plants and habitats, a<br />
fair amount <strong>of</strong> literature was available to draw up<strong>on</strong>. For wildlife species, resiliency<br />
assessments were based <strong>on</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> overall North American distributi<strong>on</strong> and range <strong>of</strong><br />
habitats<br />
that some <strong>of</strong> the animals occupy today, and whether the wildlife are specialists or<br />
generalists<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> habitat ranges.<br />
Forest and Vegetati<strong>on</strong> Impacts<br />
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s regarding the impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> the XGCA forests and vegetati<strong>on</strong> are<br />
based <strong>on</strong> the specific climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s for each <strong>of</strong> the key Biogeoclimatic Ecological<br />
Classificati<strong>on</strong> (BEC) z<strong>on</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the XGCA (discussed in secti<strong>on</strong> 4.2). The BEC system uses<br />
vegetati<strong>on</strong>, soils, and topography to infer the regi<strong>on</strong>al climate <strong>of</strong> a geographic area. Areas <strong>of</strong><br />
relatively uniform climate are called biogeoclimatic units, where climate refers to the<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al climate that influences ecosystems over an extended period <strong>of</strong> time. The BEC unit<br />
can be expressed as statistics derived from normals <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> and temperature6 The<br />
ClimateBC model was used to forecast potential changes to climatic variables in the medium<br />
term (2020 and 2050). The climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> the worst case emissi<strong>on</strong>s (A1F1)<br />
scenario were used to describe possible effects <strong>on</strong> the forests <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Territory.<br />
The projected climate variable changes by 2020 and 2050 are presented al<strong>on</strong>g with climate<br />
normals (1960‐1999) by BEC subz<strong>on</strong>e. Although the model predicts changes to climate<br />
envelopes as classified by the BEC system, the changes do not represent changes to the<br />
forest<br />
ecosystem itself. Potential changes to the forest are inferred with the help <strong>of</strong> expert<br />
opini<strong>on</strong><br />
and literature reviews7.<br />
Water Resource Impacts<br />
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s regarding the impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> XGCA water resources have been<br />
developed after extensive literature reviews, particularly recent hydrological research<br />
c<strong>on</strong>ducting<br />
by the Pacific Climate Impact C<strong>on</strong>sortium. In additi<strong>on</strong> to the literature reviews,<br />
field<br />
observati<strong>on</strong>s and water sampling data since 2006 are c<strong>on</strong>sulted to establish a baseline.<br />
Fishery Resource Impacts<br />
C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s regarding the impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> XGCA fishery resources have been<br />
developed through extensive literature research. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, the author’s observati<strong>on</strong>s are<br />
based <strong>on</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> fishery research projects undertaken in the XGCA <strong>on</strong> <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
6 Downloaded from http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/HRE/becweb/system/how/index.html. See Appendix<br />
2 for a more detailed descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the BEC system.<br />
7 This simplistic approach was taken due to the budget c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>of</strong> this project. Models are now<br />
being developed that will project effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong> (Campbell et al. 2009).<br />
6
Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s Government and the Chilko Resorts and Community Associati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
All field sampling and observati<strong>on</strong>s for these projects were completed based <strong>on</strong> Resource<br />
Inventories Standards Committee (RISC) protocols. This research provided reliable baseline<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> for fishery resources in the XGCA.<br />
2.6. Data Analysis<br />
The climate projecti<strong>on</strong> data were generated by using the ClimateBC model, which <strong>of</strong>fers<br />
high resoluti<strong>on</strong> spatial climate data for current and future climate change scenarios. 8 This<br />
program<br />
and its approach is particularly useful for generating climatic data for remote<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>s like the XGCA.<br />
One challenge the team faced in generating climate projecti<strong>on</strong> data is that currently it is<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly possible to get climate informati<strong>on</strong> within the Chilko Watershed and not for the whole<br />
XGCA. To overcome this obstacle, points were selected at set intervals <strong>on</strong> four transects<br />
(al<strong>on</strong>g a north to south directi<strong>on</strong>) in the Chilko Watershed. Based <strong>on</strong> this data, a summary<br />
was prepared <strong>on</strong> how the climate in the larger area is projected to change. More<br />
specifically, recent climatic variables were averaged spatially (i.e. with a resoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
roughly 6 km 2) throughout the Chilko River watershed and temporally for the periods 1961<br />
– 1990 (which is generally c<strong>on</strong>sidered as a valid proxy representative <strong>of</strong> present climate).<br />
2.7. Community Engagement<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in community was involved in every stage <strong>of</strong><br />
the project:<br />
Project supervisi<strong>on</strong>: A local Steering Committee was established to guide the planning<br />
process and community extensi<strong>on</strong>. Nine members <strong>of</strong> the community were selected,<br />
including the Chief, four staff members, <strong>on</strong>e elder and three members <strong>of</strong> the community<br />
known for their experience <strong>of</strong> the land. The committee met five times over the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project<br />
durati<strong>on</strong> and acted as spokespers<strong>on</strong>s in the community and at planned events.<br />
Another community member was hired<br />
to assist in coordinating project activities.<br />
Community c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> process: General community feedback was collected through 4<br />
public community meetings, with a special emphasis <strong>on</strong> collecting elder feedback. Three<br />
school events were hosted during which the project team engaged the youth in the local<br />
school to raise the awareness <strong>of</strong> climate change and present their ideas for adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
soluti<strong>on</strong>s to the community. Twenty‐eight key informant interviews were c<strong>on</strong>ducted to<br />
learn about the Xeni Gwet’in knowledge <strong>of</strong> the land and weather. Four members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community<br />
were employed to carry out these interviews. All interviews and community<br />
m eetings were held in the Nemiah Valley within the XGCA.<br />
Progress reporting: Regular progress reports, final findings and results <strong>of</strong> the study were<br />
communicated at the Steering Committee meetings and at a community lunche<strong>on</strong> at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
8 For details, please see: http://www.genetics.forestry.ubc.ca/cfcg/climate‐models.html) and Wang and others<br />
(2006).<br />
7
Awareness raising and capacity building: Capacity was built and awareness increased <strong>of</strong><br />
climate change risks and vulnerabilities by involving community members in the<br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the project (through the steering committee), engaging the school and hiring<br />
<strong>of</strong> several community members to lead part <strong>of</strong> the research and c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
3. BACKGROUND<br />
9<br />
3.1. Descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area (XGCA) ‐ also referred to as the Chilko River Watershed<br />
Area by some10 ‐ is the traditi<strong>on</strong>al Tsilhqot’in territory <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong><br />
(hereafter referred to as XGCA). It encompasses a relatively isolated and underdeveloped<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the Chilko Forest Regi<strong>on</strong> in British Columbia, and is located 160 km by air or 250 km<br />
by road southwest <strong>of</strong> Williams Lake. The area can be described as the drainage <strong>of</strong> Chilko<br />
Lake,<br />
Chilko River, and includes the Taseko Lake and Taseko river system, al<strong>on</strong>g with the<br />
Tsuniah,<br />
Nemiah, and Elkin Valleys (Figure 1).<br />
Figure 1: Map <strong>of</strong> Chilcotin<br />
Source: Canadian Geographic<br />
Comprehensive Development Plan (2009).<br />
9 Ecolibrio (2009); The Xeni Gwet’in<br />
10 See Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004).<br />
8
The study area includes the Potato Range, Choelquoit Lake Basin, the upper Chilko River,<br />
the Tsuniah Range, and porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Brittany Triangle and all <strong>of</strong> the lands in and adjacent<br />
to Ts’yl‐os Provincial Park and to the east <strong>of</strong> Taseko Lake (Figure 2). It also encompasses<br />
porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong> British Columbia’s major landscapes, namely the Chilcotin Plateau, the<br />
Chilcotin Ranges, and the Pacific Coast Range. Much <strong>of</strong> the study area is undisturbed by<br />
industrial development and remains in a natural state. This “natural state” has been<br />
modified carefully by Xeni Gwet’in management systems for thousands <strong>of</strong> years. 11<br />
Figure 2: Map <strong>of</strong> XGCA<br />
11 Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004).<br />
9
3.2. Geography<br />
The study area is located within two <strong>of</strong> the five major physiographic regi<strong>on</strong>s12 <strong>of</strong> British<br />
Columbia: The Coast Mountains and The Interior Plateau. The Coast Mountains and Interior<br />
Plateau are further subdivided into smaller more uniform physiographic regi<strong>on</strong>s. The<br />
southerly two‐thirds <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
area is within the subdivisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Coast Mountains unit<br />
12 Physiography refers to the physical geography <strong>of</strong> the land, including the terrain type, elevati<strong>on</strong>, slope positi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
slope length, slope gradient (steepness), and orientati<strong>on</strong> with respect to solar radiati<strong>on</strong> (aspect). Slope length,<br />
slope gradient, and positi<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g the slope also influence soil stability and ecological sensitivity to disturbance<br />
(source: Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2009), p.13).<br />
10
known as the Chilcotin Ranges. The northerly <strong>on</strong>e‐third <strong>of</strong> the study area is found within a<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the Interior Plateau known as the Chilcotin Plateau. 13<br />
The Chilcotin Ranges Regi<strong>on</strong><br />
The Chilcotin Ranges include the Taseko Lakes, Nemiah Valley, Tsuniah Lake, and the Potato<br />
Range. The Chilcotin Ranges c<strong>on</strong>sist <strong>of</strong> gently sloping uplands, rounded mountain summits,<br />
and broad, flat‐bottom valleys am<strong>on</strong>g the mountain ranges. The mountains are less rugged<br />
than those <strong>of</strong> the Pacific Ranges to the southwest and are generally no higher than 2700<br />
metres in elevati<strong>on</strong>. They show the effects <strong>of</strong> recent alpine glaciati<strong>on</strong> as well as the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinental glaciati<strong>on</strong> by the Cordilleran Ice Sheet during the last ice age. No major glaciers<br />
exist in the Chilcotin Ranges at this time, but numerous small isolated icefields are found in<br />
cirques in the higher alpine areas. The remnant icefields are associated with steep cirque<br />
headwalls, small glacial lakes, and terminal and lateral moraines formed <strong>of</strong> locally derived<br />
material.<br />
The Chilcotin Plateau Regi<strong>on</strong><br />
The<br />
Chilcotin Plateau landscape includes the areas north <strong>of</strong> Choelquoit Lake, and north <strong>of</strong> a<br />
line extending from the north end <strong>of</strong> Chilko Lake to the north end <strong>of</strong> Taseko Lake.<br />
The Chilcotin Plateau porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the study area features level to gently rolling terrain, with<br />
an elevati<strong>on</strong> between 1000 and 1500 metres. The upland porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Plateau is underlain<br />
by flat‐lying bedrock and covered by glacial deposits. Subtle depressi<strong>on</strong>s and meandering<br />
streams <strong>on</strong> the undulating terrain have created many lakes and wetland complexes. Isolated<br />
low,<br />
rounded mountains and ridges <strong>of</strong> erosi<strong>on</strong>‐resistant rock rise above the general level <strong>of</strong><br />
the Plateau to over 2000 metres elevati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The Brittany Triangle is bounded by deeply incised, steep‐sided valleys that developed as<br />
the Chilko River and the Taseko River down cut through the Plateau during the post‐glacial<br />
melt period. The rivers currently occupy channels that are 100‐200 metres lower than the<br />
Plateau surface. The Elkin Creek‐Elkin Lake‐Vedan Lake system occupies another deeply<br />
incised valley, which was likely down cut during the post‐glacial melt but which no l<strong>on</strong>ger<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tains<br />
a major river system. Steep scarp slopes al<strong>on</strong>g the deeply incised rivers and creek<br />
valleys<br />
are unstable and susceptible to mass wasting and slope failures14<br />
3.3. Socio‐ec<strong>on</strong>omic C<strong>on</strong>text<br />
15<br />
The total populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the XGCA is approximately 500 people; 375 are Xeni Gwet’in and<br />
125 are n<strong>on</strong>‐indigenous. The area does not c<strong>on</strong>tain any formally incorporated communities<br />
but does c<strong>on</strong>tain a number <strong>of</strong> informal hamlets, such as north Chilko, Tsuniah, Taseko and<br />
Nemiah<br />
Valley. The people who comprise these communities are to a large extent self‐<br />
reliant and have a l<strong>on</strong>g<br />
history <strong>of</strong> cooperati<strong>on</strong> with each other to sustain their way <strong>of</strong> life.<br />
13 Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004).<br />
14 Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004).<br />
15 This secti<strong>on</strong> is based <strong>on</strong> Ecolibrio (2009, 7‐10) and Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others, (2004, pp.44‐46).<br />
11
The XGCA is a remote, wilderness area, where the rural inhabitants live very disbursed. The<br />
highest c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the people in the XGCA is in the Nemiah Valley, which is located<br />
196.8 kilometres from the nearest city, Williams Lake, BC about a 3 hour drive southwest.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> Government <strong>of</strong>fice is located there and maintains isolati<strong>on</strong><br />
status, which means they provide their own public works services such as electricity,<br />
heating, community water supply and communicati<strong>on</strong> systems. There is a post <strong>of</strong>fice, a gas<br />
bar/c<strong>on</strong>venience store, visitor informati<strong>on</strong> services centre, a laundromat/internet facility,<br />
Charlene<br />
William’s Daycare and immersi<strong>on</strong> program, Naghtaneqed Elementary/Junior<br />
Sec<strong>on</strong>dary School, a health clinic and rodeo grounds.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in culture remains closely linked to the land. During the summer m<strong>on</strong>ths the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in use the lakes and rivers throughout the XGCA to catch and dry fish. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
many still rely up<strong>on</strong> wild meat, including moose and deer. Moreover, according to two<br />
separate Tourism Strategies developed for the community, the primary ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities<br />
for<br />
the Xeni Gwet’in today are ranching and involvement in tourism through local n<strong>on</strong>‐<br />
native<br />
wilderness tourism operators.<br />
4. Climate Change in the Xeni Caretaker Area: Past Trends and<br />
Future Projecti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the climate in the Cariboo‐Chilcotin regi<strong>on</strong>, and<br />
wherever possible the specific climate for the XGCA. The secti<strong>on</strong> first outlines the general<br />
climate in the study area, as determined by physiographic features (4.1). Sub‐secti<strong>on</strong> 4.2<br />
then examines historical climate trends, which combines an assessment <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
baseline data for the 1961‐1990 period (4.2.1), which are complemented by community<br />
anecdotes gathered through a key informant survey (4.2.2) follows with a projecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
possible future climates.<br />
4.1. General Climate<br />
As described by Sten and Coupe (1997) and Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004), the climate <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study area is largely determined by the physiographic 16 features <strong>of</strong> the regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Physiography refers to the physical geography <strong>of</strong> the land, including the terrain type,<br />
elevati<strong>on</strong>, slope positi<strong>on</strong>, slope length, slope gradient (steepness), and orientati<strong>on</strong> with<br />
respect to solar radiati<strong>on</strong> (aspect). 17 One key relati<strong>on</strong>ship is the effect <strong>of</strong> these factors <strong>on</strong><br />
principle air flow patterns. The latter include warm moist Pacific air from the west, and cold<br />
dry Arctic air from the north. Because the study area is located <strong>on</strong> the leeward side <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Coast Mountain Range, the climate is more str<strong>on</strong>gly influenced by Arctic air. The moist<br />
Pacific air has a limited effect <strong>on</strong> the area. The following climate summary is from<br />
Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004): 18<br />
•<br />
The Chilcotin Plateau porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the study area has a typical c<strong>on</strong>tinental climate<br />
characterized by cold winters<br />
and cool summers. The relatively high elevati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
16 Slope length, slope gradient,<br />
and positi<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g the slope also influence soil stability and ecological sensitivity<br />
to disturbance (source: Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others<br />
(2009), p.13).<br />
17 Sten and Coupe (1997).<br />
18 See Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004), p. 19.<br />
12
Plateau (between 1000 and 1500 metres) c<strong>on</strong>tributes to the cold climate. As a result, the<br />
growing seas<strong>on</strong> is short, and frost can occur at any time <strong>of</strong> the year at all elevati<strong>on</strong>s. The<br />
Plateau is also str<strong>on</strong>gly affected by the Coast Mountains rainshadow, which results in very<br />
dry c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, including summer moisture deficits – a significant factor effecting soil and<br />
plant productivity. The seas<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> moisture deficit can be from May to September, which<br />
includes most <strong>of</strong> the growing seas<strong>on</strong>. The dry c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s also result in frequent wildfires<br />
across the landscape <strong>of</strong> the Plateau.<br />
• The Chilcotin Ranges part <strong>of</strong> the study area also has a dry, c<strong>on</strong>tinental climate in the<br />
rainshadow <strong>of</strong> the Coast Mountains, but receives more precipitati<strong>on</strong> than the Chilcotin<br />
Plateau landscape due to moist, coastal air pushing through the lower mountain passes.<br />
Summer moisture deficits are lower and the seas<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> deficit is shorter than in the<br />
Chilcotin Plateau. However, the colder temperatures in this area significantly limit plant<br />
growth, with similar overall effects as the moisture deficits <strong>on</strong> the Plateau.<br />
The str<strong>on</strong>g climatic gradient that occurs from the moist coastal mountains to the dry<br />
Chilcotin Plateau results in a diversity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems, and plant and animal life. The study<br />
area includes some <strong>of</strong> the coldest and driest forested landscapes in the province.<br />
4.2. Biogeoclimatic (BEC) Z<strong>on</strong>es<br />
Steen and Coupe (1997) describe the cold, dry climate <strong>of</strong> the XGCA in their discussi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
biogeoclimatic subz<strong>on</strong>es in the Cariboo Forest Regi<strong>on</strong>. The biogeoclimatic classificati<strong>on</strong><br />
system groups forests in British Columbia into areas <strong>of</strong> broadly uniform climate, geology,<br />
and biology. The following comments are drawn from the work <strong>of</strong> Steen and Coupe, as<br />
extracted<br />
by Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004), and highlight the excepti<strong>on</strong>ally harsh climate <strong>of</strong><br />
the<br />
study area<br />
(Figure 3):<br />
• The Very Dry Very Cold Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir subz<strong>on</strong>e (ESSFxv) has a<br />
very cold, very dry climate. Although no climatic data is available, the vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />
indicates that the ESSFxv is probably the driest area <strong>of</strong> the ESSF z<strong>on</strong>e in British<br />
Columbia. Due to relatively low humidity and clear skies,<br />
overnight radiati<strong>on</strong> cooling<br />
is intense, and frosts occur very frequently during the growing seas<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• The Very Dry Very Cold M<strong>on</strong>tane Spruce subz<strong>on</strong>e (MSxv) is the coldest and driest<br />
M<strong>on</strong>tane Spruce subz<strong>on</strong>e in British Columbia, and is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the least productive<br />
biogeoclimatic units for tree growth. Winters are cold and summers are cool with<br />
frequent growing‐seas<strong>on</strong> frost.<br />
13
Figure 3: XGCA BEC Z<strong>on</strong>es<br />
14
• In general, the SubBoreal PineSpruce z<strong>on</strong>e (SBPS) has cold, dry winters and cool,<br />
dry summers. Substantial moisture deficits are normal during the middle and latter<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the growing seas<strong>on</strong>. The low precipitati<strong>on</strong>, dry air, and clear skies in the Coast<br />
Mountains rainshadow result in significant night‐time radiati<strong>on</strong> cooling and low<br />
overnight temperatures. Frost can occur at any time <strong>of</strong> the year, especially in low‐<br />
lying areas. The SBPS z<strong>on</strong>e is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the least productive areas for tree growth in the<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>, outside <strong>of</strong> the Bunch Grass and Arctic Tundra<br />
z<strong>on</strong>es which are generally<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered “n<strong>on</strong>‐forested.”<br />
• The Very Dry Cold SubBoreal PineSpruce subz<strong>on</strong>e (SBPSxc) occurs in the southern<br />
and western parts <strong>of</strong> the SBPS z<strong>on</strong>e in the study area. This subz<strong>on</strong>e is str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />
affected by the Coast Mountains rainshadow, and the SBPSxc has the lowest annual<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the SBPS subz<strong>on</strong>es. Vegetati<strong>on</strong> producti<strong>on</strong> and soil development are<br />
severely limited by the cold, very dry climate.<br />
• The Dry Cool Interior Douglasfir subz<strong>on</strong>e – Chilcotin variant (IDFdk4) is the<br />
coldest biogeoclimatic unit <strong>of</strong> the IDF z<strong>on</strong>e in British Columbia and is climatically<br />
transiti<strong>on</strong>al from the generally warmer porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the IDF z<strong>on</strong>e to the cold, dry SBPS<br />
z<strong>on</strong>e.<br />
Areas that are colder or drier than the pine and spruce forests <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin Plateau are<br />
generally not forested. Steen and Coupe (1997) comment that the total annual precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
near Tatla Lake at the western part <strong>of</strong> the Plateau is <strong>on</strong>ly 338 mm. For comparis<strong>on</strong>, any<br />
regi<strong>on</strong> that receives less than 250 mm <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> annually is generally defined as a<br />
desert. Moist forested areas in the Cariboo regi<strong>on</strong>, such as the Interior Cedar‐Hemlock Z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
to the east, receive 700 to 800 mm <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> annually while some <strong>of</strong> the wetter areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Coast Mountains to the west receive in excess <strong>of</strong> 2500 mm <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> per year<br />
4.3. Historical Climate Trends<br />
Definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> scientific baseline based <strong>on</strong> 19611990 Stati<strong>on</strong> Climatology Data 19<br />
L<strong>on</strong>g‐term climate trends show that c<strong>on</strong>siderable warming has taken place in the Cariboo‐<br />
Chilcotin and surrounding areas over the last century. A recent report from the Pacific<br />
Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium 20 shows that during this time period, the mean annual<br />
temperature has increased about 1°Celsius in the regi<strong>on</strong>. Even though data show a clear<br />
warming trend, there are large year‐to‐year variati<strong>on</strong>s in temperature, with ENSO climatic<br />
cycles having had a str<strong>on</strong>g impact <strong>on</strong> temperature. Historical changes in precipitati<strong>on</strong> are<br />
less clear and c<strong>on</strong>sistent than for temperature. What is certain, however, is that historical<br />
changes in temperature have already had real implicati<strong>on</strong>s for important hydrological<br />
variables, including snow accumulati<strong>on</strong> and timing <strong>of</strong> snow melt. In additi<strong>on</strong>, divergences in<br />
temperature and precipitati<strong>on</strong> from average c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s due to natural cycles and climate<br />
change have affected ecosystems and resource management over the past century in this<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The following provides a baseline for climate informati<strong>on</strong> by using data for the 1961‐1990<br />
period. Note that the 1961‐1990 climate period is used as a baseline against which the<br />
climate change projecti<strong>on</strong>s shown<br />
in secti<strong>on</strong> 4.4 are compared. Tables 2 and 3 show<br />
baseline<br />
temperature and precipitati<strong>on</strong> data for the Tatlayoko Lake, which is the weather<br />
19 The informati<strong>on</strong> in this secti<strong>on</strong> is extracted from Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium (PCIC) 2008.<br />
20 Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium (PCIC), 2008, p.30.<br />
15
stati<strong>on</strong> closest to the Study Area with l<strong>on</strong>ger‐term historical climate data. While this stati<strong>on</strong><br />
al<strong>on</strong>e cannot adequately represent the diversity <strong>of</strong> the varied climate c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s found<br />
within the Study Area, it does provide a reference point to examine the mean and variability<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
seas<strong>on</strong>al climate during the baseline period. This is important as both the mean and<br />
variability <strong>of</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>al temperatures affect many ecological and hydrological processes.<br />
Table 2 shows that the mean annual and maximum winter temperatures are less than 0°C<br />
for Tatlayoko Lake. The figures also reveal that the variability (standard deviati<strong>on</strong>) <strong>of</strong><br />
minimum, maximum and mean temperatures is much higher in winter than in summer.<br />
Finally,<br />
the table highlights that minimum temperatures in winter are more variable than<br />
maximum<br />
temperatures while the opposite is true in summer.<br />
Table 2: 19611990 Baseline temperature data for Tatlayoko Lake Weather Stati<strong>on</strong><br />
Tatlayoko<br />
Lake<br />
1088010<br />
Min<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Annual Winter Summ er<br />
Mean<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Max<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Min<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Mean<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Max<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Min<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Mean<br />
Temp<br />
( o C)<br />
Max<br />
Temp<br />
Mean ‐3.0 3.9 10.8 ‐11.1 ‐5.8 ‐0.4 0.6 0.8 1.4<br />
St<br />
dev<br />
Source: PCIC 2008<br />
Note – The stati<strong>on</strong> elevati<strong>on</strong> is 870m<br />
( o C)<br />
0.7 0.6 0.7 1.9 1.7 1.5 7.9 14.6 21.2<br />
While temperature is a vital climate determinant, so is precipitati<strong>on</strong>. In additi<strong>on</strong> to the total<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong>, the proporti<strong>on</strong> that falls as snow, the timing <strong>of</strong> snow melt and the variati<strong>on</strong> in<br />
snow depth between years all have important ecological and hydrological implicati<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
are likely to be affected by climate change. During the 1961‐1990 baseline period, the<br />
proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> total precipitati<strong>on</strong> from snowfall was 27% at Tatlayoko Lake. As indicated by<br />
the coefficients <strong>of</strong> variati<strong>on</strong> (Cf var), snowfall varies more from year to year relative to the<br />
mean than annual precipitati<strong>on</strong>. Overall, precipitati<strong>on</strong> is relatively low compared to other<br />
areas in BC.<br />
Table 3: 19611990 baseline precipitati<strong>on</strong> and snow depth for Tatlayoko Lake<br />
Weather Stati<strong>on</strong><br />
Tatlayoko<br />
Lake<br />
Precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
(mm)<br />
Annual<br />
Rainfall (mm) Snowfall (mm)<br />
Mean 438.9 317.0 121.9<br />
St Dev 97.6 99.3 49.1<br />
Cf var 0.2 0.3 0.4<br />
Source: PCIC 2008<br />
Note: St. Dev = standard deviati<strong>on</strong>; Cf Var = coefficient <strong>of</strong> variati<strong>on</strong><br />
16
Xeni Gwet’in anecdotal informati<strong>on</strong> about past and present seas<strong>on</strong>al climate<br />
To complement the scientific climate data, primary data and qualitative informati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
acquired through key informant surveys, which sought to capture community observati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
<strong>on</strong> past and current climatic changes. Twenty‐seven individuals were interviewed by four<br />
community<br />
members. The individuals surveyed included an equal amount <strong>of</strong> men and<br />
women but a high proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> elders in order to gain a better historical perspective.<br />
Table 4 sums up the main resp<strong>on</strong>ses from the Xeni community members, in resp<strong>on</strong>se to a<br />
questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> how the seas<strong>on</strong>s have changed climate‐wise between now and their childhood.<br />
Since the majority <strong>of</strong> the interviewees have lived between 40‐60 years in the study area,<br />
their resp<strong>on</strong>ses provided a rich amount <strong>of</strong> informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Table 4: Seas<strong>on</strong>al climate observati<strong>on</strong>s – past and present<br />
Summer Weather<br />
About temperature:<br />
• Summers used to be hot – but now they are even<br />
hotter, <strong>of</strong>ten 100 degrees and above.<br />
• Summers are l<strong>on</strong>ger now than they used to be.<br />
• Summers also used to have a mix <strong>of</strong> hot and cooler weather, but now they are mostly hot<br />
days.<br />
About precipitati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
• Now the summers are drier, as there is much less rain than in the past.<br />
• As a result, there are more droughts in the area now than before.<br />
• Hail and lightning storms are not as comm<strong>on</strong> as they were.<br />
Noticeable signs <strong>of</strong> weather changes:<br />
• In the past it would be green everywhere and there would be lots <strong>of</strong> water in the lakes<br />
during the summers.<br />
• Now nothing seems to grow and there is a lot less hay than there used to be.<br />
Observati<strong>on</strong>s – Fall Weather<br />
About temperature:<br />
• The fall weather is warmer than it used to be.<br />
About precipitati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
• There used to be a lot <strong>of</strong> rain and thunder during the fall, especially during the hay seas<strong>on</strong>,<br />
but now there is less.<br />
• The fall seas<strong>on</strong> has gotten shorter, as snow arrives earlier than it used to.<br />
• Falls used to be very windy, but now there is less wind – <strong>on</strong>ly rain and warm air.<br />
Noticeable signs <strong>of</strong> weather changes:<br />
• Before deer were fat in the fall after summer grazing, but now the deer are skinny, as there<br />
is not enough grass for their summer grazing.<br />
Winter Weather<br />
About temperature:<br />
• Winters used to be a lot colder than they are now, as it was normal to have temperatures<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‐40 degrees for l<strong>on</strong>g periods <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
About precipitati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
17
• Overall: Winter weather has gotten very unpredictable – it now seems<br />
that it can rain or<br />
snow any time.<br />
• There used to be a lot more snow during<br />
winters than there is now.<br />
• The winter seas<strong>on</strong> has gotten shorter.<br />
• There used to be a lot more wind chills than there are now.<br />
Noticeable signs <strong>of</strong> weather changes:<br />
• While there used to be thick ice <strong>on</strong> most water bodies, now there is a lot less ice. For<br />
example, Chilko Lake no l<strong>on</strong>ger freezes over during the winters<br />
About temperature:<br />
Spring Weather<br />
• Spring used to arrive earlier, but now the seas<strong>on</strong> has gotten shorter, but colder<br />
About precipitati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
• While it used to still snow in the Spring, now snow does not melt until June or July and it is<br />
cold until July<br />
• Now Springs have gotten more windy and there are lots <strong>of</strong> rain<br />
4.4. Climate Projecti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Temperature<br />
Figure 4 shows a general warming trend for mean annual temperature (MAT) throughout<br />
the following periods: (a) 1961 – 1990, (b) A1F1 2020’s, and (c) A1F1 2050’s. By mean<br />
annual temperature we refer to the average <strong>of</strong> hot and cold extremes <strong>of</strong> temperature taken<br />
every day throughout the course <strong>of</strong> a year. In recent history (1961 – 1990), if we were to<br />
average out the temperatures for the whole area, MAT would have been 0.07 °C. The A1F1<br />
scenario predicts a warming <strong>of</strong> 1.11 °C and 2.61°C for the 2020’s and 2050’s, respectively.<br />
That means that in<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly ten years (between now and 2020), the average temperature will<br />
Figure 4: Mean annual temperature for the Chilko River watershed throughout<br />
following periods: a) 19611990, b) 2020’s A1F1 scenario, and c) 2050’s<br />
A1F1 scenario.<br />
18
Source: Theo Mlynowski, UNBC<br />
increase by 0.4 degrees Celsius and with yet another 2.54 degrees Celsius in another 40<br />
years. Figure 4b and 1c illustrates that the colder temperatures will be experienced in the<br />
mountains, whereas warmer temperatures will occur in the lower areas.<br />
To put this figure in perspective, worldwide, a 2 degree increase is expected to increase sea<br />
level rise 0.5 to 2 metres by the year 2100 from the melting <strong>of</strong> ice caps in west Antarctica<br />
and Greenland. As a result, coastal areas where hundreds <strong>of</strong> milli<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> people currently live<br />
will<br />
get flooded. The B2 scenario predicts a more moderate warming <strong>of</strong> 1.02 °C and 1.72 °C<br />
for the 2020’s and 205 0’s,<br />
respectively.<br />
It is difficult to relate to the average weather that takes place across the whole XGCA. To<br />
provide a perspective <strong>of</strong> how varied the MAT will be even in a relatively small area like the<br />
XGCA when compared to the whole Cariboo‐Chilcotin Area, the study prepared a graph that<br />
compares the temperature <strong>of</strong> the XGCA to the temperatures expected at the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
Government <strong>of</strong>fice in the Nemiah Valley. Figure 5 shows that for each <strong>of</strong> the time frames, the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in Government <strong>of</strong>fice is about 1 degree warmer than the average throughout the<br />
XGCA. This is a result stemming from the fact that the <strong>of</strong>fice is in the valley. For both A1F1<br />
and B2 scenarios, temperatures increases will be relatively c<strong>on</strong>sistent over the landscape.<br />
Figure 5: Comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mean Annual Temperature (MAT).<br />
19
Source:<br />
Theo Mlynowski, UNBC<br />
Precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
Similar to temperature, Mean Annual Precipitati<strong>on</strong> (MAP) – which c<strong>on</strong>cerns both rain and<br />
snow – is the average <strong>of</strong> wet and dry extremes measured every day throughout the course<br />
<strong>of</strong> a year. Figure 6 shows a general increase <strong>of</strong> MAP throughout the following periods: (a)<br />
1961 – 1990, (b) A1F1 2020’s, and (c) A1F1 2050’s.<br />
At present, the MAP for the period 1961‐1990 for the XGCA is 901‐mm. Figure 5 illustrates<br />
that the bulk <strong>of</strong> the precipitati<strong>on</strong> happens in the mountains, whereas the low lying areas <strong>of</strong><br />
the territory are a bit dryer. Map 6b and 6c show that the future A1F1 scenario predicts an<br />
increase in annual precipitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 44‐mm and 104‐mm for the 2020’s and 2050’s,<br />
respectively. In comparis<strong>on</strong>, the B2 scenario (not shown in the Figure) predicts a slightly<br />
drier future with an increase in precipitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 21‐mm and 36‐mm for the 2020’s and<br />
2050’s,<br />
respectively. A large porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the increase in precipitati<strong>on</strong> will take place in the<br />
mountains, as illustrated by the dark blue patterns.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> the effects <strong>of</strong> a warmer climate, the percent <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> in the form <strong>of</strong> snow is<br />
expected to decrease. Throughout the period 1961 – 1990, roughly 60 % <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
was snow. The A1F1 scenario predicts a decrease to 57% by the 2020’s, and 52% by the<br />
2050’s. Likewise, the B2 scenario predicts a decrease to 58% by the 2020’s and 56% by the<br />
2050’s.<br />
Figure 6: Mean annual precipitati<strong>on</strong> for the Chilko River watershed throughout the<br />
following 19611990. Change in mean annual precipitati<strong>on</strong> (in reference to<br />
the 1961 – 1990 values) is shown for b) 2020’s A1F1 scenario, and c) 2050’s<br />
A1F1 scenario.<br />
Source: Theo Mlynowski, UNBC<br />
As with temperature above, the study prepared a graph that compares the precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
level <strong>of</strong> the Chilko Watershed to the <strong>on</strong>e expected at the Xeni Gwet’in Government <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />
20
Figure<br />
7 shows that for each <strong>of</strong> the time frames, the Xeni Gwet’in Government <strong>of</strong>fice gets<br />
about<br />
350 m less rain than the average across the Chilko Watershed.<br />
21
Figure 7: Comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mean Annual Precipitati<strong>on</strong> (MAT).<br />
Impact <strong>on</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>s from changes in temperature and precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
A fundamental questi<strong>on</strong> to ask is how the above changes in temperature and precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
will change throughout the seas<strong>on</strong>s. According to the projecti<strong>on</strong>s, over the next 40 years,<br />
the largest temperature increase will be in the spring, followed by winter. Summer and fall<br />
will experience a slightly lesser temperature increase. In Table 5, the change in temperature<br />
between the normal period (the current situati<strong>on</strong>) and the IPCC scenarios is shown by the<br />
trend<br />
which is marked by W or C (Warmer or Colder), and + or – (more than average or<br />
less‐than‐average).<br />
Table 5: The mean temperature for each IPCC Scenario shown by seas<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Mean Temperature<br />
Winter Spring Summer Autumn<br />
Scenario ◦C Trend ◦C Trend ◦C Trend ◦C Trend Normal 1961 1990 ‐9.12 ‐ ‐0.37 ‐ 9.07 ‐ 0.72 ‐<br />
A1F1 2020's ‐8.01 W+ 0.99 W+ 10.09 W‐ 1.64 W‐<br />
A1F1 2050's ‐6.51 W‐ 2.86 W+ 11.46 W‐ 2.92 W‐<br />
B2 2020's ‐8.08 W+ 0.86 W+ 10.08 W‐ 1.53 W‐<br />
B2 2050's ‐7.39 W+ 1.70 W+ 10.77 W‐ 2.10 W‐<br />
Source:<br />
Theo Mlynowski, UNBC<br />
22
The pattern <strong>of</strong> future precipitati<strong>on</strong> will be fairly different. Most precipitati<strong>on</strong> will occur in<br />
the winter and fall, whereas the spring will undergo very little change and summers will<br />
become even drier than at present for both the 2020’s and 2050’s. Table 6 shows the<br />
change in precipitati<strong>on</strong> between the normal period (current situati<strong>on</strong>) and the future IPCC<br />
scenarios.<br />
The change marked by W or D (Wetter or Drier), and + or – (more than average<br />
or<br />
less‐than‐average).<br />
Table 6: The mean precipitati<strong>on</strong> for each IPCC Scenario shown by seas<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Mean Precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
Winter Spring Summer Autumn<br />
Scenario ◦C Trend ◦C Trend ◦C Trend ◦C<br />
Normal 1961 1990 313.58 ‐ 153.76 ‐ 151.29 ‐ 282.37 ‐<br />
Tren<br />
d<br />
A1F1 2020's 343.43 W+ 153.98 W‐ 146.46 D‐ 300.91 W+<br />
A1F1 2050's 384.57 W+ 154.07 W‐ 139.75 D‐ 326.53 W+<br />
B2 2020's 336.57 W+ 154.95 W‐ 145.35 D‐ 285.07 W‐<br />
B2 2050's 352.85 W+ 155.25 W‐ 141.24 D‐ 287.98 W‐<br />
Source: Theo Mlynowski, UNBC<br />
It should be noted that the amount <strong>of</strong> snow the XGCA will receive will also very likely<br />
change.<br />
Currently about 60 percent <strong>of</strong> the precipitati<strong>on</strong> is in the form <strong>of</strong> snow. By 2020, this<br />
amount will decrease to about 57 percent, and further decrease to <strong>on</strong>ly 52 percent by 2050.<br />
In summary, over the course <strong>of</strong> the next 40 years, the XGCA can expect to see an average<br />
increase <strong>of</strong> 2.5 degrees Celsius and an increase <strong>of</strong> 104 mm <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong>. This increase in<br />
temperature will be relatively uniform across the XGCA, but precipitati<strong>on</strong> will mostly<br />
increase at higher elevati<strong>on</strong>s. Most <strong>of</strong> this precipitati<strong>on</strong> is snow, but will decrease to nearly<br />
50 percent by 2050. Seas<strong>on</strong>ally, most <strong>of</strong> the temperature increase will occur in the winter<br />
and spring, whereas the fall and winter will become wetter and the summer will become<br />
drier. Finally, due to the general effect <strong>of</strong> mountains <strong>on</strong> climate, the findings c<strong>on</strong>firm that<br />
the higher the locati<strong>on</strong>, the colder and wetter the future climate will be. Likewise, the lower<br />
the locati<strong>on</strong>, the warmer and dryer it will become.<br />
5. Current and Projected Biophysical Impacts<br />
5.1. Water Resources<br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the larger background report <strong>on</strong> Climate Impacts <strong>on</strong><br />
XGCA Water Resources prepared by Ecolibrio (see Annex 1). This secti<strong>on</strong> provides an<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> the impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change and variability <strong>on</strong> water resources in the Xeni<br />
23
Gwet’in Territory. It should be noted that this secti<strong>on</strong> is based <strong>on</strong> a literature review that<br />
summarizes previous studies from knowledgeable individuals and instituti<strong>on</strong>s familiar with<br />
the climate change impacts <strong>on</strong> water resources and/or the XGCA. More specifically, this<br />
secti<strong>on</strong> is built <strong>on</strong> previous work carried out and reflected in the following four<br />
reports/articles: (i) A recent report by the Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium (PCIC)<br />
(revised 2009); (ii) an older report by Rood and Hamilt<strong>on</strong> (1995); (iii) a report by<br />
Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004); and (vi) groundwater research carried out by Diana M. Allen<br />
and<br />
others, as documented in D. Allen (2009). 21 Other sources are listed, whenever they<br />
have<br />
been used to complement the main findings <strong>of</strong> these four reports.<br />
Projected Climate Changes and Their Impacts <strong>on</strong> Water Resources<br />
Projecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> future climate change are still an uncertain science, due to limitati<strong>on</strong>s in<br />
existing models and insufficient, l<strong>on</strong>ger‐term data set. There is no doubt, however, that<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinuous climate change will impact the water resources within the XGCA, as it already is<br />
and will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to impact the entire hydrological system in the Study Area. In particular,<br />
climate change will influence temperature as well as the timing, amount and form <strong>of</strong><br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong>. As a result, there will be shifts in streamflows and seas<strong>on</strong>al transiti<strong>on</strong>s, earlier<br />
spring run<strong>of</strong>fs, and increasing river temperatures. 23 Evaporati<strong>on</strong> and soil moisture will be<br />
affected as well (see box 1). During the cold m<strong>on</strong>ths <strong>of</strong> the year, temperature influences the<br />
balance between cryospheric24 regimes (which are l<strong>on</strong>g‐term storage) and rainfall (which<br />
results in a short‐term resp<strong>on</strong>se in streamflow) even before c<strong>on</strong>sidering climate change.<br />
When adding climate change, projected changes in temperature will be especially critical for<br />
the<br />
water resources in the XGCA, given that temperature c<strong>on</strong>trols the storage <strong>of</strong> snowfall in<br />
the<br />
wet/cold seas<strong>on</strong> for subsequent use in the dry/warm seas<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Box 1: Climate Change’s Impact <strong>on</strong> Soil Moisture and Surface Evaporati<strong>on</strong><br />
Soil moisture acts as a water reserve for vegetati<strong>on</strong> and agriculture. It integrates inputs from rain,<br />
snowmelt, and losses due to evaporati<strong>on</strong>, intercepti<strong>on</strong>, surface run<strong>of</strong>f, and drainage (base flow).<br />
Surface evaporati<strong>on</strong> is a critical hydrological feedback from the earth’s surface into the<br />
atmosphere that has, itself, been modified by global climate change. Evaporati<strong>on</strong> depends in part <strong>on</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> soil moisture, solar radiati<strong>on</strong>, and ground cover. Each process influences soil<br />
moisture with a different temporal signature and affects the timing <strong>of</strong> streamflow parameters.<br />
Finally, changes in soil moisture determine the fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> and snowmelt that is<br />
released to streams as run<strong>of</strong>f. Some measurements have been made in BC, but projecti<strong>on</strong>s for the<br />
2050s require a comprehensive hydrologic model that would determine impacts <strong>on</strong> agriculture and<br />
forestry, and feedbacks within the hydrologic system. Current projecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> changes in soil<br />
moisture have been made <strong>on</strong>ly for the Columbia Basin.<br />
Source: PCIC (2007/revised 2009, p.68)<br />
Projected changes in annual precipitati<strong>on</strong> are small and somewhat uncertain. However,<br />
these projected changes become fracti<strong>on</strong>ally large, when they c<strong>on</strong>cern climatologically dry<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>s, such as a significant part <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin Plateau, which make up a large part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
21 Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium (PCIC)<br />
(2007/revised 2009).<br />
22 This secti<strong>on</strong> primarily draws from PCIC (2007/revised 2009).<br />
23 Walker, I.J. and Sydneysmith, R. (2008).<br />
24 The cryosphere describes the porti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Earth where water is in solid form, such as sea ice, lake ice, river<br />
ice, snow cover, glaciers, ice caps and ice sheets, and frozen ground (which includes permafrost) (Source:<br />
Wikipedia).<br />
22<br />
24
XGCA. The importance <strong>of</strong> this change does not so much refer to changes in the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfall, but more to a change in the ratio between rainfall and snow. In other words, the<br />
transiti<strong>on</strong> from snow to rain during the colder m<strong>on</strong>ths (as they will become warmer) may<br />
cause complex changes in cryospheric regimes (glaciers, snowpack, lake ice) that may lead<br />
to<br />
subsequent changes in operati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> reservoirs and in the seas<strong>on</strong>al shifts in timing <strong>of</strong><br />
streamflow.<br />
The rest <strong>of</strong> this secti<strong>on</strong> provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> current research to date<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerning how climate impacts <strong>on</strong> snowpack, glaciers, streamflows and groundwater will<br />
increasingly affect the pristine water resources <strong>of</strong> the XGCA. This secti<strong>on</strong> highlights how the<br />
hydrology, and hence the water resources in the XGCA, are str<strong>on</strong>gly influenced by<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong> and temperature. For instance, the amount <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> falling as snow<br />
versus rain, the amount <strong>of</strong> evapo‐transpirati<strong>on</strong>, the sustainability <strong>of</strong> glacial inputs to rivers<br />
and the timing <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f are all potential impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change. 25<br />
Snowpack 26<br />
Snowpack is a critical seas<strong>on</strong>al water resource that is renewed each year at high elevati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
It retains freshwater during the cold winter m<strong>on</strong>ths, after which it supplies streamflow to<br />
soils, lakes and reservoirs during the warmer summer low‐flow periods. Snowpack is,<br />
however,<br />
utilized during most <strong>of</strong> the year after transformati<strong>on</strong> in reservoirs, streamflow<br />
and groundwater.<br />
Snowpack projecti<strong>on</strong>s in BC are still in their infancy, as snowpack is a difficult variable to<br />
measure. Given that the projected changes to snowpack rely <strong>on</strong> both temperature and<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong>, a great deal <strong>of</strong> uncertainty is associated with estimates. At present, a single<br />
estimate has been produced by <strong>on</strong>e RCM model. The results, however, are not sufficient to<br />
produce a c<strong>on</strong>fident statement about future changes to snowpack in BC. The results do,<br />
however,<br />
dem<strong>on</strong>strate that a combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> scientific approaches is needed to provide<br />
reliable<br />
future estimates <strong>of</strong> changes to snowpack in BC.<br />
While the findings are still tentative, the projecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> spring snowpack for BC show<br />
a decline by 2050s <strong>of</strong> 200kg/m2. Significantly, the projected snowpack decline is<br />
more pr<strong>on</strong>ounced in the Coastal Mountain ranges with 500kg/m2. This is important<br />
as while this area is more waterrich than the Chilcotin Plateau as menti<strong>on</strong>ed above,<br />
the decrease will impact the water resources in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> where the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
reside.<br />
In other words, the decrease in snowpack will impact the water resources that<br />
supply the daily water use <strong>of</strong> the Xeni people.<br />
The projected decreases were primarily caused by the change in snow‐to‐rain ratios<br />
occurring<br />
through December, which delayed snowfall into the later winter m<strong>on</strong>ths and<br />
reduced<br />
annual snow water equivalent. 27<br />
25 Daws<strong>on</strong>, R., A.T. Werner,<br />
and T.Q. Murdock, (2008).<br />
26 This secti<strong>on</strong> is primarily<br />
prepared from informati<strong>on</strong> provided in PCIC (2007/revised 2009).<br />
27 Sushama et al (2006).<br />
25
Glaciers 28<br />
Like snowmelt, glaciers are also an important c<strong>on</strong>tributor to water resources. Yet, c<strong>on</strong>trary<br />
to snowmelt, their influence extends from seas<strong>on</strong>s to decades. During the late summer,<br />
when<br />
rivers typically experience low flows and ecological requirements are high, glacier<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f may be a large facti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the streamflow.<br />
According to the IPCC, global glacier loss will c<strong>on</strong>tinue throughout the 21st century because<br />
increased melt rates will exceed supplements from increased snowfall. 29 More specifically,<br />
based <strong>on</strong> the IPCC IS92a (or “business‐as‐usual”) scenario, glacier surface area globally is<br />
expected to decrease by 38 % and 34 % by 2025 and 2050, respectively. 30 Given the data<br />
limitati<strong>on</strong>s, the behavior <strong>of</strong> glaciers in the XGCA watersheds is hard to predict with<br />
any certainty. Adding to the lack <strong>of</strong> data explained above, another key challenge is that due<br />
to the presence <strong>of</strong> more than 10,000 glaciers in Western Canada, projected changes cannot<br />
be made with fully dynamic glaciological models for all glaciers, although these models may<br />
serve well for projecting changes at individual glaciers. What is clear, though, most <strong>of</strong><br />
BC’s glaciers are losing mass and many will disappear in the next century. 31 This will<br />
undoubtedly<br />
influence river discharges and temperature in a negative way in the<br />
XGCA.<br />
A str<strong>on</strong>g example is provided in Figure 8, where projecti<strong>on</strong>s for Bridge glacier highlight<br />
substantial reducti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> its mass area by up to 20 percent by the 2050s even without<br />
further warming <strong>of</strong> the current climate. The figure also shows a subsequent marked<br />
reducti<strong>on</strong> (37%) in the mean August (summer) stream flow from approximately 2005 to<br />
2145, even when based <strong>on</strong> a c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the present climate. When the present climate<br />
was substituted with projected warmer temperatures in the applied models, the glacial<br />
trends got even str<strong>on</strong>ger. These projected changes will be the result <strong>of</strong> the projected<br />
increases<br />
in air temperature and prevalence <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> falling as rain rather than<br />
snow. 32<br />
It should be noted that the Bridge glacier is located in the southern BC, so it is not <strong>of</strong> direct<br />
relevance to the water bodies <strong>of</strong> the XGCA. This projecti<strong>on</strong> is still alarming, though, as the<br />
Bridge glacier covers the largest fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> watershed area in BC. In additi<strong>on</strong>, these results<br />
suggest that for most <strong>of</strong> BC the phase <strong>of</strong> increased streamflow that generally follows climate<br />
warming has passed and c<strong>on</strong>tinued reducti<strong>on</strong> in glacier area will lead to decreased<br />
streamflow. In other words, the future will see less water in the water bodies.<br />
28 This secti<strong>on</strong> is based solely <strong>on</strong> PCIC (2007revised 2009), unless other source<br />
is stated.<br />
29 IPCC Technical Summary for the Fourth Assessment Report<br />
30 Bush, A., and Pollock, T. (2009); Pers<strong>on</strong>al Communicati<strong>on</strong> (Nov. 2009).<br />
31 Walker, I.J. and Sydneysmith, R. (2008).<br />
32 Stahl, K., Moore, R.D., Shea, J.M., Hutchins<strong>on</strong>, D. and Cann<strong>on</strong>, A., (2007 in press).<br />
26
Figure 8: The Bridge glacier Projected changes in glacier area and mean August<br />
streamflow for the Bridge glacier in southern BC (20002150).<br />
Source: Modified from Stahl et al., in review – as seen in PCIC 2009<br />
Streamflow<br />
At present, a comprehensive study <strong>of</strong> projected BC streamflow is not available, in spite <strong>of</strong> its<br />
importance for water resources. However, several independent studies have been made for<br />
major basins and individual watersheds, including two for the Fraser River (Table 7). These<br />
studies c<strong>on</strong>firm c<strong>on</strong>cerns that the influence <strong>of</strong> future regi<strong>on</strong>al projecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> warmer<br />
temperatures, uncertain precipitati<strong>on</strong> and a reducti<strong>on</strong> in snowpack and glaciers will<br />
adversely affect both the timing and the volume <strong>of</strong> projected stream flow. 33<br />
33 Whitfield et al.(2002b).; Merritt, W.S. et al., (2006); and Loukas, A., et al. (2004)<br />
27
Table 7: Research studies <strong>on</strong>going in BC <strong>on</strong> streamflow.<br />
Regi<strong>on</strong> Source Study Site Hydrologic<br />
Model<br />
Fraser Morris<strong>on</strong><br />
River et al.<br />
200234 Fraser<br />
River<br />
Basin<br />
(217,000<br />
km2) UBC<br />
Watershed<br />
Model<br />
Fraser<br />
River<br />
Sushama<br />
et al.<br />
2006 35<br />
Fraser<br />
River basin<br />
above Port<br />
Mann<br />
(232,000<br />
km 2)<br />
Canadian<br />
Regi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Climate<br />
Model<br />
(CRCM)<br />
Source: Adapted from Merritt et al. (2006)<br />
GCM<br />
Scenario<br />
CGCMA<br />
Hadley<br />
Climate<br />
Model<br />
(HadCM2)<br />
CGCM2‐<br />
A2<br />
standard,<br />
CGCM2 –<br />
A2<br />
updated,<br />
and<br />
CGCM2‐<br />
IS92<br />
standard<br />
Downscaling<br />
Technique<br />
Statistical<br />
climate<br />
inversi<strong>on</strong><br />
CRCM<br />
(dynamical<br />
downscaling)<br />
Hydrology<br />
Scenarios<br />
Present<br />
climate:<br />
(1961‐<br />
1990)<br />
Future<br />
climate:<br />
2020<br />
(2010‐<br />
2039);<br />
2050s<br />
(2040‐<br />
2069);<br />
2080s<br />
(2070‐<br />
2099)<br />
Present<br />
climate:<br />
( 1961‐<br />
1990)<br />
Future<br />
climate:<br />
(2041‐<br />
2070)<br />
Changes to<br />
streamflow<br />
Modest average<br />
flow increase in<br />
the 2080s with a<br />
decrease in the<br />
average<br />
peak<br />
flow.<br />
General shift to<br />
earlier peak in<br />
the hydrograph<br />
(approx. 24<br />
days)<br />
A significant<br />
decrease in SWE<br />
as less<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong><br />
falls as snow.<br />
Run<strong>of</strong>f is higher<br />
during late‐fall<br />
and early‐winter.<br />
Spring peaks are<br />
attenuated<br />
and<br />
occur earlier.<br />
Increased<br />
variability in the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> days<br />
with low‐flows.<br />
Increased low<br />
flows in fall.<br />
The recent PCIC hydrology report from 2009 outlines a host <strong>of</strong> challenges and complexities<br />
related to modeling different run<strong>of</strong>f regimes, <strong>on</strong>e being the multiple sources <strong>of</strong> streamflow<br />
that have to be accounted for (i.e. glacier‐melt and groundwater). Yet, the studies highlight<br />
that projected changes to annual and seas<strong>on</strong>al streamflow volumes and timing are similar<br />
across<br />
models and approaches. 36 The following summary is provided by the PCIC report<br />
( p.106‐108):<br />
• “All models and approaches that deal with nival (i.e. snowfed) systems predict an<br />
earlier <strong>on</strong>set <strong>of</strong> the spring freshet or peak flows compared to the base case.<br />
34 Morris<strong>on</strong>, J., Quick, M.C. and Foreman, M.G.G., (2002).<br />
35 Sushama, L., Laprise, R., Caya,<br />
D., Frig<strong>on</strong>, A. and Slivitzky, M.,( 2006).<br />
36 Merritt, W.S. et al., (2006).<br />
28
• Projected changes to the magnitude <strong>of</strong> flow include increased winter and decreased<br />
summer and fall streamflow, al<strong>on</strong>g with a diminished spring freshet volume. 37<br />
• Warmer winter temperatures will cause more precipitati<strong>on</strong> to fall as rain rather than<br />
snow, resulting in increased winter run<strong>of</strong>f and decreased snowpack accumulati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
a tendency towards more pluvial(i.e. rainfed) streamflow regimes. 38<br />
• Reducti<strong>on</strong>s to spring peaks will occur primarily from reducti<strong>on</strong>s in snowpack and from<br />
warmer temperatures causing an earlier spring melt.”<br />
The changes to the flood and low‐flow volume producing mechanisms are different for<br />
pluvial (rainfed) and nival (snowfed) systems. 39 Watersheds fed by rain are expected to<br />
have<br />
increased flood magnitude and frequency. 40 This resp<strong>on</strong>se is primarily driven by<br />
warmer, wetter winters, where instead <strong>of</strong> snow, precipitati<strong>on</strong> falls as rain. 41<br />
A decrease in the number and magnitude <strong>of</strong> flood events is predicted for many snow‐fed<br />
watersheds, particularly those in the semi‐arid interior regi<strong>on</strong>s. 42 This decrease is driven by<br />
the spring melt taking place earlier. Drier summers in combinati<strong>on</strong> with year‐round<br />
warming are projected to increase water shortages in both pluvial and nival rivers because<br />
<strong>of</strong> changes in rainfall timing and amounts, projected smaller snowpack and increased<br />
evaporati<strong>on</strong>. 43 Also an increase in the time elapsed between snowmelt and fall rain is<br />
projected, which will extend the dry‐seas<strong>on</strong> low‐flow period. Interestingly, rain‐fed regimes<br />
have been shown to have noticeably l<strong>on</strong>ger dry seas<strong>on</strong>s as a result <strong>of</strong> changes in<br />
temperature<br />
and precipitati<strong>on</strong> inputs. Because <strong>of</strong> this rain‐fed systems are c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />
sensitive to climate change. 44<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> projected impacts in the XGCA, based <strong>on</strong> the above trends, from the<br />
projected warmer temperatures and increase in precipitati<strong>on</strong> for the Study Area, the<br />
XGCA rivers will probably see an increase in winter flows and decreased later<br />
summer flows. 45 Glaciers play a major role in determining low‐flows for 48 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itored<br />
rivers in BC (see secti<strong>on</strong> above). The influence <strong>of</strong> groundwater and glacier melt<br />
<strong>on</strong><br />
low‐flows requires further study. 46<br />
Groundwater 47<br />
Groundwater plays a critical role in maintaining streamflows during summer m<strong>on</strong>ths, which<br />
sustain fish habitat, aquatic ecosystems, not to menti<strong>on</strong> the animals and humans that<br />
depend <strong>on</strong> them. Yet, despite these important qualities <strong>of</strong> groundwater, very little research<br />
have been d<strong>on</strong>e to date <strong>on</strong> how climate change might affect groundwater resources in the<br />
future. C<strong>on</strong>cerning BC, for the<br />
past decade a research program spearheaded by Sim<strong>on</strong><br />
Fraser<br />
University has focused <strong>on</strong> modeling recharge and groundwater‐streamflow<br />
37 Hamlet, A.F. and Lettenmaier, D.P., (1999b).<br />
38 Hamlet, A.F. and Lettenmaier, D.P., (1999b) and Whitfield, P.H., Reynolds, C.J. and Cann<strong>on</strong>, A.J., (2002b).<br />
39 Loukas, A., Lampros, V. and Dalezios,<br />
N.R., (2002a).<br />
40 Loukas, A., Vasiliades, L. and Dalezios, N.R., (2004) and Whitfield, P.H., Reynolds, C.J. and Cann<strong>on</strong>,<br />
A.J., (2002b).<br />
41 Pars<strong>on</strong>, E.A. et al., (2001b).<br />
42 Cohen, S. and Kulkarni, T., (20010. And<br />
Loukas, A., Vasiliades, L. and Dalezios, N.R., (2002b).<br />
43 Pars<strong>on</strong>, E.A. et al., (2001a).<br />
44 Whitfield, P.H. and<br />
Taylor, E., (1998).<br />
45 Walker, I.J. and Sydneysmith, R. (2008).<br />
46 Stahl, K. (2007).<br />
47 Given the scarcity <strong>of</strong> available informati<strong>on</strong> and data, this secti<strong>on</strong> is primarily based <strong>on</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />
recent article by Diana Allen in Innovati<strong>on</strong> May/June 2009, Impacts <strong>of</strong> Climate Change <strong>on</strong> Groundwater in BC.<br />
29
interati<strong>on</strong> under different scenarios <strong>of</strong> climate change and the overall understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
climate‐groundwater‐surface water interacti<strong>on</strong>s in BC. 48 To date, four case studies in BC<br />
have<br />
been completed to quantify potential impacts <strong>of</strong> future climate changes <strong>on</strong><br />
groundwater recharge and groundwater levels.<br />
However, n<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the assessments carried out pertained to the XGCA or the Chilcotin<br />
Habitat Management Area. Given the scarcity <strong>of</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> related to the groundwater<br />
situati<strong>on</strong> in the XGCA, the following are therefore general observati<strong>on</strong>s from these other<br />
assessments. While some <strong>of</strong> these findings may be very relevant for how climate change will<br />
impact the groundwater resources in the XGCA, they should still be c<strong>on</strong>sidered with a high<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, as any given groundwater aquifer has unique physical properties (i.e.<br />
the geology), geometry (i.e. the c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>of</strong> broad flow patterns), and the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong><br />
with surface water (i.e., can be a highly dynamic water source and sink for<br />
groundwater).<br />
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
main findings <strong>of</strong> these assessments:<br />
• Of importance to the Xeni Gwet’in, groundwater systems in the interior regi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
<strong>of</strong> BC will be particularly sensitive to climate change owing to shifts in the<br />
timing and amount <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong>, and the str<strong>on</strong>g dependence <strong>of</strong> rates <strong>of</strong><br />
evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>, snow accumulati<strong>on</strong> and snowmelt <strong>on</strong> temperature.<br />
• In the spring, an increase in temperatures will kick <strong>of</strong>f the growing seas<strong>on</strong> earlier,<br />
and lead to increased rates <strong>of</strong> evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• In the summer<br />
and early fall, higher temperatures will limit groundwater<br />
recharge even more<br />
than presently observed.<br />
• In the winter, loss <strong>of</strong> snowpack and timing <strong>of</strong> snowmelt in the spring can<br />
potentially have significant impacts <strong>on</strong> the amount and timing <strong>of</strong> spring<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f. As a result, these shifts will influence groundwater recharge both in<br />
the valley bottom and in the upland areas.<br />
If groundwater levels are reduced ‐ brought about either by increased extracti<strong>on</strong> (i.e. for<br />
agricultural or human c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>) or lower recharge ‐ the c<strong>on</strong>sequence could be a<br />
reducti<strong>on</strong> in summer baseflow to stream corridors. Even if changes in recharge amounted<br />
to <strong>on</strong>ly a few millimeters per year, when summed across an entire aquifer, a significant<br />
about <strong>of</strong> stored groundwater could be lost, which, subsequently, would lead to a significant<br />
reducti<strong>on</strong> in the c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> groundwater to baseflow. Furthermore, a shift in peak<br />
stream<br />
flow will occur due to earlier snowmelt. The c<strong>on</strong>sequent l<strong>on</strong>ger baseflow period will<br />
demand a higher groundwater c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to sustain the flow.<br />
In glacierized catchments – such as some <strong>of</strong> the catchments within the XGCA ‐, it is likely<br />
that glacier‐fed rivers will experience a shift from a glacial regime with high flows in mid<br />
and late summer to a regime that resp<strong>on</strong>ds to the summer dry period with streamflow<br />
recessi<strong>on</strong>, low flows and increased temperatures. In such areas, groundwater will become<br />
an increasingly important source <strong>of</strong> water for sustaining baseflow during the summer<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ths. As a result, according to Allen (2009, “summer low flows in the streams may be<br />
exacerbated by the decreasing groundwater levels and diminished glacier cover, and<br />
streamflow may become inadequate to meet ec<strong>on</strong>omic needs such as domestic<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>,<br />
irrigati<strong>on</strong>, as well as ecological functi<strong>on</strong>s such as instream habitat for<br />
fish and other aquatic species [emphasis added].”<br />
48 Allen, Diana M. (2009)<br />
30
If the timing <strong>of</strong> river discharge shifts, it may lead to a str<strong>on</strong>g impact <strong>on</strong> groundwater levels.<br />
This is especially the case in valleys that have major rivers flowing through them. For the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in, the rivers <strong>of</strong> such importance would include the Chilcotin, Chilko and Taseko<br />
Rivers. In additi<strong>on</strong>, peak flow in many BC rivers is predicted to shift to an earlier date,<br />
combined<br />
with a prol<strong>on</strong>ged and lower baseflow period. Such a shift in peak flow would<br />
force groundwater levels to shift by the same interval.<br />
Another important factor is the projected higher incidence <strong>of</strong> extreme events. Generally,<br />
heavy rain events result in less groundwater recharge, because the ground is not able to<br />
absorb the increased precipitati<strong>on</strong> fast enough. The result will be greater run<strong>of</strong>f, more<br />
flooding, etc., which it is difficult to quantify with accuracy in hydrologic models. Similarly,<br />
extended periods <strong>of</strong> drought would lead to dry soil c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, which in some cases can<br />
result in less groundwater infiltrati<strong>on</strong>. So despite the fact that BC, as a whole, is projected to<br />
become wetter, some <strong>of</strong> this additi<strong>on</strong>al precipitati<strong>on</strong> may fall as heavy rainfall and,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sequently, the amount <strong>of</strong> groundwater recharge could decrease.<br />
5.2. Forest and Vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the larger Study Background Report <strong>on</strong> Climate Impacts<br />
<strong>on</strong> forest and vegetati<strong>on</strong> prepared by Orman C<strong>on</strong>sulting. For the full report, please see<br />
Annex 2. The methodology for the assessment carried out is provided in secti<strong>on</strong> 2.3 above.<br />
In brief, climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> the worst case emissi<strong>on</strong>s (A1F1) scenario were used<br />
to describe possible effects <strong>on</strong> the forests <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Territory by 2050. The<br />
projected climate variable changes by 2020 and 2050 are presented al<strong>on</strong>g with climate<br />
normals (1960‐1999) by Biogeoclimatic (BEC) subz<strong>on</strong>e. Although the model predicts<br />
changes to climate envelopes as classified by the BEC system, the changes do not represent<br />
changes to the forest ecosystem itself. Potential changes to the forest are inferred with the<br />
help <strong>of</strong> expert opini<strong>on</strong> and literature reviews 49.<br />
Forests <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Territory<br />
The XGCA ecosystem, including its wildlife, is somewhat adapted to periods <strong>of</strong> climate<br />
extremes, whether very severe winters or summer drought periods. In the winter, str<strong>on</strong>g<br />
winds called “Chinooks” (warm drying winds) periodically blows from the west, causing<br />
rapid warming and snow melting, as they also do in the foothills <strong>of</strong> the Rocky Mountains.<br />
Many plant and animal species have evolved and survived in areas like the XGCA because <strong>of</strong><br />
their resiliency to extreme climate variati<strong>on</strong>s. Other species have not d<strong>on</strong>e so well, largely in<br />
part due to man‐induced habitat alternati<strong>on</strong>s or destructi<strong>on</strong>, rather than climate extremes<br />
and<br />
so have either been extirpated or put <strong>on</strong> the threatened or endangered list, provincially<br />
and/or federally.<br />
The forests <strong>of</strong> British Columbia are classified using the Biogeoclimatic Ecological<br />
Classificati<strong>on</strong> (BEC) System menti<strong>on</strong>ed earlier. This classificati<strong>on</strong> system is a framework for<br />
understanding the important comp<strong>on</strong>ents <strong>of</strong> terrestrial ecological systems. These<br />
comp<strong>on</strong>ents include climate, site factors, and associated vegetati<strong>on</strong>. The BEC system uses<br />
vegetati<strong>on</strong>, soils, and topography<br />
to infer the regi<strong>on</strong>al climate <strong>of</strong> a geographic area. Areas <strong>of</strong><br />
49 This simplistic approach was taken due to the budget c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>of</strong> this project. Models are now being<br />
developed that will project effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong> (Campbell et al. 2009).<br />
31
elatively uniform climate are called biogeoclimatic units, where climate refers to the<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al climate that influences ecosystems over an extended period <strong>of</strong> time. The BEC unit<br />
can be expressed as statistics derived from normals <strong>of</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong> and temperature. 50 It<br />
was a lack <strong>of</strong> climate stati<strong>on</strong>s capable <strong>of</strong> documenting the complexity <strong>of</strong> British Columbia’s<br />
climate, as well as a need to have biologically relevant climate z<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> for understanding<br />
climatic<br />
affects <strong>on</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong> and associated sites that drove the creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the climate<br />
comp<strong>on</strong>ent<br />
<strong>of</strong> BEC. See Appendix 1 for a more detailed descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the BEC system.<br />
General Projected Climate Changes<br />
The climate <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Territory is projected to get warmer and drier and this is<br />
reflected in the changes to the BEC subz<strong>on</strong>es. Note the shift z<strong>on</strong>es from Figure 9 to Figure<br />
10. To generate Figure 10, best matches (drier, warmer BEC subz<strong>on</strong>es) were determined for<br />
each original BEC subz<strong>on</strong>e based <strong>on</strong> the climate variables projected to 2050. Although the<br />
BEC subz<strong>on</strong>es can closely represent the changes in the climate variables, precipitati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
temperature, they do not represent how the forests might change by 2050. However, the<br />
changes<br />
to the BEC subz<strong>on</strong>es described below can give some insight into what species<br />
and/or ecosystems may be vulnerable as the climate changes.<br />
Based <strong>on</strong> the team assessment, eventually the climate <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> the area will be<br />
similar to what is now the Interior Douglas‐fir (IDF) z<strong>on</strong>e, with some amounts <strong>of</strong> the Bunch<br />
Grass (BG) z<strong>on</strong>e and P<strong>on</strong>derosa Pine (PP) z<strong>on</strong>e in the warmest areas. This generally agrees<br />
with a recent modeling project completed <strong>on</strong> the entire province by UBC (Figure 11). By<br />
2050 the IDF (yellow), BG (red), and PP (orange) visibly expand in the Chilcotin area<br />
(middle <strong>of</strong> the bottom third <strong>of</strong> the map).<br />
Figure 9. BEC z<strong>on</strong>es in the study area 51<br />
Figure 10. Projected BEC subz<strong>on</strong>es by 2050<br />
50 Downloaded from http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/HRE/becweb/system/how/index.html).<br />
51 % <strong>of</strong> hectares excluding Alpine Tundra z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
32
Figure 11. Biogeoclimatic changes by 2050 52<br />
Projected Climate Changes and Impacts by BEC Z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
A descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> each ecosystem is summarized from Steen and Coupe (1997) and Silva<br />
Forest Foundati<strong>on</strong> (2004) by BEC z<strong>on</strong>e. Much <strong>of</strong> the potential effect <strong>on</strong> the forest vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />
is summarized from the ‘Ecological Summary and Narratives’ appendix <strong>of</strong> the Kamloops<br />
Future Forest Strategy (2009). The Narrative was generated by local specialists and<br />
practiti<strong>on</strong>ers with experience in forestry, habitat and biodiversity, First Nati<strong>on</strong>s, watershed<br />
management, visual landscape management and fire interface management at a workshop.<br />
It should be read with following<br />
caveat in mind(page 33):<br />
52 As predicted by the CGCM2 A2x model, which represents minimalistic emissi<strong>on</strong> reducti<strong>on</strong>s resulting in rapid<br />
global warming. http://www.geog.ubc.ca/courses/geog376/students/class07/bec_pred/<br />
33
Box 2: The importance <strong>of</strong> curre nt and future pine beetle kill<br />
The forest cover <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Territory is currently dominated by lodgepole pine,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> BEC unit. <str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> a climatic point <strong>of</strong> view, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> lodgepole pine are<br />
intimately related to fire and mountain pine beetle. 1 Recent warm, dry summers, and mild<br />
winters have elevated the pine beetle populati<strong>on</strong>s to epidemic levels all throughout British<br />
Columbia. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests and Range estimate that 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the pine in the<br />
province’s central and southern Interior could be killed by 2013, which does not bode well<br />
for the pine in the XGCA (Figure 12). As trees are killed by mountain pine beetle, mortality<br />
an be extensive enough to become a very large c<strong>on</strong>tiguous fuel base. 1 c<br />
The large 2009 fires<br />
<strong>on</strong><br />
the west side <strong>of</strong> Chilko Lake and in the Brittany Triangle are good examples.<br />
Figure 12. Predicted cumulative percent <strong>of</strong> lodgepole pine killed by 2013. 1<br />
“We think that these narratives are entirely plausible given the informati<strong>on</strong> available today.<br />
We do expect them to be correct. However, we think they are less unbelievable than<br />
assuming that nothing will change. The key thing we are trying to achieve is to not blindly<br />
paint ourselves into a corner as our climate changes, with <strong>on</strong>ly a few difficult opti<strong>on</strong>s. This<br />
strategy will not be the final word. These narratives and associated management directi<strong>on</strong><br />
should be updated as new informati<strong>on</strong> emerges.” 53<br />
53<br />
Ecological Narratives ‐ Backgrounder, Kamloops Future Forest Strategy (2009) Page 1.<br />
34
In sum, the combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> beetle kill and forest fires will be the most significant impact from<br />
climate change to be addressed in the XGCA. The Canadian Forest Service predicts that 80 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pine will be infected with beetle kill by 2012 (see Box 2). As a result, not <strong>on</strong>ly will the forest<br />
fire<br />
hazard increase in terms <strong>of</strong> frequency, but more intense fires are projected as well (see Box 3).<br />
In<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
the main specific impacts <strong>on</strong> the forest and vegetati<strong>on</strong> will likely be:<br />
• Pine, subalpine fir will no l<strong>on</strong>ger be well suited to the XGCA envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />
• Aspen presence will likely decline, but will remain <strong>on</strong> moister slopes and draws<br />
• Douglas‐fir, and many P<strong>on</strong>derosa Pine <strong>on</strong> dry sites,<br />
may be more successful, due to changes<br />
in frost c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• There will be more grasslands <strong>on</strong> marginal sites<br />
• Invasive species, such as knapweed, will increase<br />
• While some culturally important plants will decrease, others might actually increase within<br />
the XGCA, such as the Soopolsllie and Choke Cherry, as areas get drier and warmer.<br />
Interior Douglasfir (IDF) z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
The IDF z<strong>on</strong>e is characterized by warm dry summers and cool dry winters. It comprises about 22%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the forested areas <strong>of</strong> the study area (Figure 2). Two IDF subz<strong>on</strong>es occur in the study area ‐ the<br />
IDFdk4 (dry cool) and IDFdw (dry warm). The IDFdk4 occurs in the Nemiah, Elkin, Taseko River<br />
and Lower Chilko River Valleys. It also occurs as a wide crescent shape band from Cheolquoit Lake<br />
to Tatla Hill within the North Trapline area. The elevati<strong>on</strong> range is from about 950 to 1200m.<br />
Climax stands <strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>al (mesic) sites typically have multi‐aged Douglas‐fir canopy with abundant<br />
regenerati<strong>on</strong>. Dominant seral species include lodgepole pine, trembling aspen willow ad rose. Cold<br />
air accumulati<strong>on</strong> areas have lodgepole pine forests similar to those <strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>al sites in the Sub Boreal<br />
Pine Spruce xc (very dry cold). Drier sites are dominated by Douglas‐fir, comm<strong>on</strong> and Rocky<br />
Mountain<br />
juniper, bluebunch wheatgrass, Rocky Mountain fescue and lichens, while moister sites<br />
have hybrid white spruce, black twinberry, palmate colt’s foot and comm<strong>on</strong> horsetail.<br />
The IDFdw subz<strong>on</strong>e occurs at low elevati<strong>on</strong>s al<strong>on</strong>g the Chilko and Tatlayoko Lakes. Due to the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> coastal air masses, the IDFdw has a warmer moister climate relative to most other<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the IDF z<strong>on</strong>e in the Cariboo Chilcotin. Climax stands are dominated by multi‐aged Douglas‐<br />
fir and pine grass, with some lodgepole pine and the occasi<strong>on</strong>al subalpine fir, while moist areas<br />
have hybrid spruce.<br />
Climate impacts: Climate change will result in hotter and drier summers, warmer winters with<br />
less snow and more rain in the fall and winter in both the IDFdw and IDFdk4. Lower elevati<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
southern exposures will experience greater drought stress with associated reducti<strong>on</strong>s in tree vigor<br />
and increases in mortality. On northern and moister sites, there will be stands <strong>of</strong> Douglas‐fir with<br />
scattered<br />
openings from pine and possibly spruce mortality. Fire is a c<strong>on</strong>cern in the remaining<br />
lodgepole pine stands in the near term.<br />
These subz<strong>on</strong>es will become much less suited to growing lodgepole pine. Increased drought stress<br />
will lower vigour and increase susceptibility to western gall rust, terminal weevil, dwarf mistletoe<br />
and possibly bark beetles. This increased mortality al<strong>on</strong>g with warmer summers will create a high<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> large intense fires. 54 Lodgepole pine established <strong>on</strong> cooler aspects will have a better chance<br />
<strong>of</strong> survival. Douglas‐fir, P<strong>on</strong>derosa<br />
pine and spruce should be well adapted up to 2050; however the<br />
KFFS ( 2009) indicates that by 2080,<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the lodgepole pine regenerated in the early century<br />
54 KFFS 2009.<br />
35
Box 3: Forest Fire Hazard in the XGCA<br />
Fire hazard is already a c<strong>on</strong>cern in the XGCA due to high proporti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> beetle kill and high fuel loads in<br />
the XGCA forests. Climate change will <strong>on</strong>ly worsen this hazard. Hotter and drier summers, warmer<br />
winters with less snow will result in less moisture in the forest, especially in lower elevati<strong>on</strong>s with<br />
southern exposures. Forests in these areas will experience greater drought stress with associated<br />
reducti<strong>on</strong>s in tree vigor and increases in disease and mortality. This increase in mortality al<strong>on</strong>g with<br />
warmer summers will create a high risk <strong>of</strong> large intense fires. Figure 13 shows the projected fire<br />
behaviour in the XGCA forest. The dark red markings indicate areas <strong>of</strong> extreme fire hazard and a high<br />
probability <strong>of</strong> fire. Large tracts <strong>of</strong> forests in the Brittany and <strong>on</strong> the west side <strong>of</strong> Chilko Lake are<br />
identified as extreme fire hazard burned in 2009. More dry summers will likely see the remaining<br />
High to Extreme hazard areas burn in the near term.<br />
Figure 13: Project Fire Behaviour in the XGCA<br />
Source: Del<strong>on</strong>g, 2010<br />
36
will be either dead or will struggle under hotter drier c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. This mortality and past wildfires<br />
may c<strong>on</strong>tribute to expanded grasslands. P<strong>on</strong>derosa Pine could eventually be the <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>ifer<br />
adapted to drier sites and Douglas‐fir will be limited to moister areas and require shade for<br />
establishment.<br />
SubBoreal Pine Spruce (SBPS) z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
The SBPS z<strong>on</strong>e has cold dry winters and cool dry summers due to its locati<strong>on</strong> at moderately high<br />
elevati<strong>on</strong>s in the rain shadow <strong>of</strong> the Coast Mountains. The SBPSxc (very dry cold) subz<strong>on</strong>e is the<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly subz<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the SBPS in the study area and it comprises also most half <strong>of</strong> the area (Figure 2). It<br />
occurs <strong>on</strong> the Chilcotin Plateau between about 1100 and 1500 m. The SBPSxc has the least annual<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the SBPS subz<strong>on</strong>es and vegetati<strong>on</strong> and soil development has been severely limited<br />
by the cold very dry climate. The landscape is dominated by extensive lodgepole pine forests and<br />
abundant wetlands. On z<strong>on</strong>al (medium moisture) sites, the forest canopy is <strong>of</strong>ten a patchwork <strong>of</strong><br />
even‐aged lodgepole pine stands which originated from various fires over time. Scattered aspen<br />
occur <strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>al sites and hybrid white spruce occurs <strong>on</strong> moister sites. Wet meadows are comm<strong>on</strong> in<br />
poorly drained depressi<strong>on</strong>s. Mountain pine beetle has caused extensive mortality in the pine across<br />
this subz<strong>on</strong>e.<br />
Climate impacts: By 2050 the climate <strong>of</strong> the SBPSxc will likely be approaching the current climate<br />
<strong>of</strong> the IDFdw. The risk <strong>of</strong> wildfires will increase in the short term as more pine is killed by mountain<br />
pine beetle. As the climate warms, lodgepole pine will not be suited to this envir<strong>on</strong>ment. As pine<br />
declines, it is likely that grassland will expand. Aspen will likely remain in moister areas and<br />
Douglas‐fir<br />
may expand into the area. Since there is more precipitati<strong>on</strong> over all ‐ but warmer, drier<br />
summers,<br />
the wet meadows may c<strong>on</strong>tract and expand <strong>on</strong> a seas<strong>on</strong>al basis.<br />
M<strong>on</strong>tane Spruce (MS) z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
The MS z<strong>on</strong>e occurs in the transiti<strong>on</strong> between the SBPS or the IDF and the Engelmann Spruce<br />
Subalpine fire (ESSF) z<strong>on</strong>e. Lodgepole pine also dominates the MS landscape. There are two MS<br />
subz<strong>on</strong>es in the study area‐ MSxv (very dry very cold) and the MSdc2 (dry cold). The MSxv occurs<br />
in the plateau porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the study area between 1400 and 1700m. The MSxv is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the least<br />
productive BEC units in the province for tree growth. Vegetati<strong>on</strong> successi<strong>on</strong> is very slow and pine<br />
stands<br />
greater than 200 years old with <strong>on</strong>ly a few spruce or subalpine fir trees in the canopy are<br />
comm<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The MSdc2 occurs in the Chilko and Tatlayoko valleys and Stikelan and Cheshi Passes and also<br />
between the IDFdk4 and ESSF in the lower Nemiah Valley. It ranges from 1150‐ 1650m. The climate<br />
is moderated by the costal influences. Z<strong>on</strong>al stands are dominated by lodgepole pine with moderate<br />
amounts <strong>of</strong> subalpine fir, aspen, scattered spruce and occasi<strong>on</strong>ally Douglas‐fir. Drier sites have<br />
significant amounts <strong>of</strong> Douglas‐fir and moist sites have hybrid spruce.<br />
Climate impacts: The ClimateBC model projected hotter and drier summers and warmer winters<br />
with slightly less snow in the MSxv subz<strong>on</strong>e. The risk <strong>of</strong> large wildfires will likely increase due to<br />
warmer temperatures and the increased fuel load from dead lodgepole pine stands. Where it is<br />
found, Douglas‐fir and spruce released by pine mortality will increase in size and vigour over the<br />
near term, but will show signs <strong>of</strong> moisture stress <strong>on</strong> all but the wettest <strong>of</strong> sites. Subalpine fir may<br />
survive in the short term but will have a limited role as a future overstory species. By 2050 there<br />
37
will likely be scattered Douglas‐fir with small patches <strong>of</strong> aspen scattered over a landscape mostly<br />
covered by pine in decline. Lodgepole pine established <strong>on</strong> the wetter, cooler aspects will have a<br />
higher chance <strong>of</strong> survival, but the climate will not be favourable to pine in the l<strong>on</strong>g run. There will<br />
be a trend to more open forests and more grasslands.<br />
Engelmann Spruce Subalpine Fir (ESSF) Z<strong>on</strong>e<br />
The ESSF z<strong>on</strong>e lies below the Alpine Tundra z<strong>on</strong>e and above the MS or IDF z<strong>on</strong>es. There are two<br />
ESSF subz<strong>on</strong>es in the study area‐ ESSFxv1 (very dry very cold) and the ESSFxvp (very dry very cold<br />
parkland). The ESSFxv1 lies between 1650 and 2100m. It is dominated by lodgepole pine forests<br />
which regenerate following relatively frequent fires. Subalpine fir and Engelmann spruce are<br />
present<br />
in the understory however; few seral pine forests have been replaced by these l<strong>on</strong>g lived<br />
species. Whitebark pine is comm<strong>on</strong> at elevati<strong>on</strong>s above 1850m <strong>on</strong> drier, warm aspects.<br />
The ESSFxvp is a parkland subz<strong>on</strong>e characterized by patches <strong>of</strong> stunted trees. It is dominated by<br />
subalpine fir with spruce <strong>on</strong> cool exposures and Whitebark pine and lodgepole pine <strong>on</strong> warmer<br />
aspects.<br />
Climate impacts: By 2050 the climate <strong>of</strong> this area will also be warmer and wetter overall, but<br />
summers will be drier. It is colder and wetter than the IDF, but warmer than the MS z<strong>on</strong>es. It is<br />
likely that fire frequency will go up and all species may move up in elevati<strong>on</strong>. Douglas‐fir may also<br />
move up slope from lower habitats as climate warms. The parkland areas will become more treed,<br />
however the speed at which this happens will be limited by soil development (Campbell et al.<br />
2009). The slow maturing Whitebark pine will be threatened as it cannot adapt rapidly to changing<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s and will probably be out‐competed. 55<br />
Culturally Important Plants<br />
56 57<br />
As the authors <strong>of</strong> the Kamloops Future Forest Strategy (2009) describe, the dynamic nature <strong>of</strong><br />
ecosystems<br />
makes predicti<strong>on</strong>s about future c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s challenging at best. However, some<br />
generalities<br />
were surmised:<br />
• L<strong>on</strong>g lived species may be able to survive changes.<br />
• Wet to moist site plants will see suitable habitat shrink, while some dryland species may be<br />
threatened by competiti<strong>on</strong> by invasive species.<br />
• However, species that are adapted to wet or dry c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s will<br />
likely survive where<br />
biophysical factors influence the amount <strong>of</strong> moisture available.<br />
• Drought adapted species may also have a wide range <strong>of</strong> adaptati<strong>on</strong>. Vulnerability <strong>of</strong> culturally important plants <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in will vary by species. There have<br />
been upwards <strong>of</strong> 50 species identified as important to most First Nati<strong>on</strong>s in the Cariboo‐Chilcotin. 58<br />
What follows is a small selecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> those plants that were specifically identified as important by the<br />
survey <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in elders.<br />
Clayt<strong>on</strong>ia lanceolata (Indian po tato) (Western Spring Beauty)<br />
55 Cox 2000.<br />
56 Ecology summarized<br />
from Parish et al. 1996.<br />
57 Informati<strong>on</strong> also<br />
provided by Ray Coupe, Ecologist, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests and Range, Williams Lake.<br />
58 Powell 2005.<br />
38
• Ecology: Indian potato is widely scattered at mid to high elevati<strong>on</strong>s in open, moist, grassy<br />
slopes. It is <strong>of</strong>ten found in areas <strong>of</strong> late snow beds. Other than the Potato Range it is not<br />
comm<strong>on</strong> in Chilcotin. It is more comm<strong>on</strong> the Quesnel Highland and the Cariboo Mountains<br />
east <strong>of</strong> the Fraser River. It is also comm<strong>on</strong> in some Interior Douglas‐fir grassland areas near<br />
Kamloops (Lac du Bois and Nisk<strong>on</strong>lith).<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: Indian potato seems capable <strong>of</strong> enduring some drought but also<br />
requires early spring moisture for early seas<strong>on</strong> growth and flowering. As snow pack<br />
declines and temperatures warm, growth may start earlier and it may migrate upward in<br />
elevati<strong>on</strong> where there is suitable habitat.<br />
Erythr<strong>on</strong>ium<br />
grandiflorum (beartooth) (yellow glacier lily)<br />
• Ecology: Beartooth is not comm<strong>on</strong> west <strong>of</strong> the Fraser River. It is more comm<strong>on</strong> and<br />
widespread in the Quesnel Highland and Cariboo Mountains in the ESSFwcw and WSSFwcp.<br />
It occurs in subalpine and alpine meadows and wet, open high sub‐alpine forests. It blooms<br />
so<strong>on</strong> after snow melt, <strong>on</strong> the edges <strong>of</strong> retreating snow.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: As snow pack declines and temperatures warm, growth may<br />
start earlier an d it may migrate upward in elevati<strong>on</strong> where there is suitable habitat.<br />
Amelanchier<br />
alnifolia (Saskato<strong>on</strong>)<br />
• Ecology: Saskato<strong>on</strong> is wide spread and comm<strong>on</strong> dry to moist forests at low to mid<br />
elevati<strong>on</strong>s. It also occurs occasi<strong>on</strong>ally at high elevati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> warm aspects.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: Saskato<strong>on</strong> may disappear from the very driest <strong>of</strong> sites but<br />
overall habitat will likely expand into the MS and SBPS.<br />
Prunus virginiana (Chokecherry)<br />
• Ecology: Chokecherry is not comm<strong>on</strong> in the Chilcotin. It is found <strong>on</strong> dry exposed warm<br />
aspects and rocky outcrops in low to mid elevati<strong>on</strong> open forests. Most comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> steeper<br />
warm aspects, roadsides and some low elevati<strong>on</strong> talus slopes.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: As the climate warms and becomes drier, chokecherry will likely<br />
spread and be more<br />
comm<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Rubus idaeus<br />
(raspberry)<br />
• Ecology: Raspberry is relatively comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> moist disturbed sites in the Chilcotin,<br />
especially in Coast/Interior tra nsiti<strong>on</strong> . It is scattered and <strong>of</strong>ten abundant from low<br />
to<br />
subalpine areas in clearings and disturbed areas.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: May be vulnerable to warmer, drier climate, but easily<br />
cultivated.<br />
Fragaria virginiana (strawberry)<br />
• Ecology: Strawberry is widespread and comm<strong>on</strong> at low to subalpine elevati<strong>on</strong>s in dry and<br />
moist forests, openings and disturbed areas.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: Strawberry exists across a wide range <strong>of</strong> sites and is therefore<br />
less susceptible to climate change. It will likely expand and become more comm<strong>on</strong> at higher<br />
elevati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Arctostaphylos uvauri (kinnikinnick)<br />
• Ecology: Kinnikinnick is widespread and comm<strong>on</strong> at low to alpine elevati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> sandy and<br />
well drained exposed sites.<br />
39
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: Kinnikinnick is likely at low risk to climate change as it is<br />
adapted to droughty sites across BECs. However, it is sensitive to moderate and severe<br />
fires.<br />
Sheperdia Canadensis (soapberry)<br />
• Ecology: Sheperdia is widespread<br />
in dry to moist openings and clearings<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: Sheperdia<br />
will likely expand into areas as they get drier.<br />
Veratrum virid e (Indian Hellebore)<br />
• Ecology: Hellebore is wide spread and most abundant subalpine elevati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> wet seepage<br />
sites.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: Hellebore is at risk as it has a preference for wet seepage sites<br />
with cold air drainage.<br />
Ledum groenlandicum (Labrador tea) and Ledum glandulosum (Trapper tea)<br />
• Ecology: Most comm<strong>on</strong> in colder mid to high elevati<strong>on</strong>s in the Chilcotin. Often dominating<br />
bogs and cold wetland fringes. Absent in hot arid climates.<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change: At risk as climate becomes warmer and drier. Persistence may<br />
depends <strong>on</strong> what BEC it is in, i.e. the colder (higher) and wetter the ecosystem is now the<br />
l<strong>on</strong>ger it will persist.<br />
5.3. Wildlife & Wild Horses<br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the larger Study Background Report <strong>on</strong> wildlife and wild horses<br />
prepared by Wayne McCrory, RPBio. For the full report, please see Annex 3.<br />
Past and present exogenous and climaterelated impacts <strong>on</strong> wildlife and wild horse habitats<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> wildlife is not a new phenomen<strong>on</strong>. Indeed, the effects <strong>of</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
climate variati<strong>on</strong>s can be observed dating back to the last Ice Age <strong>on</strong> three <strong>of</strong> the indicator species<br />
that are currently found in the XGCA: (i) the mountain goat; (ii) the wild horse; and (iii) moose.<br />
• Mountain Goat Until about 8,000 years ago, there were mountain goats <strong>on</strong> Vancouver Island.<br />
Yet, they went extinct at that time, apparently because <strong>of</strong> global warming (temperatures<br />
higher than today), which caused fragmentati<strong>on</strong> and loss <strong>of</strong> the goats’ alpine habitat, which, in<br />
turn, was a result <strong>of</strong> the treeline expanding upward in elevati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• Wild Horses ‐ The horse species, which evolved in North America (and even existed <strong>on</strong><br />
Vancouver Island) also went extinct about 8,000 years ago, but for unknown reas<strong>on</strong>s. It was<br />
later re‐introduced by the Spaniards to the Americas in the 1500s, and was brought<br />
northward by First Nati<strong>on</strong>s. As a result, it arrived in the XGCA before the Europeans did, about<br />
200+ years ago.<br />
• Moose The moose did not arrive in the Chilcotins until about 90 years ago as a result <strong>of</strong> a<br />
gradual, southward range expansi<strong>on</strong> from refugia in the Yuk<strong>on</strong> during the last Ice Age.<br />
In more recent time (the past couple <strong>of</strong> decades), the wildlife and wild horse habitats within the<br />
XGCA have been negatively impacted by a range <strong>of</strong> factors, including both exogenous and climate‐<br />
related <strong>on</strong>es. The most significant climate‐related factors have been massive pine beetle<br />
40
infestati<strong>on</strong>s and two very large wildfires (2003 and 2009), whose enabling c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s were created<br />
by global warming. As menti<strong>on</strong>ed earlier in secti<strong>on</strong> 5.2, even larger, hotter wildfires are projected<br />
for the future. Another threat is posed by unc<strong>on</strong>trolled wildfires that burn up the peat that<br />
underlies the hundreds <strong>of</strong> small and large meadows, which store c<strong>on</strong>siderable carb<strong>on</strong> that is<br />
released in large amounts when burned.<br />
It is important to acknowledge, however, that there are very important exogenous factors, which<br />
have nothing to do with climate change, but which have also negatively impacted the wildlife and<br />
wild horse habitats to date. Government policies <strong>of</strong> wildfire suppressi<strong>on</strong>, for example, allowed<br />
excessive fuel loading, which c<strong>on</strong>tributed to the past wildfire situati<strong>on</strong>s. Other exogenous factors<br />
include tree encroachment, over‐grazing by livestock and lack <strong>of</strong> natural grassland wildfires, which<br />
have already caused some native grassland deteriorati<strong>on</strong>. In additi<strong>on</strong>, roading and clearcutting in<br />
some outlying areas have increased drying c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s that would be expected to accelerate further<br />
drying c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, changes in micro‐climate and drying <strong>of</strong> lakes and p<strong>on</strong>ds that are fed by run‐<strong>of</strong>f.<br />
Projected climaterelated impacts <strong>on</strong> wildlife and wild horse habitats<br />
Climate change factors will have an increasing effect not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> the biogeoclimatic z<strong>on</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the<br />
XGCA but also subsequently <strong>on</strong> wildlife habitats and wildlife survival. According to climate<br />
projecti<strong>on</strong>s in secti<strong>on</strong> 4.4, the XGCA may expect (i) Increased mean temperatures; (ii) increased<br />
drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in the summer; and (iii) increased rainfall (instead <strong>of</strong> snow) in winter. These<br />
climatic changes are projected to cause (i) larger and hotter wildfires (which is also a result <strong>of</strong> fire<br />
suppressi<strong>on</strong>); (ii) increase the extent <strong>of</strong> grasslands in several low elevati<strong>on</strong> bioclimatic subz<strong>on</strong>es in<br />
XGCA; (iii) increase drought; and (iv) possibly cause the treeline to increase in elevati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
To<br />
assess how these projected climate changes will impact the wildlife and wild horses in the XGCA,<br />
three sets <strong>of</strong> biological indicator species were used:<br />
1. A sma ll number <strong>of</strong> plant species and their habitat associati<strong>on</strong>s were chosen for their relative<br />
importance to wildlife. These<br />
indicator species included<br />
a. Whitebark Pine ( Pinus<br />
albicaulis),<br />
b. Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides),<br />
c.<br />
Soopolallie, and<br />
d. Western Spring Beauty (“wild potato”).<br />
2. Another set <strong>of</strong> indicator species included sensitive habitat ecot<strong>on</strong>es (treeline and grasslands).<br />
3. The final set <strong>of</strong> indicator species c<strong>on</strong>cerned wildlife, and besides the wild horse, included the<br />
grizzly bear (Ursus arctos), California bighorn sheep, mountain goat, moose, and mule deer.<br />
These mammal indicator species were chosen either because <strong>of</strong> their apparent vulnerability to<br />
global warming and or their importance to the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>. Finally, comments<br />
were also made <strong>on</strong> birdlife<br />
The following is a summary <strong>of</strong> the assessment, <strong>of</strong> which further details can be found in Appendix X.<br />
This is a subjective assessment by the project team, hence these projecti<strong>on</strong>s should be treated with<br />
care.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> future climate impact <strong>on</strong> plant indicators<br />
41
• Whitebark Pine: Of the two tree indicator species <strong>of</strong> high value to wildlife and biodiversity,<br />
Whitebark Pine will likely suffer similar extensive die‐<strong>of</strong>fs due to diseases caused by global<br />
warming as has been reported in many areas <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>tinental United States with<br />
c<strong>on</strong>comitant negative impacts <strong>on</strong> the grizzly bear and the pine crow (Nucifraga Columbiana)<br />
that seas<strong>on</strong>ally depend <strong>on</strong> pine nuts. However, wildfire could be a balancing factor in<br />
restoring/maintaining ecosystem health <strong>of</strong> this fire‐suppressed habitat.<br />
• Trembling Aspen: Barring unforeseen factors, this species will most likely c<strong>on</strong>tinue to thrive<br />
in XGCA, even with a predicted increase in drought and wildfires. If this holds true, it would<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinue to provide vital nesting and feeding habitat to a great variety <strong>of</strong> bird species. Moose<br />
would also benefit from an increased winter food supply. Large wildfires may temporarily<br />
decrease the amount <strong>of</strong> older trees as cavity‐nesting habitat for a host <strong>of</strong> birds, but may<br />
increase the forest health over time <strong>of</strong> this fast‐growing hardwood.<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> future impact <strong>on</strong> wildlife indicators<br />
• Moose: This is an important food for the Xeni Gwet’in. Due to lack <strong>of</strong> sweat glands moose may<br />
suffer during hotter periods <strong>of</strong> summer droughts when there are few p<strong>on</strong>ds available to use<br />
for cooling <strong>of</strong>f. Moose is primarily a browser <strong>of</strong> shrubs and may suffer some habitat loss as<br />
grasslands increase. Yet, it will also benefit from regenerati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> vital shrub foods at higher<br />
elevati<strong>on</strong>s from an increase in wildfires. Rain <strong>on</strong> snow in the winter may create crusting<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, reducing some winter survival.<br />
• Mule deer: This is another important year‐round food for the Xeni Gwet’in. The mule deer is a<br />
very resilient species, which has adapted to many different biogeoclimatic z<strong>on</strong>es in BC and<br />
North America, including near‐desert and grassland‐shrubland c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. The project team<br />
does not expect it to suffer from global warming in XGCA over the next 50 years. More rainfall<br />
during winters may lead to crusting and icing, that combined with deep snow, may cause<br />
some localized declines <strong>of</strong> resident deer that over‐winter in XGCA instead <strong>of</strong> migrating to<br />
easier c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
• California Bighorn Sheep: The XGCA is well known for its bighorns and here this famous<br />
desert “thinhorn” subspecies reaches the northern limits <strong>of</strong> its distributi<strong>on</strong> in North America,<br />
perhaps making it more vulnerable to climate changes. Total populati<strong>on</strong> estimates in XGCA<br />
vary between 130–450 sheep. It is uncertain at this point as to how much sheep are still used<br />
as a traditi<strong>on</strong>al meat source by the Xeni. The males are mainly hunted for trophies, even<br />
though this bighorn is blue‐listed provincially. Some <strong>of</strong> the herds have suffered declines,<br />
including disappearing from over‐hunting <strong>on</strong> Potato Mountain <strong>on</strong> the west side <strong>of</strong> Chilko<br />
Lake. There have been several successful re‐introducti<strong>on</strong>s in XGCA. This species would appear<br />
to have some vulnerability to global warming, especially as the herds in the XGCA appear to<br />
be <strong>of</strong> the ecotype that winters and summers in the mountains <strong>on</strong> high‐elevati<strong>on</strong>, windswept,<br />
alpine ridges rather than at a variety <strong>of</strong> habitats at different elevati<strong>on</strong>s. Possible threats from<br />
global warming include increased icing‐over in winter <strong>of</strong> alpine meadows used for foraging<br />
and tree encroachment. Several c<strong>on</strong>trolled burns <strong>of</strong> high elevati<strong>on</strong> habitats have already been<br />
d<strong>on</strong>e to improve winter ranges and this <strong>of</strong>fers some hope to help this species adapt and<br />
survive global warming.<br />
• Mountain goat: The XGCA has a populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> about 400 goats and there have been several<br />
small re‐introducti<strong>on</strong>s. They have some food value for the Xeni but are also managed for some<br />
42
limited entry hunting. As noted for the bighorns, the project team expect some limited effects<br />
from global warming, although icing <strong>of</strong> winter ranges from more rainfall in wintertime could<br />
cause increased hardships.<br />
• Grizzly bears: These are provincially listed as threatened in the West Chilcotin Ranges, with<br />
perhaps 100 left, and extirpated <strong>on</strong> the plateau to the north. There has been no trophy<br />
hunting for years. Recent DNA studies detected 119 grizzlies in the combined Tatlayoko/the<br />
upper Chilko River secti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> XGCA, so the populati<strong>on</strong> in Xeni may be in better shape than<br />
expected. A study shows, however, that a n<strong>on</strong>‐climate related c<strong>on</strong>cern is that the XGCA is too<br />
small to support a viable grizzly populati<strong>on</strong> that could survive over the l<strong>on</strong>g‐term. If combined<br />
with large intact mountain and foothills areas to the north and south, the total area would<br />
have enough quality grizzly habitat and salm<strong>on</strong> to provide a viable populati<strong>on</strong> core larger that<br />
the Greater Yellowst<strong>on</strong>e Grizzly Bear Yellowst<strong>on</strong>e Ecosystem. Although the grizzly populati<strong>on</strong><br />
is overall threatened and well below capacity, being part <strong>of</strong> a much larger, intact ecosystem<br />
will help XGCA grizzly numbers to survive threats from global warming. Since grizzly bears<br />
have a cosmopolitan diet, this may also help them survive global warming. Given that<br />
Grizzlies use salm<strong>on</strong> in a number <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> XGCA, they will experience changes in food<br />
supply as salm<strong>on</strong> runs decline (see secti<strong>on</strong> 5.4). However, even with these declines the<br />
grizzlies may not suffer significant food losses, especially as they also depend <strong>on</strong> berries,<br />
roots, corns and mammals in the fall. Pine nuts from Whitebark Pine are also used and<br />
declines in this species would be another effect <strong>of</strong> global warming. Wild potatoes (western<br />
spring beauty) are another food item projected to decline in availability. However, increases<br />
in berry‐producing shrubs from wildfire such as bearberry, soopolallie, huckleberry and<br />
blueberry will likely <strong>of</strong>fset some <strong>of</strong> the other food losses from global warming.<br />
• Wild horse: An estimated 200 – 400 horses range free in the XGCA, some in the Nemiah Valley<br />
where they intermingle with a small number <strong>of</strong> domestic horses and cattle, and the Brittany<br />
Triangle, which have the remotest surviving wild horses left <strong>on</strong> the Canadian mainland. So far,<br />
horses have managed to adapt to a wide range <strong>of</strong> grassland habitats and desert‐like<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, so they will likely be quite resilient to further climate changes. Notably, two large<br />
wildfires in the Brittany, partly attributed to global warming, has overall improved wild horse<br />
habitat by bringing back large areas <strong>of</strong> grasslands that were overgrown with pine forests.<br />
Horses will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to benefit from increased grasslands, but icing <strong>of</strong> grazing areas from<br />
increased rainfall combined with alternating freezing c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in winter may cause some<br />
hardships. Also, overgrazing by domestic livestock in the Nemiah Valley and near Henry’s<br />
Crossing has resulted in range deteriorati<strong>on</strong> and this is <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cern. Spread <strong>of</strong> alien plants by<br />
wild horses, pack animals and livestock is another c<strong>on</strong>cern. However, overall the project team<br />
expects wild horses to adapt well to c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
brought <strong>on</strong> by climate change.<br />
• Wetlands & migratory waterfowl: As menti<strong>on</strong>ed earlier (secti<strong>on</strong> 5.1), increased summer<br />
droughts will affect many <strong>of</strong> the large and small wetlands, such as reduced water levels,<br />
limiting the amount <strong>of</strong> marsh habitat for nesting ducks around a p<strong>on</strong>d. Migratory birds, such<br />
as waterfowl, will not <strong>on</strong>ly be affected by global warming in XGCA, they are also susceptible to<br />
all kinds <strong>of</strong> changes to their c<strong>on</strong>tinental habitat that makes them more vulnerable.<br />
5.4.<br />
Fisheries<br />
43
This secti<strong>on</strong> provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the larger Study Background Report <strong>on</strong> Climate Impacts <strong>on</strong><br />
fisheries in the XGCA prepared by Cariboo Envirotech Ltd. 2006. For the full report, please see<br />
Annex 4.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> have l<strong>on</strong>g been reliant <strong>on</strong> their own resources for food and to this day<br />
actively harvest what the local landscape and rivers have to <strong>of</strong>fer from their Caretaker Area<br />
including fish for their c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>. Since time immemorial, the Xeni Gwet’in have relied <strong>on</strong> the<br />
large sockeye, Chinook, Steelhead and Coho salm<strong>on</strong> runs as a source <strong>of</strong> protein in their diets. This is<br />
still the case, as a community survey c<strong>on</strong>ducted in 2006 as part <strong>of</strong> a fish and fish habitat study in the<br />
Nemiah Valley showed that community members depend <strong>on</strong> fish in their diet at a minimum <strong>of</strong> twice<br />
per week. 59<br />
Baseline – fisheries in the Xeni Gwet’in Territory<br />
The<br />
following Table 8 provides some <strong>of</strong> the preferred fishing sites and the species found at these<br />
locati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
within the XGCA.<br />
Table 8: Preferred fishing locati<strong>on</strong>s and species in the XGCA<br />
Locati<strong>on</strong> Known Species Present<br />
Chilko River Bull Trout, Chinook Salm<strong>on</strong>, Coho Salm<strong>on</strong>, Dolly Varden, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Dace,<br />
Mountain Whitefish, Pacific Lamprey, Rainbow Trout, Sockeye Salm<strong>on</strong>, Steelhead,<br />
Whitefish (General)<br />
Chilko Lake Bull Trout, Chinook Salm<strong>on</strong>, Dolly Varden, Minnow (general), Mountain<br />
Whitefish, Rainbow Trout, Sockeye Salm<strong>on</strong>, Steelhead, Sucker (General),<br />
Whitefish (General)<br />
Taseko River Bull Trout, Chinook Salm<strong>on</strong>, Dolly Varden, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker, Mountain Whitefish,<br />
Rainbow Trout, Sockeye Salm<strong>on</strong>, Steelhead, Whitefish (General)<br />
Taseko Lakes Bull Trout, Dolly Varden, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker, Mountain Whitefish, Rainbow Trout,<br />
Sockeye Salm<strong>on</strong><br />
Elkin Creek Bull Trout, Chinook Salm<strong>on</strong>, Dolly Varden, Kokanee, Largescale Sucker, L<strong>on</strong>gnose<br />
Dace, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker, Mountain Whitefish, Northern Pikeminnow (formerly N.<br />
Squawfish), Rainbow Trout, Redside Shiner, Steelhead, Whitefish (General)<br />
Big Lake Rainbow Trout<br />
K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake Bull Trout, Dolly Varden, Mountain Whitefish, Kokanee, Largescale Sucker,<br />
L<strong>on</strong>gnose Dace, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker,<br />
Rainbow Trout, Redside Shiner<br />
Fish Lake Rainbow Trout<br />
Big Oni<strong>on</strong> Lake Dolly Varden, Rainbow Trout<br />
Nemiah Creek Bull Trout, Dolly Varden, Kokanee, Largescale Sucker, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Dace, L<strong>on</strong>gnose<br />
Sucker, Mountain Whitefish, Rainbow<br />
Trout, Redside Shiner<br />
Tsuniah Lake L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker, Northern Redbelly Dace, Rainbow Trout, Redside Shiner<br />
Chaunigan Rainbow Trout, Redside Shiner<br />
Lake<br />
Brittany Lake L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker, Rainbow Trout, Redside Shiner, Sucker (General). Whitefish<br />
(General)<br />
Twin Lakes Bull Trout, Dolly Varden, L<strong>on</strong>gnose Sucker, Mountain Whitefish, Nothern<br />
Pikeminnow, Whitefish (General)<br />
Sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> is the most important fish species for c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> by the Xeni Gwet’in community.<br />
Fisheries and Oceans Canada determined<br />
decades ago that the salm<strong>on</strong> stocks utilizing the Chilko and<br />
59 Cariboo Envirotech Ltd. 2006.<br />
44
Taseko River drainages were extremely important and as such have invested a great deal <strong>of</strong> time<br />
and funding in the m<strong>on</strong>itoring and assessment <strong>of</strong> these runs. The following Table 9 shows sockeye<br />
and Chinook escapement data for the Chilko River. 60 The trend is further evidence that these stocks<br />
are<br />
in decline. It should be noted that the 2009 Chinook escapement is from the 2004 brood year<br />
that<br />
saw 16,287 adult Chinook return to spawn.<br />
Table 9: Salm<strong>on</strong> (Sockeye and Chinook) escapement to the Chilko River 19932009.<br />
Year Sockeye Chinook Year Sockeye Chinook<br />
1993 555226 6343 2001 668783 10891<br />
1994 450745 5665 2002 382814 11027<br />
1995 534559 10461 2003 608321 21625<br />
1996 974349 17000 2004 91909 16287<br />
1997 985827 16272 2005 535967 7668<br />
1998 879017 14549 2006 468947 5201<br />
1999 891922 8920 2007 305853 4366<br />
2000 758941 9171 2008 249863 5186<br />
2009 217572<br />
(preliminary)<br />
Source:<br />
Data provided by Fisheries and Oceans biologist Linda Stevens <strong>of</strong> Williams Lake.<br />
How climate change impacts fish<br />
8548<br />
(preliminary)<br />
While there are many negative influences <strong>on</strong> both anadromous and n<strong>on</strong>‐anadromous fish stocks,<br />
including over‐fishing, climate change is now c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the greatest threats to fish<br />
stocks throughout the world, including British Columbia and the Pacific Ocean. In its<br />
comprehensive<br />
Fourth Assessment Report in 2007, the Intergovernmental <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change<br />
( IPPC) states: “There is high c<strong>on</strong>fidence, based <strong>on</strong> substantial new evidence, that observed changes in<br />
marine and freshwater biological systems are associated with rising water temperatures, as<br />
well as related changes in ice cover, salinity, oxygen levels and circulati<strong>on</strong>. These include:<br />
shifts in ranges and changes in algal, plankt<strong>on</strong> and fish abundance in highlatitude<br />
oceans; increases in algal and zooplankt<strong>on</strong> abundance in highlatitude and highaltitude<br />
lakes; and range changes and earlier fish migrati<strong>on</strong>s in rivers [emphasis<br />
added]. While there is increasing evidence <strong>of</strong> climate change impacts <strong>on</strong> coral reefs,<br />
separating the impacts <strong>of</strong> climaterelated stresses from other stresses (e.g. overfishing and<br />
polluti<strong>on</strong>) is difficult. {WGII 1.3, SPM}” (IPCC²).<br />
The <strong>Panel</strong>’s statement reflects the impact climate change will very likely have <strong>on</strong> both freshwater<br />
and marine aquatic envir<strong>on</strong>ments. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, climate change is projected to not <strong>on</strong>ly affect<br />
anadromous species such as salm<strong>on</strong>, but also n<strong>on</strong> anadromous species, such as rainbow trout, Dolly<br />
Varden, Bull Trout, and Kokanee, all <strong>of</strong> which currently provide food for the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
community from lakes and streams<br />
in their Caretaker Area.<br />
60 Data provided by Fisheries and Oceans biologist Linda Stevens <strong>of</strong> Williams Lake.<br />
45
Past climate changes and their impacts <strong>on</strong> fish to date<br />
Globally, trends provided by scientists show fish stocks in dramatic decline. According to the IPCC,<br />
evidence for impacts <strong>of</strong> recent climate change being a serious factor in this decline is rapidly<br />
accumulating. In their 2007 4 th Assessment, the <strong>Panel</strong> summarizes the state <strong>of</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>ids <strong>on</strong> the<br />
west coast. The report stated that "Cold and coolwater fisheries, especially salm<strong>on</strong>ids, have been<br />
declining as warmer/drier c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s reduce their habitat. The searun salm<strong>on</strong> stocks are in steep<br />
decline throughout much <strong>of</strong> North America. Pacific salm<strong>on</strong> have been appearing in Arctic rivers.<br />
Salm<strong>on</strong>id species have been affected by warming in U.S. streams." 61<br />
Closer to home, climate change is believed to have been affecting the fishery resource in the XGCA<br />
for some time. While the Fraser River remains <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the most productive Pacific salm<strong>on</strong> rivers in<br />
the world, overall trends are not positive, and climate change is likely to make things worse. A<br />
recent University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia (UBC) study analyzed the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between stream<br />
temperature and salm<strong>on</strong> survival. Their findings show that temperature challenges aerobic activity<br />
in salm<strong>on</strong> and that each stock <strong>of</strong> salm<strong>on</strong> may have different thresholds <strong>of</strong> survival. 62 According to<br />
T<strong>on</strong>y Farrell, UBC, "This study shows that an increase over the past 50 years <strong>of</strong> 1.8 degrees Celsius in<br />
the Fraser River's peak summer temperatures is too much too fast for some salm<strong>on</strong> stocks". He goes <strong>on</strong><br />
to<br />
say "It also shows that climate change affects even the same species differently because individual<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>s may have adapted to their respective envir<strong>on</strong>ments. 63<br />
The following three Fgures (13, 14 and 16) from their 2009 report highlight the declines in sockeye,<br />
Coho and Chinook salm<strong>on</strong> for the Fraser River, into which the Taseko and Chilko Rivers flow. Aside<br />
from the Upper Fraser summer Chinook run, all other species and runs are also in jeopardy, which<br />
will<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly be further compounded by climate change and its effects <strong>on</strong> fish and fish habitat located<br />
within the XGCA.<br />
The above development is very alarming to the Xeni Gwet’in community, given that especially<br />
Sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> are the most important fish species for their c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>. The 2009 sockeye<br />
escapement into many tributaries <strong>of</strong> the Fraser River including the Chilko was far below<br />
expectati<strong>on</strong>s. The preliminary indicati<strong>on</strong>s suggest that the sockeye fry from the Chilko River brood<br />
year<br />
left the Chilko system in record numbers and size and expectati<strong>on</strong>s ran high in 2009 as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> this, but the return rate was c<strong>on</strong>sidered a collapse.<br />
The situati<strong>on</strong> remains <strong>of</strong> great c<strong>on</strong>cern nati<strong>on</strong>ally and a judicial inquiry has been scheduled by the<br />
Canadian government to determine the cause <strong>of</strong> the sockeye collapse in the Fraser River. Early<br />
indicati<strong>on</strong>s suggest climate change may be to blame. Scientists are now suggesting that ocean<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
in 2007 played a large role in this issue with warmer water temperatures and a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
food<br />
that the young sockeye are reliant <strong>on</strong> during their early m<strong>on</strong>ths in the ocean.<br />
61 (In the North America Chapter <strong>of</strong> the IPCC's WGII Technical Report: "Climate Change 2007: Impacts,<br />
IPCC, 2007<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong> and Vulnerability" issued April.)<br />
62 UBC (2008)<br />
63 T<strong>on</strong>y Farrell, UBC Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science website<br />
46
Figure 14: Fraser Sockeye Salm<strong>on</strong> (19802008)<br />
Source: Fraser Basin Council<br />
Figure 15: Interior Fraser Coho (19802007)<br />
Source: Fraser Basin Council<br />
Figure 16: Fraser River Chinook (19862008)<br />
Source:<br />
Fraser Basin Council<br />
47
Projected Climate Changes and Impacts<br />
On December 9, 2009 the Pacific Fisheries Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council (PFRCC) co‐hosted with<br />
Sim<strong>on</strong> Fraser University a think tank <strong>of</strong> scientists c<strong>on</strong>cerned about the failing sockeye salm<strong>on</strong><br />
returns to the Fraser River. Their press release <strong>on</strong> that date stated “Climate change poses a major<br />
threat to the future <strong>of</strong> Fraser River salm<strong>on</strong>, not <strong>on</strong>ly through direct effects <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>on</strong><br />
the fish, but also through impacts <strong>on</strong> food webs and habitats [emphasis added]. Management<br />
agencies must take this informati<strong>on</strong> into account in order to meet the objectives <strong>of</strong> Canada’s Wild<br />
Salm<strong>on</strong><br />
Policy, which include maintaining biodiversity as well as m<strong>on</strong>itoring and protecting habitat.<br />
These are clearly challenging times for Fraser River sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>.” (PFRCC).<br />
Few scientists from Fisheries and Oceans Canada will discuss the issue due to the scheduled judicial<br />
inquiry however other respected scientists are stepping forward with comments and opini<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Sim<strong>on</strong> Fraser University’s Dr. John Reynolds who holds the Tom Buell chair in salm<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
recently<br />
stated “This is now the way that things may well be for the future, especially under the<br />
predicti<strong>on</strong>s we have for climate change" (CBC).<br />
The fisheries development is very alarming to the Xeni Gwet’in community, given that especially<br />
Sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> are the most important fish species for their c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>. However, climate<br />
change will affect all fish species that the Xeni Gwet’in relies <strong>on</strong> as a food source differently. In 2009<br />
Nelitz and Porter from ESSA Technologies Ltd. prepared a report <strong>on</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong><br />
Chinook habitat in the Cariboo‐Chilcotin. 64 According to this report, the findings suggest that<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al climate change impacts <strong>on</strong> Chinook salm<strong>on</strong> may be mixed. Interestingly, in some locati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
there may be benefits <strong>of</strong> habitat changes, while in other locati<strong>on</strong>s there may be c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong><br />
producti<strong>on</strong>. For instance, stream habitats with temperatures optimal for Chinook rearing are<br />
predicted to decrease in northern areas <strong>on</strong> the study area and increase in southern areas.<br />
Late summer / early flows necessary to maintain rearing juveniles and allow return <strong>of</strong> spawning<br />
spring and summer Chinook are also predicted to decrease more markedly in the north than in the<br />
south. In some <strong>of</strong> the more northern streams summer / fall flows are predicted to decline to<br />
such an extent that minimum flows to support successful spawning and rearing may not be<br />
reached<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sistently in the future. The report stressed that further explorati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> these data and<br />
field validati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the modeled interpretati<strong>on</strong>s would be fruitful.<br />
Nelitz and Porter also prepared a report in 2009 <strong>on</strong> the effects that climate change may have <strong>on</strong><br />
Coho salm<strong>on</strong> habitat. This report stated “<str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> a thermal perspective, there appears to be a current<br />
abundance <strong>of</strong> suitable coolwater and coolwarm transiti<strong>on</strong> habitats within the downstream reaches <strong>of</strong><br />
the Chilcotin, Quesnel, and West Road watersheds. Under a “best” case scenario <strong>of</strong> climate change,<br />
changes are predicted to be most significant in the Horsefly and Chilcotin drainages, with<br />
temperatures shifting towards those preferred by warmwater fish communities. Under a<br />
“worst” case scenario thermal shifts are even more significant and extensive in the Chilcotin and<br />
Quesnel. On average, the linear extent <strong>of</strong> coolwater habitats is predicted to decline in the Chilcotin by<br />
the 2080s, while coolwarm transiti<strong>on</strong> habitats are expected to increase. The pattern is the opposite in<br />
the Quesnel where coolwater habitats are expected to increase while coolwarm transiti<strong>on</strong> habitats<br />
are expected to decrease. These changes are accompanied by potentially large increase in the extent <strong>of</strong><br />
warmwater habitats which could<br />
adversely affect Coho.” 65 The authors notes in their report that<br />
64 Nellitz and Porter (2009a).<br />
65 Nellitz and Porter (2009b).<br />
48
although informative, it will be important to examine where these changes occur specifically to<br />
determine whether they might be a benefit (increasing extent <strong>of</strong> suitable thermal habitats, as in the<br />
Quesnel) or c<strong>on</strong>straint (decreasing extent <strong>of</strong> preferable thermal habitats, as in the Chilcotin) <strong>on</strong> the<br />
productive capacity <strong>of</strong> Coho habitats.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>cern for future climate change and its effects <strong>on</strong> fish are not restricted to anadromous species<br />
such as salm<strong>on</strong>, but also to n<strong>on</strong>‐migratory species such as bull trout which form part <strong>of</strong> the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in diet. Bull trout are blue listed as a species <strong>of</strong> special c<strong>on</strong>cern in British Columbia. Nelitz<br />
and Porter prepared a third report –also in 2009 ‐ <strong>on</strong> the effects climate change may have <strong>on</strong> bull<br />
trout in the Cariboo Chilcotin. Their analyses suggest that for all regi<strong>on</strong>al watersheds with<br />
resident bull trout the extent <strong>of</strong> preferred coldwater habitats will decrease c<strong>on</strong>siderably<br />
under the varied climate change scenarios and that the extent <strong>of</strong> habitats c<strong>on</strong>sidered thermally sub‐<br />
optimal or potentially unusable by bull trout will increase. 66 The report stated, though, that “The<br />
general patterns <strong>of</strong> this analysis do not, however, seem promising for bull trout. Bull trout are already<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered a sensitive species within BC with very specific cold water habitat requirements, so further<br />
impacts to their remaining core habitats is likely a cause for c<strong>on</strong>cern. The l<strong>on</strong>g term patterns<br />
suggest both an expected decrease in the total amount <strong>of</strong> cold water stream habitat and<br />
fragmentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> these colder areas into disc<strong>on</strong>nected “patches” <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat.<br />
Maintaining viable sized patches <strong>of</strong> cold water habitats for bull trout and ensuring unimpeded<br />
c<strong>on</strong>nectivity<br />
between them may become an important future issue for maintaining genetic exchange<br />
between<br />
increasingly isolated regi<strong>on</strong>al bull trout populati<strong>on</strong>s. 67<br />
6. Xeni Gwet’in Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment<br />
Climate change vulnerability is defined as the ability or inability <strong>of</strong> individuals or a group to cope<br />
with or adapt to climate impacts <strong>on</strong> their livelihood and well‐being68. The following secti<strong>on</strong> is an<br />
assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> to potential climate changes and their<br />
impacts.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in, like many First Nati<strong>on</strong>s, have seen their fair share <strong>of</strong> changes to their way <strong>of</strong> life<br />
over the last few centuries. They have experienced col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong>, the spread <strong>of</strong> new diseases, the<br />
impositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the reserve system and the residential school system, c<strong>on</strong>tinued encroachment by<br />
outside interests intent <strong>on</strong> carving up the territory for industrial forestry and mining, resort and<br />
real<br />
estate development. And the community increasingly faces the influences <strong>of</strong> western<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sumer culture through the TV, the internet and the educati<strong>on</strong> system.<br />
Despite these changes or influences, the Xeni Gwet’in have maintained a relatively healthy<br />
community as compared to many First Nati<strong>on</strong> communities in the Cariboo‐Chilcotin. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinue to speak their mother t<strong>on</strong>gue and pass <strong>on</strong> traditi<strong>on</strong>al ways, the people<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinue to hunt fish and collect, they have an excellent K‐9 school system that teaches the Chilcotin<br />
language and culture and the community is actively engaged in political and cultural affairs. The<br />
community has also managed to protect a large part <strong>of</strong> its traditi<strong>on</strong>al territory and therefore have a<br />
relatively intact ecosystem, abundant<br />
with clean water supplies, wildlife, fish and wild horses. They<br />
have a moderately diversified<br />
energy system, a reliable water system and road maintenance<br />
66 Nellitz and Porter (2009c).<br />
67 Nellitz and Porter (2009c).<br />
68 Tyndall Group for Climate Change Research, 2005<br />
49
system. They are relatively healthy and have managed not be overcome by substance abuse like<br />
other reserves.<br />
Nevertheless the community might be characterized as relatively vulnerable to potential climate<br />
changes, since they remain very dependent <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e source income (Federal government transfers)<br />
for their livelihood and maintenance, they have very little c<strong>on</strong>trol over the land they actually<br />
inhabit and depend up<strong>on</strong> for sustenance, they are increasingly dependent <strong>on</strong> food and technology<br />
imports, they have few people and resources to plan, m<strong>on</strong>itor and enforce the management <strong>of</strong> their<br />
land or to invest in new enterprise. And they also increasingly experiencing c<strong>on</strong>flicts over land use<br />
in<br />
their territory, the results <strong>of</strong> which could jeopardize the health and biodiversity <strong>of</strong> their land and<br />
thereby their ability to cope with climate change.<br />
Below is an assessment <strong>of</strong> Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> the WEHAB+ framework developed<br />
by the Tyndall Group for Climate Change Research69.<br />
The WEHAB+ methodology is simply an<br />
acr<strong>on</strong>ym that stands<br />
for the six or more important supports for society:<br />
W ‐ Water<br />
E ‐ Energy<br />
H ‐ Health<br />
A ‐ Agriculture and Food Supply<br />
B ‐ Biodiversity<br />
+ additi<strong>on</strong>al supports like human settlements and infrastructure<br />
We use this framework but also add governance, livelihoods and culture as other important<br />
supports.<br />
6.1. Biodiversity<br />
The XGCA is <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the last intact ecosystems <strong>on</strong> the east side <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin range. It has large<br />
riparian areas in the valleys ranging from open wetlands and closed canopy moist forest. It has<br />
large plateau lands with a mix <strong>of</strong> dry forests and grasslands and l<strong>on</strong>g chains <strong>of</strong> wetland or wet<br />
forest. It has high alpine features mixed with barren mountain‐sides and alpine meadows that<br />
experience cold temperatures most <strong>of</strong> the year. It has an abundance <strong>of</strong> moose, mule deer, black<br />
bears and grizzly bears, mountain goats, California Big Horn Sheep, wolves and coyotes, beavers,<br />
marmots, tree nesting birds and waterfowl. It still supports almost all <strong>of</strong> the native flora that were<br />
present during the Pleistocene era and includes populati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> wild horses whose ancestry may<br />
date back to the Spanish horses that migrated north from Central America. Its proximity to the<br />
coastal ranges and an abundance <strong>of</strong> glaciers has also blessed it with an abundance <strong>of</strong> clean<br />
freshwater in its many lakes, rivers and streams. These water bodies are home to <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the largest<br />
interior salm<strong>on</strong> runs in BC, providing spawning grounds for sockeye, Chinook, Steelhead, Chum and<br />
Kokanee as well as home to an abundance other endogenous cool water fish. This rich biodiversity<br />
is<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> a complex <strong>of</strong> diverse soils, water and topographic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s but it is also a result <strong>of</strong><br />
limited human use in the area.<br />
This is not to say that there are no stresses <strong>on</strong> the XGCA ecosystem. There is increasing<br />
recreati<strong>on</strong>al tourism pressure <strong>on</strong> the land and water bodies, leading to more hunting, fishing, and<br />
camping, boating, <strong>of</strong>f‐road motorized and n<strong>on</strong>‐motorized access. There is also increased<br />
subsistence hunting and fishing<br />
by n<strong>on</strong>‐Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s and and recreati<strong>on</strong>al hunters.<br />
Salm<strong>on</strong><br />
stocks, as indicated in secti<strong>on</strong> 5.4, have<br />
experienced a significant decline recently for<br />
69 Tyndall Group for Climate Change Research (2005, p 42).<br />
50
unknown reas<strong>on</strong>s. There have been two significant fires in the last decade resulting in large burns,<br />
fireguards and new roads. 70 There is increasing mineral explorati<strong>on</strong> activity in the area, not least <strong>of</strong><br />
which<br />
includes the Prosperity Mine Project, which has led to tree clearing, drilling and more <strong>on</strong>‐<br />
and <strong>of</strong>f‐road traffic.<br />
As indicated in the climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s and biophysical impacts in earlier secti<strong>on</strong>s, accelerated<br />
climate warming, will likely place more stress <strong>on</strong> the ecosystem than it has recently experienced.<br />
There will be impacts throughout the XGCA <strong>on</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong>, wildlife, fish and water resources.<br />
However, despite some <strong>of</strong> the human induced stresses <strong>on</strong> the ecosystem, the XGCA is a fairly<br />
healthy and intact ecosystem, making it fairly resilient to potential climate changes. C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
biologists agree that “maintaining c<strong>on</strong>nectivity between natural habitats, and al<strong>on</strong>g altitudinal<br />
gradients, is a key strategy to allowing plant and animal species to adapt to climate change.” 71 And<br />
if the XGCA ecosystem is healthy and “resilient”, the Xeni Gwet’in community, who depend<br />
significantly up<strong>on</strong> the land for their sustenance, their health and their culture, stand a better chance<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
coping with climate change. The World Bank states as much when commenting <strong>on</strong> the<br />
relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />
between biodiversity and climate adaptati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
“Within any given ecosystem, functi<strong>on</strong>ally diverse communities are more likely to be<br />
resilient to climate change and climate variability than biologically impoverished<br />
communities.” 72<br />
The same holds true for communities and ecosystems outside the XGCA. The benefits <strong>of</strong> a healthy<br />
ecosystem accrue to ecosystems and communities downstream as well, since the ecosystem<br />
services produced in the XGCA flow out <strong>of</strong> the area benefitting all life.<br />
“Mountain habitats...bestow multiple ecosystem, soil c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>, and watershed benefits.<br />
They are <strong>of</strong>ten centers <strong>of</strong> endemism, Pleistocene refuges, and source populati<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
restocking <strong>of</strong> more low‐lying habitats. Mountain ecosystems influence rainfall regimes and<br />
climate at local and regi<strong>on</strong>al levels, helping to c<strong>on</strong>tain global warming through carb<strong>on</strong><br />
sequestrati<strong>on</strong> and storage in soils and plant biomass. Wetlands are nature’s kidneys,<br />
providing indispensable ecosystem services that regulate nutrient loading and water<br />
quality.” 73<br />
Where the Xeni Gwet’in may be vulnerable is if they cannot manage to maintain a healthy<br />
ecosystem due to increasing pressures from the outside world. There are significant logging and<br />
mining plans for the XGCA, which threaten to seriously disturb the existing balance. If this is the<br />
case and the land increasingly becomes fragmented by roads and development and the air, waters<br />
and soils become stressed by increased polluti<strong>on</strong>, the ecosystem will be much less resilient to the<br />
stresses<br />
<strong>of</strong> climate change, which will undoubtedly affect the Xeni Gwet’in’s ability to cope with<br />
climate<br />
change as well.<br />
70<br />
The 2003 Chilko Fire and the 2009 Lava Cany<strong>on</strong> Fire were the largest in BC in both years.<br />
71 World Bank (2009).<br />
72 World Bank (2009).<br />
73 World Bank (2009).<br />
51
6.2. Health and Safety<br />
At present, there is <strong>on</strong>e full‐time nurse positi<strong>on</strong> in the community (Nemiah Valley) and a full‐time<br />
nurse in Tatla Lake (two hours from Nemiah) but no doctor. The nearest ambulatory services are<br />
at<br />
Alexis Creek Reserve or Tatla Lake (over 1.5 hours away by road). Air ambulance is available<br />
from Williams Lake (0.5 hours away) for life threatening c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s pending weather c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Despite having rather limited health services, the Xeni Gwet’in community is relatively healthy,<br />
although there is a moderate rate <strong>of</strong> substance abuse and addicti<strong>on</strong> and the community is<br />
experiencing<br />
some increases in diabetes, asthma, heart disease and obesity likely due to changing<br />
diet.<br />
Safety services and infrastructure are also very limited in the XGCA, there is no community fire<br />
service or fire crew or firefighting equipment in Nemiah or Chilko, or Tatla Lake, the airstrips in<br />
Nemiah and north Chilko Lake are too short to legally handle anything bigger than a Cessna 172 or<br />
Cessna 206 (4‐6 seaters) and there is <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e good road in and out <strong>of</strong> Nemiah and north Chilko.<br />
However, the Xeni Gwet’in community has very good road maintenance equipment and skills to<br />
develop fireguards and flood guards, it has recently developed an emergency preparedness plan<br />
and<br />
a wildfire protecti<strong>on</strong> plan for the reserve and certain high value sites in the great XGCA and the<br />
community is also served by the BC Wildfire Management Branch in case <strong>of</strong> emergencies.<br />
The most immediate risk <strong>of</strong> climate change is the damage due wild fires, which could result in the<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> life (Xeni Gwet’in, n<strong>on</strong>‐Xeni Gwet’in residents, and visitors), the loss <strong>of</strong> property (homes,<br />
businesses, infrastructure and livestock), increased mental stress associated with these losses or<br />
potential losses and respiratory ailments due to smoke and ash. More l<strong>on</strong>g‐term risks are<br />
associated with flooding in the spring74. Flooding has occurred regularly in Elkin Creek, Nemiah<br />
Creek and K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake drainages and even in the Klok<strong>on</strong> Creek aquifer. Chilko Lake and Chilko<br />
River also regularly experience high levels that put property owners at risk. These and other<br />
residential areas <strong>of</strong> the XGCA as well as major roadways could experience more serious or frequent<br />
flooding in the future with milder winters. Because the Xeni Gwet’in have very limited health and<br />
safety<br />
services and they are remote and have limited access in and out <strong>of</strong> the area, they are fairly<br />
vulnerable<br />
to wild fires and flooding.<br />
6.3. Water Supply<br />
There is abundant, high quality water throughout the XGCA, with numerous glacier fed lakes and<br />
rivers. Access <strong>of</strong> potable water for household purposes by the Xeni Gwet’in is primarily through the<br />
community water system, based <strong>on</strong> a community well near the Band <strong>of</strong>fice, which draws <strong>on</strong> the<br />
Klok<strong>on</strong> aquifer. Approximately 9% <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in residents are not <strong>on</strong> this system but use<br />
shallow Wells or an infiltrati<strong>on</strong> gallery. The community water system and other household systems<br />
are tested weekly and m<strong>on</strong>itored closely. By and large the community wells and Klok<strong>on</strong> aquifer are<br />
quite healthy, with a sustainable<br />
yields <strong>of</strong> between 2.90 L/s and 5.0 L/s 75 during the summer<br />
74 Flooding does occur occasi<strong>on</strong>ally at certain points in the XGCA, which has impeded daily life for Xeni Gwet’in and n<strong>on</strong>‐<br />
Xeni Gwet’in residents. Klok<strong>on</strong> Creek and Elkins Creek are particularly vulnerable in Nemiah Valley as are the shorelines<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chilko Lake and the Chilko River, where a number <strong>of</strong> resorts are located. The Cariboo Regi<strong>on</strong>al District has kept some<br />
records <strong>of</strong> flooding in the area and now has a shoreline policy in place for property development but no comprehensive<br />
flood protecti<strong>on</strong> plan is in place for the Nemiah Valley or the XGCA.<br />
75<br />
Sustainable yield <strong>of</strong> 2.96 L/s for WIN20361, 2.90 L/s for WIN20362. 5.0 L/s for WIN24154 – Kala Groundwater 2008.<br />
52
seas<strong>on</strong> and below detecti<strong>on</strong> coliform counts. The Klok<strong>on</strong> aquifer <strong>on</strong> which the community depends<br />
is<br />
estimated to be quite large, stretching from the bifurcati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Klok<strong>on</strong> creek down to the valley<br />
bottom, which is expected to serve the community quite easily for years to come.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in rely <strong>on</strong> water sources other than their water systems. Because they are<br />
somewhat<br />
nomadic within the XGCA for traditi<strong>on</strong>al activities such hunting, fishing, collecting and<br />
back country riding, they <strong>of</strong>ten acquire drinking water from local streams, rivers, and lakes.<br />
Water for n<strong>on</strong>‐potable uses such as gardening depends <strong>on</strong> these same systems, except in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
large scale irrigati<strong>on</strong> for hay farming. To irrigate fields in the Nemiah Valley, the Xeni Gwet’in use<br />
flood irrigati<strong>on</strong>. This involves allowing natural flooding or diversi<strong>on</strong>s from nearby streams during<br />
the spring or early summer. Elkin’s Creek Ranch however diverts water regularly from Elkin’s<br />
Creek via a pump and sprinkler irrigati<strong>on</strong> system. Other pasture lands in the XGCA are largely rain<br />
fed and wild, which the cattle, wildlife and wild horses graze <strong>on</strong> the fall, spring and summer.<br />
Watering<br />
<strong>of</strong> livestock is also dependent <strong>on</strong> water directly from streams or p<strong>on</strong>ds and is largely<br />
unmanaged, leading to frequent and unm<strong>on</strong>itored c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> with fecal matter.<br />
Climate change will bring a variety <strong>of</strong> risks to water supply but most <strong>of</strong> these are likely to occur in<br />
the medium to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term, barring any damage to water systems or water courses due to fire or<br />
flood. Milder and wetter winters will cause peak flows to occur earlier in the spring or summer,<br />
which could lead to increased flooding but also less water stored as snow for flows in the late<br />
summer. Drier and hotter summers could lead to increased evapo‐transpirati<strong>on</strong> from XGCA lakes,<br />
streams and accelerated melting <strong>of</strong> glaciers, which in the short‐term may not affect water flows but<br />
in the medium and l<strong>on</strong>g‐term may result in reduced water flows in the summer. Both increased<br />
flooding<br />
in the spring and reduced flows in the summer could jeopardize property or potable water<br />
supplies. 76. These events may also affect water supplies for livestock, wild life and vegetati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The <strong>on</strong>e weakness <strong>of</strong> the current water system is that it is fed by the Klok<strong>on</strong> glacier, which may be<br />
in jeopardy in the l<strong>on</strong>g‐term with milder weather. However, should this system fail due to low<br />
glacial flows, K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake has been designated the back‐up water source for the community, which is<br />
quite large, deep and easily accessible by the community. The community is also near to Chilko<br />
Lake, which could also be a l<strong>on</strong>g‐term source <strong>of</strong> freshwater. Hence, the Xeni Gwet’in might be<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered fairly resilient as far as water supply goes due to the abundance <strong>of</strong> fresh water sources<br />
in the Nemiah Valley. This could change rapidly if outside interests begin c<strong>on</strong>taminating these<br />
water sources as a result <strong>of</strong> industrial logging or mining in the area or if they attempt large scale<br />
water diversi<strong>on</strong>s. 77 N<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> these risks are improbable. Indeed, the Prosperity Mine project is at<br />
its final stage <strong>of</strong> review and it is <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e mountain range away from the Nemiah Valley. Moreover,<br />
as<br />
the southern US becomes more arid due to climate changes, XGCA water may become a hot<br />
commodity<br />
and may either attract more development or attract increasing pressure to export.<br />
6.4. Food Supply<br />
76 Flooding could cause c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> wells and surface water as well as creating stagnant water in poorly drained<br />
areas. Increased evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> could result in lower flows, lesser recharging <strong>of</strong> water supplies and therefore result<br />
lower diluti<strong>on</strong> ratios to particulates or c<strong>on</strong>taminants.<br />
77 The Taseko Lakes were proposed to be part <strong>of</strong> a massive hydroelectric development which would have seen the flow <strong>of</strong><br />
the Taseko River dammed and diverted westward via a tunnel to Chilko Lake, which would have been also dammed and<br />
diverted through further tunnels to Tatlayoko Lake <strong>on</strong> the Homathko River, which unlike the Taseko and Chilko Rivers<br />
drains directly to the ocean at Bute Inlet rather than via the Chilcotin and Fraser Rivers. Fisheries and aboriginal land<br />
claims c<strong>on</strong>cerns have derailed the Taseko diversi<strong>on</strong>, although the Chilko diversi<strong>on</strong> remains as a possibility.<br />
53
The Xeni Gwet’in depend <strong>on</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> food sources for their diet, including wild plants and<br />
animals, store bought food and some cultivated vegetables. Wild animals important to the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in for food include: mule deer and moose, salm<strong>on</strong>, trout and whitefish for protein. These<br />
meats and fish foods are typically caught in large batches in the spring and fall and canned or dried<br />
for winter food supplies and sharing. Wild plants important to the Xeni Gwet’in for food and<br />
medicines include but are not limited to wild potato, beartooth, Trapper Tea, Indian Hellebore,<br />
raspberry, saskato<strong>on</strong> berry, chokecherry, soapberry, Kinnikinnik and strawberry. Some <strong>of</strong> these<br />
plants are dried or canned if sufficient quantities warrant and the products lend themselves to<br />
preservati<strong>on</strong>. Some <strong>of</strong> the community also cultivate vegetables in the summer and can or preserve<br />
the surpluses where available. Ir<strong>on</strong>ically, many <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in raise or have raised cattle but<br />
seldom slaughter them for eating, instead preferring to sell them for cash. Whatever is not obtained<br />
from wild sources or local gardens is supplemented by store bought food, <strong>of</strong>ten purchased in<br />
Williams Lake. Based <strong>on</strong> recent surveys roughly 70% <strong>of</strong> food supplies are purchased from<br />
commercial sources with a predominance <strong>of</strong> these purchases occurring in the winter m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
Although this balance <strong>of</strong> wild, cultivated and store bought food sources is undoubtedly higher than<br />
most n<strong>on</strong>‐First Nati<strong>on</strong>s and urban dwellers it is gradually shifting to more store bought food as a<br />
result<br />
<strong>of</strong> easier access to commercial food sources and as a result <strong>of</strong> less hunting, fishing, collecting<br />
and gardening by younger generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Climate change may affect Xeni Gwet’in food supply in both negative and positive ways. In the<br />
immediate future the occurrence <strong>of</strong> wild fires may temporarily threaten the food security <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community<br />
because it may cause wild game to flee from traditi<strong>on</strong>al hunting areas, it may destroy<br />
summer gardens and/or it may hinder access to food imports (from town).<br />
In the medium and l<strong>on</strong>g‐term, however, as the climate increasingly warms some wild food sources<br />
may shift to new areas <strong>of</strong> the XGCA or disappear altogether which may lead to lower c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> these wild foods. As menti<strong>on</strong> in secti<strong>on</strong> 5.3, dry summers may cause moose to migrate to wetter<br />
and cooler envir<strong>on</strong>ments. Drier summers may also cause wild potato, bear tooth, trapper tea,<br />
Indian hellebore and raspberry to die <strong>of</strong>f at current elevati<strong>on</strong>s (secti<strong>on</strong> 5.2). Warmer rivers, lakes<br />
and<br />
oceans, caused by hot summers and mild winters, may also reduce salm<strong>on</strong> and trout<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>s significantly in the XGCA (secti<strong>on</strong> 5.4).<br />
At the same time, the milder winters and warmer summers in the medium and l<strong>on</strong>g term may<br />
expand the growing seas<strong>on</strong> for new and existing crops. If the water is available and the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in are inclined towards agricultural development, there may be opportunities to expand their<br />
cultivated food supply. Moreover, with the help <strong>of</strong> more frequent wild fires, the availability <strong>of</strong><br />
rangeland for cattle and mule deer may be expanded, making beef and deer meat more available.<br />
Drier<br />
summers may also invigorate the growth <strong>of</strong> saskato<strong>on</strong> berry, chokecherry, soapberry,<br />
Kinnikinnik and strawberry, which are comm<strong>on</strong>ly harvested by the Xeni Gwet’in.<br />
Hence, while climate change may reduce the availability <strong>of</strong> some wild foods, it may allow others to<br />
thrive<br />
and it may allow for greater agricultural producti<strong>on</strong> in the regi<strong>on</strong>, with the potential for<br />
making<br />
the Xeni Gwet’in’s food supply more diverse.<br />
6.5. Shelter and Infrastructure<br />
Housing am<strong>on</strong>g most <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in community might best be described as rustic. Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />
housing stock in the Nemiah Valley c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> small single family log homes that are relatively old<br />
(between 30 and 50 years). Some new stick frame and mobile homes exist as well but they do not<br />
54
appear to be aging very well. 78 These houses in the community are spread out sparsely in small<br />
clusters from K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake to Chilko Lake. Despite the age <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the log housing it is still<br />
relatively functi<strong>on</strong>al and comfortable. There are issues with rot and mold due to leaky ro<strong>of</strong>s and<br />
leaky pipes, and ventilati<strong>on</strong> as well as with draftiness and poor accessibility for seniors but recent<br />
renovati<strong>on</strong>s by the community have rectified some <strong>of</strong> these c<strong>on</strong>cerns. There c<strong>on</strong>tinues to be a<br />
demand<br />
for new modern housing but INAC housing stipends are not sufficient to build new single<br />
family housing and few in the community can afford to finance a home themselves.<br />
Infrastructure in the XGCA is relatively sparse and largely locally maintained. Water, energy, and<br />
health infrastructures have already been discussed in earlier secti<strong>on</strong>s, so these need no further<br />
discussi<strong>on</strong> here. Sanitati<strong>on</strong>, telecommunicati<strong>on</strong> and public buildings used by the Xeni Gwet’in are<br />
largely in the Nemiah Valley and are very small in scale. The road network in and out <strong>of</strong> the XGCA is<br />
comprised <strong>of</strong> tertiary gravel and bush roads and are partially maintained by the Xeni Gwet’in up to<br />
the St<strong>on</strong>e Reserve and thereafter maintained by the Interior Roads Ltd. There is <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e four<br />
seas<strong>on</strong><br />
gravel road accessing the Nemiah Valley from Highway 20. There is also <strong>on</strong>e four seas<strong>on</strong><br />
gravel road maintained by Interior Roads Ltd. into north Chilko Lake.<br />
Other infrastructure like Xeni Gwet’in government buildings comprise <strong>of</strong> a Band Office, the Health<br />
and Social Services building, the daycare, the Tourism/Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Development <strong>of</strong>fice, the Xeni<br />
Enterprise Trailer, the Public Works yard and the K‐9 school, which are clustered together near the<br />
west end <strong>of</strong> K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake. Telecommunicati<strong>on</strong> infrastructure is based <strong>on</strong> radio or satellite systems,<br />
with practically every household and <strong>of</strong>fice having access to <strong>on</strong>e or the other. Sanitati<strong>on</strong> is fairly<br />
decentralized<br />
with each household <strong>on</strong> septic fields and tanks, except for the public buildings and an<br />
adjacent sub‐divisi<strong>on</strong> which have a centralized septic system.<br />
Climate change may affect Xeni Gwet’in housing and infrastructure in both immediate and l<strong>on</strong>ger<br />
term ways. In the immediate term the occurrence <strong>of</strong> wild fires may threaten the destructi<strong>on</strong> or<br />
damage <strong>of</strong> housing and infrastructure. Houses, in particular, will be difficult to protect because they<br />
are so spread out throughout the Nemiah Valley. This is not the case for for community buildings,<br />
which are fairly centralized near the head <strong>of</strong> K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake. Road access is the <strong>on</strong>ly mass evacuati<strong>on</strong><br />
route out <strong>of</strong> the XGCA at the moment and if it is blocked due to fire or damaged bridges, there are<br />
few alternatives for efficient evacuati<strong>on</strong>. Telecommunicati<strong>on</strong> may be fairly resilient to wild fires<br />
because<br />
it is either based <strong>on</strong> radio or satellite systems, which are not dependent <strong>on</strong> a central hub in<br />
the regi<strong>on</strong>. Similarly, sanitati<strong>on</strong> is fairly decentralized, except for the public buildings.<br />
In the medium to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term, wetter and milder winters and unpredictable storms may increase the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> flooding and wind damage in certain areas as well as the incidence <strong>of</strong> mold and mildew<br />
in<br />
the houses and public buildings if they are not well maintained. It may also wreak havoc <strong>on</strong> the<br />
roads networks due to more frequent icing and thawing or washouts. 79<br />
Firefighting capacity has been discussed above and needs no further elaborati<strong>on</strong>. The Xeni Gwet’in<br />
have fairly str<strong>on</strong>g capabilities to deal with road maintenance and repair but not bridge repair. They<br />
do not have much in the way <strong>of</strong> resources to m<strong>on</strong>itor and deal for flood protecti<strong>on</strong>, sanitati<strong>on</strong> repair<br />
and telecommunicati<strong>on</strong> equipment repair. They do have a number <strong>of</strong> good carpenters but few<br />
other trades people and few funds to undertake building repair, although INAC is theoretically<br />
78 Comments from J<strong>on</strong> Tanis, Carpenter and resident <strong>of</strong> Nemiah Valley.<br />
79 Typically, winter is easier <strong>on</strong> the roads than the other seas<strong>on</strong>s because the snow and ice act as a shield against wear and<br />
tear. With more frequent thawing, the roads could become quite slick and pot‐holed. As well, floods have occurred east<br />
<strong>of</strong> K<strong>on</strong>ni Lake and Elkins Creek and even at the Band <strong>of</strong>fice. These may become more comm<strong>on</strong>.<br />
55
obligated<br />
to finance these repairs in the event <strong>of</strong> an emergency or in the event <strong>of</strong> a health risk yet<br />
this<br />
does not always happen quickly.<br />
6.6. Energy Supply<br />
Comparatively speaking the people <strong>of</strong> the XGCA are relatively small energy c<strong>on</strong>sumers and are<br />
relatively diversified in their use <strong>of</strong> energy. All <strong>of</strong> the XGCA, except for Tatla Lake are <strong>of</strong>f the BC<br />
Hydro electrical grid. The nearest BCHydro line is either Tatla Lake or Lee’s Corner just passed the<br />
north east boundary <strong>of</strong> the XGCA. The entire area is also unserviced by natural gas but residents<br />
and operators can and do have propane and diesel delivered regularly. To provide power and heat<br />
for all those <strong>of</strong>f the grid, a combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> diesel generator, propane, solar, wind and/or firewood<br />
are employed. Tsuniah Lodge also has access to hydro from its own micro‐hydro system. The most<br />
comm<strong>on</strong> strategy for generating power in the XGCA is to use diesel, gas or propane generators. The<br />
most comm<strong>on</strong> strategy for generating heat is still wood fire stoves, furnaces or fireplaces. There<br />
are a number <strong>of</strong> solar/propane hybrid systems set up to serve a number <strong>of</strong> housing clusters in the<br />
Nemiah Valley. Some individual houses also have their own solar systems. There is also some<br />
explorati<strong>on</strong> in the community c<strong>on</strong>cerning alternative energy sources including wind, mini‐hydro,<br />
linking to the BCHydro grid, and bio‐fuel. At the moment, the most feasible approach seems to<br />
entail<br />
a mini‐hydro power stati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Klok<strong>on</strong> Creek (above the Band <strong>of</strong>fice), which would have the<br />
capacity to power (not heat) the whole Nemiah Valley and more80. Climate change may affect Xeni Gwet’in energy systems in a number <strong>of</strong> ways. Firstly, wild fires<br />
induced by drier summers may put some <strong>of</strong> the existing power and heating systems at risk but<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the decentralized distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> these systems it is unlikely that all systems would be<br />
affected. Sec<strong>on</strong>dly, drier summers may limit the capacity <strong>of</strong> the proposed new mini‐hydro project if<br />
significant draw downs occur because <strong>of</strong> evapo‐transpirati<strong>on</strong> and low rates <strong>of</strong> replenishment. On<br />
the<br />
positive side, milder winters are likely to result in lower heating requirements for public<br />
buildings<br />
and households.<br />
6.7. Livelihood<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in sustains their livelihoods in a mix <strong>of</strong> ways. The most predominant means is<br />
through public sector transfers (mainly federal), in the form <strong>of</strong> Band government employment, BC<br />
Parks employment, social assistance, unemployment insurance, training subsidies or social<br />
security. The sec<strong>on</strong>d most comm<strong>on</strong> means <strong>of</strong> support is by working outside <strong>of</strong> the XGCA, either in<br />
the service sector or in the resource sector (forestry and mining), <strong>on</strong> a seas<strong>on</strong>al basis. And the third<br />
means <strong>of</strong> support is by working in the XGCA tourism sector (B&B operati<strong>on</strong> or guiding for<br />
wilderness resorts) or in the ranching sector (cow‐calf operati<strong>on</strong>s). There is a significant tourism<br />
sector in the XGCA, including 11 resorts, 3 B&Bs, 3 guide‐outfitters, and 4 boat/raft companies but<br />
few <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in community are directly involved in it as yet. There are significant forest,<br />
wildlife, mineral and fishery resources in the regi<strong>on</strong> but the Xeni Gwet’in have yet to develop them<br />
except for subsistence purposes 81. There may even by viable wind energy to exploit and sell into<br />
the grid at the north end <strong>of</strong> the territory. There are plans to do more with these resources and<br />
80 Feasibility/predesign <strong>of</strong> the mini‐hydro project is complete; now awaiting decisi<strong>on</strong> from Xeni Gwet’in Council as to<br />
whether or not they wish to pursue the project. Funding is somewhat dependent <strong>on</strong> INAC and BC Hydro. Chief Marilyn<br />
wants to have a referendum <strong>on</strong> whether Xeni Gwet’in should partner with BC Hydro.<br />
81 The Prosperity Mine at a copper/gold mine that is being proposed for the Fish Lake area in the XGCA. However, this<br />
project is opposed by the Xeni Gwet’in and most <strong>of</strong> the Tsilqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
56
opportunities in the near future in a eco‐friendly manner but the lack <strong>of</strong> capital and manpower<br />
mak e progre ss very slow.<br />
The heavy dependence <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in <strong>on</strong> the public sector is both an advantage and<br />
disadvantage in the face <strong>of</strong> climate change. Core public transfers to date have been relatively stable<br />
and are likely to stay that way as l<strong>on</strong>g as the Xeni Gwet’in are governed by the Indian Act. This<br />
means that the Xeni Gwet’in are somewhat insulated from the vagaries <strong>of</strong> the ec<strong>on</strong>omy and the<br />
effects that climate change may have <strong>on</strong> the ec<strong>on</strong>omy. However, the dependence <strong>on</strong> public<br />
transfers also limits the Xeni Gwet’in to a fairly low level <strong>of</strong> income, employment and investment. It<br />
also<br />
limits the level <strong>of</strong> community aut<strong>on</strong>omy and the ability to pursue what it sees as its best<br />
interests in terms <strong>of</strong> a resp<strong>on</strong>se to climate change.<br />
There are three potential growth sectors that the Xeni Gwet’in are interested in pursuing in the<br />
future including: nature‐based aboriginal tourism, eco‐forestry & value‐added wood products and<br />
natural/organic agriculture. Nature‐based aboriginal tourism development is the key focus at the<br />
moment and involves plans for investments in guided tours, cerem<strong>on</strong>ial meals and a destinati<strong>on</strong><br />
resort. 82 Eco‐forestry has also begun to be explored with the intenti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> focusing <strong>on</strong> small‐scale<br />
ecosystem‐based c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> forestry83. Agriculture has not been closely examined but the<br />
intenti<strong>on</strong><br />
is to build <strong>on</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in ranching heritage and explore new opportunities for niche<br />
cultivati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Climate<br />
change will have a mixed impact <strong>on</strong> all three <strong>of</strong> these ec<strong>on</strong>omic sectors.<br />
Naturebase Aboriginal Tourism<br />
Wild fire poses a risk to business property and livestock, the temporary loss <strong>of</strong> wildlife for hunting<br />
and viewing, the loss <strong>of</strong> viewscapes, and the interrupti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> business operati<strong>on</strong>s. Warmer summers<br />
also may result in more frequent open camp fires bans for campers. And warmer waters pose a risk<br />
to fish stocks and therefore fishing tourism as well as the proposed cat‐skiing operati<strong>on</strong> proposed.<br />
On the other hand, wild fires could improve habitat for certain wildlife and thereby improve<br />
opportunities<br />
for hunting and wildlife viewing. And milder springs and falls could expand should<br />
seas<strong>on</strong>s<br />
to make tourism more viable in the area.<br />
EcoForestry & Valueadded<br />
The impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> forests have been discussed in secti<strong>on</strong> 5.2. Suffice to say that<br />
climate change could result in the destructi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> significant amounts <strong>of</strong> merchantable and n<strong>on</strong>‐<br />
merchantable timber through wild fires and new pests, which could greatly reduce the potential for<br />
forest harvests. However, climate change could also result in the new botanical opportunities<br />
(mushrooms, berries etc) and it could, in the l<strong>on</strong>g‐run transform a large porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the XGCA forest<br />
into Douglas‐fir stands, which are typically more merchantable and <strong>of</strong> higher value than the current<br />
lodgepole pine dominated forests. The proposed Silva ecosystem‐based forestry approach<br />
proposes an annual volume cut <strong>of</strong> 783m<br />
throughout the regio<br />
3 distributed by selective and small batch cutting<br />
throughout the “eco‐forestry z<strong>on</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the regi<strong>on</strong>84, which would leave the forest ecosystem<br />
essentially intact. As it is, the proposed approach does not account for the extensive fire risk<br />
occurring n as a result <strong>of</strong> the beetle kill infestati<strong>on</strong> nor the potential transiti<strong>on</strong><br />
82 Ecolibrio (2009).<br />
83 Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004).<br />
84 Hamm<strong>on</strong>d and others (2004).<br />
57
the ecosystem may experience over the l<strong>on</strong>g‐term. However, given the relatively small cut<br />
prescribed, it is likely that it will be easy to meet the annual cut with beetle kill wood al<strong>on</strong>e and/or<br />
adjust to cutting to new areas if wildfires destroy proposed cutting areas. Moreover, since the<br />
forestry<br />
approach is ecosystem‐based, any major changes to the ecosystem would hopefully be<br />
reflected<br />
in the approach to forestry.<br />
Organic/Natural Agriculture<br />
Ranching and haying are the main agricultural activities that the Xeni Gwet’in are engaged in the<br />
XGCA, although the level <strong>of</strong> activity has declined over the years due to poor returns <strong>on</strong> cattle sales.<br />
The community is looking to re‐invigorate this commercial activity and perhaps partner with a<br />
meat processing facility in the regi<strong>on</strong> to market Xeni branded natural or organic beef products.<br />
They<br />
are also interested in investigating the potential <strong>of</strong> other commercially viable cultivated<br />
products in the regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The most immediate risk to ranching and agricultural development in general in the XGCA is fire.<br />
Wildfires could kill, maim or scatter livestock, destroy hay fields and pastures, and damage fencing.<br />
At the same, time fire could also re‐invigorate and expand grasslands for grazing in the medium to<br />
l<strong>on</strong>g‐term,<br />
which would benefit ranching in the area. A milder fall and spring may also expand the<br />
growing<br />
seas<strong>on</strong> for new crops.<br />
6.8. Governance<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong> government governs its community under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />
Act and the federal government <strong>of</strong> Canada. This means that most decisi<strong>on</strong>‐making is carried out by<br />
the four members <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in Band Council. 85 All <strong>of</strong> the community’s planning,<br />
administrati<strong>on</strong> and social services, basic health care, housing administrati<strong>on</strong>, public works,<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omic development, external agency referrals and jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al decisi<strong>on</strong>‐making are carried<br />
out by the Band Government with some assistance <strong>of</strong> the Tsilqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>al Government <strong>on</strong><br />
regi<strong>on</strong>al planning issues. Most <strong>of</strong> the funding for these services comes from the federal<br />
government with small amounts also coming from the provincial government for designated<br />
projects. There are no other revenue sources for the Band government at this time. Although this<br />
funding<br />
covers most <strong>of</strong> the basic necessities <strong>of</strong> government, there is very little discreti<strong>on</strong>ary funding<br />
to deal with land use management issues in the XGCA.<br />
Governing the community can not be easy. The community is fairly depressed ec<strong>on</strong>omically, youth<br />
and young families regularly leave the area for work and educati<strong>on</strong> resulting in a capacity drain.<br />
The community is aging and the number <strong>of</strong> children is declining making it difficult to maintain the<br />
K‐9 school. There are c<strong>on</strong>stant threats and pressures <strong>on</strong> the land from outside sources, including<br />
most recently the push to establish the Prosperity Mine at Fish Lake and real estate development at<br />
the north end <strong>of</strong> Chilko Lake. There is also increasing unpermitted use by ATVs, mountain bikers,<br />
hunters<br />
and sports fishermen and boaters. On top <strong>of</strong> this, the community is fighting a rights and<br />
title case against the BC government<br />
in the BC Supreme Court.<br />
85 By‐Electi<strong>on</strong>s for two council positi<strong>on</strong>s recently added a fourth member to Council, which will add capacity to the<br />
current Band Council affairs and decisi<strong>on</strong>‐making.<br />
58
Climate change will not directly affect community governance but the effects it will have <strong>on</strong> the land<br />
and <strong>on</strong> community assets could certainly add more stress to governing an already challenging<br />
situati<strong>on</strong>. In the short‐term, wild fires could destroy housing and public infrastructure, which could<br />
impede<br />
the regular activities <strong>of</strong> government. L<strong>on</strong>g‐term changes due to climate change will be<br />
more<br />
gradual but they will force more systematic changes to community development.<br />
6.9. Culture<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in are the original inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the XGCA, occupying and using the land for<br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> years. Culturally they regard themselves as people <strong>of</strong> the Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>, which<br />
has a distinct language, a distinct system <strong>of</strong> meanings and values, a distinct kinship system and a<br />
distinct way <strong>of</strong> life marked by a blend <strong>of</strong> sub‐arctic, plateau and coastal practices. 86 The Xeni<br />
Gwet’in are unusual am<strong>on</strong>g First Nati<strong>on</strong> communities in the southern half <strong>of</strong> BC in retaining almost<br />
complete use <strong>of</strong> their own Chilcotin language and in c<strong>on</strong>tinuing to hunt, fish and collect berries,<br />
roots and medicines from the land much the same way their ancestors did. It is not an accident that<br />
the Xeni Gwet’in culture is relatively str<strong>on</strong>g. The community is remote and is not inundated by n<strong>on</strong>‐<br />
Xeni Gwet’in culture. It has its own K‐9 school, wherein the language and the culture are taught.<br />
The community makes a real effort to gather together and celebrate its culture at regular times <strong>of</strong><br />
the year. The children are taught and encouraged to ride and hunt, fish and collect. And the land<br />
has remained fairly healthy so hunting, fishing and collecting is relatively easy. Indeed, the strength<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in culture is closely related to the health <strong>of</strong> the land, since their stories, their diet,<br />
their<br />
medicines, their seas<strong>on</strong>al movements and their social gatherings all revolve around a healthy<br />
land.<br />
Although the Xeni Gwet’in culture is relatively str<strong>on</strong>g, the culture is at risk <strong>of</strong> declining as the<br />
outside world increasingly influences the community through TV, radio, internet and c<strong>on</strong>sumer<br />
culture and as the youth travel or leave the community for work, educati<strong>on</strong> or marriage. Climate<br />
change will <strong>on</strong>ly stress the traditi<strong>on</strong>al culture further, since it will stress the land up<strong>on</strong> which the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in culture is inextricably linked. Salm<strong>on</strong> and trout fishing, to some extent hunting<br />
(moose) and collecting may become more difficult, which may negatively impact traditi<strong>on</strong>al food<br />
gathering and local self‐sufficiency. Climate change could accelerate a shift that is already occurring<br />
away from traditi<strong>on</strong>al culture, perhaps to a more agrarian culture, if farming is taken up in a bigger<br />
way, or perhaps to a more western rural culture, if store bought foods become the sole food source.<br />
There is no way <strong>of</strong> knowing how the Xeni Gwet’in culture will resp<strong>on</strong>d to the climate<br />
changes. However, what is guaranteed is that the adaptati<strong>on</strong> choices available to the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in will become fewer if the biodiversity and resiliency <strong>of</strong> the land is compromised by<br />
unsustainable development. If the land remains healthy and resilient, it will more easily<br />
adapt to the coming climate changes and the same is true for the Xeni Gwet’in traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
culture.<br />
7. The Xeni Gwet’in Visi<strong>on</strong> for Sustainable Development<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in see themselves as stewards <strong>of</strong> the XGCA and envisi<strong>on</strong> sustainable development<br />
and human activity, grounded in an ecosystem‐based approach to land use. The community intends<br />
to c<strong>on</strong>tinue to be to hunt, trap,<br />
fish, and collect for sustenance. They intend to ranch and guide as<br />
86 Argument <strong>of</strong> Plaintiff, Volume 1. Roger Williams vs the Province <strong>of</strong> BC. P. 175<br />
59
they traditi<strong>on</strong>ally have as well as take a lead role in the administrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> their local government<br />
and its services. They also intend to be engaged in new activities such as eco‐forestry and value‐<br />
added wood processing,cultural tourism, organic/naturalagriculture and alternative energy<br />
development. However, they intend to pursue these opportunities while minimizing impacts <strong>on</strong> the<br />
land<br />
and waters, leaving them as much as possible in a self‐sustaining and wild state, so that there<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinues to be clean water, clean air and abundant fish and wildlife.<br />
There may be other opportunities that the community may pursue but development in the XGCA<br />
must strengthen the community’s well‐being, its capacity for self‐sufficiency as well as the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in people’s capacity to realize their dreams and aspirati<strong>on</strong>s. Future development may utilize<br />
the<br />
best <strong>of</strong> mainstream technology and practices but it must also respect and c<strong>on</strong>serve traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
values and practices <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in culture.<br />
The Xeni Gwet’in welcome the opportunity to work cooperatively with all their neighbours within<br />
the XGCA and outside to develop sustainable activities that are c<strong>on</strong>sistent with this visi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
8. Xeni Gwet’in Climate Change Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategies<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
to climate change can occur in many ways. Below are strategies that are based <strong>on</strong> the<br />
WEHAB+<br />
framework used in the Vulnerability Assessment.<br />
8.1. Biodiversity Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
The protecti<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> biodiversity in the XGCA is the foundati<strong>on</strong> for community<br />
resiliency in the XGCA. A healthy and resilient ecosystem allows for a healthy and resilient<br />
community and therefore a key strategy in the Xeni Gwet’in’s adaptati<strong>on</strong> plan must include the<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. The following are number <strong>of</strong> measures recommended<br />
by<br />
the community and the c<strong>on</strong>sultants to protect and c<strong>on</strong>serve the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the XGCA. They<br />
are<br />
divided into general, wildlife & wild horse and wild plant categories.<br />
Objective #1. Maintain the XGCA ecosystem(s) intac t<br />
• Limit fragmentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the XGCA area by roads, clearcuts, mines and real estate<br />
development (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Adopt an ecosystem‐based planning approach to all land use in the XGCA (short‐term)<br />
• Prohibit industrial logging and forestry in the area (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Limit access to the XGCA wilderness, restricting road, water and air access<br />
to designated<br />
areas (<strong>on</strong>going access management)<br />
• Establish baseline indicator data for biodiversity in the XGCA (short‐term)<br />
Objective #2. C<strong>on</strong>serve Wildlife and Wild Horses in the XGCA<br />
• Establish clear protocols for sustainable range management with stakeholders (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Integrate natural and prescribed burns into the Wild Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan‐ to restore<br />
grassland and mixed forest/grassland ecosystems (short‐term)<br />
• Integrate peat preservati<strong>on</strong> into Wild Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan (ensure peat meadow fires are<br />
extinguished after wildfires ) (short‐term)<br />
60
• M<strong>on</strong>itor<br />
indicator wildlife stocks and limit commercial, recreati<strong>on</strong>al and subsistence hunting<br />
if<br />
stocks decline<br />
• Investigate habitat modificati<strong>on</strong> to retain certain species (forest thinning to improve moose<br />
winter range) (L<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
• Restrict hunting during mating seas<strong>on</strong> (short‐term)<br />
• Catch wild horses, train them and use them as stock (short‐term)<br />
Box 4: Community Ideas for Biodiversity Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Community Ideas – Biodiversity Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Wildlife 1. Reduce commercial/recreati<strong>on</strong>al hunting<br />
2. C<strong>on</strong>trol subsistence hunting (take <strong>on</strong>ly what you need)<br />
3. Xeni Gwet’in start m<strong>on</strong>itoring for<br />
poaching and over‐hunting (set up road<br />
check points)<br />
4. No industrial logging or mining<br />
5. Stop littering and polluting<br />
6. Restrict hunting during mating seas<strong>on</strong><br />
Fish<br />
1. Reduce commercial/recreati<strong>on</strong>al fish catches<br />
2. C<strong>on</strong>trol subsistence fishing (take<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly what you need)<br />
3. Work with lodges to m<strong>on</strong>itor and c<strong>on</strong>trol catches<br />
4. No industrial logging or mining<br />
5. Clear beaver dams from streams<br />
6. Stop polluting the waters, esp. fire retardants<br />
and pesticides<br />
7. Catch <strong>on</strong>ly big fish (leave small fish)<br />
8. No net fishing<br />
Wild Horses<br />
1. No shooting <strong>of</strong> wild horses. If wish to cull the herd, catch them and sell them<br />
as stock.<br />
Objective #3. C<strong>on</strong>serve Fish Stocks<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor fish stocks and limit commercial, recreati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
and subsistence fishing if stocks<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinue to decline (short‐term)<br />
• Limit fish catches to large fish <strong>on</strong>ly (short‐term)<br />
• Transplant or re‐introduce fish stocks to new or extirpated lakes or streams (mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term)<br />
• Preserve pristine watersheds from unsustainable development<br />
(e.g. Prosperity Mine) (short‐<br />
term)<br />
• Implement low impact irrigati<strong>on</strong> practices (short‐term)<br />
61
• Dam and store water at Abelachez Lake to release water during the late summer m<strong>on</strong>ths if<br />
necessary (mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
• Improve fish passages by clearing culverts and streams <strong>of</strong> debris and beaver dams (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Encourage low impact forestry (if forestry is pursued) to protect riparian areas (short‐term)<br />
• Encourage low impact ranching (fence cattle, c<strong>on</strong>trol run<strong>of</strong>f<br />
and designate watering areas) to<br />
protect riparian areas. Nemiah creek is a particular c<strong>on</strong>cern. (short‐term)<br />
• Clean or install new gravels at Nemiah Creek (short‐term)<br />
• Encourage riparian planting where needed (mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
• See Water Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> for more recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Objective #4. Preserve Wild Plants in the XGCA<br />
• Transplant traditi<strong>on</strong>al food/medicine plants that require moist to wet habitats (wild potato,<br />
glacier lily, bear tooth, trapper tea, Indian hellebore and raspberry) (mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term).<br />
Assist migrati<strong>on</strong> as habitats shrink or move.<br />
8.2. Health and Safety Enhancements<br />
Wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> and preventi<strong>on</strong> is perhaps the most urgent need in terms <strong>of</strong> adaptati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in community although flood protecti<strong>on</strong> may be an increasing threat as well. Large wild<br />
fires have already begun (summer 2009) and will likely c<strong>on</strong>tinue. An emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> plan is<br />
in place, which will cover mass evacuati<strong>on</strong> in the event <strong>of</strong> a wild fire and other events (floods). The<br />
recent<br />
wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> plan developed by the community lays out a number <strong>of</strong> preventive<br />
strategies<br />
to address the risks in the short‐term as follows:<br />
Obje ctive<br />
#1. Protect Residents and Key Cultural Sites from Wild Fires in the XGCA<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Deliver FireSmart hand‐outs to all households to encourage FireSmart landscaping for<br />
individual residences.<br />
• Develop and pass a Band Council Resoluti<strong>on</strong>, with Band policy implemented, requiring that<br />
all future home c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, modificati<strong>on</strong>s, and renovati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>form to FireSmart<br />
standards.<br />
• Work closely with the appropriate agencies to carry out the necessary repairs to the mesh<br />
around the waste disposal pit and clear the forested area at least 30 metres around the<br />
entire perimeter.<br />
• Acquire sufficient wildland firefighting equipment for 10 firefighters.<br />
• Acquire sufficient equipment to manage and minimize wildfire threat i.e. mulcher, chipper.<br />
• Appoint <strong>on</strong>e individual with the resp<strong>on</strong>sibility to co‐ordinate wildland firefighting activities<br />
through equipment acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and maintenance, and training coordinati<strong>on</strong> and supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> firefighters.<br />
• Obtain a Structural Protecti<strong>on</strong> Unit capable <strong>of</strong> deployment <strong>on</strong> up to three buildings at <strong>on</strong>ce.<br />
• Work with the appropriate agencies to upgrade existing airstrips located in the XGCA that<br />
have been identified to date (Chilko and Nemiah) to provide a better alternative for<br />
emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> and address the populati<strong>on</strong> increases during the seas<strong>on</strong> where there<br />
is the most risk for wildfires in the area.<br />
• Fuel modificati<strong>on</strong> and other works identified should be carried out <strong>on</strong> the areas listed<br />
in<br />
Appendix 1 to help minimize the potential impact <strong>of</strong> a forest fire <strong>on</strong> structures.<br />
• Obtain appropriate insurance coverage for all Xeni Gwet’in homes and public assets<br />
62
• Ensure that appropriate partner agencies have a copy <strong>of</strong> the Community Wildfire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Plan.<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term Measures<br />
• Coordinate FireSmart practices with wilderness lodgesand residents in the area. Establish<br />
a<br />
fire safety committee for XGCA.<br />
• Cut Fire Breaks or reduce fuel loads around the key cultural sites outside Nemiah Valley.<br />
• Undertake road side thinning al<strong>on</strong>g the road from Nemiah through to the St<strong>on</strong>e<br />
reserve and<br />
from the north Chilko Lake through to the highway.<br />
• Salvage dead pine in high lightening strike areas <strong>of</strong>f reserve where feasible<br />
• Re‐introduce fire and identify areas where natural fires will be allowed to burn<br />
These<br />
ideas are more comprehensive than those suggested by the community but they fairly<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sistent<br />
(see Box 5)<br />
Box<br />
5: Community Ideas for Wildfire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Community Ideas – Wild Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
1. Fire safety educati<strong>on</strong> and educati<strong>on</strong> about emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> procedures for<br />
community members<br />
2. More investment in silviculture in the area for spacing, thinning and c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
burning<br />
3. Cut fireguards and cutting <strong>of</strong> beetle kill wood around the settlement areas in<br />
reserves<br />
4. Establish a local fire crew, provide equipment and c<strong>on</strong>tact list and have fire kits<br />
(hoses, axes, etc.) at all fire hydrants in the community<br />
5. Restrict forest fire suppressi<strong>on</strong> in select (high risk) areas that d<strong>on</strong>’t endanger life<br />
or property<br />
6. Harvest beetle kill wood and remove it.<br />
7. Remove fire hazards (dead trees, glass, oil etc.) from around houses<br />
Objective<br />
#2. Protect Residents and Key Cultural Sites from Floods in the XGCA<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Develop a Flood Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan for high risk areas near homes, roads and cultural sites<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tact Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium to undertake hydrological modeling in area to<br />
determine l<strong>on</strong>g‐term flood risk in the area.<br />
• Ensure that appropriate<br />
partner agencies have a copy <strong>of</strong> the Flood Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan.<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor key lake, river and stream levels<br />
• Acquire flood protecti<strong>on</strong> supplies and equipment from partnering agencies as needed.<br />
63
8.3. Water Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
Water is crucial to life and healthy potable water is crucial to good health. The Xeni Gwet’in and<br />
most other residents <strong>of</strong> the XGCA enjoy excellent water resources. To maintain secure sufficient<br />
volumes <strong>of</strong> quality water the follow recommendati<strong>on</strong>s are made:<br />
Objective<br />
#1. Protect Key Potable Water Sources<br />
Short‐term87<br />
• Educate the Xeni Gwet’in members about water protecti<strong>on</strong> (disposal <strong>of</strong> toxic chemicals,<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> from livestock, water quality standards)<br />
• Prohibit industrial logging and mining in the XGCA (no Prosperity<br />
Mine)<br />
• Fence streams from cattle and designate cattle watering areas<br />
• Establish a recycling depot in Nemiah for toxic chemicals<br />
• Remove garbage that may leach toxic chemicals<br />
into water system (old cars, appliances,<br />
drums <strong>of</strong> chemicals, etc.)<br />
• Clean up debris and garbage from streams<br />
• Collect baseline data for key glaciers and rivers, lakes & aquifers (Klok<strong>on</strong>) in the XGCA<br />
• Establish weather stati<strong>on</strong>s or rainfall m<strong>on</strong>itoring equipment in several key locati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
in the<br />
XGCA<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue water quality m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />
<strong>on</strong> key lakes, rivers, streams and aquifers<br />
• Begin water flow and temperature m<strong>on</strong>itoring bey<strong>on</strong>d the Chilko and Taseko rivers<br />
• Begin glacier m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor the water<br />
chemistry <strong>of</strong> Cheolquoit Lake (potential test case)<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Coordinate water protecti<strong>on</strong> protocols with all wilderness lodges in the XGCA ensuring all<br />
parties meet the Canadian Water Quality Standards.<br />
Objective<br />
#2. C<strong>on</strong>serve Potable Water<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Educate the Xeni Gwet’in members<br />
about water c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> measures (reduced usage<br />
techniques)<br />
• Repair pipe, faucet and toilet leaks<br />
• Install low flow faucets and toilet tank boosters<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Install rainfall collectors and cisterns, at least for n<strong>on</strong>‐potable uses.<br />
• Examine the need for water reservoirs to store peak flows for summer<br />
These ideas are more comprehensive than those suggested by the community but they are fairly<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sistent (Box 6). A recurring acti<strong>on</strong> item put forward by the community was to restrict the<br />
industrial logging and mining in the XGCA. Prosperity Mine, in particular, was seen as a significant<br />
threat to the water quality <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />
Box<br />
6: Community Ideas for Water C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Community Ideas – Water C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
and Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Ma<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
Prohibit<br />
<strong>of</strong> these recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
industrial mining<br />
are<br />
(Prosperity<br />
courtesy <strong>of</strong><br />
Mine)<br />
Cariboo<br />
and<br />
Envirotech.<br />
logging<br />
More efficient water use.<br />
3. Investigate alternate wells for community or sub‐divisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
4. Clean up streams <strong>of</strong> debris and beaver dams. Trap beaver.<br />
5. Protect water from litter and polluti<strong>on</strong>. Recycle. D<strong>on</strong>’t dump oil and anti‐freeze <strong>on</strong> ground.<br />
87 ny<br />
64
8.4. Food Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Wild foods are crucial to the health and the culture <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in community but there is also<br />
realizati<strong>on</strong> that more cultivated foods (rather than store bought foods) could also enrich the<br />
community and make it more resilient to climate change.<br />
Objective #2. C<strong>on</strong>serve and Use Wild Food Sources<br />
• Preserve biodiversity (see biodiversity)<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to subsistence hunt, fish and collect (but take <strong>on</strong>ly what you need) (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to educate youth about hunting, fishing and collecting (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Transplant or cultivate traditi<strong>on</strong>al plant foods/medicines that are stressed to new more<br />
hospitable areas <strong>of</strong> the XGCA (l<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
Objective #2. Increase Development and Diet Cultivated Food Sources<br />
• Examine interest in raising cattle and poultry for sustenance (short‐term)<br />
• Investigate community/household slaughter opti<strong>on</strong>s (short‐term)<br />
• Host workshop to educate Xeni Gwet’in members <strong>on</strong> how to start gardens and green houses<br />
(short‐term)<br />
• Establish clear protocols for sustainable range management with stakeholders (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Explore low impact irrigati<strong>on</strong> system to produce more hay (mid‐term)<br />
• Explore opportunities for new crops that are suitable to warmer climate and wildlife (mid‐<br />
term)<br />
Objective #3. Increase Preservati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wild and Cultivated Foods<br />
• Host workshops to educate and encourage Xeni Gwet’in members to start canning, drying<br />
and using root cellars<br />
Box 7: Community Ideas for Food Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Community Ideas – Food Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
1. Hunt, fish, trap and collect wild roots and berries<br />
2. Prohibit industrial mining and logging<br />
3. Raise and butcher cows and chickens for meat<br />
4. More gardening and greenhouses<br />
5. Preserve/can more berries, fish, meat and vegetables<br />
6. Bring back root cellars<br />
7. Put in proper irrigati<strong>on</strong> systems for hay producti<strong>on</strong><br />
8. More educati<strong>on</strong> for growing vegetables<br />
8.5. Shelter and Infrastructure Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Shelter and infrastructure are most at risk from wildfires and floods and from mould and mildew<br />
issues. Secti<strong>on</strong> XX (Health and Safety) discusses wild fire and flood protecti<strong>on</strong> strategies at length<br />
65
so no further elaborati<strong>on</strong> is required. Mould and mildew problems are addressed in Objective 2<br />
below.<br />
Objective #1. Protect Shelter and Infrastructure<br />
• See Health and Safety recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Objective<br />
#2. Reduce risk <strong>of</strong> Mould, Mildew and Rot<br />
Short‐term<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue m<strong>on</strong>itor for mould, mildew and rot<br />
<strong>on</strong> a regular basis and apply housing<br />
renovati<strong>on</strong> funds where available (short‐term)<br />
• Educate householders about how to m<strong>on</strong>itor for mould, mildew and rot, how to ventilate<br />
their homes properly<br />
and how fix minor leaks (short‐term)<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Examine the need to redesign new housing for wetter and milder winters (e.g. better<br />
ventilati<strong>on</strong> systems, better exterior drainage and wider ro<strong>of</strong> overhangs) (l<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
8.6. Energy Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Energy systems are most at risk from wildfires and floods. Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.2 (Health and Safety)<br />
discusses wild fire and flood protecti<strong>on</strong> strategies at some length so no further elaborati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
required. Energy c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and diversificati<strong>on</strong> are discussed in objectives 2 and 3.<br />
Objective #1. Protect Existing Energy Sources<br />
• See Health and Safety recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Objective<br />
#2. Strengthen Energy C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
Short‐term<br />
• Inspect Xeni Gwet’in housing and public building for drafts and install weather stripping<br />
where necessary<br />
• Inspect Xeni Gwet’in housing and public buildings for insulati<strong>on</strong> quality and install new<br />
insulati<strong>on</strong> where necessary<br />
• Where relevant replace incandescent bulbs with compact fluorescent<br />
bulbs and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al power bars with smart power bars<br />
• Where feasible install root cellars or cold rooms to supplement refrigerati<strong>on</strong><br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Where feasible replace old fridges and stoves with energy smart <strong>on</strong>es<br />
Objective<br />
#3 C<strong>on</strong>tinue Energy Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Short‐term<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to expand the hybrid systems (particularly the solar aspect) where cost effective<br />
• Explore mini‐wind units for hybrid systems<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to pursue mini‐hydro development but test for sensitivity to increased summer<br />
drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
66
• Explore other renewable energy supply opti<strong>on</strong>s such as wind, solar, geothermal and linking<br />
into the BC hydro grid system.<br />
• Explore a district biomass heating system or a geothermal system for Xeni Gwet’in public<br />
buildings and the school<br />
• Explore the development <strong>of</strong> wind energy at the boundary <strong>of</strong> the XGCA for sale into the<br />
BChydro grid<br />
Box 8: Community Ideas for Energy Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Community Ideas – Energy<br />
Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
1. More solar panels for hybrid systems<br />
2. Wind power <strong>on</strong> reserve<br />
3. Wind power near boundary <strong>of</strong> XGCA to sell into BCHydro grid<br />
8.7. Livelihood Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Moving the Xeni Gwet’in toward greater ec<strong>on</strong>omic diversificati<strong>on</strong> will increase the level <strong>of</strong> wealth in<br />
the community, reduce dependence <strong>on</strong> federal government transfers, and increase the level <strong>of</strong><br />
aut<strong>on</strong>omy <strong>of</strong> the community has to make its own decisi<strong>on</strong>s. Moreover, if this diversificati<strong>on</strong> is d<strong>on</strong>e<br />
in a sustainable manner and it is planned with future climate changes in mind, it will strengthen<br />
community resilience. The three sectors that show particular promise for sustainable development<br />
are nature‐based aboriginal tourism, natural or organic based agriculture and eco‐forestry. These<br />
sectors should be developed with potential climate change impacts in mind. There may also be<br />
other enterprise opportunities arising out <strong>of</strong> housing and infrastructure upgrades, fire and flood<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong>, water c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and biodiversity protecti<strong>on</strong> (adaptive enterprise development).<br />
Objective #1. Develop Naturebased Aboriginal Tourism<br />
Short‐term<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue access management planning and measures<br />
• Integrate cultural c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and tourism development plans into the wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
plan and measures<br />
• Integrate tourism development plans into the community emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> plans<br />
• Pursuekey key key airstrip improvements<br />
• Investigate business<br />
and property insurance for <strong>on</strong> and <strong>of</strong>f‐reserve tourism enterprises<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Develop and market n<strong>on</strong>‐fishing based products if fish<br />
stocks c<strong>on</strong>tinue<br />
to decline<br />
• Expand spring and fall shoulder seas<strong>on</strong> products if climate<br />
permits<br />
• See biodiversity secti<strong>on</strong> for more recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Obj ective<br />
#2. Develop Ecoforestry an d Wood Products Short‐term<br />
• Integrate wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> planning and measures into eco‐forestry<br />
development<br />
planning<br />
• Undertake eco‐forestry plan with new climate projecti<strong>on</strong>s in mind<br />
• Explore viability <strong>of</strong> FSC certificati<strong>on</strong> for forest and wood products<br />
67
• Re‐introduce fire and allow natural fires in select areas<br />
• Explore business<br />
opportunities identified in Xeni Gwet’in Fibre Needs Analysis<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Plant species mixes (in particular more Douglas‐fir) with shelter<br />
to protect from frost<br />
• Preserve and encourage aspen and other deciduous species<br />
• See biodiversity secti<strong>on</strong> for more recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Objective<br />
#3. Develop Natural/Organic Agriculture<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Assess feasibility <strong>of</strong> organic/natural beef business<br />
• Undertake an ecosystem‐based plan for agriculture and tie in with tourism plans<br />
• Integrate agriculture development plans into the wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> plan<br />
and flood<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> plan<br />
• Investigate low impact irrigati<strong>on</strong>s opti<strong>on</strong>s for hay producti<strong>on</strong> and other crops<br />
• Explore range land management soluti<strong>on</strong>s to over grazing<br />
• Integrate agriculture development plans into the community emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> plan,<br />
particularly livestock<br />
evacuati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tingencies<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Investigate new cultivati<strong>on</strong> opportunities, particularly drought resistant varieties and water<br />
c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> techniques to cope with warmer and drier summers<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>trol Invasive (n<strong>on</strong>‐native) species as grasslands expand, especially near roadsides.<br />
• Investigate business and property insurance for <strong>on</strong> and <strong>of</strong>f‐reserve agricultural enterprises<br />
Objective #4. Develop Other Adaptive Enterprise Opportunities<br />
• Explore enterprise opportunities arising out <strong>of</strong> other adaptati<strong>on</strong> measures (water, energy,<br />
food, biodiversity, shelter and infrastructure etc.)<br />
8.8. Good Governance<br />
Good governance in the face <strong>of</strong> climate change is about building community resilience towards<br />
climate impacts. The Xeni Gwet’in government is the key mobilizer in this task and has a lead role<br />
in all <strong>of</strong> the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> this report, whether it be protecting XGCA biodiversity, managing<br />
health and safety, protecting community infrastructure and housing, diversifying the local ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />
or c<strong>on</strong>trolling access management into the XGCA. These things will not happen without its<br />
directi<strong>on</strong>. However, it cannot undertake all <strong>of</strong> these resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities al<strong>on</strong>e, so it is important that it<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sult with the Xeni Gwet’in members and other residents <strong>of</strong> the regi<strong>on</strong> regarding its adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
plans to get buy‐in and partnerships wherever possible to see its plans realized.<br />
Objective #1. Incorporate Climate Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategies into Local Governance<br />
Objectives<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Inform and c<strong>on</strong>sult with Xeni Gwet’in populati<strong>on</strong> re adaptati<strong>on</strong> plans<br />
• Review priorities and determine what measures it will implement first<br />
• Apply for Phase II funding to begin implementing the Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategy<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tact key regi<strong>on</strong>al, provincial and federal government to inform about adaptati<strong>on</strong> plans<br />
and solicit resources and expertise to implement<br />
68
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
• Integrate climate adaptati<strong>on</strong> objectives into all local government<br />
planning<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor climate changes and review priorities as necessary<br />
8.9. Cultural Preservati<strong>on</strong><br />
Protecting the culture <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in people is key to protecting the land and visa versa.<br />
Through the wisdom and the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the elders, the Xeni Gwet’in know‐how to live <strong>of</strong>f and<br />
care for the land. This wisdom protects the land. At the same time, the health <strong>of</strong> the Xeni Gwet’in<br />
traditi<strong>on</strong>al culture is closely linked to the health <strong>of</strong> the land, since the Xeni Gwet’in culture is closely<br />
tied to their hunting, fishing and collecting. Protecting the Xeni Gwet’in culture therefore involves<br />
retaining use and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the Chilcotin language and customs but it also involves protecting<br />
the health <strong>of</strong> the XGCA ecosystem.<br />
Objective #1. Protect the Xeni Gwet’in Culture<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to identify and protect cultural assets in the XGCA<br />
• Integrate the protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> cultural sites into wild fire<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> plan and flood protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
plan and access management plan<br />
• See biodiversity secti<strong>on</strong> for more recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Box 9: Community Ideas for Cultural Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
:<br />
Community Ideas – Cultural Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
1. Protect the land and it will protect the people<br />
2. More cultural educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> youth by elders and parents at home<br />
3. More speaking to youth in our language by parents and elders at home and at school<br />
4. More living <strong>of</strong>f the land (hunting, fishing and collecting) and learning traditi<strong>on</strong>al ways from<br />
elders<br />
5. Acknowledge and celebrate the elders<br />
6. More community gatherings, potlucks and sweat lodges<br />
Objective #2. Celebrate the Xeni Gwet’in Culture<br />
• Encourage elders and parents to speak Chilcotin to the children at home.<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to teach children about hunting, fishing, collecting and living from the land<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to support Chilcotin studies in school and Culture Day<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to support the traditi<strong>on</strong>al gatherings, healing cerem<strong>on</strong>ies and sweats<br />
69
Biodiversity Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Maintain the<br />
XGCA as an intact<br />
ecosystem<br />
C<strong>on</strong>serve Wildlife<br />
and Wild Horses<br />
in the XGCA<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority 88<br />
• Limit fragmentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the XGCA area by roads,<br />
clearcuts, mines and real estate development<br />
• Deactivate/de‐commissi<strong>on</strong> unnecessary roads<br />
• Adopt an ecosystem‐based planning approach<br />
to all land use in the XGCA<br />
• Prohibit industrial logging and forestry in the<br />
area (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Adopt Xeni Gwet’in Proposed Access<br />
Management Plan<br />
• Establish baseline indicator data for<br />
biodiversity in the XGCA (short‐term)<br />
• Obtain recogniti<strong>on</strong> from local to internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
level (e.g. IUCN) <strong>of</strong> the unique biodiversity<br />
qualities <strong>of</strong> the XGCA<br />
• Undertake a range management plan and<br />
establish clear protocols for sustainable range<br />
management with stakeholders<br />
• Integrate natural and prescribed burns into<br />
the Wild Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan‐ to restore<br />
grassland and mixed forest/grassland<br />
ecosystems<br />
• Integrate peat preservati<strong>on</strong> into Wild Fire<br />
Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan (ensure peat meadow fires are<br />
extinguished after wildfires )<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor indicator wildlife stocks and limit<br />
commercial, recreati<strong>on</strong>al and subsistence<br />
hunting if stocks decline<br />
• Manage wildlife species that are traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
foods such as moose and deer with a priority<br />
for Xeni subsistence first<br />
• Habitat enhancement for grizzly, moose, big<br />
horn sheep and Whitebark to retain certain<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe<br />
89<br />
Council<br />
Council<br />
Council<br />
Council & Access Mgt<br />
Committee<br />
Science Committee<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Ongoing<br />
Short‐term<br />
Ongoing<br />
Ongoing<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Ongoing<br />
L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Funding<br />
Required<br />
70
C<strong>on</strong>serve Fish<br />
Stocks<br />
• Restrict hunting during mating seas<strong>on</strong><br />
• Keep domestic horses <strong>of</strong>f wild horse and cattle<br />
range unless under permit<br />
• Undertake wild horse habitat mapping<br />
• Catch wild horses regularly and sell them for<br />
stock (do not kill)<br />
• Protect migratory and resident birds and<br />
species at risk<br />
• Ensure protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> special natural features<br />
and specialized wildlife and fish habitats<br />
• Manage trails, campgrounds and residences to<br />
minimize c<strong>on</strong>flicts with grizzly and black<br />
bears<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor fish stocks and limit commercial,<br />
recreati<strong>on</strong>al and subsistence fishing if stocks<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinue to decline<br />
• Limit fish catches to large fish <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
• Transplant or re‐introduce fish stocks to new<br />
or extirpated lakes or streams<br />
• Preserve pristine watersheds from<br />
unsustainable development (e.g. Prosperity<br />
Mine)<br />
• Implement low impact irrigati<strong>on</strong> practices<br />
(short‐term)<br />
• Dam and store water at Abelachez Lake to<br />
release water during the late summer m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />
if necessary<br />
• Improve fish passages by clearing culverts and<br />
streams <strong>of</strong> debris and beaver dams<br />
• Encourage low impact forestry (if forestry is<br />
pursued) to protect riparian areas<br />
• Encourage low impact ranching (fence cattle,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol run<strong>of</strong>f and designate watering areas)<br />
to protect riparian areas. Nemiah creek is a<br />
particular c<strong>on</strong>cern.<br />
• Clean or install new gravels at Nemiah Creek<br />
(short‐term)<br />
• Encourage riparian planting where needed<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
1<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
4<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Council<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Council<br />
Council<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
71
Preserve Wild<br />
Plants & the<br />
Habitats in the<br />
XGCA<br />
(mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
NOTE See Water Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
for more recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Transplant traditi<strong>on</strong>al food/medicine plants<br />
that require moist to wet habitats (wild potato,<br />
glacier lily, bear tooth, trapper tea, Indian<br />
hellebore and raspberry) (mid to l<strong>on</strong>g‐term).<br />
Assist migrati<strong>on</strong> as habitats shrink or move.<br />
Health and Safety Enhancements<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Protect Residents<br />
and Key Cultural<br />
Sites from Wild<br />
Fires in the XGCA<br />
1<br />
Committee<br />
Elders<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding<br />
Required<br />
• Deliver FireSmart hand‐outs to all households 1 Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong> Short‐term<br />
to encourage FireSmart landscaping for<br />
individual residences.<br />
Committee<br />
• Develop and pass a Band Council Resoluti<strong>on</strong>,<br />
with Band policy implemented, requiring that<br />
all future home c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, modificati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
and renovati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>form to FireSmart<br />
standards.<br />
1 Council<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Work closely with the appropriate agencies to<br />
carry out the necessary repairs to the mesh<br />
around the waste disposal pit and clear the<br />
forested area at least 30 metres around the<br />
entire perimeter.<br />
1 Council<br />
Short‐term<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Acquire sufficient wildland firefighting<br />
equipment for 10 firefighters.<br />
Acquire sufficient equipment to manage and<br />
minimize wildfire threat i.e. mulcher, chipper.<br />
1<br />
1<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Appoint <strong>on</strong>e individual with the resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />
to co‐ordinate wildland firefighting activities<br />
through equipment acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and<br />
1 Council<br />
Short‐term<br />
maintenance, and training coordinati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> firefighters.<br />
1 Council<br />
Short‐term<br />
72
Protect Residents<br />
and Key Cultural<br />
Sites from Floods<br />
in the XGCA<br />
• Obtain a Structural Protecti<strong>on</strong> Unit capable <strong>of</strong><br />
deployment <strong>on</strong> up to three buildings at <strong>on</strong>ce.<br />
• Work with the appropriate agencies to<br />
upgrade existing airstrips located in the XGCA<br />
that have been identified to date (Chilko and<br />
Nemiah).<br />
• Fuel modificati<strong>on</strong> and other works identified<br />
should be carried out <strong>on</strong> the areas listed in<br />
Appendix 1.<br />
• Obtain appropriate insurance coverage for all<br />
Xeni Gwet’in homes and public assets<br />
• Ensure that appropriate partner agencies have<br />
a copy <strong>of</strong> the Community Wildfire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Plan.<br />
• Coordinate FireSmart practices with resorts<br />
and residents in the area. Establish a fire<br />
safety committee for XGCA.<br />
• Cut Fire Breaks or reduce fuel loads around the<br />
key cultural sites outside Nemiah Valley.<br />
• Undertake road side thinning al<strong>on</strong>g the road<br />
from Nemiah through to the St<strong>on</strong>e reserve and<br />
from the north Chilko Lake through to the<br />
highway.<br />
• Salvage dead pine in high lightening strike<br />
areas <strong>of</strong>f reserve where feasible<br />
• Re‐introduce fire and identify areas where<br />
natural fires will be allowed to burn<br />
• Develop a Flood Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan for high risk<br />
areas near homes, roads and cultural sites<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tact Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium to<br />
undertake hydrological modeling in area to<br />
determine l<strong>on</strong>g‐term flood risk in the area.<br />
• Ensure that appropriate partner agencies have<br />
a copy <strong>of</strong> the Flood Protecti<strong>on</strong> Plan.<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor key lake, river and stream levels<br />
• Acquire flood protecti<strong>on</strong> supplies and<br />
equipment from partnering agencies as<br />
needed.<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
2<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Council<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Council<br />
Council<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
?<br />
Council/Science<br />
Committee<br />
Council<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Health Dept<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
73
Water Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Protect Key<br />
Potable Water<br />
Sources<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding Required<br />
• Educate the Xeni Gwet’in members about<br />
water protecti<strong>on</strong> (disposal <strong>of</strong> toxic chemicals,<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> from livestock, water quality<br />
standards)<br />
• Prohibit industrial logging and mining in the<br />
XGCA (no Prosperity Mine)<br />
• Fence streams from cattle and designate cattle<br />
watering areas<br />
• Establish a recycling depot in Nemiah for toxic<br />
chemicals<br />
• Remove garbage that may leach toxic<br />
chemicals into water system (old cars,<br />
appliances, drums <strong>of</strong> chemicals, etc.)<br />
• Clean up debris and garbage from streams<br />
• Collect baseline data for key glaciers and<br />
rivers, lakes & aquifers (Klok<strong>on</strong>) in the XGCA<br />
• Establish weather stati<strong>on</strong>s or rainfall<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring equipment in several key locati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
in the XGCA<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue water quality m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>on</strong> key<br />
lakes, rivers, streams and aquifers<br />
• Begin water flow and temperature m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />
bey<strong>on</strong>d the Chilko and Taseko rivers<br />
• Begin glacier m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor the water chemistry <strong>of</strong> Cheolquoit<br />
Lake (potential test case)<br />
• Coordinate water protecti<strong>on</strong> protocols with all<br />
wilderness lodges in the XGCA ensuring all<br />
parties meet the Canadian Water Quality<br />
Standards.<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
2<br />
Health Dept<br />
Council<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
Recycling Committee<br />
Recycling Committee<br />
Fish &<br />
Wildlife/Recycling<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
74
C<strong>on</strong>serve Potable<br />
Water<br />
• Educate the Xeni Gwet’in members about<br />
water c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> measures (reduced usage<br />
techniques)<br />
• Repair pipe, faucet and toilet leaks<br />
• Install low flow faucets and toilet tank<br />
boosters<br />
• Install rainfall collectors and cisterns, at least<br />
for n<strong>on</strong>‐potable uses.<br />
• Examine the need for water reservoirs to store<br />
peak flows for summer<br />
Food Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
C<strong>on</strong>serve and Use<br />
Wild Food Sources<br />
Increase<br />
Development and<br />
Diet Cultivated<br />
Food Sources<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3<br />
3<br />
5<br />
Health Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Watershed<br />
Committee<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
L<strong>on</strong>g‐term<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding Required<br />
• Preserve biodiversity (see biodiversity)<br />
• Encourage subsistence hunt, fish and collect<br />
(but take <strong>on</strong>ly what you need)<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to educate youth about hunting,<br />
fishing and collecting (<strong>on</strong>going)<br />
• Transplant or cultivate traditi<strong>on</strong>al plant<br />
foods/medicines that are stressed to new<br />
more hospitable areas <strong>of</strong> the XGCA (l<strong>on</strong>g‐term)<br />
• Examine interest in raising cattle and poultry<br />
for sustenance<br />
• Investigate community/household slaughter<br />
opti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Host workshop to educate Xeni Gwet’in<br />
members <strong>on</strong> how to start gardens and green<br />
houses<br />
• Establish clear protocols for sustainable range<br />
management with stakeholders<br />
• Explore low impact irrigati<strong>on</strong> system to<br />
produce more hay<br />
• Explore opportunities for new crops that are<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
Fish & Wildlife<br />
Committee<br />
?<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Assoc./ Health Dept<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Assoc./ Health Dept<br />
Health Dept<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Assoc<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Assoc<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ongoing<br />
Ongoing<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
75
Increase<br />
Preservati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Wild and<br />
Cultivated Foods<br />
suitable to warmer climate and wildlife<br />
• Host workshops to educate and encourage<br />
Xeni Gwet’in members to start canning,<br />
drying and using root cellars<br />
Shelter and Infrastructure Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Protect Shelter<br />
and Infrastructure<br />
Reduce risk <strong>of</strong><br />
Mould, Mildew<br />
and Rot<br />
1<br />
Health Dept<br />
Short‐term<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding Required<br />
• See Health and Safety recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue m<strong>on</strong>itor for mould, mildew and<br />
rot <strong>on</strong> a regular basis and apply housing<br />
renovati<strong>on</strong> funds where available<br />
• Educate householders about how to<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itor for mould, mildew and rot, how to<br />
ventilate their homes properly and how fix<br />
minor leaks<br />
• Examine the need to redesign new housing<br />
for wetter and milder winters (e.g. better<br />
ventilati<strong>on</strong> systems, better exterior<br />
drainage and wider ro<strong>of</strong> overhangs) (l<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term)<br />
Energy Supply Protecti<strong>on</strong>, C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
1<br />
2<br />
4<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding Required<br />
76
Protect Existing<br />
Energy Sources<br />
Strengthen<br />
Energy<br />
C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>tinue Energy<br />
Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
Livelihood<br />
Diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
• See Health and Safety recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Inspect Xeni Gwet’in housing and public<br />
buildings for drafts and install weather<br />
stripping where necessary<br />
• Inspect Xeni Gwet’in housing and public<br />
buildings for insulati<strong>on</strong> quality and install<br />
new insulati<strong>on</strong> where necessary<br />
• Where relevant replace incandescent<br />
bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al power bars with smart<br />
power bars<br />
• Where feasible install root cellars or cold<br />
rooms to supplement refrigerati<strong>on</strong><br />
• Where feasible replace old fridges and<br />
stoves with energy smart <strong>on</strong>es<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to expand the hybrid systems<br />
(particularly the solar aspect) where cost<br />
effective<br />
• Explore mini‐wind units for hybrid systems<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to pursue mini‐hydro development<br />
but test for sensitivity to increased summer<br />
drought c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
• Explore other renewable energy supply<br />
opti<strong>on</strong>s such as wind, solar, geothermal and<br />
linking into the BC hydro grid system.<br />
• Explore a district biomass heating system or a<br />
geothermal system for Xeni Gwet’in public<br />
buildings and the school<br />
• Explore the development <strong>of</strong> wind energy at the<br />
boundary <strong>of</strong> the XGCA for sale into the<br />
BChydro grid<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
3<br />
4<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Health Dept<br />
Housing Dept<br />
Xeni Gwet’in<br />
XG<br />
XG<br />
XG/Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
XG/Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
XG/Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid–term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
77
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Develop Nature‐<br />
based Aboriginal<br />
Tourism<br />
Develop Eco‐<br />
forestry and<br />
Wood Products<br />
Develop<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding Required<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue access management planning and<br />
measures<br />
• Integrate cultural c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and tourism<br />
development plans into the wild fire<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> plan and measures<br />
• Integrate tourism development plans into the<br />
community emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> plans<br />
• Pursue airstrip improvements<br />
• Investigate business and property insurance<br />
for <strong>on</strong> and <strong>of</strong>f‐reserve tourism enterprises<br />
• Develop and market n<strong>on</strong>‐fishing based<br />
products if fish stocks c<strong>on</strong>tinue to decline<br />
• Expand spring and fall shoulder seas<strong>on</strong><br />
products if climate permits<br />
• See biodiversity secti<strong>on</strong> for more<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Integrate wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> planning and<br />
measures into eco‐forestry development<br />
planning<br />
• Undertake eco‐forestry plan with new climate<br />
projecti<strong>on</strong>s in mind<br />
• Explore viability <strong>of</strong> FSC certificati<strong>on</strong> for forest<br />
and wood products<br />
• Re‐introduce fire and allow natural fires in<br />
select areas<br />
• Explore business opportunities identified in<br />
Xeni Gwet’in Fibre Needs Analysis<br />
• Plant species mixes (in particular more<br />
Douglas‐fir) with shelter to protect from frost<br />
• Preserve and encourage aspen and other<br />
deciduous species<br />
• See biodiversity secti<strong>on</strong> for more<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Assess feasibility <strong>of</strong> organic/natural beef<br />
business<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1<br />
Access Mgt<br />
Committee<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Health Dept<br />
XG/Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
Mid‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Short‐term<br />
78
Natural/Organic<br />
Agriculture<br />
Develop Other<br />
Adaptive<br />
Enterprise<br />
Opportunities<br />
Good Governance<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Incorporate<br />
Climate<br />
• Undertake an ecosystem‐based plan for<br />
agriculture and tie in with tourism plans<br />
• Integrate agriculture development plans into<br />
the wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> plan and flood<br />
protecti<strong>on</strong> plan<br />
• Investigate low impact irrigati<strong>on</strong>s opti<strong>on</strong>s for<br />
hay producti<strong>on</strong> and other crops<br />
• Explore range land management soluti<strong>on</strong>s to<br />
over grazing<br />
• Integrate agriculture development plans into<br />
the community emergency evacuati<strong>on</strong> plan,<br />
particularly livestock evacuati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tingencies<br />
• Investigate new cultivati<strong>on</strong> opportunities,<br />
particularly drought resistant varieties and<br />
water c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> techniques to cope with<br />
warmer and drier summers<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>trol Invasive (n<strong>on</strong>‐native) species as<br />
grasslands expand, especially near roadsides.<br />
• Investigate business and property insurance<br />
for <strong>on</strong> and <strong>of</strong>f‐reserve agricultural enterprises<br />
• Explore enterprise opportunities arising out <strong>of</strong><br />
other adaptati<strong>on</strong> measures (water, energy,<br />
food, biodiversity, shelter and infrastructure<br />
etc.)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
Committee<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Committee<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Committee<br />
Health Dept/Nemiah<br />
Stockman’s Assoc<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Nemiah Stockman’s<br />
Committee<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Mid ‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding<br />
Required<br />
• Inform and c<strong>on</strong>sult with Xeni Gwet’in<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> re adaptati<strong>on</strong> plans<br />
1 Council<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Review priorities and determine what<br />
measures it will implement first<br />
1 Council<br />
Short‐term<br />
79
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Strategies into<br />
Local Governance<br />
Objectives<br />
Cultural Preservati<strong>on</strong><br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Objective<br />
Protect the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in Culture<br />
Celebrate the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in<br />
Culture<br />
• Apply for Phase II funding to begin<br />
implementing the Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategy<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tact key regi<strong>on</strong>al, provincial and federal<br />
government to inform about adaptati<strong>on</strong> plans<br />
and solicit resources and expertise to<br />
implement<br />
• Integrate climate adaptati<strong>on</strong> objectives into all<br />
local government planning<br />
• M<strong>on</strong>itor climate changes and review priorities<br />
as necessary<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
Ec<strong>on</strong> Dev<br />
Council<br />
Band Mgr<br />
Council &<br />
Committees<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Short‐term<br />
Mid to L<strong>on</strong>g‐<br />
term<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong>s Priority Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility Timeframe Funding<br />
Required<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to identify and protect cultural assets<br />
in the XGCA<br />
1 ?<br />
Short‐term<br />
• Integrate the protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> cultural sites into<br />
1 Fire Protecti<strong>on</strong> Short‐term<br />
wild fire protecti<strong>on</strong> plan and flood protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
plan and access management plan<br />
Committee<br />
• See biodiversity secti<strong>on</strong> for more<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
• Encourage elders and parents to speak<br />
Chilcotin to the children at home.<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to teach children about hunting,<br />
fishing, collecting and living from the land<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to support Chilcotin studies in school<br />
and Culture Day<br />
• C<strong>on</strong>tinue to support the traditi<strong>on</strong>al gatherings,<br />
healing cerem<strong>on</strong>ies and sweats<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
?<br />
?<br />
?<br />
Ongoing<br />
Ongoing<br />
Ongoing<br />
Ongoing<br />
80
REFERENCES<br />
Allen, Dr. Diana M. (2009). Impacts <strong>of</strong> Climate Change <strong>on</strong> Groundwater in BC. In Innovati<strong>on</strong> –<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> the Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al Engineers and Geoscientists <strong>of</strong> BC. May/June<br />
2009.<br />
Bush, A., and Pollock, T. (2009) Pers<strong>on</strong>al Communicati<strong>on</strong> (Nov. 2009).<br />
Campbell.<br />
E., S. Saunders, D. MacKillop and S. Haeussler. 2009. Towards a framework for<br />
operati<strong>on</strong>al indicators <strong>of</strong> ecological resilience. Draft Report.<br />
BC Min For. 75pp.<br />
CARE 2009, Climate Vulnerability & Capacity Analysis Handbook.<br />
Cariboo<br />
Envirotech Ltd. 2006. The 2006 Fish and Fish Habitat Training Program <strong>on</strong> Nemaia Creek<br />
WSC 150‐335700‐98700. Report prepared for the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s Government.<br />
CBC. Canadian Broadcasting Corporati<strong>on</strong>. December 9, 2009. Sockeye Decline Linked to Climate<br />
Change. Change in ocean c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in 2007 likely behind mass death in stocks.<br />
URL Site: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british‐columbia/story/2009/12/09/bc‐scientists‐<br />
sockeye‐climate‐change.html<br />
Cheung, William, Vicky Lam, Jorge Sarmiento, Kelly Kearney, Reg Wats<strong>on</strong> and Daniel Pauly. The<br />
capacity and likelihood <strong>of</strong> climate change adaptati<strong>on</strong> in the world's fisheries. Fish and<br />
Fisheries, February 13, 2008.<br />
C ohen, S . and Kulkarni, T., 2001. Water Management & Climate Change in the Okanagan Basin,<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>ment Canada/University <strong>of</strong> Br itish Columbia, Vancouver BC.<br />
Cox,<br />
S. 2000. Management <strong>of</strong> Whitebark pine (pinus albicaulis) in North American Forests and<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Parks. http://www.landscapeimagery.com/whitebark.html<br />
Daws<strong>on</strong>, R., A.T. Werner, T.Q. Murdock, (2008): Preliminary Analysis <strong>of</strong> Climate Change in the<br />
Cariboo‐Chilcotin Area <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Victoria, Victoria BC, 49 pp.<br />
Debeer,<br />
C.M. and Sharp, M.J., 2007. Recent changes in glacier area and volume within the southern<br />
Canadian Cordillera. Annals <strong>of</strong> Glaciology, 46: 215‐221.<br />
Dyurgerov, M.B. and McCabe, G.J., 2006. Associati<strong>on</strong>s between accelerated glacier mass wastage and<br />
increased summer temperature in coastal regi<strong>on</strong>s. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research,<br />
38(2): 190‐197.<br />
Ecolibrio<br />
2009. The Xeni Gwet’in Comprehensive Development Plan 2009.<br />
82
Ecolibrio (2009). Xeni Gwet’in Comprehensive Tourism Development Strategy.<br />
FBC. Fraser Basin Council. 2009 State <strong>of</strong> the Fraser Basin Report: Sustainability Snapshot 4 The<br />
Many faces <strong>of</strong> Sustainability. URL Site:<br />
http://www.fraserbasin.bc.ca/publicati<strong>on</strong>s/ documents/2009_SOFB_Report_SS4.pd<br />
FishWizard. URL Site: http://www.fishwizard.com/<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> Canada. Canada’s Acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change.<br />
URL Site: http://www.climatechange.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=E18C8F2D‐1/<br />
Hamann,<br />
A., and T.L. Wang. 2006. Potential effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> tree species and ecosystem<br />
distributi<strong>on</strong> in British Columbia. Ecology 87:2773‐2786.<br />
Hamm<strong>on</strong>d,<br />
H., Bradley, T. ad Mackenzie, E. 2004. Toward Culturally and Ecologically Sustainable<br />
Land Use in the Chilko River Watershed.<br />
Hamlet, A.F. and Lettenmaier, D.P., 1999b. Effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> hydrology and water<br />
resources in the Columbia River Basin. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Water Resources<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong>, 35(6): 1597‐1623.<br />
ICIMOD<br />
(Internati<strong>on</strong>al Centre for Integrated Mountain Development), 2009. Local Resp<strong>on</strong>ses to Too<br />
Much and Too Little Water in the Greater Himalayan Regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
IPPC<br />
(Intergovernmental <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change) (2000) IPCC Special Report: Emissi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Scenarios, 27pp.<br />
IPPC (Intergovernmental <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change), 2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts,<br />
Adaptati<strong>on</strong> and Vulnerability. C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment<br />
Report <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate change, Annex I., M.L. Parry, O.F.<br />
Canziani, J.P. Palutik<strong>of</strong>, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hans<strong>on</strong>, Eds., Cambridge University<br />
Press, Cambridge, UK, 976 pp.<br />
IPCC. Intergovernmental<br />
<strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change.<br />
URL Site: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/technical‐papers/climate‐change‐water‐en.pdf<br />
IPCC².<br />
I ntergovernmental <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change. Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report.<br />
URL Site: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment‐report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf<br />
IPCC³. Intergovernmental <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change. The IPCC Report <strong>on</strong> Global Warming Localizing<br />
a Global Story.<br />
URL Site: http://ipccinfo.com/west.php#Ag<br />
IUCN. 2009. Internati<strong>on</strong>al Uni<strong>on</strong> for the C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Nature. Press Release December<br />
14, 2009.<br />
Species <strong>on</strong> climate change hit list named.<br />
URL Site: http://www.iucnredlist.org/news/climate‐change‐species‐hit‐list<br />
Kaser, G., Cogley, J.G., Dyurgerov,<br />
M.B., Meier, M.F. and Ohmura, A., 2006. Mass balance <strong>of</strong> glaciers<br />
and ice caps: C<strong>on</strong>sensus<br />
estimates for 1961‐2004. Geophysical Research Letters,<br />
33(L19501): 1‐5.<br />
83
Kamloops<br />
Future Forest Strategy. 2009. Final Report.<br />
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hcp/ffs/kamloopsFFS.htm<br />
Kamloops<br />
Future Forest Strategy‐ Ecological Summary and Narratives. 2009.<br />
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hcp/ffs/kamloopsFFS.htm<br />
Klok<strong>on</strong> Groundwater C<strong>on</strong>sulting Ltd. (2008). Report <strong>of</strong> Findings: Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>, Nemiah<br />
Valley, BC. Lohibee IR3 Water System Upgrade, CPMS #7359. Test drilling – Groundwater<br />
Feasibility Study (GFS) Progress Report.<br />
L oukas, A., Vasiliades, L. and Dalezios, N.R., 2004. Climate change implicati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> flood<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>se <strong>of</strong><br />
a mountainous watershed. Water, Air, and Soil Polluti<strong>on</strong>: Focus, 4: 331‐347.<br />
Loukas, A., Lampros, V. and Dalezios, N.R., 2002a. Potential climate change impacts <strong>on</strong> flood<br />
producing mechanisms in southern British Columbia, Canada using the CGCMA1 simulati<strong>on</strong><br />
results. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, 259: 163‐188.<br />
Loukas, A., Vasiliades, L. and Dalezios, N.R., 2002b. Potential climate change impacts <strong>on</strong> flood<br />
producing mechanisms in southern British Columbia, Canada using the CGCMA1 simulati<strong>on</strong><br />
results. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, 259: 163‐188.19<br />
Luckma n, B.H., Harding, K.A. and Hamilt<strong>on</strong>, J.P., 1987. Recent glacier advances in the Premier Range,<br />
British Columbia. Journal <strong>of</strong> Earth Sciences, 24: 1149‐1161.<br />
Mylnowski,<br />
T. 2009. Xeni Gwet'in Climate Change Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Program. Recent and Project Climate<br />
Trends. Prepared for the Xeni Gwet’in First Nati<strong>on</strong>s Government.<br />
Menounos, B. and Wheate, R., 2007. State and fate <strong>of</strong> Western Canadian glaciers, C<strong>on</strong>ference,<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, Victoria, BC.<br />
M erritt, W.S. et al., 2006. Hydrologic resp<strong>on</strong>se to scenarios <strong>of</strong> climate change in sub watersheds <strong>of</strong><br />
the Okanagan basin, British Columbia. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, 326: 79‐108.<br />
Morris<strong>on</strong>, J., Quick, M.C. and Foreman, M.G.G., 2002. Climate change in the Fraser<br />
River watershed:<br />
flow and temperature projecti<strong>on</strong>s. Journal <strong>of</strong> Hydrology, 263: 230‐244.<br />
Nelitz¹, M., and M. Porter. 2009a. A future outlook <strong>on</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> Chinook<br />
salm<strong>on</strong> (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) habitats in the Cariboo‐Chilcotin. Prepared by ESSA<br />
Technologies Ltd. for Fraser Salm<strong>on</strong> and Watersheds Program, B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and Pacific Fisheries Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council.<br />
URL Site: http://www.thinksalm<strong>on</strong>.com/reports/ChinookHabitatOutlook_090314.pdf<br />
Nelitz², M. and M. Porter. 2009b. A future outlook <strong>on</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> Coho salm<strong>on</strong><br />
(Oncorhynchus kisutch) habitats in the Cariboo‐ Chilcotin. Prepared by ESSA Technologies<br />
Ltd. for Fraser Salm<strong>on</strong> and Watersheds Program, B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and Pacific<br />
Fisheries Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council.<br />
URL Site: http://www.thinksalm<strong>on</strong>.com/reports/CohoHabitatOutlook_090314.pdf<br />
84
Nelitz³, M. and M. Porter. 2009c. A future outlook <strong>on</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>on</strong> bull trout<br />
(Salvelinus c<strong>on</strong>fluentus) habitats in the Cariboo‐ Chilcotin. Prepared by ESSA Technologies<br />
Ltd. for Fraser Salm<strong>on</strong> and Watersheds Program, B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and Pacific<br />
Fisheries Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council.<br />
URL Site: http://www.thinksalm<strong>on</strong>.com/reports/BullTroutHabitatOutlook_090314.pdf<br />
Pacific Climate Impacts C<strong>on</strong>sortium (PCIC), 2008. Preliminary Analysis <strong>of</strong> Climate Change in the<br />
Cariboo‐Chilcotin Area <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. R.J. Daws<strong>on</strong> (Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Lands),<br />
A.T. Werner and T.Q. Murdock (PCIC).<br />
Parker, T.J., K. M. Clancy and R.L. Mathiasen. 2006. Interacti<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g fire, insects and pathogens in<br />
c<strong>on</strong>iferous forests <strong>of</strong> the interior western United States and Canada. Review Article.<br />
Agriculture and Forest Entomolgy. 8: 167‐189.<br />
Parish,<br />
R., R. Coupe, and D. Lloyd. 1996. Plants <strong>of</strong> Southern Interior <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. BC Min For.<br />
461pp.<br />
PICES. North Pacific Marine<br />
Science Organizati<strong>on</strong>. Effects <strong>of</strong> Climate Change <strong>on</strong> the World’s Oceans.<br />
Internati<strong>on</strong>al Symposium May 19‐23, 2008. Gij<strong>on</strong>, Spain. Symposium Proceedings.<br />
URL Site:<br />
http://www.pices.int/meetings/internati<strong>on</strong>al_symposia/2008_symposia/Climate_change/c<br />
limate_background_3.aspx<br />
Powell, G.W. 2005. A Regi<strong>on</strong>al pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> n<strong>on</strong>‐timber forest products being harvested from the<br />
Criboo‐Chilcotin, British Columba. Center for N<strong>on</strong>‐timber Resources, Royal Roads<br />
University, Victoria, BC. 48pp.<br />
PFRCC. Pacific Fisheries Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council. Adapting to Change:<br />
Managing Fraser sockeye in the face <strong>of</strong> declining productivity and increasing uncertainty.<br />
Statement from Think Tank <strong>of</strong> Scientists. December 9. 2009.<br />
URL Site: http://www.fish.bc.ca/files/FraserSockeyeThinkTankStatement.pdf<br />
PFRCC¹. Pacific Fisheries Resource C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Council. Helping Pacific Salm<strong>on</strong> Survive the Impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> Climate Change <strong>on</strong> Freshwater Habitats. Pursuing Proactive and Reactive Adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Strategies. Prepared by ESSA Technologies Ltd. September 2007.<br />
URL Site: http://www.fish.bc.ca/files/PFRCC‐ClimateChange‐Adaptati<strong>on</strong>.pdf<br />
Pars<strong>on</strong>, E.A. et al., 2001b. Chapter 9: Potential C<strong>on</strong>sequences <strong>of</strong> Climate Variability and Change for<br />
the Pacific Northwest. In: Nati<strong>on</strong>al Assessment Synthesis Team (Editor), Climate Change<br />
Impacts <strong>on</strong> the United States The Potential C<strong>on</strong>sequences <strong>of</strong> Climate Variability and Change.<br />
US Global Change Research Program.<br />
Province <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Trends in British Columbia: 2007. Climate Change.<br />
URL Site:<br />
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/soe/et07/04_climate_change/technical_paper/climate_change.p<br />
df<br />
Rood, Kenneth M. (Northwest Hydraulic C<strong>on</strong>sultants Ltd.), and Hamilt<strong>on</strong>, Roy E. (Independent<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sultant), (1995). Hydrology and Water Use for Salm<strong>on</strong> Streams in the Chilcotin Habitat<br />
Management Area, British Columbia. Fraser River Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan. Department <strong>of</strong> Fisheries &<br />
Oceans.<br />
85
S chiefer, E., Menounos, B. and Wheate, R., 2007. Recent volume loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> British Columbia glaciers,<br />
Canada. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(L16503): 1‐6.<br />
Silva<br />
Forest Foundati<strong>on</strong>. 2004. Ecosystem‐based analysis <strong>of</strong> the Brittany Triangle and North<br />
Trapline Landscapes. Silva Forest Foundati<strong>on</strong>, Winlaw, BC. 210pp<br />
Stahl,<br />
K., Moore, R.D., Shea, J.M., Hutchins<strong>on</strong>, D. and Cann<strong>on</strong>, A., 2007 in press. Coupled modeling <strong>of</strong><br />
glacier and streamflow resp<strong>on</strong>se to future climate scenarios. Ibid.<br />
Stahl,<br />
K. Climate Change and Low Flows: Influence <strong>of</strong> Glaciers and Groundwater. March 12, 2007.<br />
Vancouver, BC.<br />
Sushama,<br />
L., Laprise, R., Caya, D., Frig<strong>on</strong>, A. and Slivitzky, M., 2006. Canadian RCM projected climate‐<br />
change signal and its sensitivity to model errors.<br />
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research (Tompkins, Emma L., Sophie A. Nichols<strong>on</strong>‐Cole, Lisa‐<br />
Ann Hurlst<strong>on</strong>, Emily Boyd, Gina Brooks Hodge, Judi Clarke, Gerard Gray, Neville Trotz and<br />
Lynda Varlack (2005). Surviving Climate Change in Small Islands – A Guidebook. School <strong>of</strong><br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.<br />
UBC. University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. Media Release Nov. 12, 2008. UBC Study Establishes Formula<br />
for Predicting Climate Change Impact <strong>on</strong> Salm<strong>on</strong> Stocks.<br />
URL Site: http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/media/releases/2008/mr‐08‐144.html<br />
Walker, I.J. and Sydneysmith, R. (2008): British Columbia; in <str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> Impacts to Adaptati<strong>on</strong>: Canada in<br />
a Changing Climate 2007, edited by D.S. Lemmen, F.J.Warren, J. Lacroix and E. Bush;<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> Canada, Ottawa, ON, 329‐386.<br />
Wang, T, Hamann, A., Spittlehouse, D.L., and Aitken, S.N. (2006). Development <strong>of</strong> Scale‐free Climate<br />
Data for Western Canada for use in Resource Management. Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Climatology 26: 383‐397.<br />
Whitfield, P.H., Reynolds, C.J. and Cann<strong>on</strong>, A.J., 2002b. Modelling streamflows in present and future<br />
climates<br />
‐‐ Examples from Georgia Basin, British Columbia. Canadian Water Resources<br />
Journal 27(4): 427‐456.<br />
Whitfield, P.H. and Taylor, E., 1998. Apparent Recent Changes in Hydrology and Climate <strong>of</strong> Coastal<br />
British Columbia. In: Y. Alila (Editor), Mountains to Sea: Human Interacti<strong>on</strong> with the<br />
Hydrologic Cycle. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> 51st Annual Canadian Water Resources C<strong>on</strong>ference, pp.<br />
22‐29.<br />
World<br />
Bank, 2010. C<strong>on</strong>venient Soluti<strong>on</strong>s to an Inc<strong>on</strong>venient Truth. Ecosystem‐based Approaches to<br />
Climate Change.<br />
86
ANNEXES – BACKGROUND PAPERS<br />
(NOTE –Given the size <strong>of</strong> the files, the following documents have been submitted as separate files)<br />
1. Tine<br />
Rossing (Ecolibrio): Water Resources and Climate Change in the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker<br />
Area<br />
2. Deb<br />
Del<strong>on</strong>g (Orman C<strong>on</strong>sulting): Climate Change Impacts <strong>on</strong> Forests and Vegetati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />
Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area<br />
3. Wayne<br />
McCrory, RPBio: Climate Change and Wildlife and Wild Horse Impacts in the Xeni<br />
Gwet’in Caretaker Area<br />
4.<br />
Richard Holmes (Cariboo Envirotech Ltd.): The Impacts <strong>of</strong> Climate Change <strong>on</strong> the Fishery<br />
Resource in the Xeni Gwet’in Caretaker Area<br />
87
Memorandum<br />
To: Federal Review <strong>Panel</strong> for the Prosperity Gold-Copper Project<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Ann Maest, PhD; Camer<strong>on</strong> Wobus, PhD; C<strong>on</strong>stance Travers, MS; James Holmes,<br />
MS; Jeff Morris, PhD, Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Inc.<br />
cc: Chief Bernie Elkins, Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>al Government; Chief Anne Louie,<br />
Williams Lake Indian Band<br />
Date: 4/16/2010<br />
<strong>Subject</strong>: Informati<strong>on</strong> and arguments to be presented at Prosperity technical sessi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
The Tsilhqot’in Nati<strong>on</strong>al Government and the Williams Lake Indian Band retained our company,<br />
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Inc. <strong>of</strong> Boulder, Colorado, to review the Prosperity Gold-Copper Mine<br />
Project envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact statement (EIS). On November 9, 2009, we provided our initial<br />
comments <strong>on</strong> the hydrometeorology model that Taseko Mines Ltd. and their c<strong>on</strong>tractors, Knight<br />
Piésold (together, the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents), used to make predicti<strong>on</strong>s about future water quantity and<br />
quality issues at the mine (see Document #1345). The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have provided some resp<strong>on</strong>ses<br />
to our initial observati<strong>on</strong>s. In the technical sessi<strong>on</strong>s during the week <strong>of</strong> April 26, 2010, we will<br />
reiterate and expand our critique <strong>of</strong> the Prosperity plan.<br />
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting has investigated c<strong>on</strong>taminant releases from hundreds <strong>of</strong> hard-rock mine sites<br />
worldwide, including in Canada, the United States, Europe, Central America, Africa, South<br />
America, and Asia. In the combined experience <strong>of</strong> the authors <strong>of</strong> this memorandum, we have not<br />
seen an open pit copper mine with a waste rock and tailings storage facility (TSF) in a temperate<br />
climate that has not adversely impacted downstream and downgradient water quality. We will<br />
provide the panel with specific case studies from our collective experience that dem<strong>on</strong>strate that<br />
mine prop<strong>on</strong>ents routinely underestimate the envir<strong>on</strong>mental impacts <strong>of</strong> proposed mines, and that<br />
downgradient and downstream c<strong>on</strong>taminant releases are not uncomm<strong>on</strong>.<br />
As we outline in the following secti<strong>on</strong>s, we will discuss with the panel in greater detail some <strong>of</strong><br />
the errors and uncertainties in the prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ EIS that make its predicti<strong>on</strong>s unreliable. After<br />
reviewing the EIS and subsequent resp<strong>on</strong>ses to comments from the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents, we c<strong>on</strong>clude that<br />
it is likely that the mine as proposed will release mine-related c<strong>on</strong>taminants, including acidity,<br />
metals, metalloids, sulfate, and nitrogen compounds, into groundwater and surface water. These<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminants are likely to adversely impact salm<strong>on</strong>id (trout and salm<strong>on</strong>) fisheries at least in Fish<br />
Creek and the Taseko River.<br />
Dr. Ann Maest will attend the water quality and quantity sessi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> M<strong>on</strong>day and Tuesday,<br />
April 26�27. Dr. Maest is an envir<strong>on</strong>mental geochemist who specializes in mine site<br />
geochemistry. She coauthored a comprehensive examinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> predicted versus actual water<br />
quality impacts at large mine sites in the United States. Other authors <strong>of</strong> this memorandum will<br />
assist Dr. Maest via telec<strong>on</strong>ference.<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
Dr. Jeff Morris will attend the fish and fish habitat sessi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> Tuesday and Wednesday,<br />
April 27�28. Dr. Morris is an aquatic toxicologist who has investigated the effects <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />
metals <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>ids in both field and laboratory toxicity studies. If possible, Dr. Josh Lipt<strong>on</strong> will<br />
assist Dr. Morris via telec<strong>on</strong>ference.<br />
This memorandum is organized as follows: Secti<strong>on</strong> 1 critiques the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ tests and models<br />
used to predict acid and c<strong>on</strong>taminant generati<strong>on</strong> from exposed rock at the mine. Secti<strong>on</strong> 2<br />
critiques the hydrometeorology model, water balance, and hydrogeologic models. Secti<strong>on</strong> 3 then<br />
discusses past experience and case studies from other mines, and Secti<strong>on</strong> 4 details the adverse<br />
effects <strong>on</strong> aquatic life <strong>of</strong> copper and cadmium released into rivers. Secti<strong>on</strong> 5 presents the<br />
qualificati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the authors <strong>of</strong> this memorandum. A list <strong>of</strong> references and materials relied up<strong>on</strong><br />
is provided at the end.<br />
1. C<strong>on</strong>taminant Sources<br />
In this part <strong>of</strong> the technical sessi<strong>on</strong>s, Dr. Maest will provide evidence that the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have<br />
erred in their estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> acid and c<strong>on</strong>taminant generati<strong>on</strong> potential. In this secti<strong>on</strong>, we outline<br />
the informati<strong>on</strong> that Dr. Maest will present, including flaws identified both in geochemical<br />
testing and subsequently in geochemical modeling.<br />
1.1 Flaws in Geochemical Testing<br />
1.1.1 Humidity cell test flaws<br />
We have identified several flaws in the humidity cell test (HCT) procedures and analysis. Each<br />
<strong>of</strong> these flaws likely results in an underestimate <strong>of</strong> the quantity <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> that this mine<br />
will generate. Specific topics <strong>of</strong> the HCTs that Dr. Maest may discuss at the technical meetings<br />
include the following:<br />
�� The rock types used in the HCTs are not representative <strong>of</strong> the rock types at the proposed<br />
project. Many HCT samples had sulfide values lower and neutralizing potential to acid<br />
potential (NP:AP) ratios higher than those for rocks that are representative <strong>of</strong> pit walls.<br />
�� Phase 4 HCTs are not useful for evaluating the importance <strong>of</strong> metal leaching, especially<br />
for aquatic life c<strong>on</strong>cerns, because the detecti<strong>on</strong> limits are too high for many metals <strong>of</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>cern.<br />
�� Kinetic tests were not c<strong>on</strong>ducted for l<strong>on</strong>g enough periods <strong>of</strong> time to reach the <strong>on</strong>set <strong>of</strong><br />
acid generati<strong>on</strong> or maximum leachable c<strong>on</strong>taminant c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Page 2<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
�� The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents estimate that the majority <strong>of</strong> the mined material will be potentially acidgenerating<br />
(PAG), yet <strong>on</strong>ly three <strong>of</strong> 25 HCTs became acidic with increasing<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> metals, again suggesting flaws in the geochemical testing approach and<br />
methodology.<br />
�� Many <strong>of</strong> the HCTs show an initial pulse or release <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminants, but this was not<br />
taken into account in the predicti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminant c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in water resources.<br />
1.1.2 Short-term leach tests and identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminants <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cern<br />
The short-term leach tests were not c<strong>on</strong>ducted in a manner that allowed estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminant generati<strong>on</strong>. Specific points that Dr. Maest may discuss include the following:<br />
�� Short-term leach tests were too dilute to be used for identificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminants <strong>of</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>cern.<br />
�� The elevated c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> antim<strong>on</strong>y in the shake flask tests appear to be have been<br />
ignored in modeling <strong>of</strong> downstream/downgradient transport.<br />
�� Saturated column tests with elevated ir<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s also had elevated arsenic<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, which was not adequately c<strong>on</strong>sidered in tailings seepage modeling.<br />
�� The list <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminants <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cern developed by the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents ignores other miningrelated<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminants such as nitrate, nitrite, and amm<strong>on</strong>ia.<br />
1.2 Flaws in Geochemical Modeling<br />
Dr. Maest will also discuss flaws in the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ geochemical modeling. Some <strong>of</strong> the topics<br />
that she may discuss in the technical sessi<strong>on</strong>s include the following:<br />
�� C<strong>on</strong>taminants potentially leached from tailings materials stored in the tailings storage<br />
facility (TSF) under either oxidizing or reducing c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s were excluded from the<br />
tailings model.<br />
�� Lag times to acid generati<strong>on</strong> for PAG rocks are greatly underestimated. Using the <strong>on</strong>e<br />
HCT that became highly acidic after 40 weeks as a calibrati<strong>on</strong> point, we estimate that the<br />
time to <strong>on</strong>set <strong>of</strong> acid for PAG rocks is at least an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude less than predicted.<br />
Page 3<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
�� Given the underestimate in lag time to acid generati<strong>on</strong>, we believe there is a substantial<br />
risk that exposed wall rock in pit walls will generate large quantities <strong>of</strong> acid and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminants before the pit is inundated.<br />
�� Similarly, we believe there is a substantial risk that the PAG waste stored within the<br />
tailings impoundment can generate acid before it is submerged, or if the tailings<br />
impoundment becomes unsaturated in the future.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the factors that Dr. Maest will discuss support our c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> that the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have<br />
greatly underestimated the potential <strong>of</strong> this mine to generate substantial quantities <strong>of</strong> acid,<br />
metals, and other c<strong>on</strong>taminants.<br />
2. Mine Site Water Balance and Hydrogeology<br />
As we discussed in our previous report last November, we believe that the limited site-specific<br />
data <strong>on</strong> which the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents rely are not sufficient to support the probabilistic water balance<br />
models that they have generated for the Prosperity Project. Their recent resp<strong>on</strong>ses to our<br />
November report have not adequately addressed many <strong>of</strong> our initial c<strong>on</strong>cerns. In additi<strong>on</strong>, we<br />
believe that the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ models <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminant transport in groundwater fail to account for<br />
the large uncertainty in their underlying data, potentially resulting in unforeseen groundwater<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminant plumes and discharge <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminants to Big Oni<strong>on</strong> Lake and, potentially, the<br />
Taseko River.<br />
Dr. Maest will summarize some <strong>of</strong> the shortcomings in the hydrometeorology modeling and will<br />
review remaining c<strong>on</strong>cerns, as well as provide examples <strong>of</strong> failures in hydrologic predicti<strong>on</strong>s at<br />
other mine sites (see Secti<strong>on</strong> 3). In summary, we are c<strong>on</strong>cerned that if the water balance does not<br />
adequately account for the wide range <strong>of</strong> potential variati<strong>on</strong>s in water input over time, there<br />
remains a significant risk that water levels in the TSF will not be maintained, allowing oxidati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> mine waste materials when water levels drop during dry periods, and subsequent transport <strong>of</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminants via groundwater seepage and from releases during storm events.<br />
2.1 Maintaining Water Levels in TSF<br />
The Prop<strong>on</strong>ent has proposed inundating tailings and PAG rock in the TSF, where a static water<br />
level will need to be maintained in perpetuity. If an event such as a drought or unforeseen<br />
seepage causes water levels in the TSF to drop, sulfides in the waste material will oxidize,<br />
resulting in acid generati<strong>on</strong> and metals leaching. Specific criticisms <strong>of</strong> the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ plan for<br />
the TSF include the following:<br />
Page 4<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
�� The EIS shows PAG waste storage above the level <strong>of</strong> the supernatant p<strong>on</strong>d in year 5 <strong>of</strong><br />
operati<strong>on</strong>s. As discussed in the previous secti<strong>on</strong>, the subaerial exposure <strong>of</strong> PAG waste<br />
will increase the likelihood <strong>of</strong> acid generati<strong>on</strong> in the impoundment.<br />
�� The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents claim that extra water could be readily obtained from other sources<br />
during low-probability dry events (droughts). In a water balance analysis that they<br />
released last October, they state that the TSF p<strong>on</strong>d volume would dry up completely in a<br />
modeled drought scenario unless flows were supplemented by additi<strong>on</strong>al means. They<br />
have not put forth a c<strong>on</strong>vincing argument that they will have the “additi<strong>on</strong>al means” to<br />
make up for the shortfall.<br />
�� The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have proposed a plan in which water levels in the TSF remain static in<br />
perpetuity, submerging the PAG waste and preventing acid generati<strong>on</strong> without drying out<br />
or overflowing. There is no proposed mechanism to ensure that PAG waste rock remains<br />
submerged in perpetuity, presenting a high likelihood that the water levels will fluctuate<br />
and/or that expensive retr<strong>of</strong>itting to maintain water levels will be required.<br />
Other aspects <strong>of</strong> the TSF water balance are addressed below.<br />
2.2 TSF Seepage<br />
Under many <strong>of</strong> the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ water balance scenarios, they predict periods during which there<br />
may be insufficient water to ensure waste in the TSF remains submerged. Under these scenarios,<br />
tailings material and PAG waste will be exposed to the atmosphere. However, even these<br />
scenarios are based <strong>on</strong> a likely underestimate <strong>of</strong> groundwater seepage out <strong>of</strong> the TSF. Infiltrati<strong>on</strong><br />
losses from the TSF to groundwater in all versi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the site water balance may be<br />
underestimated for the following reas<strong>on</strong>s:<br />
�� The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents assume the hydraulic c<strong>on</strong>ductivity <strong>of</strong> the till underlying a porti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
TSF is 1 x 10 -6 cm/s in their estimate <strong>of</strong> TSF seepage, but this value is five times lower<br />
than the geometric mean c<strong>on</strong>ductivity from the hydraulic tests that were c<strong>on</strong>ducted in this<br />
unit.<br />
�� Hydraulic c<strong>on</strong>ductivity estimates from the basalt below the glacial till range across four<br />
orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude (a factor <strong>of</strong> 10,000), which likely reflects localized c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>of</strong><br />
fractures <strong>on</strong> groundwater flow. However, the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ sensitivity analyses c<strong>on</strong>ducted<br />
to estimate uncertainty in infiltrati<strong>on</strong> losses range by <strong>on</strong>ly a factor <strong>of</strong> 25. Seepage through<br />
basalt bedrock will preferentially occur in high permeability z<strong>on</strong>es, such that the actual<br />
seepage rates in bedrock could be substantially higher than their maximum predicted<br />
rates.<br />
Page 5<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
The net result is a potential underestimate <strong>of</strong> seepage, and thus an overestimate <strong>of</strong> the ability <strong>of</strong><br />
the TSF to retain water and maintain saturated c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for PAG waste. The large range <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainties in hydraulic c<strong>on</strong>ductivity in bedrock beneath the TSF also underscores the<br />
uncertainty in the magnitude and timing <strong>of</strong> groundwater c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> reaching Big<br />
Oni<strong>on</strong> Lake.<br />
2.3 Issues With Water Balance Model<br />
The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ baseline precipitati<strong>on</strong> and streamflow data are inadequate to characterize the<br />
inflows and outflows to their water balance model. The net result is that their water balance<br />
likely has far greater uncertainty than represented by their probabilistic model.<br />
2.3.1 Precipitati<strong>on</strong> and run<strong>of</strong>f data<br />
We identified several issues with the precipitati<strong>on</strong> and run<strong>of</strong>f data that the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents used in<br />
their water balance model. Most <strong>of</strong> these issues were raised in our November report, and we<br />
were unc<strong>on</strong>vinced by the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ resp<strong>on</strong>ses. Some example issues that Dr. Maest may<br />
address include the following:<br />
�� Site-specific precipitati<strong>on</strong> data are <strong>of</strong> very poor quality and are unreliable. The<br />
Prop<strong>on</strong>ents acknowledged as much, discarding many <strong>of</strong> the site-specific data and<br />
suggesting that they were err<strong>on</strong>eous.<br />
�� Modeled l<strong>on</strong>g-term precipitati<strong>on</strong> trends are based <strong>on</strong> correlati<strong>on</strong>s between <strong>on</strong>e site near<br />
the mine and <strong>on</strong>e distant site. However, in the two years for which they Prop<strong>on</strong>ents had<br />
data from each site, there did not appear to be any correlati<strong>on</strong> between measured<br />
precipitati<strong>on</strong> near the mine and measured precipitati<strong>on</strong> at the distant site used for the<br />
l<strong>on</strong>g-term modeling, thus introducing a potentially large and unquantifiable uncertainty<br />
into the water balance.<br />
�� The most recent estimate <strong>of</strong> mean annual unit run<strong>of</strong>f (MAUR) – the key parameter up<strong>on</strong><br />
which inputs to the water balance are based – appears to be derived from a single year <strong>of</strong><br />
data from a single meteorological stati<strong>on</strong>. The low estimate <strong>of</strong> MAUR appears to have<br />
been obtained from a different gauge during the same year. We questi<strong>on</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> two<br />
data points from the same year to characterize the range <strong>of</strong> potential interannual<br />
variability in unit run<strong>of</strong>f.<br />
The Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have revised the water balance model several times since the initial EIS was<br />
released. Each iterati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the water balance modeling yields c<strong>on</strong>siderably different results than<br />
the previous iterati<strong>on</strong>s, providing another indicati<strong>on</strong> that the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents do not have a solid grasp<br />
Page 6<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
<strong>on</strong> these data. Given this overall level <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in their water balance, it is troubling that<br />
they have not included in their mine plan specific c<strong>on</strong>tingencies for active water capture and<br />
treatment (in perpetuity) and specific sources <strong>of</strong> water to maintain TSF water levels in the event<br />
<strong>of</strong> drought or groundwater losses.<br />
3. Experience <str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> Other Mines<br />
As discussed in the previous secti<strong>on</strong>, the underlying data <strong>on</strong> which the water quality predicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
at this mine are based are flawed. We do not believe the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have adequate data to<br />
accurately quantify the impacts <strong>of</strong> this mine. Generally, we can state from our experience<br />
assessing mine sites worldwide that the scenario presented in the EIS (open pit copper mine with<br />
TSF, no active water treatment, and little to no anticipated adverse impacts) is not a scenario that<br />
we have ever seen at any other mine site. Dr. Maest will briefly discuss other reports and case<br />
studies that can inform the panel <strong>of</strong> the risks <strong>of</strong> this mine.<br />
While every mine site is unique in its characteristics such as mineral occurrences (e.g., massive<br />
sulfide vs. porphyritic), mining techniques (e.g., open pit vs. underground), or ore processing<br />
(e.g., heap leach vs. flotati<strong>on</strong>), many mines with differing characteristics have had water quality<br />
impacts, and mine with characteristics that are similar to the Prosperity Project have had impacts<br />
that were not predicted. These impacts have resulted in adverse downstream impacts, or costly<br />
unplanned water capture and treatment systems that in many cases must be operated in<br />
perpetuity, or both.<br />
3.1 Predicted vs. Actual Water Quality at U.S. Mines<br />
Dr. Maest will discuss the studies <strong>of</strong> the accuracy <strong>of</strong> water quality predicti<strong>on</strong>s at mine sites. She<br />
will summarize data from a study that she c<strong>on</strong>ducted with James Kuipers, PE, and others in<br />
2005�2006. This study was an in-depth review <strong>of</strong> state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art characterizati<strong>on</strong> and modeling<br />
approaches for predicting mine water quality (Maest et al., 2005) and a comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> predicted<br />
water quality impacts to actual water quality impacts at mines in the United States (Kuipers<br />
et al., 2006 – hereafter referred to collectively as the Maest-Kuipers study). In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
Dr. Maest may discuss similar data from Schafer (2008).<br />
The Maest-Kuipers study reviewed over 100 mines in the U.S. that received permits after<br />
submitting an EIS. They chose 25 case studies in which they had sufficient data to evaluate the<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> the water quality impacts predicted in the EIS. Dr. Maest will summarize the results,<br />
discussing the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between “inherent factors” (e.g., proximity to water resources,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>taminant leaching potential) at a mine and its effects <strong>on</strong> the envir<strong>on</strong>ment. She will show that<br />
nearly every mine with inherent factors similar to Prosperity released c<strong>on</strong>taminants sufficient to<br />
Page 7<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
exceed surface water and groundwater quality standards, despite predicting that they would not<br />
exceed any water quality standards.<br />
3.2 Other Case Studies<br />
Dr. Maest may also discuss examples from other mines, including the following:<br />
�� Berkeley Pit in Butte, M<strong>on</strong>tana. Dr. Maest has analyzed this highly c<strong>on</strong>taminated openpit<br />
copper mine extensively, including an analysis <strong>of</strong> the sources <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong><br />
(Maest, 2001). The rock walls in the Berkeley Pit generate enough acid and metals to<br />
result in a pit lake with a pH <strong>of</strong> 2, copper c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s at least three orders <strong>of</strong><br />
magnitude greater than water quality criteria, c<strong>on</strong>taminant c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s sufficient to kill<br />
migrating snow geese who used the lake as a stopover (Adams, 1995), and a need for<br />
expensive water treatment in perpetuity.<br />
�� Harvard Pit in Jamestown, California. The water model developed for this pit lake in the<br />
mid-1990s estimated that it would reach an elevati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 387 m in 2025, with water not<br />
reaching the 402-m level <strong>of</strong> the alluvial aquifer until many years later. In fact, the water<br />
level reached 387 m in 2008 and is now predicted to reach the alluvial aquifer in 2015<br />
(Mullenmeister, 2009). Expensive, perpetual water treatment will be required to prevent<br />
releases <strong>of</strong> this c<strong>on</strong>taminated water, and the posted b<strong>on</strong>d is far less than the actual cost.<br />
�� Buckhorn Mountain Mine, Okanogan Valley, Washingt<strong>on</strong> (near BC border). Dr. Maest<br />
has been an active participant in the review <strong>of</strong> mine management and water quality at this<br />
mine, <strong>on</strong> <strong>behalf</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Okanagan Highlands Alliance. Buckhorn Mountain Mine was<br />
originally designed as an open pit mine but failed to obtain a permit. Crown Resources, a<br />
subsidiary <strong>of</strong> Canadian mining company Kinross, purchased the property and redesigned<br />
it as an underground mine. Even with this reduced impact design, Crown was discharging<br />
mine c<strong>on</strong>taminants at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in excess <strong>of</strong> its water quality permit within <strong>on</strong>e year<br />
after the start <strong>of</strong> mining, resulting in numerous violati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> their water discharge permits<br />
(see, e.g., Washingt<strong>on</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, 2009a, 2009b, 2009c, 2009d). They<br />
underestimated metals leaching from mine workings, the amount <strong>of</strong> PAG rock, and the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> their groundwater capture system. After <strong>on</strong>e year <strong>of</strong> operati<strong>on</strong>, they were<br />
required to extensively augment their groundwater capture system and completely<br />
redesign their water treatment system.<br />
�� Ray Mine, Ray, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a. Both the Maest-Kuipers report and Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting have<br />
evaluated the impacts <strong>of</strong> this open pit porphyry copper mine. In the 1990s it released<br />
amm<strong>on</strong>ia, copper, and arsenic into the Gila River such that water quality criteria were<br />
exceeded for up to 80 km downstream <strong>of</strong> the mine, with some samples c<strong>on</strong>taining mine-<br />
Page 8<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
related c<strong>on</strong>taminants at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s 8 times higher than the water quality standard. The<br />
creek that drains the mine workings turned iridescent blue from released copper salts. In<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>, floods in 1993 breached the TSF 13 times, releasing an estimated<br />
265,000 t<strong>on</strong>nes <strong>of</strong> tailings into the Gila River (Kuipers et al., 2006; Lipt<strong>on</strong>, 2009).<br />
3.3 Tailings Dam Failures<br />
Tailings dam failures are not uncomm<strong>on</strong> (see, e.g., Davies, 2002; WISE Uranium Project, 2009).<br />
The U.S. Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Large Dams (USCOLD), the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Large<br />
Dams (ICOLD), and the United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Programme (UNEP) have each compiled<br />
tailings dam failures over the years. USCOLD compiled a list <strong>of</strong> 185 tailings dam failure<br />
incidents as <strong>of</strong> 1994, and UNEP and ICOLD compiled a list <strong>of</strong> 221 tailings dam failure incidents<br />
(WISE Uranium Project, 2009). Dr. Maest will briefly summarize these data.<br />
She will also present a recent analysis <strong>of</strong> tailings dam failures in the European Uni<strong>on</strong> (EU), in<br />
which the authors c<strong>on</strong>clude that most failures occur at operating mines that fail to adequately<br />
design for floods (Rico et al., 2008a). Data from the EU and other sources suggest that a failure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the TSF dam at Prosperity would result in a tailings plume extending many hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />
kilometers downstream (Rico et al., 2008b), impacting the Taseko, Chilcotin, Chilco, and Fraser<br />
rivers.<br />
Dr. Maest may include specific examples <strong>of</strong> tailings dam failures, such as:<br />
�� The 1990 Matachewan Mines tailings dam failure in Ontario (Baker et al., 1996), in<br />
which an estimated 190,000 m 3 <strong>of</strong> tailings were released into Davids<strong>on</strong> Creek and the<br />
M<strong>on</strong>treal River, filling the Davids<strong>on</strong> Creek floodplain with tailings, depositing an<br />
estimated 90,000 m 3 <strong>of</strong> tailings into the bed sediments <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>on</strong>treal River, and<br />
creating a plume <strong>of</strong> suspended fine tailings that was visible until the M<strong>on</strong>treal River<br />
entered Lake Temiskaming 168 km downstream.<br />
�� The 2000 Baia Mare tailings dam failure in Romania, in which a dam designed by Knight<br />
Piésold failed after <strong>on</strong>ly 8 m<strong>on</strong>ths <strong>of</strong> operati<strong>on</strong>, killing an estimated 1,240 t<strong>on</strong>nes <strong>of</strong> fish,<br />
extirpating endangered salm<strong>on</strong> and sturge<strong>on</strong> from <strong>on</strong>e river, and affecting drinking water<br />
for 2 milli<strong>on</strong> people. The EU commissi<strong>on</strong> that investigated the spill blamed it in part <strong>on</strong> a<br />
poor water balance model that did not account for the expected range <strong>of</strong> water inputs, as<br />
well as a faulty dam design by Knight-Piésold (Baia Mare Task Force, 2000).<br />
�� The 1975 failure <strong>of</strong> a tailings dam in the Upper Blackfoot River in M<strong>on</strong>tana, which<br />
destroyed aquatic habitat and riparian vegetati<strong>on</strong> for several kilometers. Now 35 years<br />
later, the area is still nearly devoid <strong>of</strong> aquatic life (Holmes and Lipt<strong>on</strong>, 2007).<br />
Page 9<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
3.4 Adaptive Management<br />
Dr. Maest will critique the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ suggesti<strong>on</strong> that they can address unplanned c<strong>on</strong>taminant<br />
releases with adaptive management. She will present informati<strong>on</strong> from a recently published<br />
governmental guide for adaptive management (Williams et al., 2009) that specifies the need for<br />
prop<strong>on</strong>ents to adequately plan for and mitigate all potential impacts, using adaptive management<br />
as an incremental step to adjust existing plans rather than as a strategy to avoid testing,<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring, mitigati<strong>on</strong> and mine planning. Dr. Maest will discuss examples where adaptive<br />
management has been attempted, including previous case studies in which mining companies<br />
either failed entirely to address the c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> they generated or were required to retr<strong>of</strong>it with<br />
very expensive water capture and treatment designs that they will need to maintain in perpetuity.<br />
4. Effects <strong>of</strong> Metals <strong>on</strong> Salm<strong>on</strong>id Fisheries<br />
Given the risk that Taseko has underestimated c<strong>on</strong>taminant generati<strong>on</strong> and transport, plus their<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> planned water capture and treatment <strong>on</strong>site and the prep<strong>on</strong>derance <strong>of</strong> evidence from other<br />
mine sites, it is highly likely that mine c<strong>on</strong>taminants will be released to downstream and<br />
downgradient resources. Specifically, we believe that heavy metals likely will be released to Fish<br />
Creek, Big Oni<strong>on</strong> Lake, and the Taseko River, at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s that could exceed the<br />
prop<strong>on</strong>ent’s “worst case scenario” by orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude. Metals releases to cold-water<br />
fisheries could have pr<strong>of</strong>ound adverse impacts <strong>on</strong> aquatic biota. To illustrate examples <strong>of</strong> such<br />
effects, Dr. Morris will present data from many toxicology studies that have examined the effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> heavy metals <strong>on</strong> fish, with Dr. Josh Lipt<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> telec<strong>on</strong>ference if possible.<br />
As menti<strong>on</strong>ed previously, the underlying data <strong>on</strong> which the water quality predicti<strong>on</strong>s at this mine<br />
are based are flawed. We do not believe the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have adequate data to accurately<br />
quantify the releases <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>taminants to downstream receptors in Fish Creek and the Taseko<br />
River. However, we can compare the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ predicted “worst case” metals c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
to known effects from our toxicity testing, and we can show the small margin <strong>of</strong> safety in those<br />
estimates. We c<strong>on</strong>clude that even a small underpredicti<strong>on</strong> in the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ modeling would<br />
lead to metals c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s that are associated with lethality to salm<strong>on</strong>id fish. To keep the<br />
presentati<strong>on</strong> simple and short, Dr. Morris will likely focus his presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
dissolved cadmium and copper <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>ids, although other metals and other mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />
adverse impact will be discussed briefly.<br />
4.1 Background Informati<strong>on</strong><br />
Dr. Morris will present basic c<strong>on</strong>cepts in aquatic toxicology, including acute toxicity, chr<strong>on</strong>ic<br />
toxicity, and different types <strong>of</strong> adverse effects <strong>of</strong> metals. He will also briefly discuss the many<br />
Page 10<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
ways in which metals can adversely affect aquatic biota, including sediment and food chain<br />
effects. He will also discuss some <strong>of</strong> the many factors that can effect metals toxicity, and how<br />
those factors suggest that the impacts <strong>of</strong> metals could easily be far greater than predicted.<br />
Background informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> basic metals toxicology will draw <strong>on</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> from Meyer et al.<br />
(2007) in additi<strong>on</strong> to other sources cited below.<br />
4.2 Cadmium Toxicity<br />
Dr. Morris will discuss the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> cadmium toxicity and present data showing<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> dissolved cadmium in surface water at which deleterious effects occur. He will<br />
show c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s at which lethality occurs, and lower c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s at which sub-lethal<br />
effects such as reduced growth and behavioral avoidance occur.<br />
Dr. Morris will show that the predicted “worst case scenario” c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> cadmium in Fish<br />
Creek and the Taseko River exceed thresholds for sub-acute effects <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>ids and exceed the<br />
Canadian Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers <strong>of</strong> the Envir<strong>on</strong>ment (CCME) acute threshold for cadmium<br />
(CCME, 1999). If the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ worst case scenario underestimates cadmium c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
cadmium would likely be acutely lethal in Fish Creek, would at least exceed c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s that<br />
reduce growth and cause behavioral avoidance in the Taseko River, and could exceed acutely<br />
lethal c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in the Taseko River.<br />
Dr. Morris’ analysis <strong>of</strong> cadmium toxicity will draw <strong>on</strong> several sources <strong>of</strong> data, including<br />
McNicol and Scherer (1991), Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting (1999), Hansen et al. (2002a, 2002b), Sloman<br />
et al. (2003), and Riddell et al. (2005).<br />
4.3 Copper Toxicity<br />
Dr. Morris will discuss the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> copper toxicity and present data showing<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> dissolved copper in surface water at which deleterious effects occur to<br />
salm<strong>on</strong>ids. He will show c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s at which lethality occurs, and lower c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s at<br />
which sub-lethal effects such as reduced growth and behavioral avoidance occur.<br />
Dr. Morris will show that the predicted “worst case scenario” c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> copper in Fish<br />
Creek exceed thresholds for sub-acute effects <strong>on</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>ids and exceed the BC Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>ment water quality guidelines acute threshold (BC MOE, 2006). Predicted copper<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s in the Taseko River would exceed thresholds for sub-acute effects <strong>on</strong> rainbow<br />
trout. If the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ worst case scenario underestimates copper c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, copper would<br />
be acutely lethal in Fish Creek, would at least exceed c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s that reduce growth and<br />
Page 11<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
cause behavioral avoidance in the Taseko River, and could exceed acutely lethal c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
in the Taseko River.<br />
Dr. Morris’ analysis <strong>of</strong> copper toxicity will draw primarily <strong>on</strong> Hansen et al. (1999, 2002c,<br />
2002d) and Meyer et al. (2007).<br />
4.4 Implicati<strong>on</strong>s for Salm<strong>on</strong>id Fisheries<br />
Given the uncertainties and problems in the c<strong>on</strong>taminant source and transport models, we believe<br />
that releases <strong>of</strong> cadmium and copper to the Taseko River at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s several times greater<br />
than what the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents have estimated is not <strong>on</strong>ly plausible but likely. In additi<strong>on</strong>, Dr. Morris<br />
will note that the metal c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s used to predict toxicity in Fish Creek and the Taseko<br />
River were the Prop<strong>on</strong>ents’ “worst case scenario” c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s from March to May, which<br />
may corresp<strong>on</strong>d to the time <strong>of</strong> migrati<strong>on</strong>, spawning, egg hatching, and swim-up for many<br />
salm<strong>on</strong>id species in this system. Therefore, sub-lethal metal c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s could disrupt adult<br />
migrati<strong>on</strong> and spawning by affecting olfactory sensory organs and disrupting the fish’s ability to<br />
find spawning grounds and establish social hierarchies. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, the highest metal<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s may occur at the time <strong>of</strong> year when certain salm<strong>on</strong>id species are hatching or<br />
young are first emerging from gravel beds (swim-up), which is the most sensitive life stage <strong>of</strong><br />
salm<strong>on</strong>ids. Finally, sub-lethal metal c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s could impact the overall fitness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
salm<strong>on</strong>id fishery by reducing growth rates in juvenile fish.<br />
The combined effect <strong>of</strong> lethal and sub-lethal c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> metals such as cadmium and<br />
copper, in additi<strong>on</strong> to possible additive and (or) synergistic effects <strong>of</strong> mixtures <strong>of</strong> these and other<br />
toxic metals in Fish Creek and the Taseko River could have deleterious effects <strong>on</strong> a salm<strong>on</strong>id<br />
fishery that currently supports viable populati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> many species including rainbow, steelhead<br />
and bull trout, and Chinook and sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>.<br />
5. Qualificati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Authors<br />
Below we present the qualificati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the authors <strong>of</strong> this memorandum. In additi<strong>on</strong>, we include<br />
the qualificati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Dr. Lipt<strong>on</strong>, who assisted Dr. Morris in the evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> metals toxicity data.<br />
If possible, Dr. Lipt<strong>on</strong> may participate via telec<strong>on</strong>ference in the technical sessi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Ann Maest, PhD, is an aqueous geochemist with expertise in the fate and transport <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
and anthropogenic c<strong>on</strong>taminants in groundwater, surface water, and sediment. She has over<br />
20 years <strong>of</strong> research and pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al experience as a geochemist and has worked <strong>on</strong> natural<br />
systems as well as <strong>on</strong> systems that have been impacted by industrial activities, especially<br />
hardrock mining and petroleum explorati<strong>on</strong>. Dr. Maest’s research has included studies <strong>of</strong> metal-<br />
Page 12<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
organic interacti<strong>on</strong>s, metal and metalloid speciati<strong>on</strong>, water-rock interacti<strong>on</strong>s, and redox<br />
geochemistry in surface water and groundwater. The results <strong>of</strong> her research have been published<br />
as numerous articles in peer-reviewed journals including Applied Geochemistry, Canadian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Chemical Geology, Applied and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
Microbiology, and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Science and Technology. She received the Adrian Smith<br />
Lecturer in Applied Geochemistry from the University <strong>of</strong> Waterloo in 1999. Dr. Maest has<br />
served <strong>on</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al and internati<strong>on</strong>al committees, including several Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences committees related to mining and minerals research issues and<br />
internati<strong>on</strong>al committees <strong>on</strong> mining and sustainable development. She was recently elected to a<br />
sec<strong>on</strong>d three-year term <strong>on</strong> the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences Committee <strong>on</strong> Earth Resources.<br />
Dr. Maest holds a PhD in geochemistry and water resources from Princet<strong>on</strong> University and an<br />
undergraduate degree in geology from Bost<strong>on</strong> University.<br />
Camer<strong>on</strong> Wobus, PhD, is a geomorphologist and surface and groundwater hydrologist. His<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> specialty include surface water and groundwater hydrology, sediment transport, and<br />
numerical modeling. Dr. Wobus has developed and implemented watershed-scale hydrologic<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring and models, developed numerical models <strong>of</strong> sediment transport and river incisi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
and evaluated c<strong>on</strong>taminant fate and transport pathways in surface and groundwaters. His<br />
publicati<strong>on</strong>s have appeared in journals including Nature, Earth and Planetary Science Letters,<br />
Geology, and the Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysical Research. Dr. Wobus holds a PhD in earth sciences<br />
from the Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, an MS in earth sciences (hydrogeology) from<br />
Dartmouth College, and an AB in ec<strong>on</strong>omics and geology from Bowdoin College.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>stance Travers, MS, is a hydrogeologist with 23 years <strong>of</strong> experience in hydrogeology, water<br />
resources, and envir<strong>on</strong>mental chemistry. She has extensive experience in the development,<br />
testing, and applicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> numerical models used in predicting the mobility <strong>of</strong> water and<br />
inorganic and organic c<strong>on</strong>taminants in the subsurface, as well as in surface water. Ms. Travers<br />
has developed vadose z<strong>on</strong>e, surface water, and groundwater models ranging in complexity from<br />
c<strong>on</strong>ceptual hydrologic models to three-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al numerical models <strong>of</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>al flow systems.<br />
Her expertise in groundwater flow, c<strong>on</strong>taminant chemistry, and transport and fate processes has<br />
been used extensively by litigati<strong>on</strong> teams involved in envir<strong>on</strong>mental lawsuits. Ms. Travers has<br />
worked <strong>on</strong> subsurface fate and transport issues to support site characterizati<strong>on</strong>, remedial<br />
investigati<strong>on</strong>s, and feasibility studies. She has directed multidisciplinary teams to assess the<br />
water quality impacts <strong>of</strong> hard-rock mining operati<strong>on</strong>s, including assessment <strong>of</strong> the water quality<br />
and ecological risks associated with the lakes that form in dewatered open pits, the effects <strong>of</strong><br />
tailings impoundments and waste rock storage facilities <strong>on</strong> receiving waters, and the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
mine dewatering <strong>on</strong> groundwater and surface water resources. She is the coauthor <strong>of</strong> a report<br />
with Dr. Maest <strong>on</strong> methods for predicting water quality impacts <strong>of</strong> hard rock mining, and<br />
Ms. Travers and Dr. Maest recently taught a short-course <strong>on</strong> the same topic to regulators in the<br />
State <strong>of</strong> California. She has managed hydrologic field investigati<strong>on</strong>s including sampling <strong>of</strong><br />
surface water, sediments, soils, and groundwater; m<strong>on</strong>itoring well installati<strong>on</strong>; aquifer testing,<br />
Page 13<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
c<strong>on</strong>e-penetrometer; and Geoprobe work. Ms. Travers holds an MS in applied hydrogeology and<br />
a BS in geology from Stanford University.<br />
James Holmes, MS, is a hydrologist with expertise in c<strong>on</strong>taminant fate and transport, acid mine<br />
drainage, and water quality modeling. Over the past 18 years, he has worked at numerous hard<br />
rock mining sites an employee <strong>of</strong> Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting, Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting’s predecessor company,<br />
and as an employee <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers. His research has included hydrograph<br />
separati<strong>on</strong> in stormflow, geochemical mixing models, and sources <strong>of</strong> acid mine drainage. He has<br />
extensive field experience designing studies <strong>of</strong> flow measurement, c<strong>on</strong>taminant loading and<br />
water quality at mine sites. He has evaluated envir<strong>on</strong>mental impacts at several large mining<br />
operati<strong>on</strong>s, including the Clark Fork Complex in M<strong>on</strong>tana, the Bunker Hill/Coeur d’Alene<br />
Complex in Idaho, the Upper Blackbird Mining District in M<strong>on</strong>tana, the Ray Mine in Ariz<strong>on</strong>a,<br />
and the Tri-State Mining District in Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma. Mr. Holmes holds an MS<br />
in earth sciences from Dartmouth College and a BA in envir<strong>on</strong>mental biology from Middlebury<br />
College.<br />
Jeff Morris, PhD, is an aquatic toxicologist with experience in aquatic biology,<br />
biogeochemistry, c<strong>on</strong>taminant fate and transport, envir<strong>on</strong>mental remediati<strong>on</strong>, and alternative<br />
energy generati<strong>on</strong>. As an aquatic toxicologist, Dr. Morris has c<strong>on</strong>ducted several laboratory and<br />
field investigati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the fate and effects <strong>of</strong> metals <strong>on</strong> aquatic biota, including fish,<br />
invertebrates, and bi<strong>of</strong>ilm. Dr. Morris has developed unique technologies to enhance<br />
bioremediati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> groundwater and sediments impacted by acid mine drainage. His research over<br />
the last 10 years has focused <strong>on</strong> acute and chr<strong>on</strong>ic investigati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> metals,<br />
amm<strong>on</strong>ia, and bacterial infecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> invertebrate and fish species including the threatened bull<br />
trout (Salvelinus c<strong>on</strong>fluentus) and the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus).<br />
Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, Dr. Morris has c<strong>on</strong>ducted detailed investigati<strong>on</strong>s into the biogeochemical<br />
mechanisms driving diel metal cycling in mining-impacted streams and applied this knowledge<br />
to the design <strong>of</strong> a biological metal-removal system for treating drinking water during l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />
missi<strong>on</strong>s in space for the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Aer<strong>on</strong>autics and Space Administrati<strong>on</strong> (NASA). He has<br />
published peer-reviewed papers in numerous scientific journals including Aquatic Toxicology;<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Toxicology and Chemistry; Archives <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental C<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
Toxicology; Water, Air, and Soil Polluti<strong>on</strong>; Biogeochemistry; Hydrobiologia; Mine Water and<br />
the Envir<strong>on</strong>ment; Journal <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Science and Health; and Chemical Engineering<br />
Journal. Dr. Morris holds a PhD in zoology and physiology and a BS in wildlife and fisheries<br />
biology and management from the University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming.<br />
Josh Lipt<strong>on</strong>, PhD, is an envir<strong>on</strong>mental toxicologist with expertise in aquatic and terrestrial<br />
toxicology, ecological assessments and ecological risk assessment, applied ecology and<br />
populati<strong>on</strong> biology, and uncertainty analysis. Dr. Lipt<strong>on</strong>’s toxicological research activities<br />
include investigati<strong>on</strong>s into the bioavailability <strong>of</strong> metals to fish and plants, sublethal and<br />
behavioral resp<strong>on</strong>ses <strong>of</strong> organisms to hazardous substances, effects <strong>of</strong> acclimati<strong>on</strong> and adaptati<strong>on</strong><br />
Page 14<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
<strong>on</strong> sensitivity to metals, and community/ecological resp<strong>on</strong>ses to chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Dr. Lipt<strong>on</strong> is an expert in the envir<strong>on</strong>mental toxicology <strong>of</strong> salm<strong>on</strong>ids, including both salm<strong>on</strong> and<br />
trout. He directs field studies <strong>on</strong> fish and wildlife populati<strong>on</strong>s, field studies <strong>of</strong> aquatic and<br />
terrestrial habitat and community compositi<strong>on</strong>, laboratory toxicity studies, and envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
sampling and m<strong>on</strong>itoring programs. Dr. Lipt<strong>on</strong> has served as Lead Scientist for numerous<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental assessments, ecological modeling studies, and evaluati<strong>on</strong>s related to water quality<br />
criteria and standards. He is the author or coauthor <strong>of</strong> over 45 peer-reviewed scientific<br />
publicati<strong>on</strong>s and over 150 presentati<strong>on</strong>s at nati<strong>on</strong>al and internati<strong>on</strong>al scientific meetings and<br />
symposia, and has been an invited speaker and instructor to a number <strong>of</strong> government and<br />
university audiences. In additi<strong>on</strong>, he holds the positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Research (Full) Pr<strong>of</strong>essor in the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Geochemistry at the Colorado School <strong>of</strong> Mines and has served as an elected<br />
member <strong>of</strong> the editorial boards <strong>of</strong> the scientific journals Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Toxicology and<br />
Chemistry and Science <strong>of</strong> the Total Envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Dr. Lipt<strong>on</strong> holds PhD and MS degrees in<br />
natural resources from Cornell University, and a BA in envir<strong>on</strong>mental biology from Middlebury<br />
College.<br />
References<br />
Adams, D. 1995. Did toxic stew cook the goose? High Country News, December 11, 1995.<br />
Available: http://www.hcn.org/issues/49/1520. Accessed 4/15/2010.<br />
Baia Mare Task Force. 2000. Report <strong>of</strong> the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Task Force for Assessing the Baia Mare<br />
Accident. December.<br />
Baker, F., D. Cook, J. Deem, H. Letient, and H. Walsh. 1996. Matachewan Mines Tailings Dam:<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>From</str<strong>on</strong>g> Failure to Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Dam Safety Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>ference, Niagara Falls.<br />
BC MOE. 2006. British Columbia Approved Water Quality Guidelines. Available:<br />
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wat/wq/BCguidelines/approv_wq_guide/approved.html. Accessed<br />
4/15/2010.<br />
CCME. 1999. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Aquatic Life: Cadmium.<br />
Canadian Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers <strong>of</strong> the Envir<strong>on</strong>ment.<br />
Davies, M.P. 2002. Tailings impoundment failures: Are geotechnical engineers listening?<br />
Geotechnical News September:24-26.<br />
Page 15<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
Hansen, J.A., P.G. Welsh, and J. Lipt<strong>on</strong>. 2002d. Relative sensitivity <strong>of</strong> bull trout (Salvelinus<br />
c<strong>on</strong>fluentus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to acute copper toxicity. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
Toxicology and Chemistry 21:633-639.<br />
Hansen, J.A., J. Lipt<strong>on</strong>, P.G. Welsh, and A.D. Dailey. 2002a. The relative sensitivity <strong>of</strong> bull trout<br />
(Salvelinus c<strong>on</strong>fluentus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to acute exposures <strong>of</strong><br />
cadmium and zinc. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Toxicology and Chemistry 21:67-75.<br />
Hansen, J.A., P.G. Welsh, J. Lipt<strong>on</strong>, and M.J. Suedkamp. 2002b. The effects <strong>of</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />
cadmium exposure <strong>on</strong> the growth and survival <strong>of</strong> juvenile bull trout (Salvelinus c<strong>on</strong>fluentus).<br />
Aquatic Toxicology 58:165-174.<br />
Hansen, J.A., J.D. Rose, R.A. Jenkins, K.G. Gerow, and H.L. Berman. 1999. Differences in<br />
neurobehavioral resp<strong>on</strong>ses <strong>of</strong> chinook salm<strong>on</strong> (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and rainbow trout<br />
(O. mykiss) exposed to copper: 2. Neurophysiological and histological effects <strong>on</strong> the olfactory<br />
system. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Toxicology and Chemistry 18(9):1972-1978.<br />
Hansen, J.A., J. Lipt<strong>on</strong>, P.G. Welsh, J. Morris, D. Cacela, and M.J. Suedkamp. 2002c.<br />
Relati<strong>on</strong>ship between exposure durati<strong>on</strong>, tissue residues, growth, and mortality in rainbow trout<br />
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) juveniles sub-chr<strong>on</strong>ically exposed to copper. Aquatic Toxicology 58:174-<br />
188.<br />
Holmes, J. and J. Lipt<strong>on</strong>. 2007. Preliminary Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Injuries and Damages: Upper<br />
Blackfoot Mining Complex, Lewis and Clark County, M<strong>on</strong>tana. Prepared by Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting<br />
for the M<strong>on</strong>tana Natural Resource Damage Program, Helena, MT. July.<br />
Kuipers, J.R., A.S. Maest, K.A. MacHardy, and G. Laws<strong>on</strong>. 2006. Comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Predicted and<br />
Actual Water Quality at Hardrock Mines: The Reliability <strong>of</strong> Predicti<strong>on</strong>s in Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact<br />
Statements. Kuipers & Associates, Butte, MT.<br />
Lipt<strong>on</strong>, J. 2009. Expert Report <strong>of</strong> Joshua Lipt<strong>on</strong>, PhD. ASARCO LLC Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.<br />
Case No. 05-21207. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Natural Resource Damages to Aquatic and Riparian<br />
Resources <strong>of</strong> Mineral Creek and the Gila River Downstream <strong>of</strong> the Ray Mine and Hayden<br />
Smelter Sites, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a. January 23. Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Inc., Boulder, CO.<br />
Maest, A. 2001. Dissolved Copper Loadings to the Berkeley Pit: Relative C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Different Sources. Prepared by Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting, Boulder, CO for U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice,<br />
Seattle, WA. Draft.<br />
Maest, A.S., J.R. Kuipers, C.L. Travers, and D.A. Atkins. 2005. Predicting Water Quality at<br />
Hardrock Mines: Methods and Models, Uncertainties, and State-<strong>of</strong>-the-Art. Kuipers &<br />
Associates, Butte, MT.<br />
Page 16<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
McNicol, R.E. and E. Scherer. 1991. Behavioral resp<strong>on</strong>ses <strong>of</strong> lake whitefish (Coreg<strong>on</strong>us<br />
clupeaformis) to cadmium during preference-avoidance testing. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Toxicology and<br />
Chemistry 10:225-234.<br />
Meyer, J.S., S.J. Clearwater, T.A. Doser, M.J. Rogaczewski, and J.A. Hansen. 2007. Effects <strong>of</strong><br />
water quality <strong>on</strong> acute toxicity <strong>of</strong> waterborne metals. In Effects <strong>of</strong> Water Chemistry <strong>on</strong><br />
Bioavailability and Toxicity <strong>of</strong> Waterborne Cadmium, Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc to<br />
Freshwater Organisms. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL. pp. 41-96.<br />
Mullenmeister, E. 2009. Jamestown Mine Harvard Pit Water Balance Model. Prepared by Shaw<br />
E & I, Inc. for the SWRCB Training Academy Short Course <strong>on</strong> Characterizing, Predicting and<br />
Modeling Water at Mine Sites. May 20.<br />
Rico, M., G. Benito, and A. Diez-Herrero. 2008b. Floods from tailings dam failures. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Hazardous Materials 154(1-3):79-87.<br />
Rico, M., G. Benito, A.R. Salgueiro, A. Diez-Herrero, and H.G. Pereira. 2008a. Reported tailings<br />
dam failures: A review <strong>of</strong> the European incidents in the worldwide c<strong>on</strong>text. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Hazardous Materials 152(2):846-852.<br />
Riddell, D.J., J.M. Culp, and D.J. Baird. 2005. Sublethal effects <strong>of</strong> cadmium <strong>on</strong> prey choice and<br />
capture efficiency in juvenile brook trout (Salvelinus f<strong>on</strong>tinalis). Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Toxicology and<br />
Chemistry 24(7):1751-1758.<br />
Schafer, W. 2008. Critical Review <strong>of</strong> Geochemical Predicti<strong>on</strong> at Mines. Prepared for Northwest<br />
Mining Associati<strong>on</strong>, Reno, NV. December.<br />
Sloman, K.A., G.R. Scott, Z. Diao, C. Rouleau, C.M. Wood, and D.G. McD<strong>on</strong>ald. 2003.<br />
Cadmium affects the social behaviour <strong>of</strong> rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquatic<br />
Toxicology 65:171-185.<br />
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting. 1999. Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> Bull Trout (Salvelinus c<strong>on</strong>fluentus) to Cadmium and<br />
Zinc in Water Characteristic <strong>of</strong> the Coeur d’Alene River Basin. Acute Toxicity Report. Prepared<br />
for U.S. EPA Regi<strong>on</strong> X. December.<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 2009a. Crown Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> Notice <strong>of</strong> Violati<strong>on</strong><br />
No. 6674. April 17.<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 2009b. Crown Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> Notice <strong>of</strong> Violati<strong>on</strong><br />
No. 6675. April 27.<br />
Page 17<br />
SC12041
Stratus C<strong>on</strong>sulting Memorandum (4/16/2010)<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 2009c. Crown Resources Corporati<strong>on</strong> Notice <strong>of</strong> Violati<strong>on</strong><br />
No. 7080. August 21.<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 2009d. Buckhorn Gold Mine Fined $40,000 for Violating<br />
Water Quality Permit. Available: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/news/2009news/2009-092.html,<br />
accessed 4/15/2010.<br />
Williams, B.K., R.C. Szaro, and C.D. Shapiro. 2009. Adaptive Management: The U.S.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior Technical Guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, DC.<br />
WISE Uranium Project. 2009. Chr<strong>on</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> major tailings dam failures. Available:<br />
http://www.wise-uranium.org/mdaf.html. Accessed 4/15/2010.<br />
Page 18<br />
SC12041