21.02.2013 Views

Energy Materials Testing Laboratory EVALUATION FROM

Energy Materials Testing Laboratory EVALUATION FROM

Energy Materials Testing Laboratory EVALUATION FROM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MoDEL FoR PowDER PRESSING AND DIE DESIGN, PART 2<br />

A two-dimensional illustration of a<br />

defective balloon eyelet produced by<br />

stress-relief upon ejection from the<br />

forming die.<br />

the head of the part relative to the<br />

bottom flange. To be able to eject the<br />

part intact from the forming die, it<br />

was determined that a critical minimum<br />

pressure was required to compact<br />

the powder in the bottom<br />

flange to a density that would provide<br />

sufficient green strength for<br />

ejection. The head and bottom<br />

flange would otherwise separate<br />

upon ejection from the forming die.<br />

A qualitative assessment of balloon<br />

e ye l e t compac t i o n b a s e d o n<br />

observed defects, die penetration<br />

tests and sintering shrinkage showed<br />

similar results for all powders examined.<br />

To complete a more quantitative<br />

analysis of the density gradients in a<br />

balloon eyelet after pressing, a<br />

94-wt% alumina part formed by dualaction<br />

pressing at 12.9 MPa was<br />

bisque-fired and subsequently characterized<br />

using XRCT. A second<br />

94-wt% alumina part formed at 56.9<br />

MPa was fired and characterized<br />

using microscopy and image analysis.<br />

The lower forming pressure produced<br />

a region of high-density in the<br />

bottom flange and in a cone-shaped<br />

region of the head of the part. This<br />

dense region is strikingly similar to<br />

the shape of the defective balloon<br />

eyelet formed by stress-relief upon<br />

ejection from the forming die in the<br />

Dorst press. The density gradients<br />

suggest that the forming pressure<br />

Density gradients measured using XRCT<br />

in a 94-wt% alumina balloon eyelet<br />

formed by dual-action uniaxial pressing<br />

with a top punch pressure of 12.9 MPa.<br />

Density increases with color from blue to<br />

green, yellow, orange and red. Note the<br />

high density in the bottom flange and the<br />

higher density cone that forms in the top,<br />

similar to the defect described in the text.<br />

The blue-green color outlining the part is<br />

an artifact.<br />

was higher in the bottom flange than<br />

in the head of the part.<br />

Results were different for the<br />

94-wt% alumina compact formed at<br />

56.9 MPa. The higher forming pressure<br />

produced the highest density<br />

(i.e., lowest measured porosity) in the<br />

head of the part, particularly near the<br />

through-hole. Density decreased axially<br />

from the top of the part, and the<br />

bottom flange had the lowest density.<br />

The higher forming pressure produced<br />

a higher, more uniform<br />

pressed and sintered density in the<br />

head of the part, indicating that the<br />

forming pressure was higher in the<br />

head than in the bottom flange.<br />

The higher forming pressure also<br />

produced a crack at the transition<br />

radius between the head and bottom<br />

flange, similar to that observed in the<br />

parts formed at high pressure on the<br />

Dorst press.<br />

Generally speaking, forming with<br />

increasingly higher applied pressures<br />

from the top punch moved the highdensity<br />

region from the bottom<br />

flange into the head of the part and<br />

produced a more uniform density<br />

powder compact.<br />

In virtually all cases, the density in<br />

the head of the part decreased axially<br />

from the top and radially from the<br />

inner diameter. The lowest density<br />

region in the head was always found<br />

in the outer diameter, lower corner.<br />

A sintered and polished quarter section<br />

of a 94-wt% alumina balloon eyelet<br />

formed by dual-action uniaxial pressing<br />

with a top punch pressure of 56.9 MPa.<br />

The figure also shows red dye penetration<br />

in regions of open porosity and notes the<br />

measured levels of porosity in different<br />

regions as determined by image analysis.<br />

Density and stress gradients at the<br />

transition radius between the head<br />

and the bottom flange contributed<br />

to cracking, particularly at high forming<br />

pressures.<br />

Cracking was more prevalent in<br />

dies designed with a sharper transition<br />

radius between the head and<br />

the bottom flange and/or when compacting<br />

more difficult to press powders.<br />

Model simulations of balloon eyelet<br />

pressing were completed using the<br />

properties of diatomaceous earth or<br />

those of the 94-wt% alumina powder.<br />

In this exercise, however, specific<br />

compaction ratios were not used.<br />

Systematic changes in the displacements<br />

of the top and bottom<br />

punches were used to assess pressing<br />

balance and its effect on density<br />

gradients in a balloon eyelet.<br />

Unbalanced pressing from the top<br />

alone produced severe density gradients<br />

in the powder compact. Powder<br />

was compacted in the head of the<br />

part, but virtually no compaction<br />

occurred in the bottom flange.<br />

This result was consistent with the<br />

general experimental observation: if<br />

42 The American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 80, No. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!