21.02.2013 Views

Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired

Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired

Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2008] <strong>Digitus</strong> <strong>Impudicus</strong> 1421<br />

middle finger gesture. 129 <strong>The</strong> man was driving within <strong>the</strong> speed limit<br />

<strong>and</strong> was photographed giving <strong>the</strong> finger to a stationary speeddetection<br />

camera. Within thirty minutes, two police officers knocked<br />

on <strong>the</strong> man’s front door <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>ed him a citation for “making<br />

offensive gestures under <strong>the</strong> Public Order Act.” 130<br />

In Germany, <strong>the</strong> law of Beleidigung, or “insult,” broadly criminalizes<br />

hate speech as well as words, gestures, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r conduct that<br />

indicates “disrespect or lack of respect” for ano<strong>the</strong>r person. 131 <strong>The</strong><br />

German law of insult specifically criminalizes use of a gesture known<br />

as “<strong>the</strong> bird,” which is formed by tapping <strong>the</strong> index finger on <strong>the</strong><br />

forehead <strong>and</strong> is typically used by car drivers to tell o<strong>the</strong>r drivers that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are “mentally defective.” 132 An author familiar with German<br />

culture has stated that all Germans know that it is illegal to use this<br />

gesture. 133 <strong>The</strong> German law of insult criminalizes words as well as<br />

gestures. 134 For example, an individual may be criminally prosecuted<br />

for calling ano<strong>the</strong>r person a “jerk.” 135<br />

Legal scholar James Q. Whitman has argued that some European<br />

cultures, especially German <strong>and</strong> French, tend to be tolerant of laws<br />

prohibiting <strong>the</strong> use of insulting words <strong>and</strong> gestures because in those<br />

cultures “‘[personal] honor’ is a protectable legal interest.” 136 In<br />

contrast, American law tends to protect only against injuries to<br />

reputation through <strong>the</strong> law of defamation, or against physical injuries<br />

to <strong>the</strong> body that result from insulting remarks, such as intentional<br />

infliction of emotional distress in tort law. 137 In addition, American<br />

constitutional law extends more protection to free speech values than<br />

Continental European legal systems afford. 138 Whereas German <strong>and</strong><br />

French law balance <strong>the</strong> speaker’s interest in free speech against <strong>the</strong><br />

listener’s legally protected honor, Whitman argues, <strong>the</strong> American legal<br />

system “balances <strong>the</strong> value of free speech against nothing at all —<br />

unless it is <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> suppression of violence (<strong>and</strong> sometimes<br />

129 See John Troup, Driver <strong>Finger</strong>ed by Police, SUN (U.K.), Feb. 1, 2006, available at<br />

http://www.<strong>the</strong>sun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article36359.ece.<br />

130 Id.<br />

131 See James Q. Whitman, Enforcing Civility <strong>and</strong> Respect: Three Societies, 109 YALE<br />

L.J. 1279, 1295-96 (2000).<br />

132 Id. at 1296.<br />

133 Id.<br />

134 Id. at 1297.<br />

135 Id.<br />

136 Id. at 1282.<br />

137 See id. at 1292, 1382.<br />

138 Id. at 1379-80.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!