21.02.2013 Views

Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired

Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired

Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1440 University of California, Davis [Vol. 41:1403<br />

stated that <strong>the</strong> middle finger gesture is indecent or profane, its<br />

guidance regarding <strong>the</strong> f-word suggests that it would punish a<br />

broadcaster for displaying <strong>the</strong> middle finger gesture on television<br />

during times that indecency is prohibited. As a result, most<br />

broadcasters err on <strong>the</strong> side of caution <strong>and</strong> voluntarily blur it out. 277<br />

In FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 278 <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court affirmed <strong>the</strong><br />

Commission’s ability to regulate speech that is indecent, but not<br />

necessarily obscene, by distinguishing broadcast speech from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

forms of communication. 279 In sanctioning a radio station for airing,<br />

during <strong>the</strong> afternoon, comedian George Carlin’s monologue on <strong>the</strong><br />

seven “Filthy Words” one cannot say in public, <strong>the</strong> Commission<br />

offered four justifications for its power to regulate indecent material:<br />

(1) children have access to broadcast material, often without parental<br />

supervision; (2) broadcast material often is consumed in <strong>the</strong> home, a<br />

place in which <strong>the</strong> individual’s privacy interests are entitled to special<br />

protection; (3) “unconsenting adults may tune in a station without<br />

any warning that offensive language is being or will be broadcast”; <strong>and</strong><br />

(4) <strong>the</strong> government has a responsibility to license scarce spectrum<br />

space “in <strong>the</strong> public interest.” 280<br />

Pursuant to <strong>the</strong>se concerns, <strong>the</strong> Commission established guidelines<br />

for determining whe<strong>the</strong>r speech is indecent. Although <strong>the</strong><br />

Commission has consistently applied a two-pronged test to determine<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r speech is indecent — determining (1) whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> speech<br />

depicts or describes “sexual or excretory activities or organs” <strong>and</strong> (2)<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> speech is “patently offensive as measured by<br />

contemporary community st<strong>and</strong>ards for <strong>the</strong> broadcast medium” — <strong>the</strong><br />

Commission’s interpretation of each prong has vacillated. 281 <strong>The</strong>se<br />

277 Cf. Mooninites Shut Down Boston, FOXNEWS.COM, Feb. 2, 2007,<br />

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,249378,00.html (reporting on guerilla<br />

marketing campaign that went awry <strong>and</strong> created bomb scare in Boston, Fox News<br />

blurred image of cartoon’s middle finger on its website). <strong>The</strong> device was a pixilated<br />

image of a Mooninite, an alien character from Cartoon Network’s Aqua Teen Hunger<br />

Force. Katie Zezima, Prosecutors Drop All Charges in Boston Terrorism Scare, N.Y.<br />

TIMES, May 12, 2007, at A11. <strong>The</strong> devices, which resembled large Lite-Brite toys, were<br />

mistaken for bombs when discovered, leading police to close roads, bridges, <strong>and</strong> part<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Charles River for hours in response. Id. Prosecutors eventually dropped <strong>the</strong><br />

charges for planting a hoax device, a felony, <strong>and</strong> disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor,<br />

against <strong>the</strong> two men who placed <strong>the</strong> devices. Id. <strong>The</strong> men were not charged for <strong>the</strong><br />

depiction of <strong>the</strong> middle finger. Id.<br />

278 438 U.S. 726 (1978).<br />

279 Id. at 731, 737-38.<br />

280 Id. at 731 n.2.<br />

281 In re Citizen’s Complaint Against Pacifica Found. Station WBAI(FM), N.Y.,<br />

N.Y., 56 F.C.C.2d 94, 94 (1975).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!