Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired
Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired
Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law - Wired
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1440 University of California, Davis [Vol. 41:1403<br />
stated that <strong>the</strong> middle finger gesture is indecent or profane, its<br />
guidance regarding <strong>the</strong> f-word suggests that it would punish a<br />
broadcaster for displaying <strong>the</strong> middle finger gesture on television<br />
during times that indecency is prohibited. As a result, most<br />
broadcasters err on <strong>the</strong> side of caution <strong>and</strong> voluntarily blur it out. 277<br />
In FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 278 <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court affirmed <strong>the</strong><br />
Commission’s ability to regulate speech that is indecent, but not<br />
necessarily obscene, by distinguishing broadcast speech from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
forms of communication. 279 In sanctioning a radio station for airing,<br />
during <strong>the</strong> afternoon, comedian George Carlin’s monologue on <strong>the</strong><br />
seven “Filthy Words” one cannot say in public, <strong>the</strong> Commission<br />
offered four justifications for its power to regulate indecent material:<br />
(1) children have access to broadcast material, often without parental<br />
supervision; (2) broadcast material often is consumed in <strong>the</strong> home, a<br />
place in which <strong>the</strong> individual’s privacy interests are entitled to special<br />
protection; (3) “unconsenting adults may tune in a station without<br />
any warning that offensive language is being or will be broadcast”; <strong>and</strong><br />
(4) <strong>the</strong> government has a responsibility to license scarce spectrum<br />
space “in <strong>the</strong> public interest.” 280<br />
Pursuant to <strong>the</strong>se concerns, <strong>the</strong> Commission established guidelines<br />
for determining whe<strong>the</strong>r speech is indecent. Although <strong>the</strong><br />
Commission has consistently applied a two-pronged test to determine<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r speech is indecent — determining (1) whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> speech<br />
depicts or describes “sexual or excretory activities or organs” <strong>and</strong> (2)<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> speech is “patently offensive as measured by<br />
contemporary community st<strong>and</strong>ards for <strong>the</strong> broadcast medium” — <strong>the</strong><br />
Commission’s interpretation of each prong has vacillated. 281 <strong>The</strong>se<br />
277 Cf. Mooninites Shut Down Boston, FOXNEWS.COM, Feb. 2, 2007,<br />
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,249378,00.html (reporting on guerilla<br />
marketing campaign that went awry <strong>and</strong> created bomb scare in Boston, Fox News<br />
blurred image of cartoon’s middle finger on its website). <strong>The</strong> device was a pixilated<br />
image of a Mooninite, an alien character from Cartoon Network’s Aqua Teen Hunger<br />
Force. Katie Zezima, Prosecutors Drop All Charges in Boston Terrorism Scare, N.Y.<br />
TIMES, May 12, 2007, at A11. <strong>The</strong> devices, which resembled large Lite-Brite toys, were<br />
mistaken for bombs when discovered, leading police to close roads, bridges, <strong>and</strong> part<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Charles River for hours in response. Id. Prosecutors eventually dropped <strong>the</strong><br />
charges for planting a hoax device, a felony, <strong>and</strong> disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor,<br />
against <strong>the</strong> two men who placed <strong>the</strong> devices. Id. <strong>The</strong> men were not charged for <strong>the</strong><br />
depiction of <strong>the</strong> middle finger. Id.<br />
278 438 U.S. 726 (1978).<br />
279 Id. at 731, 737-38.<br />
280 Id. at 731 n.2.<br />
281 In re Citizen’s Complaint Against Pacifica Found. Station WBAI(FM), N.Y.,<br />
N.Y., 56 F.C.C.2d 94, 94 (1975).