22.02.2013 Views

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RULE V<br />

BAR AGAINST<br />

IMPEACHMENT<br />

Section 14. Scope <strong>of</strong> Bar. – No<br />

impeachment proceedings shall be<br />

initiated against <strong>the</strong> same <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

more than once within <strong>the</strong> period<br />

<strong>of</strong> one (1) year.<br />

overturn or affirm <strong>the</strong> finding <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> said Committee that <strong>the</strong><br />

verified complaint and/or<br />

resolution, as <strong>the</strong> case may be, is<br />

not sufficient in substance.<br />

In cases where a verified<br />

complaint or a resolution <strong>of</strong><br />

impeachment is filed or endorsed,<br />

as <strong>the</strong> case may be, by at least<br />

one-third (1/3) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Members <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e, impeachment<br />

proceedings are deemed<br />

initiated at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> filing<br />

<strong>of</strong> such verified complaint or<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> impeachment with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Secretary General.<br />

Section 17. Bar Against<br />

Initiation Of Impeachment<br />

Proceedings. – Within a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> one (1) year from <strong>the</strong> date<br />

impeachment proceedings are<br />

deemed initiated as provided in<br />

Section 16 here<strong>of</strong>, no<br />

impeachment proceedings, as<br />

such, can be initiated against <strong>the</strong><br />

same <strong>of</strong>ficial. (Italics in <strong>the</strong><br />

original; emphasis and<br />

underscoring supplied)<br />

On July 22, 2002, <strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Representatives adopted a Resolution, 2 sponsored by<br />

Representative Felix William D. Fuentebella, which directed <strong>the</strong> Committee on J<strong>us</strong>tice "to<br />

conduct an investigation, in aid <strong>of</strong> legislation, on <strong>the</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> disbursements and expenditures<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Chief J<strong>us</strong>tice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Judiciary Development Fund (JDF)." 3<br />

On June 2, 2003, former President Joseph E. Estrada filed an impeachment complaint 4 (first<br />

impeachment complaint) against Chief J<strong>us</strong>tice Hilario G. Davide Jr. and seven Associate<br />

J<strong>us</strong>tices 5 <strong>of</strong> this Court for "culpable violation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution, betrayal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public tr<strong>us</strong>t and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r high crimes." 6 The complaint was endorsed by Representatives Rolex T. Suplico, Ronaldo<br />

B. Zamora and Didagen Piang Dilangalen, 7 and was referred to <strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e Committee on J<strong>us</strong>tice<br />

on Aug<strong>us</strong>t 5, 2003 8 in accordance with Section 3(2) <strong>of</strong> Article XI <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution which<br />

reads:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!