Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila ... - Columba.us
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
"resolution" <strong>the</strong> phrase WITH THE ARTICLES, and <strong>the</strong>n capitalize <strong>the</strong> letter "i" in<br />
"impeachment" and replace <strong>the</strong> word "by" with OF, so that <strong>the</strong> whole section will now<br />
read: "A vote <strong>of</strong> at least one-third <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e shall be necessary<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r to affirm a resolution WITH THE ARTICLES <strong>of</strong> Impeachment OF <strong>the</strong> Committee<br />
or to override its contrary resolution. The vote <strong>of</strong> each Member shall be recorded."<br />
I already mentioned earlier yesterday that <strong>the</strong> initiation, as far as <strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />
Representatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States is concerned, really starts from <strong>the</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
verified complaint and every resolution to impeach always carries with it <strong>the</strong> Articles <strong>of</strong><br />
Impeachment. As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, <strong>the</strong> words "Articles <strong>of</strong> Impeachment" are mentioned on<br />
line 25 in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> direct filing <strong>of</strong> a verified compliant <strong>of</strong> one-third <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />
Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e. I will mention again, Madam President, that my amendment will<br />
not vary <strong>the</strong> substance in any way. It is only in keeping with <strong>the</strong> uniform procedure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Ho<strong>us</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Representatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States Congress. Thank you, Madam President. 143<br />
(Italics in <strong>the</strong> original; emphasis and udnerscoring supplied)<br />
This amendment proposed by Commissioner Maambong was clarified and accepted by <strong>the</strong><br />
Committee on <strong>the</strong> Accountability <strong>of</strong> Public Officers. 144<br />
It is th<strong>us</strong> clear that <strong>the</strong> framers intended "initiation" to start with <strong>the</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complaint. In<br />
his amic<strong>us</strong> curiae brief, Commissioner Maambong explained that "<strong>the</strong> obvio<strong>us</strong> reason in deleting<br />
<strong>the</strong> phrase "to initiate impeachment proceedings" as contained in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong><br />
Section 3 (3) was to settle and make it understood once and for all that <strong>the</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong><br />
impeachment proceedings starts with <strong>the</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complaint, and <strong>the</strong> vote <strong>of</strong> one-third <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Ho<strong>us</strong>e in a resolution <strong>of</strong> impeachment does not initiate <strong>the</strong> impeachment proceedings which<br />
was already initiated by <strong>the</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> a verified complaint under Section 3, paragraph (2),<br />
Article XI <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution." 145<br />
Amic<strong>us</strong> curiae Constitutional Commissioner Regalado is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same view as is Fa<strong>the</strong>r Bernas,<br />
who was also a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1986 Constitutional Commission, that <strong>the</strong> word "initiate" as <strong>us</strong>ed<br />
in Article XI, Section 3(5) means to file, both adding, however, that <strong>the</strong> filing m<strong>us</strong>t be<br />
accompanied by an action to set <strong>the</strong> complaint moving.<br />
During <strong>the</strong> oral arguments before this Court, Fa<strong>the</strong>r Bernas clarified that <strong>the</strong> word "initiate,"<br />
appearing in <strong>the</strong> constitutional provision on impeachment, viz:<br />
Section 3 (1) The Ho<strong>us</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Representatives shall have <strong>the</strong> excl<strong>us</strong>ive power to initiate all<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> impeachment.<br />
x x x<br />
(5) No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against <strong>the</strong> same <strong>of</strong>ficial more than<br />
once within a period <strong>of</strong> one year, (Emphasis supplied)<br />
refers to two objects, "impeachment case" and "impeachment proceeding."